Agenda Document Pack - Harbours Sub-Committee - 15/09/2026
Moray Council · 15 September 2026
Back to Harbours Sub-Committee — 15 September 2026 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Harbours Sub-Committee Tuesday, 15 September 2026 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Meeting of the Harbours Sub-Committee is to be held at Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX on Tuesday, 15 September 2026 at 09:30. BUSINESS 1. Sederunt 2. Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests * 3. Minute of meeting dated 2 June 2026 5 - 8 4. Written Questions ** 5. Marine Safety and Operational Summary for Quarter 1 2026/27 Report by Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations 9 - 22 Summary of Harbour Sub Committee Functions To fulfil the role of Duty Holder as described in the Port Marine Safety Code, and to provide strategic oversight and direction for harbour operations, giving greater focus and clarity on the Council’s role as harbour authority. Page 1
Page 2
Watching the Meeting You can watch the webcast live by going to: http://www.moray.gov.uk/moray_standard/page_43661.html Webcasts are available to view for 1 year following the meeting. You can also attend the meeting in person. If you wish to attend in person, please come to the High Street entrance door and a member of staff will let you into the Chamber. Page 2
Page 3
GUIDANCE NOTES * Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests - The Chair of the meeting shall seek declarations from any individual or political group at the beginning of a meeting whether any prior decision has been reached on how the individual or members of the group will vote on any item(s) of business on the Agenda, and if so on which item(s). A prior decision shall be one that the individual or the group deems to be mandatory on the individual or the group members such that the individual or the group members will be subject to sanctions should they not vote in accordance with the prior decision. Any such prior decisions will be recorded in the Minute of the meeting. ** Written Questions - Any Member can put one written question about any relevant and competent business within the specified remits not already on the agenda, to the Chair provided it is received by the Proper Officer or Committee Services by 5pm three working days prior to the day of the meeting, please see Standing Order 36 for deadlines. A copy of any written answer provided by the Chair will be published on the Council’s committee management system by 12pm the day before the meeting. The Member who has put the question may, after the answer has been published, may ask one supplementary question directly related to the subject matter at the meeting, but no discussion will be allowed. No supplementary question can be put or answered more than 10 minutes after the Council has started on the relevant item of business, except with the consent of the Chair. If a Member does not have the opportunity to put a supplementary question because no time remains, then he or she can submit it in writing to the Proper Officer who will arrange for a written answer to be provided within 7 working days. Page 3
Page 4
MORAY COUNCIL Harbours Sub-Committee SEDERUNT Councillor Marc Macrae (Chair) Councillor Amber Dunbar (Depute Chair) Councillor James Allan (Member) Councillor Neil Cameron (Member) Councillor Tracy Colyer (Member) Councillor Sonya Warren (Member) Clerk Name: Lissa Rowan Clerk Telephone: 01343563015 Clerk Email: lissa.rowan@moray.gov.uk Page 4
Page 5
MORAY COUNCIL Minute of Meeting of the Harbours Sub-Committee Tuesday, 02 June 2026 Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX PRESENT Councillor James Allan, Councillor Neil Cameron, Councillor Tracy Colyer, Councillor Amber Dunbar, Councillor Marc Macrae, Councillor Sonya Warren IN ATTENDANCE Head of Operations and Environment; Interim Service Manager Harbours; and L Rowan, Committee Services Officer 1 Chair Councillor Macrae chaired the meeting. 2 Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests In terms of Standing Orders 21 and 23 of the Councillors’ Code of Conduct, there were no declarations from Group Leaders or Spokespersons regarding any prior decisions taken on how Members will vote on any item on the agenda or any declarations of Member’s interests in respect of any item on the agenda. 3 Minutes of meeting dated 17 March 2026 The Minute of the meeting of the Harbour Sub Committee dated 17 March 2026 was submitted and approved. 4 Written Questions The Committee noted that no written questions had been submitted. 5 Compliance Summary The meeting had before it a report by the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations informing the Sub-Committee on matters of Marine Safety and compliance with the Port Marine Safety Code (PMSC). Item 3. Page 5
