Democracy Spraffa

SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENT PACK (Audit 15 06 22) BOOKMARKED

West Dunbartonshire Council · 15 June 2022
Back to Audit Committee — 15 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Supplementary
Agenda
Audit Committee
Date: Wednesday, 15 June 2022
___________________________________________________________________
Time: 10:00
___________________________________________________________________
Format: Hybrid
___________________________________________________________________
Contact:    Ashley MacIntyre, Committee Officer
ashley.macintyre@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Dear Member
I refer to the agenda for the above meeting that was issued on 1 June and now
enclose copies of Items 10, 12 and 14 which were not available for issue at that
time.
Yours faithfully
JOYCE WHITE
Chief Executive
Page 101

Page 2

Note referred to:
10 CODE OF GOOD GOVERNANCE AND ANNUAL 103 - 113
GOVERNANCE STATEMENT 2021-22
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources advising of the outcome of the
annual self-evaluation undertaken of the Council’s compliance with its Code of
Good Governance and inviting consideration of the Annual Governance
Statement that will be published in the Council’s Abstract of Accounts.
12 APPOINTMENT OF LAY MEMBERS 115 - 116
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources providing an update on the
current status of Lay Member appointments to the Audit Committee.  
14 SCOTTISH PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN 117 - 127
COMPLAINTS REPORT 2020-21
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Citizen, Culture and Facilities presenting
the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) report on complaints
handling by West Dunbartonshire Council for the year 1 April 2020 – 31
March 2021.
Distribution:
Councillor Karen Conaghan (Chair)
Councillor Ian Dickson 
Councillor Craig Edward 
Councillor Jonathan McColl (Vice Chair)
Councillor James McElhill
Councillor Michelle McGinty
Councillor John Millar
Councillor Martin Rooney
Mr C Johnstone
All other Councillors for information
Chief Executive
Chief Officers
Date of issue: 8 June 2022
Page 102

Page 3

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer - Resources
Audit Committee: 15 June 2022
Subject:  Code of Good Governance and Annual Governance Statement
2021-22
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to:
• Advise Committee of the outcome of the annual self-evaluation
undertaken of the Council’s compliance with its Code of Good
Governance; and
• Invite Committee to consider the Annual Governance Statement that will
be published in the Council’s Abstract of Accounts.
2. Recommendations
2.1 The Committee is asked to:
i) Note the outcome of the recent self-evaluation process in considering how
the Council currently meets the agreed Code of Good Governance,
together with the issues identified and improvement actions; and
ii) Consider the detail of the Annual Governance Statement and approve the
actions identified by management to improve the internal control
environment.
3. Background
3.1 Delivering Good Governance in Local Government: Framework, published by
CIPFA in association with Solace in 2007, set the standard for local authority
governance in the UK.  CIPFA and Solace reviewed the Framework in 2015 to
ensure it remained ‘fit for purpose’ and published a revised edition in spring
2016.  The current Delivering Good Governance in Local Government:
Framework (CIPFA/Solace, 2016) has applied to annual governance
statements prepared for the financial year 2016/17 onwards.
3.2 The concept underpinning the revised Framework is that it assists local
government in taking responsibility for developing and shaping an informed
approach to governance, aimed at achieving the highest standards in a
measured and proportionate way. This Framework is intended to assist
authorities individually in reviewing and accounting for their own unique
approach. The overall aim is to ensure that:
ITEM 10
Page 103

Page 4

• resources are directed in accordance with agreed policy and according to
priorities;
• there is sound and inclusive decision making; and
• there is clear accountability for the use of those resources in order to
achieve desired outcomes for service users and communities.
3.3 In order to demonstrate a commitment to sound governance, local authorities
are encouraged to publish a governance statement on an annual basis.
3.4 The annual governance statement is the formal statement that recognises,
records and publishes a Council’s governance arrangements as defined in the
CIPFA/SOLACE Framework.  The statement requires to be signed off by the
most senior officer [Chief Executive] and the most senior member [Council
Leader].  Clearly the signatories must be satisfied that the document is
supported by reliable evidence.
3.5 Following the review of the Audit Committee, carried out in accordance with
the contents of the CIPFA publication “Audit Committees:  Practical Guidance
for Local Authorities and Police” (2018 Edition)” a report was submitted  to the
Audit Committee meeting on 12 December 2018.  One of the actions arising
was to submit the draft Annual Governance Statement to the Audit Committee
as a stand-alone document for consideration.
4. Main Issues
4.1 A revised local code was developed for the Council and agreed at the Audit
and Performance Review Committee on 8 March 2017. 
4.2 A Governance Report is produced annually and is based on an annual self-
evaluation of compliance against the Council's Code of Good Governance.
4.3 The annual self-evaluation review for 2021/22 has been carried out and has
identified that current practice is mainly compliant against our revised Code of
Governance, whilst identifying some areas for improvement.  There were no
significant governance issues identified and areas for improvement are
detailed within the draft Annual Governance Statement at Appendix 1.
4.4 The draft Annual Governance Statement details the key elements of the
Council’s governance framework, annual review process, improvement areas
and overall opinion.
4.5 In terms of the Council’s overall corporate governance arrangements, it is
considered that, although there are some areas of work to be completed to
ensure full compliance with the Local Code of Good Governance, the overall
governance arrangements of the Council are considered to be sound.  The
Annual Governance Statement 2020/21 is informed by the self-assessment of
compliance against the Local Code of Good Governance and related
Certificates of Assurance from Chief Officers, the work of Internal Audit,
External Audit and external inspection agencies.
Page 104

