Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - South Lanarkshire Council - 22/02/2023

South Lanarkshire Council · 22 February 2023
Back to South Lanarkshire Council — 22 February 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Tuesday, 14 February 2023 
Dear Councillor 
South Lanarkshire Council 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a special meeting of the Council to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Wednesday, 22 February 2023
Time:  10:00 
Venue: Hybrid - Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton, ML3
0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Cleland Sneddon
Chief Executive 
Members 
Alex Allison, John Anderson, Ralph Barker, John Bradley, Walter Brogan, Robert Brown,
Archie Buchanan, Mathew Buchanan, Janine Calikes, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers,
Ross Clark, Gerry Convery, Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Andrea Cowan, Margaret
Cowie, Maureen Devlin, Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly, Joe Fagan, Allan Falconer, Grant
Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Alistair Fulton, Ross Gowland, Geri Gray,
Lynsey Hamilton, Celine Handibode, Graeme Horne, Mark Horsham, Martin Hose, Cal
Johnston-Dempsey, Gavin Keatt, Susan Kerr, Ross Lambie, Martin Lennon, Richard
Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Katy Loudon, Hugh Macdonald, Julia Marrs, Monique McAdams, Ian
McAllan, Catherine McClymont, Kenny McCreary, Lesley McDonald, Elaine McDougall, Mark
McGeever, Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson, Carol Nugent, Norman Rae, Mo Razzaq,
Kirsten Robb, John Ross, Dr Ali Salamati, Graham Scott, David Shearer, Bert Thomson,
Helen Toner, Margaret B Walker, David Watson
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
Item(s) for Decision 
2 Overall Position of Revenue Budget and Level of Local Taxation for
2023/2024
Report dated 6 February 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
3 - 30 
3 Recommendations Referred by Executive Committee – Housing
Revenue and Capital Account Budget 2023/2024
Report dated 2 February 2023 by the Chief Executive.  (Copy attached) 
31 - 34 
4 2023/2024 Capital Programme Update
Report dated 26 January 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
35 - 48 
5 Prudential Indicators, Treasury Management Strategy and Annual
Investment Strategy 2023/2024
Report dated 6 February 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
49 - 80 
6 South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture – Concession
Recommendations for 2023/2024
Report dated 9 February 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
81 - 84 
Item(s) for Noting 
7 Family Leave for Elected Members - Councillor Hose
Report dated 3 February 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
85 - 86 
Urgent Business 
8 Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Provost decides are urgent. 
For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Susan Somerville
Clerk Telephone: 07557323097
Clerk Email: susan.somerville@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
2

Page 3

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 22 February 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Overall Position of Revenue Budget and Level of Local
Taxation for 2023/2024 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to: 
 update the Council on the 2023/2024 budget position, present the Council Tax
level for 2023/2024 for approval, and present the Revenue Budget for 2023/2024,
including the base budget allocations to Resources, for approval. 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s): 
(1) that the reinstatement of funding for 2021/22 teachers’ Pay Award of £1.8
million be noted, and that this be used to benefit the Budget Gap (section 4.4),
be approved;
(2) that £5.7 million of the retrospective benefit released by Service Concessions
be used to support the impact of the 2022/2023 Pay Award in 2023/2024
(section 4.6), be approved; 
(3) that approving the use of £1.8 million additional funding, and £5.7 million of
retrospective benefit (recommendations 1 and 2) would result in a revised
Budget Gap of £8.818 million (section 4.7), be noted;
(4) that the use of money from reserves as detailed in sections 4.8 to 4.12 be
noted;  
(5) that the level of Council Tax and the amount of savings to be used to balance
the 2023/2024 Budget, be considered; 
(6) that following the use of the service concessions retrospective benefit to fund
the 2022/2023 Pay Award and the proposed use for Budget Strategies, there
remains £10 million of unallocated monies (section 7.2), be noted;
(7) that the current, unprecedented inflationary pressures facing the Council are
noted, and that the budget gaps projected for Council in future years (section
10) are noted; and 
(8) that the Revenue Budget for 2023/2024, including the base budget allocations
to Resources, as shown in Appendix 3, be approved, subject to members’
decision on recommendation 5. 
3. Background
3.1. At its meeting on 15 June 2022, the Council approved the Revenue Budget Strategy
for 2023/2024. The Strategy assumptions resulted in an initial budget gap of £32.477
million including the impact of several corporate solutions such as savings on Loan
Charges and the outcome from reviews.  The Strategy also included the impact of
2
3

Page 4

core budget additions as well as exceptional items of expenditure on utilities and
inflation on significant Council contracts. 
3.2. Subsequent to this, a number of update papers have been presented to members,
most recently a paper to Council on 18 January 2023, which revised the Budget Gap
to £16.318 million.  This position reflects the impact of the 2023/2024 Local
Government Settlement received in December 2022, and also takes account of
additional budget pressures and further corporate solutions presented to members at
committees during the year.     
3.3. During January 2023, there have been changes to the Local Government Settlement
as a result of the checking process.  This has had an impact on the overall Council
position and will be covered in this paper.   
3.4. This report will cover the main elements of the Budget Process to date including an
update to the 2023/2024 Revenue Budget Strategy (section 4) and a proposal to
address the Budget Gap for 2023/2024 (section 5).  Achievement of a balanced
budget is covered at section 6. 
3.5. Thereafter, the report will provide details of the position in relation to Service
Concessions (section 7), the total Revenue Budget and Council Tax (section 8) and
section 9 provides details of the Budget Bill and Local Government Finance Order. 
Section 10 provides information on the budget beyond 2023/2024.     
4. Update to 2023/24 Revenue Budget Strategy  
4.1. At the Council meeting in January 2023, Members were presented with an update to
the Budget Strategy which resulted in a Budget Gap of £16.318 million.  This position
assumed no increase in Council Tax and was based on the Local Government
Settlement received in December 2022.  Subsequent information from the Scottish
Government means we expect an update to our settlement in relation to the
reinstatement of 2021/22 Teachers’ Pay Funding.  In addition, there are updates to
other areas of the Budget Strategy for Members’ attention.  Each is taken in turn. 
4.2. Funding for Teachers Pay Award 2021/2022: The last budget paper to Council (18
January 2023) referenced the fact that £32.8 million of funding for the Teachers’ pay
award dating from 2021/2022 had been removed from the Local Government
Settlement for 2023/2024.  The impact of this removal on the Council would be a loss
of funding of £1.8 million.  Consequently, the proposed saving on additional teacher
numbers (EDR05 included in the paper to Council on 18 January 2023) would need
to have an implementation timescale over a two-year period (2023/2024 and
2024/2025), with one-off monies (£1.8 million) to be drawn from reserves to balance
the position on this saving in 2023/2024. 
4.3. The changed position in the week ended 27 January 2023 was that the Scottish
Government had notified COSLA that the £32.8 million (funding for 21/22 Teachers’
pay removed from the settlement figures) was now to be reinstated by the
Government into the 2023/2024 settlement.  This has two consequences: the money
which would have been drawn from reserves (£1.8 million) to balance the position on
the saving in 2023/2024 would no longer be required and the additional teacher
numbers saving (EDR05) could now potentially be delivered in a single year
(2023/2024), rather than over two years.   
4.4. As a result of the Council receiving its share of the £32.8 million and therefore no
longer having to take the £1.8 million from Reserves, the money within reserves (see
section 4.11) could be used instead to reduce the Budget Gap, albeit on a one-off
4

Page 5

basis.  To make the saving permanent (in years 2024/2025 and beyond) a permanent
saving to that value would need to be identified.
Reduction in Budget Gap: £1.8 million 
4.5. Increased 2022/2023 Pay Award – Service Concessions:  At a meeting on 18
January 2023, the Council approved the implementation of the guidance on
accounting for Service Concessions.  This resulted in an ongoing annual financial
benefit which has been built into the Budget Gap position indicated in section 3.2, as
well as a retrospective benefit to the Council.   
4.6. As part of the 2022/2023 Probable Outturn report presented to Executive Committee
on 1 February 2023, members agreed to use £5.7 million of the retrospective gain
from service concessions to pay for the increased 2022/2023 pay award in that year. 
Previous budget papers have referenced using service concession money to meet
the costs of 2022/23 pay award in 2023/24, and it is recommended that members
approve the use of £5.7 million of the retrospective benefit to pay for this.  Again, a
permanent solution will need to be found for 2024/2025 and beyond.   
Reduction in Budget Gap: £5.7 million 
4.7. Table 1 shows the impact of the Additional Funding for Teachers Pay and the use of
Service Concessions monies on the Budget Gap.  The result is a revised Budget Gap
of £8.818 million.   
Table 1: Budget Shortfall and Solutions   
£m
Budget Shortfall (Council, January 2023) (section 4.1) 16.318
Less Solutions  
- Funding for Teachers’ Pay Award 2021/2022 (section 4.2) (1.800)
- Increased 2022/2023 Pay Award – Impact in 2023/2024 (sections 4.5-4.6)  (5.700)
Total Solutions (7.500)
Revised Budget Shortfall 8.818 
4.8. Use of Reserves (2022/23 Underspend): The paper to Council on 18 January 2023
stated that we were concluding work on this year’s Probable Outturn exercise.  The
report noted that this presented an option to help with the 2023/24 position including
the ability to bridge the gap until 2024/25 savings are realised. 
4.9. The probable outturn exercise has now been reported to Executive Committee on 1
February and an underspend of £4.696 million was reported and it was agreed that
this would be transferred to reserves to assist in the 2023/2024 Budget Strategy. 
4.10. It is proposed that this funding is used to cover the 2024/2025 Managerial and
Operational Savings from Reviews (which was included in the 18 January 2023
Council paper - £2.140 million - section 4.12) which reduced the 2023/2024 Budget
Gap but required a temporary solution in 2023/2024. 
4.11. £1.8 million of this £4.696 million would be taken from reserves to be used to reduce
the budget gap as outlined at section 4.4 above.
4.12. A balance (£0.756 million), remains to meet the 2023/24 costs of any savings in
Appendix 1 where the substantive savings are not deliverable until 2024/25, should
they be accepted (these are marked with an asterisk – CER08 and CER11). Should
5

Page 6

this money not be required for that purpose, it would be retained in reserves to assist
with budget the budget gap in 2024/25.
4.13. Update to the Local Government Settlement 2023/2024: Members will recall that
the impact of the Local Government Settlement received in December 2022 was
included in the Budget gap position reported to Council in January 2023.  At that point,
it was noted that the Circular was still under review and further updates may be
received which changes the Council’s Government grant allocation. 
4.14. The 2023/2024 Finance Order has not yet been approved (refer section 9) so further
changes could arise.  These changes will include a reduction in distributed funding as
a result of Scottish Government introducing a requirement to maintain teacher
numbers into 2023/24.  This funding will still be passed to councils if commitments are
kept, but it will be later in the year.  Therefore, this will not change the council’s funding
gap.    Members will be notified on the final settlement value as appropriate. 
5. Options to Address the Budget Gap
5.1. In order to eliminate the Budget Gap, two options available for members’
consideration are:  
• to increase the level of Council Tax (see sections 5.2 to 5.7), and
• to approve savings proposals from the package in Appendix 1 (see
sections 5.8 to 5.17) 
Each of these is taken in turn.     
5.2. Council Tax:  As previously detailed in the Budget Strategy report to Council on 18
January 2023, members will be aware that a lever available to the Council in
managing its overall budget position and any Budget Gap is the ability to increase
Council Tax.  In arriving at the restated Budget Gap detailed in Table 1, no account
has been taken of any increase in Council Tax.   
5.3. Each 1% increase in Band D would generate successive amounts of £1.452 million.   
5.4. As members will recall over recent budget papers, the Council is experiencing
extraordinary financial pressures due to inflation levels on areas including Pay,
Utilities and Contracts.  The 2022/2023 Pay Award averaged around 7% for staff and
contracts linked to RPI could see increases of between 12% and 15%.  Alongside
that, price increases across financial years 2022/2023 and 2023/2024 for utilities are
expected to be in excess of 200% for Gas and 88% for Electricity. 
5.5.  Table 2 shows the impact of a range of Council Tax increases that could reduce the
budget gap. 
6

