Democracy Spraffa

Printed minutes

Argyll and Bute Council · 7 March 2025
Back to Argyll and Bute Council — 7 March 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of SPECIAL MEETING of ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL held ON A HYBRID
BASIS IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER, KILMORY, LOCHGILPHEAD AND BY MICROSOFT
TEAMS on FRIDAY, 7 MARCH 2025 
Present: Councillor Jan Brown (Chair) 
Councillor John Armour
Councillor Gordon Blair
Councillor Math Campbell-Sturgess
Councillor Garret Corner
Councillor Audrey Forrest
Councillor Kieron Green
Councillor Amanda Hampsey
Councillor Daniel Hampsey
Councillor Graham Hardie
Councillor Anne Horn
Councillor Fiona Howard
Councillor Willie Hume
Councillor Mark Irvine
Councillor Andrew Kain
Councillor Jennifer Kean 
Councillor Paul Donald Kennedy
Councillor Reeni Kennedy-Boyle
Councillor Jim Lynch
Councillor Tommy MacPherson
Councillor Ian James MacQuire
Councillor Liz McCabe
Councillor Dougie McFadzean
Councillor Julie McKenzie
Councillor Yvonne McNeilly
Councillor Ross Moreland
Councillor Iain Shonny Paterson
Councillor Gemma Penfold
Councillor William Sinclair
Councillor Andrew Vennard
Councillor Peter Wallace 
Attending: Pippa Milne, Chief Executive
Douglas Hendry, Executive Director
Kirsty Flanagan, Executive Director
Ross McLaughlin, Head of Commercial Services
Wendy Brownlie, Head of Education – Learning and Teaching
Jen Crocket, Head of Education – Lifelong learning / Support
Diane Forsyth, Project Officer
David Logan, Head of Legal and Regulatory Support
Shona Barton, Governance Manager
Tracy Mayo
Anne Marie Rigby
Emily Greenhalgh
Mary Jean Devon 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Maurice Corry, Gary Mulvaney and
Dougie Philand. 
Councillor Gemma Penfold joined the meeting during the consideration of the following
item of Business. 
DEPUTATIONS 
The Depute Provost intimated that 2 requests for a Deputation to be heard by the Council
had been received from Tracy Mayo on behalf of community members on Mull, including
Parent Council representatives; and from Mary Jean Devon. It was unanimously agreed to
hear these Deputations.

Page 2

The Council heard a deputation from Tracy Mayo, Anne Marie Rigby and Emily
Greenhalgh in relation to the Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) – Mull
Campus which would be dealt with under item 3 of the agenda (Learning Estate
Investment Programme (LEIP) – Mull Campus – Preferred Site Recommendation).
Members were given the opportunity to ask one question each of the Deputation. 
The Council heard a deputation from Mary Jean Devon in relation to the Learning Estate
Investment Programme (LEIP) – Mull Campus which would be dealt with under item 3 of
the agenda (Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) – Mull Campus – Preferred
Site Recommendation). Members were given the opportunity to ask one question each of
the Deputation. 
The Depute Provost thanked the presenters and advised that their submissions would be
considered under item 3 of the agenda. 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
There were no declarations of interest intimated. 
Prior to the consideration of agenda item 3, the Depute Provost advised that Appendices
1, 1(i), 1J and 1L were marked exempt and if Members wished to have discussion on
these appendices then they would be asked to pass a resolution in terms of Section
50(A)(4) of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 to exclude the public for those
items on the grounds that it is likely to involve the disclosure of exempt information as
defined in paragraphs 8 and 9 of Part 1 of Schedule 7a to the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973. 
During the consideration of the following item of Business, the Depute Provost ruled and
the Council agreed to take a 10 minute comfort break between 3.25pm and 3.35pm. The
meeting reconvened with all those present as per the sederunt. 
3. LEARNING ESTATE INVESTMENT PROGRAMME (LEIP) - MULL CAMPUS
- PREFERRED SITE RECOMMENDATION 
The Council gave consideration to a report outlining key information required to identify a
preferred site for the Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) Mull Campus Project
which had reached the decision milestone for site selection. 
Following questions, the Depute Provost ruled and the Council agreed to adjourn for 10
Minutes from 4.20pm to 4.30pm to allow officers to consider the competency of a
proposed amendment. The meeting reconvened with all those present as per the
sederunt. Following consideration, the Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and
Regulatory Support advised that the amendment was not competent. 
Decision 
The Council –  
1. noted the contents of the report and supporting Appendices; 
2. endorsed the site scoring mechanism, criteria and supporting assessments which were
consistent with criteria categories commonly used for site selection on previous
Council school projects;

Page 3

3. confirmed Site 4 – Tobermory South as the preferred site for a new Mull Campus and
agreed to progress the Outline Business Case on that basis; 
4. noted that as the preferred option would constitute a proposal to relocate the existing
campus, a statutory consultation would be legally required under the Schools
(Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, the outcome of which would be reported back to
full Council upon completion of that process; and 
5. in making their decision in accordance with recommendation (b), above, had specific
regard to the detail of the Integrated Impact Assessment (Appendix 1K) on the
potential impacts to the relevant groups on Mull and its surrounding islands, as
detailed therein, recognising that each site presented different benefits and disbenefits
to these distinct groups. 
(Reference: Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Commercial Services and
Education dated 6 February 2025; and Supplementary Report by Executive Director with
responsibility for Commercial Services and Education and Executive Director with
responsibility for Financial Services dated 28 February 2025, submitted) 
4. POLITICAL MANAGEMENT ARRANGEMENTS 
The Council gave consideration to a report setting out the updated Political Composition of
the Council. 
Decision 
The Council noted the updated Political Composition of the Council. 
(Reference:  Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Legal and Regulatory
Support dated 28 February 2025, submitted) 
5. FINDINGS OF STANDARDS COMMISSION HEARING - COUNCILLOR
ALASTAIR REDMAN 
The Council gave consideration to a report setting out the full Written Decision of the
Standards Commission’s Hearing Panel, dated 24th February 2025, in respect of a
complaint against Councillor Alastair Redman. 
Decision 
The Council – 
1. noted the terms of the Standard Commission’s Written Decision which detailed the
breaches of the Councillor’s Code of Conduct that were committed by Councillor
Alastair Redman; 
2. noted the Hearing Panel’s decision to impose the sanction of suspending Councillor
Redman for a period of two months, with effect from 25th February 2025, from all
meetings of the Council and of any committee or sub-committee thereof and of any
other body on which he is a representative or nominee of the Council; 
3. noted with concern the actions of Councillor Redman before, during and after the
hearing, in particular his comments regarding the Hearing process and the Panel;

Page 4

4. affirmed that every citizen, including council officers, if they have concerns about the
behaviour or actions of an elected member, has the right to make representations
through the established process with the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public
Life; and 
5. fully endorsed the Councillors Code of Conduct and appeals to all members to support
its terms.
(Reference: Report by Monitoring Officer dated 25 February 2025, submitted)