Democracy Spraffa

Supplementary Agenda Document Pack - Economic Development and Infrastructure Services Committee - 07/02/2023

Moray Council · 7 February 2023
Back to Economic Development and Infrastructure Services Committee — 7 February 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Economic Development and Infrastructure Services
Committee 
Tuesday, 07 February 2023 
SUPPLEMENTARY AGENDA 
The undernoted reports have been added to the Agenda for the meeting of the
Economic Development and Infrastructure Services Committee to be held at
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX on Tuesday, 07
February 2023 at 09:30. 
BUSINESS 
2a) Resolution
Consider, and if so decide, adopt the following resolution:
"That under Section 50A (4) and (5) of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973, as amended, the public and media
representatives be excluded from the meeting for Item 14 of business
on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt
information of the class described in the relevant Paragraphs of Part 1
of Schedule 7A of the Act.”   
12a) Environmental and Commercial Services and Economic
Growth and Development Services Capital and
Revenue Budget Monitoring to 30 September 2022
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)  
3 - 22
Page 1

Page 2

12b) Energy Consumption Action Options and
Decarbonisation of Corporate Buildings
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)  
23 - 34 
Item(s) which the Committee may wish to consider with
the Press and Public excluded   
14 Land at Commercial Road Buckie [Para 8 and 9]
• Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be incurred
by the Authority; 
Information Reports - Not for Discussion at this Meeting
Any member wishing to call in a noting or information report from one
meeting shall give notice to Committee Services at least 48 hours
before the meeting for which the report is published. The Notice shall
be countersigned by one other elected member and shall explain the
reason for call in including any action sought.   
Information Report - Public Sector Climate Change
Reporting
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)  
35 - 42 
Page 2

Page 3

REPORT TO: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES COMMITTEE ON 7 FEBRUARY 2023 
SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND
ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) CAPITAL AND
REVENUE BUDGET MONITORING TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2022 
BY:  DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE) 
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1 To inform the Committee of the current position regarding Environmental and
Commercial Services and Economic Growth and Development Services
(Economic Development) Capital and Revenue Budgets. 
1.2 This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section III (A) (2) of the
Council’s Scheme of Administration relating to the consideration of Capital
and Revenue Budgets and long term financial plans. 
2. RECOMMENDATION 
2.1  It is recommended that Committee considers and notes the budget
monitoring report for the period to 30 September 2022. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1 The Performance Management Framework 2020 (page 27) requires that
progress against Capital and Revenue Expenditure and the Capital Plan is
reported to the relevant Service Committee every Committee cycle.
Expenditure is reported in the first instance to Corporate Committee (formerly
Policy and Resources) quarterly.   
3.2 The Capital Plan for 2022/23 was approved by a meeting of Moray Council on
22 February 2022 (para 4 of the minute refers).  The current projected
expenditure is an estimate that should be treated with caution due to volatile 
conditions within the Construction Industry and in supply chains of materials.   
3.3 Policy and Resources Committee on 10 May 2016 agreed to amendments to 
the information provided in response to the Audit Scotland report “Major
Capital Investment in Councils” (paragraph 7 of the Minute refers).
Accordingly this report includes a separate APPENDIX 4 giving details of
expenditure on projects which span more than one financial year. 
Item 12a)
Page 3

Page 4

3.4     The Council recognises five principal drivers for capital expenditure: 
Legislative requirements, efficiencies or spend to save projects, maintenance   
of assets and operations at current approved levels, service developments,
council priorities.  Capital expenditure is funded from three sources: capital
grants from Scottish Government and other sources; capital receipts from the
sale of assets or from developer obligations; and borrowing.  When the
Council borrows for capital expenditure, the capital financing charges incurred
are met from the revenue budget.  Therefore the Capital Plan has a direct
impact on the revenue budget and the two are considered jointly at the same
budget-setting meeting of Council.  The Revenue budget was approved at a
meeting of the Council on 22 February 2022 (para 4 of the minute refers).  
The Council has agreed savings of £1.576 million in 2022/23. The current
total Revenue budget for Environmental and Commercial Services is £26.099
million in 2022/23.  Any further amendments to the Capital and Revenue
budgets are first approved by Corporate Committee or Full Council,
depending on the timing of meetings. 
4. ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES REVENUE BUDGET 
4.1 APPENDIX 1 details the Environmental and Commercial Services Revenue
Budget position to 30 September 2022. 
4.2 REVENUE BUDGET POSITION 30 SEPTEMBER 2022 
4.3 Environmental and Commercial Services actual and committed budget has an 
overall Underspend to budget, of £216,000 for the period to 30 Sept 2022. 
The position is shown in APPENDIX 1 and summarised in the table below 
with major variances described in para 4.4 - 4.9 of this report.  Underspends 
or Overspends are against projected budgets for the period only.  Variances 
are further explained in this report.  All variances will be monitored closely and 
reported to Committee as the year progresses. 
Position at 30 September 2022 
Service Ref
Para
Overspend  Underspend 
£000s £000s
Fleet Services 4.4  130
Engineering
Design 4.5 79 
Traffic &
Transportation Mgt 4.6  43
Waste Mgt 4.7 40 
Building Catering 4.8  147
Annual
Budget
Budget
Year to Date
Actual &Committed
Year to Date
Variance
Year to Date 
£000s  £000s  £000s  £000s   
26,099  10,877 10,661   216    
Page 4

Page 5

and Cleaning
Parks & Open
Spaces 4.9  19 
Explanation of major variances 30 September 2022: 
4.4 Major Variance - Fleet Services 
A total underspend of £130,000 is mainly due to the following variances.  
Major variances over budget are spare parts £73,000 and under budget items
include roads fund licences £25,000, insurance recoveries £16,000 and
internal recharges to departments £163,000. 
4.5  Major Variance – Engineering Design 
Overspend of £79,000 on Lossiemouth east beach demolition costs, which
was approved to be funded from reserves £80,000.  Any underspend on
staffing due to vacancies will be offset by external consultants. 
4.6  Major Variance - Transportation
Underspend of £43,000 is mainly due to Car Park Income favourable to
budget by £11,000, harbours income £19,000 favourable and Roads
Construction consent favourable by £12,000.  
Advertising income was £9,000 below budget and school transport costs were
£8,000 over relating to additional service provision during the works at
Blackwater bridge. 
4.7 Major Variance - Waste Management has an overall overspend of £40,000. 
Main variances are:- 
Overspends: 
Trade Waste & events income £110,000 - The income shortfall to budget is
mainly due to a change in customer behaviour post covid.   
Trade waste collected through commercial contracts is based on the volume
of waste that is generated in each specific facility. Customers who have
reduced their volume of waste production or moved to using more recyclable
materials will amend their contracts to reduce their overheads. In doing so,
Moray Council retain the customer but the charge for the services provided is
reduced due to the reduction or removal of disposal costs  
Fuel costs £117,000 over, Leachate £38,000 over budget (landfill site recently
capped which leads to increased leachate initially but this is expected to
decrease over time).  Landfill tax £84,000 overspend.   
Underspends
Recycling income and costs are £221,000 favourable to budget.  However this
is a volatile market and prices for paper/card can change quickly.   Green
Waste income £18,000 better than budget, Bulky waste/bin income £24,000
better than budget and tipping income £41,000 better than budget, although
this is offset via increased landfill tax. Other minor underspends to budget
include waste disposal licensing £8,000 and advertising costs £7,000.                                  
4.8 Major Variance – Building Cleaning and Catering   
Total Underspend of £147,000 comprises of the following variances:
Underspend: Catering has a £191,000 underspend on food costs and
supplies.  The Catering service has experienced a number of major
Page 5