Page 5

4.6 The significant incident which began in late March 2020 and the Council’s
responses as a Category 1 responder during the COVID-19 Pandemic
continued to test how well the Council’s risk management, governance and
internal control framework operated during 2021/22.  This was achieved using
amended governance arrangements, embracing new ways of decision-
making, leadership and implementation including virtual meetings and secure
remote access to systems to allow homeworking for Council employees as the
Council moved forward through the recovery phase.
4.7 All members of the council’s Senior Leadership Team and key stakeholders
participated in a variety of Local Authority specific Covid-19/Business
Continuity response groups supported by the Civil Contingencies Service.  A
comprehensive Covid-19 Impact Risk Register was developed covering all
aspects of service delivery affected by the pandemic which has been
maintained on a regular basis.  
4.8 The Council’s Annual Governance Statement will be published within the
Annual Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2022.
5. People Implications
5.1 There are no personnel issues.
6. Financial and Procurement Implications
6.1 There are no direct financial or procurement implications arising from this
report as all improvement actions will be managed from within existing
resources.
7. Risk Analysis
7.1 There is a risk that a failure to maintain a local code and develop a framework
to support the gathering and updating of the necessary evidence will leave the
Council unable to produce a Governance Statement.  The current approach to
ongoing annual assessment of compliance and reporting to this Committee
ensures that the Council can produce a meaningful Governance Statement.
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
8.1 There are no issues identified.
9. Consultation
9.1 This report has been subject to consultation with appropriate Chief Officers.
Page 105

Page 6

10. Strategic Assessment
10.1 This report relates to all five of the Council’s Strategic Priorities.
....................................
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date: 07 June 2022
______________________________________________________________
Person to Contact: Andi Priestman, Shared Service Manager – Audit &
Fraud
Telephone (01389) 737436
E-mail: andi.priestman@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices: 1 – Draft Annual Governance Statement
Background Papers: Report to Audit and Performance Review Committee (8
March 2017) – Revised Local Code of Good Governance;
and
Wards Affected: All Wards
Page 106

Page 7

Annual Governance Statement
The Annual Governance Statement explains the Council’s governance arrangements as it meets the
requirements of the “Code of Practice for Local Authority Accounting in the UK” (the Code) and
reports on the effectiveness of its system of internal control, including the reliance placed on the
governance frameworks of our partners. It is included within the Council’s Financial Statements to
assure stakeholders on how the Council directs and controls its functions and how it relates to
communities in order to enhance transparency and scrutiny of the Council’s activities.
Scope of Responsibility
The Council is responsible for ensuring that its business is conducted in accordance with the law and
proper standards, and that public money is safeguarded and properly accounted for, and used
economically, efficiently and effectively. It also has a statutory duty to make arrangements to secure
best value under the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003.
In discharging this overall responsibility, the Council's Elected Members and Corporate Management
Team (CMT) are responsible for putting in place proper arrangements for the governance of its affairs
and facilitating the effective exercise of its functions, which includes arrangements for the
management of risk. The Council has established an arms-length external organisation: West
Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust – to deliver leisure services more effectively on the Council’s behalf,
which reports regularly to Elected Members. From 1 July 2015 the West Dunbartonshire Health and
Social Care Partnership was established to continue the development of the integration of social care
and health services between the Council and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde.
The Council has approved and adopted a Local Code of Corporate Governance (“the Local Code”),
which is consistent with the principles of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy
(CIPFA) and the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE) Framework: “Delivering Good
Governance in Local Government”. The Local Code evidences the Council's commitment to achieving
good governance and demonstrates how it complies with the governance standards recommended by
CIPFA. A copy of this Code is available from the Council website at:
http://www.west-dunbarton.gov.uk/media/4312582/wdc-local-code.pdf
This statement explains how the Council expects to comply with the Local Code and also meets the
Code of Practice on Local Authority Accounting in the UK, which details the requirements for the
Annual Governance Statement. 
The Purpose of the Governance Framework
The governance framework comprises: the systems and processes; and culture and values - by which
the Council is directed and controlled and through which it accounts to and engages with
communities. It enables the Council to monitor the achievement of the strategic objectives set out in
the Strategic Plan. It enables the Council to consider whether those objectives have led to the delivery
of appropriate and value for money services.
The Council has put in place a system of internal control designed to manage risk to a reasonable
level. Internal controls cannot eliminate risk of failure to achieve policies, aims and objectives and can
therefore only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance of effectiveness. The system of internal
control is based on an ongoing process designed to identify and prioritise the risks to the achievement
of the Council's policies, aims and objectives, to evaluate the likelihood of those risks being realised
and the impact should they be realised, and to manage them efficiently, effectively and economically. 
The governance framework has been in place at the Council for the year ended 31 March 2022 and
up to the date of the approval of the Statement of Accounts.
Appendix 1
Page 107

