Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Moray Council - 25/06/2025

Moray Council · 25 June 2025
Back to Moray Council — 25 June 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Moray Council
Wednesday, 25 June 2025
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Meeting of the Moray Council is to be held at
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX on Wednesday,
25 June 2025 at 09:30.
BUSINESS
1. Sederunt
2. Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests *
3. Resolution
Consider, and if so decide, adopt the following resolution:
"That under Section 50A (4) and (5) of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973, as amended, the public and media
representatives be excluded from the meeting for Items 21 - 28 of
business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt
information of the class described in the relevant Paragraphs of Part 1
of Schedule 7A of the Act.”
4. Minute of meeting of 21 May 2025 7 - 12
5. Written Questions **
6. Notice of Motion - Cleanliness of Elgin High Street 13 - 14
7. Revenue Out-Turn Variances from Budget
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
15 - 42
8. Capital Plan 2024-25 Quarter 4
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
43 - 58
Page 1

Page 2

9. Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
59 - 78
10. Common Good Funds - Summary Expenditure 2024-25
Estimated Disposable Income 2025-26
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
79 - 98
11. Corporate Plan - Progress Update 2024-25
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
99 -
114
12. Public Performance Report 2024-25
Report by the Chief Executive
115 -
118
13. Cooper Park Public Trust - Cooper Park Deed of Gift
1903
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
119 -
136
14. The Link - Your Community Space Hub
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and
Finance)
137 -
144
15. Free School Meals Expansion - S1 to S3 Pilot 2025-26
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
145 -
150
16. Polling Place Review - Consultation Feedback
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
151 -
166
17. Review of Constitutional Documents
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
167 -
174
18. Revised Calendar of Meetings
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
175 -
180
19. Changes to Senior Councillor Positions
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
181 -
184
Page 2

Page 3

20. Members' Allowances and Expenses Scheme Review
Report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and
Organisational Development)
185 -
206
Item(s) which the Committee may wish to consider with
the Press and Public excluded
21. Voluntary Early Retirement Application - ASN [Para 1
and 11]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
• 11. Information relating to any consultations or negotiations in
connection with any labour relations;
22. Customer Relationship Management Procurement [Para
8]
• 8. Information on the amount of any expenditure proposed to be
incurred by the Authority;
23. Leisure and Library Capital Plan Developments [Para 8]
• 8. Information on the amount of any expenditure proposed to be
incurred by the Authority;
24. Empty Homes [Para 1]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
25. Depot and Store Review [Para 9]
• 9. Information on terms proposed or to be proposed by or to the
Authority;
26. Refugee Resettlement and Asylum Activities [Paras 3
and 5]
• 3. Information relating to any particular applicant for, or recipient or
former recipient of, any service provided by the Authority;
• 5. Information relating to the adoption, care, fostering or education
of any particular child or relating to the supervision or residence of
any particular child in accordance with a supervision requirement;
27. Review of the Corporate Management Structure -
Consultation Feedback [Para 1]
• 1. Information relating to staffing matters;
28. Voluntary Early Retirement Application [Para 1 and 11]
Report by the Chief Executive
Page 3

Page 4

Watching the Meeting
You can watch the webcast live by going to: 
http://www.moray.gov.uk/moray_standard/page_43661.html
Webcasts are available to view for 1 year following the meeting.
You can also attend the meeting in person.  If you wish to attend
in person, please come to the High Street entrance door and a
member of staff will let you into the Chamber.
Page 4

Page 5

GUIDANCE NOTES
* Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests - The Chair of the
meeting shall seek declarations from any individual or political group at the
beginning of a meeting whether any prior decision has been reached on how
the individual or members of the group will vote on any item(s) of business on
the Agenda, and if so on which item(s).  A prior decision shall be one that the
individual or the group deems to be mandatory on the individual or the group
members such that the individual or the group members will be subject to
sanctions should they not vote in accordance with the prior decision.  Any such
prior decisions will be recorded in the Minute of the meeting.
** Written Questions - Any Member can put one written question about any
relevant and competent business within the specified remits not already on the
agenda, to the Chair provided it is received by the Proper Officer or Committee
Services by 12 noon two working days prior to the day of the meeting.  A copy
of any written answer provided by the Chair will be published on the Council’s
committee management system by 4pm the day before the meeting.  The
Member who has put the question may, after the answer has been published,
ask one supplementary question directly related to the subject matter at the
meeting, but no discussion will be allowed.
No supplementary question can be put or answered more than 10 minutes after
the Council has started on the relevant item of business, except with the
consent of the Chair. If a Member does not have the opportunity to put a
supplementary question because no time remains, then he or she can submit it
in writing to the Proper Officer who will arrange for a written answer to be
provided within 7 working days.
Page 5

Page 6

MORAY COUNCIL
Moray Council
SEDERUNT
Councillor Kathleen Robertson  (Chair)
Councillor Donald Gatt  (Depute Chair)
Councillor James  Allan  (Member)
Councillor Peter Bloomfield  (Member)
Councillor Neil Cameron  (Member)
Councillor Tracy Colyer  (Member)
Councillor Theresa Coull  (Member)
Councillor John Cowe  (Member)
Councillor John Divers  (Member)
Councillor Amber Dunbar  (Member)
Councillor Jérémie Fernandes  (Member)
Councillor David Gordon  (Member)
Councillor Juli Harris  (Member)
Councillor Sandy Keith  (Member)
Councillor Elaine Kirby  (Member)
Councillor Scott Lawrence  (Member)
Councillor Marc Macrae  (Member)
Councillor Paul McBain  (Member)
Councillor Neil McLennan  (Member)
Councillor Shona Morrison  (Member)
Councillor Bridget Mustard  (Member)
Councillor Derek Ross  (Member)
Councillor John Stuart  (Member)
Councillor Draeyk van der Horn  (Member)
Councillor Sonya Warren  (Member)
Councillor Ben Williams  (Member)
Clerk Name: Tracey Sutherland
Clerk Telephone: 07971 879268
Clerk Email: committee.services@moray.gov.uk
Page 6

Page 7

MORAY COUNCIL 
Minute of Meeting of the Moray Council 
Wednesday, 21 May 2025 
Council Chambers, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX 
PRESENT 
Councillor James  Allan, Councillor Peter Bloomfield, Councillor Neil Cameron,
Councillor Tracy Colyer, Councillor Theresa Coull, Councillor John Cowe, Councillor
John Divers, Councillor Amber Dunbar, Councillor Jérémie Fernandes, Councillor
Donald Gatt, Councillor David Gordon, Councillor Juli Harris, Councillor Sandy Keith,
Councillor Elaine Kirby, Councillor Scott Lawrence, Councillor Marc Macrae, Councillor
Paul McBain, Councillor Neil McLennan, Councillor Shona Morrison, Councillor Bridget
Mustard, Councillor Kathleen Robertson, Councillor Derek Ross, Councillor John
Stuart, Councillor Draeyk van der Horn, Councillor Sonya Warren, Councillor Ben
Williams 
IN ATTENDANCE 
Chief Executive, Depute Chief Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance),
Depute Chief Executive (Education, Communities and Organisational Development),
Chief Officer, Health and Social Care, Head of Governance, Strategy and
Performance, Chief Financial Officer, Head of Environmental and Commercial
Services, Head of HR, ICT and Organisational Development, ICT Infrastructure
Manager, Programme Manager (Learning Estate), Finance Manager and Democratic
Services Manager.   
1.         Chair 
The meeting was chaired by Councillor Kathleen Robertson.  
2.         Declaration of Group Decisions and Members Interests * 
In terms of Standing Orders 21 and 23 and the Councillors' Code of Conduct, there
were no declarations from Group Leaders or Spokespersons in regard to any prior
decisions taken on how Members will vote on any item on the agenda or any
declarations of Member's interests in respect of any item on the agenda. 
3.         Resolution 
The meeting resolved that in terms of Section 50A (4) and (5) of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973, as amended, the public and media representatives be excluded
from the meeting for Items 6 and 7 of business on the grounds that it involves the
likely disclosure of exempt information of the class described in the relevant
Paragraphs of Part 1 of Schedule 7A of the Act.   
Para Number of
the Minute Para Number of Schedule 7a
16 Para 9
Item 4.
Page 7

Page 8

Information on terms proposed or to be proposed by or to the
Authority 
17
Para 11
Information relating to any consultations or negotiations in
connection with any labour relations.   
4.         Minute of Meeting of 19 February 2025 
The minute of the meeting of Moray Council on 19 February 2025 was submitted and
approved.  
5.         Minute of Special Meeting of 26 February 2025 
The minute of the meeting of Moray Council on 26 February 2025 was submitted and
approved.  
6.         Minutes of Special Meeting of 15 April 2025 
The minute of the Special Meeting of Moray Council on 15 April 2025 was submitted
and approved. 
7.         Written Questions 
The meeting noted that there were no written questions.  
8.         Notice of Motion - Council Tax Reform 
In terms of Standing Order 35a there was submitted a Notice of Motion by Councillors
Keith and Divers in the following terms:  
Council Tax Reform  
Background 
• Public debate in Scotland has highlighted the unfairness of Council Tax in its
current form. The current Scottish Government and COSLA announcement on
“Building Consensus for Council Tax Reform,” is welcome in this regard.  
Action 
• The council affirms its support for meaningful council tax reform that results in a
fairer and less regressive system of property tax.  
Financial implications 
• There are no financial implications arising from this motion. 
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to affirm its support for
meaningful council tax reform that results in a fairer and less regressive system of
property tax.  
Page 8

Page 9

9.         Moray Integration Joint Board Chief Officer Update 
The meeting had before it a report by the Chief Officer, Health and Social Care Moray,
informing the Council of the latest approved minutes of the meeting of the Moray
Integration Joint Board (MIJB) and to provide an update following the MIJB budget
meeting held on 27 March 2025.  
Following lengthy consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to note the
contents of the report.  
10.         Closure of Crossroads Primary School - Statutory Consultation 
The meeting had before it, a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) providing an update on the statutory
consultation on the closure of Crossroads Primary School and sought approval from
the Council on the recommendation for closure.  
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to:  
i) note the formal consultation report attached as Appendix 1, regarding the
closure of Crossroads Primary School;    
ii) approve the recommendation to close Crossroads Primary School and re-
assign its catchment area to Keith and Rothiemay Primary Schools; and    
iii) authorise, in accordance with School (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010,
Council Officers to inform Scottish Ministers of the decision to close
Crossroads Primary School and the re-assignment of its catchment area.  
Councillors McLennan and Stuart left the meeting during the consideration of this
item.  
11.         Community Engagement - Future Council 
The Council noted that this item had been withdrawn prior to the meeting.  
12.         Review of Constitutional Documents 
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) inviting the Council to consider
changes to the Council's Constitutional Documents as detailed in Section 4 of the
report.  
In introducing the report, the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance sought
an additional amendment to the Scheme of Delegation in the following terms:  
Add a new section to 3 (2) of the Scheme of Delegation - 
The Audit and Risk Manager shall assume the role of the independent Chief Audit
Executive in terms of Public Sector Internal Audit Standards with unrestricted access
to the central leadership team and Council.  
Page 9

Page 10

He further advised that the addition would comply with an Audit and Scrutiny
Committee recommendation.  
Councillor Warren asked whether it would be possible to move the publishing
deadline for Written Question responses earlier to allow the Elected Member
additional time to consider the response before the meeting it was submitted for.  
In response, the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance stated that in
principle that would be possible however, it may mean that the written questions
would need to be submitted earlier to give adequate time for a response.  He further
stated that he would check the current provision in Standing Orders and come back
with alternative proposals if the Council was so minded, which would be reported in
the further report on 25 June 2025.  
Councillor Robertson sought agreement from the Council to bring back revised
timescales for Written Questions to the meeting on 25 June 2025.  This was agreed.  
Councillor McLennan re-joined the meeting at this juncture.  
Following further consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to:  
i) note the proposed changes to Standing Orders as detailed in paragraph 5.1;    
ii) note the proposed changes to the Scheme of Administration as set out in
paragraph 5.2;    
iii) note the proposed changes to the Scheme of Delegation as set out in
paragraph 5.3, including the addition to section 3 (2) - The Audit and Risk
Manager shall assume the role of the independent Chief Audit Executive in
terms of Public Sector Internal Audit Standards with unrestricted access to the
central leadership team and Council.    
iv) note that a final version of the Constitutional Documents, incorporating the
changes as detailed in paras 5.1 to 5.3, will be submitted to the next ordinary
meeting of the Council on 25 June 2025 for approval; and    
v) move the ordinary meeting of Moray Council scheduled for 6 August 2025 to 27
August 2025.  
13.         Finance Policy Review 
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) seeking to approve changes to the Council's Financial
Regulations and Bank and Cash Handling Procedure.  
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to approve:  
i)  the revised Financial Regulations set out in Appendix 1; and    
ii) the revised Banking and Cash Handling Procedure set out in Appendix 2.  
Councillor McLennan left the meeting at the conclusion of this item. 
Page 10

Page 11

14.         Harbours Sub-Committee 
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance) seeking to establish a Harbours Sub-Committee to
support the Council in discharging its responsibilities as a Statutory Harbour
Authority.  
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed:  
i) the establishment of a Harbours Sub-Committee of Economic Development
and Infrastructure Services Committee;    
ii) the remit and delegation from Economic Development and Infrastructure
Services Committee as set out in paragraph 5 of the report;    
iii) that coast protection is delegated to the Sub-Committee only in so far as it
relates to the role of the Council as a Harbour Authority;    
iv) members of the Harbour Sub-Committee shall be appointed by the Economic
Development and Infrastructure Services Committee.  Members of the Sub-
Committee may be members of Economic Development and Infrastructure
Services Committee but are not required to be; and    
v) the membership will be made up as detailed in para 5.5 of the report.   
15.         Information Reports - if called in 
The meeting noted that the Information Report had not been called in.  
16.         Wide Area Network Connectivity for Schools [Para 9] 
The meeting had before it a report by the Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development) informing the Council of progress in
relation to the migration to the new Scottish Wide Area Network (SWAN) framework,
to consider the options for network capacity in Primary Schools, and to approve the
recommendation to provide all Primary Schools with network capacity of 500 Mbps.  
Following consideration, the Council unanimously agreed to:  
i) note the progress on the migration to the new SWAN framework;    
ii) note the options for network capacity in Primary Schools; and    
iii) approve the option to provide all Primary Schools with 500 Mbps using
allocation of ear-marked Transformation reserves to fund the improvement
initially pending release of anticipated savings.  
17.         Budget Consultation Feedback [Para 11] 
The meeting had before it a report by the Monitoring Officer asking the Council to
consider the impact of consultation feedback and updated Integrated Impact
Assessments on a particular budget decision taken on 26 February 2025.
Page 11

Page 12

The Chief Executive apologised to Councillors on behalf of Officers for the omission
and confirmed that Internal Audit have been asked to look at the process and
investigate the issue, with a report being brought back to Audit and Scrutiny
Committee with any findings.  
Following lengthy consideration Councillor Ross moved the recommendations as
printed in the report, this was seconded by Councillor Macrae.  
Councillor Lawrence, seconded by Councillor Warren, proposed agreeing
recommendations (i) and (ii) and replacing recommendation (iii) with the following:  
This Council agrees to revisit decisions made on proposals A1.9-A1.11 at the earliest
opportunity as soon as all necessary information is available.  
On the division there voted:  
For the Motion (15)  Councillors Ross, Macrae, Allan, Bloomfield, Colyer,
Divers, Dunbar, Gatt, Gordon, Keith, Kirby, McBain,
Mustard, Robertson and Williams
For the Amendment (7)  Councillors Lawrence, Warren, Cameron, Fernandes,
Harris, Morrison and van der Horn.
Abstain (1)  Councillor Coull  
Accordingly, the motion became the finding of the meeting and the Council agreed:  
i) to note the outcome of the public consultation in relation to the ELC budget
proposals A1.9 - A1.11 summarised in Appendix 1;    
ii) to note the terms of the updated Integrated Impact Assessment in relation to
the ELC budget proposal contained in Appendix 2; and    
iii) to approve the ELC budget proposals A1.9 - A1.11, noting the anticipated
saving to the revenue budget of £392,000 per annum.   
Page 12

Page 13

__________________________________________________
NOTICE OF MOTION
TO MORAY COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY 25 JUNE 2025 
Background 
• The Council notes the public concern about the general cleanliness of Elgin High
Street, the Plainstones and some of the nearby closes. 
Action 
• Council agrees to utilise the monies set aside in the 2025/26 Revenue budget for Elgin
BID membership, but which are no longer required for this purpose, to undertake a
town centre deep clean. 
Financial implications 
• There are no additional financial implications arising from this motion beyond those
already approved. 
Proposed by: Councillor Sandy Keith 
Seconded by: Councillor Kathleen Robertson 
Date Motion Submitted: 6 June 2025 
Item 6.
Page 13

Page 14

Page 14

Page 15

Report to: Moray Council  Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Economy, Environment
and Finance) 
Report No: FIN008/25  
Author: Susan Souter Contact Email: susan.souter@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: 2024/25 Revenue Out-turn Variances from Budget 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to advise the Council of the major variances from the
approved budget in the actual out-turn for 2024/25 revenue budget and to seek approval of
adjustment to the budget for 2025/26 where there has been slippage in projects which are
proposed to be funded from reserves.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (25) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to the approval of the annual estimates of revenue expenditure for
all services and of Section III (B) (6) relating to monitoring current expenditure in relation to
approved estimates.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  This report presents the closing financial position of the Council’s revenue budgets for
2024/25. The final accounts process is underway, with draft annual accounts being
reported to this meeting. The figures are subject to final audit review and any further
adjustments to these figures will be reported back to Members.  
2.2  The unaudited accounts for 2024/25 are subject to a separate report to this Committee.
The unaudited accounts show that the balance on free general reserves remains at
£6,000,000 at 31 March 2025 and other ear-marked reserves of £23,284,000, totalling
£29,284,000, compared to £41,331,000 at 31 March 2024.  
2.3  The final outturn for 2024/25 shows an overspend of £1,007,000 against the approved
budget. This represents a reduction of £1,416,000 compared to the overspend forecast at
Quarter 3. The year-end budget was £288,747,000, while actual expenditure amounted to
£289,754,000, however, included within the actual outturn is £3,149,000 of funding
Item 7.
Page 15

Page 16

received during the year that is to be transferred to earmarked reserves for use in future
years. 
2.4  After applying funding from the Scottish Government (£225,659,000) and Council Tax
receipts (£51,836,000) the use of reserves to balance the expenditure totals £12,259,000.
A transfer of £212,000 from the capital grants and receipts unapplied reserve intended for
revenue spend was made, leaving £12,047,000 to be funded from revenue reserves:
Transformation £260,000; DSM £540,000; the full balance on the Working reserve of
£8,693,000, and a net transfer in to earmarked reserves of £881,000, leaving a balance of
£3,435,000 to come from Council Priorities. The detail of these reserves is explained
further in the body of the report.  
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that Council:   
i)  Notes the Council’s year-end financial position for 2024/25; 
ii)  Notes the status of the approved savings for 2024/25 and that recurring
savings achieved total £1,982,000 more than the £9,285,000 target for the
year; 
iii)  Considers and scrutinises the major variances in 2024/25 from those
anticipated in February, as summarised in Appendix 1; 
iv)  Notes the major variances from the approved budget for 2024/25 as
summarised in Appendix 2 and that the outturn of an overspend of £1,007,000
consists of an underspend on services of £3,591,000 (including ear-marked
funding); an overspend of £6,198,000 on loans charges and provisions of
£1,600,000; 
v)  Notes that £3,149,000 requires to be transferred into earmarked reserves;
and 
vi)  Approves an additional budget pressure for one project as detailed in
paragraph 5.40. 
Author Name Susan Souter
Job Title Senior Accountant 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The Council approved the General Fund Revenue Budget at a meeting on 28 February 2024
(paragraph 7 of the minute) with budgeted expenditure of £278,794,000. Council Tax
receipts of £51,375,000 were anticipated. As part of the budget setting process, Members
had approved £9,370,000 of savings in the year and, to balance the budget, the use of
£12,023,000 of reserves: Transformation £731,000, Moray Growth Deal (MGD) £1,136,000
and Working reserves £10,156,000.  
Page 16

Page 17

4.2  Expenditure against budget is reported to Committee on a quarterly basis during the
financial year, with projected outturn figures reported at Q2 and Q3. Q1 was reported to
Corporate Committee on 27 August 2024; Q2 to Full Council on 4 December 2024
(paragraph 11 of the Minute refers) and Q3 to Full Council on 19 February 2025 (paragraph
11 of the Minute refers). 
4.3  At Q3, the latest forecast projected an overspend of £2,423,000 against the approved
budget. The reported budgeted expenditure at that point was £286,636,000. Anticipated
Council Tax receipts for the year rose to £51,854,000. Additionally, £11,897,000 was
expected to be drawn from reserves, including £784,000 from the Transformation Fund,
£1,136,000 from the MGD reserve, £6,477,000 from Working Reserves, and as a working
assumption £1,465,000 from the Devolved School Management (DSM) reserve. The use of
Council Priorities funding was also acknowledged to support supernumerary staffing,
redundancy costs, and Strain on Fund liabilities, with £831,000 estimated at that stage.  
The balance on the Working Reserve as at 31 March 2025 was forecast to be £2,209,000
and the balance on the Council priorities reserve £2,303,000.  
4.4  The financial forecast for the year plays an important role in informing the budget-setting
process. The variances and insights identified in the quarterly forecasts can serve as a
basis for reviewing and, where necessary, adjusting the proposed budget for the 2025/26
financial year. 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  Appendix 1 sets out the final out-turn compared to the forecast out-turn at the end of
December 2024, summarising the General Fund net expenditure and how it is financed. 
5.2  The final out-turn for 2024/25 is an overspend against budget of £1,007,000 in
departmental budgets; £1,406,000 less of an overspend than was forecast at Q3. The
forecast at Q3 was net expenditure of £289,059,000; an overspend of £2,423,000 which
was planned to be funded by the use of the Working Reserve of £6,477,000 and the use of
the earmarked reserve for Council Priorities of £831,000. This compares with actual out-
turn of £289,764,000 against revised budget of £288,747,000, giving an overspend of
£1,017,000. The funding of the expenditure was £225,659,000 of funding from the Scottish
Government, Council Tax receipts of £51,836,000 and use of reserves of £12,259,000:
DSM £540,000, Transformation £260,000, Council Priorities £3,435,000, earmarked
reserves of £2,268,000, and the balance of £8,693,000 coming from the Working reserve.
Included in the actuals are funding that will be transferred to earmarked reserves, totalling
£3,149,000 – this needs to be funded from working reserves. The final net movement on
the earmarked reserves is an increase of £881,000.  
5.3  Appendix 2 and the table in 5.7 highlight the following key points: 
• Overall expenditure was an overspend of £1,007,000 against the budget at year
end. While this appears to be an improvement of £1,406,000 compared to the Q3
position reported in February, it should be noted this is not a genuine improvement
in service outturn. The actual variance includes £3,149,000 of funding for services
that was received but not spent during the year, which has been transferred to
earmarked reserves for future use, and not available for general use as an
additional uncommitted resource.  Further details on service-level variances and
Page 17

Page 18

the specific transfers to earmarked reserves are provided in the following
paragraphs. Capital loans charges exceeded the budget by £6,198,000 due to
higher than expected borrowing costs due to an error in calculation and interest
rates for temporary borrowing. Other transfers of interest to capital reserves and
statutory funds increase the unfavourable variance to £6,428,000. 
• Council Tax receipts were above the budgeted receipts to the General Fund.
However, the transfer to Housing Revenue Account from reduced discount on
Council Tax on second homes accounts for most of the increase. 
• The use of reserves has increased from £11,897,000 forecast at Q3 to £12,047,000.
The Council’s free General Fund reserves remain at £6,000,000. 
• Full use of the non-recurring working reserve underscores the extremely
challenging financial outlook for the new financial year. 
• The table below presents the final year-end position compared to those reports at
Q3, including the application of reserves. Favourable and unfavourable movements
are indicated. 
Variances Outturn Final year
£000
Q3
£000
Outturn Variance
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Service Expenditure 182,393 185,498 3,105
Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB) 83,956 84,374 418
Loans Charges 23,405 20,207 (3,198)
Provisions - (1,020) (1,020)
General Services expenditure 289,754 289,059 (695)    
Funding   
Scottish Government Grant 225,659 225,308 (351)
Council Tax 51,836 51,854 18
Use of Reserves   
DSM 540 1,465 925
Transformation 260 784 524
Moray Growth Deal 301 1,136 835
Council Priorities 3,134 831 (2,303)
Other Earmarked (881) 1,204 2,085
Working Reserves 8,693 6,477 (2,216)
Transfer from Unapplied capital grants 212 - (212)
Total Use of Reserves 12,259 11,897 (362)    
Total Funding 289,754 289,059 (695) 
Service Department Variances
5.4  Staffing continues to represent the single largest cross-service variance, a trend that
remains consistent year on year. The 2024/25 pay agreement, along with an increase in
vacancy factor, implemented as an approved saving, has been factored into current
budgets. 
Page 18

Page 19

5.5  In terms of income, including recharges to capital projects and the HRA, services are
reporting a mix of positive and negative variances. Some of these variances relate to
funding allocated for specific purposes. Where such funds remain unspent, they are
transferred to earmarked reserves for future use.  
5.6  The significant difference between departmental out-turn and that forecast indicates that
a review of budget variance may highlight scope for additional savings. These will be
confirmed with Heads of Service and reported to Members at a later date.  
5.7  The table below presents a summary of year-end service budget, expenditure and
variances. It also details any transfers to earmarked reserves that are included within
these variances, to clearly show the net impact on the General Fund. The use of
earmarked reserves involves a complex process, with treatment varying depending on
when the funding is received. During the financial year, any anticipated expenditure
funded from existing earmarked reserves is supported by a temporary in-year budget and a
corresponding funding budget. This arrangement ensures that any variances are managed
appropriately and are reflected in the Budget figures presented in this report. For other
funding received during the year, it is generally assumed that the funds will be spent within
the same year. However, if any portion remains unspent at year-end—and if the terms of
the funding allow—it is transferred to an earmarked reserve. These pending transfers are
detailed in the table below to show their actual impact on the General Fund; £3,149,000 to
other earmarked reserves.     
Budget  Actual  Year End
Variance
Under/
(over)
Transfer to
Earmarked
Reserves
Impact on
General
Fund 
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Education, Resources and
Community
6,985 6,555 430   430
Education 118,797 117,898 899 1,522 (623)
General Services Housing
and Property
4,018 3,640 378 437 (59)
Environmental and
Commercial Services
29,360 30,171 (811)  (811)
Economic Growth and
Development Services
3,908 2,558 1,350 841 509
HR, ICT and Organisational
Development
6,085 6,006 79  79
Financial Services 1,735 620 1,115  1,115
Governance, Strategy and
Performance
6,259 5,817 442 349 93
Other Services 3,232 3,386 (154)  (154)
Health and Social Care
and Children’s Services
(MIJB)
83,956 83,956 -  -
Health and Social Care
(non MIJB)
460 367 93  93
Page 19

Page 20

Loans Charges 22,352 28,780 (6,428)  (6,428)
Provisions 1,600 - 1,600  1,600      
Total 288,747 289,754 (1,007) 3,149 (4,156) 
5.8  Each Service area’s main actual versus projected budget variations are outlined below.   
Education, Resources and Community
5.9  The Service underspend has increased by £204,000 from the Q3 projection to £430,000.   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Vacancies 242 210 32    
Income   
Sport and Leisure 95 65 30
Shortfall in Libraries (12) (9) (3)    
Other   
PPP insurance reconciliation 137 - 137
PPP contract deductions (28) (25) (3)
Purchase of library books (27) (10) (17)
Misc Variances (11) (5) (6)
Funding transferred to earmarked
reserves (PB Community grants)
34 - 34
Net Underspend 430 226 204 
5.10  A delay in recruitment resulted in a higher than anticipated vacancy variance. Leisure
services generated increased income during Q4. An additional unexpected variance arose
from the PPP, where an insurance reconciliation due this year resulted in a £137,000
refund. Delays in supplier publication requests led to library book budget overspend in
2024/25. To prevent recurrence, the budget has been reduced by 5%, with improved
monthly tracking and plans to address rising e-content and public request demands.
Payment of a community grant to Buckie Youth Space was delayed due to the planned
grant-funded works being delayed, leading to an underspend that will need to be carried
forward in an earmarked reserve.   
Education
5.11  The Service under spend has increased from a projected £113,000 to actual £889,000 but
most of this is attributable to earmarked reserves. 
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Page 20

Page 21

Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Staffing   
Central Supply (607) (600) (7)
On costs across Primary and
Secondary
21 120 (99)
Vacancy target overachieved 747 995 (248)    
Other   
Out of Area placements (541) (430) (111)
School Sanitary products 23 23 -
Speech and Language Therapy
service
51 45 6
ELC Partner providers (599) (125) (474)
Energy costs additional budget not
required
227 - 227
Transfer to earmarked reserves (DSM,
PEF, SEF, Care Experienced, ELC
snack)
1,259 - 1,259
DSM Saving – carry forwards to be
reduced (*instead of 2025/26)
200 - 200
Misc Variances 118 85 33
Net Underspend 899 113 786 
5.12  The over achievement of the Vacancy Target has reduced from that projected due to
additional ASN/ARG allocations given in Q4. Expenditure on Out of Area placements
increased from that projected as an extension to two current placements until 31/3/25
was approved, and there were three new placements and a back dated payment due to
Scotland Excel for a contract increase (a separate paper was reported to Education,
Childcare and Leisure Services Committee on 13/5/25 on the OOA current position). The
ELC service predicted an overspend in payments to partner providers, although this is
greater than predicted at £599,000, relating mainly to the January intake. The service is
currently working on a forecasting tool for next session. Across all schools, there is an
underspend of £116,000 in Primary and £271,000 in Secondary within the Devolved
School Management (DSM) scheme. Additionally, there are underspends of £763,000 in
Pupil Equity Funding (PEF), £232,000 in Strategic Equity Funding (SEF), and £22,000 in the
Care Experienced Children and Young People fund. These figures reflect spending over the
financial year, with the underspent amounts carried forward in earmarked reserves to
support expenditure over the academic year.   
General Services Housing and Property
5.13  There is a higher than forecast underspend for the Service compared to Q3, largely due to
less expenditure on repairs and maintenance.   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
Q3
Anticipated Page 21

Page 22

£000 Variance
£000
Staffing   
Staff savings 218 256 (38)    
Income   
Property Fee income (131) (130) (1)
Industrial Estate rental income and
wayleaves
167 140 27    
Other   
Corporate Buildings repairs and
maintenance
27 (100) 127
School buildings repairs and
maintenance
(41) (150) 109
Surplus Property running costs and
less income from sales
68 (70) 138
Homeless temporary
accommodation
95 130 (35)
Misc Variances (25) - (25)
Net Underspend 378 76 302 
5.14  Repairs and maintenance for Corporate Buildings and Schools ended the year £236,000
less than the overspend forecast at Q3. In the final quarter, only emergency expenditures
were allowed in an effort to control the expected overspend. Income from surplus property
sales was initially projected to be below target and, along with running costs, the budget
for surplus property was projected to be overspent by £70,000. However, this position
reversed by year-end, primarily due to revenue sales.   
Environmental and Commercial Services
5.15  Environmental and Commercial Services is overspent by £811,000. Overall, there is an
adverse movement of £462,000 from the previously reported projection.   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Vacancies above target 301 51 250    
Income   
Catering income (secondary schools) 151 128 23
Roads Maintenance recharge to
Capital
(1,463) (344) (1,119)
Fleet Service shortfall in taxi testing (10) (10) -
Fleet Services recharges 151 210 (59)
Burial Ground income (113) (68) (45)
Page 22

