Democracy Spraffa

Item 10 - Review of Interim Change to Fortnightly Pay Frequency

West Dunbartonshire Council · 7 February 2024
Back to Corporate Services Committee — 7 February 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer – People & Technology
Corporate Services Committee – 7th February 2024
___________________________________________________________________
Subject: Review of Interim Change to Fortnightly Pay Frequency
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to update committee on the review agreed as
part of the interim change to the 2-weekly pay frequency.
2. Recommendations
2.1 Note the findings of the review and agree a permanent cessation of fortnightly
pay.
3. Background
3.1 The Corporate Services Committee approved an interim change to the
fortnightly payrun on 17 August 2022.  This was largely driven by the
significant increase in the volume of work experienced by the Payroll team
since the pandemic as outlined in section 3.3 of the paper.  The volume has
not diminished.  
3.2 Since August, the team also experienced the loss of the Payroll Section Head
who had considerable input into the more complex tasks expected of the
team, for example processing the retrospective pay award received just
before Christmas in 2022 for financial year 2022/23.   Given the scale of the
financial gap, the team has subsequently been restructured, combining payroll
and transactional HR under the one remaining Section Head.  This move aims
to increase resilience by combining the two transactional teams albeit at the
loss of the experienced Section Head, and the subsequent deletion of the
post. 
3.3 The Council will continue reviewing processes across the transactional
services, including system improvements and automation. The payrun review
considered how re-introduction of the fortnightly pay frequency would impact
on the team capacity and the ability to enable further necessary
improvements.
4. Main Issues
4.1 At the time the interim change was agreed, there were 667 employees paid
fortnightly.  Employees were offered the choice of 4 weekly or monthly with
ITEM 10

Page 2

the majority opting for the former (516), 54 monthly and 97 leavers since the
change was applied. 
4.2 As a reminder, the benefits of removing the fortnightly pay frequency included: 
• Ability to pay in advance of pay period end date as opposed to 11 days in
arrears;
• Ability to issue payslips earlier as significantly reduced pay administration;
• Better use of the limited capacity within the transactional teams but
especially focused on payroll deliverables;
• Ability to handle the vast range of statutory reporting to partners such as
SPPA, SPFO, HMRC, and 3rd parties such as Credit Unions, etc
timeously;
• Optimal handling of the complex multi tax-year pay awards which have
been common over the past few years;
• Optimal handling of tax year end ensuring ability to meet statutory
deadlines, issue P60s, etc.;
• Optimal handling of new tax year mass update tasks, e.g., tax code uplift,
pay increments, pension contribution rate re-banding, etc.;
• Reduction in errors causing additional work for both the manager and
transactional teams, and greater employee satisfaction; 
• Ability to extend the electronic payslip facility to this group via a personal
email account password protected by their National Insurance number;
and
• Simplified payroll processing calendar with fewer pay cycles. 
4.3 Since the transition of fortnightly paid to either 4-weekly or monthly payrun,
subsequent requests or issues raised have been monitored.  Only 4 additional
requests to move to the monthly cycle were received. 
4.4 The Working4U team have further confirmed the following in respect of future
decisions as to pay frequency: 
• Employees in receipt of Universal Credit (UC) and/or facing budgeting
challenges should consider changing from 4-weekly to monthly.  This
overcomes the issue presented when in receipt of 2 pays in one month
which reduces or even stops UC benefits in that month.   This would occur
3 times a year and would require re-application for UC in each case. 
Detailed information on UC has been communicated to the workforce and
is available here. 
•      Anyone seeking support from W4U and on a 4-weekly pay frequency,
would be advised to change to monthly rather than fortnightly.  This is
mainly due to bills (i.e., rent/mortgage/utilities/Hire Purchase/credit cards
etc.), that are generally due on monthly cycles.  Where difficulties are
being experienced, reverting to a monthly cycle, as available to any
employee, can be more beneficial. In reverting to fortnightly, W4U would
advise setting up two bank accounts – one for bill payments and another