Page 7

Table 2 – Council Tax Increases
Percentage
Increase
Band D         
£
Annual
Increase 
£
Monthly
Increase (over
10 payments) 
£
Reduction
to Budget
Gap 
£m
0%       1,233.00  - - -
1%       1,245.33       12.33  1.23 1.5
2%       1,257.66       24.66  2.47 2.9
3%       1,269.99       36.99  3.70 4.4
3.50%       1,276.16       43.16  4.32 5.1
4%       1,282.32       49.32  4.93 5.8
5%       1,294.65       61.65  6.17 7.3
6%       1,306.98       73.98  7.40 8.7 
5.6. As noted in Table 1, the revised Budget Gap for 2023/2024 is currently £8.818 million. 
This paper presents a balanced Budget for the coming year.  At this stage, no increase
in Council Tax is reflected within the figures in this report. 
5.7. Members are asked to note that the Council’s Band D rate at 2022/2023 levels
(£1,233) is the lowest for a mainland Scottish council, and that increasing this rate,
would allow members to reduce the level of savings required to balance the
2023/2024 budget (see sections 5.8 to 5.17 below). 
5.8. Savings Proposals: Budget savings totalling £13.094 million (£12.454 million for
2023/2024 and £0.640 for 2024/2025) are proposed for members’ consideration.
These are detailed in Appendix 1 and include savings from Reviews and Flexibilities. 
5.9. Reviews: Appendix 1 includes savings from Reviews that require members’ approval
– these total £1.172 million for 2023/2024 and also the full year impact of these
savings into 2024/2025 (£0.640 million). If the savings to be realised in 2024/2025 are
accepted for 2023/2024, then a temporary solution could be put in place in order to
allow the value of the savings to be taken in the 2023/2024 budget process. This
temporary solution could be the underspend in the 2022/2023 Probable Outturn,
report to Executive Committee on 1 February 2023.   
5.10. Flexibilities: Appendix 1 also includes proposals in relation to Flexibilities. CoSLA
and Local Authorities approached the Scottish Government with a list of potential
areas of flexibility that could be called upon which may release funding that can help
with councils’ funding pressures. COSLA identified a list of areas where funding had
been provided by the Scottish Government for specific government policies (such as
additional teachers) and approached the Government with this list. 
5.11. As advised previously, Scottish Government have, via the Depute First Minister,
issued councils with a letter that says ‘It is for individual councils, as democratically
elected bodies, to consider the needs of their communities with a focus on the most
vulnerable, their legal obligations and the totality of resource funding available to
them, and to then take the decisions necessary, openly and transparently, to operate
as effectively as possible within this context. In doing so, I would request that councils
remain mindful of our shared priorities in the National Performance Framework.
Where funding is provided as specific revenue grant (and therefore legally ring-
fenced), councils should engage with the relevant Scottish Government directorate’. 
7

Page 8

5.12. The common interpretation is that in engaging will be advising and not seeking
permission from the Scottish Government. However, recent discussions with civil
servants suggest that there may be ministerial reaction where policy commitments
are not met. Clarification on this is being sought. 
5.13. For the savings in Appendix 1 linked to Flexibilities, this is marked in the heading. If
there are savings into future years, this is noted in the narrative in Appendix 1. 
5.14.  Teacher Numbers:  In the paper to Council on 18 January 2023, there were 2 savings
where, if taken, would affect teacher and education support staff numbers.  In the
week ending 3 February 2023, correspondence sent to COSLA by the Cabinet
Secretary for Education and Skills set out four ‘red lines’ that the Scottish Government
expects to be delivered, and this included Teacher numbers being maintained at their
current levels for the year ahead, and that the number of pupil support assistants are
maintained at their current levels.  The savings that could potentially affect teacher
numbers and education pupil support assistants are EDR05 - Teacher Numbers
(Flexibilities) (full saving) and EDR06 - Pupil Equity Fund (PEF) / Scottish Attainment
Challenge (SAC) Monies (Flexibilities) (part saving, £0.775 million affects staffing). 
5.15. Pupil Equity Fund (PEF) / Scottish Attainment Challenge (SAC) Monies
(Flexibilities):  Correspondence from the Scottish Government states that the grant
conditions of these funding streams state that this funding must be utilised to target
support towards children and young people (and their families if appropriate)
impacted by poverty to improve their educational outcomes. 
5.16. This conflicts with the correspondence from the Depute First Minister around
flexibilities.  A potential outcome may be that this saving may not be deliverable.  
5.17. Flexibility on Integrated Joint Board (IJB): Similarly, in relation to the potential
flexibility on IJB budgets (SWR01), this was one of the flexibilities the Scottish
Government responded on as per section 5.11 above. Wording that could be
considered contradictory to that permission to be flexible around IJB budgets was
included in a letter to NHS and IJB chief officers at the time the Scottish Budget was
announced. A potential outcome may be that this saving may not be deliverable. 
5.18. COSLA continue to protest against these restrictions and are engaging with Scottish
Government on these issues. 
6. Achievement of a Balanced Budget 
6.1. To recap what is said in section 5.1, in order to address the Budget Gap, two
options available for members’ consideration are as follows: 
• to increase the level of Council Tax, and
• to approve savings proposals from the package in Appendix 1 
6.2. Increasing Council Tax would allow members to reduce the level of savings
needed to balance the 2023/2024 budget. 
7. Retrospective Benefit arising from application of Service Concession
Guidance
7.1. As noted in section 4.5, at a meeting on 18 January 2023, the Council approved the
implementation of the guidance on accounting for Service Concessions.  This resulted
in an ongoing annual financial benefit which has been built into the Budget Gap
position indicated in section 3.2.  It also generated a retrospective benefit of £64
million.  
8

Page 9

7.2. Members will recall that of the £64 million, £5.7 million has been approved to fund the
increased 2022/2023 Pay Award in that year.  In addition, this paper proposes that a
further £5.7 million be used to fund the impact of the increased 2022/2023 Pay Award
into 2023/2024 (section 4.6).  The use of this £11.4 million is shown in Appendix 2
along with the previously proposed use of the retrospective benefit in supporting future
years’ Budget Strategies (Executive Committee, 02 November 2022).  The use of the
retrospective benefit to fund the 2022/2023 Pay Award and the Budget Strategies
totals £54 million which would leave £10 million unallocated.   
7.3. In noting this unallocated sum, members should give consideration to the current,
unprecedented, inflationary pressures affecting the council. A prudent approach
would leave an element of this amount unallocated, to address budget pressures
which are likely to arise. 
8. Total Revenue Budget Summary 2023/2024 and Council Tax  
8.1.     Taking into account the Government Grant allocated to the Council through the
Settlement and assuming no year-on-year increase in Council Tax (section 5.6),
means that the total proposed Budget for 2023/2024 is now £895.702 million.  To
balance the budget, it has been assumed that there will be an acceptance of savings
to the value of £8.818 million from the package of savings at Appendix 1. 
8.2. The detailed allocation of the budget to each Resource is shown at Appendix 3.  The
main figures from Appendix 3 are summarised below. 
Summary of Council Budget 2023/2024
Current
Year Base
Budget
£m   
2023/2024
Proposed
Budget
£m
1,117.769  Total Services’ Gross Expenditure (Appendix 3, page ii)  1,139.392
(319.386)   Deduct: Total Services Gross Income (Appendix 3, page ii)  (321.341)
798.383  Net Service Spending  818.051     
49.282
2.500
20.860
-
Add: Loan Charges
Add: CFCR  
Add: Corporate Items inc. Service Concession Annual Benefit
less: Savings 
52.909
-
33.560
(8.818)
871.025  Net Expenditure  895.702 
8.3. Table 3 shows how this 2023/2024 budget is funded, resulting in the net Sum Funded
by Council Tax, £147.274 million. 
Table 3: Net Sum Funded by Council Tax
Indicative Budget for 2023/2024 (Appendix 3) £895.702m
Deduct: Government Grant (£702.856m)
Deduct: Use of Reserves / Underspends in the Budget Strategy  (£45.572m)
Resultant Net Sum to be Funded Locally from Council Tax £147.274m 
8.4. The net Council Tax figure comprises the 2022/2023 budget of £144.174 million,
increased to reflect the additional property numbers included in the Strategy (net
£1.800 million) and a reduction in the cost of the Council Tax Reduction Scheme
9

Page 10

included in the Strategy (£1.300 million).  It assumes no year-on-year increase in
Council Tax Band D (section 5.6). 
8.5. The Net Sum Funded by Council Tax (£147.274 million) is detailed in Table 4,
showing the Council Tax Budget for the year 2023/2024.  Table 4 also shows the
estimated amount of income for each £1 of Gross Council Tax.   
Table 4:  2023/2024 Council Tax Budget 
Gross Council Tax 2023/2024 £169.505m
Deduct: Council Tax Reduction Scheme  (£22.231m)
Resultant Net Sum to be Funded Locally from Council Tax £147.274m  
Estimated Product of £1 Gross Council Tax at 97.125% collection £137,474 
8.6. Should the Council approve the budget for 2023/2024, then the Band D Council Tax
for 2023/2024 will be applied at the figure decided and necessary billing and collection
mechanisms will be set in motion.  The ten monthly Council Tax instalments will
commence in April.  Appropriate scrutiny will continue to ensure the process of
reviewing budgetary performance is continued. 
8.7. The level of Council Tax is property based.  All houses are classified into eight bands,
A to H, with band H properties paying more than three times the level of band A. The
Council’s declared tax is for band D and all other rates are fixed using the following
scale: 
Table 5: Property Ranges and Proportion of Band D Payable 
Property Ranges in South Lanarkshire for Council Tax 
Property Value
Range
Band Proportion of
Band D
Tax Payable
Proportion of 
South Lanarkshire
Property in each band
January 2022
£27,000 and under A 67% 22.92%
£27,001 to £35,000 B 78% 19.51%
£35,001 to £45,000 C 89% 17.07% 
(Total A to C: 59.50%)
£45,001 to £58,000 D 100% 13.98%
£58,001 to £80,000 E 131% 13.10%
£80,001 to £106,000 F 162% 8.63%
£106,001 to £212,000 G 196% 4.42%
Over £212,000 H 245% 0.37%  
8.8. The Council’s declared tax will be at the Band D level but only around 22,100
properties (13.98%) are in band D.  Over the past few years, there has been an
upward movement in the valuation of properties.  However, approximately 59.50% of
properties still remain in Bands A, B and C, so the effect of any increase in Council
Tax is reduced by 33%, 22% and 11% respectively for most properties. 
8.9. The number of houses in the tax base for South Lanarkshire exceeds 157,700 as
advised by the Assessor for the Lanarkshire Valuation Joint Board.  From this figure,
an allowance is deducted for single person discounts, students, disabled, vacant
10

Page 11

premises etc. to produce an estimated yield for £1 on a Band D basis at 100%
collection of £141,543. 
8.10. The Council must set an appropriate level allowing for non-collection.  Council Tax
collection rates have improved markedly in recent years due to the number of changes
initiated by the Council. 
8.11. A yield of £137,474 for £1 tax at Council Tax Band D has been used in the 2023/2024
budget (an increase on 2022/2023 due to an increase in the number of properties). 
At an assumed 97.125%, this represents a continuation of the collection rate
performance achieved in recent years.   
8.12. This position assumes no year-on-year increase in Council Tax, as detailed in Section
5.6 and therefore sets/retains the Council Tax Band D at £1,233. 
9. Local Government Finance Order
9.1. Although the Council received its grant settlement on 20 December 2022, the level of
grant may change as the Finance Budget Bill progresses through Parliament to the
Finance Order:  Stages 1 to 3 of the Finance Budget Bill will be presented to
Parliament for debate in the coming weeks, culminating in the approval of the Local
Government Finance Order.  Dates for these Stages are yet to be confirmed. 
9.2. The Council has a statutory requirement to set its Council Tax by 11 March 2023. 
While the Council has not yet received final confirmation of its Budget as a result of
the Finance Order, it can set its Budget for the coming year using the settlement
information received to date, and it can set its Council Tax.   
9.3. As noted in section 9.1, this budget paper is based on the Local Government
Settlement received on 20 December 2022.   As the Budget Bill process continues, it
is expected that there will be changes to the level of grant allocation including the
formal distribution of monies that are already assumed in the Budget position
presented.  Any further funds are received as part of the Budget Bill process will be
brought to Council for consideration.   
10. Position Beyond 2023/2024
10.1. This paper focuses on financial year 2023/2024, however the 2023/2024 Budget has
an impact on future years’ financial position.       
10.2. Reinstatement:  The 2023/2024 budget includes a number of solutions which are
temporary in nature and will require to be re-instated in future years. The impact over
the next 2 years is shown in detail in Appendix 4.  Some of these reinstatements are
because a temporary solution is required in 2023/2024 to manage the shortfall of
£16.318 million (section 3.2).   
10.3. Appendix 4 also includes a requirement to reinstate budget of £23.500 million in
2024/2025 following the use of reserves from the Loans Fund Review.  There would
be a balance of reserves still unused (including the impact of the Loans Fund review)
that would help smooth the impact on the budget shortfall in that year.   
11. Employee Implications
11.1. Any employee implications arising from the savings proposed in Appendix 1 will be
managed within Resources, with any staffing implications dealt with through a
combination of anticipated turnover and redeployment through SWITCH 2.   
12. Financial Implications
11

Page 12

12.1. As detailed within this report. 
13. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
13.1. An exercise has been undertaken to consider the environmental impact of this
Budget.  The majority of the areas identified to balance the budget are assessed as
having a neutral impact on climate change.   
13.2. The remainder are expected to have some impact, both positive and negative but on
the whole, the Budget is not expected to have a material impact on the Council’s
approach to tackling climate change.  Details of this exercise are available on
request. 
14. Other Implications
14.1. The assumptions on which the budget is based are defined within the Financial
Strategy for the Council as initially reported to the Council in June 2022 and updated
during the year for additional pressures, corporate solutions and the Local
Government Finance Settlement received on 20 December 2022.  The Financial
Strategy is a way of managing a number of key risks which directly impact on the
funding available to deliver the Council’s Objectives.   
14.2. Requirement to Set a Budget:  Under statute and internal governance rules, Council
Members have duties around setting budgets.  Failure to set a balanced budget would
have serious implications, not just for the Council but also potentially for individual
members who could incur personal responsibility for failure to comply with their
statutory duty. 
14.3. Any failure to set a balanced budget would almost certainly provoke intervention by
Scottish Ministers and the Accounts Commission who have legislative powers to carry
out investigations and make recommendations which could result in Scottish
Ministers issuing binding directions to the Council. Under the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973, special reporting processes exist (Section 102) which, if the
Controller of Audit is not satisfied with the Council’s steps to remedy such an issue,
then he/she can make a special report to the Accounts Commission on the matter. 
14.4. The Commission can then recommend that Scottish Ministers direct the Council to
rectify the issue. Individual members who unreasonably contribute to the failure or
delay in setting a budget could be ultimately censured, suspended or disqualified from
standing for election for a prescribed period of time by the Standards Commission. 
14.5. If a new budget is not set, then the Council could not enter into any new unfunded
commitments, including contracts, and spend would be restricted to meeting existing
liabilities.  As the Council’s current position is that there is a budget shortfall that
requires to be met through identified solutions, without Council agreement on a
2023/2024 budget, a gap in our budget would remain.   
14.6. Expenditure Subject to External Influences: Whilst the budget for 2023/2024 can
be set with certainty, there are areas of expenditure that are subject to external
influences which we will continue to monitor as the year progresses.  Most
significantly, this includes the impact of potential pay awards.   While the Budget
Strategy assumes an increase in costs into that year, no pay deal has been agreed
for 2023/2024.  It is also noted that the SNCT Pay Claim for 2022/2023 is not yet
settled. 
12

