Democracy Spraffa

Document Pack (Bookmarked) Planning 13 03 24

West Dunbartonshire Council · 13 March 2024
Back to Planning Committee — 13 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Agenda
Planning Committee
Date:  Wednesday, 13 March 2024
___________________________________________________________________
Time:  10.00 a.m.
___________________________________________________________________
Venue:  Council Chambers, Clydebank Town Hall, 5 Hall Street,
Clydebank G81 1UB
_________________________________________________________________
Contact:   Nicola Moorcroft, Committee Officer
Email: nicola.moorcroft@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
committee.admin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Dear Member
Please attend a meeting of the Planning Committee as detailed above. 
The business is shown on the attached agenda.
Yours faithfully
PETER HESSETT
Chief Executive
Page 1

Page 2

Distribution:-
Councillor Lawrence O’Neill (Chair)
Councillor Gurpreet Singh Johal (Vice Chair)
Councillor Ian Dickson
Councillor Daniel Lennie
Provost Douglas McAllister
Councillor June McKay
Councillor Karen Murray Conaghan
Councillor Chris Pollock
Councillor Hazel Sorrell
Councillor Sophie Traynor
All other Councillors for information
Date of Issue: 29 February 2024
Page 2

Page 3

PLANNING COMMITTEE
WEDNESDAY, 13 MARCH 2024
AGENDA
1 APOLOGIES
2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Members are invited to declare if they have any interests in the items of
business on this agenda and the reasons for such declarations.
3 OPEN FORUM
The Committee is asked to note that no open forum questions have been
submitted by members of the public.
4 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 5 - 39
Submit for approval, as a correct record, the Minutes of Meeting of the
Planning Committee held on 14 February 2024.
5 NOTE OF SITE VISITATIONS 41
Submit, for information, Note of Site Visitations carried out on 12
February 2024.
6 PLANNING APPLICATION 43 - 76
Submit report by the Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health
Manager – in respect of the following Planning application:- 
DC23/177/FUL: Erection of single wind turbine, 30m hub and 43m tip, access
track, substation and associated works at land to East of Broomhill Wood,
Bonhill, Alexandria by Mr Harris Smith. 
__________________________________________________________________
Page 3

Page 4

Page 4

Page 5

PLANNING COMMITTEE
At a Meeting of the Planning Committee held in the Civic Space, Council Offices, 16
Church Street, Dumbarton, on Wednesday, 14 February 2024 at 10.00 a.m.
Present: Councillors Ian Dickson, Gurpreet Singh Johal, Daniel Lennie,
Karen Murray Conaghan, Lawrence O’Neill, Chris Pollock and
Sophie Traynor.
Attending: Pamela Clifford, Planning, Building Standards and
Environmental Health Manager; James McColl, Development
Management Team Leader; Amy Melkevik, Lead Planning
Officer; Cameron Clow, Planning Policy Officer; Nigel Ettles,
Section Head – Litigation (Legal Officer); and Nicola Moorcroft,
Committee Officer.
Apologies: Apologies for absence were intimated on behalf of Provost
Douglas McAllister and Councillors June McKay and Hazel
Sorrell.
Councillor Gurpreet Singh Johal in the Chair
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
It was noted that there were no declarations of interest in any of the items of
business on the agenda. Councillor Karen Murray Conaghan declared, for the
purposes of transparency, that she had been contacted, as Ward Councillor,
regarding Planning Application Reference DC23/177/FUL but had not discussed the
application.
OPEN FORUM
The Committee noted that no open forum questions had been submitted by
members of the public.
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS
The Minutes of Meetings of the Planning Committee held on 6 December 2023
(ordinary) and 17 January 2024 (special) were submitted and approved as correct
records.
ITEM 4
Page 5

Page 6

NOTE OF VISITATIONS 
A Note of Visitations carried out on 15 January 2024, a copy of which forms
Appendix 1 hereto, was submitted and amended to remove Councillor Chris Pollock
from the list of attendees. 
PLANNING APPLICATIONS 
Reports were submitted by the Planning, Building Standards and Environmental
Health Manager, in respect of the following Planning applications:- 
(a) DC23/210/PPP: Erection of three dwelling houses (in principle) at Old
Carman Water Works Site, Cardross Road, Renton, Dumbarton by Mr J
McDougal. 
Reference was made to a site visit which had been undertaken in respect of
the above application. The Planning, Building Standards and Environmental
Health Manager and the Development Management Team Leader were heard
in further explanation, and in answer to Members’ questions. 
The Chair invited Mr Jeremy Watson, objector, to address the Committee. Mr
Watson was heard in respect of the application and in answer to Members’
questions. 
After discussion, Councillor O’Neill, seconded by Councillor Lennie, moved;- 
That the Committee agree to grant planning permission, subject to the
conditions set out in Section 9 of the report, as detailed within Appendix 2
hereto. 
As an amendment, Councillor Murray Conaghan, seconded by Councillor Chris
Pollock, moved:- 
That the Planning application be refused due to over-development of the site. 
On a vote being taken, 2 Members voted for the amendment and 5 Members voted
for the motion, which was accordingly declared carried. 
(b) DC23/177/FUL: Erection of single wind turbine, 30m hub and 43m tip,
access track, substation and associated works at land to East of
Broomhill Wood, Bonhill, Alexandria by Mr Harris Smith. 
At this point, Councillor Ian Dickson, declared an interest in this item, being a
member of the Beechwood and Wheatcroft Residents Associations and left
the meeting during consideration of this item. 
Page 6

Page 7

Reference was made to a site visit which had been undertaken in respect of
the above application.  The Development Management Team Leader, was
heard in further explanation, and in answer to Members’ questions. 
The Chair invited Mr Harry Scammell, objector, (on behalf of Beechwood and
Wheatcroft Residents Association) to address the Committee. Mr Scammell
was heard in respect of the application and in answer to Members’ questions. 
The Chair invited Jack Fordy, objector, (on behalf Bonhill and Dalmonach
Community Council) to address the Committee. Mr Fordy was heard in
respect of the application and in answer to Members’ questions. 
The Chair invited Mr Waseem Hussain (Applicant’s Agent) to address the
Committee. Mr Hussain was heard in respect of the application and in answer
to Members’ questions. 
After discussion and having heard the Planning, Building Standards and
Environmental Health Manager and the Development Management Team
Leader, in further explanation, and in answer to Members’ questions, the
Committee agreed:- 
(1) that it did not have enough information to make a decision, on this
application, at this moment in time; and 
(2) that this matter be continued at a future meeting of the Committee to
allow the Applicant to address the Committee and answer any
questions Members may have. 
ADJOURNMENT 
The Chair adjourned the meeting for a short recess. The meeting reconvened at
11.55 a.m. with the Elected Members listed in the sederunt present, including
Councillor Dickson. 
(c) DC23/202/FUL: Application under Section 42 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as Amended, in relation to Condition 17
(approach to risk assessment and any associated required remediation
strategy/plan) attached to Planning Permission, in Principle, reference
DC20/088 at Land at Former Dunglass Oil Terminal Dumbarton Road,
Bowling by West Dunbartonshire Council. 
The Development Management Team Leader was heard in further
explanation, and in answer to Members’ questions. After discussion, the
Committee agreed to grant planning permission subject to the conditions set
out in Section 9 of the report, as detailed within Appendix 4 hereto. 
(d) DC23/205/FUL: Application under section 42 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 to vary Condition 7, relating to the timing
Page 7

Page 8

of footpath delivery at Farm Road, Duntocher, Clydebank by Barratt
Homes West Scotland. 
The Development Management Team Leader was heard in further
explanation and in answer to Members’ questions. After discussion, the
Committee agreed to grant planning permission subject to the conditions set
out in Section 9 of the report, as detailed within Appendix 5 hereto. 
(e) DC22/185/FUL: Change of use of ground for the siting of three holiday
lodges including a waste water treatment plant and ancillary car parking
(being a revised design from that approved under Planning Permission
ref: DC21/096/FUL) at Former Maryland Water Pumping Station,
Garshake Road, Dumbarton by Mrs Mary Gillies. 
The Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health Manager and the
Development Management Team Leader were heard in further explanation,
and in answer to Members’ questions. 
After discussion, Councillor O’Neill, seconded by Councillor Singh Johal, moved
that:- 
(1) the Committee agree to grant planning permission subject to the
conditions set out in Section 9 of the report, as detailed within
Appendix 6 hereto; and 
(2) an additional condition be added, that a barrier,1.8m in height is sited
close to the entrance of the development site. 
As an amendment, Councillor Murray Conaghan, seconded by Councillor Chris
Pollock, moved:- 
That the original Planning permission be revoked and this Planning
Application be refused. 
On a vote being taken, 3 Members voted for the amendment and 3 Members, voted
for the motion. There being an equality of votes, Councillor O’Neill, Chair, used his
casting vote in favour of the motion which was accordingly declared carried. 
(f) DC22/072/FUL: Residential development, landscaping and associated
Infrastructure at Hawthornhill Road, Dumbarton by Persimmon Homes. 
The Development Management Team Leader was heard in further
explanation, and in answer to Members’ questions. After discussion, the
Committee agreed to grant planning permission subject to the conditions set
out in Section 9 of the report, as detailed within Appendix 7 hereto. 
Page 8

Page 9

CLYDEBANK BUSINESS PARK PLANNING GUIDANCE 
A report was submitted by the Planning, Building Standards and Environmental
Health Manager, seeking approval of the finalised version of Planning Guidance
relating to Clydebank Business Park for use in making planning decisions. 
After discussion and having heard the Planning Policy Officer in further explanation
and in answer to Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to approve the
finalised version of Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance contained in
Appendix 1 of the report. 
DRAFT PAY DAY LENDING AND BETTING SHOP PLANNING GUIDANCE 
A report was submitted by the Planning, Building Standards and Environmental
Health Manager, seeking approval to consult on draft Planning Guidance relating to
Pay Day Lending and Betting Offices. 
After discussion and having heard the Planning Policy Officer in further explanation
and in answer to Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to approve the
publication of the Draft Pay Day Lending and Betting Shops Guidance (Appendix 1
to the report), for consultation, for a minimum of 8 weeks and that all background
information supporting the guidance to be distributed with the consultation. 
VALEDICTORY – ALAN WILLIAMSON 
Councillor O’Neill requested that formal thanks be recorded and sent to Alan
Williamson (who left his role, as Development Planning and Place Team Leader, in
January 2024), for his dedicated service, work and commitment to the Planning
Committee and to wish him well in his new role with Inverclyde Council. 
VALEDICTORY – JOSHUA DOYLE 
Councillor O’Neill requested that formal thanks be recorded to Joshua Doyle, who is
due to leave his role, as Placemaking Co-ordinator, at the end of February 2024, for
his dedicated work for the Planning Committee and to wish him well in his new role. 
The meeting closed at 13.25 
Page 9

Page 10

APPENDIX 1 
PLANNING COMMITTEE 
NOTE OF VISITATIONS – 15 JANUARY 2024 
Present: Councillors Gurpreet Johal, June McKay, John Millar, Chris
Pollock and Clare Steel. 
Attending: Pamela Clifford, Planning, Building Standards and
Environmental Health Manager and James McColl,
Development Management Team Leader. 
SITE VISITS 
Site visits were undertaken in connection with the undernoted planning applications:- 
Former Playdrome site, Abbotsford Road, Clydebank 
DC23/149/FUL: Erection of 128 residential homes, associated roads, infrastructure
and open space on existing brownfield site, (former Playdrome site) by Miller Homes 
EXXON Site - Land at Former Dunglass Oil Terminal, Bowling and Dunglass
roundabout and areas of the site at Dumbuck. 
DC23/113/MSC: Details relating to the first Approval of Matters Specified by
Condition (AMSC) application  (Phase 1 and 2 works only) for conditions 1(a), 1(d),
12, 23, 24 and 30. 
Page 10

Page 11

APPENDIX 2 
DC23/210/PPP: Erection of three dwelling houses (in principle) at Old Carman
Water Works Site,Cardross Road, Renton, Dumbarton by Mr J McDougal. 
GRANT full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
1.  No development shall commence until such time as approval of the detailed
design, layout and other matters associated with the development (hereinafter
called "the matters specified in conditions") has been granted by the Planning
Authority.  Any application(s) for approval of matters specified in conditions
shall be submitted before the expiration of three years from the date of this
planning permission in principle and shall include: 
a)  the siting, design, external appearance and external materials of all
buildings and other structures;
b)  the means of access to the site;
c)  the layout of the site, including all car and cycle parking areas;
d)  the details of and timetable for the implementation of the hard and soft
landscaping for the site;
e)  details of the management and maintenance of the areas identified in
(d) above;
f)  full details of the design and location of all boundary walls and fences;
g)  the provision of surface water drainage works incorporating
Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS).  For the avoidance of doubt,
the submitted details shall be in accordance with CIRIA C753, the
SUDS Manual and Sewers for Scotland;
h)  the disposal of sewerage;
i)  details of existing and proposed site levels;
j)  details of the storage and collection of waste and recycling from the
new dwellinghouses;
k)  details of required sightlines and visibility splays;
l)  biodiversity enhancement measures to be incorporated into the
development;
m)  full details of the incorporation of low and zero carbon infrastructure
into the development;
n)  details of the provision for electric vehicle charging 
2.  Notwithstanding condition 1 above, prior to the commencement of
development on site, exact details, specifications and samples of all proposed
external materials to be used within the development site inclusive of hard
surfaces shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority.  Thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning
Authority, the development shall be completed in accordance with the
approved material details and palette. 
Page 11

Page 12

3.  Notwithstanding conditions 1 and 2 above and unless otherwise first agreed in
writing by the Planning Authority, the design and layout of the development
shall generally follow the indicative details submitted and approved inclusive
of siting of the dwellinghouses, one and a half storey design, pitched roof,
light coloured render and use of timber cladding. 
4. That with the first application for matters specified by condition application, full
details of the design and implementation of the works to the hairpin bend in
Cardross Road shall be submitted for the written approval of the Planning
Authority.  Works shall then proceed as approved. 
5. Notwithstanding the approved plans, all recommendations within the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal dated 24 March 2023 shall be followed. 
6. Notwithstanding condition 5 above, no removal of and vegetation shall take
place during the bird nesting season March to September inclusive unless first
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority and nesting bird survey
undertaken not more than 48 hours prior to the commencement of site
clearance works, the findings of which shall be submitted to the Planning
Authority. 
7. Notwithstanding condition 3 above and prior to the commencement of works
on site, full details of mitigation in respect of Black Grouse shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority and the agreed mitigation
measures implemented as approved.  The development shall then proceed as
approved. 
8. That prior to the occupation of any house, the off-street parking provision shall
be completed and be available for use by residents of the associated house. 
The off-street parking provision shall then remain unobstructed and available
for use by residents of the associated house at all times thereafter. 
9. That all surface water shall be intercepted within the site both during
construction and on completion of the development and full details of
measures to ensure that surface water run-off is contained within the site shall
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority prior to the
commencement of any works on site.  The measures shall be implemented
and maintained as approved. 
10. Prior to the occupation of the first house within the site, the developer shall
install the necessary infrastructure to enable the full development and all
associated properties to be connected to the existing fibre optic network,
where available in West Dunbartonshire, and in accordance with the relevant
telecommunications provider’s standards. 
Page 12

