Item 09 Appendix 1
West Dunbartonshire Council · 14 December 2022
Back to Educational Services Committee — 14 December 2022 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Appendix 1 SQA Appendix 1 - Insight Charts and Significance Statements for individual establishments in West Dunbartonshire Note about Insight Schools and education authorities have made their data available to others in a spirit of co-operation and trust. Access is provided to assist colleagues in the delivery of their professional duties. Of particular note, users of Insight agree not to seek to identify individuals from the information provided, for which they have no direct professional responsibility. All data in the tool (including downloaded tables) should be treated as carefully as other confidential pupil data. Data in the tool are provided to all education authorities and schools on the understanding that they will be used for self-evaluation, professional reflection and benchmarking purposes only and that they will NOT be used publicly, directly or indirectly, to draw comparisons. Insight data should also not be used publicly unless appropriate disclosure control has been implemented to prevent the identification of individuals. The Crown retains copyright of Insight and other publications. As with all Crown Copyright material, users must acknowledge its source and must not use such information to mislead or to advertise a particular product or service. Clydebank High School Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy and Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2022 is much greater than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 2
Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure. Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2022 is much greater than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 3
Improving Attainment for All – S6 2019 Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Lowest 20% is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Middle 60% is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Improving Attainment for All – SIMD Deciles 1-4 (Most Deprived 20%) - S6 2019 The significance of comparisons was not tested.
Page 4
Attainment versus Deprivation – S6 2019 Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure. Dumbarton Academy Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy and Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2020 is much lower than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 4, 2018 is much lower than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 5
Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy at SCQF Level 5, 2018 is much lower than your Virtual Comparator. Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2020 is much lower than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 4, 2018 is much lower than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 6
Improving Attainment for All – S6 2019 Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure. Improving Attainment for All – SIMD Quintile 1 (Most Deprived 20%) - S6 2019 The significance of comparisons was not tested.
Page 7
Attainment versus Deprivation – S6 2019 Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: In SIMD decile 3, your performance is much greater than the Virtual Comparator. Our Lady and St. Patrick’s High School Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy and Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2021 is lower than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 8
Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy at SCQF Level 5, 2019 is lower than your Virtual Comparator. Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2021 is lower than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 9
Improving Attainment for All – S6 2019 Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Middle 60% is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Improving Attainment for All – SIMD Quintile 1 (Most Deprived 20%) - S6 2019 The significance of comparisons was not tested.
Page 10
Attainment versus Deprivation – S6 2019 Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: In SIMD decile 5, your performance is greater than the Virtual Comparator. St. Peter the Apostle High School Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy and Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2020 is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2019 is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2018 is greater than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 11
Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy at SCQF Level 5, 2019 is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 4, 2022 is lower than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2020 is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2019 is greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2018 is greater than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 12
Improving Attainment for All – S6 2019 Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure. Improving Attainment for All – SIMD Quintile 1 (Most Deprived 20%) - S6 2019 The significance of comparisons was not tested.
Page 13
Attainment versus Deprivation – S6 2019 Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure. Vale of Leven Academy Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy and Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 4, 2018 is much greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Literacy and Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2018 is much greater than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 14
Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Literacy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Literacy at SCQF Level 5, 2018 is much greater than your Virtual Comparator. Percentage of S6 Candidates Attaining Numeracy Testing found that the following comparisons were significant: Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 4, 2018 is much greater than your Virtual Comparator. Performance in Numeracy at SCQF Level 5, 2018 is greater than your Virtual Comparator.
Page 15
Improving Attainment for All – S6 2019 Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure. Improving Attainment for All – SIMD Quintile 1 (Most Deprived 20%) - S6 2019 The significance of comparisons was not tested.
Page 16
Attainment versus Deprivation – S6 2019 Testing found that there were no significant comparisons for this measure.