Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Moray Council - 04/12/2024

Moray Council · 4 December 2024
Back to Moray Council — 4 December 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Moray Council
Wednesday, 04 December 2024
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Meeting of the Moray Council is to be held at
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX on Wednesday,
04 December 2024 at 09:30.
BUSINESS
1. Sederunt
2. Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests *
3. Resolution
Consider, and if so decide, adopt the following resolution:
"That under Section 50A (4) and (5) of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973, as amended, the public and media
representatives be excluded from the meeting for Items 17 - 22 of
business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt
information of the class described in the relevant Paragraphs of Part 1
of Schedule 7A of the Act.”
4. Minutes
4a. Minute of Meeting of 25 September 2024 7 - 24
4b. Minute of Special Meeting of 22 October 2024 25 - 36
5. Notice of Motion - Gaza 37 - 38
6. Written Questions **
7. Moray Integration Joint Board Summary Report
Report by Chief Officer, Health and Social Care Moray
39 - 54
Page 1

Page 2

8. Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
55 - 82
9. Revenue Expenditure to 30 September 2024
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
83 -
116
10. Capital Plan 2024-25 Quarter 2
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
117 -
130
11. Capital Strategy
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
131 -
148
12. Corporate Asset Management Plan
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
149 -
166
13. Committee Changes - Roles and Outside Bodies
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
167 -
184
14. Proxy Voting by Councillors Consultation
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
185 -
192
15. Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero 2024
Update
Report by Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
193 -
268
16. Information Reports - if called in
Item(s) which the Committee may wish to consider with
the Press and Public excluded
17. Applications For Voluntary Early Retirement - Voluntary
Severance [Para 1]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
Page 2

Page 3

18. Collaborative Leadership Development Work Update
[Para 1]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
19. Smarter Working Project Report- Phase 2 Update [Para
1]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
20. Short to Medium Term Financial Plan [Para 1]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
21. Residential Property Acquisition [Para 9]
• 9. Information on terms proposed or to be proposed by or to the
Authority;
22. Moray Growth Deal Full Business Case - Cultural
Quarter [Paras 6 8 and 9]
• 6. Information relating to the financial or business affairs of any
particular person(s);
• 8 & 9. Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be
incurred by the Authority;
Information Reports - Not for Discussion at this Meeting
Any member wishing to call in a noting or information report from one
meeting shall give notice to Committee Services at least 48 hours
before the meeting for which the report is published. The Notice shall
be countersigned by one other elected member and shall explain the
reason for call in including any action sought.
Information Report - Accounts Commission Report -
Transformation in Councils
269 -
292
Information Report - Monitoring Officer Report 1
November 2023 - 31 October 2024
293 -
298
Watching the Meeting
You can watch the webcast live by going to: 
http://www.moray.gov.uk/moray_standard/page_43661.html
Webcasts are available to view for 1 year following the meeting.
You can also attend the meeting in person, if you wish to do so,
please come to the High Street entrance door and a member of
staff will be let into the building.
Page 3

Page 4

Page 4

Page 5

GUIDANCE NOTES
* Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests - The Chair of the
meeting shall seek declarations from any individual or political group at the
beginning of a meeting whether any prior decision has been reached on how
the individual or members of the group will vote on any item(s) of business on
the Agenda, and if so on which item(s).  A prior decision shall be one that the
individual or the group deems to be mandatory on the individual or the group
members such that the individual or the group members will be subject to
sanctions should they not vote in accordance with the prior decision.  Any such
prior decisions will be recorded in the Minute of the meeting.
** Written Questions - Any Member can put one written question about any
relevant and competent business within the specified remits not already on the
agenda, to the Chair provided it is received by the Proper Officer or Committee
Services by 12 noon two working days prior to the day of the meeting.  A copy
of any written answer provided by the Chair will be published on the Council’s
committee management system by 4pm the day before the meeting.  The
Member who has put the question may, after the answer has been published,
ask one supplementary question directly related to the subject matter at the
meeting, but no discussion will be allowed.
No supplementary question can be put or answered more than 10 minutes after
the Council has started on the relevant item of business, except with the
consent of the Chair. If a Member does not have the opportunity to put a
supplementary question because no time remains, then he or she can submit it
in writing to the Proper Officer who will arrange for a written answer to be
provided within 7 working days.
Page 5

Page 6

MORAY COUNCIL
Moray Council
SEDERUNT
Councillor Kathleen Robertson  (Chair)
Councillor Donald Gatt  (Depute Chair)
Councillor James  Allan  (Member)
Councillor Peter Bloomfield  (Member)
Councillor Neil Cameron  (Member)
Councillor Tracy Colyer  (Member)
Councillor Theresa Coull  (Member)
Councillor John Cowe  (Member)
Councillor John Divers  (Member)
Councillor Amber Dunbar  (Member)
Councillor Jérémie Fernandes  (Member)
Councillor David Gordon  (Member)
Councillor Juli Harris  (Member)
Councillor Sandy Keith  (Member)
Councillor Elaine Kirby  (Member)
Councillor Scott Lawrence  (Member)
Councillor Marc Macrae  (Member)
Councillor Paul McBain  (Member)
Councillor Neil McLennan  (Member)
Councillor Shona Morrison  (Member)
Councillor Bridget Mustard  (Member)
Councillor Derek Ross  (Member)
Councillor John Stuart  (Member)
Councillor Draeyk van der Horn  (Member)
Councillor Sonya Warren  (Member)
Councillor Ben Williams  (Member)
Clerk Name: Tracey Sutherland
Clerk Telephone: 07971 879268
Clerk Email: committee.services@moray.gov.uk
Page 6

Page 7

MORAY COUNCIL
Minute of Meeting of the Moray Council
Wednesday, 25 September 2024
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX
PRESENT
Councillor James  Allan, Councillor Peter Bloomfield, Councillor Neil Cameron,
Councillor Tracy Colyer, Councillor Theresa Coull, Councillor John Cowe, Councillor
John Divers, Councillor Amber Dunbar, Councillor Jérémie Fernandes, Councillor
Donald Gatt, Councillor David Gordon, Councillor Juli Harris, Councillor Sandy Keith,
Councillor Scott Lawrence, Councillor Marc Macrae, Councillor Paul McBain,
Councillor Neil McLennan, Councillor Shona Morrison, Councillor Bridget Mustard,
Councillor Kathleen Robertson, Councillor Derek Ross, Councillor John Stuart,
Councillor Sonya Warren, Councillor Ben Williams
APOLOGIES
Councillor Draeyk van der Horn
IN ATTENDANCE
Interim Chief Executive, Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance), Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and Organisational
Development), Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance, Head of Housing
and Property Services, Head of Environmental and Commercial Services, Chief
Financial Officer, Acting Head of Economic Growth and Development, Asset
Manager - Commercial Properties, Moray Growth Deal Programme Manager,
Project Manager (Cultural Quarter), Climate Change Strategy Officer, Democratic
Services Manager and Angela Pieri, External Auditor.
1.         Chair
The meeting was chaired by Councillor Kathleen Robertson.
2.         Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests *
In terms of Standing Orders 21 and 23 and The Councillors' Code of conduct the
Council noted that Councillor Lawrence confirmed that the SNP Group had agreed
a position on Item 18 - No Compulsory Redundancy Policy. 
Councillor Robertson declared that the Conservative Group had also agreed a
position on Item 18 - No Compulsory Redundancy Policy.
There were no declarations of Member's interests in respect of any item on the
agenda.
In relation to Item 16 - Cultural Quarter Governance Models, Councillor Williams
stated for transparency there was a connection due to a family member's
Item 4a.
Page 7

Page 8

employment, however he felt it did not meet the threshold and would remain in the
meeting for the consideration of the item.
3.         Resolution
Councillor McLennan sought clarification on whether Items 18, 19 and 20 on the
agenda were confidential or except in term sof the Local Government (Scotland)
Act 1973.
The Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance confirmed the reports
contained information which the Officers will have considered as exempt in
Schedule (7) (2) of the 1973 Act.  He further added that although the exempt
information may only be a small section of the report, it would still mean that the
report be heard in confidence and the rules provide that the Chair can then provide
any public statements following the meeting depending on the decision made.
Councillor McLennan moved that Items 19 and 20 be moved into the open section
of the meeting.  On failing to find a seconder the motion fell and Councillor
McLennan's dissent was recorded.
Thereafter the  meeting resolved that in terms of Section 50A (4) and (5) of the
Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973, as amended, the public and media
representatives be excluded from the meeting for Items 10 and 11 of business on
the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information of the class.
Para number of the
minute Para Number of Schedule 7a
10
Para 8 and 9
Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be
incurred by the Authority
11
Para 6
Information relating to the financial or business affairs of
any particular person(s)
Para 8 and 9
Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be
incurred by the Authority
12
Para 1
Information relating to staffing matters
13 Para 1
Information relating to staffing matters
14
Para 8 and 9
Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be
incurred by the Authority
4.         Order of Business
Page 8

Page 9

Under reference to Standing Order 29, the Chair advised the Council that the
confidential items would be taken following Item7 - Written Questions on the agenda
due to some members having unavoidable appointments in the afternoon.
5.         Minute of Special Meeting of Moray Council on 11 June 2024
The minute of the special meeting of Moray Council on 11 June 2024 were
submitted and approved.
6.         Minute of Meeting of Moray Council on 13 August 2024
The minute of the meeting of the Moray Council on 13 August 2024 was submitted
and approved subject to the Clerk reviewing the webcast and making any
necessary changes following the amendments proposed by Councillor McLennan.
7.         Notice of Motion - Winter Fuel Payments
In terms of Standing Order 35a there was submitted a Notice of Motion by
Councillors Warren and Coull in the following terms:
Winter Fuel Payments
Preliminary issues
• Council notes with concern the recent decision by the UK Government to
introduce means-testing for the Winter Fuel Payment. This decision threatens
to significantly impact pensioners in our community, particularly given that
Moray experiences some of the coldest winter temperatures in the United
Kingdom.
Background 
• The consequence of this decision means that the Scottish Government would
need to allocate an additional £100 million to ensure that the Pension Age
Winter Heating Payment remains universal. This financial burden could detract
from other critical services and supports necessary for our residents.
• Furthermore, it is essential to highlight that over 5,000 pensioners in Moray
benefited from the Winter Heating Payment last year. The introduction of
means-testing would directly affect these individuals, potentially leaving them
vulnerable during the coldest months of the year.
• Be concise but include sufficient and clear info for members to make an
informed and balanced decision.
• Give clear links to any reference material. 
Action 
• Council firmly believes that all pensioners, irrespective of their income, should
be supported during the winter months to ensure they can adequately heat
their homes and maintain a decent standard of living. The Winter Fuel
Payment has historically been a vital lifeline for many elderly individuals in our
community, helping to mitigate the risks of cold-related health issues and
ensuring their well-being during harsh winter conditions.
Page 9

Page 10

• Therefore, Moray Council calls on the UK Government to reverse its decision
to means-test the Winter Fuel Payment, and ensure that the financial burden of
maintaining a universal winter fuel payment is not passed onto the Scottish
Government and therefore on local authorities.
• We urge the UK Government to recognise the unique climatic challenges
faced by regions such as Moray and to maintain this critical support for all
pensioners. 
• Moray Council resolves that the Leader of the Council should write to the
Chancellor of the Exchequer expressing the Council’s strong opposition to the
means-testing of the Winter Fuel Payment and highlighting the financial strain
it would place on the Scottish Government to maintain universal payments.
Financial implications
There are no financial implications for the Council in writing the letter
Proposed By:            Councillor Sonya Warren
Seconded By:           Councillor Theresa Coull
Draft Letter
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
1 Horse Guards Road
London
SW1A 2HQ
Dear Chancellor
Request to Reverse the Decision to Means-Test the Winter Fuel Payment
I am writing to you on behalf of the Moray Council to express our deep concern
regarding the recent decision by the UK Government to introduce means-testing
for the Winter Fuel Payment. We believe this decision will have severe and
detrimental effects on the pensioner population within our community.
Moray is known for experiencing some of the coldest winter temperatures in the
United Kingdom. In such a climate, the Winter Fuel Payment has been a vital
lifeline for many of our elderly residents, helping them to adequately heat their
homes and protect their health during harsh winter conditions. Last year alone,
over 5,000 pensioners in Moray benefitted from this crucial support.
The consequence of the means-testing decision means that the Scottish
Government would need to find an additional £100 million to maintain the universal
provision of the Pension Age Winter Heating Payment. This substantial financial
burden would likely necessitate reallocation from other critical services, thus
impacting the broader community adversely.
Moray Council firmly believes that all pensioners, regardless of their income,
should be supported through the winter months. The universal nature of the Winter
Page 10

Page 11

Fuel Payment has ensured that vulnerable individuals are not missed and that no
pensioner has to choose between heating and other essentials.
In light of these considerations, Moray Council passed a motion calling on the UK
Government to reverse its decision to means-test the Winter Fuel Payment. We
urge you to reconsider this policy, taking into account the unique climatic
challenges faced by regions such as Moray and the essential support this payment
provides to all our pensioners.
We hope that you will give this matter the urgent attention it deserves and take
immediate steps to ensure that all pensioners continue to receive the Winter Fuel
Payment without means-testing. By doing so, you will help protect the health and
well-being of thousands of elderly individuals in Moray and across the UK.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Yours sincerely
Councillor Robertson, seconded by Councillor Dunbar proposed an amendment to
the Notice of Motion in the following terms:
Preliminary issues
• Council notes with concern the recent decisions by both the UK and Scottish
Governments to introduce means-testing for the Winter Fuel Payment. This
decision threatens to significantly impact pensioners in our community,
particularly given that Moray experiences some of the coldest winter
temperatures in the United Kingdom.
Background
• The UK government decision affects pensioners in England and Wales. The
Scottish Government’s decision to take the lead from the UK government is
entirely their decision as they were due to start administering the Winter Fuel
Payment’s replacement from this winter, but have instead handed back this
power to the UK Government.
• The Scottish Fiscal Commission recently highlighted Scottish government
makes its own choices that lead to its own financial position. In order to fund
public-sector pay rises, money has been taken/raided from the Nature
Restoration Fund, Free school meal expansion for p6/7, flood adaptation
schemes and other funds are well reported but no money has been taken from
the portfolio on the constitution.
• Additionally, it should be noted that since this decision was taken it has been
announced that energy bills are to increase from October further adding to the
risk of fuel poverty to our pensioners.
• Furthermore, it is essential to highlight that 19,988 pensioners in Moray
benefitted from the Winter Fuel Payment last year and a further cost-of-living
payment on top of that. The introduction of means-testing will cut the number
of pensioners receiving the payment in Moray by around 18,000, potentially
leaving them vulnerable during the coldest months of the year.
Action
• Council firmly believes that all pensioners, irrespective of their income, should
be supported during the winter months to ensure they can adequately heat
Page 11

Page 12

their homes and maintain a decent standard of living. The Winter Fuel
Payment has historically been a vital lifeline for many elderly individuals in our
community, helping to mitigate the risks of cold-related health issues and
ensuring their wellbeing during harsh winter conditions.
• Therefore, Moray Council calls on the Scottish Government to reverse its
decision to means-test the Winter Fuel Payment in recognition that this is
within their gift to do so as it is a devolved issue.
• Moray Council also calls on the UK Government to reverse its decision to
means test the Winter Fuel Payment in recognition of the impact this will have
on pensioners across the UK, in the hope that the Scottish Government will
follow suit.
• We urge both Governments to recognise the unique climatic challenges faced
by regions such as Moray and to maintain this critical support for all
pensioners.
• Moray Council resolves that the Leader of the Council alongside the Council’s
Joint Older Person’s Champions should write to both the Chancellor and the
Cabinet Secretary for Finance expressing the Council’s strong opposition to
the means-testing of the Winter Fuel Payment.
Financial Implications
• There are no financial implications for the council arising from writing these
letters.
Proposed by Cllr Kathleen Robertson
Seconded by Cllr Amber Dunbar
Draft letter to Chancellor 
Rt Hon Rachel Reeves MP
Chancellor of the Exchequer
HM Treasury
1 Horse Guards Road
London
SW1A 2HQ
Dear Chancellor,
I am writing to you on behalf of the Moray Council to express our deep concern
regarding the recent decision by the UK Government to introduce means-testing
for the Winter Fuel Payment.
It is regrettable that whilst this is a devolved matter, your decision has emboldened
the Scottish Government to take the same steps in regards to winter fuel
payments. We believe this decision will have severe and detrimental effects on the
pensioner population within our community.
Moray is known for experiencing some of the coldest winter temperatures in the
United Kingdom. In such a climate, the Winter Fuel Payment has been a vital
lifeline for thousands of our elderly residents, helping them to adequately heat their
homes and protect their health during harsh winter conditions.
Page 12

Page 13

Moray Council firmly believes that all pensioners, regardless of their income,
should be supported through the winter months. The universal nature of the Winter
Fuel Payment has ensured that vulnerable individuals are not missed and that no
pensioner has to choose between heating and other essentials.
In light of these considerations, Moray Council passed a motion requesting I write
to you, calling on the UK Government to reverse its decision to means-test the
Winter Fuel Payment. We urge you to reconsider this policy, taking into account
the unique climatic challenges faced by regions such as Moray and the essential
support this payment provides to all our pensioners.
We hope that you will give this matter the urgent attention it deserves and take
immediate steps to ensure that all pensioners continue to receive the Winter Fuel
Payment without means-testing. I would hope that in doing so, the Scottish
Government would follow suit.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Yours sincerely
Draft letter to Cabinet Secretary – 
Shona Robison MSP
Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government
Scottish Government
St Andrew's House
Regent Road
Edinburgh
EH1 3DG
Dear Cabinet Secretary
I am writing to you on behalf of the Moray Council to express our deep concern
regarding the recent decision by the Scottish Government to follow the UK
Government’s decision to means test the Winter Fuel Payment.
This decision will have severe and detrimental effects on the pension population
within our community.
Moray is known for experiencing some of the coldest winter temperatures in the
United Kingdom. In such a climate, the Winter Fuel Payment has been a vital
lifeline for thousands of our elderly residents, helping them to adequately heat their
homes and protect their health during harsh winter conditions.
Moray Council firmly believes that all pensioners, regardless of their income,
should be supported through the winter months. The universal nature of the Winter
Fuel Payment has ensured that vulnerable individuals are not missed and that no
pensioner has to choose between heating and other essentials.
In light of these considerations, Moray Council passed a motion requesting I write
to you, calling on the Scottish Government to reverse its decision to means-test
the Winter Fuel Payment, as it is entirely within the remit of the Scottish
Government to do so.
Page 13

Page 14

We urge you to reconsider this policy, taking into account the unique climatic
challenges faced by regions such as Moray and the essential support this payment
provides to all our pensioners.
We hope that you will give this matter the urgent attention it deserves and take
immediate steps to ensure that all pensioners continue to receive the Winter Fuel
Payment without means-testing.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Yours sincerely
Following consideration the Chair proposed a short adjournment to allow the
proposers and seconders for the motion and amendment to try and come to a
consensus.
On the resumption of the meeting, the motion and the amendment still stood and
on the division there voted
For the motion (9) Councillor Warren, Coull, Cameron, Cowe,
Fernandes, Harris, Lawrence, Morrison and Stuart.
For the Amendment (15)
Councillors Robertson, Dunbar, Allan, Bloomfield,
Colyer, Divers, Gatt, Gordon, Keith, Macrae, McBain,
McLennan, Mustard, Ross, Williams
Abstention (0) 
Accordingly the amendment became the finding of the meeting and the Council
agreed that a letter from the Council Leader and Joint Older Person's Champions
would be sent to the Chancellor and the Cabinet Secretary for Finance expressing
the Council's strong opposition to the means testing of the Winter Fuel Payment.
8.         Notice of Motion - Action to Reduce Seagull Numbers in Elgin
In terms of Standing Order 35a there was submitted a Notice of Motion by
Councillors Keith and Divers in the following terms:
Action to Reduce Seagull Numbers in Elgin
Preliminary Issues
None to consider
Background
Over recent years seagulls have become a menace to the people of Elgin. Despite
the efforts of bodies like Elgin BID, the Moray Council and other public sector
organisations and private companies in seeking to address the problems caused
by the seagulls the issue remains. 
Seagulls are traditionally a coastal species but have spread to towns like Elgin.
These so-called urban gulls are now commonplace and often attack people, cause
noise and general disturbance.
Page 14

Page 15

Whilst introducing gull proof bins and installing sonic sound devices, paid for by the
Elgin Common Good Fund, has seen some improvements in terms of fewer chicks
being raised, the identified problems have continued and the issue of seagulls
continues to be a matter of concern for Elgin residents.
The NatureScot licensing system does not allow for the Moray Council to properly
address the problem of seagull numbers. Ministerial direction is sought to ensure
NatureScot considers the impact on residents of affected towns – alongside any
objective to protect endangered birds. 
Action
This Council notes the public concern over seagull numbers in Elgin and agrees to
approach Scottish Ministers seeking further interventions to control numbers going
forward.
It is proposed that the Council instructs the Council Leader to write to the Cabinet
Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands. This letter will seek
ministerial direction in the matter and instruct NatureScot to licence further
interventions to reduce the menace of seagull numbers in Elgin and elsewhere.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications arising from this report.
Proposed By: Councillor Sandy Keith
Seconded By: Councillor John Divers
Draft Letter
Mairi Gougeon
Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs, Land Reform and Islands
The Scottish Government
St. Andrew’s House
Regent Road
Edinburgh.
EH1 3 DG.
Dear Ms Gougeon
Action to Reduce Seagull Numbers in Elgin
At the Moray Council meeting on Wednesday 25th September 2024 members
debated a Notice of Motion calling for urgent action to reduce the seagull
population in Elgin and I was mandated to write to you as a consequence.
For many years the public of Elgin have become used to the phenomenon of
“urban gulls.” The numbers of gulls inhabiting the town are such that they have
become a danger to the general public.
Moray Council has tried to work within the licensing system operated by
NatureScot. The Moray Council has carried out egg and nest removal initiatives
when licensing allowed and has for the last two seasons spent a considerable sum
of public money on sonic sound devices and other activities. Provision of gull proof
bins has also been funded.
Page 15

Page 16

The business community has been on board this journey and Elgin BID has funded
sonic devices in Elgin Town Centre. Other private companies have also opted to
do likewise.
Whilst these initiatives have seen the numbers of young chicks fall in general, it
would be fair to say that the results are still way off what is required to finally
address the matter and see seagull numbers drastically reducedin urban areas.
Furthermore, changes to NatureScot’s licencing regime have made it practically
impossible for councils to take more effective actions like egg and nest removal.
Public finances are stretched across the UK at this time. It cannot be right for
public funding to continue to be used on very limited measures of lesser efficacy
than options which are not permitted by NatureScot, in the face of what, at best,
seems a very gradual decline in numbers. For example, Elgin Common Good
Fund has spent £26,000 in 2024/25 and in the last financial year Moray Council
spent £100,000 on seagull control measures across Moray. The business sector
has also spent many thousands in this regard.
The public of Elgin and Moray in general would like to see decisive action,
withpeople living in fear of attack, noise is causing many problems with their sleep
patterns and the seagull droppings are both unsightly and a potential health
hazard. Anecdotally, tourists are telling us that they do not plan to come back to
Elgin due to the nuisance caused by seagulls.
Council members are united in their belief that urgent action to reduce seagull
numbers is necessary going forward. Once numbers are reduced to safe levels
remedial action will be necessary to maintain the population at this lower baseline.
This control of numbers will allow for the smaller garden birds to make a comeback
as they will no longer have to compete with these aggressive birds thus
biodiversity will be enhanced.
I would, therefore, be obliged if you could give this matter some consideration.
NatureScot has a belief that numbers of these birds are falling but the council
questions their numbers. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee acknowledges
that population estimates of Herring Gulls and Lesser Black-backed Gulls are
considered unreliable due to likely under-estimation of roof-nesting gull numbers.
Ministerial direction is deemed necessary for NatureScot to be required  to balance
legitimate endeavours aimed an protecting endangered  birds and with the well
evidenced effects upon humans. This does not require a change to the law, as the
Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 continues to provide for general licenses to
control wild bird populations. S16A(5) provides that NatureScot acts as a licensing
authority under written ministerial direction. We therefore urge you to act. 
In order to maintain public confidence in wider efforts to protect endangered
species of birds, we therefore seek action to remove excessive restrictions on the
control of urban gulls.   
I look forward to hearing from you in due course.
Councillor Macrae sought agreement from Councillor Keith and Councillor Divers
to amend the wording in the letter reflect that the issue of seagulls is a Moray wide
issue.
Page 16

Page 17

Councillors Keith and Divers confirmed that they were happy to accept Councillor
Macrae's amendment.
There being no one other wise minded the Council unanimously agreed the Notice
of Motion.
9.         Written Questions **
Under reference to Standing Order 36 a written question from Councillor
McLennan was submitted in the following terms:
Between April 2022 and now (April 2022 to April 2023; April 2023 to April 2024;
April 2024 to now i.e budget years*) how many temporary workers; contract
workers; consultants and /or consultancy organisations ¥ and staff working
overtime has Moray Council paid for* and what was the total cost of each of these
types of worker per the year’s asked about?
*please break up as below
¥ please also note travel and substance costs for consultants brought to work for
Moray Council 
Number of
temporary
workers &
total cost
to Moray
Council
Number of
consultants
and total
cost to
Moray
Council
Number
of Moray
Council
staff
working
overtime
and total
cost to
Moray
Council
Number of
consultants
working for
Moray
Council and
total cost to
Moray
Council
Number of
consultancy
organisations
(i.e the
Improvement
Service etc)
working for
Moray Council
and total cost
to Moray
Council
Total cost of
consultants
subsistence
and travel
costs and
how many
consultants
was this for
April 2022
to April
2023
April 2023
to April
2024
April 2024
to date of
response
to Written
Question
RESPONSE
As Council Leader I am happy to ask Officers to provide the information
requested. 
Unfortunately it has not been possible to assemble all of this information in the
timescale available.
Page 17

Page 18

It would be helpful for Officers compiling this information if Councillor McLennan
was able to narrow down the request to a particular area or set of circumstances.
Councillor McLennan sought assurances from the Council Leader that legislation
will be followed and ACAS codes adhered to when looking at budgeting and
employment matters.
In response, the Interim Chief Executive confirmed that the Council will be happy
to respond as indicated in the response to the written question.  He further advised
that the amount of information requested was significant and appreciated the
sentiment about having the information available but due to holidays of staff
involved in providing the information, it has not been possible to obtain all the
information in the level of detail requested going back more than one year.  He
further assured Councillor McLennan that the information sought will be provided.
10.         Cultural Quarter Governance Models [Para 8 and 9]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) which informed the Council of an options appraisal
commissioned as part of the Cultural Quarter (CQ) Full Business Case. The report
appraised a range of options for the governance and management of the CQ and
establishes a preferred model to support the sustainable future of the project.
The Council was also asked to consider the information provided in the report and
seek in principle agreement for the preferred governance model in advance of
presentation of the CQ Full Business Case at a future Council meeting.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) agree in principle the preferred model recommended in the options appraisal
as a core principle for the sustainable implementation of the Cultural Quarter
project as part of the Moray Growth Deal; and
ii) note that the Cultural Full Business Case will be presented to Council for
approval on the basis of this governance model.
11.         Former Offices [Para 6 8 and 9]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) asking the Council to consider offers received to acquire
the former offices at 30-32 High Street, Elgin.
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) approve the sale of the former offices at 30-32 High Street, Elgin as detailed
in Section 5 of this report; and
ii) authorise the Asset Manager (Commercial Buildings) and the Legal Services
Manager to finalise detailed terms and conditions and conclude the
transaction.
Page 18

Page 19

The Council joined the Chair in wishing Mr Stuart Beveridge, Asset Manager
(Commercial Buildings) a long and happy retirement as this was his last meeting of
the Council.
12.         Revised Redundancy Policy [Para 1]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) inviting the Council to review the
principle of no compulsory redundancies (NCR) and to reverse that as a policy
position.
Councillor Robertson moved the recommendations as printed in the report, this
was seconded by Councillor Gatt.
Councillor Lawrence, seconded by Councillor Coull proposed amending
recommendations to read:
It is recommended that the Council considers the content of the report and
Appendix 1 in relation to a principle of no compulsory redundancies.
Councillor McLennan proposed amending the recommendations as follows:
i) as written in the report;
ii) defer a decision until the budget is known;
iii) request an urgent answer to the written question.
In failing to obtain a seconder, the amendment fell and Councillor McLennan's
dissent was recorded.
Councillor McLennan sought clarification on whether the Council had the
information required to determine the report.
The Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and Organisational
Development) confirmed that all the information is before the meeting.
On the division there voted:
For the motion (12)
Councillors Robertson, Gatt, Allan, Bloomfield,
Colyer, Cowe, Dunbar, Gordon, Macrae, McBain,
Mustard and Ross
For the Amendment (11)
Councillors Lawrence, Coull, Cameron, Divers,
Fernandes, Harris, Keith, McLennan, Morrison,
Warren and Williams.
Abstention (1) Councillor Stuart
Accordingly the motion became the finding of the meeting and the Council agreed
to:
i) note the contents of the report and Appendix 1 in relation to a principle of no
compulsory redundancy and that the principle is removed as a policy position
of the Council; and
Page 19

Page 20

ii) revert to the previous policies and procedures which include the use of
compulsory redundancies, only as a measure of last resort, to achieve
necessary workforce change and contraction.
13.         Senior Management Recruitment Update [Para 1]
The meeting had before it a report by the Interim Chief Executive asking the
Council to note and endorse arrangements for recruiting a permanent Chief
Executive including approval for a mentoring support and performance review
process for the successful candidate.
The report also asked the Council to approve an extension of the tenure of the
Interim Chief Social Work Officer/Head of Service.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) approve the proposed arrangements for recruitment of a permanent Chief
Executive;
ii) note that a review of the current policy for recruitment of Chief Officers will
be progressed for approval by Corporate Committee by January 2025;
iii) the Interim Chief Executive for the role of principal professional advisor to
the Recruitment Panel for shortleeting and the professional/technical
interview and subsequent Moray Council interview;
iv) endorse the appointment of external professional services to support the
recruitment and selection process;
v) endorse the development of a mentoring support and performance review
process for the permanent Chief Executive with the details to be submitted
for approval of at Corporate Committee in January 2025; and
vi) approve the extension of the temporary employment of the Interim Chief
Social Work Officer/Head of Service until May 2025 to ensure appropriate
cover is in place until a permanent Chief Officer Moray Integrated Joint
Board (MIJB) has recruited a permanent Chief Social Work Officer
(CSWO)/Head of Service.
14.         Consultancy Support For Review Of Council Corporate Management
Structure [Para 8 and 9]
The meeting had before it a report by the Interim Chief Executive seeking
budgetary approval for the use of external consultancy services to support a
corporate management restructure within the Council.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) the use of consultancy services to provide support for a review of its
corporate management structure on the terms set out in paragraph 4.5; and
Page 20

Page 21

ii) delegate authority to the Interim Chief Executive, in consultation with Political
Group Leaders, to make an appointment based on relevant skills, experience
and cost.
Councillor Harris left the meeting following the conclusion of this item.
15.         Financial Reserves Policy
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) seeking approval from the Council to update the
Financial Reserves Policy.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed:
i) to approve the Financial Reserves Policy attached as Appendix 1 of the
report; and
ii) that the next review will be no later than October 2027.
16.         Savings Delivery Plan
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) asking Council to consider progress made in identifying
savings to bridge the budget gap in 2024/25 and 2025/26, following the Council’s
approved Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy.
Councillor Robertson moved the recommendations as printed in the report.
Councillor McBain sought clarification on whether the figure in recommendation (ii)
should read £370,000 and not £307,000 as printed.
The Chief Financial Officer confirmed that the figure should read £370,000 and
apologised for the error.
Councillor McLennan sought clarification on when the overall single plan on the
£10million savings be available and asked whether the paper should be deferred
until the plan is available.
In response, the Interim Chief Executive confirmed that the Council cannot wait,
savings need to start being made.
Councillor McLennan proposed defering the report until the overall plan and all
information is available.  In failing to find a seconder the amendment fell and
Councillor McLennan's dissent was recorded.
Following further consideration the Council agreed to note:
i) the progress made in identifying potential savings, following the Short to
Medium Term Financial Strategy;
ii) additional savings of £370,000 as set out in paragraph 3.9;
Page 21

Page 22

iii) that further potential savings still require to be identified and the timeline for
budget developments;
iv) that there is still considerable uncertainty around key budget assumptions in
2025/26 which may further alter the budget gap; and
v) that this report meets a target in the Best Value Action Plan of developing a
Savings Plan by the end of August 2024.
The Council further agreed to continue to deploy the budget engagement strategy
as set out in Appendix 1 to engage on future Council priorities and delivery of
services within a reduced budget.
Councillor Cowe left the meeting at the conclusion of this item.
17.         Connected Charities Audited Annual Accounts 1 April 2023 to 31
March 2024
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) which submitted the audited Annual Accounts for Moray
Council's Connected Charities for the year ended 31 March 2024.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to approve the audited
Annual Accounts for the Connected Charities for the financial year 2023/24.
18.         Treasury Management Prudential Indicators
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) providing Council with the annual outturn report on
Treasury Management and details of the Council’s Prudential Indicators for
Treasury Management and Capital Investment for the year ended 31 March 2024.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to note the Treasury
Management Performance and the Council’s Treasury Management and Capital
Investment Prudential Indicators for 2023/24 as set out in APPENDIX 2.
19.         Change to Calendar of Meetings
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) requesting agreement from the
Council to change a scheduled ordinary meeting of the Council to a special
meeting to consider the Budget and add in an additional meeting.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) designate the scheduled ordinary meeting of the Council on 26 February
2025 as a special meeting to consider the 2025/26 budget;
ii) add in an additional meeting on 19 February 2025 as an ordinary meeting of
the Council; and
iii) add a special meeting of Moray Council on 22 October 2024 and a diary
hold for a special meeting on 14 January 2025, pending confirmation of this
date.
Page 22

Page 23

20.         Appointment of Chair and Depute Chair for Audit and Scrutiny
Committee
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) inviting the Council to appoint a
new Chair and Depute Chair of Audit and Scrutiny Committee.
Councillor Macrae moved to appoint Councillor Lawrence as Chair of Audit and
Scrutiny, this was seconded by Councillor Divers.
Councillor Macrae moved to appoint Councillor Coull as Depute Chair of Audit and
Scrutiny, this was seconded by Councillor Divers.
Following consideration and there being no one otherwise minded the Council
unanimously agreed to appoint Councillor Lawrence as Chair of Audit and Scrutiny
and Councillor Coull as Depute Chair.
21.         Climate Adaptation Benchmarking 2023
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) informed the Council of the findings from the council’s
first climate adaptation benchmarking exercise and propose updated actions for
the Climate Change Action Plan.
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) note the Council's statutory duty to ensure activities and programs are
designed to best support delivery of climate adaptation;
ii) note the contents of the first adaptation benchmarking report; and
iii) the existing adaptation action within the Climate Change Action Plan be
updated as outlined in para 5.6.
22.         Moray Council Bus Revolution Phase 2
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) informing the Council of operational plans and revenue
requirements supporting the incremental expansion of m.connect services in
Moray for the second Phase of the Bus Revolution project plan within the wider
Moray Growth Deal programme.
Under reference to Standing Order 81, the Chair sought agreement to Suspend
Standing Order 75 to continue the meeting past 12.45pm to conclude the meeting.
This was unanimously agreed. 
Following lengthy consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) approve m.connect service amendments, changes, expansions of new
services that form the operational plans for phase 2 of project delivery
Moray wide, as set out in paragraph 5; and   
ii) approve the fares proposals and revenue requirements, noting the cost
neutrality of the changes, to be implemented from 1 April 2025, to deliver the
operational plans as set out in this report
Page 23

Page 24

23.         Early Years STEM Full Business Case
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) informing the Council of progress
made by the Moray Growth Deal (MGD) to prepare a full business case for the
Early Years Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (EY STEM)
project and seek delegated authority to enable final approval of the business case
enabling the project to move into delivery.
Councillor Macrae proposed the recommendations as printed and selected Option
4 from the options in para 5.6 of the report.  This was seconded by Councillor
Robertson.
Following further consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) approve the Full Business Case summarised in this report and contained in
Appendix 1;
ii) delegate authority to the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities
and Organisational Development) to make any final changes as required
following completion of the Government review process, with a view to
agreeing a final version of the FBC to progress to implementation;   
iii) delegate authority to the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment
and Finance) or other such signatory as may be required to accept the
Government grants for the projects in line with the terms of the MGD; and
iv) the intermediate option - provision in targeted locations across Moray, a
mobile and outreach offering and partnership activity.
Page 24

Page 25

MORAY COUNCIL
Minute of Special Meeting of the Moray Council
Tuesday, 22 October 2024
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX
PRESENT
Councillor James  Allan, Councillor Peter Bloomfield, Councillor Neil Cameron,
Councillor Tracy Colyer, Councillor John Cowe, Councillor John Divers, Councillor
Amber Dunbar, Councillor Jérémie Fernandes, Councillor Donald Gatt, Councillor
David Gordon, Councillor Juli Harris, Councillor Sandy Keith, Councillor Scott
Lawrence, Councillor Marc Macrae, Councillor Paul McBain, Councillor Neil
McLennan, Councillor Shona Morrison, Councillor Bridget Mustard, Councillor
Kathleen Robertson, Councillor Derek Ross, Councillor John Stuart, Councillor
Draeyk van der Horn, Councillor Sonya Warren, Councillor Ben Williams
APOLOGIES
Councillor Theresa Coull
IN ATTENDANCE
The Interim Chief Executive, Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance), Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and Organisational
Development), Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance, Chief Financial
Officer, Head of Housing and Property Services, Head of Environmental and
Commercial Services, Acting Head of Economic Growth and Development, Head of
HR, ICT and Organisational Development, Customer Development Manager, Sport
and Culture Services Manager, Moray Growth Deal Programme Manager, Cultural
Quarter Project Manager, Tracey Laing, Senior Auditor, Benefits Manager,
Democratic Services Manager and Angela Pieri, External Auditor.
1.         Chair
The meeting was chaired by Councillor Kathleen Robertson.
2.         Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests *
In terms of Standing Orders 21 and 23 and The Councillors' Code of conduct the
Council noted that there were no declarations for Group Leaders or Spokesperson in
regard to any prior decisions taken on how members will vote on any item on the
agenda or any declarations of Member's interests in respect of any item on the
agenda.
Transparency Statements:
Councillor Gatt - Items 5a and 6 - Chair of Grampian Valuation Joint Board
Item 4b.
Page 25

Page 26

Councillor Warren - Items 5a and 6 - Member of Grampian Valuation Joint Board
Councillor Divers and Fernandes - Item 14 - Advisers to Moray Citizens Advice
Bureau
Councillor Williams - Item 11 - there was a connection due to a family member's
employment, however he felt it did not meet the threshold and would remain in the
meeting for the consideration of the item.
Councillors Macrae, Gordon and Cameron - Item 11 - Directors on the Board of
Moray Leisure Centre
3.         Resolution
Councillor McLennan sought clarification in terms of Standing Order 78 on whether
Councillors had all the information required to make decisions today, given that the
response to his written question from 25 September 2024 was still outstanding and
may be relevant to the decisions being made today.
In response, the Interim Chief Executive confirmed that in his professional view the
information requested is not material in terms of the decisions that need to be taken
at the meeting. He further added that he had responded to Councillor McLennan with
regards to the written question relative to the information he had requested.  The
information requested has been given in regard to temporary workers for the last 3
years.  Identifying the information sought in regard to consultants is more difficult to
determine and work is being carried out to provide the information which is taking
longer than anticipated.  Councillor McLennan had been asked to hone down the
particular request for information to make it easier for Officers to answer.
Councillor McLennan sought further clarification from the Monitoring Officer that he
was happy for the Council to proceed with the decisions to be made at the meeting.
The Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance confirmed that he had nothing
further to add to what the Interim Chief Executive had stated and that he was satisfied
that Elected Members had the information before them to make decisions at the
meeting.
Thereafter the  meeting resolved that in terms of Section 50A (4) and (5) of the Local
Government (Scotland) Act 1973, as amended, the public and media representatives
be excluded from the meeting for Items 10 and 11 of business on the grounds that it
involves the likely disclosure of exempt information of the class.
Para number of the
minute Para Number of Schedule 7a
12 Para 1
Information relating to staffing matters
13 Para 1
Information relating to staffing matters
14 Para 6
Information relating to the financial or business affairs of
any particular person(s)
15 Para 1
Page 26

Page 27

Information relating to staffing matters
Para 8 and 9
Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be
incurred by the Authority
16
Para 9
Information on terms proposed or to be proposed by or to
the Authority
18 Para 8 and 9
Information on proposed terms and/or expenditure to be
incurred by the Authority
19
Para 6
Information relating to the financial or business affairs of
any particular person(s)
4.         Jo Cox Foundation
The meeting had before it a report by the Interim Chief Executive asking the Council
to consider a recommendation by COSLA Leaders that Councils consider making a
donation to the Jo Cox Civility Commission in support of its work against abuse,
intimidation and violence towards politicians.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) note the recommendation of COSLA Leaders meeting on the 30 August 2024
for consideration of funding support for the Jo Cox Civility Commission; and
ii) make a donation of £500 in support of the work of the Jo Cox Civility
Commission.
5.         Best Value Workforce Thematic Draft Outcomes
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) informing the Council of the
outcomes from the Best Value Workforce Thematic report and invited consideration
of the key messages.
The Thematic Report was introduced by Angela Pieri, External Auditor, Grant
Thornton UK LLP
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to note the key messages
in the best value workforce innovation thematic review.
6.         External Audit - Annual Report to Members on 2023-24 Audit
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) providing Council with a copy of the External Auditor's
Annual Audit Report to Council on the 2023/24 Accounts.
The report was introduced by Angela Pieri, External Auditor, Grant Thornton LLP UK.
Page 27

Page 28

Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to note the contents of the
Annual Audit Report 2023/24.
7.         Audited Annual Accounts 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) submitting to the Council the Audited Annual Accounts for
the Moray Council for the year ended 31 March 2024.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) note the Audited Annual Accounts for the financial year 2023/24; and
ii) approve that the Annual Accounts are signed, having regard to the Annual
Report from the External Auditor which another item on this agenda.
8.         Budget Protocol
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) providing the Council with an updated Budget
Protocol reflecting feedback on the version used for the 2024/25 budget setting
process and seek endorsement of this as a policy for the budget setting process for
2025/26. 
Councillor Keith expressed unease with the wording in paragraph 2 in the Appendix
under the section Budget Amendments.
In response, the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance)
confirmed that the wording is intended to ensure all members are aware of the
officers from whom they can get early advice on proposed amendments to ensure
that the amendments proposed are based on robust information and that the
proposals are deliverable.
Councillor McLennan sought clarification on whether there were any legislative
implications with regards to section 6 of the protocol and also para 3 of the section on
Budget Amendments in relation to late amendments.
In response the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance confirmed that what
is being discussed is good decision making of the Council and he drew members
particular attention to the Accounts Commission Guidance note which stated, are we
getting it right, is fair notice being given for decisions the Council has to make and as
he had stated earlier, Councillors having sufficient information before them to come to
a reasonable and balanced decision.
Councillor McLennan moved to remove paragraph 3 under Budget Amendments in
the Appendix and Principle 6 under section Principles. This was seconded by
Councillor Keith.
The Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance advised the Council that the
more that is written in the protocol the better as removing these elements are leaving
it to chance at the time and that Councillors not in the administration would benefit
from these paragraphs for the reasons stated earlier in terms of the Council making
valid decisions.  As Monitoring Officer, it was his recommendation to keep the
sections in the protocol.
Page 28

Page 29

Councillor Macrae, seconded by Councillor Ross proposed agreeing the
recommendations as printed in the report.
On the division there voted:
For the motion (3) Councillors McLennan, Keith and Stuart
For the Amendment (18) Councillors Macrae, Ross, Allan, Bloomfield, Cameron,
Colyer, Cowe, Divers, Dunbar, Gatt, Gordon, Harris,
Lawrence, Macrae, McBain, Mustard, Robertson and
Warren
Abstention (2) Councillors van der Horn and Williams
Accordingly, the amendment became the finding of the meeting, and the Council
agreed:
i) the updated Budget Protocol (V13.1) produced as Appendix I as a statement
of policy to apply to the process leading to setting of the Council budget for
2025/26; and
ii) to note that the Budget Protocol will continue to be reviewed at least annually
to reflect political and other changes as required, for endorsement by
members of the Budget Development Forum, which failing by a further report
to Council.
Councillor McLennan's dissent was recorded.
9.         Operation of a Cap on Capital Expenditure for 2025-26
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) recommending a methodology for keeping the Council’s
capital expenditure within affordable limits, having in regard the life of the indicative
ten-year capital plan.
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to approve the
methodology for the application of a cap to capital expenditure as set out in this report
and summarised in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.3.
10.         Pre-Election Period
The Chair reminded members that the Council is currently in a pre-election period for
the Elgin City South by election which takes place on 7 November.  National
guidance places restrictions on the Council publishing material showing support for a
particular political party.  Should the debate become overtly political whilst being
webcast, then as Chair, may need to intervene. 
The Chair further added that should any votes take place on confidential items on the
meeting agenda, the voting results will not be published on CMIS until after the by-
election has taken place.
11.         Order of Business
Page 29

Page 30

The Chair advised that Item 13 - Non-Domestic Rates Recovery will be taken at the
end of the agenda.
12.         Short to Medium Term Financial Plan [Para 1]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) seeking approval to proposed savings, subject to
consultation where appropriate, for implementation in 2024/25 and 2025/26, in
accordance with the Council’s Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) note the financial update summarised APPENDIX 1;
ii) notes the savings options set out in APPENDIX 2, having due regard to the
Integrated Impact Equalities Assessments summarised in APPENDIX 3;
iii) the greatest level of savings possible, subject to Stage 2 public
communications as indicated in APPENDIX 2 and/or workforce consultation as
required; and
iv) notes that there is still significant uncertainty around budget assumptions for
2025/26 which may alter the budget gap.
13.         Libraries Learning Centres and Heritage Service Redesign and Savings
Delivery [Para 1]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) informing the Council of the proposed
service redesign and savings delivery options in relation to the Libraries, Learning
Centres and Heritage Team.
Following length consideration in which a number of Councillors raised concerns
about the proposals the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) note the transformation work undertaken by the Libraries, Learning Centres
and Heritage service to date and the future service strategy to meet changing
demand/need;   
ii) note the proposal in regard to future provision of the service which aligns with
the savings hierarchy of transformation and service reduction to aid the
Council’s short to medium term financial strategy;
iii) proceed with consultation on the proposed future service provision; and
iv) a report due back to Council in January 2025 on consultation responses.
14.         Moray Leisure Centre Update [Para 6]
Councillor Morrison joined the meeting at this juncture.
Page 30

Page 31

The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) updating Council on developments in
relation to Moray Leisure Centre operations.
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to note:
i) the update in regard to the Moray Leisure Centre expansion plans;
ii) the ‘do minimum’ repairs and maintenance required to keep the facility
functional for the next 12-18mths; and
iii) that a report for further consideration on this will be brought back to a future
meeting of the Council alongside the outcome of the sport and leisure asset
review, which is planned for December 2024.
15.         Review of Out of Hours Service [Para 1 8 and 9]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) detailing the findings of a review of the Council’s out of
hours service and to consider recommendations for an alternative method of service
delivery.
Following consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) note the findings of the review of the Council's out of hours service;
ii) approve the Business Case at Appendix I, including the request for funding of
£53k from transformation reserves to proceed with the proposed
implementation of an alternative method of service delivery; and
iii) note that periodic updates on progress will be provided to the Council to
monitor and scrutinise progress.
16.         Service Level Agreement with Moray Citizens Advice Bureau [Para 9]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) inviting the Council to consider the
operational and financial arrangement between The Council and Moray Citizens
Advice Bureau (CAB) via a revised Service Level Agreement in respect of the
provision of Benefits, Debt and Housing advice.
Councillor Divers expressed concern about the paper as he felt it would reduce the
service provided to the people of Moray.  He added that if Moray Citizens Advice
Bureau folds, then all the cases they deal with will revert back to the Council to take
on.  He moved to defer the report until further information is available.
In response, the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance confirmed that the
report could be deferred to allow consultation with the Moray CAB and bring back a
further report to a future meeting but was unclear on what further information
Councillor Divers sought.  He further added that if Council were minded to reduce the
funding with a range of amounts then consultation could take place with Moray CAB
and a report could then come back to a future meeting with the results of the
consultation.
Page 31

Page 32

Councillor McLennan echoed Councillor Divers concern but was re-assured by the
comments from the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance but the option
was not reflected in the recommendations.
Councillor Gatt said that he had great sympathy with what Councillors Divers and
McLennan had said and sought clarification on whether Moray CAB could be
consulted on all the proposals with a report back on the result of those discussions.
The Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance confirmed that this would be
possible.
Councillor Lawrence noted that there is the possibility of the Shared Prosperity
Funding running out in March 2025.
In response the Benefits Manager confirmed that it is likely that the funding will
continue but at present there is no guarantee.
Councillor Robertson suggested deferring the report until after information on the
Shared Prosperity Fund is known.
Following further consideration the Council unanimously agreed to:
i) defer the report until consultation had taken place with Moray CAB on the
options and a decision on the Shared Prosperity Fund is known; and
ii) delegate authority to the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance to
consult with Moray CAB on the options.
17.         Suspension of Standing Orders
Under reference to Standing Order 83 the Chair sought agreement from the Council to
suspend Standing Order 75 to continue the meeting after 5.00pm.
This was unanimously agreed.
18.         Cultural Quarter Full Business Case [Para 8 and 9)
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) informing the Council of progress made by the Moray
Growth Deal (MGD) to prepare a full business case for the Cultural Quarter project
and grant delegated authority to enable final approval of the business case so
enabling the project to move into delivery.
Councillor Stuart re-joined the meeting during the consideration of this item.
Councillor Allan left the meeting during the consideration of this item.
During lengthy consideration, concern was raised by a number of Councillors on
various aspects of the full business case.
Councillor Gatt moved to approve the Full Business Case in principle and that the
project is brought back into budget and cost no more than originally agreed.
Page 32

Page 33

Councillor McBain added that there had been a huge amount of work put into the
project and that Members needed to have confidence in the information before
them. Councillor McBain, seconded by Councillor Robertson proposed to agree the
recommendations as printed.
Councillor Mustard sought to add to Councillor McBain's amendment by adding in a
caveat that the Council are not agreeing to anything that has not already been agreed
by the Council i.e. Tourist Visitor Levy. Councillor McBain was happy with the addition
of the caveat.
Councillor McLennan proposed the following amendment:
i) agree as printed
ii) a report back to a future meeting of Council to agree any final changes as
required following completion of the Government review process, with a view
to agreeing final versions of each Full Business Case (FBC) to progress to
implementation;
iii) agree as printed
iv) agree as printed
v) an urgent report is brought back to a future meeting of the Council on Grant
Lodge.
Following further lengthy consideration, Councillor Robertson proposed a short
adjournment to see whether all members could reach a consensus.
On the resumption of the meeting Councillor Gatt withdrew his motion and
Councillors McBain and McLennan withdrew their amendments.
Councillor Robertson moved the following:
i) agree as printed;
ii) a report back to a future meeting of Council to agree any final changes as
required following completion of the Government review process, with a view
to agreeing final versions of each Full Business Case (FBC) to progress to
implementation;
iii) agree as printed;
iv) agree as printed;
v) Commitment that £3.9m is being provided by the Council and that any
deviation has to come back to a meeting of the Council before any spend, that
safeguards are in place and there are no implied decision/actions or
agreements such as Tourism Visitor Levy and in other Council funding that
requires a separate decision.
This was seconded by Councillor McLennan.
There being no one otherwise minded the Council unanimously agreed to:
Page 33

Page 34

i) considers and approves the Full Business Case (FBC) summarised in this
report and contained in Appendix 1;
ii) a report back to a future meeting of Council to agree any final changes as
required following completion of the Government review process, with a view
to agreeing final versions of each Full Business Case (FBC) to progress to
implementation;
iii) delegates authority to the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment
and Finance) or other such signatory as may be required to accept the
Government grants for the projects in line with the terms of the MGD;   
iv) delegates authority to the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment
and Finance) to submit applications for funding that will assist in addressing
the financial shortfall associated with the project; and
v) a commitment that £3.9m is being provided by the Council and that any
deviation must come back to a future meeting of the Council before any
spend, that safeguards are in place and there are no implied decision/actions
or agreements such as Tourism Visitor Levy and in other Council funding that
requires a separate decision.
19.         Non-Domestic Rates Recovery [Para 6]
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) asking the Council to agree a position on the enforcement
of non-domestic rates against a property in Elgin.
Councillors Morrison and van der Horn left the meeting during the consideration of
this item.
Concern was raised by Councillor Fernandes regarding the timing of the paper as it
was during a pre-election period.
In response Councillor Robertson confirmed that any vote taken on the report would
not be published until after the by-election and any enforcement action would take
place after 8 November 2024.
Following lengthy consideration, Councillor Keith said that the Council needed to be
financially prudent and moved to accept recommendation (i) and agree Option 2 in
para 6.5.  This was seconded by Councillor Fernandes.
Councillor Gatt, seconded by Councillor Gordon proposed the recommendations as
printed in the report.
On the division there voted:
For the Motion (5) Councillors Keith, Fernandes, Cameron, Divers and
Harris,  
For the Amendment (15)
Councillors Gatt, Gordon, Bloomfield, Colyer, Cowe,
Dunbar, Lawrence, Macrae, McBain, McLennan,
Mustard, Robertson, Ross, Stuart and Warren
Page 34

Page 35

Abstention (1) Councillor Williams
Accordingly, the amendment became the finding of the meeting, and the Council
agreed:
i) to note the three options set out in paragraph 6.5 of this report, and
summarised in Appendix 1; and
ii) that Officers progress Option 1, with no action being taken until after 7
November 2024.
Page 35

Page 36

Page 36

Page 37

__________________________________________________
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO MORAY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2024
Background
 This council notes the public concern over the escalation of hostilities in the
middle east. In particular in Israel, Gaza, Lebanon and Iran.
 Council takes no sides and believes that the values of equality, democracy,
human rights and the international rule of law are of fundamental importance.
 Moray has a long-held mission of serving its local people whilst also offering a
helping hand to those who find themselves in desperate need, whether at
home or hosting refugees from overseas.
 UK armed forces have already taken part alongside other NATO countries in
the region and we are rightly concerned that with two important military
facilities located here in Moray, that men and women stationed locally may
end up in harms way.
Action
 Moray Council calls on the UK Government to exercise every diplomatic tool
at its disposal to seek a cessation of all hostilities at the earliest possible
opportunity and to encourage all parties to engage in the internationally
accepted need for a 2-state solution, which can be implemented through
peaceful dialogue and collaboration of all political sides.
 Council instructs the Council Leader to write to the Prime Minister seeking
diplomatic interventions of the highest level both in the region of hostility and
at the United Nations to seek an end to the senseless death and destruction,
with innocent lives being taken across several borders.
Financial Implications
 There are no financial implications arising from this motion.
Proposed by: Councillor Marc Macrae
Seconded by: Councillor Sonya Warren
Date Motion Submitted: 7 October 2024
Item 5.
Page 37

Page 38

DRAFT LETTER
Rt. Hon. Keir Starmer MP
Prime Minister
10 Downing Street
London
SW1A 2AA
Dear Prime Minister
At a meeting of the Moray Council on Wednesday 4 December 2024 members
debated a motion on the ongoing hostilities in the middle east and I am writing to you
on behalf of all elected members.
Council takes no sides in the conflicts which have arisen and believes that the values
of equality, democracy, human rights and the international rule of law are of
fundamental importance.
Moray Council asks, that as Prime Minister, you will instruct the UK Government to
exercise every diplomatic tool at its disposal to seek a cessation of all hostilities at
the earliest possible opportunity, and to encourage all relevant parties to engage in
peaceful dialogue so that the internationally accepted need for a 2-state solution can
be implemented.
I hope that you will give this matter the urgent attention it deserves and work not just
with your government but those overseas as well as the United Nations to seek the
end of hostilities and to end the senseless killing on all sides of innocent men,
women and children.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and I look forward to hearing from you in
due course.
Yours faithfully
Page 38