Page 8

The Governance Framework
The main features of our governance arrangements are described in the Local Code but are
summarised below: 
• The overarching strategic vision and objectives of the Council are detailed in the Strategic Plan
2017/22, which sets out the key priorities of the Council and key outcomes the Council is
committed to delivering with its partners, as set out in the Local Outcome Improvement Plan;
• Services are able to demonstrate how their own activities link to the Council's vision and priorities
through their Delivery Plans. Performance management and monitoring of service delivery is
reported through service committees regularly. The CMT monitors performance information
regularly. The Council regularly publishes information about its performance;
• The West Dunbartonshire Community Alliance, which supports Community Planning West
Dunbartonshire, represents the views of community organisations, communities of interest and
geographical communities.  In addition the Council has an Engaging Communities Framework in
place which sets out our approach to engaging with citizens, community organisations and
stakeholders. Consultation on the future vision and activities of the partnership is undertaken in a
range of ways, including seeking the views of  the Alliance and through specific service
consultations and the Council actively engages with its partners through community planning
arrangements;
• The Council has adopted a Code of Conduct and associated employment policies for its
employees. Elected members adhere to the nationally prescribed Code of Conduct for Members
in a localised format. In addition, the Council has in place a protocol on member/ officer relations
and an inter-party protocol;
• The Council operates within an established procedural framework which incorporates a Scheme
of Delegation, Standing Orders and Financial Regulations. These describe the roles and
responsibilities of Elected Members and officers and are subject to regular review. The Council
facilitates policy and decision making through the agreed committee structure;
• Responsibility for maintaining and operating an effective system of internal financial control rests
with the Council’s Chief Officer Resources as Section 95 Officer. The system of internal financial
control is based on a framework of regular management information, the Financial Regulations,
administrative procedures (including separation of duties), management and supervision, and a
system of delegation and accountability. Development and maintenance of the system is
undertaken by managers within the Council;
• The Council’s approach to risk management is set out in the Risk Management Framework. A
strategic risk register is in place and an update report on this is regularly submitted to the
Corporate Services Committee and Audit Committee. The approach is embedded within the
Council’s strategic planning and performance management framework with regular reporting of
risk management reported to service committees; and
• Comprehensive arrangements are in place to ensure Elected Members and officers are
supported by appropriate training and development.
• The Council has adopted a response that is appropriate for its fraud and corruption risks and
commits to maintain its vigilance to tackle fraud.
• The Council continues to assess and monitor ongoing compliance with the CIPFA Finance
Management Code.
Review of Effectiveness
The Council has a responsibility to review, at least annually, the effectiveness of its governance
framework including the system of internal financial control. The review of effectiveness of the
framework is informed by the work of the CMT which has responsibility for the development,
implementation and maintenance of the governance environment, the Chief Internal Auditor’s annual
report; and reports from the external auditors and other review agencies and inspectorates.
The Council’s current Code of Good Governance was approved at the Audit & Performance Review
Committee on 8 March 2017. An assessment of the Council’s compliance with the Code of Good
Governance is supported by a process of self-assessment and assurance certification by Chief
Officers and the outcome of this assessment was reported to the Audit Committee on 15 June 2022.
Page 108

