Democracy Spraffa

Document Pack (Bookmarked) - CPWD Management Board 19 02 26

West Dunbartonshire Council · 19 February 2026
Back to Community Planning West Dunbartonshire Management Board — 19 February 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Agenda 
Community Planning West
Dunbartonshire Management Board 
Date:  Thursday, 19 February 2026
___________________________________________________________________ 
Time:  14:00
___________________________________________________________________ 
Venue:      The Board Room, NHS Golden Jubilee, Clydebank G81 4DY
___________________________________________________________________ 
Contact:    Nicola Moorcroft, Committee Officer  
nicola.moorcroft@west-dunbarton.gov.uk  
committee.admin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Dear Member 
Please attend a meeting of the Community Planning West Dunbartonshire
Management Board as detailed above. 
The business is shown on the attached agenda. 
Yours faithfully 
PETER HESSETT 
Chief Executive 
Page 1

Page 2

Distribution:- 
Councillor Martin Rooney (Chair) 
Councillor David McBride
Councillor Clare Steel 
Peter Hessett, Chief Executive, West Dunbartonshire Council  
Beth Culshaw, Chief Officer, West Dunbartonshire Health and Social Care
Partnership (WD HSCP) 
Gillian Hamilton, Chief Education Officer, West Dunbartonshire Council 
Gail MacFarlane, Chief Officer, Roads and Neighbourhood
Fiona Taylor, Health and Social Care Partnership (WD HSCP) 
Colin Smith, Communities Team Leader
John Anderson, Manager, West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust 
Anne Campbell, Principal, West College Scotland
Brian Dornan, West Dunbartonshire’s Place Director
Laurence Bayston, Head of West Region, Skills Development Scotland 
Joe McKay, Local Senior Officer – West Dunbartonshire, Scottish Fire &  
Rescue Service  
Selina Ross, Manager, West Dunbartonshire Community Volunteering Service 
Rebecca Campbell, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde 
Catherine Topley, Chief Executive, Scottish Canals 
Gordon Watson, Loch Lomond & the Trossachs National Park 
Sandie Scott, NHS Golden Jubilee, Director of Strategic Communications and
Stakeholder Relations
Carole Anderson, NHS Golden Jubilee, Director of Transformation, Strategy
Planning and Performance
Gary L’Anson, Police Scotland, Divisional Commander Argyll and West
Dunbartonshire Division
Lynsey Booth, Police Scotland
Jennifer Gilliver, Department for Work and Pensions
Amanda Kean, Climate Change and Energy Officer 
Councillor John Millar [substitute] 
Councillor Lawrence O’Neill [substitute]
Councillor Gurpreet Singh Johal [substitute] 
Date of issue: 6 February 2026 
Page 2

Page 3

COMMUNITY PLANNING WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE MANAGEMENT BOARD 
THURSDAY, 19 FEBRUARY 
AGENDA 
1 APOLOGIES 
2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
Members are invited to declare if they have an interest in any of the items of
business on the agenda and the reasons for such declarations. 
3 MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING                                                    7 - 11 
Submit for approval as a correct record, the Minutes of Meeting of the
Community Planning West Dunbartonshire Management Board held on 20
November 2025. 
4 ACTION LOG             13 
Submit for information the Rolling Action List for the Community Planning
West Dunbartonshire Management Board.   
5 COMMUNITY PLANNING EXECUTIVE GROUP      15 - 18 
Submit report by Peter Hessett, Chief Executive providing an update of
discussion at the Community Planning Executive Group (CPEG) meeting 
held on 21 January 2026. 
6 INTRODUCTION TO NATIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNING 
SELF-ASSESSMENT PROCESS   
19 - 21 
Presentation by Thomas Boyle (Improvement Service) providing and
introduction to the National Community Planning Self-Assessment Process. 
7/ 
Page 3

Page 4

7 WEST COLLEGE SCOTLAND’S STRATEGIC PLAN – ‘WE ARE WEST 
2026-2030’ 
Presentation by Anne Campbell, Principal - West College Scotland regarding 
West College Scotland’s Strategic Plan ‘We Are West 2026-2030’. 
8  DOMESTIC ABUSE AND VULNERABLE PERSONS 
Presentation by Susan MacIver and Stephen Love (Police Scotland)
regarding the above. 
9 UPDATE ON WHOLE FAMILY WELLBEING FUND   
APPROACHES   
23 - 53 
Submit report by Claire Cusick, Senior Education Officer, providing
information on the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund and an update on plans to
deliver Whole Family Supports. 
10 VERBAL UPDATE FROM PLACE DIRECTOR FOR CPWD AND HEAD OF
STRATEGY, SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT 
Verbal update from Brian Dornan and a review of discussions at recent
Scottish Government presentation to Community Planning Partners. 
11 COMMUNITY JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP UPDATE               55 - 60 
Submit report by Lesley James, Head of Children’s Health, Care and Criminal
Justice (Chief Social Worker – HSCP) providing an update regarding the
above. 
12 FLOURISHING DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP 
(DIG) UPDATE             
61 - 63 
Submit report by Gail McFarlane, Chief Officer, Roads and Neighbourhood
providing an update on the work of the Flourishing Delivery and Improvement
Group. 
13 NURTURED DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP                       To Follow                      
(DIG) UPDATE 
Submit a report by Lesley James, Head of Children’s Health, Care and
Criminal Justice (Chief Social Work Officer – HSCP), providing an update on
the work of the Nurtured Delivery and Improvement Group.
Page 4

Page 5

14 EMPOWERED DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP  
(DIG) UPDATE              
65 - 66 
Submit report by Selina Ross, West Dunbartonshire CVS providing an update
on the work of the Empowered Delivery and Improvement Group. 
15 CLIMATE ACTION HUB – ACTIVITY UPDATE REPORT     67 - 69         
Submit report by Selina Ross, West Dunbartonshire CVS providing an update
on the recent activity of the Climate Action Hub, facilitated and hosted by
WDCVS. 
16 EMERGENCY SERVICES SPOTLIGHT       
Verbal update by Police Scotland and Scottish Fire and Rescue service
highlighting current activities and initiatives. 
17 DATE OF NEXT MEETING 
Members are asked to note that the next meeting of the CPWD Management
Board will be on Thursday, 21 May 2026 at 2pm, on MS Teams. 
Page 5

Page 6

Page 6

Page 7

COMMUNITY PLANNING WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE MANAGEMENT BOARD 
Thursday, 20 November 2025 
Present: 
Councillor Martin Rooney (Chair)    West Dunbartonshire Council
Councillor Clare Steel              West Dunbartonshire Council
Beth Culshaw      West Dunbartonshire Council
Gillian Hamilton      West Dunbartonshire Council
Lesley James      West Dunbartonshire Council
Gail McFarlane      West Dunbartonshire Council
Colin Smith        West Dunbartonshire Council
Fiona Taylor        West Dunbartonshire Health and       
Social Care Partnership
John Binning     Strathclyde Partnership for 
Transport
Stephen Brooks    WD Working4U
Laurence Bayston    Skills Development Scotland
Trish Robertson    Police Scotland
Carole Anderson      NHS Golden Jubilee
Nicola Moorcroft      West Dunbartonshire Council 
Apologies: 
Peter Hessett      West Dunbartonshire Council
Councillor David McBride             West Dunbartonshire Council
Gerry Watt       Scottish Prison Service
Joe McKay        Scottish Fire and Rescue Service
Sandie Scott       NHS Golden Jubilee 
Selina Ross        West Dunbartonshire CVS
Brian Dornan        Scottish Government
Jan Haining        DWP
Rebecca Campbell      NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
John Anderson    West Dunbartonshire Leisure    
Trust
Chief Superintendent Gary I'Anson    Police Scotland
Anne Campbell    West College Scotland
Richard Millar    Scottish Canals 
ITEM 3
Page 7

Page 8

Councillor Martin Rooney in the Chair 
Councillor Rooney welcomed everyone to the meeting of the Community Planning West
Dunbartonshire Management Board. 
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
It was noted that there were no declarations of interest in any of the items of business
on the agenda. 
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING 
The Minutes of Meeting of the Community Planning West Dunbartonshire Management
Board held on 14 August 2025 were submitted and approved as a correct record. 
ACTION LOG 
The Rolling Action list for the Community Planning West Dunbartonshire Management
Board was submitted for information and relevant updates were noted and agreed. 
COMMUNITY PLANNING EXECUTIVE GROUP 
A report was submitted by Peter Hessett, Chief Executive providing an update of
discussion at the most recent Community Planning Executive Group (CPEG) meeting
held on 23 October 2025. 
After discussion and having heard the Chief Officer - WD Health and Social Care
partnership and the Communities Team Leader in further explanation and in answer to
Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to note the content of the report and
Appendix 1 of the report - CEPG Note and Actions 23 October 2025. 
INTEGRATED CHILDREN’S SERVICES PLAN REPORT 
A report was submitted by Lesley James, Head of Children’s Health, Care and Criminal
Justice (Chief Social Worker – HSCP), providing an update regarding the above. 
After discussion and having heard Lesley James in further explanation and in answer to
Members’ questions, the Board agreed to note the detailed update provided. 
LOCAL CHILD POVERTY ACTION REPORT 
A report was submitted by the Stephen Brooks (Working4U Manager) providing an
update on the on Local Child Poverty Action Report 2024/25. 
A detailed presentation highlighted:
 The scale of poverty, trends and data.
Page 8

Page 9

 Who is affected by Child poverty; the six priority groups
 What the drivers of child poverty are and its impact
 The work of the Family Prosperity Network, its vision and the  2025/26 action
plan
After discussion and having heard the Working 4U Manager in further explanation and
in answer to Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to :- 
(1) to note and support the actions set within the child poverty report: 
(2) to commit support, and representation where appropriate to the Family
Prosperity Network and its aims; and 
(3) Circulate the Presentation to all CPWD Partners. 
VERBAL UPDATE ON CLIMATE HUB 
In Selina Ross’s absence, Colin Smith provided an update; highlighting that the Lead
Officer is now in place and has taken forward a programme of meetings with Partners. 
COLLABORATION FOR HEALTH EQUITY 
A report was submitted from Colin Smith, Communities Team Leader, regarding the
above. 
After discussion and having heard the Communities Team Leader in further explanation
and in answer to Members’ questions, the Committee agreed:- 
(1)  note the content of the report; and 
(2) that the Chief Executive, on behalf of the CPWD Management Board, should
write to Collaboration for Health Equity Scotland (CHES) to highlight the failure of
general Grants to address the inequalities in funding. 
REVIEW OF DIG REPORTING 
A report was submitted from Colin Smith, Communities Team Leader, regarding the
above. 
After discussion and having heard the Communities Team Leader, in further
explanation and in answer to Members’ questions, the Committee agreed:- 
(1) to note the work carried out to review the Delivery Improvement Groups; 
(2) to approve the recommendations summarised in paragraph 4.12 of the report
with the exception of the Community Justice Partnership which will continue to
report quarterly; and 
(3) to continue discussions on reporting of the following initiatives:-
Page 9

Page 10

 Poverty/anti-poverty strategies
 Review of action plans
 Collating information on details of relevant Community Leaders with
regards to Emergency Planning 
PILOT PROJECT UPDATE 
Verbal update was given by Colin Smith, Communities Team Leader, regarding the
above; highlighting the findings of the consultation which will enable population of an
action plan to tackle the issues raised. 
COMMUNITY JUSTICE PARTNERSHIP UPDATE 
A report was submitted by Lesley James, Head of Children’s Health, Care and Criminal
Justice (Chief Social Worker – HSCP), providing an update regarding the above. 
After discussion and having heard Lesley James in further explanation and in answer to
Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to note the detailed update provided. 
FLOURISHING DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP (DIG) UPDATE 
A report was submitted by Gail MacFarlane, Chief Officer - Roads and Neighbourhood
providing an update on the work of the Flourishing Delivery and Improvement Group. 
After discussion and having heard Gail MacFarlane, Stephen Brooks and Laurence
Bayston (Skills Development Scotland) in further explanation and in answer to
Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to note the detailed update provided. 
INDEPENDENT DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP (DIG) UPDATE 
A report was submitted by Fiona Taylor, Head of Health and Community Care providing
an update on the work of the Independent Delivery and Improvement Group. 
After discussion and having heard Fiona Taylor in further explanation and in answer to
Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to note the detailed update provided. 
NURTURED DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP (DIG) UPDATE 
A report was submitted by Lesley James, Head of Children’s Health, Care and Criminal
Justice (Chief Social Work Officer – HSCP), providing an update on the work of the
Nurtured Delivery and Improvement Group. 
After discussion and having heard Lesley James in further explanation and in answer to
Members’ questions, the Committee agreed to note the detailed update provided. 
Page 10