Page 13

15. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
15.1. Equality Impact Assessments have been undertaken for the Budget.   These are
available for members to assist in the decision-making process.  In addition, an
assessment has been carried out in line with the Fairer Scotland duty.  For details of
work undertaken, please contact the Employee Development and Diversity Manager,
Finance and Corporate Resources.   
15.2. Meetings have taken place with the Trade Unions.  With regard to consultation with
the public, members of the public and partners were invited to comment on any aspect
of the Council’s Budget. 
15.3. The outcome of the Public Consultation has been advised to all Elected Members. 
Paul Manning
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
6 February 2023 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Council, 18 January 2023 – Update on the Budget Strategy for 2023/2024 
List of Background Papers
 Local Government Finance Circular 11/2022 
Contact for Further Information 
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Paul Manning, Executive Director, Finance and Corporate Resources 
Ext:  4530 (Tel: 01698 454530)
E-mail paul.manning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
13

Page 14

Appendix 1 
Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
Community
and
Enterprise
Resources 
CER01 Planning and
Economic
Services
Planning and Building Standard Fees (Flexibilities)
There are options to consider that would generate more income in planning
and building standards.   
Legal have advised that legislation prescribes the level of many fees so we
cannot simply decide to increase these.  There is discretion to reduce or
wave a few, but not increase. 
The Resource has advised that there is the ability to charge for 
- non-material variations (fixed fee) - estimated income for year £4,500
- discharge of conditions (fixed fee) - estimated income £61,300
- 25% surcharge on retrospective applications – estimated income
£6,000 
These additional charges will result in around £72,000 of additional income   
0.072
CER02 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services 
Other Children and Young People funding – free school meals (remove
for P4/5) (Flexibilities)
This option revisits the policy intent to provide free school meals for P4/5 and
revert back to charging for these groups.   
Children entitled to free school meals would still receive them.  There is no
statutory requirement to provide free meals for these groups of children. 
SLC Funding received for this policy in 2022/23 of £2.596m. 
0.839
14

Page 15

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
To achieve a saving we would reintroduce charges for P4 and P5
A prudent assumption may be that all meals continue and are charged for. 
407,360 paid meals based on pre UFSM 2020 figures would bring in
£0.839m.   
CER03 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Christmas Trees and lighting
Budget reduction due to rationalisation of trees and festive lighting to eight
main geographical areas to Hamilton, East Kilbride, Rutherglen, Carluke,
Blantyre, Cambuslang Larkhall and Lanark. 
There is expected to be an overall saving of up to £0.086m from this option –
there may be other costs that would require to be confirmed therefore at
present the value of the saving has been limited to £0.037m.   
- 0.037
CER04 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Food Waste Liners
Cease the provision of food waste liners for food recycling saving the cost of
the liners and associated staff costs. 
0.5  0.100
CER05 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Xmas Lights Switch On 
This option would see a budget reduction due to rationalising the Christmas
Switch On events.  The Council currently supports six switch on events
across South Lanarkshire, in Hamilton, East Kilbride, Rutherglen,
Cambuslang, Lanark and Carluke. 
This proposal would instead see the creation of a Christmas events fund of
£0.030m for distribution to community groups to support local decorations or
events. In a number of areas, it is anticipated that local businesses, BID
companies or Development Trusts will be in a position to support future
events. 
- 0.030
15

Page 16

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
There is expected to be an overall saving of up to £0.084m from this option
which includes creating the Christmas events fund – there may be other
costs that would require to be confirmed therefore at present, the value of
the saving has been limited to £0.030m. 
CER06 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Cremations
This proposal is to move the Council’s charges for Cremations towards the
average charge across all other council areas. 
The average figure for 2022/2023 for local authority crematoria is £808.33 per
cremation, ranging from South Lanarkshire at the lowest (£680.05) to Highland
at £959.00.  It is proposed that the Council’s charge per cremation is increased
to the average charge of £808.33 (an increase of £128.28 per Cremation) and
this would achieve additional income of £0.200 million.   
This charge is higher than our closest neighbour in Glasgow City (£699.00),
and therefore the projected income takes account of some customers
choosing the Glasgow facilities of Daldowie and Linn instead. A 10% reduction
in cremations have been assumed in these figures. 
-   0.200 
CER07 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Special / Bulk Uplifts 
South Lanarkshire residents are currently allowed one free bulky uplift per
year which allows for the collection of up to 20 items.  Subsequent requests
are charged at £33.05. A benchmarking exercise has shown that most
councils across Scotland now charge for all uplifts, with the average cost for a
10 item uplift at £61.32. 
This proposal is to remove the first free bulky uplift and introduce a £37.50
charge for all requests. The number of items per uplift will also reduce to a
maximum of 10 at a time. 
-   0.395 
16

Page 17

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
Based on our current bulky uplift data and an estimated uptake of 25% for paid
uplifts (based on other councils’ experience), income of £0.395m is projected
for 2023/24. Future year income projections will be refined following the first
full year of operation. 
CER08 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Garden Waste (Burgundy Bins) – 2024/25 saving
The household waste collection service provides a burgundy bin for the
disposal of food and garden waste. The collection of garden waste is a non-
statutory service however food waste is a statutory service. 
There are around 5,000 households within the Clydesdale area who are not
currently included in the burgundy bin service, as permitted by a rural
exemption within the food waste regulations. In addition, approximately 30%
of households in South Lanarkshire live in flatted accommodation and do not
have gardens.  There are now 14 local authorities in Scotland who charge for
the collection of garden waste. These charges range from £30 to £45 with an
average of £36.  This proposal is to incorporate those Households in
Clydesdale currently without a service, and to introduce a charge to account
for the increased cost. 
Based on estimated uptake levels and an annual subscription charge of £40
for an expanded garden waste collection service would mean income of
£0.440m could be achieved in 2024/2025 (net of start-up costs) and a further
£0.650m from 2025/26 onwards. 
It should also be noted that the Scottish Government are considering making
garden waste a mandatory waste stream collection. This would mean that we
would be unable to charge for the service, however additional budget would
be expected to reflect any new statutory designation. 
-   *0.440 
17

Page 18

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
CER09 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Other Garden Uplifts
Currently, residents can request a free uplift of garden waste that is too large
to fit into the household burgundy bin and there are no limits to the number of
requests that can be made.  It is proposed to introduce a £37.50 charge for
this service. 
Based on an estimated 25% uptake of the current service users, income of
£0.055m is projected for 2023/24. 
-   0.055 
CER10 Facilities,
Waste and
Grounds
Services
Secondary School Meals
The average charge of a school meal across Scottish Councils has risen to
£2.40 and South Lanarkshire currently charges £2.00.  The highest is North
Lanarkshire who currently charge £3.15. 
This proposal is to increase the charge of secondary school meals to the
average charge (£2.40 in 2022). This equates to a 40p increase on the current
charge of £2.00, a 20% increase. 
Assuming a 10% reduction in uptake, this proposal is expected to generate
income of £0.355 million.  Uptake of meals and income will continue to be
monitored. 
South Lanarkshire would move from being the lowest school meal price in
Scotland to 13th position (assuming other councils do not increase their
charges).  Note that children entitled to free school meals will continue to
receive these. 
-   0.355 
CER11 Roads and
Transportation 
Parking at Key Attractions (£0.200m 2024/25) 
This proposal is to introduce a £2 charge for parking at key attractions across
various Council services including South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture
attractions. The income would be retained by the Council.  
- * 0.200 
18

Page 19

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
Examples include Tinto Hill, Chatelherault Country Park, Calderglen Country
Park and James Hamilton Heritage Park. 
Total 0.5 2.723     
Education 
Resources 
EDR01  Education Other Children and Young People funding – Summer Funding
(Flexibilities)
Funding was provided by the Scottish Government to deliver a government
policy to provide school holiday programme.  As a saving option this
proposal looks at revisiting the policy intent.  SLC received funding in
2022/23 of £0.577m. 
To achieve a saving we could reduce the level of funding for summer
programmes by the government funding received.  This would save
£0.577m. Removal of summer programmes for families including lunch
provision would remove support for childcare across summer period.  Also
new supports around most vulnerable and ASN would be impacted.   
A small core budget of £0.143m would be retained in the education budget. 
This reduction in spend would impact on services provided by the Council,
by the 3rd sector and by South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture.   
Note - the that the Scottish Government have still to confirm how this
funding will be passed to councils in 2023/2024.  
1.0 0.577 
EDR02 Education Other Children and Young People funding – School Counselling
(Flexibilities)
Funding was provided by the Scottish Government to deliver a government
policy to provide school counselling.  As a saving option this proposal looks
1 0.960 
19

Page 20

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
at revisiting the policy intent.  SLC received funding in 2022/2023 of
£0.960m. 
To achieve a saving we could cease any further commissioning of
counselling that utilised this funding (£0.960m).  Service implications would
be the removal of counselling support for young people in schools across
primary, secondary and ASN sectors, also programmes including play
therapy, gypsy travellers, Kooth and Action for Children would be removed.   
There is a balance of funds in reserves that would allow a continuation of
some commissioning for a period of time but when that is utilised, the
additional provision would end.     
There is also permanent staffing funded via this initiative including 1FTE
Quality Improvement Officer that would have to be managed.  There is no
committed financial obligation through any contract. 
EDR03  Education Other Children and Young People funding – Community Health and
Wellbeing (Flexibilities) 
Funding was provided by the Scottish Government to deliver a government
policy to enhance community health and wellbeing.  As a saving option this
proposal looks at revisiting the policy intent.  SLC received funding in
2022/2023 of £0.835m 
Currently this is SW funding with some allocated to Education supporting
permanent staff for Inclusion including Psychologist, Research Assistant,
Quality Improvement Officer (Virtual HT) and Action for Children
programme.  Staffing would be surplus and would need to be redeployed
and programmes to support mental health would cease.   
5.5 0.835 
20

Page 21

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
Moving forward, the majority of all of the funding will be managed by
Education – plans are being put in place currently to consider how this is
spent.  If this saving is agreed, this work will require to be paused. 
EDR04 Education Other Children and Young People funding – Access to Period
Products (Flexibilities)
Funding was provided by the Scottish Government to deliver a government
policy to allow access to free period products in schools and communities.  
SLC received funding in 2022/2023 of £0.301m 
There is a legislative requirement to ensure that products are available free
of charge.  To achieve a saving we would reduce the provision of access to
period provision in schools and communities but still look to ensure the
legislative obligations are met. 
0.100 
EDR05 Education  Teacher Numbers (Flexibilities) 
This option would look to reduce additionality in relation to the recruitment of
3500 teachers, and 500 classroom assistants nationally (£65.5m nationally
for 1000 teachers / 500 classroom assistants) and reduce additionality in
relation to the £80m national baselined funding for extra teachers / support
through pandemic  
SLC Funding £9.379m in total.   This option could see funding released of -
£4.6m 
This proposal would see 73 teachers removed from the establishment
reflecting 50% of the additional funding provided and 17 SSA (Primary
38FTE, 32.5FTE secondary, 2.5FTE ASN and 17 SSA across 2 school
sessions (three financial years). 
2023/24 –
est 35 
( 90 fte
over 3
years of
saving) 
1.800
21

Page 22

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
The profiling of how budget could be released reflects the school session
and the expected time frame to achieve natural turnover of teaching staff. 
Further savings of £2.200m and £0.600m can be made in future years.   
EDR06 Education   Pupil Equity Fund (PEF) / Scottish Attainment Challenge (SAC) Monies
(Flexibilities) 
This flexibility was targeted at either utilising specific funding in other ways or
utilising underspends.  
SLC 2022/2023 Funding is £8.9m for PEF (which is a specific grant) and
£1.4m for SEF (formerly SAC).There is an option to save £5.7m over 2
years. 
The PEF funding is currently split: 
- £3.946m permanent staffing 
- £0.450m temp staffing
- £0.700m SSA/other staffing including enhancements  
- £3.827m non staffing spend 
- This is variable each year subject to staffing levels and funding. 
Therefore a reduction in spend of £4.977m of the funding could be
achieved through stopping non staffing spend and ending temp staff
contracts / SSA / enhancements. 
Pupil Equity Funding goes directly to schools and funding is allocated on
levels of pupil deprivation. 
As spending across schools is not split over categories on the same ratios
as above, then the saving would have to be taken from the schools
2023/24 –
15 fte 
(further 15
fte in
2024/25)   
2.858
22