Page 9

Each Chief Officer was presented with a self-assessment checklist to complete and return as
evidence of review of seven key areas of the Council’s governance framework and provided a
certificate of assurance for their service areas. 
The Audit Committee performs a scrutiny role in relation to the application of the Code of Good
Governance and regularly monitors the performance of the Council's Internal Audit service.
In relation to the effectiveness of governance arrangements and systems of internal control for the
Council’s group entities, the Council places reliance upon the individual bodies’ management
assurances in relation to the soundness of their systems of internal control.
The Internal Audit service operates in accordance with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards
(PSIAS) 2017 and reports to the Audit Committee.  An annual programme of work is determined and
undertaken by Internal Audit, approved by the Audit Committee, based upon an established risk
based methodology. The Shared Service Manager – Audit & Fraud provides an independent opinion
on the adequacy and effectiveness of the Council’s System of Internal Financial Control. 
The Audit Committee performs a scrutiny role in relation to the application of PSIAS and regularly
monitors the performance of the Internal Audit service. The Council's Shared Service Manager – Audit
& Fraud (the Council’s Chief Internal Auditor) has responsibility for reviewing independently and
reporting to the Audit Committee annually, to provide assurance on the adequacy and effectiveness of
the code and the extent of compliance with it.  
It is our view that the Council has in place a sound system of internal financial control and that
appropriate mechanisms are in place to identify areas of weakness. This is corroborated by an annual
assurance statement prepared by the Shared Service Manager – Audit & Fraud stating that
reasonable assurance can be placed upon the adequacy and effectiveness of the Council's internal
control systems.  Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some audits from 2021/22 could not be carried out
and have been rescheduled to take place in early 2022/23. However the overall audit plan is set
within the context of a multi-year approach to audit planning such that key risk areas are reviewed
over a 5 year cycle.
The system of governance (including the system of internal control) can provide only reasonable and
not absolute assurance that the assets are safeguarded, the transactions are authorised and properly
recorded, that material errors or irregularities are either prevented or would be detected within a
timely period and that significant risks impacting on the achievement of the Council's objectives have
been mitigated. 
COVID-19
The significant incident which began in late March 2020 and the Council’s responses as a Category 1
responder during the COVID-19 pandemic continued to test how well the Council’s risk management,
governance and internal controls framework operated during 2021/22.  This was achieved using
amended governance arrangements, embracing new ways of decision-making, leadership and
implementation including virtual meetings and secure remote access to systems to allow
homeworking for Council employees as the Council moved forward through the recovery phase.
All members of the Council’s Senior Leadership Team and key stakeholders participated in a variety
of Local Authority specific Covid-19/Business Continuity response groups supported by the Civil
Contingencies Service.  A comprehensive Covid-19 Impact Risk Register was developed covering all
aspects of service delivery affected by the pandemic which was maintained throughout 2021/22.
Page 109

Page 10

Governance Issues and Planned Actions
The following main issues and areas for improvement during 2021/22 have been identified through
the self-assessment exercise carried out by Chief Officers against key aspects of the Code of Good
Governance:
Improvement Area identified by 2021/22 Exercise Responsible Officer
Embedding Be the Best Conversations within all service
teams.
Chief Officer, Citizen, Culture and
Facilities
Chief Officer, Supplies, Distribution
and Property
Work is required in some services to review and update
business continuity planning documentation.
Chief Officer, Housing and
Employability
Chief Officer, Resources
Business Classification Scheme will be rolled out to
relevant service areas.  
Chief Officer, People and Technology
Chief Officer, Resources
Chief Officer, Education, Learning and
Attainment
Due to ongoing COVID-19 restrictions during 2021/22,
some services have been unable to access offices and
therefore physical access to hard copy files for destruction
has not been possible.  This will be resumed in line with
easing of restrictions.
Chief Officer, Regulatory and
Regeneration
Chief Officer, People and Technology
Appropriate and proportionate assurances will be sought
from key partners and suppliers in relation to business
continuity arrangements in place for managing key risks.
Chief Officer, Education, Learning and
Attainment
Chief Officer, People and Technology
Although improvement activity stimulated by external
inspection and internal improvement activity is monitored
by HSCP Board and relevant Projects, it is recognised
that HSCP would benefit from establishing arrangements
to ensure consistency in monitoring processes.
Chief Officer, HSCP
Staff training and development has been identified as an
area for improvement and resources have been identified
and agreed to ensure co-ordination of approach to training
and development across the HSCP.
Chief Officer, HSCP
An integrated workforce plan is being developed for HSCP
for approval by HSCP Board during 2022/23.  Succession
planning has been identified as an area for improvement
for the HSCP and work is ongoing in this regard.
Chief Officer, HSCP
In relation to self-evaluation, work is ongoing to review
complaints and consider how all feedback can be
captured and used to inform service improvement across
HSCP.
Chief Officer, HSCP
Work is ongoing to implement the Council’s information
classification policy and procedure as part of the Microsoft
Office 365 project.
Data Protection/Information
Governance Officer
Review of Learning Disability Service to improve on ways
of working to ensure the service is fit for the future
demands.  Service Improvement lead aligned to service.
Full review to be picked up as part of renewal and
recovery work.
Head of Mental Health, Addictions &
Learning Disabilities
A Project Overview document has been developed and
approved by the Integrated Housing Project Board in
relation to the IHMS. This document is being utilised to
manage all remaining Phase 2 implementation items.
Chief Officer, Housing and
Employability
At the appropriate time a post-incident review will be
carried out in relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic
highlighting any lessons learned which will inform future
emergency response and recovery arrangements.
Chief Executive
Page 110