Page 13

11. No development (other than investigative works) shall commence on site until
such time as a detailed report on the nature and extent of any contamination
of the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority.  The report shall be prepared by a suitably qualified person and
shall include the following: 
a) A detailed site investigation identifying the extent, scale and nature of
contamination on the site (irrespective of whether this contamination
originates on the site)
b) An assessment of the potential risks (where applicable) to:
• human health
• property (existing and proposed), including buildings, crops, livestock, 
pets, woodland and service lines and pipes
• groundwater and surface waters
• ecological systems
• archaeological sites and ancient monuments
c) An appraisal of remedial options, including a detailed remediation
strategy based on the preferred option. 
12. No development (other than works) shall commence on site until such time as
a detailed remediation scheme for the site has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The scheme shall be prepared
by a suitably qualified person and shall detail the measures necessary to
bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by removing
unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property, and the
natural and historical environment.  The scheme shall include details of all
works to be undertaken, the remediation objectives and criteria, a timetable of
works and/or details of the phasing of works relative to the rest of the
development, and site management procedures.  The scheme shall ensure
that upon completion of the remediation works the site will not qualify as
contaminated land under Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part IIA in
Relation to the intended use of the land after remediation. 
13. The approved remediation scheme shall be carried out in accordance with its
terms prior to the commencement of development other than that required to
carry out remediation, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority.  The Planning Authority shall be notified in writing of the intended
commencement of remediation works not less than 14 days before these
works commence on site.  Upon completion of the remediation works and
prior to the site being occupied, a verification report which demonstrates the
effectiveness of the completed remediation works shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
Page 13

Page 14

14. The presence of any previously unencountered contamination that becomes
evident during the development of the site shall be reported to the Planning
Authority in writing within one week, and work on the affected area shall
cease.  At this stage, if equested by the Planning Authority, an investigation
and risk assessment shall be undertaken and an amended remediation
scheme shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority prior to
the recommencement of works in the affected area.  The approved details
shall be implemented as approved. 
15. If the remediation plan requires it then a monitoring and maintenance scheme
(including the monitoring of the long-term effectiveness of the proposed
remediation) shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority. 
Any actions/measures ongoing shall be implemented within an agreed
timescale with the Planning Authority.  Following completion of the
actions/measures identified in the approved remediation scheme a further
report which demonstrates the effectiveness of the monitoring and
maintenance measures shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Authority. 
16. If there is a requirement to either re-use site won material or to import material
then the assessment criteria and sampling frequency that would adequately
demonstrate its suitability for use shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Authority prior to any material being used.  In addition to this and in
accordance with BS3882:2015 and BS8601:2013, material to be used in the
top 300mm shall also be free from metals, plastic, wood, glass, tarmac, paper
and odours.  On completion of the works and at a time and or phasing agreed
by the Planning Authority, the developer shall submit a verification report
containing details of the source of the material and appropriate test results to
demonstrate its suitability for use. 
17. Prior to the commencement of development on the site, full details of any
external lighting within the site shall be submitted to and approved in writing
by the Planning Authority.  The lighting shall thereafter be installed as
approved. 
18. The applicant shall undertake a noise assessment to determine the impact of
noise from nearby noise sources on the proposed development using the
principles set out in British Standard BS 4142:2014 – “Methods for rating and
assessing industrial and commercial sound”, or a method agreed by the
Planning Authority. Where the Level of Significance as described within the
Scottish Government Document: “Technical Advice Note Assessment of
Noise”, identifies changes in noise as moderate or greater (assessed with
windows open), a scheme for protecting the proposed dwelling(s) from
industrial/stationary noise shall be submitted to, and approved by, the
Planning Authority.  The approved scheme for the mitigation of noise shall be
implemented prior to the occupation of the houses and shall be retained in
accordance with the approved scheme.  The noise impact assessment and
any recommendations in respect of mitigation measures shall be prepared by
a suitably qualified person. 
Page 14

Page 15

19. No development shall commence on site until such time as a noise control
method statement for the construction period has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  This statement shall identify
likely sources of noise (including specific noisy operations and items of
plant/machinery), the anticipated duration of any particularly noisy phases of
the construction works, and details of the proposed means of limiting the
impact of these noise sources upon nearby residential properties and other
noise-sensitive properties.  The construction works shall thereafter be carried
out in accordance with the approved method statement unless otherwise
approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
20. During the period of construction, all works and ancillary operations which are
audible at the site boundary (or at such other place(s) as may first be agreed
in writing with the Planning Authority), shall be carried out between the
following hours unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning
Authority: 
Mondays to Fridays: 0800-1800 
Saturdays: 0800-1300 
Sundays and public holidays: No working 
21. No piling works shall be carried out until a method statement has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  This
statement shall include an assessment of the impact of the piling on
surrounding properties, taking into account the guidance contained in BS6472
‘Evaluation of Human Response to Vibration in Buildings’.  It shall detail any
procedures, which are proposed to minimise the impact of noise and vibration
on the occupants of surrounding properties.  This statement shall be prepared
by a suitably qualified person, and the piling works shall thereafter be carried
out in accordance with the approved method statement. 
22. During the period of construction no commercial vehicle making deliveries to
or collecting material from the development shall enter or leave the site before
08:00 or after 18:00. 
23. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority, no
development shall commence on site until such time as a scheme for the
control and mitigation of dust has been submitted to and approved in writing
by the Planning Authority.  The scheme shall identify likely sources of dust
arising from the development or its construction, and shall identify measures
to prevent or limit the occurrence and impact of such dust.  The approved
scheme shall thereafter be implemented fully prior to any of the identified dust
generating activities commencing on site and shall be maintained thereafter,
unless otherwise approved by the Planning Authority.
Page 15

Page 16

APPENDIX 3 
DC23/177/FUL: Erection of single wind turbine, 30m hub and 43m tip, access
track, substation and associated works at land to East of Broomhill Wood,
Bonhill, Alexandria by Mr Harris Smith. 
GRANT full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
1. The planning permission for the wind turbine hereby granted shall be for a
maximum period of 25 years and 6 months from the date of the permission. 
This period consists of a 25 year period of operation of the turbine followed by
a 6 month period for removal of the turbine, ancillary equipment, associated
hard standing and access track and restoration of the site to its former
condition, or other such condition as agreed in writing as acceptable to the
Planning Authority in accordance with the terms of Condition 6 below. 
2. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, should the
turbine cease to generate electricity for a continuous period of 6 months, the
turbine, ancillary equipment, associated hard standing and access track shall
be removed.  Restoration of the site to its former condition, or other such
condition as agreed in writing as acceptable to the Planning Authority in
accordance with the terms of Condition 6 below, shall thereafter take place
within 6 months. 
3. All external colours of the turbine and associated equipment cabinet shall be
agreed with the Planning Authority prior to the commencement of works and
shall be implemented as approved. 
4. No turbine, transformer building or any other above ground infrastructure shall
be illuminated or display any name, logo, sign or advertisement (other than
health and safety signage) unless and until otherwise approved in writing by
the Planning Authority. 
5. Within one year of the date of this consent, the turbine operator shall submit
an Outline Decommissioning, Restoration and Aftercare Scheme (the Outline
Decommissioning Scheme) for the Turbine development, for the written
approval of Planning Authority.  The Outline Decommissioning Scheme shall
include (but not necessarily be limited to) details of: 
a) Works for the decommissioning and removal of the turbine (together
with the foundations to a depth of at least one meter) and all above
ground ancillary infrastructure and equipment;
b) The treatment of any ground surfaces including access tracks,
hardstanding areas and any sub-surface elements including cabling to
restore the site to its former condition, or other such condition as is
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority;
c) Environmental management provisions, including waste management;
d) A decommissioning timetable;
e) Appropriate aftercare following site restoration; and
Page 16

Page 17

f) How and when the Outline Decommissioning Scheme will be reviewed
during the operational life of the development.  The approved Outline
Decommissioning Scheme shall be implemented as approved, unless
otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 
6. No later than 12 months prior to the decommissioning of the development, or
the expiration of the 25 year period of operation (whichever is earlier), a
detailed Decommissioning, Restoration and Aftercare Scheme, which takes
account of the latest version of the Outline Decommissioning Scheme
(approved under Condition 5) and which also takes into account of the current
best environmental practice, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority.  The development shall be decommission, the site
restored and aftercare thereafter in accordance with the scheme approved as
part of this condition, unless otherwise agreed in writing in advance by the
Planning Authority. 
7. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, if the wind
turbine fails to generate electricity for a continuous period of 12 months, the
turbine shall be deemed to have ceased to be required, and a scheme that
takes cognizance of Condition 6, setting out how the wind turbine and
associated infrastructure will be removed from the site, the ground restored
and aftercare carried out, shall be submitted for the written approval of the
Planning Authority no later than one month after the date of the expiry of the 6
months.  The scheme approved shall be implemented within 12 months of the
date of its approval. 
8. In order to ensure compliance with Condition 7, the wind turbine operator shall
submit 12 monthly generation and output figures to the Planning Authority to
evidence that the turbine is continuing to generate electricity and the 12
monthly reporting cycle shall commence from the date the turbine is
commissioned (turned on). 
9. Notwithstanding the approved plans, all recommendations within the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal dated December 2022 shall be followed to
the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 
10. That prior to works commencing on site a traffic management plan indicating
the proposals for the construction and delivery of the turbine and all
associated construction material shall be submitted to the Planning Authority
for their written approval, and shall thereafter be implemented as approved. 
The statement shall include the following information: 
a) The intended turbine transportation route including swept path
analysis, timings and methodology.
b) All temporary works including relocation of signs, guardrails, bollards,
street furniture and all temporary measures.
c) Any alteration to the public road network.
d) Details of the construction compound including staff car parking.
e) Details of proposed signage during the delivery and construction
period.
Page 17

Page 18

f) Any necessary mitigation.
g) Details of the type, weight, frequency and number of delivery and
construction vehicles inclusive of those delivering all associated
construction materials, for example, hardcore and associated tonnage. 
h) Details of wheel washing facilities.
i) A condition report based on a joint survey of the proposed route to
ensure that all temporary alterations and any damage to the road
network are made good. 
11. No development shall take place within the development site until the
developer has secured the implementation of an archaeological watching
brief, to be carried out by an archaeological organisation acceptable to the
Planning Authority, during all ground disturbance.  The retained
archaeological organisation shall be afforded access at all reasonable times
and allowed to record, recover and report items or interest and finds.  A
method statement for the watching brief shall be submitted by the applicant
and agreed in writing with the Planning Authority in consultation with the West
of Scotland Archology Service prior to the commencement of the watching
brief.  The name of the archaeological organisation retained by the developer
shall be given the Planning Authority in writing prior to any works on site. 
12. Prior to the commencement of development full details of the surface water
drainage system shall be submitted for the written approval of the Planning
Authority and shall be implemented as approved prior to the occupation of the
building.  The drainage system shall incorporate the principles of Sustainable
Drainage Systems within its design, and shall thereafter be implemented as
approved. 
13. In accordance with ETSU- R- 97 (Simplified Method) the noise from the wind
turbine shall not exceed an LA90(10min) of 35dB at the boundary of the
curtilage of any noise sensitive premises at all times at wind speeds of up to
10 metres per second at 10m height as measured within the site. 
14. Prior to the installation of the turbine, the developer shall submit a report for
approval by the Planning Authority which demonstrates compliance with the
noise limits in Condition 13 above.  The report shall be prepared in
accordance with reference to the Institute of Acoustics Good Practice Guide
to the Application of ETSU-R-97 and associated supplementary guidance
notes. 
15. Prior to the installation of the turbine, the applicant shall provide written
confirmation to the Planning Authority that the noise from turbine operation
will be broad-band with no discernible tonal characteristics. 
16. Within 14 days from the receipt of a written request from the Planning
Authority or following a complaint to the Planning Authority from the occupant
of a dwelling regarding noise from the wind turbine operation, the wind turbine
operator shall, at the wind turbine operator’s expense, employ an independent
consultant approved by the Planning Authority to assess the level of noise
emissions from the wind turbine at the complainant’s property following
Page 18

Page 19

procedures to be agreed with the Planning Authority.  The wind turbine
operator shall provide to the Planning Authority the independent consultant’s
assessment and conclusions regarding the said noise complaint, including all
calculations, audio recordings and the raw data upon which those
assessments and conclusions are based.  Such information shall be provided
within 28 days of the date of the written request of the Planning Authority
unless otherwise extended in writing by the Planning Authority.  The wind
turbine operator shall take such remedial action as required by the Planning
Authority. 
17. Wind speed, wind direction and power generation data shall be continuously
logged and provided to the Planning Authority in a format to be agreed at its
request and within 28 days of such a request.  Such data shall be retained by
the operator for a period of not less than 12 months. 
18. No development shall commence on site until details of a nominated person
have been submitted in writing to the Planning Authority for the development
who will act as a point of contact for local residents (in connection with
conditions 13 - 17), together with the arrangements for notifying and
approving any subsequent change in the nominated representative.  The
nominated representative shall have responsibility for liaison with the Planning
Authority in connection with any noise complaints made during the
construction, operation and decommissioning of the wind turbines. 
19. During the period of construction, all works and ancillary operations (including
piling) which are audible at the site boundary (or at such other place(s) as
may first be agreed in writing with the Planning Authority), shall be carried out
between the following hours unless otherwise approved in writing by the
Planning Authority: 
Mondays to Fridays:  0800-1800
Saturday:    0800-1300
Sundays and public holidays: No working 
20. During the period of construction no delivery or removal of material from the
site shall take place outwith the hours of 8am to 6pm Mondays to Fridays and
8am to 1pm on Saturdays, and not at all on Sundays or Public Holidays
unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
21. The applicant shall ensure that all works carried out on site are carried out in
accordance with the current BS5228, 'Noise control on construction and open
sites'.  No further development shall commence on site until such time as a
noise control method statement for the construction period has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. This statement
shall identify likely sources of noise (including specific noisy operations and
items of plant/machinery), the anticipated duration of any particularly noisy
phases of the construction works, and details of the proposed means of
limiting the impact of these noise sources upon nearby residential properties
and other noise-sensitive properties. The construction works shall thereafter
Page 19

Page 20

be carried out in accordance with the approved method statement unless
otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
22. Before any further plant and machinery is used on the premises it shall be
enclosed with sound insulating material in accordance with a scheme which
shall first be approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The sound
insulation measures shall thereafter be retained. 
23. Within 14 days from the receipt of a written request from the Planning
Authority or following a complaint to the Planning Authority following a
complaint alleging shadow flicker nuisance, the wind turbine operator shall at
the wind turbine operator’s expense: 
a) Employ an independent consultant approved by the Planning Authority
to assess the conditions likely to be causing the incidences of shadow
flicker to which the complaint relates. 
b) Within 28 days of receipt of the written request from the Planning
Authority, the wind turbine operator shall submit to the Planning
Authority, the independent consultant’s report on shadow flicker,
detailing any amendments to the operation of the wind turbine
necessary to mitigate any further incidences of shadow flicker, for the
written approval of the Planning Authority.  The turbine shall thereafter
operate in accordance with the amendments to operation as approved. 
24. Notwithstanding the approved plans, and prior to any works on site, a further
submission which demonstrates an understanding on how the proposal
enhances biodiversity beyond the current baseline shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  All measures shall then be
implemented as approved. 
Page 20

Page 21

APPENDIX 4 
DC23/202/FUL: Application under Section 42 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, as Amended, in relation to Condition 17
(approach to risk assessment and any associated required remediation
strategy/plan) attached to Planning Permission, in Principle, reference
DC20/088 at Land At Former Dunglass Oil Terminal Dumbarton Road, Bowling
by West Dunbartonshire Council. 
GRANT full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
1. Prior to the commencement of works associated with any part of the
development (apart from remediation works), an application(s) for approval of
detailed design matters shall be submitted for the written approval of the
Planning Authority.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority, all applications for the approval of matters specified in conditions
shall be accompanied by: 
a) Development platforms and site layout plans showing the position of all
buildings, roads, access arrangements, parking areas, footpaths,
waterfront walkway, green corridors, open space, boundary treatments
and drainage infrastructure. 
b) Block and layout plans showing existing, proposed and finished floor
levels and elevations of each building, showing dimensions, and
palettes of external materials. 
c) Applications that include proposals for buildings, will provide details of
cycle parking, shelter and storage provision, electric car charging
points, shower, changing and drying facilities and any other facilities
and measures which promote and support active and sustainable
travel. 
d) Landscape and streetscape plans showing the locations and species of
all proposed trees, shrubs, hedges, palettes of hard landscaping
materials and street furniture.  Where applicable, all trees and planting
shall be sited at least 10 metres in distance from the railway boundary
located within the application site.  Where it is agreed for trees, shrubs
are to be planted adjacent to the railway boundary located within the
application site, these shall be positioned at a minimum distance from
the boundary which is greater than their predicted mature height. 
2. Any applications(s) for approval of matters specified in conditions for any
phase or part of the development submitted under Condition 1 shall also
accord with the elements of approved 'design and construction' and
'operational phase' management plans and strategies associated with
Conditions 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16 that are relevant to the
development being proposed. 
Page 21