Page 3

for living expenses. This would require closer budget management and
ideally access to banking apps to manage. This would be challenging for
those without smart devices, ready access to broadband/wi-fi and limited
digital skill. 
4.5 Experiential feedback was also gathered directly from the Payroll team,
supported by their TU representative, on the volume of additional work that
would be generated by the re-introduction of fortnightly pay. As previously
reported, the team have only just started to stabilise following the spike in
demand during and after pandemic, resourcing challenges presented by
higher than usual turnover including retirement of several experienced
colleagues. Adding this pay frequency back into the workload would require 3
days of a supervisor’s time per pay so 6 days each month (almost 30%) which
is a considerable drain on the small team and would undoubtedly
detrimentally impact other important tasks.   
4.6 The team comprises 2 FTE supervisors and 5 FTE payroll assistants with little
spare capacity given the volume of statutory tasks e.g., processing pay,
returns to pension administrators (SPFO and SPPA), multiple statutory
returns to HMRC, managing Auto Enrolment cycles, and many others.  These
tasks are undertaken for just under 8,500 employees across the Council, our
partners and the Elected Members.  The team also processes election pay as
required.   
4.7 The payroll function, like others across the organisation, must focus on wider
process improvement which is now especially critical to cope with increased
demand, releasing capacity and generating savings for the immediate team
and wider service areas.  These much-needed changes would not be feasible
should fortnightly pay be reintroduced.   
4.8 In short, while there may be a desire from some to include a fortnightly pay in
the council’s offering, given the challenges this poses to benefit recipients, the
difficulty in accommodating the additional workload and concerns about
retention of the team in an ever changing and complex space, it simply is not
feasible to reintroduce this pay frequency.   
5. People Implications 
5.1 Anyone who wishes to move to monthly to avoid impacting Universal Credit
(UC) payments or indeed for budgeting purposes, will be moved at the earliest
opportunity. This offer, extended to all, will also be reiterated in the wider
employee communication including the detailed UC information. 
5.2 In the event that fortnightly pay was reintroduced, those moving back to this
frequency would have a 4 week wait for their next pay as the fortnightly run
was calculated in arrears. This may well create further budgeting challenges
for the employees.

Page 4

6. Financial and Procurement Implications 
6.1 The proposals outlined above are necessary to manage the level of
administration experienced by the transactional teams especially Payroll and
to achieve the various legislative obligations some of which, at the current
time, have had to be extended. Whilst no direct cashable savings are
foreseen, nor is that the intension, it will most definitely deliver time release
savings, failure of which has the potential to result in additional resource being
sought.  This is challenging both in the delivery of the circa 12-month training
programme by the team already struggling with the workload and in light of
the reduction in allocated funding.   
7 Risk Analysis 
7.1 Reverting back to the fortnightly pay risks the Council’s ability to make
accurate and appropriate payments to employees, Elected Members and
partner organisations. Furthermore, statutory payments to a whole range of
agencies may be delayed, inaccurate and causes further problems for
employees in future, e.g., pension records not correct, tax changes not
reported in a timely manner etc. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 A high level Equality Impact Assessment was carried out for the initial
proposal which remains relevant.  This showed that retaining fortnightly pay
disproportionally affected male employees given they formed the larger
percentage, at odds with the overall male/female demographic split. No
complaints were received following the transfer to monthly/4-weekly
frequencies. 
9. Consultation 
9.1 This proposal has been discussed previously with the Trade Unions and the
outcome of the review was shared early November 2023. 
9.2 At time of issue, no formal feedback had been received from either Unison or
Unite.   
9.3 GMB confirmed that they conducted a survey of those formerly on fortnightly
pay and received responses from only 153 (26%).  Of these, 112 (73%)
indicated their desire to revert to fortnightly pay.   In the context of the broader
workforce, the 112 respondents represent just 1% of the total workforce
serviced by payroll. Given the significant risk associated with reintroducing a
fortnightly pay, it is prudent to consider the wider implications.

Page 5

10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1 The proposals set out within this report will assist the Council to deliver
against its strategic priority “to deliver efficient and effective frontline services
that improve the everyday lives of residents”, by contributing to the supporting
outcome of being a “continuously improving Council delivering best value”. 
Victoria Rogers 
Chief Officer People & Technology 
Date: 24 January 2024 
Person to contact:  Arun Menon, Business Support Manager, 
Church St, Dumbarton.  
Tel: 07772593317  
Email: arun.menon@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendix: EIA # 817 
Background Papers: None 
Wards Affected:  None

Page 6

No embedded text on this page.