Page 23

Other   
Building Catering and Cleaning (other) 22 (14) 36
Roads Maintenance – Winter Maint. (658) (263) (395)
Roads Maintenance – other 689 - 689
Waste Management 394 97 297
Engineering Design (55) 103 (158)
Transportation (303) (414) 111
Open Spaces (excl. Burial Ground
income)
79 50 29 
Directorate 4 - 4
Net Overspend (811) (474) (337) 
5.16  The over achievement of the Vacancy Target for Environmental and Commercial Services
increased by £250,000. Service specific variations are: 
Building Catering and Cleaning - Catering income exceeded projections by £23,000, driven
by increased demand in secondary schools. Additionally, favourable variances were
reported in food, materials, and equipment costs by the end of Q4. 
The overspend in Roads Maintenance during the year was primarily due to a misalignment
between the recharge budget in the revenue account and the actual capital expenditure.
Consequently, the anticipated recharge income was not fully realised, leading to an
income shortfall. This emphasises the need for better coordination between capital
programme planning and revenue budgeting. The service is now actively working to
improve this alignment for the 2025/26 capital programme, particularly in relation to
revenue requirements for staffing, vehicles and other plant. Budgeting for winter
maintenance is challenging due to the unpredictable nature of weather conditions. The
budget is typically set based on the assumption of a mild winter to manage financial risk,
which often results in overspends during harsher or prolonged winter periods. Other
Roads Maintenance budgets were favourable as the recharges to the revenue programme
and external works, exceeded budget. 
In Fleet Services there were increased costs of hiring, running and maintenance of
vehicles. This resulted in increased internal recharges to other services, showing here as a
favourable variance to Fleet Services, although it is important to note that these remain
over-budget costs to the Council. The projected overall surplus at Q3 was not achieved
due to a review of recharges which identified and corrected overcharges prior to year-end. 
In Waste Management, expenditure on waste disposal at the NESS Energy for Waste
facility was £159,000 below the landfill tax budget for 2024/25. Budgets will be reviewed in
2025/26 to assess ongoing costs and identify potential savings following the closure of the
Dallachy Landfill Site. Income from recycling, tipping, and gas extraction also
outperformed Q3 estimates, with an overall under spend in Waste of £394,000 
Engineering Design – Infrastructure Maintenance was initially expected to remain within
budget, as projected at Q3. However, the service ultimately recorded an overspend, a
portion of which is attributable to recoverable works. While income did exceed the original
budget by £25,000, it fell short of the Q3 estimated outturn of £108,000. This shortfall was
Page 23

Page 24

influenced by a late adjustment for an approved £40,000 budget saving attributed to
additional income from service users, along with a reduction in capital recharges. 
Transportation - Harbours income significantly exceeded Q3 projections. Staffing
vacancies early in the year caused delayed invoicing until Q4, making revenue forecasting
challenging, particularly due to recent windfarm activities near Buckie Harbour. Income
from road closures and street occupations was also well above expectations, attributed to
prolonged roadworks in certain areas. However, car park income fell short by £73,000
more than expected at Q3, potentially impacted by the closure of the St Giles Shopping
Centre. 
Burial Grounds, managed under Open Spaces, initially projected a £68,000 shortfall in
income from lair and interment sales. However, the year-end position was more adverse,
with a deficit of £113,000. Charges were reviewed to ensure full cost recovery, with revised
rates implemented from 1 April 2024. Further refinements have been incorporated into the
2025/26 charging methodology to improve accuracy. Underspends within costs reduce the
overall overspend on Burial Grounds to £90,000. Open Spaces, in total, was £34,000 over
budget at year end.   
Economic Growth and Development Services
5.17  The budget shows an underspend of £753,000, which represents a favourable variation of
£345,000 compared to the position reported in February. This change is due to several
factors, as outlined below.   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Vacancies above target 377 300 77
Redundancy Costs (*funded from
Council Priorities reserve)
(27) (27) -    
Income   
Building Standards 70 30 40
Environmental Health 55 26 29
Planning 89 - 89    
Projects/Initiatives (Economic
Development/Strategic
Planning/Business Gateway/Climate
Change
80 79 1
Supplies and Services 71 - 71
Misc Variances 38 - 38
Transfers to earmarked reserves 597 - 597
Net Underspend 1,350 408 942 
Page 24

Page 25

5.18  Vacancy savings between Q3 and Q4 exceeded the original estimate by £77,000. Planning
fee income significantly outperformed projections due to several large applications
received during Q4. Additionally, income from building standards applications and
landlord registration fees was higher than anticipated at Q3. Further grant income of
£200,000 was received from the Place Based Investment Fund to support future work on
the Forres Conservation and Heritage Scheme. This funding, along with £140,000 in
capacity funding for the Long Term Town Plan and £257,000 of Coastal Communities
funding, will be transferred to earmarked reserves for use in future years.   
HR, ICT and Organisational Development
5.19  The service is reporting a year-end underspend of £79,000, a significant improvement from
the overspend projected in the previous report. 
5.20   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Vacancy target shortfall (24) (32) 8        
Central telephones (53) (40) (13)
Training 115 50 65
Misc Variances 41 - 41
Net Under/(Over)spend 79 (22) 101 
5.21  Organisational Development projected an underspend on training, by year end this was
£65,000 higher than originally forecast. Additionally, HR and ICT allocations showed a
favourable £34,000 underspend, primarily due to higher-than-budgeted recharge income
to HRA etc.   
Financial Services
5.22  At year-end, Financial Services budget reports an underspend of £1,114,000, a decrease
of £253,000 from the previous quarter’s forecast. This variance is influenced by several
factors within this budget heading. 
5.23   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Staff savings 114 91 23    
Income   
Interest on Revenue Balances (IORB) 1,750 2,054 (304)
Legal cases (555) (490) (65) Page 25

Page 26

NDR Reliefs (141) (149) 8
Small Scale Service Improvement 91 15 76
Misc Variances (144) (154) 10
Net Under/(Over)spend 1,115 1,367 (252) 
5.24  The variation in the IORB forecast was £304,000, primarily due to moving balances in Q4
and transfers of interest out of revenue to capital reserves and statutory funds as
highlighted in paragraph 5.3. Legal costs showed a £65,000 increased overspend from that
projected, largely resulting from the transfer of case-related expenses from Children’s
Services during the same period. Meanwhile, the Small Scale Service Improvement
budget recorded a £76,000 underspend, as the planned HR iTrent project did not
commence in 2024/25.   
Governance, Strategy and Performance
5.25  The service shows an underspend of £443,000, which represents a favourable variation of
£334,000 compared to the Q3 position, but mainly relating to ear-marked reserves. 
5.26   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Staff savings 81 92 (11)    
Income   
Income Surplus 86 108 (22)    
Housing Benefits (70) (50) (20)
Software costs (52) (52) -
By-Election expenses (38) (24) (14)
Members allowances and expenses 32 20 12
Transfer to earmarked reserve -
Scottish Welfare Fund
296 - 296
Misc Variances 107 15 93
Net Underspend 442 109 333 
5.27  The Scottish Welfare Fund reported an underspend of £296,000, which was not
anticipated at Q3. This underspend will be held within the earmarked portion of the
General Fund for future use. Additionally, miscellaneous variances resulted in a £93,000
higher underspend than forecast. This includes a £19,000 holiday pay accrual, £35,000
from CSS allocations to the HRA/DLO and £13,000 funding for Community Planning,
which will also be carried forward within an earmarked reserve. The remaining £26,000
relates to various other minor underspends.   
Other
5.28  Expenditure within the ‘Other’ heading includes costs associated with supernumerary
posts and voluntary redundancy payments. These costs are being funded from the
Page 26

Page 27

Council Priorities Reserve, ensuring they do not impact core service budgets. Additionally,
the category includes increased pension-related costs, including Strain on Fund charges.
These arise when employees retire early, and the pension fund must cover the shortfall
created by the early payment of benefits. As these costs are not budgeted within service
areas, they will also be met from Council Priorities reserve. A corresponding budget
adjustment was made in the final quarter to align the use of reserves with the actual
expenditure, which had increased compared to the Q3 expectation. 
5.29   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Staffing   
Supernumerary, Redundancy and
Strain on Fund costs *
(816) (640) (176)
Additional Pensions (48) (52) 4    
Misc Variances (106) (125) 19
*Funded from Earmarked reserve 816 - 816
Net Under/(Over)spend (154) (817) 663 
Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB)
5.30  At Q3 the Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB) was forecasting an overspend of
£5,514,000, with the Council responsible for 47% of this amount - £2,592,000. Based on
the forecast recurring overspend within the MIJB when the Council’s budget was set, the
Council had included a £5,000,000 provision during budget setting to cover its share. The
final outturn showed a reduced overspend of £4,257,000, resulting in the Council drawing
down a smaller portion of the provision than anticipated - £2,001,000. However, due to
late ledger entries in the Council which required partner funding, as the agreed deadline
dates of final figures had passed and the NHS accounts had already closed, preventing
them from processing their share, it was agreed that the Council would temporarily cover
the full amount. This resulted in an additional cost of £61,000 which will be recovered from
the NHS through an adjustment in 2025/26.
5.31   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
MIJB overspend (4,257) (5,514) 1,257
Council’s 47% share of overspend (2,001) (2,592) 591     
5.32  The Health and Social Care non MIJB element is £93,000 under budget at year-end,
compared to £108,000 forecast underspend.  
Page 27

Page 28

Loans Charges
5.33  A discrepancy was identified in the calculation of full-year interest costs, where the fourth
quarter interest due was inadvertently omitted. In addition, a new loan was taken out
during Q4 and interest fell due on that on 31 March 2025.  This resulted in capital loans
charges being £3,298,000 higher than anticipated at Q3. The discrepancy arose from
unaccounted interest on both temporary and long-term borrowing. This, along with an
interest payment made in April 2024 related to long-term borrowing that should have been
attributed to the 2023/24 financial year, has resulted in the overspend. These issues have
been resolved, and a new procedure is now in place to improve the accuracy of future loan
forecasts. 
5.34   
June 2025
Report
Feb 2025
Report  Movement
Fav/(Unfav)
£000
Full Year
Variance
£000
Q3
Anticipated
Variance
£000
Loans Interest (5,774) (3,000) (2,774)
Loans Principal (424) - (424)
Transfer Interest (IORB) to Capital
reserves 
(230) - (230)    
Net Overspend (6,428) (3,000) (3,428) 
5.35  Provisions 
Provisions within the budget include allocations for known financial pressures, anticipated
inflationary uplifts, and planned savings. At year-end, the total provision stood at
£1,600,000. This represents an increase of £580,000 compared to the Q3 estimate, which
projected an overspend of £1,020,000. The final position reflects a combination of factors:
notably, unused provision of £3,000,000 set aside for the Council’s share of the MIJB
deficit, and an increased drawdown on inflation-related provisions, primarily to fund the
agreed pay award. Further detail on the pay award impact is provided in paragraph 5.37.   
General Revenue Grant 
5.36  At Q3, the total revenue funding (excluding specific grants) for the Council was estimated
at £225,308,000, as outlined in Finance Circular 10/2024. Since then, an additional £21
million in funding has been allocated to support the 2023/24 Local Government Pay
Award, with the Council’s share amounting to £351,000. The budgeted grant has been
updated accordingly to reflect this additional allocation. 
Local Government Pay Award
5.37  The funding package provided by the Scottish Government for the 2024/25 local
government pay award has been complex. The agreed pay award for local government
employees was 3.6% or £0.67 per hour, whichever is greater, applied to each spinal
column point. In addition, the Scottish Local Government Living Wage increased by 5.63%
to £12.56 per hour. These changes, effective from 1 April 2024, exceeded initial budget
assumptions and the funding made available by Scottish Government to support the pay
award, and as a result, increased reliance on reserves has been necessary to manage the
resulting shortfall. The total cost of the pay award in 2024/25 was £7,046,000 with
Page 28

Page 29

budgeted provision and Scottish Government funding totalling £3,409,000 has created an
additional recurring cost of over £1,800,000.   
Council Tax Income
5.38  At the time of setting the budget, Council Tax income was projected at £51,375,000.
Following an increase in the Council Tax base and in anticipation of the implementation of
a spend-to-save initiative to generate additional income, the budget was revised to
£51,854,000. After accounting for the transfer to the Housing Revenue Account for
Council Tax on second homes, the net income stands at £51,836,000—effectively on the
increased target, with  in-year collection rate of 95.7% (2023/24: 95.8%).   
Approved Savings 2024/25
5.39  To balance the 2024/25 budget, recurring savings of £9,258,000 were approved at the time
of budget setting, alongside £1,216,000 of savings carried forward from 2023/24. During
the year, an additional £2,959,000 in savings were approved. These savings were allocated
to departmental budgets during the year; however, if any are no longer considered
deliverable, they are either removed (classified as red) or deferred to future years (amber).
APPENDIX 3 details and the table below summarises the current status of all savings.
Achieved savings, totalling £11,240,000 are classed as green, £1,127,000 as amber and
have been deferred to future years, while those marked red total £1,066,000.    
Service Red
Savings
£000
Amber
Savings
£000
Green
Savings
£000
Total
Savings
£000
Children’s Services 22  - 454 476
Cross Service/Corporate 477 20 5,004 5,501
Economic Growth and Development 2 95 367 464
Education - 31 934 965
Education Resources and
Communities
40 - 1,761 1,801
Environmental & Commercial Services  353 840 1,087 2,280
Financial Services - - 531 531
Housing and Property 42 - 448 490
Governance, Strategy & Performance - 36 300 336
HR, ICT and Organisational
Development
10 - 109 119
I&M programme/Transformation 181 44 245 470
Total 1,127 1,066 11,240 13,433 
Budget Pressure
5.40  The following table details one recommendation to include in Budget Pressures in
2025/26, due to committed expenditure. It is anticipated that the expenditure will be
covered by additional income generated by the service during the year.  
Section Description Para
ref
£000
Page 29

Page 30

Transportation Local Development Plan
Transport studies
5.40 29
Total   29 
5.41  Planning authorities have a statutory requirement to set out a timetable for the
review/production of their Local Development Plan (LDP) in the form of a Development
Plan Scheme (DPS) and to submit this annually to the Scottish Government. Work on the
Local Development Plan 2027 commenced in 2023/24 and continued in 2024/25 and into
2025/26.  A budget pressure was identified of £100,000 in 2024/25 and £50,000 in
2025/26. Other costs required to inform and develop the LDP will be met from the LDP
annual. There are commitments of £29,000 for ongoing work within the Local
Development Plan from the 2024/25 planned works that have slipped and are committed
to be funded next year.   
Reserves
5.42  The Council needs to retain a certain level of free reserves in case of unforeseen
contingencies or emergencies. The balance on free general reserves (i.e. excluding DSM
and ear-marked reserves) as at 1 April 2024 was £6,000,000. This is the minimum level of
reserves that can be held on free general reserves in terms of the Council’s financial
reserves policy, recently reviewed and approved by Council on 25 September 2024
(paragraph 15 of the minute refers).  
5.43  In addition to the free general reserve, the Council maintains several earmarked reserves
designated for specific purposes. These include reserves for Transformation, cash flow for
the Moray Growth Deal, Council Priorities, and other service-specific areas such as DSM.
Due to the timing of funding allocations and delays in project delivery, some funds may
remain unspent, leading to an accumulation in reserve balances. To ensure these funds
are preserved and managed separately from the Council’s general working reserves,
earmarked reserves allow for the controlled release of funds as expenditures occur, in
accordance with approved plans. The Working reserve has currently been used to cover
any funding shortfalls. The table below shows the planned use of reserves in 2024/25; the
original budget approved, the Q3 anticipated use of reserves, compared with the actual
use of reserves in the year. The balance of reserves are shown. A comprehensive list of
earmarked reserves is provided in APPENDIX 4.     
Budgeted
Use of
Reserves
Q3
Anticipated
Use of
Reserves
Actual
Use of
Reserve
2024/25
Opening
Balance
1/4/24
Transfer
In/(Out)
Closing
Balance
31/3/25 
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
General - - - 6,000 - 6,000       
Earmarked      
Working 10,156 6,477 *8,693 8,693 (8,693) -
DSM - 1,465 540 753 (540) 213
Transformation 731 784 260 6,152 (260) 5,892
Council Priorities - 831 3,134 3,134 (3,134) -
Moray Growth
Deal
1,136 1,136 301 4,000 (301) 3,699
Page 30

Page 31

Service
Concession
- - - 7,526 - 7,526
Other Earmarked
(App 4)
- 1,204 (881) 5,073 881 5,954
Total 12,023 11,897 12,047 41,331 (12,047) 29,284 
5.44  * A correction has been made in 2024/25 to adjust for an error in 2022/23 where an asset
under construction was incorrectly written off to revenue. The correction has been posted
this year, increasing General Fund Reserves (Working reserve) opening balance by £7,000
to £8,693,000.  
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  X
Policy and Legal  X
Financial X 
Risk X 
Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital  X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
Page 31

Page 32

6.3  Policy and Legal 
There are no policy or legal implications arising directly from this report.  
6.4  Financial 
The financial implications are noted within the body of the report and in APPENDICES 1-4. 
One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments       
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments       
6.5  Risk 
The actual overspend incurred during the year has fully depleted the Council’s Working
reserve, which has served as a financial safeguard in recent years. While department
savings exceeding £11,000,000 have been posted against service budgets, these are now
significantly impacting the variance between budgeted and actual outturn figures. This
level of reliance on reserves and in-year savings is not sustainable and, if continued,
present a serious risk to the Council’s financial stability and long-term planning.  In
recognition of this the Council’s budget for 2025/26 balances without the use of reserves.    
6.6  Staffing 
There are no staffing implications arising directly from this report.  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
There are no best value and transformation implications arising directly from this report.  
6.8  Property 
There are no property implications arising directly from this report.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
There are no information communication/technology/digital implications arising directly
from this report.  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
There are no equalities issues arising directly from this report.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
There are no climate change or biodiversity issues arising directly from this report. 
Achieving the target of net zero will have significant implications for future planned capital
expenditure.
Page 32

Page 33

7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with Heads of Service and any comments
made have been incorporated into the report.  
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  All background papers held by the author within accountancy service.   
Page 33

Page 34

APPENDIX 1 
Moray Council Outturn v Forecast Forecast
As at 31st March 2025 Outturn Var vs
Actual at 31.12.25 Prediction
£'000s £'000s £'000s
SERVICE
Education 6,555 6,759 204
Education Resources & Communities 117,898 118,684 786
General Services Housing & Property 3,640 3,942 302
Environmental & Commercial Services 30,171 29,834 (337)
Economic Growth & Development 2,558 3,500 942
HR, ICT & Organisational Development 6,006 6,107 101
Financial Services 620 368 (252)
Governance, Strategy & Performance 5,817 6,150 333
Other Services 3,386 4,049 663
Transfer of Interest to Capital Reserves & Stat Funds 230 0 (230)
SERVICES excl MIJB 176,881 179,393 2,512
Health and Social Care and Children's Services 83,956 86,548 2,592
Health and Social Care (non MIJB) 367 352 (15)
TOTAL SERVICES incl MIJB 261,204 266,293 5,089
Loans Charges 28,550 25,352 (3,198)
Provision for Contingencies and Inflation 0 15 15
Additional Costs 0 (1,938) (1,938)
Additional Costs - Covid 0 0 0
Unallocated Savings 0 1,448 1,448
TOTAL PROVISIONS 0 (475) (475)
TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE 289,754 291,170 1,416
Commentary
Education, Resources and Communities: alongside funding to be transferred to
earmarked reserves, there was an unexpected underspend from the PPP, due to
an insurance reconciliation resulting in a refund.
Education: Underspends have been transferred to earmarked reserves for
Devolved School Management and Education Attainment Fund.
Environmental and Commerical Services: a mixture of over and under spends,
including Winter Maintenance, as budgeting for WM is challenging due to the
unpredictable nature of weather conditions. The budget is typically set based on
the assumption of a mild winter to manage financial risk.
Economic Growth and Development: Income from planning and building
standards applications were higher than expected. Funding received to be
transferred to earmarked reserves for a number of projects totals £597k.
2.3%
40.7%
1.4%
10.2%
1.2%2.1%0.1%2.1%
1.4%
29.8%
8.7%
Predicted Outturn % of Total
Education Education Resources & Communities
General Services Housing & Property Environmental & Commercial Services
Economic Growth & Development HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Performance
Other Services Health and Social Care and Children's Services
204
786
302
(337)
942
101
(252)
333
663
2,577
(3,428)
(4,000) (3,000) (2,000) (1,000) 0 1,000 2,000 3,000
Education
Education Resources & Communities
General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services
Economic Growth & Development
HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services
Governance, Strategy & Performance
Other Services
Health and Social Care and Children's Services
Loans Charges
Variance vs Prediction £000's
2.3%
40.7%
1.3%10.4%0.9%2.1%
0.2%
2.0%
1.2%
29.1%
9.9%Actual % of Total
Education Education Resources & Communities
General Services Housing & Property Environmental & Commercial Services
Economic Growth & Development HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Performance
Other Services Health and Social Care and Children's Services
Page 34

Page 35

APPENDIX 2 
Moray Council Outturn report
As at 31st March 2025 Var vs
Actual Budget Budget
£'000s £'000s £'000s
SERVICE
Education 6,555 6,985 430
Education Resources & Communities 117,898 118,797 899
General Services Housing & Property 3,640 4,018 378
Environmental & Commercial Services 30,171 29,360 (811)
Economic Growth & Development 2,558 3,908 1,350
HR, ICT & Organisational Development 6,006 6,085 79
Financial Services 620 1,735 1,115
Governance, Strategy & Performance 5,817 6,259 442
Other Services 3,386 3,232 (154)
Transfer of Interest to Capital Reserves & Stat Funds 230 0 (230)
SERVICES excl MIJB 176,881 180,379 3,498
Health and Social Care and Children's Services 83,956 83,956 0
Health and Social Care (non MIJB) 367 460 93
TOTAL SERVICES incl MIJB 261,204 264,795 3,591
Loans Charges 28,550 22,352 (6,198)
Provision for Contingencies and Inflation 0 (4,569) (4,569)
Additional Costs 0 6,024 6,024
Additional Costs - Covid 0 0 0
Unallocated Savings 0 145 145
TOTAL PROVISIONS 0 1,600 1,600
TOTAL GENERAL SERVICES EXPENDITURE 289,754 288,747 (1,007)
Commentary
Loans Charges: an interest payment made in April 2024 related to long-term borrowing
that should have been attributed to the 2023/24 financial year
Underspends in service budgets that require transfers in to earmarked reserves in the
year total £1.629m: Education £0.159m, Economic Growth and Development £0.597m,
Governance, Strategy and Performance £0.349m, and Whole Family Wellbeing Fund
(Children's) £0.524m.
Environmental & Commercial Services: the expected level of recharges to the Roads
capital programme was not fully achieved, resulting in an underachievement on revenue
income for Roads Maintenance. Also the Winter Maintenance budget was over budget
due to budgeting for a mild winter. Other Roads Maintenance budgets were favourable
as the recharges to the revenue programme and external works exceeded budget.
Financial Services: Interest on Revenue Balances £1.7m above budget, partly offset
the overspend on Loans Charges.
2.4%
41.4%
1.4%10.2%1.4%2.1%0.6%
2.2%
1.1%
29.4%
7.8%
Budget % of Total
Education Education Resources & Communities
General Services Housing & Property Environmental & Commercial Services
Economic Growth & Development HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Performance
Other Services Health and Social Care and Children's Services
430
899
378
(811)
1,350
79
1,115
442
(154)
93
(1,000) (500) 0 500 1,000 1,500
Education
Education Resources & Communities
General Services Housing & Property
Environmental & Commercial Services
Economic Growth & Development
HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services
Governance, Strategy & Performance
Other Services
Health and Social Care and Children's Services
Variance vs Budget £000's
2.3%
40.7%
1.3%
10.4%0.9%2.1%0.2%
2.0%
1.2%
29.1%
9.9%Actual % of Total
Education Education Resources & Communities
General Services Housing & Property Environmental & Commercial Services
Economic Growth & Development HR, ICT & Organisational Development
Financial Services Governance, Strategy & Performance
Other Services Health and Social Care and Children's Services
Page 35

Page 36

APPENDIX 3 
SAVINGS STATUS 2024/25 
Red
Savings
£000
Amber
Savings
£000
Green
Savings
£000
Total
£000
Reason for red savings
Childrens Services
Children's Services saving 454 454
Reduction in reinvestment costs 22 22 Originally to be taken from Children's
Services but unachieved
Corporate/Cross Service
EV / ULE salary sacrifice 20 20
Increase vacancy factor in line with pay awards 447 193 640 Budgeted savings linked to pay award
uplift. To be reviewed in 25/26
NESPF rate decrease from 19.3% to 14.3% 4455 4455
Review of purchasing card 30 30 Saving from enhanced VAT recovery on
purchase cards; unrelated to
departmental budgets
Charges for Services 356 356
Economic Growth and Development
Building st - enforcement 18 18
Building Standards 24 24
Planning post (E2-6) 49 49
Admin - Restructure 34 34
Economic Development - Business Gateway Advisor post (0.2FTE) 12 12
Economic Growth and Development - misc 2 2
Employability - restructure the service 14 14
Environmental Health (Appendix 5 item 10) 12 36 48
Environmental Health - Remove 1 Animal Services Officer post 30 30
Fair Trading 38 38
Page 36

Page 37

APPENDIX 3 
Red
Savings
£000
Amber
Savings
£000
Green
Savings
£000
Total
£000
Reason for red savings
Moray Training - VER 2 100 102
Saving achieved was below estimate but
not material
Planning Income 4 4
Statutory fees for planning applications 40 40
Strategic Planning - misc 15 15
Strategic Planning (Appendix 4 item 10) 34 34
Education
Amend Cullen/Portgordon/Portknockie pairing fm Aug 24 10 10
Central Education - Remove 1QIM 24 85 109
Early Learning & Childcare (ELC) - Delete Early Years PSA 12 12
East End/St Sylvester Federation Model (fye 2025-26) 15 15
ELC - Reduce Early Years teaching team by 2 posts 83 83
ELC CMP - NM's wks & 36.25-35hrs saving 62 62
ELC CMP - YR to TT savings 24/25 81 81
ELC CMP YR to TT saving 24/25 - Addition 2 2
ELC Rental Income 31 31
Knockando PS unpairing from Apr 24 48 48
Learning Technologist 7 43 50
MGD EY Stem PM end of funding 58 58
Primary - Pupil teacher ration move to statutory requirement 42 42
Primary Advisor role 15 15
Schools Energy saving 150 150
Secondary Schools - Reduce DSM 192 192
St Thomas & St Peters pairing fm Apr 24 5 5
Education Resources and Communities
Business Admin - Remove 4 fte posts 111 111
Communities Team - Reduce community capacity training budget 4 4
Communities Team - Remove 1 Outdoor Learning post 60 60
Page 37

Page 38

APPENDIX 3 
Red
Savings
£000
Amber
Savings
£000
Green
Savings
£000
Total
£000
Reason for red savings
Education Resources and Communities (continued)
Communities Team - Remove 1.75fte from the  CSU 88 88
Elgin Community Centre closure - VER 40 123 163
The balance of the saving will not be
achieved until the building is sold
Library contract management systems 7 7
Primary School FM - Delete PAT testing post and contract out 27 27
Auchernack 23 23
Service Concession 1247 1247
Sport and Culture - Remove Health and Wellbeing Officer post 51 51
Sport and Culture - Replace mobile library with redesigned service 20 20
Environmental & Commercial Services
Admin - Remove 1fte 31 31
Bakery budget saving part yr 2 2
Building cleaning HQ 20 20
Catering - Dynamic Pricing 6 6
Catering - Withdraw from Food for Life 70 70
D11-3 FRA and DIA - charges 20 20
D11-4 COMAH fee 20 20
Dallachy - closure 617 617
Elgin Car Parking Review - fye 311 311
Energy from Waste reduced gate fee due to Electricity generation 150 150
Fleet - Lease Specialist Vehicles 76 76
Harbours commercial income 30 30
Lands and Parks - reduce Glyphosate use 8 8
Open Spaces - HRA OAP cuts (4 p.a.) 61 61
Open Spaces - Maintain parks of Common Good/Trust land 47 45 92
Savings reliant on Common Good and
Trust Fund income. Will vary year on
year
Open Spaces - Uplift burial charges to full cost recovery 165 165
Cost recovery model introduced, but did
not generate savings
Page 38

Page 39

APPENDIX 3 
Red
Savings
£000
Amber
Savings
£000
Green
Savings
£000
Total
£000
Reason for red savings
Environmental & Commercial Services (continued)
Roads maintenance - hire out machinery 100 100
Roads Maintenance - Reduce operational staff by 3fte 102 102
Roads Maintenance - Reduce street lighting maintenance budget 25 25
Sponsorship income 10 10 Income generation was not achieved
Stop School Transport on In Service Days 6 6
Waste Management - Increase charges for garden waste to £50 131 177 308
Budget updated to reflect actual
additional income received
Waste Management - Reduce HWRC opening hours (close 1 weekday) 47 3 50
Financial Services
Discretionary NDR Relief 27 27
Empty Property Relief 338 338
F6-14  Increase CTX collection rate 30 30
F6-15 Accountancy - Principal Accountant post 15 15
F6-16 Payments - AP post 31 31
F6-16 Payments - AP Software 6 6
F6-17 Financial systems - Development 6 6
F6-18 Misc Finance - Purchasing card rebate 10 10
Internal Audit - recharges to outside bodies 20 20
Procurement - Reduce the Buying Team by 1fte 32 32
Scottish Water Fee 6 6
Taxation - recharges to outside bodies 10 10
Housing and Property
Homelessness - Allocate a further 5 flats for accommodation 5 5
Homelessness - Negotiate discount for block purchased temp accom 96 96
Housing General Services - Reallocate duties to HRA 8 8
Housing Needs - Allocate 50% of Housing Support costs to HRA 220 220
Langstane rental 8 8
MC 25.9.24 Sale of 30/32 High St 2 2
Page 39

Page 40

APPENDIX 3 
Red
Savings
£000
Amber
Savings
£000
Green
Savings
£000
Total
£000
Reason for red savings
Housing and Property (continued)
Property - Close two corporate offices 44 44
Property - Take a more commercial approach to rent reviews 65 65
Temporary Accommodation - increased charging policy 42 42
This was already taken as part of
opening postion budget adjustments.
Possibility for further savings.
Governanance Strategy & Performance 0
Customer Service - Print contract 13 13
Customer Service - Reduce Contact Centre staff by 4fte 114 114
Welfare Benefits & Money Advice - Co-locate Citizen's Advice Bureau 20 20
Democratic/Legal Services (inc Members) savings 18 18
Performance monitoring 16 36 52
Fraud post 24 24
Money Advice 95 95
HR, ICT and Organisational Development
Corporate Training 57 57
F8-7 Health and Safety - Specialist advice 10 10 Duplicate saving taken in 2023/24
HR  - Cease central short leating 49 49
HR, ICT and OD - misc 3 3
I&M programme/Transformation
Care placements 245 245
LEAN review 125 125 Saving to be confirmed and profiled. A further £125k saving in 2025/26
Stream 2: ICT & Digital - Schools Admin 56 56 Saving to be confirmed
Stream 4: Review & Expansion of Flexible Working 44 44
Total 1,127      1,066      11,240    13,433   
Page 40

Page 41

APPENDIX 4 
OTHER EARMARKED RESERVES 2024/25 
Opening
Balance
Transfers
In
Transfers
(Out)
Closing
Balance
£000 £000 £000 £000
Education Attainment Fund (SEF/PEF/Care
Experienced Fund) 920 998 (897) 1,021
ELC Snack/Fundraising Accounts 34 (9) 25
Dornell Windfarm 76 (10) 66
Scottish Welfare Fund 0 296 296
Sanquhar Loch 45 (1) 44
Welfare reform 13 13
Employability YPG 102 (21) 81
Adult Protection 18 18
Refugee Resettlement 2,449 437 (662) 2,224
Whole Family Wellbeing Fund 827 524 (350) 1,001
SSEN Community Resilience Project 196 (18) 178
Employability Child Poverty 97 97
Long Term Town Plan Capacity Funding 50 140 190
Levelling Up Capacity Funding 86 86
DLUHC - Elections Act 2022 15 (11) 4
Youth Work Communities Grants 80 (46) 34
Rothes Way (funding from Visit
Scotland/HITRANS) 30 (30) 0
HIE Procurement Funding 35 35
Placed Based Investment Fund 0 412 (212) 200
Coastal Communities 23/24 and 24/25 0 257 257
Community Planning Partnership 0 53 53
East of Scotland Loans Fund 0 32 32
Total 5073 3,149 (2,268) 5,954
Page 41