Page 6
During discussion surrounding the informal update outlining progress in relation to compliance with the Port and Marine Facilities Safety Code that had been expected prior to 31 March 2026, it was noted that this had not been issued. In response, the Head of Operations and Environment explained that final compliance actions were only concluded on 29 and 30 March 2026 and, due to operational pressures, priority had been given to achieving compliance. Councillor Cameron thanked the Head of Operations and Environment for the explanation and moved that the Sub-Committee agree the recommendations as printed. During further discussion, clarification was sought on the role of the Designated Person in providing assurance of compliance to the Duty Holder. In response, the Head of Operations and Environment advised that the Duty Holder is responsible for declaring compliance, with the Designated Person providing independent advice, identifying areas for improvement and highlighting potential non-compliance. It was further noted that Members may seek advice directly from the Designated Person and that they can attend the Harbour Sub-Committee if necessary. Councillor Warren sought assurance from Officers in relation to the resilience of the operating model, the sufficiency of governance and compulsory pilotage at Buckie Harbour which were answered by Officers and thereafter seconded Councillor Cameron’s motion to agree the recommendations as printed within the report. The Chair highlighted key safety messages within the report regarding risks associated with entering the water from piers, cold water shock, paddleboarding activity, and the use of drones within harbour areas. Thereafter, the Sub-Committee agreed to: (i) note that the Head of Operations and Environment, in consultation with the Chair of Harbour Sub Committee, declared compliance with the PMSC on 31 March 2026; and (ii) approve the policy documents and amendments to the Marine Safety Management System referenced and included in the appendices to the report. 6 Marine Safety and Operational Summary for Quarter 4 2025-26 The meeting had before it a report by the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations informing the Sub-Committee on matters of Marine Safety and compliance with the Port Marine Safety Code (PMSC) for Quarter 4 2025/26. During their introduction, the Head of Operations and Environment advised that the report covered the period up to 31 March 2026 and that following a request at the previous meeting, a glossary of abbreviations had been included within the report to help understanding, and that this would be a standing appendix in future reports. Page 6
Page 7
The Sub-Committee noted the recent cruise vessel activity at Buckie Harbour and commended the harbour team for the successful handling of this noting that this was well organised and efficient. In response to questions regarding pilotage sufficiency, the Interim Service Manager Harbours advised that there is currently one authorised pilot supported by trainees, and that this is sufficient for current levels of activity. It was acknowledged, however, that should vessel traffic increase, this could present a risk. Training of additional pilots had been slowed during the reporting period due to reduced vessel movements but had since resumed as activity levels increased. In relation to the weighbridge and Pier 1 repairs at Buckie Harbour, it was queried whether the weighbridge was fully operational and whether the delay to the repairs on Pier 1 was having an impact on operational matters. In response, the Head of Operations and Environment confirmed that the weighbridge is fully operational, with only minor improvements required subject to available funding. In respect of Pier 1 repairs, members were advised that works had been paused to enable ongoing timber export operations, and that this was considered the correct operational decision to support commercial activity. Regarding dredging activity across Moray Harbours, it was confirmed that dredging undertaken during the period related to maintenance which was necessary to maintain channel depths and support existing vessel traffic. It was emphasised that the primary objective of the current programme is to maintain operational capacity and ensure continuity of commercial activity rather than to increase capacity. Updates were provided on dredging works at individual harbours, and it was confirmed that dredging had been carried out at