Democracy Spraffa

Item 7 - Appendix 1

West Dunbartonshire Council · 14 February 2024
Back to Planning Committee — 14 February 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance
1
1. Introduction
Clydebank Business Park is an area designated primarily for business, general
industry, and storage and distribution uses, however the Council has and continues
to receive interest from more diverse range of uses to locate within Clydebank
Business Park. Planning applications and enquiries have been received for the
change of use of existing premises to uses such as nurseries, soft play,
gymnasiums, and dog grooming and training premises. This has raised issues about
whether these are suitable uses to locate within a business/industrial area in terms of
their impact on existing uses and the impact on the availability of property for
industrial and business uses.
This document offers additional guidance on how the Council’s Local Development
Plan (LDP2, as modified 2020) should be applied when considering proposals for
such uses. It will assist the Council in determining applications and will also provide
greater certainty to potential applicants. It also takes account of the Fourth National
Planning Framework (NPF4).
2. Alternative Uses: Defining the Issue
This Guidance uses the term ‘industrial/business uses’ to refer to the following uses
from the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Scotland) Order 1997:
Use Class 4 – Business
Use Class 5 – General Industry
Use Class 6 – Storage and Distribution
This guidance uses the term ‘residential/accommodation uses’ to refer to:
Use Class 7- Hotels and Hostels
Use Class 8 & 8A - Residential Institutions and Secure Residential Institutions, e.g.
nursing home, hospital, prison
Use Class 9 – Houses
Sui Generis flats and student accommodation
All other uses will be referred to as ‘alternative employment uses’.
3. Clydebank Business Park
Clydebank Business Park was built on part of the site of the former Singer Sewing
Machine factory which closed in 1980. The site was identified as an Enterprise Zone
in 1981 and the Business Park developed to provide industrial and business
accommodation.
It is located centrally within Clydebank, adjacent to the town centre and Clyde
Shopping Centre. It is easily accessible by public transport with Singer rail station
sitting immediately adjacent to the north, and Clydebank rail station within walking
distance to the south. A frequent bus service runs along Kilbowie Road at the
ITEM 7 - APPENDIX 1

Page 2

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance
2
eastern entrance to the Business Park, with more services available within walking
distance from locations within the town centre.
Road access is also good with Kilbowie Road linking to the A82 and A814 which
provide access to the rest of Clydebank and the West Dunbartonshire area, Glasgow
City Centre and via the Erskine Bridge and Clyde Tunnel to the wider trunk road
network. 
Map 1 Clydebank Business Park location and transport links
The Business Park is predominantly occupied by Business (Use Class 4), General
Industry (Use Class 5) and Storage and Distribution (Use Class 6) uses. Business
types range from small local businesses to national and international organisations
such as the Clydesdale Bank and Northern Marine. Business units range in size from
under 100sq.m up to 8,000 sq.m.
The Business Park is in multiple ownership, with business units and common areas
in different private ownerships. The Council does not own or manage property within
the Business Park.
4. Policy context
Policy 26 of NPF4 describes the type of development that is acceptable in on land
allocated for business and industry uses. Part c) of the policy states: “Development
proposals for business and industry uses will be supported where they are

Page 3

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance
3
compatible with the primary business function of the area. Other employment uses
will be supported where they will not prejudice the primary function of the area and
are compatible with the business/industrial character of the area.” 
Policy E1 of LDP2 designates the Business Park as an existing business and
industrial area and directs development in Use Class 4, 5 and 6 to these areas.
Policy E2 is intended to manage the level and type of alternative employment uses
within business and industrial areas. Proposals for alternative uses will be assessed
with regard to the following criteria in E2:
a) There is no adverse impact on the operation of existing uses or the
potential for future business, industrial or employment use within the area;
b) The proposal protects and enhances the attractiveness of the area as an
industrial and business location;
c) The proposal is ancillary to the industrial and business uses;
d) There is no unacceptable detrimental impact on the availability of
employment land; and
e) The economic benefit that the proposal can bring to the area is
demonstrated.
Policy 27 of NPF4 also identifies town centres as the preferred location for uses
attracting significant number of people including retail and commercial leisure,
offices, and community, sport, cultural facilities and public buildings. 
Policy SC1 of LDP2 (and the accompanying Table 4) states that town centres are
the preferred location for new leisure uses. The Plan’s strategy for Clydebank town
centre includes support for strengthening and diversifying the town centres role as a
hub for retail, leisure, cultural, civic, and office uses.
5. Current situation
Alternative uses
The predominant existing uses within the Business Park are industrial and business
(Use Classes 4/5/6). However a number of non-industrial/business uses have been
established including a café, dog care/training service, sport/fitness uses, children’s
nursery and a soft play centre.  Table 1 and Map 2 show the number and spread of
these non-industrial uses.
Table 1 Breakdown of alternative uses
Use Count of
Premises
Percentage
of
premises
1A – Shops and
professional services 5 4%
3 - Food and Drink 1 1%
4 - Business 70 59%