Page 22

3. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Phasing Plan including details for the subsequent
delivery for each phase of the development alongside timescales for
implementation of the various phases shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Planning Authority.  The Phasing Plan shall contain a strategy
for the submission of a series of future detailed applications as under
Condition 1 above including the delivery and implementation of the approved
zones (including the waterfront walkway, green spaces and green network
corridors).  The approved Phasing Plan including any measures there within
shall be implemented on site and unless otherwise agreed in writing by the
Planning Authority.  Any modifications or updates of the approved phasing
plan shall be subject to the written approval of the Planning Authority and
implemented thereafter as approved. 
4. Prior to the submission of any application for matters specified in Condition 1
(parts B, C or D), a design strategy to establish the principles for the design
and locations of street furniture, railings, bollards, signage, bins, substations,
generators and cycle parking shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority, each application for approval of matters specified in conditions
submitted shall adhere to the principles and requirements approved through
the design strategy. 
5 Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, prior to the
submission of any application for matters specified in Condition 1 (A, B, C or
D), a Preliminary Options Appraisal Report including a condition survey and
scheme of repairs for the conservation, repair and reuse of Dunglass Castle
(including the house, garden, walls) and the Henry Bell Obelisk in both in the
short term and long term shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority.  Prior to the occupation of any buildings to be located
within Zones A and B as identified on Parameters Plan (Drawing No.
30953/4504/002 Rev F), details of the final chosen option for Dunglass Castle
(including the house, garden and castle walls) and the Henry Bell Obelisk
shall be submitted to and agreed in writing Planning Authority.  These details
shall include a programme of works including timescales for obtaining relevant
permissions alongside timelines for the delivery and completion of the works
for the Dunglass Castle (including the house, garden, walls) and the Henry
Bell Obelisk.  Thereafter this shall be implemented as approved in accordance
with the approved final strategy. 
6. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Soil Management Plan and Earthworks and
Materials Movement Strategy shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority.  Beyond the details set out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule
of Mitigation and Monitoring) of the approved 'Environmental Statement
Volume 1 Main Text (Dated: September 2019), these submissions shall
include: 
•  Details of the assessment criteria and sampling frequency that would
adequately demonstrate suitability for use.
Page 22

Page 23

•  A Waste Management and Recycling Strategy to address on-site waste
and materials. 
The approved plans and strategies shall be implemented on site and unless
otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority.  These shall remain in
place for the duration of the construction phase of the full re-development of
the site.  Any modifications or updates required shall first be subject to the
written approval of the Planning Authority and implemented thereafter as
approved. 
7. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) shall
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  Beyond
the details and scope set out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule of Mitigation and
Monitoring) if the approved 'Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text
(Dated: September 2019), the CTMP shall include details of measures for
minimising the disruption of the construction works on existing local bus
services along the A82 and A814.  As part of such details it shall also
demonstrate continuity of access along the A82 and A814 at all times, to allow
for the continued operation of local bus services, except where otherwise
agreed by the Planning Authority.  The approved CTMP including any
measures therewithin shall be implemented on site and unless otherwise
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority and shall remain in place for the
duration of the construction phase of the full redevelopment of the site.  Any
modifications or updates required for the approved CTMP shall first be subject
to the written approval of the Planning Authority and implemented thereafter
as approved. 
8. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Flood Risk Management Plan, a Construction Flood
Response Plan and a Construction Drainage Plan shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  Beyond the details and scope
set out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule of Mitigation and Monitoring) of the
approved 'Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text (Dated: September
2019), the Construction Drainage Plan shall include confirmation that all foul
drainage installed within the application site shall discharge into the public
sewer network at all times.  The approved plans including any measures
therewithin shall be implemented on site and shall remain in place for the
duration of the construction phase of the full re-development of the site,
unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority.  Any
modifications or updates required for these approved plans shall first be
subject to the written approval of the Planning Authority and implemented
thereafter as approved. 
9. Prior to the occupation of any part of the site, all measures agreed in
accordance with Condition 8 above which are associated with addressing
flood risk shall be implemented.  This shall also include those measures set
out in Section 5.3.5 of the approved 'Environmental Statement Non-technical
Summary (September 2019)' and Chapter 7 and figure 7.2 'Conceptual Flood
Mitigation Strategy' of the approved 'Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main
Page 23

Page 24

Text (Dated: September 2019)' .Once implemented, all of these measures
shall be maintained thereafter unless otherwise agreed in writing by the
Planning Authority. 
10 Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Lighting Strategy and an Otter Mitigation Strategy
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
Beyond the details and scope set out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule of Mitigation
and Monitoring) of the approved 'Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main
Text (Dated: September 2019), the Lighting Strategy shall provide specific
confirmation that night lighting will be avoided during the months of
September to March inclusive where such lighting would illuminate areas of
inter-tidal habitat of the Inner Clyde Special Protection Area (SPA) to levels in
excess of 1 Lux (i.e. the maximum natural night-time background light level).
The approved strategies, including any measures therewithin shall be
implemented on site and shall remain in place for the duration of the
construction phase of the full re-development of the site, and unless otherwise
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority.  Any modifications or updates
required for these approved strategies shall first be subject to the written
approval of the Planning Authority and implemented thereafter as approved. 
11. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Landscape Framework and Strategy shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  Beyond the
details and scope set out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule of Mitigation and
Monitoring) of the approved Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text
(Dated: September 2019), the Landscape Framework and Strategy shall be
prepared in accordance with the approved 'Landscape Framework Objectives'
document (Dated October 2020) and shall update the approved masterplan
and parameters plan for the site.  The approved Landscape Framework and
Strategy including any measures therewithin shall be implemented on site and
unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority.  Any
modifications or updates required for this approved strategy shall first be
subject to the written approval of the Planning Authority and implemented
thereafter as approved. 
12. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, as part of any
applications for approval of matters specified in conditions, and with regard to
the requirements of condition 1 above, a supporting report which evidences
how the relevant development proposals complies with and delivers the
requirements and aims of the 'Landscape Framework and Strategy' approved
under Condition 11 above. 
13 Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Construction Environmental Management Plan
(CEMP) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority.  Beyond the details and scope set out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule of
Mitigation and Monitoring) of the approved 'Environmental Statement Volume
1 Main Text (Dated: September 2019), the CEMP shall also include a
timetable and programme for all noise and vibration generating works
Page 24

Page 25

associated with the construction of the development including the use of plant
and machinery and vehicle movements.  The timetable shall set out how the
construction works will be programmed to minimise noise and vibration
generation during the months of September to March inclusive and associated
disturbance on wintering redshank and other qualifying features of the Inner
Clyde Special Protection Area.  Any noise generating works and/or operations
agreed in consultation with the Planning Authority as being unavoidable
during the period specified shall be accompanied by a schedule of mitigation
detailing the measures that will be put in place to mitigate those impacts that
will be caused by noise generating works and operations.  The approved
CEMP including any measures there within shall be implemented on site and
shall remain in place for the duration of the construction phase of the full re-
development of the site, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority.  Any modifications or updates required for the approved CEMP
shall first be subject to the written approval of the Planning Authority and
implemented thereafter as approved. 
14. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, a Written Scheme of Archaeological Investigation and
Programme of Archaeological Works shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Planning Authority.  Notwithstanding the details and scope set
out in in Chapter 15 (Schedule of Mitigation and Monitoring) of the approved
'Environmental Statement Volume 1 Main Text (Dated: September 2019), this
investigation shall be subject to a full Risk Assessment considering all areas
of the site not previously covered by permission DC18/013 for the
Remediation Strategy for the site.  If required by the Risk Assessment, the
scope for the Written Scheme of Archaeological Investigation shall be
extended beyond the boundary of Zone F of the site and may include other
areas.  The approved written investigation and programme of works including
any measures there within shall be implemented on site and shall remain in
place for the duration of the construction phase of the areas subject to the
investigation, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 
Any modifications or updates required for the approved written investigation
and programme of works shall first be subject to the written approval of the
Planning Authority and implemented thereafter as approved. 
15. Prior to the submission of the first application for the approval of matters
specified in conditions, an Energy Strategy shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  Further to the approach and
overarching aims set out in the approved 'Energy Masterplan' (Dated, May
2020) document, the Energy Strategy shall include details for the delivery and
implementation of on-site low carbon and renewable energy solutions,
building specific technologies and features alongside any other measures
aimed at increasing energy efficiency on the site.  The approved strategy
including any measures there within shall be implemented on site and unless
otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority and shall remain in
place for the lifetime of the development.  Any modifications or updates
required for the approved strategy shall first be subject to the written approval
of the Planning Authority and implemented thereafter as approved. 
Page 25

Page 26

16. Prior to the occupation of any part of the site, a Travel Plan including
measures to minimise the impact of traffic and to promote sustainable and
active travel choices for staff and visitors shall be submitted to and approved
in writing by the Planning Authority.  The Travel Plan shall include the details
and requirements as set out in Section 7 of the approved 'Transport
Assessment (Dated April 2019).  The approved Travel Plan including any
measures there within shall be implemented on site and unless otherwise
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority and shall remain in place for the
lifetime of the development.  Any modifications or updates required for the
approved Travel Plan shall first be subject to the written approval of the
Planning Authority and implemented thereafter as approved. 
17. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, no development
shall commence on site until the approach to undertaking an assessment of
the risks to all new receptors, such as people and buildings, that this
development will introduce has been submitted to and agreed in writing by the
Planning Authority.  The assessment of the risks to all new receptors shall
then be undertaken in accordance with the approved approach unless
otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority.  If the risk assessment
identifies any unacceptable risks on any part of the site then a remediation
strategy will be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as
Planning Authority prior to development works commencing on that part of the
site.  The report shall be prepared by a suitably qualitied person. 
18. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, prior to the
submission of any approval of matters specified in conditions applications
AMSC), a full Site Investigation and Risk Assessment for areas of the AMSC
site not previously covered by the Remediation Strategy to be undertaken in
accordance with permission DC18/013 shall require to be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The approved details shall be
implemented as approved. 
19. In the event that contamination, which has not previously been identified and
assessed, becomes evident at any time during the development of the site, it
shall be reported in writing to the Planning Authority within 1 week.  If such
contamination can be dealt with without departing from the principles and
outcome of an already approved remediation strategy then works can
continue on the affected part of the site.  If the contamination would result in a
departure from the principles and outcome of the approved remediation
strategy and if requested by the Planning Authority, works shall cease and/or
an investigation and risk assessment shall be undertaken and an amended
remediation strategy shall be submitted to the Planning Authority for approval. 
The amended remediation strategy, once approved in writing by the Planning
Authority, shall be implemented as approved prior to the recommencement of
works in the affected area. 
20. Prior to the occupation of any part of the site and unless otherwise agreed in
writing by the Planning Authority, the proposed upgrade of Dunglass
Roundabout Junction of the A82 (T) with the A814 to traffic signal control shall
Page 26

Page 27

be constructed in accordance with approved plan 'Eastern Access' (Drawing
No. 30953-STN- 00-XX-DR-D-0021 Rev P01). 
21. Prior to the occupation of any part of the site and unless otherwise agreed in
writing by the Planning Authority, the proposed upgrade of the Dumbuck
signalised junction of the A82 (T) with the A814 shall be constructed in
accordance with approved plan 'Western Access' (Drawing No. 30953-STN-
00-XX-DR-D-0020 Rev P01). 
22. Development proposals affecting the route of NCN7, shall include
arrangements for the temporary diversion of the NCN7.  Such details shall be
accompanied by measures which seek to mitigate the impact of the diversion
such as the provision for wayfinding signage and the use of distinctive
materials alongside other measures of route design required to ensure that
the diverted route remains clear, attractive and intuitive to users.  Thereafter
the approved temporary diversion and associated mitigation measures shall
be undertaken in a timescale agreed in writing by the Planning Authority.  The
mitigation measures shall be maintained on site for as long as the temporary
diversion of the NCN7 remain in place. 
23. Development proposals that propose to alter the route of NCN7 shall include
details for the final arrangement of post-development reconfiguration of NCN7
at the western end of the site.  These details shall include the final route and
positioning of NCN7.  Thereafter, the approved details shall be implemented
as approved in a timescale agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 
24. Any development proposals that will permanently affect the route and function
of existing bus stops shall be accompanied by a report assessing and
reviewing the impact of the proposed road layout upon existing bus stop
locations (including those stops situated along the A82 and A814).  If
required, the report shall include details for any new bus stops required or
details for relocation of existing bus routes.  The approved report, including
any identified findings and measures shall be implemented in a timescale
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 
25. Prior to the commencement of any development on site, a trespass proof
fence of minimum 1.8 metres in height shall be installed along the boundary of
the railway line within the application site.  Prior to its installation, details of the
proposed trespass fencing including its location and design shall be submitted
to, and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The approved trespass
fence shall thereafter be implemented as approved in a timescale agreed in
writing by the Planning Authority.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the
Planning Authority, the approved trespass fence shall remain in place for the
duration of when construction works are taking place on the part of the site
impacting the railway. 
26. No development shall take place, between the months of September to March
inclusive, until an independent Ecological Clerk of Works (ECoW) or on-site
Ecologist (with ornithological experience) has been appointed by the
developer/applicant to oversee, monitor and ensure the effectiveness of all
Page 27

Page 28

ecological mitigation measures to protect the integrity of the Inner Clyde
Special Protection Area and other ecological designations.  The Planning
Authority shall be notified in writing once this person has been appointed. 
Thereafter, the ECoW shall remain in place for the duration of the construction
works associated with that part of the development, unless otherwise agreed
with the Planning Authority. 
27. Further to Condition 26, prior to appointing the ECoW, a 'scope of works' and
'terms of reference' for that person shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by, the Planning Authority.  This specifically shall detail the role and
remit of the ECoW and the circumstances and timescales during the
construction phase whereby they will require to be present within the
application site.  As a minimum, this shall detail that the ECoW shall: 
•  Be kept adequately informed of and ensure compliance with the
construction timetable and programming (including any variations to
such details) to be agreed under the terms of approved CEMP
alongside all other ecological mitigation measures and proposals which
are to be in place for the lifetime of the construction work associated
with the redevelopment of the site. 
•  Have the capacity and authority to halt/postpone any construction
works taking place during the sensitive over-wintering months (i.e. from
September to March inclusive) and until such time as they believe the
operations concerned will not result in any redshank, cormorants,
goldeneye, oystercatchers, red-breasted merganser (or any other
notified bird species) being displaced from feeding or roosting within
the identified Inner Clyde Special Protection Area or within the
designated Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). 
28. No development shall commence, between the months of September to
March inclusive until a screening and protective barrier has been installed
along the boundary between the Inner Clyde Special Protection Area (SPA)
and the area proposed for development works within the application site
(southern boundary of the water/foreshore edge boundary of the works area). 
Prior to its erection, details of the proposed screening barrier including its
location, extent, design and level of obscurity shall be submitted to, and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The approved screening barrier
shall thereafter be implemented as approved in a timescale agreed in writing
by the Planning Authority.  Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority, the approved screening barrier shall remain in place for when
construction works are taking place within the part of the site impacting the
SPA. 
29. Further to Condition 28 above, in the event that any such screening barrier is
to be replaced by more permanent screen planting, details of such proposals
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority prior to
the removal of the screening barrier (between the months of September to
March inclusive).  Such proposals shall include details for planting along the
edge of the development site area (referred to as the 'Green Corridor' on the
Page 28