Page 6

challenges over the last couple of years including menu changes due to new
nutritional standards, provision of nursery meals, above inflation food prices,
universal free school meals expanded to Primary 4-5's. The underspend in
food costs and supplies is due to efficiencies of scale for the additional meals
for nursery and Primary 4-5 Universal Free School Meals UFSM.  The uptake
of UFSM is not yet at the projected uptake of 78% and some food prices have
not been as high as anticipated.   Admin & travel were underspent by
£11,000.  Catering income £66,000 income shortfall to budgeted target is due
to not providing functions to other departments and HQ services, secondary
income is still lower then pre covid plus adult meals uptake is low.   Free
period products underspent by £10,000. 
4.9 Major Variance – Parks & Open Spaces 
The net underspend of £19,000 is due to better than budget income in Burial
Grounds.  Overspends in Open Spaces relate to higher fuel costs ( £30k) but
these have been offset by income from the Housing Revenue Account and
Flood Alleviation grounds maintenance works.  Fuel costs will continue to be
monitored as a potential budget pressure. 
5. ECONOMIC GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT) REVENUE BUDGET   
5.1 REVENUE BUDGET POSITION 30 SEPTEMBER 2022   
Annual
Budget
2022/23
Budget
Year to Date
Actual &
Committed
Year to Date
Variance
Year to Date 
£000s £000s £000s £000s
4,592 1,753 1,629 124 
5.2 Development Services - Economic Development, the variance to projection is
an underspend of £124,000.  Fee income from building standards and
planning applications are in aggregate £76,000 above target. Income from
street naming and numbering was also favourable by £7,000. Other minor
variances across the service make up the balance of the underspend. 
6. ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES CAPITAL BUDGET TO
30 SEPTEMBER 2022. 
6.1 APPENDIX 2 details the Environmental and Commercial Services Capital
Budget position to 30 September 2022 (QTR 2).  The total Capital Plan
budget of £28.864 million has an actual spend at the end of September 2022
of £5.977 million and a projected spend at end of March 2023 of £29.864
million. 
6.2 Expenditure on Lands & Buildings to 30 September 2022 totals £1.193 million. 
The major items of expenditure to date were £347,000 at Dallachy Landfill site
and £757,000 for the Council’s contribution of the NESS energy from waste
plant – construction phase. 
6.3 Expenditure on Infrastructure assets to 30 September 2022 totals £3.169
million.  The main items of expenditure were £398,000 on the U82H/ 10
Page 6

Page 7

Aldunie Bridge, Cabrach combined Dykeside bridge project.  £144,000 was
spent on Knockando Bridges and £168,000 on the Lossiemouth Bridge. 
£1.608 million was spent on roads resurfacing works throughout the Council
area and a further £169,000 on road drainage works. 
Other items of expenditure include £137,000 on various Road Safety works
and £200,000 on LCTT Speyside Way (grant funded).  Work to improve the
Junction at the Wards / Edgar Road were predominantly funded by £372,176
of Developer Obligations.  This work was completed in August 2022 at a total
cost of £382,982.  As such, none of the Developer Obligation funding will be
returned to the developer.   
6.4 Expenditure on vehicles, plant and equipment to 30 September 2022 was
£1.615 million, the main item of expenditure being £1.384 million on the
Vehicle & Plant Replacement Programme, a significant proportion of which is
slippage from 2021/22 due to the current lead time for the delivery of vehicles.     
£69,000 was spent on Children’s Play Areas; £52,000 was spent on car
charge point upgrades and £53,000 on Domestic & Trade Waste Bins and
£19,000 on Gull Proof Bins. 
6.5 APPENDIX 3 shows the projects within the Capital Budget with a summary of
the ratings estimated by budget managers. 
6.6 Budget managers have been requested to update projected estimates of
expenditure on capital projects in 2022/23.   Projects are marked
red/amber/green. This column represents an assessment of projected
expenditure at end of year - with green being a high confidence level of
expenditure close to projected expenditure for the total of the year, medium
confidence as amber and low confidence as red. There are various unknowns
surrounding the impact that the situation in the wider construction industry and
in supply chains will have and this is reflected in the value of projected
expenditure in amber and red. A summary of the ratings is given in the table
below. 
6.7 
Risk status RAG No. of
projects
Projected
expenditure
2022/23       
£000s
High confidence of spend to estimate G 56 19,725
Medium confidence of spend to
estimate  A  8            8,019
Low confidence of spend to estimate R 4 1,051  
61          28,795   
6.8 A red status highlights areas where there is low level of confidence in estimated
expenditure. The following have been identified by budget managers as having
a Red status:   
Page 7

Page 8

Project Capital 
Plan 
£000s
Projected
Expenditure
2021/2022 
£000s
Projected
Variance
2021/2022
£000s
Infrastructure   
U117H/10 Bridge of
Slateford Tomnavoulin
16 16 0
U82H Aldunie Bridge,
Carbrach/ Dykeside
Bridge
450 485 (35)
U118E/10 Shougle
Bridge
589 550 39
Roads -Kerb Edge
replacement
25 0 25
TOTAL 1,080 1,051 29 
6.9 Three bridge projects are currently predicting a status of red (Bridge of
Slateford, Aldunie Bridge/Dykeside Bridge and Shougle Bridge). Current
construction industry inflation, along with complex negotiations with land
owners are contributing to this status. 
6.10 A lack of staff resources with the Roads service has impacted on priority to
identify locations for kerb edge replacement works. The budget has been
reduced by £25,000 and a further review will be carried out when preparing
the monitoring for quarter 3. 
6.11 Amber Rating 
An amber rating of confidence to spend budget highlights areas where there
are issues impacting on the ability to project spend – generally indicating
factors outwith the budget managers control. The following have been
identified by budget managers as having amber status: 
Project Capital
Plan
£000s
Projected
Expenditure
2022/23
£000s
Projected
Variance
2022/23
£000s
Land & Buildings   
Park & Open Spaces
Infrastructure
140 140 -
Infrastructure   
Street Lighting – Replacement
Columns and Lights
800 800 -
Bridges (2 projects) 3,820 3,046 774
Footways 250 250 -
Vehicles, Plant & Equipment   
Vehicle & Plant Replacement
Programme
3,531 3,531 -
Children’s Play Area Equipment 253 253 -
TOTAL 8,794 8,020 774 
Page 8

Page 9

6.12   Capacity issues in the Land and Parks team have seen delays in progressing
Parks Infrastructure projects. 
6.13 Staff vacancies within the Roads Service are impacting on plans for footways
projects and street light column replacements. Bridge projects for a new
Craigellachie Bridge and Boat O Brig Bridge at Orton are both classed as
amber based on tender returns and construction industry inflation. 
6.14 The lead time for vehicle replacements is very long due to issues with the
supply of small components to complete vehicles and there is therefore a high
degree of uncertainty as to when vehicles will be delivered. There is a similar
situation with regards to Play Area Equipment. 
6.15 Details of the projected variances as at September 2022 from the current
approved capital programme, summarised in APPENDIX 3, is set out below: 
Description Ref Underspend
/(Overspend
) £000s
Infrastructure  
Bridges 6.16 864
Kerb Edge Replacement 6.17 25
Wards Road Junction Improvements 6.18 (118)
Vehicles, Plant & Equipment  
Gull Proof Bins 6.19 (2)
Replacement Household Waste and Recycling
Centre (HWRC)
6.20 300
TOTAL  1,069 
6.16 Bridges
A941 New Craigellachie Bridge – Tenders have been returned for this project
and were lower than budget. At this stage it is projected that the project will
cost £3 million, currently £786,000 less than budget. 
A941/100 Blackwater Bridge – The original budget for this project was
£613,000 and the anticipated cost is £400,000 which includes a risk
allowance of £100,000 to allow for any unforeseen circumstances that may
occur. 
Boat O Brig Bridge Orton – There is a budget of £4,000 for design and
preparatory work in 2022/23, with construction planned for 2023/24. An
alternative solution has been identified that will cost a total of £15,000, which
is significantly less expensive than the original two stage solution. 
Aldunie Bridge Cabrach/Dykeside Bridge – The original budget, partly funded
by Lifeline Bridges Funding was £571,000. This project has been completed
at a total cost of £485,000. 
U118E/10 Shougle Bridge – Tender has been awarded and costs are
projected to be £550,000 versus a budget of £589,000. Final compensation
has yet to be agreed with landowners and this could increase costs.
Page 9