Page 42

Page 42

Page 43

Report to:  Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Economy, Environment
and Finance) 
Report No: FIN009/25/LP/LR  
Author: Lesley Rash Contact Email: lesley.rash@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Capital Plan 2024/25 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to inform the Council of the full year expenditure to 31 March
2025 under the capital plan for financial year 2024/25 and to recommend budget
adjustments for inclusion in the Capital Plan for 2025/26 and future years.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (B) five of the Council's Scheme
of Administration relating to monitoring progress of projects in the approved capital plan
including any revisions to the price or phasing on a quarterly basis.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  Capital expenditure for the financial year 2024/25 was £27,219,000 against a revised
budget of £30,268,000 and against an estimated out-turn of £22,541,000 as at 31
December 2024. This represents a delivery rate of 90% of the capital programme.
Equivalent spend in financial year 2023/24 was £30,429,000 against a revised budget of
£42,936,000, representing a delivery rate of 71%. The increase in delivery rate represents
the results of early work on budget profiling, working with budget managers to identify
delivery capacity over delivery appetite. The estimated out-turn was based on only a
marginal improvement in delivery rate being achieved. 
2.2 In total, including carry forwards recommended for approval today, budget of £50,423,000
has been reprofiled into future years during 2024/25. The level of carry forward request at
just under £2,970,000 is reflective of the Council’s ability to deliver the capital plan
(delivery capacity) and the challenges it faces in developing projects at the pace in which it
originally sets out (delivery appetite), particularly the stages from feasibility to
construction. This puts additional pressure on the Council as aging assets, which should
be replaced are instead being maintained as ‘managed decline’ likely requiring more
repairs and maintenance, costs which cannot be covered by the capital plan.
Item 8.
Page 43

Page 44

2.3 The provisional affordability indicator for 2024/25 is 10.75%, exceeding the agreed
threshold of 10%. Previous estimates were based on a lower forecast capital expenditure.
Consideration has been given to the estimation methodology, which has since been
reviewed to mitigate against future under estimation. In addition, the implementation of
the accounting standard IFRS 16 Leases changes the treatment of financing costs for
lease agreements, the impact of which was not known at the time the indicator was set.
However, IFRS 16 does not increase expenditure, it changes how expenditure is disclosed. 
Consideration will be given as to whether the affordability indicator level should be
adjusted in the light of implementation of IFRS 16. 
2.4 The capital plan continues to face several key risks, including rising construction and
material costs that are pushing projects over budget or delaying starts, prompting the use
of early contractor involvement to maintain progress. Limited availability of goods and
labour—especially in Moray’s remote location—has reduced supplier participation, while
aging infrastructure across education, leisure, and roads is under increasing strain due to
delays and funding gaps. The need to rationalise the asset base is acknowledged but
progressing slowly. Additionally, extreme weather patterns, such as high levels of sunshine
and potential drought, pose risks to infrastructure stability. Finally, affordability
constraints are beginning to affect future project timelines, particularly in the Leisure and
Learning Estates, potentially increasing revenue pressures and the risk of asset failure. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that the Council:   
i)  Considers and notes full year expenditure to 31 March 2025 of £27,219,000
against an approved amended budget of £30,268,000 as set out in APPENDIX
1 and against an estimated out-turn of £22,541,000; 
ii)  Approves final carry forwards and amendments to 2025/26 and future years
totalling an increase of £2,970,000; and 
iii)  Considers and notes the provisional affordability indicator for 2024/25 of
10.75%. This is above the agreed threshold of 10%.   
Lesley Rash
Accountant 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The capital plan for 2024/25 totalling £49,662,000, (excluding Moray Growth Deal projects)
was approved by Moray Council on 24 January 2024 (paragraph 11 of the Minute refers). 
The Council approved carried forward budget and reprofiling amendments to future years
of £12,529,000 on 26 June 2024 (paragraph 13 of the Minute refers), amendments of
£3,047,000 at Corporate Committee on 27 August 2024 (paragraph 9 of the Minute refers)
and further amendments of £6,789,000 (including Moray Growth Deal) on 4 December
2024 (paragraph 11 of the minute refers).  The Council on 21 January 2025 (paragraph 7 of
the minute refers) agreed the three-year capital plan for 2025/26-27/28 which included
amendments of £4,134,000 from 2024/25. Further amendments of £9,339,000 were
Page 44

Page 45

approved by Full Council on 19 February 2025 (paragraph X of the meeting refers). The
results of these amendments are an amended capital plan for 2024/25 of £30,268,000  
5.  CAPITAL PLAN  
5.1  A copy of the capital plan for 2024/25 is included as APPENDIX 1. Expenditure to 31
March 2025 was £27,219,000 against an approved budget of £30,268,000 representing a
delivery rate of 90% of the programme, an improvement from the delivery rate of 71% in
2023/24. Capital spend has been funded by General Capital Grant of £8,164,000 from the
Scottish Government and other grants of £8,162,000 of which £5,837,000 was received
for the Moray Growth Deal. Further balances of £1,327,000 have been used from the
Useable Capital Receipts Reserve and £276,000 from receipts generated from sale of
assets. The remaining balance of £9,290,000 is funded from prudential borrowing.  
5.2  A summary of the variances of expenditure from approved budget at the year end is set out
in the extract of APPENDIX 1 below and discussed in more detail in the noted paragraphs.
The extract shows recommended final carry forwards. Carry forward requests from Budget
Managers have been scrutinised and only those that are linked to a commitment i.e. works
already underway or out to tender as at 31 March 2025 have been recommended. Projects
which are funded by external grant are also carried forward, provided the terms of the
funding allow. The final outturn position is then reported after accounting for recommended
carry forward. 
Asset Area Para
ref
(Over) /
Under Spend
Para
ref
Q4 Carry
Forward
Final Out turn
Position 
£000  £000 £000
Bridges 5.3 244 5.4 244 -
Car Parks 5.5 (50) - - (50)
Climate Change 5.6             200 5.7 200 -
Corporate Buildings 5.8  28 5.9 71 43
Fleet 5.10 76 - - (76)
Flood Risk & Coastal
Protection
5.11 29 5.12 29 -
Harbours 5.13          83 5.14 166 83
ICT 5.15 34 5.16 14 (20)
Industrial Portfolio 5.17              238 5.18 161 (77)
Learning Estate 5.19 (340) 5.20 (340) -
Libraries & Leisure 5.21 (123) 5.23 (123) -
Page 45

Page 46

Parks & Open Spaces 5.24 364 5.25 360 4
Road Improvements 5.26 216 5.27 444 (178)
Street Lighting 5.28 (118) - - (118)
Traffic & Road Safety 5.29 1 - - (1)
Waste Management 5.31 1,733 5.32 1,384            (349)
Spend to Save Projects  5.33 19 5.34 (19) -
Other Funded Projects  5.35 - - - -
Economic Development 5.36 71 5.37 47 24
Moray Growth Deal 5.38 180 5.39 180 -
Levelling Up Fund 5.40 164 5.41 164 -
TOTAL  3,049  2,970 (79) 
5.3  Bridges 
Spend of £749,000 was incurred against a budget of £993,000 resulting in an underspend
of £244,000. Bridge refurbishment schemes were completed during 2024/25 at Bridge of
Slateford, Auchriachan Bridge, and Viewmill Bridge. Arthur’s Bridge Feasibility Study and
structural assessments for Lea Bridge and Poolsflagan Bridge were concluded within the
reporting period. Enabling works to support the replacement of Sanquhar Loch Bridge were
also completed. The replacement of Blackhills Culvert has been delayed following higher
than anticipated tender returns and underspends from the Auchriachan Bridge, Viewmill
Bridge, and Arthur’s Bridge projects have been reallocated to support the increased costs.
It is anticipated that the replacement of Blackhills Culvert will now be completed in Q2
2025/26. 
5.4  Bridges Carry Forward 
It is recommended £244,000 is carried forward to allow the completion of the replacement
of Blackhill Culvert. 
5.5 Car Parks 
Spend of £255,000 was incurred against a budget of £205,000 resulting in an overspend of
£50,000. Completed works include replacement of expansion joints at Batchen Lane, Elgin
and resurfacing of Northfields Terrace and Elgin Railway Station. The overspend has been
covered by underspends within the wider Environmental & Commercial Services capital
allocation. 
5.6 Climate Change 
There was nil spend associated with the Climate Change asset category in 2024/25
resulting in an underspend of £200,000. Budget of £213,000 from the original £631,000
budget was reclassified as Fleet expenditure and utilised against the purchase of electric
vehicles. Material and labour shortages in the solar sector alongside capacity within the
Energy Team has resulted in planned works being delayed. A contractor has now been
appointed, and 4 properties are due for upgrades in summer 2025.    
Page 46

Page 47

5.7 Climate Change Carry Forward 
It is recommended £200,000 is carried forward to allow for the completion of solar panel
installations in summer 2025. 
5.8 Corporate Buildings 
Spend of £225,000 was incurred against a budget of £253,000 resulting in an underspend
of £28,000 before accounting for recommended carry forward. The largest spend was
attributable to four back-up generators installed across Moray funded by an SSEN
resilience grant at a cost of £114,000, with remaining balances on legionella and fire risk
assessment upgrades (£56,000); Smarter Working upgrades (£50,000) and corporate
furniture (£5,000).   
5.9 Corporate Buildings Carry Forward 
It is recommended £71,000 is carried forward. This is the balance of the unspent resilience
grant received from SSEN. Accounting for carry forward the final out turn position for
Corporate Buildings is an overspend of £43,000 which is covered by underspends within
the wider Housing and Property capital allocation.  
5.10 Fleet 
Spend of £3,959,000 was incurred against a budget of £4,035,000 resulting in an
underspend of £76,000 which has been utilised against overspends within the wider
Environmental & Commercial Services capital allocation. Fleet Services have a 10-year
vehicle and plant replacement plan to allow equipment to be replaced at the optimal age,
taking into account residual asset value, maintenance costs and down time. In total, 73
diesel and 14 electric vehicles were purchased in 2024/25.    
5.11 Flood Risk and Coastal Protection 
Spend of £478,000 was incurred against a budget of £507,000 resulting in an underspend
of £29,000. Expenditure related to coastal erosion works at Findhorn (£199,000) and flood
scheme channel works (£93,000) with the remaining budget spent on settlement of historic
compensation claims against Elgin and Forres Flood Alleviation schemes and externally
funded coastal adaptation plans. 
5.12 Flood Risk and Coastal Protection Carry Forward. 
It is recommended £29,000 is carried forward. £19,000 is for Scottish Government funded
Coastal Adaptation Plans due to have been completed in 2024/25 but due to tendering
delays the works instruction could not be issued until Q1 2025/26.  A further £10,000 is
recommended for retention payments on Findhorn Coastal Erosion works which were
completed in the year.  
5.13 Harbours 
Spend of £1,418,000 was incurred against a budget of £1,501,000 resulting in an
underspend of £83,000 before accounting for recommended carry forward. Rock blasting
at Buckie Harbour made up the majority of spend (£1,113,000) with other notable projects
including Buckie Weighbridge upgrades (£124,000); sheet pile repairs at Findochty
(£68,0000); works to date on the navigation light at Buckie Harbour (£54,000) and the
balance being made up of other minor works. 
5.14 Harbours Carry Forward 
Page 47

Page 48

It is recommended that £161,000 is carried forward. £122,000 is required to complete
contracted works on the navigation light at Buckie Harbour. Adverse weather conditions
resulted in the works needing to be pushed back for health and safety reasons. It is
expected the works will now be completed in Q2 2025/26. £22,000 is required to cover the
council’s contribution to Pier 3 demolition costs. A further £22,000 is required to complete
works at the Buckie Weighbridge, which includes £11,000 for the installation of a second
operator point. Accounting for carry forward the final out turn position for Harbours is an
overspend of £83,000 which has been covered by underspends within the wider
Environmental & Commercial Services capital allocation.  
5.15 ICT 
Spend of £557,000 was incurred against a budget of £591,000 resulting in an underspend
of £34,000 before accounting for recommended carry forward. The bulk of spend related to
the ICT Asset Replacement Programme (£433,000) as well as ICT specific projects such as
the upgrade of a cashless payments software for schools (£7,000) and replacement CCTV
equipment (£45,000). 
5.16 ICT Carry Forward 
It is recommend that £14,000 is carried forward. Network upgrades originally planned to be
completed by Q4 2024/25 had been rescheduled into the new financial year due to
contractor delays. Works have now been completed. Accounting for carry forward the final
out turn position for ICT is an underspend of £20,000. 
5.17 Industrial Portfolio 
Spend of £41,000 was incurred against a budget of £279,000 resulting in an underspend of
£238,000.  A number of capital improvement works were planned to be completed during
the financial year. However, due to a number of factors, primarily lack of Estate team staff
resource following a number of retirements, the projects were not able to be progressed in
time to be delivered during the financial year. 
5.18 Industrial Portfolio Carry Forward 
It is recommended that £161,000 is carried forward. The amount relates to works that had
begun in Q4 2024/25 but were not complete by 31 March 2025. Accounting for carry
forward the final out turn position for Industrial Portfolio is an underspend of £77,000
which will cover overspends within the wider Housing and Property capital allocation. 
5.19 Learning Estate 
Spend of £4,417,000 was incurred against a budget of £4,077,000 resulting in an overspend
of £340,000 before accounting for recommended adjustments. The largest element of
spend was on the BB Upgrade Programme (£2,446,000) which included a number of
completed fabric works alongside preparatory spend on more major fabric upgrades
expected to start in 2025/26. Spend on the major rebuild and refurbishment projects was
£1,637,000, split across early development costs for New Elgin High School, Forres
Academy and Buckie High School. Spend on compliance and accessibility works was
£210,00 with remaining spend on Early Year Centre improvements (£71,000) and Scottish
Government Funded projects (£53,000) for Universal Free School Meals and Co2 Monitors. 
5.20 Learning Estate Adjustment 
It is recommended that previously agreed carry forward of £340,000 is reversed to cover
the above noted overspend.
Page 48

Page 49

5.21 Libraries and Leisure 
Spend of £418,000 was incurred against a budget of £295,000 resulting in an overspend of
£123,000. Works to refurbish the 3G Sports Pitch at Keith Grammar School (£209,000) as
well as minor upgrade works at Elgin Library (£61,000) were both completed ahead of
schedule. Monies set aside for equipment failure at Moray Leisure Centre was also utilised
in the year for replacement boilers (£122,000). The balance of spend was made up of
equipment upgrades (£26,000) 
5.22 Libraries & Leisure Adjustment 
It is recommended that previously agreed carry forward of £123,000 is reversed to cover
the above noted overspend.  
5.23 Parks and Opens Spaces 
Spend of £612,000 was incurred against a budget of £976,000 resulting in an underspend
of £364,000 before accounting for recommended carry forward. The underspend was
attributable to tender delays at Elgin Cemetery as well delays in completing the new
mortuary in Aberdeen for which Moray Council will pay a contribution. A large portion of the
spend in year was attributable to Scottish Government funded play area upgrades which
saw the installation of new parks at Letterfourie and Tomnavoulin (£176,000). The balance
of spend was attributable to development costs of Elgin Cemetery (£353,000); minor
upgrades across the burial estate (£51,000) and council funded play area upgrades
(£32,000).  
5.24 Parks and Open Spaces Carry Forward 
It is recommended that £360,000 is carried forward for the Elgin Cemetery, which is
currently under tender evaluation at the time of writing this report, and the contribution to
the new mortuary. Accounting for carry forward the final out turn position is an underspend
of £4,000 which will be utilised against overspends within the wider Environmental &
Commercial Services capital allocation. 
5.26 Road Improvements 
Spend of £4,053,000 was incurred against a budget of £4,270,000 resulting in an
underspend of £216,000 before accounting for recommended carry forwards. Carriageway
resurfacing and surface dressing works made up the bulk of spend (£3,155,000) with the
balance being split across drainage works (£355,000); landslip feasibility/construction
works (£290,000) and footway upgrades (£253,000). 
5.27 Road Improvements Carry Forward 
It is recommended that £363,000 is carried forward. £216,000 of the carry forward is for
carriageway and resurfacing works, with £80,000 as a result of contractor delays with
works completed in Q1 2025/26 and the balance delayed due to machinery breakdown –
now also forecast for completion in Q1 2025/26. £147,000 of the carry forward is for
landslip works, with £113,000 related to committed works on the A939 landslip at Creag
Chalcaidh Quarry and the balance on finalising feasibility studies for a number of potential
landslip sites. Accounting for recommended carry forwards the final outturn position
resulted in £147,000 overspend. This was driven primarily by increased demand to address
current and future potential landslips which put pressure on the budget. The overspend will
be covered by underspends within the wider Environmental & Commercial Services capital
allocation.  
Page 49

Page 50

5.28 Street Lighting 
Spend of £774,000 was incurred against a budget of £656,000 resulting in an overspend of
£118,000. The overspend is attributed to unplanned replacement of underground cables
that had been identified during the column replacement works, which resulted in an
increase of core material costs. The additional works/costs incurred were essential to
ensure the electrical safety of the works undertaken. The overspend is covered by
underspends within the wider Environmental and Commercial Services capital allocation.    
5.29 Traffic & Road Safety 
Spend of £225,000 was incurred against a budget of £224,000 resulting in an overspend of
£1,000 which has been offset against underspends within the wider Environmental &
Commercial Services capital allocation. Spend was split across road safety upgrades
(£88,000) disability adaptations (£61,000), signs and road markings (£47,000) and
replacement traffic signals (£2,000). 
5.30 Waste Management 
Spend of £1,402,000 was incurred against a budget of £3,125,000 resulting in an
underspend of £1,733,000 before accounting for recommended carry forwards. The bulk of
spend in the year was for final construction costs for the Ness Energy for Waste (EFW)
incinerator (£1,229,000) with the remaining spend related to replacement waste
equipment (£110,000); recycling centre upgrades (£38,000) and final capping development
costs for Dallachy landfill site (£25,000). 
5.31 Waste Management Carry Forward. 
It is recommended that £1,344,000 is carried forward. The tender exercise for final capping
works at Dallachy landfill site concluded in Q4 2024/25 with works already underway, as
such £328,000 will be carried forward. The remainder of the balance will be for the Ness
EFW incinerator with £150,000 to be used in 2025/26 for final consultant fees and the
remaining carry forward moved to the final year of the ten-year capital plan as a provisional
sum for decommissioning costs. It will be carried forward in the final year of successive
iterations of the ten year plan until required, currently anticipated to be 2045.  Accounting
for carry forward the final out turn position for Waste Management is an underspend of
£349,000 which is set against overspends within the wider Environmental & Commercial
Services capital allocation. 
5.32 Spend to Save 
Spend of £48,000 was incurred against a budget of £67,000 resulting in an underspend of
£19,000 before accounting for recommended carry forwards. Two projects had been
classified as spend to save in the financial year – Salt Barn, Keith and MOT test equipment
upgrades. Spend was entirely related to Salt Barn, Keith as a result of accelerated
development spend. 
5.33 Spend to Save Carry Forward. 
It is recommended £50,000 is carried forward. Works to upgrade the MOT Testing Station at
Ashgrove were completed in Q1 2025/26. Accounting for carry forward, the final out turn
position for Spend to Save is an overspend of £31,000 due to accelerate spend on the Salt
Barn. It is recommended to reverse previous approved carried forward to bring this
overspend to nil. 
Page 50

Page 51

5.34 Other Funded Projects - Active Travel 
Spend of £486,000 was recorded against a budget of £486,000. The budget is made entirely
of Scottish Government grant funded spend on active travel projects, formally knowns as
Cycling, Walking and Safer Streets. Projects delivered with the funding included, amongst
others, a new Toucan crossing outside Lossiemouth High School, new and enhanced road
surfaces at two sites where there had been loss of control accidents and a new footway in
Rafford.  
5.35 Economic Development 
Spend of £468,000 was recorded against a budget of £539,000 resulting in an underspend
of £71,000 before accounting for recommended carry forward.  Spend on the Placed Based
Investment Programme made up £212,000 of the total spend. A further £106,000 was
attributable to spend on nature restoration works funded by Scottish Government.
Remaining spend was spread across other economic initiative projects including Town
Centre Initiative Fund and Town Centre Improvement Plans.  
5.36 Economic Development Carry Forward 
It is recommended that £47,000 is carried forward. Works to install seating in Buckie was
due to be completed in Q4 2024/25 have been rescheduled due to staffing shortages and
are now expected to be complete in Q1 2025/27. Accounting for carry forward the final out
turn is an underspend of £24,000. 
5.37 Moray Growth Deal 
Spend of £5,836,000 was incurred against a budget of £6,017,000 resulting in an
underspend of £180,000. As at the end of 2024/25 six of the Deal’s eight projects have now
reached the delivery stage, with Early Year STEM and Cultural Quarter both given full
business case approval. Housing Mix Delivery accounted for the largest portion of spend
(£2,077,000) as a result of building purchases for the South Street regeneration as well as
development of affordable housing at Speyview, Aberlour.  Cultural Quarter (£1,632,000)
saw design and early development spend for both Grant Lodge and Elgin Town Hall. Digital
Health (£955,000), which is delivered by Digital Health Institute, delivered all five of its
Living Lab sessions. Manufacturing Innovation Centre for Moray (£512,000), which is
delivered by Highlands and Islands Enterprise, awarded a tender contract at the end of Q3
2024/25. Early Years STEM (£457,000) progressed design proposals for the first STEM
centre in Elgin.  Finally, Bus Revolution (£203,000) saw the addition of three new buses
alongside the installation and upgrade of electric vehicle charging stations.  
5.38 Moray Growth Deal Carry Forward 
The full underspend of £180,000 will be carried forward. Moray Growth Deal is governed by
its own board where reprofiling is approved via change requests to Scottish Government
with periodic issue-specific and more general annual reports to Council. 
5.39 Levelling Up Fund 
Spend of £798,000 was incurred against a budget of £962,000, the majority of which
related to enabling works for the South Street regeneration. The underspend of £164,000
was a result of early feasibility/design not progressing due to prolonged discussions around
key legal agreements, which are still being finalised.   
5.40 Levelling Up Fund Carry Forward 
Page 51

Page 52

It is recommended that £164,000 is carried forward. The Levelling Up Fund is entirely
funded by UK Government. 
5.41 The net final out turn position for financial year 2024/25 before accounting for
recommended carry forward was a £27,219,000 and an underspend of £3,049,000. This
represents a delivery rate of 90% of the approved capital plan. In comparison, the final out
turn position for financial year 2023/24 before accounting for carry forward was
£30,429,000 and an underspend of £12,507,000 representing a delivery rate of 71%.
Acknowledgement of recent improvements in budget profiling should be noted with greater
recognition by budget managers of the Council’s capacity to deliver the capital programme,
and the high level moderation used to estimate expenditure will be adjusted to reflect this
improvement. However, consideration still needs to be given to the volume of carry
forwards being approved, with further work needed to address this in 2025/26. 
5.42 The net final out turn position for financial year 2024/25 after accounting for recommended
carry forward was an underspend of £79,000. APPENDIX 2 shows a table of over /
underspends at asset category. From 2025/26 these asset categories have been grouped to
provide budget managers flexibility to offset overspends with available underspend. For
2024/25 asset group overspends have been maintained within the capital allocations at
service level.    
6 AFFORDIBILITY INDICATOR 
6.1 The provision affordability indicator as at 31 March 2025 has been calculated based on the
year end position. The indicator now sits at 10.46%  
Ratio of Financing Costs to Net Revenue Budget 
Financing Costs £29.755m
Net Revenue Budget £284.472m
Affordability Indicator 10.46% 
6.2 The indicator saw an increase from an estimated 7.94% in Q3 to a provisional indicative
outturn of 10.46%. This is driven by higher than previously estimated financing costs with
further detail provided in the paragraphs below. 
6.3 The accounting standard IFRS 16 Leases was introduced from 1 April 2024. The standard
required the recalculation of finance costs related to leases for which the Council is the
lessee, with the two largest being the PPP/DBFM School leases. The impact of these
recalculations was not known until Q1 2025/26, however it should be noted that applying
the new standard creates an accounting adjustment only and does not create an additional
finance burden on the Council. Adjusting the calculation to pre-IFRS 16 methodology
would have resulted in the affordability indicator being less than 10%.  
6.4 Consideration has also been given to the estimation methodology for broader financing
costs. An extended period of low borrowing rates meant discrepancies in the methodology
had not been stress tested and only fully understood as rates began to climb. Errors made
during the estimation process therefore had more noticeable impact than would have
previously been the case. The methodology has now been revised and incorporated into
future estimates. 
Page 52

Page 53

6.5 Figures provided in the report are provisional, based on unaudited accounts. The final
affordability indicator will be reported as part of the full suite of prudential indicators which
are due to be reported to Council in September 2025, when the audited accounts are
reported. 
7 RISK AND EMERGING ISSUES  
7.1 A number of key risks continue to have an impact on the capital plan, the detail of which is
as follows: 
7.2 Construction / material costs 
Increased construction and material costs are resulting in projects coming in over budget
or failing to start due to tender bids coming in higher than initially budgeted.  A number of
tenders are now being designed with the inclusion of early contractor involvement clauses
to allow projects to keep some momentum and minimize disruption whilst projects are
rescoped into affordable limits. 
7.3 Scarcity of goods and labour  
Linked to increased prices, the availability of goods and labour has also been felt across
the capital plan. Whilst delays are not as severe as previously reported, the supply chain
has not yet recovered to pre-pandemic rates. Where projects must rely on an external
contractor there has been a notable decline in the number of suppliers bidding for works.
This is compounded by the geographical location of Moray and the reliance on specialist
suppliers situated in the central belt and further afield. 
7.4 Increased demand on aging asset base 
The Council has a mature asset base, particularly across key education, leisure and
infrastructure assets. Project delays, insufficient funding and slowness of strategic
decision making are all having an impact on delivering the necessary investment needed. 
Furthermore, the 2025-28 capital plan re-iterates the need to reduce the asset base, which
is set out in the Council’s Capital Strategy, and whilst there has been some conversation
around under-utilised schools and depots, the pace of progress across asset bases will
need to be accelerated. 
7.5 Weather / ground conditions
April 2025 was the sunniest since records began in 1910 with meteorologists now warning
of the potential for a summer drought.  As well as the risk of wildfires, dry spells can result
in hardpacked land conditions, overwhelming flooding assets in the event of rainfall and
promoting landslips. Prolonged drought can also put stress on infrastructure assets (roads
and bridges) due to the expansion and contraction of materials, forming cracks within
foundations leading to potential asset failure. 
7.6 Affordability
The impact of the reduced capital plan driven by affordability and cap on capital is starting
to be reported via the various service committees. Whilst there has been minimal
disruption to planned activities for 2025/26, asset groupings such as the Leisure and
Learning estates are having to reprofile projects for the later years of the 2025/28 capital
plan. This alongside the risks highlighted in paragraph 7.4 could result in additional budget
pressures of revenue costs as well as increase the possibility of full asset failure. There are
also a small number of services who are reliant on charges to capital works to fund their
Page 53

Page 54

revenue budgets, and the implication of the cap on capital is being reviewed with those
services to minimise disruption and alleviate further budget pressures. 
8 SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
8.1 The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) X 
Policy and Legal  X
Financial X 
Risk X 
Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital            X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
8.2 Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
8.3 Policy and Legal 
There are no policy or legal implications arising directly from this report.  
8.4 Financial 
The financial implications are noted within the body of the report and in APPENDIX 1. 
One off Costs:
Page 54

Page 55

Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments
- - - - - - 
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments
- - - - - - 
8.5 Risk 
Budget managers are aware of their responsibilities for managing budget allocations and
approval for variance will be sought from Council in line with the financial regulations. 
8.6 Staffing 
There are no staffing implications arising directly from this report. 
8.7 Best Value and Transformation 
There are no best value and transformation implications arising directly from this report.  
8.8 Property 
There are no property implications arising directly from this report.  
8.9 Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
There are no information communication/technology/digital implications arising directly
from this report. 
8.10 Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
There are no equalities issues arising directly from this report. 
8.11 Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
There are no climate change or biodiversity issues arising directly from this report. 
Achieving the target of net zero will have significant implications for future planned capital
expenditure 
9. CONSULTATION  
9.1 This report has been prepared in consultation with capital budget managers and all Heads
of Service and any comments made have been incorporated into the report  
10. BACKGROUND PAPERS  
10.1 All background papers held by the author within accountancy service. 
Page 55

Page 56

Moray Council Capital Programme 2024/25
As at 31 March 2025
Amended
Capital Plan
Actual to
Date
Estimated
(Over) / Under
Spend
Carry
Forward
Request
Final Out
Turn Position
Asset Category £000 £000 £000
Bridges 993 749 244 244 0
Car Parks 205 255 (50) 0 (50)
Climate Change 200 0 200 200 0
Corporate Buildings 253 225 28 71 (43)
Fleet 4,035 3,959 76 0 76
Flood Risk Management & Coastal
Protection 507 478 29 29 (0)
Harbours 1,501 1,418 83 166 (83)
ICT 591 557 34 14 20
Industrial Portfolio 279 41 238 161 77
Learning Estate 4,077 4,417 (340) (340) 0
Libraries & Leisure 295 418 (123) (123) 0
Parks & Open Space 976 612 364 360 4
Road Improvements 4,270 4,053 216 394 (178)
Street Lighting 656 774 (118) 0 (118)
Traffic & Road Safety 224 225 (1) 0 (1)
Waste Management 3,135 1,402 1,733 1,384 349
Spend to Save 67 48 19 19 0
Other Funded Projects 486 486 0 0 0
Economic Development 539 468 71 47 24
Moray Growth Deal 6,017 5,837 180 180 (0)
Levelling Up Fund 962 798 164 164 0
30,268 27,219 3,049 2,970 79
Income
Prudential Borrowing 15,691 9,290
General Capital Grant 7,959 8,164
Moray Growth Deal 6,017 5,837
Other Grants & Contributions / Inapplied 411 309
Levelling Up Fund 798
PBIF 212
Other Grants Rec in year 1,006
Developers Contributions 35 0
Useable capital receipts b/f 1,327
Receipts generated in year 155 276
30,268 27,219
APPENDIX 1
Page 56

Page 57

Moray Council Capital Programme 2024/25
As at 31 March 2025
Out turn per service allocation
Asset Category
Final Out
Turn
Position Environm
ent &
Com
m
ercial
Services
Housing
and
Property
Econm
ic Developm
ent
Education
Resource &
Com
m
unities
HR, ICT
&
Organisational
Developm
ent
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Bridges - - - - - -
Car Parks (50) (50) - - - -
Climate Change - - - - - -
Corporate Buildings (43) - (43) - - -
Fleet 76 76 - - - -
Flood Risk Management & Coastal Protection (0) (0) - - - -
Harbours (83) (83) - - - -
ICT 20 - - - - 20
Industrial Portfolio 77 - 77 - - -
Learning Estate 0 - - - - -
Libraries & Leisure 0 - - - - -
Parks & Open Space 4 4 - - - -
Road Improvements (178) (178) - - - -
Street Lighting (118) (118) - - - -
Traffic & Road Safety (1) (1) - - - -
Waste Management 349 349 - - - -
Spend to Save - - - - - -
Other Funded Projects - - - - - -
Economic Development 24 - - 24 - -
Moray Growth Deal - - - - - -
Levelling Up Fund - - - - -
TOTAL 79 - 34 24 - 20
APPENDIX 2
Page 57

Page 58

Page 58

Page 59

Report to: Moray Council  Meeting
Date:
25 June 2025      
Report by: Depute Chief
Executive (Economy,
Environment and
Finance)
Report No: FIN006/25/LP/LC      
Author: Lorraine Paisey Contact
Email:
lorraine.paisey@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to approve a Short to Medium Term Financial
Strategy, covering preparation of the Council’s General Services Revenue
budgets for 2026/27 and 2027/28.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (13) of the Council's
Scheme of Administration relating to the approval of Council reports and
strategies of a corporate nature. 
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  This strategy builds on the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy approved
by Council on 4 December 2024 and the indicative budgets for 2026/27 and
2027/28 noted by Council on 26 February 2025, when the budget for 2025/26
was approved (para 3 of the minute refers). 
2.2 The Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy indicates a mid-case scenario of
a budget shortfall of £5 million in 2026/27 and £6 million in 2027/28.  The
indicative budgets for 2026/27 and 2027/28 include assumptions which vary
from the mid-case for Council Tax and which also show the impact of the
removal of the structural budget deficit in 2025/26.  The result is forecast
Item 9.
Page 59

