Democracy Spraffa

Review of Policy to Charge Double Council Tax on Second Homes

Argyll and Bute Council · 26 November 2025
Back to Argyll and Bute Council — 26 November 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL                    COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES                                   26 NOVEMBER 2025 
REVIEW OF POLICY TO CHARGE DOUBLE COUNCIL TAX ON SECOND HOMES 
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 This paper accompanies the draft “Report on Second Homes Premium
Council Tax – September 2025” (Appendix 1). It summarises outcomes from
the first full year of implementation, highlights challenges, and sets out next
steps.
1.2 Eighteen months after introduction, recorded second homes have reduced by
15% (from 3,043 in Nov 2023 to 2,582 in May 2025). Over the same period,
770 properties left the second home category, while 309 new second homes
were added, giving a net reduction of 461. Of the 770 that left, 421 have been
brought back into active use (sold, let or occupied as a main home), 98 are
now staff accommodation supporting key local sectors and 241 remain empty
or not in use pending review. 
1.3 Financially, the premium delivered £3.86m in levy income in 2024/25,
exceeding budget (£3.75m), with a 97.3% collection rate and high
compliance.
1.4 While outcomes are positive, challenges remain: 13% of dwellings remain
“ineffective stock”, including empty homes and self-catering conversions.
Some buyers remain undeterred by the premium. Comparative evidence from
Wales underscores the importance of enforcement and transparent
reinvestment.
1.5 The Housing (Scotland) Bill has now passed Stage 3, removing the national
100% cap on premiums for second and empty homes. If enacted from April
2026, this will give councils discretion to apply higher charges. The Council
may wish to consider whether to use these powers in future, taking account of
local housing pressures, wider budget needs, and potential market impacts.
Any decision would benefit from further engagement with other authorities and
a reasonable lead-in period to protect revenues and avoid unintended
disruption in the housing market.

Page 2

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL                    COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES                                   26 NOVEMBER 2025 
REVIEW OF POLICY TO CHARGE DOUBLE COUNCIL TAX ON SECOND HOMES 
2.0      INTRODUCTION
2.1 In November 2023 the Council agreed to apply a 100% premium (double
charge) on second homes from April 2024, intended to improve fairness,
encourage properties back into residential use, and generate additional revenue
to support local priorities.
2.2 The attached report provides the first comprehensive review of the policy’s
impacts across housing supply, financial performance, and community
response. 
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 It is recommended that the Council – 
1. note the key findings set out in this covering report and Appendix 1; 
2. endorse continued monitoring of second-home movements, empty dwellings,
and self-catering reclassifications; and 
3. support further engagement with Welsh councils to build the evidence base
for potential future premium levels above 100%.

Page 3

4.0 DETAIL 
Policy Impacts
4.1 Between November 2023 and May 2025 770 properties moved out of the
second-home category and 309 new second homes were created, resulting in a
net reduction of 461 (15%): Of those leaving the category, 421 (55%) were
brought back into active use (sold, let, or occupied as a main home), 98 (13%)
are used as staff accommodation supporting hospitality, health, transport and
care sectors, 242 (31%) remain empty or not in use, requiring further review and
9 (1%) were reclassified as purpose built holiday homes and job related
dwellings.
4.2 The overall level of “ineffective stock” in Argyll and Bute remains high at 13% of
dwellings, with acute concentrations on islands such as Coll & Tiree. 
Financial Outcomes
4.3 Levy income in 2024/25: £3.97m billed, £3.86m collected. Exceeded budget by
£0.115m. 84.6% of second-home owners pay by Direct Debit, showing strong
compliance. Payment rates across all bands are consistently above 96%. 
Community Feedback
4.4 Around 1,000 enquiries were managed by the Council Tax administration team
in early 2025, however there was only 6 formal complaints, 3 of which
progressed to stage two.  One appeal was taken to the Scottish Local Taxation
Chamber (SLTC) as a first-tier tribunal. The judge upheld the Council’s decision
to apply the second home levy in this case. 
4.5 Concerns remain in some areas, particularly from owners of inherited properties
who have an emotional connection to them, and from owners of high-value
homes who argue their properties are unlikely ever to provide affordable
accommodation. Nevertheless, the regulations are designed to discourage
property hoarding, release dwellings back into local use, and contribute to
easing housing pressures. 
Housing Market 
4.6 There is no evidence of price shock; house sales and prices increased in Argyll
and Bute in 2024/2025 in line with national trends. Rental market tightening
continues, but re-use of second homes has contributed some additional stock.
The Council declared a housing emergency in 2023, the premium forms one
part of the wider response. 
Comparative Evidence
4.7 In Wales, councils have discretion to levy premiums of up to 300%. While no
authority has applied the maximum rate on second homes, some have imposed
up to 300% on long-term empty properties, reflecting the wider negative impact
that derelict or unused buildings can have on communities. By contrast, second
homes, even if occupied only 10–20% of the year, can bring some contribution
to the local economy through visitor spending. 
4.8 For example, Gwynedd applies a 150% premium on second homes and has
strengthened its compliance arrangements by introducing a data-matching
system (InfoShare) that uses credit-reference information to verify an