Page 10

Knockando Bridges – This project is now complete and with a slight
overspend of £14,000 due to remedial works that were required to address a
safety issue with the new parapet alignment. 
6.17 Kerb Edge Replacement – Lack of staff resources within the Roads Service
has meant that work to identify locations for kerb edge replacement works has
been unable to be carried out and an underspend of £25,000 is currently
projected at this stage of the year. A further review will be carried out when
preparing the monitoring for quarter 3. 
6.18 Wards Road Junction Improvements – During construction of the project a
number of design reviews led to additional work being undertaken in terms of
cable ducting and lighting for bollards, accommodation works for the adjacent
development and construction depths. 
6.19 Gull Proof Bins – This heading will overspend by £2,000 due to an increase
in the unit price of bins. 
6.20 Replacement HWRC Elgin – A land assessment is currently underway for
the construction of a new HWRC for Elgin. Some sites have been identified as
suitable for the project and within budget. However, if the land in question is
not purchased, another assessment will be required and costs could change
significantly. The sites under consideration are commercially sensitive. 
7. RISK AND EMERGING ISSUES 
7.1 Budget managers have been requested to identify any specific areas of risk 
for the projects in the Capital Plan for which they are responsible. 
7.2 As reported to Economic Growth, Housing and Environmental Sustainability
Committee on 24 August 2021 (paragraph 7 of the minute refers) a risk to the
capital plan is an increase in the cost of materials and scarcity of many
materials which are key for the construction industry. Scotland Excel have
informed the Council of unavoidable increases to costs on four of their
frameworks and some key materials such as concrete, wood and steel are
currently difficult to source and costlier if they are available. This is partly a
world-wide reaction to the pandemic, and partly due to Brexit, and the war in
Ukraine is also having an impact. The construction industry is also over-
heated and some recent procurement exercises have stalled.  The Strategic
Territory Partnering Board are also monitoring market volatility. 
7.3 There is a risk that contract inflation might increase the eventual cost of 
projects in future years of the capital plan and a risk that any deferment of 
projects relating to asset condition might result in element failure, potentially 
incurring unbudgeted costs. 
7.4 The main risk for the vehicle replacement programme is manufacturers failing 
to deliver to agreed timescales and this risk is heightened at this time due to 
the shortage of semi-conductors.
Page 10

Page 11

7.5 Projects can be subject to risks which are outwith the direct control of the 
Council.  Poor weather conditions can impact project timescales. 
7.6 Lack of staff resources and staff turnover can impact on project timescales
and other emerging work priorities can impact in scheduled works and this is
reflected in delays where work planned to be out-sourced is being brought in-
house as a result of poor response to tender requests. Poor responses to
tender requests are an increasing phenomenon and work is on-going with
organisations such as Hubco to attempt to improve market engagement, as
well as support from the Procurement team to engage local suppliers and
contractors. Lack of staff resources is a more intractable problem and current
recruitment difficulties, coupled with additional funding stream with short time
envelopes for spend, which adds pressure to staff workloads, is creating
difficulties. 
7.7 There is a risk that time-limited funding is not spent within time-frame and that 
the Council therefore loses the opportunity to improve or create assets at no 
or reduced cost to the Council.   
7.8 No other project risks have been specifically identified by budget managers. 
8. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS 
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan, (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan   (LOIP)) 
Effective budget management is an essential component of delivery of
Council priorities.   The capital plan is one of the vehicles through which
the Council’s priorities can be delivered. The approved capital plan for
2022/23 and the outline ten year plan incorporates measures designed
to address the LOIP priorities of building a better future for our children
and young people, empowering and connecting communities and
developing a diverse, inclusive and sustainable economy 
(b)    Policy and Legal
There are no policy or legal implications arising directly from this report 
(c)    Financial implications
The financial implications are highlighted within the report and detailed
in APPENDICES 1 – 4. 
Environmental and Commercial Services revenue spend to 30
September 2022 is £10.661 million against a budget to end September
of £10.877 million giving an underspend of £216,000.  The annual
revenue budget for 2022/2023 is currently £26.099 million. 
Economic Growth and Development Services – (Development
Services) Revenue spend to 30 September 2022 is £1.629 million
against a budget year to date of £1.753 million giving an underspend
variance of £124,000.  The annual revenue budget for 2022/2023 is
currently £4.592 million. 
Page 11

Page 12

Environmental and Commercial Services - Capital spend is £5.977
million to 30 September 2022. 
(d) Risk Implications
Budget managers are aware of their responsibilities for managing
budget allocations and approval for variance will be sought from
Committee in line with the Financial Regulations. 
(e)   Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications arising from this report. 
(f)    Property
There are no Property implications arising from this report. 
(g)    Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no equalities implications arising from this report because
the report informs the Committee on budget monitoring.     
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
There are no climate change or Biodiversity impacts arising from this
report, 
(i) Consultations
This report has been prepared in consultation with Depute Chief
Executive (Economy, Environment & Finance), Head of Environmental
and Commercial Services, Head of Economic Growth and
Development Services, Chief Financial Officer, Legal Services
Manager, Committee Service Officer (Lissa Rowan) and Environmental
and Commercial Services Management Team and Budget Managers. 
Any comments have been taken into consideration. 
9.   CONCLUSION 
9.1 This report sets out the budget monitoring position and comments on 
variances for the Environmental and Commercial Services and
Economic Growth and Development Services (Economic Development)
Capital and Revenue Budgets for the period to 30 September 2022. 
Author of Report:  Nichola Urquhart, Quality Management Systems Officer 
Background Papers:   
Ref:   SPMAN-524642768-832 
Page 12

Page 13

APPENDIX 1   
ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES  - REVENUE BUDGET PROGRESS 
PERIOD TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2022  (QTR 2) 
Service  Annual Budget Budget to date Actual & Committed
YTD
Variance to
date 
£000s £000s £000s £000s
Fleet  Services -1,950 -1,061 -1,191 130
Engineering Design 1000 389 468 -79
Roads Management 4,335 1,490 1,488 2
Traffic & Transportation Mgmt 5,667 2,192 2,149 43
Waste Management 8,210 3,465 3,505 -40
Building Cleaning & Catering 6,808 3,193 3,046 147
Parks & Open Spaces 1,468 687 668 19
Env& Com Services Admin / Suppt Svs /H&S 458 222 219 3
Emergency Planning 60 12 13 -1
Env & Com Services Covid 19  231 208 217 -9
Staff Saving Targets -309 0 0 0
Direct Services Directorate 181 92 92 0
Total Env & Com Services 26,099 10,877 10,661 216
UNDERSPEND 
Item 12a)
Page 13

Page 14

Page 14

Page 15

APPENDIX 2 
APPENDIX II ENVIRONMENTAL AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES - CAPITAL BUDGET PROGRESS –
PERIOD TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2022 
Service Description
Total
Number of
Projects
Current Capital
Plan Budget
2022 - 2023 
Actual &
Committed to 
30 Sept 2022 
Total
Projected
Expenditure
30 March
2023  
£000s £000s £000s 
Vehicle Plant and Equipment  13 4,969 1,615  4,671 
Lands and Buildings  9 9,575 1,193  9,575 
Infrastructure 40 15,320 3,169  14,549
Total 62 28,864 5,977 28,795 
Item 12a)
Page 15

Page 16

Page 16

Page 17

APPENDIX 3 
CAPITAL PROJECTS 2022 / 2023 
As at 30 September 2022 
Current
Capital
Plan
2022/23
Actual to
30 Sept
2022 
(QTR 2)
Total
Projected
Expenditure
2022/23
Projected
Variance
RAG Service 
£000 £000 £000   
LANDS AND
BUILDINGS      
Cemetery       
Cemetery
infrastructure
(paths, walls,
railings,
signage)
70 32 70 0 G Environmental
Protection
Cemetery
Provision –
Elgin,
Lossiemouth,
Keith
60 20 60 0 G Environmental
Protection
Contribution to
the cost of a
new Mortuary
160 0 160 0 G Environmental
Protection
Parks & Open
Spaces      
Paths, car
parks, steps,
walls, fences,
signage
140 5 140 0 A Environmental
Protection
Waste
Management      
Dallachy Landfill
site – new calls,
capping &
reinstatement
906 347 906 0 G Environmental
Protection
NESS energy
from waste –
construction
phase
7,777 757 7,777 0 G Environmental
Protection
Moycroft 0 0 0 0 G Environmental
Protection
Transportation 
Replace
waterproof and
expansion joints
at multi-story car
parks and
lighting, car park
resurfacing
430 0 430 0 G Transportation
/ Consultancy
RTIF Rural
Tourism
Infrastructure
Fund ( Fully
Funded by
Grant Funding)
32 32 32 0 G Transportation
/ Consultancy
TOTAL -
LANDS AND
BUILDINGS
9,575 1,193 9,575 0     
Item 12a)
Page 17