Page 29

approved Masterplan and Parameters Plan) combined with tree/scrub
retention and appropriate reinforcement planting along the route of the
new/upgraded road and along the edge of the existing railway line.  The
approved screen planting details shall thereafter be implemented as approved
in a timescale agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 
30. As part of any applications for approval of matters specified in conditions, and
with regard to the requirements of condition 1 above, up-to-date protected
species surveys insofar as required in relation to the area of proposed
development and associated ecological features shall accompany
development proposals within the site.  These surveys shall be carried out by
a suitable qualified ecologist at the appropriate time of year and will be
provided to update the baseline information provided through the
Environmental Statement and ecological surveys provided as part of this
application.  Furthermore, should the results of such surveys show them to be
necessary, any such applications shall also be accompanied by the relevant
species protection plans to identify any license requirements. 
31. Prior to the commencement on any development on site, details of measures
to protect retained trees and areas of woodland on the site during construction
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The
details shall include specific details for the establishment of buffer zones for
the protection of trees and area of woodland along and within the site
boundary.  Thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority, the approved measures shall be implemented and shall remain in
place for the duration when construction works are taking place on site.
Page 29

Page 30

APPENDIX 5 
(d) DC23/205/FUL: Application under section 42 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 to vary Condition 7, relating to the timing
of footpath delivery at Farm Road, Duntocher, Clydebank by Barratt
Homes West Scotland. 
GRANT full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
1. No development shall commence on site until such time as approval of the
detailed design and layout of the residential development (hereinafter called
“the matters specified in conditions”) has been granted by the planning
authority.  Any application for approval of matters specified in conditions shall
be submitted before the expiration of three years from the date of this
planning permission in principle and shall include: 
a) the overall site layout;
b) the orientation, size, height, design and external appearance of the
proposed houses;
c) the means of drainage and sewage (including perimeter drainage)
which shall incorporate the principles of Sustainable Drainage Systems
(SuDS);
d) details of the full access arrangements (including a swept path analysis
to demonstrate the suitability of the road layout within the site for refuse
vehicles) ;
e) provisions for car parking;
f) boundary walls/fences to be erected and/or retained;
g) existing and proposed site levels and floor levels;
h) hard and soft landscaping for the site;
i) the provision of private open space within each house plot to West
Dunbartonshire Council’s Residential Design Guidance Standards; and
j) provisions for the storage and collection of waste arising from the
development. 
2. Prior to the commencement of development on site, details of the measures
to be taken to protect the existing trees on the site, as identified in the Tree
Survey and Arboricultural Report, dated September 2019, shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the planning authority.  The approved measures
shall thereafter be fully implemented during the course of all construction
works on the site. None of these trees shall be felled, lopped or topped except
as otherwise approved by the authority. 
3. Further to Section 4.2 of the approved Extended Phase 1 Habitat Survey
(dated 15 August 2019) the further badger, otter, water vole and bat surveys
and assessments shall be carried out and submitted for approval by the
planning authority as part of the detailed application(s) for the matters
specified in conditions.  If no works have commenced on site by 1 August
2021, a new habitat survey shall be undertaken and submitted as part of the
detailed application(s).  This shall either confirm that the findings and
Page 30

Page 31

recommendations of the original survey remain valid or alternatively outline
further recommendations as required based on current circumstances. 
4. No development shall take place within the development site until the
developer has secured the implementation of a programme of archaeological
works in accordance with a written scheme of investigation which has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the planning authority.  Thereafter the
developer shall ensure that the programme of archaeological works is fully
implemented and that all recording and recovery of archaeological resources
within the development site is undertaken to the satisfaction of the Planning
Authority in agreement with the West of Scotland Archaeological Service. 
5. Further to Appendix 4: ‘Flood Risk Assessment’ of the approved Engineering
Assessment and Drainage Report (dated September 2019), any modification
or alterations to the indicative masterplan layout of the proposed residential
development (as shown on approved plan ‘Masterplan’ (Drawing No. 5914(2)
S005 Rev E) shall be subject to a further Flood Risk Assessment.  This shall
be submitted as part of the application(s) for the approval of matters specified
in conditions. 
6. No development shall commence on site until a site-specific Construction
Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the planning authority.  The CEMP shall include the
following information: 
a) a site management plan including details of the management/storage
of soil and construction materials, of the storage of all waste materials,
and for the parking of all vehicles associated with the construction
operations;
b) a construction method statement, detailing the hours of construction
operations and deliveries, measures to prevent the transmission of
noise to adjoining residents, and measures to control the spread of
dust from the site;
c) details of wheel-washing arrangements;
d) a construction traffic management plan; and
e) details of construction stage sustainable drainage measures, including
provision for
f) the prevention of pollution of groundwater or surface watercourses. 
7. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, none of the
houses within the development shall be occupied until bus stops and shelters
have been provided on Craigielea Road, in locations to be agreed with the
Council, as Roads Authority, and Strathclyde Partnership for Transport. 
Furthermore a footpath linking these stops with the development shall be
provided prior to the occupation of the 64th dwellinghouse in the development
site. 
8. That the development shall be implemented in a continuous programme of
construction commencing with the northern field as Phase 1 and concluding
with the southwestern field as Phase 2.
Page 31

Page 32

APPENDIX 6 
DC22/185/FUL: Change of use of ground for the siting of three holiday lodges
including a waste water treatment plant and ancillary car parking (being a
revised design from that approved under Planning Permission ref:
DC21/096/FUL) at Former Maryland Water Pumping Station, Garshake Road,
Dumbarton by Mrs Mary Gillies. 
GRANT full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
1. No individual shall reside in the tourist accommodation for more than 28
consecutive days. In addition, no individuals shall reside in the tourist
accommodation for more than 60 days in the calendar year.  To this effect, a
permanent log book shall be kept of all visitors who stay at the tourist
accommodation for the lifetime of the development. This shall note the names
and addresses of all visitors.  The log book shall be made available for the
inspection of the Council as Planning Authority, if requested. 
2. Prior to the commencement of development, full details of the parking
arrangement will be provided to the Planning Authority for written approval. 
Thereafter, the approved parking arrangement shall be formed and available
prior to the lodges hereby approved being first brought into use.  The spaces
and access arrangements shall thereafter be kept available for the lifetime of
the development. 
3. Prior to the commencement of development, full details of the surface and foul
drainage shall be provided to the Planning Authority for written approval. 
Thereafter, the approved arrangements shall be implemented prior to the
lodges hereby approved being brought into use. The drainage arrangements
shall thereafter be maintained for the lifetime of the development.  For the
avoidance of doubt, the arrangement will incorporate sustainable drainage
arrangements (SuDS). 
4. Prior to the lodges hereby approved being first brought into use, the lodges
operator shall submit a Management Plan to the Planning Authority for their
written approval.  The Management Plan shall include details of day to day
site management and maintenance and how potential noise and guest
behaviour issues are to be dealt with, should they arise.  Thereafter, the site
will operate in accordance with the approved Management Plan for the
lifetime of the development unless otherwise agreed by the Planning
Authority. 
5. Prior to the commencement of works, full details of both hard and soft
landscaping works shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority.  Where appropriate, these details shall include proposed
finished and existing grounds levels and contours, hard surfacing materials
and lighting.  Thereafter, the approved details shall be fully implemented in
accordance with the approved details prior to the lodges being brought into
Page 32

Page 33

use, unless otherwise agreed by the Planning Authority.  Any trees, shrubs, or
hedges planted in accordance with this condition which are removed, die,
become severely damaged or become seriously diseased within five years if
planting shall be replaced within the next planting season by trees, shrubs or
hedging plants of similar size and species to those originally required to be
planted. 
6. The 1.6m high wall to the north of the gable end of unit 1 and the 1.1m high
wall along the front edge of the former water tank shall be finished in timber
cladding to match that across the wider site. 
7. Prior to the commencement of development on site, the finishing materials to
be used shall be submitted to the Planning Authority for written approval.  
Thereafter, the approved materials shall be implemented as approved. 
8. If there is a requirement to either re-use site one material or to import material
then the assessment criteria and sampling frequency that would adequately
demonstrate its suitability for use shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Authority prior to any material being used.  In addition to this and in
accordance with BS3882:2015 and Bs8601:2013 material to be used in the
top 300mm shall also be free from metals, plastic, wood, glass, tarmac and
odours. On completion of the works and at a time and/or phasing agreed by
the Planning Authority, the developer shall submit a verification report
containing details of the source of the material and appropriate test results to
demonstrate its suitability for use. 
9.  the presence of any previously unexpected contamination that becomes
evident during the development of the site shall be reported to the Planning
Authority in writing within one week, and work on the site shall cease.  At this
stage, if requested by the Planning Authority an appropriate investigation and
risk assessment shall be undertaken and a remediation scheme shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority prior to the
recommencement of works.  The approved details shall be implemented as
approved.
Page 33

Page 34

APPENDIX 7 
DC22/072/FUL: Residential development, landscaping and associated
Infrastructure at Hawthornhill Road, Dumbarton by Persimmon Homes. 
GRANT full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
1. Prior to the commencement of development on site, exact details,
specifications and samples of all proposed external materials to be used for
the houses within the development site shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Planning Authority.  Thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in
writing with the Planning Authority, the development shall be completed in
strict accordance with the approved material details and palette. 
2. Further to condition 1 above, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the
Planning Authority, the brick type to be used for the elevation treatment of all
houses within the development site shall be of the ‘Forterra Victorian Mixture’
specification and variety. 
3. Further to Conditions 1 and 2 above, prior to the approved brickwork
associated with any house being constructed or installed on site, a sample
panel of this brickwork shall be constructed on site in order for it and the
associated mortar to be reviewed, inspected and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority.  Thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the
Planning Authority, the development shall be completed in strict accordance
with the approved brick details. 
4. The approved hard and soft landscaping and all associated approved planting
details shall be implemented within a timescale to be agreed prior to the
commencement of works on site with the Planning Authority. 
5. Notwithstanding the approved plans , an updated planting schedule to
incorporate Hawthorn planting and clarify the suitability of the planting within
the SuDS area shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority prior to the commencement of any works on site and shall be
implemented with a timescale to be agreed with the Planning Authority. 
6. That any trees, shrubs or areas of grass which die, are removed, damaged or
become diseased within five years of completion of the landscaping shall be
replaced within the following year with others of a similar size and species. 
7. That full details of maintenance and management for the landscaping
approved shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority prior to the start of construction of the development hereby
permitted.  Management and maintenance shall commence upon completion
of the landscaping. 
8. That prior to each house hereby permitted being occupied, all new roads and
footways leading to it shall be surfaced to a sealed base course.
Page 34

Page 35

9. That within 4 weeks of the last of the houses hereby permitted being
completed, all roads and footways within the application site shall be
completed to a final wearing course. 
10. That prior to the occupation of any house, the off-street parking provision shall
be completed and be available for use by residents of the associated house. 
The offstreet parking provision inclusive of garages where they part of this
parking provision shall be shall then remain unobstructed and available for
use by residents of the associated house at all times thereafter. 
11. No construction works except ground investigation works shall commence on
site until the existing pedestrian crossing on Cardross Road shall be relocated
and be fully operational in the new position. 
12. No construction works shall commence on site until full details of the new
position of the existing bus stop on Cardross Road currently in the position of
the relocated pedestrian crossing shall be submitted to and approved in
writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with SPT with the relocation
taking place and the bus stop being available for use by services 
13. That the approved drainage regime inclusive of the SuDS pond shall be fully
implemented.  For the avoidance of doubt, the drainage regime shall be
implemented commensurately with the construction of the houses it serves. 
14. That all surface water shall be intercepted within the site both during
construction and on completion of the development and full details of
measures to ensure that surface water run-off is contained within the site shall
be submitted to and approved in writing ty the Planning Authority prior to the
commencement of any works on site.  The measures shall be implemented
and maintained as approved. 
15. No site clearance works shall be undertaken during the bird nesting season
March to September inclusive unless first agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority.  For the avoidance of doubt, any such agreement will require a full
nesting bird survey prior to the commencement of works on site, the
methodology and findings of which shall be submitted to the Planning
Authority 
16. That prior to the commencement of any works on site, full details of the
incorporation of low or zero carbon generating technologies shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  Thereafter the
development shall be undertaken in accordance with the approved details. 
17. Prior to the commencement of development with the site, details of the
location and design of electric charging points/units and associated
infrastructure and ducting to serve the development shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The approved car charging
points/units/ducting and associated infrastructure shall thereafter be installed
Page 35

Page 36

in accordance with the approved details at a timescale agreed by the Planning
Authority and maintained at all times thereafter. 
18. Prior to the occupation of the first house within the site, the developer shall
install the necessary infrastructure to enable the full development and all
associated properties to be connected to the existing fibre optic network,
where available in West Dunbartonshire, and in accordance with the relevant
telecommunications provider’s standards. 
19. Details of the provision of grit bins for the development shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The agreed details shall be
in place prior the occupation of the first house within the site and thereafter
maintained for the lifetime of the development. 
20. Prior to the commencement of works on site, details of any street furniture
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority and
shall be implemented within an agreed timescale. 
21. No house shall be occupied until the contents of a Travel Information Pack
which encourages reduced dependency on the private car by highlighting the
location of local amenities, public transport services and active travel routes is
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  Thereafter, on
the occupation of each dwelling, the approved Travel Information Pack shall
be provided to new residents. 
22. No development (other than investigative work) can take place until such time
as a comprehensive site investigation has been carried out to the appropriate
Phase level and submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority.  The investigation shall be completed by a suitably qualified and
competent person and completed in accordance with advice given in the
following: 
•  Planning Advice Note 33 (2000) and Part IIA of the Environmental
Protection
• Act 1990 (as inserted by section 57 of the Environment Act 1995)
• BS 10175:2011+A1:2013 – British Standards institution ‘The
Investigation of Potentially Contaminated Sites – Code of Practice’.
•  Land Contamination and Development Management -Guidance.
https://www.epscotland.org.uk/wp[1]content/uploads/2019/09/ConLanD
evGuide_12-Aug19-FINAL.pdf 
23. If the Phase 1 investigation indicates any potential pollution linkages, a
Conceptual Site Model must be formulated and these linkages must be
subjected to risk assessment.  If a Phase 2 investigation is required, then a
risk assessment of all relevant pollution linkages will require to be submitted. 
24. If the risk assessment identifies any unacceptable risks then an appraisal of
remedial options followed by a detailed remediation scheme will be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  No works other than
Page 36

Page 37

investigative works shall be carried out on site prior to receipt of the Planning
Authority’s written approval of the remediation scheme. 
25. No development (other than investigative works) shall commence on site until
such time as a detailed remediation scheme for the site has been submitted to
and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The scheme shall be
prepared by a suitably qualified person and shall detail the measures
necessary to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by
removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other property,
and the natural and historical environment.  The scheme shall include details
of all works to be undertaken, the remediation objectives and criteria, a
timetable of works and/or details of the phasing of works relative to the rest of
the development, and site management procedures.  The scheme shall
ensure that upon completion of the remediation works the site will not qualify
as contaminated land under Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part IIA in
relation to the intended use of the land after remediation. 
26. The approved remediation scheme shall be carried out in accordance with its
terms prior to the commencement of development other than that required to
carry out remediation, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning
Authority.  The Planning Authority shall be notified in writing of the intended
commencement of remediation works not less than 14 days before these
works commence on site. 
27. Upon completion of the remediation works and prior to the site being
occupied, a   verification report which demonstrates the effectiveness of the
completed remediation works shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Local Planning Authority. 
28. The presence of any previously unexpected contamination that becomes
evident during the development of the site shall be reported to the Planning
Authority in writing within one week, and work on the site shall cease.  At this
stage, if requested by the Planning Authority, an appropriate investigation and
risk assessment shall be undertaken and a remediation scheme shall be
submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority prior to the
recommencement of site works.  The approved details shall be implemented
as approved. 
29. If there is a requirement to either re-use site won material or to import material
then the assessment criteria and sampling frequency that would adequately
demonstrate its suitability for use shall be submitted to and approved by the
Planning Authority prior to any material being re-used or imported.  In addition
to this and in accordance with BS3882:2015 and BS8601:2013, material to be
used in the top 300mm shall also be free from metals, plastic, wood, glass,
tarmac, paper and odours. 
30. On completion of the works and at a time and or phasing agreed by the
Planning Authority, the developer shall submit a validation report containing
details of the source of the material and associated test results to
demonstrate its suitability for use.
Page 37