Page 11

The 2020/21 Annual Governance Statement highlighted a range of areas for improvement during
2021/22. The following table provides an update on progress with these with a number having been
completed or are areas which continue to have ongoing focus:
Improvement Area identified by 2020/21 Exercise Status
Embedding Be the Best Conversations within all service
teams.
Ongoing.  There is improvement to
be made to ensure all employees
have regular 121s
Following COVID-19 work is required in some services to
review and update business continuity planning
documentation.
Ongoing
Business Classification Scheme will be rolled out to relevant
service areas.  
Ongoing.  This will be resumed in
line with easing of restrictions.
Due to COVID-19 restrictions during 2020-21, some
services have been unable to access offices and therefore
physical access to hard copy files for destruction has not
been possible.  This will be resumed in line with easing of
restrictions.
Ongoing.  This will be resumed in
line with easing of restrictions
Improvement activity is ongoing within teams in order to
develop and maintain strong supervision practices.
Complete
Although the Health and Safety team undertake the co-
ordination role of Health and Safety Executive inspection
reports to ensure that action plans are put in place, there is
a need to ensure that there is regular review of action plan
progress which will be included on agendas for 121
meetings between Chief Executive and Chief Officers going
forward.
Complete
Work is ongoing to implement the Council’s information
classification policy and procedure as part of the Microsoft
Office 365 project.
Ongoing as part of the Microsoft
Office 365 rollout
Within HSCP, work is ongoing with Healthcare Improvement
Scotland in respect of self-evaluation activity.
Complete
Within HSCP, continue to undertake targeted interventions
for areas with higher absence levels to support line
managers and ensure individual absences are being
managed in an appropriate manner to support return to
work.
Complete
Within HSCP, governance processes developed for tracking
of audit action plans and ensuring action deadlines are met
will continue to be embedded.
Complete
Continue to develop plans in response to the ageing
population.  We continue to develop and review services in
response to the changing demographic.
Complete
Review of Learning Disability Service to improve on ways of
working to ensure the service is fit for the future demands. 
Service Improvement lead aligned to service. Full review to
be picked up as part of renewal and recovery work.
Ongoing
Improved case recording and assessment for children and
families who receive statutory social work services.  
Complete
Page 111

Page 12

Improvement Area identified by 2020/21 Exercise Status
A Project Overview document has been developed and
approved by the Integrated Housing Project Board in
relation to the IHMS. This document is being utilised to
manage all remaining Phase 2 implementation items.
Ongoing
At the appropriate time a post-incident review will be
carried out in relation to the COVID-19 Pandemic
highlighting any lessons learned which will inform future
emergency response and recovery arrangements.
Ongoing
Best Value Assurance Report
Audit Scotland reported a Best Value Assurance Report on West Dunbartonshire Council to the
Accounts Commission on 28 June 2018 which contained five recommendations, all of which are
complete.  
Health and Social Care Integration
The Council, as the funder of the Social Care services within the West Dunbartonshire Health and
Social Care Partnership (HSCP) has an interest in the governance arrangements within the HSCP.
Internal Audit arrangements for the HSCP is provided jointly by the Council’s Internal Audit service
and the Health Board’s Internal Audit Service, with the Council’s Internal Audit service providing audit
arrangements for social care services and the general oversight of the HSCP’s governance
arrangements. 
The HSCP has arrangements in place to review its own ongoing compliance with the revised Code of
Governance. Due to the Council’s role as social care service provider Internal Audit’s process
outcomes on such services are reported to the Council’s Audit Committee as well as that of the
HSCP. The Chief Social Worker provides Council with an annual report on the performance of the
HSCP. 
The financial arrangements for the Council’s funding to the HSCP are aligned and budget processes
run parallel to ensure that appropriate budgets for the HSCP are aligned with Council policy and
budgeting approaches, particularly in relation to ensuring any efficiency targets for the HSCP funding
from the Council are planned for and appropriate efficiencies are approved by the HSCP. On an
ongoing basis Council continues to receive budgetary control information in relation to HSCP services
funded by the Council.
Compliance with Best Practice
Statement on the role of the Chief Financial Officer in local government
The Council complies with the requirements of the CIPFA Statement on “The Role of the Chief
Financial Officer in Local Government 2010”. The Council’s Chief Financial Officer (Section 95
Officer) has overall responsibility for the Council’s financial arrangements, and is professionally
qualified and suitably experienced to lead the Council’s finance function and to direct finance staff.
Statement on the role of the Head of Internal Audit in Public Service Organisations
The Council complies with the requirements of the CIPFA Statement on “The Role of the Head of
Internal Audit in Public Service Organisations 2019”. The Council’s Chief Internal Auditor has
responsibility for the Council’s Internal Audit function and is professionally qualified and suitably
experienced to lead and direct the Council’s Internal Audit staff. The Internal Audit service generally
operates in accordance with the CIPFA “Public Sector Internal Audit Standards 2017”.
Page 112

Page 13

Assurance
Subject to the above, and on the basis of the assurances provided, we consider the governance and
internal control environment operating during 2021/22 provides reasonable and objective assurance
that any significant risks impacting on the achievement of our principle objectives will be identified and
actions taken to avoid or mitigate their impact. Systems are in place to continually review and improve
the governance and internal control environment with plans in place to address improvement areas.
Martin Rooney  Joyce White Laurence Slavin
Leader of the Council Chief Executive Chief Officer – Resources
Date:  Date:  Date: 
Page 113