Page 18

CAPITAL PROJECTS 2022 / 2023   (Continued)
As at 30 Sept 2022 
Current
Capital
Plan
2022/23
Actual to
30 Sept
2022 
(QTR 2)
Total
Projected
Expenditure
2022/23
Projected
Variance
RAG Service 
£000 £000 £000   
INFRASTRUCTURE      
Bridges      
A941/ New
Craigellachie
Bridge
3,786 7 3,000 786 A Consultancy
A941/100
Blackwater
bridge, lower
Cabrach
500 11 400 100 G Consultancy
A941/340 New
Bishopmill
Bridge
10 1 10 0 G  Consultancy
B9103/100 Boat
O Brig Bridge,
Orton
4 0 15 (11) A Consultancy
Remote 
footbridges
50 0 50 0 G Consultancy
U117H/10
Bridge of
Slateford /
Tomnavoulin
16 5 16 0 R Consultancy
U170E/20
Kirkhill Drive,
Lhanbryde
30 5 30 0 A Consultancy
U173E/Lea
Brige Forres
10 0 10 0 G Consultancy
U82H/10
Aldunie Bridge,
Cabrach /
Dykeside 
450 8 485 (35) R Consultancy
U118E/10
Shougle Bridge
589 8 550 (39) R Consultancy
Knockando
Bridges
130 144 144 (14) G Consultancy
MacDowall
Bridge
10 0 10 0 G Consultancy
Lossiemouth
Bridge 
60 168 60 0 G Consultancy
Arthurs Bridge 0 0 0 0 G Consultancy
Principal Bridge
Inspections  245  0  245  0  G  Consultancy
Flood Risk
Management
and Coastal
Protection      
Elgin Flood
Alleviation
Scheme
149 5 149 0 G Consultancy
Findhorn Flood
Alleviation
0 3 0 0 G Consultancy
Coastal change
adaption 
0 4 0 0 G Consultancy 
Page 18

Page 19

CAPITAL PROJECTS 2022 / 2023   (Continued)
As at 30 Sept 2022 
Current
Capital
Plan
2022/23
Actual to 
30 Sept
2022 
(QTR 2)
Total
Projected
Expenditure
2022/23
Projected
Variance
RAG Service 
£000 £000 £000   
INFRASTRUCTURE      
Harbours      
Power Upgrade
– Buckie
Harbour
500 0 500 0 G Consultancy
Replacement of
life expired
elements and
upgrade
374 6 374 0 A Consultancy
Burghead
Groyne
250 0 250 0 G  Consultancy
Findochty sink
hole
195 0 195 0 G Consultancy
Findochty
Pontoons
50 0 50 0 G Consultancy
Buckie Harbour
ice plant
18 0 18 0 G Consultancy
Economic
Development
0 5 0 0 G Consultancy
Road
Improvements      
A95 Landslip
River Isla
1,199 0 1,199 0 G Consultancy
Carriageway
resurfacing /
reconstruction/
surface dressing
3,617 1,608 3,617 0 G Roads
Maintenance
Drainage and
other works
400 169 400 0 G Roads
Maintenance
Footways 250 23 250 0 G Roads
Maintenance
Kerb Edge
Replacement
25 0 0 25 A Roads
Maintenance
Timber Traffic 180 0 180 0 R Roads
Maintenance
Street Lighting      
Replacement
Columns and
Lights
800 5 800 0 A Roads
Maintenance
LED Lighting 213 6 213 0 G Roads
Maintenance
Road Safety      
Disability
Adaptions
76 28 76 0 G Transportation
New Road
Signs and
Markings
58 21 58 0 G Transportation
Road Safety
Barrier Provision
195 60 195 0 G 
Consultancy
Road Safety
Provision
135 0 135 0 G Transportation
CWSR 613 28 613 0 G Transportation
Page 19

Page 20

CAPITAL PROJECTS 2022 / 2023   (Continued)
As at 30 Sept 2022 
Current
Capital
Plan
2022/23
Actual to
30 Sept
2022 
(QTR 2)
Total
Projected
Expenditure
2022/23
Projected
Variance
RAG Service 
£000 £000 £000   
INFRASTRUCTURE      
Traffic      
Wards Road
Junction
Improvements
133 251 251 (-118) G Transportation
LCTT Speyside
Way
0 200 0 0 G Transportation       
TOTAL -
INFRASTRUCTURE
15,320 3,169 14,549 771     
VEHICLES PLANT
& EQUIPMENT      
Vehicle & plant
replacement
Programme
3,531 1,384 3,531 0 A Roads 
Maintenance
Facilities
Management
Equipment
13 2 13 0 G Environmental
Protection  
Children’s Play
Areas                
(Parkland)
253 69 253 0 A Environmental
Protection  
Car charge
Point Upgrades 
0 52 0 0 G Roads
Maintenance
Waste
Management      
Domestic &
Trade Waste
Bins
100 53 100 0 G Environmental
Protection  
Gull Proof Bins 22 19 24 (2) G Environmental
Protection  
Replacement
HWRC
800 5 500 300 G Environmental
Protection  
Upgrade of
containers at
Recycling
Centres
20 0 20 0 G Environmental
Protection  
Upgrade of
Recycling
Centres
0 0 0 0 G Environmental
Protection  
Chemical Waste
Disposal Points
15 5 15 0 G Consultancy
Traffic      
Orchard Road
Signal
192 26 192 0 G Transportation
Traffic Data
Collection
Equipment
7  0 7 0 G Transportation
Traffic Signal
replacement
16 0 16 0 G Transportation
TOTAL -
VEHICLES PLANT
& EQUIPMENT
4,969 1,615 4,671 298     
Page 20

Page 21

APPENDIX 4  
Major Capital Projects spanning more than 1 financial year (as at 30 September 2022)
Description Approved
Budget
Total
Expenditure
in previous
financial
years
Current
2022-23
Budget
Actual 
spend to
2022-23 
Remaining
Budget 
2022-23 
Project Life
Spend to
31/03/22 
Projected
Future
Years 
Budget
Required
Estimated
Final Cost
Projected
Budget
Variance 
£000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s
LED Street
lighting
replacement
programme
5,000 3,904 213 5 208 3,909 883 5,000 0
NESS Energy
from waste 
27,224 19,619 7,605 757 6,848 20,376 0 27,224 0
Total 32,224 23,523 7,818 440 7,378 23,963 883 32,224 0
Item 12a)
Page 21

Page 22

Page 22

Page 23

REPORT TO: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES COMMITTEE ON 7 FEBRUARY 2023
SUBJECT: ENERGY CONSUMPTION ACTION OPTIONS AND
DECARBONISATION OF CORPORATE BUILDINGS 
BY:  DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE) 
1.  REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1 To seek committee authority to progress with appropriate actions to reduce
energy consumption in our Corporate Buildings in the short term and note
longer term projects which will be developed and brought back to committee
as appropriate. 
1.2 To apprise Committee of the proposed methodology for phasing the
decarbonisation of Moray Council Buildings, taking account of current financial
resources and corporate priorities.   
1.3 This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section III (F) (33) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to the monitoring of the Council’s
Economic Development and Infrastructure Services. 
2.  RECOMMENDATION 
2.1  It is recommended that Committee: 
(i) approve the further reduction in the heat set point within our
properties to 18 degrees which coincides with the school Easter
break; 
(ii) instruct officers to progress the development of spend to save
energy proposals (LED lighting and Solar PV) which will be
presented to future meetings of the Asset Management Working
Group for approval, subject to payback period for each project; 
Item 12b)
Page 23