Page 4

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
4
Use Count of
Premises
Percentage
of
premises
5 - General Industry 9 8%
6 - Storage and
Distribution 2 2%
8 - Residential
Institutions 1 1%
10 - Non-residential
Institutions 1 1%
11 - Assembly and
Leisure 7 6%
Sui Generis 9 8%
Vacant 14 12%
Total 118 
Of the nine sui generis uses, four are dog grooming or dog day care businesses, two
are vehicle hire, one is a taxi office, one is the ambulance depot, and one is a car
storage and appointment only showroom. 
Map 2 Use Classes in Clydebank Business Park
Unit sizes and vacancies
There are a range of different unit types and sizes in the Business Park. Table 2
identifies the number of units available within different size bands. Vacancies exist in
greatest number and at the highest rate in the 150-250 sq.m size band and the
highest vacancy rate is within the 250 – 800sq.m size band. Vacancies exist in all

Page 5

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
5
the other size bands but in less number and not as high a rate. Vacancies are
spread throughout the business park 
Table 2 Breakdown of unit sizes (February 2023)
Size band
(sq.m)
No of
units
Vacant
unit
Vacancy
rate
<150 22 3 14%
150 - 250 42 5 12%
250 - 800 18 4 22%
800 - 1500 16 1 6%
>1500 20 1 5%
Total 118 14 12% 
Floorspace information was unavailable for four units. When compared to the floor
space of similar size, three of these buildings likely exceed 1000 square meters and
one most likely falls within the 100 – 499 square meter size bracket. Additionally,
office buildings that are subdivided into different floor space areas which are then let
are counted as one premises. They are counted as occupied here, but there was
some vacant floor space during the survey, evidenced by advertisements for office
space available to let.
Overall there is a higher level of occupancy in the business park in 2023 than the
previous survey in 2016. 
6. Research
Survey of Business Park businesses
The Council undertook a survey of Clydebank Business Park businesses in April
2023, to update the previous survey undertaken in September 2016. This involved
an online questionnaire, with a letter delivered to all businesses in the business park
advising of its availability and purpose. Responses were received from seven
businesses and four employees. The survey results provide information on the
attitude of existing Clydebank Business Park businesses towards alternative uses
and vacancies within the Business Park. Full details of the survey and the results are
set out in Appendix 1 – Online Questionnaire for Clydebank Business Park. Some
headline findings are included below. These results were also compared to previous
survey results to indicate any changes in attitude towards alternative employment
uses. 
Alternative uses
• Overall, alternative uses were generally seen to provide convenient services for
businesses and employees, with the exception of residential, which was not
seen to provide useful services to the business park. Hotels had a mixed