Page 39

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: MORAY INTEGRATION JOINT BOARD CHIEF OFFICER UPDATE
BY: CHIEF OFFICER, HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE MORAY
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To inform the Council of the latest approved minutes of the meetings of the
Moray Integration Joint Board and an up to date overview of activities.
1.2 This report is submitted under Section II (22) of the Council's Scheme of
Administration relating to the Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB).
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 The Council is invited to consider and note the content of this report.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The MIJB was established on 6 February 2016 under the terms of the Public
Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 with full delegation of functions
and resources to enable integration of primary and community health and
social care services effective from 1 April 2016. The MIJB is a separate legal
organisation and acts as principal in its own right.
The principal ambitions of health and social care integration are to:
 Support the improvement of the quality and consistency of services for
patients, carers, service-users and their families.
 Provide seamless, joined-up quality health and social care services in
order to care for people in their homes or a homely setting where it is
safe to do so.
 Ensure resources are used effectively and efficiently to deliver services.
4. KEY MATTERS RELEVANT TO RECOMMENDATION
4.1 The approved minute from the MIJB meeting held on 27 June 2024, which
was accepted as a correct record of the meeting on 26 September 2024, can
be found at Appendix 1.  A few key highlights from the meeting for the Moray
Council to note were, the MIJB:
Item 7.
Page 39

Page 40

27 June 2024
 Noted a report by the Interim Chief Officer which detailed activities that
support the delivery against the MIJB’s strategic priorities as set out in
the Strategic Plan.
 Approved the unaudited Annual Accounts to be submitted to the external
auditor, noting all figures remain subject to audit. Noted the Annual
Governance Statement and accounting policies applied in the production
of the unaudited Annual Accounts.
 Approved the updated Local Code of Corporate Governance which
supports the Annual Governance Statement.
 Received a report from the Interim Head of Service and Chief Social
Work Officer which informed members of the progress of the
replacement social work and social care case management system and
approved the project to progress to Outline Business Case.
 Noted NHS Grampian’s Putting People First framework, ambition and
guiding principles and priorities for the foundation years, and considered
opportunities for collaboration around the new approach.
 Noted progress made on delivery of the objectives within the local carer
strategy: Morays Unpaid Carers Strategy and instructed the Lead Officer
for Unpaid Carers to report back to the Board on an annual basis, and to
Clinical and Care Governance Committee quarterly, as a minimum, to
monitor the progress of the actions within the strategy.
 Received a report updating members of a change in strategy for the
Telecare transition in Moray, following the announcement by Openreach
to extend the deadline for analogue to digital phone line migration from
December 2025 to January 2027.  The Board approved the revised
strategy and the revised financial expectations.
 Approved the MIJB Directions Policy.
4.2 The link to the webcast and reports submitted to the MIJB meeting on 27 June
2024 can be found here:
https://moray.cmis.uk.com/moray/CouncilandGovernance/Meetings/tabid/70/ct
l/ViewMeetingPublic/mid/397/Meeting/2320/Committee/18/Default.aspx
4.3 It is recognised that providing a summary of approved MIJB minutes alone
offers limited value to the Council.  With the aim of providing the Council with
an up to date overview of activities please find attached the Chief Officer
report, at Appendix 2, which was presented to MIJB on 28 November 2024.
The intention is to develop this update report further to provide assurance.
4.4 Approved minutes, reports and link to webcast library for all MIJB meetings
can be found here:
https://moray.cmis.uk.com/moray/CouncilandGovernance/Committees/tabid/6
2/ctl/ViewCMIS_CommitteeDetails/mid/381/id/18/Default.aspx
Page 40

Page 41

5. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
This report forms part of the governance arrangements of MIJB; good
governance arrangements will support the Board to fulfil its objectives.
(b) Policy and Legal
There are no policy or legal implications associated with this report.
(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with this report.
(d) Risk Implications
There are no risk implications associated with this report.
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications arising from this report.
(f) Property
There are no property implications arising from this report.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
An Equalities Impact Assessment is not required as there is no change
to policy and procedures resulting from this report.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
There are no climate change or biodiversity implications arising from this
report.
(i) Consultations
Consultation on this report has taken place with Corporate Manager,
Health and Social Care Moray who is in agreement with the content in
relation to their area of responsibility.
6. CONCLUSION
6.1 This report provides a summary of the business addressed by the MIJB
at their meeting on 27 June 2024 and an up to date overview of activities.
Author of Report: Isla Whyte, Corporate Business Support Manager, Health
and Social Care Moray
Background Papers: available online
Ref: SPMAN-305227695-154
Page 41

Page 42

Page 42

Page 43

MINUTE OF MEETING OF THE MORAY INTEGRATION JOINT BOARD 
Thursday, 27 June 2024 
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX 
PRESENT 
Mr Ivan Augustus, Mrs Sheila Brumby, Mr Sean Coady, Councillor Tracy Colyer,
Councillor Scott Lawrence, Dr Robert Lockhart, Mr Jim Lyon, Mr Derick Murray, Ms
Deborah O'Shea, Mr Sandy Riddell, Mr Dennis Robertson, Ms Elizabeth Robinson,
Dr Malcolm Simmons, Mr Kevin Todd, Ms Janette Topp, Councillor Ben Williams
Councillor Donald Gatt (for Councillor Peter Bloomfield) 
APOLOGIES 
Councillor Peter Bloomfield, Professor Duff Bruce, Mr Adam Coldwells, Ms Sonya
Duncan, Ms Jane Ewen, Ms Deirdre McIntyre, Mr John Mundell 
IN ATTENDANCE 
Service Manager - Strategic Commissioning; Strategic Development Manager,
NHS Grampian; SDS and Unpaid Carers Team Manager; Business Change
Manager (TEC); Consultant Psychiatrist and Clinical Lead; Lead for Mental Health
and Learning Disability (MHLD) Inpatient, Specialist Services and Children and
Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS); Locality Manager - Forres and
Lossiemouth and Caroline O'Connor, Committee Services Officer. 
1.         Chair 
The meeting was chaired by Councillor Tracy Colyer.  
2.         Pre-Election Period 
The Chair reminded the Board the meeting was taking place during the pre-election
period and, with regards to discussion relating to the budget, asked that members
observe discretion with regards to discussion of any new new policies or actions which
may be seen to be politically motivated at a time when it was important that the Board
remains politically impartial.  
3.         Declaration of Member's Interests 
Item 7.
Page 43

Page 44

Mr Riddell stated for transparency that he was Chair of the Mental Welfare
Commission Scotland.  
The Board noted there were no other declarations of member's interests.  
4.         Welcome and Apologies 
The Board joined the Chair in welcoming Jim Lyon, who was replacing Tracy Stephen
as Interim Chief Social Work Officer, to his first meeting of the Board.  
The Chair also confirmed Judith Proctor had been appointed to the position of Interim
Chief Officer, Health & Social Care Moray from mid July.  
5.         Minute of meeting of 30 May 2024 
The minute of the meeting of 30 May 2024 had been submitted.  
In respect of Item 18 "General Adult Mental Health Secondary Care Pathway Review
Report", Mr Murray stated he had suggested at the meeting that it would be useful if
the report was not finalised until such time as the Moray Mental Health Secondary
Care Pathway Review was completed and asked that the minute be amended to
reflect his comments.   The Chair confirmed she was in agreement with the
suggested change.  
Subject to the amendment above, the Committee agreed the minute of the meeting.  
6.         Action Log of 30 May 2024 
The Action Log of the meeting of 30 May 2024 was discussed and updated
accordingly.  
7.         Minute of meeting Clinical and Care Governance Committee of 28 March
2024 
The Board noted the minute of the meeting of the Clinical and Care Governance
Committee of 28 March 2024.  
8.         Chief Officer Report 
The meeting had before it a report by the Interim Chief Officer informing the Board of
the Chief Officer activities that support the delivery against the Moray Integration Joint
Board's (MIJB's) strategic priorities articulated in the Strategic Plan, and the delivery
against the 9 Health and Wellbeing outcomes.  Strategic planning needs to maintain
a focus on transformational change to deliver services to our community within the
resources we have available. 2024/25 is a very challenging year for delivering within
the budget, with our two funding partners, Moray Council and NHS Grampian, under
considerable financial pressure as well.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed:-  
i) to note the content of the report; and 
ii) that transforming services to meet the aspirations of the MIJB's Strategic Plan
remains a priority.  
Page 44

Page 45

9.         Unaudited Annual Accounts 2023-24 
The meeting had before it a report by the Chief Financial Officer informing the Board
of the unaudited Annual Accounts of the Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB) for the
year ended 31 March 2024.  
Mr Riddell, as Chair of Audit, Performance and Risk Committee, advised the draft
unaudited Annual Accounts had been considered at the Committee earlier that day
and agreed to recommend to the Board approval in order that the accounts could be
signed off and submitted to the external auditors.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed to:-  
i) approve the unaudited Annual Accounts to be submitted to the external auditor,
noting that all figures remain subject to audit, in Appendix 1; 
ii) note the Annual Governance Statement contained within the unaudited Annual
Accounts; 
iii) note the accounting policies applied in the production of the unaudited Annual
Accounts, pages 46 to 27 of the accounts; and 
iv) approve the updated Local Code of Corporate Governance which supports the
Annual Governance Statement, in Appendix 2.  
10.         Carefirst Replacement 
The meeting had before it a report by the Interim Head of Service and Chief Social
Work Officer informing the Board of the progress of the replacement Social Work and
social care case management system and the outline business case.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed to:-  
i) note the project mandate (Appendix 1) and the enabling work required at 4.9; 
ii) note the governance arrangements and proposal to use existing resources as set
out in Appendix 3; and 
iii) approve the project to progress to Outline Business Case to be reported back to
the Board in September 2024 for consideration of funding requirements.  
12.         Putting People First - NHS Grampians New Approach to Listening to
and Involving People 
The meeting had before it a report by the Strategic Development Manager, NHS
Grampian updating the Board on the new NHS Grampian Putting People First
framework and asking the Board to consider opportunities to collaborate around
listening to and involving the public in improving services and creating more
preventative and sustainable models of care.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed to:-  
i) note NHS Grampian's Putting People First framework, ambition and guiding
principles and priorities for the foundation years; and 
Page 45

Page 46

ii) consider opportunities for collaboration around the new approach including the
proof of concept areas.  
13.         Progress Report on Morays Unpaid Carers Strategy 
The meeting had before it a report by the Lead Officer for Unpaid Carers updating the
Board of the progress in delivering on the objectives within the local carer
strategy.  Preparation and review of the strategy is a requirement of the Carers
(Scotland) Act 2016.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed to:-  
i) note the progress made in meeting the objectives within the strategy; and 
ii) instruct the Lead Officer for Unpaid Carers to report back to the Board on an
annual basis, and to Clinical and Care Governance Committee quarterly, as a
minimum, to monitor the progress of the actions within the strategy.  
14.         Analogue to Digital Telecare Transition (A2DT) Update 
The meeting had before it a report by the Interim Chief Officer updating the Board of
a change in strategy for the Telecare transition in Moray, following the announcement
by Openreach to extend the deadline for analogue to digital phone line migration from
December 2025 to January 2027.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed to:-  
i) note the current situation in relation to the procurement of a digital alarm receiving
centre; 
ii) approve the the revised strategy for the replacement of analogue devices, which
includes the opportunity to collaborate with Digital Health and Care Institute (DHI)
to look at more innovative solutions; and 
iii) approve the revised financial expectations, which have now been attributed over
three financial years (having regard to the caveat in paragraphs 4.5 and 4.17).  
15.         Moray Integration Joint Board - Directions Policy 
The meeting had before it a report by the Chief Financial Officer providing the Board
with a Directions Policy which has been developed in line with the provisions of the
Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 and statutory guidance issued by
Scottish Government.  
Following consideration the Board unanimously agreed to:-  
i) note the content of this report, the requirements of the Public Bodies (Joint
Working) (Scotland) Act 2014 and the statutory guidance issues by the Scottish
Government in relation to Directions; and 
ii) approve the updated MIJB Directions Policy and Procedures as set out in
Appendix 1.  
16.         Options for Ward 4 Inpatient Unit for Patients with Mental Illness [Para
6.2.1]
Page 46

Page 47

The meeting had before it a report from the Interim Integrated Service Manager, Mental
Health and Drug and Alcohol Service updating the Board on the options for Ward 4,
which is the mental health inpatient ward on the Dr Gray's Hospital site.  
Concern was raised by members of the Board that there was not enough detailed
information in the report for a decision to be made at the meeting.  
The Chair moved to defer the report in order for development work to be undertaken to
provide a full detailed report to a future meeting of the Board.  The Interim Chief Officer
confirmed the necessary work would be undertaken and a further report would be
brought back to the Board in approximately 3 months time. 
Following lengthy consideration and there being no-one otherwise minded, the Board
unanimously agreed that further development work be undertaken in order to prepare
a full detailed report which would be brought back to the Board for consideration. 
Page 47

Page 48

Page 48

Page 49

REPORT TO: MORAY INTEGRATION JOINT BOARD ON 28 NOVEMBER 2024
SUBJECT:  CHIEF OFFICER REPORT
BY: INTERIM CHIEF OFFICER
1.  REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To inform the Board of the Chief Officer activities that support the delivery
against the Moray Integration Joint Board’s (MIJB’s) strategic priorities
articulated in the Strategic Plan, and the delivery against the 9 Health and
Wellbeing outcomes.
1.2 Strategic planning needs to maintain a focus on transformational change to
deliver services to our community within the resources we have available.
2024/25 is a very challenging year for delivering within the budget, with our
two funding partners, Moray Council and NHS Grampian, under considerable
financial pressure as well.
2.  RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that the Board:
i) consider and note the content of the report; and
ii) agree that transforming services to meet the aspirations of the
MIJB’s Strategic Plan remains a priority.
3. BACKGROUND
Home First
3.1 The numbers of patients whose discharge is delayed remains challenging.  
The current position at time of report is 34 patients delayed, with the target
being 26. In response teams are developing innovative ways to tackle this.
The Discharge to Assess Team (D2A) has joined forces with the START team
(care at home enablement team) to ensure more patients are discharged from
hospital after an acute stay and that their ongoing needs are assessed in their
own home. This pilot will run throughout November. Additionally, a new link is
being piloted between acute hospital and primary care Multi-disciplinary
Teams (MDT). This District Nurse Led pilot will see teams from three pilot
areas ensure that patients at risk of a complex discharge are discussed and
Item 7.
Page 49

Page 50

supported by their local MDT as well as their hospital one and will run
throughout November.
3.2 Health and Social Care Moray (HSCM) continues with daily strategic MDT and
focus on the use of Predicted Date of Discharge. The operational staff
investment in this has been recognised across Grampian as an area of good
practice and teams in City and Shire are hoping to replicate some of this work.
HSCM are linked in with the Grampian and National programmes designed to
support work on winter pressures and delayed discharges and are assured on
the ability to operationally deploy available resource, particularly during times
of intense acute pressure will be invaluable as services head into winter.
3.3 The Making Everyone Opportunity Count (MEOC) Ageing Well Tool is in use
in a variety of settings including both primary and community care.  A digital
version of the tool is currently being piloted in Moray.  Realistic Medicine
principles and values based care approaches are promoted through taster
sessions for HSCM staff and volunteers.  A rolling programme of Ageing Well
health and wellbeing presentations, focusing on prevention, has been
delivered to older people’s groups throughout Moray.
3.4 A final evaluation report was presented to Scottish Government Realistic
Medicine Policy Team providing an overview of the Realistic Medicine
Wellbeing Coordinator project.  Feedback was positive with the original
outcomes met and the increased value of the project made clear.  The
unintended outcomes /opportunities were recognised, with particular
reference being paid to the delivery of the Community Appointment Day which
promoted values based on shared care decision making.  It was noted that the
project has supported to link HSCM systems together as well as contributing
to the Grampian wide Realistic Medicine action plan and progress. Overall,
the project was described as inspiring. 
Vaccination Programme
3.5 Due to issues with the data collection platform used by the national
vaccination team, the data for this report is unavailable, but a comprehensive
report will be available for the next reporting period.
3.6   The vaccination team in Moray have delivered the shingles vaccination
program which commenced in January 2024, this programme is currently
paused and will recommence in January 2025.
3.7    The Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) programme commenced in August
2024, and all eligible citizens will have been offered a vaccine. For Moray, this
is in the region of 5,800 citizens.
3.8 Pneumococcal vaccination concluded in September 2024, a total of 26,000
were eligible, this program will recommence in January 2025.
3.9 The COVID-19 and Flu national vaccination programme commenced on 16
September 2024 and is focussing on residents in care homes, all adults aged
65yrs and over, individuals aged six months and over who are in a clinical at-
risk group, including pregnant women, front-line health and care workers and
staff in care homes for older adults. Bespoke clinics have been made
available for staff to maximise opportunities for the uptake of eligible vaccines.
Additionally, to reduce unnecessary travel, outreach clinics for those over
Page 50

Page 51

75yrs have also been organised within each locality. Options for clinics and
the contact centre details are within the letters to residents.
3.10    The vaccination centre will remain at the Southfield location for the next
financial year.
Ward 4
3.11 Workshops were set up by the Mental Health and Learning Disability (MHLD)
Portfolio Board and commenced in November, as part of the Mental Health
Bed Base Review for Grampian. The health and care system has remained
under considerable pressure, nationally and locally, and has not recovered
since the covid pandemic. Royal Cornhill Hospital operates almost entirely at
GOPES Level 4, the highest ranking of pressure, on a daily basis. Mental
health beds elsewhere in Grampian remain high in demand,  often exceeding
capacity. Discharging people back into community settings is made more
challenging with other sectors also under pressure.
3.12 A bed base review of inpatient mental health beds across Grampian has been
commissioned with the aim of achieving a balance between capacity and
demand within the resources available. This will include consideration of
under usage in some  areas, and how pathway redesign can help put balance
back into the system.
3.13 A key consideration within the review is that Ward 4, inpatient mental health
unit at Dr Gray’s Hospital, may not be operable in the future due to
infrastructure issues, and there is a requirement to explore all options,
including the potential for a different model of community-based delivery.
3.14 The bed base review recognises the considerable improvement work that is
ongoing in a pressured and complex system, and is not intending to replicate
that, but to pull on the experience and expertise of those working in the
system to understand how to better match capacity to demand, and how the
risks associated with any change proposals can be safely managed.
3.15 Workshops were held 6 and 12 November 2024 where data was presented
and services were asked to contribute a narrative for each area that explained
the data, and to explore solutions to address system pressures. The NHS
Benchmarking Network data 2023/24 for Adult and Older People’s Mental
Health Services was used to support local data at the workshops.
3.16 A timetable has been set out in the Programme Initiation Document, agreed
by the MHLD Programme Board that reaches conclusions on the way
forwards within this financial year.
Aberlour Medical Centre Update
3.17 The tender interviews have now concluded and the process to transfer
Aberlour Medical Practice to the successful candidate is now in progress. The
agreed transfer date is 1 April 2025, and the practice will remain under the
running of HSCM until that date.
Lossiemouth Locality Update
3.18 The Scottish Government report titled ‘Independent Report on the Moray
Coast Branch Surgeries Closure’ was presented to the MIJB on the 26
September 2024 (para 15 of minute refers).
Page 51

Page 52

3.19 The Head of Service and Deputy Head of Service of, HSCM subsequently
met with the Save our Surgeries (SOS) group on 23 October 2024 to discuss
the three key points within Recommendation 2 of the report:-
 The Continued Engagement with Community Groups on the Innovative
use of the Burghead Building. At the recent meeting with SOS members
and Health and Social Care Moray present explored this further and have
agreed to meet again in December 2024. It was noted that the primary
structure for service planning will continue to be progressed through the
Lossiemouth Locality Planning Group to ensure a 'whole system'
approach is taken to service delivery.
 The Community Empowerment Act. Contact details for staff within Moray
Council were provided to further inform the group on the Community
Empowerment Act.
 The Glasgow School of Art. Funding remains an issue however Health
and Social Care Moray remain committed to undertaking this work if at all
possible.
Management capacity
3.20 The programme management office has been established to co-ordinate and
support progress of savings projects with the re-deployment of a service
manager and part time support manager.  Management capacity to progress
actions to release savings remains a challenge, so opportunities for
development have been identified for circulation with wider staff groups, that
are intended to provide additional capacity in key project areas.            
External Inspections of our services
3.21   The Care Inspectorate carried out an Adult Support and Protection (ASP)
Progress Review from July to September 2024 in Moray adult services
partnership, as a follow up to their full Inspection of ASP in June 2022. Their
report on the findings of the Progress Review was published at the end of
October 2024 and highlighted significant improvement, the top of the
improvement scale applied, across all the practice areas reviewed.
3.22 The scale of improvement was remarkable which was a result of the passion,
and unwavering commitment of those driving forward the ASP Improvement
Plan and front-line staff developing their practice. Moreover, it is good news
for the people of Moray who experience the need for support in the work we
do in adult protection.
3.23 As always with inspections, there are areas requiring further attention
including developing our risk assessments and greater involvement of the
adults at the centre of adult support and protection. This work will be taken
forward diligently within the ASP Improvement Plan.
Primary Care Out of Hours (GMED)
3.24 The GMED service has faced recurring difficulties in staffing shifts across its
centres. It is not always possible to secure staff through the bank system to
cover unplanned absences and staff may decline requests to redeploy to
other areas which are short-staffed.
3.25 Agreements have been put in place to limit lone working for clinicians in
GMED centres following representations around professional isolation and
safe working environments to improve sustainability.
Page 52

Page 53

3.26 Contingency protocols activated by GMED in October have included:-
 Fraserburgh operations: Clinician and driver relocated to Peterhead.
 Huntly operations: Following a review of protocols, Huntly remains in full
operations.
These arrangements are subject to daily review to ensure that protocols
remain appropriate and safe for both patients and staff.
There is no change to the way patients access the GMED service across the
Grampian region.
3.27    Early in 2024, Chief Officers for Moray, Aberdeen City and Aberdeenshire
health and social care partnerships requested a review of the GMED model.
3.28 The review, led by a programme board, aims to enhance the quality, safety
and efficiency of the service while ensuring sustainable workforce levels and
promoting staff wellbeing.
3.29 It is anticipated that the review will be completed by the end of January 2025
with review findings due to be presented to the three Integration Joint Boards
in March 2025. A programme of engagement and consultation will be included
as informed by the national ‘Planning with People’ guidance.
4. KEY MATTERS RELEVANT TO RECOMMENDATION
4.1 To support the acceleration of the MIJB ambitions set out in the Strategic Plan
the Delivery plan is currently being refreshed to support next steps
4.2 The challenge of finance persists and there remains the need to address the
underlying deficit in core services. The development of a Programme
Management Office is in progress to support our financial savings.
5. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP)) and Moray Integration Joint Board Strategic Plan
“Partners in Care 2022 – 2032”
Working with our partners to support people so they can cope with, and
where possible, overcome the health and wellbeing challenges they
may face.
Ensuring that the right care is provided at the right place at the right time
when people are in need. Ensuring that our systems are as simple and
efficient as possible.
(b) Policy and Legal
The Chief Officer continues to operate within the appropriate level of
delegated authority, ensuring that the MIJB is sighted on key issues at
the earliest opportunity, and continues to influence and agree the
strategic direction.
(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications arising directly from this report. The
Chief Finance Officer continues to report regularly. There is an ongoing
requirement to find efficiencies and to demonstrate best value for money.
Page 53

Page 54

(d) Risk Implications and Mitigation
The risk of not redesigning services will mean that HSCM and the Moray
Portfolio cannot respond adequately to future demands. 
(e) Staffing Implications
Staff remain the organisation’s greatest asset, and engagement with all
sectors must continue to ensure full involvement, which will create the
best solutions to the challenges faced. HSCM staff are facing continued
pressures on a daily basis, and effort into ensuring staff well-being must
continue.
(f) Property
There are no issues arising directly from this report.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
Any proposed permanent change to service delivery will need to be
impact assessed to ensure that HSCM are not disadvantaging any
section of the community.
HSCM will continue to work closely with all partners  ensuring the
continued contribution to the health and well-being of the community and
support the recovery phase of the Covid-19 pandemic.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
Care closer to and at home, delivered by teams working on a locality
basis, will reduce HSCM’s reliance on centralised fixed assets and the
associated use of utilities.
(i) Directions
There are no directions arising from this report.
(j) Consultations
The Moray Portfolio Senior Management Team, the Legal Services
Manager and Caroline O’Connor, Committee Services Officer have been
consulted in the drafting of this report.
6. CONCLUSION
6.1 The Board are asked to acknowledge the significant efforts of staff,
across in-house providers, externally commissioned services, the
Independent and Third Sector, who are supporting the response to the
recovery, and the drive to create resilience and sustainability through
positive change.
6.2 The size of the financial challenge facing the MIJB, and also its two
funding partners, means that redesign and transformation is not an
option but a necessity. HSCM’s approach will be to prioritise quality,
safety and good outcomes in all service redesigns.
Author of Report: Judith Proctor, Interim Chief Officer, Moray Portfolio
Page 54

Page 55

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: MEDIUM TO LONG TERM FINANCIAL STRATEGY
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To ask Council to consider an updated financial strategy to facilitate
medium to long term financial planning.
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (A) 2 of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to long term financial plans.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that Council approves the updated Medium to
Long Term Financial Strategy at APPENDIX 1 to this report.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The Council’s Corporate Plan provides direction and focus for financial
planning through clarification of corporate priorities. Council, on 28 February
2024 (paragraph 5 of the Minute refers), approved the Corporate Plan 2024-
29 and the approach to delivery and performance management through
service and strategic plans. The Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy
forms part of a suite of documents, including the Corporate Plan, used to
facilitate planning, and was approved at the meeting of Council on 25
October 2023 (paragraph 9 of the Minute refers).
3.2 The objective of the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy (MLTFS) is to
provide clear guidance on how the Council can manage its financial
resources in the next 10 years to ensure that effective financial planning
contributes to the Council achieving its Corporate Priorities.
3.3 The Council faces significant challenges: to remove the reliance on reserves
(the structural or underlying deficit in funding), to contain budget pressures
from increased demand in services and the cost pressures arising from
inflation. The strategy collates all known factors that affect the financial
position and financial sustainability of the Council over the term, in one place,
and addresses their impact on tackling these challenges.
Item 8.
Page 55

Page 56

3.4 The Financial Strategy identifies the principal cost drivers for the Council’s
services and looks at the impact of these under a number of different
scenarios - essentially taking a range of options for these cost drivers from
an optimistic to a more pessimistic point on a scale, with a mid-point
position. This enables an assessment of the possible financial position of
the Council over the next ten years.  As noted in the Strategy, the
characteristics of a long-term financial strategy are quite different from a
short term strategy, with the focus being on factors which are uncertain and
a low degree of detail, looking at scenario planning to give a range of
expected outcomes.
3.5 The Strategy also sets out the main vehicles which the Council will use to
make strategic shifts in expenditure, in order to achieve financial
sustainability and this has been updated to reflect work which has been
ongoing over the last year and emerging work streams now planned for the
future.  The main vehicles will be asset management, service redesign and
planning for future demand.  As workstreams in these areas are developed
they will be reported back to Council for approval.
3.6 This Strategy will be reviewed annually as part of the Council’s financial
planning process.
3.7 The Strategy includes consideration of increases in Council Tax. The
assumption for the medium to long term is that increasing Council Tax will
remain a realistic option for Scottish local authorities, although one scenario
shown in the Appendix is for a Council Tax freeze.
4. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
The Financial Strategy is a companion document to the Corporate Plan.
(b) Policy and Legal
There are no direct policy and legal implications arising from this report.
(c) Financial implications
There are no direct financial implications arising directly from this
report. The Financial Strategy sets out the financial parameters within
which the Council’s financial planning activity is expected to take place
over the next ten years and looks at the main means of mitigating
potential budget gaps.
(d) Risk Implications
Although the Strategy looks at the long term, the further off the financial
projections are the greater risk of inaccuracy. 
(e) Staffing Implications
No staffing implications arise directly from this report.
(f) Property
No property implications arise directly from this report.
Page 56

Page 57

(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no equalities issues or impact on the socio-economic duty
arising from this report.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
There are no implications for Climate Change and Biodiversity arising
directly from this approach.  The Council’s Climate Change Strategy and
Road Map to Net Zero will have significant influence on the Council’s
planned future spend.
(i) Consultations
The Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy has been prepared in
consultation with CMT and SMT.
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 The Financial Strategy provides a detailed consideration of the
factors which will impact on financial planning over the medium to
long term and sets out the factors which the Council will have to
consider in realigning its finances to achieve financial sustainability.
5.2 Reflecting the Council’s current plans and the wider context in which
the Council makes these plans the Strategy indicates a continued
challenge to achieve and maintain financial stability.
Author of Report: Lorraine Paisey, Chief Financial Officer
Background Papers:
Ref: SPMAN-1293228629-1185
Page 57

Page 58

Page 58

Page 59

1
APPENDIX 1
Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy
2025/26 to 2034/35
1. Introduction
1.1 The objective of the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy (MLTFS) is to provide
clear guidance on how the Council can manage its financial resources in the next 5 to
10 years to ensure that effective financial planning contributes to the Council achieving
its Corporate Priorities.
1.2 The MLTFS forms part of a suite of documents used in the Council’s financial
planning:
 the three-year budget reported when the Council Tax for the year is set, and the
budget regularly updated in reports to Council
 the indicative 10-year Capital Plan, underpinned by the Council’s Capital Strategy
 the Council’s Reserves Policy
 the Council’s Charging Policy
 the Treasury Management Policy
 the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy (SMTFS)
 sitting above all these, the Council’s Corporate Plan
1.3 The Council faces significant challenges: to remove the reliance on reserves (the
structural or underlying deficit in funding), to contain budget pressures from increased
demand in services and the cost pressures arising from inflation.
1.4 Given the extent of financial challenges experienced by local authorities it is vital that
the Council develops an understanding of the wider financial environment within which
it functions. The MLTFS will help enable that by identifying and managing risk factors
and ensure that the Council shows resilience by being fully aware of the key financial
challenges and uncertainties that it faces. This will place them in a stronger position for
successful delivery of their Corporate priorities.
1.5 The key objectives of the MLTFS are:
 Summarise the Council’s financial position over the next 10 years for the period
2025/26 to 2034/35 based on a range of scenarios.
 Identify and explain the key variables that are influential in the financial planning
of the Council and quantify the potential impact of these together.
 Provide a framework which enables the Council to effectively allocate its financial
resources to achieve its objectives.
 Focus on the resources available to the Council to ensure they are directed to
support the Corporate Plan.
 Ensure that the Council is fully aware how current financial challenges and
uncertainties may impact on the financial position of the Council for the period of
the Strategy and how to be resilient in its decision making.
Item 8.
Page 59

Page 60

2
 Help achieve a sustainable and balanced budget without the need for reserves to
balance the budget.
 Highlight and maximise the importance of income generation in the period of the
MLTFS.
2. Key Financial Levers
2.1 Financial levers adopted in the SMTFS, the latest version of which was approved by
Council on 26 June 2024 (paragraph 11 of the Minute refers) are key to both the short
to medium and medium to long term financial strategies of the Council.  The
movement from each of these levers impacts on the others and the ability to get a
sustainable, balanced budget.
Council Tax Other Income
generation
Staff
establishment Asset base
2.2 The SMTFS sets out a strategy to remove the structural deficit embedded within the
Council’s revenue budget, setting out a strategy to achieve a balanced and sustainable
budget in 2025/26 and is underpinned by a Savings Delivery Plan, approved by
Council on 25 September 2024 (paragraph x of the Minute refers).
2.3 This MLTFS builds on that and extends the financial planning timeframe to 10 years,
looking at the key influences and cost drivers that are considered to have the most
bearing on the sustainability of the future budget. Characteristics of financial planning
horizons in the Short, Medium and Long term as described by CIPFA are set out in the
table below.
Short Term Medium Term Long Term
Nature Budget Financial Plan Financial Strategy
Timeframe Annual 2-5 years 3-10 years +
Focus Accountability Performance Transformation
Unpredictability Risk Risk/Uncertainty Uncertainty
Financial
Techniques
Estimating Forecasting Scenario Planning
Level of Detail High Medium Low
Page 60

Page 61

3
2.4 The MLTFS plays an important role in the financial planning process as it reinforces
the long-term sustainability of the Council by ensuring that the financial outlook
required to provide good quality services are sustainable within a changing economic
outlook over the next 10 years.
2.5 The strategy makes a number of key assumptions and, while it is recognised that
future projections covering a 10 year period will contain a degree of uncertainty, these
assumptions are clearly laid out below, and will be updated annually to reflect latest
developments. The approach for the assumptions is to assume a range of possible
outcomes with an optimistic (i.e. a positive for the Council budget), a pessimistic
(negative position for the Council) and a mid-range scenario. In this document it is
taken that the mid-range scenario will be the most likely outcome. With that, the mid-
range does assume a prudent position where applicable and these will be explained
throughout.
2.6 The strategy places a lot of importance on achieving strategic and significant cost-
cutting/savings proposals, in line with the Council’s priorities within the Corporate Plan.
The intended outcome of the financial strategy is a sustainable financial plan, with
planned revenue expenditure met by budgeted revenue income and use of earmarked
reserves for planned spending for specific outcomes.
2.7 The strategy covers the period 2025/26 to 2034/35 with 2024/25 as base year. The
main focus is on 2027 onwards as the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy
covers years 1 and 2 and is more detailed than this high-level strategy. It will:
 Highlight the key influences, risks and cost drivers for the Council’s service
delivery
 Outline the Council’s high-level position over the years 2025/26 to 2034/35
 Facilitate planning ahead to enable the impact of change to be managed more
proactively and effectively
 Plan for a sustainable revenue budget and capital investment programme
which will support the Council’s priorities and address the key issues for Moray
 Assist in increasing the people of Moray’s understanding of the Council’s
financial position and the challenges facing it over the next ten years.
2.8 This Strategy sets out the financial roadmap for the Council for the medium to long
term and gives background to the various financial pressures and drivers that will
impact on the wider economy, and the communities in Moray.  It will be reviewed
annually as part of the Council’s financial planning process, with updates of the short-
medium term position reported to Corporate Management Team and Corporate
Committee on a regular basis. The inclusion of information in the Strategy does not
imply approval. All financial estimates are subject to approval by Council as part of the
budget setting process.
2.9 The scope of this Financial Strategy is the Council‘s General Fund.  The Council’s
Housing Revenue Account (HRA) is ring-fenced, according to statutory requirements,
and consequently financial planning for the HRA is a separate exercise.
Page 61

Page 62

4
3. Influences and Risks
3.1 There are several factors influencing the financial sustainability of the Council over the
short, medium and long term as shown below. The MLTFS considers a number of
macro-economic issues, some of which are outwith the Council’s control and others
that are internal and can be influenced by the Council’s decision making. These are
summarised in the table below.
External Climate Internal
 Economic factors
 Rate of Inflation
 Interest rate
fluctuations
 Level of grant funding
from the Scottish
Government
 Pay agreements
 Demographics
 Taxation changes
impacting on the
Council
 Climate change –
Council’s policy and
legislative requirements
 Flooding
 Storm damage
 Winter maintenance
 Corporate priorities
 Transformation of
services
 Asset Management of
the Council’s schools
and other properties
 Other service costs
efficiencies and
reduction
 Participatory Budgeting,
commitment to giving
communities the
influence on decisions
for 1% of the Council’s
budget
 The Council’s Treasury
Management function
and financing of the
capital programme
 Council Tax levels
3.2 These are key variables that influence the financial planning of the Council and, while
not an exhaustive list, these will be measured using a scenario basis that can be
routinely updated to keep assumptions in line with the economic outlook.  In doing so
this ensures that the Council continues to meet its statutory obligations in line with its
corporate policies.  The key variables to be used are:
 Inflation, including pay awards
 Anticipated Scottish Government funding
 Council Tax levels
 Interest rates and loans charges
 Demand on services
 Savings from Transformational change
 Other efficiencies and cost reduction
Page 62

Page 63

5
3.3 The following variables have been considered in preparing the 10-year plan:
 Funding from the Scottish Government
 Council Tax levels
 Inflation provision for pay awards and contracts
 Loans charges and the cost of borrowing to fund investment in the Capital Plan
 Increased demand for services e.g. Health and Social Care services
 Charging for services to maximise income generation
 Investment in modernisation of the Councilthrough
Transformation/Council of the Future, includingAsset Management
andService redesign/review of processes
4. Cost Drivers and Variables
4.1 The Council’s budget of £368 million gross revenue expenditure for 2024/25 includes
£193 million for employee costs. Pay awards and pension costs are key cost drivers
for the Council. Pay awards for 2024/25 have been agreed for teaching staff and
recent negotiations for non-teaching staff at higher than the Council has budgeted for
this year, any further increases will have a substantial effect on current and future
years financial planning.
4.2 A significant proportion of the Council’s services are outsourced, with 18% of the
Council’s expenditure being on services delivered by third parties. The procurement
process therefore has a strong influence on the costs borne by the Council and
significant savings have been made by procurement on the purchase of supplies and
services as well as on out-sourced services.
4.3 The split of the Council budget is shown below.
Employee Costs ,
52%
Property Costs ,
6%
Supplies and Services,
10%
Transport & Plant Costs,
5%
Support Services,
0%
Third Party Payments,
18%
Transfer Payments,
7%
Financing Costs,
2%
2024/25 Budget
Page 63

Page 64

6
Inflation
4.4 Cost pressures arise from the Council’s contractual obligations which are uplifted for
inflation.  Such inflationary uplifts are difficult to forecast as a result of uncertainties in
the economy and how effective attempts by the Bank of England at reducing inflation
will be, especially within the projected timescales.  Inflation affects a small number of
significant contracts – in particular the PPP schools contract – and also covers
potential increases in utilities; energy prices have been one of the main forces in
driving inflation levels in recent years.  The cost of utilities and fuel has been volatile
over the past couple of years, with additional budget pressures identified in the
revenue budget for these areas.
4.5 The outlook for inflation remains a key source of uncertainty yet has a crucial influence
in long term financial planning, particularly around pay and core contract inflations
increases that are often linked to, or kept as closely aligned as possible, to the inflation
rate.
4.6 Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation peaked in the fourth quarter of 2022 at its highest
rate in around 40 years. Inflation has been falling recently at a faster rate than was
previously forecast. The path of inflation is to return to the Treasury’s 2% target.
4.7 The Scottish Fiscal Commissions (SFC) are a non-Ministerial Office who produce
Scotland’s official, independent economic and fiscal forecasts to accompany the
Scottish Government’s Budget cycle, and who are accountable to the Scottish
Parliament for their functions (set out in the Scottish Fiscal Commission Act 2016),
reporting twice a year.  The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), an official
independent fiscal watchdog that produces detailed forecasts for the economy and
public finances, also provide UK Government with forecast data. The OBRs most
recent forecast in August 2024 indicates a decline in the rate of inflation before
levelling off to the 2% target thereafter for the remainder of the ten-year outlook, as the
diagram below shows. CPI inflation remained just above the 2% target in August, with
the Bank of England expecting this to increase to around 2.5% in the second half of
this year as lower energy prices drive most of the downward revision and the impact of
other domestic inflationary pressures come to light.
4.8 The OBRs most recent forecast in October 2024 make an initial assessment of the
economic and fiscal effects of the new UK Government’s Budget, set out in October
2024. With CPI inflation having fallen back to around 2% mid 2024, the impact of
Budget policies, including the increase in employers National Insurance Contributions
(NICs) taking effect from April 2025 onwards, is expected to push up CPI by around 
0.5% at its peak, meaning it is now projected to rise to 2.6% in 2025 and then
gradually fall back to the target bank of England rate of 2% as the effects of the Budget
measures fade out. Compared to the March 2024 forecast shown in paragraph 4.8,
inflation is now expected to be 1.1% higher in 2025 and 0.6% higher in 2026.
Page 64

Page 65

7
Source: ONS, OBR - Economic and Fiscal Outlook October 2024
Forecasts for Inflation (CPI, year on year)
4.9 The latest published forecast CPI inflation rates from the OBR from March 2024 are:
2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35
Inflation (Consumer Price Index (CPI)) 1.55% 1.60% 1.67% 1.97% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00% 2.00%
Source: Office for Budget Responsibility "Long-term economic determinants - March 2024 Economic and fiscal outlook"
4.10 W hen the 2024/25 revenue budget was approved, indicative figures for 2025/26 and
2026/27 were based on the forecast assumptions at that time that inflation, having
peaked at over 11% in October 2022, would rapidly return to the 2% target. A budget
provision of £4.7m was included in the 2024/25 budget for expected inflationary
increases, including pay awards.
Demographics
4.11 Population changes vary across Scotland, and between council areas from one year to
the next. The National Records of Scotland most recent population estimates report is
the Mid-2023 Population Estimates, Scotland
4.12 The population of Scotland has been increasing every year for the last 20 years and is
projected to continue rising until around mid-2033 before beginning a gradual decline
over the following two decades.  Population change is driven by two main factors:
natural change (number of births minus the number of deaths) and net migration (the
number of people moving into an area minus the number of people leaving). 
Scotland’s population is ageing. An estimated 20.3% of the population were aged 65
and over, an increase from 16.1% in 2003. An estimated 16.3% were aged 0 to 15
years, a decrease from 18.7% in 2003.
Page 65

Page 66

8
4.13 In Moray, the population grew by 6.6% from 2003 to 2023, with an increase of 0.4% in
the year to June 2023, which can be further analysed as -0.5% natural change, +0.8%
net migration and 0.1% due to other changes. The population is currently expected to
decrease by 0.1% in the 10-year period between 2018 and 2028.  Moray’s population
is ageing, with life expectancy and healthy life expectancy for both men and women
above the Scottish average.  The age structure of the population in Moray in mid-2023
(with the mid-2021 figures in brackets for comparison) was: 0-15 years 16% (mid-2021
17%), 16-64 years 60% (mid-2021 61%) and 65 years and over 23% (mid-2021 22%).
This trend indicates a reducing number of children with an even greater level of ageing
population settling in Moray.  Between 2018 and 2028 the age group 90 years and
over is projected to see a +50.9% increase.  The number of households in Moray has
increased by 22.4% since 2001, at a more rapid change than the Scotland level for the
same period (+15.5%).  The level is projected to increase even further by 3.4% up to
2034.  (Source National Records of Scotland, Household Estimates 2023). Likewise,
the number of dwellings had steadily increased in the period from 2001 to 2023.  In
Moray, Council Tax band A has the highest proportion (25.3%), followed by Council
tax band B (22.5%), with Council Tax band H the least (0.2%).
4.14 Primary and secondary school roll projections forecast a decrease in total over the
next three years. This will impact on demand for services and also on grant support
from Scottish Government under the present method of allocating general revenue
grant. School pupil data is collected through the annual school pupil census.
4.15 A significant element of Scottish Government grant funding is allocated through Grant
Aided Expenditure (GAE).  GAE uses statistical measures to apportion funding across
local authorities.  Over 30% of GAE is linked to the number of school pupils in primary
and secondary education.  A further 15% is linked to population, either of a certain age
group, working age population or the total population.  The impact of demographic
changes; migration, population growth may lead to funding changes for specific
services particularly Education and will fall within the timescale of this strategy.  The 
updated population projections  will be reviewed to estimate the likely impact on
income for the Council and to assist in financial planning for services likely to be
impacted by changing population numbers.
5. Financial Outlook – Key factors and assumptions
Funding from the Scottish Government
5.1 Scottish Government funding through General Revenue Grant (GRG) and the
allocation of Non Domestic Rates (NDR) income accounts for around 77% of the
Council’s funding, with the balance to be funded from Council Tax income and the
utilisation of Council reserves. Single year settlements from the Scottish Government
mean the Council must make assumptions in the revenue plan from years 2-10, and
plan on that basis. For financial year 2024/25 a one year settlement was provided in
December 2023.
5.2 The chart below shows the breakdown of funding sources budgeted for the Council in
2024/25.
Page 66

Page 67

9
77%
18%
5%
Scottish Government Funding Council Tax Use of Reserves
Sources of Council funding 2024/25
5.3 The block grant from UK Treasury to the Scottish Government is based on the Barnett
Formula and any changes in UK Government funding in addition to Scottish
Government policies and economic forecasts may impact on the level of Council
funding.  Notably UK Government have departed from Barnett to separately negotiate
funding to cover the impact of the recently announced amendments to employers
national insurance contributions on the public sector.  The likely result of this is at
present unknown.
5.4 The current assumption in the MLTFS is that there will be a flat cash settlement each
year in the core grant from the Scottish Government. Each 1% movement from this flat
cash position accounts for around £2m of movement in funding.  This is a particularly
important assumption in financial planning.
5.5 In June 2023 the Verity House Agreement was signed between the Scottish
Government and Local Government which was expected to support the Scottish
Government’s proposed new deal for Local Government.  A commitment was made to
agree a new Fiscal Framework governing how funding is allocated to local authorities,
reducing ring fencing and giving them greater flexibility over their budgets to meet local
needs, by giving the freedom to be resourceful and removing the administration that
ring-fenced funding and specific grants often come with. In financial year 2024/25, £9m
of funding previously ring-fenced by Scottish Government has been baselined as part
of that commitment. A multi-year funding settlement from Scottish Government
including clarification on the remaining ring-fenced funding remains the aim for local
government. There has also been a commitment from the Scottish Government to
produce multi-year settlements which would allow more accurate forecasting to take
place at all levels of government.
5.6 The Scottish Government’s Medium Term Financial Strategy published in May 2023
stated that “In order to prioritise the programmes that will have the greatest impact on
delivery of our three missions, such as early learning and childcare, we will need to
deprioritise programmes that make a less meaningful contribution to our central
missions.”  This suggests that local government (except for these priority areas) will be
viewed as lower priority and subject to further reductions in funding support. It is
expected that the Scottish Government will provide clarity on details of its financial
Page 67

Page 68

10
strategy following the UK Budget in late October 2024, prior to the Local Government
Finance Settlement in December 2024.
5.7 Until the settlement is announced, non-protected budgets are expected to face
reduced settlements in the medium to long term.  The optimistic scenario assumes a
2% increase from 2025/26, mid-range assumes 1% increase for one year then flat
cash for the remainder of the plan.  The pessimistic scenario assumes a 1% reduction
year on year.  The optimistic scenario is that the local government settlement covers
target inflation but no growth.  The pessimistic scenario assumes no inflation uplift and
a reduction in nominal terms.  These ranges are based on ranges used by various
economic commentators and fall within the range of options being considered by other
Scottish local authorities for planning purposes.  This translates to the cash
movements detailed below.
 Increase 2% - £4.34m
 No increase
 Decrease 1% (£2.17m)
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption +2% Flat cash -1%
Year 1 £4.340m - (£2.170m)
Year 2 £4.427m - (£2.148m)
Year 3 £4.516m - (£2.127m)
Years 4-10 £34.242m - (£14.305m)
Council Tax Income
5.8 Council Tax income accounts for 18% of the Council’s revenue and is the main fiscal
lever that local authorities have.  In setting Council Tax, estimated income is based on
a combination of Band D equivalent numbers (the Council Tax base), householder
base (single occupancy and other discounts) and the expected rate of collection.
5.9 The Council has discretion to increase tax levels however this has been capped in
recent years through conditions set out by the Scottish Government in the annual local
government settlement.  The Council’s Band D equivalent was £1,135 for 10 years
between 2007/08 and 2016/17 when the Scottish Government’s Council Tax freeze
ended. The freeze was reinstated in 2021/22 during the Covid-19 pandemic and again
in 2024/25 when its Band D equivalent is £1,431.
5.10 The rate of Council Tax must provide the Council with a degree of certainty around
current and future funding levels.  The system must therefore be stable and buoyant to
provide this certainty and must not expose the Council to an unmanageable degree of
financial risk by reduced collection rates.  The number of chargeable dwellings
between bands increase modestly year on year, reflecting new dwellings and
developments in the area as well as properties removed.
5.11 There are general assumptions made when budgeting for Council Tax revenue raised:
collection rates and the buoyancy of the tax base.  The scenarios adopted in the long-
term planning are twofold: increases in Council tax and an assumption for an element
of growth in the tax base.
Page 68

Page 69

11
5.12 For each 1% increase in Council Tax rates, at current 2024/25 rates, the Council could
raise approximately £500,000 in additional revenue.  For scenario planning the
following key assumptions have been made in relation to Council Tax increases: all
scenarios include a 1% increase in the number of chargeable dwellings each year, and
maintain a stable collection rate of 98.5% (96.5% in year + 2% prior year recoveries)
as these are not variables the Council has control over, although it is appreciated that
as the % rate increases so does the risk of failure to pay resulting in a decrease in
collection rate.
5.13 Council at its meeting on 12 December 2023 (paragraph 7 of the Minute refers) agreed
as part of  the Short to Medium Term Financial Plan update,  that an increase on
Council tax for 2025/25 and 2026/27 above the rate of inflation would be required to
catch up on lost revenue from the Council tax freeze, with an increase of 7% included
as the minimum intended increase for 2025/26 and a further 6.2% increase in 2026/27.
At the same meeting Council approved the revised Charging for Services Policy and
agreed the default increase for fees and charges for Council Services for the period
2024/25 to 2026/27. The revised Charging Policy is a default increase of CPI including
owner occupiers housing costs (CPIH) plus 1% as measured for October of the year
before the increase takes effect. These two positions constitute the Council’s Income
Strategy for the short to medium term.
5.14 The scenarios for Council tax receipts are:
 the pessimistic scenario – from the baseline of the Council’s Income Strategy
which seeks to preserve the real value of income to the Council – is based on a
3% increase in rates, which long term would be just above an inflationary
increase
 The mid-point scenario is based on the Council’s revised Charging Policy for a
default increase of CPI including owner occupiers housing costs (CPIH) plus
1% as measured for October of the year before the increase takes effect. This
includes a factor to recoup income foregone from the 2024/25 freeze; 7% in
2025/26 and 6.2% in 2026/27.
 the optimistic scenario from a funding perspective assumes a 5% increase.
 A Council Tax freeze is also shown and the income projected is solely from the
growth in the tax base of 1%. For this to be a  practical option, a premise of
Government Grant to match the projected shortfall in Council Tax receipts
would be required.
5.15 In summary, additional revenue income generated from Council tax receipts year on
year are as follows:
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic Council tax
freeze
Assumption 5% CPIH+1% 3%
Year 1 £3.075m £4.102m £2.048m £0.508m
Year 2 £3.261m £3.989m £2.131m £0.513m
Year 3 £3.458m £2.535m £2.217m £0.518m
Years 4-10 £30.833m £19.579m £18.231m £3.778m
Page 69

Page 70

12
5.16 Other revenue-raising methods that may give rise to additional income depending on
the development of Council policy are:
 Council Tax on second homes and empty properties – currently charged at
legal maximum
 NDR Empty Property Relief
 Local Visitor Levy
Following changes in legislation the Council has adopted a premium on second homes
and a levy on empty homes and has taken a policy position on NDR empty property
relief.  No further changes are assumed in the Medium to Long Term Financial
Strategy and given the uncertainties about any future proposals for Council Tax
nationally, no additional income is assumed at this stage. It would not be prudent to
import this into longer term calculations without a degree of certainty.
The Council will investigate the implications of raising funds through a Local Visitor
Levy (tourist tax). MSPs have given approval for legislation giving local authorities a
new discretionary power to introduce a levy on stays in overnight accommodation in
their area, at a rate to be set by them. Revenue income raised from a visitor levy will
be required to be reinvested within the visitor economy such as facilities or services
substantially for or used by visitors. The intention is that funds raised are in addition to
the local government settlement. An 18-month implementation period will apply before
and levy scheme can be introduced to enable councils and businesses adequate time
to put in place the systems required to administer and collect a levy therefore it is
estimated the earliest date for putting into practice the levy is 2026, with an update
report to Council due in early 2025.
Pay
5.17 Pay accounts for over 72% of budgeted net expenditure across the Council.  The
Council’s financial planning requires to forecast future pay settlements as 1% change
can result in a significant cost to the Council if not funded. Pay agreements for Council
staff, including teachers, are negotiated at a national level.  The 2023/24 budget
process saw 3% included for the pay award however, as circumstances in the
economy quickly changed with inflation rapidly increasing, and the cost of living crisis,
pay awards actually averaged over 6% in the year, after agreements were reached for
both the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) and Scottish Joint
Councils (SJC) pay deals. A funding package from the Scottish Government for the
local government pay settlement has been agreed with Councils notified of allocations
in October. The Council must satisfy itself that the pay bill and pay awards for the
workforce are affordable and sustainable and remain within existing budget
allocations.
5.18 In response to high inflation, average pay growth accelerated in 2022/23 and 2023/24
and continues to remain above current inflation, with uncertainty surrounding future
years. The Council’s financial planning requires to take a sensible approach to future
pay settlements as it is such a significant portion of the budget that even a modest
change in assumption can affect the decisions made regarding the other financial
levers.
Page 70

Page 71

13
5.19 The Scottish Government’s 2024/25 Public Sector Pay Policy was published in May
2024, at a time when the pay awards for 2024/25 for much of the Scottish Public
Sector were still in negotiation. Key features of the 2024/25 policy are:
 A multi-year framework from 2024-25 to 2026-27 which would offer pay metrics
above forecasted levels of inflation (the Scottish Government use average
Bank of England and Office of Budget Responsibility as sources for inflation);
 Pay metrics must balance flexibility with fairness and affordability;
 Agreeing a multi-year deal between Scottish Government, employers and
Trade Unions
Source: Scottish Government Public Sector Pay Policy 2024-25
5.20 For planning purposes, alternative scenarios are presented in the tables below. The
multi-year framework set out in the Public Sector Pay Policy offers a deal above
forecasted levels of inflation; 3% in the three years from, and including, 2024/25. The
2024/25 pay settlement has been agreed at a minimum rate of 3.6% for non-teaching
staff and 4.27% for teachers. However. at 1% higher than the target rate of inflation,
3% has been maintained as the pay metric and is the mid-point scenario for future pay
deals. The Scottish Government previously set a pay floor of 2%, therefore this is the
optimistic scenario in the model. The pessimistic scenario, assuming a pay award to
be fully funded by the Council, is 4%. All scenarios shown below are the budget
pressures that would be borne by the Council; funding or flexibilities offered by the
Scottish Government, and the impact on the rest of the Council’s budget, are not
included.
5.21 In summary, budget cost pressures arising from workforce pay increases are as
follows:
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption 2% 3% 4% CPI forecast
Year 1 £4.00m £6.01m £10.02m £5.2m
Year 2 £4.01m £6.19m £10.52m £4.67m
Year 3 £4.17m £6.38m £11.05m £4.21m
Years 4-10 £31.62m £50.33m £94.44m £31.89m
Contract Inflation
5.22 The provision for inflation needs continual monitoring in terms of the short-medium and
medium-long term financial planning of the Council as, although inflation is continuing
to show signs of stabilising at the target rate, lessons have been learned from the last
few years just how exposed the Council is to economic factors such as how the conflict
in Ukraine has impacted significantly on inflationary pressures, particularly energy
prices, and the corresponding rise in interest rates having an impact on borrowing
costs. Uncertainty remains high, particularly for the economy with expectations of how
inflation and interest rates will go forward together and in order to be more prudent the
MLTFS errs on the side of caution in such a volatile situation.
5.23 Key contracts receive an uplift in line with inflation for the prior 12-month period. For
scenario planning, the mid-range scenario will apply a more cautious rate of the
Page 71