Page 24

(iii) notes the link between energy consumption, decarbonisation
strategies and the ongoing development of a Heat in Buildings
Strategy; 
(iv) notes the financial challenges arising from the conversion of our
property estate to non-carbon based heating systems and the
proposed methodology for determining affordability and value for
money in appraising options in the interim; and 
(v) notes that officers will prepare detailed information to assist the
budget setting process as outlined in paragraph 5.7. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1 There is a significant budget pressure in relation to future energy budget. The
annual energy report in November 2022 indicated increase in consumption for
financial year 2021/22 which resulted in increased costs. With increases in
wholesale utility prices, significant increases in energy costs are anticipated
for this financial year and next. Due to the way our energy is purchased, this
year’s increased costs have not been as marked as domestic increases due
to our unit price being fixed at April 2022, with the overall increase circa 50%.
Consequently future wholesale cost reductions may take longer to feed
through to unit cost for the Council. 
3.2   
The above table shows the estimated cost for this financial year and the
following financial year. It should be noted that this is an estimate based on
2021/22 consumption using the best available price information at time of
writing. There will be further price guidance from Scottish Procurement in late
January/February and the actual price will be confirmed in late March. The
actual spend will potentially vary greatly depending on building use and
performance, as well as the weather.   
3.3 It is our understanding that the cost of energy will continue to rise until 2025
and remain high. The pre-2021 winter average was £50/MWh.  Prices are
expected to rise to £150/MWh in winter 2025 and will remain in excess of
£100/MWh annually until 2030 and beyond.
4. REDUCING ENERGY CONSUMPTION 
4.1 The costs of energy are directly linked to our consumption, although it should
be noted that, as with domestic energy, we pay a standing charge which has
2021/22 Actual
Spend
2022/23
Projected
Outturn
2023/24
Estimated
Spend
Electricity 2,209,147£         2,643,778£ 4,044,980£
Gas 688,094£            1,783,450£ 1,926,126£
Biomass & Oil 315,442£            447,234£    496,430£   
Total 3,212,683£         4,874,462£ 6,467,536£
Page 24

Page 25

also increased significantly and is outwith our control. Energy consumption
can be reduced either by the introduction of energy efficiency measures,
behavioural changes and by closing or changing how buildings are occupied. 
LED Lighting
4.2 The table below shows an example LED replacement project at Lhanbryde
Primary School. 
Lhanbryde Primary School LED Replacement Project
Project
Capital Cost
2023/24
Savings
Payback
Period Years
Annual Kg
CO2e
Savings
£37,600 £5,269 5.7 4,688 
4.3 The table above shows how a modest investment could provide some
savings. This is a straightforward intervention which could be undertaken
relatively quickly. 
4.4 The costing above has been calculated by officers in conjunction with
suppliers.  However, the exact final cost would have to be determined
following quotes from contractors or by competitive tendering. 
4.5 It should be noted that fluorescent light fittings are being phased out by 2027
and therefore all fluorescent light fittings will need to be replaced over the
coming years.  If the costs of the above project are extrapolated out across
the Learning Estate using a basic floor area calculation, the cost of LED
replacement will be in the region of £2 million for the entire Learning Estate. 
4.6 LED replacement in the council’s office space potentially gives greater
savings as, in general, the lights are operational for longer than in schools. 
Modern controls and sensors that detect occupancy will give more savings,
especially given the increased transitory occupation of our office space. 
4.7 The initial investigation and design work to replace the lighting in the corridors
and stair wells of Council HQ has begun.  As an example of the savings to be
made in offices, lights in the HQ entrance hallway were changed in October
2022. The payback period for these is under two years.    
4.8 External lights, there are opportunities for replacing external, car park and
playing fields.  For example, there are quotes being obtained for replacing the
lights in the HQ Annexe car park.  This is likely to cost around £5,500 and will
have a payback period of around two years. Officers are assessing the
external lighting across the estate to establish the scope of what will require
replacing. In the meantime as opportunities arise projects will be considered
individually and business cases conveyed to Asset Management Working
Group.   
Solar PV
4.9 There are opportunities to make revenue and carbon emissions savings by
installing Solar PV on the roof tops of buildings. Officers have costed an
Page 25

Page 26

example of such a project for Bishopmill Primary School and it is detailed in
the table below.  
Bishopmill Primary School Solar PV Project
Project Capital
Cost
2023/24
Savings
Payback
Period Years
Annual Kg
CO2e Savings
£30,000 £5,277 5.7 5,600 
4.10 We have received an estimate for roof top solar on the HQ building.  At this
stage, it does not contain some of the labour elements of the cost.  It would
likely cost a similar amount to that of the example of Bishopmill Primary
School and deliver similar savings. 
4.11 Solar PV projects of this size require permission from the Distribution Network
Operator (DNO) which is SSEN in Moray.  This is done through a G99
application, a process that can take three months.  These kind of projects are
likely to be approved as the system would be sized for the majority of the
generated electricity which will be used on site, limiting the impact on the local
grid. Solar PV projects do require more planning and time to execute than
LED projects.  As each building will have to be assessed individually to make
sure they are suitable, an application to the DNO has to be made, and there
are currently long lead times for parts and labour.     
Mechanical Ventilation with Heat Recovery (MVHR)
4.12 Greenwards Primary School has struggled to maintain acceptable levels of air
quality with CO2 levels recorded above the acceptable level.  This was
highlighted by the monitoring work introduced during the pandemic and has
resulted in windows being opened to allow airflow, increasing gas
consumption to heat the building.  Installing MVHR would improve the internal
learning environment, thermal comfort and air quality for the staff and
students. The cost implication and energy savings of installing MVHR are
detailed in the table below. 
Greenwards Primary School MVHR Project
Project
Capital
Cost
Potential
2023/24
Savings
Payback
Period Years
Potential
Annual Kg
CO2e
Savings
£200,000 £12,988 13.56 45,000 
4.13 The above projects will provide improvements in consumption. However, to
secure design, approval, procurement and then implementation this all takes
time and will likely have minimal effect on 2023/24 budget. This projected
savings would, however, be in place for financial year 2024/25 and there may
be Scottish Government funding available to fund part of this type of
intervention. 
Page 26

Page 27

Valuation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions 
4.14 Incorporating the value of carbon into the appraisal of projects can ensure
proper account of greenhouse gas emissions, therefore putting a monetary
value on the social and environmental benefits of a project that delivers a
reduction in carbon emissions. 
4.15 Using the example of MVHR in Greenwards Primary school, it can be shown
how including this value can support the case for executing a project that
would otherwise be rejected on a purely financial basis. This will allow a more
thorough analysis of how a project can reduce financial costs and carbon
emissions, otherwise projects which save money but not carbon will be
ranked higher than projects which save both money and carbon. As per
guidance from UK Government Department for Business, Energy & Industry
Strategy (BEIS) the social costs of carbon should be monetised and included
in appraisal and evaluation to ensure the impacts of carbon are taken into
consideration. 
4.16
Greenwards Primary School MVHR Project
Project
Capital
Cost
Potential
2023/24
revenue
Savings
Potential
Annual
CO2e
Savings
*
Payback
Period
Years
£200,000 £12,988 £11,160 8.2
* Potential annual co2e savings of 45,000 kg per annum monetised as per
BEIS Valuation of greenhouse gas emissions: for policy appraisal and
evaluation
5. IMMEDIATE INTERVENTION 
5.1 The projects outlined in section 4 above will be progressed via the Council’s
spend to save procedure which will be progressed by officers via the Asset
Management Working Group with the intention that savings will be generated
from 1 April 2024. Updates on progress will be provided in the annual energy
report. 
5.2 A further immediate intervention could be to reduce the heat set point in
corporate buildings from 19 degrees to 18 degrees, as this was a mitigation
discussed at this Committee on 15 November 2022. Discussions in the
Scottish Energy Officer’s Network (SEON) have shown that sometimes a
further reduction of the heat set point can be difficult to achieve with another
Local Authority highlighting opposition from occupiers of buildings who had
noted feeling cold. As discussed in November a comfortable temperature can
be subjective. Due to the significant financial challenge, it is recommended
that we progress to reduce the heat set point to 18 degrees.  However, to
mitigate the impact on building occupiers it is recommended that we introduce
this measure after the School Easter Holidays as the ambient temperature
heats up. This will permit building occupiers to become accustomed to the
changed temperature prior to the winter period.
Page 27