Page 38

31 No development shall commence on site until such time as a noise control
method statement for the construction period has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  This statement shall identify
likely sources of noise (including specific noisy operations and items of
plant/machinery), the anticipated duration of any particularly noisy phases of
the construction works, and details of the proposed means of limiting the
impact of these noise-sensitive properties.  The construction works shall
thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved method statement
unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
32. During the period of construction, all works and ancillary operations which are
audible at the site boundary (or at such other place(s) as may first be agreed
in writing with the Planning Authority), shall be carried out between the
following hours unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning
Authority: 
• Mondays to Fridays: 0800 – 1800
• Saturdays: 0800 – 1300
• Sundays and public holidays: No Working 
33. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority, no
development shall commence on site until such time as a scheme for the
control and mitigation of dust has been submitted to and approved in writing
by this Authority.  The scheme shall identify likely sources of dust arising from
the development or its construction, and shall identify measures to prevent or
limit the occurrence and impact of such dust.  The approved scheme shall
thereafter be implemented fully prior to any of the identified dust generating
activities commencing on site and shall be maintained thereafter, unless
otherwise approved by this Authority. 
34. No commercial vehicle making deliveries to or collecting material from the
development shall enter or leave the site before 0800 or after 1800. 
35. No piling works shall be carried out until a method statement has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  This
statement shall include an assessment of the impact of the piling on
surrounding properties, taking into account the guidance contained in BS
6472: 1984 ‘Evaluation of Human Response to Vibration in Buildings’.  It shall
detail any procedures which are proposed to minimise the impact of noise and
vibration on the occupants of surrounding properties.  This statement shall be
prepared by a suitably qualified person, and the piling works shall thereafter
be carried out in accordance with the approved method statement. 
36. Notwithstanding condition 36 above, full details of the design, height and
location of an acoustic fence adjacent the sports pitch shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The fence shall then be
erected prior to the occupation of any dwellinghouse on plots 32 to 44
inclusive. 
Page 38

Page 39

37. No development shall commence on site until details for the storage and the
collection of waste arising from the development and the location of grit bins
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority.  The
agreed details shall be in place prior the occupation of the first housing
unit/property within the site and thereafter maintained for the lifetime of the
development. 
Page 39

Page 40

Page 40

Page 41

PLANNING COMMITTEE
NOTE OF VISITATIONS – 12 FEBRUARY 2024
Present: Councillors Lawrence O’Neill and Chris Pollock.
Attending: Pamela Clifford, Planning, Building Standards and Environmental
Health Manager and James McColl, Development Management
Team Leader. 
SITE VISITS
Site visits were undertaken in connection with the undernoted planning applications:-
Old Carman Water Works Site, Cardross Road, Renton, Dumbarton
DC23/210/PPP: Erection of three dwelling houses (in principle) by Mr J McDougal.
Land to East of Broomhill Wood, Bonhill, Alexandria
DC22/190/FUL - Erection of single wind turbine, 30m hub and 43m tip, access track,
substation, agricultural shed and associated works by Mr Harris Smith.
ITEM 5
Page 41

Page 42

Page 42

Page 43

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health Manager
Planning Committee: 13th March 2024
DC23/177/FUL: Erection of single wind turbine, 30m hub and 43m tip,
access track, substation and associated works at Land to
East of Broomhill Wood, Bonhill, Alexandria by Mr Harris
Smith.
1. PURPOSE
1.1 To provide the Committee with the opportunity to further consider the
planning application, to allow for the Applicant to be present at Planning
Committee in order to answer further questions regarding the application
and to seek the Committee’s decision on the application.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 Grant planning permission and delegate authority to the Planning &
Building Standards Manager to issue the decision subject to the conditions
set out in Section 9 of Appendix 1 of the report, and subject to the conclusion
of a legal agreement to ensure that a suitable financial bond is put in place
to cover restoration liabilities for the site and the community benefit
contribution.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The above planning application was presented to Planning Committee on
14th February 2024. Appendix 1 contains a copy of the report considered by
Planning Committee. It was determined by the Planning Committee to
continue the application to allow for the Applicant to be present at Planning
Committee in order to answer further questions regarding the application.
3.2 Following the February meeting of the Planning Committee, the applicant
was invited to attend Planning Committee. A reply was received on 27th
February 2024 confirming that the applicant would be able to attend
Planning Committee on 13th March 2024.
ITEM 6
Page 43

Page 44

4. MAIN ISSUES
4.1 There are no material changes to either the development plan position or
the circumstances of the site since Committee previously considered the
application. 
4.2 Since the publication of the original Committee Report (Appendix 1) and as
reported to Members at February Planning Committee, a further objection
was received from Dame Jackie Baillie MSP. This highlights resident’s
concerns regarding the applicant’s intentions and practices on site and the
lack of any attempt to foster positive relations with nearby residents.
Concerns regarding the works undertaken without planning permission are
also raised and the proximity to residential properties and whether the
turbine will have any impact upon the supply to the National Grid. The
continued concern of constituents is highlighted by Dame Jackie Baillie
MSP and that opposition to the proposal remains. No material planning
considerations that have not already been assessed in the original
Committee Report have been raised in this objection. 
4.3 A further letter has been received from the Beechwood and Wheatcroft
Residents Association which sets out a range of queries in relation to the
proposal and the discussion at February Planning Committee. A response
to these additional queries is as follows: an assessment against Policy GB1
of the adopted Local Plan and proposed Local Development Plan 2 is set
out in the Committee Report in Appendix 1. The Committee report further
sets out that the grid connection can be addressed via a separate
consenting process where required. Condition 2 in Section 9 of the report
addresses the situation where the turbine does not generate electricity for
a continuous period of 6 months and subsequent decommissioning
requirements. Further queries in respect of construction vehicles,
contractors parking, deliveries and vehicle movements would be addressed
via the traffic management plan required by condition 10 as set out in the
Committee report. There is no objection from the Council’s Roads Service
and they do not identify the requirement for a Roads Bond. Matters relating
to the use of the existing access track to the site are also considered in the
original Committee report. Decommissioning requirements would be
addressed by condition and in the event the turbine was not
decommissioned as required, a bond will be in place to cover this. Noise
matters are addressed previously and land ownership is not a material
planning consideration. It would not be considered appropriate to
specifically seek to control the timescale for implementing the proposal on
site. 
4.4 It remains the case that the proposal accords with NPF4, the adopted West
Dunbartonshire Local Plan and the proposed West Dunbartonshire Local
Development Plan 2 and the recommendation remains to Grant planning
Page 44

Page 45

permission and delegate authority to the Planning and Building Standards
Manager to issue the decision subject to the conditions set out in Section 9
of Appendix 1 of the report, and subject to the conclusion of a legal
agreement to ensure that a suitable financial bond is put in place to cover
restoration liabilities for the site and the community benefit contribution. 
5. PEOPLE IMPLICATIONS
5.1 None.
6. FINANCIAL AND PROCUREMENT IMPLICATIONS
6.1 There are no financial or procurement implications in terms of this report.
7. RISK ANALYSIS
7.1 No risks have been identified.
8. EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
8.1 Not required.
9. ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY
9.1 Matters relating to environmental sustainability have been fully considered
via the planning application assessment.
10. CONSULTATION
10.1 Consultation was undertaken as part of planning processes associated with
the planning application. 
11. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT
11.1 There are no strategic issues.
Pamela Clifford 
Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health Manager
Date: 13th March 2024 
Page 45

Page 46

Person to Contact: Pamela Clifford, Planning & Building Standards
Manager
Email: Pamela.Clifford@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
James McColl, Development Management Team
Leader
Email: James.McColl@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendix 1: DC23/177/FUL Committee Report (14/02/2024)
Appendix 2: Location Plan
Wards affected: Ward 3 (Dumbarton)
Page 46

Page 47

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health Manager
Planning Committee: 14th February 2024
DC23/177/FUL: Erection of single wind turbine, 30m hub and 43m tip,
access track, substation and associated works at Land to
East of Broomhill Wood, Bonhill, Alexandria by Mr Harris
Smith.
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 The planning application is subject to a substantial body of objection.
Under the terms of the approved Scheme of Delegation, it therefore
requires to be determined by the Planning Committee.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 Grant planning permission and delegate authority to the Planning &
Building Standards Manager to issue the decision subject to the conditions
set out in Section 9 and subject to the conclusion of a legal agreement to
ensure that a suitable financial bond is put in place to cover restoration
liabilities for the site and the community benefit contribution.
3. DEVELOPMENT DETAILS
3.1 The application site is located to the east of Bonhill, Alexandria. The
nearest residential areas are Beechwood and Wheatcroft Estate, Bonhill
located approximately 440m to the west and Bellsmyre which is just over
1km to the south, though there is intervening woodland between the site
and both residential areas. The site is to the north of the Murroch Glen (a
steep wooded valley containing the Murroch Burn), on land which rises to
the northeast into the Kilpatrick Hills. It forms part of an area of plantation
woodland, bordered by the Murroch Glen and areas of grazing land. The
application site boundary extends to 0.89 hectares, but is within a much
larger area of land controlled by the applicant.
ITEM 6 - APPENDIX 1
Page 47

Page 48

3.2 The proposal would involve the following works:
• Installation of a single wind turbine;
• Construction of a 550m access track;
• Construction of an electrical substation and underground cabling;
• Construction infrastructure (e.g. crane hardstanding area);
• Construction of 6 vehicle parking spaces;
3.3 The turbine would be a three-bladed, horizontal axis turbine, with a
nominal rated capacity of 250kW. It would have a hub height of 30m and a
maximum height to the blade tip of 43m. The turbine would be of the
conventional design for such pieces of equipment, featuring a tubular
tower and blades finished in a non-reflective pale grey colour consistent
with the industry standard used in most UK wind turbines. 
3.4 The turbine would sit on a concrete base measuring roughly 7.5m x 7.5m,
with an expected depth of 3m, although the exact design of the foundation
would depend upon which specific manufacturer’s turbine was used
(which is not known at this stage). In addition to the foundation, an area of
hardstanding would be required adjacent to the turbine as a crane platform
for construction and ongoing maintenance. Adjacent to the base of the
turbine would be an external substation measuring approximately 7.5m x
4m, and 2.8m in height. The colour of the substation is currently
unspecified, however the supporting statement suggests it will be either
green or pale grey. Due to the relatively small generator size of the
proposed turbine, a local connection to the distribution network is
anticipated and without the need for more extensive reinforcement or
upgrade works.
3.5 Access to the site would be by way of the existing private access track
leading to Highdykes Farm, which is, itself, accessed from Broomhill
Crescent. A new 550m access track would be created between the farm
track and the proposed turbine. The new track would be 4.5m wide and
surfaced in hardcore, with a passing place and areas to permit the turning
of long vehicles. The road is likely to sit above the existing ground by
approximately 300mm with banking at either side. No borrow pits are
proposed as part of the development and material would be imported to
construct the access track. The level of material required to be imported is
not, however, specified in the application submission. The access track
crosses a drainage ditch around 330 metres from the junction with the
existing farm track, which a short section of pipe being installed below the
hardcore.
3.6 In terms of the planning history of the site, there have been two previous
applications for the erection of a wind turbine of the same size, as well as
the associated access track on this site. 
Page 48

Page 49

The Planning Committee considered the first application (DC14/210) on 29
April 2015 and were minded to grant planning permission subject to the
conclusion of a legal agreement to ensure that a suitable financial bond is
put in place to cover restoration liabilities for the site and the community
benefit contribution. The financial bond was never concluded and with a
lack of any progress over an extended period, the application was
considered withdrawn in March 2021. 
3.7 The second application (DC22/190/FUL) was submitted in 2022. In addition
to the wind turbine and associated works, an agricultural storage shed was
also proposed as part of this application. All planning application proposals
require to be considered as a whole and in assessing the application it was
concluded that the proposed shed was not a form of development which
could be supported in this Green Belt location and would result in an
unjustified sporadic development within the Green Belt. The application was
refused by Planning Committee on 2nd August 2023 for the following reason: 
1. It has not been demonstrated that the proposed agricultural shed is
being provided in association with an agricultural land holding, nor has
the nature of any farming operation at this location been quantified.
Therefore it cannot be concluded that the proposed shed is specifically
required to support agriculture at this green belt and the shed would
result in unjustified sporadic development within the green belt
location. It is thus not a form of development that is supported in the
green belt by Policy 8 – Green Belts of the National Planning
Framework 4, Policy GB1 – Green Belt of the adopted West
Dunbartonshire Local Development Plan, Policy GB1 – Greenbelt and
Countryside of the proposed West Dunbartonshire Local Development
Plan 2. 
This refusal of planning permission was not appealed to the Scottish
Government Planning and Environmental Appeals Division. 
3.8 Works to create the access track associated with the wind turbine
commenced on site prior to this application being determined. The
applicant was advised that the works were being undertaken without
planning permission. The applicant was requested on a number of
occasions to stop works until such time that planning permission was
granted. The applicant continued works on the access track and a
Temporary Stop Notice was subsequently issued. Works initially continued
after the Notice was issued and then halted. At the expiry of the
Temporary Stop Notice works commenced again, despite it remaining that
no planning permission was in place. 
3.9 Further to the refusal of application DC22/190/FUL, an Enforcement Notice
was issued requiring the removal of the partially constructed access track.
Page 49

Page 50

The applicant appealed this Enforcement Notice which was dismissed by
the Reporter of the Planning and Environmental Appeals Division of the
Scottish Government. Reports from residents within the area suggested that
works were ongoing to further develop the track. However a site visit on 30th
January 2024 has confirmed that the works are ongoing to remove the track
in accordance with the requirements of the Enforcement Notice. 
4. CONSULTATIONS 
4.1 West Dunbartonshire Council Environmental Health Service have no
objections to the proposal and recommends the following conditions
regarding noise in relation to the turbine, noise complaints, wind data,
point of contact, hours of work, delivery vehicles during construction,
construction noise, and noise attenuation.   
4.2 West Dunbartonshire Council Roads Service have no objections in relation
to flooding matters. A Traffic Management Plan was submitted and the
Roads Service confirmed that the clarifications and qualifications
contained within the plan made the proposal acceptable to the Roads
Service. 
4.3 West of Scotland Archaeological Service (WoSAS) have no objection
subject to a condition requiring the implementation of an archaeological
watching brief. 
4.4 West Dunbartonshire Council Biodiversity Officer has no further comments
to make on the current proposal. Comments from the previous application
note that the Preliminary Ecological Assessment submitted offers
mitigation in section 7 of the document and should be conditioned if the
development is to proceed. The proposed mitigation includes following
national guidelines and standards for any tree/hedgerow retention, that
best working practice measures are adhered to safeguard otters and
badgers, and a walkover survey prior to works commencing within bird
breeding season. If any otter or badger resting place is found then an
ecologist should produce an otter protection plan. Should the development
proceed there should be a clear intention provided of the biodiversity
enhancement works that will be included to meet the requirements of
NPF4 Policy 3. It should be specifically noted what is being regarded as
mitigation and enhancement so that a clear picture of the ‘positive effect
on biodiversity’ can be determined. 
4.5 Glasgow Airport and National Air Traffic Services have no objections to the
proposal. 
Page 50