Page 11

EMPOWERED DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP (DIG) UPDATE 
A report was submitted by Selina Ross, West Dunbartonshire CVS providing an update
on the work of the Empowered Delivery and Improvement Group. 
After discussion the Committee agreed to note the detailed update provided. 
SAFE DELIVERY IMPROVEMENT GROUP (DIG) UPDATE 
Verbal update was given from Superintendent Patricia Robertson, Police Scotland, on
the work of the Safe Delivery and Improvement Group. 
CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL FACE TO FACE MEETINGS 
To discuss and consider whether or not to proceed with additional in-person
meeting(s) of the CPWD Management Board. 
After discussion, the Committee agreed to hold additional face to face or hybrid
meetings at venues to be confirmed. 
DATE OF NEXT MEETING 
It was noted that the next meeting of the CPWD Management Board would be on
Thursday, 19 February 2026 at 2pm at a venue TBC. 
The meeting closed at 3.53 p.m.
Page 11

Page 12

Page 12

Page 13

Date Set Action Who Required by Date Status
20.11.25 Write to Collaboration for Health Equity Scotland
(CHES) to highlight the failure of general Grants to
address the inequalities in funding.
Peter Hesset,
Chief executive
As soon as
possible  Complete
20.11.25 Provide an update on Community Wealth Building
and presentation to a meeting of the CPWD
Officer to be
sourced/identified
As soon as
possible 
Complete –
Magda Swider to
deliver to May
meeting of CPWD
20.11.25 Circulate the Local Child Poverty Action Report
Presentation to all CPWD Partners. 
Committee
Officer
As soon as
possible  Complete 
Complete  In Progress  Outstanding 
ITEM 4
Page 13

Page 14

Page 14

Page 15

Report by the Chief Executive Officer of West Dunbartonshire Council, Chair of
the Community Planning Executive Group 
Management Group: 19th February 2026 
___________________________________________________________________ 
Subject: Community Planning Executive Group 
1. Purpose 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform CPWD Board members of the
discussion at the most recent Community Planning Executive Group (CPEG)
meeting held on 21st January 2026.   
2. Recommendations 
2.1 CPWD is asked to note the content of Appendix One: Minute and Action Note of
Community Planning Executive Group meeting held 21st January 2026. 
3. Background 
5.1 The Community Planning Executive Group met on 21st January 2026. The
group is chaired by the Council’s Chief Executive, and membership includes
the three DIG leads.  The purpose of the group is to support CPWD and
oversee improvement activity across the partnership.     
4. Main Issues 
4.1 The key discussion points and actions are noted in Appendix One: Community
Planning Executive Group Meeting Note and Action Grid 21st January 2026. 
5. People Implications 
5.1 There are no people implications. 
6. Financial Implications 
6.1 There are no financial implications. 
7. Risk Analysis
ITEM 5
Page 15

Page 16

7.1 Failure to respond to challenges would risk delivery against policy priorities. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 No actions are required as this is an update report. 
9. Consultation 
9.1 This report provides an update on ongoing CPWD activity. 
10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1  Progressing work as outlined in this report ensures CPWD can deliver on the
outcomes set in the Local Outcome Improvement Plan. 
Peter Hessett -  Chair, CPEG 
21st January 2026
_______________________   
Person to Contact: Colin Smith, Communities Team Leader. Colin.Smith@west-
dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices: None 
Background Papers:    Previous reports to Community Planning West
Dunbartonshire Management Board on Executive Group
activity. 
Wards Affected: All 
Page 16

Page 17

Community Planning West
Dunbartonshire Executive Group –
Meeting Note and Actions 
Date:  Wednesday 21st January 2026
___________________________________________________________________ 
Time:  2pm on MS Teams
___________________________________________________________________ 
Item
1. Welcome, introductions and apologies. 
In Attendance:
Peter Hessett (Chair) (PH), Beth Culshaw (BC), Fiona Taylor (FT), Gail
MacFarlane (GM), Lesley James (LJ), Colin Smith (CS), Elaine Boyle
(EB).
Apologies: Selina Ross. (SR) 
2. Note and action log of previous meeting 
 Action: Alter Executive Group meeting invitation to reflect changes to
DIGS. (EB) 
3.1 DIG updates on Action Plans 
 Nurtured DIG– (LJ) A progress update will be available for CPWD
Board meeting.        
 Flourishing DIG- (GM) – Report will be available for Board meeting. 
DIG Partners are looking at an event focusing on Employability and
enhancing employment opportunities in Green and other emerging
areas of employment.  
 Empowered DIG- No report 
3.2 Exception reporting: Nothing raised. 
Remove this item from future agendas. (CS)
4. Community Planning West Dunbartonshire 
Planning for a community planning event in year 2026-27- Flourishing
DIG’s potential event around Green Jobs could fulfil the CPWD
commitment 
Pilot Project Up-date
Initial community engagement has been completed and a summary report
on findings is available.  
Action: CS to restart pilot project and seek partner backing
ITEM 5 - APPENDIX 1
Page 17

Page 18

 Community Cohesion-
Action to engage with and collate details of relevant community
leaders with regards to community cohesion and preparedness for any
potential issues in West Dunbartonshire.  Particularly in relation to
community tensions focused on New Scots, immigrants and refugees. 
BC will meet with Chair of the Empowered DIG (SR) in relation to this. 
5. CPWD Management Board Meeting feedback 
Agenda items for CPWD:
a). Improvement Service presentation on CP Self- Assessment
(Thomas Boyle)
b) DIG Reports-Empowered, Flourishing and Nurtured.
c) Update on Whole Family Wellbeing Fund Approaches- Claire Cusick 
d) Climate Change Action Plan- Amanda Kean
d) West-College Scotland Strategic Plan- Anne Campbell
e) Community Justice Partnership Report 
f) Community Learning and Development Strategic Group 
g) Further reflections/consideration of SG presentation to CPWD from
22nd January 26.   
Action: CS Check availability of speakers for future meetings-
Community Wealth Building and Sport and Physical Activity Strategy.
6. AOCB and Date of Next Meeting  
Meeting dates:
 CPWD Pre-agenda – Wednesday 28th January 10am. (MS Teams)
 CPWD Board – Thursday 19th February 2pm (Golden Jubilee
Hospital, Clydebank.)
 CPEG – Wednesday 22nd April 11.30 (MS Teams) 
No. Action Progress
3.  Action: CS to restart pilot and seek
partnership backing 
Engagement complete.   
4. Action:  BC to speak to SR about Community
Cohesion and Empowerment DIG agenda. 
5. Action: CS to circulate reporting schedule for
approval/adoption. 
Page 18

Page 19

National 
Community Planning
Self-Assessment
ITEM 6
Page 19

Page 20

National Community Planning Self-Assessment | 2
Community Planning Partnerships (CPPs) play a leading role in delivering improved outcomes
for the communities they serve. To support partnerships to critically review their ‘fitness for
purpose’ in achieving shared outcomes, the Improvement Service are proposing a new national
self-assessment to be held every two years. This will be focussed at the strategic Board level
using a CPP Checklist. This follows the well-established Public Service Improvement Framework
(PSIF) Checklist Approach.
Since 2016, more than half of CPPs have successfully undertaken a self-assessment using
this approach. However, this will be the first time that this approach has been applied across
Scotland to provide a national overview of areas that are working well and areas where
improvements could be made across community planning in Scotland.
The key aim of self-assessment at this level is to support the Board of the CPP to ensure that
areas such as governance, accountability, leadership and performance management are fit for
purpose to achieve the outcomes of the LOIP.
The checklist acts as a ‘can opener’ for identifying areas of strength across the partnership and
also potential areas for improvement, which can then be developed into an improvement plan
for the CPP moving forward.
Self-Assessment Process
For CPPs that engage in this process, the first stage will be a short online Awareness Session
to explain the process and what is required from Board members. Following this, the online
checklist will be distributed to CPPs for all Board members to complete.
Once the checklist closes, the Improvement Service will analyse the findings and highlight these
in a national report. The report will be completely anonymised with the findings published at a
national level.
As well as the national report, each participating CPP will be provided with their own checklist
report which can be used to develop an improvement plan at
a local level. The Improvement Service will make the offer,
if required, to facilitate a session for individual CPPs to
develop their improvement plan.
Page 20

Page 21

National Community Planning Self-Assessment | 3
Benefits of a National Approach
■ National overview of what is working well and where improvements could be made. This
would provide a baseline that CPPs could use to assess progress in future years. 
■ National organisations, such as the IS, can use this information to further develop offers of
support. 
■ Develop case studies based on areas of good practice which will be shared nationally.
■ Individual CPP Checklist Reports that can be used at a local level to review strengths and
areas for improvement, leading to the development of an improvement plan for the CPP.
Individual CPP Checklist Reports will be completely anonymous and not shared beyond the
CPP itself. 
■ No cost to partnerships to participate in the process.
This approach offers an exciting opportunity to develop a national understanding of Community
Planning Partnerships that will offer both opportunities to share good practice across Scotland
and provide more targeted support from national organisations.
If you would like more information on this
approach, please contact:
thomas.boyle@improvementservice.org.uk
Page 21

Page 22

Page 22

Page 23

Report by the Chief Education Officer 
Management Group:  February 2026
___________________________________________________________________ 
Subject: 
1. Purpose 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to: 
 Inform members of the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund and;
 Update on plans to deliver whole family supports. 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 Community Planning Partnership (CPP) West Dunbartonshire is asked to: 
 note progress and strategic direction of plans. 
3. Background 
3.1 Scottish Government (SG) have established the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund
(WFWF) over the lifetime of this parliament (2022-2026). They have committed
£500 million to support Community Planning Partnerships to:
 support the whole system transformational change required to reduce the
need for crisis intervention and;
 shift investment towards prevention and early intervention. Appendix 1 – 
National Principles of Holistic Whole Family Support. 
3.2 It is their ambition that by 2030 at least 5% of all community-based health and
social care spend will be on preventative whole family support measures. 
3.3 Funding priorities are focused on:
 supporting capacity building at local and national level;
 supporting the scaling up of existing transformational practice in line with
holistic whole family support principles and;
 demonstrating positive impact for families. 
3.4 The fund is split into three elements: £32 million to support Children’s Services
Planning Partnerships, £6 million to enable direct support to CPP’s from a
national improvement team and the third element supporting new, SG led
national policy delivery that will help transform how families are
supported(decisions on this element are still pending).
ITEM 9
Page 23

Page 24

3.5 It is expected that when WFWF ceases at the end of 2027-2028, local
investment will have realigned to support the new systems and services it has
enabled. 
4. Main Issues  
4.1 WDC has established a multi-agency steering group to develop a strategic
approach to delivering Whole Family Wellbeing changes and improvements.
Key staff have been identified who will progress workstreams. Plans and
updates are and will continue to be reflected in the Integrated Children’s
Services Plan.  This Lead Group has skills and values centred on the
principles of holistic whole family support and a commitment to working in new
and different ways to join up resources and approaches.  
The establishment of a cyclical series of meetings by the Expert Group and
the Changemaker Groups ensures joined up decision making and action
planning which is timely, effective and impactful. 
4.2 Our vision of family support is one which is clearly accessible and readily
available to all and any family who needs it. We aim to ensure families are
able to access the help they need, where and when they need it for as long as
it is needed. In this way, we will shift towards a West Dunbartonshire where
more of our children know and experience care, compassion and love, as
opposed to a ‘care system’.  This will enable us to fulfil the right of children to
be raised safely in their own families; where those family’s skills and
capacities have been developed and strengthened, leaving them better
equipped to support their children. 
4.3 Our strategy guides partners in jointly developing systems to provide holistic
support which addresses the needs of children and adults in a family at the
time of need rather than at times of crisis. In turn, it is anticipated this will help
families to flourish, reduce the chances of family breakdown, and of children
entering the care system.   It takes account of The Promise Scotland and
clearly highlights the importance of un-stigmatised access to effective
universal and intensive family support with early intervention and prevention at
its core. 
4.4 We recognise the need to ensure the voice of our children, young people and
families is crucial to ensuring we develop our systems in a way they recognise
reflects their needs and views.  We aim to develop pathways to support where
the experiences of our families are embedded in their rights, their needs and
their hopes, informed by recent survey activity. A Family Wellbeing,
Participation and Involvement Lead Officer has been appointed to support the
coordination, strategic planning and developments surrounding West
Dunbartonshire's aspirations to fully implement our Whole Family Wellbeing
Route Map and Plan.  In addition, a Whole Family Wellbeing Support Officer
has been appointed.  This Officer has responsibility to support in the delivery
of the expectations of Family Support and the collaboration across services to
drive forward our shared ambitions associated with The Promise, UNCRC and
GIRFEC.
Page 24