Page 72

14
forecast inflation rate in the table +2% before stabilising at 2% in 2028/29 as forecasts
suggest, thus removing the drop to 0% in assumptions, which is still a positive outlook
given the volatility that national and global events can have inflation and interest rates.
The optimistic scenario will be 1% less (until assuming the 2% target from 2028/29)
and the pessimistic at 1% higher than mid-range.
5.24 The areas of cost pressures for inflation provisions, which are looked at individually
below, are:
 Contracts – service contracts
 Contracts – PPP, Energy
 Pay
5.25 In summary, cost pressures arising with service contract inflation (excluding pay
awards, energy and PPP contract uplifts which are shown separately) are as follows:
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption Mid-range -1% CPI forecast +2% Mid-range +1%
Year 1 £0.369m £0.476m £0.585m
Year 2 £0.347m £0.462m £0.582m
Year 3 £0.318m £0.433m £0.552m
Years 4-10 £1.681m £1.844m £2.765m
Energy Contracts
5.26 Energy costs include oil, gas, metered electricity, water and street lighting and
unmetered electricity.  The nature of these costs is such that inflation is not the only
influencing factor; markets are volatile and affected by the national and global
economy.  As such, to predict with any level of accuracy the long-term position on
energy costs is impossible and current forecasts available to the Energy Team only go
to 2026/27.  Updated prices and consumption along with forecast are reported each
year in the annual Energy Report.  The scenarios have been calculated using 2023/24
full year consumption as a basis.  However, energy efficiency measures as part of the
Council’s Road Map to Net Zero may go some way to reduce energy consumption.
5.27 Scenarios for energy costs have been calculated on the same basis as contract
inflation above but with a wider range given the volatility of the energy market: the mid-
range adopts forecast CPI +2% until levelling at 2% in 2028/29, the optimistic scenario
will be 4% less and the pessimistic at 4% higher than mid-range.
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption Mid-range -4% CPI forecast +2% Mid-range +4%
Year 1 (£0.031m) £0.245m £0.522m
Year 2 (£0.041m) £0.329m £0.639m
Year 3 (£0.019m) £0.320m £0.668m
Years 4-10 (£0.00m) £1.337m £3.205m
PPP/PFI Contract
Page 72

Page 73

15
5.28 The Council’s schools PPP/PFI contracts are significant contracts that attract an
annual inflationary increase for the payments. The level of uplift applicable to the
contract is the value of the Retail Price Index (RPI) for the month of February
immediately preceding the indexation review date (1 April) compared to the value of
RPI at the base date. As with the above scenarios for service contract and energy
costs, the PPP assumptions will follow the same reasoning: the mid-range scenario
will apply the forecast RPI rate +2% before stabilising at 2% in 2029/30 (two years
behind CPI), the optimistic scenario will be 1% less (until assuming the 2% target from
2029/30) and the pessimistic at 1% higher than mid-range.
5.29 In summary, budget pressures associated with the PPP contact are as follows:
RPI Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption Mid-range -1% RPI forecast +2% Mid-range +1%
Year 1 £0.287m £0.373m £0.458m
Year 2 £0.283m £0.375m £0.469m
Year 3 £0.331m £0.431m £0.534m
Years 4-10 £1.176m £1.987m £2.891m
The Cost of Capital Borrowing
5.30 The Council’s revenue budget is interconnected to the financing of its capital
expenditure and to the treasury management function that lies beneath the day-to-day
transactions of the Council’s service provision. When the Capital Programme is
approved, the impact of debt and borrowing requirements that will arise from it are
factored into the revenue budget.  The affordability of the recurring interest and
principal debt repayments are a significant part of the Council budget and changes to
interest rates can create unexpected budget pressures. When there is a pressure on
the revenue budget, this in turn can put a strain on decision making within the capital
programme.
5.31 It is a statutory requirement under Section 93 of the Local Government Finance Act
1992 for the Council to produce a balanced budget.  The Act specifies that a local
authority must calculate its budget requirement for each financial year to include the
revenue costs incurred from capital financing decisions. The key objectives are to
ensure the capital investment plans of the Council are affordable, prudent and
sustainable.
5.32 Given the volatility of interest rates recently, the Council is carefully monitoring the
impact of current commitments and existing plans.  A review of the Council’s capital
plan has commenced and a mechanism for capping capital expenditure has been
agreed.  Increased construction costs in recent years are also a pressure for the
capital plan and that translates into increased borrowing costs also. The Treasury
Management Team, in partnership with the Council’s treasury advisors Arlingclose, will
continue to monitor closely the situation around interest rates and take any necessary
action on a day-to-day basis to avoid risk to the Council’s finances. In the longer term
the Council’s approved Performance Indicator for the costs of borrowing – cost of
borrowing as a percentage of the Council’s net revenue budget – will continue to be
used as a litmus test for affordability.
Page 73

Page 74

16
5.33 The Council has a revenue budget for debt charges and the increases in capital
expenditure between 2024/25 and 2033/34 means that the revenue debt budget needs
to be reviewed and increased.  Current assumptions in respect of the debt charges are
shown below along with optimistic and pessimistic scenarios based on the indicative
10-year Capital Plan approved at Council on 24 January 2024 (paragraph 11 of the
minute refers).  Although this indicative plan is used as the baseline the Council
recognises that it becomes unaffordable even with heavy capping of expenditure
during the second half of the period. The plan is currently under review.  Several
strands of the Transformation Strategy – Smarter Working, Depot and Stores review,
Leisure review, Libraries review – will feed into this review, but this most significant
aspect with be the Learning Estate review as it is the requirements of the Learning
Estate which is creating the severe pressure in the latter years of the Plan which
render it unaffordable.
 Optimistic spend is 60% expenditure of the approved plan and assumes
underspends rather than carry forward to the following year. Mid case is 75%
and pessimistic is 90% expenditure of the approved plan.
 Interest rates for the scenarios use the 20-year UK Gilt forecast from the Office
for Budget Responsibility as at May 2024. Gilt rates are different to the base
rate and is tracked by the Public Works Loans Board (PWLB) so are more
reflective of the borrowing rates the Council would get. The immediate reaction
to the UK Government’s October Budget saw the number of Gilt yields rise
materially the day after, thus causing gilt prices to fall. Forecasts will be closely
monitored for any marked change in the assumptions used below. The
optimistic scenario assumes the actual UK Gilt forecast, mid-range is the gilt
forecast +0.5% each year, and the pessimistic is the gilt forecast +1.0%. it is
difficult to predict what will happen to interest rates, particularly in the long
term, as it depends on whether inflation remains consistent near to the inflation
target (see paragraphs 4.6-4.7 above).
5.34 Prudential borrowing levels are based on the capital expenditure of each scenario less
the funding from capital grant and receipts. The loans charges are based on these
borrowing requirements.
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption 60% spend on
Capital Plan
UK Gilt forecast
75% spend on
Capital Plan
UK Gilt forecast +
0.5%
90% spend on
Capital Plan
UK Gilt forecast
+1%
Year 1 Increase in Loans
Charges £2.106m £2.838m £3.652m
Year 2 Increase in Loans
Charges £1.428m £1.921m £2.469m
Year 3 Increase in Loans
Charges £0.903m £1.213m £1.557m
Year 4-10 Increase in
Loans Charges £5.419m £7.264m £9.305m
5.35 The Capital Plan is being reviewed and a cap on capital expenditure will be applied
from the financial year 2025/26, which is intended to be reported to Council in Q4
2024/25. The Council has imposed a 10% limit of budgeted income to be spent on
borrowing costs which is similar to many other local authorities.
Page 74

Page 75

17
Charging for Services
5.36 The income generated by charging for services is around £8 million, of which £1
million is retained by the MIJB. Based on that budget, income might be expected to
increase by £70,000 for every 1% increase in charges, although this needs to be
caveated as increasing prices only if the demand for the service is buoyant; it is
accepted that there will be an element of decline in the demand for services if the
charges are increased too steeply.
5.37 Under the Council’s Charging for Services Policy, an annual revision of charges is
required and charges within the control of the council are generally inflated annually. 
This is reinforced by the Income Strategy for 2024/25 to 2026/27.  When setting
Charges services should consider the scope for full cost recovery, with benchmarking
against other local authorities a good test of reasonableness.
5.38 Council approved the revised Charging for Services Policy at a special meeting on 12
December 2023 (paragraph 7 of the minute refers) and agreed the default inflation
increase for fees and charges for Council Services for the period 2024/25 to 2026/27.
The revised Charging Policy is a default increase of CPI including owner occupiers
housing costs (CPIH) plus 1% as measured for October of the year before the
increase takes effect.
5.39 Not all charges are within the Council’s control, some are levied by statute and are
excluded from the Policy and the scenarios below.
5.40 Assumptions used in the scenarios below are:
 Optimistic – 5 % (2 ½ times forecast inflation – a significant income boost)
 Mid-range – CPIH+1% - per current Income Strategy
 Pessimistic – 2% - target inflation only – minimum position per the Charging for
Services Policy
Optimistic Mid-range Pessimistic
Assumption 5% CPIH +1% 2%
Year 1 £0.368m £0.258m £0.143m
Year 2 £0.386m £0.243m £0.146m
Year 3 £0.405m £0.230m £0.149m
Year 4-10 £3.464m £1.818m £1.127m
Additional Financial Risks
5.41 There are several additional financial risks that cannot currently be quantified or
classed as budget pressures, therefore they are categorised as risks that may or may
not materialise during the period of time which the strategy covers.  If and when this
happens, officers will update the financial assumptions in the strategy and notify
members. At this present time, these financial risks include:
 Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB). The provision of health and social care
and children’s social work is delivered by NHS Grampian and the Moray
Page 75

Page 76

18
Council under the direction of the Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB).  The
Council has no direct control over the strategic delivery of these services and is
currently liable for 47% of any overspend by MIJB.  Based on current levels of
expenditure and future predicted demographic changes, MIJB is currently
projecting an overspend, with particular pressure on adult health and social
care services due to projected increases in the population of older people.  This
presents a significant risk for the Council in terms of budget management. They
do have an approved savings plan in place and the Council has made
budgetary provision for an element of overspend.
 There is a growing demand for Additional Support within Early Years and
school settings.  The Council has allocated additional funding in 2023/24.
 Other demand-led expenditure will vary according to the need for a particular
service and can depend on social and economic factors at set points in time. 
For example, homelessness and the need for temporary accommodation must
be managed within the service budget allocated yet are subject to
unpredictable demand when linked to social and economic factors. Also, the
Council budgets for a mild winter in terms of winter maintenance but the actual
cost will be higher if weather conditions are poorer.
5.42 This medium to long term strategy includes known service specific cost pressures,
either existing or anticipated to be new burdens. Other risks in the environment in
which the Council operates are noted as above and any other emerging risks will be
kept under review as part of the medium to long term financial planning process. 
Identification of these risks, monitoring and where possible mitigating them form part of
the unquantifiable input into the financial planning process.
6. Other Influencing Factors
Transformation Strategy
6.1 Within the Corporate Plan, the Council recognises transformation and innovation as a
key priority.
6.2 The Council approved a Transformation Strategy “to ensure continued focus on
delivering transformational projects to support the Council’s financial sustainability”
(meeting of the Moray Council on 24 April 2024, paragraph xx of the minute refers).
The emphasis is on achieving cash savings in support of closing the Council’s budget
gap. The transition from its predecessor, the Improvement and Modernisation
Programme (IMP), the Strategy takes forward projects already in progress in addition
to new projects and others being investigated to determine their inclusion in the
strategy.
6.3 The Council agreed the first iteration of the new Transformation Strategy which
focuses on maintaining progress on currently identified projects and identifying scope
for further development and engagement to proceed. The revised programme
proposes:
(i) New opportunities for discovery work have been identified from horizon
scanning;
(ii)Innovation areas for research and discovery to assess future potential;
Page 76

Page 77

19
(iii)Additional projects for initiation have been added to the IMP;
(iv)Expansion or acceleration projects have been identified from current
transformation work;
(v)Current projects that provide financial savings
6.4 The new Transformation Strategy is anticipated to develop over a number of stages as
progress is made on current projects and seeing new concepts through from the idea
to delivery stage. The end result will be continued sustainability that stretches into the
duration of the medium to long term financial plan.
6.5 An update on the Transformation Strategy was reported to Corporate Committee on 5
November 2024 with latest progress on specific projects:
(i) Leisure review
(ii)Libraries review
(iii)ASN review
(iv)Learning estate
(v)Out of Hours services
(vi)Smarter working
(vii) Depot review
6.6 A number of projects are reaching a stage where they will be ready to report early in
2025 which is in line with the planned 12 month period set out in the Strategy. As
these develop all projects bar the ASN review, which is meeting increased demand
within the core budget whilst ensuring the service is financially stable in the future, are
projected to produce  revenue savings which will contribute to the financial
sustainability of the Council. The Learning estate and Depot review projects will also
result in avoided capital spend.
Sustainable Development
6.7 Sustainable Development is a fundamental part of Best Value that should be reflected
in a local authority’s vision and strategic priorities. The Council’s Best Value Action
Plan was approved at a meeting of Council on 11 June 2024 (paragraph 3 of the
minute refers) and in section 6.1 of that Action Plan the Council undertook to develop a
Sustainable Development Statement that draws together the range of work the Council
has in place to deliver sustainability, identifying any gaps that require consideration
and action. The Council’s Sustainable Development Statement was reported and
approved at a meeting of Corporate Committee on 5 November 2024 (paragraph 16 of
the minute refers). It sets out the way in which Sustainable Development within the
Council is integrated into its policies, plans and procedures.
6.8 In line with Best value guidance, the Statement draws out the way in with sustainable
development is embedded in the Corporate Plan 2024-2029 and wider corporate
policies and strategies. In particular the Statement:
 Outlines the role of the Corporate vision and values in creating a culture
focussed on sustainable development, with clea guiding principals to support
this
 Exemplifies how sustainable development is integrated into corporate priorities,
key strategies, plans and governance systems
Page 77

Page 78

20
 Sets out how the impact of sustainable development in relation to key
economic, social and environmental issues will be measured, evaluated,
reported and scrutinised.
6.9 S One of the main objectives of the medium to long term planning of the Council is to
focus on the resources available and ensure they are directed to support the
Corporate Plan.  Sustainable Development  is the wider context in which the Council
seeks to ensure the future financial sustainability of the council. A clear and robust
financial strategy is vital to identify the likely level of resources available each year to
the council, as well as the anticipated level of demand for, and cost of, providing
services.
6.10 Future progress in regard to the Statement will be reported through Best Value
quarterly updates, performance reporting to service committees from Quarter 4 and
through annual reports such as the Annual Corporate Plan report and Public
Performance Report.
Asset Management
6.11 Various strands of work are encompassed under this theme. The Smarter Working
project is already in Phase 2 of delivery.  The Depot review Outline Business Case is
approved and the Full Business Case is being developed and will be reported by the
end of the financial year.  At this stage potential revenue savings of £200,000 to
£400,000 have been provisionally estimated.  The strategic review of the Learning
Estate has commenced and again has potential to result in reduced running costs.
With further investment there is scope to accelerate the pace of this review. Part of the
Route Map to Net Zero involves a reduction is the Council’s energy use. Preliminary
estimates are for financial savings of £100,000 to £200,000 resulting from this. As can
be seen from the table at 8.1 a significant element of the budget gap is generated from
planned capital spend.  In common with other local authorities the Council needs to
reduce its planned capital spend. This needs to be followed up by service reviews to
determine the pattern of service delivery from a reduced asset base. A combination of
reduced capital spend and a reduced asset base has the potential to reduce costs by
the order of £1,000,000.
Place Based Approach
6.12 In considering what the Council’s future asset base might look like, consideration must
be given to the optimal basis on which to meet place based needs and other sources
of service support including through partner organisations and services delivered by
communities themselves. The rural nature and geography of Moray requires to be
factored into the distribution of service bases in order to meet the needs of Moray’s
population. This is an emerging aspect of the Transformation Programme. Future
distribution of service bases is  being  reviewed across major asset classes taking
account of factors such as operating cost, local population, service usage, travel
(time/distance), geography (ease of access) and asset condition. In some cases a
service base may not be proposed in every area where residents can access that
service in a neighbouring or central area.
Page 78

Page 79

21
Service redesign / review of processes
6.13 A Lean review of processes was been part of IMP2 for some time but work had been
delayed. This needs to be progressed to facilitate digitisation of Council processes.
Lean as a tool in itself and as a facilitator for digitisation is anticipated to generate
significant savings. Linked to such a micro review of service delivery needs to be a
macro review, considering management and governance arrangements, to ensure a
more streamlined approach. Estimated savings are included in the current financial
plan at £250,000 and since those savings were estimated further areas for
consideration have been identified.
6.14 As can be seen from the table at paragraph 8.1 the biggest single contributor to the
projected future budget gap is from pay awards.  Service redesign resulting in a
streamlined council with consequent reduced head count over time will mitigate this
pressure.
Participatory Budgeting
6.15 Participatory Budgeting (PB) is a democratic process in which members of the
community decide how to spend part of a public budget. It gives the public influence in
the decision-making over Council finances.
6.16 Scottish Local Authorities and the Scottish Government have a framework agreement
with a target where at least 1% of Council budgets will be subject to PB.  Currently the
Council is actively engaged in a wide variety of PB projects and making every effort to
reach the target, however, actual amounts allocated through PB fall short of the
2024/25 target of £2.17million.
6.17 PB goes above and beyond budget consultations and requires facilitation between the
sponsor (Council) to ensure openness and transparency and a vote by stakeholders
on the actual outcome to determine that outcome.
6.18 The benefits of Participatory Budgeting are perceived to be:
 Improved democratic process
 Improved public awareness and understanding of the Council
 Strengthens the relationship between the community and the Council
6.19 There are also risks with PB:
 Unrealistic expectations from the community if not properly facilitated
 Limited scope where restrictions on budgets
 Needs public buy-in
 Voting risks (excluding minority or hard to reach groups)
 Very time consuming and requires significant officer input
6.20 Embedding PB into the Councils business as usual processes is embedded in our
Best Value Action Plan.  This is exemplified through our budget engagement approach
and consultation on major components of the Transformation Strategy such as the
Learning Estate, Leisure and Libraries reviews.
Page 79

Page 80

22
7. Conclusion
7.1 The impact of all the main assumptions listed above and the mid case scenarios
discussed in this strategy are summarised below.  The actions to balance 2024/25 and
2025/26 are driven by the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy and are included
here as illustrative information only.  The main consideration within the Short to
Medium Term Financial Strategy has been to remove the structural deficit.  On the
assumption that this has been achieved, the table below identifies the main influences
on the budget from 2027/28 going forward.  The key consideration for the Medium to
Long Term is that from 2027/28 onwards a budget gap of approximately £6 million on
average is anticipated to be created by inflationary pressures and the cost of
borrowing, even after increase in Council Tax and charges for services.  This Strategy
therefore identifies how that ongoing gap could be bridged.
7.2 The Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy for a financially sustainable Council is to
take work along three main strands of service development.
7.3 The Council will take a strategic approach to asset management, seeking to develop a
strategically located asset base using a Place Based Approach to serve local
communities from energy efficient facilities.
7.4 The Council will aim to be a more streamlined organisation, using recognised
techniques to improve efficiency and taking advantage of technology to support
service delivery.
7.5 The Council will seek to future proof its services, using the most up-to-date information
on population to inform planning for future service delivery.
7.6 Work is on-going to develop workstreams to support the Council of the Future and
reports will be brought to members as plans are developed.  As approval is given for
these developments the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy will be updated to
appropriately reflect them.
7.7 As can be seen from the summary of the mid-case assumptions in the section below, if
the Council does not receive an uplift in revenue grant support then for the life time of
this financial plan it will require to make significant savings year on year to cover the
impact of pay awards and inflation.  The strands of work indicated in paragraphs 7.3 to
7.6 indicate the direction of travel for the Council to future proof services as far as
possible to mitigate the impact of below inflation settlements.
7.8 A reconciliation of the budget gaps for 2025/26 and 2026/27 as developed using the
mid case assumptions in the Medium to Long Term Financial Planning process to the
more detailed development of these used and reported in the Short to Medium Term
Financial Plan is given below:
2025/26
£m
2026/27
£m
Budget gap per Short Term Financial Plan 11.05 0.19
Balance of overbudget bf from 2024/25 (7.26) -
Increase in GRG assumed in STFP 1.03 2.25
Page 80

Page 81

23
Loans charges difference (to be updated in Short
Term Plan)
1.3 2.7
Decrease in school rolls (0.3) (0.4)
Revised gap 5.82 4.74
A residual difference of £0.24m in 2025/26 and (£0.31m) in 2026/27 is considered to reflect
timing differences.
Page 81

Page 82

24
8. Mid-case Assumptions within the Financial Strategy
Para Scenario Assumption 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 - 2034/35
% £m £m £m £m
Income 
Government Grant core funding 5.7 Mid 0% £0.000 £0.000 £0.000 £0.000
Council Tax Income 5.15 Mid CPIH+1% £4.102 £3.989 £2.535 £19.579
Income – discretionary charges 5.4 Mid CPIH+1% £0.258 £0.243 £0.230 £1.818
Total Income £4.360 £4.232 £2.765 £21.397
Expenditure
Pay Award 5.21 Mid 3% £6.012 £6.192 £6.378 £50.334
Inflationary pressures/Contract inflation – general 5.25 Mid CPI +2% £0.476 £0.462 £0.433 £1.844
Contract inflation - Energy (tariff changes) 5.27 Mid CPI +2% £0.245 £0.329 £0.320 £1.337
Contract inflation – PPP 5.29 Mid RPI +2% £0.373 £0.375 £0.431 £1.987
Loans Charges - borrowing for capital programme 5.34 Mid 75% spend £2.838 £1.921 £1.213 £7.264
Total Expenditure £9.944 £9.280 £8.775 £62.765
BUDGET GAP £5.584 £5.048 £6.009 £41.368
Page 82

Page 83

REPORT TO:  MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: REVENUE BUDGET MONITORING TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2024
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To advise Council of the revenue budget monitoring position to 30 September
2024 and the current estimated out-turn for 2024/25.
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III B (10) of the
Council’s Administrative Scheme relating to monitoring current revenue
expenditure against approved budget.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that the Council considers and notes:
(i) the budget monitoring position of £3,693,000 over budget for 2024/25
as at 30 September 2024;
(ii) that this position consists of an underspend on Devolved School
budgets of £686,000, an overspend of £1,879,000 on Adult Social
Care and Children’s Services delivered on behalf of the Moray
Integration Joint Board (MIJB), an overspend on Environmental
Services of £1,486,000, and overspend on non-devolved Education
budgets of £438,000, Strain on Fund costs of £252,000 and an
overspend within other services of £324,000;
(iii) movement of a £1,315,000 increase in General Revenue Grant, as
detailed in paragraph 3.4;
(iv) the current estimated out-turn for 2024/25 of an overspend in
Council services including Health and Social Care of £1,406,000 after
adjusting for the cost sharing agreement with NHS for MIJB, with
overspends across services including Education of £680,000,
Environmental and Commercial Services £818,000, other services
£680,000 in total, MIJB £2,620,000 and reduction in requirement of
provisions of £3,933,000, and planned use of non-working earmarked
reserves (DSM, Transformation and other earmarked) of £2,889,000,
Item 9.
Page 83

Page 84

and that balance of funding from working earmarked reserves is
currently showing higher than planned use due to unconfirmed
funding allocations expected;
(v) that Heads of Service will be tasked with reducing overspends and
generally reducing expenditure to bring expenditure back into line
with budget; and
(vi) the emerging budget pressure noted in paragraph 6.2.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 When the revenue budget for 2024/25 was approved by Moray Council on 28
February 2024 (paragraph 7 of the minute refers), General Revenue Grant of
£215,396,000 was estimated for the year, based on the latest amount notified
to the Council and included an increase of £9,167,000 for the transfer of
Early Learning and Childcare from specific grant, as well as estimates for
further distributions of grant expected during the year.  Council Tax receipts
of £51,375,000 were anticipated. Budgeted expenditure of £278,794,000 was
agreed, and this required use of ear-marked reserves totalling £731,000 for
transformation, £1,136,000 for Moray Growth Deal cash flow and of
£10,156,000 from working (covid) reserves to balance the budget.
3.2 In addition to the Council’s core budget, monies allocated to schools through
the Devolved School Management (DSM) scheme and not spent are brought
forward from previous years.  The DSM balance brought forward in 2024/25
is £753,000 (2023/24 £853,000). Unused Pupil Equity Fund of £677,000
received in 2023/24 and £76,000 funding for nursery snacks and fundraising
have been carried forward into 2024/25 in accordance with the grant
conditions. On 26 June 2024 Council approved additional expenditure of
£192,000 to be funded from the working ear-marked reserve.  All these
adjustments have been posted to departmental budgets.
3.3 Additional General Revenue Grant (GRG) of £1 million has been included on
Appendix 3 after being confirmed by the Scottish Government in May 2024
as the Council’s share of additional GRG totalling £62.7million across all
Scottish local authorities.  The funding will be baselined for future years.
Further redeterminations of funding have been announced and are reflected
in the revised budget: £19,000 for Scottish School Milk Subsidy Scheme and
£296,000 for Children’s Social Care pay uplift.
3.4 The Council’s allocation of a total funding package of £77,500,000 from the
Scottish Government to support the 2024/25 local government pay offer for
SJC, Craft and Chief Officer staff was confirmed in late October as
£1,283,000.  This will be baselined as General Revenue Grant from 2025/26
onwards.  This additional funding is not reflected in the quarter 2 figures but
has been taken account of when calculating the estimated overspend.
3.5 With these adjustments to use of reserves and GRG, the Council’s overall
General Services revenue budget currently stands at £281,941,000.
3.6 Reconciliation of the movements in the base budget from that which was
approved by the Moray Council on 28 February 2024 is shown in APPENDIX
Page 84

Page 85

3 and allocations to departments from the provisions for Inflation and
Contingencies, Additional Costs and Savings are listed in APPENDIX 4.
4. BUDGET POSITION
4.1 APPENDIX 1 summarises the current position for each service, comparing
actual expenditure with budget to 30 September 2024.
4.2 Overall the budget position at 30 September 2024 is expenditure over budget
to date of £3,693,000 or 2.8% of budget to date, which includes services
delivered on behalf of the Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB). 
4.3 The principal areas of overspend and underspend across the Council are
summarised below.
4.4 In Education, Resources and Communities there is an underspend to date of
£51,000.  Much of this relates to the over achievement of income in Sport and
Leisure services (£54,000) and underspends in the Learning Estate
operational budget of £12,000.  Libraries have an underspend on energy
costs of £16,000 and under achieved on income of £3,000.  There are
overspends on licences within Leisure, along with underachievement of
budgeted Public Private Partnership (PPP) contract deductions.
4.5 Education has a £248,000 underspend to date.  Devolved School budgets are
underspent by £686,000 at the end of the second quarter; £262,000 in primary
schools and £424,000 in secondary schools.  There is flexibility in DSM
budgets to allow for planning for the sessions ahead and where spend is
planned on the academic year.  Non-devolved budgets are £137,000
overspent to date, mainly energy costs (£135,000).  In Early Learning and
Childcare, there is a £38,000 underspend on the earmarked snack and
fundraising account, alongside a £13,000 training underspend.  Underspends
in Schools and Curriculum Development include: free sanitary products
£15,000, advertising £9,000 and disturbance mileage £6,000.  Overspends in
central supply are £246,000 to date; a cost which is difficult to forecast due to
being cover for maternity and sick leave.  Out of Area is showing a £143,000
overspend; this is due to the extension of placements for two young persons
until the end of the financial year and one new placement.
4.6 Environmental and Commercial Services are presenting a £1,486,000
overspend to date across sections within the service.
Roads Maintenance
There is a net overspend of £1,439,000 within Roads Maintenance revenue
budget, primarily due to a processing time lag for the recharge to capital,
which is £1.05m below target to date and will be processed in future periods.
The bulk of the revenue maintenance budget is allocated to items such as
carriageway repairs/footway repairs/gully cleaning/grass cutting and ditching
maintenance.  Actual works completed and works committed (i.e works
identified and waiting to have repairs scheduled and undertaken) currently
totals £700,000.  It is forecast with high confidence that this revenue
maintenance budget will be brought back into line and on budget at end of
financial year.
Page 85

Page 86

Fleet Services
Fleet are currently £227,000 under budget.  The overspend reported in Fleet
Services in Quarter 1 has been reversed as internal recharges for vehicles
and plant have now been reviewed and updated.  Fleet recharges to
departments for ad hoc maintenance work done in the workshop and hire of
additional vehicles are now above budget.  These will be reflected as
overspends in departments.
Building Cleaning and Catering
Within Catering there are underspends on food costs of £6,000 and income
ahead of budget to date £46,000.  Facilities Management is under budget by
£12,000 on free sanitary products.
Open Spaces
Lands and Parks operational budget is £19,000 under budget to date, with
variances including within supplies and services and vehicle hire charges.
Burial Grounds has an overspend of £69,000, primarily due to an income
shortfall to date on interment fees and sale of lairs.  Other Grounds
Maintenance is under budget including Dorenell Core Paths projects; unspent
funding for these projects will be carried forward in an earmarked reserves at
the end of the year.
Waste Management
Waste is £60,000 over budget. Variances include overspends on the NESS
Energy from Waste, but a credit is due from Aberdeen City Council which
should offset the overspend. Underspends on a recycling contract of £22,000,
energy costs £14,000 and Leachate and specialist services £11,000. Income
variances include surplus of gas income at Dallachy £64,000 and tipping and
street sweeping income £39,000, against income shortfalls of £109,000 in
Green Waste permit income, and bulky and trade waste income £26,000.
Traffic and Transportation
An overspend of £271,000 to date is primarily due to shortfall in income
across services: car park income £50,000; Harbours £94,000 (although this is
due to invoicing falling behind due to staff sickness) and Traffic £36,000.
Other overspends include Harbours staffing/agency costs and allowances
£33,000 and electricity costs £22,000 which can be partly recharged
externally.  An upgrade of 25 car park machines to 4G was a one off
additional expense of £17,000, which can be capitalised.  Other minor
overspends total £13,000.
Engineering Design
Variances total £85,000 of an underspend to date on Bridge Works and Flood
Prevention budgets to date, which are due to timing of planned works against
the budget.
4.7 Economic Growth and Development Services have a £282,000 underspend;
planning fee income and building control income are ahead of target by
£153,000 and £99,000 respectively, both due to large fee paying applications.
Other underspends include administration costs £12,000 and Landlord
registration fees within Environmental Health £15,000 ahead of target.
Page 86

Page 87

4.8 Governance, Strategy and Performance have an underspend of £33,000
which is made up of several variances; overspends on Housing Benefits
£101,000 and Discretionary Housing Payments £201,000 along with software
costs £52,000 higher than budget.  Underspends in Civic Licensing fee
income of £109,000 mainly from Short Term Lets and Central Postages and
photocopying £45,000 the latter of which is timing related.
4.9 General Services Housing and Property is overspent by £16,000 in total with
over and under variances; overspends on corporate buildings repairs and
maintenance of £119,000 and schools repairs and maintenance £93,000.
Underspends within Homeless temporary accommodation £84,000 and a
surplus of Industrial Estate rental income £121,000.
4.10 Other expenditure is over budget to date by £493,000 including £121,000 for
supernumerary posts and voluntary redundancy payments which will be
funded from Council Priorities reserve.  Additional pension costs were
£280,000 over budget (including Strain on the Fund).
4.11 Health and Social Care is reporting an overspend across services at the end
of quarter 2 of £1,879,000.  The figures included in this report relate purely to
the services delivered by Moray Council on behalf of the MIJB for Adults and
Children’s Services.  There are overspends in most areas; the significant
variances include Learning disability service of £1,100,000 for purchasing of
care; older people and physical sensory disability of £1,300,000 which relates
to purchasing of care and permanent care placements; £118,000 relating to
children’s and justice services for continuing care placements and  residential
placements for children with a disability; which is being reduced by
underspends in the care services provided in-house of £768,000 due to the
challenges of recruitment in this area.
4.12 Income budgets across the Council are showing both positive and negative
variances and the main variances have been identified above in paragraphs
4.1 - 4.11.
4.13 The quarter 2 position is summarised in the table below:
Overspend
£000
Underspend
£000
Net
Variance
£000
Schools - DSM 686
Schools - Non-devolved energy costs (135) 
Central Supply teachers (246) 
Out of Area (143) 
Roads Maintenance (1,439) 
Environmental & Commercial Services
income
(384) 149
Other Environmental & Commercial
Services
188
Building Control & Planning fee income 252
Property repairs & maintenance (212) 
Costs of early retirement/supernumeracy (401) 
Page 87

Page 88

MIJB - Health & Social Care and
Children’s Services
(1,879)
Other Council Services (129) 
TOTAL (4,968) 1,275 (3,693)
5. BUDGET PRESSURES AND ADDITIONS
5.1 Budget pressures recognised when the budget was approved on 28 February
2024 are released when the pressure builds up to the extent that it can be
accurately quantified.  Provisions to meet budget pressures and new duties
totalling £814,000 have been released in quarter 2 and these are itemised in
APPENDIX 4.
5.2 Provisions still held centrally at the end of quarter 2 total £8,819,000 and are
detailed in APPENDIX 5 and given a RAG assessment for likelihood of
requirement. 
5.3 Four provisions are assessed as red at this point, as no longer being required
this year; the £30,000 Deposit Return Scheme budget pressure was
confirmed by the Scottish Government to be delayed until October 2025.  The
Revised Improvement and Modernisation Plan (IMP) (now Transformation
Strategy) of £596,000 for Raising Attainment was carried over from 2023/24
and was required for full year effect funding to cover April to August 2024; this
has now all been drawn down and the balance is not required.  An initial
provision of £635,000 for Energy increases was included in the budget; latest
projections (using 2023/24 consumption data) is that the current budget will be
sufficient to cover overall costs for gas and electricity.  This assessment is
based on information included in the Annual Report on Energy Consumption
and Expenditure reported to the Economic Development and Infrastructure
Services Committee on 12 November 2024.  The fourth is £57,000 for Trade
Union Facility time that requires no drawdown of budget.
5.4 Nine provisions, totalling £7,368,000, are assessed as amber and have yet to
be taken, or uncertain if required.  Seven have had no draw down of budget
this year to date and consist of: the Moray Growth Deal contribution to Early
Years Science Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (EY STEM)
£62,000 which was used in prior years to fund the Project Manager’s post and
is now funded by ELC.  A report to Council on 25 September 2024 informed
Council of the progress of the EY STEM project and final stage of approval of
the FBC was given by the Scottish Government in early November enabling
the project to move into delivery stage, thus £44,000 will be required this year
for revenue spend; Uprating Personal & Nursing Care £80,000 is awaiting
confirmation of allocation but latest projections based on the GAE allocations
are this could be £215,000 (share of an £11,500,000 allocation); Increase in
loans charges £800,000; loans principal and interest projections show that this
budget pressure will be required in full and forecasts will be updated during
quarter three and drawn down if projections remain the same.  The budget
pressure allowed for the Council’s 47% share of the MIJB overspend will
remain as amber until final year figures are known.  At this point the
anticipated variance, including the adjustment to reflect the cost sharing
agreement, is estimated to be £2.4 m.  The Joint Transition Plan pressure
Page 88

Page 89

may fall into next year, depending on timing of procurement which is currently
underway.  The Free School Meals expansion project has been marked as
amber as the Scottish Government this year announced it was delaying its
policy of expanding free school meals to all primary pupils and will remain to
be provided for all pupils in P1 to P5, and P6 and P7 pupils whose families
receive the Scottish Child Payment.  This budget pressure will therefore be
removed, leaving £81,000 for school holiday provision for eligible families.
Following the UK Budget in October 2024, the Levelling Up funds were
confirmed for Moray (£18.2m) and the Elgin Town Plan (£20m).  The budget
pressure may not develop in this financial year, or will be minimal spend, and
fall into next financial year.  School Milk Subsidy funding of £19,000 has been
confirmed as a redetermination to the General Revenue Grant.  This is
intended to be a contribution towards school milk in primary schools.
5.5 All other provisions are expected to be required in full at this juncture.
6. EMERGING BUDGET PRESSURES
6.1 Emerging budget pressures are noted throughout the year as they are
identified.  Pressures that were identified during quarter 2 are listed in the
table below.
Para
Ref
Estimated full year
effect
£000s
Local Development Plan 2027 6.3 100
____
Total 100
====
6.2 Planning authorities have a statutory requirement to set out a timetable for the
review/production of their Local Development Plan (LDP) in the form of a
Development Plan Scheme (DPS) and to submit this annually to the Scottish
Government.  The Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 introduced changes to the
LDP preparation process and new LDP’s in Scotland are required to be place
based, looking at areas of new growth, but also looking at what needs to
change within existing neighbourhoods and greater focus on the re-use of
vacant and derelict land.  The LDP will reflect national priorities with a greater
focus on carbon reduction, 20-minute neighbourhoods and better engagement
with young people.
6.3 A budget pressure was highlighted in a report on Moray’s Local Development
Plan 2025 to the Planning and Regulatory Services Committee on 23 March
2021 (paragraph 13 of the minute refers) for critical transportation appraisals
of £200,000 in 2022/23 and £50,000 in 2023/24.  It was later reported at a
meeting of the same committee on 20 December 2022 that the budgets would
not be spent that year due to delays finalising and adopting the government’s
National Planning Framework 4, which resulted in many planning authorities
delaying LPD reviews.  Work on the Local Development Plan 2027
commenced in 2023/24 and will continue into 2024/25 and 2025/26, with a
likely split of spend £100,000, £100,000 and £50,000 respectively.  Other
costs required to inform and develop the LDP will be met from the LDP annual
Page 89

Page 90

revenue budget.  A budget pressure has been identified of £100,000 in
2024/25 and £50,000 in 2025/26.
7. SAVINGS
7.1 Savings and increased charges of £9,370,000 were approved when the
budget was set.  These savings comprised one-off savings of £112,000 and
other permanent savings of £8,916,000.  The increase in charges per the
budget paper was £342,000.
7.2 In addition to the savings approved when the budget was set, additional
savings/income of £1,216,000 were carried forward from 2023/24 to be
actioned in the current year.  Further recurring savings/additional income of
£225,000 were approved at Moray Council on 26 June 2024; £75,000 leisure
services income and £150,000 energy costs saving (paragraph 14 of the
minute refers) and £50,000 approved at Moray Council on 25 September
2024 (paragraph 16 of the minute refers).  These are included on APPENDIX
6.
7.3 Of the original approved savings, a balance of £1,207,000 remains in central
provisions as at the end of June.  These are detailed in APPENDIX 6 and
given a RAG assessment for anticipated achievement.  The balance consists
of savings not yet posted to services (£1,282,000) less additional savings
found in year (£75,000).
7.4 Sixty nine savings marked as green have been achieved, or will be achieved
in the year, totalling £8,618,000.
7.5 Twenty six savings classed as amber total £2,880,000 outstanding.  Of these,
£2,259,000 are still expected to be achieved this year.  Several savings within
Environmental and Commercial Services have been delayed and their
positions being confirmed: the reduction in Building Cleaning across the HQ
campus buildings is a part year saving and will be posted in quarter 3; 
£52,000 of increased income/savings in Parks and Open Spaces have yet to
be taken from departmental budgets for the uplift in burial charges to full cost
recovery; and the recharge for the maintenance of Common Good/Trust land
and parks is to be posted against budgets; an amount of £65,000 has been
identified as available funds in 2024/25 but the Common Good and Trust
Funds are high risk savings in that the disbursable income in the year is linked
to the interest rate, as well as repairs and maintenance and other expenditure,
and if this is sufficient funding to cover the costs of grounds maintenance.
Fleet have identified externally leased vehicles that can be ended and
therefore reduce costs as user departments will share existing vehicles/plant.
When vehicles have been collected, savings will then be generated and
processed.  In Waste Management, the reduction in Household Waste
Recycling Centres opening hours will generate a part year saving this year as
closure is from October 2024, and the reduced gate fee at the NESS Energy
from Waste facility will be confirmed in quarter 3 as the invoicing is running
two months in arrears.  Cross service savings include the Electric
Vehicle/Ultra Low Emission salary sacrifice are unconfirmed for this year.  The
expected increase in vacancy factor in line with pay awards will be determined
now the pay award has been posted.  The approved saving from the Elgin
Community Centre closure will not be fully achieved until the building is sold.
Page 90

Page 91

A one off saving of £73,000 is anticipated to accrue from the refund due from
Grampian Valuation Joint Board, the amount of which will be confirmed when
the accounts for 2023/24 are audited and approved by the Board – the saving
will be posted thereafter.  Indicative savings from the Improvement and
Modernisation Programme (now Transformation Strategy) have a variety of
classifications; Stream 4: Review and expansion of flexible working £44,000,
Reduction in investment costs £4,000 which are expected this year, and
LEAN review £125,000, a project which has been reprioritised for the Future
Council work.
7.6 Savings carried forward from 2023/24 are still showing as amber but are all
expected to be achieved and posted to the ledger: the review of purchasing
card £30,000, which will be across services to ensure that VAT receipts are
submitted per financial regulations and therefore all input VAT reclaimed;
reduction in reinvestment costs of £18,000; and the balance of the schools
PPP service concession which requires detailed calculations to be carried out
to confirm the exact saving.
7.7 Approved savings that are now not expected to go ahead, marked in red on
the APPENDIX 6, total £786,000: income generation of £100,000 from hiring
out a new Roads Maintenance surface dressing machine will not materialise
until well into 2025/26 due to a long delivery lead time; the saving from
Dallachy will be delayed as the tender for the closure works is now live with
an expected commencement date of April 2025.  It is proposed to move these
expected savings/income into 2025/26; £56,000 for the Stream 2: ICT and
Digital, the schools admin review will not be realised.
7.8 An increase of £429,000 for Council tax receipts has also been forecast after
the annual review of the Council Tax base and is reflected in the figures for
quarter 2.
8 ESTIMATED OUT-TURN
8.1 APPENDIX 2 summarises the first estimated out-turn position for each service
area, comparing the estimated expenditure with the budget to 31 March 2024.
8.2 Overall the estimated out-turn position for 2024/25 is expenditure over budget
of £1,406,000 or 0.5% of budget for the year, including services delivered on
behalf of the MIJB. 
8.3 The principal area of forecast overspends and underspends across the
Council reflect the major variances mentioned in section 4 of this report.
Details of projected out-turn variances are summarised below.
8.4 The estimated out-turn position of 2024/25 for the MIJB is an overspend of
£5,583,000.  The Council’s share of funding for MIJB is now 47% of the total
following the full delegation of Children’s and Justice services from 1 April
2024, therefore the Council’s share of this projected overspend is £2,626,000.
The forecast deficit is the worse case scenario and work is still on going to
produce savings in the second half of the year, which will be reflected in the
quarter 3 report.  The Council included a budget pressure of £5,000,000 at
budget setting time, based on the recurring overspend position at the end of
Page 91

Page 92

2023/24.  The MIJB have worked hard to achieve a proportionate amount of
savings to date to reduce this deficit in 2024/25.
8.5 Staff savings from vacancies and appointments below top of scale across all
services are anticipated to exceed the overall budget provision.  This excludes
the current saving still to be posted against staffing budgets to increase the
vacancy factor, which will be done when the pay award has been settled and
department budgets updated. Income budgets across the Council are
showing both positive and negative variances.  This includes additional
income in short term lets and licensing fees, industrial estate rental income
and wayleaves, recycling and street sweeping income, school catering.
Planning fee income and building control income are also ahead of target, and
landlord registration fees.  There is a shortfall in income for car park and
harbours income, green waste and trade waste.  Also, sale of lairs in Burial
Grounds is below target budget.
8.6 In Education there is a projected overspend of £680,000.  The overspends to
date detailed in paragraph 4.5 are projected to be significantly higher by year
end; central supply £650,000 and Out of Area £450,000.  Underspends
include spend on school sanitary products £15,000, clothing grants £5,000,
disturbance mileage £6,000, staff advertising £9,000 and a review of the
Speech and Language Therapy service generating a projected £35,000
underspend.  Staffing vacancies also generating an overachievement of
vacancy target by £312,000.
8.7 As mentioned earlier in this report (paragraph 4.9) there is an overspend in
corporate buildings and schools repairs and maintenance.  These are forecast
to outturn at overspends of £125,000 and £200,000 respectively.  Other
projected overspends include Property fee income less than target by
£130,000, and surplus property running costs £40,000 and less income from
miscellaneous land sales £30,000.  Underspends are expected on Homeless
temporary accommodation £120,000, a surplus of industrial estate rental
income and wayleaves £115,000, and staff savings higher than budgeted
£143,000. The full year effect is a projected overspend on General Services
Housing of £142,000.
8.8 Environmental and Commercial Services currently projecting an over spend of
£818,000 for the year.
Estimated
Overspend
£000
Estimated
Underspend
£000
Net
Variance
£000
Directorate - - -
Savings (76) - (76)
Roads Maintenance (262) - (262)
Fleet Services (122) - (122)
Building Catering & Cleaning - 99 99
Open Spaces (30) - (30)
Waste Management - 6 6
Traffic & Transportation (524) - (524)
Engineering Design - 91 91
Page 92

Page 93

TOTAL (1,014) 196 (818)
Roads Maintenance
Whilst Roads Maintenance has a current overspend against budget to date,
this is largely due to timing of the recharges to capital projects.  Current
forecasts are for the service to outturn a £262,000 overspend.  Of this,
£126,000 is an overspend due to increases in materials costs, higher than
planned vehicle costs and other variable costs such as insurance claims.
Fleet Services
Currently projecting a £122,000 overspend primarily around transport costs
including spare parts, other materials, external vehicle hire for user
departments (not staff car hire), trackers/radio contracts and accident
damage.  There are projected underspends on staff transport costs due to
reduced external car hires.
Building Catering & Cleaning
Within catering there are projected underspends on income of £89,000.
Facilities are projected to be under budget by £10,000 on free sanitary
products.
Open Spaces
Open Spaces are projecting a £30,000 overspend for the year.  Underspends
expected on tools, materials, fuel etc total £10,000 and are offset by
overspends on rent and rates, cleaning costs £10,000, transport maintenance
costs, and additional costs in the War Memorial budget for plants since the
closure of Greenfingers.  Increased income from HRA and Flood Alleviation of
£67,000 is offset by income shortfall in external income including annual
inspections of play equipment, which is restricted by staff resources.  The
shortfall in Burial Ground income from sale of lairs is anticipated to recover
later in the year.
Waste Management
Waste is forecasting to be within budget.  Income surpluses include; gas at
Dallachy £106,000, Recycling £50,000 and one off street Sweeping income
£11,000.  Underspend on Waste royalites due to less deposits at Dallachy are
estimated at £24,000 and Recycling advertising which is now done internally
is a possible £10,000 saving.  Income shortfalls of £119,000 in Green Waste
permit income due to number of estimated permits set too high and lower
uptake, and trade waste income £88,000.
Traffic and Transportation
An overspend forecast of £524,000 are partly due to a shortfall in income from
car parks of £180,000 and Bus Revolution £75,000.  Other operational
overspends include in car parks: upgrade of car park machines £17,000 (per
paragraph 4.9), fees for Pay by Phone car parking charges £14,000, and in
Harbours/Dredger: Harbours staffing/agency costs and allowances £35,000,
Dredger repairs from the mid-term loadline survey £40,000, weighbridge
hardware costs required during the upgrade £22,000, £20,000 increased
Page 93

Page 94

electricity charges for Pier 3, Buckie (partly rechargeable externally), Deep
dredging licence £5,000, additional van hire for harbours £6,000,
management consultants for Harbours review £10,000.  A further £100,000
overspend is estimated for Transport Studies for the Local Development Plan
(LDP); as highlighted in section 6 above a 2 year budget was approved in
2022/23 however, due to delays, there was slippage in the LDP progression.
Work commenced in 2023/24 and will continue into 2024/25 and 2025/26,
with a likely split of spend £100,000, £100,000 and £50,000 respectively. A
budget pressure has been identified of £100,000 in 2024/25 and £50,000 in
2025/26.
Engineering Design
With an underspend to date, Engineering Design is forecasting a £91,000
underspend at year end.  Minor variances offset within the operational budget
while there is a surplus income forecast of £75,000 from service users and
£12,000 to other departments.
8.9 HR, ICT and Organisational Development have a projected overspend of
£112,000: staff vacancy target shortfall £107,000 and central phones
overspend £30,000 against a training underspend £25,000.
8.10 Financial Services has a net overspend of £412,000 projected; a staff
vacancy target surplus of £95,000 is offset by postages, NDR reliefs and
banking charges, and the payment of an uninsured loss that was incurred
during the year.
8.11 Governance, Strategy and Performance have a net £252,000 overspend
projected. Overspends on housing benefits of £100,000, Discretionary
Housing Payments £218,000, and software costs £52,000, as well as election
polling booths etc £11,000 to be funded from an earmarked reserve, and staff
savings less than budget £19,000.  Underspends include Members
allowances and expenses £20,000, Money Advice – Accountant in
Bankruptcy (AIB) income £8,000, Registrars income £10,000, Licensing
Board income £40,000, Civic License fee income (mainly Short Term Lets)
£40,000 plus other supplies and services budgets £30,000.
8.12 In Other expenditure, an overspend of £649,000 is forecast.  This includes
supernumerary, additional pension and Strain on the Fund costs, external
advisor costs and one-off higher than budgeted salaries.
8.13 Loans Charges – an £800,000 budget pressure was approved as part of
budget setting and remain in provisions at quarter 2.  Loans Charges are
currently forecasting an overspend against budget of £800,000 therefore the
provision of £800,000 will be required in full.
8.14 Centrally held provisions are expected to underspend by £4,158,000.
Additional Costs including the remaining budget pressure requirements as
discussed in section 5 are estimated to be £5,604,000 under by the end of the
year; primarily due to the forecast balance of the £5,000,000 budget pressure
for the Council’s share of the MIJB overspend.  As discussed in paragraph 8.4
the outturn currently estimated by the MIJB would result in £2,620,000 of this
overspend to be funded by the Council.  Another budgeted provision is for
Page 94

Page 95

Free School Meals expansion (paragraph 5.4) with a balance of £1,141,000
which has been put on hold for Primary 6 and 7’s.
8.15 Savings outstanding were discussed in section 7 and the amber savings
expected to be achieved this year of £2,101,000 (paragraph 7.5) have been
included in the estimated outturn figure in APPENDIX 2.  If these are realised
there will be an overachievement of savings of £2,222,000 in the year.
Provision for Contingencies and Inflation estimations include the current Local
Government pay settlement which was implemented following a meeting of
Council Leaders in September.  Funding has been notified (per paragraph
3.4) which also includes Health & Social Care pay.  Teachers pay has also
been agreed and will be backdated in November.  Funding towards the pay
settlement from the Scottish Government has yet to be notified and is
therefore not included in the estimations.  The estimated position for inflation
is an overspend of £2,461,000.
9 RESERVES
9.1 The Council needs to retain a certain level of free reserves in case of
unforeseen contingencies or emergencies.  The balance on free general
reserves (excluding DSM and ear-marked reserves) as at 1 April 2024 was
£6,000,000.  This is the minimum level of reserves that can be held on free
general reserves in terms of the Council’s financial reserves policy, recently
reviewed and reported to Council on 25 September 2024 (paragraph 15 of the
minute refers).
9.2 APPENDIX 7 itemises the movements on reserves during the year to date
and gives the free balance on the reserves at 30 September 2024.  The
working reserve had a balance of £8,686,000 on 1 April (£8,721,000 reported
to Moray Council on 26 June which was reduced by a DSM adjustment of
£35,000) and has a commitment to balance the 2024/25 budget.  Moray
Council on 26 June 2024 approved an additional use of working ear marked
reserves totalling £192,000 (paragraph 14 of the Minute refers) and a further
£13,000 for School catering Fusion app upgrade approved at Corporate on 27
August 2024 (paragraph 10 of the minute refers).  Savings were approved at
Council on 25 September (paragraph 16 of the minute refers) and
implemented in full, and as discussed in paragraph 7.8 above, an increase to
the Council tax base is expected to generate £429,000 of income, thus
reducing reliance on working reserve, bringing the balance of the reserve to
£8,960,000, before planned use of the reserve to balance the 2024/25 budget.
When the 2024/25 budget was set it was planned to use £10,156,000 of
working reserves to balance the budget, as per paragraph 3.1.  During the
2023/24 year end accounts closedown, £3,045,000 was transferred from the
working reserve to other earmarked reserves, in order to preserve funding for
specific projects, thus reducing the unrestricted portion of the working reserve.
9.3 APPENDIX 2 summarises the estimated out-turn position for the year and
overall an overspend of £1,406,000 is forecast.  The forecast use of working
reserves is currently £10,858,000 which is higher than the available balance
of £8,960,000.  The Council awaits notification of funding for the Teachers pay
settlement and funding towards the increase in Teachers Pensions, both of
which are expected to be advised in December.  Until figures have been
confirmed, estimates have not been included in the Quarter 2 report and
Page 95

Page 96

therefore the balance of funding required has been shown as requirement
from working reserves.
9.4 Earmarked reserves for project slippages are held to keep track of funding for
projects where reserves balances have built up and need to be drawn down
as and when the expenditure is incurred.  These include: Refugee
resettlement funding, Education Attainment Fund, Whole Family Wellbeing
Fund, Employability, Dorenell Windfarm fund, Sanquhar Loch.  The current
balance of these is £4,025,000. This excludes DSM reserve.
9.5 Balances on 30 September 2024 for other ear marked reserves include
£5,964,000 for Transformation, £2,197,000 for Council priorities and
£4,000,000 for Moray Growth Deal cash flow funding and £7,526,000 for the
newly created reserve at 2023/24 closedown for the PPP Service Concession.
10 SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Moray 2026: A Plan for the Future and Moray Corporate Plan
Effective budget management is an essential component of delivery of
Council priorities on a sustainable basis.
(b) Policy and Legal
No policy or legal implications arise directly from the contents of this
report.
(c) Financial implications
The financial implications are addressed throughout the report.
(d) Risk Implications
There are no risk implications arising directly from this report. Budget
managers are aware of their responsibilities for managing their budgets
in accordance with the Council’s Financial Regulations.  There is a risk
to the Council arising from the agreement that if the Moray Integrated
Joint Board overspends the Council will meet 47% of the additional
costs incurred. Variable inflation presents a risk to the Council’s
budget; the Office for Budget Responsibility’s most recent forecast in
October 2024 makes an initial assessment of the economic and fiscal
effects of the new UK Government’s Budget set out in October 2024.
With CPI inflation having fallen back to around 2% mid 2024, the
impact of Budget policies, including the increase in employers National
Insurance Contributions taking effect from April 2025 onwards, is
expected to push up CPI by around 0.5% at its peak, meaning it is now
projected to rise to 2.6% in 2025 and then gradually fall back to the
target bank of England rate of 2%.
(e) Staffing Implications
No staffing implications arise directly from this report.
(f) Property
No property implications arise directly from this report.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
No equalities implications arise directly from this report.
Page 96

Page 97

(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
No climate change and biodiversity impacts arise directly from this
report.
(i) Consultations
Consultation concerning Revenue Budget Monitoring is an on-going
process with budget managers across the Council.  CMT and Heads of
Service have also been consulted in the preparation of this report and
any comments incorporated.
11 CONCLUSION
11.1 The financial position of the Council at the end of September 2024 is an
overspend against General Services Revenue Budget of £3,693,000,
including services delivered on behalf of the Moray Integration Joint
Board.
11.2 Variations in General Revenue Grant totalling £315,000 have been
notified to the Council.
11.3 There is one additional budget pressure totalling £100,000 for quarter 2,
noted in section 6.
11.4 The estimated out-turn position is for an over spend of £1,406,000.
11.5 The Council has estimated use of £8,685,000 from the working reserve in
2024/25.
Author of Report: Susan Souter, Senior Accountant
Background Papers: Held by author
Ref:    SS/LJC/SPMAN-1293228629-1189
Page 97