Page 23

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
spending in this way.  Therefore the removal of budget would not be in the
same basis across the PEF schools. 
Permanent staffing could only be released through natural turnover over a
period of time however that would be after 2024/2025 (as natural turnover
has been built into the reduction in teachers covered in the Teacher
Number line). 
This will also affect the ability to continue to meet Newly Qualified Teacher
commitment as this is a route through which this is managed.   
A reduction in spend of £0.740m on SEF funding could be achieved
through stopping non staffing spend and ending temp staff contracts
(£0.400m reduction via temp staff and £0.340m non staffing) 
This funding is currently grant claimed and based on an agreed spending
plan for the specific purpose of closing the poverty related attainment gap,
therefore discussions with the Scottish Government on releasing this
saving will be required. 
Further saving in 24/25 of £2.859m. 
EDR07 Schools Early Learning and Childcare (Flexibilities)
Funding was provided by the Scottish Government to deliver a government
policy around provision of early learning and childcare.  SLC received
specific grant funding in 2022/2023 of £31.6m   
This proposal is specifically in relation to utilising reserves for ELC currently
held for early level teachers and pupil growth  for 2023/2024.  This is a time
limited saving and will need to be removed into 2024/2025. 
0 1.500
23

Page 24

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m 
It may be possible to make this a permanent savings through looking at
option for flexibility including levels of parental choice and the service will
consider options here.   
EDR08  Other Children and Young People funding – reinstate core curriculum
/ music tuition charges (Flexibilities)
Funding was provided by the Scottish Government to deliver a government
policy around removing charges to pupils for core curriculum lessons and
music tuition.  SLC Funding received for these policies in 2022/23 was
£0.472m/£0.451m 
To achieve a saving we would require to re-introduce a level of charging for
music tuition, and contributions towards practical lessons.  A charge at 10%
of the previous charges would result in income of around £0.092m. There is
a potential impact on curriculum delivery if funding reduced and income is
not collected. 
0.092  
Total 57.5 8.722
Finance and
Corporate 
Resources 
FCR01 Transactions  Other Children and Young People funding – FSM holiday support
(Flexibilities)
Scottish Government funding was provided to allow payments for Free
school meals in holiday periods.  This proposal looks at revisiting the policy
intent and reducing the daily payment by 10%.  
SLC Funding received for this in 2022/23 was £1.499m. 
0.149
24

Page 25

Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
The current daily payment is £2.50.  
A reduction of 10% would mean a daily payment of £2.25 and would
generate a saving of £0.149m.  
Total  0.149     
Housing and
Technical
Resources 
HTR01 Housing
Services 
Second Homes / Reliefs (Flexibilities) 
The flexibility proposed here was to look at removing the ringfencing of
second home council tax charges.  The average income in relation to second
homes has been around £0.5m over the past 3 years (2019/2020 £0.462m,
2020/2021 £0.501m, 2021/2022 £0.540m) 
Currently funds are ringfenced for investment to support a range of specified
purposes associated with affordable housing activities.
We do not consider that the guidance that advises this money should be
ringfenced as legally enforceable and therefore there is the option to redirect
this funding to manage budget gaps.   
This will have the impact of reducing funds available to Housing for
investment.   In relation to the guidance, whilst not legally enforceable, there
is a risk that council funding may be reduced if this funding is redirected. 
This will be taken up through Cosla and the Scottish Government.     
0.500  
Total - 0.500     
25

Page 26

2023/24 & 2024/25 *
£m
FTE
2023/24
FTE
2024/25
Community and Enterprise  2.723 0.5 
Education  8.722 57.5 -
Finance and Corporate  0.149 - -
Housing and Technical Resources 0.500 - -
Social work  1.000 - -
Total 13.094 58 - 
*of the above £13.094m of savings, £0.640m will happen in 2024/2025 and could be covered until then by use of one off funding. 
Reference  Service Name and Brief Description of Saving Employee
FTE
Saving value  
(2024/25 savings
marked with an
asterisk)
£m
Social Work
Resources 
SWR01 Adults and
Older People 
Remove restrictions in passing over funding to the Health and Social
Care partnership (Integrated Joint Boards - IJB) (Flexibilities) 
This option would be to reduce the contribution currently made to the IJB.
This option proposes £1m.
This would require to be considered by the IJB as to what action it would
need to take to manage this reduced funding level in their 2023/24 budget. 
This is included as it is one of the flexibilities sought by Cosla to which
(collectively as a package of flexibilities) the Scottish Government responded
on.  Wording that could be considered contradictory to that permission to be
flexible around IJB budgets was included in a letter to NHS and IJB chief
officers and finance around the time the Scottish Budget was announced,
and we are currently working with Cosla to get clarity on this.  A potential
outcome may be that this saving may not be deliverable.   
Unknown  1.000  
Total - 1.000
26

Page 27

Appendix 2 
Table copied from Executive Committee 2 November 2022 (updated for 22 Feb Council) 
2024/
2025 
£m
2025/
2026 
£m
2026/
2027 
£m
2027/
2028 
£m
Total
2024/25
to 
2027/28
only
£m
Total Use of
Service
Concession 
£m
Budget Gap (for 2024/2025 to 2027/2028, the Budget Gap is as
per the September 2022 Executive Committee) 32.0 27.2 5.2 11.1  75.5 
Finance Exercise - includes reinstatement of 2023/2024 solutions
into 2024/2025  4.8 - - -  4.8
Reinstatement of use of reserves to reduce the budget gap 
(22 February council paper – section 4.4)  1.8    1.8
Budget Gap (Before Use of Retrospective Service Concessions)
38.6 27.2 5.2 11.1  82.1
Use of Retrospective Service Concessions (Reserves) to meet the
impact of the 2022/2023 Pay Award and Support Future Year
Budget Strategies (27.5) (15.1) -  -  (42.6)  (54.0)* 
Reinstatement of Previous Year Use of Reserves  5.7  27.5  15.1  -  48.3 
Revised Budget Gap 16.8 39.6 20.3 11.1 87.8 
*£54m use of service concession funding includes £11.4m for 22/23 pay award costs ( in 2022/23 and 2023/24)
27

Page 28

Appendix 3
Page (i) 
South Lanarkshire Council 
2023/2024 Revenue Budget Summary 
2022/23
Base
Budget 
2023/24
Rollover 
2023/24
Proposed
Base
Budget 
£m  £m  £m      
Community and Enterprise Resources 117.329  6.830  124.159            
Education Resources 410.247  10.728  420.975            
Finance and Corporate Resources 39.042  (2.523)  36.519            
Housing and Technical Resources 13.174  0.456  13.630            
Social Work Resources 216.439  4.177  220.616            
Joint Boards 2.152  -  2.152      
Total of all Resources plus Joint Boards 798.383  19.668  818.051            
Other Budget Items:     
Loan Charges 49.282  3.627  52.909   
CFCR 2.500  (2.500)  -
Corporate Items inc. Service Concession      
Annual benefit 20.860  12.700  33.560
Savings -  (8.818)  (8.818)      
Total Base Budget 2022/2023 871.025           
Total Proposed Budget 2023/2024   24.677  895.702           
The 2022/2023 base budget includes adjustments approved during 2022/2023. 
28

Page 29

Appendix 3
Page (ii) 
South Lanarkshire Council 2023/2024 
Revenue Budget Summary 
2022/2023
Base
Budget  
2023/2024
Proposed
Base
Budget 
£m  £m 
Budgetary Category     
Employee Costs 566.557  576.902 
Property Costs 50.137  51.032 
Supplies and Services 64.418  65.704 
Transport and Plant Costs 42.082  42.777 
Administration Costs 14.395  14.409 
Payments to Other Bodies 72.392  75.152 
Payment to Contractors 234.708  246.851 
Transfer Payments (Housing & Council Tax Benefit) 70.737  64.211 
Financing Charges (Leasing Costs) 2.343  2.354 
Total Expenditure 1,117.769  1,139.392 
Total Income (319.386)  (321.341) 
Net Expenditure 798.383  818.051 
Other Budget Items:       
Loan Charges 49.282  52.909 
CFCR 2.500  0.000 
Corporate Items inc. Service Concession Annual Benefit 20.860  33.560 
Savings 0.000  (8.818) 
Total Base Budget 2022/2023 871.025   
Total Proposed Budget 2023/2024   895.702 
29

Page 30

Appendix 4 
Temporary Solutions 
Year of Adjustment
2024/
2025
£m
2025/
2026
£m
2023/2024 Corporate Solutions  
One Off Use of Loans Fund Review Reserves in 2023/2024
(June 2021 Executive Committee paper, section 7.2) 
Managed in 2024/2025 by: 
Further One-Off Use of Reserves in 2024/2025 
Reinstated into 2025/2026
(June 2021 Executive Committee paper, section 7.2) 
23.500 
(14.000)
-
14.000   
2021/2022 Underspend – reinstated in 2024/2025
(Executive Committee, 29 June 2022, section 4.12)
6.109 -   
Underspend from 2022/2023
Reinstated in 2024/2025 
(Council, 15 June 2022, section 6, Table 3)
0.650 -   
2022/2023 Loan Charges Underspend – reinstate in 2024/2025
(Council, 15 June 2022, section 6, Table 3)
1.386 -   
2023/2024 Finance Exercise
Reinstated into 2024/2025
(Executive, 02 November 2022)
4.800  -   
Additional Council Tax from extra properties (2021/2022) –
expected future reduction in Government Grant 
Est.
1.360
-
Bridging Solution to Manage 2023/2024 Review Savings that
will be realised in 2024/2025 
Managed by: 
Use of Reserves (2023/2024 Forecast Underspend)
(Council, 18 January 2023)
2.140 
(2.140) 
Use of Reserves to Reduce the Budget Gap 
Initially earmarked for Teachers’ 2021/2022 Pay Award but no
longer required – section 4.4.
Reinstate in 2024/2025.
1.800 -   
Use of Service Concessions Monies to fund the 2022/2023 Pay
Award in 2023/2024 – section 4.6.
Reinstated in 2024/2025
5.700 -   
Total Temporary Solutions 31.305 14.000 
30

Page 31

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 22 February 2023
Report by: Chief Executive  
Subject: Recommendations Referred by Executive Committee –
Housing Revenue and Capital Account Budget
2023/2024 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 allow consideration of the recommendations of the Executive Committee of 1
February 2023 in relation to the Housing Revenue and Capital Account Budget
2023/2024 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the recommendations from the Executive Committee of 1 February 2023
in relation to the following issue be approved:- 
Housing Revenue and Capital Account Budget 2023/2024
 that the proposed rent increase of 3.5% for all Council houses,
gypsy/traveller sites, lockups and garage sites and the revenue estimate
proposals for the Housing Revenue Account Budget 2023/2024 be
approved
 that, based on the rent increase of 3.5%, the 2023/2024 Housing Capital
Programme totalling £63.916 million be approved 
pose] 
3. Background
3.1. Recommendations Referred by Executive Committee of 1 February 2023 –
Housing Revenue and Capital Account Budget 2023/2024 - Extract of Minute 
A report dated 23 January 2023 by the Chief Executive was submitted on
recommendations referred to this Committee by the Housing and Technical
Resources Committee at its meeting of 23 January 2023 (Special). 
The recommendations of the Housing and Technical Resources Committee were
as follows:- 
(1) that the proposed rent increase of 3.5% for all Council houses, gypsy/traveller
sites, lockups and garage sites and the revenue estimate proposals for the
Housing Revenue Account be endorsed; and
3
31

Page 32

(2) that, based on the rent increase of 3.5%, the 2023/2024 Housing Capital
Programme of £63.916 million be endorsed. 
Officers responded to members’ questions on various aspects of the report. 
The Committee recommended to the Council: 
(1) that the proposed rent increase of 3.5% for all Council houses, gypsy/traveller
sites, lockups and garage sites and the revenue estimate proposals for the
Housing Revenue Account Budget 2022/2023 be approved; and 
(2) that, based on the rent increase of 3.5%, the 2023/2024 Housing Capital
Programme, totalling £63.916 million, be approved. 
[Reference: Minutes of the special meeting of Housing and Technical
Resources Committee of 23 January 2023 (Paragraph 2)] 
3.2. A link to the report submitted to the Executive Committee of 1 February 2023 is
provided below for information. 
Report to Executive Committee - 1 February 2023 
4 Employee Implications
4.1 Any employee implications were raised in the original report to the special meeting
of the Housing and Technical Resources Committee. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1 All financial implications have been highlighted as part of the original report to the
special meeting of the Housing and Technical Resources Committee. 
6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
7. Other Implications
7.1 Any implications have been highlighted as part of the original report to the special
meeting of the Housing and Technical Resources Committee. 
8. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
8.1 No equality impact assessment is required in terms of the recommendations
contained within this report. 
8.2. Consultation with both tenants and members to agree the annual rent rises required
to fund the Housing Business Plan had previously taken place in terms of the
recommendations considered by the Housing and Technical Resources Committee 
Cleland Sneddon
Chief Executive 
2 February 2023 
32

Page 33

Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 Executive Committee of 1 February 2023
 Housing and Technical Resources Committee of 23 January 2023 
List of Background Papers
None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Susan Somerville, Administration Manager
Ext:  4197  (Tel:  01698 454197)
E-mail:  susan.somerville@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
33