Page 25

4.5 A revised calendar of Quality Improvement and Self-Evaluation has been
produced and is being implemented, which will lead all Nurtured DIG partners
in evaluating How Good Is Our Family Support.  This process supports
partners over a three year cycle, to consider the four themes of family support
and outcomes of this will inform developments and improvements to service
delivery. 
4.6 Planning and delivery of supports has involved establishing three Family Help
WDC sites across the Council; Clydebank Central, Dumbarton Central and
Bonhill. Families will be able to access a range of workers and supports on
the premises in any given day. Staffing of the Hubs includes: 5 Outreach
Workers and an NHS Neurodevelopment Team.  They will offer planned
group and 1-1 sessions focussing on family help.   This partnership working
will offer opportunities for professional learning for the wider multi-agency
workforce, with a series of ND specific CPD sessions for staff from all
agencies being delivered in each hub.  NHS staff from Specialist Children's
Services (including Paediatricians, Nursing, Occupational Therapy and
Speech & Language Therapy), CAMHS (including Psychology and Nursing),
and from the ND team itself will deliver these sessions.   
4.8 A diverse range of multi-agency staff and partners provides a suite of family
help supports coordinated and delivered in the premises and elsewhere as
appropriate. These include: W4U supporting access to financial support,
Neurodevelopmental workers, Includem,  Education Outreach workers,
Specialists in Family Group Decision Making, Speech and Language
Therapists, Occupational Therapists and Family Nursing staff. The impact of
this work is measured and evaluated to inform progress and next steps.
Appendix 2 – WFWF Annual Report 2024-25    
5. People Implications 
5.1 There are no people implications as a result of this report.  However, it is
essential that partners collaborate to re-align resource allocation and priorities
to meet the needs of children, young people and families with Early Help as
we progress towards 2028. 
6. Financial Implications 
6.1 There are no direct financial implications for Community Planning West
Dunbartonshire resulting from this report.  All activities related to the
implementation of these interventions are contained within allocated SG
funding. 
7. Risk Analysis 
Page 25

Page 26

7.1 If the Council is unable to ensure positive outcomes for children, we will not
be meeting their needs (Children and Young People Act 2014) (Equalities Act
2010). 
7.2 If the Council is unable to meet the needs of children, young people and
families this could result in reputational damage. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 The plans enhance the quality of the service provided to all children, young
people and families, therefore it can be seen to have a positive impact in
terms of the equalities 
9. Consultation 
9.1 Legal Services and the Section 95 Officer have been consulted in relation to
the content of this report.   
10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1  This report reflects the Council’s aspiration to reduce inequalities for the
people of West Dunbartonshire. 
Person to Contact:  Claire Cusick Senior Education Officer 
Appendices: Appendix 1 –  National Principles of Holistic Whole Family
Support. http://www.gov.scot/ISBN/9781804351208 
Appendix 2 – WFWF Annual Report 2024-25   
Wards Affected: All 
Page 26

Page 27

West Dunbartonshire Council -  April 2024 - March 2025  
Whole Family Wellbeing Funding (WFWF) Programme – Year 3 Progress
Report 
SECTION 1: Activities, WFWF Logic Model Outcomes, and Estimated Budget
Allocated
Activity 1: Question 1: Activity title and description:    Family Wellbeing, Participation and
Involvement Lead Officer & Whole Family Wellbeing Support Officer 
A Family Wellbeing, Participation and Involvement  Officer remains in post to support the coordination
and operational planning of our aspirations to fully implement our Whole Family Wellbeing Route Map
and Plan. A Whole Family Wellbeing Support Officer remains in post who has responsibility to support
our shared ambitions associated with The Promise, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the
Child (UNCRC) and Getting It Right For Every Child (GIRFEC). 
Question 2: a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please
indicate the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Early Outcomes: 
●  Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners begin embedding national principles
for holistic whole family support in their own systems and services (focus on prevention + early
intervention).
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners use new knowledge of good practice.
●  Strategic leaders set local budgets to invest in planning system change.
●  Increased Whole Family support service capacity among CSPP partners – plans available for
integrating scaled and new services. 
Long Term Outcomes:
●  Sustainable Whole Family Support service provision maintained through budget allocations 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? 
Championing the UNCRC is central to the Whole Family Wellbeing Support Officer's role, driving a
plan that delivers targeted professional learning across West Dunbartonshire Council. This training
aims to embed a strong understanding of Children's Rights, ensuring services strategically consider
the UNCRC in their work and prioritise the voices of children in all relevant decisions, by bolstering
advocacy and integrating children's perspectives into policy. Extending UNCRC awareness to the
community empowers families and enables the gathering of parental perspectives on children's rights,
ultimately fostering stronger whole family wellbeing. Key activities supporting this work have been: 
● Creation and delivery of shared professional learning sessions to embed UNCRC at the heart of
everything we do. We are developing a community where every child and young person is aware
of their Rights, where these Rights are respected, protected, and fulfilled in all our policies,
practices, and services, and where children and young people are empowered to actively
participate in shaping their lives and their community.  Professional learning sessions have
involved a range of staff groups across the Council such as; newly qualified teachers (NQTs), WD
Leisure Active Schools team,Modern Apprentices and the Alternatives to Care Team.
1
ITEM 9 - APPENDIX 1
Page 27

Page 28

The creation of  ILEARN WDC UNCRC Training Module for Education staff and a 10-minute
briefing video for all other council staff.  
Current participations numbers since the modules were launched are as follows: 
* UNCRC 10 Minute Briefing (non-education) - 54 staff completed, an increase from 3 in 2024.  
*UNCRC 45 minute Education Staff Module - 378 staff completed, an increase from 216 in 2024. 
Feedback survey data can be accessed here from the NQT training sessions - NQT UNCRC
Training module feedback January 2025.pdf. 
●  The Rights Advisory Board, consisting of a representative group of young people from across
the Council, has worked in collaboration with a range of  WDC Officers,  gaining insight into areas
of responsibility, giving feedback and contributing to surveys providing views on the places they
live in and steps for improvement. Rights Board members have produced an Introductory Video
entitled ‘We are the Rights Advisory Board’. This details the board’s aims and objectives with a
view to enabling a more full engagement with Service Leads. 
●  We have continued to raise the Profile of Rights  via a range of social media. More recently,
congratulatory messages have been shared in relation to the successful achievement of  Rights
Respecting Schools Bronze and Silver Awards. Next steps for social media will include
signposting to RRSA’s monthly spotlight resource, continued signposting to articles of the week
and further good news stories relating to the wider recognition of UNCRC across the Council. 
●  We are ambitious in our drive towards  Rights Respecting Schools. We currently have 19
schools who have achieved Bronze Awards and 4 schools who have achieved Silver. This is a
significant improvement from one school with a Bronze Award last session.   To ensure
sustainability of the model, key staff have trained as accreditors.   During a recent accreditation
visit evaluation feedback was gathered from  Head Teachers, “Investing tIme and energy into the
RRSA has paid off. There are increased levels of pupils who want to learn and less intervention by
management to regulate behaviour. Our staff are equipped and better informed in rights respecting
practices. Experiences are not as stressful! Children can see the links between restorative
practices and their Rights. They’re platforms for sharing their voice and opportunities to share
opinions have increased as well.” 
Engagement with Children and Young People regarding UNCRC Articles
Children and Young People from across the Council have engaged in a range of UNCRC sessions
eliciting their perspectives and understanding of the rights afforded to them under the UNCRC,  They
demonstrated a commendable grasp of the various articles within the Convention, articulating their
views and opinions with clarity and insight. Their contributions provided valuable qualitative data
regarding their comprehension of their Rights, informing next steps.
These insights were transformed into engaging videos to be shared via social media and the UNCRC
website to help raise awareness. They can be accessed here - Article Videos. 
●   The 'Our Voices, Our Stories' pilot programme, running from January to May 2025, successfully
engaged an S1 class to tackle poverty and anti-stigma through the power of lived experiences.
This collaborative project, involving multiple education and partnerships, innovatively used comic
book creation to help young people explore themes of empathy and inclusion. The pilot's impact
and success was shared with the Poverty and Inequality Commission and the Scottish Poverty
and Inequality Research Unit  and presented at an Education Leaders Conference, with plans to
2 Page 28

Page 29

refine its resources into a 6-lesson block for wider S1 implementation and to establish an
Ambassador programme involving the pilot students..
Impact:
Enhanced understanding of Poverty Anti-Stigma: Directly addressed the core theme, fostering
a deeper understanding of the issue among young people.
Increased Empathy and Inclusion: Utilized lived experiences to strengthen students' empathy
and promote inclusive attitudes.
Empowerment of Young Voices: Provided a platform for young people's thoughts and opinions
to be captured and valued through comic book design, contributing to their sense of achievement.
Innovative Educational Resources: Developed new, engaging resources (printed and digital
comics) that creatively convey complex social themes.
Demonstrated Collaborative Success: Highlighted effective team working and collaboration
between diverse internal and external agencies.
Developed Student Leadership: Cultivated leadership skills among participating S1 pupils
through their involvement in the planned ambassador programme.
Showcased Best Practice: The  presentation at the Education Leaders Conference promoted the
pilot's success, facilitating  its broader adoption across West Dunbartonshire . 
Evidence: Our Voices, Our Stories midway survey
WDC UNCRC Website
Our website serves as a central hub for Children's Rights resources. This accessible online platform
provides valuable information for both the public and Council employees, including dedicated CLPL
(Continuous Learning and Professional Development) links. These resources for employees feature an
in-depth Education Staff module and a concise 7-minute briefing for all other Council personnel,
ensuring broad access to essential training.
Click here
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in pounds):   
Total: £126,691
Activity 2 : Outreach Team Caseload & Group Work
Question 1: Activity title and description: Outreach Team- Outreach Caseload Intensive
1to1 Family Support & Group Work
Question 2: Question 1: Activity title and description:  
The 3 WD for Families Hub Sites across our communities continue to support our approaches to 
Tests of Change for Family Help; improving family  support tailored to their needs, in dignified
ways. Site location was informed by scoping exercises, community consultations and professional
knowledge and dialogue of the Strategic Group. Support is easily accessible, stigma free and
3 Page 29

Page 30

located in places that work for children and families.   Our WD for Families website  is updated
regularly and shared across services and with parents, carers and community organisations :  
a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please indicate
the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Early Outcome :
●   Family support managers and practitioners develop engagement, feedback collection and
co-design skills.
●   CYPF are actively, regularly and meaningfully engaged in service design.
●   Family support managers and practitioners collate and analyse service design feedback (See
connection to outcome: Family support managers analyse CYPF feedback and monitoring data to
inform multi-agency and partnership planning).
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners begin embedding national principles
for holistic whole family support in their own systems and services (focus on prevention + early
intervention).
●   CYPF say that services are designed to be: free of stigma; rights-led; and to meet their specific
needs.
●  More CYPF receive whole family support through referrals or self-referrals.
●   CYPF are aware of how to access relevant Family support.
●   CYPF say they feel positive and trusting of services as result of implemented changes to service
design.
●   CYPF take up services.
●   CYPF say family support is accessible and provides early help and support where and when it suits
them.
● Strategic leaders set local budgets to invest in planning system change.
● Increased Whole Family support service capacity among CSPP partners – plans available for
integrating scaled and new services.
●Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG have clear &
shared understanding of families’ needs and how services are experienced across whole system
●Family support managers and practitioners say that there is cross-sectoral commitment that enables
them to collaborate to deliver Holistic Family support and that children’s services culture empowers
them to innovate to deliver Holistic Family support.
●Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners’ wellbeing is improved and integral to
delivery of Family support. 
Intermediate Outcome :
●CYPF recognise available support is informed by them and feel their contributions influence service
design.
●CYPF say they feel positive and trusting of services as result of implemented changes to service
design.
● CYPF individual outcomes improve (e.g. confidence; social capital/connections; attendance at
school; parental financial literacy).
● Strategic leaders, Family support managers (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG demonstrate a collaborative,
co-productive approach to planning, working culture, and delivery.
● All CSPP partners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG agree that they are equal partners in collaborative,
4 Page 30