Page 98

Page 98

Page 99

APPENDIX 1
MORAY COUNCIL - APPENDIX 1
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT
QUARTER 2 TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2024
Service
Revised Budget
2024/25
£000s
Budget to 30
September 2024
£000
Actual &
Committed to
30 September
2024 £000s
Year to date
variance
£000s
Education, Resources & Community 12,990 6,525 6,474 51
Education 114,216 58,056 57,808 248
General Services Housing & Property 4,327 2,875 2,891 (16)
Environmental & Commercial Services 28,202 13,368 14,854 (1,486)
Economic Growth & Development Services 3,544 2,218 1,936 282
HR, ICT & Organisational Development 5,785 3,638 3,684 (46)
Financial Services 1,631 1,325 1,763 (438)
Governance, Strategy & Perfomance 5,680 3,917 3,884 33
Other Services 2,495 1,314 1,807 (493)
SERVICES excl HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE 178,870 93,236 95,101 (1,865)
Health & Social Care (IJB) 76,970 38,272 40,151 (1,879)
Health & Social Care (Non IJB) 446 222 171 51
TOTAL SERVICES incl HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE 256,286 131,730 135,423 (3,693)
Loans Charges 16,407 0 0 0
Provision for Contingencies and Inflation 1,636 0 0 0
Additional Costs 8,819 0 0 0
Unallocated Savings (1,207) 0 0 0
TOTAL PROVISIONS 9,248 0 0 0
TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE 281,941 131,730 135,423 (3,693)
Commentary on Quarter 1 Performance
Economic Growth & Development Services: underspend of £282k due to income surplus: planning fees £153k and building
control income £99k, and landlord registration fees £15k.
Health & Social Care: H&SC is reporting an overspend of £1,879k for services delivered on behalf of the MIJB.
Overall the budget position at 30 September 2024 is expenditure over budget to date of £3.693m, or 2.8%, which includes
services delivered on behalf of the Moray Integration Joint  Board (MIJB).
Environmental & Commercial Services: A net overspend to date of £1.486m to date across services. Roads maintenance
recharging of works to the capital programme has fallen behind due to a time lag in pricessing and will be reprofiled in future
periods. Traffic & Transportation budgets are over primarily to a shortfall in income. from car parks and harbours
Education: Devolved School budgets are underspent by £686k at the end of the third quarter; £262k in Primary schools and
£424k in Secondary schools. Non-devolved budgets are over budget by £137k. Overspends in central supply of £246k. Out of
Area is £143k over due to the extension of secure care and new placements.
5.3%
47.0%
2.3%
10.8%1.8%
2.9%
1.1%
3.2%
1.1%
24.3%
0.2% 0.0%Budget YTD
% of Total
Education, Resources & Community Education General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services Economic Growth & Development Services HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Perfomance Other Services
Health & Social Care (IJB) Health & Social Care (Non IJB) Loans Charges
5.3%
47.3%
2.4%
12.1%
1.6%3.0%
1.4%
3.2%
1.5% 22.1%
0.1% 0.0%Actual YTD
% of Total
Education, Resources & Community Education General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services Economic Growth & Development Services HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Perfomance Other Services
Health & Social Care (IJB) Health & Social Care (Non IJB) Loans Charges
(2,000)
(1,000)
0
1,000
£000's
YTD Actual Variance to Budget (excl Loans & Provisions)
Education, Resources & Community #REF!
Education General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services Economic Growth & Development Services
HR, ICT & Organisational Development Financial Services
Item 9.
Page 99

Page 100

Page 100

Page 101

APPENDIX 2
MORAY COUNCIL - APPENDIX 2
BUDGET MONITORING REPORT
QUARTER 2 TO 30 SEPTEMBER 2024
Service
Revised Budget
2024/25
£000s
Estimated
Outturn 2024/25
£000s
Anticpated
Variance
2024/25
£000s
Variance vs Base
Budget
%
Education, Resources & Community 12,990 12,816 174 1.3%
Education 114,216 114,896 (680) (0.6)%
General Services Housing & Property 4,327 4,469 (142) (3.3)%
Environmental & Commercial Services 28,202 29,020 (818) (2.9)%
Economic Growth & Development Services 3,544 2,865 679 19.2%
HR, ICT & Organisational Development 5,785 5,897 (112) (1.9)%
Financial Services 1,631 2,043 (412) (25.3)%
Governance, Strategy & Perfomance 5,680 5,932 (252) (4.4)%
Other Services 2,495 3,144 (649) (26.0)%
SERVICES excl HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE 178,870 181,082 (2,212) (1.2)%
Health & Social Care (IJB) 76,970 78,741 (1,771) (2.3)%
Funded from central provision 0 855 (855) -
Health & Social Care (Non IJB) 446 372 74 16.6%
TOTAL SERVICES incl HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE 256,286 261,050 (4,764) (1.9)%
Loans Charges 16,407 17,207 (800) (4.9)%
Provision for Contingencies and Inflation 1,636 4,097 (2,461) (150.4)%
Additional Costs 8,819 3,215 5,604 63.5%
Unallocated Savings (1,207) (2,222) 1,015 (84.1)%
TOTAL PROVISIONS 9,248 5,090 4,158 45%
TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE 281,941 283,347 (1,406) -0.5%
Funded By:
Scottish Government Grant 216,711 216,296 415 0.2%
Pay Award funding 0 1283 (1,283) 0.0%
Council Tax 51,804 51,804 0 0.0%
Funded From Reserves:
DSM c/f 1,465 1,677 (212) (14.5)%
Transformation 784 53 731 93.2%
Working 8,882 10,858 (1,976) (22.2)%
Other Earmarked 1,159 1,159 0 0.0%
MGD Cash Flow 1136 0 1,136 100.0%
Council Priorities 0 217 (217) 0.0%
TOTAL FUNDING 281,941 283,347 (1,406) (0.5)%
OVERALL VARIANCE 0 0 0
Commentary on Quarter 3 Performance
Environmental & Commercial Services: projecting an outturn of £818k over; shortfall in income from car parking and harbours,
alongside increased costs and one off expenditure.
Overall the estimated out-turn position for 2024/25 is expenditure over budget of £1,406,000 or 0.5% of budget for the year,
including services delivered on behalf of the MIJB.
Education: a  projected overspend of £680,000 primarily due to central supply costs and Out of Area. Staff vacancies above budget
show an underspend.
Health & Social Care (IJB) The estimated out-turn position for the MIJB is an overspend of £5.583m; the Council's share of funding
for MIJB is 47%, £2.626m
4.6%
40.5%
1.5%
10.0%
1.3%2.1%
0.6%
2.0%
0.9%
27.3%
0.0% 0.2% 5.8%Budget 2024/25
% of Total
Education, Resources & Community Education General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services Economic Growth & Development Services HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Perfomance Other Services
Health & Social Care (IJB) Cost sharing agreement Health & Social Care (Non IJB)
Loans Charges
4.5%
40.5%
1.6%
10.2%
1.0%
2.1%
0.7%
2.1% 1.1%
27.8%
0.3% 0.1% 6.1%Est Outturn
% of Total
Education, Resources & Community Education General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services Economic Growth & Development Services HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Perfomance Other Services
Health & Social Care (IJB) Cost sharing agreement Health & Social Care (Non IJB)
Loans Charges
(2,000)
(1,500)
(1,000)
(500)
0
500
1,000
£000's
Est Outturn Variance to Budget (excl Loans & Provisions)
Education, Resources &
Community
#REF!
Education
General Services Housing &
Property
Environmental & Commercial
Services
Economic Growth &
Development Services
HR, ICT & Organisational
Development
Governance, Strategy &
Perfomance
Other Services
Health & Social Care (IJB)
Health & Social Care (Non
IJB)
Item 9.
Page 101

Page 102

Page 102

Page 103

Allocated
Budget
Provisions for
Contingencies
and Inflation
Additional
costs
Savings Budget Loan
Charges
Depreciation Total
Budget
£000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s £000s
MC 28 Feb 2024 256,525 4,504 11,944 (10,586) 262,387 16,407 278,794
School carry forwards 753 753 753
PEF/SEF carry forwards 840 840 840
ELC carry forwards 34 34 34
Funded from Transformation Earmarked Reserve (43) (43) -43
Funded from Other Earmarked Reserves 822 822 822
Adjustment 1 - release to departments (3,677) (2,399) (2,639) 8,715 0 0
Corporate Committee 27/8/24 255,254 2,105 9,305 (1,871) 264,793 16,407 0 281,200
Additional GRG:
Redeterminations 315 315 315
Additional Funding (to rec to overview) 1,000 1,000 1,000
Additional Council Tax (increase to Ctax base) 429 429 429
Savings approved at MC 25/9/24 (50) 50 0 0
Funded from Working Reserves (1,318) (1,318) -1,318
Funded from Transformation Earmarked Reserve 96 96 96
Funded from Other Earmarked Reserves 219 219 219
Adjustment 2 - release to departments 656 (469) (801) 614 0 0
Moray Council 4/12/24 256,286 1,636 8,819 (1,207) 265,534 16,407 0 281,941
APPENDIX 3
Item 9.
Page 103

Page 104

Page 104

Page 105

APPENDIX 4
ALLOCATIONS FROM PROVISIONS
Provision for Contingencies and Inflation Committee
reference
£000s £000s
Balance at 30 June 2024 Corp 27/8/24 2,105
Education MBS (76)
Contract Inflation increases (33)
Increase in PVI hourly rate (342)
Regrading H&SC post (9)
Sale of unit of Coulardbank Industrial Estate, Lossiemouth
(9)
(469)
Balance at 30 September 2024 1,636
Additional Costs Committee
reference
£000s £000s
Balance at 30 June 2024 Corp 27/8/24 9,305
Movements in General Revenue Grant
Redeterminations
Scottish School Milk Subsidy Scheme 19
Chidlrens Social Care pay uplift 296
315
Additional Budget Pressures approved since budget
setFusion app - school catering Corp 27/8/24 13
13
Budget pressures drawn down in Quarter 2
School roll numbers (63)
NDR Liabilities increase in Uniform Business Rates (UBR) (230)
Fusion app - school catering (13)
New Burdens
Free School Meals expansion (63)
Service Developments
Detached Youth Workers (62)
Community Wardens (87)
Additional funding allocated
Chidlrens Social Care pay uplift (296)
(814)
Balance at 30 September 2024 8,819
Savings & Charges Committee
reference
£000s £000s
Balance at 30 June 2024 Corp 27/8/24 (1,871)
APPENDIX 4 Item 9.
Page 105

Page 106

APPENDIX 4 Additional Savings/income identified since budget set:
Savings approved at MC 25.9.24 MC 25/9/24 (50)
Environmental & Commercial Services savings 8
Economic Growth and Development savings 152
Housing and Property 46
Education 247
Education Resources and Communities 71
Governance, Strategy and Performance
HR, ICT & Organisational Development 3
Financial Services 30
Childrens Services
Cross Service:
NESPF pension fund rate from 19.3% to 14.3% adjustment (1)
Income target per budget paper
Environmental & Commercial Services charges 158
714
Balance at 30 September 2024 (1,207)
Page 106

Page 107

APPENDIX 5
BUDGET PRESSURES
Ref Description Original Amount Drawn Down Balance Status Comments
RECOGNISED WHEN BUDGET SET £000 £000 £000
2023/24 opening position adj
NDR Revaluation 37 23 14
Education
School Roll numbers 243 53 190
Teacher's Pension increase from 23% to 26% (wef 1 April
2024)
1,500 1,517 (17)
Economic Growth & Development
MGD revenue contribution STEM 62 0 62 FBC reported to Council on 25 Sept
and approved by Scottish Govt 5
Nov. £44k required for revenue costs
in Q3 & 4
Environmental & Commercial
Deposit Return Scheme 30 0 30 Won't be required this year.  Move to
25-26
Fusion App upgrade - School catering 13 13 0
HR, ICT & Organisational Development
ICT Software subscription 36 36 0
Other
Uprating Personal & Nursing Care (share of £11.5m) 80 0 80 Allocation figures awaited but is a
share of £11.5m and estimated at
£215k
Additonal Funding to the Scottish Welfare Fund - one year
only
40 40 0
Cross Service
Revised IMP 596 195 401 Nothing further funding will be drawn
down as all positions finished in
August.
Increase in Loans Charges 800 800 Quarter 2 estimate this is required in
full
NDR Liabilities increase in Uniform Business Rates (UBR) 290 230 60 small number of queried accounts
outstanding which may need further
draw down. Emailed JT/IW for
update 17.10.24
Item 9.
Page 107

Page 108

Electricity/Gas increase 635 0 635 Unlikely to be required. Email from
Iain Highet with latest 24/25
projections suggests that current
budget for Gas/electricity should be
sufficient to cover costs overall but
Trade Union Facility time 57 0 57 for HR part - £23k was drawn down
as V1 in 23/24 and has rolled so no
further drawdown required but
please advise if you wish any further
entries posted to record as BP
24/25.
ASN - MC 28/6/23 perm £0.7m 434 434 0
ASN - MC 28/6/23  temp £1.1m 325 325 0
MIJB Share of core overspend
5,000 0 5,000 Update on MIJB estimated outturn
given in report. Qtr 2 £2m share of
overspend
Total 10,178 2,866 7,312
Funded from Transformation Earmarked Reserves
Joint Transition Plan 30 0 30 May fall into next year.  Looking at
Procurement just now.  Will update
for Q3
Total 30 0 30
Free School Meals Expansion
1,204 63 1,141 A further £81k is required for school
holidays
Expansion of UFSM 79 79 0
SERVICE DEVELOPMENTS
Levelling Up Fund 176 0 176 Still waitng for the outcome of the
Investment plan to be approved. 
Will update in Q3.  Likely to be little
spend in this financial year
Detached Youth Workers (8x0.69FTE) 200 62 138 4 positions drawn down. I
understand there is a hold on the
other 4.
Community Wardens (2FTE) 90 87 3 Drawn down in full
REDETERMINATIONS
School Milk Subsidy Scheme 19 0 19
Children's Social Care Pay uplift 296 296 0
FUNDING FOR NEW DUTIES
Page 108

Page 109

Total 2,064 587 1,477
Total 12,272 3,453 8,819
No longer required/slipped into future years
Not taken and uncertain if required - more detail to be given
Not taken but still required - more detail to be given
Taken in full, or if more than original allocation
Page 109

Page 110

Page 110

Page 111

SAVINGS APPENDIX 6
Update Q2
Ref Description Amount Posted Balance Status Reason for balance
£000 £000 £000
2023/24 opening position adj
Service Concession PPP (1,168) - (1,168) Saving will be taken next quarter exact
amount not calculated.
Reduction in reinvestment costs (18) 0 (18) Saving will be taken
Review of purchasing card (30) 0 (30) VAT saving - Council wide
Approved when 2023/24 budget set:
Environmental & Commercial Services
Roads maintenance - hire out machinery (100) 0 (100) Potential savings will not materialise this FY,
and possibly not until well into 2025/26
Dallachy - closure (630) 0 (630) Tender for closure works now live.  Likely to
be April before the works commence.  Move
saving to 25-26
Stop School Transport on In Service Days (6) 6 0
Harbours commercial income (30) 30 0
Building cleaning HQ (20) 0 (20) Will be a part year saving this year from Oct -
March. Will confirm amount for Q3
Waste Management - Increase charges for garden
waste to £50
(308) 308 0 Underachievment of £120k to go back against
savings.
Open Spaces - Uplift burial charges to full cost
recovery
(165) 0 (165) Full cost recovery exercise is complete. £52k
of saving achieved which will be taken in Q3.
Open Spaces - Maintain parks of Common
Good/Trust land from income from CG/Trusts as far
as possible
(92) 0 (92) Saving/income will be taken
Catering - Dynamic Pricing (6) 6 0
Catering - Withdraw from Food for Life (70) 70 0
Fleet - Lease Specialist Vehicles (76) 0 (76) Fleet have identified externally leased
vehicles that can be ceased and therefore
reduced costs. User departments will share
existing vehicles/plant. When vehicles have
been collected, savings will then be
generated and processed.
Waste Management - Reduce HWRC opening
hours (close 1 weekday)
(50) 0 (50) Full year saving of £25K from next year as not
all HWRC sites are closing on a Monday.
Closure from Oct 2024 with minimal saving
anticipated this year as staff are on protected
salaries for 3 months.
Admin - Remove 1fte (28) 31 3
Roads Maintenance - Reduce street lighting
maintenance budget
(25) 25 0
Roads Maintenance - Reduce operational staff by
3fte
(100) 102 2
Elgin Car Parking Review - fye (311) 311 0
Energy from Waste reduced gate fee due to
Electricity generation (minimum £300k)
(150) 0 (150) To be reviewed for Q3.  ACC invoices
currently 2 months behind
Sponsorship income (10) 0 (10)
Lands and Parks - reduce Glyphosate use (8) 8 0
Economic Growth and Development
Statutory fees for planning applications (40) 0 (40) Planning fee income on target.  Will post for
Q3
Employability - restructure the service so 1
keyworker is externally funded
(13) 14 1
Item 9.
Page 111

Page 112

Economic Development - Reduce budget for
Business Gateway Advisor by 0.2fte reflecting
current level of staffing
(11) 12 1
Environmental Health and Trading Standards -
Remove 1 Animal Services Officer post
(30) 30 0
Planning Income (4) 4 0
Building Standards (24) 24 0
Building st - enforcement (18) 18 0
Fair Trading (38) 38 0
Perfomance monitoring (52) 36 (16) Part year effect. Full saving not able to be
taken until 25/26
Fraud post (24) 24 0
Money Advice (66) 95 29
Moray Training - VER (102) 100 (2)
Strategic Planning (Appendix 4 item 10) (33) 33 0
Environmental Health (Appendix 5 item 10) (48) 0 (48) Post was held in Transform but likely to be
resolved now that no compulsory redundancy
ban has been lifted.  Potentially £12k saving
this year and balance of £36k to be taken in
25-26
Corporate/Cross service
EV / ULE salary sacrifice (20) 0 (20) Not yet operational
Increase vacancy factor in line with pay awards (640) 0 (640) Will be calculated and posted against budgets in
Q3
NESPF rate decrease from 19.3% to 14.3% from 1
April 2024
(1,900) 4,455 2,555
NESPF (Add back H&SC) (660) 0 (660)
Empty Property Relief (338) 338 0
Discretionary NDR Relief (27) 27 0
Corporate Training (56) 57 1
Budget templates
Primary Advisor role (15) 15 0
Housing and Property
Homelessness - Negotiate discount for block
pourchased temporary accommodation
(96) 96 0
Homelessness - Allocate a further 5 flats for
homelessness accommodation
(5) 5 0
Housing Needs - Allocate 50% of Housing Support
costs to HRA
(197) 220 23
Housing General Services - Reallocate duties to
HRA, reflecting general pattern of support reqd for
Gypsy Travellers
(8) 8 0
Property - Take a more commercial approach to
rent reviews
(65) 65 0
Property - Close two corporate offices (25) 44 19 Savings for closure of offices are being taken
as soon as confirmed. These savings relate
to 9 North Guildry and 13 Cluny Square (part
year) but savinsg proposed for Beechbrae
and 232-240 High St are to follow.
Page 112

Page 113

Sale of 30/32 High St (MC 25.9.24) 2 2 Additional property saving taken
Temporary Accommodation - increased charging
policy
(42) 0 (42) This was already taken as part of the opening
postion adjustments
Langstane rental 8 8
Education
Early Learning & Childcare (ELC) - Delete Early
Years PSA
(12) 12 0
ELC - Reduce Early Years teaching team by 2
posts
(83) 83 0
Primary - Pupil teacher ration move to statutory
requirement
(42) 41 (1)
Secondary Schools - Reduce DSM (188) 192 4
Central Education - Remove 1QIM (109) 85 (24) Balance to be taken next year
Learning Technologist (50) 43 (7)
Schools Energy saving 0 150 150
St Thomas & St Peters pairing fm Apr 24 5 5
Knockando PS unpairing from Apr 24 48 48
Amend Cullen/Portgordon/Portknockie pairing fm
Aug 24 (fye 2025-26)
10 10
East End/St Sylvester Federation Model (fye 2025-
26)
(15) (15)
MGD EY Stem PM end of funding 0 58 58
ELC CMP - NM's wks & 36.25-35hrs saving 0 62 62
ELC CMP - YR to TT savings 24/25 81 81
ELC CMP YR to TT saving 24/25 - Addition 2 2
ELC rental income 32 32
Education Resources and Communities
Business Admin - Remove 4 fte posts (55) 111 56 The saving was to be over 2 years but due to
vacancies it has all been taken in 24/25. There will
be no further saving in 25/26
Primary School FM - Delete PAT testing post and
contract out
(27) 27 0
Sport and Culture - Replace mobile library with
redesigned service
(20) 20 0
Sport and Culture - Remove Health and Wellbeing
Officer post
(51) 51 0
Communities Team - Remove 1 Outdoor Learning
post
(59) 59 0
Communities Team - Remove 1.75fte from the 
Community Support Unit
(88) 88 0
Communities Team - Reduce community capacity
training budget
(4) 4 0
Elgin Community Centre closure - VER (163) 123 (40) This will not be fully achieved - addl £51k posted
in Q 2. There is a £71k budget in surplus property,
this saving will be made when the building is sold.
Library contract management systems (7) 7 0
Relocate staff from Auchernack plus Forres
Community Centre staff restructure
(20) 23 3
Page 113

Page 114

Governance, Strategy and Performance
Customer Service - Print contract (13) 13 0
Customer Service - Reduce Contact Centre staff by
4fte
(114) 114 0
Welfare Benefits & Money Advice - Co-locate
Citizen's Advice Bureau
(20) 0 (20)
Report due to Committee
HR, ICT and Organisational Development
HR  - Cease central short leating (50) 48 (2)
Financial Services
Procurement - Reduce the Buying Team by 1fte (31) 32 1
Childrens Services
Children's Services savings target (454) 454 0
Savings approved at MC 25.9.24
Economic Growth and Development - misc (2) 2 0
Strategic Planning - misc (15) 15 0
HR, ICT and OD - misc (3) 3 0
Taxation - recharges to outside bodies (10) 10 0
Internal Audit - recharges to outside bodies (20) 20 0
Indicative Savings from I&M programme
Stream 2: ICT & Digital - Schools Admin (56) 0 (56)
Stream 4: Review & Expansion of Flexible Working (44) 0 (44)
Care placements (245) 245 0
Reduction in reinvestment costs (4) 0 (4)
LEAN review (125) 0 (125)
TEMPORARY SAVIINGS
Approved when 2023/24 budget set:
Grampian Valuation Joint Board - refund 2018/19,
2020/21, 2021/22, 2022/23
(62) - (62) Amount will be confirmed when the accounts for
2023/24 are audited and approved by the Board
LHEES saving 23/24 (50) 50 0
CHARGES
Income target per budget paper (342) 281 (61)
Increase to Leisure income target (MC 26/6/24) 75 75
Total Approved when budget set (9,370) 9,304 9
Further savings approved in 24/25 (50) 125 0
Savings c/fwd from 2023/24 (1,216) 0 (1,216)
Balance at Qtr 2 (10,636) 9,429 (1,207)
* Status
Saving not taken and wont be achieved this year - if slipped into future years please give details in Col I
Saving not taken and uncertain if it will be achieved in full this year
Saving taken, or will be taken, in full
Page 114

Page 115

APPENDIX 7
General Reserves Committee
reference
Approved
£000s
Budget
released
£000s
General Reserves @ 1 April 2024 6,000
Free balance @ 30 Sept 2024 6,000
Transformation Ear marked Reserve Committee
reference
Approved
£000s
Budget
released
£000s
Balance @ 1 April 2024 6,152
Project Management revenue costs for closure of two corporate officesSMC 25/10/23 (105)
Plan for Just Transition Moray MC 28/2/24 (30)
Clear Transfrom rolled budgets 24/25 to
reserves
174 174
Reinstate Transform budget  - PMO Admin (45) (45)
Reinstate Transform budget - Snr Proj Officer
(Office Review)
(69) (69)
Reinstate Transform budget - to cover costs
1377 PROP
2 2
Alliance Leisure Review (27) (27)
BIM (64) (64)
ECLS 19.9.23 - IMP Digital Snr ICT Officer to Sept24 (24) (24)
(188) (53)
Free balance @ 30 Sept 2024 5,964
Working Ear marked Reserve Committee
reference
Approved
£000s
Budget
released
£000s
Balance @ 1 April 2024 8,686
Less commitments against reserves when
budget was set:
To balance budget MC 28/2/24
Funding from reserves approved in 2023/24
Corporate Training MC 26/6/24 (50)
Homelessness MC 26/6/24 (20)
Economic Development (East of Scotland
Homes Fund)
MC 26/6/24 (45)
Burial Grounds - Headstones Inspections MC 26/6/24 (10) 10
Open Spaces - Tree Inspections MC 26/6/24 (67) 67
School Catering Fusion App upgrade Corp 27.8.24 (13)
Savings approved at MC 25/9/24 MC 25/9/24 50
Council Tax increase (reduce use of reserves) 429
274
Approved use of reserves
Free balance @ 30 Sept 2024 8,960
Item 9.
Page 115

Page 116

Council Priorities ear marked Reserve Committee
reference
Approved
£000s
Budget
released
£000s
Balance @ 1 April 2024 3,134
Voluntary Early Retirement costs (217)
Free balance @ 30 Sept 2024 2,917
MGD Cash Flow Reserve Committee
reference
Approved
£000s
Budget
released
£000s
Balance @ 1 April 2024 4,000
Free balance @ 30 Sept 2024 4,000
Service Concession (PPP) Committee
reference
Approved
£000s
Budget
released
£000s
Balance @ 1 April 2024 7,526
Free balance @ 30 Sept 2024 7,526
Page 116

Page 117

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: CAPITAL PLAN 2024/25
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT and
FINANCE)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To advise the Committee of expenditure to 30 September 2024 under the
capital plan for financial year 2024/25 and of estimates of projected
expenditure profiled into quarters.
1.2 This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section III (B) 9 of the
Council’s Administrative Scheme relating to monitoring progress of projects in
the approved capital plan including any revisions to the price or phasing on a
quarterly basis.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that the Council:
(i) considers and notes expenditure to 30 September 2024 of
£7,087,000;
(ii) considers and notes the current projected full year out turn of
£42,292,000, prior to approval, and £43,350,000 following approval of
amendments, as set out in APPENDIX 1;
(iii) considers and notes the projected overall expenditure for projects
spanning more than one financial year, as set out in APPENDIX 2
(iv) considers and notes the amended projected expenditure in the year
as detailed in section 7 of the report;
(v) considers and notes the latest affordability indicator outturn of
8.77% against an upper limit of 10% as set out in paragraph 8.1; and
(vi) approve further net amendments of £6,798,000 for 2024/25, including
carried forward requests to 2025/26 of £8,088,000 to the capital plan
as detailed in section 5.
Item 10.
Page 117

Page 118

3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The capital plan for 2024/25 totalling £49,662,000 (excluding Moray Growth
Deal projects) was approved by Moray Council on 24 January 2024
(paragraph 11 of the Minute refers). The Council approved carried forward
budget and reprofiling amendments to future years of £12,529,000 on 26 June
2024 (paragraph 13 of the Minute refers) and further amendments of
£3,047,000 at Corporate Committee on 27 August 2024 (paragraph 9 of the
Minute refers). The results of these amendments are an amended capital plan
for 2024/25 of £50,148,000, now including Moray Growth Deal projects.
3.2 The 2024/25 Capital Plan includes a £9,000,000 slippage factor, a reduction
in core budget of 15%. For future years a cap on capital expenditure is to be
applied to ensure the affordability of the capital plan.  At a special meeting of
the Council on 22 October 2024 (paragraph 9 of the Minute refers) the
mechanism for applying a cap on capital expenditure from 2025/26 was
agreed. The cap will allow a systematic approach to capital budgeting,
focusing on asset prioritisation for individual projects as well as a general
reduction in on-going programmes of work.
4. CAPITAL PLAN 2024/2025
4.1 The summary capital plan is shown below, with actual expenditure to 30
September 2024 of £7,087,000. This equates to 18% of the currently
approved Capital Plan and is an underspend of £7,144,000 against budget to
date. General Capital Grant of £4,500,000 has been received from the
Scottish Government. In addition to this, Developer Contributions of £707,000
have been received along with capital receipts of £300,000 for the sale of
land, buildings and vehicles. 
4.2 The following table provides a breakdown of variances to date. For budgets
with a variance of +/- £10,000 further narrative is provided. Estimated full year
figures, and variances, are set out in APPENDIX 1.
Area Para
ref
Annual
Budget
£000
Budget
to Date
£000
Spend to
Date
£000
(Over)/
Under
Spend
£000
Bridges 4.3 5,491  312  335      (23)
Car Parks n/a   417      2      2 -
Climate Change n/a   631 - - -
Corporate Buildings n/a 46 - 4 (4)
Fleet 4.4 3,783 2,873   828 2,045
Flood Risk & Coastal
Protection
4.5 430   235   173     62
Harbours 4.6 1,483 1,500 1,568 (68)
ICT 4.7 526   173   92     81
Industrial Portfolio 4.8   279 90     26 64
Learning Estate 4.9 11,979 3,031 1,612 1,419
Libraries & Leisure 4.10 3,300 127     21 106
Parks & Open Spaces 4.11 1,166 36   142 (107)
Road Improvements 4.12 3,927 1,786   317 1,469
Page 118

Page 119

Area Para
ref
Annual
Budget
£000
Budget
to Date
£000
Spend to
Date
£000
(Over)/
Under
Spend
£000
Street Lighting 4.13   656   309   364      (55)
Traffic & Road Safety n/a   277 59     60 (1)
Waste Management n/a 3,275   127   117    10
Spend to Save - n/a   132     17     17 -
Economic Development 4.14 1,294 188   161 27
Moray Growth Deal 4.15 603 3,003 1,099 1,904
Active Travel
Infrastructure
4.16  411   226   148  78
TOTAL 40,106 14,094 7,087 7,077
4.3 Expenditure on Bridges was £335,000 against a budget to date of £312,000.
The overspend to date is a result of works at Viewmill Bridge being completed
earlier than profiled. A request to carry forward £364,000 has been made with
details outlined in paragraph 5.2.  Current projections, after that adjustment,
are for an underspend of £20,000.
4.4 Expenditure on Fleet was £828,000 against a budget to date of £2,873,000.
The underspend is due to the budget profile being based on vehicle orders,
but not all orders placed have yet been delivered. The budget profile going
forward will be corrected to better reflect spend timings and there is no
expected variance for the full year.
4.5 Expenditure on Flood Risk Management and Costal Protection to 30
September 2024 was £173,000 against the profiled budget of £235,000
resulting in an underspend to date of £62,000. Minor delays due to licensing
requirements for coastal erosion protection at Kingston have resulted in works
being re-profiled to the next quarter. Historic compensation claims related to
the Elgin and Findhorn Flood Alleviation Schemes have been settled resulting
in a projected overspend for the year of £165,000. All other planned projects
are projected to stay in budget.
4.6 Expenditure on Harbours to date has been £1,568,000 against a budget of
£1,500,000. Overspend for the period was due to higher than anticipated
costs for rock cutting and power upgrades at Buckie Harbour. Given this, the
projected outturn for the year is an overspend of £96,000
4.7 Expenditure on ICT for the period was £92,000 against budget of £173,000.
The underspend is attributable to delays in ordering equipment and has been
reprofiled. Expenditure for the year is projected to be on budget.
4.8 Expenditure on the Industrial Estate portfolio for the period was £26,000
against a budget of £90,000. Workforce changes have resulted in delays to
the programme which has been reprofiled to future quarters. Expenditure for
the year is projected to be on budget.
Page 119

Page 120

4.9 Expenditure on the Learning Estate for the period was £1,612,000 against
planned spend of £3,031,000. The underspend is attributable primarily to
project delays materialising on Elgin High School Extension and Forres
Academy as well as works not starting across a number of schools under the
BB programme, either due to additional design and survey works being
required or the lead in time for procurement not being fully considered when
profiling the budget. Further information related to the reprofiling and carry
forward of spend is noted in paragraph 5.7 of this report.
4.10 Expenditure on Libraries and Leisure was £21,000 against planned spend of
£127,000. Refurbishment works planned for quarter 2 are now expected in the
next quarter.  Spend associated with Moray Leisure Centre has been paused
pending a review, which is the subject of another report to this meeting of
Council. Pending the decision of the meeting there has been no adjustment to
the projected spend. However, part of this budget has been identified as
amber rated spend as noted in para 6.3 of the report and may be adjusted in
future periods.
4.11 Expenditure on Parks and Open Spaces was £142,000 against planned
spend of £36,000. Favourable summer conditions allowed two play area
upgrades to be completed ahead of schedule bringing costs forward one
quarter. There is a recommended carry forward relating to two play areas
which have not progressed so quickly in paragraph 6.8 of this report.
4.12 Expenditure on Roads Improvements is recorded as £317,000 against a
budget of £1,786,000. The apparent underspend has been reprofiled into
future periods and is a result of works carried out not being recharged to
capital before the quarter end. Cost pressures associated with landslips have
highlighted an expected overspend in the year. Anticipated costs of £752,000
have been identified and where possible, existing budget has been allocated
to absorb the cost. However, it is currently expected the budget will have an
overspend of £473, 000 for the year.
4.13 Expenditure on Street Lighting for the period was £364,00 against planned
spend of £309,000. This is considered to be a timing difference with
expenditure for the year anticipated to be on budget.
4.14 Expenditure on Economic Development was £161,000 against a budget of
£188,000. The underspend of £27,000 was due to a reprofiling of the Nature
Restoration Fund brought forward from 2023/24 with a request to carry
forward £18,000 to future years.
4.15 Expenditure on the Moray Growth Deal was £1,099,000 against anticipated
spend to date of £3,003,000. The largest contribution to the underspend was
delay in site acquisition for the Housing Mix Delivery. Delays in projects
reaching full business case have also pushed back expenditure. Moray
Growth Deal is projecting an estimated overall underspend in the year of
£452,000.  Further information related to the reprofiling and carry forward of
spend is contained in paragraph 5.13 of the report.
4.16 Expenditure on Active Travel Infrastructure, which is fully funded by grant,
was £148,000 against anticipated spend of £226,000. Initial profiling has been
Page 120

Page 121

updated to reflect more accurate timings follow a review of the project profile.
Funding is expected to be fully spent during the year.
5. CAPITAL PLAN AMENDMENTS
5.1 The following amendments are recommended for approval.
Area Para ref Amendment Of
which
Carry
Forward
Increase £000 £000
Corporate Buildings 5.4 185 -
Fleet 5.3/5.5/5.10 385 -
Flood Risk Management and
Coastal Protection
5.6 77 -
Fleet 385 -
ICT 5.7 92 -
Roads Improvements 5.9 342
Active Travel Infrastructure Fund 5.11 23 -
Waste – Dallachy 5.14 - 1,000
Total Increase 1,104 -
Decrease
Bridges 5.2 (364) 364
Climate Change 5.3 (431) 218
Learning Estate 5.8 (4,750) 4,497
Parks and Open Spaces 5.15 (190) 190
Nature Restoration Fund 5.12 (18) 18
Moray Growth Deal 5.13 (2,149) 2,149
Total Decrease (7,902)
TOTAL NET AMENDMENTS (6,798) 8,088
5.2 It is recommended that £364,000 is deferred from the Bridges budget. Works
related to New Bishopmill Bridge had been reprogrammed to future years in
anticipation of works at Cloddach Bridge beginning this financial year.
Confirmation on whether funding will be made available for Cloddach Bridge
is still outstanding. Pending final decision, the Bridges team are reviewing
work programmes to evaluate the possibility of pulling this work forward in the
event of Cloddach Bridge not progressing. It is however unlikely the Bridges
team would be unable to mobilise before the year end.
5.3 The £631,000 budget for Climate Change should have been split, with an
element allocated towards the purchase of electric vehicles (EV) and EV
charging points.  It is recommended that £213,000 is reallocated to Fleet
Services for this purpose.  It is also recommended that £218,000 is carried
forward to future years for Climate Change. Current planned spend in the year
focuses on solar energy projects to council buildings and future spend will
focus on the school estate, where time on site is limited to holidays. It is also
expected future year spend will include more complex spend, for example
where planning applications are required. 
Page 121

Page 122

5.4 £160,000 of monies received from SSEN for community resilience projects
have been made available for the purchase of three power generators to be
installed at sites across Moray – Aberlour Primary School, Applegrove
Primary School and Cluny Primary. A need for a fourth generator (to be
installed at Ashgrove depot, Elgin) has been identified and there are
opportunities for economies of scale in terms of cost and design time if these
are combined. It is recommended that £25,000 is added to the capital plan
(Corporate Buildings) for 2024/25 as a contribution from Moray Council
alongside the £160,000 received from SSEN.
5.5 It is recommended that a further £122,000 is re-instated from the original
slippage applied to fleet services to cover the unexpected write-off of a
vehicle..
5.6 It is recommended that £77,000 is redirected from Roads Improvement to
Flood Risk Management and Coastal Protection. Coastal erosion works at
Findhorn have been identified at a cost of £155,000 with the remining cost
being absorbed by existing budget.
5.7 It is recommended £92,000 is added to the capital plan to allow for the
purchase and installation of an upgraded cashless catering system, Fusion,
for schools. This is an essential software replacement that was not included in
the original ICT budget.
5.8 Following the reprofiling of spend on the Learning Estate, a net reduction of
£4,750,000 from the 2024/25 capital plan is being recommended. Of the
reduction, £4,497.000 is recommended to be deferred to future years and
£253,000 of design fee contingency to be removed completely from the plan.
The deferral of works is due to the above mentioned delays in para 4.9. A
further report is due to the Education Resources and Communities Committee
in February 2025.
5.8 It is recommended that £190,000 is to be carried forward to 2025/26 for Play
Area Upgrades. Public consultation, procurement lead in times and favourable
weather conditions are required, making it unlikely these works can be
completed this financial year. These upgrades are fully funded by Scottish
Government grant.
5.9 It is recommended that £342,000 is re-instated from the original slippage
applied to Road Improvements to cover emerging pressures with landslips. A
programme of works is being established with planned works at Findhorn
(noted above), A95 River Isla and A959 Creag Chalcaidh Quarry alongside
feasibility studies expected to be carried out this year.
5.10 It is recommended that £50,000 is added to the plan for a MOT Testing
Station upgrade as a cost avoidance exercise. Current equipment utilised by
Fleet Services has begun to fail and the expected costs and loss of income
relating to outsourcing this is estimated at £50,000 p.a. – loss of income from
testing taxis (£20,000) and other vehicles (£12,000) plus additional costs of
outsourcing testing (£17,000).  Upgrading the MOT test equipment would also
provide the opportunity to carry out testing on larger vehicles which is
currently being outsourced at £2,000 pa.
Page 122

Page 123

5.11 A slippage factor of £23,000 has incorrectly been applied to the capital plan
for the Active Travel Infrastructure Fund. It is recommended this budget
(Other Funded Projects) is reinstated as this will be fully funded from external
sources.
5.12 It is recommended that £18,000 is carried forward from the Nature Restoration
Fund. Reduced government funding has resulted in a reprogramming of
current budget which has created a short delay in works being completed by
the year end.
5.13 It is recommended that £2,149,000 is carried forward from Moray Growth
Deal. A reprofile request has gone to Scottish Government as a result of
development of the Manufacturing Innovation Centre being slower than
initially anticipated. The request also covers spend on the Housing Mix
Delivery and Bus Revolution projects progressing ahead of schedule.
5.14 From the end of 2025 landfilling of biodegradable waste will be banned.  The
Council has transitioned to the NESS Energy from Waste incinerator for the
disposal of its mixed municipal waste, and, as part of the 2024/25 capital plan,
£449,000 was earmarked for the final capping of Dallachy landfill.  A tender
exercise was undertaken in June/July 2024 but no compliant bids were
received. Following the initial tender exercise, an options appraisal and 
market research were undertaken to understand the options available to the
Council and the potential cost pressures for the final capping exercise. The
tender for the capping works was republished and closed on 18 November
2024.  Whilst the works will not commence until April 2025, and no spend will
be needed until 2025/26, it is anticipated that approval of an additional
£1,000,000 is required within 2024/25 in order to be able to award the contract
in 2024/25.  Once approved, carry forward of the full year budget 2025/26 will
be recommended. The Council has no option but to carry out the final capping
of Dallachy in accordance with statutory requirements.
5.15 In total, amendments to decrease the capital budget for 2024/25 by
£6,798,000 is being recommended, with a request to carry forward
£7,088,000 into future years.
6. ESTIMATED OUTTURN
6.1 The spend projected provided by budget managers are based on the best
information available at this time. Where a budget manager has not provided
an estimate the capital accountant has applied their judgement.  Projects are
graded for confidence of achieving projected expenditure with high confidence
rates as green, medium confidence as amber, and low confidence as red. A
summary of the ratings is given in the table below.
Risk Status RAG No of
Projects
Budgeted
Expenditure
2024/25
£000
High confidence of spend to estimate G 98 13,372
Page 123

Page 124

Medium confidence of spend to estimate A 49 22,239
Low confidence of spend to estimate R 7 6,681
Total Projected Expenditure 153 42,292
6.2 Red Rating - £6,681.000 has been given low confidence of spend to estimate
in the year. The majority of this balance is made up of Bridges budget
(£4,137,000) for Cloddach Bridge, as there is still uncertainty around
government funding. £1,678,000 relates to two Moray Growth Deal projects
(EY STEM and Manufacturing Innovation Centre) which are progressing
slower than anticipated. The remaining red rating spend was for Dallachy
landfill (£499,000) which will unlikely be progressed this year as the
anticipated cost is higher than budget (see paragraph 6.14) and £350,000
related to the Learning Estate
6.3 Amber Rating - £22,239,000 has been given medium confidence of spend to
estimate in the year. This equates to 54% of the capital programme. Three
Moray Growth Deal Projects (Culture Quarter, Housing Mix Delivery and
Business Enterprise Hub) equate to £5,688,000 of amber spend driven by the
complexity of the projects and various business case sign off stages.
£4,586,000 is related to the Learning Estate based on the current pace of
works being completed and the required procurement lead in times for a
number of the projects. £4,118,000 is related to fleet spend which has been
hard to profile against in the last couple of years given the lengthy delivery
windows for ordering new vehicles. £2,784,000 of Library and Leisure spend
is currently pending the outcome of the Leisure Review. £2,428,000 is related
to Waste Management for budget set aside of Ness Energy for Waste final
account settlement. The balance of amber rate spend is to account for the
optimism that budget managers historically give when profiling spend.
6.4 The Estimated outturn from budget managers has been revised at
Programme level to reflect levels of slippage based on expenditure to date
and levels of overall expenditure in the last three financial years. The 15%
slippage during the budget setting has already been accounted for.
£000
Projected Spend notified per departments 43,350
Amend for slippage on red projects 6,681
Amend for slippage on amber projects (35%) 7,784
Amend for slippage on green projects (15%) 2,005
Revised Estimated Out-turn 26,880
7. EMERGING ISSUES
7.1 An action of the Best Value Review was to align the capital plan to the
revenue budget, particularly in terms of affordability. The capital plan has an
impact on the revenue budget by the way of financing costs to service the
loan debt taken out to fund capital expenditure. Going forward, these reports
will make reference to the current affordability indicator which is the ratio of
financing costs to net revenue stream. Financing costs are principal and
interest loans charges in the year, which also include charges associated with
the PPP and DBFM School leases. Net revenue stream is defined as Scottish
Government Revenue Grant, Council Tax Income and NDR Income.
Page 124

Page 125

£000 £000
Financing Cost
Financing Costs for prior year spend 22,142
Estimated Financing cost for current year spend 1,087
Estimated Financing cost for PPP/DBFM Schools 93
Estimated Financing Cost 23,322
Net Revenue Budget
Scottish Gov Revenue Grant 147,015
NDR (estimated) 67,220
Council Tax (estimated) 51,804
Estimated Net Revenue Budget 266,039
Affordability Indicator 8.77%
The threshold for affordability has been set at 10%. The most recent estimate
shows this is 8.77% which is within the threshold.
7.2 The announcement of the UK budget on 30 October 2024 plus the result of
US elections have resulted in an increase in gilt yields. Borrowing rates via the
PWLB are set in accordance with these gilt yields so any increases would
result in higher borrowing costs for any new PWLB loans. These are
monitored as part of our standard treasury management practices.
8. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan
(LOIP))
Effective budget management is an essential component of delivery of
Council priorities on a sustainable basis.
(b) Policy and Legal
There are no policy or legal implications arising directly from this report.
(c) Financial implications
The financial implications are highlighted within the report and
APPENDICES 1 and 2 to the report.
(d) Risk Implications
Budget managers are aware of their responsibilities for managing budget
allocations and approval for variance will be sought from Council in line
with the financial regulations.
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications arising directly from this report.
(f) Property
There are no property implications arising directly from this report.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no equalities issues arising from this report
Page 125

Page 126

(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
There are no climate change or biodiversity issues directly arising from
this report.
(i) Consultations
All capital budget managers have been consulted as part of the
preparation of this report. All Heads of Service and the Corporate
Management Team have been consulted and any comments incorporated
in the report.
9. CONCLUSION
9.1 Capital expenditure to the quarter ended 30 September 2024 was
£7,087,000
9.2 Capital expenditure is currently projected to be £26,397,000. Lower than
the approved capital plan for 2024/25 but with a high degree of
uncertainty.
9.3 Amendments to the capital plan amounting to a decrease of £6,798,000
in 2024/25 and an increase of £8,088,000 for future years is
recommended.
9.4 The affordability indicator outturn is projected to be 8.77% This is within
the agreed threshold of 10%.
Author of Report: Jamie Fraser, Finance Manager
Background Papers:
Ref:  SPMAN-1293228629-1175
Page 126

Page 127

Moray Council Capital Programme 2024/25
As at 30 September 2024
Section 5.
Current
Capital Plan
2024/2025 Budget to Date Actual to Date
Variance to
Date
Full Year
Projection
Full Year
Variance
Amendments to
QTR 2 for
approval
Amended
Capital Plan
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Bridges 5,491 312 335 (23) 5,107 384 (364) 5,127
Car Parks 417 2 2 0 417 0 0 417
Climate Change 631 0 0 0 200 431 (431) 200
Corporate Buildings 46 0 4 (4) 231 (185) 185 231
Fleet 3,783 2,873 828 2,045 4,168 (385) 385 4,168
Flood Risk Management & Coastal Protection 430 235 173 62 672 (242) 77 507
Harbours 1,483 1,500 1,568 (68) 1,579 (96) 0 1,483
ICT 526 173 92 81 618 (92) 92 618
Industrial Portfolio 279 90 26 64 279 0 0 279
Learning Estate 11,979 3,031 1,612 1,419 7,229 4,750 (4,750) 7,229
Libraries & Leisure 3,300 127 21 106 1,950 1,350 0 3,300
Parks & Open Space 1,166 36 142 (107) 976 190 (190) 976
Road Improvements 3,927 1,786 317 1,469 4,271 (344) 342 4,269
Street Lighting 656 309 364 (55) 656 0 0 656
Traffic & Road Safety 277 59 60 (1) 277 (0) 0 277
Waste Management 3,275 127 117 10 3,275 0 0 3,275
Spend to Save 132 17 17 0 182 (50) 0 132
Other Funded Projects 411 226 148 78 434 (23) 23 434
Economic Development 1,294 188 161 27 1,276 18 (18) 1,276
Moray Growth Deal 10,645 3,003 1,099 1,904 8,496 2,149 (2,149) 8,496
50,148 14,094 7,087 7,007 42,292 7,856 (6,798) 43,350
Target
Funding
Prudential Borrowing 35,350 1,310 28,761
General Capital Grant (exc PSHG and CYPA) 7,959 4,286 7,959
Moray Growth Deal 6,238 476 6,029
Other Grants & Contributions 411 308 411
Developers Contributions 35 707 35
Useable capital receipts b/f 0 0 0
Receipts generated in year 155 0 155
50,148 7,087 43,350
APPENDIX 1
Section 4.
Item 10.
Page 127

Page 128

Page 128

Page 129

Major Capital Projects spanning more than 1 financial years (as at 30th September 2024) APPENDIX 2
Approved
budget
Total
Expenditure
in previous
years
Current
budget   
24-25
Actual
spend  
24-25
Remaining
budget    
24-25
Projected
future
years
budget
required
Estimated
Final Cost
Projected
Variance
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Schools Estate
BB Programme      91,500               3,999         4,373      1,133 3,240          83,128       91,500                      -
Refurbishment and Rebuild   289,684                  527         2,545         435 2,110          286,612     289,684                    -
Universal school meals          617                    12            200            3 197             405            617                           - 
Moray Growth Deal
Bus Revolution 4,000       1,015              997          24         973             1,988         4,000                        -
Early Years STEM 4,800       66                  2,077       115       1,962          2,657         4,800                        -
Housing Mix Delivery 7,500       1,385              -               157       157-             6,115         7,500                        -
Cultural Quarter 23,802     458                2,340       473       1,867          21,004       23,802                      -
Business Enterprise Hub 5,000       -                     1,550       -            1,550          3,450         5,000                        -
Moray Aerospace, Advanced technology
and Innovation Campus 27,035     -                     1,032       -            1,032          26,003       27,035                      -
Manufacturing Innovation Centre 6,832       -                     1,920       47         1,873          4,912         6,832                        -
Digital Health Innitiative 5,000       3,185              126          283       157-             1,689         5,000                        -
TOTAL 465,770   10,647            17,160     2,670    14,490        437,963     465,770                    -
Notes:
School Estate Budget is indicative based on 10 year plan submitted 24 January 2024
Item 10.
Page 129

Page 130

Page 130

Page 131

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: CAPITAL STRATEGY
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To ask Council to approve the amended Capital Strategy presented in draft as
APPENDIX 1 to this report.
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (B) (1) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to consideration of the financial
and budgetary policy of the Council.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that Council approve the amended Capital Strategy
as set out in APPENDIX 1.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The Council’s current Capital Strategy was approved by the Council at its
meeting on 24 January 2024 (paragraph 10 of the Minute refers). 
3.2 The Prudential Code governs the Council’s capital expenditure.  The Code
states that the capital strategy should be tailored to local circumstances
ensuring that each local authority will be able to determine its own
prerequisites for their capital strategy, while taking into account any statutory
requirements.  The draft revised Capital Strategy at APPENDIX 1 complies
with the Prudential Code 2021 and continues to follow the 2021 Chartered
Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) guidance on Capital
Strategy and its emphasis on a whole organisation approach to capital
planning.
3.3 As a document, the Capital Strategy complements other documents such as
the Council’s Treasury Management Strategy.  The Capital Strategy is not
intended to be a technical document, but instead viewed as an accessible
document, which sets out the context in which decisions about capital
expenditure are to be made.  This revised Capital Strategy sets the context for
approving the Capital Plan for 2025/26, reflecting the approved mechanism for
applying a cap to capital expenditure for 2025/26 onwards.
Item 11.
Page 131

Page 132

3.4 The draft Capital Strategy at APPENDIX 1 sets out:
 what constitutes capital expenditure;
 why the Council undertakes capital expenditure;
 how the capital programmes of the Council relate to Council priorities
and other Council policies;
 the link between asset management and capital planning;
 how the Council finances capital expenditure;
 the main aims of Treasury Management;
 the Council’s governance arrangement for approving and monitoring
capital expenditure;
 the risks the Council is exposed to from its capital programmes;
 how the Council accesses appropriate knowledge and skills;
 shows diagrammatically the links between different bodies, plans and
processes and the Council’s capital plans.
3.5 All proposed amendments are made in tracked changes.  There are no other
substantive amendments proposed.
4. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
The Capital Strategy indicates the links between the LOIP and the
Council’s Corporate Plan and the Council’s planned capital expenditure
(b) Policy and Legal
Part 7 of the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003 requires local
authorities to have regard to the Prudential Code.
(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications arising directly from this report. The
Capital Strategy is one of a number of documents which assist in the
Council’s financial planning process.
(d) Risk Implications
There are no risk implications arising directly from this report.  The
Capital Strategy indicates risks associated with capital expenditure plans
and introduces measures to deal with the risk the Council is exposed to
from inflation and in particular rising construction costs and increased
interest rates.  There may be risks to service delivery which arise from
application of the cap on capital expenditure and these will be reported
as they are identified.
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications arising directly from this report.  Any
staffing implications which arise from application of the cap on capital
expenditure will be reported as they are identified.
Page 132

Page 133

(f) Property
There are no property implications arising directly from this report.  Any
property implications which arise from application of the cap of capital
expenditure will be reported as they are identified.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no implications for equalities or the socio-economic duty
arising directly from this report.
(h)    Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
There are no climate change or biodiversity issues arising directly from  
this report.  The revised Capital Strategy continues to recognise climate
change as a Council priority which will have implications for the Council’s
capital plan.
(i)     Consultations
Members CMT have been consulted in the preparation of this report.
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 The Council’s Capital Strategy has been revised as part of the financial
planning process
5.2 The Strategy underpins the Council’s 10 year indicative Capital Plan.
Author of Report: Lorraine Paisey, Chief Financial Officer
Background Papers:
Ref: LP/SPMAN-1293228629-1203
Page 133

Page 134

Page 134

Page 135

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
THE MORAY COUNCIL CAPITAL STRATEGY 2024/25
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Council owns a range of assets which are used to deliver – directly or indirectly –
services to the people of Moray. The investment needed to ensure that these assets
meet the Council approved standard for the asset type is ascertained through the asset
management planning process.  The Capital Strategy links that process to the Council’s
Capital Plan.  The Council’s Corporate Asset Management Plan recognises that Asset
Management Planning is an iterative process, with constraints imposed by financial
affordability, and that is reflected directly in this Capital Strategy.  Asset Management is
recognised in the Council’s Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy as one of the main
vehicles which the Council will use to make strategic shifts in expenditure to achieve
financial sustainability.
1.2 The Council also requires to invest to provide the infrastructure needed for economic
growth, in accordance with the Local Development Plan, but also to ensure that the
Council operates efficiently and can meet the needs of transformation to a sustainable
operating model.
1.3 The CIPFA Guidance to Capital Strategy 2021 recognises that a capital strategy is not
simply a document but a whole organisation approach to effective, long-term planning
and investment, with outputs and outcomes that lead to healthy, vibrant, green and
resilient communities, businesses, organisations and geographic areas.
1.4 The Council through its medium-term financial planning, Corporate Plan, Climate
Strategy and Asset Management Plans embraces the approach to capital strategy
recommended by CIPFA, albeit tempered by issues of affordability, which have  become
more pressing in the current environment of higher interest rates and increased
construction costs than were seen in the recent past.  The Council has adopted a
mechanism for capping the capital plan to reflect these constraints.
1.5 All investment in capital is made under the Prudential Code.  A revised version of the
Code was published in 2021.  The new Code contains requirements for a Capital
Strategy and this Strategy complies with those requirements.  The Code states that:
“A capital strategy should give a high level overview of how capital expenditure, capital
financing and treasury management activity contribute to the delivery of the authority’s
plans and provisions of services along with an overview of how associated risk is
managed and the implications for future financial sustainability.”
1.6 The Code requires each local authority to tailor their capital strategy to their own
individual circumstances, whilst containing sufficient detail to allow members to
understand how stewardship, prudence, sustainability, proportionality and affordability
will be secured, taking into account any legislative requirements on reporting.
1.7 The Capital Strategy incorporates an approach to affordability based on an expenditure
cap.   This approach requires an iterative approach to capital planning, identifying the
Item 11.
Page 135