Burghead, with approximately 1,200 tonnes of material removed to date and further works scheduled. Members also noted progress in relation to the land dredging application for Hopeman, which has been submitted to the Marine Directorate and is awaiting approval. During discussion surrounding the increase in incident and near-miss reporting, assurance was sought that this was a result of reporting confidence rather than a rise in incidents. In response, the Interim Service Manager Harbours clarified that the increase is attributable to a stronger reporting culture rather than a deterioration in safety. Councillor Cameron thanked the Harbour Team for their continued work and moved that the Sub-Committee agree the recommendations as printed. This was seconded by the Chair. There being no-one otherwise minded, the Sub-Committee agreed to note the: (i) reported progress against the KPIs for the Marine Safety Plan 2025-2028, fulfilling their function as Duty Holder under the Port Marine Safety Code (PMSC) as set out in paragraphs 4.8 and 4.9 of the report; and (ii) contents of the report. Page 7
Page 8
Page 8
Page 9
Report to: Harbours Sub Committee Meeting Date: 15 September 2026 Report by: Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations Author: Cameron MacPhail Contact Email: cameron.macphail@moray.gov.uk Subject: Marine Safety and Operational Summary for Quarter 1 2026/27 1. PURPOSE ☒ For Decision ☐ For Information 1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the Harbour Sub Committee (HSC) on matters of Marine Safety and compliance with the Port Marine Safety Code (PMSC) for Quarter 1 2026/27. 1.2 This report is submitted to the Harbour Sub Committee in terms of Section III (F) (25) of the Council's Scheme of Administration relating to the functions of Council as Statutory Harbour Authority (SHA). 2. SUMMARY 2.1 The report sets out safety and key operational indicators for the harbours, a financial overview, reports against the Marine Safety Plan KPIs and the progress towards compliance with the Port and Marine Facilities Safety Code. 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 It is recommended that the Sub Committee: i) note the reported progress against the KPIs for the Marine Safety Plan 2025- 2028, fulfilling their function as Duty Holder under the Port Marine Safety Code (PMSC) (para 4.8 and 4.9) and ii) consider the contents of the report. Cameron MacPhail Interim Service Manager Harbours Item 5. Page 9
Page 10
4. PORT & MARINE FACILITIES SAFETY CODE 4.1 Under the requirements of the Port & Marine Facilities Safety Code (PMSC) the Council must appoint a Duty Holder to ensure that compliance with the PMSC is achieved. The role of Duty Holder is held by members of this Sub Committee. 4.2 The Harbour Authority appoints a suitably qualified person to act as the Designated Person (DP) – their function is to provide independent assurance that the Marine Safety Management System is working effectively and to audit compliance with the PMSC. The DP role is currently undertaken by ABPmer. 4.3 As a matter of good practice, a further audit by the Designated Person is planned for autumn 2026. 4.4 A glossary of marine terms used in this report is attached at Appendix 1. 4.5 The Marine Safety Plan Following approval of the Marine Safety Plan by this Sub-Committee on 22 October 2025 (para 4 of the minute refers), the agreed KPIs for the 2025-2028 period are shown in the table below with the latest results. The plan is based upon marine safety management requirements, conservancy requirements, compliance requirements, the financial situation, growth potential, harbours user and community consultation. The HSMS was updated with minor amendments during the period following Sub Committee approval June 2026 to reflect correct role titles and departments. 1. Full compliance with the Port Marine Safety Code. KPI indicator: No non compliances reported against the PMSC audit. Update July 2026 No non compliance against PMSC 2. Incident reporting improved. KPI indicator: Improved near miss reporting methodologies with better public access to reporting systems. Update July 2026 Significant improvement in reporting. New internal incident logging system in place to improve recording and investigations. Incidents investigated within 2 weeks of the date reported. Update July 2026 All incidents investigated within time limit. 3. Harbour infrastructure maintained to ensure all commercial contracts can be fulfilled. KPI indicator: No reported delays to commercial contracts due to infrastructure issues. Update July 2026 No reported issues KPI indicator: AtoN availability in accordance with NLB reporting requirements Page 10