Page 31

multi-agency delivery of family support. 
Long Term Outcomes:
. Improved family wellbeing
. Reduced inequalities in family wellbeing   
. Increase in families taking up wider supports
. Sustainable Whole Family Support service provision maintained through budget allocations 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing?   
WD For Families Hubs are staffed
and operate on a ‘chatty cafe’
style approach, where families
can drop in for help and or plan a
visit to attend 1-1 or group
sessions. Families can be helped
by; outreach workers, signposting,
on site welfare support workers
and specialist providers.  
5 Outreach Workers currently staff
the Hubs and have 71 Families
active across caseloads. 
Currently 140 children are being
supported via family support.
Since August they have worked in
partnership and discharged  63  families following a period of intervention; thus impacting directly on 129
children.   Families on caseload are those not yet ready to engage in group work and they receive intensive
support via  1-1 sessions either in the home setting or hubs when appropriate.  
To date our cyclical programme of group sessions has focussed on themes such as Supporting Sleep,
Supporting Behaviour, Supporting Toileting and  Supporting Emotional Regulation. From August to March
2025 the Outreach Team has delivered 18 Groups,  within these themes, with 100 families engaging.  This
has led to 135 children being supported
through parent/carer learning opportunities. 
Feedback tells us that all feel the support they
have received has helped their own wellbeing,
their child/children’s wellbeing and the
wellbeing of their family.    To further support
wellbeing and provide relaxation opportunities
an Outreach worker provided Knit and Natter
sessions.  These sessions  provide an
opportunity for social connection and
relaxation, fostering improved mental
wellbeing through shared activity and
conversation.  The group has asked to self
facilitate and continue the sessions creating their own sustainable 
support network.
In December, 32 Families attended the Family Festive Film Sessions
delivered by the Outreach Workers in partnership with a local cinema
group, with opportunities for families to participate together in
Christmas film activities as well as eat together within the Hub setting. 
5 Page 31

Page 32

Feedback from the Festive Fun Sessions was very positive and families have asked for similar family
opportunities to be provided.   
In partnership with the (Trauma Informed Parenting
(TIPS) Charity,two parents/carers workshops on
how to manage children's challenging behaviours
by applying a trauma-informed approach were
delivered and supported 14 families.  Feedback
was very positive with parents / carers commenting
they felt seen, validated and less alone.  Further
sessions have been planned for the next session. 
Recognising the need to develop pro-active
approaches to family wellbeing opportunities,
informed by parents / carers  and pupil voice consultation, Parent / Carer Consultation October 2024 - WD
for Families - Family Fun & Learning Sessions - Google Forms we worked collaboratively with partners in
Active Schools, Health Improvement and Y Sort It to deliver Free Family Fun sessions that included
opportunities for Family Physical Fun as well as
Family Creative and Music Fun. 33 Families
engaged across 5 session with 52 children
participating in free,  planned family sessions and
shared dining experiences with family members.
Taking cognisance of consultation, quieter low
sensory sessions were also facilitated to provide
opportunities for families with members with
additional support needs to participate in
experiences with no cost within their local Hub. 
9 parents/carers have been supported via core
Incredible Years (IY) Groups which have involved
14 weeks of support and learning. In response to
needs identified, professional learning has been
undertaken by our teams in order to develop this
offer to support parents/carers of children with Autism and/or Language Delay.  An Autism and Language
Delay IY Pilot group is currently underway supporting 10 families with a further pilot group planned for
January 2026. This pilot model has been supported in partnership with PoPP and is being collaboratively
delivered by NHS and Education staff in West Dunbartonshire.
It is recognised that the added value of attendance and support in the Hubs has ensured opportunities for
cross fertilisation to take place, where families can be signposted and supported to access a range of
additional supports and opportunities. Feedback tells us this is welcomed and impactful.
6 Page 32

Page 33

●   We continue to  develop awareness and engagement in Hub activities via the use of social
media. To date 4 WD Family HUB short films have been created:
1. Introductory video of all the Hubs - Click here for Hub Video 
2. Impact of Clydebank Hub - Interview of Hub users -  Click here for Clydebank Hub users
interview
3. Tanya Tenant Neuro Diverse Training Interview with Tanya Tennant -   Click here for Tanya
Tennant interview
4. Dumbarton Hub user experiences interview - Click here for Dumbarton Hub user experiences
interview 
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds)
Outreach Salaries : £196,601 
Hub Hire -  £55,777
Hub Running Costs, Family Fun Partnership Costs  & Catering for Family Events   -  £1702 
Activity 3 : Professional Learning for Workforce via WD for Families Hubs   
Question 1: Activity title and description:  Professional Learning for Workforce via WD for Families
Hubs  
In recognition that our workforce are our greatest assets and will have the biggest impact on change and
improvement, we have delivered multi-agency professional learning to a variety of staff across a range of
topics. This has helped develop a shared language and approach to family help. 
a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please indicate
the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Early Outcome :
●   Family support managers and practitioners develop engagement, feedback collection and
co-design skills.
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners begin embedding national principles
for holistic whole family support in their own systems and services (focus on prevention + early
intervention).
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners begin embedding national principles
for holistic whole family support in their own systems and services (focus on prevention + early
7 Page 33

Page 34

intervention). (See connection to outcome: CYPF say that services are designed to be: free of
stigma; rights-led; and to meet their specific needs).
●   Family support managers collect and analyse CYPF feedback and monitoring data.
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners use new knowledge of good practice.
●   CSPPs plan to shift towards non-siloed and aligned Family support funding that matches the scale
of need. 
Intermediate Outcome :
●   All CSPP partners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG agree that they are equal partners in collaborative,
multi-agency delivery of family support.
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG demonstrate a collaborative,
co-productive approach to planning, working culture, and delivery. 
Long Term Outcomes:
●   Sustainable Whole Family Support service provision maintained through budget allocations 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing?
TIPS Professional Learning - Almost all attendees (92%) rated the quality of the session Very Good or
Good.  Most (82% ) strongly agreed or agreed with
the statements:
‘My confidence around the topic(s) of the session
has increased.’ 
‘I am more knowledgeable about the topic(s) of the
session.’
‘I have increased awareness of the topic(s) of the
session.’
‘I have increased understanding of the topic(s) of
the session.’
Almost all attendees (92%) stated they were Likely
or Very Likely to:
‘Implement the learning in practice.’
‘Share what you learned with colleagues’
‘Continue to engage in learning around this practice.’ 
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year.
£0 (TIPS, Health Improvement, NHS SLT, etc. all provided free training. Partner Provider cost
accounted for in Activity 6) 
Activity 4 : Neurodevelopmental Team (ND) Input
Question 1: Activity title and description: “Cuppa and Connect” sessions have been
introduced within the local Primary Schools.  
The sessions are aimed at carers of CYP
with neurodivergent profiles to offer support
and advice around a range of topics. This
replaces the drop-in sessions previously run
8 Page 34

Page 35

within the WFW Hubs as attendance in the hubs was lower than the need for support informed us.
Since moving into the primary schools there has been a tenfold increase in families attending the
sessions. We plan to expand these next session to encompass more establishments including an
earlier intervention approach in ELCC.
Question 2: 
a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please indicate
the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Availability & Access:
Early Outcome – for CYPF, FS is perceived as accessible providing early help and support where
and when it suits them. 
Intermediate Outcome – CYPF needs are met by the right service for their needs (spectrum
between universal and statutory services).
Long Term Outcomes – 1. Improved family wellbeing, 3. Reduction in families requiring crisis
intervention, 5. Increase in families taking up wider support.
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? 
Early Outcomes : Sessions are held in each of the local primary schools at drop-off or pick-up
times to support parental attendance.  Sessions are facilitated by ND HCSWs (funded through the
WFW Monies), sometimes supported by ASN coordinator from the primary school. Increase in
attendance at sessions is evidence that families prefer going to the schools.
Intermediate Outcome – Increased attendance at the Cuppa and Connect sessions has been
reflected in a reduction in phone calls to the ND service helpline.
Long Term Outcomes – We are not far enough into this to identify long term benefits to family
wellbeing or reduction in crisis intervention.  There has been a marked reduction in stage 1 and 2
complaints to the local NHS team, however we cannot formally identify if there is a direct
correlation to the Cuppa & Connect sessions. 
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds)
£35,000 
Activity 5 : Neurodevelopmental Team Input
Question 1: Activity title and description: 
Neurodevelopmental Assessment Test of Change pilot.  Three Primary schools within West
Dunbartonshire were chosen to have enhanced support within the P1 classes to facilitate
supporting ASN pupils with complex ND profiles.  The NHS ND Team collaborated with our
colleagues in education to pilot a new model of assessment and diagnosis working with teaching
staff and assessing pupils in the school environment.  Training and support was provided to
Education staff to help support their understanding and awareness of the needs of the new P1
pupils, and all other children within the school who were on the ND waiting list, had their
assessments & feedback appointments within the school.  ND staff based themselves within the
schools and all aspects of the assessment were undertaken during school hours.
9 Page 35

Page 36

Question 2: a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to?
Please indicate the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Children & Families at the Centre of Service Design:
Early Outcomes – For CYPF, services shift to needs and rights-based planning and participation.
For CYPF services maintain respectful relationships.
Long Term Outcome – Reduced inequalities in family wellbeing
Availability & Access: 
Early Outcome – for CYPF, FS is perceived as accessible providing early help and support where
and when it suits them. 
Intermediate Outcome – CYPF needs are met by the right service for their needs (spectrum
between universal and statutory services).
Long term outcome – Increase in families taking up wider support.
Whole System Approach:
Early Outcomes – CSPPs share accountability for the whole system/joined up approach. CSPPs
planning focused on WFS informed by NP, CYPF and local need, evidence based (local & national
data) 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? 
Children & Families at the Centre of Service Design:
Early Outcomes – Staff from the ND team based themselves within each of the local primary
schools and worked with parents and education staff to deliver a robust and holistic assessment
service.  Assessments were able to be carried out across a school term. CYP were able to be
observed in a safe and comfortable environment. Teaching and support staff collaborated with the
assessment process, and outcomes were provided in a TATC setting.  Feedback from both carers
and education staff was overwhelmingly positive. Please see attached data for a full range of
feedback information. Particularly positive feedback was received about school staff being part of
the feedback process so that everyone was hearing the same information at the same time and
we had an opportunity to reassure parents about what support the schools had already put in
place for their child. 
Long Term Outcome – Did Not Attend rates reduced considerably as families were able to attend
appointments in their local school, rather than traveling long distances to a hospital environment.
Unfortunately uptake of post diagnostic supports did not improve and although parent/carer
engagement in the assessment process was significantly improved, attendance at training
workshops was not any better.
Availability & Access: 
Early Outcome – Parents commented on feeling much more comfortable being part of the
assessment process in a familiar environment, feeling less stressed without the difficulties of
10  Page 36

Page 37

taking neurodivergent children long distances on public transport, and being much happier about
their children having less time out of class to attend appointments.
Intermediate Outcome – As part of the ToC we invited several different health professionals to
come into the schools to assess pupils who had been identified as requiring further support. 
Pupils benefitted from direct access to SLTs, OTs, Paediatricians and CAMHS staff, and were able
to have additional assessments and/or access appropriate medical intervention in a timely fashion.
Long term outcome – We have not been able to evidence this, but as stated above uptake of
post diagnostic supports did not improve and although parent/carer engagement in the
assessment process was significantly improved, attendance at training workshops was not any
better.
Whole System Approach:
Early Outcomes – working collaboratively across health and education was beneficial for both
parties and feedback from professionals involved was very positive.  Unfortunately we have not
been able to implement or extend any of the working practices to other schools due to cuts to the
ND team budget, resulting in the loss of 2/3rds of the team. 
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds):
Staff were based in the 3 test schools for a period of 14 weeks.  2 Clinicians and 1 support worker
were involved for the full 14 week period.  Additional support workers helped run training sessions
for parents and teachers. Only the support worker costs came from WFW funding. Costs are
therefore estimated at £9,000.
Activity 6: Neurodevelopmental Team Input
Question 1: Activity title and description: Post diagnostic training for Carers and
professionals. 
One recurring and increasing area of challenge for families remains supporting parents and their
children who are neurodiverse. To provide early and effective practical support which does not rely
on Specialist Children’s Services waiting lists or appointments, we continue to employ an external
trainer to deliver awareness raising and solution focused training for both carers and multi-agency
professionals.  The trainer (Tanya Tennant) is neurodivergent herself and has lived experience of
parenting neurodivergent CYP.  3 sessions are offered to parents following their child’s diagnosis
to increase understanding and provide management strategies addressing the areas of
behavioural differences and sensory sensitivities. Additional sessions are offered to education,
health, SW and third sector staff looking at executive function, managing differences and
supportive strategies
Question 2: a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to?
Please indicate the relevant early,
intermediate, and long-term
outcomes.
Leadership, Workforce and Culture:
Early Outcome – Strategic leaders, FS
managers and practitioners use new
knowledge of good practice
Intermediate Outcome – All CSPP
partners agree that they are equal
11  Page 37