Page 4

individual’s true main residence. This approach helps identify avoidance, such
as owners reclassifying properties incorrectly to reduce liability. Similar
techniques may be useful locally: around 40% of properties no longer declared
as second homes in Argyll and Bute are currently subject to detailed review to
ensure declarations are accurate and to protect the integrity of the Council Tax
base.  
4.9 Early officer-level engagement confirms that compliance tools and transparency
on revenue use are key to community acceptance. This intelligence will inform
future consideration should Scottish Ministers legislate to permit premiums
above 100%. 
Legislative position and timing in Scotland
4.10 The Housing (Scotland) Bill was passed at Stage 3 on 30 September 2025,
including the provision removing the current 100% cap on council tax premiums
for second and long-term empty homes. Commencement of these new powers
will be set by Ministers via a commencement order; the Act does not fix a date. 
4.11 While the Act does not fix a date, if the remaining legal steps proceed as
planned, a 1 April 2026 switch-on is a reasonable assumption, in line with the
start of the financial year, but this remains subject to the formal commencement
regulations and any transitional provisions. 
Revenue at Risk
4.12 Revenue at risk from properties shifting into Non-Domestic Rates is offset by
Assessor canvass add-backs. This helps maintain stability in the levy base, but
ongoing monitoring is required. 
Forward Look
4.13 Colleagues in Planning are preparing proposals on the potential designation of
Short-Term Let Control Areas, with a paper expected to come to Council in
Spring 2026. This regulatory measure would complement the second-homes
premium by limiting displacement into the self-catering sector. The removal of
the national 100% cap on premiums is closely aligned, and both strands should
be considered in the same timeframe to ensure a coherent local approach to
housing supply and community sustainability. 
Careful Use of New Premium Powers
4.14 If the Council gains discretion to apply premiums above 100% from 1 April 2026,
this cannot simply be “switched on” without significant risk. Excessive charges
could drive avoidance behaviour, alter ownership habits, and ultimately reduce
revenues. They could also create unintended disruption in the housing market. 
4.15 Any future decision to increase the premium above 100% would benefit from
careful preparation and evidence. In particular, it would be advisable to:
• Review the experience of Welsh authorities that have introduced higher
rates, to understand both outcomes and potential unintended
consequences; 
• Engage with local stakeholders, including property owners, letting
agents, and community representatives, to test potential impacts and
compliance; and