Page 136

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
expenditure required by the various drivers for capital expenditure then modifying
planned expenditure to keep within the expenditure cap. In this respect the approach is
similar to that adopted for revenue planning: a balanced budget is identified with
estimated income limiting spending which is then planned and monitored to ensure it
stays within that balanced budget.
2. CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
2.1 Capital expenditure is expenditure to acquire, improve, upgrade or extend the life of an
asset, such as land and buildings, roads infrastructure, vehicles and equipment.  The
Council sets de minimis levels below which expenditure will not be accounted for as
capital.  The current levels are:
 Land and buildings, council houses, surplus assets (valued at current value) -
£20,000
 Infrastructure, vehicles, equipment, community assets (valued at historic cost) -
£6,000
2.2 Much capital expenditure requires a lead-in time to ensure that relevant legal conditions
are met, e.g. planning permission is in place; for project design, and for procurement. 
Capital expenditure therefore requires a longer planning timeframe than revenue
expenditure.  The Council therefore prepares and annually updates an indicative ten
year capital programme to facilitate future planning.
2.3 Due to the short-term nature of Council funding settlements from Scottish Government,
only the first year of the plan has been submitted to the Council for approval.  In order to
facilitate application of the cap whilst retaining the ability to commit to projects which will
extend over more than one year a three year programme will be submitted for approval
in 2025.  The full ten year plan is approved as indicative of the Council’s intentions and
allows the affordability of capital plans over a longer timeframe to be assessed.
2.4 Currently all of the Council’s planned capital expenditure is operational; none is for
commercial or purely income generating purposes.
3. CAPITAL INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
3.1 The Council’s objectives in investing in capital are to ensure an adequate suite of assets
to deliver the Council’s services, in accordance with the Council’s policies, strategies
and plans, and priorities; legislative duties and other requirements, including
affordability.  The Council’s Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy, the latest version
of which was approved by Council on 26 June 2024, recognises the Council’s asset
base as a key financial lever and the pressing need to review the use of the Council’s
assets to generate savings.  The Council’s Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy,
approved by Council on 25 October 2023 with a revised version being reported on 4
December 2024 highlights the extent to which the Council’s forecast budget shortfall is
created by the cost of maintaining the Council’s current asset base. Projected capital
costs are very strongly influenced by the current condition of corporate assets, with the
Page 136

Page 137

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
condition of the Learning Estate in particular having been consistently benchmarked as
one of the poorest in Scotland for many years.
3.2 A key consideration in developing the capital plan is the requirement to provide new
infrastructure and facilities to accommodate planned local developments. 
3.3 The Capital Plan reflects the requirements identified in the Local Development Plan for
Moray for infrastructure projects required to support growth including transport, schools,
health services and where necessary sports and community facilities. These
requirements are established through the strategic planning of relevant departments
such as Transport and Education Resources but also include Community Planning
Partners and the evidence base on housing and employment land demand and
forecasted delivery. This evidence base allows for the long term planning of Capital
expenditure to support economic growth and also for the Developer Obligations
requirements to ensure that the development pays for the infrastructure burden it
creates.
3.4 The process relies upon robust strategic planning of major infrastructure provision
relating to Learning Estate, Transport, Health and Sports and Community facilities.
Where this evidence base does not exist or is not robust it will be difficult to obtain
developer obligations. The Council also needs to demonstrate its commitment to deliver
the infrastructure required to support the economic growth within the Local Development
Plan through its Capital Planning process.
3.5 The Community Planning Partnership’s priorities (Our People, Our Place, Our Future)
are encompassed in the Moray 2027 Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP). The
Council has adopted the following priorities in its Corporate Plan, which was approved
on 28 February 2024:
 Tackle poverty and inequality
 Build a stronger, greener, vibrant economy
 Build thriving, resilient, empowered communities
3.6 The General Services Capital Plan includes investment in the local economy,
principally through  Moray Growth Deal and investment in the Council’s industrial
portfolio.  There is provision for investment under the heading of Climate change, and
zero carbon aims are gradually being mainstreamed into ongoing programmes of work,
such as the fleet replacement programme and planned work on corporate buildings and
the Learning Estate. 
3.7 A key outcome of the Local Housing Strategy is to ensure there is an adequate supply
of affordable housing in a good quality condition.  This is reflected in the Housing
Revenue Account (HRA) Capital Plan.  The originally planned new build programme has
been scaled back following reduction in Scottish Government grant funding.
3.8 Council on 10 March 2021 agreed the Climate Change Strategy 2020-2030 (Para 13
Minute refers). The strategy supports the aims of the Council’s Corporate Plan 2024-
2027 to build a greener economy by creating a more resilient and sustainable future. As
a complementary document the Council on 6 April 2022 approved a Route Map to Net
Zero, setting out a series of actions within a carbon management hierarchy, which
Page 137

Page 138

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
prioritises the avoidance of carbon emissions.  Economic Development and
Infrastructure Services Committee on 30 April 2024 approved the Zero Emission Feet
Strategy.
3.9 Although many of the actions will not require capital investment, many do and in
particular the Climate Change Strategy recognised that significant investment will be
required to ensure that all corporate buildings (including the Learning Estate) meet the
net zero carbon target. Further significant investment will be required to replace the
Council’s fossil fuelled fleet and current technology coupled with local capacity and
prohibitive cost does not allow for heavier vehicles to be replaced with zero emission
alternatives. Future Capital Plans will incorporate Climate Change Strategy and Route
Map to Net Zero implications as these are mainstreamed into asset management
planning as has been done for fleet.
3.10 The balance of the Council’s Capital Plan arises from the need to invest in the Council’s
current asset base, either to bring it to the approved standard or to maintain it at the
Council’s approved standard for the asset type.  The Council recognises that the asset
management requirements of the current asset base are such that the asset base is
unaffordable and that the Capital Plan must reflect the need to manage down the
required level of capital investment in part by reducing the asset base.  The Smarter
Working Project has been instrumental in allowing the Council to start to reduce its
corporate office base and the Depot and Stores review has also commenced the
rationalisation process.
4. ASSET MANAGEMENT
4.1 The Council’s Asset Objectives were approved by the Policy and Resources Committee
on 11 October 2011:
 To ensure that our assets are fit for purpose in terms of condition, sufficiency,
suitability, and accessibility.
 To ensure that our asset use demonstrates Best Value in terms of running costs
and environmental impacts.
 To ensure that our Asset Management processes reflect good practice.
 To ensure that our assets reflect the policies and priorities of the Council.
4.2 The Council adopted the following standards for the asset classes within the Capital
Plan on 11 February 2014, which were reviewed during 2021 by the Asset Management
Working Group to ensure that they remain relevant:
Asset Type Recommended Standard
Learning Estate B condition B suitability
Offices, Depots etc Of a standard that supports the
efficient delivery of services
Leisure Centres and Community
Centres
B condition B suitability
Children’s Play Areas To meet safety standards
Page 138

Page 139

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
Asset Type Recommended Standard
Day Centres and Resource Centres B condition B suitability
ICT Schools 5 Year Replacement
Offices etc 7 Year Replacement
Plant and Vehicles Replacement based on cost
effectiveness – assessment of replace
or repair
Industrial Estates B condition B suitability
Waste Management Of a standard that supports the
efficient delivery of services
Roads
Bridges
Street Lighting
Aim to be at the midpoint of the table
for road conditions in Scotland.
Harbours B condition B suitability
4.3 At the same meeting the Council adopted the following policy in relation to the
preparation of the Capital Plan:
“The Council recognises the importance of the principles underpinning the CIPFA
Prudential Code in relation to capital expenditure, in particular, affordability and
sustainability of its investment plans. The Council’s policy in relation to Capital Planning
is:
a) To maintain all buildings at a satisfactory level of condition and suitability for the
provision of council services;
b) To maintain the road infrastructure with regard to the safety of all road users and
aim to be at the mid-point of the table for carriageway conditions in Scotland;
c) To maintain all short-life assets (less than 10 years) required for the provision of
council services at the optimum level to minimise the annual cost to the council;
d) To provide investment funding to support economic development plans; and
e) To identify assets for disposal.
In relation to the council’s housing stock the same principles are applied in the Housing
Business Plan. The Council is also required to meet the Scottish Housing Quality
Standard.”  It is implicit in the requirements for both affordability and sustainability that
the Council’s asset base is of a size that it can afford to maintain to a suitable standard.
Following the adoption of a cap on capital expenditure the policy in relation to capital
planning will be reviewed in the context of the Corporate Asset Management Plan.
4.4 A 30 year Business Plan for the HRA is regularly updated to ensure that housing stock
can be brought up to and maintained at the Scottish Housing Quality Standard (SHQS)
and can achieve the second Energy Efficiency Standard for Social Housing (EESSH2)
set in June 2019, for social rented houses to meet by 2032. This has a target that all
Page 139

Page 140

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
social housing meets, or can be treated as meeting, EPC Band B, or is as energy
efficient as practically possible by the end of December 2032 and within the limits of
cost, technology and necessary consent.
.
4.5 To ensure that the General Services Capital Plan is affordable and sustainable, the draft
Capital Plan is reviewed in the context of the Council’s financial planning processes for
the General Fund. 
4.6 Good quality asset management information is vital to enable planning for capital
expenditure.  Where the expenditure required to maintain the Council’s asset base at
approved levels is unaffordable, the Council must take steps to address this.  This could
be by increasing income to cover costs or by decreasing the asset base or approved
asset standard.  In its Financial Strategies (both short term and medium to long term)
the Council recognises its asset base as a key financial lever.    The Council has
approved a capping mechanism for capital expenditure, to ensure that expenditure on
servicing debt remains below 10% of income generated (government grant, Non
Domestic Rates Income and Council Tax).  To achieve this and continue to meet the
objectives of capital spend requires that the Council’s asset base is reduced.
5. CAPITAL FINANCING
5.1 A number of sources of funding are available to the Council to finance its capital
expenditure:
 General and specific capital grants from Scottish and UK Governments
and other bodies
 Contributions from the Council’s revenue budgets
 Capital receipts from the disposal of surplus Council assets
 Developer contributions
 Borrowing, in the long term predominantly from the Public Works Loan
Board (PWLB), although in recent years the Council has taken advantage
of relatively cheap rates from other local authorities
5.2 The Council is awarded General Capital Grant from the Scottish Government and this is
used to fund capital expenditure before the use of any other capital receipts.  The HRA
makes extensive use of contributions from its revenue budget, but the General Services
Capital Plan does not budget for contributions from revenue.  The amount of capital
expenditure which cannot be met from grant or other receipts will be funded by
borrowing.
5.3 When setting the amount which it is willing to borrow, the Council must comply with the
Prudential Code.  The two main criteria for compliance with the code are that the
Council can demonstrate that the borrowing decision is affordable, sustainable, and
prudent.  Accordingly the Council approves Prudential Indicators, prescribed by the
Code, when the budget is set. 
5.4 The capital plan impacts on the revenue budget in two ways: the impact of increased
loan charges required by additional borrowing required to finance capital expenditure
and the revenue (running) costs of new facilities, or revenue savings achieved through
Page 140

Page 141

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
spend-to-save projects. In the case of the Moray Growth Deal, because of the timing
difference between spend and grant profile the Council will be spending in advance of
funding to varying degrees and borrowing to cover that spend. This will incur additional
loan charges for Moray Growth Deal and the Council earmarked £4 million of reserves
to fund this expenditure.  As the grant is received this will reduce the need to borrow in
future, allowing the replenishment of reserves if this is considered prudent. As projects
enter delivery their financial spend profile is finalised and used in agreeing the planned
grant profile with Scottish Government for the year ahead. This will allow creation of a
revised financial profile at programme level in 2025/26.
5.5 Loan charges represent the cost of interest on loans and also of principal repayments of
loans used to fund capital expenditure.  The Council has developed a local prudential
indicator based on General Services loan charges as a percentage of the total General
Services revenue budget.  This indicator is to act as a guideline to assist with the
Council budget setting process and to highlight the overall impact of capital expenditure
to the Council’s annual budgeted revenue costs.  As part of the financial planning
process each year the budgeted cost of borrowing will be approved based on an
approved level of borrowing for the year ahead and indicatively for the next nine years.  
Borrowing will be capped to a level deemed to be affordable at projected rates of
interest.  This will be measured across the length of the ten year indicative plan, to act
as an early warning of future affordability and a cap approved for the first three years of
the plan – a three year period will be used to facilitate the planning for lead-in time and
preparatory work needed for capital projects. .   
5.6 The period of time over which loans repayments are made into the loans pool is
matched to the expected life of the asset.  These can vary from three to sixty years.
5.7 Proposals for expenditure from the General Fund on asset maintenance are scrutinised
to ensure that all costs which could potentially be capitalised are funded through the
capital programme as in the short term this is the most economically advantageous way
for the Council to fund replacement of failed elements or life-expired assets.
5.8 If appropriate specific grant funding is available it may be applied for to reduce the
amount of borrowing required or to increase the level of expenditure possible within the
Council’s agreed borrowing limit.
5.9 The Council entered into Public Private Partnership (PPP)/ Private Finance Initiatives
(PFI) contracts in when Scottish Government was promoting these vehicles for learning
estate improvement. Under such arrangements, the Council enters into a long-term
contract with a private sector organisation to construct new assets. Annual payments
are then made over the life of the contract for the assets provided. The Council has
used such arrangements to facilitate the building of new schools in Keith and Elgin. 
Such arrangements can mean capital investment where, due to financial constraints, it
might not have been possible otherwise.  All the Council’s PPP/PFI arrangements have
been supported by funding from Scottish Government.
5.10 The Scottish Government has moved away from supporting new PPP/PFI contracts to
the LEIP funding model for school construction projects. Under this arrangement the
Council will be fully responsible for the costs of construction of new schools or
refurbishment of current schools from either existing capital budgets, or by borrowing
Page 141

Page 142

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
through the PWLB. The LEIP outcome Based Funding Model has a number of key
outcome requirements and Scottish Government revenue funding will be released on
evidence of the achievement of these agreed outcomes. These key requirements are:
 Building Condition
 Energy Efficiency
 Digital Enabled Learning
 Carbon
6. TREASURY MANAGEMENT
6.1 Treasury management is concerned with keeping sufficient but not excessive cash
available to meet the Council’s spending needs, while managing the risks involved.
Surplus cash is invested until required, while a shortage of cash will be met by
borrowing, to avoid excessive credit balances or overdrafts in the bank current account.
The Council is typically cash rich in the short-term as revenue income is received before
it is spent, but cash poor in the long-term as capital expenditure is incurred before being
financed.
6.2 The Council’s main objectives when borrowing are to achieve a low but certain cost of
finance while retaining flexibility should plans change in future. These objectives are
often conflicting, and the Council therefore seeks to strike a balance between cheaper
short-term loans and long-term fixed rate loans where the future cost is known but
higher. Statutory guidance from the Prudential Code is that debt should remain below
the capital financing requirement, except in the short-term.
6.3 Under the Prudential Code, the Council is legally obliged to set an affordable borrowing
limit (also termed the authorised limit for external debt) each year, and a lower
“operational boundary” is also set as a warning level should debt approach the limit.
6.4 Treasury investments arise from receiving cash before it is paid out again. Any
investment made for service reasons or for pure financial gain would not generally be
considered to be part of treasury management. The Council’s policy on treasury
investments is to prioritise security and liquidity over yield, focussing on minimising risk
rather than maximising returns. Cash that is likely to be spent in the near term is
invested securely to minimise the risk of loss. Both near and longer-term investments
may be held in pooled funds, where an external fund manager makes decisions on
which particular investments to buy and the Council may request its money back at
short notice.
7. GOVERNANCE
7.1 The development, control, management and delivery of capital investment programmes
is of key concern to the Council to ensure that public money is used wisely, best value is
secured and the responsibility for decisions is clearly understood and taken at the right
level. In managing the aspirations for capital expenditure from Council Services, it is
inevitable that demands for capital resources to meet capital investment needs and
ambitions will exceed the resources available to the Council.
Page 142

Page 143

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
7.2 As a consequence of this the Asset Management Working Group is tasked with
corporate responsibility for asset management.  It has the responsibility of ensuring
systems are in place to develop and update asset management plans (AMPs) to identify
the maintenance and replacement requirements to deliver the Council’s policy for assets
and agreed position in relation to standards of condition and suitability, moderated by an
assessment of affordability through the capital planning process. 
7.3 The Asset Management Working Group aims to ensure that AMPs are robust and that
tools such as options appraisal are used as appropriate.  The assumptions behind
AMPs are challenged periodically by the Group.  In parallel to this process a number of
projects in the Transformation Strategy are reviewing the requirements for the Council’s
asset base – Smarter Working, Depot and Stores review, Learning Estate review,
libraries review, leisure review, industrial estates review - and these will all feed into the
asset management planning process.
7.4 The group is also responsible for developing the Council’s draft capital plan each year. 
A ten-year plan is prepared in draft and updated annually.  The group uses a process of
peer review to ensure that appropriate rigour can be demonstrated in preparing the draft
ten year Capital Plan and that revenue consequences of capital expenditure are
recognised in the financial planning process, including whole life costing in relation to
maintenance requirements.  All new proposals for capital expenditure are taken through
the Council’s corporate Gateway process, from mandate to post-project review, as
appropriate for the complexity of project and level of spend.  In 2023, the group trialled a
matrix for prioritising and ranking capital projects, taking into account Council priorities
and other salient factors.  In the light of experience this has been modified for use in the
capping process and relevant factors approved as part of that process: Council
priorities, legislative requirements, connectivity, community priorities.
7.5 Spend-to-save is a feature of the Council’s financial strategy.  There is a presumption
that a spend-to-save proposal with a suitable business case will be approved.  However,
such proposals will always be reviewed to ensure that they fit within the Council’s
priorities and as an indicative guide the payback period of a spend-to-save project
should be three years or less.  The factors to be taken into account when assessing a
spend-to-save proposal are:
 Size of investment required;
 Payback period;
 Risk assessment of achieving payback;
 Impact on service.
7.6 The Council’s Planning and Development service provide the Group with information on
the infrastructure required to support new housing development – schools, roads,
leisure and health facilities – and expenditure and developer contributions are factored
into the Capital Plan.
7.7 To ensure that no capital project is considered on its own merits alone, but that all
proposals for capital expenditure are considered in the context of the Council’s overall
plans for capital expenditure, no individual request for capital projects is considered
outwith the agreed cycle of approval when the revenue budget is set (February/March);
Page 143

Page 144

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
reviewed when capital carry forwards from the previous year are considered (generally
June); and when estimated actuals for the year are first reported (November). The
exception to this general rule is spend-to-save projects, and only then if a good case
can be made for why these should be considered outwith the normal planning cycle. 
Exception is also made for emergencies, but there is a general presumption that
planned works will be delayed to minimise additional spend. 
7.8 Governance arrangements for the council’s HRA capital plan are separate and
recognise the ring-fenced nature of any HRA spend.  The HRA Business Plan models
scenarios for additional investment in further new build development which has been set
against a range of risk factors, rent affordability and debt affordability levels to ensure
borrowing levels are prudent, affordable and sustainable.
8. RISK AND RISK MANAGEMENT
8.1 The Council is exposed to risk in various ways through its programmes of capital
expenditure.  There are risks associated with various funding streams, different types of
procurement, and predictability and controllability of spend.  These are managed by
individual project managers and corporately by the monitoring regimes for both General
Services and HRA capital, which include Transformation Boards for strategic projects. 
The asset management led components of the programmes themselves are risk-
mitigators against the risk of failure of the Council’s assets.
8.2 There are different types of risk associated with different methods of financing capital
projects.  Public-private partnerships seek to transfer risk to the private sector.  
Investors will typically expect higher returns for higher risk projects, so there is usually a
financial trade-off when risk is transferred.  General Capital Grant funding comes at no
risk to the Council.  The terms and conditions of the grant are well understood and the
risk of having to repay grant because it had been misapplied are minimal.  However,
specific grants vary greatly in their terms and conditions.  There is a much higher risk
that some specific grants may have to be repaid.  The terms and conditions are typically
much more stringent and there are significant specific grants now available from both
Scottish and UK governments, many with stringent monitoring regimes.
8.3 The Council generates capital receipts from the sale of surplus assets.  As a general
rule, capital receipts can only be applied to capital expenditure. Whilst no risk attaches
to the use of capital receipts, there would be a risk in budgeting for significant funding
from capital receipts that they would not meet the target either in terms of amount or
timing.
8.4 Properties which no longer contribute to the delivery of the Council’s services or
objectives are deemed surplus. The Council has procedures in place to ensure that
surplus and/or under-used property is identified and reviewed prior to being offered for
disposal, with the approval of the Asset Management Working Group as an early stage
in that process.
8.5 The Council also receives developer obligations towards the cost of development of
infrastructure or other requirements arising from developments.  They are time-limited
and the main risk from these is that they are used timeously.  The amounts received
Page 144

Page 145

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
might also be insufficient to fund the expenditure required.  Developer obligations from
major developments will typically be received over a long time scale, whereas the
Council may have to invest up front to provide infrastructure.  The Council bears the
cost associated with the time-lag in funding; the risk that future contributions may not
materialise, and the risk that relevant Council policy might change over time.
8.6 The Council manages the risks of borrowing through its Treasury Management strategy.
The residual risk to the Council is that borrowing can carry very long term commitments
and so capital expenditure in any one year can have revenue implications thirty or forty
years into the future.
8.7 The Council can develop its asset base in conjunction with other public sector partners. 
The risks involved in that relate largely to the governance of the project, and to the
possibilities of one partner rescinding on their agreement.  These risks must be
addressed at the inception of the project.
8.8 There are risks involved in developing assets through innovative funding models; such
risks are likely to be largely outwith the Council’s control.
8.9 Inflation can pose a risk to the Council.  Construction Industry inflation can be highly
volatile.  Projects are included in the Capital Plan at current prices.  Depending on how
far in advance these have been scheduled, costs may be significantly above the original
estimate simply because of inflation in the intervening period.  This is a risk to the
affordability of the Capital Plan.
8.10 The cost to the Council of borrowing is calculated based on interest rates at that time.
The interest rates rose within the previous 12 month period and it is considered likely
that higher interest rates than seen in the recent past will continue.  That is a risk to the
affordability of the Capital Plan and will be taken into account when looking at future
capital proposals. 
8.11 A significant risk arises from the Council’s revenue budget for repairs and maintenance.
If the budget for revenue maintenance is insufficient and results in deterioration of
assets there may be a resulting requirement for capital expenditure to replace or renew
the asset.  If revenue budgets are reduced without a corresponding reduction in the
asset base then the Capital plan will come under pressure.  A related risk is the risk that
a health and safety issue might arise, contravening the Council’s legislative
responsibility to the public and to Council employees.
8.12 The other main risks concerning the Capital Plan relate to project management and the
many factors which impinge upon the delivery of the Capital Plan.  These factors may
be internal – such as staff shortages or competing priorities – but are frequently
external, ranging across supplier delivery time, landowner disputes/compensation
requests, unforeseen site conditions, contractor delays, weather conditions and many
others.  Project specific risks are identified in the capital monitoring reports to committee
and, where appropriate, project boards.
Page 145

Page 146

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
9. KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS
9.1 The Council employs professionally qualified and experienced staff in senior positions
with responsibility for making recommendations on capital expenditure and borrowing
and investment decisions. The Council also makes use of external advisors and
consultants which are specialists in their field.  Specialist advisors are generally specific
to major capital projects and employed as required.  This approach is more cost
effective than employing specialist staff directly and ensures that the Council has access
to knowledge and skills commensurate with its risk appetite.  In addition, the Council
also employs treasury management advisors, currently Arlingclose Ltd.
Page 146

Page 147

DRAFT
APPENDIX 1
10. LINKS WITH OTHER PLANS AND PROCESSES
Community Planning Partnership Local Outcome Improvement Plan (LOIP)
Asset Management Plans
•Housing
•ICT
•Roads
•Harbours
•Fleet
•Open Spaces
•Learning Estate
•Management Plans
•Property Asset Strategy
•Corporate Plan including
Short to Medium and
Medium to Long term
Financial Plans
•Treasury Strategy
•Corporate Asset
Management Plan
•Local Development Plan
•Departmental Service
Plans
Capital
Strategy
Capital
Plan
NHS Grampian Moray Integrated Joint Board MIJB
Page 147

Page 148

Page 148

Page 149

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: CORPORATE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To provide the Council with a report of progress made against the Corporate
Asset Management Plan for 2024/25 and with a revised Corporate Asset
Management Plan reflecting the cap on capital expenditure.
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (B) (28) of the
Council’s Scheme of Administration relating to the formulation, implementation
and review of asset management policies and practices, and to the
maintenance of an overview of the Council’s property disposal programme.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that the Council:
(i) considers and notes the work done to date to meet the targets set
in the Corporate Asset Management Plan for 2024/25 as set out in
paragraphs 4.1 to 4.6;
(ii) notes that an updated Corporate Asset Management Plan fulfils
one of the actions in the Best Value Action Plan; and
(iii) approves the amended Corporate Asset Management Plan for
2024/25 as set out in APPENDIX 2.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 The Policy and Resources Committee approved the Council’s first Corporate
Asset Management Plan (CAMP) on 23 September 2008 (paragraph 6 of the
minute refers). The CAMP is updated annually and the updated CAMP for
2023/24 was approved by Corporate Committee on 13 June 2023 (paragraph
8 of the minute refers).  The update to the CAMP for 2024/25 was delayed
due to the review of the capital planning progress and this updated follows the
approval of the capital expenditure cap mechanism at a special meeting of
Council on 22 October 2024 (paragraph 9 of the Minute refers).  Reporting an
Item 12.
Page 149

Page 150

updated CAMP as part of the review of capital is an action in the Best Value
Action Pan.
3.2 A schematic representation of the asset management planning process is
included as APPENDIX 1.  This representation has always accompanied the
CAMP and Council should note the iterative nature of asset management
planning, taking financial affordability into account.  This is brought into
greater focus with the application of a cap on capital expenditure.
3.3 Asset Management Planning is recognised as one of the main drivers for the
Capital Plan.  The lead-in time for capital projects can be up to 24 months,
allowing for design work, planning permission if required and depending on
the procurement route appropriate to the project.  Consequently the Council
prepares ten year capital plans as part of the planning process for future
years.  This also facilitates assurance of financial sustainability by forecasting
future investment needs of the current asset base of the Council. 
4. REPORT ON PROGRESS UNDER THE CORPORATE ASSET
MANAGEMENT PLAN 2023/24
4.1 There were eight key tasks identified for 2023/24 and these are discussed
below.
4.2 Improve and automate capital monitoring information provided to budget
managers to facilitate better management of the capital plan.  A project plan
has been developed for this task and the feasibility of using current budget
monitoring tools is being investigated through the Finance Development
working group. 
4.3 Continue work on prioritisation of the capital plan for including in the budget
process.  A prioritisation tool which had been developed for use in prioritising
small service developments was trialled through 2023.  The Asset
Management Working Group concluded that the tool, although complex,
worked reasonably well for individual projects but was not a suitable tool for
prioritising programmes of work.  Further review as part of the cap mechanism
led to the recommendation of a simpler prioritisation method, using the
following criteria – contributes towards achieving a corporate priority in the
Corporate Plan; fulfils a legislative requirement; impact on connectivity
between communities and facilities; community priority – and these were
approved by Council on 22 October 2024. 
4.4 Update the Asset Management Planning Process to incorporate the
requirements of the Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting
Requirements) (Scotland) Amendment Order 2020.  This requires local
authorities to report how they will align their spending plans and use of
resources to contribute to reducing emissions and delivering their emissions
reduction target.  The Council has approved a vehicle replacement policy,
incorporating targets for electric vehicles.  A programme of energy efficiency
measures is included in the Transformation Strategy.  Carbon budgeting
comparisons with financial impacts are included in the decision-making
process for property improvements.  Climate change implications feature in
Page 150

Page 151

procurement weightings and the recent photocopier procurement process
used this. 
4.5 Progress with the development of the Learning Estate Strategy – this is on-
going and is reported to Education, Children’s and Leisure Service Committee
and is a strand within the Transformation Strategy.
4.6 Progress with the Smarter Working Project with a view to increasing
occupancy in the HQ campus – Stage one of this project is complete and
Stage 2 has commenced with closure of offices in Elgin and Buckie to date. 
This is also part of the Transformation Strategy and is the main vehicle
through which the Council will achieve its aim of reducing its asset base for
corporate buildings.
4.7 Continue to develop the outline business case (OBC) for the rationalisation of
depots and stores taking into account the need to decarbonise the Council’s
property and fleet assets in line with the Council’s climate change objectives. 
This is linked with the task described in paragraph 4.4.  The OBC has been
developed and work is in hand to develop the Full Business Case.  This is
another piece of work which will see the reduction of the Council’s asset base
for corporate buildings, and a number of early closures have successfully
been achieved.  This too is a strand in the Transformation Strategy.
4.8 Continue to develop a selection process for post project reviews.  This task
has stalled, with the emphasis having been on financial sustainability.
4.9 Review the status of Asset Management Plans and develop a programme of
updates.  A full review has been largely superseded by other work – Smarter
Working, the depot and stores review, the Learning Estate Strategy, the
Libraries Review, the Leisure Review – all of which will have implications for
asset management plans.
5. CORPORATE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2023/24
5.1 The Corporate Asset Management Plan (CAMP) for 2024/25 continues with
the actions included in the 2023/24 CAMP, moot of which are significant
pieces of work which will continue into 2025/26.
5.2 The full CAMP can be found at APPENDIX 2.
6. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
Asset management planning assists the Council to deliver Council and
community planning priorities whilst achieving Best Value.
(b) Policy and Legal
There are no policy or legal implications arising directly from this report.
Page 151

Page 152

(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications arising directly from this report.  Asset
management planning feeds into the Council’s financial planning process
and forms a key part of the strategy for reducing budget pressures and
of the Council’s Transformation Strategy.
(d) Risk Implications
There are no risks to the Council arising directly from this report.  Asset
management planning reduces the risk to the Council of unexpected
issues arising relating to the Council’s assets.
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications arising directly from this report.  All
recommended actions are planned to be carried out within current
staffing resources. 
(f) Property
There are no property implications arising directly from this report.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no equalities issues arising directly from this report.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
The mandatory annual reporting under the Climate Change (Duties of
Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements) (Scotland) Amendment Order
2020 means that the annual compliance reports must now include details
of how Moray Council will align its spending plans and use of resources
to contribute to reducing emissions and delivering national and regional
emissions reduction targets. This means the asset management plan
should align with the Climate Change Strategy and the Route Map to Net
Zero.
(i) Consultations
Members of the Corporate Management Team and of the Asset
Management Working Group have been consulted in the preparation of
this report.
7. CONCLUSION
7.1 Progress has been made on 6 of the 8 actions identified in the CAMP for
2023/24.
7.2 The action to develop a prioritisation process for the capital plan is
complete and will be reviewed for success or problems once used.
7.3 All other actions are carried forward into the CAMP for 2024/25.
7.4 Reporting an updated CAMP completes one of the actions contained in
the Best Value Action Plan.
Page 152

Page 153

Author of Report: Lorraine Paisey, Chief Financial Officer
Background Papers:
Ref: SPMAN-1293228629-1180
Page 153

Page 154

Page 154

Page 155

Dwelling
houses
School
Estate
Corporate
Offices
Other
operational
builidings
Industrial
Estates Roads Harbours
Flood
Alleviation
Schemes
Fleet ICT
Draft AMP Draft
SEMP
Draft
Offices
AMP
Draft ops
building
AMP
Draft IE
AMP -
annual
report
Draft
roads
AMP
Draft AMP FAS AMP
Draft
vehicles
AMP
Draft ICT
AMP
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
P
L
A
N
Housing
Investment
Plan
Final AMP SEMP Offices
AMP
Ops
building
AMP
IE AMP
(annual
report)
Roads
AMP
Harbours
AMP FAS AMP Vehicles
AMP ICT AMP
A
S
S
E
T
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
N
I
N
G
Land and buildings Infrastructure
Members set policy for asset class
Members set priorities across asset classes to achieve corporate priorities
Review overall affordability
C
A
P
I
T
A
L
S
T
R
A
T
E
G
Y
APPENDIX
1
Vehicles, Plant &
Equipment
Gather information
Technical review and recommendation
Affordability
Planning
Composite Capital Plan / Revenue Repairs & Maintenance / Other General Services Revenue Costs
Item 12.
Page 155

Page 156

Page 156

Page 157

APPENDIX 2
CORPORATE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2024/25
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Council’s Corporate Asset Management Plan (CAMP) describes the
arrangements which the Moray Council has made for asset management
planning; links the asset management planning process to other key concerns
of the Council; highlights progress in the preparation of asset management
plans for the six main categories of asset, and includes an action plan for the
coming year.
1.2 The CAMP also seeks to make explicit the links which exist between the asset
management planning process and the financial planning process, particularly
capital planning, and this is addressed throughout the CAMP.
1.3 The CAMP has been prepared according to the guidelines set out in the
CIPFA Guide to Asset Management and Capital Planning (“the CIPFA
Guide”).
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 The Asset Management Working Group (AMWG) was established to develop
and oversee overall asset management arrangements within Moray Council. 
A key task for the group is to assist in the development of proposals for capital
expenditure based on asset management principles.  These proposals are
then fed into the Council’s financial planning process.  They aim to establish
appropriate expenditure plans for the medium term.    Indicative ten year
plans are prepared, reflecting approved asset standards and asset conditions
at the time the plan is prepared, and reported to Council when the Council
Tax is set to facilitate longer term planning.  The current indicative ten year
plan was approved on 24 January 2024, along with the capital plan for
2024/25. The 2024/25 plan continues to reflect increased costs of
construction.  . The  increased interest rates are also putting pressure on
spending plans.
2.2 The AMWG is also responsible for developing the corporate asset
management framework and for overseeing progress on the development of
individual asset management plans. Progress on the development of asset
management planning is generally reported to the Corporate Committee,
which approves the CAMP on an annual basis.
2.3 The key drivers for asset management planning are listed below:
Driver
Item 12.
Page 157

Page 158

Driver
Condition This requires to be measured for each class of asset,
and each asset within that class graded.  The Council
sets targets for condition for each asset class.
Suitability This assesses whether or not an asset is fit for purpose.
Sufficiency This is about asset capacity rather than asset use and
reflects demand for the asset.
Revenue Costs The costs of operating the asset.
Accessibility Both physical accessibility – e.g. with the duty to make
reasonable adjustments under the Equalities Act 2010
– and whether specialist knowledge is required to
operate the asset, potentially restricting its use.
Value This could be the book value of the asset, the market
value or replacement value.
2.4 Asset management planning is closely linked to capital planning, and has
come of age in local government under the Prudential Code.  Long-term
affordability is therefore a major concern for asset management planning.  
The recognised six drivers listed above all impact on affordability.  The CAMP
places this under the umbrella of sustainability and this will be discussed from
three aspects – financial sustainability, environmental sustainability and
economic sustainability – in section 3.
2.5 As well as affordability, the asset management process aims to achieve
efficiency in terms of use of assets, and maximisation of value in terms of
asset disposal.  These twin aims imply a reduction in the Council’s asset base
to reduce the cost of holding more assets than strictly required to deliver the
Council’s aims and this coheres with a recommendation in the Annual Audit
Report from the Council’s auditors and is included in the Best Value Action
Plan
2.6 The CIPFA Guide identifies the six main categories of asset for asset
management planning as property, open space, roads and associated
structures, housing, fleet and ICT.  Asset Management Plans should be based
on robust data about the number of assets in each category; their condition;
suitability for use; sufficiency for use, and revenue cost of use.  They should
set targets for performance; relate to service plans for future delivery of
service; identify investment needs; support the Local Outcome Improvement
Plan, Corporate Plan or other Council policy priorities.
2.7 In order to better reflect local priorities and operational needs two of these
main categories have been subdivided.  Property is subdivided into the school
estate, industrial estates and offices and other properties with the later groups
managed as the Council’s corporate properties; Roads etc. is subdivided into
Page 158

Page 159

roads and directly associated infrastructure; harbours; flood alleviation
schemes.
2.8 Assessment of current progress on preparation of asset management plans
for each asset type is summarised in section 4.
2.9  The Action Plan for 2024/25 forms section 5 of the CAMP.
3. SUSTAINABILITY
Financial Sustainability
3.1 For the Council to be able to assess the sustainability of its asset base, it
must have good quality information on the condition of its assets and use this
to estimate the cost to the Council of maintaining each asset over its expected
life.
3.2 The Council’s Capital Strategy sets out the principles underlying the Capital
Planning process and in doing so describes how Asset Management Planning
and Capital Planning inter-relate.  The latest version of the Capital Strategy
was approved by Council on 24 January 2024  (paragraph 10 of the Minute
refers).
3.3 The Council requires to reduce expenditure to an affordable and sustainable
level.  An important part of this process will be to reduce the Council’s asset
base and to agree on an affordable level of capital expenditure using the
Council’s internal Performance Indicator (PI) for affordability: the percentage
of general revenue funding (grant funding, Non Domestic Rates income and
Council Tax) spent on servicing debt should be less than 10%
3.4 The ten-year plan when first developed was based on the work required to
meet the Council’s approved standards for all asset groups.  The plan
presented to the Council on 24 January 2024 also reflected the requirement to
provide new or improved infrastructure and facilities to accommodate planned
local developments, along with expenditure arising from Asset Management
Plans (AMPs). Accordingly, the Capital Plan is framed by drivers for
expenditure that: recognise the Local Development Plan and other Council
plans (specifically for Economic Development); Asset Management Planning;
service efficiencies, particularly spend-to-save initiatives; expenditure arising
from Legislative Requirements; Funded Government Priorities and
Responsive Expenditure.  The Plan is divided into ongoing programmes of
work, named projects, fully funded projects and spend-to-save.
3.5 When the initial draft Plan has been scoped out, affordability will be assessed
over the life of the Plan, using the agreed PI.  This is a more rigorous test of
affordability than the required Prudential Indicators as it takes a longer-term
view of affordability and so acts as an early warning.  Any required cap on
capital expenditure will be applied pro rata to programmes and the totality of
named projects.  Named projects will be prioritised and ranked, with projects
included in the final draft Plan up to the total capped ceiling of expenditure, as
Page 159

Page 160

approved by Council on 22 October 2024, when the methodology of applying
a cap to the capital plan was agreed.
Environmental Sustainability
3.6 The Council’s first Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan was  approved
on 10 March 2021 (paragraph 13 of the Minute refers).  At a meeting of the
Council on 6 April 2022 a Route Map to Net Zero (RMNZ) Carbon Emissions
was approved. Revised versions of the Strategy and Route map were
reported to Council on 4 December 2024. 
3.7 The Council has invested in energy efficiency projects and in prior years has
benefited from  the Scottish Government. The Council is investigating solar
energy projects to progress as spend to save energy proposals with possible
funding through SALIX Loans.  An annual report on the Council’s Energy
Strategy is made to the Economic Development and Infrastructure Service
Committee, with the latest report being to that committee on 12 November
2024.
3.8 The Council undertook a project to replace all SON and SOX street lanterns
with LED lanterns and this was successfully complete in 2022/23.  A project to
replace lighting in corporate buildings with LED lighting where this will
generate cost savings is included in the Transformation Strategy.
3.9 The Council also funds on-going small scale energy saving projects and an
allowance is included in the capital plan each year to fund such projects.
3.10 Environmental considerations will remain an important consideration in the
development of individual asset management plans and in developing
individual projects. Proposals for capital projects will seek to maximise
environmental benefits, balanced with cost to the Council. With respect to the
Learning Estate and LEIP funding, this has set an energy efficiency target of
67/kWh per square metre per annum for core facilities use. At a meeting of
Economic Development and Infrastructure Services Committee on 7 February
2023 (paragraph 12 of the minute refers) it was agreed that for capital spend
on fleet and property the value of carbon should be incorporated into the
appraisal of projects. As per guidance from the UK Government Department
for Business, Energy & Industry Strategy (BEIS) the social costs of carbon
should be monetised and included in appraisal and evaluations to ensure the
impacts of carbon are taken into consideration.  The Zero Emission Fleet
Strategy was approved by Economic Development and Infrastructure
Services Committee on 30 April 2024 (paragraph 15 of the Minute refers).
3.11 Each key service area has a responsibility of supporting the Council’s budget
strategy through reducing the cost and impact of the use of resources,
including water, energy and transport fuel. This has associated carbon
reductions that will contribute to the goal of the Council being carbon neutral.
Page 160

Page 161

Economic Sustainability
3.12 The Council aims to support a sustainable economy in Moray through various
policy initiatives designed to support economic development locally and in
particular through the development of the Moray Economic Partnership,
Moray Economic Strategy and the Moray Growth Deal.
3.13 For asset management planning, economic sustainability has three strands:
 ensuring the Council’s asset management planning process supports
the economic development process by joined-up planning with
partners in the Moray Economic Partnership and Moray Growth Deal;
 planning asset management which directly supports economic
development (such as developing industrial estates or facilitating
development at Buckie harbour), and
 reflecting the requirements of the Local Development Plan. 
3.14 Asset disposal can support financial sustainability by maximising capital or
other financial receipts.  Economic sustainability can also be assisted by
facilitating community development and the Council’s Community Asset
Transfer process seeks to support local sustainable community ventures. 
This process continues to be part of the mainstream asset management
planning function of the Council.
3.15 The Moray Growth Deal was formally signed by the Council and the both the
UK and Scottish Governments on 20 December 2021. The outline business
cases (OBC) for the various projects were presented to Government and
agreed as a precursor to sign off. The financial spend and funding profile in
the full business case for the Digital Health Initiative and OBCs for the other
seven projects were incorporated into the Council’s ten year Capital Plan.  As
Full Business Cases are and signed off the capital plan is updated to reflect
the latest planned profile.  Any amendments arising from approved change
requests will also be reflected in Council’s ten year capital plan.  The current
plan reflects 2 of the Council-led projects being in delivery.
4. ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANS
4.1 Property
4.1.1 The Learning Estate
The Council is reviewing its Learning Estate in  a phased process based
around Associated School Groups (ASGs) A Learning Estate team was
established in May 2021 to deliver the 2020 Moray Learning Estate Strategy.
In addition to managing refurbishment and new build projects, the team are
focused on developing options for estate rationalisation, engaging with the
local community and other stakeholders to deliver a long term sustainable and
affordable Learning Estate. At Council on 9 October 2020 (paragraph 4 of the
Minute refers) the draft approach on the Learning Estate Strategy was
presented. The approach confirmed that B suitability and B condition across
Page 161

Page 162

all elements of a school should be a minimum standard. An updated Learning
Estate Strategy was agreed at Council on 28 September 2022 (paragraph 12
of the minute refers). The Scottish Government have stipulated minimum
standards for schools funded through the Learning Estate Improvement
Programme (LEIP). There are four key elements to LEIP. Firstly condition,
where a new learning environment is built to a high quality (Condition A) and
well maintained (not less than Condition B) over the long-term (25 years).
Secondly, new build should be energy efficient and over the long-term
contribute to net zero commitments. Thirdly, it should enable digital learning
and advancements in technology. Finally, the investment creates new jobs
and enables inclusive economic growth.   It recognised there needs to be
whole life costing and maintenance plans adequately provided for in the
Council’s financial planning and recognition that it may take many years to
achieve this across the whole school estate.
4.1.2 Offices / Other operational buildings
A review of the Council’s office accommodation is  progressing as part of the
Smarter Working Project following the move to hybrid working as the norm.
The project began with the HQ Campus  and the general principles are now
being rolled out across all Council offices.  The outline business case was
approved by Full Council on 2 February 2023. Surplus office assets have
been identified as part of this process and  revenue savings have been and
continue to be identified. The outline business case for the rationalisation of
depots and stores was approved by the Economic Development and
Infrastructure Services Committee on 30 April 2024 (paragraph of the Minute
refers) and the full business case is being developed.  This will facilitate
decarbonisation  of the Council’s property and fleet assets in line with the
Council’s climate change objectives.   These two projects are part of the
Council’s Transformation Strategy.
4.1.3 Industrial Estates
The annual industrial portfolio report on industrial estates is the vehicle for
asset management planning for the Council’s industrial portfolio.  The latest
report was to the Economic Development and Infrastructure Committee on 3
September 2024.  The Industrial Estate portfolio plays an important role in
supporting the Corporate Plan aim of facilitating economic growth and
diversification of the local economy.  A recent development has been the
inclusion of a review of disposal on part of the industrial portfolio in the
Council’s Transformation Strategy, as part of the process of challenging the
Council’s asset base with a view to reducing it where this will generate
savings.
4.2 Open Space
4.2.1 The Council does not have an approved all-encompassing asset management
plan for open spaces (including park and cemeteries), however specific types
of open space – in particular cemeteries – have strategies approved by
committee. The Cemetery Strategy was approved by the Economic
Page 162

Page 163

Development and Infrastructure Services Committee on 4 December 2018
(paragraph 6 of the Minute refers) and provision of a new cemetery in Elgin is
being progressed.
4.2.2 The Council has a rolling programme of replacement of play area equipment
Play area upgrades are prioritised and selected from condition scores
received annually from an independent play inspection report. This is currently
funded by Scottish Government grant.
4.2.3 A programme of infrastructure repairs for parks and cemeteries has been
developed and includes road, steps and footpath repairs; and where required
refurbishments to walls, gates and fences.
4.2.4 Given the annual value of the capital programme for open space, the
development of a full Asset Management Plan is not currently a priority of the
service due to other competing demands on the team’s resources but
investment continues to be made and prioritised in response to health and
safety concerns and as outlined above.
4.3 Roads and other infrastructure
4.3.1 Roads and Associated Infrastructure
The first Roads Asset Management Plan (RAMP) was completed in April
2012, following a nationally developed model.  The RAMP addressed the
specific lifecycle requirements of 5 different asset groups: carriageways,
footways (including footpaths and cycle tracks), structures (road bridges, foot
bridges and retaining walls), street lighting and street furniture. This was then
modified in the preparation of the financial plan for 2014/15 in which a target
of reducing the standard of Moray’s roads to the Scottish average over the
next ten years was set in order to achieve savings, and this target has since
been clarified as being a desired mid-table ranking. The latest RAMP was
presented to the Economic Development and Infrastructure Services
Committee on 7 February 2023 (paragraph 6 of the Minute refers). It was
approved that Officers continue to monitor the Road Condition Indicator (RCI)
on an annual basis and subject to the outcome of these, consider undertaking
a more detailed analysis that would provide a more up to date long-term
prediction on road condition for the future years. In the meantime, work would
continue to the current standard, which is mid-table in terms of the highlight
RCI score.  The latest report on RCI was to Economic Development and
Infrastructure Services Committee on 30 April 2024 (paragraph 8 of the
Minute refers).
4.4 Harbours
4.4.1 Condition surveys of the harbours have been used to develop a planned
programme of work which forms the Asset Management Plan for the
harbours. That plan is reviewed annually.  The nature of the asset is such that
emergency and unplanned works can be required, particularly following
Page 163

Page 164

severe weather events, and an agile approach to asset management planning
is required.
4.5 Flood Alleviation Schemes
4.5.1 Maintenance of the Council’s seven flood protection schemes is undertaken
as and when required. Inspection of these schemes is considered critical and
any work identified during these inspections will be prioritised based on risk.
4.5.2 Under the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009, the Council must
prepare and publish Flood Risk Management Plans for Moray.  This is done in
partnership with SEPA and neighbouring authorities.  The plans set out at a
fairly high level actions to address flood risk over a six year cycle.  As part of
the plan, an annual schedule of Clearance and Repair is published, subject to
agreement by members.
4.5.3 Small watercourses, culverts and coastal protection systems as identified on
the flood team’s schedule of clearance and repair are prioritised based on
risk.
4.5.4 The Council has also approved a Coastal Adaption Plan for managing the
coastline within the Moray area (Economic Development and Infrastructure
Service Committee on 30 April 2024, paragraph 9 of the Minute refers)
4.6 Housing
4.6.1 The Council’s housing stock requires significant investment to meet the
Scottish Housing Quality Standard (SHQS) and Energy Efficiency Standard
for Social Housing (EESSH) within appropriate timescales and work has been
and continues to be ongoing to achieve this. The Housing Investment Plan
approved by Council on 28 February 2024 (paragraph 8 of the minute refers)
sets out the areas of spend for next financial year and the following two years
in order that the Council can significantly improve the quality of the housing
stock in line with legislation, with a particular emphasis on improvement to the
poorest energy efficient properties first.
4.6.2 A review of the Housing Business Plan was carried out in 2023 to assess the
capacity of the Housing Revenue Account to deliver the housing service’s
ongoing investment priorities, and this was refreshed in 2024 following
significant increase in interest rates..
4.6.3 The Council’s Strategic Housing Investment Plan 2023/28 sets out proposals
for the delivery of new Council housing over the planned period. The
programme will be funded from resources provided by the Scottish
Government as part of the Moray Affordable Housing Programme. Targets
have been revised following a decrease in Scottish Government funding for
housing new build.  The new council housing is being built to high levels of
sustainable design and energy efficiency, achieving EPC B and the “silver”
level of current Building Regulations in respect of both Carbon Emissions and
Energy for Space Heating.
Page 164

Page 165

4.7 Fleet
4.7.1 The current policy for replacing vehicles is to plan to replace them at the age
assessed as being, on average, the optimum replacement age for that type of
vehicle, balancing the cost of repairs and downtime with the cost of
replacement.   The Zero Emission Fleet Strategy was approved by Economic
Development and Infrastructure Services Committee on 30 April 2024
(paragraph 15 of the Minute refers).
4.8 ICT
4.8.1 The use of ICT underpins all of the Council’s activities, to a greater or lesser
extent. It is recognised that robust asset management planning for this area is
of great importance.  The response to the pandemic has changed the shape
of the Council’s ICT asset base through extensive roll out of devices to
support hybrid working. Another significant change is the move to hosted, or
Cloud based, systems which reduces the requirement for ICT infrastructure at
our own premises. The impact of these changes on future requirements is still
being assessed.
4.8.2 The current policy for replacing ICT assets varies, depending whether the
equipment is related to the schools’ network, or the corporate network but is
essentially based on the optimal age for the type of asset in the particular
setting. Actual replacement, however, does need to take into account other
factors such as performance of the asset but also external factors such as
third party support, compatibility with other products, general trends in
technology, and security requirements / accreditation. The increased number
of mobile devices will also have a bearing on the current policy. This will be
addressed when consideration is given to the replacement of the mobile
devices which were rolled out during a short period of time.
5. ACTIONS PLANNED FOR 2024/25
5.1 The key tasks are noted below:
 Improve and automate capital monitoring information provided to
budget managers to assist in improved management of the capital plan,
with a target completion date of March 2025, subject to ICT
requirements;
 Continuing to update Asset Management Planning Process to
incorporate the requirements of the Climate Change (Duties of Public
Bodies: Reporting Requirements) (Scotland) Amendment Order 2020.
 Progress with the development of the Learning Estate Strategy;
 Progress with the Smarter Working Project Stage 2;
 Continue to develop the full business case for the rationalisation of
depots and stores taking into account the need to decarbonise the
Council’s property and fleet assets in line with the Council’s climate
change objectives.
Page 165

Page 166

 Continue to develop a selection process for post project reviews, with a
target of March 2025;
 Review the status of Asset Management Plans in January 2025 and
develop a programme of updates by June 2025, incorporating the
timeframes from the Transformation Strategy for those AMPS which
relate to reviews which form part of  Transformation.  A rolling 5 year
programme is envisaged as the likely outcome.
Page 166

Page 167

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: COMMITTEE CHANGES, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES AND
OUTSIDE BODY VACANCIES
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (EDUCATION, COMMUNITIES AND
ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To ask Council to consider the number of members on Committees, Outside
Body vacancies and changes to roles and responsibilities.
1.2 This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section II (16) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to the review and amendment of
the Council’s constitutional documents.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that Council agree:
i) the number of councillors who sit on principal Committees;
ii) that Councillor Gatt becomes the Depute Chair of Planning and
Regulatory Services Committee;
iii) whether an amendment to the Standing Orders is brought forward
to allow substitutes at Committees;
iv) to appoint Councillors to the vacant positions on outside bodies
detailed in paragraph 4.1;
v) to review Councillor membership on Outside Bodies and a report
to be brought back to the March 2025 meeting to determine a
position;
vi) a position on the role of Council Champions; and
vii) an amendment to the Council Roles and Responsibilities
document to allow deputising for the Civic Leader as detailed in
paragraph 7.1 below and paragraph 7.4 of Appendix 1.
Item 13.
Page 167

Page 168

3. MEMBERSHIP OF COMMITTEES
3.1 Service Committees currently have a membership of 15 with the following
political balance agreed by Council on 7 December 2022 (para 17 of the
minute refers).
Conservative SNP Labour Independents Conservative Non
Aligned/Green
5 5 2 2 1
3.2 Following the recent by election the political balance for committee
membership of 15 would be as follows:
Conservative SNP Labour Independents Conservative
Non
Aligned/Green
5 4 2 2 2
3.3 It is proposed to amend the membership to 11 with the following political
balance.
Conservative SNP Labour Independents Conservative
Non
Aligned/Green
4 3 1 2 1
3.4 The current convention within the Council is that the Council agrees the
numbers on Committee and political balance. Group leaders then notify
Committee Services of how they wish to fill their allocated committee spaces
with a similar process taking place for independent/non-aligned councillors.  If
a Councillor is unable to attend a Committee they are marked as absent.
3.5 The Council are asked to consider whether Committee members should be
able to appoint a substitute for any Committee they are unable to attend. 
Many Local Authorities across Scotland allow substitutes on their Committees
Pros Cons
Allows consistent representation for
groups on high value issues
There is already some flexibility in the
current system for medium to longer
term absences with group leaders
able to switch nominated councillors
for committees.
Would align with national proposals to
allow Councils to adopt proxy voting.
A workaround would be needed for
the committee management system
in which committee members names
are pre-populated.
Note: Substitutes on Planning and Regulatory Services Committee and Moray
Local Review Body would need to have specific training
Page 168

Page 169

3.6 This would require a change to the Council’s Standing Orders and could be
actioned at the next annual review in January 2025.
4. COMMITTEE DEPUTE CHAIR CHANGE
4.1 At the meeting of Moray Council on 18 May 2022 (para 3 of the minute refers)
it was agreed that Councillor Macrae would be Depute Chair of Planning and
Regulatory Services Committee.  Due to a change within the Administration
Group, it is proposed that Councillor Macrae will be replaced by Councillor
Gatt as the Depute Chair of Planning and Regulatory Services Committee.
5. OUTSIDE BODY APPOINTMENTS
4.1 Due to changes in membership the following vacancies require to be filled:
 Local Space Leadership Group
 Moray Economic Partnership
 NESS Energy From Waste Project – Elected Members Engagement
Group
 NHS Grampian nominated member
 One MIJB nominated member and MIJB Chair
4.3 As the Council is mid way through the term it would be prudent to clarify the
position with regards to Councillor positions on the remaining Outside Bodies
to determine whether a representative from the Council is still required.
4.4 It is proposed that a report will be brought back to Council in March 2025 to
consider the responses and whether the Council still wish to appoint to the
various Outside Bodies.
6. COUNCIL CHAMPIONS
5.1 The Council currently has 4 Champion roles, Armed Forces, Climate Change,
Equalities and Older Persons.  The Armed Forces Champion role is a
requirement of the Armed Forces Covenant which the Council have signed up
to and is linked to Scottish National War Memorial Outside Body. The
remaining Champion roles have been agreed by councillors to promote
particular themes.
5.2 The responsibilities of the Champions are listed in the Councillors Roles and
Responsibilities document, agreed at a meeting of the Council on
28 September 2022 (para 11 of the minute refers) Appendix 1 and are
detailed below for information:
 Encourage best practice, make suggestions and act as a positive
influencers within the Council in relation to the theme, goal or group to
which they have been nominated;
 Maintain links with relevant Officers, chairs and external groups/bodies as
appropriate in relation to their particular role; and
 Participate in appropriate publicity relevant to their particular role.
Page 169