Page 38

partners in collaborative multi-agency delivery of family support
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this financial
year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? In your response, please describe
how this has happened (processes/ mechanisms) and who has been involved (i.e. CSPP staff
roles and, where applicable, the types of families receiving support – particularly the six priority
family types of the Tackling Child Poverty Delivery Plan).
Early Outcome – over the past 7 months over 180 teachers, plus health professionals, social
work and third sector staff have attended the training for professionals delivered by Tanya
Tennant.  Feedback has been consistently positive.     
Intermediate Outcome –
Over the same period the
parents of all CYP diagnosed
with ASD in West
Dunbartonshire have been
invited to attend the same
training. The fact that all
agencies and parents are
hearing the same messages
and adopting a consistent
approach to understanding
and supporting CYP can only
be beneficial to our
neurodivergent population.  
Question 3 : Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds):
£14,614 
Activity 7 : Health Improvement Team input to WD for Families Hubs Year 3 
Question 1:  Develop WD for Families Hub Model – Outreach Support and Group Work 
According to the Scottish Government’s estimates of trauma and adversity in the general
population, in West Dunbartonshire:
. 20% of our children and young people have experienced physical or sexual abuse
. 50% are bereaved by the age of 8
. 14% have experienced 3 or more ACES
. In 2023/24 there were 145 new Child Protection registrations. We had 479 children and young  
people who were Looked After at this time.
. The impact of domestic abuse is the most common reason for CP registration, followed in  
second place by parental drug use.
. In 2023/24, 168 children in West Dunbartonshire were identified at 27-30 month assessment with  
one or more developmental concerns including speech, language and communications, and
12  Page 38

Page 39

emotional/behavioural issues. 
When we considered these statistics alongside the fact that in 2021, 20.6% of under 16s lived in
relative poverty, and 15% lived in absolute poverty, higher than the Greater Glasgow and Clyde
and National averages, then we recognised that help which wraps around a family, from a range
of partners, is crucial in making any lasting improvement to their lives. So, in recognition that our
workforce are our greatest assets and will have the biggest impact on change and improvement.
We have delivered multi-agency professional learning to the wider workforce across a range of
training activities from internal and external providers. 
Question 2 : a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to?
Please indicate the relevant early (year 1 and year 2-4 outcomes), intermediate, and
long-term outcomes. 
Whole System approach 
Early Outcomes:
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners begin to develop a holistic workforce approach
FS managers and practitioners start to redesign/design delivery of new WFS services (as per
local strategic plans), including removing barriers for CYPF to accessing support (e.g. making
improvements to access pathways and referral processes). 
Intermediate outcomes:
All CSPP partners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG agree that they are equal partners in collaborative,
multi-agency delivery of family support 
Leadership, Workforce & Culture 
Early outcomes:
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners use new knowledge of good practice
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners begin to develop a holistic workforce approach
CSPPs’ plans related to holistic family support align with evidence of CYPF & local needs (local
and national data), and national priorities.
CSPPs demonstrate increased capacity and capability to do transformation work
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG have clear & shared
understanding of families’ needs and how services are experienced across whole system 
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners’ wellbeing is improved and integral to delivery of
FS
Intermediate Outcomes 
Strategic leaders, FS managers (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG demonstrate a collaborative,
co-productive approach to planning, working culture, and deliver 
Long Term outcomes:
1. Improved family wellbeing
2. Reduced inequalities in family wellbeing 
5. Increase in families taking up wider supports 
b) During this financial year (23/24), how has
this activity contributed toward these
outcomes? 
Professional Learning Timetable shows the range
of learning offered to the wider workforce.
The Health Improvement Team delivered 2 ‘Ask, Tell, Save a Life’ Children and Young People
Suicide Prevention sessions utilising animations created by NHS Education Scotland to support
13  Page 39

Page 40

discussions and raise awareness about mental health, self-harm and suicide prevention. These
sessions aimed to address some of the barriers to talking about these issues to enable
participants to provide support and have compassionate conversations with children and young
people who are struggling and help them to access further support.  
Trauma Informed Parenting  sessions focussed on working with children who display challenging
behaviours due to trauma or additional needs, to apply a trauma-informed approach.  Twenty nine
people from four different workforce groups attended over the 2 Ask, Tell, Save a Life sessions: 
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year.
£0 -Delivered as part of the partnership approach and collaborative input from the Health
Improvement Team.  Staff deliver training as part of their role therefore no additional costs
incurred.   
Activity 8 : Health Improvement -WDWellbeing Website 
Question 1:  Expansion and widening reach of the West Dunbartonshire wellbeing site has
continued in 2024/25.  Work has been undertaken to ensure the information contained within the
site remains relevant and current.  A communication campaign encouraged the widest reach of the
site.  The campaign promotes the site as a stigma free location for universal support in West
Dunbartonshire.  While offering quality assured support to encourage self management of
wellbeing up to resources for those in crisis.   
Collaboration with the West Dunbartonshire Shameless Youth Campaigners to share their
messages about mental health and online safety with those using the site.  This led to
diversification of the resources to include sections specifically for digital and online safety as well
as support for people and families with children who have a neurodiversity. 
The site has been promoted using a range of new resources including QR codes, lanyards, id
holders and pens. 
An editorial piece within The Clydeside Community
newspaper has been commissioned for Spring 2025.  The
article outlines the benefits of the site for parents and carers
and showcases a selection of the resources included in the
site.  The Clydesider has an average readership of 5000
people per edition.    
An animation to showcase the website has been created
and will be used as another method for promotion in 2025. 
To view the animation, visit WDwellbeing.info animation 
14  Page 40

Page 41

Question 2: a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? 
Availability & Access:
Early outcomes :
CYPF are aware of how to access relevant FS support 
CYPF take up services
CYPF say family support is accessible and provides early help and support where and when it
suits them
Intermediate Outcomes 
Parents/carers say they are more able to access employability and other support to improve their
finances
Long Term outcomes
Improved family wellbeing
Increase in families taking up wider supports
Whole system approach
Early outcomes:
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners use new knowledge of good practice
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners begin to develop a holistic workforce approach
Learning, Workforce & Culture
Early Outcomes:
Strategic leaders, FS managers and practitioners use new knowledge of good practice 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? 
Google Analytics are used to monitor the website usage.  The following data is from April 2024 –
March 2025
6.1K views (number of page views of a website)
19,000 events (an event is counted when a user view pages, scrolls for a certain time, engages
with the resources, downloads a resource) 
2.2K new users
In March 2025 (cannot provide resource uptake information for the 12 month period, limitation of
Google Analytics) top 5 topics searched for were:
Anxiety 
Money
Parents and Families
Positive Wellbeing
Care Experienced
15  Page 41

Page 42

Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year.
£0. the costs incurred for the website activity has been funded in collaboration with the WDHSCP
Suicide Prevention Group and the Community Planning Thematic group and the WD Community
Planning subgroup Mental Health & Wellbeing.   
Activity 9 : Family Group Decision Making (FGDM)  
Question 1: Family Group Decision Making 
FGDM is a rights based approach that empowers children and families to have a voice and to be
involved in decisions that affect them.  As a model it supports children and families to have their
voices heard and take ownership of decision making in matters affecting their family. It draws on
strengths and resources from within the wider family group.  Family plans are focussed on
ensuring that children remain safe and home within their families, and that the rights of the
children and families are upheld. Managers of the Service contribute to strategic evaluation and
planning of joint approaches to whole family help, which has informed changes to allocation
models and enabled service staff to signpost and provide additional help to families at risk of
‘breaking down’.
Question 2: a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to?
Long-term Outcomes (contribution to during life of Funding)
The FGDM team has been in place for approx. 5 years now so have progressed through the early
and intermediate outcomes.
● Improved family wellbeing (aligned to CYPF outcomes framework and indicators)
● Reduction in the gap in wellbeing outcomes for those from our most disadvantaged communities
● Reduction in families requiring crisis intervention
● Reduction in children and young people living away from families
● Increase in families taking up wider supports
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing?  
From April 2024 til April 2025 FGDM have worked alongside 25 families.  This is the most families
we have worked with over a one year period.  The families worked encompass 5 of the 6 family
types identified in the Tackling Child Poverty Delivery Plan.
In almost all (5 of 6)  family plans were deemed successful and the child remained cared for within
the family.
Our current recording system does not allow for the easy reporting of data and requires a manual
trawl.  There will be work done in 2025 to improve how we gather and report on the achievements
of the service.
The team has also been operating at 50% capacity for most of the year due to staff absence. 
There is currently a 0.5 FTE vacancy, which will now be recruited to now that further funding has
been agreed.
Of the 26 referrals received 25 progressed to engagement with the child and the wider family.
The breakdown of referrals was:
15 female children
16  Page 42

Page 43

9 male children
2 children were unborn at the point of referral
8 children were 0-5 years
2 children were 6-10
15 children were 11-17 years
There were 14 family plans developed that allowed the child to remain at home with their parents.
3 Children were able to return to their family having been accommodated with the support of a
family plan.
Family plans prevented the breakdown of 4 Kinship placements so ensuring the child remained
with family and within their own community,
One family plan ensured that a child could have safe contact with the parent they could no longer
live with.
There was one child where no extended family was identified, therefore the FGDM workers linked
the parent with support services.  There were 2 families where although they engaged initially,
there was no family plan developed.
The feedback from families is that they feel empowered by the model in that their strengths are
acknowledged and built upon. 
The quotes below are from five different families the team worked with this year and various family
members:
Feeling Heard and Respected:
"For the first time, I felt like our voices really mattered"
"It wasn't just professionals telling us what to do we were part of the decision"
"We felt that both G and S did not judge us and we trusted them!
Increased Confidence
"We came out of the meeting feeling stronger as a family"
"It gave us the confidence to believe we could sort things out together"
Stronger Family Relationships
"It brought us closer. We hadn’t all sat down together in a long time"
"Even though it was hard, talking helped”
Clarity and Direction
"Having a clear plan made us feel less overwhelmed"
"We all knew who was doing what"
"We were nervous at first but so glad we did it"
"It gave us time to think things though"
"Found both G and S easy to talk to and could contact them anytime if needed"
FGDM has become embedded in WDC processes for Family Help, with referrals now coming from
our Area Resource Group (which considers external placements so some placements have been
avoided by being diverted to FGDM) and our new Access Help and Support team can make direct
17  Page 43

Page 44

referrals to FGDM at point of first contact with the department thereby potentially avoiding more
social work involvement in their lives and giving them the right support from the right people at the
right time.
As there are new social workers across our local authority FGDM team have arranged a
presentation which they are taking to social work team meetings to keep the new workers
informed regarding the referral process and keep FGDM to the forefront in workers minds. This will
help continue embedding FGDM in our practice.
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds):
£0 - funded via Care Experienced Children’s Fund 
Activity 10 : Includem
Question 1: Activity title and description:   Includem’s edge of care service, co-produced with
West Dunbartonshire Health and Social Care Partnership, commenced on 24th July 2023. The
primary objective of the service is to prevent children and young people’s needs from escalating,
reducing admissions to statutory care provisions and keeping families together. The service
contributes positively towards the West Dunbartonshire HSCP strategy for children and young
people - What Would it Take? This strategy aims to improve outcomes for children and young
people by using local services and is aligned to ‘The Promise’ following the ‘Independent Care
Review’, as well as reducing spend and improving efficiencies.
In line with the current service level agreement with West Dunbartonshire HSCP, includem’s
delivery model is focussed on offering whole family support to children, young people and their
families within their own communities.  We deliver support to a maximum of 12 children/young
people at any one time, aged 10 years old and over.  Support is available over 7 days including
evenings and weekends, alongside the provision of a free phone 24-7 helpline.  
The core elements of the service model are: 
●Working in partnership with the child/young person, their family and professionals to achieve the
desired outcomes set out in the child’s/young person’s plan. 
●Having identified key worker(s) that build and sustain relationships with the child/young person,
their family and professionals. 
●Delivering needs led, flexible one-to-one support predominately on a face-to-face basis with
additional flexibility through the use of technology and remote support where required. 
●Delivering a structured support planning process which is founded in true co-production and led
by the child/ young person. 
●Ensuring that there is robust monitoring and reporting process against agreed outcomes for
individual children and young people, which evidences the changes achieved through the support
provided.
Staff are supported by includem’s ‘A Better Life’ toolkit which is underpinned by relevant child and
adolescent development theories and was designed to be adapted to meet the specific needs of
each child, young person and family. 
Professional case management delivered by trained and qualified staff which adheres to the
principles of GIRFEC, Scottish Health and Social Care Standards and the SSSC Code of Practice. 
Collaborative and regular evaluations of service delivery including feedback from children/young
people, their families and professionals to evidence the impact of service delivery. 
18  Page 44