Page 60

budget shortfalls in 2026/27 of £1.8 million and 2027/28 of £1.1 million – a
budget gap across the two years of £2.9 million.  Currently approved savings
of £1 million reduce this to a residual budget gap of £1.9 million, with £0.8
million further savings forecast to be required in 2026/27.  
2.3 The Short to Medium Term Strategy sets out an approach towards closing this
budget gap, based on the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy; the risks
and uncertainties which exist and which if materialised would increase the
budget gap, and a high-level timescale for key decisions as the budget for
2026/27 is developed. 
2.4 The Strategy notes the potential significant impact of variances from budget
assumptions and sets a tolerance level to increase the projected savings to
be identified to allow for the impact of a moderate variance from base
assumptions and on that basis sets a savings target for 2026/27 of
£2,500,000.  
2.5 It also incorporates a Budget on a Page tracker of issues likely to help to close
or tend to widen the budget gap which will be used as a measure of the
progress of the Short to Medium Term Strategy through the year. 
2.6 A Performance Indicator to be used as a headline measure of progress
(budget gap as percentage of net revenue budget) is also recommended. 
2.7 A recently proposed spend to save project is also included in the report and
shown in the appendix to the Strategy as a potential contribution towards the
savings target. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS  
3.1  It is recommended that Council approve:   
i)  The approach set out in the Short to Medium Term Strategy
contained in APPENDIX 1 to this report; 
ii)  The savings target of £2,500,000 for 2026/27 derived within the
Strategy; 
iii)  The Performance Indicator set out in paragraph 5.15; 
iv)  The high-level timetable included in the Strategy; and 
v)  The spend to save project of rebuilding the Council’s website to
offer improved customer service and deliver recurring savings
estimated at £23,000 as set out in paragraph 5.19 of this report.   
Page 60

Page 61

3.2 It is recommended that Council notes the risks and uncertainties currently
identified as set out in the Strategy and listed in APPENDIX 2 to this report.:   
Lorraine Paisey
Chief Financial Officer 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy for 2025 to 2035 was approved by
Council on 4 December 2024 (paragraph 10 of the Minute refers).  It indicated a
mid-case scenario of a budget shortfall of £5 million for 2026/27 and of £6
million for 2027/28, with an average shortfall of £4.1 million each year for the
10 years covered by the Strategy.    
4.2  The key levers identified in the Strategy for reduction of the budget shortfall
were: Council Tax, other income, staffing, asset base.  The Council’s
Transformation Strategy will be key in long term financial strategy, utilising
these levers to reduce expenditure as the Council transforms its operations in
response to the Council’s vision for the future.  Planning for future service
demand will also be a key feature.  
4.3  The indicative budgets noted when the budget for 2025/26 was approved by
Council on 26 February 2025 (paragraph 3 of the Minute refers) indicated
budget gaps of £1.9 million in 2026/27 and £1.1 million in 2027/28, with £1
million approved resulting in a residual budget gap of £0.9 million in 2026/27. 
The reduction in budget gap from that estimated in the Medum to Long Term
Financial Strategy arose from indicative increases in Council Tax which were
above the mid case used in the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy.  
4.4  These indicative budgets are the starting point for this Short to Medium Term
Financial Strategy, with a focus on how these budget gaps will be removed.    
4.5  The Strategy also identifies the key risks for the budget setting process which
could increase the budget gap.  The budget planning process will therefore
address the potential for greater savings being required than the indicative
budgets suggest and sets a target figure for savings to be identified as part of
the financial planning process. 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  The Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy aims to hold in balance two main
sources of financial change:  the Council’s Transformation Strategy, which is
recognised as the source of long-term change, and service redesign in response to
short-term requirements.  These short-term requirements could arise from changes
in demand for service, inflation or other external cost impact or underlying
overspends identified during review of the out-turn for 2024/45.   
Page 61

Page 62

The position is reflected diagrammatically below: 
Transformation
5.2  The Council’s Transformation Strategy is regularly reported on and potential savings
identified as progress on individual projects enables this to be done.  Current areas
where savings are estimated to be within the scope of this strategy are: 
• Smarter Working
• Depot and Stores Review
• LED lighting and solar power   
5.3  Savings are projected to arise from reduction in the Council’s asset base from
Smarter Working and the Depot and Stores Review.  Reduction in energy costs are
projected from the LED lighting and solar power projects.  Current estimates of
savings are included in the indicative budget for 2025/26, however there may be
further savings from these projects during the period 2026/27 to 2027/28 and these
projects are included in the Budget on a Page (APPENDIX 2) as having potential to
contribute towards filling the budget gap. 
Income
5.4  The Council approved a three year Income Strategy on 12 December 2023
(paragraph 7 of the Minute refers).  This set out a minimum position for increases in
Council Tax and charges for services for the period 2024/25 to 2026/27.  The budget
approved for 2025/26 incorporated a higher increase in Council Tax, generating
additional income of £1,540,000 in 2025/26.  This is reflected in the base position
for 2026/27 and 2027/28.  The indicative budget for 2026/27 also included a higher
increase in Council Tax as an indicative proposal. 
Budget
2026/27
Transformation
Strategy
Medium to Long
Term Financial
Strategy
(rebased for
indicative budget)
Variance Report
Page 62

Page 63

5.5  Council Tax is the main lever within the budget for generating income.  If innovative
income generating proposals are developed these will be considered as a high
priority, in accordance with the savings hierarchy.  There are currently no significant
proposals under development for income generation which would come to fruition
in the time frame of this Strategy.  Consequently this report focuses on the approach
proposed to be taken to generating savings from service reduction. 
Savings / service reduction
Budget-led approach
5.6  As shown in paragraph 5.1 it is proposed that the main reference point for savings
will be given by variances from budget in 2024/25 in the first instance.  Thereafter
any further variances from budget will be included as these emerge during the
budget monitoring process. 
5.7  This approach is consistent with a policy led approach to budgeting.  Budgets
approved by Council should be adhered to in order that the Council’s expressed
level of expenditure is adhered to.  Budget managers should develop proposals to
vary service delivery to ensure that expenditure remains within budget if it appears
likely that budget will be exceeded.  
5.8  When the out-turn for the year is reported the budget variances for the year are also
reported, setting out variance from budget and reasons why, also variances from
those projected during the year. 
5.9 Where one-off expenditure has been incurred such that budget is exceeded, budget
managers will be asked to confirm the one-off nature of the spend (or loss of
income).  
5.10 Where expenditure is potentially recurring, budget managers will be asked to
develop plans for service reduction to bring expenditure into line with budget.  This
could be from reduction in services standards, reduction in volume of service or
from alternative methods of service delivery. 
5.11 Heads of Service will monitor progress against these plans on a quarterly basis. 
This will form part of revenue budget monitoring report to Corporate Committee and
to service committees.  This represents a firming up response to potential
overspends.  It coheres with the Council’s Financial Regulations but takes a firmer
stance operationally on overspends than has previously been the case. 
Demand-led approach
5.12 Heads of Service will also be asked to identify opportunities for savings arising from
projected reduction in demand for services eg from demographic changes.  This has
been recognised as a feature of the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy but
needs to be given more prominence in the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy. 
5.13
Best Value approach
Page 63

Page 64

Services will be asked to review the cost of delivering services in-house as opposed
to outsourcing services.  In the first instance this will be focused on areas of budget
pressure identified in the review of year end variances. 
5.14 There will also be a general call for savings to all Heads of Service as usual.   This
does not form part of the strategic approach.  It is included for completeness and in
recognition that savings above the level being planned for may have to be identified. 
Partnership Approach
5.15 The last strand of the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy is proposed to be the
Partnership approach, which was part of the Short to Medium Term Financial
Strategy for 2024/25 to 2025/26 and has seen successful co-development of the
Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB) Recovery Plan and successful delivery of
significant levels of savings in 2024/25.  Services delivered by MIJB remain under
acute financial pressure and continued partnership working will be key to ensuring
the finances of both organisations are protected. 
5.16 Other areas where the Council works with – mainly third sector – providers have
been subject to financial scrutiny as part of budget preparation, particularly in
recent years.   Where there has not been recent financial scrutiny, partners should
be asked if they can identify savings to contribute towards the Council’s residual
budget gap. 
Savings target
5.17 The Strategy contains a sensitivity analysis of the impact of variances of key budget
assumptions from which a working target for savings is developed – this is higher
than the indicative budget figure of £0.825 million in 2026/27 as the timescale
during which some of these assumptions will crystallise are too short to enable an
agile response to changes in assumptions as they materialise. 
5.18 It is proposed that the working savings target for 2026/27 is set at £2,500,000, based
on a 0.5% reduction in Scottish Government grant and a 0.5% increase in the cost of
pay awards, as these are considered the highest risk variables.  The Performance
Indicator to measure progress in meeting the savings target therefore starts at
0.82% (£2.5 million as a percentage of £303.582 million). 
Spend to Save project
5.19 The ICT service has identified a potential spend to save project.  The service had
commenced work on rebuilding the Council website but this has been paused due
to work on the replacement Customer Relationship Management system. To
expedite delivery of this improvement it is estimated that commissioning a third
party with expertise in this area would cost £12,000.  This would deliver an improved
website and thus better customer experience for the public. Savings would be
generated from reduced support and hosting costs and these are estimated to total
£23,000. 
Page 64

Page 65

6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the
recommendations are agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  X
Policy and Legal  X
Financial X 
Risk X 
Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital          X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan
(LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement
through Best Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set
out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and
contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the
following Council Plan strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report
support and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as
outlined in the following local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in  
Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
There are no policy and legal implications arising directly from this report. 
6.4  Financial 
The report sets out the approach taken to close the budget gap for 2026/27
identified when the budget for 2025/26 was approved and to address the
Page 65

Page 66

potential additional savings requirements which arise if various risks
crystallise.  It also proposes expenditure of £12,000 to generate annual
recurring savings of £23,000.   
One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments
ICT - 2025/26 £12,000  Expenditure
to be
covered by
savings 
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments
- - - - - - 
6.5  Risk 
There are significant areas of risk to the financial planning process arising from
major uncertainties and these are itemised in the attached Strategy.  
6.6  Staffing 
No staffing implications arise directly from this report. 
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
There are no implications arising directly from this report.  The report assumes
that the Transformation Strategy is a key document for financial planning
purposes.  
6.8  Property 
No property implications arise directly from this report.  The report recognises
that the Council’s asset base is a key driver for expenditure and requires to be
reduced.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
No information communications/technology/digital implications arise directly
from this report.    
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
There are no equalities, social inclusion or economic impacts arising from this
report.  
Page 66

Page 67

6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
There are no direct climate change or biodiversity implications arising from this
report. 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with ECLT and any comments
have been included in the report. 
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None.   
Page 67

Page 68

APPENDIX 1 
SHORT TO MEDIUM TERM FINANCIAL STRATEGY 2026/2027 to 2027/28 
Background
1.1 The Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy forms part of a suite of documents
used in the Council’s financial planning:
• The three year indicative budget reported when the budget for the year is
set and regularly updated throughout the year in financial planning reports
to Council;
• The indicative ten year Capital Plan, underpinned by the Council’s Capital
Strategy;
• The Council’s Charging Policy, sitting within the Income Strategy;
• The Council’s Reserves Policy;
• The Council’s Treasury Management Policy;
• The Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy;
• The Transformation Strategy; and
• Sitting above all these, the Council’s Corporate Plan.
1.2 Moray Council in common with all other Scottish local authorities has been
delivering service efficiencies and making budget savings for many years.  For
most of this time reserves have been planned to be used to make up the shortfall
between the cost of services and funding for the Council.  That was not a
sustainable position and the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy for 2024/25
to 2025/26 aimed to remove the use of reserves, described as removing the
structural or underlying budget deficit.  That aim was achieved when the budget
for 2025/26 was approved, with no planned use of reserves to fill part of the
budget shortfall.
1.3 It should be noted that the Council has set aside ear-marked reserves for specific
purposes, notably for Transformation of services in particular.  Use of these
reserves in accordance with the Council’s intent reflects prudent and forward-
looking financial planning.
1.4 Following removal of the structural budget deficit this Short to Medium Term
Financial Strategy focuses on the approach to eliminating forecast budget gaps
arising from the assumption that costs will increase by more than the funding
available to the Council, in particular core funding from Scottish Government. 
Page 68

Page 69

2 Key Financial Levers 
2.1 The levers above have been recognised as the key financial levers in previous
Financial Strategies (both Short to Medium and Medium to Long Term).  Their
relevance continues.  These are the components in the budget which the Council
can decide or influence and the movement from each of these levers impacts on
the required movement from the others.  Increasing income from Council Tax and
other charges lessens the need to reduce expenditure on the main drivers for the
cost of Council services: staff and the Council’s asset base.  In that way they help
to protect services.   
2.2 In recognition of the importance of income generation the Council adopted a three
year Income Strategy on 12 December 2023. 
3 Hierarchy of Transformation, Income and Savings
3.1 The Council has an agreed Savings hierarchy, with transformation of services as
the preferred option, followed by income generation, thereafter services reduction
or cessation. 
Transformation
3.2 Service transformation to deliver services has been delivered over an extended
period of time.  The current transformation projects underway or in the course of
Council Tax Other Income
generation
Staff
establishment Asset base
Transform /spend to save
Increased income
Reduce /
cease service
Page 69

Page 70

being developed are included in the Transformation Strategy approved by Council
on 24 April 2024.  Where quantified, savings are included in financial projections. 
3.3 The focus of Transformation for the Short to Medium Term Financial Strategy is on
savings arising from Asset Management: Smarter Working; Depot and Stores
Review; LED lighting and solar power energy efficiency.  Current estimates of
savings to be achieved in the short term by projects underway are included in the
indicative budget for 2026/27.  Scope for increasing savings through extending
work programmes will be explored as part of the Strategy. 
Spend to Save
3.4 Spend to save proposals are part of the top level of the savings hierarchy and
budget managers are encouraged to bring forward spend to save proposals as
they are identified. 
Income
3.5 The Council approved an Income Strategy for the period 2024/25 to 2026/27,
covering both Council Tax and charges currently made for services.  The Income
Strategy gives an agreed basis for planning which includes a minimum income
target.  As part of the budget setting process for 2025/26 indicative Council Tax
increases for 2026/27 and 2027/28 which were higher than the minimum level
were included, as an expression of the Council’s likely future intent. 
3.6 Review of proposed increases for Council Tax and for charges for services will form
part of the annual financial planning process, with the review being held within the
framework of the Income Strategy. 
3.7 Following the budget driven approach, income from charges in 2024/25 will be
reviewed and where possible savings taken by increasing budgets to reflect
increased income.  It is recognised that increased income may entail increased
expenditure in some instances and a case-by-case review between service
departments and accountancy staff will be required. 
Savings
3.8 As part of the financial planning process for 2024/25 and 2025/26 a Savings
Delivery Plan was agreed, and this set three approaches to generating savings: the
thematic approach, the review-led approach and the partnership approach.  The
thematic approach has largely been encompassed within the latest version of the
Transformation Strategy and the approach proposed for 2026/27 for Council
services is to follow a budget-monitoring driven approach, focussing on areas of
Page 70

Page 71

divergence from budget in 2024/25 and projected areas of divergence in 2025/26
as these emerge. 
Budget-led approach
3.9 Heads of Service will be asked to develop plans for reducing net expenditure to
budget levels where the budget to date is exceeded or the budget for the year is
forecast to be exceeded.  The starting point for this process will be variances from
budget in 2024/25.  Progress against these plans will be monitored and the impact
reported on as part of quarterly budget monitoring to Corporate Committee and
to services committees. This will give heightened visibility of the relationship
between service delivery and budget is pressured areas.  This in turn enables
members to further develop a priority-led approach to budgeting. 
Demand-led approach
3.10 Heads of Service will also be asked to be alert for savings opportunities arising
from change in demand for services eg due to demographics, where Moray is
forecast to see a significant reduction in the number of younger people.  Medium
to long term financial planning should reflect the impact of changing
demographics but there will also be consequences which arise immediately (eg
for the Devolved School Management budget) and which should therefore be
incorporated into short term financial planning. 
Best Value approach
3.11 Heads of Service will be asked to consider whether the use of in-house or out-
sourced services represents Best Value.  In the first instance this will be driven by
areas of budget pressure identified as part of the Budget-led approach.  In order
that this is effective, the cost of in-house services must be known with confidence
in the accuracy of costing. 
Residual savings
3.12 As is customary Heads of Service will also be asked for any other scope for
savings.  Given the level of savings in recent years this general ask will not be part
of the Strategy to deliver savings but will be made for completeness.  The starting
point will be identifying the potential for recurring savings from underspends in
2024/25. 
Partnership approach 
3.13 The partnership approach was based on co-development of a Recovery Plan for
Moray Integration Joint Board and support through the delivery of the Recovery
Page 71

Page 72

Plan.  The Recovery Plan has been notably successful in 2024/25 and it is
proposed that this strand of work continues during 2025/26.   
3.14 It is proposed that where possible the partnership approach is extended to
encompass other delivery partners, recognising that none of the other
partnerships will be on the scale of MIJB. 
3.15 Developing Shared Services with other local authorities may be considered as
part of the partnership approach. 
4 Sensitivity Analysis 
4.1 Key budget assumptions for 2026/27 are set out in the table below.  Comparison
with the mid case in the Medium to Long Term Financial Strategy is shown, along
with the impact of the range of assumptions used in that Strategy and the impact
of a 1% variance from the indicative budget. 
4.2 This sensitivity analysis will be used to develop a working savings target range for
financial planning processes during 2025/26. 
Budget
component
Assumption + / - 1% Impact on
residual budget
gap
Scottish
Government Grant
(inc NDR income)
Flat cash + / - £2.3m 280%
Pay award (exc
MIJB staff)
3% increase
across the board
for all pay groups
+ / - £0.8m  97%
Council Tax in-
year collection
rate
96.5% + / - £0.6m 72%
Loans Interest 5% + / - £1.7m 200% 
Range   + £5.4m to -
£5.4m 
650% 
4.3 Unsurprisingly the budget is most sensitive to movement in government grant, the
largest single component of the budget.  Unfortunately this is inherently difficult
to predict. 
4.4 As the residual budget gap is reduced, the impact of variance from budget
assumptions becomes more marked.  It is therefore important to set a tolerance
Page 72

Page 73

level for budget savings which is large enough to facilitate planning for scenarios
which are worse than those envisaged in the indicative budgets for 2026/27 and
2027/28. 
4.5 It is proposed that the tolerance level is based on variance in Scottish Government
grant and pay and price inflation, as these are completely outwith the control of
the council.    To build in some leeway for these key assumptions it is proposed
that the target savings are the residual budget gap per the indicative budget for
2026/27 plus half of the impact of a 1% reduction in Scottish Government support
and a measure of shortfall of funding for pay awards and comparable to in
previous years (note that in previous years Scottish Government has provided a
significant element of grant support).  This would result in a savings target for
financial planning purposed of £2.5 million. 
4.6 It should be noted that this savings target assumes a Council Tax increase of 10%
in 2026/27, with no leeway for downwards review. 
5 Risk factors
5.1 In addition to the key budget assumptions identified above, the budget is subject
to the following risks: 
Core assumptions in 2025/26
5.2 The savings incorporated in the budget for 2025/26 may not be fully realised.   This
includes the increase in Council Tax, where a reduction in collection rate is
possible in the current economic climate. 
5.3 The pay award for 2025/26 has not been agreed and current pay claims are well in
excess of 3%.  COSLA has indicated that 3% is the limit of affordability for councils
but Scottish Government has not indicated that any additional funding would be
available were pay claims to be settled at a level above a 3% average. 
5.4 The current economic climate is very volatile and significant increases in costs for
goods and services are feasible.  A number of significant procurement exercises
are underway.  ICT suppliers are moving towards the cloud, which means costs
must all be met from revenue.   
5.5 Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB) is implementing its current Recovery Plan but
increased costs due to pay awards and other cost increases and to increased
demand are forecast.   MIJB is in the process of developing savings from further
efficiency and operating model changes.  There is the risk that expenditure may
Page 73

Page 74

not be contained.  The cost of Children’s Services, particularly out of area
placements, is increasing.  Such costs may be recurring. 
5.6 Restrictions on the Capital Plan arising from capped expenditure may reduce the
ability of services to recharge staff time to capital projects. 
5.7 Any of the above would create additional budget pressures which would roll
forward into 2026/27. 
Core assumptions 2026/27
5.8 The key variables are set out in paragraph 4.2.  In addition to these: 
5.9 The indicative budget assumes no increase in the shortfall funding for MIJB which
currently stands at £3,400,000.  The MIJB plans for containing costs may not be
deliverable within the required timescales.   
5.10 Inflation is forecast to reduce to the treasury target of 2% within 2026/27 but there
is no guarantee that that will happen and a significant level of cost increases – Real
Living Wage, PPP / PFI payments, transport contracts, cost of insurance – are
based on or partly based on the Consumer Price Index. 
5.11 A trend for increased costs arising at least in part from the impact of climate
change appears to be emerging, with landslips a notable example of this.  Such
events are not amenable to planning.  The Council has incorporated an element
of contingency in its capital programme but this may prove insufficient. 
5.12 A 10% increase in Council Tax is assumed.  The Scottish Government Programme
for Government announced on 6 May 2025 included comments on Council Tax
which may entail freeze or a cap on increases.  At present there is no detail and so
the implications are unclear.  A freeze or cap unless fully funded would increase
the budget gap.   
6 The Wider Context
6.1 There are emerging issues which could potentially impact on the Council’s
financial planning process during the scope of this Strategy. 
6.2 Additional powers such as the ability to set a visitor levy may change the financial
landscape within which the Council is operating. 
6.3 Part of that landscape is significant funding from both Scottish Government and
UK Government which require expertise in framing bids and significant staff
Page 74

Page 75

resource to monitor compliance with grant conditions and report on progress and
spend in accordance with government directions. 
6.4 Despite reduction in specific revenue grants a sizeable proportion of Scottish
Government grant funding is subject to restrictions.  Funding directed by Scottish
Government is frequently less that the full cost of the initiative for which it is
required to be used. 
6.5 The Council is operating in an environment which is largely digital by default in its
dealing with other organisations.  This brings scope for efficiencies but also risk
from cyber attacks. 
6.6 The Council’s Learning Estate requires significant investment to bring facilities to
the Scottish Government’ recommended “B-B” standard.  School rolls are
projected to fall, which should result in reduction of expenditure, but Scottish
Government is maintaining pressure to meet targets for teacher numbers which
disregard pupil rolls.  Falling school rolls can also result in reduced General
Revenue Grant. 
6.7 The Council continues to have difficulty with staff recruitment and retention. 
7 Timescale for implementation
7.1 Key stages are set out below: 
July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
Efficiencies Develop Report     
Savings  Develop  Report  
Charges       Report 
Capital    Develop  Report 
Settlement    Draft  
Budget      Report 
7.2 This Strategy will be updated and progress reported to Council on a regular basis. 
Updates will track movements in the Budget on a Page and show the balance of the
savings target for 2026/27 as a percentage of the indicative net revenue budget   for
2026/27.  The Budget on a Page includes emerging issues and will be updated as they
are crystallised and as further issues emerge. 
Page 75

Page 76

APPENDIX 2 
BUDGET ON A PAGE 
2025/26
£000s 
2026/27
£000s 
2027/08
£000s 
Expenditure 294,197  303,582  310,842 
Income 294,197  301,737  309,797 
Shortfall -  1,845  1,045 £2.89m – this is
the budget gap         
SAVINGS
APPROVED      
Approved when the
budget set  
1,020  16 
Balance   825  1,029 £1.85m – this is
the residual
budget gap @ May
2025
Adjust for tolerance
level  
1,675   
Savings target for
2026/07  
2,500   
Potential to meet
savings target     
Notes
Grant dependent on
teacher numbers     
Balance of grant
£1.5m
Non Domestic Rates
Incentivisation
Scheme     
2024/25 target 1%
Reduction in
interest rates     
5% assumed when
budget set.  
Disposal of
Beechbrae     
In use by NHSG
until December
2025
Review of Workforce      
MIJB      Recovery Plan
Recurring
underspends 
Review 2024/25
out-turn
Automation of time
sheets      
Website rebuild   23   Current proposal       
Page 76

Page 77

Potential to
increase budget
gap      
MIJB      Increased demand
Pay award      Claims above
budget allowance
Council Tax cap /
freeze     
If not fully funded
SG grant funding      Initial indications
December 2025
Capital plan
recharges reduced     
Reduced capital
expenditure
Procurement      Major contracts;
move to cloud-
based systems;
contract inflation
Demand for funded
ELC     
Measures of trends
need to be
developed
Out of Area
placements     
Expenditure
currently rising
Other overspends
from 2024/25     
Review and
develop plans to
contain 
Page 77

Page 78

Page 78

Page 79

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Economy, Environment
and Finance)
Report No: FIN010/25  
Author: Nicky Gosling Contact Email: nicky.gosling@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Common Good Funds – Summary Expenditure For 2024/25 and
Estimated Disposable Income For 2025/26 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the final position of Common Good
Funds at 31 March 2025 and the estimated income available for disbursement in 2025/26.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section III (B) (16) of the Council's
Scheme of Administration relating to dealing with the Management and Investment of
funds including Common Good.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  The report provides the final outturn for 2024/25 and the budgeted income available for
disbursement in 2025/26 for each of the Common Good Funds, which the Council
administers.  
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS  
3.1  It is recommended that Council:   
i)  note the disbursements approved for 2024/25 for each of the Common Good
Funds shown in APPENDIX 1; 
ii)  approve the carry forward of the undisbursed balances for 2024/25 for the
Buckie, Cullen, Dufftown, Elgin, Portknockie, Keith, Findochty and Millbuies
Funds to be made available in 2025/26; 
iii)  agree the estimated income available for disbursement in 2025/26 shown in
APPENDIX 1; 
Item 10.
Page 79

Page 80

iv)  note the Balance Sheet for each Common Good at APPENDIX 2; and 
v)  note Common Good Fund asset register at APPENDIX 3.   
Nicky Gosling
Senior Accountant (Acting) 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The origins of Common Good Funds in Scotland are late 15th Century and they have been
defined as “all property of a Royal Burgh not acquired under statutory powers or held
under specified trusts”.  
4.2  Until 1975, the Town Councils or those Burghs in Moray having Common Good Funds
managed them.  Moray District Council took over the management until 1996 when this
Council took over responsibility.  The Members of the Council are in a similar position to
Trustees.  
4.3  The Council must retain the ability to continue to make grants from the Common Good
Funds to future generations.  For that reason preservation of the Common Good Funds’
Capital is essential. 
4.4  In addition, it is essential to use the revenue generated from the Funds to maintain the
land and buildings held as assets.  
4.5  The Council is obliged to maintain the Common Good Funds’ Balance whether as land,
buildings or cash.  Common Good Funds’ cash balances can be applied to acquire assets
or to carry out major repairs but Members must be satisfied that such acquisitions or
works carried out will provide a long term and lasting benefit to the particular Community
as a whole.  The same criteria have to apply to any disposal of assets.  
4.6  The Policy and Resources Committee on 20 June 2001 established the Council’s current
policy regarding distribution of the annual income available (paragraph 7 of Minute refers). 
At that time the Committee noted that the true value of money depreciates over time and
in an attempt to keep pace and at the same time to be able to make reasonable levels of
grants from the income earned, it agreed a policy of distributing two-thirds of the annual
income earned with the remaining one-third being retained to maintain the value of the
funds.  
4.7  The Policy and Resources Committee agreed on 16 January 2002 to continue with the
policy of distribution of two-thirds of the estimated annual income available from the
Common Good Funds (paragraph 22 of Minute refers).  The remaining third was to be re-
invested in order to maintain the funds for future generations.  
4.8  In order to speed up the processing of grant applications, the Policy and Resources
Committee delegated authority to the Head of Financial Services in consultation with
Local Members to consider grant applications and make appropriate awards.  Moray
Council agreed on 13 March 2019 (para 10 of Minute refers) that if two thirds or more of
local members are in agreement it is sufficient authority to proceed under delegated
authority of the Head of Financial Services.  If the agreement of at least two thirds cannot
Page 80

Page 81

be obtained on an application then the application will be reported to Policy and
Resources Committee.  
4.9  The Policy and Resources Committee at its meeting on 2 September 2008 (paragraph 12 of
Minute refers) agreed to allow unspent balances to be carried forward and be available to
use in the following two years.  Any unused funds after two years are added back to the
Fund balance.  At the same meeting the Committee also agreed that any overspends at
the end of the financial year would be limited to 25% of disposable income in that year and
would be replaced over the following two years.  
4.10  Members should note that the Council is required to account for depreciation on Common
Good assets.  As this is an accounting entry only, the disposable income continues to be
calculated prior to the deduction of depreciation.  
5.  PROPOSALS   
2024/25 DISPOSABLE INCOME AND DISBURSEMENTS APPROVED
5.1  APPENDIX 1 shows details of the estimated income and actual disbursements approved
for 2024/25 for each of the Common Good Funds.  
5.2  Elgin Common Good - the 2024/25 variance in Property Income is a result of a delay in
leasing to a new tenant due to building works required.  
5.3  Forres Common Good – the 2024/25 variance in Property Income is the result of a
backdated rent review for Clovenside Cemetery car park.  
5.4  Forres Common Good income projection for 25/26 is based on a full year’s rental for the
ground rent at Clovenside.  
5.5  Where rental rebates are awarded, the full amount of the rent is shown as income when
calculating the disbursable income and the rental rebate is shown as a disbursement.   
2025/26 DISPOSABLE INCOME
5.6  APPENDIX 1 details the current financial position of the Common Good Funds and the
estimated disposable income for 2025/26.    
5.7  The estimated income figure is calculated to assist Local Members’ decision making when
allocating grants. The figures are only there as a guide.  If a supported application would
breach the estimated income limit, disbursement can be made but will require Committee
approval.  
5.8  As can be seen in APPENDIX 1 there are a number of projects which have already been
approved by Local Members for 2025/26.  
5.9  In the calculation of disbursable income it has been assumed that the full amount of
rental income due in 2025/26 will be received.  
5.10  The interest for 2025/26 has been calculated using a two year fixed PWLB rate of 5.41% as
at the 1 April 2024.    
Page 81

Page 82

6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  ✓
Policy and Legal  
Financial ✓ 
Risk ✓ 
Staffing  ✓
Best Value and Transformation  
Property  
Information Communications Technology/Digital  
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   ✓
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  ✓ 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
The Council’s adoption of the policy of retaining one third of disposable income in each
financial year will protect the capital for each of the Common Good Funds and ensure
their sustainability in the future.  
6.4  Financial 
The financial implications are contained in the body of the report and are detailed in the
Appendices. 
One off Costs:
Page 82

Page 83

Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments       
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments       
6.5  Risk 
There is a risk of overspends exceeding 25% of disposable income if any unforeseen
emergency major repairs are required for properties owned by Common Good Funds.
Close monitoring of costs and the condition of properties will be undertaken by officers in
order to mitigate this risk. 
6.6  Staffing 
There are no staffing implications arising from this report..  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation  
6.8  Property 
The condition of all Common Good properties will be monitored in order to keep reactive
repairs to a minimum.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
There are no equalities, social inclusion and economic impacts arising directly from this
report.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
There are no climate change and biodiversity impacts arise directly from this report. 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with Local Members, Legal Services
Manager and Democratic Services Manager and any comments made have been
incorporated into the report  
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None 
Page 83

Page 84

APPENDIX 1 
Buckie Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Property Income  5,440  5,414               26 
Investment Income  88,744 88,309  435 
Other Income  - 846 (846)  
94,184  94,569  (385)
Less Administrative Costs  2,029  1,642  387  
92,155  92,927  (772)
Two thirds  61,437   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  13,456   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  74,893   
Grants Awarded During the Year         
Buckie Christmas Lights  2,753   
Buckie Community Alert Day  1,223   
Active Schools – Street Activities  688  
Buckie Men’s Shed  8,500  
Buckie Heritage Centre – Rental Rebate  2,700    
15,864   
Other Expenditure         
Sporadic parking enforcement sessions  3,040   
Legal report – Merson park  63  
Grounds maintenance recharge  6,000    
9,103       
Undisbursed Income  49,926   
Page 84

Page 85

Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Buckie 
£
Estimated Disposable Income
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
Disbursements approved to Date: 
• Buckie Community Alert Day
• Buckie Heritage Centre – Rental Rebate
• Grounds Maintenance Recharge
• Buckie Community Council – Linzee Gordon Park
• Royal British Legion Buckie Branch
• Buckie Community Council – Linzee Gordon Park
• Fishermen’s Hall 
63,926    
49,926 
113,852     
1,223
2,700
6,000
20,000
5,570
6,500
20,000  
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 51,859 
Page 85