Page 14

Page 114

Page 15

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer – Resources
Audit Committee: 15 June 2022
Subject: Appointment of Lay Members
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide Members with an update on the current
status of Lay Member appointments to the Audit Committee.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that Members:
• note the resignation of Lay Member Christopher Todd.
• agree to the continuation of current Lay Member Chris Johnstone.
• consider whether additional Lay Members should be appointed.
3. Background
3.1 The Audit Committee has appointed Lay Members to the Committee since
2015/16.
3.2  Audit Scotland have commented positively on the appointment of Lay Members
to the Audit Committee through their Annual Report to Members each year in
terms of the Council’s overall corporate governance arrangements.
4. Main Issues
4.1. There were two Lay Members appointed to the Audit Committee however, one Lay
Member, Christopher Todd, has resigned from his appointment and the other Lay
Member Chris Johnstone has expressed an interest in continuing his appointment
to the Audit Committee.
5. People Implications
5.1 There are no people implications.  Recruitment of new lay members will be
undertaken in line with previous practice.
6. Financial and Procurement Implications
6.1 There are no financial implications.  Lay Members are entitled to claim
incidental expenses as a result of their appointment.
6.2 There are no procurement implications arising from this report.
ITEM 12
Page 115

Page 16

7. Risk Analysis
7.1 Appointing Lay Members to the Audit Committee would positively contribute to
the Council’s overall corporate governance arrangements.
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
8.1 There are no issues.
9. Consultation
9.1 This report has been subject to consultation with appropriate Chief Officers, the
Chair and Vice-Chair of the Audit Committee.
10. Strategic Assessment
10.1 This report relates to strong corporate governance.
....................................
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date: 15 June 2022
Person to Contact: Andi Priestman, Shared Service Manager – Audit & Fraud
E-mail: andi.priestman@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices:  None
Background Papers: None
Wards Affected: All wards
Page 116

Page 17

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer- Citizen, Culture & Facilities
Audit Committee: 15 June 2022
___________________________________________________________________
Subject: Scottish Public Services Ombudsman Complaints Report 2020-21
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to present the Scottish Public Services
Ombudsman (SPSO) report on complaints handling by West Dunbartonshire
Council for the year 1 April 2020 – 31 March 2021.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that Committee:
• Notes the contents of the report and the ongoing commitment at a service
and strategic level to monitor complaints and ensure compliance with
Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) timelines
3. Background
3.1 West Dunbartonshire Council adopted the SPSO complaint handling model
operating in line with all other Local Authorities on 1 April 2013.  Complaints
continue to be managed centrally by the Citizen Relations team for all Council
services. Complaints regarding West Dunbartonshire Health and Social Care
Partnership (HSCP) are managed independently by the partnership.
Statutory appeals and reviews, such as planning decision appeals, continue to
be directed to the relevant decision making body, and are not processed
through the SPSO office.
3.2 The Complaints Handling Process is well established and understood by both
citizens and staff. Centralised complaints handling ensures an open and
transparent process. Complaints are valued because they provide an insight
into services, and how the Council is performing. The feedback offers
valuable information helping to inform service planning, improve how services
are delivered and ensure citizen’s voices are heard and views considered.
Citizens who remain dissatisfied with the final outcome of their complaint are
openly directed to the SPSO to have their case considered for review.
3.3 West Dunbartonshire Council acts as factor for the buildings where we retain
an interest with tenanted properties.  Anyone who remains dissatisfied with
the outcome of their complaint may be also signposted to the First-tier
Tribunal for Scotland (Housing and Property Chamber). The Tribunal is an
independent and impartial judicial body whose function is to review complaints
ITEM 14
Page 117