Page 11
Update July 2026 AtoN availability is currently at 100% for quarter. 3 year rolling NLB availability last reported an average across all sectors of CAT 1 97.45% and CAT 2 99.65% KPI indicator: Commercial quayside lighting at 100% availability Update July 2026 100% availability KPI indicator: Pilot boat availability at 95%. Update July 2026 100% availability KPI indicator: Commercial quays and approaches dredged to declared depths for commercial customers. Update July 2026 100% availability 4. Harbour staff competent in their core roles. KPI indicator: Competence matrix measured at competent or awaiting assessment, for all staff with more than six months service. Update July 2026 100% for the quarter – training delivery for 26/27 underway KPI indicator: All Duty Holders completed training within 6 months of appointment Update July 2026 As complete 5. Traffic management reviews conducted for all harbours, to minimise risk between all types of harbour user. KPI indicator: Traffic management reviewed by March 2027. Update July 2026 In progress – discussions held with roads team. KPI indicator: Actions from traffic management plans in place by March 2028. Update July 2026 In progress 6. Harbours Website updated. KPI indicator: New website to include all relevant compliance, navigational and conservancy information, including the MSP and reported progress against the plan. Update July 2026 In progress- HM and HSM discussed options. Target completion December 2026. 7. Leisure berth occupancy maximised KPI indicator: No unsold leisure berths Update July 2026 Zero unsold berths KPI indicator: Waiting lists numbers above zero for all harbours Update July 2026 Waiting list in place 8. Harbour quayside space used to maximise, safety, community benefit and income at all harbours. KPI indicator: One improvement or service provided following suggestions by the relevant Harbour User Groups, implemented at, Burghead, Hopeman, Findochty, Portknockie Page 11
Page 12
and Cullen Harbours by March 2027. Update July 2026 Alternative storage sites being sought to free up quayside space for initiative options 5. FINANCIAL REPORT 5.1 At the end of Q1 Marine Services whilst still reporting an operating surplus, is at a £43k negative variance to budget. This principally relates to a shortfall in income. Whilst there are some timing issues on invoicing, the most notable influence is the impact of reduced whisky production, with no malt cargo in the first quarter of 26/27. The stevedore and shipping agent have been looking at alternative cargo business, and the harbour has benefited from some timber wharfage and transport. 6. OPERATIONAL REPORT 6.1 Operational Report Incidents Reported 2024/25 Injuries Incidents Near Misses Q1 0 2 0 Q2 1 0 0 Q3 0 1 0 Q4 0 0 0 Total 1 3 0 2025/26 Q1 0 0 0 Q2 1 0 0 Q3 0 0 0 Q4 0 1 3 Total 1 1 3 2026/2027 Q1 0 1 5 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total 0 1 5 6.2 Incident reporting and near miss reporting remains low but noted another significant improvement in reporting by users. Initiatives recently communicated to harbour users has seen one incident and five near miss reported. 6.3 One reported incident the MV Selkie making contact with a fishing boat within Buckie harbour during manoeuvring for dredge operations. Incident was investigated and mitigations put in place. Near miss reports included lack of water for vessel arrival at Hopeman, person fishing and striking vessel, persons playing on sandbank, and paddleboarder near misses reported at the June Harbour User meetings. The MSP includes and monitors this initiative, reporting accordingly. Page 12
Page 13
6.4 Harbour Noticeboards have been updated to encourage users to report any incidents and near misses. The forthcoming harbours website development will also promote a positive safety and reporting culture. 6.5 Pilotage and Shipping Pilotage is not compulsory at Buckie harbour, or any Moray Council Harbour, and therefore not all cargo movements require the services of a pilot. The number of pilotage acts carried out in the last 3 months (Q1) is: Period Vessel movements Piloted vessel movements FY 25/26 Q1 24 12 FY 25/26 Q2 24 17 FY 25/26 Q3 14 4 FY 25/26 Q4 6 2 FY 26/27 Q1 10 10 6.6 In order to increase resilience in pilotage a new trainee pilot has been engaged. Due to lack of vessel movements limited pilot trips have been undertaken. Currently there is one authorised pilot (daytime only) and two trainee pilots. One trainee pilot is due for authorisation over the upcoming vessel movements to provide further resilience to the pilot service. 