Democracy Spraffa

Item 11 - Senior Phase Update

West Dunbartonshire Council · 18 March 2026
Back to Educational Services Committee — 18 March 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by the Chief Education Officer
Educational Services Committee:  18 March 2026
___________________________________________________________________
Subject: Senior Phase Update
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide an update for members on the change
in the national body providing qualifications, and to provide our new policy
supporting centres in investigating claims of malpractice in qualifications.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that Committee:
a) Note the national change from Scottish Qualifications Agency to
Qualifications Scotland; and
b) Note the introduction of our malpractice policy which helps our
secondary schools ensure that guidance is accurately followed, and
guard against the submission of work that is not of a candidates
making.
3. Background
3.1 In 2024, Scottish Government announced a National Education Reform
agenda, that would see the introduction of an independent His Majesties
Inspectorate of Education, and replacements of the two national bodies
Education Scotland and the Scottish Qualifications Agency (SQA).
3.2 In February 2026, the Scottish Qualifications Agency became Qualifications
Scotland. Initially, little will change with Qualifications Scotland, as it continues
to deliver assessment programmes and qualifications created by its
predecessor. Over the next six years, Qualifications Scotland will undertake a
reform of the qualifications on offer in our presenting centres. As a council, we
will take our part in this reform agenda as a key stakeholder and ensure our
young people, parents, staff and establishments are able to contribute to the
process.
3.3 Qualifications Scotland expect presenting centres and local authorities to
review their policies, practices and procedures on a regular basis to ensure
they are well placed to run and manage qualifications.
ITEM 11

Page 2

3.4 As part of our ongoing review, we identified an area requiring development to
ensure our centres are well placed to deal with any concerns that arise.
3.5 Qualifications Scotland advise presentation centres that in any instance of
candidate or centre malpractice being alleged, the centre should conduct it’s
own investigation following a local malpractice policy.
3.6 Allegations of malpractice are rare. In the last 10 years, the number of
allegations of malpractice account for 0.002% of our presentations.
3.7 In managing risk however, we are aware that the rise in the use of Artificial
Intelligence could see an increase in the number of alegations of malpractice,
and we need to make sure our presenting centres are able to deal with such
alegations effectively.
4. Main Issues
4.1 Where an allegation of malpractice is made, whether about an individual
candidate or indeed a presenting centre, there needs to be a policy in place to
clarify how the allegation is investigated, and clarity given to the candidate,
their parents and carers and the centre involved.  Our Malpractice policy is
provided in Appendix A.
4.2 With the rise in the use of Artificial Intelligence, we anticipate that allegations
of malpractice will increase, so this policy will provide guidance to centres in
how to investigate any allegation, and how to then communicate the outcome
of that investigation to candidates, their parents and carers, and if need be,
Qualifications Scotland.
4.3 This policy has also been shared with Qualifications Scotland and our
neighbours in the West Partnership to help them with the development of their
own arrangements.
4.4 The policy has been shared with Secondary Head Teachers and our in-school
Qualifications Scotland Coordinators, to be implemented should any
allegation of malpractice be raised this session, or at any point in the future.
5. People Implications
5.1 There are no direct people implications resulting from this report.
6. Financial Implications
6.1 There are no associated costs with this report. Time to undertake
investigations into any alleged malpractice would be covered by central
officers and promoted staff in our secondary schools.

Page 3

7. Risk Analysis
7.1 Not having a malpractice policy would leave us failing to meet Qualifications
Scotland policies and in conducting fair, transparent and impartial
investigations into alleged malpractice.
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
8.1 An Equalities Impact Assessment screening has been undertaken for the
malpractice policy.
9. Consultation
9.1 Legal Services and the Section 95 Officer have been consulted on the content
of this report.
10. Strategic Assessment
10.1 Having a Malpractice Policy contributes to Outcome 4 ‘our council is inclusive
and adaptable’ in our Strategic Plan.
Gillian Hamilton
Chief Education Officer
Date: 20 February 2026
___________________________________________________________________
Person to Contact: Andrew Brown
Senior Education Officer
Email: andrew.brown@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices: Appendix A – WDC Malpractice Policy.
Background Papers: None.
Wards Affected: All wards

Page 4

No embedded text on this page.