Page 170

5.3 There has been some confusion over the Champion role.  In particular the
extent of authority of the Champion role and how this relates to the role of
Committee Chairs . It is therefore considered prudent to review the definition
of the Champion role.
6. COUNCIL CHAMPIONS - OPTIONS GOING FORWARD
6.1 There are a number of options the Council may wish to consider in how the
Champions role is managed going forward.
6.2
Option 1 Do nothing – leave the roles as they currently are.
This does not address the issues detailed in 5.3 above.
Option 2 Give the roles to the relevant Committee Chair with the following
suggestions:
Armed Forces - Police and Fire
Climate Change – Economic Development and Infrastructure
Equalities - Corporate
Older Persons - Moray Integration Joint Board Chair/Vice
Option 3 Amend the definition to the Champions roles to remove the second
two bullet points, as follows: 
• Encourage best practice, make suggestions and act as positive
influencers within the Council in relation to the theme, goal or group to
which they have been nominated;
• Maintain links with relevant Officers, chairs and external
groups/bodies as appropriate in relation to their particular role; and
• Participate in appropriate publicity relevant to their particular
role.
7. DEPUTISING FOR THE CIVIC LEADER
7.1 An amendment to the Councillor Roles and Responsibilities document is
proposed to allow the Council Leader or Depute Leader to deputise for the
Civic Leader for one-off occasions. The proposed wording amendment is
shown as a tracked change in the version of this document contained in
Appendix 1. The relevant exact is as follows:
Additional responsibilities
Para 7.4: The Civic Leader is authorised to wear the Council chain of office
and is expected to:-
 act as civic head, hosting Council events and attending other events as civic
leader and representative of the Council and the Moray communities. Where
Page 170

Page 171

the Civic Leader is unable to attend a particular event then either the Council
Leader or Depute Leader may deputise for them with authority to wear the
Council chain of office for that event. If neither is available, then in
consultation with the Chief Executive another Senior Member may deputise.
8. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
None
(b) Policy and Legal
There is no legal requirement to have Champions roles within the
Council.
(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications associated with this report.
(d) Risk Implications
There are no risk implications associated with this report.
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no staffing implications associated with this report.
(f) Property
There are no property implications associated with this report.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
Two of the Champions roles relate to the promotion of the interests of
protected groups in Council decision making. 
As the options in paragraph 4.2 above (Options 2,3 and 4) provide for
some continuation of this promotion through the Chair and as the
Council still require in law to have regard to the interests of these groups
in its decision making there is not considered to be any detrimental
impact on these groups.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
There are no climate change and biodiversity impacts associated with
this report.
(i) Consultations
The Interim Chief Executive, Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance), Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development), Head of Governance,
Strategy and Performance, Head of HR, ICT and OD and Acting Head of
Economic Growth and Development have been consulted and any
comments included in the report.
9. CONCLUSION
Page 171

Page 172

9.1 Council is asked to consider membership of committees, political
balance on committees, appointments to certain outside bodes and
whether to amend the role of Council Champion.
Author of Report: Alasdair McEachan, Head of Governance, Strategy and
Performance and Tracey Sutherland, Democratic
Services Manager
Background Papers:
Ref:
Page 172

Page 173

APPENDIX 1 
MORAY COUNCIL
COUNCILLORS’ ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 
The document sets out the different roles which Councillors can hold within the
Council and the Council’s expectations of these roles. It has been created for the
benefit of the public, Councillors and Officers in the interests of clarity and
transparency. 
Date approved  28 September 22
Document status For publication
Document owner Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance
Date for review September 25
1. ALL COUNCILLORS 
Legal Duties
1.1 All Councillors must comply with general legal requirements in carrying out
their duties. They also have specific legal duties to:- 
• sign a declaration of acceptance office
• at least once in a six-month period, attend a meeting of the Council, a
committee, a sub-committee, a joint committee, a joint board or other
formal outside body as a Council representative 
• maintain an accurate and up-to-date Register of Interests available on
the Councillors pages of the Committee Management Information
System CMIS
• familiarise themselves with and comply with the Councillors’ Code of
Conduct, having regard to Standards Commission guidance and advice
• comply with duties under the UK General Data Protection Regulation
(UK GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018
• comply with regulations concerning remuneration, expenses and
allowances and the Council’s Scheme of Elected Members’
Remuneration, Allowances and Reimbursement of Expenses 
Other duties and expectations
1.2 There are other duties and expectations over and above that legal minimum.
They arise in the following areas. Councillors have to maintain a complex
balance and mix of roles:- 
• as Moray residents and recipients of Council services
• as holders of a public office
• as ward members, to the ward area and constituents
• as Council members, to the whole Council and its constituents
• as members of a political party or group, expressing political values
and supporting the group to which they belong and its policies and
values
• as independent Councillors, supporting and following their values and 
the platform on which they were elected
• as decision-makers in a regulatory capacity
• as holders of additional responsibilities and positions within the Council
Item 13.
Page 173

Page 174

APPENDIX 1 
• as representatives of the Council in partnership working, outside body 
appointments and dealing with the public in general 
Values and principles
1.3 In everything they do, Councillors are expected to uphold and comply with the
Council’s values as set out in our Corporate Plan. Those are:- 
Fair 
• tackle inequalities
• treat people fairly
• promote equalities and awareness
• consider our impact on others 
Ambitious
• promote and celebrate Moray
• be a great place to work
• ensure sustainable and efficient Council services
• improve life for the most vulnerable• 
Improving
• Drive improvement
• Encourage innovation 
• Take commercial opportunities
• Invest in transforming to meet future needs 
Responsive
• Be open and transparent
• Promote community participation and involvement
• Listen to and involve our communities  
1.4 The Councillors’ Code of Conduct sets out the principles of good conduct
which Councillors must follow:- 
• Duty
• Selflessness
• Integrity
• Objectivity
• Accountability
• Stewardship
• Openness
• Honesty
• Leadership
• Respect 
Public office
1.5 As holders of public office Councillors are accountable to the public of Moray 
for their decisions. Through their personal conduct and through their work
Page 174

Page 175

APPENDIX 1 
including contact with the people in the area they represent, the media and 
other agencies, Councillors are expected to:- 
• uphold and act in accordance with the law
• fulfil and act in accordance with the public trust placed in them
• justify their actions to the public
• maintain the highest standards of conduct
• promote the core values of the Council
• provide an example to others
• enhance the reputation of the Council and Moray
• safeguard and enhance the public perception of the Council and its
status
• take a key role in advancing the social, economic and environmental
wellbeing of Moray
• facilitate and encourage partnership working with other
committees/boards in responding to meeting the needs of Moray
communities
• avoid any circumstance which could lead to the suspicion or
appearance of improper conduct or which could bring the Council into
disrepute
• carry out their roles and duties in a dignified and respectful manner 
Internal Rules and Procedures
1.6 Councillors are expected to comply with the Council’s internal governance
arrangements by:- 
• being familiar with and complying with Standing Orders 
• respecting other Councillors, the Chair and rulings by the Chair at
meetings
• adhering to the protocols approved to guide Councillor and Officer
relations
• following the Council’s rules regarding the use of Council facilities
• respecting the role and responsibilities of Officers
• complying with corporate policies which apply to them as well as
Officers (for example, information security) 
Duties to whole Council and to the Ward
1.7 Councillors have responsibilities and duties to the Council and Council area
as a whole. They are expected to:- 
• participate in the decision making of the Council and the formation of
the Council’s policies and programmes
• monitor and scrutinise the effectiveness and efficiency of the Council in
the discharge of its functions
• ensure that the Council uses its resources prudently and in accordance
with the law 
• represent, both in Council decision-making and in contact with Officers
of the Council, all of the constituents in the area which they are elected
to represent
• promote participation and citizen involvement in the decision making
process through recognised means. 
Page 175

Page 176

APPENDIX 1 
• have regard to the policies and decisions of the Council when
representing the interests of their constituents
• recognise the cultural diversity within the area and encourage equal
opportunities
• attend training and briefing sessions and progress their own personal
development 
• seek advice where appropriate from colleagues and senior Officers
• consider issues on their merits, taking account of the views of others
• accept responsibility individually and collectively for ensuring that
adequate provisions for the proper conduct of the Council’s business
are in place 
1.8 Alongside the duties to the Council as a whole, Councillors have specific roles
and duties in relation to their ward area. They are  expected to:- 
• be accessible to all the people within their ward area 
• represent conscientiously the interests of the people within their ward
to the Council and to other public sector committees/boards
• respect and work constructively with their ward Councillor colleagues
• have regard to and respect the policies and decisions of the Council
when representing the interests of their constituents without limiting
their ability to scrutinise and review the application and continuing
relevance and fitness for purpose of these policies and decisions. 
• interpret and express the wishes of their constituents to the Council
• exercise community leadership and involvement, both in their ward and
in Moray as a whole 
• develop local knowledge of local issues and use it to inform Council
decisions and policy-making
• listen and respond to the needs of local people
• carry out casework on behalf of constituents
• account for service priorities, the allocation of resources and the
performance of the Council to constituents 
Regulatory and quasi-judicial business
1.9 Councillors may be appointed to make decisions on regulatory or quasi-
judicial business. This means that they are acting like a court of law in making
a decision on an application or determination of individual rights or an appeal. 
1.10 Councillors have duties and responsibilities in these cases which are higher
than normal:- 
• They must be impartial
• They must be aware of and understand the relevant legal provisions
and take advice where necessary
• They must be aware of relevant Council policies
• They must make decisions based only on relevant facts and
circumstances which have been brought to their attention as part of the
meeting or hearing
Page 176

Page 177

APPENDIX 1 
• They must apply the appropriate legal tests and rules to those relevant
factors
• They must not take irrelevant factors into account
• They must ensure that everyone is treated fairly and equally and is
given a fair hearing 
• They must avoid making statements or doing or saying anything which
may give the perception of bias or pre-judgment
• They must not make decisions according to a pre-determined political
or group line, or lobby colleagues to reach a particular determination 
External work and relationships
1.11 Councillors may be appointed by the Council to external committees/boards,
including arms-length external organisations (ALEOs). They have particular
responsibilities in relation to those appointments. Those are:-
• participating in the activities of the outside body
• providing two-way communication between it and the Council
• developing and maintaining a working knowledge of the Council’s
policies and practices in relation to that body and of the community’s
needs and aspirations in respect of that body’s role and functions
• contributing to community planning by acting as a representative of the
Council, working in partnership with relevant external
committees/boards
• representing the Council and Moray at events at local, national and
international level
• acting as an effective ambassador for the Council and Moray at all
times
• representing the interests of the people of Moray to the Council to other
public sector committees/boards 
1.12 The Councillors’ Code of Conduct extends to Councillors representing the
Council on outside committees/boards. It also requires compliance with any
other Code of Conduct applicable to the outside body itself.
2. COUNCILLORS WITH ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES 
Defined
2.1 The Council recognises a number of positions with additional responsibilities
to that of a Councillor. These positions are described in more detail below and
comprise: 
• Council Champions
• Chairs of Committees and Boards
• Leader of the Council 
• Depute-Leader of the Council
• Leader of Largest Non-Administration Group
• Civic Leader   
Page 177

Page 178

APPENDIX 1 
Additional allowances 
2.2 Under statutory remuneration regulations every Councillor receives a basic
allowance.  A fixed higher allowance is payable for the positions of Council
Leader, Civic Leader and Chairs/Vice-Chairs of Joint Boards. In addition the
remuneration regulations give the Council discretion to approve up to 9 further
senior responsibility allowances or SRA’s.   
2.3 The posts which attract SRA’s are not fixed and require to be approved at a
Council meeting. For transparency the remuneration of Councillors is reported
annually to the Council.   
3. COUNCIL CHAMPIONS   
Defined
3.1 The Council may nominate individual Councillors as Champions to promote
an aspirational theme, goal or group interest in which that Councillor has a
particular interest, knowledge or affinity. 
Responsibilities
3.2 Council Champions are expected to: 
• Encourage best practice, make suggestions and act as a positive
influencers within the Council in relation to the theme, goal or group to
which they have been nominated.
• Maintain links with relevant Officers, chairs and external groups /bodies
as appropriate in relation to their particular role 
• Participate in appropriate publicity relevant to their particular role.   
4. CHAIRS OF COMMITTEES AND BOARDS 
Defined
4.1 The Council delegates functions to committees and sub-committees to make
recommendations and to take decisions in relation to the delivery of services
and the discharge of the Council’s functions. These committees require an
individual Councillor to chair their meetings.  Chairs are appointed by Moray
Council.   
4.2 Chairs (who may have multiple roles) will generally be classed as Senior
Councillors and receive a higher level of remuneration than ordinary
Councillors. 
4.3 The role of Chairs goes beyond that of ordinary Councillors. Chairs are
expected to provide a focus for Councillors in relation to the services within
the remit of the committees/boards they chair and to enhance the reputation
of the Council and Moray. 
Additional responsibilities
4.4 Chairs are expected to: 
Page 178

Page 179

APPENDIX 1 
• promote corporate responsibility for the policies and decisions of their
committees/boards and ensure clear political direction and guidance in the
best interests of the whole of Moray.
• ensure that the Leader of the Council is briefed as appropriate on
significant issues within their committee remit
• work with the appropriate Officers in respect of the services within the
remits of the committees/boards they chair
• foster and develop effective and constructive working relationships with
other members of the Council and Officers, and with relevant outside
bodies
• liaise closely and effectively with senior Officers in relation to the business
of their committees/boards
• chair meetings and ensure the proper conduct of meetings including
keeping order; ensuring that members have a fair hearing; that reasonable
steps are taken to enable effective participation by members, Officers and
members of the public participating by being present physically or by
remote-access; regulating participation by Officers and the public; ruling
on all matters of procedure, competency and relevancy; and ensuring the
business on the agenda is concluded efficiently and effectively within the
terms of the Council’s Standing Orders.
• promote compliance with the Council’s Constitutional Documents
corporate policies and objectives and the Council’s committees/boards as
they affect their committees/boards’ remit
• communicate and link effectively with other committees and working
groups and with individual elected members, other committees/boards and
community groups
• promote the core values of the Council in the work of their
committees/boards
• act at all times in a manner to enhance the reputation of the Council in
terms of fair representation, open government and accountability and as a
representative of both the Council and the community
• maintain the highest standards of integrity and behaviour personally and
act as an example to others
• assist in identifying and raising awareness of  relevant training for 
members of their committees/boards 
Vice-Chairs and Acting Chairs
4.5 These responsibilities apply to the Depute-Chairs when acting in the role of
Chair. 
4.6 These responsibilities apply to any Councillor appointed in an acting capacity
under the Council’s Family Leave Scheme for Elected Members or where they
are covering an extended absence. 
5. COUNCIL LEADER 
Defined
5.1 The Leader of the Council is a Councillor elected by the other members of the
Council to be the political figurehead and leader of the Council and its
Page 179

Page 180

APPENDIX 1 
Councillors and is the title given by the Council to the Councillor performing
the role of “Convener” and elected under section 4 of the Local Government
etc. (Scotland) Act 1994.  The statutory requirement of this role is to chair
Moray Council. 
5.2 The Leader of the Council is usually the head of the political party or group
which forms the administration group on the Council. The role will carry
overall political responsibility for all Council service areas as well as any
specific area defined in the Scheme of Administration. The role carries a
higher level of remuneration (prescribed by regulation) which is distinct from
Senior Councillor payments. 
5.3 The Leader of the Council is expected to enhance the reputation of the
Council in terms of fair representation, open government and accountability
and to maintain the highest standards of integrity and behaviour. 
5.4 As leader of their political group, they have particular responsibility to
represent and communicate the views of their group as part of the formal
decision making processes of the Council and its committees and through
informal working groups and forums. They are to provide leadership of their
group and act as its main spokesperson to ensure clear political direction and
guidance is given on behalf of the political administration. 
Additional responsibilities
5.5 In addition to meeting the expectations of a Council Chair and an ordinary
Councillor the Leader of the Council is expected to:-   
• chair meetings of Moray Council and ensure the proper conduct of
meetings including keeping order; ensuring that members have a fair
hearing; that reasonable steps are taken to enable effective participation
by members, Officers and members of the public participating by being
present physically or by remote-access; regulating participation by Officers
and the public; ruling on all matters of procedure, competency and
relevancy; and ensure the business on the agenda is concluded efficiently
and effectively in terms of Standing Orders.
• lead the political administration of the Council
• ensure clear political direction and guidance in the best interests of the
whole of Moray.
• carry overall political responsibility to promote  the vision, policies,
strategies and decisions of the Council as a whole
• promote  public confidence in the activities of the Council as a whole
• have particular responsibility with regard to community leadership 
• exercise sound and fair political leadership
• be responsible for developing and overseeing effective political
relationships with partner organisations
• act as the Council’s main political spokesperson to communicate and
promote the policies, strategies, decisions and the achievements of the
Council within agreed communications strategies.
Page 180

Page 181

APPENDIX 1 
• provide feedback to the Chief Executive where requested in the following
areas: organisational and management processes of the Council,
decisions to be taken under delegated powers, budget priorities, service
planning and performance  and pre committee formulation of policy
• promote an inclusive working environment involving all members of the
Council 
• develop and encourages effective working relationships among
Councillors and Officers
• represent the Council at meetings of the Convention of Scottish Local
Authorities (COSLA) and ensures that the position and interests of the
Council are represented at COSLA meetings and that feedback from these
meetings is given through established channels within the Council.
• if appointed, chair significant policy consideration/discussion groups
established by the Council such as the Political Group Leaders group
• help ensure that the work of all committee Chairs contributes to the
corporate effectiveness of the Council as a whole
• liaise closely with the Depute Leader over the division and delegation of
responsibilities between the Leader and Depute Leader roles
• liaise closely with the Civic Leader in terms of civic roles and functions on
behalf of the Council 
Depute Leader, Acting Leader, Joint Leaders
5.6 In addition to meeting the expectations of a Council Chair and an ordinary
Councillor the Depute Leader is expected to assist the Council Leader in
discharging the roll of Council Leader. They may undertake any
responsibilities associated with the Leader role as informally agreed by the
Council Leader, or in terms of any more formal division agreement, and shall
liaise with and work constructively and effectively with the Council leader.  In
particular the Depute Leader is expected to: 
• Provide cover for chairing of Moray Council or attendance at COSLA
leaders meetings where the Council Leader is unable to attend.
• promote an inclusive working environment involving all members of the
Council
• develop and encourage effective working relationships among Councillors
and Officers
• provide feedback to the Chief Executive where requested in the following
areas: organisational and management processes of the Council,
decisions to be taken under delegated powers, budget priorities, service
planning and performance  and pre committee formulation of policy 
5.7 These responsibilities apply to any Councillor appointed in an acting capacity
under the Council’s Family Leave Scheme for Elected Members or covering a
period of extended leave. 
5.8 Joint Leaders may be elected by the Council. The responsibilities of the
Leader will apply equally to those who share the office. Joint Leaders have
the additional responsibility of liaising with and working constructively and
effectively with each other in the best interests of the Council and the
Page 181

Page 182

APPENDIX 1 
Council’s area and residents. If joint Leaders are appointed then either will be
able to take the chair at Moray Council meetings. 
6. GROUP LEADER 
Defined
6.1 A Group Leader is the nominated representative/spokesperson of any non-
administration political party or group comprising three or more Councillors.
The holder of the position is not elected by the Council and there is no
automatic right to additional remuneration. 
6.2 The holder of the post carries all of the duties and responsibilities of an
ordinary Councillor (and Chair if applicable) with additional responsibilities to
ensure that the views of their group are communicated and represented as
part of the democratic governance of the Council. 
Additional responsibilities
6.3 A Group Leader is expected to:- 
• represent and communicate the views of their group as part of the formal
decision making processes of the Council and its committees and through
informal working groups and forums
• provide leadership of their group
• act as the group’s main spokesperson in order to enable the group to
participate effectively in the decision-making processes 
• ensure clear political direction and guidance is given on behalf of their
group in the best interests of the Council and Moray
• participate actively and effectively in the scrutiny of the Council’s policies,
budgets and service delivery and their effectiveness in meeting the
strategic and operational objectives agreed by the Council and the needs of
the communities in Moray
• promote an inclusive working environment and ensure the participation of
members of their group in debate and policy decision making processes of
the Council
• maintain effective communications with other Group Leaders and the Chief
Executive
• participate as required in consultation organised by the Council with
Moray’s communities to ensure that their full range of views and opinion are
expressed to Council in the formulation and review of policies, budgets,
strategies and service delivery
• represent their group in Council events, community involvement and in
other forums in order to further the interests of the Council and Moray
• promote the core values of the Council in fulfilling their remit 
Depute, Acting and Joint  Group Leader 
6.4 These responsibilities apply to any Depute Group Leader appointed by a
group. 
Page 182

Page 183

APPENDIX 1 
6.5 The responsibilities of  Group Leader will apply equally to any Acting Leader
(acting in that capacity under the Council’s Family Leave Scheme for Elected
Members or covering a period of extended leave) or to those who share the
office as Joint Leaders 
7. CIVIC LEADER 
Defined
7.1 The Civic Leader fulfils a unique and important function as the civic head in
representing the Council and the wider Moray community at ceremonial and
other formal events and occasions both within and outside Moray. The Civic
Leader is the formal representative of the Council when meeting with visiting
dignitaries. 
7.2 The position shall attract a higher level of remuneration, defined “Civic Head”
in terms of the remuneration regulations. 
7.3 The holder of the post carries all of the duties and responsibilities of an
ordinary Councillor with the additional responsibilities set out below. 
Additional responsibilities
7.4 The Civic Leader is authorised to wear the Council chain of office and is
expected to:- 
• act as civic head, hosting Council events and attending other events as
civic leader and representative of the Council and the Moray communities.
Where the Civic Leader is unable to attend a particular event then either
the Council Leader or Depute Leader may deputise for them with authority
to wear the Council chain of officer for that event. If neither is available,
then in consultation with the Chief Executive another Senior Member may
deputise. 
• act as civic head, hosting Council events and attending other events as
civic leader and representative of the Council and the Moray communities
with authority to appoint a substitute when they are unable to attend.
• 
• promote Moray’s profile to the wider community through public
appearances at social, community, cultural and business events and
though the media
• foster networks with other organisations in both the business and public
sectors to support and enhance the development of Moray and its
communities
• liaise closely with the Leader of the Council in terms of the civic roles and
functions on behalf of the Council, and with the Depute Leader
• promote the core values of the Council
• act at all times in a manner to enhance the reputation of the Council in
terms of fair representation, open government and accountability and as a
representative of both the Council and the community
Page 183

Page 184

APPENDIX 1 
• maintain the highest standards of integrity and behaviour personally and
act as an example to others
• hold an ex officio position on any cross party policy formulation groups
established by the Council (such as the Political Group Leaders group) to
assist them in meeting their civic duties 
Acting Civic Leader
7.5 These responsibilities apply to any Councillor appointed in an acting capacity
under the Council’s Family Leave Scheme for Elected Members.
Page 184

Page 185

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION ON PROPOSAL TO ALLOW
PROXY VOTING BY COUNCILLORS
BY: HEAD OF GOVERNANCE STRATEGY AND PERFORMANCE
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To advise the Council of a consultation by the Scottish Government on a
proposal to allow proxy voting by councillors; and
1.2 This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section II (19) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating any new policy matter which does
not fall within the terms of reference of any Committee.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1     The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
(i) note the contents of this report; and
(ii) agree the proposed response by the Council to the consultation,
as included in Appendix 1 to this report.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On 3 October 2024, the Scottish Government opened a consultation on a
proposal to allow proxy voting by councillors.
3.2 The consultation closed on 28 November 2024 however special dispensation
has been sought to submit this response late.
3.3 The consultation paper advises that concerns have been raised with the
Scottish Government around the absence of proxy voting provision for
councillors. The consultation notes that the absence of explicit provisions
allowing for proxy voting within local authorities could impact councillors on
parental leave, or those who are unable to attend for other reasons, for
example, because of an accident or serious illness. Proxy voting in these
circumstances would allow a councillor to nominate another specified
councillor to vote on their behalf during Council decisions.
Item 14.
Page 185

Page 186

3.4 The relevant legislative framework allows for formal local authority meetings
(including committees, joint committees and sub-committees) to be conducted
in any way in which each member is enabled to participate, even if not
physically present. However, there are no provisions which explicitly allow for
proxy voting, and the consultation seeks views on introducing a provision to
permit proxy voting within local authorities.
3.5 The consultation notes that there may be options, short of proxy voting, that
could aid decision making. The Scottish Government notes that local
authorities could introduce informal pairing agreements along the lines of
those previously used in the Scottish Parliament prior to its introduction of
explicit proxy voting provisions. Pairing occurs where two individuals from
opposing parties both agree not to vote on a decision. In local government,
this would allow a councillor to be absent without affecting the result of the
vote as the absences balance each other out.
3.6 The Scottish Government does, however, recognise that there could be
difficulties around this given councils are smaller, with more limited numbers
of councillors to pair. There may also be instances where local circumstances
mean it would not be possible to agree a pair. Such a pairing agreement
might also prevent quorum requirements being met, particularly in smaller
authorities.
3.7 The consultation notes that local authorities could also consider the
appointment of named substitutes to committees, effectively allowing a form of
proxy voting to be used. Most Scottish local authorities allow substitutes on
committees and this is the subject of a separate report to the Council at this
this meeting. The consultation does, however, note that where there are
independent members or a smaller number of councillors from the same party
then opportunities for named substitutes may be limited. It would also not be
possible to apply this to full Council meetings as all councillors are required at
those meetings.
3.8Given the above limitations to these options, the Scottish Government                 
believes that a statutory provision around proxy voting would be preferable.
4 PROPOSALS
4.1 The Scottish Government proposes to amend the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973 to enable a councillor in Scotland to arrange for their vote
to be cast by a proxy. A further amendment would also be made which would
require local authorities to agree and publish a scheme setting out how proxy
voting would work in practice, where they choose to introduce proxy voting.
4.2. The Scottish Government advise that the operational details, including the
criteria of the scheme, would not be set out in legislation. It would be for local
authorities to determine how a scheme could work in practice and under
which circumstances proxy voting could be available, should they wish to
allow for it. Joint guidance would be produced by COSLA and the Scottish
Government to assist the drafting of the operational scheme.
Page 186

Page 187

4.3. The Scottish Government proposes the following criteria be included within
the operational guidance as suggestions on where proxy voting could be
appropriate:
 maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave, shared parental leave
or adoption leave;
 complications arising from pregnancy, childbirth, miscarriage or baby
loss;
 serious long-term illness or injury;
 bereavement;
 attending to a person who is near the end of their life;
 any other reason subject to agreement of the full Council.
4.4. The Scottish Government has, however, advised that at this time there is no
suitable legislative opportunity to introduce this amendment should the
consultation support the introduction of proxy voting. The Scottish
Government will continue to support authorities to investigate other options to
enable councillor participation until such time an amendment can be
introduced.
4.5. Officers have assessed the proposal. Broadly speaking, officers can see
benefit in permitting local authorities the ability to introduce some form of
proxy voting, in such form as an individual local authority considers
appropriate. Officers have drafted a proposed consultation response, included
in Appendix 1 to this report. As included in the draft response, there are a few
comments that it is suggested are worth noting in the response:-
 It is understood that most, if not all, local authorities already have
arrangements for substitutions, so in practical terms this is most likely only to
be relevant for meetings of the full Council, or where a member cannot
arrange a substitute;
 It is commonly accepted that in the exercise of a proxy vote, the person
entitled to vote (Cllr A) instructs their proxy (Cllr B) to exercise their vote in
accordance with their wishes (ie Cllr A’s wishes). Quasi-judicial matters
cannot be pre-determined and there is a clear requirement for elected
members to only make a decision once all relevant considerations have been
suitably considered. It is difficult to see how this could be reconciled with a
member arranging for a proxy to vote on their behalf in a particular way. If this
is how the Government intends the proposal to operate, and the proxy does
not have discretion as to how they vote, then it is recommended that proxy
votes are not permitted for quasi-judicial matters;
 Linked to the above, whilst some local authorities require certain motions and
amendments to be tabled in advance of the meeting, this is not the case for
all, and even then there will still be the ability to move proposals at the
meeting itself. If an elected member is not able to participate in the meeting,
then they will not have heard the full discussion and debate and, as such,
might not be able to fully take all relevant considerations into account before
they vote. They will neither be able to ask questions or contribute to the
discussion/debate themselves as they might otherwise have done had they
been able to participate. In this context, relevant considerations could include
the application of the Public Sector Equality Duty and the Fairer Scotland Duty
Page 187

Page 188

to the matter in question. Decisions of the Council are at risk of legal
challenge if there is a flaw in the decision-making process, for instance
because a relevant duty was not suitably discharged. As above, if this is how
the Government intends the proposal to operate, then it is recommended that
consideration is given to proxy votes not being permitted for matters where
councillors need to be able to participate in the meeting;
 If someone arranges for a proxy to vote on their behalf this presumably would
not be counted as attendance at the meeting, in terms of Section 35 of the
Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973;
 A member who would otherwise have been unable to vote on the matter in
question should not be able to have a proxy vote on their behalf, e.g. where
they are currently in a period of suspension following a decision of the
Standards Commission or where they would have declared an interest and
recused themselves from the meeting;
 A member who has arranged for a proxy to vote on their behalf should not
count towards a quorum at the meeting;
 Whilst it would no doubt be for each authority to consider their own local rules,
any proxy arrangements would need to be advised to relevant Council officials
by a suitable time in advance of the meeting commencing; and
 Councils now use a variety of electronic meeting systems, some with voting
options, and individual Councils would need to ensure their system could
accommodate a proxy vote.
5 SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
No direct implications.
(b) Policy and Legal
If legislation where changed to allow proxy voting at council meetings
then a further decision would be required by the council and, if agreed
then a change to the council's standing orders would be required.
(c) Financial implications
There are no financial implications arising directly from this report.
(d) Risk Implications
None
(e) Staffing Implications
There are no employee implications arising directly from this report.
(f) Property
No direct implications.
Page 188

Page 189

(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
No direct implications.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental
implications arising directly from this report.
(i) Consultations
Group leaders have been consulted on the merits of bringing this report
to the Council.
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 The Council are asked to agree a response to the Scottish Government
on proposals to allow proxy voting within Council meetings.
Author of Report: Alasdair McEachan
Background Papers:
Ref:
Page 189

Page 190

Page 190

Page 191

APPENDIX 1
Consultation on proposal to Allow Proxy Voting by Councillors
Consultation Questions
Question 1
Do you agree that an explicit provision should be introduced to allow a
councillor to arrange for their vote to be cast by proxy
(YES/NO) Proposed Response: Yes
Question 2
Do you agree with the optional criteria set out at paragraph 12 which could be
applied by a local authority to allow for proxy voting?
(YES/NO) Proposed Response: Yes
Question 3
Are there any further comments that you wish to make on the proposal to
allow for proxy voting (free text, 300 word maximum)?
In general terms, the Council is supportive of the additional flexibility that proxy
voting might permit. Clearly, how such an arrangement might operate in any
individual council would be for them to determine, and would need to take account of
its size, political composition and meeting arrangements (including any electronic
meeting/voting systems adopted). However, the Council believes the following points
are also worthy of consideration:-
 Many local authorities already have arrangements for substitutions in
committees, so proxy voting is most likely only to be relevant for
meetings of the full Council, or where a member cannot arrange a
substitute;
 In the exercise of a proxy vote, the person entitled to vote instructs
their proxy to exercise their vote in accordance with their wishes. Quasi
-judicial matters cannot be pre-determined and there is a clear
requirement for a councillor to only make a decision once all relevant
considerations have been suitably considered. It is difficult to see how
this could be reconciled with a member arranging for a proxy to vote on
their behalf in a particular way. If this is how it is envisaged proxy
voting would operate, then it is recommended that proxy votes are not
permitted for quasi-judicial matters;
 Many motions and amendments are tabled at meetings following
debate. An elected member giving a proxy will not have heard the full
discussion and debate and, as such, might not be able to fully take all
relevant considerations into account before they vote. They will neither
be able to ask questions or contribute to the discussion/debate
themselves as they might otherwise have done had they been able to
participate. In this context, relevant considerations could include the
application of the Public Sector Equality Duty and the Fairer Scotland
Duty to the matter in question. Decisions of the Council are at risk of
legal challenge if there is a flaw in the decision-making process, for
instance because a relevant duty was not suitably discharged. As
above, if this is how the Government intends the proposal to operate,
Item 14.
Page 191

Page 192

then it is recommended that consideration is given to proxy votes not
being permitted for matters where councillors need to be able to
participate in the meeting;
 If someone arranges for a proxy to vote on their behalf this presumably
would not be counted as attendance at the meeting, in terms of Section
35 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973;
 A member who would otherwise have been unable to vote on the
matter in question should not be able to have a proxy vote on their
behalf, e.g. where they are currently in a period of suspension following
a decision of the Standards Commission or where they would have
declared an interest and recused themselves from the meeting;
 A member who has arranged for a proxy to vote on their behalf should
not count towards a quorum at the meeting;
Page 192

Page 193

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: CLIMATE CHANGE PLAN AND ROUTE MAP TO NET ZERO
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (ECONOMY, ENVIRONMENT AND
FINANCE)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To ask the Council to approve the update to the Climate Change Plan and
Routemap to Net Zero, to note the Council’s progress to date and actions
required to meet targets and statutory duties, to agree the scope and process
of updating the Climate Change Strategy in 2025.
1.2 This report is submitted to the Council in terms of Section III (F) (33) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to providing, developing and
monitoring the Council’s Economic Development and Infrastructure Services.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1 It is recommended that Council:
(i) approves the Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero
(Appendix 1);
(ii) notes that if the Council’s targets and statutory duties are to be
met, action is required to accelerate the pace of building
decarbonisation, progress in waste reduction, and development of
a delivery model for natural capital enhancements, the
groundwork for which has now been completed or is currently
underway;
(iii) notes that significant funding opportunities are available to the
Council to make progress in these areas, including the Scottish
Government’s £500m North East Just Transition Fund;
(iv) agrees that existing decarbonisation project groundwork be built
upon by working up projects in detail with a view to submitting
funding bids for committee approval and progressing spend-to-
save opportunities, noting that funding bids should align with
aspirations for the pathway to net zero that emerges as the review
progresses;
Item 15.
Page 193

Page 194

(v) agrees that a member and officer Climate Change Working Group
be established to oversee the Climate Change Strategy update
(Appendix 2);
(vi) notes that on 18 April 2024, the Scottish Government removed the
target of a 75% reduction by 2030 while retaining the statutory
target of net zero carbon emissions by 2045;
(vii) agrees that the Climate Change Strategy update should move
away from committing the Council to a 2030 net zero target and
adopt decarbonisation targets for each area within the council. As
set out in para 6.6 of this report, these should at least align to
national targets and could show greater ambition where this is felt
to be practically and financially achievable; and
(viii) Agrees that a briefing for members will be provided as high-level
work on Just Transition and socio-economic benefits is
developed.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 Climate change is a significant and escalating threat to Moray’s natural
environment, people and economic wellbeing. The impacts of climate change
are already being felt. These will continue to worsen, posing major challenges
for both current and future generations, ecosystems, infrastructure and key
sectors including food and drink, agriculture and tourism.
3.2 The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 requires the Council to respond to
these challenges by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, adapting to the
changing climate, and to act in a way considered most sustainable. The
Council must report on compliance with these duties annually.
3.3 Contributing to the achievement of sustainable development through
continuous improvement in performance is a key component of the Council’s
Best Value duties set out by the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003.
Achieving sustainable development means meeting the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own
needs.
3.4 On 27 June 2019, the Council made a declaration of climate emergency,
which stated that the Council must take necessary actions to protect our area,
country and planet (para 6 of the Minute refers).
3.5 In response to the commitments made in the declaration, on 10 March 2021
(para 13 of the Minute refers) the Council adopted a Climate Change Strategy
for 2020-30. The strategy set a net zero target of 2030, and required that its
officers and elected members work with others across Moray to deliver that
goal. It was agreed that an annual Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net
Zero would be produced and updated with the latest data on current
emissions, progress and future projections.
Page 194

Page 195

3.6 On 28 February 2024, the Council agreed a new Corporate Plan 2024-29,
with climate change integrated prominently throughout its priorities (para 15 of
the Minute refers).
3.7 On 18 April 2024, the Scottish Government replaced annual carbon reduction
targets with multi-year carbon budgets. This action retains the statutory target
of net zero carbon emissions by 2045 within the public sector but removes the
target of a 75% reduction by 2030. The Scottish Government also announced
a new package of climate action measures on transport, uptake of EV
chargers and land use. Some of the new actions aim to increase funding for
peatland restoration, tree planting and renewable energy generation.
3.8 In May 2024, the Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero and Energy wrote to the
Council Leader and Chief Executive regarding the latest public bodies’ climate
change duties reporting. The Cabinet Secretary commended officers for
continued on-time compliance with the duty and gave an overview of analysis
undertaken on the reporting. The analysis reveals areas where attention
needs to be focused over the coming years, including scaling up project
delivery to decarbonise heating and strengthening reporting on climate risk
assessment and adaptation action. The Cabinet Secretary has requested that
all public bodies undertake an internal review of their reporting processes and
quality assurance procedures to ensure compliance with their duties under the
Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009.
4. CLIMATE CHANGE PLAN AND ROUTEMAP TO NET ZERO
4.1 The updated Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero is set out in
Appendix 1. It details how the Council is progressing its statutory duties
under three key themes:
 Reducing carbon emissions;
 Restoring nature; and
 Being ready for climate impacts.
4.2 It also sets out how embedding climate action within services supports the
delivery of the Council’s new corporate priorities and vision, presenting a
strategic and cost-effective way to overcome the challenges identified within
the Corporate Plan 2024-29.
4.3 The document has been produced in collaboration with key services across
the Council, all of which have a responsibility to lead climate action in their
respective workstreams.
4.4 Whilst the 2022-23 report highlights areas of progress and best practice;
carbon emissions have increased due to a continuation of business-as-usual
practices within the Council. Beyond business-as-usual emissions increases,
progress on carbon emissions reduction has been restricted for several
reasons:
 Services within the Council increasingly lack the resources or expertise
needed to develop and manage effective carbon and cost reduction
projects, and/or secure external funding;
Page 195

Page 196

 A lack of shared ownership and collaboration across services together
with competing priorities has created a situation where climate change is
often regarded as a separate issue, rather than an opportunity which can
be integrated into existing work – creating efficiencies;
 Mixed understanding of climate change at all levels within the Council can
hinder buy-in, proactive action and sustainable development; and
 External factors and funding availability have resulted in some decisions
taken by the Council contributing to a delay in carbon emissions
reduction. For example, the Council’s new fleet replacement strategy
which delayed uptake of low emission vehicles due to immature
technology and funding constraints.
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO ROUTEMAP TO NET ZERO
5.1 There has been a delay in presenting the 2022-23 Route Map to Net Zero to
Council. Since the report was written there havebeen a number of changes
which are worth noting. Firstly, as reported to the ED&I committee on 12
November 2024 (para 13 of the draft minute refers) in 2023/24, the Council’s
recorded carbon emissions decreased by 7,836 tCO2e (-29%) compared to
reporting year 2022/23. This is principally the result of the use of the NESS
Energy from Waste facility, which processes non-recyclable waste to produce
electricity for the national grid, and heat for a district heating network.
5.2 In addition, obligations around nature conservation and opportunities and
funding to support natural capital projects have grown since the publication of
the Climate Change Strategy 2020-30. The Nature Network Opportunity Map
is currently being finalised and expected to be complete by March 2025 and
the creation of a Biodiversity Strategy is being developed alongside the
Climate Change Strategy update and expected to be complete by August
2025. These will contribute to the new Local Development Plan. However, the
reduction in Nature Restoration Funding has had an impact on the Council’s
ability to progress biodiversity projects. Future success in this area will require
securing new funding sources and integrating biodiversity efforts with other
initiatives where appropriate to create efficiencies.
5.3 There also remains a critical gap in the Council’s readiness for the impacts of
climate change. As reported to Council on 25 September 2024 (para 21 of the
draft minute refers), adaptation is very clearly evidenced in some key service
areas, most notably coastal change and flood management planning, and
local development planning.  While some progress is being made in other
areas, the organisation is clearly in the early stages of preparing for climate
impacts. Continuing work is required in this area to ensure that the Council
meets its statutory obligations and is otherwise satisfied that it is prepared for
the impacts of climate change.
5.4 Significant opportunities lie ahead to make progress against these challenges,
including
 The Scottish Government’s £500m North East Just Transition Fund, which
officers are developing future bids for. To date, the Council has secured
£881,000 from this Fund and officers are exploring at a high level the
opportunity to work with partners to develop a multi-year, multi million
pound bid across a range of projects, supporting economic growth, carbon
Page 196

Page 197

reduction, renewable energy generation, use of natural capital. This will
include potential spend to save opportunities.
 Potential future funding for the actions raised within the Council’s Local
Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy (LHEES);
 Incoming Regional Land Use Partnerships (RLUPs) which will be key to
delivery of natural infrastructure development. Funding to enable peatland
restoration, tree planting and renewable energy generation is expected to
be made available by a new carbon tax;
 Work to maximise socio-economic benefits from energy developments in
Moray which could deliver significant funding opportunities for ongoing
projects locally. This is based upon National Planning Framework 4 Policy
11 and guidance approved by the Council on 24 April 2024 (para 4a of the
Minute refers). The Local Development Plan is required to identify
opportunities for renewable energy and along with grid infrastructure, these
are required by Policy 11 to maximise net economic impact, including local
and community socio-economic benefits. The guidance proposes that a
strategic regional approach is taken, which is additional to the existing
community benefit process, to identify regional interventions which will be
developed by the Council and HIE and could include elements of economic
growth and spend to save, such as energy efficiency measures, affordable
housing, renewables generation, tourism infrastructure, apprenticeship
schemes, green skills and business space;
 Power purchase agreements (PPAs) to cover capital funding of renewable
energy installations, and provide a reduced energy cost to the Council; and
 Retrofit credits for retrofitting works principally in social housing.
As high-level work develops on Just Transition and socio-economic benefits a
briefing for members will be provided.
5.5 Success will require a combination of strong leadership, collaboration across
services, knowledge building and adequate resourcing to realise these
opportunities.
5.6 The groundwork to strengthen the Council’s position for advancing projects
and securing external funding has been completed in some areas and is
ongoing in others. This includes completion of the Council’s Local Heat and
Energy Efficiency Strategy (LHEES), natural capital opportunities study,
rooftop solar feasibility studies for buildings together with a further programme
of lighting replacement and costing actions to inform the Climate Change
Strategy update in 2025. Renewable energy projects on buildings are actively
in development, with indicative payback periods of around 6 years, and
demonstrating high net lifetime savings for the Council. These sit within the
Transformation Strategy.
6. NEXT STEPS – CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGY UPDATE
6.1 To ensure the Climate Change Strategy (CCS) remains relevant and accounts
for ongoing national policy development, it is subject to review. The Strategy
and its targets now require updating to reflect the progress that has taken
place over the last three years, the greater understanding of the
decarbonisation pathway the Council is on, and the changes in national
policies around Climate Change. It is recommended that a member and officer
Page 197

Page 198

Climate Change Working Group be established to oversee this CCS update. A
similar arrangement was beneficial during development of the original CCS
and can provide useful in-depth oversight around key areas of policy
development.
6.2 The scope of work for the CCS update (including details of the need to amend
the Council net Zero target), the terms of reference for the Climate Change
Working Group, and the process for engagement are detailed in Appendix 2.
6.3 A decision point in 2025 was built into the CCS for members to reassess the
Council’s decarbonisation targets, considering changes in the policy and
funding landscape, which will form the basis for a review of the Climate
Change Strategy 2020-30. It is proposed to take this decision early as part of
the scope setting for the Climate Change Strategy update 2025.
6.4 As reported to the ED&I committee on 12 November 2024 (para 13 of the
draft minute refers), the latest Moray Council annual Public Bodies Climate
Change Duties Report shows a reduction in carbon emissions. However, the
rate of reduction is not enough to reach the 2030 target. The RMNZ report
2022/23 highlights the need for action at pace and greater resourcing if the
pace of decarbonisation is to be increased. This is unlikely within the current
finance arrangements, although officers have commissioned high level work
exploring potential projects for Just Transition funding for Moray wide projects.
6.5 The areas of building heat and fleet are the largest areas of emissions for
Moray Council and among the most difficult to reduce. Relevant strategies on
these areas currently use national decarbonisation targets and these
legislative deadlines are being used in calculating Moray Council carbon
emissions reductions. Savings from other areas and carbon sequestration will
not take overall carbon emissions down to net zero by 2030.
6.6 The recommendation is that the Climate Change Working Group should
update the Climate Change Strategy by moving away from the 2030 target,
adopt decarbonisation targets for each area within the council and track these
individually. These should at least align to national targets and could show
greater ambition where this is felt to be achievable in terms of financial
availability and technical practicality. This will mean a backstop date of 2045
for overall net zero, but could include interim targets for each area as
appropriate. When setting any interim targets, the dates and emission
reductions should be set using the best available data and knowledge.
6.7 It is proposed that the new working group would follow a similar structure to
existing council working groups, with membership including:
 The Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance)
 Heads of Service (as appropriate)
 The Climate Change Team
 Nominated representatives from the member body
 Relevant operational officers from key sections as required
6.8 If the Working Group proposal is approved, officers will seek nominations for
representatives from the member body. Membership will be established to
Page 198

Page 199

reflect the political balance of the Council and comprise of Members of the
parent committee (Economic Development & Infrastructure).
6.9 Climate Change officers will collate information from officers working in
relevant fields and report to the working group. This information should
include:
 appropriate decarbonisation pathways, existing strategies and relevant
actions with appropriate staff
 existing governance and reporting processes for these strategies and
action plans
 suggest targets and interim targets. Link these to financial estimates and
any additional requirements needed to meet targets
 identify barriers to progress and suggested solutions to address these
 set out proposals for clear governance and monitoring of actions. This
should consider inclusion of actions in service plans
6.10 The Climate Change Working Group will not replicate or work in addition to
the Climate Change Board. It is recommended that the Climate Change Board
will pause while the Working Group is operating. It is recommended that the
Climate Change Working Group will meet monthly to carry out its role of
updating the CCS, and while it is operating, it will receive the quarterly action
updates of the Climate Change Board to inform its work. It is anticipated that
six meetings of the Working Group would be required to oversee the CCS
update. Each meeting would focus on a specific topic, although they would
also consider any relevant information.
6.11 The timeline for the update of the CCS is:
 Route Map to Net Zero report and CCS update report December 2024
 New Draft Climate Change Strategy report August 2025
 Public consultation on draft strategy ends October 2025
 Final Climate Change Strategy report December 2025
7. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
The Climate Change Strategy 2020-30 supports the priorities set out in
the Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan. The Council has declared a
climate and nature emergency, and the measures being progressed as
part of the strategy seek to create a resilient, biodiverse, fair and more
sustainable future for everyone within Moray.
The actions of the strategy align fully with the priorities:
 Tackling poverty and inequality;
 Building a stronger, greener, vibrant economy; and
 Building thriving, resilient, empowered communities.
(b) Policy and Legal
Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 places a duty on public bodies to
act in the way best calculated to contribute to the delivery of Scotland’s
climate change targets; in the way best calculated to help deliver any
Page 199

Page 200

programme for climate change adaptation laid before the Scottish
Parliament; in a way it considers most sustainable.
Local Government in Scotland Act 2003 places Best Value duties on the
Council which include contributing to the achievement of sustainable
development through continuous improvement in performance.
Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements)
(Scotland) Order 2015 requires that public bodies prepare a report on
compliance with climate change duties as set out by the Climate Change
(Scotland) Act 2009.
Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies: Reporting Requirements)
(Scotland) Amendment Order 2020 requires that public bodies provide
further details within their mandatory reporting on climate change duties.
Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 places a duty on the Council to
consider biodiversity in its decision-making processes and to promote
the conservation of local habitats and species.
Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategies (Scotland) Order 2022
requires the Council to develop plans to improve energy efficiency and
reduce carbon emissions in buildings across Moray.
Heat Networks (Scotland) Act 2021 requires the Council to develop
plans to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions in
buildings across Moray.
Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 provides the Council with powers to
improve active travel infrastructure and implement low emission zones.
Planning (Scotland) Act 2019, through National Planning Framework 4
(NPF4), incorporates national climate change targets into the local
planning system to promote sustainable development, and consider
carbon, biodiversity and climate change impacts throughout the planning
process.
In addition, climate change is increasingly being embedded in in all
government policies ranging from infrastructure delivery to energy policy,
and these are likely to influence the Council’s work moving forward.
(c) Financial implications
This report has no additional financial expenditure for the Council.
However, there are significant challenges to fund decarbonisation
actions as well as significant opportunities to lever in funding for these.
Whenever possible, the update to the Climate Change Strategy should
include annual financial estimates of actions to decarbonise the activities
of the Council.
Page 200

Page 201

(d) Risk Implications
Climate change is a serious risk to the Council’s service provision. It
poses significant risks to our health, our economy, our environment and
endangers the wellbeing of current and future generations.
There is a risk that the Council’s statutory obligations and targets will not
be met if the actions within the Climate Change Strategy 2020-30 are not
progressed as a priority.
(e) Staffing Implications
Groundwork to strengthen the Council’s position for advancing
decarbonisation projects and external funding is principally led by
officers in Strategic Planning and Development, with support from
officers in Housing and Property and Transportation. These services are
under significant workload pressures associated with Climate Change
Duties, Local Development Plan, Moray Growth Deal, Levelling Up Fund,
and Elgin Town Board. There is no staffing resource to progress beyond
high level work on developing Just Transition bids and delivering the
Socio-economic benefit Fund and this will require further consideration in
the future.
(f) Property
The development of decarbonisation projects will impact on corporate
buildings, council landholdings and the learning estate.
As agreed by the Council in the case of natural capital projects, any
landholdings identified as potentially suitable for change will be assessed
on a case-by-case basis in collaboration with key stakeholders. If any
proposed improvements would lead to change of use of common good
land, then this would be subject to a statutory public consultation under
S104 of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 to ensure
community support for the proposals.
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
Climate change will impact on every service area of the Council. By
considering climate change across services, it is possible to deliver
positive equalities and socio-economic impacts. Climate action is integral
in progressing the Council’s corporate priorities of tackling poverty and
inequality, building a stronger greener economy, and building thriving,
resilient, empowered communities.
Climate change will lead to more extreme weather events in Moray
which will have a disproportionate impact on those already in poverty or
with the inability to adapt to this change.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
This report focuses attention on the actions required to ensure that the
Council meets its statutory obligations and targets. Reducing carbon
emissions, restoring nature and being ready for climate impacts are
necessary steps to act on the climate and nature emergency and show
local leadership.
Page 201

Page 202

(i) Consultations
Consultations have been undertaken with the Interim Chief Executive,
the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance), the
Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and Organisational
Development), the Acting Head of Economic Growth and Development,
the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance, the Head of
Housing and Property, the Head of Environmental and Commercial
Services, the Chief Financial Officer, the Democratic Services Manager,
the Roads Maintenance Manager, the Vehicle Services and Compliance
Manager, the Programme Manager (Learning Estate), the Waste
Manager, the Energy Officer, and the Equal Opportunities Officer.
8. CONCLUSION
8.1 The Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero provides an update
on the Council’s progress towards its targets and statutory duties in
relation to climate change. There is a need for improvement in the
Council’s response across the key areas of carbon reduction, restoring
nature and being prepared for the impacts of climate change.
8.2 Groundwork has been completed in some areas and is underway in
others to respond to the need for improvement. Significant funding
opportunities lie ahead to progress these decarbonisation projects.
8.3 The Climate Change Strategy will require to be updated in 2025. This will
be overseen by an Officer Member Working Group which will amend the
net zero target of 2030 to at least align to national targets.
Representatives from the member body will reflect the political balance
of the Council and comprise of Members of the parent committee
(Economic Development & Infrastructure).
Authors of Report: Rod Lovie, Principal Climate Change Strategy Officer
George Gunn, Climate Change Strategy Officer
Background Papers:
Ref:
Page 202

Page 203

Climate Change Plan and
Routemap to Net Zero
2024 update
Moray Council Climate Change Strategy 2020-2030
Item 15.
Page 203

Page 204

Contents 
Executive Summary 
1 Why are we taking climate action 
2 How we approach climate action 
3 Our climate action progress
3.1 Building Heat and Electricity
3.2 Transport
3.3 Waste
3.4 Operating Emissions
3.5 Procurement and Investment
3.6 Nature and Carbon Sequestration
3.7 Adaptation
3.8 External Influence 
4 Where are we going 
5 Conclusion 
Glossary
Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
1
2
10 
16
18
21
24
26
28
30
34
37 
40 
47 
48
Page 204

Page 205

Climate change and its impact on nature are already being felt
across Moray communities. From coastal erosion to severe storms
and flooding, these impacts affect the way that Moray Council
delivers vital public services. 
The Council’s declaration of a climate and nature emergency places
urgency on its work to both reduce carbon emissions and prepare
public services and communities for the impacts of tomorrow. 
This Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero is an annual
report on the progress of the Moray Council Climate Change
Strategy 2020-2030. It provides a strategic outlook to ensure the
greatest impact from our resources whilst addressing the climate
and nature emergencies. 
Whilst this year’s report highlights progress and best practices,
carbon emissions have increased due to business-as-usual
practices. This reinforces the need to use resources to their best
advantage in a challenging financial climate and underlines that
achieving the Council’s aspirations and statutory duties requires
revisiting the following fundamental principles: 
Strong leadership
Sufficient resources
Well-defined roles and responsibilities
An empowering change culture
Clear and transparent communication
Knowledge and expertise
Robust targets, measurement and evaluation
1Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
A decision point report will be produced in 2025 for members to
reassess the Council’s decarbonisation targets, considering
changes in the policy and funding landscape, which will for the
basis for a review of the Climate Change Strategy 2020-30. 
Achieving the Council’s target of net zero by 2030 will require
further action in key areas. This includes building decarbonisation,
continuing progress in waste reduction and developing a delivery
model for natural capital enhancements. Groundwork in these
areas has been completed or is currently underway, including on
the Council’s Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy, natural
capital opportunities study, rooftop solar feasibility studies for
buildings and costing actions to inform the Climate Change
Strategy update in 2025. 
Significant opportunities lie ahead to make progress in these
areas, including through the Scottish Government’s £500m North
East Just Transition Fund. Success will require a combination of
strong leadership, collaboration across services, knowledge
building and adequate resourcing to realise these opportunities.
Executive Summary
Page 205

Page 206

1.1 Introduction 
Moray Council is committed to acting on the causes and impacts of
climate change. 
Since declaring a climate emergency in June 2019, the Council has
introduced a Climate Change Strategy with a target of reducing
direct emissions from council activities to net zero by 2030. This
Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero supports the
strategy, providing an annual update on progress, actions and will
inform the strategy update in 2025. 
The Council also declared a nature emergency in February 2023.
This recognises the value of nature and its role in achieving climate
targets, maintaining a strong economy and protecting the health
and wellbeing of future generations. The importance of using
nature-based solutions to climate change are well recognised, with
positive outcomes for both mitigation and adaptation1. 
2 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
1.2 Think global, act local 
The climate is changing faster than ever previously experienced.
Scientists agree that greenhouse gas emissions from human
activities are the main reason for global temperature increases
over the past 150 years2 (Figure 1). 
Urgent cutting of carbon emissions is needed to limit global
warming to 1.5°C. To achieve this, some argue that countries with
the highest emissions should take greater responsibility. However,
as Figure 2 illustrates, there is a responsibility on all nations to
contribute. The UK contributed the majority of global emissions
until the 1900s. 
Increased carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere also has a profound
impact on the health and wellbeing of
the population. There is approximately
1 excess death per 4,500 tCO2e
emitted3 and the impacts of climate
change will be felt disproportionately
by people on low incomes who have
contributed least to the increase in
greenhouse gas emissions4. 
1. Why we are taking climate action
1 Seddon et al. (2020) ‘Global recognition of the importance of nature-based
solutions to the impacts of climate change’.
2 IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis.
3 Bressler (2021) ‘The mortality cost of carbon’. 
4 UK Government (2019) The Impacts of Climate Change.
Annual Moray 
carbon emissions 
of approximately
500,000 tCO2e 
= estimated 
111 excess deaths
per year3
Page 206

Page 207

Moray’s climate is no longer what it used to be. Weather patterns
are becoming increasingly erratic and sea levels are rising, with the
impacts already being felt. Extreme weather events such as
heatwaves, droughts and sudden heavy rainfall are increasing in
frequency. These changes are projected to continue and intensify
in the future. 
Climate impacts experienced elsewhere on Earth will also affect life
in Moray. For example, disruption to supply chains or higher costs
following drought in major food producing countries, or where
conflict arises over access to natural resources. 
Pressure on local services will increase due to climate change.
Impacts will include: 
Damage to infrastructure such as buildings, roads, railways and
power supplies; 
Damage to ecosystems, water supplies and agricultural
production; 
Disrupted food supply chains and increased costs; and 
Disproportionate health and economic effects on vulnerable
people. 
3Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 207