6.7 The harbour workboat, which is also coded for pilot boat use, is fully operational. The ‘old’ Pilot Vessel ‘Pioneer’ was identified as a liability for the Moray Council and subsequently sold and transfer to new owner taken place. Vessel removed from Buckie Harbour. 6.8 Commercial shipping numbers remain low compared to previous years, but increased from 25/26 Q4 movements. Buckie harbour handled five cruise vessels (three anchored and tendered into Buckie) which received positive support from the community. The export of timber continues from basin one with three timber vessels during the period, which will continue into Q2 and Q3. Buckie harbour also handled two ‘project cargo’ vessels. An aggregate and project cargo export are due over the coming months. 6.9 Staffing, Training and Competence Harbours staff training requirements for 2026/2027 complete and issued. Key focus area is to support the current Harbour Master to achieve their Harbour Master certification and support the Selkie full time engineer to attain their Advanced Powerboat certification to support the ongoing manning on the Selkie. Harbour staff require to undertake review of DFT training material for familiarity. 6.10 Staffing of the work/pilot boat remains a challenge, but is being managed effectively by the Harbour Master. The forthcoming training requirement for 26/27 includes staff training to mitigate this issue. This is in accordance with the staff competency matrix which is now linked to National Occupational Standards for the sector. Page 13
Page 14
6.11 Watchman on Duty 24/7 request a review of working pattern.. Currently the watchmen operate continental shifts (8hrs) and request review of 12hr shifts. Harbour Master and HSM undertaking review to assess viability and options. 7. CONSERVANCY 7.1 Aids to Navigation The tables below summarise the availability of Navigational lights under Moray Council’s responsibility. All navigation lights across all harbours are either solar powered or run through the street lighting systems. A new sector light at Buckie has been installed and testing is required prior to approval/sanction from NLB and NTM issued. Figure 1. Availability during the last 12 months 7.2 The ‘Availability Objective’ is calculated over a rolling 36 month period. This means that over this period a Cat 1 Aid to Navigation needs to be functional for 99.8% of the time, Cat 2 Aids to Navigation 99%. The updated availability information has been reflected in the KPI report. 7.3 Burghead AtoN was changed out during period and supports the increase in availability. The new Buckie sector light will further support the rise in availability figures with changes being undertaken to a number of lights at Buckie. 7.4 Dredging MV Selkie has completed her 5 yearly MCA recertification – including in water and out water surveys by the MCA . The Selkie was certified on 14 April 2026 by the MCA. The Selkie currently operates under Workboat Code 2, the MCA has provided the Selkie with certification until April/May 2027 instructing a gap analysis to be carried out of Workboat Code 3 requirements and outputs shared with the MCA before December 2026 for approval. Initial engagement with the yard and builder indicates the changes are very minor but full assessment is to be finalised. 7.5 There were a number of minor defects reported with the excavator during the last quarter. The inspection regime has been increased to monthly and components identified to be at risk of failure (the main cause of breakdown) are now exchanged prior to failure, outside of the crewed the operational cycle of the vessel. 7.6 This improves vessel availability and the cost efficiency per tonne of dredged material. The aim is to also improve operational availability. Moray Council Fleet services currently Page 14
Page 15
support the inspection, planned maintenance and repair of the excavator and have planned dates to attend and undertake inspections until October 2026. 7.7 Dredger working Days Year Working Days Weather Delay Days Maintenance Days Working Day % Tonnage Removed 26/27 (Q1) 21 9 6 59 2748 25/26 70 22 43 52 11180 24/25 32 12 91 24 9012 23/24 62 58 28 42 8472 22/23 94 68 46 46 12880 21/22 77 62 59 39 14120 20/21 38 14 47 39 11240 7.8 It is pleasing to report continued improvement through Q1 of dredging operations, building on the work done in 25/26. The dredging requirement for all harbours was kept under continuous monitoring by the Harbour Master for any requirements. Note: no dredging was undertaken between 1 January 2026 and 30 April 2026. Working % is from May to June. Working days does not include MacDuff contract dredge. 