Page 51

4.6 RSPB Scotland note that the previous ecological report appears to be
based on site visit(s) during December 2022 (so outside the
recommended dates for protected species surveys) and the conclusion
that there would be no impact on birds was based on a desktop study
using only freely available data rather than survey visits – and so no actual
survey work had taken place. The updated application mentions NPF4
policies, but again says that based on an assessment in support of the
application, it concludes there will be no material impact on biodiversity,
including birds. It is unclear how this can be assessed from the data
provided. There is also no mention of proposed biodiversity
enhancements. 
4.7 Stirling Council and Inverclyde Council have no objections to the proposal. 
4.8 Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park Authority and Argyll and
Bute Council have not provided a response at the time of writing this
report. 
5. REPRESENTATIONS 
5.1 Fifty eight representations from fifty seven representees have been
received in connection with the proposal including from Beechwood &
Wheatcroft Residents Association. All are in objection. The full details are
contained within the planning file and are available for public viewing.
However, the points raised can be summarised as follows: 
Roads and traffic
• The estate roads are not suitable for heavy vehicles.
• There will be a noise impact from the HGV traffic.
• Concern for children and elderly in relation to the increase in traffic.
• There was never a road in this location before. 
Location and visual impact of the development 
• Concern for the visual impact on Dumbarton Rock, cluttering the
backdrop to & from the Kilpatrick and Lang Craig Hills & the Pappert
Well.
• No access track previously existed at this location previously.
• There are industrial estates within Dumbarton and Vale of Leven which
are more suited to a development of this nature. 
Page 51

Page 52

Residential amenity
• Nearby residents would be adversely affected by noise disturbance. 
• There are potential health side effects from living beside a wind
turbine, including from vibration, shadow flicker and ice throw.
• The area is a residential area and is too close to residents/houses.
• Scottish Government guidelines state that wind turbines should be no
closer than 2km away from residential properties. 
Environmental matters
• Air pollution may result from the development, particularly during
construction.
• The development would adversely impact upon wildlife, trees, and
hedgerows. 
Procedural concerns
• The applicant has not attended the resident’s association meetings to
discuss their plans.
• The applicant has not met his legal obligation to the residents to provide
compensation for previous work.
• There is no stated business aim and no community benefit.
• There is no stated life of the turbine and no bond for restoration on
decommissioning. 
Other matters
• What is the energy to be used for?
• The applicant intends to produce bio fuel which is not on the application.
• No connection to the grid has been indicated.
• The turbine name no longer seems to be in production.
• Property prices will be affected.
• Approval would set a precedent and open the area to further large scale
turbines.
• West Dunbartonshire Council’s Open Space Strategy 2011 states that
planning authorities are expected to support, protect and enhance open
space and opportunities for sport & recreation. 
5.2 The matters of concern raised above are addressed in Sections 6 and 7
below. 
6. ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
National Planning Policy 4 
6.1 Policy 1 relates to tackling the climate and nature crises and states that
when considering all development proposals significant weight will be given
to the global climate and nature crises. 
Page 52

Page 53

Policy 2 also relates to the climate in the form of climate mitigation and
adaptation and states development proposals will be sited and designed to
minimise lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions as far as possible and
development proposals will be sited and designed to adapt to current and
future risks from climate change. 
6.2 Policy 3 states that development proposals will contribute to the
enhancement of biodiversity and should integrate nature-based solutions
where possible. Proposals for local development will include appropriate
measures to conserve, restore and enhance biodiversity, in accordance
with national and local guidance. Policy 4 requires that development
proposals do not have an unacceptable impact on the natural environment
inclusive of environmental designations and protected species. Policy 5
states that development proposals will only be supported if they are
designed and constructed in accordance with the mitigation hierarchy by
first avoiding and then minimising the amount of disturbance to soils on
undeveloped land and in a manner that protects soil from damage
including from compaction and erosion that minimises soil sealing. 
6.3 Where there is potential for non-designated buried archaeological remains
to exist below a site, developers will provide an evaluation of the
archaeological resource at an early stage so that planning authorities can
assess impacts in accordance with Policy 7. 
6.4 Policy 8 supports development within the green belt in a limited number of
circumstances. These include: 
• development associated with agriculture, woodland creation,
forestry and existing woodland (including community woodlands); 
• horticulture, including market gardening and directly connected
retailing, as well as community growing; 
• essential infrastructure or new cemetery provision;
• minerals operations and renewable energy developments; 
• intensification of established uses, including extensions to an
existing building where that is ancillary to the main use. 
Additional requirements include justification is provided for the green belt
location; the purpose of the green belt is not undermined by the
development; the development is compatible with the surrounding
countryside and landscape character; the development is of an
appropriate scale, massing and external appearance and minimises visual
impact; and there will be no long-term impacts on the environmental
quality of the green belt. 
Page 53

Page 54

6.5  Policy 11 supports proposals for all forms of renewable, low-carbon and
zero emissions technologies. Policy 11 also states that development
proposals will only be supported where they maximise net economic
impact, including local and community socio-economic benefits such as
employment, associated business and supply chain opportunities. The
policy also lists impacts which must be addressed including residential
amenity, visual impact, noise and shadow flicker, impacts on road traffic
and on adjacent trunk roads, including during construction; and the quality
of site restoration plans including the measures in place to safeguard or
guarantee availability of finances to effectively implement those plans. 
6.6 Development proposals will be designed to improve the quality of an area
whether in urban or rural locations and regardless of scale as per Policy
14. Policy 20 states that development proposals that result in
fragmentation or net loss of existing blue and green infrastructure will only
be supported where it can be demonstrated that the proposal would not
result in or exacerbate a deficit in blue or green infrastructure provision,
and the overall integrity of the network will be maintained. The planning
authority’s Open Space Strategy should inform this. Green infrastructure is
defined as features or spaces within the natural and built environments
that provide a range of ecosystem services. An ecosystem services is the
benefits people obtain from ecosystems. 
6.7  Policy 23 relates to health and safety and states that development proposals
that are likely to raise unacceptable noise issues will not be supported. A
Noise Impact Assessment may be required where the nature of the proposal
or its location suggests that significant effects are likely. 
6.8  The matters relevant to the assessment against the above policies are
addressed in detail in Section 7 below. Based on that assessment, it is
concluded that the proposal is in accordance with NPF4. 
West Dunbartonshire Adopted Local Plan 2010 
6.9 The site of the proposed turbine is identified as Green Belt. Policy GB1
indicates a general presumption against development within the Green
Belt, other than in certain circumstances, including where there is a
specific locational requirement and established need for the development
and it cannot be accommodated on an alternative site. Development in the
Green Belt will not be permitted if it would have an adverse effect on the
landscape character of the area. 
6.10 All development is expected to be of a high quality of design and to respect
the character and amenity of the area in which it is located in accordance
with policy GD1. 
Page 54

Page 55

6.11 Policy E5 relates to development affecting trees. There are trees on site
which line the proposed access route. In accordance with policy E5 new
development proposed on sites with, or adjacent to, existing trees will be
assessed in accordance with best practice. Policy BE5 states that where
the presence of archaeology becomes apparent once development has
commenced, adequate opportunity must be afforded by the developer for
an archaeological investigation. 
6.12 The development takes access via a designated core path and as such
policy R5 applies. Policy R5 states that the Council will undertake to protect
Core Paths using the Council’s statutory powers. 
6.13 Policy DC6 states that renewable energy proposals will be permitted
where these would not give rise to unacceptable detriment to the
landscape, natural or build heritage, sport or recreation interests or local
amenity. Development proposals are to be considered against the
following criteria: 
• visual impact and effect on landscape character, including the
landscape character of the Kilpatrick Hills RSA;
• nature conservation interests;
• historic environment and its setting, including scheduled ancient
monuments;
• local amenity, including noise, traffic and broadcast interference;
• any cumulative impacts. 
6.14 Policy DC3 states that within the Glasgow Airport Safeguarding Zone,
development which adversely affects the operational integrity or safety of
the airport will not normally be permitted. 
6.15 Policy GN1 seeks to promote, protect and improve the Green Network. It
states that development which is detrimental to the green network will be
considered contrary to the Plan, and that new development should
contribute positively to the protection and improvement of the green
network. The Kilpatrick Hills are recognised as an important green network
resource in West Dunbartonshire owing to their landscape value, the
habitats and species found there and the outdoor recreation opportunities
they offer. Policy SUS1 states that all development should seek to
conserve and enhance environmental resources and ensure
environmental impact is minimised. 
6.16 Policy E3A states that the Council will seek to maintain and enhance the
environmental resources of the Plan area by protection of habitats,
species and natural features which are vulnerable and/or specifically
protected, including Local Nature Conservation Sites. It also states that
proposals should not have an adverse effect on the integrity or character
Page 55

Page 56

of Local Nature Conservation Sites and that satisfactory arrangement for
habitat creation/site enhancement elsewhere should be made to
compensate where development would cause the total or partial loss of a
Local Nature Conservation Site. The application is in close proximity to
Murroch Burn but is located outwith the Local Nature Conservation Site. 
6.17 The matters relevant to the assessment against the above policies are
addressed in detail in Section 7 below. It is concluded that the proposal is
in accordance with the Local Plan. 
7. ASSESSMENT AGAINST MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS 
West Dunbartonshire Local Development Plan (LDP2) Proposed Plan
7.1 On 15 March 2023, the Planning Committee took a decision that the
Council would not adopt Local Development Plan 2. The Proposed Local
Development Plan 2 (LDP2), incorporating the recommended
modifications of the Examination Report received on 22 April 2020, which
were accepted by the Planning Committee of 19 August 2020, remains the
Council’s most up to date spatial strategy and is therefore afforded
significant weight in the assessment and determination of planning
applications, subject to compatibility with NPF4. The Scottish Ministers’
Direction relating to the adoption of LDP2, dated 18 December 2020, is
also a material consideration. 
7.2 The proposed turbine does not trigger Policy RE2: Spatial Framework for
Wind Energy, and therefore requires to be assessed against Policy RE3,
which is supportive of wind energy proposals where it can be
demonstrated that there will be no unacceptable significant adverse
impacts on the local area and the wider landscape and where they avoid
unacceptable landscape, visual, aviation, infrastructure, cumulative and
residential impacts and unacceptable impacts on the built and natural
environment and do not have an adverse effect on a Natura 2000 site. 
7.3 Policy GB1 restricts development in the green belt to a limited number of
circumstances. These include development associated with agriculture,
horticulture and forestry, rural economic development and infrastructure
with a specific locational need. 
7.4  Any development proposed within the Kilpatrick Hills Local Landscape Area
must; protect and enhance the landscape character; protect and enhance
the integrated network of habitats and important geological features; and
protect and enhance the Hills as an accessible recreation resource in
accordance with policy KH1. 
Page 56

Page 57

7.5 Policy H4 of the LDP2 relates to residential amenity. The policy states that
the Council will protect, preserve and enhance the residential character
and amenity of existing residential areas at all times In this regard, there
will be a general presumption against the establishment of non-residential
uses within, or in close proximity to, residential areas which potentially
have detrimental effects on local amenity or which cause unacceptable
disturbance to local residents. 
7.6 Policy ENV2 relates to landscape character. Development proposals should
be sited and designed to relate to the local landscape character of the area
and ensure that the integrity of this landscape character is maintained and,
where appropriate, enhanced. Policy ENV4 relates to forestry, trees and
woodland. The loss or fragmentation of long established woodland, high
conservation value or areas covered by tree preservation orders will only be
supported where any significant adverse effects are clearly outweighed by
significant social or economic benefits. Policy ENV8 relates to air, light and
noise pollution. All new development must ensure that significant adverse
noise impacts on surrounding properties and uses are avoided. 
7.7 Policy CON3 is not supportive of development which disrupts or adversely
impacts on any existing or potential core path, right of way, bridle path, or
footpath, including off-path access rights, used by the general public for
recreational or other purposes. 
7.8  Policy BE1 states that unscheduled archaeological sites should be
preserved insitu where possible. Where not possible, provision should be
made by the developer to undertake the excavation, recording analysis,
publication and archiving of the archaeological remains. Development that
would adversely impact on the operations of Glasgow Airport or would be
adversely affected by aircraft noise will not be permitted in accordance with
Policy E7. 
7.9 Policy CP1 requires new development to take a design led approach to
creating sustainable places which puts the needs of people first and
demonstrate the six qualities of successful places. Policy CP2 requires all
development to demonstrate that green infrastructure has been integrated
into the design approach from the outset. 
7.10 The matters relevant to the assessment against the above policies are
addressed in detail below. It is concluded that the proposal is in accordance
with proposed Local Development Plan 2. 
Kilpatrick Hills Local Landscape Area – Statement of Importance
7.11 This Statement of Importance explains the reasons why the Kilpatrick Hills
have been selected for the designation. The special qualities of the
Kilpatrick Hills are identified as being:
Page 57

Page 58

• Strong sense of remoteness, wildness and open horizons;
• Distinctive geomorphology and topographical features; and
• A unique diversity of views. 
The impact of the proposed development on these special landscape
qualities of the Kilpatrick Hills is assessed below, and it is concluded that
the proposal would not significantly detract from the special qualities of the
Local Landscape Area. 
Renewable Energy Local Development Plan (Proposed Plan) Planning
Guidance November 2016
7.12 Whilst written in the context of proposed Local Development Plan 1
together with Scottish Planning Policy (SPP), both of which no longer form
a material consideration in the assessment of planning applications, much
of the general advice and guidance set out remains relevant in assessing
wind energy proposals. 
This document provides guidance on planning for wind energy including a
Spatial Framework and guidance on the factors that will be considered in
assessing wind energy proposals. The spatial framework applies to “wind
farms” which are defined by the Council as: 
• Any development containing a turbine of 50m and above to tip
height; or 
• Any development of 3 or more turbines, containing a turbine of
30m above to tip height. 
As this turbine is a single turbine and 43m to blade tip it falls under the
threshold for assessment under the spatial framework. 
7.13  It remains, however, that the document provides guidance on the
assessment of all proposals for wind energy. This includes considering
matters pertaining to landscape character, forestry and woodland, the
water environment, the path network, built heritage, aviation, residential
amenity in respect of noise, shadow flicker and visual intrusion, economic
benefit, contribution towards renewable energy targets, effect on soils,
impact on the road network and decommissioning. These matters are fully
assessed in detail below where it is concluded that, in taking into account
all material planning considerations, the wind turbine proposal is
acceptable. 
7.14 The guidance also highlights the expectation for all wind energy
applications to provide a community benefit. In this case, the proposed
turbine is indicated to have generating capacity of 250kw so any financial
amount will be small. 
Page 58

Page 59

However, the guidance does not have a minimum threshold and therefore
this is aspect is applicable and a financial contribution would be required if
the proposal is approved. 
Overall, it is considered that the proposal presents no conflict with the aims
of the guidance. 
Site Selection and Design
7.15 The application site was selected by the applicant as it was established to
benefit from an above average windspeed. Further operational
advantages include its proximity to a grid connection point and the
proximity off the A82 being relatively short without requiring extensive
works impacting the local road network. In terms of impacts on the
surrounding area, although the nearest settlement to the site (Bonhill) is
located only 440m away, the site is well screened from it by high ground
and trees. The 440m distance from residential properties is noted in
multiple objections as being too close due to Scottish Government
Guidance. However the guidance which notes 2km as being the
separation distance relates to wind farms and is also contained within
Scottish Planning Policy, which has been superseded by National
Planning Framework 4. 
7.16 The wind turbine is located in the green belt and requires to be justified
against Policy 8 of NPF4 and GB1 of both the adopted Plan and Proposed
Plan. Essential infrastructure is acceptable within the green belt with
reference to the above policies. Essential infrastructure includes all forms
of renewable energy generation. Therefore the wind turbine itself together
with the associated access, crane pad and sub-station would in principle
be acceptable. The design and height of the turbine would follow current
wind energy industry practice, and the turbine would be of the type widely
used elsewhere. The location of the proposed turbine has also been
selected in order to minimise its prominence. Due to the height of the
turbine, some views from sensitive locations such as the Loch Lomond
and the Trossachs National Park and Kilpatrick Hills are unavoidable but
not significant enough to be unacceptable. It is acknowledged that an
effort has been made by the applicant to minimise the impact of the
development on the landscape. 
Impact on Landscape Character
7.17 The proposed turbine would be located on the edge of the Kilpatrick Hills
which are designated as “Rugged Moorland Hill” Landscape Character
Type (LCT). The actual application site is on the boundary of the urban
area and the Rugged Moorland Hill LCT of the Kilpatrick Hills. The
Kilpatrick Hills have a distinctive upland character created by the
combination of elevation, exposure, rugged landform, moorland vegetation
and the predominant lack of modern development. 
Page 59