Page 6

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
6
response to this question, with most respondents being neutral on them, and
roughly even positive and negative responses.
• Alternative uses were generally not seen to detract from the character of the
business park. Residential and hotels received a more mixed response to this
question, with responses to residential uses leaning towards that they would
detract from the character.
• There was general agreement that alternative uses helped fill vacant units.
• There were some mixed views on whether alternative uses caused traffic
conflicts, but generally that they did not was the most common response. The
exceptions to this were hotels, retail and residential, where more respondents
strongly agreed that they did cause traffic conflicts with existing businesses.
• There were mixed views as to whether there were other operational conflicts
cause by alternative uses. Overall it was generally considered that child related
uses did not cause conflict, but this was not unanimous. Opinions on hotels, pet
grooming and day care, and residential were split roughly evenly, both in favour
and against.
• It was generally agreed that alternative uses contributed to a lively and active
business park, with the exception of hotels and residential which received more
mixed views. 
Vacancies
• The majority of respondents agreed or strongly agreed that vacant units detract
from the character of the business park, attract anti-social behaviour and
vandalism and present a negative image to customers and clients. 
Other Issues
• On street parking is causing difficulty for other road traffic.
• There was a request for businesses to have industrial bins
Conclusions from survey
The survey indicates a majority opinion within existing businesses in favour of
alternative employment uses within the Business Park and support for vacancies to
be addressed. There are concerns around on-road parking within the Business Park,
although this is not specifically connected to alternative uses. 
Accessibility
NPF4 and LDP2 require development proposals to demonstrate they are accessible
by active travel and public transport. Map 3 shows the majority of the Business Park
is within 800 metres (approximately 10 minutes walk) of nearby train stations
(Singer, which is immediately adjacent, Clydebank, and Dalmuir stations) and that
there are numerous bus stops on the surrounding roads and streets, including at the
main entrance on Kilbowie Road.

Page 7

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
7
Map 3 Accessibility to public transport

Page 8

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
8
7. Application of NPF4 Policies and Local Development Plan Policy
E2 criteria 
Alternative employment uses will be supported in the area from the eastern entrance
to the business park up to Symington Drive, as shown on Map 4. The reasons for
this are: 
• to ensure the business park is primarily for meeting the demand for use
classes 4, 5, and 6, aligning with NPF4 Policy 26 and LDP2 Policy E2;
• the area is adjacent to the Town Centre and so the next sequentially preferred
location if there are not suitable premises in the Town Centre or Commercial
Centres for the proposed use, following NPF4 Policy 27;
• the area is within easy walking distance of public transport, encouraging
sustainable access, following NPF4 Policy 13;
Further details on application of each of these policies, and possible exceptions are
described below. Figure 1 contains a flow chart to provide an overview of how the
council will assess if an alternative use may or may not be supported, but other
considerations may be material. 
Map 4 Area identified for the location of non-industrial/business uses

Page 9

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
9
NPF4 Policy 26
The primary use of Clydebank Business Park is industry and business. Alternative
uses will need to demonstrate that they are compatible with existing business and
industrial uses in the business park. The council will use the criteria in Policy E2 of
LDP2 in order to determine compatibility.
NPF4 Policy 27
Taking the town centre first approach, Clydebank town centre is the preferred
location for town centre uses (as defined in the development plan) that attract
significant footfall, followed by Clyde Retail Park and Kilbowie Retail Park. Where
relevant, applicants for alternative employment uses within the Business Park should
demonstrate through a Town Centre First Assessment that they have considered
available premises within Clydebank town centre and retail parks. 
In some circumstances it is accepted that premises within Clydebank town centre
and its commercial centres may not be suitable for alternative uses, and cognisance
will be given to the operational requirements of the proposed use with regard to
physical requirements and hours of operation that may not make it suitable for a
town/commercial centre location.
LDP2 Policy E2
a. Will there be adverse impacts on the operation of existing uses or the
potential for future business, industrial or employment use within the area?
The Council shares the view of the majority of respondents that alternative
employment uses have limited impact on the operations of existing businesses. 
Therefore, where an application is within the area outlined in map 4, and meets the
other considerations set out in this guidance, only where there is clear evidence that
there would be an adverse impact on an existing industrial/business use, would an
alternative use be refused. However, the Council does have concerns about the
safety of users of alternative employment uses within industrial/business areas,
particularly of child-focused uses, and survey evidence suggests that there is a
general concern with regards to parking in the Business Park, particularly on-road
parking. Therefore the safety of the staff and customers of proposed alternative uses
will be a consideration, as will the impact on the operations and safety of staff and
customers of adjacent businesses.
Proposals should prioritise, sustainable travel, with suitable, safe walking route to the
unit from public transport stops demonstrated. This includes ensuring accessibility
for people with disabilities.
Any traffic impacts and parking requirements should be discussed and agreed with
the Council. Consideration will be given to the need for parking in close proximity to
the unit to avoid traffic conflict. Where parking areas are shared with other uses,
different hours of operation will be a consideration.