7.9 Tonnage removed per harbour during 2026/2027 YTD Harbour Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Buckie 1298 0 0 0 Burghead 1450 0 0 0 Findochty 0 0 0 0 Portnockie 0 0 0 0 Hopeman 0 0 0 0 Cullen 0 0 0 0 7.10 Dredging at Buckie is to planned depth and regularly checked by the harbour staff. 7.11 A dredge campaign for all harbours has been detailed by the Harbour Master and commenced May 2026 at Buckie Harbour. The current dredge programme consists of 34 days, commenced May 2026. The Selkie has a planned dredge programme covering Q2 26/27 in place. 7.12 The operational ambition remains to lower the depth of the approaches, then resurvey prior to submitting the survey data and updating the charted depth. Then to maintain this lower depth and the accessibility of the harbour at as wide a range of the tide as is practicable. 7.13 On completion of current dredge programme, a full bathymetric survey of all harbours shall be undertaken and promulgated to users. This will also allow a full review of current depths to be assessed, and areas identified for further dredging. 7.14 An application for land-based dredging and beach replenishment disposal is being progressed for Hopeman harbour. Marine Directorate (MD-LOT) licence for land-based dredge submitted to MD-LOT June 2026. Discussions ongoing with MD-LOT and next steps. Page 15
Page 16
The Moray Harbours wider dredge licence renewal process is due to commence in near future as current dredge licences expire Feb/March 2027. Renewal process will require new sampling analysis and methodology submission to MD-LOT. 7.15 Selkie has also carried out 3rd party dredge works in 2026 generating additional income. There have been approaches to carry out works for other harbours which have been accepted with a planned dredge programme July/August. Moray Harbours dredge programme will remain a priority before external dredge contracts. 7.16 Infrastructure The capital plan is addressing the harbour wall infrastructure issues raised by the routine periodic surveys. Some further items of infrastructure may need to be brought into this routine survey programme, such as bollard surveys. This will add additional pressure to the maintenance budget. 7.17 The recent engineering survey at Portknockie exposed greater structural degradation of middle pier than expected. Engineer planning continues for structural improvements. It is intended to restrict access to berth holders only whilst repairs are pending due to the uneven surface. Pontoon assessment with contractor underway to address the reduced berthing capacity at Portknockie to deliver successful outcome with pontoons stored at Buckie Harbour. Ladder replacement programme also underway in conjunction with structural works. 7.18 The ends of the west and north quays at Cullen are also showing signs of structural degradation following recent storms. Again, access may need to be restricted for safety reasons whilst the extent of the required repairs is assessed. If this presents any material restriction for users then appropriate communications with harbour users and councillors will be put in place. 7.19 Anchors and pontoons were reset at Findochty following movement. Safety chains remain on pontoon to assess movement. Safety chains shall be removed once satisfied no further movement. 7.20 Buckie Harbour Pier 1 joint repairs ongoing. Work to the repairs delayed due to timber cargo shipment at berth 1. 7.21 Harbours team continue to undertake regular inspections of assets and undertake minor maintenance (painting) and pressure washing of pontoons. 8. OTHER UPDATES 8.1 Laurie Piper has been appointed as Service Manager – Harbours. 9. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS 9.1 The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are agreed: SUBJECT YES NO Page 16
Page 17
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) x Policy and Legal x Financial x Risk x Staffing x Best Value and Transformation x Property x Information Communications Technology/Digital x Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact x Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact x 9.2 Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP)) Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan strategic priorities: ☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality. ☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy. ☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities. b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities: ☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy ☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in Moray. ☐ Empowering and connecting communities. ☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 9.3 Policy and Legal The Council aims to run the harbours in compliance with the PMSC and within the legislative framework set out for harbours. Non compliance with the code will have legal implications. 9.4 Financial Non compliance with the code may have financial implications. 9.5 Risk Non compliance with the PMSC could result in the prosecution of the authority. 9.6 Staffing There are no staffing implications arising from the report. 9.7 Best Value and Transformation N/A 9.8 Property No property implications arise from the report. Page 17