Page 34

34

Page 35

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 22 February 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: 2023/2024 Capital Programme Update
1. Purpose of Report 
1.1. The purpose of the report is to: 
 Provide the Council with a proposed General Services Capital Programme for
financial year 2023/2024, reflecting the spend requirements identified by
Resources and the availability of funding.   
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s): 
(1) that the 2023/2024 Capital Programme totalling £91.061 million (Section 4.17)
and detailed in Appendix 3 be approved. 
3. Background
3.1. When the current General Services Capital Programme comes to an end (at the end
of 2022/2023), there is no approved programme for financial year 2023/2024 and
beyond.   
3.2.  A proposed capital programme for 2023/24 has been drafted for consideration by
members.  Section 4 develops a proposed programme for 2023/2024 considering
ongoing programmes of work and priorities, commitments from the approved Glasgow
City Region City Deal Programme as well as incorporating the programme moves and
additions from financial year 2022/2023.   
3.3. The funding available in-year is discussed at Section 5 and includes details of the
Council’s grant allocations received as part of the 2023/2024 Local Government
Finance Settlement released on 20 December 2022. 
3.4. Finally, section 6 provides an update on the principles underpinning the Capital
Investment strategy in line with the main requirements of the Prudential Code. 
4. Proposed 2023/2024 Capital Programme 
4.1. In addition to any new requirements for 2023/2024, there are approved ongoing
commitments from previous financial years which need to be reflected in the
2023/2024 programme.  This includes commitments from the approved Glasgow City
Region City Deal Programme and Education Growth and Capacities Programme, in
line with the approach taken in compiling previous years’ capital programmes.  Each
is taken in turn in sections 4.2 to 4.16.     
4
35

Page 36

4.2. Ongoing Programmes of Work (£20.500m):  In line with the Capital Programme,
there are a number of projects which need to be included in the capital programme to
support ongoing programmes of work.  These total £20.500 million for 2023/2024 and
are in addition to monies slipped from previous years for these projects.  The projects
and their values are noted in Appendix 1. 
4.3. New Priorities Identified for 2023/2024 (£0.161m):  In addition to the projects
already identified either in existing Capital Programmes or through the Capital
Strategy, it is proposed that a project totalling £0.161 million be considered for
inclusion in the 2023/2024 Capital Programme for the SLLCT Booking and Admission
System (£0.161m).  This system is business critical and the support for current point
of sale software is coming to an end.  There would be no future capital commitments
in agreeing to this proposal. 
4.4. Specific Capital Projects (£7.758m): In addition to the projects detailed above, the
Local Government Finance Settlement received on 20 December 2022 allocated
£2.096 million of grant funding for specific projects.  This includes specific grants for
Vacant and Derelict Land (£0.687m) and Cycling, Walking and Safer Routes
(£1.409m).  These projects have been included in the expenditure requirements for
2023/2024. 
4.5. Furthermore, the Scottish Government have confirmed General Capital Grant funding
of £0.597 million for 2023/2024 to continue the Renewal of Play Parks programme and
£5.065 million for Free School Meals.  These projects have been included in the
expenditure requirements for 2023/2024.   
4.6. Glasgow City Region City Deal (£26.978m):  There are a number of projects which
are being progressed as part of the Glasgow City Region City Deal Programme and
these need to be added to the 2023/2024 Capital Programme.  Based on current
predictions, additional spend totalling £26.978 million will be incurred in 2023/2024. 
This excludes slippage from the 2022/2023 Programme (refer section 4.15).  This will
be funded by borrowing, in line with the approved funding package for the City Deal
programme, developers’ contributions from the Community Growth Areas, and other
developers’ contributions (for Jackton Primary School). 
4.7. Larkhall Leisure Centre – External Funding (£2.200m):  Funding of £9.550 million
has been approved for the replacement of Larkhall Leisure Centre: Council (£6
million), City Deal (£3 million) and Place Based Investment Funding (£0.550 million).
£0.550 million of this remains in the 2022/2023 Capital Programme with the other £9
million being slipped from 2022/2023 into the Programme for 2023/2024 (see section
4.15 ‘2022/2023 Movements’).   
4.8. External funding totalling £2.2 million has been pursued from the Shared Prosperity
Fund (£1 million - confirmed), Place Based Investment Fund (£0.650 million -
confirmed), SportScotland (£0.250 million – still to be confirmed) and the Scottish
Government’s Capital Regeneration Fund (£0.300 million - confirmed).  Assuming the
SportScotland funding is successful, the total funding available is £11.750 million. This
funding will be insufficient to cover the anticipated cost of the project.  The current
budget gap is estimated to be in excess of £12 million. 
4.9. Due to the complex nature / scale of this build, the expenditure is anticipated to cover
several financial years. 
36

Page 37

4.10. Given the timescales involved in design and tendering, only an element of the budget
will be required in 2023/2024, and £9 million has been included at this point in time. 
Officers will continue to review the design for the proposed facility, projected costs and
funding options however the budget gap is significant and unlikely to be met from
external sources. Should a significant budget gap remain, the Council will require to
consider the extent to which this could be drawn from capital funding sources for
2024/2025 and 2025/2026. This is likely to be in line with the expenditure profile for
the project.  Given the pressure on capital funding over the coming 3-year period (as
intimated by the Scottish Government), if that action was taken, it would significantly
restrict the ability to undertake any other new capital investment.   
4.11. Projects Approved During Previous Financial Years (£6.870m):  Specific projects
were approved by Council Committees during 2021/2022 and for 2023/2024 the
remaining budget allocations for these projects totalling £6.370 million will be required
for:  Newton Farm Primary School Extension (£0.109 million – Executive Committee,
26 May 2021), Oracle Fusion (£5.683 million – Finance and Corporate Resources
Committee, 1 September 2021) and SWiS Plus Replacement (£0.578 million – Social
Work Resources Committee, 2 June 2021). 
4.12. The total relating to projects approved in previous years is £6.870 million.   
4.13. In addition to the previously approved projects detailed in section 4.11, growth in
predicted pupil numbers relating to general population growth and significant new
housing development across the Council area has resulted in projects to manage
accommodation pressures in the Early Years and School sectors.  The majority of
these projects are expected to be funded from developers’ contributions / City Deal. 
In addition, a report was submitted to the Executive Committee (21 September 2022)
advising of the predicted capacity issues at four Secondary Schools again due to a
significant growth in pupil numbers.   
4.14. The requirements for these Education Growth and Capacities projects in
2023/2024, as they currently stand are already incorporated into the proposed
programme either as a result of slippage from 2022/2023 or as part of the City Deal
Programme of works.  The requirements are funded either from City Deal and / or
Community Growth Area Developer Contributions as well as a bid for LEIP funding for
the secondary schools.  These allocations may require to be updated to reflect more
clearly defined project costs, timescales and additional funding available e.g. LEIP, as
they are confirmed.  
4.15. 2022/2023 Movements (£33.202m):  In addition to the projects identified above, there
were project movements from 2022/2023 into 2023/2024 which were approved by
Executive Committee throughout the year, up to and including the meeting on 1
February 2023.  These movements total £33.202 million and reflect the 2022/2023
budget not required in year.    
4.16. 2023/2024 Movements (£6.608m):  Resources have confirmed that projects totalling
£6.608 million are not required in financial year 2023/2024.  A breakdown of these
projects is included in Appendix 2.  The impact of this has been included within the full
analysis of the proposed 2023/24 capital programme included in Appendix 3. 
4.17. 2023/2024 Capital Programme Summary:  Taking into account the proposals
covered in sections 4.2 to 4.16 a budget of £91.061 million is required in 2023/2024. 
This is summarised in table 1 below, with a full list of the projects which make up this
£91.061 million total detailed in Appendix 3. 
37

Page 38

Table 1:  Compilation of the 2023/2024 Capital Programme 
2023/2024
Capital
Programme
£m
Ongoing Programmes of Work (section 4.2 and Appendix 1) 20.500
New Priority Projects (section 4.3) 0.161
Specific Capital Projects (section 4.4 and 4.5) 7.758
Glasgow City Region City Deal (section 4.6) 26.978
Larkhall Leisure Centre – External Funding (sections 4.7 – 4.10) 2.200
Projects Approved in Previous Financial Years (section 4.11 – 4.12) 6.870
2022/2023 Movements (section 4.15)  33.202
2023/2024 Movements (section 4.16)
Including additional funding identified for Larkhall Leisure Centre 
(6.608)  
Total 2023/2024 Capital Programme 91.061  
5. 2023/2024 Capital Programme – Funding Available 
5.1. A core element of any Capital Programme is the level of funding available to support
the programme.  For financial year 2023/2024 total funding of £91.061 million is
available to fund the Capital Programme.  This includes General Capital Grant
(£33.985 million) advised as part of the Local Government Finance Settlement
received in December 2022 and Specific Capital Grants (£3.338 million), Capital
Receipts (£1 million), Borrowing (£50.812 million), Developer Contributions (£1.523
million), External grant funding (£0.277 million) and investment funding previously
transferred to reserves (£0.126 million).   
5.2. As part of the funding for the Pay Award for 2023/2024, the Scottish Government have
agreed to allocate £121 million nationally to cover part of the additional costs.  For
South Lanarkshire Council, this is an allocation of £7.116 million and as was the case
in financial year 2022/2023, this will be paid as part of our General Capital Grant
allocation.   
5.3. A review of the Council’s Capital funding package has identified funding that could be
transferred to the Council’s Revenue Account and used to fund the pay award.  These
funds will be replaced by General Capital Grant.   The funding package for the
2023/2024 Capital Programme noted at Section 5.1. reflects this funding arrangement. 
A detailed breakdown of the funding package is included in Appendix 4.   
6. Key Highlights from the Capital Investment Strategy
6.1. As the revised Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities 2017 requires
councils to produce a Capital Strategy, the Council’s Executive Committee approved
a Future Capital Investment Strategy (Capital Strategy) on 21 November 2018. 
6.2. The key issues and risks that will impact on the delivery of the Capital Strategy, how
the Capital Strategy and Treasury Management Strategy are aligned, and the
governance framework required to ensure the Capital Strategy can be delivered have
been updated for financial year 2023/2024 and are detailed in Appendix 5.   
7. Employee Implications
7.1. There are no employee implications as a result of this report.  
38

Page 39

8. Financial Implications
8.1. A Capital Programme for financial year 2023/2024 totalling £91.061 million has been
proposed in this report.  Details as to how this Programme has been arrived at are
shown in Section 4.  Details of the full Programme are listed in Appendix 3.   
8.2. Section 5 details the funding available in-year of £91.061 million with a breakdown
included in Appendix 4.   
8.3. Moving forward consideration will have to be given to the level of programme which
can be delivered, given the funding available.  As noted at Section 4.3, agreeing to the
new priority project for 2023/2024 will not commit the Council to expenditure in future
years.  However, projects totalling £6.608 million (Section 4.16) have slipped, along
with borrowing of £0.162 million, developers’ contributions (£0.992 million), and
specific grants, still to be confirmed, for Larkhall Leisure Centre (£2.200 million). 
Consideration will need to be given to providing funding for the balance (£3.254m) in
future years in the first instance, to enable these projects to complete.   
8.4. It is anticipated that the council will still be operating in very changeable and fluid
market conditions due to the current economic climate.  Officers will continue to
monitor these conditions however; Council should be aware of the potential disruption
to the 2023/24 Capital Programme in similar terms to that experienced over the
preceding two financial years.   
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
9.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms
of the information contained in this report. 
10. Other Implications
10.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Capital Programme is an overspend. 
There are detailed project management plans prepared and the risk of overspend on
each project is monitored through four weekly investment management meetings. 
10.2. The Council continues to experience material shortages, longer lead times and
extraordinary inflationary price increases and it is anticipated that this will continue to
impact the supply chain for the foreseeable future.  The impact of this will continue to
be monitored through the four weekly investment management meetings.  Further
updates will be reported in the coming months with any significant increases in
contract values being brought to members’ attention.   
11. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
11.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to existing policy, function, or strategy and therefore no impact assessment is
required. 
11.2. There was also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
Paul Manning
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
26 January 2023 
39

Page 40

Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Executive Committee, 21 November 2018 - Future Capital Investment Strategy
 Executive Committee, 26 May 2021 – Expansion of Newton Farm Primary School
 Social Work Resources Committee, 2 June 2021 - SWiSPlus Replacement
 Finance and Corporate Resources Committee, 1 September 2021 – Oracle Fusion 
List of Background Papers
None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Lorraine O’Hagan, Finance Manager (Strategy)
Ext:  2601(Tel:  01698 452601)
E-mail:  lorraine.o’hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk     
40

Page 41

Appendix 1   
Ongoing Programmes of Work Considered for 2023/2024 Programme (section 4.2) 
Project Name and Description 2023/24
(£m)
Schools Information Communication Technology (ICT)
Development
A contribution towards the costs of delivering the ICT contract to
schools.  As there is an ongoing commitment to this contract moving
forward, funding of £1.8m per annum is required.     
1.800
Roads Carriageways and Associated Infrastructure
Investment of £10m in Roads Carriageways (£9.4m) and associated
infrastructure (£0.6m).  This would continue the investment of £10m
provided in 2022/23.  This will be augmented by a revenue contribution
of £1.5m. 
10.000
IT Infrastructure 
Investment is required in order to maintain services. It is estimated that
an average £0.450 million per annum will be required to cover refresh
exercises (servers, networks and storage) as well as data security,
resilience and disaster recovery activity. 
0.450
Private Housing Scheme of Assistance 
Housing provide mandatory grants for disabled adaptations in private
homes and to encourage private owners in shared blocks to participate
in the Housing Investment Programme works.   An allocation of £1m
would continue the investment provided in previous financial years.   
1.000
Planned Asset Management 
Funding of £4.8m per annum is required to ensure continued delivery
of the Planned Asset Management model.  This model aims to
maintain all of the Council’s new build General Services facilities
(constructed since 2000), in a good condition and to a compliant
standard.   
4.800
Prioritised Urgent Investment in Property Assets 
The continuation of the previous model to meet urgent essential works
needed on all Council properties.     
1.700 
Lifecycle Replacement – Schools
The first school completed under the Primary School Modernisation
Programme opened during financial year 2004/05.  An allocation was
provided in 2020/21 to commence a programme of replacement for
major elements of infrastructure during the next capital programme. 
This requirement is likely to increase as the schools become
progressively older. 
0.750
Total Ongoing Programmes of Work 20.500 
41