Page 28

5.3 In order to deliver significant consumption reductions quickly, without incurring
spend, there is the option to consider curtailing building opening. On that
basis, the table below serves to provide an illustration of the potential savings
temporarily closing the highest consuming corporate buildings could produce.
The cost below are for consumption only and do not include standing charges.
This information will inform budget considerations and the development of the
Heat in Buildings Strategy, while efficient use of buildings is also a focus of
the Smarter Working Project. 
Annual Consumption
cost / Mothball Savings
2023/24 Prices.
Daily Closure
Savings Winter
Daily Closure
Savings Summer
Moray Council HQ  £       121,024   £         194   £         140 
Moray Council Annexe  £       186,742   £           73   £           64 
Elgin Library  £       126,363   £         142   £         133 
Ashgrove Offices  £         32,457   £           85   £           43 
Swimming Pools
5.4 Our highest consuming buildings include our swimming pools.  The table
below provides the annual consumption saving for the three pools which are
separately metred assuming the properties were mothballed. 
Annual Consumption cost / Mothball Savings 
2023/24 Energy prices
Buckie Swimming Pool  £  148,370
Keith Swimming Pool  £  126,528
Forres Swimming Pool  £  119,573 
5.5 The pools in Lossiemouth and Speyside High School are metered as part of
the School.  Therefore, it is harder to estimate the savings to be made by
mothballing them.  The consumption costs for Lossiemouth are in the region
of £52,000 and Speyside £48,000. 
5.6 It may not be cost effective to close swimming pools for short periods. As the
water temperature would have to be maintained, or if allowed to cool, savings
may be negated by the energy needed to re-heat the water back up to
temperature. For this reason and for the way their energy is metered, it is
difficult to quantify any energy saving to be made by closing for short periods
on pool open days. 
5.7 It should be noted that the above has only taken into account the savings to
be made from energy consumption. Further any decisions on considering
curtailing building openings will only be progressed in consultation with the
smarter working project. Officers from Housing and Property will work with
other Services during the budget setting process in order to assist in
developing any potential savings proposals for consideration by Committee to
ensure full property cost information will be available. 
Page 28

Page 29

5.8 Behavioural change is as important as ever to make staff, students and
service users aware of the challenges we face, both financially and in relation
to carbon emissions. We will engage with the lead officers and services for
our highest consuming buildings via the Energy and Climate Change teams.
In particular, officers will engage with the climate change champions within
schools to drive innovation and behaviours which will assist with reduction in
our consumption. 
5.9 Officers are in the process of developing a Heat in Building Strategy which will
provide support to decision makers to ensure that proposals to use and
develop our buildings complies with the Council’s objectives and ensures the
most efficient use of our properties and their heating systems. This strategy
will be reported as part of the annual energy report. The strategy will align
with the Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy (LHEES). The council is
required to submit a LHEES by the end of 2023. A LHEES officer has started
with the council in January 2023 to begin working on this strategy. 
6. DECARBONISING THE BUILDING STOCK 
6.1 With the Council’s net-zero target of 2030 and the Scottish Government target
for all public buildings to be decarbonised by 2038, there are major works
required, including replacement of carbon based heating systems.   Of our 56
Schools, 26 are heated with gas systems, 18 by oil, 2 by biomass and the
remainder being heated by inefficient electric systems.  A similar situation can
be found in the remainder of the building stock. In order to meet the
respective targets, all of these heating systems would require to be replaced
by low or zero carbon heat sources between now and 2030 or 2038, or for
emissions to be offset where applicable. These heat sources will be either
individual air source heat pumps (ASHP), ground source heat pumps (GSHP),
connection to heat networks and possibly biomass. 
6.2 As it stands, it is not financially viable to replace gas boilers of the size
required for larger public buildings with heat pumps. The example in the table
below shows the cost implications of simply replacing the gas boiler with
ASHP in Bishopmill Primary.   
Bishopmill Primary School Air Source Heat Pump Project
Project Capital
Cost
Annual
Savings
Payback
Period
Years IRR
Annual Kg
CO2e Savings
£961,500.00 -£12,440 NA Negative 86,000 
6.3 This demonstrates part of the predicament faced on the route to net zero. 
Many of the boilers within our estate have reached the end of their designed
life.  To replace a boiler with a new like for like system will typically be the
most practicable and cost effective option. However, ultimately this would not
be optimal in terms of the Council’s net-zero ambitions and lifecycle cost
would have to be considered in terms of further upgrading being required
before the end of their useful life. It is anticipated that new technologies will be
developed in the years leading to 2030 which may strike the optimal balance
Page 29

Page 30

between installation cost, efficiency of operation and carbon emissions and
each decision in the interim will be subject to an options appraisal to
determine value for money for the Council. 
Fabric First
6.4 The majority of the building stock is not suitable for fitting ASHP as a single
heat source. The heat provided by this type of system is low level heat.  This
requires an efficient building envelope to be effective.  The Scottish
Government recommends as best practice to approach buildings with a
‘Fabric First’ approach, meaning that building’s condition and fabric should be
upgraded before considering low-carbon heat and renewable generation.
Upgrading building fabric not only makes the building suitable for low carbon
heat sources, fabric improvements make significant energy savings and a
reduction in operational CO2 in the meantime. 
6.5 A Fabric First approach should be the guiding principle within financial and
affordability parameters, doing so will make the building more suitable for low
carbon heat sources, allow time for technology to improve and reduce in
price, allow time for heat networks to develop and potential grant funding that
may come from central government.  Most fabric improvements will, however,
not give the demonstrable return on investment or payback periods offered by
the LED and PV projects.   
6.6 The route to retrofitting a building to becoming net-zero by 2030 could be
demonstrated using Greenwards Primary School as an example. 
Year Measure Benefits Approximate
Cost
1 - 2 Undertake
mechanical
ventilation project
Improved pupil work
environment reduction in
consumption. 
£200,000
1 - 2 LED lighting
Replacement. 
Improved environment for
pupils and reduction in
consumption.
£38,000
2 - 5 Roof replacement
with improved
insulation
Extends life of roof/building
fabric and reduces energy
consumption.
£800,000
2 - 5 Externally insulate
walls.
Extends life of walls/building
fabric and reduces energy
consumption 
£200,000
4 - 7 Replace heating
with low-carbon
alternative.
Replaces carbon heat source
for net zero objects but at a
time when the building is as
energy efficient as possible.
£900,000 
6.7 Due to the challenges of funding the above, it is recommended that 
Committee note that initial interventions will be progressed based on spend 
to save options. However, it is recognised that to undertake the improvement 
in the  fabric of our buildings and decarbonisation of our property estate that 
further capital funding will be required. It is proposed that officers develop
business cases for the decarbonisation of our highest energy using buildings
Page 30

Page 31

first, that the focus for these business cases must be on reducing
consumption first via spend to save projects where applicable and then
establishing the most economically viable option to improve the building fabric
and then replace the heat source with a non-carbon heat source if financially
viable. 
6.8 The methodology for assessing the financial viability of any works will first 
undertake an assessment to establish if the works generate a saving. If so, 
then the payback period will be established in pure financial terms and also 
taking account of the social costs of carbon of any reduction in CO2.  If a 
payback period of less than 15 years is established, the project will be taken 
to the Asset Management Working Group for assessment and decision 
making.  When there is no financial benefit in terms of running cost reduction 
or the  payback period is longer than 15 years, then capital investment will be 
required without a payback. The proposal will be assessed on a full life cycle 
approach taking account of the net zero objectives of the Council and future 
costs of carbon emissions. 
6.9 Notwithstanding the above, there may be occasions where there is a failure of
heating system which has exceeded their designed life time. If these fail in
critical operational buildings such as schools, there may be a requirement to
replace them before it is possible to upgrade the building’s fabric. On those
occasions to ensure continued service delivery, a like for like replacement
may be required. 
7. FINANCE / FUNDING 
7.1 There is some external support available from the Non Domestic Energy
Efficiency Framework (NDEE). There is a support Unit in the form of
consultation delivered by Mott Macdonald and funded by the Scottish
Government up to £50K.  The support unit offer project management,
technical and procurement support to deliver projects.  The framework allows
projects to be procured with Energy Performance Contracts (EnPCs) meaning
that 25% of the fee is withheld until the project demonstrates its intended
energy performance.  This support is available until March 2024. 
7.2 There are interest free loans available via SALIX.  As part of the Scottish
Green Public Sector Estate Decarbonisation Scheme Salix will continue to
offer funding to eligible public bodies in Scotland via the existing Scottish
Public Sector Energy Efficiency Loan Scheme. 
7.3 This loan scheme offers zero interest loans to the public sector to enable
them to undertake spend to save retrofit energy efficiency improvement
projects to help them towards achieving net zero carbon in their estates. The
available funding allows Salix to offer up to 75% of the total compliant project
value along with increased payback criteria (subject to technical review and
due diligence). 
7.4 Salix is currently accepting applications to set up new Recycling Funds with
Scottish local authorities and universities, dedicated to estate-wide energy
Page 31