Page 18
9.9 Information Communications/Technology/Digital No ICT implications arise from the report. 9.10 Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact There are no impacts arising from this report. While no significant long term adverse impacts have been identified, the report highlights several operational matters that may have indirect shorter term impacts on harbour users and coastal communities. Temporary infrastructure restrictions, harbour access arrangements and future financial pressures may affect berth holders, local businesses and users with protected characteristics. These impacts will need to be mitigated through user consultation, proportionate safety measures, accessible communications and consideration of alternative arrangements where practicable to ensure limited affects from reduced harbour business affecting local small businesses. The improvements in marine safety, incident reporting, infrastructure maintenance and navigation safety are expected to have positive impacts for all harbour users, including children and vulnerable individuals. Does the proposal have the potential to affect people from the below categories differently to the wider Moray population: Yes Maybe No Positive Negative Positive Negative Any protected characteristics individuals or groups (Equality Act 2010) ☐ ☐ ✓ ✓ ☐ Any socio-economic disadvantaged individuals or groups – i.e. low / no income / wealth or deprivation ☐ ☐ ✓ ✓ ☐ Human Rights of individuals ☐ ☐ ✓ ✓ ☐ Rights of Children or Young People (UNCRC) ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ✓ JUSTIFICATION - Please provide a brief justification statement explaining why the above boxes have been selected 9.11 Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts There are no climate change and biodiversity implications arising from this report. 10. CONSULTATION Page 18
Page 19
10.1 This report has been prepared in consultation with the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations, Head of Operations and Environment, Service Manager Legal Services, Senior Engineer (Flood Risk Management), Principal Climate Change Officer, Equalities Officer and L Rowan, Committee Services Officer and any comments made have been incorporated into the report 11 BACKGROUND PAPERS 11.1 N/A Page 19
Page 20
Page 20
Page 21
Appendix 1 – Glossary Word / Abbreviation Meaning Aid to Navigation any device, system, or service, external to a vessel or aircraft, designed to enhance safe and efficient navigation by helping mariners determine their position, determine a safe course, or warn them of dangers and obstructions. Common examples include buoys, lighthouses, beacons, and electronic signals (AIS) Chart Datum Chart Datum is defined as the sea level that is so low the tide will not frequently fall below it. In the United Kingdom, this level is typically the level of the Lowest Astronomical Tide Conservancy The duty of a harbour authority to maintain a port or harbour in a condition that is safe for navigation. This duty requires ensuring the harbour is fit for use by vessels and providing users with necessary information about conditions, such as depths and hazards DP / Designated Person an independent individual or organization appointed by a port or harbour authority to provide assurance that their marine safety management system is working effectively and is compliant with national standards LOA Length Overall - the maximum length of a vessel's hull measured parallel to the waterline, from the foremost point of the bow to the aftermost point of the stern LOLER Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998, a set of UK safety regulations designed to ensure that equipment used to lift people or loads is safe, properly planned, and thoroughly examined MCA Maritime and Coastguard Agency MSMS Marine Safety Management System (occasionally referred to a HSMS / Harbour Safety Management System) PMSC Port and Marine Facilities Safety Code SOSREP Secretary of State’s Representative: a skilled and experienced individual with full authority of government to provide strategic oversight of a maritime incident on behalf of Government. Page 21
Page 22
Page 22