Page 86

Cullen Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Investment Income  9,937  9,934  3 
9,937  9,934  3
Less Administrative Costs  42  99  (57)  
9,895  9,835  60
Two thirds  6,596   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  5,131   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  11,727   
Grants Awarded During the Year         
Robert the Bruce Endowment  2   
2        
Undisbursed Income  11,725   
Cullen Common Good Fund 
Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Cullen 
£
Estimated Disposable Income
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
Annual Recurring Requests Outstanding:- 
• Robert the Bruce Endowment
(This amount is £2.10 accrued annually until sum reaches a
reasonable amount to be paid out) 
6,911  
9,386   
16,297 
2
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 16,295 
Page 86

Page 87

Dufftown Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Property Income  -  -  - 
Investment Income  847  840  7 
Other Income  8  8  - 
855  848  7 
Less Administrative Costs  94  8  86  
761  840  (79)
Two thirds  508   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  483   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  991   
Grants Awarded During the Year 
Grounds Maintenance Recharge  508       
Undisbursed Income  483 
Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Dufftown 
£
Estimated Disposable Income 577
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
Disbursements approved to date:- 
• Grounds Maintenance Recharge 
483      
1,060 
508
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 552 
Page 87

Page 88

Elgin Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Property Income  26,527  21,941  4,586
Investment Income  86,779  85,446  1,333
Other Income  - 554 (554)  
113,306  107,941  5,365
Less Administrative Costs  2,770  3,190  (420)  
110,536  104,751  5,785
Two thirds  73,691   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  29,798   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  103,489   
Actual Grants Awarded         
Mum Days  500  
Elgin and District Pipe Band  5,000  
The Rotary Club of Elgin – Bonfire 2024  5,000    
10,500   
Other Expenditure         
Contribution to Sonic Seagull Control 2024-25  26,760   
Parking Enforcement  9,690  
Ladyhill Grass Cutting  636  
Grounds Maintenance Recharge  11,000  
MC BIDS 239 High Street, Elgin  101  
239 High St Repairs  276  
Council Tax 239 High St, Elgin  3,029  
Running Costs 239 High St, Elgin  1,390    
52,882   
Undisbursed Income   40,107   
Page 88

Page 89

Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Elgin 
£
Estimated Disposable Income 73,236
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
Disbursements approved to Date: 
• Moray Street and School Pastors
• Sonic Seagull Deterrent
• Repairs to 239 High Street
• Grounds Maintenance Recharge
• Ladyhill Grass Cutting 
40,107     
113,343 
2,185
31,680
29,925
11,000
636 
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 37,917 
Page 89

Page 90

Forres Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Property Income  31,850  36,204  (4,354) 
Investment Income  26,130  26,337  (207)
Other Income  -  200 (200)  
57,980 62,741  (4,761)
Less Administrative Costs  3,364  3,198  166 
54,616  59,543  4,927
Two thirds  36,410   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  585   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  36,995   
Grants Awarded During the Year    
Forres in Bloom 2024  5,000  
Forres Community Activities Association
entertainment licence   333  
Transition Town Forres Rental Rebate  8,700   
Grounds Maintenance Recharge  22,962  
Undisbursed Income  0   
Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Forres 
£
Estimated Disposable Income 36,410
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2024/25 
Disbursements approved to Date:
• Transition Town Forres – Rental Rebate
• Grounds Maintenance Recharge 
-
36,995 
8,700
22,962  
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 5,333  
Page 90

Page 91

Portknockie Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Investment Income  2,934  2,934 -  
2,934  2,934  - 
Less Administrative Costs  62  29  33  
2,872  2,905  (33)
Two thirds  1,915   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  1,573   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  3,488   
Grants Awarded During the Year  -               
Undisbursed Income  3,488   
Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Portknockie 
£
Estimated Disposable Income 2,042
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
Disbursements approved to Date:
2,704 
4,746 
-
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 4,746 
Page 91

Page 92

Keith Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Investment Income  636  633  3 
636  633  3 
Less Administrative Costs  322  326  (-4) 
314  307  7
Two thirds  210   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  372   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  582   
Grants Awarded During the Year     
Ground Maintenance Recharge  210       
Undisbursed Income  372   
Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Keith 
£
Estimated Disposable Income
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25)
210                 
372   
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
Disbursements approved to Date: 
• Grounds Maintenance Recharge 
582 
210
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 372 
Page 92

Page 93

Findochty Common Good Fund 
Actual Financial Performance against Estimated Figures for 2024-25 
Estimate Actual Variance  
£ £ £     
Investment Property Income  1,500  1,498  2 
Investment Income  322  399  (77)  
1,822  1,897  (75)
Less Administrative Costs  76  79  (3)  
1,746  1,818 (72)
Two thirds  1,164   
C/f undisbursed income from prior years  1,989   
Total Budget Available for Disbursement 2024/25  3,153   
Grants Awarded During the Year  -       
-        
Undisbursed Income  3,153   
Estimated Figures for Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Findochty 
£
Estimated Disposable Income 1,228
Undisbursed Income (unused limit carry forward from 2024/25) 
Total Available for Disbursement 2025/26 
2,149 
3,377 
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 3,377 
Page 93

Page 94

Millbuies Country Park 
Actual Financial Performance for 2024-25 
Actual  
£
Tree Felling Income  17,398
Forest Management Fees  9,725
Surplus/(Deficit)  7,673 
Estimated Disposable Income in 2025/26 
Millbuies Forestry Operations 
£
Deficit 2023/24
Surplus 2024/25 
Estimated Expenditure: 
• Pathworks at Millbuies 
(175)             
7,673  
7,498 
2,203
Projected Income Available for Disbursement 5,295 
Page 94

Page 95

Appendix 2             
Balance Sheet as at 31st March 2025 by Common Good Fund     
Buckie Cullen Dufftown Elgin Forres Portknockie Keith Lossie Findochty Millbuies Total  
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Fixed Assets   2,385   17  -  11,832   2,029  -  302   1,876  - -  18,441 
Current Assets            
Debtors and Stocks   1  - -  8  - - - - - -  9 
Loans Fund
Balance   1,703   193   16   1,645   501   57   12  -  8   8   4,143 
1,704   193   16   1,653   501   57   12  -  8   8   4,152 
Current Liabillities            
Creditors  - - -  1   4  - - -  1  -  6 
- - -  1   4  - - -  1  -  6 
Total Net Assets    4,089   210   16   13,484   2,526   57   314   1,876   7   8   22,587 
Financed By:            
Revaluation
Reserve   2,336   17  -  10,669   1,064  -  59   1,876  - -  16,021 
Revenue Balance   1,753   193   16   2,815   1,462   57   255  -  7   8   6,566 
Reserves    4,089   210   16   13,484   2,526   57   314   1,876   7   8   22,587 
Page 95

Page 96

APPENDIX 3
Common Good Asset Register  
Buckie
Common Good 
Town House West (Hall), Cluny Place, Buckie AB56 1HB 
Library, Cluny Place, Buckie, AB56 1HB 
Fishing Heritage Centre, Cluny Place, Buckie AB56 1HB 
Town House West (Offices), Cluny Place, Buckie AB56 1HB 
Public Toilets, Cluny Place, Buckie 
Sites Opposite 26 Barron St, Buckie AB56 1XD 
42A Freuchny Rd, Buckie AB56 1TX 
25B East Cathcart St, Buckie AB56 1JP 
Site to rear of 5 Bridge Place, Buckie 
Store, Freuchny Road, Buckie 
Linzee Gordon Park, Buckie - Public Park, Play Area and Pavilion 
Cricket Club Linzee Gordon Park, Buckie 
Pavilion And Football Ground, 
Merson Park, 
Barhill Road, 
Buckie 
Merson Park - Public Park and Play Area 
Buckie Victoria Bowling Club, West Church Street, Buckie 
Heritable Assets - Ansons Collection 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office    
Cullen
Common Good 
Market Cross Monument, The Square, Cullen 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office    
Dufftown
Common Good 
Tininver Park, Tininver Street, Dufftown 
Store, Tininver Street, Dufftown 
Woodland Princess Royal Park Conval Street Dufftown 
Woodland Bridge Of Poolinch Dufftown 
Woodland Tininver Brae Dufftown 
Woodland Mortlach Distillery Dufftown    
Page 96

Page 97

Elgin Common
Good 
239 High Street, Elgin, IV30 1DJ 
Site Adjacent To 239 High Street Elgin Moray 
Riverside Caravan site, Elgin IV30 8UN 
Field Adjacent to The Oaks, Morriston Road, Elgin 
Field Adjacent to Oakview, Morriston Road, Elgin 
Shooting Acres & Aughteen Park Lands, Pluscarden Road, Elgin 
Moray Leisure Centre, Borough Briggs Road IV30 1AP 
Field at Riverside, West Road, Elgin 
Ground adjacent to The Mansion House, Blackfriars Rd, Elgin 
The Oaks, Morriston Road, Elgin IV30 6UN 
Playing field, Borough Briggs Rd, Elgin 
Lesser Borough Briggs, Borough Briggs Road, Elgin 
Play area, McIntosh Drive, Elgin 
Play area, Ardgilzean Place, Elgin 
Loch and Country Park, Millbuies, Elgin 
Field at Country Park, Millbuies, Longmorn, Elgin 
Depot Cooper Park, Elgin 
Greenfingers Nursery, King Street , Elgin IV30 1HU 
Biblical Gardens, King Street, Elgin 
Training Centre, Cooper Park, King Street, Elgin 
Rainbow Castle, Borough Briggs Road, Elgin 
Dovecot Pavilion, Elgin 
Monument, Prospect Terrace, Lossiemouth (Charter of Novodamus) 
Site opposite 2 Seatown, Lossiemouth (Charter of Novodamus) 
Public Convenience, Seatown Rd, Lossiemouth IV31 6JL (Charter of
Novodamus) 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office    
Forres
Common Good 
Forres Mechanics Football Ground, Mosset Park, Lea Rd, Forres IV36 1AU 
Forres Bowling Club, St Catherines Rd , Forres 
Nelsons Tower 
The Greens, Forres 
Transition Town Forres Car Park, Bogton Road, Forres IV36 3TW 
Transition Town Forres, Bogton Road, Forres IV36 3TW 
Bogton Playing Field and Play Area, Bogton, Forres 
Christies Elite Nurseries Limited, Bogton Rd, Forres IV36 3TW 
38a Clovenside Road (adjacent to Clovenside Cemetry), Forres 
Field, Pilmuir Road West, Forres 
Kingsmeadow Field, Forres 
Field A Clovenside 
Field B Clovenside 
Page 97

Page 98

Market Cross Monument, High St, Forres 
Forres Golf Course, Forres IV36 2RD 
Land at mouth of River Findhorn 
Applegrove Garden, Sanquhar Road, Forres 
Roysvale Park and Pavillion, Sanquhar Road, Forres 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office    
Keith Common
Good 
Nursery Park, Keith 
Show Ground Store, Seafield Park, Keith AB55 5AJ 
Pavillion, Seafield Park, Keith 
Seafield Park, Keith 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office    
Lossiemouth
Common Good 
Coulardbank Pavillion, Coulardbank Playing Fields, Lossie 
Coulardbank Playing Fields, Coulardbank Road, Lossiemouth 
Pitch Coulardbank Playing Fields, Coulardbank Road, Lossiemouth 
1st Lossiemouth Scout Hall, Elgin Road, Lossiemouth IV31 6HD 
Town Hall,  High Street,  Lossiemouth   IV31 6AA 
Lossiemouth Library,  High Street,  Lossiemouth   IV31 6AA 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office    
Findochty
Common Good 
Telecommunications Mast, Town Hall, 22 Station Road, Findochty    
Burghead
Common Good 
St Aethans Park and Play Area, St Aethans Rd, Burghead 
Heritable Assets - Chains of Office   
Page 98

Page 99

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Education Communities
and Organisational
Development) 
Report No: DCE(ECOD)006/25   
Author: Louise Marshall Contact Email: performance@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Corporate Plan – Progress Update 2024-25 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to scrutinise and note progress made during 2024-25 on the
Corporate Plan 2024-29.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (A) (4) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to monitoring performance in accordance with the Council’s
performance management framework. 
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  This report brings together reporting on all Corporate Plan actions during the reporting
period across 3 levels:
• A high-level overview of progress against actions and key performance indicators with
key highlights (para 5.2 below refers)
• More detailed analysis in Appendix 1, identifying key performance indicators for each
Corporate Plan priority with a RAG table and chart providing a snapshot of progress
against underlying actions and performance indicators.  
• Backing tables provide the line-by-line detail for all are included as links in background
papers
- Actions – what we said we were going to do 
- Performance Indicators – the evidence of change 
Item 11.
Page 99

Page 100

3.  RECOMMENDATIONS  
3.1  It is recommended that the Council scrutinises and notes progress made during 2024-
25 on the Corporate Plan 2024-29.   
Author Name Louise Marshall
Job Title  Strategy and Performance Manager 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The Corporate Plan is an important document that is intended to provide clarity and
direction on the Council’s priorities, values and plans.  Its publication assists in
communicating these to the public, the workforce and partners.  
4.2  The plan provides the context for implementation, the constraints within which the
Council must operate, the challenges and pressures and the organisational change
required to successfully deliver the priorities.  It provides a link between the national
priorities, the Moray Community Planning Partnership’s plan and the Council’s own plans
and priorities so that these can be cascaded into actions and delivery within service plans.  
4.3  While the Corporate Plan provides focus, it is not intended to encompass every Council
service that contributes directly or indirectly to the priorities or indeed those aspects of
services which are less of a priority. 
4.4  The Corporate Plan 2024-2029 and Delivery Framework were approved by the Council on
28 February 2024 (para 5 of the Minute refers).  The Plan sets out Council’s priorities and
vision over the 5-year period and how the Council plans to progress these priorities,
including the financial strategy aimed at progressing towards financial sustainability. 
• Tackle poverty and inequality
• Build stronger greener vibrant economy
• Build thriving, resilient, empowered communities 
The Delivery Framework sets out more detailed actions which will be taken to achieve
these priorities.  Actions are refreshed annually as part of the Service Planning process
and updated Delivery Frameworks will be submitted to Committee in due course.  Any
work outstanding in the delivery framework covering the period to March 2025 will be
either incorporated within refreshed service plan actions or completed at a departmental
level. 
4.5  Progress against actions incorporated within Service Plans is monitored and reported
through service committees as described in the Council’s Performance Management
Framework. 
4.6  The Sustainable Development Statement was approved by the Corporate Committee on
5 November 2024 (para 16 of the Minute refers).  The Statement draws out the way in
which sustainable development is embedded in the Corporate Plan 2024-29 and wider
corporate policies, strategies and plans with progress being reported through several
updates and reports, one of which is quarter 4 performance reporting in which Service
Plan actions and indicators that underpin the delivery of Sustainable Development Goals
Page 100

Page 101

were highlighted in backing table documents.  An overview of progress is incorporated in
this report (para 5.4 refers). 
5.  PROPOSALS 
5.1  High Level Overview of Actions and Performance Indicators: The following charts and
tables provide a streamlined set of data that reflects a snapshot of performance against
strategic priorities in the Corporate Plan. 
All actions have equal weighting and are subject to update and refresh annually following
review of Service Plans.  Although due dates range across multiple years, the table
presents progress by year in which actions are due to complete as well as overall
cumulative progress over the 5-year term of the plan.   
In the year to March 2025, 25 actions were due for completion, 11 actions completed as
planned and 14 actions will continue to progress out with their original due date.  Overall,
67% of planned work was completed.  In addition, progress was made against actions due
to be completed in future years, including the completion of 4 actions ahead of schedule. 
Based on the current 57 defined actions in the period of the Corporate Plan to 2029, the
Plan is 51% complete.  These figures will change annually following the refresh of Service
Plan actions that contribute to the delivery of Corporate Plan priorities. 
There were 56 corporate plan performance indicators, 2024-25 data is provided where
available, however for most indicator data relates to 2023-24.   
Thirty-two indicators have targets, of those 18 indicators achieved or were within
tolerance levels of target and 14 indicators did not meet expected levels of performance,
monitoring will continue through the cycle of performance reporting to committee as set
out in the Council’s Performance Management Framework.   
In terms of short-term trend, based on the previous year’s result, 35% of indicators show
an improving trend and 41% a worsening trend, results remain unchanged for 9% and data
is not available for the final 14%. 
Priority 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 
No of Actions
% progress by due date
No % No % No % No % No % Cumulative
Poverty 6 62% 11 37%       46%
Economy 8 63% 1 66%       63%
Communities 3 48% 8 46% 6 34%   2 21% 40%
Delivery Framework 8 81% 2 53% 1 60% 1 20%   70%
Overall  25 67% 22 43% 7 37% 1 20% 2 21% 51% 
Page 101

Page 102

5.2  Highlights of Achievements: summarised from action updates and related reports to
service committees through the reporting year. 
Tackle Poverty and Inequality
• Child poverty data set agreed by Committee to include data on key priority groups.
• Fairer Moray Forum Action Group mapped supports available in Moray and distributed
to all households in Moray.
• Family Fest event held on 19 September provided updates on progress with Children’s
Service Plan and raised awareness of organisations and service supporting children,
young people and families.
• Raising Attainment Strategy developed and implemented.
• Universal and targeted primary and secondary school challenge visits undertaken.
• Pupil Equity Fund and Strategic Equity Fund delivering projects across most Associated
School Groups lining in with attendance, attainment, achievement, health and
wellbeing. 
Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy
• Bus Revolution m:connect project progressed; charging locations agreed, group
booking function released and vehicle orders placed.
• 7 of 8 Moray Growth Deal projects in delivery; Bus Revolution, Digital Health, Housing
Mix and Manufacturing and Innovation Centre for Moray (MICM), Business Enterprise
Hub, Cultural Quarter and Early Years STEM.
• 313 people supported by Moray Pathways in the year to March 2025, participants
entered employment, participated in vocational skills programme, Sector Based Work
Academy Programme (SWAP) and further or higher education.
• Pathway participants benefitted from barrier removal activities, Creative skills network
activities, CLD personal development and counselling.
• Child Poverty Officer within Employability Team in post focused on interface between
the child poverty plan and employability.
• Pathways referral system in place for secondary schools to support pupils and parents 
Build Thriving, Resilient, Empowered Communities
• Strategic Housing Investment Plan agreed by Committee
• The Link facility in New Elgin launched with focus around developing community
involvement and activity
• Buckie Community Lunches continue with attendances averaging at 83 residents
• Networking session co-delivered by community partners in Buckie to bring together
local groups
• Mental Health and Wellbeing funding secured to support self-funding of volunteer led
Buckie Community Hub
• Learning estate consultation and engagement undertaken in Keith, Elgin, Forres and
Buckie associated school groups completed and work on design and construction on
planned sites progressed 
Delivery Framework
• Capital and Revenue Budgets and Medium to Long term financial plan approved
• Workforce Planning Report and Workforce Strategy 2024-27 agreed by committee
• Expansion of digital approach has continued in several areas with development and go
live of online forms for grit bin fault reporting, short term lets renewals, benefits
Page 102

Page 103

applications, grass cutting, council tax enquiries, money advice, garden waste permits,
school registration and early learning / childcare submission.
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool designed for Microsoft 365 suite piloted involving 75 staff. 
5.3 . Sustainable Development: embedded in our priorities are selected key actions and
indicators which the Council has prioritised to demonstrate the impact of sustainable
development in relation to social, economic and environmental issues. 
Social
There are three areas contributing to this theme, with most of the work being delivered via
the Children’s Service Plan; a child poverty data set was established and support
available across Moray was mapped and promoted.  Planned work on early intervention
addressing whole family well-being was completed and the focus around getting it right
for every child was on Leadership of Change in planning for improvement.  2023/24 results
for national indicators have yet to be published. 
Economic
Good progress has been made in bringing 7 of the remaining 8 Moray Growth Deal projects
into delivery.  Community Wealth Building Strategy approved by Committee; however
resourcing challenges are restricting delivery of actions.  The Local Employability
Partnership Moray Pathways continued to support individuals into fair and sustainable
jobs, more recently assisting employees affected by the closure of St Giles Centre. 
Median gross weekly earnings by place of work at £688.80 is on an improving trend, albeit
remaining below the national average if £739.70.  Latest data for 2024 reported 14.0% of
people earned less than the living wage, below the family group average but remaining
above the national average.  Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings provisional results
report the gender pay gap has widened. 
Environmental
Levelling Up funding was confirmed in the UK Government’s November budget
announcement; delivery of elements of the Elgin City Centre Masterplan is underway.  The
Strategic Housing Investment Plan, approved by Committee in November 2024 will enable
the delivery of housing investment and affordable housing supply programmes.  Tackling
the affordability and standard of our learning estate is progressing as planned on longer
term design and construction projects with engagement and consultation completed in
affected associated school group areas. 
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) √ 
Policy and Legal √ 
Financial √ 
Risk √ 
Staffing  √
Best Value and Transformation √ 
Page 103

Page 104

Property √ 
Information Communications Technology/Digital  √
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact  √ 
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact √ 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☒ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☒ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☒ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☒ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☒ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☒ Empowering and connecting communities.
☒ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
Consideration was given to relevant policy and legislative requirements and direction in its
preparation.  The Plan sets out direction for the Council which may influence the
development of future policy and this will be reported where appropriate.  
6.4  Financial 
The Corporate Plan recognises that the council makes difficult decisions to continue to
work within budget constraints.  Setting out priorities assists in making those decisions. 
6.5  Risk 
The Corporate Plan employs robust risk management arrangements to the decision-
making process that will be used in the management and monitoring of the plan.  It is
increasingly important that there is strong political leadership, direction and resilience in
the pursuit of the corporate agenda.  
6.6  Staffing 
There are no staffing implications arising from this report.  Any realignment of resources as
the Council’s business is reviewed may lead to workforce implications in future which will
be reported when relevant.  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
The Accounts Commission Direction 2021 requires council’s to report a range of
information to show improving local services and local outcomes and demonstrating best
value.   
Page 104

Page 105

6.8  Property 
There are no property implications arising from this report.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
There are no information communications, technology, digital implications arising from
this report.  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
The Council’s ongoing commitment to equalities is reflected in the Corporate Plan.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
The Council’s ongoing commitment to climate change and biodiversity is reflected in the
Corporate Plan. 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Corporate Leadership Team and
Heads of Service and any comments made have been incorporated into the report 
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  Corporate Plan 2024-25 – Actions 
Corporate Plan 2024-25 – Performance Indicators 
Page 105

Page 106

APPENDIX 1
Corporate Plan > 2029: Progress Update 2024-25 
Priority: Tackle Poverty and Inequality 
Key Performance Indicators Target Benchmarking Comparator
Averages 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Short term
trend
Proportion of children living in poverty (after housing costs) 20.8% 23.1%
Family Group 23.9% N/A N/A 
Literacy Attainment Gap (P1,4,7 Combined) – percentage point gap
between the least deprived and most deprived pupils 23.7% 23.7%
Family Group 32.1% N/A N/A 
Numeracy Attainment Gap (P1,4,7 Combined) – percentage point gap
between the least deprived and most deprived pupils 20.3% 20.3%
Family Group 26.6% N/A N/A 
Percentage of pupils achieving expected level in Literacy (P1,4,7
Combined) 77.1% 72.8%
Family Group 67.9% 70.6% N/A 
Percentage of pupils achieving expected level in Numeracy (P1,4,7
Combined) 82.9% 78.9%
Family Group 75.5% 76.5% N/A 
Percentage of pupils gaining 5+ awards at Level 5 62% 64%
Family Group 62% 62% N/A 
Percentage of pupils gaining 5+ awards at Level 6 33% 36%
Family Group 28% 30% N/A 
Overall Average Total Tariff 837 873
Family Group 834 825 N/A 
Percentage of pupils entering Positive Destinations 95.2% 95.2%
Family Group 95.1% 93.8% N/A 
Desired Outcome Due Date Latest Status Update Progress
(cumulative) Status Icon Progress made ‘Go to Green’ Plan
TACKLE POVERTY AND INEQUALITY – 
Overall Progress   31-Mar-2026
Progress against planned work to complete by due date
(year) 
March 2025 – 62% (6 actions, 2 complete)
March 2026 – 37% (11 actions, 3 complete)
46% 
Maximise household income by working with partners to ensure
financial inclusion services have maximum reach 31-Mar-2026
Child poverty data set
established and informing
improvement activity.
Supports for those experiencing
poverty mapped and
distributed across Moray to
Roll out Financial Inclusion
Pathway to other relevant
child-based NHS teams to
further increase sign posting
and referrals for parents of
children under 5, data
capture to continue to
33% 
Page 106

Page 107

clearly articulate support
available.
identify barriers, additional
training to Health Visitors
around routine enquiries for
financial worries to be
confident families are getting
everything they are entitled
to.  Thereafter evaluate and
assess impact
Early intervention addressing whole family well-being to ensure that
children can reach their full potential 31-Mar-2026
Pre-school children supported
as part of transition planning for
primary 1.  Universal and
targeted programmes of
support in place in primary and
secondary schools.  Early
indication data used to
strengthen challenge and
support visits. Improvement
attainment in some measures.
Research based work to explore
parents view on family support
needs completed.
PEEP learning together
programme model in place
through commissioning
process.
Recruitment to manager post
to coordinate development of
family support in Moray and
bring provision together to
outline support pathway and
identify gaps in service.
Funding pooling across
partnership to ensure long
term sustainability for
parent’s support pathway. 
Roll out PEEP learning
together programme across
Moray Partnership to
maximise opportunities to
gain qualifications leading to
employment in childcare.
52% 
Getting it right for every child so that we continue to improve
attainment for all 30-Jun-2025
Focus on Leadership of Change
to support schools and early
learning centres to reflect
inwards and outwards. 
Improvement across some
attainment measures.
Continue improvement at
both Broad General and
Senior Phase identified
through ACEL and LGBF
measures.
100% 
Page 107

Page 108

Priority: Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy
Key Performance Indicators Target Benchmarking Comparator
Averages 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Short term
trend
Proportion of 16-29 year olds within Moray Data only 16.9%
Scotland 14.4% 14.6% N/A 
Moray median weekly earnings – by place of work (ONS – ASHE based
on provisional data for 2024 – aligned with SLAED indicator) Data only £739.70
Scotland £619.50 £647.20 £688.80 
Moray median weekly earnings – by place of residence (ONS – ASHE
based on provisional data for 2024 – aligned with SLAED indicator) Data only £740.00
Scotland £509.80 £647.10 £638.60 
Proportion of people earning less than the living wage 11.4% 9.4%
Family Group 13.8% 14.4% 14.0% 
Gender Pay Gap – Moray being place of work (ONS – ASHE based on
provisional data for 2024 - aligned with SLAED indicator) Data only 9.2%
Scotland 7.6% 12.5% 16.3% 
Desired Outcome Due Date Latest Status Update Progress
(cumulative) Status Icon Progress made ‘Go to Green’ Plan
BUILD STRONGER GREENER VIBRANT ECONOMY - Overall Progress   31-Mar-2026
Progress against planned work to complete by due date
(year) 
March 2025 – 63% (8 actions, 4 complete)
March 2026 – 66% (1 action, 0 complete)
63% 
Progress Moray Growth Deal: bring the remaining Moray Growth Deal
projects into delivery 30-Jun-2025
Increased public transport
passenger journeys, reduced
environmental impact of
transport in the area.
7 of 8 Moray Growth Deal
Projects entered delivery
phase.
Phase 2 launch of Bus
Revolution m:connect.
Replacement Growth Deal
Project for MAATIC. 83% 
Delivery of the Community Wealth Building Strategy and Action Plan 31-Mar-2025
Community Wealth Building
Strategy 2024 and Action Plan
approved.
Constraints around delivery
of Strategy due to resourcing,
recruitment to CWB Officer
post commenced.  Go live of
Community Identified
Benefits list for Moray
following officer
appointment.
30% 
Improve access to fair work, employment and training opportunities 31-Mar-2025
Local Employability Partnership
Moray Pathways supported
individuals into fair and
sustainable jobs through
Additional promotion of
parents’ service to increase
access to grants/allowances
through Moray Pathways.
66% 
Page 108

Page 109

projects aimed at tackling child
poverty, improving access to
community hubs and
supporting people with
disabilities.
Employability Child Poverty
Officer appointed and
promoting access, support
provision for those aged 15
years and over no longer in
Education.
Data gathering and preparatory
work completed by HIREP
Childcare Working Group.
Increased childcare service
provision and reduced costs to
families secured because of
collaborative working between
3rd sector, m:connect and
Employability.
Progress collaborative
development of affordable
wrap around childcare pilots
in Buckie and Forres.
Upscale wrap around
childcare throughout Moray
following learning from tests
of change. 
Enable more people to work by supporting access to affordable
childcare 31-Mar-2025
Progress for Parents project
supported 27 individuals
accessed schools aged
childcare, learning and
employment through Moray
Employer Recruitment Scheme
(MERI), with most sustaining
their 6-month placement.
Further minimise the barrier
to people working such as
childcare, transport issues,
training and qualifications,
language skills and
confidence.
Develop options on School
Aged Childcare provision
presented to the Board in
June 2025.
40% 
Page 109

Page 110

Priority: Build Thriving Resilient Empowered Communities 
Key Performance Indicators Target Benchmarking Comparator
Averages 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 Short term
trend
Town Vacancy Rates 9.0% 13.1%
Family Group 10.6% 14.1% N/A 
Number of new Community Action Plans in place 3 N/A 3 3 N/A 
Percentage of Council services who have devolved
funding to PB processes 100% N/A 36% 36% 36% 
Number of affordable housing completions at end of
current financial year Data only N/A 146 97 85 
Percentage of schools that are rated B or better for
condition 50.9% N/A 46.3% 41% N/A 
Percentage of schools that are rated B or better for
suitability 100% N/A 98.1% 100% N/A 
CO2 emissions area wide per capita Data
Only
5.5
Family Group 4.64 N/A N/A 
CO2 emissions within scope of LA per capita Data
only
5.17
Family Group 6.94 N/A N/A 
Desired Outcome Due Date Latest Status Update Progress
(cumulative) Status Icon Progress made ‘Go to Green’ Plan
BUILD THRIVING RESILIENT EMPOWERED COMMUNITIES - Overall
Progress   31-Mar-2029
Progress against planned work to complete by due date
(year) 
March 2025 – 48% (3 actions, 1 complete)
March 2026 – 46% (8 actions, 0 complete)
March 2027 – 34% (6 actions, 0 complete)
March 2029 – 21% (2 actions, 0 complete)
40% 
Delivery of the Levelling Up Fund elements of the Elgin City Centre
Masterplan 31-Mar-2026
UK Government funding
confirmed in November, and
Memorandum of
Understanding signed, and
Programme Manager recruited.
Significant investment in South
Street regeneration project.
Progress for the sawmill site,
Creative Arts Centre and
Cooper Park toilets projects
within extended timeline for
spend of March 2027.
10% 
Delivery of Town Centre Improvement Plan & Annual Report 31-Mar-2025
Update on Town Centre
Regeneration Projects and
Delays in confirmation of
funding and Planning
resourcing.
15% 
Page 110

Page 111

Funding provided to
Committee.
Coordination of Town Centre
regeneration projects and
securement of funding for
proposals.
Plans reflected in new ‘place-
based’ Local Development
Plan.
Take a partnership approach to locality planning in priority areas of
Moray to enable people to influence services and develop community
action
31-Mar-2026
Annual report from Localities
work submitted to Community
Planning Board meeting in
March who reaffirmed their
collective support for Buckie
and New Elgin.
Learning Estate engagement
progressing as planned.
Young people PB engagement
around open spaces in Forres
and allocation of Corra Trust
funding.
Digital Engagement platform
commissioned.
Participatory Budgeting
subject to a change of
approach with confirmation
of activity and spend provided
by services.  
44% 
Delivery of the Housing. Investment and Affordable Housing Supply
programmes 31-Mar-2025
Strategic Housing Investment
Plan (SHIP) approved by
Committee.
Delivery of Housing,
Investment and Affordable
Housing Supply Programmes
to increase the supply of
affordable housing.
100% 
Tackle the affordability and standard of our learning estate to ensure
sustainability while meeting climate requirements 31-Mar-2029
Planned work progressed on
Elgin High School, Forres
Academy. Options appraisal
prepared for Buckie High
School and planning for
progress.  Extensive
consultation across associated
school groups completed.
Continued design and
construction of learning
estate programme.
Update options to manage
Elgin South primary school
capacity requirements
37% 
Page 111