Page 10

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
10 
The survey showed the number of dog care, grooming, and training premises within
the park has increased. Further proposals for these or similar uses will be required to
demonstrate how animals will be kept securely and that any outdoor space
dedicated to animals will adjoined and accessed through the unit occupied by the
business.
The impact from the overall level of alternative employment uses within the business
park on the operation, suitability of existing industrial and business uses will be a
consideration. The primary purpose of this Business Park for industrial/business use
will remain
The council will not support residential/accommodation uses in the business park as
this would not conform to the character of the business park.  The operation of
existing buildings would likely conflict with residential/accommodation amenity.
b. will the proposal protect and enhance the attractiveness of the area as an
industrial or business location?
The evidence does not suggest alternative employment uses have a detrimental
impact on the suitability of an area’s future for industrial/business development and
that filling vacant units has a positive effect on the attractiveness of the business
park. However, a consideration will be the impact of any particular alternative use, or
cluster of alternative uses on the quality and character of the Business Park.
c. Is the proposal ancillary to the industrial and business use of the area?
Alternative employment uses that are primarily aimed at servicing businesses or
employees operating and working within the business park will be considered
favourably.  In particular, retail (and other class 1A uses) and food and drink uses
should not exceed 250sq.m.
Uses ancillary to a business that is primarily use class 4, 5, or 6 outside of the area
defined on Map 4 may be acceptable, provided that the main activity of the business
falls within use classes 4, 5, or 6. The applicant must demonstrate that this ancillary
uses will not attract a significant level of footfall.
d. Will there be a detrimental impact on the availability of employment land?
The Council will seek to retain a supply of units for Use Class 4, 5 and 6 uses in
preference to other uses. Therefore, the Council will not support an alternative use in
any unit that would result in there being no vacant units remaining in any of the size
bands identified in Table 2.
e. Is the economic benefit the proposal will bring to the area demonstrable?
There is a strong preference for vacant units to be occupied as they detract from the
character of the Business Park. Therefore the occupation of a vacant unit by an

Page 11

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
11 
alternative employment use will be viewed positively within the area defined in Map 4
for these uses and where they meet other relevant policy criteria.

Page 12

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
12 
Figure 1 Flow chart indicating if a proposed alternative use may be appropriate.

Page 13

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
13 
Appendix 1 – Online Questionnaire for Clydebank Business Park 
The purpose of this survey was to gain the views of business managers, owners and
employees within the business park regarding non-business, industry, and storage
and distribution uses within the business park.
The survey was distributed in April 2023 with respondents given a month to reply to
each business in the park. Letters explaining the purpose of the survey, with a link
and QR code to the survey were delivered to businesses. Where possible they were
handed directly to a manager or employee of the business. Where this was not
possible it was posted through the door or into a mail box. 
Where applicable responses were compared to the previous survey, which was part
of preparing the original 2017 guidance. It should be noted that the previous survey
did not ask questions on pet grooming and day care services, retail uses, or
residential uses, so any comparison does not refer to these uses.
Definitions
• Adults Sports/ fitness – Use class 11 premises focussed adult fitness, such as
gyms and personal training
• Child fitness/sports – Use class 11 premises focussed on activities and fitness
for children, such as dance studios, and gymnastics
• Child focused leisure – Use class 11 premises focussed on leisure for
children, such as soft play.
• Child care/education – Use class 10 for child care, such as crèche and
nurseries. 
• Food and Drink – Use class 3 and Sui Generis hot food takeaways.
• Hotels – Use class 7.
• Retail – Use class 1
• Pet grooming/ day care Residential – premises for pet grooming and day
care services
• Residential – residential uses, including institutions such as care homes and
student accommodation.
Number and Type of Respondents
There were a total of 11 respondents to the survey. Respondents were asked if they
were responding on behalf of a business or as an employee. Seven responses were
on behalf of a business as the manager or owner which represents a 4% response
rate from businesses. The remaining four responses were from people who identified
as employees.