Page 42

Appendix 2
2023/2024 Project Movements into 2024/2025 (section 4.16) 
2023/2024
Budget
Setting
Movements
(£m)
Community and Enterprise Resources 
Extension / Improvement of Cemeteries  1.148
Larkhall Leisure Centre 2.200
Total Community and Enterprise Resources 3.348  
Education Resources 
Holy Cross High School 0.792
Total Education Resources 0.792  
Housing and Technical Resources 
Springhall Regeneration 0.304
Housing and Technical Resources 0.304  
Social Work Resources 
Community Alarms – Analogue to Digital 0.838
SWIS Plus Replacement 1.326
Total Social Work Resources 2.164  
2023/2024 Budget Setting Movements into 2024/2025 6.608 
42

Page 43

Appendix 3
2023/2024 Summary of Capital Programme Expenditure
(including slippage from previous years) 
2023/2024
Proposed
Programme
(£m)
Community and Enterprise Resources 
Lanark Library, Lindsay Institute 0.200
Ballgreen Hall Demolition 0.127
SLLCT – Booking System 0.161
Larkhall Leisure Centre  9.000
Ash Die Back 0.500
Extension / Improvement of Cemeteries 0.500
Country Parks – Horseshoe Bridge, Calderglen 0.174
White Bridge Replacement, Chatelherault 0.226
Kildare Park – BMX Trail 0.025
Renewal of Play Parks 0.597
Gilmourton Play Park Redevelopment 0.102
Libberton Primary Outdoor Play 0.052
Symington Play Park Redevelopment 0.123
Hamilton Palace Grounds - Sports Pitches 0.029
Priory Changing Pavilion, Blantyre 0.225
Rural Business Centre – Lanark 0.650
Clyde Gateway 0.669
Vacant & Derelict Land (includes new allocation for 2023/2024 of £0.687m) 1.279
Glasgow City Region City Deal – Community Growth Areas 24.161
Roads Carriageways and Associated Infrastructure 10.000
Clyde Bridge 5.400
Cycling, Walking and Safer Routes 1.409
Glasgow City Region City Deal – Roads 3.309
Total Community and Enterprise Resources 58.918  
Education Resources 
Newton Farm Primary School – Extension 0.109
Schools Information Communication Technology (ICT) Development 2.444
Early Years 1,140 Hours – Clyde Terrace 3.145
Kirklandpark Primary School Adaptations 0.035
St John the Baptist Nursery Expansion 0.504
Free School Meals (including 2022/23 slippage of £1.577m) 6.642
Total Education Resources 12.879  
Finance and Corporate Resources 
IT Infrastructure – Business As Usual 0.450
Oracle Fusion 6.780
Total Finance and Corporate Resources 7.230   
43

Page 44

Appendix 3
(continued)
2023/2024 Summary of Capital Programme Expenditure
(including slippage from previous years) 
2023/2024
Proposed
Programme
(£m)
Housing and Technical Resources 
Private Housing Scheme of Assistance  1.000
Planned Asset Management  4.800
Prioritised Urgent Investment in Property Assets  1.700
Lifecycle Replacement – Schools 0.750
Total Housing and Technical Resources 8.250  
Social Work Resources 
Community Alarms – Analogue to Digital 1.232
SWIS Plus Replacement 0.752
Total Social Work Resources 1.984  
Other 
Match Funding for External Funding Bids 1.800
Total Other  1.800  
Total Proposed 2023/2024 Capital Programme 91.061 
44

Page 45

Appendix 4
2023/2024 Capital Programme – Funding Available 
Funding Source  Ref
Total
Funding
Available
(£m)
General Capital Grant 1 21.207
General Capital Grant – Pay Award 1 7.116
General Capital Grant – Play Parks  1 0.597
General Capital Grant – Free School Meals 1 5.065
Specific Capital Grant – Regeneration Capital Grant 2 0.650
Specific Capital Grant – Vacant & Derelict Land 2 1.279
Specific Capital Grant – Cycling, Walking and Safer Routes 2 1.409
Capital Receipts  3 1.000
Existing Borrowing – Previous Years 4 50.812
Developers Contributions 5 1.523
External Contributions 6 0.277
Reserves 7 0.126
Total Funding Available  91.061   
Proposed 2023/2024 Capital Programme (Appendix 3)  91.061   
Funding Surplus / (Shortfall)   -   
1. General Capital Grant (£33.985m)
The Finance Circular (December 2022) announced a 2023/2024 General Capital
Grant for South Lanarkshire of £21.207 million.   
South Lanarkshire Council has also been awarded an allocation of £7.116 million to
cover the Pay Award (Section 5.2).  As was the case in financial year 2022/2023,
this will be paid as part of our General Capital Grant allocation.   
As discussed at section 4.5, £5.662 million of General Capital Grant funding will also
be made available for specific projects, being:  Renewal of Play Parks (£0.597
million) and Free School Meals (£5.065 million).  This results in a total General
Capital Grant allocation for 2023/2024 of £33.985 million.   
2. Specific Capital Grants (£3.338 million)
As detailed at Section 4.4, specific grant funding has been provided in 2023/2024 for
Vacant and Derelict Land (£0.687 million) and Cycling, Walking and Safer Streets
(£1.409 million).   
Specific Grant Funding totalling £1.242 million has also carried forward from
previous financial years for Vacant and Derelict Land (£0.592 million) and the Rural
Development Centre, Lanark (£0.650 million) 
3. Capital Receipts (£1.000 million)
An annual target of £1 million was incorporated into the Capital Strategy.  The target
of £1 million for 2023/2024 is considered realistic and achievable and this will
continue to be monitored. 
45

Page 46

4. Borrowing (£50.812 million)
The borrowing required for 2023/2024 reflects the requirement to borrow to fund the
timing of spend in relation to the Glasgow City Region City Deal programme has
already been reported to Executive Committee (11 May 2016).  For 2023/2024 the
new requirement is £19.053 million.   
The Executive Committee have also approved additional borrowing to undertake the
Newton Farm Primary School Extension (Executive Committee, 26 May 2021),
Oracle Fusion (Finance and Corporate Resources Committee, 1 September 2021)
and SWiS Plus Replacement (Social Work Resources Committee, 2 June 2021). 
For 2023/2024 new borrowing of £6.370 million is required being:  Newton Farm
(£0.109 million), Oracle Fusion (£5.683 million) and SWis Plus (£0.578 million).     
The balance of £25.389 million relates to previously approved borrowing carried
forward from prior financial years.   
5. Developer Contributions (£1.523 million)
Contributions from developers will be used to undertake specific projects in
accordance with the conditions of the relevant Section 75 agreements, mainly growth
and capacity projects required within the school estate. The level of developers’
contributions reflects the required transfer to revenue to manage the 2023/2024 Pay
Award funding (Section 1).   
6. External Contributions (£0.277 million)
This reflects specific contributions from Clyde Windfarm (£0.175 million), Renewable
Energy Fund (£0.061 million), EB Scotland (£0.025 million), Banks Renewable
(£0.010 million) and Snabe Quarry (£0.006 million) towards the cost of the following
projects:  Gilmourton Play Park Redevelopment, Libberton Primary Outdoor Play and
Symington Play Park Redevelopment. 
7. Reserves (£0.126 million)
Investment funding previously earmarked for the White Bridge Replacement project,
at Chatelherault Country Park.   
46

Page 47

Appendix 5 
Principles underpinning the Capital Investment Strategy 
1. Key issues and risks that will impact on the delivery of the Capital Investment
Strategy and other long-term liabilities 
The Prudential Code requires the Council to identify the long-term implications, both
financial and operational, and the potential risks to service delivery through non-
investment in our assets.  The Council’s appetite for risk is taken into account in
establishing the Capital Strategy. 
There are no proposals in this report which would impact on the Council’s long-term
liabilities that have not been considered, such as long-term borrowing, or provisions. 
2. The Alignment of the Capital Strategy and Treasury Management Strategy  
The Prudential Code requires that the Council’s Capital Strategy be aligned with the
Treasury Management Strategy which is approved by the Executive Committee
annually as part of the budget setting process. This Treasury Management report is
also being presented to this Meeting for approval. 
The capital programme determines the borrowing need of the Council, the Treasury
Management process essentially monitors the longer-term cash flow planning, to
ensure the Council can manage its capital spending obligations. 
The Capital Strategy details the Council’s debt position, including the anticipated
level of debt and the authorised borrowing limit.   
3. Governance Framework  
It is important that the appropriate Governance framework be in place when
considering capital investment.  In order to mitigate some of the risks associated with
poor governance, there is appropriate governance arrangements in place in terms of
the Capital Programme and Treasury Management processes.  These are detailed
below.   
i) Capital Programme Governance:  The Capital Programme is prepared
following an exercise to prioritise projects in line with the Council priorities and
links to Asset Management Plans and is subject to approval by the Executive
Committee or Council. Any changes to the programme will be agreed by the
Executive Committee.  The Head of Finance (Strategy) and Head of Property
Services monitors the delivery of the capital programme on a monthly basis. 
This is reported to elected members via the Executive and Resource
Committees, along with the Financial Resources Scrutiny Forum. The Capital
Programme is subject to Internal and External Audit Review. 
ii) Treasury Management Governance: The Council’s treasury activities are
regulated by the Local Government (Scotland) Acts 1975 and 2003, and a
professional code of practice (the CIPFA Treasury Management in Public
Services Code of Practice – revised December 2017). It is a requirement of
this Code, and the financial regulations of South Lanarkshire Council, that a
Treasury Management Strategy is approved by Committee every year. A key
requirement of this strategy it to explain both the risks and the management of
these risks associated with the treasury function. The Council employs Link
Asset Services as its Treasury Management Advisors. Treasury Management
is also subject to Internal and External Audit review.
47

Page 48

4. Knowledge and Skills  
The employees responsible for monitoring the Council’s capital programmes, asset
management, and treasury management have the appropriate skills and knowledge
to ensure the successful delivery of capital investment.   
5. Capital Programme Summary  
The Future Capital Investment Strategy (November 2018) provided an estimate of
potential capital investment and funding package.  This was based on the
information available at that time and will be subject to further refinement when the
ongoing works to develop each of the projects / programmes is complete.   As an
update to the Capital Strategy, this report provides a proposed programme for
2023/2024.   
48

Page 49

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 22 February 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Prudential Indicators, Treasury Management Strategy
and Annual Investment Strategy 2023/2024 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide members with the Prudential Code indicators for 2023/2024 to
2025/2026;
 provide members with the Treasury Management Strategy for 2023/2024; and
 provide members with the Annual Investment Strategy for 2023/2024.
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the Prudential Code indicators for 2023/2024 to 2025/2026 are approved
(section 4).
(2) that the 2023/2024 Treasury Management Strategy is approved (section 5)
(3) that the Annual Investment Strategy is approved (section 6) 
3. Background 
3.1. Through guidance and regulation, the Council is required to produce Prudential
Indicators, a Treasury Management Strategy and an Annual Investment Strategy.  It
has been cited as best practice to combine the information in one document.  This
paper will therefore cover:- 
 Prudential Indicators (Section 4)
 Treasury Management Strategy (Section 5)
 Annual Investment Strategy (Section 6) 
3.2. At a meeting of the Council on 28 September 2022, a motion was passed for South
Lanarkshire Council to further demonstrate its own climate leadership by:- 
 Reviewing its Investment Strategy and developing and implementing a
Responsible Investment Policy to ensure that South Lanarkshire money is
invested for positive change and does not fuel the climate and ecological crises;
and 
 Reporting back on work to incorporate sustainability into Treasury Management
decisions to the Climate Change and Sustainability Committee.  
5
49