Page 112

Priority: Delivery Framework 
Desired Outcome Due Date Latest Status Update Progress
(cumulative) Status Icon Progress made ‘Go to Green’ Plan
STRATEGIC DELIVERY FRAMEWORK – Overall Progress 31-Mar-2028
Progress against planned work to complete by due date
(year) 
March 2025 – 81% (8 actions, 4 complete)
March 2026 – 53% (2 actions, 1 complete)
March 2027 – 60% (1 action, 0 complete)
March 2028 – 20% (1 action, 0 complete)
70% 
Financial Planning 30-Jun-2025
Capital Plan and Revenue
Budget approved and financial
planning in place to ensure
future financial sustainability.
Further develop mainstream
Participatory Budgeting
approach. 75% 
Workforce Strategy 31-Mar-2025
Indicative strategy with phased
approach to take account of
management review.
Planned work on recruitment
and retention activities
affected by resourcing issues
but progressing out with
original due dates.
83% 
Digital Strategy 31-Aug-2027
Improved efficiency and
effectiveness in the delivery of
services with the continued
expansion of online forms.
Pilot programme of Copilot
running.
Further develop Data Strategy
and Action Plan. 
28% 
Transformation Projects  Transformation Strategy Development update submitted
to Moray Council in August 2024 (item 6a refers)  
Performance Management Framework 31-Dec-2024
Timely reporting that identifies
issues and contributes to
improvement.
PSIF pilot undertaken.
Roll out PSIF across council
services not participating in
any other self-assessment
activities.
92% 
Page 112

Page 113

Page 113

Page 114

Page 114

Page 115

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Chief Executive Report No: HR010/25/FG/KC  
Author: Frances Garrow Contact Email: hr@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Public Performance Report 2024-25 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to ask Council to consider the Public Performance Report
(PPR) 2024-25 which reports progress and performance of Council services against
Corporate Plan 2024-2029 priorities in a format accessible to the public.    
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (A) (4) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to contributing to public performance reporting.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  The Public Performance Report 2024-25 reports on progress against Corporate Plan
Priorities. With the agreement of the Council, the report will be published on the Council’s
website.  
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that the Council:   
i)  Note the revised format; 
ii)  Consider and approve the Public Performance Report 2024-25 which reports
Council performance and progress against 2024-2029 priorities; and 
iii)  Agree the PPR for publication on the Council website   
Author Name   
Frances Garrow, Head of HR, ICT and Organisational Development
Kirsty Craig, Senior Communications Officer 
Item 12.
Page 115

Page 116

4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The Accounts Commission has a statutory power to define the performance information
that Councils must publish for performance comparison and benchmarking purposes.
The Commission issues a Statutory Performance Information (SPI) Direction to Councils
which sets out the performance information that Councils require to publish. This must
include progress against improving local services and outcomes and demonstrating best
value and is to be presented in an accessible style for citizens and communities.  
4.2  The Council’s Performance Management Framework sets out the arrangements to report
on progress against the strategic objectives, including those in the Council Corporate Plan
and local government benchmarking information from appropriate sources (e.g. Local
Government Benchmarking Framework LGBF)). These elements of public performance
reporting throughout the year (as noted below) are drawn into an annual public
performance report presented in a more user-friendly format that is published online each
year.
• Corporate plan annual progress monitoring (also on Council agenda for
this meeting)
• Local Outcomes Improvement plan monitoring
• Reporting on partnership plans and strategies (e.g. Children’s Services
Plan, CLD Strategy)
• Service plan 6 monthly reporting
• LGBF annual reporting  
4.3  Throughout 2024-25 the Council has continued to respond to the Accounts Commission’s
Best Value Assurance requirements as contained in the Best Value Action Plan agreed by
full Council on 28 April 2024 with quarterly updates to Corporate Committee on 5
November 2024, 28 January 2025 and 10 June 2025. 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  The Annual Public Performance Report 2024-25 is the first in a revised format that is
designed to be more accessible and easy to read in the form of a webpage. By presenting
the report as a webpage the data can be updated in real-time when it is available to ensure
the most up-to-date performance information is available to the public and interested
parties.  
5.2  The report draws from information that has been reported to Council or Committee
throughout the year for performance monitoring and scrutiny to provide an overall
appraisal of performance of Council services, performance data and summarises the
actions that have been taken to progress corporate plan priorities with a continued focus
on outcomes.  
5.3  The information within the Public Performance Report shows a number of areas where
local services are improving and those identified for further improvement as reported to,
and scrutinised by, Council throughout the year.  Key trends are highlighted and presented
in a visually appeal way for public awareness.  
5.4 There are a number of areas where the LGBF performance results were not available when
the reports are prepared, as reported to Corporate Committee on 22 April 2025.  Similarly,
Page 116

Page 117

any areas where performance results are not available for this report will be updated on
the webpage when they become available.  
5.5 The target audience for the PPR is the public and the media.  For that reason, the new style
of PPR was tested with key media contacts for feedback.  Responses received stated the
webpage was easier to navigate than the previous document version; statistics and trends
were easy to pick out and comparisons were useful.  While the split between narrative and
data was welcomed the narrative was still thought to be in ‘Council speak’, this has now
been reviewed further. 
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1 The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) √ 
Policy and Legal √ 
Financial √ 
Risk √ 
Staffing  √
Best Value and Transformation √ 
Property √ 
Information Communications Technology/Digital  √
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact  √ 
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact √ 
6.2 Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☒ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☒ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☒ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☒ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☒ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☒ Empowering and connecting communities.
☒ Improving wellbeing of our population   
6.3 Policy and Legal 
The Council publishes an annual Public Performance Report to stakeholders.
Page 117

Page 118

“Public Performance Reporting should give stakeholders information that allows them to
make informed judgements about public services, to contribute to decisions about what
standards of service should be pursued, and to challenge performance in the interests of
future service development. To be productive PPR has to involve the right information
going in the right way to the right people at the right time.” 
Source: Statutory guidance (The Local Government in Scotland Act 2003 Best Value Guidance) 
6.4 Financial 
There are no financial implications arising from this report.  
6.5 Risk 
There are no risk implications arising from this report.  
6.6 Staffing 
There are no staffing implications arising from this report.  
6.7 Best Value and Transformation 
The PPR provides an update on the Council’s progress on Best Value and Transformation.  
6.8 Property 
There are no property implications arising from this report.  
6.9 Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
There are no ICT, technology or digital implications arising from this report albeit the use of
a web page format for improved ease of use is noted.  
6.10 Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
There are no equalities, social inclusion or economic impacts arising from this report.  
6.11 Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
There are no climate change and biodiversity impacts arising from this report. 
7. CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Corporate Leadership Team and
Heads of Service and any comments made have been incorporated into the report   
8. BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  There are no background papers.   
Page 118

Page 119

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Economy, Environment
and Finance)
Report No: EGD018/25
Author: Claire English Contact
Email:
Claire.english@moray.gov.uk
Subject: Cooper Park Public Trust – Petition to Court of Session
1. PURPOSE
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information
1.1 The purpose of this report is to ask the Council for approval to seek to petition the
Court of Session to vary the Cooper Park Public Trust terms in support of the long-term
sustainability of the park and its assets. 
1.2 This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (5) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to any enactment, alteration or revocation of any Orders,
Regulations, By-laws or Schemes 
2. SUMMARY
2.1 The grounds now known as Cooper Park and the mansion house Grant Lodge are
subject to the conditions of a Deed of Gift from George A Cooper in 1903 (included as
Appendix 1), now known as the Cooper Park Public Trust. The Council, in its role as a
trustee, is responsible for the upkeep of Cooper Park and its assets, including Grant
Lodge, and cannot pass on responsibility to a third party without a change to the trust
terms.
2.2 The terms of the 1903 Deed of Gift restricts the use to which Grant Lodge can be put,
and declares the lands disponed as a public park or pleasure ground for the use and
enjoyment of the inhabitants of Elgin. The Deed denies the Trustees the right to sell or
let on long lease the whole or any part of the subjects of the gift. A plan of the Land
which is subject to the terms of the Trust is included as Appendix 2.
2.3 Existing sports grounds and associated buildings in the park are currently operated and
maintained by local community groups through various informal and formal
arrangements. These arrangements, many of which are historic, may not strictly
comply with the Deed of Gift. The council is also in receipt of capital funding from
Scottish Government and UK Government to make improvements to areas of the park
and Grant Lodge. These projects and relationships are overseen by teams across the
council including the Sport and Culture Service, Strategic Planning and Development
covering Levelling Up Fund (LUF) and potential projects through the Elgin
Neighbourhood Board (ENB) as well as the Moray Growth Deal (MGD).
Item 13.
Page 119

Page 120

2.4 Given the current pressures facing the authority, and in the interest of long-term
sustainability and public benefit, the preferred approach for both existing and proposed
uses of land and buildings in the park is to seek to have the ability to agree longer term
lease or asset transfer arrangements with suitable organisations. As such, authority is
sought to lodge a petition in the Court of Session to vary the existing Trust terms to
enable the council to enter into a range of legal agreements. These would be to support
the MGD and LUF projects relevant to Grant Lodge /Cooper Park and to support
various community/sporting groups and seek to secure the ongoing viability of Grant
Lodge and the wider Cooper Park. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that the Council agree to:   
i)  authorise the Legal Services Manager to instruct external legal agents to
petition the Court of Session seeking to vary the terms of the Cooper
Park Trust to enable the Council to enter into appropriate legal
agreements, including longer term leases, to support the MGD and LUF
projects for Grant Lodge/Cooper Park  and to enable support for other
parties with interest in facilities across the Cooper Park; and   
ii)  delegate authority to the Legal Services Manager to approve the final
petition for submission to the Court of Session so that the terms of the
Trust may be varied as outlined in the report.   
Claire English
Senior Project Officer – Cultural Quarter 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  The title to the Mansion House known as Grant Lodge, along with its grounds, now
Cooper Park was conveyed by Deed of Gift in 1903 by Sir George Alexander Cooper in
favour of the Lord Provost, Magistrates, and Councillors of the City and Royal Burgh of
Elgin, acting on behalf of "the whole body and community of said City and Royal Burgh
and their successors in office as representatives." These assets are now held in trust
by the Cooper Park Public Trust.  
4.2 The terms of the 1903 Deed of Gift presents as a Free Gift to the community of Elgin
the property known as Grant Lodge and Grounds as Public Park. The donor ‘at my own
expense…to convert the Mansion House of Grant Lodge into a Public Library and
Reading Rooms and a Museum of Arts and Industry for the use and benefit of the
inhabitants of Elgin’ and declaring the lands disponed as a public park or pleasure
ground for the use and enjoyment of the inhabitants of Elgin. The Deed of Gift further
directs the Trustees ‘that it shall not be in their power at any time to give off feus or sell
or let on long lease the whole or part of the same’…and should the ‘Town Council or
any other body coming into their place contravene….by alienating or attempting to
alienate in any way the whole or part of the subjects’ this would be considered a breach
of trust.    
4.3 On 16 November 2021 the Planning and Regulatory Services Committee approved the
Elgin City Centre Masterplan (ECCM) which sets out a long-term programme of
aspirational projects to ensure Elgin City Centre is a prosperous, attractive and healthy
place (para 12 of the minute refers). The approved Masterplan includes four core
packages of interventions, of which Cooper Park and the Cultural Quarter (CQ),
Page 120

Page 121

including Grant Lodge, are two.
4.4 Since approval of the ECCM positive progress has been made towards realising these
long-term ambitions. Moray Council is now in receipt of funding from the UK and
Scottish Government through The Moray Growth Deal and the UK Government’s
Levelling Up Fund (LUF) to make improvements to various elements of Cooper Park,
including Grant Lodge, for the purposes of regeneration, economic development and
community benefit. Council received confirmation that LUF had been awarded on 20
Nov 2023 and the CQ Full Business Case was approved by Moray Council on 4
December 2024, (para 25 of the minute refers), subject to a further report on Grant
Lodge to Council in Autumn 2025. Following expert advice and previously reported in
relation to the MGD Cultural Quarter, the preferred model to ensure the viability of the
new facilities created will be to agree operational leasing agreements with suitable
organisations. Additionally, the Elgin Neighbourhood Board are also considering
potential projects to support Cooper Park as a ‘destination park’ and have approved
funding for the preparation of a Cooper Park Masterplan to ensure projects are
complementary, connected, and do not compromise existing activity or use of the park
for major events.
4.5 In terms of existing activity in the park, sports grounds and associated buildings are
currently operated and maintained by local organisations/community groups and these
relationships are overseen by the Sport and Culture Service. This team has identified
that these existing arrangements (including tennis courts, bowling club and community
sports hub) are very historic and vary in governance arrangements and a renewal of
agreements is required to enable these facilities to be managed by the community to
aid their sustainable future as the Council do not have the capital/revenue resource to
operate these within current budget. A variation of the Trust Deed would be required to
gain permission to put these arrangements in place. These would be arrangements
which would still seek to respect the aim of the Trust as set out in paragraph 4.9 below.
Without the variation of this historic deed the impact could be that clubs have to
relocate activity from the park, with an impact on public accessibility, social, health and
well-being impacts and resource available for upkeep and maintenance.
4.6 Funding attached to developing the park must meet the required timescales of external
funders (delivery for LUF due by the end of March 2027, delivery for MGD projects by
2031). The Council must also be able to give community organisations running existing
facilities formal arrangements soon to avoid the risk of aging memberships and/or
uncertainty for groups leading to withdrawal of activities. To avoid associated assets
falling into disrepair at potential cost to the council it is also imperative to put a
sustainable solution in place as soon as possible.  
4.7 Over the years the Council has sought various pieces of advice on the conditions
attached to the Cooper Park Public Trust. The overarching barrier to future
sustainability and viability which must be addressed in the current day is to vary the
clause which prohibits long lease arrangements.
4.8 As part of the Moray Growth Deal CQ the team sought advice and quotes for legal
support required to deliver the Grant Lodge project – including a variation of the
Cooper Park Public Trust. This was quoted at c.£30k which is incorporated into the
funded project budget and estimated to take 6-8 months to complete. Officers would
now like to widen the scope of the works proposed to incorporate the requirements of
other teams within the council to enable a holistic approach to facilities within the wider
Cooper Park whilst also overcoming this critical barrier to sustainability for park
operations in the long term. It is considered beneficial to seek to address these wider
issues in one petition to the Court of Session. This will also avoid incurring additional
Page 121

Page 122

cost for multiple petitions.
4.9 In 1994, the Court of Session approved a change to the purposes for Grant Lodge. 
The 1994 approval sets a precedent that a variation is possible, as long as proposals
meet the overarching condition of providing public benefit to the inhabitants of Elgin. It
is considered that each of the projects mentioned in this report share this overarching
aim. Opinion on the matter sought by the council in 2020 considered that whilst the
existing permitted use from the 1994 petition for Grant Lodge was largely in line with
proposals to refurbish the building, maintain public access and make room available for
social and heritage use, a  fresh petition to vary the Trust by way of a cy pres scheme,
which allows the use of a charitable asset to a purpose as close as possible to the
original purpose if the original terms are no longer feasible, would be required should
the council proposal to sell or lease any part of the site to a third party operator.
5. PROPOSALS
5.1 Authorise the Legal Services Manager to instruct external legal advisors to progress
and submit a petition based on the agreed requirements across council services. This
work would be funded from the approved capital budgets relating to the MGD and the
LUF.
5.2 Ensure that any petition submitted to the Court of Session to vary the Cooper Park
Public Trust to allow leasing of Grant Lodge/parts of Cooper Park is on the basis that
the proposed use continues to deliver public benefits to the inhabitants of Elgin. 
6. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
6.1 The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations
are agreed:
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement
Plan)
X
Policy and Legal X
Financial X
Risk X
Staffing X
Best Value and Transformation X
Property X
Information Communications Technology/Digital      X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact    X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact X
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans.
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and
contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Council Plan strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☒ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☒ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.
Page 122

Page 123

Delivery of the Moray Growth Deal and Levelling Up Fund are priorities of the
Corporate Plan. The wider proposals contribute to the Corporate Plan priorities of
driving economic development to create a vibrant economy for the future, empower
and support communities to build capacity, provide opportunities for people to
achieve their potential throughout their lives, and contribute towards creating a
sustainable council that provides valued services to our communities. 
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☒ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☒ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☒ Empowering and connecting communities.
☒ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
The Council, in its role as a trustee, is responsible for the upkeep of Cooper Park and
its assets, including Grant Lodge, and cannot pass on responsibility to a third party
without a change to the trust terms. The proposals set out provide a solution for the
council to make mutually beneficial agreements with suitable organisations which will
secure the future sustainability of the park and its assets whilst continuing to deliver
benefit to the public in line with the corporate plan and the local outcome improvement
plan.  
6.4  Financial 
The financial implications of this report are the costs associated for legal
representation to submit a petition to the Court of Session to vary the terms of the
Cooper Park Public Trust. Funds are allocated within the MGD CQ and LUF funded
projects to carry out this work. If the petition for the variation of the Cooper Park Public
Trust is successful, this should reduce the ongoing financial responsibility for the park
and associated assets for the council. Taking a comprehensive approach covering
existing sports groups should also avoid additional unbudgeted expenditure being
incurred to regularise existing arrangements. 
Page 123

Page 124

One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend
this Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments
Economic
Growth and
Development
– MGD and
LUF
MGD CQ
Budget
LUF
Budget
2025-2026 
20262-2028
(subject to
process
requirements)
£30,000
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments
NA NA NA NA NA NA
6.5  Risk
Not progressing with this proposed work could risk the viability of both existing and
planned activities and facilities in Cooper Park and compromise the delivery of MGD
and LUF projects.
6.6 Staffing
No staffing implications. The specialist nature of the legal work required means external
legal advisers need to be instructed.
6.7 Best Value and Transformation
Taking a joint approach to this piece of work presents best value to the council where
the same action is required by a number of services/projects. 
6.8 Property
The property implications are set out in the body of the report.
6.9 Information Communications/Technology/Digital
No implications.
6.10 Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact
There would potentially be impacts if the trust deeds cannot be amended to enable
long leases to be provided.
6.11 Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts
None.
7. CONSULTATION
7.1 This report has been prepared in consultation with the Depute Chief Executive
(Economy, Environment and Finance, Head of Economic Growth and Development
(Acting), Legal Services Manager, Strategic Planning and Development Manager, Sport
and Culture Service Manager, Property Asset Manager, Levelling Up Fund Programme
Manager, Chief Financial Officer and Democratic Services Manager and any comments
made have been incorporated into the report
Page 124

Page 125

8. BACKGROUND PAPERS
8.1  Appendix 1 - Cooper Park Public Trust - Cooper Park Deed of Gift 1903
8.2  Appendix 2 - Cooper Park Public Trust - Elgin Cooper Park Identifying Land and
Common Good Trust
Page 125

Page 126

APPENDIX I
Page 126

Page 127

Page 127

Page 128

Page 128

Page 129

Page 129

Page 130

Page 130

Page 131

Page 131

Page 132

Page 132

Page 133

Page 133

Page 134

Page 134

Page 135

Page 135

Page 136

APPENDIX 2
Page 136

Page 137

Report to: Moray Council  Meeting
Date:
25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Economy, Environment
and Finance) 
Report No: EGD017/25/AC  
Author: Amy Cruickshank  Contact
Email:
Amy.cruickshank@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: The Link: Your Community Space 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  This report seeks approval to allocate funds to extend the lease of a newly established
community hub in the New Elgin area for a further 6 months from October to March 2026. 
1.2  This report is submitted to Committee in terms of Section III of the Council's Scheme of
Administration relating to the new community space.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  This report provides an update on the progress of The Link since opening and seeks
approval of earmarked funds to extend the lease for a further 6 months. The Link has
quickly established itself as a valued local resource, successfully engaging residents
across all age groups. Continued community input, volunteer development, and targeted
programming to meet outcomes are central to its growing success. Future priorities
include supporting the volunteers to set up a constitution and charitable status to ensure
sustainability beyond the funding support from the local employability partnership. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that Council approve the allocation of £17,500 previously
earmarked funds to extend the lease of a new community hub in the New Elgin area
for a further 6 months. 
Author Name: Amy Cruickshank
Job Title: Employability Team Manager 
Item 14.
Page 137

Page 138

4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  A report was submitted to Council on 27 March 2024 highlighting that the Moray
Pathways Local Employability Partnership (LEP), the New Elgin Community Plan group
and members of the community safety partnership joined forces to plan for a new
community space on Southfield Drive, New Elgin. The LEP identified a need to support
the development of new community spaces in key localities, and this matched with a
top priority from local residents from New Elgin.  This is also contained within the New
Elgin Community plan.  Approval was granted by the committee to utilise employability
funding to fund a 1-year lease from the date of opening (para 7 of the minute refers). 
4.2  From March 2024 a series of community engagement events took place to plan the
development of this facility, and a local steering group named the new space, “The
Link: Your Community Space”.  The new space was officially opened on 30 November
2024.   
4.3  Progress To Date: 
The new community space was opened on 30 November 2024 and the opening
involved a light show, Santa Grotto and a range of partners offering engaging activities
during the community event.  The event was also supported by the neighbouring Deli
café and refreshments were provided. A total of 230 local people of all ages attended
the event and feedback was gathered and volunteers recruited. 
4.4  A new steering group has been formed, and 14 volunteers have signed up to help with
the running of the space.  It has been agreed that this facility will be inclusive to all ages
of the community and during its first phase it will operate as a daytime drop-in facility
(9:30-1:30pm) and a range of taster sessions.  This will provide time for further
engagement to take place to increase the community involvement in the running of the
space and identify what activities would be the most beneficial.   
4.5  In December 2024, a drop-in took place 5 mornings a week and was staffed by
volunteers and partner organisations. A total of 36 people attended and a further 4
volunteers were recruited to the steering group. A family drop-in has been established
to take place on a Monday afternoon with an average of 6-12 local families attending on
a regular basis.   
4.6  A Knit and Natter craft group has been established for all ages and abilities has been
identified as an opportunity to increase community engagement, support adults who
are isolated in the community and develop skills. Since February the group has grown
to a regular 12-15 members.   
4.7  S1-S6 pupils from the local area have identified an interest in creative arts taster
activities taking place during the evening on a weekly basis and this commenced in
March 2025.  This project is supported by the Moray Council Youth Work Team and the
MADE creative network. A total of 6-10 young people from Elgin High School are
attending on a regular basis and a number of these young people are dis-engaged from
learning and services have struggled to engage with them. 
Page 138

Page 139

4.8  The venue is now open for room bookings, open to partner organisations across the
Community Learning and Development (CLD) and LEP partnership.  Bookings are open
for activities and events that will benefit the local community and not available for
purposes that does not involve local residents.  There has been a lot of interest from
local partner organisations keen to use the space to engage with local people who they
support in the community.   
4.9  Young people (16-25 years) from the local area and are keen to take part in an Explore
personal development employability support programme.  This programme is co-
ordinated jointly by the Moray Council Employability Team, Youth Work Team and LEP
partner providers, the programme is aimed at young people who are unemployed or
economically inactive. 
4.10  Volunteer Development: The volunteers involved in the steering group will be supported
with training opportunities to meet their needs and develop their skills.  The CLD team
will support the volunteers to set up a constituted group for the project and to support
longer term sustainability of the project. 
4.11  A varied programme of activities was delivered in the Mid-term February holidays and
the Easter holidays and this included the following: Make it Mondays (Crafts and family
drop-in), Table Top Tuesdays (Board games and STEM activities), Feel Good Fridays
(Wellbeing activities and a mix of games and crafts) and the holidays were concluded
with a Duck Race at the Linkwood Burn.  A total of 44 families and 134 residents
participated in the activities over the duration of the holidays. As a result of this
successful programme, a themed approach is to be continued and will be reviewed in
June. The themes for the next phase are as follows, Make it Mondays, Table-top
Tuesdays, Knit N Natter Wednesdays, Digi Know Thursdays and Feel Good Fridays. 
4.12  In partnership with a local retailer at the Premier Store (New Elgin Service Station), the
community have expressed the need for a food larder, and this will be developed and
launched in the coming months.   
4.13  The Press and Journal recently wrote an article about the progress so far with the new
hub, click on this link :
https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/moray/6721249/the-link-new-elgin-
community-hub/ 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  Initial funding for the first 12 months of the lease was approved in March 2024 (para 7 of
minute refers). This was approved from the Employability ear-marked reserve initially set
up to fund Moray Employer Recruitment Incentive (MERI)commitments funded from the
Scottish Government’s Young Person’s Guarantee scheme.  This particular scheme
ended in 23-24 and the underspend of £102,000 was ear-marked for further Employability
activities including the lease costs for the first 12 months of the Community Hub.  The
approved lease and associated committed costs to be funded from this reserve are
expected to be iro £17,500. This would leave a balance in the reserve of £62,777, which
could provide adequate funding for a further 6 months lease from October - March
2026.  Further funding for an additional 2 years was requested and approved by the Elgin
Long Term Town Board.  However, due to the funding being paused and re-introduced as
Page 139

Page 140

the Elgin Neighbourhood Fund this future funding is not guaranteed. Funding proposals for
the continuation of the hub lease for a further 2 years is proposed to be included in the
revised investment plan.  It is anticipated that the board will make a decision on the
investment plan in September 2025.  The investment plan will then be presented to
committee in November and submitted to the Scottish Government by the end of
December 2025.  There is no set date for a decision but as spend will commence in April
2026 it is anticipated that approval of the investment plan will be known by late February
2026.The new prospectus for the Elgin Neighbourhood fund has a greater focus on
neighbourhood and socio-economic challenges and this aligns with the focus of this new
community space.   
5.2  The volunteers within the new steering group are motivated to become an independent
organisation and are in the early planning stages of setting up the project as a charity.  The
additional 2 years funding will provide an adequate period of time to get established and
apply for funding for the future sustainability of the hub. 
5.3  Should the Elgin Neighbourhood Funding Proposal prove unsuccessful, a report will be put
back to council to consider the options available to fund further extensions to the lease. 
5.4  During 2024/2025, the local employability partnership invested in community outreach
facilities across Moray and launched a Community Space Grant Fund.  The following
organisations benefited from this fund: Achiestown Village Council, Lossiemouth 2-3
Group, Lossiemouth Community Development Group, Earthtime West Lodge Project, The
Loft Project (Keith), Elgin Sport Community Trust, Elgin Town Hall Digital Project, Forres
Action Community Trust and Garmouth and Kingston Community Association.  
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) X 
Policy and Legal X 
Financial X 
Risk X 
Staffing X 
Best Value and Transformation  X
Property X 
Information Communications Technology/Digital  X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans.
Page 140

Page 141

a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☒ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☒ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☒ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☒ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☒ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☒ Empowering and connecting communities.
☒ Improving wellbeing of our population   
6.3  Policy and Legal 
The Council considers support for economic development issues on their merits, against
the objective to facilitate sustainable economic growth and the desired outcomes of the
Ten-Year Plan and Corporate Plan. The Moray Council is currently the tenant of the lease
for the pilot phase and Property Services will collaborate with Legal to progress
negotiations. 
6.4  Financial 
The initial funding for the first 12 months of the lease was approved per para 4.1.  This was
approved from the Employability ear-marked reserve initially set up to fund MERI
commitments funded from the Scottish Government’s Young Person’s Guarantee scheme. 
This particular scheme ended in 23-24 and the underspend of £102,000 was ear-marked
for further Employability activities including the lease costs for the first 12 months of the
Community Hub.  The approved lease and associated committed costs to be funded from
this reserve are expected to be in the region of £17,500.  This would leave a balance on the
reserve of £62,777, which could provide adequate funding for a further 6 months lease
from Sep 25-March 26.  Further funding has been requested from the Elgin Neighbourhood
Fund and a decision is pending consideration.   
The funding proposal for the continuation of the hub lease for a further 2 years is
anticipated to be included in the investment plan for the Elgin Neighbourhood Board and a
decision will be made on 19 September 2025. 
Should the Elgin Neighbourhood Funding Proposal prove unsuccessful a report will then
be put back to council to consider the options available to fund further extensions to the
lease. 
One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend
this Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments
Page 141

Page 142

Economic
Growth and
Regeneration
£80,277 2025/26 £17,500     N/A Earmarked
reserves for
employability 
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 
6.5  Risk 
It is intended that the Council would extend the lease of Unit 3 Southfield Drive, Elgin, for a
further period of 6 months using the funds identified. A continuation of the lease will be at
risk, pending the outcome of the revised investment plan for the Elgin Neighbourhood
Fund.  A funding application for 2 years was previously agreed by the Elgin Long Term Town
Fund when the initial investment plan was submitted.  
6.6  Staffing
The tenant of the property is currently the Council and the Community, Learning and
Development team within the Council have overall responsibility for the building, A multi-
agency group comprising of public sector partners from the Moray Pathways partnership,
CLD partnership and community members of the LOIP group to support all activities
taking place. 
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
Not applicable 
6.8  Property 
Approved officers will negotiate an extension of the lease as highlighted in this report.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None 
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
Moray Pathways Local Employability Partnership target people who face inequalities and
therefore there is no negative impacts found.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Depute Chief Executive (Economy,
Environment and Finance), the Acting Head of Economic Growth and Development, the
Economic Growth and Regeneration Manager, the Head of Housing and Property, the Legal
Services Manager, the Equal Opportunities Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the
Democratic Services Manager and any comments made have been incorporated into the
report. 
Page 142

Page 143

8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None 
Page 143

Page 144

Page 144

Page 145

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Education, Communities
and Organisational
Development) 
Report No: EDU031/25   
Author: Fiona Michie Contact Email: fiona.michie@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Free School Meals Expansion – S1 to S3 Pilot 2025/26 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to consider and approve the participation of Keith Grammar,
Keith and Milne’s High School, Fochabers in the Scottish Government’s Free School Meal
(FSM) expansion programme, which aims to provide meals to some pupils whose families
are in receipt of Scottish Child Payment (SCP) in S1 to S3 during the academic year
2025/26.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (D) (1) of the
Council's Scheme of Administration relating to all the functions of the Council
as an Education Authority.  
2.  SUMMARY 
2.1  This report provides information on the Scottish Government’s FSM expansion
programme, and to requests approval of the inclusion of Keith Grammar and Milne’s High
within the pilot programme. 
2.2  The Scottish Government is committed to eradicating child poverty and the FSM
Programme is key to this aim.    
2.3  The purpose of the programme is a new Test of Change phase of the programme, which
aims to provide meals to some pupils whose families are in receipt of SCP in S1 to S3.  
2.4  The Test of Change will be independently evaluated, and this will help the Scottish
Government in its decision making and vision for the Free School Meal Programme’s
continued growth. 
Item 15.
Page 145

Page 146

3.  RECOMMENDATIONS  
3.1  It is recommended that the Council consider and accept the Scottish Government
offer of £45,480 grant funding and approve Keith Grammar, Keith and Milne’s High
School, Fochabers’ participation in the FSM expansion pilot programme.   
Fiona Michie
Business Support Development Manager (Education)  
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  All Local Authorities (LAs) have been involved in rolling out provision of meals to those in
receipt of SCP in P6 and P7.  
4.2  Scottish Government has identified £3m resource funding to implement and evaluate, a
new ‘Test of Change’ phase of the FSM Programme, which aims to provide meals to some
pupils whose families are in receipt of SCP in S1 to S3.  
4.3  The pilot programme will run for the academic year 2025/26 and funding will be available
for the provision of meals through grant support over financial years 2025/26 and 2026/27.
There is no capital funding available to increase kitchen or dining capacity, and the pilot
must be carried out within the current staff complement.  
4.4  In Moray, many school dining rooms have seating issues and would require capital works
to extend the capacity in order to accommodate an expansion of school meals. In
addition, the pilot requires that the expansion is delivered within the existing staffing
arrangements. Only the 2 of the 8 secondary schools within Moray can accommodate this
as the other 6 would require additional staff to serve the pupils within the time allocation
for the lunch provision within a school day, which means that they are not eligible for the
funding for the pilot.  However, there is the capacity to deliver the pilot in 2 of our 8
secondary schools (Keith Grammar and Milne’s High) without any building works and
within the current staff resource.  
4.5  Scottish Government invited applications to participate in the pilot programme. The
Corporate Leadership Team considered this on 20 March 2025 and agreed to put Moray
forward the two eligible schools, without commitment, and on the understanding, there
would be no financial detriment to the Council by participating.  
4.6  The Council has been selected as 1 of the 8 LAs to participate in the pilot. Scottish
Government has selected 2 LAs in each of the 4 demographics of rural, urban, semi-rural
and island. The other LAs that have been selected are Aberdeen, Fife, Glasgow, North
Ayrshire, Shetland, South Lanarkshire and Western Isles.  
4.7  Scottish Government suggest up to 100 newly eligible pupils in Keith Grammar and Milne’s
High can benefit. Neither Scottish Government nor the Council has access to accurate
SCP data at this time due to a pending data sharing agreement with Social Security
Scotland. Therefore, the Scottish Government estimates are based on deprivation factors
and projected meal uptake.    
Page 146

