Democracy Spraffa

Sylvania Way Delivery Group report

West Dunbartonshire Council · 31 July 2026
Back to Clydebank Pride in Place Board — 31 July 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

OFFICIAL [DATE]   
1
Official
Clydebank 
Neighbourhood 
Board
Paper Template 
Meeting details
Date 31/07/2026 Time 10 am 
Location Clyde Regional Shopping Centre Management Suite, Clydebank 
Agenda item details
Item number  Item
description
Project A5: Sylvania Way feasibility
For
information X
For
decison  Date of report  
Lead name Alan Douglas
Magda Swider
Lead email 
Report item details
1. Main issues
The first meeting of the group was held online on 9 June. Origins and strategic context of the
project were discussed, including the Clydebank Town Centre Development Framework which
was approved by the Council in 2021 and is adopted as supplementary planning guidance. 
It was agreed that the feasibility stage should prioritise the identification of viable and deliverable
redevelopment routes. This must take into account both the wider impact on the town centre and
the financial implications for the shopping centre owners.
Thereafter the discussion identified a number of key issues that will require careful consideration
as the project progresses:
 Asset performance 
It was noted that the shopping centre is currently performing well, particularly within the
southern section, where a number of reliable long-term leases are in place. This highlights
the importance of safeguarding existing income streams and maintaining tenant
confidence.
 Commercial and financial implications
There is a clear need to fully understand the commercial and financial impact of any
redevelopment proposals, alongside the long-term prospects of the asset. This analysis

Page 2

OFFICIAL [DATE]   
2
Official
should be undertaken at an early stage and prior to the development of detailed
redevelopment options.
 Tenant perception and market confidence
Consideration must be given to how redevelopment proposals are perceived by existing
tenants, particularly in relation to potential uncertainty. Maintaining confidence and
minimising disruption will be critical.
 Avoidance of displacement
Any proposals should seek to avoid the displacement of existing retail and activities,
recognising their role in sustaining the vitality and viability of the town centre.
 Review of existing proposals 
The Clydebank Town Centre Development Framework proposals should be critically
reassessed in light of current market conditions. There is a possibility that elements such as
the proposed town square and market hall may not represent the most viable or deliverable
options.
 Policy and environmental considerations
Key policy and environmental factors must be incorporated into the analysis, including
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4), flooding risk, and alignment with the Clyde
Mission.
 Scope and boundaries
It is important to clearly define what is included within the project scope, ensuring that all
areas of the framework not yet delivered are considered. This may include extending the
boundary across Chalmers Street.
 Integration with adjacent projects
The relationship with other nearby developments, including Three Queens Square and the
future Transport Hub, should be considered to ensure alignment and maximise
regeneration benefits.
The second meeting of the group took place on 13 July. The primary focus of the meeting was to
review and discuss the proposed brief, with all members invited to provide comments and
feedback. The final version of the brief will be completed by mid-August.
The Council will procure suitably qualified consultants to undertake the feasibility study on behalf
of the Board. A shortlist of proposed consultants will be circulated to the group in due course.
It was also agreed that the next meeting will be scheduled for late August, primarily to review the
tender submissions. The exact date is to be confirmed and will be dependent on the tender
procurement timescales.
2. Outline of any issues/risks and how these are being managed
The key risks at this stage relate primarily to stakeholder engagement and information availability.
There is a risk of insufficient buy-in from key partners, which could impact the ability to progress
feasibility work and agree a clear direction for the project. This risk is being managed through
ongoing engagement and ensuring that partners are involved in shaping the scope and objectives
of the work from an early stage.

Page 3

OFFICIAL [DATE]   
3
Official
A further risk relates to the potential requirement for access to commercially sensitive or
confidential information to establish an accurate understanding of the shopping centre’s condition,
performance and future prospects. This could be managed through the use of appropriate
confidentiality arrangements ensuring that trust is maintained while enabling robust analysis to
inform decision-making. 
3. Outline of the main outputs expected before next meeting
The key outputs anticipated prior to the next reporting period are:
 Agreed procurement route
 Agreed brief for the appointment of external consultants with expertise required to support
the study
 Commence procurement 
4. What are the requirements to achieve the outcomes of this report?
To support delivery of the above outputs, the following requirements are in place:
 Commitment from and ongoing collaboration with the key partners: Clydebank Shopping
Centre and West Dunbartonshire Council
 Continued officer resource to manage the project activity.
 Appropriate governance and approvals in line with Council procurement and financial
procedures. 
No additional approvals are sought at this stage.
5. Recommendations
It is recommended that the Clydebank Neighbourhood Board: 
 Notes the update.