Page 18

from homeowners who consider their property factor has failed to perform its
factoring duties or failed to comply with the Property Factors’ Code of
Conduct. 
3.4    As a member of the Local Authority Complaints Handlers Network, the
Council continues to fully engage in sharing of good practice, and developing
consistent approaches to complaints handling and reporting. Network
meetings are held regularly, with SPSO in attendance at each meeting.  The
meetings are a valuable source of information and support across the sector.
4. Main Issues
4.1 The SPSO delivers an annual report to each Local Authority detailing the
number of complaints reported to its office.  Appendix 1 provides a
breakdown of enquiries handled by SPSO relating to West Dunbartonshire
Council for 2020-21 together with comparison data for 2019-20.  Appendix 2
is a summary breakdown of complaints received by the Council in 2020-21. 
Appendix 3 shows Social Work complaints handled by the HSCP for the
same period.  
4.2 In the year 2020-21, SPSO received 32 complaints regarding the Council, an
increase of 7 from 2019-20. For the second year, the highest proportion of
complaints made by West Dunbartonshire citizens related to housing matters.
4.3 Of the 32 complaints to SPSO, 11 were deemed as premature, which is
terminology used by the SPSO when the complainant has not exhausted the
Council’s complaints process. A further 4 were closed by SPSO as unable to
proceed.  SPSO considered 10 of the complaints demonstrated good
complaint handling and further investigation was not needed.  A further 5
complaints were closed by SPSO as the desired outcome was not achievable
for the citizen or the Council or an alternative route was available.   
4.4 Investigations were carried out on two complaints raised against West
Dunbartonshire Council. Following investigation one complaint was deemed
not upheld and one was partially upheld. This is positive and reflects on the
high level of effective complaints handling within West Dunbartonshire
Council.
4.5 As outlined in Appendix 2, the Council handled 785 complaints internally in
2020-21.  Of these, 577 were closed within 2020-21.  The difference in
complaints handled and closed is due to complaints being received during the
reporting period, but still being worked on.  The remaining 208 were closed in
2021-22 and will be included in appropriate reporting periods.  When
registering a complaint, residents preferred method is the online complaints
form which accounted for 47% of all complaints received. Email is the next
preferred method accounting for 35%.    
4.6 Of the 577 complaints closed, 80% were resolved within SPSO timescales,
including with extension where applicable, representing an increase of 5%
Page 118

Page 19

from 2019-20. Citizen Relations maintain a focus on right first time and is
committed to ensuring the quality of responses remains high whilst seeking to
improve response times again in 2021-22.
4.7 As noted above, the number of complaints received in 2020-21 was 785. This
represents a decrease of 2% when compared to complaints received in 2019-
20. While the decrease in complaints received is small it is important to
continue to encourage capturing expressions of dissatisfaction.  Complaints
data provides services with valuable information to inform service
improvement and understand the expectations of Citizens.
4.8 In line with this, the service continue to work to encourage a culture of
welcoming complaints and ensuring services across the Council use the data
provided to identify and progress complaints improvement activity.   
5. People Implications
5.1 There are no people implications arising from this report.
6. Financial and Procurement Implications
6.1 There are no financial implications arising from this report.
7. Risk Analysis
7.1 There is a reputational risk in not responding to complaints in defined time
periods within the two stage process.  Complaints data is closely monitored,
including response times and quality of response from services.  Citizen
Relations continue to work to support services to improve response
timescales and maintain quality of complaints management.
7.2 There is a risk that services do not learn from the complaints received and do
not adapt processes or policies to stop it happening again. To reduce this risk
complaints data is reported quarterly to Performance & Monitoring Group.
Complaints data is also shared with Chief Officers and included within service
Delivery Plans to ensure visibility and to assist in informing service
improvements.
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
8.1 The two stage process has been equality impact assessed at a National level.
Locally, all aspects have been considered and assistance to navigate the
complaints process is available for all citizens.
9. Consultation
9.1 Not applicable to this report.
Page 119

Page 20

10. Strategic Assessment
10.1 Effective complaints handling contributes to all five Council strategic priorities.
Amanda Graham
Chief Officer 
Citizen, Culture and Facilities
Date:   27 May, 2022
___________________________________________________________________
Person to Contact: Stephen Daly
Citizen & Library Manager
Citizen, Culture and Facilities
Council Offices, 16 Church Street, Dumbarton
01389 737263
Appendices: Appendix 1 – SPSO Complaints Data
Appendix 2 - Summary of Council Complaints 2020-21
Appendix 3 -  Summary of HSCP Complaints 2020-21
Background Papers: None
Wards Affected: All Wards
Page 120

Page 21

Appendix 1
West Dunbartonshire Council complaints closed 2020-21
2020-21 
Stage Outcome Group
West
Dunbartonshire
Council
Sector
Total
Advice Discretion – alternative
action proposed
0 1
Organisation not in
jurisdiction
0 1
Premature 10 244
Subject matter not in
jurisdiction
0 1
Unable to proceed 4 140
Total 14 387
Early
Resolution
Cause and impact test not
met (s 5 (3))
0 7
Discretion –   alternative
route used or available
1 7
Discretion –  Insufficient
benefit would be achieved
by investigation
1 85
Discretion – alternative
action proposed
2 17
Discretion - Good complaint
handling
10 291
Discretion – referred back 0 25
Member of the public test
not met (s 5 (6))
0 1
Premature 1 11
Right of appeal to
court/tribunal/Scottish
ministers (s 7 (8))
0 8
Subject matter not in
jurisdiction
0 23
Time limit (s 10) 0 7
Unable to proceed 1 21
Total 16 503
Investigation Fully upheld 0 29
Not upheld 1 22
Some upheld 1 12
Total 2 63
Total Complaints 32 953
Page 121