Page 32

efficiency retrofits, in support of Scottish Government’s carbon reduction
target.  Salix have been working with the public sector in Scotland since 2006.
The Salix Recycling Fund aims to increase long-term investment in energy
efficient technologies across the public sector. It is a ring-fenced fund held by
the local authority, created with capital provided by Scottish Government
through Salix, and equally matched by the local authority. Current Recycling
Fund sizes vary from £100,000 to £1.6 million.  The Salix contribution is a
long-term 100% interest-free repayable grant. Scottish local authorities can
use their former Central Energy Efficiency Fund (CEEF) or their own capital
as their match contribution. The financial savings achieved by the projects are
reinvested in further eligible projects year on year, hence the term ‘Recycling
Fund’.  The Recycling Fund can also be used to finance retrofit programmes
from the Non Domestic Energy Efficiency Framework (NDEE).
8. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS 
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan) (LOIP)
The Council’s Corporate Plan 2019 – 2024 identifies the environment as
a key principle in the delivery of the Council’s priorities. 
“Environment – look after the world we live in to protect it for the future”
and for Moray Council to be “A resource efficient, carbon neutral council
that works with partners to mitigate the worst effects of Climate Change,
to create a resilient, fair and more sustainable future for everyone within
Moray”. 
On 10 March 2021 (paragraph 13 of minute refers) the council adopted
the Climate Change Strategy.  The strategy set a goal of the Council
being carbon neutral by 2030.  On 6 April 2022 (paragraph 18 of minute
refers), the Route Map to Net Zero was approved.  This creates a
framework for our actions aimed at reducing carbon emissions to net
zero by 2030. 
This report highlights some of the operational and financial challenges
faced in order to reach this target. 
(b) Policy and Legal
In October 2021 the Scottish Government published The Heat in
Buildings Strategy. This sets a requirement for all local authorities to
produce a Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy (LHEES) by the
end of 2023. 
(c) Financial Implications
In 2021/22 the Council’s total utility bill amounted to £3,696,136, an
increase of £543,809 (17%) compared to 2020/21. 
Unit electricity costs have increased by 20% and gas costs have
increased by 157% from 2021/22 to 2022/23. With 2022/23 actual spend
to end of August and current cost is applied to energy consumption of
Page 32

Page 33

2021/22, the projected annual costs of electricity and gas in 2022/23 will
be £2,643,778 and £1,783,450 and respectively. 
The Energy spend for the year 2023/24 will potentially be in excess of
£6M.  Energy prices will not fall back down to prices seen before 2021. 
(d) Risk Implications
Budget guidance issued in June 2021 by Scottish Procurement indicates
that in 2023-24 electricity unit costs are forecast to increase by 53% and
gas unit costs by 8%, whilst in 2024-25 electricity will increase by 79%
and gas by 79% - compared to 2022-23.  However, energy markets
remain volatile, there is a significant risk that future prices may change
dramatically. 
(e) Staffing Implications
The workload associated with transforming the Council’s property
portfolio to net zero carbon is expected to increase year on year. 
(f) Property
The property implications are as set out in this report. 
(g) Equalities
There are no equalities implications. 
(h)    Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
Updating the EPS to reflect the Councils goals to achieve net zero and
the developing LHEES strategy will assist in setting out strategic
cohesion in achieving reductions in climate emissions. 
(i) Consultations
The Head of Housing and Property Services, the Chief Financial Officer,
the Head of Economic Growth and Development Services, the Design
and Construction Manager, the Principal Climate Change Officer, the
Principal Building Services Engineer, the Legal Services Manager, the
Equal Opportunities Officer, the Programme Manager (Learning Estate)
and Lissa Rowan, Committee Services Officer have been consulted and
any comments incorporated in this report as appropriate.
9. CONCLUSIONS 
9.1 There are further potential savings to be made with a further reduction
in the heating set points. However, the return may be diminished slightly
when compared to the initial reduction and implementation may prove
more difficult. 
9.2 The greatest financial energy savings in the short to medium term can
be achieved with LED lighting and Solar PV projects. 
9.3 Reaching Net Zero is financially and operationally challenging.  The way
forward needs to be carefully planned and in conjunction with LHEES,
Page 33

Page 34

maintenance, service provision needs and the rationalisation of the
council’s corporate building stock and the way in which we use
buildings post pandemic. 
9.4 Officers will ensure that building energy consumption data is available
for the development of budget proposals during the budget setting
process. 
Author of Report:  Iain Highet/Neil Strachan
Background Papers: with author
Ref:    SPMAN-1285234812-1235 
Page 34

Page 35

REPORT TO: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES COMMITTEE ON 7 FEBRUARY 2023 
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REPORT: PUBLIC SECTOR CLIMATE CHANGE
REPORTING 
BY:  DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE)   
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1 To inform the Committee of the Council’s Public Sector Report on Compliance
with Climate Change Duties 2021/22 and updates to the reporting
methodology and statutory requirements. 
1.2 This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section III (F) (33) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to providing, developing and
monitoring the Council’s Economic Development and Infrastructure Services. 
2. BACKGROUND 
2.1 The Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements)
(Scotland) Order 2015 requires public sector bodies to publish annual climate
change reports. This is intended to demonstrate compliance with public sector
bodies’ climate change duties, to engage leaders and encourage action to be
taken to reduce carbon emissions. 
2.2 Moray Council has a duty under Section 44 of the Climate Change (Scotland)
Act 2009 to contribute to reducing Scotland’s greenhouse gas emissions,
contribute to helping Scotland adapt to a changing climate, and to act in a way
it considers most sustainable. 
2.3 Moray Council submitted its first mandatory report on its compliance with
climate change duties to the Scottish Government in November 2016,
covering the period 2015/16, and has subsequently submitted annual reports
each November. 
3. PERFORMANCE AND UPDATES 
3.1 A copy of the Council’s Public Sector Report on Compliance with Climate
Change Duties as submitted to the Scottish Government on 15 November
Page 35

Page 36

2022 has been uploaded to the Committee Management Information System
(CMIS) and is available here.
3.2 In 2021/22, the Council’s recorded carbon emissions were 24,490 tonnes of
carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e) – an increase of 2,014 tCO2e (9%)
compared to reporting year 2020/21. A summary of changes by emissions
source between the reporting years is provided in Appendix 1.
3.3 The increase in the Council’s recorded carbon emissions during 2021/22 is
principally the result of services increasingly returning towards ‘business as
usual’ following the operational changes necessitated by the Covid-19
pandemic:
• Higher consumption of grid electricity;
• Higher consumption and treatment of water;
• Higher consumption of fuels; and
• Higher consumption of biomass and most heating fuels. 
These changes represented a carbon increase of 1,202.9 tCO2e. However a
reduction in emissions from the areas waste led to a carbon reduction of
439.2 tCO2e. 
3.4 It should be noted that the 2021/22 figures represent a reduction of almost
1,000 tCO2e from the pre-pandemic submission of 2019/20. The increase in
emissions this year caused by returning to a ‘business as usual’ approach
after the pandemic was predicted within the Council’s Route Map to Net Zero.
Decisions to be taken around flexible working, use of buildings and fleet
decarbonisation will influence this trajectory in the coming years.
3.5 The highest number of full time equivalent (FTE) staff employed during the
2021-22 financial year was 3,762, an increase of 184 FTE since the previous
report. A proportion of this increase in FTE is likely to be associated with
factors such as additional staffing relating to the Covid-19 pandemic and
expansion of Early Learning and Childcare provision. This figure is used to
calculate an estimate of the carbon emissions resulting from the proportion of
employees who are homeworking to some degree through hybrid working
arrangements, and who would previously have been office based. 
3.6 Homeworking emissions continued to represent a significant emission source
for the Council. This source represented carbon emissions of 1,073.1 tCO2e
(an increase of 55.4 tCO2e). This total is calculated using the Scottish
Government’s proxy homeworking emissions multiplier of 0.3 tCO2e per FTE.
There is presently no system within the Council to distinguish between
homeworkers/hybrid/office-based staff. Therefore an assumption of 100%
homeworking is made within reporting to avoid understating carbon
emissions. When data becomes available via the Council’s Smarter Working
Project, it is may be possible to refine this assumption in future calculations.
3.7 The following emissions sources were not included in the previous reporting
submission:
• Grey fleet (average car) mileage;
• Hotel stays – UK;
• Short-haul flights (economy class); and
Page 36