Page 14

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
14 
Alternative uses provide convenient services for businesses and employees 
The majority of respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that sports and fitness
(for adults and children), child focussed leisure, child care and education, and food
and drink provided convenient services to the businesses and employees. For hotels
the largest response was neutral, and overall there was slightly more disagreement
than agreement that they provided a convenient service. Retail was generally
considered to provide a convenient service, as was pet grooming and day care.
Residential had the strongest negative response of all the listed uses, with only one
respondent strongly agreeing they provide a convenient service and four giving a
neutral response.
When compared to the previous survey results were similar for adult fitness, child
care and food and drink, however there were more neutral or negative responses to
these uses in this survey. Responses were more mixed towards hotels in this survey
than the previous survey were responses were in agreement or neutral.  
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Do you Agree or disagree that the following uses provide
convenient services for business and employees
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 15

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
15 
Alternative uses affect the character of the business park 
Adult fitness, child fitness, child leisure, child care, and food and drink all had the
same responses to this question. More respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed
that these uses detracted from the character of the business park than agreed or
strongly agreed. Hotels received a mixed response to this question; the largest
number of responses were neutral, and slightly more agreed or strongly agreed that
hotels detract from the character of the park than agreed or disagreed. Retail
received a mixed response, with only one more responded disagreeing or strongly
disagreeing that retail detracts from the character of the business park than agreeing
or strongly agreeing. The response to pet grooming and day care was generally
more positive than negative. 
Overall the results of this and the previous survey disagreed that adult fitness, child
fitness, child leisure, child care and food and drink detracted from the character of
the business park. However there was more, responses in agreement that they did
detract than the previous survey. In this survey more respondents strongly disagreed
than in the previous. The view on hotels is more mixed than in the previous survey,
with more agreement or strong agreement that they detracted from the character of
the business park.  
0
1
2
3
4
5
Do you agree or disagee that the following businesses
detract from the character of the business park
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 16

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
16 
Alternative Uses and Vacancies 
There was general agreement that alternative uses helped to fill vacancies within the
business park, with a small number of answers being neutral, disagreeing, or
strongly disagreeing. The exception to this was residential which had a more mixed
response, but was slightly weighted towards agreement. 
The previous survey was also in agreement that alternative uses help fill vacancies.  
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Do you agree or disagree that the following uses help to
fill vacancies
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 17

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
17 
Alternative uses and traffic conflicts 
Adult fitness, child fitness, child leisure, child care, and food and drink all had similar
responses to this question; “disagree” was the most common answer among all
these uses, however some responses did agree or strongly agree that these uses
created traffic conflict. Residential and Hotels had the largest “strongly agree”
responses, respectively, and this was the most common response for these uses,
however this was followed by “disagree” in most cases. Retail had a mixed
response, however more respondents agreed or strongly agreed than disagreed or
agreed. Pet grooming and day care had a very mixed response, but the most
common response was “disagree”.
Where applicable, responses from the previous survey are comparable to responses
to this survey. Hotels are an exception to this, which received more responses in
strong agreement than previously. 
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Do you agree or disagree that the following uses create
traffic conflicts with the operations of existing businesses
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 18

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
18 
Alternative uses and operational conflicts 
Overall, respondents disagreed, strongly disagreed, or were neutral that child fitness,
child leisure, child care, and retail uses did not create operational conflicts or
responded neutrally for these uses. Other uses received more mixed results. Adult
sports and fitness, and food and drink were considered by more respondents to
cause operational conflicts than those uses listed above, but more views stated they
disagreed or strongly disagreed they created conflict than did agree or strongly
agree. Opinions on hotels, pet grooming and day care, and residential were split
roughly evenly.
In the previous survey there was general disagreement that alternative uses cause
other operational conflicts with existing businesses. Disagree was still the most
common response in this survey, the response overall was more mixed, particularly
with adult fitness and food and drink.  
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Do you agree or disagree that the following uses may
create other conflicts with the operation of existing uses.
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 19

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
19 
Alternative uses and contributing to a lively business park 
The majority of responses either agreed or strongly agreed that other uses
contributed to a lively and active business park. The exceptions to this was hotels
and residential. For hotels more respondents had a neutral response or disagreed,
though there was still some agreement that hotels contributed to an active and lively
business park. Residential received a mixed response, with the most common
response being neutral and an equal number of responses that agreed, strongly
agreed, disagreed or strongly disagreed.
This generally aligns with responses from the previous survey, however there was
some more disagree or strongly disagree responses than in the previous surveys.  
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Do you agree or disagree that the following uses contribute
to an active and lively business park
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 20