Page 147

4.8  The grant allocation to deliver the pilot in Keith Grammar and Milne’s High is £45,480,
which has been calculated at £2.38 per pupil for food costs and disposables and is based
on 100% attendance and uptake using the figures above.  
4.9  The Council’s current secondary school food and disposables costs are £1.65 per pupil for
a two course meal. Not all pupils have 100% attendance, and not all pupils use the
canteen daily due to food choice preferences. The lower delivery cost and potentially
lower uptake offers a contingency, which will ensure the pilot is delivered within the
available budget.  
4.10  All current FSM pupils are able to spend their FSM allowance at either lunch or morning
breaks. The Scottish Government’s aim is that the funding is to provide a healthy lunch
and is not designed for free spending at morning breaks. However, the Council is not being
asked to change our current delivery model.  
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  To consider and accept the Scottish Government offer of £45,480 grant funding to enable
Keith Grammar and Milne’s High to participate in the FSM expansion pilot programme.  
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) X 
Policy and Legal  X
Financial X 
Risk X 
Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital             X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact  X 
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☒ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☒ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
Page 147

Page 148

b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☒ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☒ Improving wellbeing of our population   
6.3  Policy and Legal 
None.  
6.4  Financial 
The financial implications are set out in the body of the report. 
One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments
Catering £31,597 2025/26 £21,780 None 
Catering £13,883 2026/27 £9,570 None 
TOTAL £45,480  £31,350  £14,130
contingency 
6.5  Risk 
The following risks are already identified and should be noted:
• Grant funding is only available for the 2025/26 academic year and there will be
pressure on Scottish Government to continue the funding and expand the
programme to meet public expectations.
• Some meal delivery adaptations may be needed in the use of the pre-order system
at Milne’s High to manage queues, as this could discourage pupils from accessing
meals.
• Any increase in catering may have the potential to lose revenue, as paying pupils
may avoid increased queues in favour of local shops.  
6.6  Staffing 
None, however, the pilot will be independently evaluated to help SG in its decision making
and vision for the FSM programme’s continued growth. Participating LAs will be required to
work with the researchers, and the views of school staff and young people will be included
in the evaluation.  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
None.  
6.8  Property 
None.   
Page 148

Page 149

6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None, however there is a reliance on the Council’s cashless catering system to effectively
manage meal pre-orders.  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
Participation in the pilot supports the Scottish Government’s agenda to eradicate child
poverty by offering access to a FSM.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None.  
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer, Head of
Education (Chief Education Officer), Head of Environmental and Commercial Services,
Democratic Services Manager and the Catering Manager, and any comments made have
been incorporated into the report.  
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  www.gov.scot/news/delivering-free-school-meals/   
Page 149

Page 150

Page 150

Page 151

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Education, Communities and
Organisational Development) 
Report No: GSP011/25/LR/TS  
Author: Lindsey Robinson Contact Email: elections@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Polling Place Review – Consultation Feedback 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to note the comments received during the first round of
consultation and to seek approval to go back out to consultation on the proposed revision
to polling places as part of the statutory review.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (9) of the Council's Scheme of
Administration relating to all election matters. 
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  Following a review of the comments received during the first stage of the statutory
consultation, proposals for potential changes to the current polling arrangements have
been suggested and need to be agreed before going back out for further consultation.  
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that Council:   
i)  note the comments received during the first stage of consultation; and   
ii)  approve a second round of consultation on the proposed revisions, with a
report coming back to Council for approval on 27 August 2025.   
Lindsey Robinson
Committee Services and Election Support Officer 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
Item 16.
Page 151

Page 152

4.1  In accordance with Section 18(3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983, each Local
Authority in Scotland is required to designate a polling place for each of its polling districts
and to conduct a review every 5 years.  
4.2  The last statutory review of polling places took place in 2019 and concluded in November
2020.  This current review was due to commence in 2024, however the announcement of
the UK Parliamentary General Election and the subsequent Council By-election meant the
review has been delayed.  
4.3  A polling place is defined as ‘a geographical area in which a polling station is located’.
There is no legal definition of what a polling place is, but it is widely accepted to be a
specific building identified for the purpose, which the Local Authority is responsible for
determining.  
4.4  A polling station is the actual area where the process of voting takes place and must be
located within the polling place designated for the polling district.  
4.5  In designating a polling place the Local Authority must demonstrate they have, as far as is
practicable, met the criteria set in the legislation and in doing so must: 
• ensure all the electors in the constituency have such reasonable facilities
for voting as are practicable in the circumstances; and 
• ensure that, so far as is reasonable and practicable, every polling place for
which it is responsible is accessible to disabled electors. 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  Proposals for the next round of consultation are shown in paragraphs 5.4 – 5.11 and have
taken into consideration Electoral Commission guidance and criteria, feedback during
polls in the last five years, as well as any suggestions or changes submitted during the first
round of consultation and comments from the Returning Officer (RO).  The RO comments
will be published online following the second round of consultation.  
5.2  Any changes would not be implemented until September 2025.  
5.3  The responses to the first round consultation were published as required at on the
Council’s website and are included in Appendix 1 and 2.  
5.4 Ward 1 
No changes at present – the suggested changes would leave some voters disenfranchised.  
5.5 Ward 2
Suggestion:
Return to using Rothiemay Hall, allowing Rothiemay Primary School to stay open on
Election days.   
Response:
Rothiemay Hall have confirmed that they would be happy for the hall to be used as a
polling place again.  This would allow the primary school to stay open on polling day.
Page 152

Page 153

Action:
If agreed, consultation will be held on moving to the new venue, with the consultation
results reported back to Council in August. 
5.6 Ward 3
Suggestion:
Open up Buckie Access point for the day.   
Response:
This option is not viable as the building has been declared surplus by the Council and is
currently on the market for sale. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
Suggestion:
Look at combining Buckie East and West to allow fewer polling places but multiple
stations within them.   
Response:
There could be an option to increase some single polling stations to doubles, however by
combining single stations voters may have to travel further to vote. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
5.7 Ward 4
No changes suggested.  
5.8 Ward 5 
Suggestion:
Stop using Lossiemouth FC Social Club and look to use the Scout Hall at the playing
fields. 
Response:
Contact has been made with the Scout Hall on Elgin Road and they have advised that at
the moment they are not in a position to rent out the hall, although they may be able to
help in the future. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
Suggestion:
The existing properties at Findrassie vote in Duffus (ward 5) but are closer to Bishopmill
Hall (ward 6). 
Response:
Page 153

Page 154

The Representation of the People Act 1983 states that the polling station for any particular
district must be in a polling place for that district. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
Suggestion:
The new build properties at Findrassie should vote in Lossiemouth (Ward 5) or Elgin North
(Ward 6) 
Response:
These properties vote in Lossiemouth, so no change would be required. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
5.9 Ward 6 
Suggestion:
Move the boundary to the river so that those living in the Kingsmills area could vote at
Seafield School. 
Response:
This option is not viable as it would result in capacity issues within Seafield Primary
School and there is no alternative venue in the locality. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
Suggestion:
Move the polling place from Elgin Indoor Bowling Club to stop voters having to cross the
A96, which potentially causes low voter turnout and use a portacabin as a temporary
polling place instead. 
Response:
This polling place had a low voter turnout prior to the move to the Bowling Club.  It would
be difficult to get permissions to site a portacabin for each election, particularly if it was a
snap election.   
Initial enquiries with other local authorities have found that although some authorities
have used portacabins it was found to be expensive and there were issues with getting
reliable power to the portacabins.  The elections team will continue to monitor the voter
numbers. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
5.10 Ward 7 
Suggestion:
Look into using the Territorial Army Hall at Edgar Road as an alternative to Greenwards
Primary.  
Page 154

Page 155

Response:
Following a site visit and discussions with the Territorial Army, moving the Polling Station to
this location is a viable alternative to using Greenwards Primary School. 
Action:
If agreed, consultation will be held on moving to the new venue, with the consultation
results reported back to Council in August. 
Suggestion:
Out of the Darkness Studio, next to the retail park, was suggested.   
Response:
The Studio has been contacted but do not have the capacity to accommodate a polling
place. 
Action:
No further action to be taken 
Suggestion:
Move the ward 4 and 7 boundary from the Linkwood burn to include the new properties at
Linkwood.  Currently these properties go to Lhanbryde to vote, this change would allow
them to vote at Moray Sports Centre.   
Response:
This would require a boundary change.  The Representation of the People Act 1983 states
that the polling station for any particular district must be in a polling place for that district. 
Action:
No action to be taken 
5.11 Ward 8 
Suggestion:
Move out of Pilmuir Primary School and into the Erskine veterans building (the old Victoria
Hotel).  The polling place was located here previously but moved when the hotel closed.   
Response:
Initial contact with the Erskine Centre has confirmed that at the current time they would
be unable to accommodate a Polling Place in the building, but if the position changed,
they will get back in touch.   
Action:
No action to be taken. 
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed:  
6.2  
Page 155

Page 156

SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan) x 
Policy and Legal x 
Financial x 
Risk x 
Staffing  x
Best Value and Transformation  x
Property  x
Information Communications Technology/Digital             x
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact             x 
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  x 
6.3  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☒ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in Moray.
☒ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.4  Policy and Legal 
Section 18(3) of the Representation of the People Act 1983 requires each Local Authority
in Scotland to designate a polling place for each of its polling districts and to conduct
regular reviews.  Under provisions in Section 17 of the Electoral Registration and
Administration Act 2013, a review must be completed between October 2023 and January
2025.  This deadline was missed due to the UK Parliamentary General Election and the
subsequent Council By-election, but we are still on target to meet the deadlines for use in
the Scottish Parliamentary Elections in early May 2026.  
6.5  Financial 
There are no financial implications with this stage of the consultation.  Following the
second stage, if there are to be any changes to the polling arrangements then statutory
notices would be required to be published in the local newspapers and on the Council
social media platforms.  The costs for this previously have been less than £400. 
Page 156

Page 157

One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments       
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments       
6.6  Risk 
The next scheduled election is the Scottish Parliamentary Election in early May 2026 and
the polling place review must be completed and agreed well in advance of this date to
allow for any changes to be made to the electoral register so that the Electoral Registration
Officer (ERO) can publish the full register on time.  
6.7  Staffing 
None, the review can be carried out using the current compliment of staff.  
6.8  Best Value and Transformation 
None  
6.9  Property 
None  
6.10  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None  
6.11  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
Accessibility issues for disabled and elderly voters were taken into consideration during
the review process.  Accessibility is also looked at during periodic audits of the polling
places.  Accessibility for voters is part of the planning for each election and the elections
team follow all of the current guidelines from the Electoral Commission and Association of
Electoral Administrators.  
6.12  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Chief Executive, Depute Chief
Executive (Education, Communities and Organisational Development), Head of
Governance, Strategy and Performance and Democratic Services Manager and any
comments made have been incorporated into the report.  The consultation was also
publicly advertised, and the responses have been included in Appendices 1 and 2. 
Page 157

Page 158

8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None   
Page 158

Page 159

Polling Place Review – Stakeholder survey responses
There were 56 responses.  48 (85.71%) were from members of the public, 1 (1.79%) was
from a political party, 5 (8.93%) were from local councillors, 1 (1.79%) was from an
advocacy or support group and 1 was marked as other (described themselves as a local
resident, rate payer of voting age)
There were 0 responses from the community councils (although 1 Cllr response
included CC consultation) or the MSP and MP.
Please provide any comments you have on our current polling stations and polling
districts 
- Keep them local 
-  Easy to get too 
-   Jasmin Drive is yards from Moray Sports Centre, which is used as a polling
station, but we have to travel to Lhanbryde to vote as ward boundaries are at the
Linkwood Burn.  These boundaries should be revised as I consider Elgin to be my
local area and have no contact with Lhanbryde apart from on polling day. 
-  Easy to get to local polling station although I’m registered for postal voting. 
-  Ideal @ Miltonduff Public Hall plenty parking & disabled facilities 
-  I am getting lots of complaints from constituents about using Lossiemouth
Football Social Club in Macduff Street.  It is quite a bit away from the former
Polling Station at Lossiemouth Community Centre.  People say coming from
Coulardbank Estate it is a long way and they have to cross the main road.  Also
people don't like the drinkers standing at the door smoking and drinking and
trying to get through them to get in.  The staff at the polling station also
complained about always having to move all the furniture before starting.
-  People living in Glenlatterach have to go all the way to Rothes to vote, yet we
pass the polling station at Fogwatt Hall to get to Rothes! I know boundaries are
drawn, but it always seemed a bit silly to pass a polling station to get to another
one! 
-  The ones in Keith are easy to access 
-   
ELGIN NORTH
The most obvious issue in terms of polling station is Pinefield (Bowling Club) as
the turnout is always extremely low - 40% on a good election turnout. Regardless
of the more deprived population being one of the likely reasons for the lower
turnout, crossing the A96 to go vote seems to be putting people off. We would
suggest the installation of a portacabin (e.g on the patch of grass on Waulkmill
Grove, or the park on McBeath Avenue). 
Appendix 1
Page 159

Page 160

Obviously the new development in Findrassie needs to have the polling station
moved to Lossiemouth or Bishopmill Hall, as opposed to Duffus.
ELGIN SOUTH:
The use of the Sports Centre is problematic as it is far away from some voters in
the polling district. Voters have to drive. We would suggest the newly opened Link
on Southfield drive.
SPEYSIDE:
Do we really need a polling station in Drummuir where it is hardly used, likewise
Knockando. Knockando and Archiestown are pretty close and anyone travelling
to Knockando polling station must do so by car as there is no village of
Knockando as such. 
-  
-  Alves/Roseisle - although rural this box is well-placed and there aren't any
accessibility issues; perhaps the wrong side of the A96
-  Burghead/Cummingston - seems to suit all and is both within walking distance
and easily accessible for all in Burghead
-  Duffus - voters from Findrassie currently use this box since Findrassie is in H&L
but perhaps they should vote at Bishopmill?
- Hopeman - as with Burghead
- Lossiemouth (Town Hall) - no issues with accessibility or distance although
some voters in the same street vote here or at the other Lossie box!
- Lossiemouth (Football club) - a few issues. 1) This is a licensed premises and
many I have spoken to have voiced concern about the suitability of this, 2) this
boxed moved from the old community centre/high school and is much much
further away from the Coulardbank Estate where a large percentage of the box's
voters live and 3) this box is now very close to the Town Hall box and is less
central for the majority of the box's voters
- Miltonduff - although rural this box is well-placed and there aren't any
accessibility issues
- Parking can be a problem at busy times in Dufftown as people tend to stop on the
street rather than pulling into the car park adjacent to the hall.
-  In my local area of Forres, I have thus far been very happy with the number of
polling stations that are within walking distance of the local population, which
have good accessibility for people with disabilities or other vulnerabilities. 
Page 160

Page 161

-  Some polling places have 2 stations which will save in costs considering the
lower number of voters there are now at polling station.  Can more polling
stations be combined with appropriate staff numbers ie Buckie East & West 
-  My polling station is ideal in that it is within walking distance of our home.
-  It would be good not to have to use Greenwards, as it means the school is
closed. 
-  make sense, good accessibility and availibility 
-  In my limited experience, no complaints or issues. Polling station clearly
marked, polling district known, good hours, kind workers.
-  School should be used as a last resort it’s always the case that children
education is put 2nd to polling stations 
-  Try to avoid using schools 
-  Adequate
-  Not a problem I have a postal vote
-  We live near Drummuir and really value being able to vote there. 
-  Miltonduff village hall- with it being a nursery there is often disruption to the
children’s families 
-  I don’t agree with polling stations being in a school. Children should not miss out
on a days education for voting. Not to mention the parents have to find suitable
childcare too! 
-  Polling stations should not be in licensed premises whether they are open or not.
-  Don’t think schools should be closed. 
-  Totally satisfactory 
- I think you should stop using schools as this costs the parents a lot of money to
either have to be off work or arrange child care. There are options like community
halls which all have public access. More people should be encouraged to vote by
post as it’s an antiquated way of voting in person. 
-  I’m happy with town hall 
-  The closest polling station to the Glassgreen estates in new Elgin is New Elgin
Hall which is a 5min walk but the allocated station is Greenwards Primary which
is a 20/30min walk. I did not vote in the recent council elections due to
Greenwards being out of my way.
Page 161

Page 162

- I feel that schools should not be used as polling stations-this is additional days
of school for only some pupils and not all meaning some pupils are missing out
on class time that their peers aren’t.
- Room is too small and very cluttered with unused, stacked chairs and tables.
- The polling district change seems very strange I live in the highland council area
but my polling station is run by moray council doesn’t make sense
- My current polling place is good and convenient
- Schools should not be used anymore
- I live in Glenrinnes, I'm sure others in Glenrinnes would agree that the Glenrinnes
Hall would be more convenient than having to travel to Dufftown.
- Shouldn't be held in schools disrupting children's learning with schools having to
close for the day.
- I vote in a local school which obviously has to close to pupils and staff to allow
voting to take place. In view of the increase in house building thoughts need to be
given to alternative arrangements.
- Bishopmill works well for us
-  We live in Findrassie Elgin. You put our polling station as Duffus. As someone
with no transportation we are limited with how many buses go there. We have a
community hall just half a mile from our house. Why can’t we use it
- Seem fine
- I'd like to see use of Rothiemay Primary School avoided please.
- Comment has been made to me from people in the Kingsmills area that Seafield
School would be easier to vote from rather than Williamson Hall. If there was
merit in this then perhaps the River would be the boundary for voting purposes
with those on the Lesmurdie side going to Seafield School.
- Lossiemouth community centre was used as a polling place until the new school
was being built, the football club was then chosen. I have several concerns
about this as a venue. Firstly it is off any main bus route, it is in a pub which may
put people off voting and it is not a place which everyone is familiar with in the
town. I also feels that the big scheme behind the high school/ community centre
is also an area of deprivation and of low voting turnout historically. In moving it so
far from the previous polling station, if further disenfranchises the community
who we need to turn out. as parking is so bad at the new school/ community
centre it is unlikely that it can be moved back there but that would be the ideal.
- My local polling station at Fife Keith scout hall is very convenient. It's central for
locals and has disabled access
Page 162

Page 163

- Since moving the polling station to Lossiemouth FC Social Club on Macduff
Street from Lossiemouth Community Centre have had lots of people
complaining it's a lot further to walk from the Coulardbank housing Estate and
have to cross the main road and go to the very bottom of Macduff Street.
What suggestions do you have for alternative polling places
-  Use village halls
- Explore the use of Scout/Guide halls for polling stations? Or other Youth Group
locations.
- The alternative I would recommend would be the Scout Hall on the playing on
the right side of the main road not far from the previous polling station at the
community centre 
- British legion halls? Most towns have one. 
- As indicated above the Link on Southfield Drive, and use of portacabins.  We
suggest merging polling districts in Knockando and Archiestown
- Could a polling station be opened in the Thomshill Hall
- Scout Hall (playing fields ) Lossiemouth
- It's a pity that schools are no longer used for polling stations since, almost
without exception, these are familiar buildings, fairly central for the majority of
voters and already form a central part of community life (which elections should
also do!). Not all communities have a hall that would have these qualities,
however, and, of course getting a day off from school was always a buzz! 
- I have used churches, community centres, libraries and sports clubs to vote in
my local areas over the years. Keep community centres and libraries open! 
- If you combined Bishopmill East & West & New Elgin East & West this would
mean 2 schools are not used. Could the M Connect bus collect people that
struggle with transport?  
- Libraries, Shops with a quiet space, Companies that may have free space and
easy access, Police station, Fire station, Sports grounds, Train stations
- Elgin Golf Club, New Elgin Community Hub
- Cooperation with large businesses, community halls, churches etc 
- Change Pilmuir Primary School to the Erskine Centre now that its fully open.
- Could you use the TA hall in new Elgin instead of Greenwards?
- Erskine centre in Forres it was used in the past when a hotel. 
- Is Pluscarden hall wheelchair accessible for an alternative or any library?
Page 163

Page 164

- New Elgin hall? Old vaccination centre? 
- Schools are public buildings, accessible in communities and should be utilised
for lots of things including pilling stations.
- New Elgin Hall, Scout hall, Sports centre, Unit at retail park (such as the old
vaccination centre)
- Use new Elgin hall, Miltonduff hall, Forres tollbooth or community centre ,
Bishopmill hall, Elgin library- gallery room, Buckie town house or open up Buckie
access point for the day as it’s still a council building or fisherman’s hall, long
more hall, moray sports centre, Lossie community centre or town hall. most of
these would cost nothing as already council owned. 
- Better for schools not to be used as working parents need to take unnecessary
days off over what they need to. 
- Moray Sport Centre-this venue has a huge hall that could be the polling station
for new Elgin as a whole. It is on a public transport route and buses stop at the
door so there would no access issues.
- The closest polling station to the Glassgreen estates in new Elgin is New Elgin Hall which
is a 5min walk but the allocated station is Greenwards Primary which is a 20/30min
walk. I did not vote in the recent council elections due to Greenwards being out of my
way.
- Burghead Community Hall
- Scout hut / out of darkness studio near greenwards. 
- Glenrinnes Hall
- Bishopmill hall is half a mile from Findrassie 
- Could Rothiemay Public Hall be used in place of Rothiemay Primary School?
- The Scout Hall on the playing fields not far from the old polling station would be a
much better venue and folk wouldn't need to cross the main road.
- Supermarkets? Bus station, train stations 
Page 164

Page 165

Polling Place Review Consultation Results – Stage 1
Responses from Current Polling Places
100% of respondents stated they were happy for the building to remain a polling place.
Are there any known issues which could impact on the building for use as a polling
place?
- Forres House Community Centre 
At present the Council are carrying out a review of the future of Leisure and
Community facilities in Moray and the outcome of this may affect the Community
Centre. 
- Burghead Free Church Hall
Hall renovation underway and due to be completed July 2025 
-        British Legion Hall, Buckie
We currently do not have a functioning kitchen; however, arrangements can be
made on the day so that your staff have access to water, a kettle etc.  This has been
the case the last few times. 
Are there any known issues caused as a result of the venue being used as a polling
place, if so, what are the issues?
- Forres House Community Centre
Not really a big issue but there is disruption to regular user, clubs etc. on polling day
as the facility is closed for these groups. 
- Craigellachie Village Hall
The Busy Bees nursery school will not open that day as the room is required for a
Polling Place.  The primary school pupils continue to use the main hall for their
lunches, but are supervised by staff. 
-       Kinloss Church Hall
We have no real issues other than we have to cancel the evening events the night
before the polling day as well as the polling day events so our disruption is perhaps
greater than anticipated. 
Any further comments?
- Williamson Hall
We can easily shift our groups when notification received as we have sufficient
advance notice
- Edinkillie Community Hall
We hope that we will be able to continue to provide this valuable local service 
Appendix 2
Page 165

Page 166

- Alves Hall
We are happy to continue to be used as a Polling Station
- Hopeman Memorial Hall
Happy to stay as a polling station 
- Moray Sports Centre 
We would be happy to continue being a Polling Station 
- Forres Tennis Club
Everything is the same as last year so happy to continue to be a polling station 
- Cullen Bowling and Tennis Club
Happy to continue as a polling station 
- Lossiemouth FC Social Club
We would like to continue as a polling place. 
Page 166

Page 167

Report to: Moray Council Meeting
Date:
25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Education,
Communities and
Organisational
Development)
Report No: GSP010/25/AM/TS   
Author: Tracey Sutherland Contact
Email:
Committee.services@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Review of Constitutional Documents 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to approve the revised Constitutional Documents.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (15) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to the formulation, review and amendment of the Administrative
Scheme and Standing Orders which provides that amendments to Standing Orders require
to be raised at one Council meeting for approval at the following meeting.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  Following the presentation of the proposed amendments to the meeting of the Council on
21 May 2025, this report now presents the amendments for final approval. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that Council: 
i) notes the additional changes suggested at the meeting of Moray Council on
21 May 2025 regarding the Chief Internal Auditor and Written Questions; and   
ii) approve the final version of the Constitutional Documents following the
2024/25 review.   
Tracey Sutherland
Democratic Services Manager
Item 17.
Page 167

Page 168

4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  In terms of Standing Order 90 the Council is required, at least once every year to review
the Constitutional Documents to determine whether any alteration should be considered  
4.2  Recommendations were considered by the Council on 21 May 2025 (para 12 of the draft
minute refers.    
4.3  The final amendments are detailed in paragraph 5 below. 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  Standing Order Amendments: 
SO No Amendment Reason
31 Replace “Chief Officer” with “Chief
Executive or relevant Chief Officer”.
Clarification
36 A copy of any written answer provided
by the Leader or Chair will be published
on the Council’s online committee
management system by 12pm the day
before the meeting. 
Amended to reflect the earlier
publishing time.
36 Monday meeting - 5pm on Tuesday
before the meeting
Tuesday meeting -  5pm on Wednesday
before the meeting
Wednesday meeting - 5pm on Thursday
before the meeting
Thursday meeting - 5pm on Friday
before the meeting
Friday meeting – 5pm on Monday before
the meeting 
Deadlines for the submission
of written questions to be
amended to reflect the earlier
publication date to allow
Officers the same time to
respond.
45 Amend to Standing Orders 43 and 44 Re-numbering issue 
64(d) Amend wording to read:
In the case of a vote relating to the
appointment of a Chief Officer the
minute shall only record that a vote by
secret ballot had taken place and the
decision.
Brings in line with practice in
other local authorities.
71 Amend Standing Order numbers
referred to in (b) and (c) to read 71(a)  
Numbering out of sync. 
5.2  Scheme of Administration Amendments: 
Page 168

Page 169

SOA No Amendment Reason
(II) (2) Increase to £250,000 To bring in line with Scheme of
Delegation which gives
authority to Heads of Service to
purchase land up to £250,000 
(II) (21) Update to read – The statutory functions
delegated by the Council to the Moray
Integration Joint Board in terms of the
Integration Scheme for Moray. 
Updated to include Children
and Families and Justice
Services moving to the MIJB
(II) (28) Add in new para – To consider Accounts
Commission findings and actions in
relation to the Council’s Best Value duty
under the Community Empowerment
Act 2023 
Not previously contained in
Scheme of Administration
(A) (3) Increase to £250,000 As (II) (2) 
(B) (7) Monitor the Council’s Best Value Plan New para – rest of the section
will be renumbered as a result. 
(G) (14) To exercise the Council’s functions in
relation to resettlement,
accommodation and integration of
displaced persons, under provisions
including the UK Resettlement Scheme,
New Scots Integration Strategy 2024 and
the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999,
incorporating development,
implementation and monitoring of
related strategy and policies as required
New provision
(I) (13) Remove – to deal with all matters
relating to local inquiries into matters
affecting children.
This is now dealt with by the
Tribunal Service
Appendix Include Service Managers As agreed at Moray Council on
15 April 2025 
5.3  Scheme of Delegation Amendments: 
SOD No Amendment Reason
3 (xxiv) Add – Section 206 - Maintain a roll
containing names of persons who have
Freedom of Moray status 
• Head of Governance Strategy
and Performance
• Democratic Services Manager 
Not previously contained in
Scheme of Delegation
Page 169

Page 170

1 (10) Amend to read – To assist Councillors
and Officers of the Council in relation to
a Councillor’s representative role, the
Council has agreed guidance on
Councillor/Officer relations. 
Update to second tier
governance document
2 (4) Add – The Chief Executive shall have the
authority to exercise the powers of
either Depute Chief Executive and the
Depute Chief Executives shall have…. 
Omission in existing wording.
3 (1) (iii) Section 40 – include Chief Executive  Extend existing arrangements
3 (1) (v) Section 43 – Include Chief Executive  Extend existing arrangements. 
3 (1) (vii) Section 50B – Include Chief Executive or
relevant Depute Chief Executive 
Extend existing arrangements.
3 (1) (xi) Section 92 – Include Chief Executive  Extend existing arrangements.
3 (1) (xii) Section 95 – amend to read Chief
Financial Officer in whose absence the
Finance Manager shall deputise 
Update to recognise
restructure within department
3 (1)
(xxiii)
Add – Section 206 - Maintain a roll
containing names of persons who have
Freedom of Moray status 
• Head of Governance Strategy
and Performance
• Democratic Services Manager 
Not previously contained in
Scheme of Delegation
3 (2) (i) Add in new section – Local Authority
Accounts (Scotland) Regulations 2014
and the Public Sector Internal Audit
Standards 
Audit recommendation. 
3 (2) (j) Add in new section – Section 1A Town
and Country Planning (Scotland) Act
1997 – Introduction of a Chief Planning
Officer 
New Legislation
3 (2) (k) Add
Local Authority Accounts (Scotland)
Regulations 2014 (para 7) 
The Audit and Risk Manager shall
assume the role of the independent
Chief Audit Executive in terms of Public
Sector Internal Audit Standards with
Audit recommendation.
Page 170

Page 171

unrestricted access to the central
leadership team and Council. 
5 (1) Update to read – 
To give a direction in special
circumstances: 
i) That any officer shall not
exercise a delegated power;
ii) On how a delegation to an
officer should be exercised,
other than where a Statutory
Appointee is exercising a
function particular to their
statutory role. 
If such direction is given the Chief
Executive shall consider the need to
report the circumstances to the
appropriate Council or Committee
meeting and the use of powers
contained in paragraph 5(7). 
Audit recommendation to
review 
9 (35) New Section
Committee Services – to maintain a
register of those person or groups who
have been bestowed the Freedom of
Moray. 
To reflect the decision of Moray
Council on 15 April 2025
10 (13) Amend to include the Chief Executive  Extend existing arrangements.
10 (26) New section – to provide a public
relations/communications service on
behalf of the Council. 
To reflect existing
arrangements.
12 Re-name Homelessness Heading to
Housing Needs and Resettlement 
12 (29) To carry out the functions of the Council
in relation to resettlement,
accommodation and integration of
displaced persons, under provisions
including the UK Resettlement Scheme,
New Scots Integration Strategy 2024 and
the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. 
New provision
13 (22) Remove – subsequent numbering in
section will change
Responsibility transferred to
Scottish Environmental
Protection Agency in 2016
Page 171

Page 172

13 (26) New section – enact new ticket types for
Council operated bus services 
Agreed at ED&I on 6 September
2022
13 (27) New para – Consider short term fares
offers and promotions for Council
operated bus services as appropriate 
Agreed at ED&I on 6 September
2022
14 (46) Environmental Impact Assessment
(Scotland) Regulations 2017 
Updating regulations from
2011 to 2017
14 (52) Respond to Section 37 consultations
from the Energy Consents Unit where
the consultations relate to: 
a) Wooden pole lines less than
10km in length;
b) Reconfiguration/repositioning of
larger lattice steel pylons, where
there is no net increase in the
number of pylons proposed. 
Agreed at Planning and
Regulatory Services
Committee on 15 August 2023
14 (53) Provide preliminary advice for planning
applications, determining non-material
variations and discharging planning
conditions under the Planning etc.
(Scotland) Act 2006 
Update to guidance
14 (54) Addition of ‘in accordance with the
agreed Developer Obligations.’ 
Update to guidance
16 (69)  Update to read – to have the power to
apply for a child protection order in
terms of Section 57 of the Children
(Scotland) Act 1995 or Section 37 and/or
Section 38 of the Children’s Hearings
(Scotland) Act 2011 
Update to legislation. 
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  X
Policy and Legal X 
Financial  X
Risk  X
Page 172

Page 173

Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital             X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
Provision of Standing Orders ensures that the Council’s affairs are administered in
accordance with the law, propriety and proper standards.  
6.4  Financial 
None. 
One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments       
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments       
6.5  Risk
Page 173