Page 45

Key brokerage with education, health, housing, finance support, addictions services and other
community-based organisations. 
a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please indicate
the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Long Term Outcomes:
●Improved family wellbeing
●Reduced inequalities in family wellbeing
●Reduction in families requiring crisis intervention
●Reduction in the number of children and young people living away from their families
●Sustainable Whole Family Support service provision maintained through budget allocations 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing?
Over the 12-month period (April 2024-April 2025), Includem had a contract capacity of 5564 hours.
West Dunbartonshire HSCP have referred a total of 5148 hours or 93% of the contract capacity.
Includem have delivered 4844 hours of support over this reporting period, which is 94% of referred
hours. This includes all time spent delivering support to, or on behalf of the child/young person and
their family, in line with working towards their agreed outcomes. Workers offer support in a planned
and unplanned way to build relationships and trust to ensure a high uptake of support from
families who are experiencing challenges and may find building relationships difficult.
There have been 1041 visits to young people across this reporting period and a further 598 visits
to parents and carers. Providing visits to both young people and parents/carers means
wrap-around support to the whole family rather than focusing on the referred child or young person
in isolation. 31% of all support delivered has been out of hours (i.e. after 5pm or at weekends). A
total of 23 calls were made to the 24/7 helpline, with 39% of these helpline calls received out of
hours. It should be noted that young people and their families can also contact their workers
directly, and there are a further 631 calls and text messages recorded directly by workers.
A total of 11 young people have been referred over this 12-month period.  These 11 referrals
equate to support being provided to a total of 20 family members with the focus being whole family
support. 14 young people have moved on from the service over this period, with 9 having met the
primary objective of living safely with their family in their own communities. It should be noted that
for the referrals who did not meet the primary objective one of the families moved out with the local
authority which meant support concluded. For another two of the families, they were reluctant to
engage with services and despite several attempts from Includem staff it was agreed with the
social work team that the support would conclude.  The average number of weeks a young person
received support was 25, with the minimum being 2 and maximum being 56. Moving beyond this
12-month period, 9 young people are continuing to receive support to work towards achieving their
agreed outcomes.
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds)
£99,762 
Activity 11 : Functioning Family Therapy (FFT)
19  Page 45

Page 46

Question 1: Activity title and description: 
FFT is an evidence-based programme aimed at improving the outcomes for young people aged 8
- 18.  It is a family based intensive intervention programme that builds on the existing strengths
within family relationships. The programme works with some of the most vulnerable young people
including those who are demonstrating significant behavioural difficulties, involvement in
community risk behaviours, violent behaviour, substance misuse and young people who are at risk
of becoming accommodated.  FFT interventions range from 12 to 30 sessions over a
three-to-five-month period.  The intensity and duration is dependent on the levels of risk that the
young person is deemed to be exposed to. Working with the whole family, FFT supports young
people and their relatives to learn new skills to help address the challenges they face within the
context of their relationships with each family member. By taking a whole-family approach, FFT
works to ensure that changes are maintained and that the young people we help make real
progress.  
FFT West Dunbartonshire End of Year Report 24-25.pdf
a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please indicate
the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Early Outcome :
●   Family support managers and practitioners collate and analyse service design feedback (See
connection to outcome: Family support managers analyse CYPF feedback and monitoring data to
inform multi-agency and partnership planning).
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners begin embedding national principles
for holistic whole family support in their own systems and services (focus on prevention + early
intervention). 
Intermediate Outcome :
●   CYPF individual outcomes improve (e.g. confidence; social capital/connections; attendance at
school; parental financial literacy).
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG demonstrate a collaborative,
co-productive approach to planning, working culture, and delivery.
●   All CSPP partners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG agree that they are equal partners in collaborative,
multi-agency delivery of family support. 
Long Term Outcomes:  
●   Improved family wellbeing
●   Reduced inequalities in family wellbeing
●   Reduction in families requiring crisis intervention
● Sustainable Whole Family Support service provision maintained through budget allocations 
20  Page 46

Page 47

b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? 
Improved family wellbeing:
Outcome Measures: The Client Outcome Measure (COM) is a questionnaire which assesses
parent/carer’s perceptions of change in family functioning, communication, improved parenting
skills, parental supervision and changes in family conflict. Each dimension is rated on a scale
ranging from things that are worse to things that are much better. Measures also explore the
frequency of any presenting challenging behaviours and prosocial behaviours. This data allows
FFT Therapists to assess progress in a range of domains relating to improvements in family
functioning and relationships. Data shows improvements in all 6 self-reported subscales for young
people, parents/ carers, and therapists; with 5 subscales showing average scores exceeding 3 (a
score of 3 and above indicating a clinically significant outcome).
Outcome data from Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire measures show positive improvements
across all 7 subscales for young people and parents/ carers. Referring professionals reported
improvement in 6 out of 7 for pre and post intervention with scores for hyperactive behaviours and
difficulties concentrating remaining the same.
The Outcome Questionnaire 45 (OQ-45) is a brief scale used with parents/carers to measure the
subjective experience of a person, as well as how they function in the world pre and post FFT
intervention. Progress is tracked across three different domains including:  • Symptom Distress:
Measuring an individual's degree of subjective discomfort.  • Interpersonal Relations: Measuring
impairment in interpersonal functioning.  • Social Role: Measuring impairment in functioning at
work and in other social roles. 
Impact:
• 39% of parents and carers reported
symptoms of clinical significance pre
FFT.
• 34% of parents and carers reported
clinically significant reductions in
symptoms of distress from pre to post
intervention.
• 56.5% of parents and carers reported
reductions in symptoms of distress
from pre to post intervention.
Reduction in the number of children and young people living away from families
Outcome data for the first 6 months of this year shows that 4 young people were assessed as
likely or highly likely to become accommodated pre FFT intervention and 2 somewhat likely. All
were supported to remain safely at home. Post FFT referrers reports that 92% (11) of young
people were very unlikely or unlikely to become accommodated, and 8% (1) somewhat likely.
Data shows improvements in all 6 self-reported subscales for young people, parents/ carers, and
therapists; with 5 subscales showing average scores exceeding 3 (a score of 3 and above
indicating a clinically significant outcome).
In addition to working to
improve the well-being
of young people and
their families, FFT
21  Page 47

Page 48

works to positively impact local communities by reducing the number of young people requiring
care placements. Following on from the 2020 Independent Care Review and The Promise, FFT
continues to be committed to improving the life outcomes for young people and their families by
supporting young people to remain safely at home with their families while also reducing the
associated costs to local authorities of young people requiring care placements. To support
assessment of this impact all referring social workers are asked to report on their views on the
likelihood of a young person being accommodated pre and post intervention.
In addition to the positive impact for young people and their families when they are supported to
remain at home safely, the current FFT service costs are recovered when 2 young people are
supported to avoid the need for foster care for 1 year, or 1 young person is supported to avoid the
need for secure residential care for 6 months. Outcome data for the first 6 months of this year
shows that 4 young people were assessed as likely or highly likely to become accommodated pre
FFT intervention and 2 somewhat likely. All were supported to remain safely at home. Post FFT
referrers reports that 92% (11) of young people were very unlikely or unlikely to become
accommodated, and 8% (1) somewhat likely. 
FFT West Dunbartonshire End of Year Report 24-25.pdf
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds)
£90 000 
Question 12: Support Provided to WD for Families Hub from Working 4 U 
Question 1: Activity title and description: 
The Family Opportunity Hub team, as a collaborative initiative involving West Dunbartonshire
Council services including Working4U and Education Services, plays a key role in supporting the
WD for Families Hubs. The team focuses on Child Poverty supports enabling better outcomes for
children and families. This is achieved by alleviating immediate hardship; maximising income
(Benefits and Debt); reducing the cost of living and maximising income from employment. 
a) Which WFWF Logic Model outcome(s) does this activity contribute to? Please indicate
the relevant early, intermediate, and long-term outcomes.
Early Outcome :
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners begin embedding national principles
for holistic whole family support in their own systems and services (focus on prevention + early
intervention).
22  Page 48

Page 49

●   CYPF say that services are designed to be: free of stigma; rights-led; and to meet their specific
needs.
●   CYPF say they feel positive and trusting of services as result of implemented changes to service
design.
●   More CYPF receive whole family support through referrals or self-referrals.
●   CYPF take up services.
●   CYPF say family support is accessible and provides early help and support where and when it suits
them.
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers and practitioners (inc. 3rd Sector partners) are working
more collaboratively and with adult services.
●   CSPPs’ plans related to holistic family support align with evidence of CYPF & local needs (local
and national data), and national priorities. 
Intermediate Outcome :
●   All CSPP partners (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG agree that they are equal partners in collaborative,
multi-agency delivery of family support.
●   Strategic leaders, Family support managers (inc. 3rd Sector) and SG demonstrate a collaborative,
co-productive approach to planning, working culture, and delivery. 
Long Term Outcomes:  
●   Improved family wellbeing
●   Reduced inequalities in family wellbeing
●   Reduction in families requiring crisis intervention
●   Reduction in the number of children and young people living away from their families
●   Increase in families taking up wider supports
●   Sustainable Whole Family Support service provision maintained through budget allocations 
b) For each outcome above, what specific qualitative or quantitative evidence from this
financial year (2024-2025) shows how these outcomes are progressing? 
Integration of Working4U Services
·  Working4U staff attend the WD for Families Hubs monthly to provide direct, in-person advice and
support to families.
·  They offer help with employability, welfare rights, benefits, debt management, digital skills, and
learning opportunities.
·  This collaboration ensures that families have access to professional guidance on employment
and financial stability within the familiar and accessible environment of the WD for Families Hubs.
Personalised, One-to-One Support
Family Opportunity Hub staff conduct holistic assessments using a structured self-assessment tool
focusing on:
·       Pockets – increasing income, managing debt, and accessing financial aid (e.g., Cash First
Funds).
·       Prospects – addressing personal development barriers like confidence, health,
literacy/numeracy, and skills.
·       Place – tackling local and environmental barriers like housing and energy inefficiency.
23  Page 49

Page 50

This one-to-one approach helps families feel supported and engaged in a safe, non-stigmatising
setting.
Delivery of Financial and Practical Support
The team connects families to vital financial support, such as:
·       Working 4U Money Team for specific debt advice
·       Accessing financial support available through Scottish Welfare Fund, Cash First Fund
(Addressing Food Insecurity, aimed at reducing reliance on foodbanks), School uniform grants,
school meals & EMA applications.
·       Carrying out better off calculations and maximising income through Social Security Benefits.
By providing immediate cash-based interventions, the team helps alleviate short-term financial
crises while linking families to longer-term solutions.
Enhancing Family Capability and Inclusion
The Hub supports learning and training opportunities that promote:
·       Improved language, literacy, numeracy.
·       Development of vocational and non-vocational skills.
These efforts aim to empower parents to contribute positively to their families and communities,
supporting wider goals around social inclusion and employability.
Extending Reach Across the Community
The Family Opportunity hubs are located in secondary schools, the Hubs extend support to feeder
primary schools and early years centres, ensuring early intervention and continuity of care for
families across age groups.
Impact on Family Wellbeing
Through this joined-up, person-centred approach, the Family Opportunity Hub team enhances the
ability of the WD for Families Hubs to support families holistically — reducing crisis risk, promoting
financial wellbeing, and enabling long-term improvements in employment, education, and social
inclusion outcomes.
Question 3: Estimate of WFWF funding spent on this activity in this financial year (in
pounds)
£0 
24  Page 50

