Democracy Spraffa

Item 16 app 3 - IRED Budgetary Control Report 2022_23 to Period 3 (30 June 2022)

West Dunbartonshire Council · 17 August 2022
Back to Infrastructure, Regeneration & Economic Development Committee — 17 August 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL APPENDIX 3
REVENUE BUDGETARY CONTROL 2022/23
ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES OVER £50,000
PERIOD END DATE
Total Budget Forecast
Spend RAG Status
£000 £000 £000 %
Corporate Asset Maintenance (266) (206) 60 -23% 
Service Description
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Transport, Fleet & Maintenance
Services (592) (493) 99 -17% 
Service Description
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
30 June 2022
Budget Details
Variance Analysis
Variance
This service manages and undertakes repairs and maintenance to public
buildings
Lower than budgeted income due to a reduced programme of CAMS work
delviered by subcontractor partners
None - although service will endeavour to reduce the adverse variance
where possible
Surplus to be less than target
Surplus slightly less than target
Transport services across WDC
There is a favourable variance (£39k) against employee costs due to a
number of vacancies. However this is more than offset by higher fuel costs
(£150k), which will follow through to higher recharges to services.
The level of internal recharges is under review

Page 2

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL APPENDIX 3
REVENUE BUDGETARY CONTROL 2022/23
ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES OVER £50,000
PERIOD END DATE
Total Budget Forecast
Spend RAG Status
£000 £000 £000 %
30 June 2022
Budget Details
Variance Analysis
Variance
Roads Services 2,933 3,013 80 3% 
Service Description
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Outdoor Services 187 168 (19) -10% 
Service Description
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
An adverse variance is anticipated
This service relates to Roads operations, design, structures, street lighting,
road safety and school crossing patrols
Employee costs are adverse (£65k) because overtime is projected to be in
excess of budget although this is partly offset by additional grant income
(£30k). Electricity (£19k) and street lighting (£22k) costs have increased
during the year to a level not anticipated when the budget was set.
management will continue to monitor all budget heads with a view to
minimising the overspend
This service covers the outdoor sporting facilities provided by WDC and
public conveniences
Employee costs are favourable (£53k) because of a number of vacancies.
This favourable variance has offset the adverse variance against
electricity/gas (£24k).
none necessary
small favourable variance

Page 3

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL APPENDIX 3
REVENUE BUDGETARY CONTROL 2022/23
ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES OVER £50,000
PERIOD END DATE
Total Budget Forecast
Spend RAG Status
£000 £000 £000 %
30 June 2022
Budget Details
Variance Analysis
Variance
Ground Maintenance & Street Cleaning
Trading A/c (2,239) (2,162) 78 -3% 
Service Description
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Burial Grounds (193) (230) (37) 19% 
Service Description This service provides burial services within the Council area
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Crematorium (1,031) (991) 40 -4% 
Service Description This service provides crematorium services within the Council area
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Waste Services 7,978 8,199 221 3% 
Service Description Waste Collection and Refuse disposal services
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Trading operation providing grounds maintenance and street cleaning
services
Property costs are adverse due to electricity costs. Fuel (£41k) and tyre
(£20k) costs have increased to a level not anticipated when the budget was
set.
None possible at this time
A small adverse variance is anticipated
Overspend anticipated
Gas costs are higher than budgeted (£15k) while income is projected to be
less than budgeted , particularly from plaques/books of remembrance etc
(£25k)
management will continue to monitor all budget heads with a view to
minimising the overspend
none possible at present
Employee costs are higher (£176k) as projected savings from waste route
optimisation ,which depend on operating from a single depot, are not yet
achievable . Expenditure on bin replacements is higher (£71k) than
anticipated when the budget was set. These have been partly offset by
reduced vehicle hires (£45k).
None necessary
A favourable variance is anticipated
Income from internments/lairs is projected to exceed budget.
small overspend

Page 4

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL APPENDIX 3
REVENUE BUDGETARY CONTROL 2022/23
ANALYSIS FOR VARIANCES OVER £50,000
PERIOD END DATE
Total Budget Forecast
Spend RAG Status
£000 £000 £000 %
30 June 2022
Budget Details
Variance Analysis
Variance
Corporate Assets /Capital Investment
Programme (2,315) (2,313) 2 0% 
Service Description This service provides asset and estate management
Main Issues / Reason for Variance
Mitigating Action
Anticipated Outcome
Overall Corporate Assets/ Capital Investment Programme has a small
adverse variance of £3k. However, there are favourable and adverse
variances which offset each other. The main ones being: There has been
an over recovery of income of £35k due to good estates management and
maximising income.                                                                                                      
There is also a favourable variance on employee costs of £70k due to
current vacancies.                                                                                    
However, there is an adverse variance because, Aon/BAM PPP issued an
Insurance Cost Sharing Report in December 2020, with a cost share of
£117k to the Authority. In May 2021 they issued a statement that there was
an error in the report and the sum should have read a cost share of £18k
and not £117k. All information was passed to WDC’s insurance broker for
review who have recently confirmed there is no grounds to challenge the
revised figure. This results in and adverse variance of £104k within supplies
and services.
Income and expenditure will continue to be monitored throughout the year.
A small overspend is anticipated