Democracy Spraffa

Item 6 - Minutes of JCF

West Dunbartonshire Council · 1 February 2023
Back to Corporate Services Committee — 1 February 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

JOINT CONSULTATIVE FORUM
At a Meeting of the Joint Consultative Forum held in the Council Chambers,
Clydebank Town Hall, 5 Hall Street, Clydebank on Thursday, 1 December 2022 at
2.00 p.m.
Present: Councillors Karen Conaghan, Daniel Lennie*, David McBride,
Martin Rooney and Hazel Sorrell; Michael Dolan (EIS); Shirley
Furie, David Scott and John Wagner (GMB); Claire Mackenzie
(SSTA); Norman King, Chris Rossi and Margaret Wood (Unite);
and David Smith (UNISON).
*Arrived later in the meeting.
Attending: Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer – People & Technology; Amanda
Graham, Chief Officer – Citizen, Culture & Facilities; Laura
Mason, Chief Education Officer; Angela Wilson, Chief Officer –
Supply, Distribution & Property; Stephen Brooks, Working 4U
Manager; Alison McBride, Strategic People & Change Manager;
Lisa MacGregor, People & Change Partner; Michael McDougall
(Senior Solicitor), and Scott Kelly, Committee Officer.
Apologies: Apologies for absence were intimated on behalf of Councillor
Michelle McGinty; Derek Hutchison (GMB); Gail Macfarlane,
Shared Head of Service – Roads & Neighbourhood; Claire
Cusick, Senior Education Officer – Services for Children &
Young People; Margaret-Jane Cardno, Head of Strategy and
Transformation, Health & Social Care Partnership (HSCP); and
Sylvia Chatfield, Head of Mental Health, Learning Disability &
Addictions, HSCP.
Councillor David McBride in the Chair
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
It was noted that there were no declarations of interest in any of the items of
business on the agenda.
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
The Minutes of Meeting of the Joint Consultative Forum held on 8 September 2022
were submitted and approved as a correct record.
Note: Councillor Lennie entered the meeting at this point.
ITEM 6

Page 2

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT UPDATE
A report was submitted by the Chief Officer – People & Technology providing an
update on the approach to Employee Engagement and on the activities aligned to
the People First Strategy.
After discussion and having heard the Strategic People & Change Manager in
explanation of the report and in answer to Members’ questions, the Forum agreed to
note the contents of the report.
EQUALLY SAFE AT WORK – PROGRESS UPDATE
A report was submitted by the Chief Officer – People & Technology providing an
update on the Council’s work on the Equally Safe at Work employers’ accreditation
programme.
Following discussion and having heard the People & Change Partner in explanation
of the report and in answer to Members’ questions, the Forum agreed to note the
contents of the report and voiced support for training offered to be undertaken by all
employees.
EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS MONITORING: BI-ANNUAL UPDATE, 1 APRIL TO
30 SEPTEMBER 2022
A report was submitted by the Chief Officer – People & Technology advising of
progress on employment relations matters for the period 1 April to 30 September
2022.
After discussion and having heard the Strategic People & Change Manager in
explanation of the report and in answer to Members’ questions, the Forum agreed to
note the contents of the report.
EMPLOYEE WELLBEING BI-ANNUAL UPDATE, 1 APRIL 30 SEPTEMBER 2022
(COUNCIL-WIDE)
A report by the Chief Officer – People & Technology providing a detailed analysis on
Council-wide employee wellbeing and attendance for the period 1 April to 30
September 2022.
After discussion and having heard the Strategic People & Change Manager in
explanation of the report and in answer to Members’ questions, the Forum agreed:-
(1) to note the bi-annual findings for reported absence for the period 1 April to 30
September 2022, and in particular:-

Page 3

(a) the increase in Council wide sickness absence of approximately 883
full time equivalent (FTE) days lost compared to the same period last
year; 
(b) that the proportion of absence attributed to personal stress had
decreased by 5%, acute medical conditions and musculoskeletal had
both decreased by approximately 3% and minor illness absence had
increased by 9%; and 
(c) (i) that there was a change in how Covid-19 sickness absence was
reported when the nationally agreed special leave provisions for such
absences ceased in July 2022 and that, since that time, Covid-19
absences had been captured by the minor illness category thereby
accounting for some of the increase in minor illnesses in this reporting
period compared to 1 April to 30 September 2021; and (ii) that Long
Covid remained an absence category in its own right; and 
(2) to note that the categorising of absences which were due to personal or work-
related stress was based on information provided by the employee and that
clarification of the recording process would be provided to Mr Dolan. 
TRADES UNION ISSUES 
Apprenticeship Pay with regards to Minimum Wage related to age after Year 1 is
completed (item requested by Margaret Wood, Unite) 
Ms Wood provided the undernoted statement in relation to the above issue. 
Issue: Modern Apprentices being offered a 2 year apprenticeship without
being told that they will be a Level 2 apprentice for 1 year then will be put onto
a Level 3 apprenticeship. Meaning they have transferred to a new contract
and will not be eligible to be paid the living wage in year two in accordance
with their age. 
The TU’s would want the employer to do what is morally correct and pay
these young workers the appropriate rate of pay according to their age after
their 1st year is complete. Otherwise it is exploitative as they have very little
chance of gaining full time employment within WDC, making them feel used
as cheap labour. Most of these young people come from deprived
backgrounds many having their own homes from an early age. They have the
foresight and strength of character to realise that living hand to mouth for a
year will help them out of poverty by gaining experience they can use to
secure employment. Two years of living hand to mouth is unsustainable.
Whilst we recognise it is within the SG legislation framework not to apply the
LW if moved from a Level 2 to a Level 3 apprenticeship these young workers
must be told this at the application stage to allow them to make an informed
decision when being offered the MA. Which has not happened up until now.
Working 4 U need to be more aware of what Apprentice pay will be. Any
discussion I have had with them I have been referred to payroll which

Page 4

suggests they do not know. Working 4U is the contact for the MA’s this is just
not good enough. 
I have spoken to Working 4U and the Lead Officer of HR. 
After discussion and having heard the Chief Officer – People & Technology and the
Working 4U Manager in response, the Forum agreed:- 
(1) to note: (i) that the current pay model for apprentices had been in place since
2009 and that a review of its fairness was expected to be completed in the
near future; and (ii) that a report with recommendations to update the model
would be submitted to the appropriate committee in due course; and 
(2) to note that the advancement of apprentices from Level 2 to Level 3 was not
automatic and that an assessment took place before apprentices were offered
a new contract for Level 3. 
The meeting closed at 3.00 p.m.