Page 50

3.3. In the Annual Investment Strategy, set out in Appendix 3 to this report, an additional
section on Responsible Investing has been included. Further information is provided
in Section 6 of this report. 
3.4. At a special meeting of South Lanarkshire Council on 18 January 2023, a report on
Service Concessions was presented. This included details of a strategy to manage the
costs of borrowing by building assumptions on the level of reserves, cash balances
and the phasing of the use of the service concession flexibility into the Council’s loan
charge model. The indicators presented in this paper reflect this approach.  
4. Prudential Code Indicators
4.1. The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities was introduced through
the Local Government (Scotland) Act 2003 with the aim of supporting strategic
planning for capital investment at a local level. 
4.2. The key objectives of the Code are to ensure, within a clear framework, that the capital
expenditure plans of local authorities are affordable, prudent and sustainable; and that
treasury management decisions are taken in accordance with good professional
practice and in full understanding of the risks involved and how these risks will be
managed to levels that are acceptable to the organisation. 
4.3. A revision of the Prudential Code was issued by CIPFA in December 2021. The key
objectives of the Code remain unchanged and are to ensure, within a clear framework,
that Local Authorities capital investment plans are affordable, prudent and sustainable. 
4.4. The Prudential Code now requires changes to the way that investments are
categorised.  Also, provisions within the code regarding borrowing in advance of need
have been strengthened to make it clear that borrowing to fund commercial
investments purely to benefit from the return on these investments is not permissible. 
4.5. The Prudential Indicators for 2023/2024 to 2025/2026 are shown in Appendix 1 along
with explanations for each indicator.  An updated position for 2022/2023 is also
included. 
4.6. Through these Prudential Indicators we are laying out what our expectations are for 
the coming year, and setting limits based on these expectations.  A report will be 
presented to Committee later this year showing actual achievement against the 
2022/2023 indicators. 
4.7. The first three indicators show details of capital expenditure, how this will be funded
and set limits for external borrowing. The fourth indicator demonstrates the financial
impact of the expected borrowing and that this is affordable. 
4.8. Capital Expenditure and Asset Management: The Prudential Indicators include
estimates of capital expenditure.  It was through the introduction of the Code that
councils are now able to take responsibility for deciding an affordable level of
borrowing to fund capital expenditure.  This moves away from the previous regime
through which central government gave councils consent to borrow defined amounts
for capital expenditure.  The Prudential Indicators show the level of borrowing required. 
4.9. An update to the General Fund capital programme for 2023/2024 was presented to
this meeting earlier in the agenda.  This allows for investment across priorities
consistent with the objectives of the Council Plan.  
50

Page 51

4.10. The capital expenditure for 2023/2024 included in our indicators is based on the
aforementioned report, while for 2024/25 and 2025/2026, the Capital Strategy,
adjusted to reflect anticipated spend, has been used as the basis. It includes the
General Capital Grant funding allocated by the Scottish Government and projects
which will be funded by Specific Capital Grants from the Scottish Government. 
4.11. The HRA capital programme for 2023/2024 is also presented to this meeting, following
its endorsement by the Executive Committee on 1 February 2023. For financial years
2024/2025 and 2025/2026, estimated capital programmes based on the HRA business
plan have been included. 
4.12. Housing capital expenditure reflects investment priorities of maintaining and improving
the housing stock to the Scottish Housing Quality Standard (SHQS) and the updated
Energy Efficiency Standard for Social Housing (EESSH2). The programme also
includes projects to increase the supply of council housing as well as environmental
works and legislative compliance programmes to ensure that all safety requirement
standards are met. 
4.13. The Prudential Code also recognises that in making capital investment decisions the
authority should be informed by sound asset management planning and options
appraisal. 
4.14. When considering potential capital investment, the Council ensures that the objectives
of capital investment fit within the Council strategic plans and that the investment is
informed through the asset management planning process. The following asset
management plans were updated for 2022 and approved by the relevant Resource
Committees. 
 2022/2023 Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Asset
Management Plan presented to Finance and Corporate Resources Committee 7
September 2022
 Roads Asset Management Plan – 2022 Update presented to Community and
Enterprise Resources Committee 13 December 2022 
4.15. The Property and Housing Asset Management Plan is currently being revised and
should be presented to the Housing and Technical Resources Committee in May
2023. 
4.16. The Fleet Asset Management Plan and Fleet Strategy is currently being developed
subject to reviews of services’ requirements and will be presented to the appropriate
committee during 2023. 
5. Treasury Management Strategy
5.1. The Council’s treasury activities are regulated by statute, and a professional code of
practice (the CIPFA Treasury Management in the Public Services Code of Practice). 
It is a requirement of this Code, and the financial regulations of South Lanarkshire
Council that a Treasury Management Strategy is approved by Committee every year. 
5.2. The Treasury Management Strategy for 2023/2024 is detailed at Appendix 2. The main
areas covered by the Strategy are:-
 Debt and Investment Projections
 Expected Movement in Interest Rates
 Borrowing Strategies
 Statutory Repayment of Loans Fund Advances
51

Page 52

5.3. The Treasury Management in the Public Services – Guidance Notes for Local
Authorities details treasury management indicators that are to be reported within the
Treasury Strategy. The update in 2021 included an additional indicator known as the
Liability Benchmark. 
5.4. The liability benchmark is a comparison of existing borrowing against committed and
planned borrowing needs, while taking into account how reserves, cash balances and
the need for short-term liquidity affect the future borrowing requirement. Further
information on this is included in Sections 6.3. to 6.8. of Appendix 2. 
5.6. The level of borrowing required to fund the Council’s Capital programme, together with
the variable nature of interest rates increases the risks associated with the treasury
management function. As a result, the Council will take a cautious approach to its
Treasury Strategy by setting treasury management indicators to contain the activity of
the treasury function within certain limits, thereby managing risk and reducing the
impact of adverse movements in interest rates. 
5.7. Key details included in the Indicators include total external net debt which is expected
to reach £1,102.685 million by the end of 2022/2023. This is gross debt of £1,215.435
million less estimated investments of £112.750 million. The estimated level of
investments reflects the level of reserves held plus an element of working capital and
the borrowing that was taken in 2022/2023, recognising that this increases the cash
that the council has available for investment. 
5.8. External debt includes the liability of £179.133 million that is included on the Council’s
balance sheet for the Secondary Schools and finance leases under International
Financial Reporting Standards. It should be noted that while these liabilities are to be
classed as external debt, there is no requirement to borrow these amounts and there
is therefore no impact on borrowing costs. 
6. Annual Investment Strategy 2022/23
6.1. The Local Government Investments (Scotland) Regulations 2010 provides a formal
investment framework for councils. It provides greater autonomy for local authorities
in their investment activities but with this greater freedom comes greater responsibility
and the onus is on local authorities to act prudently with regard to their investment and
treasury management activities. 
6.2. The Council can decide what investment tools it will class as permitted investments in
the coming year. The Regulations require an Annual Investment Strategy detailing the
permitted investments to be approved by the Council. 
6.3. The Annual Investment Strategy for 2023/2024 has been included at Appendix 3. 
6.4. The two fundamental principles of the Investment Regulations are that: 
 Councils are required to manage their investments and deposits in a way that
minimises the risk to the capital sum and optimises the return on the funds
consistent with those risks.  Security should be considered first, then liquidity,
and lastly the yield or return. 
 Councils are able to determine what investments they may make, including both
the type and duration of the investment. 
52

Page 53

6.5. The Annual Investment Strategy is considered to be central to the Regulation. The
Council is required to prepare an Annual Investment Strategy prior to the start of the
financial year. 
6.6. The Regulations require the Council to consider its investment activity as a whole. This
includes a range of investments, which covers the depositing of temporary surplus
funds with banks and similar institutions, shareholdings in companies or joint ventures,
loans to group undertakings and third parties. It also covers investment properties. 
6.7. The Council is required to set out in the strategy the types of investment that it will
permit in the financial year. These will be known as “permitted investments”.  The
strategy also limits the amounts that may be held in such investments at any time in
the year. 
6.8. After consideration of the Council’s requirements to manage funds and our approach
to risk, no changes have been made to the permitted investments previously agreed
for 2022/2023. 
6.9. The Executive Director of Finance and Corporate Resources will ensure that the
strategy is adhered to at all times.  The Council can only make an investment if that
type of investment is detailed in this Strategy. 
6.10. Responsible Investing
6.11. Section 10 of the Annual Investment Strategy details our approach to Responsible
Investing, focusing on banks and building societies. 
6.12. For operational banking the Council is contracted with Royal Bank of Scotland until
March 2029. The Council currently only places short term deposits with three banks,
Bank of Scotland, The Royal Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank. 
6.13. There is currently no generally accepted method to assess an organisation’s approach
to climate change, sustainability and the environment. Along with our Treasury
Management Advisers, we are looking at emerging assessments of ethical banking
and have asked them to provide information on when they plan to provide information
or ratings that would allow the Council to ensure that its investments do not fuel the
climate and ecological crises. 
6.14. In the meantime, we are sighted on the work of Bank Green and research carried out
by The Ethical Consumer Research Association Ltd which rated banks on climate
change. 
6.15. Out of 26 banks rated by The Ethical Consumer Research Association Ltd, two were
rated “best” and five rated “middle”. Of these seven, two met the minimum credit
ratings used for the security of the deposit and facilities to allow the Council to place
short term deposits with them will be opened. 
6.16. For the three banks that the Council currently places short term deposits with, there
has been some positive action taken regarding climate change, however until there is
a generally accepted standard to assess banks’ approach to climate change and
sustainability, deposits outwith the “best” and “middle” categories will be limited to
instant access. Banks are required to hold capital in reserves to cover these deposits
and so cannot use them to invest in any projects.  
53

Page 54

6.17. The Council can use its voice as a customer or client of the banks to influence their
actions and to encourage them to make further progress regarding climate change
and sustainability. We will write to the banks to set out the Council’s position, explain
that we expect them to take positive action in these areas and ask them what they are
doing to address these issues. 
6.18. Borrowing in Advance:  Borrowing in advance of need increases the level of funds
which require to be invested or deposited.  Scottish Ministers therefore require local
authorities to set out within their Annual Investment Strategy, their approach to
borrowing in advance. 
6.19. The CIPFA Prudential Code is clear that the Council must not borrow more than, or in
advance of needs purely in order to profit from the investment of the extra sums
borrowed. 
6.20. The Council needs to be able to demonstrate that borrowing is for a legitimate purpose
such as the exercise of day to day cash management or the management of borrowing
for capital purposes. 
6.21. The regulations do not prevent borrowing in advance of need but for it to be allowed
the Council must detail its policy for borrowing in advance in the strategy. 
6.22. The Executive Director of Finance and Corporate Resources will ensure that
borrowing is taken at the most appropriate time to ensure best value and that the
requirements of the Prudential Code are met. 
7. Employee Implications
7.1. None 
8. Financial Implications
8.1. There are no direct funding implications arising from the production of the Prudential
Indicators, Treasury Management Strategy or Annual Investment Strategy. 
8.2. The financial impact from treasury activity and borrowing for capital expenditure has
been built into the long-term revenue budget strategy. 
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
9.1. Section 6.10 of this report and Section 10 of the Annual Investment Strategy provides
information on our approach to responsible investing and how we will ensure that our
deposits with banks are not used to fuel the climate and ecologicial crises, and how
we will encourage banks to take positive action regarding climate change and
sustainability. 
10. Other Implications
10.1. South Lanarkshire Council recognises that any treasury management activity will carry
an element of risk.  It is important that risk is identified, and controls put in place to
limit those risks. 
10.2. The preparation and approval of Prudential Indicators and the Treasury Management
Strategy set a framework for treasury management activities and limits on debt to
mitigate risks. 
54

Page 55

10.3. The CIPFA Treasury Management Code of Practice adopted by the Council, places
Credit and Counterparty risk at the forefront of treasury risks. 
10.4. South Lanarkshire Council recognises that any investment activity will carry an
element of risk. It is important that risk is identified, and controls put in place to limit
and manage those risks. 
10.5. Section 5 of the Annual Investment Strategy details how South Lanarkshire Council
will manage these risks. 
11. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
11.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
11.2. There is no requirement to undertake any consultation in relation to the content of the
report. 
Paul Manning
Executive Director of Finance and Corporate Resources 
6 February 2023 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Value:  Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Jackie Taylor, Head of Finance
Ext:  5367 (Tel: 01698 455367)
E-mail:  jackie.taylor@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
55

Page 56

Appendix 1
Prudential Indicators 2022/2023 – 2024/2025
The Prudential Indicators are shown below and are split into 2 categories: 
• Capital Expenditure and External Debt
• Affordability 
Indicators 1 to 3 show statements of the expected borrowing requirement for the years
2021/2022 to 2024/2025 and attributes limits for external borrowing. 
Indicator 4 demonstrates the financial impact of the expected borrowing for the years
2021/2022 to 2024/2025 and that this borrowing is affordable. 
After year end, the actual position for the Indicators will be reported to the Executive
Committee. 
Capital Expenditure and External Debt Indicators 
1. Prudential Indicator 1 – Capital Expenditure
1.1. This indicator states the capital expenditure plans for the years 2022/2023 through to
2025/2026.  The indicator takes account of the anticipated spend for 2022/2023 and
2023/2024. For 2024/2025 and 2025/2026, the Capital Strategy has been used as
the basis, adjusted to reflect anticipated spend and funding.   
2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m 
General Fund Capital Expenditure  78.272  91.061  85.131  40.179
Funded by:    
Borrowing 30.260 50.812 59.427 8.137
Capital Receipts and Grants 46.098 40.123 25.704 32.042
Contributions from Reserves 1.400 0.126 0.000 0.000
Revenue Contributions 0.514 0.000 0.000 0.000
Total Funding 78.272 91.061 85.131 40.179 
HRA Capital Expenditure  66.361  63.916  96.436  98.563
Funded by:    
Borrowing 26.462 17.302 26.162 26.030
Capital Receipts and Grants 13.849 19.452 36.768 36.900
Revenue Contributions 26.050 27.162 33.506 35.633
Total Funding 66.361 63.916 96.436 98.563 
56

