Democracy Spraffa

Item 9 - Internal Audit Annual Report to 31 March 2025

West Dunbartonshire Council · 11 June 2025
Back to Audit Committee — 11 June 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL 
Report by Chief Officer – Resources 
Audit Committee: 11 June 2025 
Subject: Internal Audit Annual Report to 31 March 2025 
1. Purpose 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to advise Members of the work undertaken by
Internal Audit in respect of the 2024/25 Annual Audit Plan and to advise
Members of the contents of the Assurance Statement given to Members of
West Dunbartonshire Council, the Chief Executive and the Section 95
Officer (Chief Officer - Resources) in support of the Annual Governance
Statement. This report outlines how audit assurances are obtained. 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 It is recommended that Members note the contents of this report.  
3. Background 
3.1 The Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS) became effective on
1st April 2013 (revised in 2017) and require that: 
“The chief audit executive [WDC: Shared Service Manager Audit & Fraud]
must deliver an annual internal audit opinion and report that can be used
by the organisation to inform its governance statement. 
The annual internal audit opinion must conclude on the overall adequacy
and effectiveness of the organisation’s framework of governance, risk
management and control. 
The annual report must incorporate:
• The opinion;
• A summary of the work that supports the opinion; and
• A statement on conformance with the Public Sector Internal Audit
Standards and the results of the quality assurance and improvement
programme”. 
3.2 Progress reports were provided to the Audit Committee at each meeting
during 2024/25 on Internal Audit activity and progress against the annual
audit plan. 
Item 9

Page 2

4. Main Issues 
4.1 Internal Audit has implemented a new risk-based audit methodology which
means that for each audit, one of the following opinions is expressed: 
Strong In our opinion there is a sound system of internal
controls designed to ensure that the organisation
is able to achieve its objectives.  
Satisfactory In our opinion isolated areas of control
weakness were identified which, whilst not
systemic, put some organisation objectives at
risk.  
Requires Improvement In our opinion systemic and/or material control
weaknesses were identified such that some
organisation objectives are put at significant risk.
Unsatisfactory In our opinion the control environment was
considered inadequate to ensure that the
organisation is able to achieve its objectives. 
4.2 Detailed findings and recommendations reported to management are graded
using the following criteria:   
Red In our opinion the control environment is insufficient to address the
risk and this could impact the Council as a whole. 
Corrective action must be taken and should start immediately. 
Overseen to completion by Corporate Management Team.
Amber In our opinion there are areas of control weakness which we
consider to be individually significant but which are unlikely to
affect the Council as a whole.
Corrective action must be taken (some exceptions may be agreed
with Internal Audit) within reasonable timeframe.
Overseen to completion by Chief Officer/Head of Service.
Green In our opinion the risk area is well controlled or our audit
highlighted areas for minor control improvement and/or areas of
minor control weakness. 
Process improvements/efficiencies may be actioned at
management discretion in consultation with Internal Audit.
Managed by service manager. 
Not reported in Audit Committee papers. 
4.3 The status of the Audit Plan for 2024/25 is set out at Appendix 1.

Page 3

4.4 The 2024/25 Internal Audit Annual Report and Assurance Statement is set
out at Appendix 2.   There are four overall Audit Opinion types as follows: 
Satisfactory Controls evaluated are adequate, appropriate and effective
to provide reasonable assurance that risks are being
managed and objectives should be met. 
• A limited number of amber rated issues may have been
identified, but generally only green issues have been
found in individual audit assignments.
• None of the individual assignment reports have an
overall opinion of Requires Improvement or
Unsatisfactory. 
Generally
Satisfactory
with some
improvement
needed
A few specific control weaknesses were noted: generally
however, controls evaluated are adequate, appropriate and
effective to provide reasonable assurance that risks are
being managed and objectives should be met. 
• A number of amber rated issues identified in individual
audit assignments that collectively do not significantly
impact the system of internal control.
• Red rated issues that are isolated to specific systems or
processes.
• None of the individual assignment reports have an
overall opinion of Unsatisfactory.
Major
improvement
needed
Numerous specific control weaknesses were noted. 
Controls evaluated are unlikely to provide reasonable
assurance that risks are being managed and objectives
should be met. 
• A high number of amber rated issues that collectively
have a significant impact on some parts of the system
of internal control but are not widespread.
• A number of red rated issues that collectively have a
significant impact on some parts of the system of
internal control but are not widespread.
• A small number of individual assignment reports have
an overall opinion of Requires Improvement or
Unsatisfactory.
Unsatisfactory Controls evaluated are not adequate, appropriate or
effective to provide reasonable assurance that risks are
being managed and objectives should be met. 
• Amber and red rated issues identified in individual
assignments that collectively are widespread to the
system of internal control.
• A high number of individual assignment reports have an
overall opinion of Requires Improvement or
Unsatisfactory.

Page 4

4.5 On the basis of Internal Audit work performed in 2024/25 it can be
concluded that the majority of the Council’s control procedures are
operating as expected during the period under review, although it is
recognised that work is ongoing with management to continue to make
good progress in implementing agreed action plans arising from Internal
Audit reviews.   
4.6 However, there was one audit where a Requires Improvement rating was
given in relation to Housing Repairs and Maintenance.  Work is underway to
implement a number of agreed internal audit actions to improve the
governance, risk management and control arrangements in this area. 
4.7 Therefore the overall audit opinion is Generally Satisfactory with some
improvement needed. 
4.8 Performance indicators for the Audit and Fraud service were reviewed for
2024/25 and reporting on performance against target is included within the
service delivery plan. 
5.  People Implications 
5.1 There are no people implications. 
6.  Financial and Procurement Implications 
6.1 As a result of Corporate Fraud Team activity, actual recoveries, charges
and re-billings of £123,651 have been identified during 2024/25. 
6.2 There are no procurement implications arising from this report. 
7. Risk Analysis 
7.1 There is a risk that failure to deliver the Internal Audit Plan would result in
an inability to provide a minimum level of assurance over the Council’s
system of internal financial control to those charged with governance. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 There is no requirement for an EIA. 
9. Consultation 
9.1 This report has been subject to consultation with appropriate Chief Officers. 
10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1 This report helps ensure strong governance and will help support delivery of
the Council Plan, and in particular priority 4: Inclusive and Adaptable, with the

Page 5

Council seeking to provide high quality and adaptable services that deliver
value for money.
....................................
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date:  11 June 2025 
Person to Contact: Andi Priestman, Shared Service Manager – Audit & Fraud 
E-mail: andi.priestman@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices: 1 – Status of Audit Plan 2024/25 
2 - Internal Audit Annual Report and Assurance Statement
for the year ended 31 March 2025 
Background Papers: Audit Committee – 4 December 2024: Internal Audit
Plan 2024/25 
Wards Affected: All wards

Page 6

No embedded text on this page.