Page 51

SECTION 2: Progress Narrative for your overall WFWF plans
Please respond to each question below. Examples are included in Annex B (below). Responses to
each question should be 250 words max. Aim for responses to refer back to specific activities
mentioned in Section 1 above.
Question 4: 
Please consider the key recommendations from the Year 2 Evaluation report that are most relevant for
your area. These include the topics of planning for sustainability of the activity beyond WFWF;
developing a whole systems approach; outcomes related to leadership, workforce and culture;
providing feedback on children, young people and families (CYPF) involvement in design; and data
and evidence (see pages 78-86 of the full report). From your activities in Section 1, please provide any
specific examples of how they are responding to these issues (or planning to do so during Year 4), this
does not need to be comprehensive but focused on the most important recommendations. 
Please cite your evidence sources. May include: data from reports, evaluation evidence, service data,
specific plans that have been agreed to, training data.
Neurodevelopmental Team Activity:
Having responded to Carer/CYP stakeholder feedback to develop the neurodevelopmental team’s
input to the WFW hub in the first instance, we delivered the requested services in each of the 3
localities.  Numbers of carers engaging with both drop-in sessions and training workshops were
consistently poor, and so in an attempt to engage better with families we established the Cuppa
and Connect sessions in the local primary schools.  Numbers are increasing month on month and
we have plans to roll out to ELCC’s in Autumn 2025. 
Health Improvement Team 
Planet Youth Programme data continues to provide insight to a range of health and wellbeing
outcomes for young people in West Dunbartonshire. The third survey will be undertaken in
Autumn 2025. This valuable data set will continue to influence content on WDWellbeing.info to
respond to the concerns raised by survey participants. The site will remain a key onward support
by schools and community groups as they continue to implement the Planet Youth Programme.
There has been a shift in focus around supporting and working with the family, as opposed to just
working with young people. 
Question 5: 
Based on your evidence provided in Section 1, please describe how the activities of the WFWF
Programme overall are supporting services to shift towards (1) more preventative interventions  
Detailed previously. 
Question 6: Describe the main successes to delivery and how specific factors enabled these
successes.
Please cite your evidence sources. May include: resourcing, skill development, planning or
engagement, activities, or emerging outcomes. Evidence of economic/budgetary impact may also be
included.
Neurodevelopmental Team Activity:
The ND service developments this session have been able to offer pre-assessment and
post-diagnostic support due to the funding that has been received from the WFW fund.  Using the
Health Care Support workers (HCSW) to gather additional information from both home and school
25  Page 51

Page 52

settings, supporting  the assessment process, has enabled an increase in the number of
assessments and appropriately identified strategies to help being concluded each year. 
Partnership Working of the Strategic Group
The  Strategic leadership of Service Leads and Partners has facilitated a culture of collaboration
focussing on developing systematic change which empowers staff to work together across
services, with a shared purpose to improve help to families. This has resulted in the very effective
mobilisation of a range of resource sharing across our model, which has not always relied on new
funding but rather the co-location or re-distribution of existing resources. 
Question 7: Describe the main challenges to delivery, and how these have been mitigated or plans to
mitigate them. Please include any details on any activities which have not progressed as expected.
This is a space to reflect on any lessons learned and how these might inform future work. The logic
model context, assumptions, and risks, as well as any locally monitored risks may be useful to
consider in this response (page 13).
Please cite your evidence sources. May include: resourcing, skill development, planning or
engagement, activities, or emerging outcomes. Evidence of economic/budgetary impact may also be
included.
Neurodevelopmental Team Activity:
The ability of the ND team to assess and diagnose will be significantly impacted by the loss of 3
out of 4 clinicians, due to internal reductions in funding.  This will impact on waiting times and the
number of assessments that can be undertaken.  It will have an additional impact of fewer children
needing parts of the assessment process undertaken by HCSWs, although this is enabling us to
find the capacity to roll out Cuppa & Connect sessions to ELCC’s as well as primary schools.
Therefore, the drive to provide early intervention is essential.  Moving forward to develop a
sustainable model of support a short life working group will be established to develop the universal
messaging across West Dunbartonshire with regards to Neurodevelopmental Supports and public
expectations, emphasising a shift from diagnosis to increased  uptake of support via Hubs and
Universal Services.
Health Improvement Team 
Early 2024/25, low uptake of the training offer in self harm which resulted in cancellation of one
course.  Changes made to promotion and registration process resulting in increased uptake of
suicide prevention training but not self harm. Steps were taken to share the offer with the wider
workforce to include Council, HSCP & third sector partners. 
Local wellbeing website WDwellbeing info: The main challenge remains in relation to overseeing
and ongoing editing the site content going forward. Currently this responsibility remains with a very
small proportion of the Health Improvement team. Ideally additional editorial access is made
available to personnel who are using and familiar with the site content.
Planet Youth: Time taken to fully embed the role of PY Manager hosted by the commissioned third
sector partner.  Recent confirmation from the Scottish Government to fund another year of national
PY pilot. This uncertainty has impacted on 25/26 planning and encouraged a shift to a holistic
ethos with upstream changes to the services where possible, without a strong reliance on the
future of PY beyond 2026. 
Question 8: Please give details of your spend for 24/25 and your expected spend in the following
financial years: 
FY 25/26: detailed above in each section
26  Page 52

Page 53

FY 26/27: to be clarified reflecting evaluation/pay rises/commissioning and running costs. We will
work within the allocated budget.
FY 27/28:  to be clarified reflecting evaluation/pay rises/commissioning and running costs. We will
work within the allocated budget. 
Additional: Any other comments, innovative work, relevant learning, or unexpected changes identified
during this year?
May include: any progress not captured elsewhere in the table, or questions for the Scottish
Government. Please indicate any related local evaluation work in progress here.
3 Year Cycle of Multi Agency Evaluation - How good is our family support ?
Our Calendar of Self-Evaluation has been instrumental in supporting our Strategic Group to
collaboratively evaluate and plan improvements, informed by the use of data.  Over a three year
cycle,  there is a termly  focus on the four main areas of Family Support: Availability and Access,
Children and Families at the Centre of Service Design, Whole System Approaches and Workforce
and Culture. Used effectively, continuous self-evaluation has supported partners to monitor
progress and continue to strive for excellence,  broadly focusing on answering three key
questions:
How good are we now? 
How do we know?
What do we plan to do next?
Evaluations have informed next steps in family help and focussed attention, leading to targeted
improvements over time. 
27  Page 53

Page 54

Page 54

Page 55

Management Board Meeting
Community Planning Partnership
Highlights and Issues Report 
FOR INFORMATION ONLY  X
FOR DECISION 
Name of Partnership  Community Justice Partnership (CJP)
Date of report 22/01/2026
Name and email of lead contact Lesley.James@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
1 Highlights of activity and progress since last meeting 
Working/Steering Group Updates: 
 Arrest Referral Scheme
The meeting with Police Scotland Custody Division and East Dunbartonshire (ED)
went ahead but it is clear there is no cross over for a shared pathway, residents of
ED don’t tend to come to WD instead they are likely to be held in Coatbridge.
Numbers of WD residents being supported by the scheme remain disproportionately
(and concerningly) low compared with level of need and intersectionality that
underpins offending.  New alcohol and drug services providers are now operating in
WD ‘With You’ meetings are in the diary to meet with the new providers with an
invitation to be part of the Arrest Referral Scheme Working Group.  The chair of the
ARS working group is working closely with police custody staff and concern hub
staff to look at sharing of information under the auspice of ‘Public Task’ with a view
that this should support the referral pathway with meaningful engagement with
services for those who would benefit from it at the point of arrest.   
 Custody to Community (C-C)
1. Emergency Early Release of Prisoners
The early release of prisoners remains underway and will be underway until April
2026.  Whole systems communication pathways have been established with
partners to ensure that challenges and pressures to services can be fed back to the
Scottish Government.  WD Justice Services has contributed to the Survey to
quantify impact of Emergency Early Release (EER) being undertaken by Social
Work Scotland.   Staff from homelessness services are reporting a strain on
services as many residents who are being released are homeless, due to the
housing crisis in WD this is placing stress on a service which is already stressed. 
ITEM 11
Page 55

Page 56

There remains open communication between the Custody-Community
Vulnerability/Risk management & Victim Safety Planning Group.  The Community
Justice Co-ordinator is triaging the EER prisoner names and requesting veto
information for those we would have concerns about being released.  This process
is further alerting colleagues in Children & families social work and Violence Against
Women and Girls services to potential releases to allow for timeous victim safety
planning.  Wider services are being alerted to support prisoner risk/vulnerabilities
management and housing needs prior to release.   
2. Custody to Rehab (C2R) “Proof of Concept”
The Custody to Rehab agenda is going very well and there have been many
referrals to the pathway.  The CJ Co-ordinator approached Community Justice
Scotland (CJS) to request further places in line with demand, and this was granted. 
CJS have removed the cap on placements, and we can refer as many residents as
per demand.  To date 14 referrals have been made to the pathway with 4 residents
admitted to rehab establishments.  Local C2R Guidance is currently being written to
support process and protocol for the pathway to ensure that the process is robust
and clear for all potential referrers. 
3. Talking About Mental Health Toolkit
Community Justice NHS GGC have been working in partnership with Penumbra
who have created a “Talking about Mental Health” toolkit for those working with
justice populations.  The Community Justice Co-ordinator has been trained to
deliver the materials and a workplan is currently being developed to support the
wider roll out of the resource in the locality.  There will be a targeted approach to
training delivery and will include justice services and closest partners in the first
instance i.e. social work staff and housing 1st staff.  The workplan will be available
by mid-February with a view to the training being rolled out in May 2026 
 Prevention and Early and Effective Intervention
1. The use of Diversion in both adult and youth justice context:
‘Understanding Youth and Adult Diversion’ whole-systems development sessions
have been held in December 2025 with another pending in February 2026.  A
specialist input to Education services took place in November 2025 to ensure that
the voices of education colleagues are captured as part of outcome improvement
planning activity.  The sessions will shape and support enhancing the use of
Diversion and contribute to supporting the national and local community justice
outcome improvement plan.  A workplan will be developed following the session in
February detailing identified improvement activity. 
2. Framework for Risk Assessment, Management & Evaluation (FRAME)
and Care and Risk Management (CARM) (multi-agency)
FRAME/CARM training was delivered to to Justice and Children and Families social
workers in October 2025. Next steps will be supported by CYCJ and will include the
development of local guidance including process, protocol and governance.  A short
life working group has been created to undertake writing the local guidance and the
guidance should be available by May 2026. 
Page 56

Page 57

3. Justice services have introduced a safeguarding protocol 
for sharing risk and concerns around child protection and violence against women
and girls.  To support the safeguarding of children, young people and vulnerable
adults affected by domestic abuse, justice services are triaging the names of those
due to be released from prison (planned releases) with our partners in VAWG and
children and families’ services to ensure effective victim safety planning and
safeguarding.  This process has proved to be both effective and beneficial in terms
of best – safe practice.
4. ‘With You’ new drug and alcohol providers in WD can work with young
people from aged 16 years.  This wasn’t the case previous and it is hoped
that as part of EEI young people can be referred to services at the point of
need not chronological age. 
 Women in Justice 
A workplan is underway to undertake embedding the recommendations from The
Discovery report.  This plan will be a whole-systems plan involving all justice
services from the point of arrest through to prosecution.  There is a clear training
gap for understanding violent resistance and the CJ Co-ordinator is developing this
training as part of outcome improvement planning.  It is anticipated the training will
be ready for delivery as part of 16 Days of Action for VAWG 2026.  The WiJ working
group is considering the National Women’s Health Plan and where it fits with locality
planning and women in justice services. 
 Authentic Voices
A decision was taken at the CJP in November 2025 to disband the AV working
group as this activity is now firmly embedded into all work strands which is the gold
standard the CJP had hoped to achieve.  AV work will be reported on for each
working group and any wider CJP activity. 
Heath Needs Analysis NHS GGC
WD Justice Services are collaborating with NHS GGC to better understand the
health needs of community justice populations.  Phase 2 of the project has
commenced with data transfer and seeding activity is underway.  Focus groups and
qualitative activity has been arranged with the justice team and justice service users
has commended.  Reporting is expected in spring/summer 2026. 
Community Based Sentences
WD Justice Services has developed pre/post measure to ensure that the voices of
service users are captured for all community-based sentences.  This is being
collated using Microsoft Forms and will be analysed annually as part of outcome
improvement planning. 
 Caledonian Systems Steering Group
The group has been developing a Standard Operating Protocol (SOP) between
partners to ensure effective communication and agreed protocols to manage risk
and ensure the safety of victims as paramount.  The SOP is being developed in a
partnership approach, and each partner has contributed to its development.  The 1st
draft of the SOP has been referred to other strategic partner i.e. the VAWGP and
the MARAC steering group for scrutiny and agreement. 
Page 57

