Democracy Spraffa

Item 09 - Reduced Class Contact Time

West Dunbartonshire Council · 16 September 2026
Back to Educational Services Committee — 16 September 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL 
Report by the Chief Education Officer 
Educational Services Committee: 16 September 2026
___________________________________________________________________ 
Subject:  Reduced Class Contact Time 
1. Purpose 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide an outline of work done to date
preparing for Reduced Class Contact Time (RCCT), and to seek agreement
for our proposed development plan for implementation. 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 It is recommended that Committee: 
a) Note the work done to date in preparation for Reduced Class Contact
Time, 
b) Note the present position of readiness; and
c) Agree the proposed governance and development plan for
implementation. 
3. Background 
3.1 In January 2001, ‘A Teaching Profession for the 21st Century’ (commonly
known as the McCrone Agreement) set the framework for Scottish teachers'
pay, class contact limits and working conditions. This brought parity of esteem
across sectors and ensured that all teaching staff had protected ‘non-contact
time’ in their working week. Class teachers now had a maximum of 22 ½
hours that they would be teaching classes, with the remainer of their
contracted week being protected time for other activities, such as preparation,
correction and marking, planning, collegiate working and professional
development. 
3.2 In secondary schools, teaching staff would be used for a maximum of 26
periods per week, ensuring that they had the required amount of non-contact
time. This number of periods was reduced pro-rata for promoted teaching
staff. For young people in our secondary schools, this would have no impact
on their 27 ½ hours of teaching time. 
3.3 For children in primary schools having 25 hours of learning per week, this
change meant that during the week they would no longer be taught by one
class teacher but would have input from other teaching staff. 
ITEM 9

Page 2

3.4 In West Dunbartonshire there was no uniform approach to implementation. In
some schools, ‘McCrone time’ for a class would focus on a specific aspect of
the curriculum such as health and wellbeing or expressive arts. In other
schools, classes grouped together with the support of Senior Leadership
Teams to undertake Interdisciplinary projects, assemblies or wider school
activities. 
3.5 In recent times during periods of staff absence and where scarcity of supply
teaching staff has been problematic, scheduling McCrone time has been a
pressure on school staff, where on occasion time has been ‘banked’ and
given in a subsequent week when staffing availability made this possible. This
practice is far from ideal and reflects existing pressures in the system still
present today. 
3.6 As part of their Programme for Government, Scottish Government agreed to
implement a reduction in teacher class contact time from the current 22 ½
hours to 21 hours. As this would affect terms and conditions for teaching staff,
this would be a formal agreement through the Scottish Negotiating Committee
for Teachers (SNCT), requiring local agreement for implementation through a
Local Negotiating Committee for Teachers (LNCT). 
3.7 Despite much discussion, little progress had been made on this matter since
20212. A Special COSLA Leaders’ Meeting took place on 13 March 2026 at
the request of the Scottish Government and the EIS to decide on the
reduction in class contact time (RCCT), in response to an EIS deadline
associated with planned teacher industrial action. 
3.8 Correspondence issued to COSLA Leaders proposed a joint agreement,
including an initial commitment of £40 million in 2026/27. This funding would
allow preparatory work to begin ahead of a fully funded national
implementation of RCCT for Primary, Early Years and ASN Schools by
August 2027, and for Secondary Schools by August 2029. 
4. Main Issues 
Preparation 
4.1 In 2021, Councils were asked to undertake a projection exercise to prepare
for implementation, and to assist Scottish Government in modelling the
required increase in teaching staff. This is a complex exercise that requires
significant coordination nationally to achieve. There are local variances in the
number of staff required, and the local availability of staff to fill vacancies. This
analysis would also need to be combined with capacity of and recruitment to
Initial Teacher Education programmes in universities, combined with
marketing campaigns to increase the number of graduates entering the
profession. Such an increase in staffing would require significant funding
nationally and would not be possible without a national agreement to fully fund
it.