Page 174

Updated constitutional documents help to promote good governance and reduce the
chance of a successful challenge to Council decisions.  
6.6  Staffing 
None  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
None  
6.8  Property 
None  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
None  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Chief Executive, Depute Chief
Executive (Economy, Environment and Finance), Depute Chief Executive (Education,
Communities and Organisational Development and Heads of Service have been
consulted and any comments have been included in the report.  
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  Standing Orders
Scheme of Administration
Scheme of Delegation   
Page 174

Page 175

Report to: Moray Council Meeting
Date:
25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Education, Communities
and Organisational
Development)
Report
No:
GSP018/25/TS  
Author: Tracey Sutherland  Contact
Email:
committee.services@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Revised Calendar of Meetings 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to consider and agree a revised Calendar of Meetings until
April 2027.  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section II (10) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to committee structures, distribution of functions and
responsibilities.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  The Council has a duty to provide regular updates on its financial position and
performance.  
2.2 The current Committee meeting schedule does not align itself with timely reporting of
these functions and it was felt that a revision of the schedule would be 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS.  
3.1  It is recommended that the Council:   
i) consider and agree the cycle of meetings as detailed in Appendix 1; and   
ii) agree to review the effectiveness of the new schedule in early 2027 ahead of
the Local Government Elections in May 2027.   
Tracey Sutherland
Item 18.
Page 175

Page 176

Democratic Services Manager 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  At its meeting on 18 May 2022, the Council agreed the cycle of meetings until April 2027
(para 4 of the minute refers)  
4.2  The current cycle of meetings runs on an 8 weekly cycle, with the exception of Moray Local
Review Body which meetings monthly and Police and Fire and Rescue Services
Committee which meets quarterly.    
4.3  The current meeting cycle does not allow for timely consideration of performance and
finance reports.  Members are often considering information that is several months out of
date and any issues highlighted may already have been addressed.  
4.4  To try and address the issue, it was suggested that a new committee cycle be developed
which would assist in timely reporting.  
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  The new proposals have been worked around fixed reporting dates, rather than a fixed 8
week cycle.  
5.2  The schedule is detailed in APPENDIX 1.  
5.3 It is proposed to run the new schedule starting January 2026 as it is acknowledged that
trying to re-schedule Committee dates sooner, around already busy Elected Member and
Officer diaries would be difficult.  
5.4 If agreed, the Committee schedule will include dates up April 2027 prior to the Local
Government Elections in 2027. 
5.5 It was felt to be sensible to review the new Committee schedule after it had been in place
for 12 months and a report will be brought back in early 2027 to review the schedule and
determine whether it needs reviewed ahead of the new Council being created following
the Local Government Elections in May 2027.  
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  X
Policy and Legal  X
Financial  X
Risk  X
Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Page 176

Page 177

Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital            X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
None arising from this report.  
6.4  Financial 
None arising from this report. 
One off Costs:
Service
Area
Budget Budget
Years
Proposed
Spend this
Year
Virement
From
Other
Comments       
Annually Recurring Costs:
Service
Area
Budget With
Effect
From
Annual
Net
Impact
Virement
From (if
applicable)
Other
Comments       
6.5  Risk 
None arising from this report.  
6.6  Staffing 
None arising from this report.
Page 177

Page 178

6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
None arising from this report.  
6.8  Property 
None arising from this report.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None arising from this report.  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
None arising from this report.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None arising from this report. 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Corporate Leadership Team, Heads
of Service and any comments made have been incorporated into the report  
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None.   
Page 178

Page 179

QUARTER
MONTH
WEEK COMMENCING 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 1 4 11 18 25 1 8 15 22 29 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28
Budget Setting A
Draft Annual Accounts A
Audited Annual Accounts A
Corporate Plan indicators A
Revenue Monitoring Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Capitial Monitoring Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Best Value Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Corporate Risk Register Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Transformation Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Workforce Planning Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
Capitial & Revenue           (To
follow corporate) Q3 Q3 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q1 Q2 Q2
Performance Reports           (6
Monthly) 3+4 3+4 1+2 1+2
Service Plan Approval
(Annually) A A
Audit Plan A
Annual Audit Opinion A
2 further quarterly  meetings A A
AUDIT & SCRUTINY
QUARTLERLY MEETINGS
QUARTER 4 QUARTER 1 QUARTER 3QUARTER 2
SERVICE COMMITTEES
CORPORATE COMMITTEE
QUARTERLY REPORTING
FULL COUNCIL
ANNUAL REPORTING
JULY AUGUST SEPT OCT
Fixed Committee Reporting Dates: 2026 Proposals
NOV DECJAN FEB MAR APR JUNEMAY
Page 179

Page 180

5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30
Full Council LRB IJB GVJB
2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27
Licensing
Police &
Fire Corporate LRB Full Council CCG
2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 30 31
ECLS Planning ED&I Housing LRB A&S IJB
1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30
LRB Licensing Planning
Police & Fire
5 6 7 8 1 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29
Full Council LRB Corporate
1 2 3 4 5 8 9 10 11 12 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 29 30
Licensing LRB ED&I A&S ECLS IJB GVJB Full Council
Housing
5 6 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 31
Planning
3 4 5 6 7 10 11 12 13 14 17 18 19 20 21 24 25 26 27 28 31
Police & Fire LRB Corporate GVJB
5 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30
ECLS Licensing Planning ED&I Housing LRB A&S Full Council
5 6 7 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30
LRB Planning GVJB
2 3 4 6 6 9 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 30
Licensing Full Council Police & Fire LRB Corporate
5 1 2 3 4 7 8 9 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 21 22 23 24 25 28 29 30 31
ECLS Planning ED&I Housing A&S LRB
OCTOBER 2026
NOVEMBER 2026
JANUARY 2026
FEBRUARY 2026
MARCH 2026
APRIL 2026
MAY 2026
OCTOBER RECESS
EASTER RECESS
AUGUST 2026
SEPTEMBER 2026
JUNE 2026
JULY 2026
SUMMER RECESS
DECEMBER 2026
CHRISTMAS HOLIDAYS
Page 180

Page 181

Report to: Moray Council Meeting
Date:
25 June 2025  
Report by: Depute Chief Executive
(Education,
Communities and
Organisational
Development) 
Report No: GSP040/25/TJS  
Author: Tracey Sutherland Contact
Email:
committee.services@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Changes to Senior Councillor  Positions 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to note changes to a number of Chair/Depute Chair and
Senior Councillor positions. 
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section I (2) of the Council’s Scheme of
Administration relating to exercising the functions conferred on it in complying with
Standing Orders.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  Some changes to Chair/Depute Chair and Senior Councillor positions have been made
within the Administration Group and SNP Groups. These can be accommodated within the
current agreed number of Senior Responsibility Allowances. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS  
3.1  It is recommended that the Council:   
i) note the changes to the Chair/Depute and Senior Councillor positions detailed in
para 5.1 below; and   
ii) agree that any future changes to Chair/Depute and Senior Councillor positions of
Committees (and which of these attract Senior Responsibility Allowances (SRAs))
can be made by the relevant Group Leaders notifying the Chief Executive, subject
to the number of SRAs not exceeding those already agreed by the Council. 
Item 19.
Page 181

Page 182

Tracey Sutherland
Democratic Services Manager 
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  Traditionally the appointment of Committee Chairs and any subsequent changes has been
agreed through a report to Council with the last consideration of appointments being on 4
December  2024.  
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  Following some internal changes within the Administration and SNP Groups it is proposed
that the following changes be made to Chair/Depute and Senior Councillor position
holders. 
Position Current Change
Chair of Corporate  Councillor Mustard Councillor Gatt
Chair of Licensing Councillor McBain Councillor Colyer
Joint Leader of SNP - Councillor Warren
Chair/Vice Chair of MIJB Councillor Kirby Councillor Mustard
Depute Chair Housing and
Community Safety
Councillor Gatt Councillor McBain 
5.2  The proposed changes from the Administration Group will take effect from 1 August 2025
and the changes for the SNP group with immediate effect.  The proposals will not require
any change to the number of senior responsibility allowances agreed by the Council on 19
February 2025 (para 19 of the minute refers).  
5.3  Previously it was agreed that Group Leaders, would notify Committee Services of any
changes to group membership of the Committees.  It is proposed that the same
arrangement could be used for changes to Chairs and Deputes provided there has been no
change to the political balance or the number of SRAs being paid does not exceed those
already agreed.  This would mean that a report to Council would not be required for any
changes subject to the conditions above.  
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  X
Policy and Legal X 
Financial  X
Risk  X
Staffing  X
Best Value and Transformation  X
Page 182

Page 183

Property  X
Information Communications Technology/Digital            X
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   X
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  X 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.   
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
Local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
6.3  Policy and Legal 
Councillors remuneration is regulated by the Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004
(Remuneration) Regulations with amounts being updated annually by further regulations. 
6.4  Financial 
None as the amendments are within the previously agreed numbers. If recommendations
are approved the Senior Responsibility Payments would be as follows: 
Role  Role Holder Fixed rem.
2007 Regs
SRA Additional roles
Leader  Cllr Robertson  Leader - Chair of ECLS
Depute Leader Cllr Gatt  1 Chair Corporate
Ctee  Chair GVJB
Civic Leader Cllr Cowe “Civic
Head”
- 
Chair/Vice of MIJB Cllr Mustard  2 
Chair of EDIS Cllr Macrae  3 
Page 183

Page 184

Chair of Housing
and CS
Cllr Dunbar  4 
Chair of Licensing Cllr Colyer  5 
Chair of PRS Cllr Gordon  6 
Chair Police & Fire Cllr Bloomfield  - 
Chair of Audit and
Scrutiny
Cllr Lawrence  7 Joint Leader of Largest
Opposition party
Joint leader of
Largest Opposition
Party
Cllr Warren  8 
6.5  Risk 
None.  
6.6  Staffing 
None.  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
None.  
6.8  Property 
None.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None.  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
None.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with Corporate Leadership Team, the Head
of Governance, Strategy and Performance and Chief Financial Officer and any comments
have been incorporated into the report.  
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None   
Page 184

Page 185

Report to: Moray Council Meeting Date: 26 June 2025  
Report by: Head of HR, ICT and
Organisational
Development
Report No: HR006/25/FG  
Author: Frances Garrow Contact Email: hr@moray.gov.uk 
Subject: Members’ Allowances and Expenses Scheme Review 
1.  PURPOSE 
☒ For Decision      ☐  For Information 
1.1  The purpose of this report is to approved the revised Members’ Allowances and Expenses
Scheme (Appendix A).  
1.2  This report is submitted to Council in terms of Section III (B) (49) of the Council’s Scheme
of Administration relating to exercising of the statutory functions of the Council under the
Local Government in Scotland Act 2003.  
2.  SUMMARY  
2.1  Following an internal audit of members’ expenses in late 2024 which recommended
review of the Members’ Allowances and Expenses Scheme, this report provides an update
on that Scheme following completion of the review.   The Scheme is also updated
following The Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 (Remuneration) Amendment
Regulations 2025.  
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS  
3.1  It is recommended that the Council consider and approve the updated Scheme   
Author Name Frances Garrow
Job Title Head of HR, ICT & Organisational Development 
Item 20.
Page 185

Page 186

- 2 -  
4.  BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT  
4.1  Following an Internal Audit review of members’ expenses and compliance with the
Members’ Allowances and Expenses Scheme, it was recommended that a review of the
existing Scheme should be undertaken to ensure greater clarity is provided in relation to
what would be considered appropriate expenses, which in turn would support elected
members and payroll staff with endorsement at full council level and periodic review
thereafter.  
4.2  A review of the Scheme by the Head of Governance, Strategy and Performance/Chief
Governance Officer (Monitoring Officer) and the Head of HR, ICT and Organisational
Development/Head of Community Strategy, People & Change highlights the following
proposed amendments: 
• Section 2- amended to reflect recent changes to the Council banding contained in
Remuneration Regulations. 
• Section 4.2 – amended to include reference to community based events attended
as a ward councillor
• Appendix 1 – Breakdown of Remuneration – updated to reflect current values
• Minor changes to wording to reflect the current committee and organisational
structure
• Addition of recommended review date 
5.  PROPOSALS  
5.1  It is proposed that the revised Scheme is approved.  
6.  SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS  
6.1  The table below shows whether risks and implications apply if the recommendations are
agreed: 
SUBJECT YES NO
Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcome Improvement Plan)  x
Policy and Legal x 
Financial x 
Risk  x
Staffing  x
Best Value and Transformation  x
Property  x
Information Communications Technology/Digital  x
Equalities. Social Inclusion and Economic Impact   x
Page 186

Page 187

- 3 -  
Climate Change and Biodiversity Impact  x 
6.2  Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP))
Improved Collaborative Leadership, as part of continuous improvement through Best
Value, will better enable the Council to fulfil the ambitions set out in its strategic plans. 
a) Links to Council Corporate Plan – The proposals in this report support and contribute
to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following Council Plan
strategic priorities:
☐ Tackle Poverty and Inequality.
☐ Build Stronger Greener Vibrant Economy.
☐ Build Thriving, resilient, empowered Communities.  
None. 
b) Links to Local Outcomes Improvement Plan – The proposals in this report support
and contribute to improved outcomes for communities as outlined in the following
local Outcomes Improvement Plan priorities:
☐ Developing a diverse, inclusive, and sustainable economy
☐ Building a better future for our children and young people in   Moray.
☐ Empowering and connecting communities.
☐ Improving wellbeing of our population 
None.
6.3  Policy and Legal 
Councillors remuneration is regulated by the Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004
(Remuneration) Regulations with amounts being updated annually by further regulations.  
6.4  Financial 
None. 
6.5  Risk 
Clear guidance within the Scheme will assist in reducing misunderstanding and
misapplication of the Scheme.  
6.6  Staffing 
None.  
6.7  Best Value and Transformation 
None.  
6.8  Property 
None.  
6.9  Information Communications/Technology/Digital 
None.  
Page 187

Page 188

- 4 -  
6.10  Equalities, Social Inclusion and Economic Impact 
None.  
6.11  Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None. 
7.  CONSULTATION  
7.1  This report has been prepared in consultation with the Head of Governance, Strategy and
Performance/Chief Governance Officer (Monitoring Officer), the Corporate Leadership
Team and Strategic Leadership Forum  and any comments made have been incorporated
into the report.   
8.  BACKGROUND PAPERS  
8.1  None.   
Page 188

Page 189

MORAY COUNCIL              MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES AND EXPENSES SCHEME 
APPENDIX A 
MORAY COUNCIL 
MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES AND EXPENSES SCHEME 
Version 1 April 2025
Next Review Date: March 2028 
Page 189

Page 190

INDEX OF CONTENTS 
SCHEME OF MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES 
Page
Numbers 
1.   INTRODUCTION  1 
2.   REMUNERATION LIMITS  1 
3.   PAYMENT  2 
4.   TRAVELLING AND SUBSISTENCE APPROVED DUTIES AND      
CONFERENCES                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
2  
5.   MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT  5 
6.   TAXATION OF MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES  6 
7.   COMPLETION, SUBMISSION AND PAYMENT OF CLAIM      
FORMS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
7
8.   PUBLICATION OF REMUNERATION INFORMATION 8 
APPENDIX 1 – SALARY LIMITS 
Page 190

Page 191

- 2 -  
APPENDIX 2 – TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE RATES 
APPENDIX 3 –  APPROVED CONFERENCES 
APPENDIX 4 – SPECIMEN CLAIM FORM 
APPENDIX 5 – RECORD OF CLAIMS 
Community Strategy, People & Change
Payroll Services
1 April 2025 (Updated) 
Page 191

Page 192

- 1 -  
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 This Scheme has been prepared as required by the Local Governance (Scotland)
Act 2004 (Remuneration) Amendment Regulations 2025 which control the
payment of expenses and allowances to its members who are elected at an
ordinary election or by election to fill a casual vacancy. 
1.2 The Scheme gives details of the level, entitlement, claiming, and payment
procedures for Members’ Allowances. 
1.3 A local authority shall pay contributions or other payments as required of an
employing authority under the Local Government Pension Scheme (Scotland)
regulations 1998(d) in respect of those councillors that elect to become
councillor members of the pension scheme established under those regulations. 
1.4 Under the Regulations, a Member may, by notice in writing, elect to forego any
payment of his/her entitlement to an allowance under this Scheme. 
2. REMUNERATION LIMITS 
2.1 Remuneration should be based on the role carried out and the responsibilities
held by the councillor: 
• 'Leader' means the Leader of the Council of the authority, or such other
councillor that the authority decides has the title of Leader of the Council.
• ‘Civic Head’ means Civic Leader.
• ‘Depute Leader’ of the authority means a councillor who is designated as
such by the authority.  The Depute Leader is treated for remuneration
purposes as a Senior Councillor.
• 'Senior Councillor' means a councillor who is designated as such by the
authority of which that person is an elected member and who holds a
significant position of responsibility in the Council’s political
management structure.
• 'Councillor' means an elected member of the authority who is likely to
hold no significant position of responsibility in the Council’s political
management structure. 
2.2 Moray Council has been re-classified within Statutory Instrument 2007 No 183
as a Band “B” Council with salary limits updated annually by Statutory
Instrument.   Current levels are listed in APPENDIX 1.  The Minister of Finance
issued a further Scottish Statutory Instruments in April 2025 (No.  8 and 36). This
covers Remuneration Payments. 
2.3 Senior Councillors are restricted to 10 and a maximum total amount payable to
the 10 or fewer councillors.  The amount referred to is listed on APPENDIX 1. The
Page 192

Page 193

- 2 -  
number and remuneration level of Senior Councillors will be agreed by the
Council. 
2.4 For each Joint Board remuneration shall be paid by the local authority of which
the convener or vice convener is a member.  This total payment is restricted and
the calculation will include any payment received from the authority for acting as
councillor or senior councillor.  The amount referred to is listed on APPENDIX 1. 
2.5 A Councillor may only receive one allowance from those listed in 2.1 to 2.4
above.  Allowances paid by other bodies are paid in addition to councillor
allowances listed in 2.1 to 2.4 above. 
3. PAYMENT 
3.1 Payment will be made by twelve monthly instalments, which will be
automatically generated by the Payroll Section.  Once elected, councillors would
be available to the electorate on a daily basis and therefore salaries will be
calculated as such and based on number of days in the calendar month. 
3.2 The monthly instalments will be paid on the last Thursday of each calendar
month. 
3.3 Payments will be effected by direct credit to the Member’s nominated bank or
building society account. 
3.4 Members will receive an advice slip for each payment, which will give details of
the composition of the payment. 
4. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE FOR APPROVED DUTIES AND CONFERENCES 
4.1 Approved Duties are defined by Section 49 of the Local Government (Scotland)
1973 Act as:-   
(a) attendance at a meeting of the Authority or of any of its committees or
sub-committees; 
(b) the doing of any other thing approved by the Authority, or anything of a
class so approved, for the purpose of or in connection with the discharge
of the functions of the Authority or of any of its committees or sub-
committees; 
(c) the performing of any duty as a member of any Other Body, prescribed by
the Scottish Ministers for the purpose, to which the Member has been
nominated or appointed by the Authority;   
Page 193

Page 194

- 3 -  
4.2 The following list summarises the duties which are approved for the purposes of
claiming travelling and subsistence expenses as legitimate Council or Ward
business.  This list is not exhaustive and further guidance may be obtained
through consultation with the Head of Community Strategy, People & Change
and Chief Governance Officer (Monitoring Officer):- 
1. Attendance at a meeting of the Council or of any of its committees, sub-
committees or working parties
2. Attendance at meetings with Outside Bodies where Members have been
appointed to the bodies by the Council including COSLA Boards,
Scottish Government events, etc
3. Members’ Surgeries
4. Individual consultations with Chief Officials and other Senior Officers
5. Individual consultations with constituents
6. Constituency business – visiting Schools, Community Centres etc.
7.  Attending community events and meetings which are reasonably
associated with duties as a councillor
8. Committee Pre- Meetings
9. Community Council Meetings
10. Hearings and Tribunals
11. Opening of Tenders
12. School Parent Council Meetings
13.  Education Department Parents Meetings
14.  Budget and other consultation meetings with the public
15.  Site Visits
16.  Training Sessions for Elected Members
17. Attendance at award ceremonies
18.  Leader and Civic Head Duties
19. Attendance at approved conferences (see APPENDIX 3) 
Page 194

Page 195

- 4 -  
4.3 A list of the types of expenditure and maximum rates of payment is attached as
APPENDIX 2. 
4.4 Members shall be entitled to receive payment from the authority by way of
reimbursement of travel, subsistence or other expenditure that is “reasonably
incurred” and “receipted” (apart from road and bridge tolls).  As reimbursement
is based on actual expenditure no advances may be granted. 
4.5 Where a councillor is required to carry out council business out with his or her
own ward, or out with council premises, the actual receipted cost of reasonable
expenses incurred for lunch and dinner – up to the maximum listed in APPENDIX
2 may be reimbursed. 
4.6 Specific details of the duties and meetings for which expenses are claimed
should be specified on the claim form, paper or electronic version – (see
APPENDIX 4). 
4.7 Travelling and Subsistence Expenses may be claimed for up to two Members’
Surgeries and two Group Meetings per calendar month. 
4.8 For Approved Duties undertaken within the United Kingdom, claims for Travelling
and Subsistence must not exceed maximum rates prescribed by the Scottish
Ministers. 
4.9 Travelling Expenses – Guidance 
(1) Travel by Public Transport 
(a) Actual fare. 
(2) Travel by Taxi-Cab or Cab 
(a) In cases of urgency, or where no public transport is reasonably
available, the amount of the actual fare and any reasonable
gratuity paid; 
(b) In other cases, the amount of the fare for travel by the most
appropriate public transport. 
(3) Travel by Member’s Own Vehicle 
(a) When practicable, Members should arrange to share transport
(b) Members should travel by shortest practicable route. 
(4) Travel by Hired Motor Vehicle, Other than a Taxi-Cab or a Cab
(a) Arrangements can be made through the Council’s Fleet Services
for the hire of vehicle, which on longer journeys can prove to be the
most cost effective method of travel. 
Page 195

Page 196

- 5 -   
(5) Travel by Air 
The rate for travel by air must not exceed the cost of travelling by any
other appropriate means of transport (with an allowance equivalent to
any savings in subsistence allowances arising from the decision to fly). 
Payments must not exceed:- 
(a) Ordinary fare or any available cheap fare for travel by regular air
service;
(c) Where no such service is available, or in cases of emergency, the
fare actually paid. 
(6) Travel by Sea   
(a) Actual fare. 
4.10 For Approved Duties undertaken outwith the United Kingdom, rates will be
based on UK rates for accommodation costs for bed and breakfast and meals.     
As reimbursement is based on actual expenditure no advances will be granted. 
4.11 Except in cases when a spouse or partner forms part of an approved group or
delegation, their full travel costs and additional accommodation costs must be
met by the Member.  The Corporate Committee must approve any other
arrangement in advance. 
5. MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT 
5.1 As far as possible, the Council will provide a range of facilities, appropriate to
each individual Member’s needs, which will allow them to operate effectively as
a Councillor and communicate with Council Departments.  The following are
examples of available facilities:- 
Mobile Telephones  
Personal Computers 
5.2 These facilities are intended for business use and all non council business use
of Mobile Phones, for example, should be reimbursed to the Council. 
5.3 Councillors are required to make arrangements for and pay for their own
broadband.  
Page 196

Page 197

- 6 -  
6. TAXATION OF MEMBERS’ ALLOWANCES 
6.1 Remuneration 
All remuneration is subject to both tax and national insurance.  Additional tax
relief may also be claimed directly from HM R&C by councillors for use of
domestic facilities for business purposes, however, this is an individual
assessment made by HM R&C and is not guaranteed.   
6.2 Subsistence Allowances 
HMR&C have ruled that Members are deemed to have two places of work, i.e.
home and Council Headquarters, this means that expenses incurred within a
five mile radius of either location are taxable.  Overnight subsistence expenses
are not taxable. 
6.3 Mileage Allowances 
For income tax purposes, mileage allowances have to be considered from two
separate angles.  Firstly, it is necessary to consider whether the journeys are
business journeys (non-business journeys are taxable) and, secondly, it must be
ascertained as to whether there is any profit element within the mileage
allowances. 
Journeys on Business
It is accepted that Councillors normally have two places of work, i.e. home and
Council Headquarters.  This means that mileage allowances are not taxable
provided that:- 
• Members undertake duties on behalf of the Council at home and are paid
for travel between home and Council offices. 
• Allowances are paid for travel between home or Council offices and some
other place on Council business. 
• Their home is within the authority area or no more than 20 miles from the
area boundary (Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003, as
amended by the Finance (No. 2) Act 2015, s 331 (3)). 
Profit Element
HMR&C publish a set of “tax free” mileage rates which are known as the
Approved Mileage Allowance Payments (AMAP). When the mileage rates payable
to Members are compared with the rates in the AMAP, then it is clear that a tax
liability may arise dependent upon the c.c. rating and total mileage undertaken
by Members during the financial year.  This is assessed annually by HMR&C
based on information supplied by the Council.  The tax free limits under AMAP
compare to mileage allowances (see APPENDIX 2)
Page 197

Page 198

- 7 -   
It should be noted that it is open to Members to keep detailed records in respect
of all expenses incurred in running and maintaining their vehicle.  Such records
would require to be substantiated with receipts for all items.  Members would
then have to negotiate a profit element calculation directly with the HMR&C. 
6.4 Mobile Telephones 
No charge to Income Tax will arise where the full cost of private calls are
reimbursed to the Council. 
6.5 Micro-Computers, etc. 
HMR&C have indicated that they are willing to accept that personal usage of such
equipment is not material and that, consequently, no tax liability will arise. 
7. COMPLETION, SUBMISSION AND PAYMENT OF CLAIM FORMS 
7.1 Claims for Travel and Subsistence Expenses, Fares and Other Authorised
Payments must be made on the Council’s standard claim form which is
available from the Members’ Services Section. 
7.2 Claim forms should be completed by Elected Members, totalled, and signed
before they are submitted to Payroll Services for processing and payment. 
In particular, to assist with the processing, audit, and recovery of VAT, Elected
Members should ensure that claim forms:- 
(a) are supported by receipts for all expenditure.  No payment will be made
without the necessary receipts 
(b) show the exact period of time spent on Approved Duties; 
(c) show meaningful details of the Approved Duties being claimed; 
(d) show details of each individual journey, including the starting point, times
and destination, for every entry on the claim form including consultation
meetings. 
(e) for passenger miles, the number of passengers, number of miles
travelled, multiplied to give the total e.g. 2 passengers times 30 miles = 60
miles. 
(f) a VAT fuel receipt is attached to each claim made. 
7.3 Where it is not possible for claim forms to be  authorised by the Head of
Community Strategy, People & Change before they are processed for payment,
Page 198

Page 199

- 8 -  
any necessary corrections will be adjusted when the next payment of
allowances is made to the Member. 
7.4 It is the responsibility of Members to ensure that all sums claimed fall within the
limits detailed in this Scheme and relate to activities, which properly attract
payment of expenses. 
7.5 Members are requested to submit claim forms on a monthly basis, as soon as
possible after the end of each calendar month.  Members’ expense claim
forms submitted more than four months after the end of the claim period
will require to be submitted to Corporate Committee before payment. 
7.6 Reimbursement of expenses will be via the payroll system and must be received
by the Payroll Section by the 10th of the month to ensure payment by the end of
the month. 
8.    PUBLICATION OF REMUNERATION INFORMATION 
8.1 All Councils must publish information on councillors’ salaries, allowances and
expenses in respect of the previous financial year in a standard format
(APPENDIX 5) on their websites by 1st June each year.  This should include
information for any costs for transport or subsistence, which have been booked
by the Council on behalf of the councillor.   
8.2 Councils will also be required to make information on councillors’ remuneration
and expenses available for inspection at council offices when requested in
writing by a member of the public.   
Page 199

Page 200

- 9 -  
APPENDIX 1
Breakdown of Remuneration
Council Leader £50,063
Civic Head £37,548
Senior Councillor 
Maximum total payment to all Senior
Councillors
Maximum number of senior councillors
Maximum amount payable to each Senior
Councillor
£31,764
£317,646.25 
10
75% of £50,063 = £37,548
Councillor £25,982 
Convener Police or Fire Board
75% of Band C Convener 
n/a 
Vice Convener Police of Fire Board
75% of Joint Board Convener  
n/a 
Convener Joint Board (GV) £28,207
Vice Convener Joint Board (GV) £26,797 
These amounts are as specified in
Statutory Instrument 2025 No.s 8 and36 Local Government.  
The Local Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 (Remuneration) Amendment Regulations
2025
Other Allowances are paid by the following other bodies for which the Council has a
nominated representative:
Grampian NHS Board
Cairngorm National Park
Page 200

Page 201

- 10 -  
APPENDIX 2 
Travel and Subsistence Allowances effective from 14/11/11
SUBSISTENCE 
Maximum  reimbursement
Meals taken within a councillors ward No reimbursement
Meals taken within any council premises No reimbursement
Breakfast (where no overnight is claimed) £8 per day
Lunch £12 per day
Dinner £25 per day
Overnight accommodation away from
home and council premises (costs for
bed and breakfast)
£131 within London
£110 elsewhere
Overnight accommodation staying with a
friend
£25
Other particular cost of travel by private
car, motorcycle of bicycle, being - 
Receipted cost of expenses
(a)  parking charges 
(b)  road pricing schemes and congestion
charging 
(c)  Ferry fares 
Road and bridge tolls Actual cost of expense
Parking fines and tow-away fines and
costs
No reimbursement
Public transport (including taxis) Receipted cost of expense
Telephone line rental for use of personal
telephone and computer for approved
duties
50 percent of line rental cost
Telephone line rental for second line for
approved duties use
Receipted cost of expense
Page 201

Page 202

- 11 -  
Telephone and computer costs (apart
from calls or line rental) necessarily
incurred for approved duties
Receipted cost of expense
Calls made in respect of approved duties,
upon a home telephone, networked
personal computer, fax machine or
personal mobile telephone
Receipted cost of expense 
MILEAGE 
Car or van  45p per mile
Motorcycle 24p per mile
Bicycle 20p per mile
Passenger travelling allowance – where
both the member and passengers are
carrying out approved duties
5p per mile, per passenger 
HMRC APPROVED MILEAGE (AMAP) RATE FROM 01/04/2011  
Up to 10,000 miles 45.0p per mile
Over 10,000 miles 25.0p per mile
Motor Cycles
24.0p per mile
The above rates are used for calculating Income Tax liability.  In addition the first rate of
45p per mile is also used to calculate National Insurance liability regardless of the
number of miles travelled
Page 202

Page 203

- 12 -  
APPENDIX 3 
APPROVED CONFERENCES
MEMBERS ATTENDANCE 
1. Attendance at seminars, conferences and similar events (whether inside or
outside the United Kingdom), by Members is generally subject to the approval of
the Council on the basis of recommendations from the relevant service
committee. Where there is inadequate time to refer a matter through this
procedure, the Civic Leader shall determine the matter in consultation with the
Chief Executive based on relevance to the Member’s role. 
2. Authorisation of attendance at seminars, conferences and similar events within
the United Kingdom by officers is delegated to the relevant heads of service,
subject to expenditure on such attendance being contained within the budgetary
provision set aside for that department. 
3. Authorisation of officer attendance at seminars, conferences and similar events
outwith the United Kingdom is delegated to the relevant service committee
subject to the relevant head of service being satisfied that the costs associated
with such attendance can be met from departmental budgetary provision set
aside for such purpose. 
4. Conferences, seminars and similar events which a member attends as a result
of an appointment, nomination or office holding with an organisation to which
the council has appointed or nominated that member shall be an approved duty
for the purposes of this scheme and the scheme of Members Allowances and
Expenses. 
5. Other training, seminar events organised by any of the bodies referred to above
or the Scottish Executive and held within Scotland may be attended by any
Member if it is relevant to their specific area of responsibility within the Council. 
Attendance will be limited by the total annual budget available for attendance at
such events. 
Page 203

Page 204

- 1 -   Page 204

Page 205

APPENDIX 5 
RECORD OF CLAIMS 
RE-IMURSEMENT OF EXPENSES 
SALARY AND
EXPENSES TOTAL 
(I) = C + H
NAME
(A)
DESIGNATION
(B)
SALARY
(C)
TRAVEL
EXPENSES
(D)
SUBSISTENCE
EXPENSES
(E)
INFORMATION
COMMUNICATON
TECHNOLOGY
(ICT) EXPENSES
(F)
OTHER
EXPENSES
(G)
TOTAL
EXPENSES 
(H) = D + E + F
+ G         
Page 205

Page 206

Page 206