Page 58

The group is working closely with further considering protocols regarding breeches
of orders and responding to breeches timeously to ensure that the men who are on
the programme are engaging a meaningful way and that risk is always considered in
a dynamic manner and shared with relevant partners i.e. justice and children and
families’ social work.  A template has been developed and created to ensure robust
meaningful information sharing between justice and Police Scotland – the template
is under consideration at this time. 
Recording as part of Domestic Abuse EEI is under development and the Caledonian
steering group is contributing toward this Children & Families Social Work to ensure
that service generated risk and trauma is mitigated.   
As part of a partnership approach with the Child Protection Committee the working
group is considering the incorporation of multiagency chronologies as part of best
practice to ensure that all significant information is shared with relevant stakeholder
partners.  The group is developing protocols around ensuring contribution to the
chronologies as standard practice for those who are part of the Caledonian men’s
programme. 
 Employability
WD Justice Services are working closely with Working 4 U “Fairer Futures” Proof of
Concept.  W4U have secured money from the Scottish Government until March
2026 to support justice populations with a routes out of poverty agenda.  There has
been much development and implementation work undertaken and there will be a
targeted approach to service provision operating through 7 separate work strands: 
1. Community to Rehab
2. Caledonian men’s group
3. WSSS women’s groups
4. Community based sentences 
5. Education & Higher Education
6. Youth Justice
7. Justice Throughcare 
The proof of concept will seek to engage with services users to support them to a
position whereby they see employability as a viable option, cognisant of the
challenges and barriers faced by the justice population. 
 Training, Learning & Development 2026
 9th March 2026 – Justice and Partners Information & Awareness Raising
Session
 23rd April 2026 – Dash-Ric Multi-agency
 19th May 2026 – Penumbra – talking about mental health toolkit
 30th June 2026 - Penumbra – talking about mental health toolkit
 13th August - Dash-Ric Multi-agency
 17th August - Justice and Partners Information & Awareness Raising Session
 8th September - Penumbra – talking about mental health toolkit
 12th November - Dash-Ric Multi-agency
Page 58

Page 59

 23rd November - Justice and Partners Information & Awareness Raising
Session
 8th December – DAAMH -I Training 
2 Outline of any issues/risks and how these are being managed
Currently justice services are scrutinising the impact of the EER of prisoners and
what this means in terms of pressure and capacity for services.  The ongoing
housing crisis will potentially face further stress as a ripple effect of this activity. 
Concerns will be escalated through the CJP and wider governance structures. 
Budgets and capacity are an ongoing issue for community justice – this is a national
issue and hopefully we will see a bigger investment in community justice with the
presumption towards liberty and away from custodial sentences. 
Issues or risk will be identified and assessed in the Strategic Needs and Strengths
Assessments and identified at working/steering groups.  These will be reported to
the CJP for escalation where necessary. 
3 Outline of the main outputs expected before next meeting 
Progress reporting updates from all working groups. 
4 What are your requirements of partners in the Community Planning
Management Board to achieve the outcomes of the DIG? 
 To support the CJP to deliver locally on the ‘National Strategy for Community
Justice’ at a local level. 
 To support the CJP with the uncertainty (nationally) regarding funding and
budgets to support the local delivery of the strategy.
 The CJP will be required to identify funding to deliver the local CJOIP and
associated activities. 
5 Please outline any good news story you wish to share                                              
The local Community Justice Outcome Improvement Plan will be reviewed at the
next community justice partnership in February.  Much progress has been made
with the strategic plan – so much so that we are asking for a pause on all
development work in 2026-2027 to allow for the embedding of current developments
and improvement activity. 
Page 59

Page 60

Development work that requires embedded 2026-2027:
 The Women in Justice Discovery Report
 Health Needs Analysis recommendations
 Head Injury Research Recommendations
 Youth and Adult Diversion development session outcome improvement
activity.
 Fairer Futures Learning Report and recommendations
 Community to Rehab learning report and recommendations
 Children’s Care and justice (Scotland) Act 2024 – fulfilling statutory duties
Reflection and Review of the current strategy:
 Care Inspectorate Self-evaluation Jan-April 2027 
Page 60

Page 61

Management Board Meeting
Development and Improvement Groups (DIGs): Highlights and
Issues Report
FOR INFORMATION ONLY  x
FOR DECISION 
Name of DIG Flourishing Delivery and Improvement Group
(DIG).
Date of report February 2026
Name and email of lead contact Gail Macfarlane
Gail.macfarlane@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
1 Highlights of activity and progress since last meeting 
Work is still ongoing in relation to new actions and the Terms of Reference for the
group.  This will finalise for the next meeting for discussion and approval. 
The new actions will consider the feedback from the partners and workshop
engagement. 
Members of the group are to consider any new actions and bring to next board for
discussion.   
There was a lengthy discussion on green growth and indicative milestones and
consideration of each partners role to maximise opportunities for residents to be fit
for the future employment opportunities.   
There was also discussion on the Child Poverty Update Report and the role of the
DIG to develop actions that contribute to lifting families out of poverty. 
There were the usual 3 key updates on employability, regeneration and city region. 
This led to discussion on funding challenges/opportunities. 
Partner updates included the following:  
 Launch of local innovation centres. Private and third sector
businesses/organisations would be eligible if they can demonstrate social
benefits.   
 Innovative development programme for supporting apprentices. Free at point
of use for businesses.
ITEM 12
Page 61

Page 62

 The Advanced Manufacturing Innovation District Scotland Skills Group have
undertaken a consultation with local employers. Members to consider
opportunity for West Dunbartonshire.   
 Golden Jubilee advised progressing foundation modern apprenticeships with
discussion taking place with Strathclyde University and Glasgow University
regarding the concept of a Civic University and their role in West
Dunbartonshire.   
 Considering how to promote STEM activities and link with local partners. 
 Development of Social based community facility and will look at homework
club at Golden Jubilee to support attainment. 
 New regional skill assessment set developed and to be considered by
partners. 
 Discussion on an employability event to be held. 
2 Outline of any issues/risks and how these are being managed
The action plan is being developed by the partnership and discussion ongoing to
ensure there are actions and milestones that will align to the required outcomes. 
Discussion on external funding and any risk to activities being undertaken, ongoing
discussion to take place. 
3 Outline of the main outputs expected before next meeting 
Continue the review of the draft action plan to finalise actions and milestones 
Page 62

Page 63

4 What are your requirements of partners in the Community Planning
Management Board to achieve the outcomes of the DIG?
N/A 
5 Please outline any good news story you wish to share                                               
Page 63

Page 64

Page 64

Page 65

Management Board Meeting
Development and Improvement Groups (DIGs): Highlights and
Issues Report
FOR INFORMATION ONLY  X
FOR DECISION 
Name of DIG Empowered
Date of report 23 January 2026
Name and email of lead contact Selina Ross
selina@wdcvs.com 
1 Highlights of activity and progress since last meeting 
Community Development Alliance (CDA) Partnership
Work continues to progress the Alliance action plan. Since the October meeting of
the group this has included:
 Development of a Community of Practice Survey to be distributed across all
partner agencies in March 2026
 The ongoing collection of information and training materials used by group
members, with a view to developing a central practice hub/resource library 
 Establishing a shared Teams space and case study format, allowing
consistency in the collation of good practice/impact examples
 Mapping of known community spaces to facilitate the development of an
access map for local groups – showing location, size, availability, cost etc. 
Self-Management Assembly
Plans for the next Self-Management assembly session are underway, with session 3
taking place on 29th April again in Clydebank Town Hall. Work has also been
ongoing with the Assembly steering group to deliver an information resource
highlighting positive self-management practice and locally and nationally available
support services. This will be housed on the WDCVS website and should be
complete by the end of February 2026. 
Community Mental Health and Wellbeing Fund (Year 5/6 funding)
The grant assessment panel met in mid-December to consider the allocation of year
5 resources (2026/7). Members will note that in line with the Scottish Government
Fairer Funding pilot arrangements, 70% of the fund was to be committed to 2-year
funding offers.  The fund was again over-subscribed and due diligence
arrangements are underway with the successful applicants to ensure awards can be
completed by the end of February 2026. A list of awardees will be made available to
the next Community Planning Management Board Meeting. 
ITEM 14
Page 65

Page 66

Arrangements to integrate Independent DIG into Empowered DIG
Following the decision made at the last Community Planning Management Group
meeting, a mapping exercise has been taking place to integrate the action
plans/activities of the 2 DIG groups. The Chair and new Vice Chair plan to meet
within the next few weeks to finalise arrangements with a view to presenting a
refreshed 2026/7 action plan. 
2 Outline of any issues/risks and how these are being managed
No current issues or risks to report. 
3 Outline of the main outputs expected before next meeting 
Availability of Self-Management resource tool
Publication of Community Mental Health Fund for Adult Awardees 
4 What are your requirements of partners in the Community Planning
Management Board to achieve the outcomes of the DIG?
No current requests 
5 Please outline any good news story you wish to share                                               
Page 66

Page 67

Report by Selina Ross, WDCVS 
Community Planning West Dunbartonshire January 2026 
Subject: Climate Action Hub – Activity Update Report 
1. Purpose 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to update CPWD Board members of the recent activity
of the Climate Action Hub, facilitated and hosted by WDCVS. 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 CPWD is asked to note the content and consider the suggested actions arising from
the session feedback. 
3. Background 
3.1 Since its inaugural community planning partner conversation session in June
2025, the Climate Action Hub, supported by funding from Scottish
Government has progressed a range of actions and initiatives. 
3.2 This brief update report provides information on the activities taken forward
and the engagement secured in that six-month period. 
4. Main Issues 
4.1 The Hub has committed to a range of engagement, knowledge exchange and
funding support interventions. 
Engagement 
4.2 Building on from the first June conversation session, the Hub has now delivered an
additional 2 engagement events and attended three community-delivered sessions,
engaging with around 150 local organisations. In addition, a programme of 1-2-1
visits with community organisations has taken place to help identify additional
elements of a 2026/7 workplan. 
4.3 The next hub event is a Biodiversity Awareness session planned for the 27th
January, with 25 participants currently registered. 
ITEM 15
Page 67

Page 68

Knowledge Exchange
4.4 The Hub has produced a range of written resources, including three fact sheets
(climate mitigation/adaptation & biodiversity; Net Zero and The Climate Crisis) and
five support pieces covering biodiversity, energy and retrofitting, food and growing,
re-use and the circular economy, and travel and transport). 
4.5 These can be accessed via the WDCVS website: https://wdcvs.com/climate-action/. 
4.6 17 organisations have so far been provided one-to-one support from the Hub, to
develop their ideas and projects. Funding application support has also been given to
four organisations – and the results of their applications is awaited. 
Funding 
4.7 The Hub provided access to a Seedcorn Fund programme between Sept and
November 2025, allocating £25,000 to 17 community groups, supporting a wide
range of climate mitigation, adaptation and biodiversity projects.  
4.8 Across 6 key themes, funded activities included: 
Growing & Biodiversity (Biodiversity): 
 Improved allotment accessibility for disabled members
 Composting equipment and education
 Gardening tools and seeds
 Youth biodiversity and growing education
 Beekeeping courses
 Wildlife pond restoration
 Citizen science surveys
 Environmental maintenance equipment and volunteer safety training
 Outdoor education and space creation for young people. 
Food (Mitigation): 
 Sustainable cooking classes focusing on climate-friendly diets, food waste
reduction, and promotion of local food. 
Share & Repair (Mitigation): 
 Repair equipment and storage
 Volunteer repair and safety training
 Sewing and fabric re-use workshops. 
Recycling (Mitigation): 
Youth-led recycling education projects. 
Building Energy Efficiency (Mitigation): 
Small-scale energy efficiency measures. 
4.9 The end of year evaluation is pending and will be used to support the business case
for 2026/27. 
Page 68

Page 69

5. People Implications 
5.1 There are no people implications. 
6. Financial Implications 
6.1 There are no financial implications. 
7. Risk Analysis 
7.1 Failure to respond to challenges would risk delivery against policy priorities. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 No actions are required as this is an update report. 
9. Consultation 
9.1 Extensive consultation with partners and community members has been taken
forward to support the activity of the Climate Action Hub. Thanks are recorded to all
for their involvement and support. 
10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1 The level of engagement suggests a strong appetite for climate action across West
Dunbartonshire across a range of themed activity areas. 
Person to Contact: Selina Ross, WDCVS, selina@wdcvs.com T: 0141 941 0886 
Appendices: N/A 
Background Papers: N/A 
Wards Affected: All
Page 69