Page 3

4.2 In 2021, West Dunbartonshire established a RCCT Working Group to begin
preparation for implementation. The first activities undertaken were modelling
exercises to understand our requirements to implement RCCT across sectors.
At that time, initial modelling suggested we would require the equivalent of an
additional 77 teaching staff, spread across early years, primary, ASN and
secondary sectors.  This would require an additional £4.697M in funding.
When this data was aggregated nationally, country wide Scotland estimated
an additional 4,900 teaching staff would be required, at a national cost of
£298.9M. 
4.3 With no agreement being reached nationally about implementation, and no
confirmation of funding given to West Dunbartonshire, the RCCT Working
Group stood down in 2022. 
Current Readiness 
4.4 In 2025/26 the Staffing Team included calculating the teaching staff
requirement as part of the Staffing Exercise undertaken each year. This has
put us in a strong position of understanding the resource requirement for us in
the Primary sector. 
4.5 In 2025, West Dunbartonshire considered changes to the timetable in
secondary schools through a consultation. The outcome of this was to return
to a future committee with other models to consider. Due to the timing of the
work to consider the timetable, and the work to implement RCCT it would be
best to complete this as one activity, rather than a change to the timetable
that then changes again for RCCT. 
4.6 In 2025/26 we continued our work with secondary timetablers to reach an
understanding of the resource requirement across departments and subject
areas in each of our schools. This has given us a detailed understanding of
the resource requirement in our Secondary sector. 
4.7 In summer 2026, secondary timetablers started to consider models for
implementation, and will continue to work on these in this new session. Due to
the reduction in contact time to 21 hours, this poses complex operational
challenges in constructing a timetable due to the length of periods in the
school day. Models are being considered and developed to meet this
challenge.   
4.8 Further work will be required this session to develop a detailed understanding
of the resource requirement in the Early Years and ASN sectors, which will be
undertaken through working groups.

Page 4

Governance and Development Plan 
4.9 Accountability to deliver RCCT will sit with the Council, so it is recommended
that Education Committee agrees the governance structure and the
Development Plan to implement the change. The Development Plan is
provided in Appendix A. Progress with this plan will be reported through the
Delivery Plan, with additional papers being brought twice per year to
Education Committee for oversight of progress. 
4.10 Responsibility to deliver RCCT will sit with the Local Negotiating Committee
for Teachers (LNCT), as this directly impacts teachers’ terms and conditions.
This will become a standing item on LNCT agenda, with working groups set
up to develop models and report to LNCT. 
4.11 Two working groups have been established. A working group for ‘Primary,
Early Years and ASN’ and a working group for ‘Secondary’ have been
established, which will report to LNCT. Membership of the groups is drawn
from central education staff, strategic HR, establishment staff and Trade
Union representatives. 
4.12 Where new delivery models are suggested, stakeholder groups such as
parents, pupils and support staff will be consulted, with all stakeholders
informed of decisions taken, and timescales for implementation.   
5. People Implications 
5.1 To delivery RCCT will require additional project management resource in the
Education Staffing team, and will require around an additional 70 FTE
teaching staff. 
6. Financial Implications 
6.1 To implement Reduced Class Contact time will cost £5.429M. Scottish
Government made an assurance that each council would receive their
proportionate share of £40M in 2026/27 to assist with preparatory activities,
but this has now been confirmed to be a share of £7.5M. We await
confirmation of West Dunbartonshire’s share of this funding. Initial funding
would be used to fund delivery of the project, including central costs for HR,
Finance, IT etc, costs to release staff for development activities and early
recruitment of teaching staff ahead of the first phase of rollout in August 2027.

Page 5

7. Risk Analysis 
7.1 As part of the Programme for Government, the SNCT agreement to
implement RCCT brought about the removal of planned industrial action.
Failure to deliver would carry political and reputational risk, as we have
agreed to implement this through COSLA. Failure to implement may have
financial consequences for the Council and put us at a disadvantage when
viewed as an employer for prospective teachers. There is significant risk
around the availability of teachers nationally and locally to meet the
requirements to implement RCCT. The timing of recruitment could put us in
direct competition with our neighbours to recruit and retain staff. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 An Equalities Impact Assessment has not been undertaken for this report, as
we await the outcome of national EIA prior to undertaking a local version. 
9. Consultation 
9.1 Legal Services and the Section 95 Officer have been consulted on the content
of this report. 
10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1 Delivering Reduce Class Contact Time contributes directly to our objective
that ‘our Council is adaptable and focused on delivering best value for our
residents, as the way we work embodies continuous improvement, innovation
and ambition’ within outcome 4 ‘our council is inclusive and adaptable’ from
our Strategic Plan 2022-27. 
Gillian Hamilton
Chief Education Officer
21 August 2026
___________________________________________________________________ 
Person to Contact: Andrew Brown  
Senior Education Officer  
Email: andrew.brown@west-dunbarton.gov.uk   
Appendices: Appendix A: RCCT Development Plan 
Background Papers: None 
Wards Affected: All wards

Page 6

No embedded text on this page.