Democracy Spraffa

Item 05 Appendix 1D - WDC Transport Response 2023 - Archdiocese

West Dunbartonshire Council · 7 July 2023
Back to Educational Services Committee — 7 July 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

The Archdiocese of Glasgow is a Designated Religious Body, Charity Number SC018140
ARCHBISHOP OF GLASGOW
Curial Offices, 196 Clyde Street
Glasgow, G1 4JY
Tel: +44 (0) 141 226 5898
Fax: +44 (0) 141 225 2600
E-mail: archbishop@rcag.org.uk
www.rcag.org.uk   
2 May 2023 
Ms Laura Mason
Chief Education Officer
West Dunbartonshire Council
16 Church Street
Dumbarton G82 1QL 
A Proposal Document 
to
Alter arrangements for the provision of transport by West Dunbartonshire
Council for pupils attending mainstream schools 
Response of the Archdiocese of Glasgow 
The Archdiocese of Glasgow welcomes the opportunity to respond to the proposal
within this consultation paper and to be involved in any discussions about
denominational education within West Dunbartonshire Council. 
It is important to state that we, in the Archdiocese, understand and appreciate that
Local Councils, are in severe economic straits and need to use their funds to ensure
the best possible outcomes for all people in their authority.   
We note, therefore, that West Dunbartonshire council is proposing to discontinue their
transport arrangements for primary and secondary pupils and reverting to the provision
of conveyancing of pupils between home and school contained in the 1980 Education
(Scotland) Act recommendation of a safe walking distance of 2 miles for primary
children and 3 miles for secondary pupils.

Page 2

ARCHBISHOP OF GLASGOW
2 | P a g e
This is disappointing given that West Dunbartonshire is one of the most deprived
Council areas in Scotland with many of its families residing in Quintile 1, SIMD 1-2,
regarding (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation). 
It is obvious therefore, that families face great hardship in trying to feed and clothe
their children and young people as well as striving to provide heating, lighting,
electricity, and rent, in order to survive in these unprecedented times of economic
hardship.   
However before taking your transport proposals for pupils in West Dunbartonshire
further, we would urge you to consider: 
• That by this travel proposal you may be promoting further disadvantage for
pupils in Quintile 1 (SIMD 1-2), as you are proposing a blanket approach for all
pupils.  Perhaps there should be a clause that allows pupils in these areas more
support, considering their personal circumstances, ensuring an equitable
approach.  
• While you are encouraging ‘safe walking’ and list benefits of this, many parents
will not want their sons and daughters to undertake this mode of travel for safety
reasons.  This may mean more car journeys or parents having to accompany
younger pupils on buses which may impact on their ability to undertake
employment thus causing further hardship.  
• You note in your Consultation Paper that for some, if not travelling by bus, the
journey to school will take longer.  We consider that this may mean increased
absences from school particularly in winter and inclement/cold weather.  This
may result in a fall in the attainment of those pupils resulting in increased
disadvantage for them.
• If children are walking to school, they will require proper clothing for wet and
windy weather if they are to remain healthy and fit to learn.  This will place even
more financial pressure on parents already struggling in our economic climate.
• It is recognised and appreciated that all young people between the ages of five
and twenty-two years in Scotland have access to free bus travel, which in itself
is a huge support to families.  However, travelling by public transport at peak
school times will be problematic not only for pupils but for the wider population,
in terms of ease of access, reliability and safety.  This may result in increased
late coming to schools at the start of the day and a later time home for pupils
thus increasing the length of their journeys and their overall ‘school’ day. 
• Given that if this proposal is passed it will impact on the provision of buses and
bus timetabled, we note that the bus companies are not included in the list of
consultees. 
• That the two denominational secondary schools have a wider catchment area
that the non-denominational secondary schools. In fact, half of the population
of Our Lady and St Patrick’s High School will lose transport if your proposal
goes through.  It may be that parents rather, than having their children travel

Page 3

ARCHBISHOP OF GLASGOW
3 | P a g e
the new distance by foot or public transport, may feel forced to decide to send
their son or daughter to the nearest non-denominational school.  This could be
regarded as indirect discrimination by the Council towards Catholic pupils.
• At a reasonable pace an adult will walk 3 miles in one hour.  This means that
some secondary aged pupils will be adding 2 hours onto their school day.  This
will impact on their capacity to remain in school for clubs, supported study and
on their opportunity to do homework.
• While the intention to encourage walking to school is admirable, there is
concern that removing organised school transport will only increase private
cars, with parents (who have cars) choosing to drive their children to school,
thus causing congestion and pollution at peak times. 
Given our points for your consideration raised above we do not agree that West
Dunbartonshire Council should bring transport provision for school more in line with
the Government’s safe walking distance to school.  We wish you well in your decision
making for the pupils of West Dunbartonshire. 
We, in the Archdiocese, look forward to ongoing discussions on this and any other
proposals which might affect denominational education in your Council area.
With my very best wishes for your continued work. 
+William Nolan
Archbishop of Glasgow