Page 60

These areas share a sense of apparent naturalness and remoteness
which contrasts strongly with the farmed and developed lowland areas.
The general aim should be to conserve the upland character of the
Rugged Moorland Hills and where possible, the visual influence of existing
developments should be reduced. New developments which would
introduce modern elements or which would undermine the sense of
`wildness' and remoteness should be resisted even though it is accepted
that these areas already contain tall structures such as pylons and
communications masts. Although this landscape can provide an essential
location for this type of infrastructure, the erection of certain structures can
lead to disproportionate levels of landscape impact, affecting the remote
character of the moorland hills. Additional masts and other tall structures
should be discouraged within the hills, with particular concerns relating to
wind development. It is therefore vital that developments which could have
a significant and adverse effect on the landscape character are resisted. 
7.18 In general, there is limited capacity to accommodate wind turbines within or
adjacent to the Rugged Moorland Hill LCT of the Kilpatrick Hills, particularly
in areas which are identified as Green Belt and which form part of the
landscape and recreational setting for the settlements which they surround.
In this instance however, the sloping ground and established tree coverage
would help to screen the site from surrounding areas. This tree cover would
also limit the visibility of the proposed access track. The proposed turbine
would be viewed from certain positions in the context of an urban area,
backclothed by the hills and woodland and importantly, it would not impact
upon the skyline or detract from the remoteness of the Kilpatrick Hills. On
this basis, it is considered that the wind turbine would not have a significant
impact on the landscape quality or the character of the Kilpatrick Hills and
surrounding area. This is a similar opinion taken when 2014 previous
application was assessed and approved. 
Designated Landscapes
7.19 Regional Scenic Areas/Local Landscape Areas are landscapes which
have been designated as of local importance by the relevant local
planning authority. Such designations seek to preserve a high quality
landscape and its natural character. The Regional Scenic Area/Local
Landscape Area most affected by this proposal is the Kilpatrick Hills
Regional Scenic Area/Local Landscape Area, which covers the area of the
Kilpatrick Hills located within the West Dunbartonshire Council area. The
wind turbine would be located in close proximity to the Kilpatrick Hills
Regional Scenic Area but within the more recently designated Local
Landscape Area. Whilst the site is readily visible from a wide area within
the Regional Scenic Area/Local Landscape Area the turbine would be
close to the urban edge where it would be seen against the backdrop of
other man-made development. 
Page 60

Page 61

When viewed from outwith the Regional Scenic Area/Local Landscape
Area it would normally be seen against a backdrop of rising land and it
would not break the skyline. Although it would introduce a large man-
made structure into the environment, the turbine would not be visually
dominant or would detract from the sense of remoteness and wildness
provided by the Kilpatrick Hills. The overall impact upon the Regional
Scenic Area/Local Landscape Area is therefore considered to be
acceptable. The turbine would be 4km from the southern boundary of
Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park. Whilst it would be visible from
some places within the National Park, it would be seen in the context of an
urban area, backclothed by the hills and woodland and would not impact
on the skyline of the Kilpatrick Hills which forms part of the setting of the
National Park. This was previously confirmed as part of the response to
the last planning application by the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National
Park Planning Authority in their consultation response. Since then, nothing
significant has changed in terms of changes to the landscape character to
arrive at a different opinion. There is also no change in the proposed
access track and this, together with the other infrastructure proposed
raises no concerns. 
Visual Impact
7.20 The information accompanying the application demonstrates that the wind
turbine would not be visible from most of the closest built up area (Bonhill)
because of the intervening high ground, but that it would be visible from
much of Dumbarton and from areas further afield such as Port Glasgow, at
distances of up to 10km. However, when viewed from distance, it would be
difficult to differentiate the turbine from the overall urban context due to the
proximity of the turbine to the built up area of Bonhill. Consequently, the
visual impact would be less significant from greater distance. Outwith
settlements, the wind turbine would be visible from much of the western
shore of Loch Lomond, the River Clyde and areas within the Kilpatrick Hills.
However, due to the distances involved and the size of the turbine, it will not
have a significant impact on the landscape from distance and therefore will
have an acceptable visual impact. 
7.21 The applicant has provided photomontages and wireframe drawings for
each of 20 previously agreed viewpoints, in accordance with the national
methodology for such visual modeling exercises. These photomontages
provide a representation of how the turbine might typically appear in clear
weather from representative and sensitive locations, although obviously
the appearance would vary according to weather conditions. The majority
of the viewpoints demonstrate that the turbine would not be visible or that
it would be seen at sufficient distance to have little impact on the
landscape. From the viewpoints at Auchiewannie Wood and Cardross
Road, the turbine would be visible to the rear/side of the settlement of
Bonhill. 
Page 61

Page 62

Further viewpoints at Auchenreoch Muir and the core path at Highdykes
Farm show the turbine appearing more dominant in views looking
south/south west. It is accepted that turbine development cannot take
place on this site without being visible from a large area, however the size
of turbine proposed is suitable for the location and will minimise any visual
impacts beyond 5km and the proposal is therefore acceptable. 
7.22 The landform behind the turbine provides a backdrop setting which would
ensure that from most viewpoints, the turbine would not breach the skyline
of the Kilpatrick Hills. Although the turbine is a total height of 43 m, the
location, size and setting of the turbine are such that it will not have a
detrimental visual impact on the Kilpatrick Hills regional scenic area or
significantly alter the local landscape. It is further considered, the access
track would not result in an adverse visual impact within the landscape. 
Residential Amenity
7.23 The proposed turbine would be located 440m from the edge of Bonhill, but
its impact would be minimal as between the proposed turbine and the
settlement is an area of plantation woodland and a further area of
woodland adjacent to the houses. This would provide adequate separation
in terms of both amenity and visual impact, ensuring that the turbine would
be adequately screened from the nearest residential properties. Whilst the
wind turbine may be visible from some urban areas further from the site,
such as Dumbarton and parts of Alexandria, it would be sufficiently distant
to avoid being visually dominant and therefore it would have an
acceptable impact. The proposed access track takes access from an
existing track which serves Highdykes Farm. It is visually separated from
the nearest residential neighbours by trees. As part of the operation of the
turbine there are minimal traffic movements proposed. As such the
proposed access road will not have an unacceptable impact to residential
amenity. 
Shadow Flicker
7.24 Shadow flicker is the flickering effect caused when rotating wind turbine
blade periodically cast shadows through constrained openings such as the
windows of neighboring properties. The distance at which shadow flicker
is created is accepted to be 10 times the rotor diameter. In this case the
rotor diameter is 26m and as such the distance would be 260m. The
closest property to the proposed wind turbine is 65B Broomhill Crescent,
notes at 447m away from the proposed turbine. The application also gives
scope for a 25m buffer for micro siting. This could mean the turbine could
be 422m away from 65B Broomhill Crescent, however this is still outwith
the 260m distance at which shadow flicker could be created. 
Page 62

Page 63

The Council’s Environmental Health Service have raised no objection in
this regard, although they nonetheless recommend a condition for any
granting of permission, requiring the site operator to investigate any
complaints and instigate appropriate mitigation measures in the event of
shadow flicker occurring. 
Noise & Air Quality
7.25 Turbines produce two distinct types of noise – the mechanical noise
produced by the machine and the aerodynamic noise produced by the
passage of the blades through the air. The “Assessment and Rating of
Noise from Wind Farms” (Final Report, Sept 1996, DTI), (ETSU-R-97)
provides a UK framework for the measurement of wind turbine noise,
including indicative noise levels deemed to be appropriate. Subsequent
UK government reports have concluded that there is no evidence of health
affects arising from infrasound or low frequency noise generated by
turbines. 
7.26 The supporting information predicts that the operation of the wind turbine is
capable of meeting ETSU-R-97 standards at the nearest properties, the
closest of which is 440m from the proposed turbine location. Hours of work
could be limited by condition to avoid disturbance during the construction
phase to nearby residential properties. The Council’s Environmental Health
Service has no objection to the proposal on noise grounds subject to
appropriate conditions. No issues have been raised in terms of air quality. 
Road Traffic Impact
7.27 As part of the proposal, an access track is proposed which joins the
existing farm track leading from Broomhill Crescent at the point before the
entrance to Highdykes Farm. As noted above, the construction of this
track has already commenced. The applicant has stated that this was
done as the access track was existing and was being upgraded. The
Traffic Management Plan submitted as part of the application states that
where practicable, material for the access track and hard standings will be
recycled material that is available on-site. Any additional material that is
required shall be sourced from a local quarry. As part of the “proposed”
access track already constructed on site, it is clear that recycled materials
have not been used. Deliveries have occurred from local quarries,
however, there appears to have been no co-ordination of or a structured
approach to deliveries which the objections highlight has caused
congestion on the residential roads with large delivery vehicles being
unable to pass on both the residential roads and the farm track. If the
application is approved, a robust condition regarding a delivery
management strategy for materials delivered on site would be required to
ensure that the further importation of material would be carefully managed
and to minimise the disruption to adjacent residential properties. 
Page 63

Page 64

The Council’s Roads Service have no objections to the proposal subject to
the implementation of the Traffic Management Plan. Comments raised in
objections regarding continuous traffic from a wood mill/sawmill/bio fuel
facility cannot be considered at this time due to the application not
including such details. The wind turbine and its construction is not
considered to be a large traffic generating use. Whilst concerns are raised
in respect of potential to damage to road surfaces, any damage that did
occur would be a matter to be addressed in conjunction with the Council’s
Roads Service. 
7.28 Once operational a wind turbine would generate negligible traffic, but the
size of the turbine components is such that delivery of the turbine to the
site can cause disruption due to oversized loads. Deliveries would be from
the south, off the A82, onto Stirling Road (A813) heading northbound and
then towards the Nobleston roundabout. From there any deliveries would
traverse onto residential roads to the south of the Bonhill area via
Beechwood Drive, Murroch Crescent and Broomhill Crescent before
moving onto the access track and onto the “proposed” access into the site.
The Traffic Management Plan states that from point 6
Redburn/Beechwood Drive measures would be required in order to
facilitate the deliveries of the wind turbine. For the duration of the journey
a support vehicle is recommended. At point 6, the open verges would
need to be used and a banksman and support vehicle. The same applies
for point 7 Beechwood Drive / Murroch Crescent. Once the turbine
delivery would reach point 8 Murroch Crescent/Broomhill Crescent the
previous measures as well as the clearing of parked cars is
recommended. At point 10, the alignment of the track is noted to be a
“concern”. It is indicated that the track would be required to be widened to
support load-bearing surface to the western edge. This track is not,
however, included within the applicant’s ownership or within the red line
boundary of the site. Accordingly, any works required to this track would
be a civil matter between the parties involved and if the works are to an
extent that planning permission is required, a separate application would
require to be brought forward in this circumstance. Point 11 is from the
“proposed” new access track which has been designed for the proposed
use. 
Impact on recreation, open space and the core path network
7.29 The development will not result in the loss of open space that has been
laid out with the purpose of providing amenity, an area of public access or
an area for countryside recreation. There is also no impact on any areas
of open space specifically identified on the Proposals Maps of the adopted
local plan or proposed local development plan. Consequently, it is not
considered that the proposal will adversely impact on open space or
countryside recreation or the sustainable access to such. 
Page 64

Page 65

7.30 The existing access track to Highdykes Farm which will provide access to
the application site is designated as a core path. Whilst this track will be
used to access the site and for deliveries during construction, overall the
impact on users of the core path will be minimal during construction and
following completion it is not considered there will be any discernible
impact. 
Cumulative Impacts
7.31 The proposal would be the first significant wind turbine to be located within
the West Dunbartonshire area, so there would be no localised cumulative
impacts. The proposed wind turbine is well separated from other wind
turbine development in neighbouring Council areas. 
Natural Heritage – Designated Sites/Peat and Soils/Habitats/Protected
Species/Ornithology
7.32 There are no site-specific statutory nature conservation designations
within the site and it is not considered that the proposal would have any
detrimental impact on any other designated sites. A Preliminary Ecological
Assessment (PEA) was submitted in support of the application. The
surveys included an extended Phase 1 habitat survey with protected
species walkover survey, which considered not only habitats and species
of plant present but also the potential presence of relevant European
Protected Species (Bats and Otters, Badgers, Water Voles and breeding
birds). It was concluded that in general, habitats and plant species were
common and typical of former agricultural land that has been planted up
with young deciduous woodland, with no notable species found. Habitats
and plant species are therefore not considered ecological constraints for
the proposed development. Bats, badgers, otters, water voles and
breeding birds were also considered not to be an ecological constraint in
the PEA. 
7.33 The consultation response from the RSPB notes that the site visit for the
PEA was carried out in mid-December 2022 (which is now outside the
recommended dates for protected species surveys). The conclusion that
there would be no impact on birds was based on a desktop study using
only freely available data rather than survey visits – and so no actual
survey work has taken place. The PEA states that if site preparation work
is to be undertaken between March and September that the presence of
breeding birds should be assessed by an ecologist prior to work
commencing on site. As it is an offence to disturb any active bird nest, any
granting of permission would require a condition relating to acceptable
months for working or further survey work to establish that there are no
breeding birds. The RSPB also note that the updated application mentions
NPF4 policies and concludes there will be no material impact on
biodiversity, including birds. 
Page 65

Page 66

Whilst the RSPB state that it is unclear how this can be assessed from the
data provided, they raise no specific concerns regarding potential impact
on any particular bird species, migratory routes, the general commuting
and foraging of birds within the locality or a concern regarding bird
collisions. No information is highlighted in respect of a need for specific
avoidance or mitigation in respect of birds. 
7.34 The Council’s Biodiversity Officer previously noted that no additional
species protection plans or follow up surveys were identified in the PEA.
The proposed mitigation includes following national guidelines and
standards for any tree/hedgerow retention, that best working practice
measures are adhered to safeguard otters and badgers, and a walkover
survey prior to works commencing within bird breeding season. If any otter
or badger-resting place is found then an ecologist will produce an otter
protection plan. It can therefore be concluded that the proposal will not
adversely impact upon protected species and it is appropriate that the pre-
start surveys and any required protection plans identified at this stage are
conditioned should the development proceed. Special Protection Area
(SPA) connectivity is not mentioned as an issue in the PEA. Annex 1 of
Nature Scot’s “Assessing the impact of small-scale wind energy proposals
on the natural heritage” guidance document considers SPA’s within a
20km connectivity zone to be relevant. Therefore, both Inner Clyde SPA
and Loch Lomond SPA should be considered. Greenland White - Fronted
Goose is the relevant species to be considered and has a core foraging
range of 5-8km. The Loch Lomond SPA is around 10km from the
proposed development site and therefore falls out with requirement for
further assessment. The Carbon and Peatland 2016 map shows the site
area to not be within an area of peatland. Whilst acknowledging the points
highlighted in the consultation response from the RSPB, having fully
considered the impact upon ecology, and informed by the consultation
response from the Council’s Biodiversity Officer, subject to condition, the
impacts of the development upon designated sites, peat and soils,
habitats, protected species and ornithology are all considered acceptable. 
Hydrological & Hydrogeological Impact
7.35 The Supporting Statement provided as part of the application states that
the site has no watercourses within it, and it is not anticipated that the
development would impact significantly upon any water course or local
groundwater. During site visits, it was noted that the access road (being
constructed without the benefit of planning permission) crossed a small
drainage ditch and the road thus included a small section of pipe at this
location. No concerns arise from this arrangement and no wider issues are
considered to arise in this respect. 
Page 66