Page 5

• Allow a reasonable lead-in period before implementation, giving existing
second-home and empty property owners time to make informed
decisions about the use or sale of their properties.
4.16 Ultimately, the decision on whether and how to increase the premium rests with
Members, but a measured and evidence-led approach would support
transparency and minimise the risk of unintended consequences.
5.0 CONCLUSION
5.1 The first year of the second homes premium has delivered a measurable
reduction in recorded second homes, strong financial returns above budget and
evidence of properties being brought back into use, including staff
accommodation in key sectors.
5.2 Challenges remain in addressing empty dwellings, self-catering reclassifications,
and the broader housing emergency. Ongoing monitoring and engagement with
Welsh counterparts will ensure Argyll & Bute is prepared for potential future
policy changes.
5.3  Looking ahead, if the new powers expected from April 2026 permit premiums
above 100%, these should be considered with care. Any increase would benefit
from an evidence-led approach, further engagement with local stakeholders,
and a reasonable lead-in period to allow owners time to plan and adapt.
Excessive rates could risk avoidance behaviour, revenue loss, or market
distortion, so a balanced and transparent approach is advised.
6.0 IMPLICATIONS
6.1 Policy - The policy aligns with the Local Housing Strategy objective to
increase effective housing supply and supports corporate priorities on
sustainable communities. It operates alongside planned regulatory measures
(e.g. potential use of Short-Term Let control areas) to reduce displacement
into Self-Catering Units (SCUs). A joined-up approach with Housing, Planning,
and Economic Development is proposed, with further options (e.g. use of
higher premiums if enabled nationally) to be brought back if appropriate.
6.2 Financial - Year 1 outturn exceeded budget (high collection rate and strong
Direct Debit uptake). Future receipts remain exposed to behavioural change
(e.g. movement into Non-Domestic Rates), data cleansing adjustments, and
macroeconomic conditions. Mitigations include continued targeted recovery,
monitoring of arrears and reconciliation to the Council Tax base. 
6.3  Legal: The policy is implemented within existing legislation on Council Tax
and premiums for second homes, and classification rules for self-catering
accommodation. Ongoing legal considerations include data
protection/compliance in reviews, fair procedures for discretion and appeals,
and the lawful process for introducing planning controls (e.g. Short-Term Let
control areas) if pursued. Legal Services will be engaged on any proposed
changes and communications.
6.4  HR: Implementation has generated additional workload in the Revenues team
and the Counter Fraud will soon be engaged in reviews, appeals and further
enquiries. Short-term pressure will be managed through targeted prioritisation.

Page 6

Staff training on policy intent, exemptions, and evidence requirements will
continue.
6.5  Customer Service: Initial enquiry numbers were high and difficult but have
now stabilised. Clearer guidance, FAQs, and templated responses are in
place, with signposting to payment options and support. We will continue to
track themes (hard cases, inherited properties, high-band homes), refine
messaging, and ensure consistent handling across channels.
6.6 Risk: 
Key risks; Displacement into SCU/NDR undermining outcomes, data quality
and the risk of fraud and error in declarations from owners.  Reputational risk
around perceived fairness of the charges, potential legal challenges to
classification and decisions that will be heard by the Scottish Local Taxation
Chamber.
6.7 Climate Change: Bringing existing dwellings back into permanent use can
reduce pressure for new build and associated embodied carbon. Staff
accommodation closer to workplaces may reduce commuting and travel
emissions. No significant negative climate impacts are anticipated.
6.8  Fairer Scotland Duty: The policy aims to address socio-economic
disadvantage by improving access to housing for those on lower and median
incomes and by raising resources for local priorities. A proportionate
assessment indicates likely positive impacts through increased availability of
housing and potential targeted reinvestment in that area. We will continue to
consider cumulative effects (including on rural and island areas) and report
any unintended consequences.
6.9 Equalities – Protected Characteristics: The premium applies by property use,
not personal characteristics. No direct differential impact is identified across
protected groups. Indirect effects (e.g. improved access to housing for
families, workers, and older residents) are expected to be positive. Equalities
impacts will be monitored through complaints/themes and service feedback.
6.10 Consumer Duty: The report considers impacts on consumers of Council
services, including clarity of information, routes to challenge, and support for
potentially vulnerable consumers (e.g. inherited properties). Actions include
plain-English communications, transparent evidence requirements, and clear
signposting to payment options and assistance.
6.11 Islands Communities - Given the distinct housing pressures and labour market
dynamics on our islands, the policy is particularly relevant there and may have
greater impact than in some mainland areas. Early evidence shows benefits
via staff accommodation and reuse; risks include displacement to SCU and
effects on seasonal economies. We propose continuing to screen for Island
Communities impacts and to develop island-specific metrics (by Intermediate
Zone) to inform any adjustments.
6.12 Children’s Rights and Wellbeing: No direct impact on children’s rights is
identified. Indirect positive effects are anticipated through increased
availability of permanent homes for families and workforce stability in
children’s services, education, and health.

Page 7

Executive Director Kirsty Flanagan
Executive Director with responsibility for Finance
Policy Lead Councillor Moreland
1 October 2025                                                
For further information contact: Fergus Walker, Revenues and Benefits Manager
Fergus.Walker@argyll-bute.gov.uk Tel: 01586 555237 
Appendix A - Report on Second Homes Premium for Council Tax