Page 37

• Rail mileage (National Rail). 
These emissions sources were reported in the 2021/22 submission and
represent carbon emissions of 268.3 tCO2e. 
3.8 Several energy saving projects and initiatives were carried out in 2021/22:
• LED lighting replacement;
• Water main replacement;
• Roof insulation;
• Draught proofing; and
• Miscellaneous insulation projects. 
These changes represented an estimated carbon saving of 24 tCO2e. 
3.9 The Council’s annual procurement report now highlights the number of
contracts with environmental/climate change conditions attached. This
included 13 contracts in the reporting year, broken down by conditions as
follows:
• 5 x energy;
• 3 x greenhouse gases;
• 4 x waste; and
• 1 x sustainable construction. 
3.10 All of the data used within the submission was obtained from previous
compliance reports and from sections within the Council which collect data as
part of their operational functions. In some cases, data used within the
submission has been the basis for papers approved by Council committees. 
4. FUTURE REPORTING 
4.1 The Council will continue to be required to publish annual climate change
reports as per the Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting
Requirements) (Scotland) Order 2015.
4.2 The Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements)
(Scotland) Amendment Order 2020 states that all future reporting must
include:
• the Council’s target date for achieving zero direct emissions of
greenhouse gases, or such other targets that demonstrate how the
Council is contributing to Scotland achieving its emissions reduction
targets;
• the Council’s targets for reducing indirect emissions of greenhouse
gases (where applicable);
• details regarding how the Council will align its spending plans and use
of resources to reducing emissions and delivering its emissions
reduction targets;
• details regarding how the Council will publish, or otherwise make
available, its progress to achieving its emissions reductions targets;
and
Page 37

Page 38

• details of any contributions made by the Council to helping deliver
Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Programme. 
4.3 Officers working across the Council therefore have a responsibility to provide
all necessary information required for submission as part of the statutory
annual climate change reporting.
4.4 Data collected for the purposes of annual climate change reporting will also be
used to inform updates to the Council’s Routemap to Net Zero Carbon
Emissions. 
5. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS 
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
This reporting demonstrates the challenge the Council has in
progressing towards its ambitious greenhouse gas emissions targets. 
The Council’s Corporate Plan 2019-2024 identifies the environment as a
key principle in the delivery of the Council’s priorities: 
“Environment – look after the world we live in to protect it for our future” 
and for Moray Council to be: 
“A resource efficient, carbon neutral council that works with partners to
mitigate the worst effects of Climate Change, to create a resilient, fair
and more sustainable future for everyone within Moray”. 
(b) Policy and Legal
The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 places a duty on public bodies
to act in the way best calculated to contribute to the delivery of
Scotland’s climate change targets; in the way best calculated to help
deliver any programme for climate change adaptation laid before the
Scottish Parliament; in a way it considers most sustainable. 
The Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements)
(Scotland) Order 2015 requires that public bodies prepare a report on
compliance with climate change duties as set out by the Climate Change
(Scotland) Act 2009. 
The Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements)
(Scotland) Amendment Order 2020 requires that the body to provide
further details within its mandatory reporting on climate change duties. 
(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications. 
Page 38

Page 39

(d) Risk Implications
There are no risk implications. The upcoming revision to the Council’s
Routemap to Net Zero Carbon Emissions will include updated emissions
forecasting and actions, taking account of the data within this report and
will highlight any risks to meeting our net zero targets. 
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications. 
(f) Property
There are no property implications. 
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no equalities/socio economic impact implications. 
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Implications
There are no climate change or biodiversity implications directly resulting
from this report. The upcoming revision to the Council’s Routemap to Net
Zero Carbon Emissions will include updated emissions forecasting and
actions, taking account of the data within this report. 
(i) Consultations
Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance), the Head
of Economic Growth and Development, the Head of Governance,
Strategy and Performance, the Head of Housing and Property, the Head
of Environmental & Commercial Services, the Head of Education
Resources and Communities, the Legal Services Manager, the Energy
Officer, the Equal Opportunities Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and
Lissa Rowan (Committee Services Officer). 
5. CONCLUSION 
5.1 The submission of the Public Sector Report on Compliance with Climate
Change Duties 2021/22 by the Council to the Scottish Government in
November 2022 fulfilled its statutory reporting obligation.
5.2 The Council will continue to be required to submit annual Public Sector
Reports on Compliance with Climate Change Duties.
5.3 Data collected for the Public Sector Report on Compliance with Climate
Change Duties 2021/22 will be used within updates to the Council’s
Routemap to Net Zero Carbon Emissions. 
Author of Report: George Gunn, Climate Change Strategy Officer
Background Papers: As referred to in this report.
Ref:
http://spman.moray.gov.uk/MANComRepDraftSite/_layouts/15/DocIdRedir.as
px?ID=SPMAN-813460984-323 
Page 39

Page 40

Page 40

Page 41

Emission source Type 2020/21 emissions (tCO2e) 2021/22 emissions (tCO2e) % Change Change (tCO2e)
Batteries Recycling Scope 3 0.1 0.0 -100.0% -0.1
Purchased Heat and Steam Scope 2 11.8 0.0 -100.0% -11.8
Van - Average (up to 3.5 tonnes) Battery Electric Vehicle miles Scope 1 2.3 0.0 -100.0% 2.3
Car - hybrid (average) miles Scope 1 0.9 0.0 -100.0% 0.9
Car - Battery Electric Vehicle (average) miles Scope 1 0.7 0.0 -100.0% 0.7
Landfill gas kWh Scope 1 0.7 0.7 0.0% 0.7
Mixed recycling Scope 3 32.7 16.0 -51.1% -16.7
Organic Food & Drink Composting Scope 3 96.8 73.9 -23.7% -22.9
Organic Garden Waste Composting Scope 3 11.2 8.7 -22.3% -2.5
Refuse Municipal to Landfill Scope 3 8507.3 8110.2 -4.7% -397.1
Biomass (Wood Pellets) kWh Scope 1 15.0 15.0 0.0% 0.0
Paper & Board (Mixed) Recycling Scope 3 93.3 93.4 0.1% 0.1
Glass Recycling Scope 3 68.4 70.1 2.5% 1.7
Water - Treatment Scope 3 22.5 23.2 3.1% 0.7
Water - Supply Scope 3 11.3 11.7 3.5% 0.4
Homeworking emissions Scope 3 1073.1 1128.5 5.2% 55.4
Biomass (Wood Chips)kWh Scope 1 18.9 20.2 6.9% 1.3
Natural Gas Scope 1 4315.4 4722.7 9.4% 407.3
Grid Electricity (generation) Scope 2 2649.0 2909.8 9.8% 260.8
Diesel (average biofuel blend) Scope 1 2711.4 3001.3 10.7% 289.9
Gas oil litre Scope 1 246.3 278.3 13.0% 32.0
Grid Electricity (transmission & distribution losses) Scope 3 227.8 257.5 13.0% 29.7
Gas oil kWh Scope 1 750.1 856.8 14.2% 106.7
WEEE (Mixed) Recycling Scope 3 16.9 24.0 42.0% 7.1
Refuse Commercial & Industrial to Landfill Scope 3 1458.3 2335.8 60.2% 877.5
Clinical Waste - Other Scope 3 47.5 77.2 62.5% 47.5
Metal Cans (Mixed) & Metal Scrap Recycling Scope 3 12.5 21.2 69.6% 8.7
Marine Fuel Oil litres Scope 1 56.2 111.8 98.9% 56.2
Petrol (average biofuel blend) Scope 1 9.8 27.7 182.7% 17.9
Plastics (Average) Recycling Scope 3 4.5 15.4 242.2% 10.9
Clothing (Closed loop recycling) Scope 3 2.6 10.7 311.5% 2.6
Grey fleet (average car) mileage Scope 3 Not previously reported 263.8 N/A 263.8
Hotel stays - UK Scope 3 Not previously reported 1.9 N/A 1.9
Short-haul flights (Economy class) Scope 3 Not previously reported 1.7 N/A 1.7
Rail (National Rail) Scope 3 Not previously reported 0.9 N/A 0.9
TOTALS: 22,475                                       24,490                                        
Page 41

Page 42

Page 42