Page 22

West Dunbartonshire Council complaints closed 2019-20
2019-20
Stage Outcome Group
West
Dunbartonshire
Council
Sector
Total
Advice Complaint - Not duly made or
withdrawn
6 248
Complaint - Out of jurisdiction
(discretionary)
0 1
Complaint - Out of jurisdiction
(non-discretionary)
0 8
Complaint - Outcome not
achievable
0 1
Complaint - Premature 5 233
Total 11 491
Early
Resolution
Not duly made or withdrawn 3 42
Out of jurisdiction
(discretionary)
2 49
Out of jurisdiction (non-
discretionary)
1 44
Outcome not achievable 0 29
Premature 1 34
Proportionality 7 462
Resolved 0 13
Total 14 673
Investigation Fully upheld 0 29
Not upheld 0 30
Resolved 0 1
Some upheld 0 25
Total 0 85
Total Complaints 25 1249
Page 122

Page 23

Year 2020-21
Performance & Monitoring
Total
Complaints
Received
Complaints
Received
Stage 1
Complaints
Received
Stage 2
People & Technology  0 0 0
Regulatory 18 15 3
Resources 84 73 11
Communications, Culture, Communities & Facilities 31 30 1
Education, Learning & Attainment 107 96 11
Roads & Neighbourhood 216 205 11
Housing & Employability 80 67 13
Regeneration 249 227 22
Totals 785 713 72
0
517
122
6
1
8
0
64
56
9
0
2
785
Complaints Received
Complaint Category
Upheld per category Stage 1
Below declared service standard 0
Citizen expectation not met - quality of service 194
Citizen expectation not met – timescales 66
Council policy – does not meet criteria 0
Council policy – charges 0
Delay in service delivery 0
Error in Service Delivery 21
Council policy – level of service provision 0
Employee behaviour 19
Failure to deliver service 3
Service standards not declared 0
Total 303
Contractor 0
Appendix 2
Page 123

Page 24

Total
complaints
closed
Closed at Stage
1
Closed within 
5 Working
Days
Extension Stage
1
Exceeded S1
deadline after
extension ie
+10days
Total working
days to close
Stage 1
complaints
Average
working days
to close S1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 7 4 2 1 55 8
57 49 26 14 9 408 8
25 24 19 4 1 100 4
80 71 60 6 5 424 6
161 153 114 20 19 877 6
56 43 33 6 4 199 5
189 162 86 30 46 2010 12
577 509 342 82 85 4073 8
Channel Received
Social Media
Complaints Closed
Upheld per category Stage 1
Upheld per category Stage
2
Performance
% of complaints closed within SPSO timescales
0 0 average working days to close Stage 1 complaints
194 27 average working days to close Stage 2 complaints
66 7 % of Stage 1 complaints upheld
0 0
0 0 % of Stage 2 complaints upheld
0 0 E-mail
21 0 Internal Complaints form
0 0
19 1 Online Complaints form
3 0 In Writing
0 0 By telephone
303 35 TOTAL
0 0 Face to Face
Page 124

Page 25

Closed at
Stage 2
Closed
within 20
working days
Extension
Stage 2
Exceeded S2
deadline after
extention ie
+25
Total working
days to close
Stage 2
complaints
Average
working days
to close S2
Escalated from
Stage 1 to 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2 1 0 1 55 28 1
8 5 1 2 112 61 5
1 1 0 0 20 20 0
9 8 0 1 95 29 6
8 1 2 5 223 74 4
13 8 1 4 281 64 7
27 5 4 18 1145 150 7
68 29 8 31 1931 28 30
80%
8
28
60%
51%
272 0
372
10
10
121
0
0
785
Complaints Closed
Performance
% of complaints closed within SPSO timescales
average working days to close Stage 1 complaints
average working days to close Stage 2 complaints
% of Stage 1 complaints upheld
% of Stage 2 complaints upheld
Equalities
E-mail Equality concern raised
Internal Complaints form
Online Complaints form
In Writing
By telephone
TOTAL
Face to Face
Page 125

Page 26

Outcome
Upheld
Stage 1
Not Upheld
Stage 1
Upheld
Stage 2
Not upheld
Stage 2
Withdrawn
0 0 0 0 0
3 4 1 1 0
26 23 3 5 0
11 13 0 1 0
36 35 2 7 0
96 57 5 3 0
16 27 4 9 1
115 47 20 7 0
303 206 35 33 1
Page 126

Page 27

Appendix 3
WDHSCP – Social Work Complaints Data
Period: 1st April 2020- 31st March 2021
Social Work Services Total
Children’s Health, Care & Criminal Justice 14
Community Health and Care Services 6
Mental Health, Learning Disability & Addictions 2
Total 22
Subject
Communication 1
Failure to fulfil statutory responsibilities 2
Failure to provide service 7
Failure to Achieve Standards 3
Data Breach 1
Bias or unfair discrimination 1
Employee Attitude 5
Other 1
Response
Acknowledged within 3 days 18
Response within 28 days 6
Outcomes
Upheld 1
Unsubstantiated 2
Partially Upheld 4
Not Upheld 15
Page 127