Page 67

Historic Environment Impacts
7.36 No historic buildings or monuments are located within the site. There are a
number of monuments in the vicinity of the site, although there would be
no direct impact on these from construction or operation of the wind
turbine. In regard to archaeology, WoSAS have no objection however the
implementation of an archaeological watching brief would be required prior
to the commencement of any development on site. 
Renewable Energy Targets
7.37 Scotland’s long-term climate change targets will require the near-complete
decarbonisation of the energy system by 2050, with renewable energy
meeting a significant share of the need. The Scottish energy strategy sets
a 2030 target for the equivalent of 50% of the energy for Scotland’s heat,
transport and electricity consumption to be supplied by renewable
sources. This approach is supported via NPF4’s just transition spatial
principle that seeks to empower people to shape their places and ensure
the transition to net zero is fair and inclusive. 
Economic Impact
7.38 The proposed development would have minimal impact on the potential
use of the wider area for grazing or forestry whilst the construction of the
wind turbine would provide some short-term employment during
construction. In the longer term, once completed and operational, there
would be a requirement for site maintenance, although it is acknowledged
this would likely be minimal. It is not considered that the proposed wind
turbine would have any impact on tourism within West Dunbartonshire or
neighbouring areas. It is therefore considered that whilst any development
of this nature will have a positive impact, the scale of the development
would result in the long-term economic benefits being negligible. 
Community Benefit
7.39 The Council’s Renewable Energy Planning Guidance (2016) states that in
line with Scottish Government guidance, the Council expects all wind
energy applicants to provide a community benefit of a minimum £5,000
per MW of installed capacity. This would be payable annually and would
increase relative to the Retail Price Index. The contribution is expected
from all wind energy developments. As such it is recommended that
should the application be granted, a legal agreement should be put in
place to address the community benefit contribution. 
Aviation Safety
7.40 NATS and Glasgow Airport have no objections in terms of airport
safeguarding. 
Page 67

Page 68

Decommissioning
7.41 Should permission be granted, there would be a requirement for
decommissioning and site restoration. A legal agreement to ensure that a
suitable financial bond is put in place to cover restoration liabilities for the
site would be required. Site restoration would be triggered by either the
expiry of any permission or if the project ceased to operate for a specific
period of time. 
Matters raised in objections
7.42 A wide range of matters were raised in the objections received, many of
which are already addressed as part of the main assessment set out above.
Multiple objections question what the energy is to be used for and that no
grid connection has been shown. A lack of grid connection, however, can
be done via a separate consenting process where required. 
7.43 The availability of the turbine type which has been applied for has been
brought into question. However, the application notes that the final choice
of the wind turbine will be dependent upon availability. Conditions
associated to any granting of permission would ensure that the impact of
any turbine would remain the same. 
7.44  Alternative locations for the proposal have been suggested, however the
applicant has stated that this is a good site for wind energy creation due to
wind speeds and the application requires to be assessed on its own merits.
It is contended that the applicant has indicated to residents that he intends
to produce bio fuel. The application form and supporting documents do not
indicate this and the Planning Authority can only assess the submitted
proposal. Matters relating to traffic and the road have been assessed above. 
7.45 Whilst there has been some removal or trees and hedgerows these are not
protected and the extent of the removal undertaken is in any case limited.
Matters raised in respect of the Council objective for Natural & Semi Natural
Green Space and the impact on the green belt are assessed above. 
7.46  One objector states that West Dunbartonshire Council’s Open Space
Strategy 2011 states that planning authorities are expected to support,
protect and enhance open space and opportunities for sport and
recreation. As set out in the assessment above, the development proposal
will not impact upon or result in the loss of open space that has been laid
out with the purpose of providing amenity, an area of public access or an
area for countryside recreation. 
7.47 Any perceived impact upon property values is not a material planning
consideration. Finally, the applicant non-attendance at the local residents
meeting has been brought into question. As this is not a procedural
requirement for the application, it is not a material planning consideration.
Page 68

Page 69

8. CONCLUSION 
8.1 The proposed wind turbine complies with both the adopted and proposed
local plans as well as NPF4. The sloping landscape and urban character
in the vicinity of the site mitigates against the visual impact of the turbine
on the Kilpatrick Hills or the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National
Park and there would be no adverse cumulative impacts. The distance
from the nearest residential property and intervening tree coverage is
sufficient to ensure that there would be no unacceptable impact on
residential properties. A legal agreement would ensure that a suitable
financial bond is put in place to cover future restoration liabilities for the
site and community benefit would also require to be addressed in a similar
way. Previously planning permission was granted for the erection of a
wind turbine of the same size, as well as the associated access track on
this site in 2015, although the decision notice was never issued and the
application subsequently withdrawn. 
8.2 Planning application DC22/190/FUL was refused due to the concern
regarding the proposed agricultural shed. By removing the proposed
agricultural shed, this current proposal addresses the concerns raised in
2023 refusal. 
8.3 Overall, the proposed development would allow the erection of a wind
turbine which would be appropriately sited, have no unacceptable impacts
and would contribute to renewable energy targets. 
9. CONDITIONS 
1. The planning permission for the wind turbine hereby granted shall be for a
maximum period of 25 years and 6 months from the date of the
permission. This period consists of a 25 year period of operation of the
turbine followed by a 6 month period for removal of the turbine, ancillary
equipment, associated hard standing and access track and restoration of
the site to its former condition, or other such condition as agreed in writing
as acceptable to the Planning Authority in accordance with the terms of
Condition 6 below. 
2. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, should the
turbine cease to generate electricity for a continuous period of 6 months,
the turbine, ancillary equipment, associated hard standing and access track
shall be removed. Restoration of the site to its former condition, or other
such condition as agreed in writing as acceptable to the Planning Authority
in accordance with the terms of Condition 6 below, shall thereafter take
place within 6 months. 
Page 69

Page 70

3. All external colours of the turbine and associated equipment cabinet shall
be agreed with the Planning Authority prior to the commencement of works
and shall be implemented as approved. 
4. No turbine, transformer building or any other above ground infrastructure
shall be illuminated or display any name, logo, sign or advertisement (other
than health and safety signage) unless and until otherwise approved in
writing by the Planning Authority. 
5. Within one year of the date of this consent, the turbine operator shall
submit an Outline Decommissioning, Restoration and Aftercare Scheme
(the Outline Decommissioning Scheme) for the Turbine development, for
the written approval of Planning Authority. The Outline Decommissioning
Scheme shall include (but not necessarily be limited to) details of: 
a) Works for the decommissioning and removal of the turbine (together
with the foundations to a depth of at least one meter) and all above
ground ancillary infrastructure and equipment; 
b) The treatment of any ground surfaces including access tracks, hard-
standing areas and any sub-surface elements including cabling to
restore the site to its former condition, or other such condition as is
agreed in writing by the Planning Authority; 
c) Environmental management provisions, including waste management; 
d) A decommissioning timetable; 
e) Appropriate aftercare following site restoration; and 
f) How and when the Outline Decommissioning Scheme will be reviewed
during the operational life of the development. 
The approved Outline Decommissioning Scheme shall be implemented as
approved, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. 
6. No later than 12 months prior to the decommissioning of the development,
or the expiration of the 25 year period of operation (whichever is earlier), a
detailed Decommissioning, Restoration and Aftercare Scheme, which
takes account of the latest version of the Outline Decommissioning
Scheme (approved under Condition 5) and which also takes into account
of the current best environmental practice, shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
The development shall be decommission, the site restored and aftercare
thereafter in accordance with the scheme approved as part of this
condition, unless otherwise agreed in writing in advance by the Planning
Authority. 
7. Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, if the wind
turbine fails to generate electricity for a continuous period of 12 months,
Page 70

Page 71

the turbine shall be deemed to have ceased to be required, and a scheme
that takes cognizance of Condition 6, setting out how the wind turbine and
associated infrastructure will be removed from the site, the ground
restored and aftercare carried out, shall be submitted for the written
approval of the Planning Authority no later than one month after the date
of the expiry of the 6 months. 
The scheme approved shall be implemented within 12 months of the date
of its approval. 
8. In order to ensure compliance with Condition 7, the wind turbine operator
shall submit 12 monthly generation and output figures to the Planning
Authority to evidence that the turbine is continuing to generate electricity
and the 12 monthly reporting cycle shall commence from the date the
turbine is commissioned (turned on). 
9. Notwithstanding the approved plans, all recommendations within the
Preliminary Ecological Appraisal dated December 2022 shall be followed
to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 
10. That prior to works commencing on site a traffic management plan
indicating the proposals for the construction and delivery of the turbine and
all associated construction material shall be submitted to the Planning
Authority for their written approval, and shall thereafter be implemented as
approved. The statement shall include the following information: 
a)  The intended turbine transportation route including swept path
analysis, timings and methodology.
b)  All temporary works including relocation of signs, guardrails,
bollards, street furniture and all temporary measures.
c)  Any alteration to the public road network.
d)  Details of the construction compound including staff car parking.
e)  Details of proposed signage during the delivery and construction
period.
f)  Any necessary mitigation.
g)  Details of the type, weight, frequency and number of delivery and
construction vehicles inclusive of those delivering all associated
construction materials, for example, hardcore and associated
tonnage.
h)  Details of wheel washing facilities.
i) A condition report based on a joint survey of the proposed route to
ensure that all temporary alterations and any damage to the road
network are made good. 
11. No development shall take place within the development site until the
developer has secured the implementation of an archaeological watching
Page 71

Page 72

brief, to be carried out by an archaeological organisation acceptable to the
Planning Authority, during all ground disturbance. The retained
archaeological organisation shall be afforded access at all reasonable
times and allowed to record, recover and report items or interest and finds.
A method statement for the watching brief shall be submitted by the
applicant and agreed in writing with the Planning Authority in consultation
with the West of Scotland Archology Service prior to the commencement
of the watching brief. 
The name of the archaeological organisation retained by the developer
shall be given the Planning Authority in writing prior to any works on site. 
12. Prior to the commencement of development full details of the surface
water drainage system shall be submitted for the written approval of the
Planning Authority and shall be implemented as approved prior to the
occupation of the building. The drainage system shall incorporate the
principles of Sustainable Drainage Systems within its design, and shall
thereafter be implemented as approved. 
13. In accordance with ETSU- R- 97 (Simplified Method) the noise from the
wind turbine shall not exceed an LA90(10min) of 35dB at the boundary of
the curtilage of any noise sensitive premises at all times at wind speeds of
up to 10 metres per second at 10m height as measured within the site. 
14. Prior to the installation of the turbine, the developer shall submit a report
for approval by the Planning Authority which demonstrates compliance
with the noise limits in Condition 13 above. The report shall be prepared in
accordance with reference to the Institute of Acoustics Good Practice
Guide to the Application of ETSU-R-97 and associated supplementary
guidance notes. 
15. Prior to the installation of the turbine, the applicant shall provide written
confirmation to the Planning Authority that the noise from turbine operation
will be broad-band with no discernible tonal characteristics. 
16. Within 14 days from the receipt of a written request from the Planning
Authority or following a complaint to the Planning Authority from the
occupant of a dwelling regarding noise from the wind turbine operation,
the wind turbine operator shall, at the wind turbine operator’s expense,
employ an independent consultant approved by the Planning Authority to
assess the level of noise emissions from the wind turbine at the
complainant’s property following procedures to be agreed with the
Planning Authority. The wind turbine operator shall provide to the Planning
Authority the independent consultant’s assessment and conclusions
regarding the said noise complaint, including all calculations, audio
recordings and the raw data upon which those assessments and
Page 72

Page 73

conclusions are based. Such information shall be provided within 28 days
of the date of the written request of the Planning Authority unless
otherwise extended in writing by the Planning Authority. The wind turbine
operator shall take such remedial action as required by the Planning
Authority. 
17. Wind speed, wind direction and power generation data shall be
continuously logged and provided to the Planning Authority in a format to
be agreed at its request and within 28 days of such a request. Such data
shall be retained by the operator for a period of not less than 12 months. 
18. No development shall commence  on site until details of a nominated
person have been submitted in writing to the Planning Authority for the
development who will act as a point of contact for local residents (in
connection with conditions 13 - 17), together with the arrangements for
notifying and approving any subsequent change in the nominated
representative. The nominated representative shall have responsibility for
liaison with the Planning Authority in connection with any noise complaints
made during the construction, operation and decommissioning of the wind
turbines. 
19. During the period of construction, all works and ancillary operations
(including piling) which are audible at the site boundary (or at such other
place(s) as may first be agreed in writing with the Planning Authority),
shall be carried out between the following hours unless otherwise
approved in writing by the Planning Authority: 
Mondays to Fridays:   0800-1800 
Saturday:     0800-1300 
Sundays and public holidays:  No working 
20. During the period of construction no delivery or removal of material from
the site shall take place outwith the hours of 8am to 6pm Mondays to
Fridays and 8am to 1pm on Saturdays, and not at all on Sundays or Public
Holidays unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
21. The applicant shall ensure that all works carried out on site are carried out
in accordance with the current BS5228, 'Noise control on construction and
open sites'. No further development shall commence on site until such
time as a noise control method statement for the construction period has
been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. This
statement shall identify likely sources of noise (including specific noisy
operations and items of plant/machinery), the anticipated duration of any
particularly noisy phases of the construction works, and details of the
proposed means of limiting the impact of these noise sources upon nearby
residential properties and other noise-sensitive properties. The
Page 73

Page 74

construction works shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the
approved method statement unless otherwise approved in writing by the
Planning Authority. 
22. Before any further plant and machinery is used on the premises it shall be
enclosed with sound insulating material in accordance with a scheme
which shall first be approved in writing by the Planning Authority. The
sound insulation measures shall thereafter be retained. 
23. Within 14 days from the receipt of a written request from the Planning
Authority or following a complaint to the Planning Authority following a
complaint alleging shadow flicker nuisance, the wind turbine operator shall
at the wind turbine operator’s expense: 
a) Employ an independent consultant approved by the Planning Authority
to assess the conditions likely to be causing the incidences of shadow
flicker to which the complaint relates.
b) Within 28 days of receipt of the written request from the Planning
Authority, the wind turbine operator shall submit to the Planning
Authority, the independent consultant’s report on shadow flicker,
detailing any amendments to the operation of the wind turbine
necessary to mitigate any further incidences of shadow flicker, for the
written approval of the Planning Authority. The turbine shall thereafter
operate in accordance with the amendments to operation as approved. 
24. Notwithstanding the approved plans, and prior to any works on site, a
further submission which demonstrates an understanding on how the
proposal enhances biodiversity beyond the current baseline shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. All
measures shall then be implemented as approved. 
Page 74

Page 75

Pamela Clifford 
Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health Manager 
Date: 14th February 2024 
Person to Contact: Pamela Clifford, Planning & Building Standards
Manager 
Email: Pamela.Clifford@west-dunbarton.gov.uk   
James McColl, Development Management Team
Leader 
Email: James.McColl@west-dunbarton.gov.uk  
Appendix: Location Plan   
Background Papers: 1.  Application forms and plans 
2.  Consultation responses 
3.  Representations 
4.  National Planning Framework 4 
5.  West Dunbartonshire Local Plan 2010 
6.  Proposed West Dunbartonshire Local
Development Plan 2 2020, as amended 
7.  Kilpatrick Hills Local Landscape Area Statement
of Importance 
8.  Renewable Energy Local Development Plan
(Proposed Plan) Planning Guidance November
2016   
Wards affected: Ward 3 (Dumbarton) 
Page 75

Page 76

¯
Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. (C) Crown copyright and database right 01/02/2024.
All rights reserved. West Dunbartonshire OS Licence Number 100020790.
Scale: 1:2,500@A401/02/2024
DC23/177/FUL - MapWest Dunbartonshire
Council
16 Church Street
Dumbarton
G82 1QL
ITEM 6 - APPENDIX 2
Page 76