Page 208

4 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Coastal flooding and erosion is a high risk in Moray due to rising sea
levels and storm surges leading to property damage, infrastructure
disruption and loss of habitable land. Storms and wildfires already
have a significant impact on Moray’s woodland resources. 
Climate change and biodiversity loss are inextricably linked. The
rapid loss of nature is both a result and driver of climate change.
Biodiversity loss will negatively impact our ability to adapt to a
changing climate, with implications for the Moray food and drink
sector, tourism sector, and overall health and wellbeing. 
The severity of future climate change depends on how fast we
reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Early and significant emissions
cuts can lessen the degree and impact of climate change. But past
and present global emissions have already set some effects in
motion, regardless of future reductions. 
The Council should prepare for a global temperature increase of
2°C, but also plan for a potential rise of up to 4°C by 2100. This is
because global carbon emission trajectories at present fall far short
of restricting average temperature rises to within safe limits, and
historical emissions will continue to have an impact long after we
have reached net zero. 
If targets continue to be missed, the quality of life that we know in
Moray today will no longer be recognisable to our descendants by
the end of this century. This will be due to the extreme
circumstances that they will be forced to live in. To reduce the
severity of these impacts, deep and urgent cuts to the carbon
emissions (mitigation) are necessary, alongside preparation for the
unavoidable impacts (adaptation). It is not possible to achieve this
within the confines of the Council’s budget alone. Funding
opportunities are currently and in future are likely to become
available to make progress in these areas.
Page 208

Page 209

1.3 Co-benefits of climate action 
Moray Council and its community planning partners play a vital
leadership role in driving the ambition and local collaboration
necessary to integrate climate action and a just transition into
planning and investment decisions5. 
Recognising that every council service has an impact on the
climate is necessary to deliver a sustainable future for Moray.
Ensuring that the Council’s budget of over £278 million is
strategically invested, and opportunities for external funding
maximised, presents co-benefits which support multiple demands
from communities and businesses. 
The wider benefits of climate action can include the creation of
green jobs, reduction of fuel poverty and energy costs, improved
public health from active travel and cleaner air, and enhanced
biodiversity due to the expansion and enhancement of green
spaces. 
Climate action supports the delivery of the Council’s corporate
priorities and vision, presenting opportunities to improve multiple
outcomes at once. Embedding climate action within services offers
a strategic and cost-effective way to overcome the challenges
identified in the corporate plan. 
5Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Early investment in climate change adaptation delivers strong
value for money. It has been found that most measures deliver £2
to £10 of net wider economic benefits locally for every £1 spent6. In
addition, around £9 in property damages and wider impacts can
be avoided. 
1.3.1 Tackling poverty and inequality 
The most vulnerable people in our communities are also most at
risk from climate impacts. Those with existing health conditions,
the elderly, the very young, and those on a low income or in rented
accommodation are all disproportionately affected by climate
change. 
Actions such as improving poor housing energy efficiency and
greenspaces can: 
√ Protect the most vulnerable
from climate impacts;
√ Reduce fuel poverty by
lowering bills and living costs;
√ Improve health and wellbeing;
√ Lead to healthier diets 
√ Reduce health and social care
costs; and
√ Increase productivity by
reduction in missed school and
workdays. 
5 Improvement Service (2023) Community Planning Improvement Board: Climate change and sustainability key messages.
6 UK National Audit Office (2022) ‘Climate change adaptation: the government’s role and progress’.
Page 209

Page 210

6 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
1.3.2 Building a stronger, greener, vibrant economy 
Promoting green skills to people from an early age, investing in low
carbon technologies and nature-based solutions in projects and
taking opportunities to develop local skills and industry in these
areas can: 
√ Increase demand and opportunities for green jobs and skills; 
√ Retain young people in Moray; 
√ Reverse biodiversity loss; 
√ Strengthen the Moray economy and build community wealth; 
√ Improve standards of living; 
√ Build resilience to climate change impacts such as flooding or
droughts; 
√ Reduce energy and maintenance bills; 
√ Reduce costs from severe weather damage; and 
√ Create new opportunities for Council revenue generation. 
Page 210

Page 211

1.3.3 Building thriving, resilient, empowered communities 
Being able to respond to climate impacts and benefit from the
opportunities through a just transition will require communities to
work together. 
Actions such as improving public transport, active travel, and
access to greenspace, facilitating resilience planning and green
grants can support: 
√ Strong, well-connected communities with enhanced job
prospects; 
√ Increased community wealth – keeping money in Moray; 
√ Reduced health costs; 
√ Improved physical and mental health; 
√ Community-led improvements; 
√ Public involvement in planning; 
√ Community income generation; and 
√ Less waste. 
7Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 211

Page 212

1.4 Statutory obligations 
Moray Council has a statutory responsibility to undertake climate
change action. 
Scotland aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to reach net
zero by 2045. The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 places a
duty on all public bodies to act to deliver on the national climate
change targets. 
Under this legislation, Moray Council has three main duties: 
Mitigation: To contribute to reducing greenhouse gas
emissions 
Adaptation: To help Moray adapt to the changing climate 
Sustainability: To act in a sustainable manner. 
The Council must report on compliance with these duties annually
in accordance with the Climate Change (Duties of Public Bodies:
Reporting Requirements) (Scotland) Order 2015 and subsequent
amendments. 
8 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
The Council is required to provide the following information in
annual climate change reports: 
its target date for achieving zero direct emissions;
its targets for reducing indirect emissions; 
how its targets will align spending plans and use of resources to
contribute to reducing emissions; 
how it will publish progress to achieving emissions reduction
targets; and
what contribution it has made to helping deliver Scotland’s
Climate Change Adaptation Programme. 
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) considers carbon, climate
change and biodiversity by incorporating the national climate
change targets into the local planning system to promote
sustainable development. 
The Heat Networks (Scotland) Act 2021 aims to regulate and
support the development of heat networks. Heat networks
distribute heat from a central source to multiple buildings,
reducing the need for individual heating systems and promoting
energy efficiency. The council is required to undertake
assessments of the potential for heat networks in Moray and
develop plans to promote their use. 
The Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategies (Scotland) Order
2022 requires the council to develop plans to improve energy
efficiency and reduce carbon emissions in buildings across Moray,
to support the transition to net zero. 
Page 212

Page 213

The Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 aims to protect and
conserve biodiversity and natural habitats. It places a duty on the
council to consider biodiversity in its decision-making processes
and to promote the conservation of local habitats and species. 
The Transport (Scotland) Act 2019 aims to promote sustainable
transport and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the
transport sector. It has provided the council with greater powers to
implement Low Emission Zones and improve active travel
infrastructure. 
9Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Figure 1. Global atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration from 803,720
BCE to present day. Data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (2023).
Figure 2. Share of global cumulative carbon emissions since 1750. Data from Our
World In Data/Global Carbon Budget (2023).
Page 213

Page 214

The Council recognises that a considered approach is necessary
for successful climate action. To ensure the greatest impact from
our resources, climate action measures should be designed into all
services and budgets rather than considered in isolation. 
A dedicated team of climate change officers are responsible for
preparing, monitoring and implementing the Climate Change
Strategy. The scope of this team continues to grow as more
statutory duties are placed on the authority. The team also act as a
consultee and provide guidance on planning applications and
provide advice to support funding bids and delivery of Council and
Community Planning Partnership projects including Moray Growth
Deal, Elgin Town Board and the Levelling Up Fund. 
The Council’s declaration of a climate and nature emergency
places urgency on the pace and scope of all actions. The Climate
Change Strategy therefore sets out how the Council will respond to
the climate and nature emergencies, and its statutory duties. To
achieve this requires: 
1. Strong leadership
It is recommended that climate action is supported by elected
members and all of the Council’s managers. They lead by
example and are visibly involved in climate action initiatives,
and routinely engage in updates on the Council’s progress to
net zero. This outlines the importance of these actions to
employees and encourages them to get involved. 
10 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Climate change is reflected as priority in corporate and service
plans of the Council. 
It is recommended that all tier 1-3 managers and elected
members have completed climate and nature emergency
training, to improve understanding and encourage wider
participation. 
2. Sufficient resources
Implementation of projects is supported by sufficient
resources and staffing. Embedding actions within ongoing
transformation of services is essential to ensure that the
Council reduces costs and its impacts on the climate and
nature. 
3. Well-defined roles and responsibilities
It is regularly promoted that everyone at the Council has a
responsibility to act sustainably in the interests of the
organisation and the environment. 
A governance structure for climate action is included within the
Climate Change Strategy. The Climate Change Board meets
quarterly to review actions and progress is reported annually
to the Council via the Climate Change Plan and Routemap to
Net Zero. 
2. How we approach climate action
Page 214

Page 215

Two climate champions promote climate action within their
respective remits and ensure effective communication. The
Corporate Climate Change Champion is the Chief Executive,
and the Elected Climate Change Champion is chosen by
members. These individuals are briefed regularly by the
Council’s climate change officers and are invited to attend the
Climate Change Board. 
4. An empowering change culture
The Council fosters a culture that encourages and supports
innovative ideas for reducing emissions and wider impact on
the environment. 
It does so by regularly consulting with colleagues and
stakeholders and responding to their ideas. The Council
celebrates success and milestones achieved through annual
staff awards and the employee magazine, Connect. It is
recommended that climate change is an integral part of the
annual staff conference, where officers update staff on
progress and seek their feedback. 
5. Clear and transparent communication
Communications around climate and nature should be clear
and explain why action is being taken, to ensure
understanding and promote behaviour change. 
Elected members, staff and stakeholders are kept informed
about the Council’s progress on climate action, including any
challenges, through the annual Climate Change Plan and
Routemap to Net Zero update.
11Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
6. Knowledge and expertise
In addition to its climate change officers, the Council
recognises the importance of upskilling to achieve its targets.
Training and development opportunities are created and
provided for employees and elected members on the climate
and nature emergency. 
The Council works closely with academic institutions such as
UHI and industry bodies to leverage their expertise and
knowledge. 
7. Robust targets, measurement and evaluation
The Council’s targets are measurable and recording
mechanisms transparent and improved over time. Where there
is uncertainty, assumptions backed by expertise will be made
and stated clearly to avoid understating the Council’s climate
and nature impacts. 
Reports should be candid in their evaluation of activities to
provide opportunities for continuous improvement and
learning by the Council and the wider community. 
Page 215

Page 216

2.1 How we define net zero 
Net zero means cutting greenhouse gas emissions to as
close to zero as possible, with any remaining emissions
re-absorbed from the atmosphere – for example, by
oceans and forests7. 
Emissions originate from sources directly within the
Council’s control (Scope 1), or where it is the direct user of a
good or service (Scope 2), e.g. fleet vehicle emissions and
grid electricity use. The Council’s target for net zero is to
reduce direct operating emissions of the council to net zero
by 2030. 
Other emissions originate from sources where the council
has an interest but no direct control (Scope 3), e.g.
procurement of food for school catering. Calculating these
emissions involves a greater level of uncertainty: both in the
emissions themselves, and the level of responsibility for
them. 
The Council has a statutory duty to report on all Scope 1 and
2 emissions, and all Scope 3 emissions from “relevant and
significant areas of the organisation’s indirect emissions”
greater than 1% of total organisational emissions. Figure 3
provides an overview of all emission scopes. 
12 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
7 United Nations (2023) What is net zero?
Figure 3. Emissions scope classification for Moray Council activities.
Page 216

Page 217

2.2 Setting our targets 
The Council’s targets include direct and indirect emissions. They: 
Are clear on what is included in the scope of the Council’s
emissions;
Cover all Scope 1 and 2 emissions and appropriate areas of
Scope 3 emissions (e.g. municipal waste);
Have interim reduction targets at set periods that align to the
Scottish Government targets; and
Reduce residual emissions to as low a level as possible and set
out how carbon sequestration methods will be used to achieve
net zero emissions. 
13Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
The Council uses a carbon management hierarchy approach to
prioritise its targets and necessary actions (Figure 4). This approach
prioritises the avoidance of carbon emissions to deliver lasting
change. Where avoidance of emissions is not possible then they
should be reduced through service efficiencies or redesign.
Removal of emissions is required where further reductions cannot
be achieved. 
Figure 4. Moray Council carbon management hierarchy.
Page 217

Page 218

Offsetting ‘unavoidable’ emissions through offsetting schemes
should be considered as a last resort in target setting. Offsetting
significant levels of carbon is discouraged as large-scale offsets are
not sustainable and guidance makes clear that public bodies are
required to reduce emissions as much as possible before
considering offsets. 
For example, actions might look like: 
AVOID: Redesign services to enable smarter working. 
REDUCE: Reduce energy through smart timing solutions or
motion sensors.
REPLACE: Decarbonisation of the Council’s fleet.
OFFSET: Plant an area of woodland to offset unavoidable
emissions. 
2.3 Baselining our emissions 
Calculating a baseline of emissions helps to determine the level of
intervention needed to achieve net zero carbon emissions, and to
allow progress to be monitored. 
The Council’s carbon emissions from 2017/18 are used as a
baseline for emissions (Table 1). This year was chosen as it was the
earliest year that had a comprehensive return of emissions to the
Scottish Government. 
It should be noted that as these data are from prior to the COVID-
19 pandemic, operational emissions were minimal as most staff
worked from an office base and home working emissions were not
being recorded. The first time that the Council recorded
homeworking emissions was during the pandemic.
14 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 218

Page 219

Table 1. Moray Council 2017/18 baseline carbon emissions.
15Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Building heat 
Building
electricity 
Emission source by area
and source
4,077.9
1,034.1
34.7
15.4
Subtotal - 5,162.1 
1,122.0 
1,177.3
1,685.5
523.8
358.5
145.7 
249.6
346.2
611.0
Subtotal - 6,219.6
Natural gas                             
Gas oil                                     
Biomass                                  
Purchased heat and steam 
Primary schools and
nurseries                                
Secondary schools                
Unmetered electricity          
Offices                                     
Community facilities             
Residential homes and day
centres                                    
Sports facilities                      
Industrial                                
Other
Carbon emissions
(tCO2e) Transport 
Waste 
Operational
emissions
Emission source by area
and source
3,591.5
27.5
776.6
0.0
0.0
68.2
Subtotal - 4,463.8 
0.0
9,130.3
2,048.7 
387.2
Subtotal - 11,566.2 
72.1
0.0
125.8 
394.8
Subtotal - 592.7
TOTAL - 28,004.4
Diesel                                      
Petrol                                      
Gas oil                                     
Electric vehicles                     
Hybrid vehicles                      
Marine fuel oil 
Landfill gas                             
Municipal refuse to landfill  
Commercial, industrial and
clinical waste to landfill        
Recycling and composting 
Outdoor spaces                     
Homeworking emissions     
Water supply and
treatment                               
Corporate travel                   
Carbon emissions
(tCO2e)
Page 219

Page 220

16 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3. Our climate action progress
The following milestones have been adopted by Moray Council in response to the wider commitments set by the
Scottish Government for Scotland and the public sector.
From 2021 Moray Council
implements its Climate Change
Strategy with the goal to be net
zero by 2030
Public bodies tasked with
embedding climate change
and circular economy
principles in procurement
strategies and 
reporting
2022 Public
bodies 
have to report
target date for
zero direct
emissions and
for reducing
indirect
emissions.
2025 Council decision point to
reassess commitment to 2030 net
zero target
Updated Climate Change Strategy
due for publication
New petrol and diesel light
commercial vehicles phased out of
Scottish public bodies’
procurement Scotland-wide ban
on landfilling biodegradable
municipal waste
2030 Moray Council target to
be net zero
New petrol and diesel large
commercial vehicles phased
out of Scottish public bodies’
procurement
Scotland and international
goals to halt and reverse
biodiversity loss
Scotland goal to restore and
regenerate biodiversity
2038 Scotland has zero
direct emissions from
public buildings
2045 Scotland
target to be
net zero
2023
2022
2030
2045
2038
2021
2025
2023 Moray
Council diverts all
waste from landfill
to energy from waste
facility.
2024 Moray Council agrees
draft Local Heat and Energy
Efficiency Strategy and
commits to developing a
natural capital
enhancements delivery
model.
Work commences to cost
interventions to inform
review of the Climate Change
Strategy.
Page 220

Page 221

The way that the Council conducts its work and manages its assets
all has an impact on the climate and nature. Every service has a
responsibility to reduce this impact. 
If progress is to be made on the Council’s targets, it must consider
what it is doing and how it is doing it. Within that, the Council
should also reflect on the lessons that it can learn from examples
of good progress and how these can be applied to future action. 
17Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 221

Page 222

18 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.1.1 Overview 
The Council’s property portfolio comprises a range of buildings
including offices, schools, libraries, sports facilities and depots.
These buildings vary in age, size, energy efficiency and condition. 
Most of the Council’s buildings are heated by natural gas or gas oil.
However, there are some sites where biomass has been installed. 
Building electricity is drawn from the national grid. A small
minority of buildings have been fitted with solar PV panels.
Electricity use also includes street lighting and safety floodlighting. 
There are a series of national phased targets for all publicly owned
buildings to meet zero emission heating requirements, with a
backstop of 2038. 
To enable this, support is being provided by the Scottish
Government via the: 
Scottish Government Heat Network Support Unit Grant
Scottish Public Sector Energy Efficiency Loan Scheme
Scottish Central Government Energy Efficiency Grant Scheme 
3.1   Building heat and electricity
Page 222

Page 223

3.1.2 Current emissions 
Emissions from the Council’s buildings are split into two categories:
building heat and building electricity. 
Building electricity emissions currently represent 11% of our
overall emissions. As shown in Figure 5, building electricity
emissions have decreased by 66% from our baseline. This is due to
a greener national grid and reduced electricity consumption
through efficiency programmes such as those in Case Study 1. 
Further significant emissions reduction is achievable in this area
with strategic investment (spend-to-save basis) – particularly
through widespread adoption of roof-mounted solar PV panels. 
19Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Building heat emissions currently represent 24% of the Council’s
overall emissions. 
Whilst use of gas oil and purchased heat and steam has decreased
over the baseline period, Figure 5 illustrates a continued reliance in
the most recent reporting period on natural gas and gas oil for
building heat. This is largely due to a return to ‘business as usual’
working practices following the marked decrease in these emissions
during the Covid-19 pandemic working restrictions, as well as
decisions made to continue use of gas boilers on cost grounds.
Figure 5. Building heat and electricity emissions from baseline to present.
Page 223

Page 224

Case study 1:  Pilmuir Nursery 
Pilmuir Nursery, a
large nursery built
in 2020,
demonstrates how
modern design
principles can
contribute to
emissions
reduction. 
The nursery uses an Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) for heating.
This uses renewable energy from the ambient air, resulting in
at least three times the efficiency of conventional gas or oil
boilers. This shift translates to a significant reduction in CO2
emissions. 
Rooftop solar PV panels generate around 2,500 kWh of clean
electricity per year. This offsets the energy costs of the ASHP
and the entire nursery, reducing reliance on the grid and
saving an estimated 480 kgCO2e each year. 
Pilmuir Nursery serves as a successful example of how
sustainable design can be effectively integrated into council
buildings. By prioritising energy efficiency and renewable
energy generation, the nursery demonstrates a cost-effective
and sustainable building solution. 
20 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.1.3 Action areas 
Increasing building user awareness of
ways to reduce energy use and save
utility costs
Curtailing building opening times
Progress a ‘fabric first’ approach to
building design
Identifying opportunities for heating
and power refurbishment in the
learning estate
Promoting Smarter Working 
Feasibility studies to consider
renewable energy potential across the
Council’s property portfolio, and
potential for connect to a heat network
Installing renewable energy
technologies on council-owned
buildings and land
Replacement of carbon-based heating
systems 
Aim to achieve zero carbon standards
for all new buildings, including housing
and schools
Achieve Energy Efficiency Standard for
Social Housing (EESSH) for all council
housing
Reduced heat
and electricity
consumption 
More energy
produced by
renewables and
low carbon
sources 
Reduced
building carbon
output and
increased
energy
efficiency
Outcomes Actions include:
Page 224

Page 225

3.2.1 Overview 
The Council’s fleet is used by employees to conduct council
business and deliver services for the people of Moray. It comprises
over 500 cars, vans, buses, trucks, specialist vehicles and vessels. 
Most of the fleet runs on diesel or gas oil fuel. Marine fuel oil is
currently used in council vessels. Petrol is used for open spaces
machinery. 
There are currently a series of national targets in relation to public
sector transport fleets: 
All fossil fuel cars to be replaced by zero emission alternatives
by 2025 
No purchases of fossil fuel powered light commercial vehicles
(under 3.5 tonnes) after 2025, with remaining vehicles phased
out by 2030 
Phase out heavy-duty vehicles by 2040 
21Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Case study 2: Bus Revolution 
The Bus Revolution
project launched in
May 2023 with a
goal of reducing
the environmental
impact of transport
in Moray by 30
tCO2e by 2030. 
Bus Revolution leverages existing public transport expertise to
tackle a critical need: connecting residents in rural Moray to
essential services like work, education, and leisure. This
innovative project offers a flexible, on-demand service
accessible through a user-friendly app. 
In the first 6 months of service, the project's electric vehicles
saved consumption of an estimated 3,400 litres of diesel and
8.5 tCO2e. With the carbon cost of electricity included, this
resulted in direct emission savings of 7.6 tCO2e, exceeding the
project's annual carbon saving target of 4.3 tCO2e. 
Bus Revolution represents a transformation in rural mobility,
offering freedom and opportunity while promoting
sustainability.
3.2   Transport
Page 225

Page 226

3.2.2 Current emissions 
Emissions from the Council’s fleet are mostly from the use of
diesel (Figure 6). 
In the most recent reporting period, there has been a rise in
emissions from diesel use (Figure 7). This is largely due to a
continued return to ‘business as usual’ working practices following
the COVID-19 pandemic working restrictions. 
Fossil fuel cars in Moray will not all be replaced by the national
target of 2025, owing to decisions taken recently by the Council
due to immature technology and funding constraints. Subject to
decisions on funding and infrastructure, it is possible that no
purchases of fossil fuel powered light commercial vehicles (under
3.5 tonnes) will occur after 2025, with remaining vehicles phased
out by 2030. 
The Zero Emission Fleet Replacement Strategy details the Council’s
plans to decarbonise the remainder of the fleet in line with the
Scottish Government’s net zero targets. 
22 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Figure 6. Breakdown of Moray Council transport emissions 2022-23.
Figure 7. Transport emissions from baseline date to present.
Page 226

Page 227

Outcomes Actions include:
3.2.3 Action areas
23Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Decarbonised
council fleet 
Increased
awareness of
actions and
opportunities to
reduce emissions 
Facilitating
emissions
reduction
Displacing fossil fuel powered vehicles
and plant with ULEV alternatives 
Developing and promoting staff travel
plans
Delivering and promoting active travel
to school campaigns
Developing a calendar of sustainable
events 
Developing strategy and guidance for
provision of public EV charging
facilities in Moray
Organising bicycle maintenance
sessions and led rides for staff
Parking management around schools
and supporting modal shift from
vehicles to active travel
Page 227

Page 228

3.3.1 Overview 
Waste is collected across Moray from households and commercial
organisations. The Council is in the process of closing its landfill
site at Nether Dallachy which now handles a small volume of
commercial and industrial waste. From May 2023, the Council
diverted its municipal waste from landfill to a new energy from
waste facility (Case Study 2). 
Disposing of waste within landfill is the worst option for the
environment and leads to significant carbon emissions. It should
be the last resort for waste disposal (Figure 8). Prioritising the
waste management hierarchy is crucial for further reduction in
waste emissions. This means encouraging and implementing
initiatives which promote waste prevention, reuse and recycling
wherever possible. 
There are several national targets in relation to waste
management:
Minimum recycling from all sources to be 70% by 2025
Maximum of 5% of all waste sent to landfill by 2025
33% reduction in food waste by 2025
24 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Case study 2: NESS Energy from Waste facility 
Despite the Council’s efforts to reduce residual waste through
minimisation campaigns, recycling,
composting and use of other treatments, a
substantial quantity of residual waste that is
generated will still need to be collected and
cannot be landfilled anymore. 
The NESS Energy from Waste facility, a
collaboration between Aberdeen City,
Aberdeenshire and Moray Councils, opened in
April 2024 and diverts non-recyclable waste from landfill and
transforms it into clean energy. 
This state-of-the-art plant processes 150,000 tonnes of waste
annually, generating electricity for the national grid and heat
for a local district heating network. 
Diverting this residual waste from landfill to this facility will
reduce the Council’s waste emissions by around 95%. 
Leader of Moray Council, Councillor Kathleen Robertson, said: 
“The opening of this facility couldn’t come at a better time and
ensures that we not only meet our legislative obligations but
will ensure that value, in terms of heat and electricity, is
extracted from our waste. 
“As a high performing recycling authority, we’re pleased we
have a modern facility that will serve the residents of Moray,
and our partner authorities, for decades to come.”
3.3   Waste
Figure 8. Scotland’s
waste management
hierarchy (Scottish
Government 2015)
Page 228

Page 229

Outcomes Actions include:
3.3.2 Current emissions 
Moray recorded the highest recycling rate across all local
authorties in Scotland during 2022. The Council’s waste operations
are undergoing a significant transformation. While currently
responsible for 97% of all waste emissions (Figure 9), a switch to
energy from waste technology will lead to a significant reduction in
the next reporting year. 
Beyond existing landfill emissions, further emissions result from
the processes involved in recycling and composting waste. The
ongoing production of landfill gas at Nether Dallachy results in a
negligible level of annual emissions. 
25Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.3.3 Action areas 
Reduced
emissions from
non-recyclable
waste 
Reduction in
residual waste
Diverting non-recyclable waste to NESS
energy from waste facility in Aberdeen 
Working with Zero Waste Scotland and
third sector partners to progress
projects to reduce waste through re-
use and recycling
Carrying out education on recycling
and waste reduction to improve
sustainability awareness and recycling
in schools and across council buildings
Continue to drive participation in
kirbside recycling including green waste
through promotion and increased sales
of the green waste permit
Supporting creation and promotion of
a Community Identified Benefits Portal,
facilitating collaborative relationships
between local construction
firms/developers and circular economy
initiatives
Improving recycling and food
composting facilities in schools
Figure 9. Waste emissions from baseline date to present.
Page 229

Page 230

3.4.1 Overview 
Operating emissions result from the day-to-day work of the
Council. These include an annually estimated carbon emissions
impact for employees working from home, commuting, electricity
use in outdoor spaces, the use and treatment of water, and
corporate travel. 
3.4.2 Current emissions 
The Council’s operating emissions have marginally increased over
the past year (Figure 10). 
Homeworking emissions were first required to be recorded in
2020/21, and since 2022/23 have also included staff commuting
emissions. 
Emissions from electricity use in outdoor spaces have followed a
decreasing trend in recent years owing to ongoing decarbonisation
programmes such as those in Case Study 3. 
26 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Case study 3:  LED street lighting programme 
The Council’s
street lighting
spend-to-save
programme saw
the replacement
of approximately
17,600 lamps
across Moray
with LED
alternatives. 
The typical
lifespan of an LED street light is estimated to around 25 years. 
By comparison, traditional lamps last 4-5 years, resulting in
more costly maintenance regime requirements. 
The programme has resulted in energy use reductions of
almost 70%, as well as a reduction in light pollution across the
Moray region. 
3.4   Operating Emissions
Figure 10. Operating emissions from baseline date to present.
Page 230

Page 231

3.4.3 Action areas 
27Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Outcomes Actions include:
Supporting homeworkers to reduce
their emissions through relevant advice
and practical assistance
Introducing an ultra-low emission
vehicle (ULEV) salary sacrifice scheme
for employees
Promoting Smarter Working
Increasing use of the cloud to reduce
server network and electricity
consumption
Continue to make school meals more
sustainable with a reduced carbon
impact
Developing and promoting more
vegetarian and vegan food options 
Developing and delivering climate and
nature emergency training for staff and
elected members
Updating climate change awareness
training as part of the employee
induction process
Increasing opportunities for ‘Learning
for Sustainability’ within the school
curriculum
Reduced
emissions from
operational
actions 
Increased
awareness of
actions and
opportunities to
reduce
emissions
Outcomes Actions include:
Applying zero and low carbon
objectives as a factor in all investment
decisions in relation to budgets and the
Capital Plan
Ensuring the Climate Change Strategy
and Action Plan are living documents
and remain fresh and valid until 2030
Assessing climate change and
biodiversity impacts as part of all
reports to committee
Supporting the development of
knowledge and skills to promote
innovation and effective carbon
management across departments
Supporting opportunities for teachers
and pupils to access and share
knowledge/resources to progress
climate change work
Page 231

Page 232

3.5.1 Overview 
Around a third of the country’s emissions are dependent on
sectors that are directly shaped or influenced by local authority
practices, policy or partnerships8. It is to this end that procurement
performs such a key role in reducing national climate impact. 
28 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
procurement and community wealth building, as well as
advisers from Business Gateway. Existing suppliers were on
hand to share their experience of supplying the council. 
Suppliers liked that they could come to talk with relevant
officers and obtain information before deciding whether to
proceed with the tender process. It was an excellent
opportunity for officers to handle any concerns or
misconceptions about the process at an early stage. 
Feedback from attendees was very positive. Three local
butchers went on to join the tender process, and one
purchased an electric van. 
3.5   Procurement and Investment
8 UK Climate Change Committee (2020) ‘Local authorities and the sixth carbon
budget’.
Case study 4:  Food for Moray supplier
engagement event 
The Food for Moray
event invited any
business interested in
supplying fresh meat,
fruit and veg and
bakery products to
schools to learn more
about the process and
gain advice from the
teams involved. 
Suppliers spoke with relevant officers to find out about the
criteria for supplying schools, how they can operate more
sustainably and evidence this in their bids. The event was
attended by officers from catering, climate change,
Procurement of goods and services with the Council amounts to
some £140 million annually. The Council therefore has a significant
influence locally and regionally on climate change through
procurement. 
The Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 introduced a
sustainable procurement duty for local authorities. This requires
that before the Council buys anything, it must think about: 
how it can improve the social, environmental and economic
wellbeing of Moray, with a particular focus on reducing
inequality
how its procurement processes can facilitate the involvement of
SMEs, third sector bodies and supported business
how public procurement can be used to promote innovation 
Page 232

Page 233

Outcomes Actions include:
Climate change and procurement officers have worked to develop
a simple process for suppliers to evidence their carbon reduction
actions when bidding for smaller contracts. 
The Council has also developed Sustainable Procurement
Guidance and an associated training module and embedded this
within the tender process to reflect the priorities and actions of the
Climate Change Strategy. 
3.5.2 Action areas 
29Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Support
suppliers to
reduce their
climate impact 
Maximise
opportunities
for climate
action through
procurement
Developing a simple process for
suppliers to evidence their carbon
reduction actions when bidding for
smaller contracts
Developing an action plan for raising
awareness to local business of new
opportunities created through the
Scottish Government’s Just Transition
approach, following approval of the
Community Wealth Building Strategy 
Continuing to develop the non-cash
benefits available through procurement
Implementing updates into the
procurement process
Developing sustainable procurement
guidance and updating modules as
appropriate
Supporting and informing departmental
lead officers through the sustainable
procurement process
Page 233

Page 234

3.6.2 Current activity - internal 
The Council’s latest biodiversity duty report was published in
December 2023, highlighting continued improvements in
managing council land positively for nature. Key actions from the
past year have been:   
Five new wildflower / living lawn sites added, and condition
surveys for all wild flower sites completed with
recommendations for improved management; 
Invasive non-native tree removal in the Oakwood Site of Special
Scientific Interest; 
Replacing even aged spruce with mixed native trees at Millbuies
woodland and loch; and 
Reducing the use of herbicides in parks by almost half, allowing
grass to grow longer and flowering plants to be present in some
areas. 
Most of the Council’s land is not being managed with biodiversity
as primary objective. This currently includes most park land,
roadside verges, school playgrounds, and smaller spaces around
buildings. 
3.6.1 Overview 
The Council has a duty to further the conservation of biodiversity
when carrying out its work. 
Many of the Council’s activities have the potential to drive
biodiversity loss or nature recovery. These include discharging
responsibility as Planning Authority through application of policy,
as a landowner by how the estate is managed, and as Education
Authority through how young people are connected with nature.
The Council’s biodiversity duty should be exercised through all
these responsibilities to support the national target to restore and
reverse biodiversity loss by 2045. 
Enhancing biodiversity can also sequester carbon through well-
managed soil and vegetation, thereby reducing net emissions
(Figure 12). 
The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy recognises the key role that
local authorities must play in delivering nature recovery with broad
national targets for Scotland to halt and reverse nature loss by
2030, and to restore and regenerate biodiversity by 2045. 
NPF4 places the climate and nature crises at the centre of planning
policy, in addition to rebalancing planning policy to ensure that
positive effects for biodiversity are secured. Significant weight is to
be given to the climate and nature crises in all development
decisions, so that biodiversity is enhanced, and nature networks
strengthened. The policies also promote the use of nature-based
solutions. 
30 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.6   Nature and carbon sequestration
Page 234

Page 235

31Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.6.2 Current activity – Moray area and Council influence 
Developments of every size are required to enhance biodiversity
and should also use nature-based-solutions where possible. With
planning permission granted for over 12,000 units each year in
Moray, this presents a significant opportunity to secure positive
effects for nature. 
The Council’s quality audit process has highlighted that while some
protective measures are working as they should be, there is
evidence of a lack of site-specific biodiversity improvements across
development sites, particularly in smaller housing developments. 
A biodiversity study was completed during 2023 to inform the next
LDP, reviewing the Council’s current policies against NPF4 and
highlighting important species, habitats and ecological links across
Moray. This also provided a foundation for the development of a
Moray Nature Network, which is now being mapped. The nature
network will address nature recovery on a landscape scale.  
The Council’s new Woodland and Forestry Strategy highlights
opportunities for climate mitigation and adaptation alongside
nature recovery. The strategy will help to guide new woodland
creation as well as to encourage more urban tree cover and skills
development to support this growing sector. 
Studies to identify natural capital enhancement opportunities
which could enable carbon sequestration on council land and
across Moray were presented to Council in spring 2024. Council
agreed that the opportunities be progressed as part of the next
LDP and through a suitable project delivery model yet to be
agreed.
Page 235

Page 236

32 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Case study 5: Millbuies woodland
restructuring 
Major forestry
operations were
undertaken at
Millbuies
woodland and
loch with the aim
of improving
biodiversity and
climate
resilience. 
A large area of
even aged non-native conifers were planted between 1960
and 1990 and while they provide some refuge for wildlife
this is very limited compared to a more diverse native
woodland composition. 
The devastating rate of biodiversity loss evidenced over the
last 25 years, combined with increased frequency and
severity of storm damage, risk of pests and diseases on
woodland motivated urgent action to be taken. 
9,750 mixed native trees have now been replanted across
3.6 hectares to the south of the loch, including Scots pine,
oak and silver birch. This diverse mix will soon create a much
healthier ecosystem and will be managed with low
intervention and cost in the future. 
Outcomes Actions include:
Maximise
opportunities to
sequester carbon
within existing
council assets 
Contribute to
halting and
restoring nature
loss
Progress and monitor carbon
sequestration opportunities on council
land holdings, beginning with the
development of a suitable delivery
model 
Deliver the direct grant from Scottish
Government’s Nature Restoration Fund
and increase nature positive
management of council land 
Promote and support developments to
be nature positive through the planning
process 
Work with partners, including NESBiP
and Moray CAN, to progress
biodiversity actions at the local level
and support the development of Nature
Networks
3.6.3 Action areas 
Page 236

Page 237

33Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Figure 11. Nature based solutions to climate change
(based on content from Improvement Service
2021).
Improving health
and wellbeing
and reducing
health
inequalities
Building stronger
and more
resilient
communities
Nurturing our
young people
Preventing the
loss of
biodiversity and
protecting our
natural capital
Reducing carbon
emissions and
storing carbon
safely
Adapting to the
impacts of
climate change
Supporting a
Green Recovery
and Just
Transition
Page 237

Page 238

Overview 
The Council has a statutory obligation within its annual Public
Bodies Climate Change Duties reporting to record how it is
contributing to Scotland’s Adaptation Programme. 
There is also a statutory duty to carry out actions to adapt to the
impacts of climate change. 
The key outcomes that the Council is required to contribute to
include: 
Outcome 1: Our communities are inclusive, empowered,
resilient and safe in response to the changing climate. 
Outcome 3: Our inclusive and sustainable economy is flexible,
adaptable and responsive to the changing climate. 
Outcome 5: Our natural environment is valued, enjoyed,
protected and enhanced and has increased resilience to climate
change. 
NPF4 identifies the Scottish adaptation programme as a cross-
cutting policy link, requiring LDPs to adapt to the current and
future risks of climate change by promoting nature recovery and
restoration in Moray and introducing policy requirements which
ensure that developments consider and take steps to address a
range of climate risks. 
34 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.7   Adaptation
Page 238

Page 239

35Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
The Civil Contingencies Act (2004) requires the Council to assess
the risk of emergencies occurring and maintain plans to ensure
that services continue to be delivered in the event of an
emergency. Severe weather and climate change are linked to
emergencies that may result in wide impacts ranging from serious
environmental damage to loss of life. 
Under the Flood Risk Management (Scotland) Act 2009, the
Council has a statutory duty to implement and maintain flood
protection actions and prepare local flood risk management plans.
The Council is the lead authority for the Findhorn, Nairn and
Speyside Local Plan District and works with partners to deliver the
plan. 
Page 239

Page 240

Current activity 
A climate change adaptation benchmarking process was
undertaken over the past year, which involved collating council
activity which contributes to the Scottish adaptation programme. 
While the Council is a national leader in our approach to coastal
change and has robust flood risk management plans in place, very
little consideration has been given to how the wide range of
impacts of climate will affect the organisation and services it
delivers. The benchmarking process itself has begun to raise
awareness and understanding, alongside the climate change
training programme. 
The Scottish Government’s guidance outlines the need for flexible
measures to be taken to adapt to climate change risks to critical
infrastructure. The Council has supported the establishment of 14
Community Resilience Groups and draft plans are now in place for
Lossiemouth, Forres, Keith, Elgin, Portgordon, Buckie and Aberlour. 
Moray is covered by Regional and Local Flood Risk Management
Plans that identify vulnerabilities and actions in place to address
risks. The plans follow a 6-year cycle, prioritising actions with the
local plans detailing the responsible body, timescales and funding
for these actions.   
An innovative pathway approach is now in place for Moray’s
coastline. The Regional Coastal Change Adaptation Plan and ten
local plans will enable the council to plan for, and react to,
different scenarios as they are triggered. Collaborative working
across services will ensure that the coastal plans links with wider
adaptation plans and how services can be delivered while
considering possible climate change impacts. 
36 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 240

Page 241

3.8.1 Overview 
Many of the Council’s statutory duties are related to reducing
greenhouse gas emissions in the wider Moray area. This includes
actions such as supporting energy efficiency improvements in
homes, active travel and green training as part of a just transition
away from fossil fuels. 
While this will not reduce the Council’s direct carbon footprint, the
Climate Change Strategy also seeks to reduce carbon emissions
across Moray by demonstrating leadership and good practice. 
The leadership role of local authorities is reflected in the Scottish
Public Engagement Strategy for Climate Change, to support the
wider area to understand, participate and act on climate change.
This includes being prepared for the impacts of climate change,
and several of the Council’s responsibilities to the wider area cross
over with the duty to support delivery of the Scottish National
Adaptation Programme. In delivering the Biodiversity Duty, the
Council must also aim to engage the wider community with nature
alongside embedding nature conservation in service delivery. 
Engaging with the community is essential to understand local
concerns and bring about necessary change. A collaborative
approach can lead to more effective policies, behavioural changes,
enhanced community resilience and a reduction in climate change
impacts. 
37Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
3.8.2 Current activity 
The Council has produced its first draft Local Heat and Energy
Efficiency Strategy (LHEES). This strategy is crucial for communities
as it aims to provide affordable and sustainable heating solutions,
reduce energy consumption and alleviate fuel poverty. LHEES can
help to create jobs in the green sector, improve health and
wellbeing, and contribute to achieving net zero – thus ultimately
benefitting the local economy and wider environment. 
NPF4 will help to guide the location of new housing, transport links
and infrastructure, ensuring that communities have access to the
services they need whilst enhancing the environment and meeting
net zero targets. 
NPF4 introduces the concept of Local Place Plans (LPPs) which are
community-led plans that provide a framework for shaping the
future of local places. LPPs are an essential tool for engaging with
communities and fostering local democracy, ensuring that Moray’s
towns and villages are designed with the people who live there in
mind. 
The Council’s Hydrogen Strategy seeks to encourage a local supply
chain for hydrogen production and use, providing job
opportunities and economic benefits for the region. Using green
hydrogen as a fuel for transport, heating and industrial processes
it likely to be essential for cutting Moray’s regional carbon
emissions (Case Study 6). 
3.8   External influence
Page 241

Page 242

Moray Climate Action Network (Moray CAN), which is hosted by
tsiMORAY, is a collaborative initiative funded by the Scottish
Government as a designated climate hub. The network facilitates
knowledge exchange, project collaboration, and commissioning
opportunities, aiming to address gaps in climate action and build
upon existing efforts within the community. 
The Council is a member of Moray CAN and contributes support
and expertise as well as benefitting from taking a collaborative
approach to climate engagement. In 2023-24 Moray CAN
distributed £25,900 in community grants to 19 projects that
delivered action on climate change, community wellbeing and
sustainability. 
38 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Case study 6: Moray hydrogen stakeholder
workshop 
Over 100 representatives from 75 organisations convened at a
two-day workshop in Elgin to explore opportunities in the
hydrogen sector. The now annual event, co-organised by
Hydrogen Scotland, Moray Council and HIE, highlighted
Moray's potential for green hydrogen production. 
The Council’s Hydrogen Strategy aims to leverage the region's
abundant renewable resources to produce clean hydrogen by
creating a local supply chain.  Discussions at the workshop
explored how this green hydrogen can be used by local
industries, particularly distilleries seeking to decarbonise their
operations. 
By fostering collaboration between public and private sectors,
and through production of its regional hydrogen strategy, the
Council has been successful in having Moray recognised by the
Scottish Government as a ‘hydrogen hub’ within its strategic
plans. This will not only benefit the environment, but also
create economic opportunities in green hydrogen production,
storage, and distribution. 
Page 242

Page 243

Outcomes Actions include:
3.8.2 Action areas 
39Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Develop skills
and the
economy 
Enabling the
community to
understand and
take action on
climate change 
Increasing provision of relevant skills
and knowledge for a greener economy
to support delivery of the Moray
Apprenticeship Strategy
Supporting the planning and delivery of
awareness raising events for businesses
to transition to a green economy
Joining support networks to assist the
progress of climate change action 
Consulting community groups and
residents about climate action and
delivering the Moray Climate Change
Engagement Strategy
Supporting the work of Moray CAN
Engaging with communities to facilitate
renewable energy projects
Promoting Moray-specific climate
emergency training for community
groups and organisations 
Promoting the Active Travel Strategy
Delivering the LHEES programme
Continuing the Energy Efficiency
Scotland: Area Based Scheme 
(EES: ABS)
Delivering the Moray Hydrogen Strategy 
Outcomes Actions include:
Implementing NPF4 policies relating to
the climate and nature crises.
Updated the Council’s Climate Change
Strategy and contributing to a Moray-
wide climate strategy
Developing a Regional Spatial Strategy
Delivering the new Forest and
Woodland Strategy, Food Growing
Strategy and Open Space Strategy
Developing 20-minute neighbourhood
concepts for Moray’s main towns and
embedding within the next Local
Development Plan
Promoting and supporting brownfield
over greenfield development
Providing sustainability guidance to
support Moray Growth Deal projects
Implementing and reviewing carbon
guidance for planning applications in
line with NPF4
Monitoring and reporting of area-wide
carbon emissions and actions
Strategic
planning which
reflects the
climate and
nature
emergency 
Page 243

Page 244

4.1 Reducing carbon emissions 
The Council currently faces a significant challenge in
meeting its carbon reduction targets, both locally and
nationally. Existing efforts will need to be coupled with
further action if the 2030 net zero target is to be met. 
The current pathway of recorded emissions is a projection created
using the baseline and other known emissions data. It shows how
recorded emissions may change over time when considering the
Council’s pre-planned actions. Only activities which are highly likely
are accounted for within this projection. 
This pathway highlights the increase in emissions as a result of the
Council’s services returning towards a ‘business as usual’ approach
following the pandemic. Notwithstanding that, the overall trend
remains that emissions continue to reduce from the baseline value
to a level where a carbon sequestration scheme may be used to
offset any remaining emissions in the future (Figure 12). In this
figure, annual emissions are divided into five categories (Table 2). 
40 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
4. Where are we going
Category 
Operating
emissions 
Waste 
Building
electricity 
Transport 
Building
heat
Description 
Emissions generated by the council through its
day-to-day work. These consist of emissions
that the council can control and influence.
These are recorded in the annual greenhouse
gas emissions reporting. 
Emissions from dealing with municipal and
industrial-level waste. These are recorded in
the annual greenhouse gas emissions
reporting. 
Emissions from electricity use in council
buildings. These are recorded in the annual
greenhouse gas emissions reporting. 
Emissions from the operation of the Council’s
fleet vehicles and vessels. These are recorded
in the annual greenhouse gas emissions
reporting. 
Emissions from heating of council buildings.
These are recorded in the annual greenhouse
gas emissions reporting.
Table 2. Explanation of emissions categories used in carbon emission reporting. 
Page 244

Page 245

The current pathway aims to find a compromise between speed,
technological limitations and funding. Whilst there are likely to be
budgetary restrictions, this pathway avoids late adoption of
technology and measures. This is to reduce carbon emissions and
also because demand could impact on the cost of supply as the
2045 deadline approaches and public and private sectors are
potentially legislated to take action. 
A balanced approach to the implementation of measures is more
likely to benefit from reducing costs of measures as the scaling up
of production reduces costs. This could also allow planned
solutions to align with national infrastructure investment. For
example, vehicles could continue to transition to zero carbon using
batteries, or hydrogen could become more dominant if electricity
distribution networks are unable to cope with the electrification of
both heat and transport. 
The calculations for the current pathway account for: 
Internal factors: Known internal changes that will impact on
emissions, e.g. confirmed waste management change. 
External factors: Known external changes that will impact on
emissions, e.g. ongoing decarbonisation of the national grid. 
Population change: Annual changes in population, based on
the 2018 Scottish Sub-National Populations Projections for
Moray, which may impact future emissions.   
41Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 245

Page 246

42 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Figure 12. Current pathway of recorded carbon emissions from baseline date to 2030. Figures from 2023 onwards are forecast estimates and denoted by a lighter colour.
Page 246

Page 247

Concerns 
Progress on carbon emissions reduction has been restricted. There
are several reasons for this: 
Services within the Council increasingly lack the resources or
expertise needed to develop and manage effective carbon and
cost reduction projects, and/or secure external funding;
A lack of shared ownership, leadership and collaboration across
services together with competing priorities has created a
situation where climate change is often regarded as a separate
issue, rather than an opportunity which can be integrated into
existing work – creating efficiencies;
Mixed understanding of climate change at all levels within the
Council can hinder buy-in, proactive action and sustainable
development; and
Some decisions taken by the Council have contributed to a
delay in carbon emissions reduction. For example, the Council’s
new fleet replacement strategy which delayed uptake of low
emission vehicles due to immature technology and funding
constraints. 
The upcoming update to the Climate Change Strategy presents an
opportunity to reassess the Council’s approach and to begin
addressing these issues, as well as to better embed climate and
sustainable development within transformation plans. 
To inform a robust and impactful updated strategy, the Council
needs to address several key issues and decide on its net zero
targets. These decisions will lay the groundwork for a cohesive
approach that delivers on the Council’s aspirations. 
43Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Net zero must be budgeted for and taken into consideration in the
pace of decision making around the renovation and rationalisation
of the council building stock. This will enable the production of
accurate estimates of financial costs and emissions reductions
which will assist future planning. Deciding on the level of
commitment to renewable energy projects is crucial. Exploring
options like solar panels will help to reduce reliance on fossil fuels
which are rising in price and contribute to significant emissions
reductions. 
Agreeing a delivery model for carbon offsetting through natural
capital enhancements presents an opportunity to invest in a
variety of benefits for communities whilst reducing emissions. 
Identifying and allocating sufficient resources is essential for
effective project management. This will ensure the successful
implementation of carbon reduction initiatives. 
The difficulty and expense of converting buildings to reach net
zero means that if further delays are experienced then emissions
relating to buildings may not reduce sufficiently to meet targets.
Therefore, greater emphasis on other parts of council operations
reaching net zero faster, and increased carbon sequestration, may
have to be explored if the pace of change continues to be
insufficient. 
If all information gathering and decisions on future change are
made by 2025 then a more accurate assumption can be made for
residual emissions and the need for carbon sequestration. This will
provide a decision point milestone for the council to reassess the
commitment to the 2030 net zero target knowing the full costs and
carbon sequestration requirements. 
Page 247

Page 248

Benefits and threats associated with current pathway 
In summary, the benefits of threats of the current pathway are: 
44 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
4.2 Restoring nature 
The Council's commitment to nature conservation has
grown, but future success hinges on securing new
funding sources and integrating biodiversity efforts with
other initiatives. While expected statutory targets and
the uncertainty of dedicated funding pose challenges,
the Council plans to address them through a new Moray
Biodiversity Strategy, improved staff training, and a
focus on community engagement and evidence-based
actions. 
The level of nature positive activity taken by the Council has been
steadily increasing since the 2018-20 Biodiversity Duty report. The
Scottish Government is expected to introduce statutory targets for
nature restoration, bringing further responsibilities for local
authorities. 
In terms of land management, improvements largely relied on
dedicated funding through the Scottish Government’s Nature
Restoration Fund, which runs until 2025/26. There is a risk that
progress will slow if this funding stream ends, so alternative
sources including private finance and embedding biodiversity
within other projects such as the Moray Growth Deal and town
centre improvements will be essential. As the Council’s natural
capital study recommends, carbon sequestration should also be
delivered in conjunction with biodiversity enhancement. 
Benefits 
Reflects the path the
council is currently
pursuing. Does not
commit the council
to altering the timing
or type of planned
expenditure. 
Most statutory
deadlines are met.
Threats 
Carbon sequestration will be required
to reach net zero by 2030 as
decarbonisation of estate and fleet will
not be complete. 
Uncertainty around timescale for
building improvement relating to
carbon emissions. 
Many of the current commitments to
reduce carbon emissions are currently
unfunded. The Council requires to use
its full breadth of powers to
raise/attract funding, apply for
government and other external
funding, and lobby for further powers
or financial assistance as may be
required. 
Some statutory deadlines are not met.
Page 248

Page 249

A Moray Biodiversity Strategy will be produced alongside the
Climate Change Strategy update, focussing on achievable actions
that are balanced with the urgency of reversing biodiversity loss.
Engaging communities, and increasing opportunities for young
people to engage with nature to bring additional benefits should
be a priority and support the sourcing of funding. Actions and
improvements should be evidence led, using national guidance
and measurements as they are available. 
Statutory responsibilities for biodiversity have significantly
increased through the introduction of NPF4, introducing additional
work that is currently being met within existing staff capacity.
Improved guidance and training is being developed to support the
planning service to deliver positive effects for biodiversity in
Moray. Ecological expertise will be drawn upon for larger and more
complex developments. Going forward there should be an
emphasis on proper biodiversity assessment of all developments,
resulting in specific plans that enhance biodiversity and help link
to the wider environment. 
A significant challenge over the coming years will be the delivery of
a Moray Nature Network, which is a requirement of the LDP.  While
the Scottish Government has funded mapping and engagement,
delivery and monitoring will require additional resources. This
should delivered through an integrated approach, bringing wider
community benefits while also supporting climate adaptation and
mitigation. 
45Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 249

Page 250

4.3 Being ready for climate impacts 
There remains a critical gap in the Council’s readiness for
the impacts of climate change. A recent assessment
revealed a low level of maturity of response to climate
adaptation and understanding of the Council's
vulnerability to climate impacts and the potential
financial implications. 
The Council’s first adaptation benchmarking exercise highlights the
significant shift required to understand and recognise where it is
vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, and what the financial
implications may be going forward. 
An adaptation plan will be embedded within the next Climate
Change Strategy Update. This should be evidence led and risk
informed, the scope of which will be subject to available resources.
The planned programme of engagement for the strategy update
will be an opportunity to both gather new information and
increase understanding of climate risk. 
Until a climate risk assessment has been undertaken the cost to
the Council of climate impacts remain unknown, however as the
Scottish Fiscal Commission have outlined, ‘the implications of not
investing in adaptation would be harmful in the long term and
could lead to even more pressure on future Scottish Budgets’. 
46 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
The draft third Scottish National Adaptation Programme (SNAP 3)
places greater emphasis on the interconnection between climate
and nature, drawing close links to the delivery of the Scottish
Biodiversity Strategy and National Planning Framework 4. As SNAP
3 is expected to be published by the end of 2024, the Council’s
climate change strategy update will be able to integrate the
planned national outcomes with local needs, as well as develop
measures that align with the national monitoring framework. 
Page 250

Page 251

The Council recognises that further action will be
required if its 2030 net zero target is to be met. Though
progress has been made, current efforts fall short of
local and national targets. Whilst challenges lay ahead,
there is significant scope to turn these into opportunities
for the Council and the wider community. The upcoming
Climate Change Strategy update presents a critical
opportunity to address these challenges.   
It remains feasible for the Council to achieve net zero if key
decisions on building decarbonisation and rationalisation of the
estate are taken, and progress is made to enhance solar provision
on buildings, consistently improve fleet vehicles and reduce waste
in the future. There is also a need to develop a suitable delivery
model for natural capital enhancements which will provide any
necessary carbon offsetting opportunities. 
Securing external funding will be essential if these aspirations are
to be met. Success will require a combination of strong leadership,
collaboration across services, knowledge building and adequate
resourcing to realise opportunities. 
47Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Assuming that all necessary decisions are made and information is
gathered by 2025, this will enable the development of robust
pathways that accurately project residual emissions and the level
of carbon sequestration required from 2030 onwards. 
With this information, elected members can reassess the feasibility
of the 2030 net zero target. They will have a clear picture of the
estimated costs, the level of carbon sequestration required, and
the impact on other aspects of the Council's climate and nature
response. This will enable a well-informed decision on whether to
maintain the 2030 target or revise it to achieve a more cohesive
and sustainable approach. 
5. Conclusion
Page 251

Page 252

Glossary
48 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
active travel 
adaptation 
baseline 
biodiversity 
carbon
Journeys made by modes of transport that are
fully or partially people-powered, irrespective
of the purpose of the journey. It includes
walking, people using wheelchairs, cycling
(including e-bikes) to name a few. 
Adjustments in natural or human systems in
response to actual or expected climatic stimuli
or their effects, which moderates harm or
exploits beneficial opportunities. 
Historical period specified for the purpose of
comparing greenhouse gas emissions. 
The variability among living organisms from
all sources, including, inter alia, terrestrial,
marine and other aquatic ecosystems and the
ecological complexes of which they are part;
this includes diversity within species, between
species and of ecosystems (UN 1992). 
Umbrella term used to describe all of the
greenhouse gases. 
carbon
dioxide (CO2) 
carbon
neutrality 
carbon
sequestration 
circular
economy 
climate
action 
climate
change 
climate
emergency
A naturally occurring gas, CO2 is also a by-
product of burning fossil fuels (such as oil, gas
and coal), of burning biomass, of land-use
changes and of industrial processes (e.g.,
cement production). It is the principal
anthropogenic greenhouse gas that affects
the Earth’s radiative balance. 
See net zero. 
A process by which carbon dioxide is removed
from the atmosphere and held in solid or
liquid form. 
A circular economy is one in which resources
are kept in use for as long as possible. 
Efforts taken to mitigate and adapt to the
impacts of climate change. 
The state of the climate that can be identified
(e.g., by using statistical tests) by changes in
the mean and/or the variability of its
properties and that persists for an extended
period, typically decades or longer. 
A situation in which urgent action is required
to reduce or halt climate change and avoid
potentially irreversible environmental damage
resulting from it.
Page 252