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
20 
Vacant Units 
Respondents generally agreed that vacant units detracted from the character of the
business park, vacant units attract anti-social behaviour and vandalism, and present
a negative image to customers and clients. Respondents generally disagreed that
they make no difference to the operations of the business park. There were mixed
views, but general disagreement that vacant units always ensure there are units
available for new businesses to locate.
This survey generally aligns with the previous survey.  
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
They detract
from the
character of the
business park
They ensure that
there are always
units available for
new businesses
to locate
They attract anti-
social behaviour
and vandalism
They present a
negative image to
customers and
clients
They make no
difference to
operations of
existing
businesses
Do you agree or disagree with the following
statements about vacant units
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree

Page 21

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
21 
Concern about non-industrial business uses 
Most respondents were not very concerned about non-industrial uses in the business
park. Two respondents were quite concerned and three were not at all concerned. 
A larger proportion of respondents selected “not very concerned” compared to the
previous survey, with a small proportion of respondents being quite concerned or not
at all concerned. 
Other uses in the business park you would like to see
Respondents were asked if there are any other uses in the business park they would
like to see. There were three responses suggesting the following uses:
• Trade stores, e.g. Screwfix
• More food uses
• Hair dresser or nail technician
Other Comments
When asked if they had any other comments on non-industrial uses in the business
park the following responses were received:
• Could we have industrial bins 
• I think any business that attract people into the Business Park is good and
also feel landlords should be doing all they can to ensure units remain in use
and that might mean assistance from the Council to keep rent and service
charges affordable while ensuring all roads are in a satisfactory condition
which is not the case withing the Business Park at the moment.  
• In 2016 we moved into the business park by the skin of our teeth after very
strong opposition from some councillors. 7 years later (even after the
pandemic and being forced to close for 15 months) we are still here
welcoming families,  Employing 23 members of staff and contributing to the
local community/economy in many small ways. I don’t see any reason to
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Quite Concerned Not Very Concerned Not concerned at all
To what extent are you concerned about the
existing level of non-industrial business uses in 
Clydebank Business Park

Page 22

Clydebank Business Park Planning Guidance 
22 
leave units empty when they could be filled with thriving business’s? I’d like to
thank those councillors who had the foresight to have faith in us. 
• We (UK) are moving to, or have moved to years ago, service led businesses. 
Manufacturing et al is no longer congruent or pivotal with a modern growing
economy..
• You just have to look outside any school / nursery or even local activities
centres at start finish times to see the chaos brought to any area by
inconsiderate and often dangerous parking and blocking of lanes, Some of the
parking at weekends with the 1 current play centre is bad enough
• Parking  lighting and safety are concerns.
• Traffic and parking is ready a nightmare
Key Points from Survey
• Overall, alternative uses were generally seen to provide convenient services
for businesses and employees, with the exception of residential, which was
not seen to. Hotels had a mixed response to this question.
• Alternative uses were generally not seen to detract from the character of the
business park. Residential and hotels received a more mixed response to this
question, with responses to residential uses leaning towards that they would
detract from the character.
• There was general agreement that alternative uses helped fill vacant units.
• There were some mixed views on whether alternative uses caused traffic
conflicts, but generally that they did not was the most common response. The
exceptions to this were hotels, retail and residential, where more respondents
strongly agreed that they did cause traffic conflicts with existing businesses.
• There were also mixed views as to whether there were other operational
conflicts cause by alternative uses. Overall it was generally considered that
child related uses did not cause conflict, but this was not unanimous. Opinions
on hotels, pet grooming and day care, and residential were split roughly
evenly.
• It was generally agreed that alternative uses contributed to a lively and active
business park, with the exception of hotels and residential which received
more mixed views.
• Overall it was felt that the presence of vacant units had a detrimental effect on
the business park.
• There is some concern as to the number of alternative uses within the
business park.

Page 23

This document is also available in other languages, large print
and audio format on request. 
Arabic 
Hindi 
Punjabi 
Urdu 
Chinese (Cantonese) 
Polish 
British Sign Language
BSL users can contact us via contactSCOTLAND-BSL, the on-line
British Sign Language interpreting service.   
  01389 737527 
 West Dunbartonshire Council, 16 Church Street, 
Dumbarton, G82 1QL 
   communications@west-dunbarton.gov.uk