Page 253

49Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
co-benefits 
direct
emissions 
drought 
excess deaths 
flood 
green jobs
The positive effects that a policy or measure
aimed at one objective might have on other
objectives, thereby increasing the total
benefits for society or the environment. Co-
benefits are often subject to uncertainty and
depend on local circumstances and
implementation practices, among other
factors. Co-benefits are also referred to as
ancillary benefits. 
Emissions directly under the organisation's
control. 
A prolonged period of abnormally low rainfall,
leading to a shortage of water. 
The number of deaths from all causes during
a crisis above and beyond what we would
have expected to see under 'normal'
conditions. 
The overflowing of the normal confines of a
stream or other body of water, or the
accumulation of water over areas that are not
normally submerged. Floods include river
(fluvial) floods, flash floods, urban floods,
pluvial floods, sewer floods and coastal floods. 
Employment opportunities that contribute to
environmental sustainability. 
green
recovery 
greenhouse
gas emissions 
heatwave 
indirect
emissions 
insetting 
IPCC 
The transition to a more sustainable and
resilient economy following a crisis, such as
the Covid-19 pandemic, that prioritises
investment in low carbon technologies,
sustainable infrastructure and job creation in
environmentally friendly sectors. 
Any gas that contributes to the greenhouse
effect by absorbing infrared radiation in the
atmosphere. 
A heatwave is an extended period of hot
weather relative to the expected conditions of
the area at that time of year. In Moray, a
heatwave event is defined a at least three
consecutive days with daily maximum
temperatures meeting or exceeding 25°C. 
Emissions outside the organisation's control
but over which it has an influence. 
The process of offsetting carbon emissions by
sequestering carbon within the organisation's
own landholdings. 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. A
scientific body established by the United
Nations to provide policymakers with regular
assessments of the state of climate science and
the potential impacts of climate change, as well
as strategies for mitigation and adaptation. 
Page 253

Page 254

50 Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 update
Just
transition 
Mitigation 
Nature
emergency 
Nature
network 
Net zero 
Designing policies in a way that ensures the
benefits of climate action are shared widely,
while the costs do not unfairly burden those
least able to pay, or whose livelihoods are
directly or indirectly at risk as the economy
shifts and changes. 
A human intervention to reduce emissions or
enhance the sinks of greenhouse gases. 
The rapidly worsening state of the natural
world, including the loss of biodiversity,
ecosystem degradation, and the threat of
ecological collapse, caused by human
activities such as habitat destruction, pollution
and climate change. 
A network which connects together nature-
rich sites, including restoration areas and
other environmental projects, through a
series of areas of suitable habitat, habitat
corridors, and stepping-stones. 
Net zero emissions are achieved
when anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
gases to the atmosphere are balanced
by anthropogenic removals over a specified
period.  
Offsetting 
Renewable
energy 
Sustainable
development 
tCO2e 
Wildfire 
The practice of compensating for carbon
emissions by funding projects that reduce
greenhouse gas emissions outside of the
organisation's own landholdings. 
Energy derived from natural sources that are
replenished at a higher rate than they are
consumed. 
Meeting the needs of the present without
compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs. 
Tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. A metric
measure used to compare the emissions from
various greenhouse gases on the basis of
their global-warming potential (GWP), by
converting amounts of other gases to the
equivalent amount of carbon dioxide with the
same global warming potential. 
Any uncontrolled vegetation fire which
requires a decision, or action, regarding
suppression.
Page 254

Page 255

51Climate Change Plan and Route Map to Net Zero 2024 updatePage 255

Page 256

Page 256

Page 257

APPENDIX 2
Climate Change Strategy Update – Process and Scope of Work
On 27 June 2019, the Council made a declaration of climate emergency, which
stated that the Council must take necessary actions to protect our area, country and
planet (para 6 of the Minute refers).
In response to the commitments made in the declaration, on 10 March 2021 (para 13
of the Minute refers) the Council adopted a Climate Change Strategy (SSC) for 2020
-30. The strategy set a net zero target of 2030 and required that its officers and
elected members work with others across Moray to deliver that goal. It was agreed
that an annual Climate Change Plan and Routemap to Net Zero would be produced
and updated with the latest data on current emissions, progress and future
projections.
To ensure the Strategy remains relevant and accounts for ongoing national policy
development, it is subject to review. Therefore, the Strategy and its targets now
require updating to reflect the progress that has taken place over the last three
years, the greater understanding of the decarbonisation pathway the Council is on,
and the changes in national policies around Climate Change. It is recommended that
a member and officer Climate Change Working Group be established to oversee this
CCS update. A similar arrangement was beneficial during development of the
original CCS and can provide useful in-depth oversight, influence, and information
around key areas of policy development.
To set the context of the update it is important to:
 Define the scope of work for the CCS update 2025
 Define the terms of reference for the Climate Change Working Group
 Set out the process for engagement to underpin the update of the strategy.
Item 15.
Page 257

Page 258

APPENDIX 2
The scope of work for the Climate Change Strategy update 2025
The CCS should detail how the Council will progress its statutory duties under three
key themes:
 Reducing carbon emissions (mitigation)
 Being ready for climate impacts (adaptation) and
 Acting in a sustainable manner (sustainable development and biodiversity)
Content
Statutory guidance on the expected content of LA Climate Change Plans is being
developed to support the Public Bodies Climate Change Duties. These are likely to
recommend LA Climate Change Plans should cover:
 Corporate emissions - activities and the emissions generated by the
Council, including relevant scope 3 emissions
 Area-wide emissions - many of which will lie outside the control of the LA but
within their sphere of influence.
 Corporate adaptation – main hazards, vulnerabilities and exposure; key
risks and opportunities in relation to assets, service delivery and fulfilment of
LA functions; key partners and stakeholders
 Area-wide adaptation – main hazards, vulnerabilities and exposure; key
risks and opportunities for the LA area (or wider region if appropriate) and
wider priorities (e.g. economic development); key partners and stakeholders
 Corporate sustainability – consideration of wider environmental, social and
economic issues, beyond GHGs and net zero. Contribution to and alignment
with the National Performance Framework and UN SDGs.
 Area-wide sustainability - wider environmental, social and economic issues;
LA area or regional issues such as air and water pollution, contaminated or
abandoned land or property, health, areas of deprivation, inequalities. Any
specific issues, challenges and opportunities. How the LA fits into the national
picture, contribution to and alignment with the National Performance
Framework and UN SDGs.
The strategy should be supported and implemented by a series of targeted policies,
route maps and action plans which lay out the more granular detail for relevant
assets, functions and activities. Many of these plans are already created so the
overarching LA Climate Change plan will be made up of the Climate Change
Strategy and a suite of additional documents including but not exclusively:
 Zero Emission Fleet Replacement Strategy (April 2024)
 Biodiversity Strategy (in production)
 Local Development Plan (in production)
 Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy (August 2024)
 Coastal Adaptation Plan for Moray (in production)
 Heat Network legislation
Page 258

Page 259

APPENDIX 2
 Regional Just Transition Plan (in production)
 Regional Spatial Strategy (in production)
 Regional Climate Change Strategy (in development with Scottish Climate
Information Service (SCIS) and Moray CAN)
Other key issues to be addressed through the updated strategy include:
 Distinction between the internal Moray Council strategy and forthcoming area-
wide strategy. Set clear boundaries to the strategy including Scope 3
emissions
 Embedding a climate adaptation strategy and action plan within the CCS,
aligned with SNAP 3
 Embedding Sustainable Development Priorities and actions within the CCS
 Aligning the CCS with the forthcoming Biodiversity Strategy
Targets
A decision point in 2025 was built into the Climate Change Strategy (CCS) for
members to reassess the Council’s decarbonisation targets, considering changes in
the policy and funding landscape, which will form the basis for a review of the
Climate Change Strategy 2020-30. It is proposed to take this decision early as part
of the scope setting for the Climate Change Strategy update 2025.
In April this year the Scottish Government scrapped the national target of cutting
emissions by 75% by 2030 but maintained the long-term target to reach net zero by
2045. A recent audit commission report (2022) found that 28 of the 32 Councils in
Scotland had declared a climate emergency and 26 Councils had a target for their
own emissions. Most of these Councils have targets to reach net zero by 2045.
The latest Moray Council annual Public Bodies Climate Change Duties Reports
shows a reduction in carbon emissions. However, the rate of reduction is not enough
to reach the 2030 target. The draft RMNZ report 2022/23 highlights the need for
action at pace and greater resourcing if the pace of decarbonisation is to be
increased. This is unlikely within the current finance arrangements although officers
have commissioned high level work exploring potential projects for Just Transition
funding for Moray wide projects.
The areas of building heat and fleet are the largest areas of emissions for Moray
Council and among the most difficult to reduce. Relevant strategies on these areas
currently use national decarbonisation targets and these legislative deadlines are
being used in calculating Moray Council carbon emissions reductions. Savings from
other areas and carbon sequestration will not take overall carbon emissions down to
net zero by 2030.
In terms of LA corporate emission reduction targets there are various national policy
targets and ambitions in place, for example around heat in buildings, fleet
decarbonisation and the circular economy. Public Bodies Climate Change Duties
Page 259

Page 260

APPENDIX 2
guidance is when setting their corporate targets LAs should, as best practice, align to
these; and could show greater ambition where this is felt to be achievable.
Therefore, an overall net zero target for scopes 1 and 2 should be no later than
2045, earlier where possible.
Page 260

Page 261

APPENDIX 2
The legislative deadlines for different areas and how these are influencing our
current and future activities are:
Building Heat
Legislative Deadlines Comments
2038 Scotland has zero
direct emissions from
public buildings
Moray Council has a large and diverse building
portfolio which will be difficult to transition to
decarbonised heating. While strides have been made
to reduce carbon, sell surplus property, and retrofit
remaining buildings, the difficulty of retrofitting
buildings at speed and within restricted budgets are
shown in the projections which will not see all
buildings decarbonised by 2030. At present, the
legislative deadline of 2038 is being used in
calculating carbon reductions.
Building Electricity
Legislative Deadlines Comments
2030 Grid Decarbonisation
- The equivalent of 50% of
the energy for Scotland's
heat, transport and
electricity consumption to
be supplied from
renewable sources.
Carbon emissions from electricity have been
decreasing and will continue to decrease due to the
increased national use of renewables. Moving to
electrical heating systems in buildings will greatly
reducing carbon emissions compared to fossil fuel.
However, this will also require the use of more
electricity so our overall carbon emissions from
electricity will be a balance over time influenced by
overall grid decarbonisation and increased electricity
consumption
Transport
Legislative Deadlines Comments
2025 New petrol and
diesel light commercial
vehicles phased out of
Scottish public bodies’
procurement
2030 New petrol and
diesel large commercial
vehicles phased out of
Scottish public bodies’
procurement.
The recent Fleet Decarbonisation Strategy adopted
national targets for our fleet decarbonisation journey.
These were seen to be challenging due to financial
pressures and the immaturity of the market for low
carbon large fleet vehicles. However, this also means
that we will still have fossil fuel vehicles operating out
their lifespan well after the deadline to stop
purchasing new ones, meaning the projected target
for zero emissions from fleet is well beyond 2030.
Waste
Legislative Deadlines Comments
2025 Scotland-wide ban
on landfilling
biodegradable municipal
waste
The EfW plant in Aberdeen will see Moray Council
meeting this deadline. However, our relatively high
recycling levels makes it difficult to source funds for
additional recycling and reuse facilities.
Operating Emissions
Legislative Deadlines Comments
Page 261

Page 262

APPENDIX 2
A variety of guidance on
commuting, procurement
etc. The deadline would be
national net-zero target of
2045
Additional aspects such as scope 3 emissions
(emissions from procurement etc) will soon have to
be included into our net zero projections.
The recommendation is that the Climate Change Working Group should update the
Climate Change Strategy by moving away from the 2030 target and adopt
decarbonisation targets for each area within the council and track these individually.
These should at least align to national targets and could show greater ambition
where this is felt to be achievable in terms of financial availability and technical
practicality.
This will mean a backstop date of 2045 for overall net zero but could include interim
targets for each area as appropriate. When setting any interim targets, the dates and
emission reductions should be set using the best available data and knowledge.
Page 262

Page 263

APPENDIX 2
Terms of reference for the Climate Change Working group
It is proposed that the new working group would follow a similar structure to existing
council working groups, with membership including:
 The Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance)
 Heads of Service (as appropriate)
 The Climate Change Team
 Nominated representatives from the member body
 Relevant operational officers from key sections as required
If the Working Group proposal is approved, officers will seek nominations for
representatives fromthe member body. Membership will be established to reflect the
political balance of the Council and comprise of Members of the parent committee
(Economic Development & Infrastructure).
The Climate Change Working Group will not replicate or work in addition to the
Climate Change Board. It is recommended that the Climate Change Board will pause
while the Working Group is operating. It is recommended that the Climate Change
Working Group will meet monthly to carry out its role of updating the CCS, and while
it is operating, they will receive the quarterly action updates of the Climate Change
Board to inform its work.
Four new theme groups, led by climate change officers, will be established to
address specific themes within the Climate Change Strategy update (See Figure 1).
These themes are:
 Energy and buildings
 Transport and travel
 Operating emissions
 Area based emissions
Officers working on relevant actions will be invited to join these theme groups and
Climate Change officers will collect information on possible actions.. This will
eliminate the need for individual officer action update reporting. Climate change
officers will compile reports for the Working Group based on these theme group
discussions. It is envisaged that much of this work of the theme groups will be
through email, but it would require at least two workshops of each theme group.
Climate Change
Working Group
Energy and
Buildings Theme
Group
Transport and
Travel Theme
Group
Operating
Emissions Theme
Group
Area Based
Emissions Theme
GroupFigure 1. Proposed structure of Climate Change Working Group and theme groups.
Page 263

Page 264

APPENDIX 2
Theme group Focus
Energy and buildings  Energy consumption
 Heat consumption
 Heat decarbonisation
 Energy efficiency
 Renewable energy
 Adaptation
 Opportunities for biodiversity
enhancement
Transport and travel  Fleet decarbonisation
 Active travel promotion
 Sustainable travel hierarchy
 Commuting
 Adaptation
 Opportunities for biodiversity
enhancement
Operating emissions  Procurement
 Waste
 Homeworking
 Education and engagement
 Adaptation
 Opportunities for biodiversity
enhancement
Area Based Emissions  Moray wide emissions reduction
projects
 Moray CAN regional climate strategy
link
 Strategic Planning
 Adaptation
 Opportunities for biodiversity
enhancement
Each theme group will be asked to carry out the following tasks:
 Collate information on appropriate decarbonisation pathways, existing
strategies and relevant actions with appropriate staff
 Identify existing governance and reporting processes for these strategies and
action plans
 Suggest targets and interim targets. Link these to financial estimates and any
additional requirements needed to meet targets
 Identify barriers to progress and suggested solutions to address these
 Set out proposals for clear governance and monitoring of actions. This should
consider inclusion of actions in service plans.
The area of governance and monitoring will remain with the working group, though
officers in the action groups will be requested to provide feedback where
appropriate. It is anticipated that six meetings of the Working Group would be
required to oversee the CCS update. Each meeting would focus on a specific topic,
Page 264

Page 265

APPENDIX 2
although they would also consider any information from the theme groups. The order
of topics for the six meetings could be:
1. High level pass of tasks and process. Also, a focus on Governance and
Monitoring
2. Transport and travel
3. Energy and buildings
4. Operating emissions
5. Area based emissions
6. Sustainable development, cross cutting and co-benefits
Page 265

Page 266

APPENDIX 2
The engagement plan to underpin the update of the strategy.
The council’s Climate Change Engagement Strategy sets out the principles, aims
and objectives that will act as a guide throughout the CCS update engagement:
Possible Internal Engagement - Identify key services: action holders and potential
new action holders
Group Engagement Purpose Method
Climate Change
Working group
Share information, raise
awareness, steer
priorities and objectives,
explore opportunities
and barriers
Initial presentation: existing
strategy vision
Micro workshops on topics/
workstreams (e.g.
governance, mitigation,
adaptation, nature, sus dev)
Key services Learning, share
information, raise
awareness, explore
opportunities and
barriers, refine and
agree action plans
Officer/ management:
workshops
Operational staff: possibly
Focus groups
Sections not included
in theme groups
Ensure all of Council is
included eg Health &
Social Care,
Wider staff group and
those not online
Share information, raise
awareness,
Inform
Engagement opportunities
may include:
Suggestion tree at depots
Pop up coffee and chat
Connect 
Objectives
Understand communicate the change and how it relates to each relevant group
Participate involve stakeholders in the design/shaping of the network
Act inspire positive change, so that (particularly community) groups feel supported and
empowered to get involved
Principles
Positive uplifting, motivating, relatable, co-benefits
Putting people first communities play a key role
Participative conversation and discussion
Just understanding and engaging with those most affected
Inclusive equal and accessible engagement
Evidence based using sound science, improving engagement through active reflection
Open and transparent ensuring our actions are seen and understood
Page 266

Page 267

APPENDIX 2
Elected Members Briefing
Committee report
Possible External Engagement
Group Engagement Purpose Method
CPOG/CPB Engage around
regional strategy
Engage with interested
parties
To consult on draft
strategy
Workshop (Jan-May)
Moray CAN Engage around
regional strategy
Engage with interested
parties
Survey Monkey (climate
week)
Mentimeter (climate
week)
Workshop (Jan-May)
Wider public To consult on draft
strategy
TBD
Formal consultation
Young people To consult on draft
strategy
TBD
The above engagement list is aspirational and will be dependent on internal
capacity. Engagement will be prioritised to those groups and methods that have
priority.
Timeline
November
2024
Public Sector
Bodies
Climate
Change
Duties report
December
2025
Route Map to
Net Zero
report and
CCS update
report
August 2025
New Draft
Climate
Change
Strategy
report
Mid-October
2025
Public
consultation
on draft
strategy ends
December
2025
Final Climate
Change
Strategy
report
Page 267

Page 268

Page 268

Page 269

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REPORT: ACCOUNTS COMMISSION REPORT –
TRANSFORMATION IN COUNCILS
BY: DEPUTE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (EDUCATION COMMUNITIES AND
ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT)
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To inform the Council of the findings of the Accounts Commission presented
in their Transformation in Councils report published on 1 October 2024.
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (19)  of the Council's
Scheme of Administration relating to any new policy matter which does not fall
within the terms of reference of any Committee.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 The Accounts Commission report on Transformation in Councils (Appendix
1) is part of a series of reports to provide an independent overview of local
government and provide insight into how the sector is responding to a key
challenge facing local government.
2.2 The report looks at the role that transformation and collaboration can play in
helping councils to achieve financial sustainability.  It recognises that councils
have never faced such a challenging financial situation, placing vital public
services at risk and identifies an urgent need for local government to
transform
2.3 While noting that there is no single definition of transformation, the report sets
out that it is about radically changing how councils operate and deliver
services to achieve planned outcomes in a financially sustainable way.
2.4 The key messages emerging from the report are:
1. Councils need to urgently transform how they deliver services as the
financial and services challenges continue to deepen but councils face
barriers and progress has been slow
Page 269

Page 270

2. A sector-led Transformation Programme has been put in place by the
Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (Solace) and the Improvement
Service but this is at an early stage and more clarity is needed on
timescales for achieving outcomes and there are risks around workforce
capacity and skills to realise ambitions
3. Councils cannot deliver transformation alone, it will be more effective
through collaboration with Scottish Government, Community Planning and
third sector partners to achieve consensus on a longer term vision.
4. Public and political support is critical and public engagement and
communication campaign should be undertaken.  Councils should
prioritise workforce capacity and capability to match the ambition and pace
needed to transform.
2.5 This message of transformation for future financial sustainability is one that
the Council has recognised and has reflected in the Moray Transformation
Strategy which also prioritises progressing at pace.  However, the difficulty of
doing so while also delivering “business as usual” in such a difficult
environment is recognised by the Accounts Commission report as
exceptionally difficult circumstances.  Nonetheless, councils are urged to
commit to the long term transformation work to sustain a programme of
transformation.
2.6 The findings of the Report will be taken account of and relevant actions and
learning from it built into the developing projects within the Council’s
transformation work and will be reflected in the next iteration of the Council’s
Transformation Strategy.
3. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP): None
(b) Policy and Legal: None
(c) Financial implications: None directly from this report, although to
increase pace and scale of transformation would require investment,
which will be addressed in reports on proposed developments to the
Council’s transformation work
(d) Risk Implications:
None
(e) Staffing Implications:
None
(f) Property:
None
Page 270

Page 271

(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact:
None
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts:
None
(i) Consultations:
None
4. CONCLUSION
4.1 This report draws to the Council’s attention the report from the
Accounts Commission on Transformation in Councils.
Author of Report: Denise Whitworth, DCE ECOD
Background Papers:
Ref: SPMAN-1108985784-1034 / SPMAN-1108985784-1035
Page 271

Page 272

Page 272

Page 273

Prepared by Audit Scotland
October 2024
Transformation in
councils
Sector-led change and collaboration to achieve
financial sustainability
Page 273

Page 274

2Transformation in councils
Contents
Key messages 3
Commission expectations 5
Introduction 6
1. Councils must transform to become 
financially sustainable 7
2. Urgent action is required to progress
transformation  12
Accessibility
You can find out more and read this report using assistive
technology on our website www.audit.scot/accessibility.
Audit team
The core audit 
team consisted of:
Derek Hoy, Lucy
Jones, Lorna Munro,
Becki Lancaster and
Niamh Pritchard 
under the direction 
of Blyth Deans.
Page 274

Page 275

3Key messagesKey messages
Key messages
1 As financial and service demand challenges continue to deepen,
councils know they urgently need to transform how they
deliver services. Transformation in local government has been
happening for decades, but a step change is now urgently
required. Councils face barriers to transformation and progress
has been slow, but reform is vital and must happen at greater
pace and scale. Not doing so puts the sustainability of vital public
services at risk.
2 To meet these challenges, the Society of Local Authority Chief
Executives (Solace) and the Improvement Service have put in
place a sector-led Transformation Programme. This is focused on
developing proposals for a future operating model for councils
through short-term transformation projects, dialogue with
public sector partners and a forum for developing leadership
capabilities. The Transformation Programme is a positive
development representing a radical change to how councils work
towards transformation. But the work is at an early stage. More
clarity is needed on the timescales for achieving outcomes and
there are significant risks around workforce capacity and skills to
realise ambitions.
3 Councils cannot deliver transformation alone and it is essential
that the Scottish Government and Community Planning and
third sector partners support the transformation of local services
through more effective collaboration. Achieving consensus on
the longer-term vision for local services is crucial. Faster progress
in delivering the aims of the Verity House Agreement (VHA)
should also aid the development and delivery of sector-led and
local transformation work. Page 275

Page 276

Key messages 4
4 Public and political support is critical. All elected members
must exercise their responsibilities to give clarity on the longer-
term vision and ambitions of the councils they represent. A
coordinated sector-wide public engagement and communication
campaign should be undertaken to help gain backing from
communities. To deliver on the change now urgently needed,
councils must prioritise both capacity and capability in their
workforces to match the ambition and pace needed to
transform. This is highly challenging given the significant
pressures they face to deliver day-to-day services.
Page 276

Page 277

5Commission expectations
Commission expectations
The Commission recognises the challenging situation councils and their
public and third sector partners face and welcomes the Transformation
Programme. It sees the potential of sector-led transformation work,
alongside other local approaches, to help councils achieve financial
sustainability and deliver better outcomes in the medium to long
term. Effective collaboration is needed across the sector to realise that
potential. While this work is at an early stage, the Commission urgently
calls for the pace to be accelerated.
In the next 12 months we expect:
• the local government sector, the Scottish Government and councils’
Community Planning and third sector partners to make significant
progress in agreeing a future operating model for councils and 
how council services can be sustainably delivered according to 
local circumstances
• the local government sector to initiate an effective coordinated public
engagement campaign to obtain agreement on the future operating
model for councils, how it will be achieved, and the impact this will have
on communities
• Solace and the Improvement Service to sustain momentum of the
Transformation Programme and be clear on the actions needed to
successfully deliver across the different workstreams. This includes more
clarity on timescales, costs, resources, outcomes, outputs and impact 
• the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA) and the Scottish
Government to make sustained progress on the commitments within
the VHA including to agree a fiscal framework, an accountability and
assurance framework and to conclude the Local Governance Review
• individual councils to prioritise and urgently progress the delivery of
their local transformation ambitions and engage effectively in sector-
led transformation activity, securing political backing and committing
resources. We will be auditing local transformation work through year
three of our Best Value reporting programme that starts in October 2024.
Page 277

Page 278

6Introduction
Introduction
1. This report is part of a series of outputs produced by the Accounts
Commission that, taken together, provide an independent overview of
the local government sector. It provides an insight into how the sector
is responding to a key challenge currently facing local government. The
report follows on from three other outputs in the series published earlier
in 2024: Local government in Scotland: Financial bulletin 2022/23,
Local government budgets 2024/25 and a Local government blog
on benchmarking and performance. It also draws on local Best Value
audit work and the Accounts Commission’s wider work programme.
2. This report looks at the role that transformation and collaboration
can play in helping councils to achieve financial sustainability. The work
undertaken to date in the series has brought financial sustainability
into sharp focus. This report provides an opportunity for the Accounts
Commission to assess progress with sector-led approaches to
transformation. It will set the scene for the analysis of plans for
transformation at an individual council level that will be captured as part
of our Best Value thematic focus in the 2024/25 annual audit, with 
the national Best Value thematic report on transformation scheduled 
for 2026.
3. Financial sustainability is an issue that extends across the whole public
sector. This report complements work planned by the Auditor General for
Scotland on the Scottish Government’s approach to fiscal sustainability
and reform due for publication later this year.
Local government in
Scotland: Financial
bulletin 2022/23
provides a high-
level independent
analysis of the
financial performance
of councils during
2022/23, including
funding and
expenditure, year end
financial position and
the financial outlook.
Local government
budgets 2024/25
examines the 2024/25
budgets set by
councils, including
analysis of anticipated
budget gaps and
actions to set a
balanced budget.
Page 278

Page 279

71. Councils must transform to become financially sustainable
1. Councils must transform 
to become financially
sustainable
Councils face significant financial sustainability
challenges, placing vital public services at risk
4. We reported last year in our Local government overview 2023 that
councils have never faced such a challenging situation, with increasing
demand, workforce pressures and council budgets under severe strain. Our
audit work over the past year has continued to show the significant financial
sustainability challenges councils face, placing vital public services at risk:
• Our most recent assessment of councils’ financial position and
outlook, in our Local government in Scotland: Financial bulletin
2022/23, was that the financial outlook is extremely challenging and
presents real risks for the future.
• Our Local government budgets 2024/25 report found that councils
have had to make difficult budget-setting decisions for 2024/25
to bridge a gap of at least £585 million between their anticipated
expenditure and the funding and income they expect to receive (the
‘budget gap’). The budget gap is estimated to rise to £780 million by
2026/27, which represents five per cent of councils’ revenue budget.
• Our blog on performance reporting included findings from the
latest Local Government Benchmarking Framework annual
report that shows the pace of improvement in council services is
slowing. 2022/23 is the first year that the rate of decline in indicators
has overtaken the rate of improvement.
• Our Best Value work in the last year highlighted the risk to financial
sustainability and the need for transformation.
5. The unprecedented financial and service demand pressures mean
there is an urgent need for the local government sector to transform how it
operates if it is to sustainably maintain services.
6. We recognise that there is no single, concise definition of transformation
in a local government context. Transformation means different things
for different councils, and individual councils must have the flexibility
to transform their service delivery appropriate to the needs of their
communities. We have developed some principles (Exhibit 1, page 8)
to help guide all councils around our expectations for transformational
activity at a council level, while allowing for the flexibility required. We
expect all councils to follow those principles. Page 279

Page 280

1. Councils must transform to become financially sustainable 8
Exhibit 1. 
Transformation principles
Transformation is about radically changing how councils operate and deliver services
to achieve planned outcomes in a financially sustainable way.
Source: Accounts Commission
Vision Have a clear vision that sets out the intended end state of any transformation
activity, focused on:
• delivering large-scale recurring savings or generating income for the council,
contributing to its longer-term financial sustainability
• improving outcomes for citizens in line with council priorities
• taking a whole-system approach to see and realise opportunities both within
councils and more widely
• meeting the needs of the people who use services and reduce inequalities
• focusing on preventative activity, where applicable, to reduce the demand for
services and to make them sustainable in the longer term.
Planning • Be clear on the scale of the change required and ensure transformation plans
are sufficiently ambitious to credibly respond to the scale of the challenge.
• Commit staff with appropriate skills, time and resources to ensure
transformation occurs at the scale and pace required and that there is enough
capacity for the changes to be embedded.
• Be clear about the timescales, costs, outcomes, and anticipated impacts of
transformation projects.
• Show urgency and progress projects at pace without compromising
appropriate governance on projects.
Governance • Have a clear process for monitoring, evaluating and reporting progress.
• Put in place effective governance and escalation processes so that the
transformation activities are well managed in their own right, but also able to
be given priority alongside other business-as-usual activities.
Collaboration • Develop better working relationships with communities and/or partners to
achieve a sustainable model of service delivery.
• Actively consider the opportunities offered by regional or national sectoral
collaboration, or by integrating services locally with partners, or by supporting
individuals and communities to achieve desired outcomes in place of an 
existing service.
• Learn from good practice across Scotland and beyond.
Innovation • Implement new ways of thinking, including innovation, creativity and a desire,
willingness and action to change and do things in new and different ways that
achieve the outcomes needed.
• Embed the right culture and behaviours to manage change and help maximise
the contribution of all the team.
Page 280

Page 281

1. Councils must transform to become financially sustainable 9
7. As we stated in our Local government overview 2023, the
Accounts Commission recognises how challenging it is for councils to
work on three planning horizons: to continue to deliver services here and
now, to identify and make improvements in the short term and to plan
and implement longer-term radical change.
8. Local government transformation is not a new concept and work in
this area has been happening for decades. But a step change is needed,
and the scale and pace of transformation must increase significantly. For
example, that could be new innovative approaches to service delivery,
reconsidering which services could be more effectively delivered by other
partners, or identifying how economies of scale could be achieved by
sharing services.
9. Evidence from our Best Value reporting work shows that
transformation activity across Scotland’s 32 councils is varied. Some
councils have made very little progress towards transformation. Others
have shown some positive examples of innovative activity, but generally
the scale and pace of transformation must increase.
10. Councils have generally been effective in identifying and delivering
efficiency savings and have continued to deliver services in recent years.
But the scale of the challenge is significant and relying on efficiency
savings alone to stay within budget is not sustainable. Ring-fenced
and directed funding also makes it difficult for councils to identify
opportunities to make the level of savings required through efficiencies
alone. Overall, there is not enough evidence of truly transformational
change taking place at a local level to address the financial sustainability
challenges facing councils.
11. Councils must ensure they fully engage in transformation and do all
they can to deliver on their transformation ambitions. Our Best Value
reporting shows the level of ambition to transform services is varied
across Scotland’s councils. Where there is a good level of ambition there
is, in some cases, a gap between that ambition and the councils’ ability
to meet it.
12. For example, we reported that Orkney Islands Council needs to show
greater urgency in a range of areas, including medium-term financial
planning, management of capital projects, and its approach to tackling
climate change, if its plans for transformation are to be successful.
13. We also reported that Moray Council must accelerate the pace
and ambition of its plans for transformation and show clear, sustained
evidence of this transformation. We highlighted the need to set out clear
deliverables, deadlines and lines of accountability, and to ensure strong
financial management, accurate forecasting and budget monitoring. 
We also acknowledged long-standing issues with recruiting senior staff, 
and the impact that has on the council’s capacity to deliver its
transformation programme.
Page 281

Page 282

1. Councils must transform to become financially sustainable 10
14. Some councils have made good progress in establishing and
delivering against their plans for transformation. Dundee City Council
has embarked on a lengthy transformational programme, which is now
integrated within the Council Plan and has delivered £147 million in
savings. It is focusing on large-scale transformative changes including
property rationalisation, digital service provision, service re-design, shared
services and payments and income generation. This should align well
with the sector-led transformation activity covered in Part 2 of this report.
15. We know there are significant barriers that impact on councils’ ability
to deliver services efficiently and progress their transformation ambitions
(Exhibit 2, page 11). Some of these barriers are external and not
within councils’ control. Others are internal or partially internal, and
councils have at least some control over how they overcome or remove
those barriers and should do all they can to do so.
16. These barriers partly account for the varied progress made so far
across Scotland’s councils. It is vital that councils show real ambition
for transformative change and prioritise the capacity and capability to
meet that ambition at the pace and scale required. Elected members
must support officers in progressing transformation. Where appropriate,
councils should look to other councils, public sector partners and industry
for transformation best practices.
17. The scale and nature of the challenge means that councils cannot
deliver sustainable services on their own. It is only by working more
collaboratively that councils and their local partners, communities and
the third sector will be able to provide sustainable local services and
deliver a significant programme of national reform to tackle issues such
as climate change, child poverty and inequalities. Wider public service
reform activities may change the context within which council services
are delivered. It is important that councils also consider this within their
transformation planning.
18. In our recent Integration Joint Board (IJB) finance and
performance overview 2024 we highlighted that the Scottish
Government, councils, IJBs and health boards all need to work together
to deliver sustainable health and social care services. That point applies
more widely around sustainable council services, and it is vital that
councils’ Community Planning and third sector partners support the
transformation of local services.
Page 282

Page 283

1. Councils must transform to become financially sustainable 11
Exhibit 2. 
Barriers to transformation
Source: Audit Scotland
Ring-fenced funding and 
protected services
Funding allocated to national priorities
can limit the decisions councils can
make about how funds are used at a
local level to meet local need. Funding
for children’s services, education and
adult social care has been protected
and increased due to national policy
directives. Remaining services have
consequently borne a disproportionate
level of spending reductions.
Short term-ism
Preventative approaches to reduce the
demand for services in the longer-term
have not been prioritised due to the
focus on meeting the current demand
for services.
Cost of Living
Financial hardship is deepening for
some people who use council services,
evidenced by growing levels of rent
arrears and homelessness applications.
This places additional pressure on
councils’ finances.
Demographic changes
Changes in the structure of the
population are impacting demand
and the type of services needed. For
example, an ageing population increases
demand on social care services, while
some areas are experiencing falling
school rolls.
Workforce pressures
Skills gaps, vacancies, absences, an
ageing workforce and lack of retention
are well known issues that continue to
worsen. Workforce gaps are now seen
in areas previously not impacted, such
as statutory professional roles.
Lack of coordinated decision-
making
Public sector bodies can often make
decisions in isolation from their partners,
which can impact the demand on other
public services. There is also tension
in relation to policies set by central
government but delivered by councils.
Public perception or push back 
on decisions
Some councils are experiencing
significant resistance when seeking 
to reduce services to balance budgets.
Effective public engagement, including
timely consultation with communities, is
inconsistent and must improve.
Risk appetite
There is a low appetite for risk in some
councils, where transformational
activity is held back by fear of failure.
Not every transformational change will
succeed, but not progressing radical 
transformation is a greater risk.
Increased service demand
Demand for services, such as social
care and housing, has increased. This
can limit councils’ capacity to focus on
transformational activity.
Increasing costs
The cost of materials and services
has increased, affecting construction
projects and social care in particular.
Willingness and capacity of the
council (both officers and elected
members) to engage in and properly
resource transformative activity.
Page 283

Page 284

122. Urgent action is required to progress transformation
2. Urgent action is required
to progress transformation
Solace and the Improvement Service are in the early
stages of delivering a Transformation Programme for
councils
19. The main sector-led piece of work currently under way to help
councils reform how they deliver services is the Transformation
Programme launched by Solace and the Improvement Service in
September 2023. It is focused on developing proposals for a future
operating model for councils and options for the delivery of sustainable
council services. The programme builds on the model that was proposed
in the Delivering a future for Scottish Local authorities report
published by the Improvement Service in October 2022.
20. The Transformation Programme is structured around the six key
anchors identified in that report as the building blocks to transformation.
Each anchor is sponsored by a council chief executive. Sitting below the
anchors are three workstreams, which contribute to one or more of the
anchors (Exhibit 3, page 13).
21. The Transformation Programme is still in the early stages, but good
progress has been made in engaging with most councils and a small
number of other public service bodies on the programme.
22. There is a basic outline of, and justification for, the programme on the
Improvement Service website. But generally, it is not yet clear how the
public will be engaged at a sector level on how council services should
be reformed.
23. Financial sustainability is one of the outcomes of the programme, 
but it is currently unclear what level of contribution the programme will
make towards it. We expect that the financial benefits will become
clearer as the programme moves from the planning and discovery phase
to implementation.
Page 284

Page 285

2. Urgent action is required to progress transformation 13
Progress against the Transformation Programme
workstreams is at an early stage
Short-term projects
24. Work began on six focused 12-to-18-month projects in January 2024.
These are aimed at helping councils achieve savings and identify longer-
term solutions and set the foundation for collaboration and joint working
across local authorities .
25. The six short-term projects are:
• Collaboration within the local government sector on procurement .
• Analysis of local government’s statutory and discretionary services. 
Exhibit 3. 
Transformation Programme structure
Note 1. Including the Leadership Practitioner Forum.
Source: Audit Scotland
Anchor 1.
Unlocking
community action
Anchor 2. 
Tackle
inequality
and meet the
needs of all
citizens
Anchor 3. 
Enable a functioning,
trusted local and central
government relationship 
Anchor 4. 
Design for
people’s needs 
Anchor 5.
Create digital,
design and
technology-
enabled
transformation 
Anchor 6. 
Lead council
and cross-sector
partnerships
Workstream
Officer-led 
conversation on
public sector
reform
Workstream
Short-term
local government
transformation 
projects 
Workstream
Building capacity
to lead and deliver
transformation1
Page 285

Page 286

2. Urgent action is required to progress transformation 14
• The full implementation of Crerar for Local Government.
• Development of a Digital To-Be State for Scottish Local
Government.
• Identification of new digital shared services that could be 
delivered nationally or regionally .
• Repository of examples of active communities/participatory design.
26. These projects are at an early stage of development. Volunteers were
identified early and they are progressing through the discovery phase to
set goals and engage subject matter experts. Projects leads now need
to develop and finalise business cases for each project to provide clarity
on timescales, resources needed and impact over the short, medium
and long term. Although the projects are short term, it is likely that
some could take years to implement and for the benefits to be realised,
particularly if legislative changes are required.
Building capacity to lead and deliver transformation
27. Council chief executives have established a Leadership Practitioner
Forum aimed at aspiring chief executives, directors and heads of service.
It has been set up to facilitate collaboration on the Transformation
Programme anchors and workstreams and to develop leadership
capabilities for the future.
28. Thirty of the 32 councils have engaged to date. Five meetings have
taken place, covering the purpose of the group, key challenges and
opportunities, progress on other workstreams, the VHA and budget
position, and the local government workforce.
29. The forum is a welcome development and momentum and
engagement appear to be strong, but it is too early to see its impact.
Councils should be clear on the lifespan of the forum, its intended
specific outcomes in relation to developing leadership capabilities, and
how success will be measured.
Officer-led conversation on public sector reform
30. This workstream aligns with the VHA and focuses on the need for
behaviours and actions to change to collaborate effectively on reform.
It has a long-term ambition to implement radical public sector reform
over the next three to five years. Twenty-eight of the 32 councils have
engaged so far.
31. This workstream organised a round-table discussion in March 2024
on ‘Delivering a Roadmap for Public Service Reform in Scotland’. There
was representation at chief executive/chief officer level from local
government (including COSLA), the Scottish Government, NHS, Scottish
Fire and Rescue and the enterprise agencies. A follow up discussion is
planned for the autumn.
The Crerar Review,
published in 2007,
examined the current
systems of audit,
regulation, inspection
and complaint
handling of public
services in Scotland.
It made a number of
recommendations
around better
coordination of
scrutiny, more
emphasis placed on
self assessment and
that the number of
scrutiny bodies should
be reduced.
Page 286

Page 287

2. Urgent action is required to progress transformation 15
32. Local authority chief executives have demonstrated a clear desire to
work with other public sector agencies and have taken steps to initiate
dialogue with partners. It remains unclear how the councils and their
partners intend to work collectively with shared ownership to make
this happen. There must be clarity on how they will agree a vision and
timeline for transformation across the sector.
33. As we state in paragraph 18, it is essential that councils’ Community
Planning partners support the transformation of local services. There is
a role for the Scottish Government, through its commitment in the VHA,
to ensure that those public bodies that contribute to Community Planning
play their part.
There are risks to the overall delivery of the Transformation
Programme
34. There are strategic risks to progressing transformation, which we
discuss in paragraphs 43–49. But there are also practical risks to 
the successful delivery of the Transformation Programme. Programme,
workstream and project documentation is in place for most activity
but there is not yet sufficient detail on timescales, costs, resources,
outcomes, outputs and impact on the overall programme aims. 
These could provide reassurance and clarity for councils’ medium to
longer-term planning.
35. The Improvement Service is currently leading the programme, with
the expectation that the role of councils develops as work progresses
into the implementation phase. The Improvement Service would continue
its programme management office function. The resource requirements
are so far unquantified, with council staff supporting the programme
on top of their day jobs. Councils should consider how to allocate staff
resources to best build momentum with the programme and to minimise
the risk of missing targets.
36. There are several facilitators of transformation associated with the
Transformation Programme that have still to be progressed. There is a
need for urgent action on these facilitators to minimise the risk of slow or
no progress:
• Preventative approach – there is the opportunity for councils to
minimise demand through a ‘preventative approach’ by developing
a deeper understanding of lived experience in the community, with
the Transformation Programme anchors one, two and four aimed at
engaging communities.
• Innovation culture (Helsinborg Innovation) – fostering a culture
of innovation and improvement, where new ideas are encouraged,
tried and evaluated before being rolled out in a timeous manner.
This was a key principle identified in the Delivering a future for
Scottish local authorities report. This will need to be embraced
and embedded as the Transformation Programme moves beyond
the discovery phase if transformational change is to be successfully
achieved at pace. Page 287

Page 288

2. Urgent action is required to progress transformation 16
• Whole public service approach – delivery of services to ensure
demand is supported in the right place at the right time, with
a focus on improving the effectiveness of prevention services.
Examples include support for affordable sustainable housing
through planning processes, supporting public health initiatives
and bolstering economic development opportunities and initiatives.
Anchor six of the Transformation Programme is aimed at engaging
within councils and other public sector partners.
COSLA and the Scottish Government must take
action to facilitate sector-wide transformation
Slow progress on the commitments in the Verity House
Agreement (VHA) poses a risk to transformation
37. The VHA between COSLA and the Scottish Government was
designed as a reset of the relationship between central and local
government. It sets out a vision for a more collaborative approach to
delivering shared priorities. It also includes commitments to agree a 
new fiscal framework and an accountability and assurance framework, 
to minimise ring-fenced funding, to review specific grants to allow 
for greater local discretion and to conclude the Local Governance
Review (LGR).
38. In our Local government in Scotland: Financial bulletin 2022/23,
published in January 2024, we reviewed early progress on the aims
and commitments of the VHA and found key milestones had not been
met. The VHA has now been in place for over a year and although
discussions have taken place to progress several commitments, tangible
progress is still limited:
• Fiscal framework – Joint discussions have progressed work and
additional exploratory work has been undertaken to look at how
a rules-based framework might be established (at the request of
COSLA). However, capacity within both COSLA and the Scottish
Government has limited sustained progress. We do not yet know
what the framework will look like, and no new deadline for agreeing
the framework has been set. While it is important to get things right
so that the framework endures, we reiterate the recommendation
we made in our Local government in Scotland: Financial bulletin
2022/23 for momentum and progress to be accelerated.
• Accountability and assurance framework – The VHA set out a
commitment to jointly develop simple structures for accountability
and assurance. Work is ongoing to unpick some of the complex
issues around: where accountability lies for policy priorities, the
existing accountability and assurance arrangements in place within
local government, how assurance can recognise local difference
and how to achieve proportionate reporting. This work goes hand in
hand with agreeing a fiscal framework (and specifically reductions to
ring-fenced funding) and while discussions are ongoing it is not clear
when this will be achieved.
The Local
Governance Review
looks at how power,
responsibility and
resources are
shared with local
government and
different communities
and what needs to
change to enable
public service reform,
innovation and
collective, whole
system improvement.
Page 288

Page 289

2. Urgent action is required to progress transformation 17
• Local governance review – The review is now in its seventh year.
It was paused during the Covid-19 pandemic and restarted in 2023.
A report on the outcome of the latest consultation, Democracy
Matters 2, was published in September 2024. The pace of work
will need to be significantly improved if the commitment to
conclude the review by the Scottish Parliament election in 2026 is
to be achieved.
39. Several actions, decisions and behaviours have challenged and risked
undermining the collaborative vision of the VHA. These include the former
First Minister’s announcement last October of a Council Tax freeze and the
imposition of teacher numbers and learning hours.
40. COSLA and the Scottish Government must urgently take action to
deliver on the commitments in the VHA. These are key facilitators to the
successful delivery of transformation work and to councils’ ability to achieve
financial sustainability. Further delay poses a risk to achieving these at the
pace required.
COSLA has the potential to facilitate sector-wide transformation
and coordinate joint work with the Scottish Government
41. In late 2023, COSLA established the ‘Innovating Developing and
Transforming’ special interest group (SIG) to facilitate collaboration between
political leaders, the Scottish Government and other key public sector
partners. It aims to create a more coordinated, transparent and efficient local
government system that prioritises citizen engagement, financial stability,
and transformative change.
42. In April 2024, it agreed it would be the key stakeholder group for political
engagement and monitoring progress on transformation work. While it is
too early to see the impact of SIG’s role in sector-led transformation work, it
has potential to be an important mechanism for gaining political consensus
on what the future of local government looks like. It also has the potential
to facilitate better sector-wide public engagement and better collaboration
between local and national government to implement the changes needed
at both levels to achieve sustainable services that meet local needs.
Urgency and collaboration are needed across the
sector to deliver transformation
43. Councils are trying to deliver transformation in exceptionally difficult
circumstances. Most councils, in common with most of the public sector,
are finding it challenging just to deliver ‘business as usual’ services.
They struggle to dedicate the time and resources to focus on long-term
transformation work. But to deliver tangible progress, councils must commit
to and sustain engagement with the Transformation Programme, other
sector-led transformation work and their own plans for transformation, at
political and officer level.
Page 289

Page 290

2. Urgent action is required to progress transformation 18
44. Sector-led transformation work across local government is at an early
stage. It is a long-term process, and most of the sector-led workstreams
and projects will not deliver outcomes for several years. Councils should not
view these programmes of work as solutions to their immediate and short-
term financial sustainability issues. Nor should councils rely solely on sector-
led approaches to deliver their long-term transformation goals. They should
press ahead with their own plans for transformation and do everything they
can to deliver them successfully.
45. The sector must also do all it can to ensure sector-led transformation
work meets the needs of all councils where possible. There must be shared
aims, outcomes and priorities. But there is no one-size-fits-all solution. Any
new model for service delivery in councils should be principles-based and
not overly prescriptive. It should give councils the flexibility to change how
they deliver their services to best meet the needs of their communities
efficiently, effectively and sustainably.
46. There are overall risks to the successful delivery of sector-led
transformation work. Councils should recognise those risks, take collective
ownership of them and work together to overcome them. They must
ensure sufficient time and resources are focused on this transformation
work, and that effective governance, planning and scrutiny arrangements
are in place.
47. Given the scale of the challenge, councils cannot deliver transformation
on their own and the Scottish Government and other public bodies need to
collaborate with local government on transformation work. Partners from
across the sector must urgently come around the table to agree a shared
understanding of what local government transformation looks like, how
it aligns with wider public sector reform and what it should achieve, how
and by when. The Transformation Programme provides a forum for those
officer-led discussions to take place, and momentum must be gained so
that tangible progress can be seen.
48. There must also be meaningful engagement with the people who
use council services to ensure transformation is aligned to their needs.
Councils have a responsibility to do this as they implement their own plans
for transformation. But a coordinated sector-wide public engagement and
communication campaign should help gain acceptance from communities
on what sustainable local services could look like in the future and how that
will be achieved. There is potential for COSLA, via its ‘Innovating Developing
and Transforming’ special interest group, to help facilitate this sector-wide
public engagement.
49. While transformation is a long-term ambition, the need for change,
innovation and action is urgent. The longer it takes to create solutions to
the financial sustainability challenges facing the sector, the tougher those
challenges will become and the more difficult it will be to find solutions.
Page 290

Page 291

Transformation in
councils
Sector-led change and collaboration
to achieve financial sustainability
Audit Scotland, 4th Floor, 102 West Port, Edinburgh EH3 9DN
Phone: 0131 625 1500 Email: info@audit.scot
www.audit.scot
ISBN 978 1 915839 51 0
Page 291

Page 292

Page 292

Page 293

REPORT TO: MORAY COUNCIL ON 4 DECEMBER 2024
SUBJECT:  INFORMATION REPORT - MONITORING OFFICER REPORT
FROM 1 NOVEMBER 2023 TO 31 OCTOBER 2024
BY:  MONITORING OFFICER
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To inform the Council of the range of activities undertaken by the Monitoring
Officer.
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III A (4) of the Council's
Scheme of Administration relating to public performance reporting.
2. BACKGROUND
2.1 There is a statutory requirement for every Council to appoint a Monitoring
Officer. The Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance performs this
role in Moray Council supported by the Legal Services Manager who acts as
Depute Monitoring Officer.
2.2 Legislation requires the Monitoring Officer to bring to the attention of the
Council:
 A contravention of law or any code of practice made or approved under
any enactment; or
 Maladministration or injustice in each case actual or potential and
whether by the Council, committees, sub-committees or officers.
2.3 The position adopted by the Monitoring Officer is that a breach would require
to be material, or a significant breach of the law in terms of the operations or
finances of the Council to cause the Monitoring Officer to issue a report to the
Council. 
2.4 It is normal practice within local authorities for the Monitoring Officer to:
 Promote good governance and sound decision making.
 Promote the Councillors Code of Conduct.
2.5 The Council’s Policy and Resources Committee on 2 October 2012 agreed
that the Monitoring Officer would present an annual report on the activities of
the post (para 8 of the minute refers).
3. SUMMARY OF WORK UNDERTAKEN BY THE MONITORING OFFICER:
Page 293

Page 294

Statutory role
3.1 There have been no formal reports by the Monitoring Officer of legal
contravention or maladministration as described in paragraph 2.2.
The Council have a number of systems and processes in place to deal with
breaches or non-compliance with legislation/policy at a lower level.
Governance role
3.2 During the period covered by the report the Monitoring Officer has:
3.3 Been appointed by the Interim Chief Executive as a member of CMT,
attending weekly CMT meetings along with the Chief Financial Officer. This
improves awareness on major issues facing the Council.
3.4 Helped commission external assistance to improve collaborative leadership
amongst Councillors and Officers to help the Council make progress with its
strategic agenda and priorities. The results of this work were considered by
the Council’s Corporate Committee on 27 August 2024 (para 18 of the minute
refers).
3.5 Helped ensure continued flexibility for Council/Committee meetings with the
option of hybrid meetings and online voting.
3.6 Signed off agendas, reports and notices of motion submitted for all formal
meetings of the Council and its Committees/Sub-Committees with assistance
from the Legal Services Manager (Depute Monitoring Officer), Committee
Services team and Legal team.
 This is a significant element of the Monitoring Officer’s workload, often
undertaken over a very restricted period to enable Committee Agendas to
be published within the statutory timescales.
 Given increasing and competing demands on the roles of the Monitoring
Officer/Depute, and staffing gaps within Legal Services, a lighter touch is
now being given to the report review process with time spent being relative
to the risk.
 Due to workload pressures in other areas, reports are often received late
which puts additional pressure on the agenda preparation process.  
 The combined effect of these issues creates an increased risk that
procedural problems arise at committee.
3.7 Introduced the guidance on Councillor/Officer relations and guidance for
Councillors serving on outside bodies. 
3.8 Delivered training on scrutiny for members of the Audit and Scrutiny
Committee.
3.9 Advised all Councillors - administration and non-administration - on practical
application of the Council’s Constitutional Documents to the committee
Page 294

Page 295

system, including advice on notices of motion, competency of motions, written
questions, political balance and rights to information. 
3.10 Through the legal services section, managed the Council’s legal risk through:
 Dealing with claims in courts and tribunals
 Advice, statutory processes and transactional work
 Promotion of awareness of and compliance with major pieces of new
legislation
3.11 Traditionally most legal work would be undertaken by an in-house team with a
small amount of complex work being outsourced to experts. Ongoing difficulty
in recruiting in-house solicitors has led to an increasing amount of routine
work being outsourced to private firms through a framework arrangement.
3.12 Outsourcing legal work can be time consuming and costly and does not
capitalise on the benefits of having skilled in-house solicitors advising in
projects at an earlier stage. This creates a significant legal risk to the Council
which could manifest itself through service or process failure, leading to
financial or reputational damage. 
Code of Conduct Role
3.13 During the period covered by the report the Monitoring Officer has:
3.14 Maintained the register of councillors’ interests including six monthly
reminders and council tax payment checks prior to budget setting. Councillors
are reminded that any changes must be notified within one month of them
occurring.
3.15 Provided regular updates to Councillors in relation to Standards Commission
briefings and relevant hearings. It is recognised that further in person training
is overdue and it is hoped to provide a training on external bodies/conflicts of
interest by the end of 2024. .
3.16 Given advice to councillors on individual circumstances including:
 gifts and hospitality and what can be reasonably associated with
councillors’ duties
 the requirement to declare an interest and how to make transparency
statements
 registration of interests
3.17 Dealt with complaints against Councillors in terms of the Council’s policy.
Whilst resolution of complaints at a political level is generally preferrable this
is often not considered appropriate by those making complaints which are
then passed to the Monitoring Officer. These complaints cover the same
themes as those in from last year’s report: 
 showing respect for other Councillors
 language used in social media
 allegations of bullying and harassment
Page 295

Page 296

3.18 This intervention can be time consuming and the Monitoring Officer has no
authority to enforce the code, only to promote its observance. Success is
limited where there is no element of contrition from those complained about.
In these circumstances the complainer is signposted to the complaints
process of the Commissioner for Ethical Standards.
3.19 Given the political nature of the Council the level of complaints received does
not seem outwith the norm and Moray appears to have a relatively low level of
cases which are escalated to the Ethical Standards Commission.
3.20 Communicated with the Ethical Standards Commissioner and the Standards
Commissioner over complaints covering respect provisions.
3.21 Participated with other Monitoring Officers in workshops with the Standards
Commission over guidance on the Code of Conduct.
3.22 Maintained close links with other Monitoring Officers to act as a sounding
board for tricky and complex issues.
4. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement
Plan (LOIP))
Effective governance is required for the delivery of the Council’s stated
priorities and plans.
(b) Policy and Legal
These are detailed more fully in the report.
(c) Financial Implications
None.
(d) Risks implications
Actions taken by the Monitoring Officer help to manage political and
regulatory risks within the Corporate Risk Register.
(e) Staffing implications
The role is carried out by the Head of Governance Strategy and
Performance, supported by the Legal Services Manager. It can be
challenging to fulfil the role alongside competing workload priorities.
(f) Property Implications
None
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact
There are no issues arising directly from this report.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
None
Page 296

Page 297

(i) Consultations
The Depute Monitoring Officer has been consulted and her comments
have been reflected in the report.
5. CONCLUSION
5.1 The report informs the Council on the activities undertaken by the
Monitoring Officer during the period covered by this report.
Author of Report: Alasdair McEachan, Head of Governance, Strategy and
Performance (Monitoring Officer)
Background Papers: None
Ref: 
Page 297

Page 298

Page 298