Page 57

1.2. The table below shows how the borrowing required for the capital programmes and
to use the benefit from the service concession flexibility are adjusted for loans fund
principal repayments, maturing debt, use of cash balances and reserves and
borrowing carried over between financial years to derive the borrowing requirement
for the Council in each financial year. 
2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m 
Borrowing for GF Capital Expenditure  30.260  50.812  59.840  8.137
Borrowing for HRA Capital Expenditure 26.462 17.302 26.162 26.030
Total Borrowing for Capital Expenditure 56.722 68.114 86.002 34.167
Less Loans Fund Principal Repayments (7.399) (11.815) (12.732) (22.743)
Funding for Capital Programmes 49.323 56.299 73.270 11.424
Funding for Service Concession Flexibility 64.366 4.437 4.587 4.645
Movement in CFR 113.689 60.736 77.857 16.069
Maturing Debt 43.884 21.770 33.770 120.153
Use of Cash Balances & Reserves (152.000) 10.000 10.000 10.000
External Borrowing Requirement 5.573 92.506 121.627 146.222
Reprofiling of Service Concession Flexibility (64.366) 13.963 30.913 17.455
Borrowing carried over from previous years. 118.683 (26.810) 0.000 0.000
Adjusted External Borrowing
Requirement 59.890 79.659 152.540 163.677
Actual/Planned Borrowing 86.700 79.659 152.540 163.677
Borrowing carried over to future years. (26.810) 0.000 0.000 0.000 
1.3. The Council has borrowed £86.700 during 2022/2023. This is more than the
borrowing requirement of £59.890m due to the decision to reduce the borrowing
requirement by building assumptions on the level of reserves, cash balances and the
phasing of the use of the service concession flexibility into the Council’s loan charge
model. 
1.4. The borrowing not required in 2022/2023 will be carried over and used to reduce the
borrowing requirement in 2023/2024. 
1.5. The borrowing identified above, and associated costs have been included in the
Council’s Financial Strategy. 
2. Prudential Indicator 2 – Council’s Borrowing Need (the Capital Financing
Requirement) and Gross Debt
2.1. The Council’s Capital Financial Requirement (CFR) is the total outstanding capital
expenditure which has not yet been paid for from either revenue or capital resources. 
It is essentially a measure of the Council’s underlying need to borrow for past and
present capital expenditure. 
2.2. The Council is required to pay off an element of the accumulated balance of
borrowing every year through a charge to the revenue account.  
57

Page 58

2.3. In order that over the medium-term debt will only be for a capital purpose, the
Council needs to ensure that debt does not, except in the short term, exceed the
total of the Capital Financing requirement (CFR) in 2022/2023 plus the estimates of
any additional CFR for 2023/24 and the following two financial years.  This allows
some flexibility for limited early borrowing for future years but ensures that borrowing
is not undertaken for revenue purposes. 
2.4. The projected Capital Financing Requirement and Gross Debt is shown in the table
below. 
2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m
General Fund 
Capital Financing Requirement  1,100.253  1,145.081  1,198.255  1,190.174
HRA 
Capital Financing Requirement  304.739  313.550  330.843  347.394
Total Capital Financing
Requirement  1,404.992  1,458.631  1,529.098  1,537.568 
Gross Debt  1,215.435  1,266.641  1,377.608  1,413.533 
Difference  189.557  191.990  151.490  124.035 
2.5. It can be seen that the estimated gross debt levels for the period 2022/2023 to
2025/2026 do not exceed the forecast CFR at the end of 2025/2026, demonstrating
that borrowing will only be undertaken for capital purposes. 
2.6. This indicator sets out the expected CFR based on the capital plans shown at
Indicator 1.  Actual CFR for 2022/2023 will be presented to committee following year
end. 
3. Prudential Indicator 3 – Limits to Borrowing 
3.1. The Operational Boundary for external debt is based on the expected maximum
external debt that could be faced in the course of the year.  It is set to accommodate
the borrowing requirements as detailed at Prudential Indicator 1, and also includes
sufficient scope to allow for changes to the capital programme throughout the year
and to borrow for the following year should this be considered appropriate. This limit
is permitted to be breached during the year. This would be reported in the Prudential
Indicators report presented to Committee after year end. 
3.2. The Authorised Limit for External Debt represents a limit beyond which external
debt is prohibited.  It represents the level of external debt which could be afforded in
the very short term, but is not sustainable in the longer term without consideration to
revenue budgets.  This limit needs to be set or revised by the full Council who should
also be advised if the limit is exceeded or is expected to be exceeded. Again the
limits include scope to borrow for the following year should this be considered
appropriate. 
58

Page 59

2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m
Operational Limit for debt 1,340.000 1,270.000 1,420.000 1,460.000
Operational Limit for other liabilities 190.000 180.000 180.000 170.000
Operational Limit 1,530.000 1,450.000 1,600.000 1,630.000
Authorised Limit for debt 1,360.000 1,290.000 1,440.000 1,480.000
Authorised Limit for other liabilities 190.000 180.000 180.000 170.000
Authorised Limit 1,550.000 1,470,000 1,620,000 1,650.000 
Affordability Indicators 
4. Prudential Indicator 4 – Ratio of Financing Costs to Net Revenue Stream
4.1. This indicator focuses on the extent to which the Council’s net revenue budget is
used for servicing debt.  This is shown for both General Fund and HRA. The figures
for General Fund include the reduction in the PPP/Finance Lease Liability as a
financing cost. 
2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m
General Fund Ratio of Financing
Costs to Net Revenue Stream
(expressed as %)
4.96% 4.60% 4.69%  5.94%
HRA General Fund Ratio of
Financing Costs to Net Revenue
Stream (expressed as %)
17.16% 17.80% 20.50% 21.17%  
4.2. While the Council has prepared a Financial Strategy for 2022/23 to 2024/25, at the
time of writing this report, we have not been advised of our General Revenue Grant
funding beyond 2023/24. The indicators have been calculated using the assumptions
regarding reductions in grant levels built into the Financial Strategy for 2024/25 and
beyond. 
4.3. For the HRA, estimates of rental income in each financial year have been used in the
calculation. 
5. Prudential Indicator 5 – Ratio of Net Income from Commercial and Service
Investments to Net Revenue Stream
5.1. The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities 2021 introduced a new
indicator – The Ratio of Net Income from Commercial and Service Investments to
Net Revenue Stream. 
5.2. The Code defines Commercial Investments as investments taken or held primarily
for financial return and not linked to treasury management activity and Service
Investments as those directly involved in the delivery of a service, for example, loans
to leisure providers, loans to trusts providing services, a shareholding in a shared
service vehicle, and investments in local companies for regeneration. 
5.3. As the Council has no investments that fall into these categories, there is no
requirement to report this indicator.
59

Page 60

Appendix 2
Treasury Management Strategy 2023/2024 
1. Foreword
1.1. The treasury management function is an important part of the overall financial
management of the Council’s affairs.  The treasury management function considers
the effective funding of capital investment plans and works toward ensuring that best
practice is followed when making decisions on managing Council deposited funds. 
The Council’s treasury activities are regulated by the Local Government (Scotland)
Acts 1975 and 2003, and a professional code of practice (the CIPFA Code of
Practice on Treasury Management – revised December 2021).  It is a requirement of
this Code, and the financial regulations of South Lanarkshire Council, that a
Treasury Management Strategy is approved by Committee every year. 
A key requirement of this strategy is to explain both the risks and the management of
these risks associated with the treasury function.  A further report will be produced
after the year end to report on actual activity during the year. It is a requirement of
the Treasury Management Code of Practice that a mid year monitoring report is
produced. This will cover the period 1 April 2023 to 30 September 2023 and will be
submitted to Committee after that date. 
This strategy covers: 
• The Council’s debt and investment projections (Section 2)
• The Council’s estimates and limits on future debt levels (Section 3)
• The expected movement in interest rates (Section 4)
• The Council’s borrowing strategy (Section 5)
• Treasury Management Limits on Activity (Section 6)
• Statutory Repayment of Loans Fund Advances (Section 7) 
2. Debt and Investment Projections 2023/2024 – 2025/2026
2.1 The expected levels of external borrowing and investment for 2023/2024 to 2025/2026
are shown in the table below.  An updated position for 2022/2023 is also shown.   
2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m
External Debt
Borrowing   £1,036.302 £1,094.605 £1,212.962 £1,256.486
Other long term
liabilities  £179.133  £172.036  £164.646  £157.047
Debt at 31 March
(including
PPP/Finance Lease
Liability)  £1,215.435  £1,266.641  £1,377.608  £1,413.533
Investments
Total Investments at 
31 March  £112.750  £40.000  £40.000  £40.000 
60

Page 61

3. Estimates and Limits on Future Debt Levels
3.1 There are a number of key indicators to ensure the Council operates its activities
within well defined limits.  These are detailed in the Prudential Indicators Appendix 1,
paragraphs 2.1 to 3.2. 
4. Expected Movement in Interest Rates 
4.1. The interest rate forecast provided by the Council’s treasury advisor, Link Asset
Services is reproduced below. Economic and interest rate forecasting remains
difficult with so many external influences weighing on the UK. The forecasts below
will be liable to further amendment depending on how economic data and
developments in financial markets transpire over the next year. 
Medium Term Interest Rates – Annual Averages (Link Asset Services) 
4.2. Since the start of 2022, there has been a lot of volatility in gilt yields, and hence
PWLB rates. As the interest forecast table above shows, Link Asset Services are
forecasting a steady, but slow, fall in both Bank Rate and gilt yields during the
forecast period to March 2026, with periods of volatility continuing during this
forecast period. 
4.3. The differential between investment earnings and debt costs remains high and is
expected to continue in 2023/2024. This “cost of carrying” needs to be considered if
borrowing is taken before our cash flow requires funds as returns on deposits will be
lower than the rate paid on borrowing. 
5. Borrowing Strategy 
5.1. The Council is currently maintaining an under-borrowed position in comparison to its
Capital Financing Requirement, using its cash balances rather than borrowing to
fund capital expenditure. This strategy is prudent as investment returns remain low in
comparison to the rates at which we can borrow, medium and longer dated
borrowing rates are expected to fall from their current levels and counterparty risk is
still an issue that needs to be considered. 
5.2. The Council’s borrowing strategy will be to minimise borrowing costs over the
medium to long term by considering the borrowing requirement arising from the
capital programmes along with expected interest rates and the level of existing cash
balances and reserves. 
5.3. In conjunction with advice from its treasury adviser, Link Asset Services, the Council
will keep under review the options it has in borrowing from the PWLB, the market
and other sources up to the available capacity within its CFR and Authorised Limit. 
5.4. One of the options to finance capital borrowing is the issuance of Bonds.  In the right
circumstances, Bonds could be appropriate for the Council but are dependent on the
level of borrowing, the repayment period and the mix of other funding sources to fund
a large-scale capital programme. To date, their use has not been considered
appropriate or necessary given the amount the Council requires to borrow and the 
Base
Interest
Rate
5 year
PWLB 
10 year
PWLB
25 year
PWLB
50 year
PWLB
2023/24 4.438%  4.125% 4.300% 4.525% 4.225%
2024/25 3.625% 3.700% 3.825% 4.050% 3.750%
2025/26 2.688% 3.250% 3.375% 3.575% 3.300%
61

Page 62

repayment period of the borrowing. Moving forward, they will remain an option and will
be considered along with other sources of borrowing as required. 
5.5. Alongside fixed rate maturity borrowing, other options such as variable rate or short-
term borrowing or EIP (equal instalments of principal) loans that help mitigate the
impact of the cost of carry are all active considerations. 
5.6. The Council will consider debt rescheduling where appropriate to make savings in
interest costs or to amend the profile of maturing debt to reduce any inherent
refinancing risks, however opportunities will be limited due to the premium that is
charged by the PWLB for the early repayment of debt. 
5.7. The overall strategy for borrowing will be to monitor interest rates, undertake planned 
borrowing at the best time, whilst investigating opportunities where possible to 
improve the structure of our existing loan portfolio. 
5.8. The expected borrowing is detailed in the Prudential Indicators Appendix 1,
paragraphs 1.1. to 1.2. and is summarised below. 
2022/23
Estimate
£ m
2023/24
Estimate
£ m
2024/25
Estimate
£ m
2025/26
Estimate
£ m
Expected Borrowing  86.700 79.659 152.540 163.677 
6. Treasury Management Limits on Activity
6.1. The Treasury Management in the Public Services - Guidance Notes for Local
Authorities details treasury management indicators that are to be reported within the
Treasury Strategy. The update in 2021 introduced a new indicator – The Liability
Benchmark which is covered in Section 6.3 to 6.8. 
6.2. The purpose of the Treasury Management Indicators is to contain the activity of the
treasury function within certain limits, thereby managing risk and reducing the impact
of an adverse movement in interest rates. However, if these are set to be too
restrictive, they will impair the opportunities to reduce costs/improve performance. 
The indicators are detailed below. 
Treasury Management Indicator 1 – Liability Benchmark
6.3. The liability benchmark is a comparison of the existing loan portfolio against
committed and planned borrowing needs, while taking into account how reserves,
cash balances and the need for short-term liquidity affect the future borrowing
requirement. 
6.4. The liability benchmark is included in Annex 1 to this strategy. The top line shows the
projected loans capital financing requirement. This is the total outstanding capital
expenditure that has not been paid for from either revenue or capital resources and
is funded by borrowing. 
6.5. The dotted line shows the net loans requirement which takes the loans CFR and
adjusts it for reserves and cash balances that are available to use in lieu of
borrowing. 
6.6. The solid line is the liability benchmark which is equal to the net loans requirement
plus a short term liquidity requirement. The two shaded areas at the bottom of the
chart shows the maturity profile of our actual loan debt outstanding split between
LOBOs and PWLB. 
62

Page 63

6.7. The Treasury Management Code requires that any mismatches between actual loan
debt outstanding and the liability benchmark are explained. The years where actual
loans are less than the benchmark indicate a future borrowing requirement while any
years where actual loans outstanding exceed the benchmark represent an
overborrowed position which will result in excess cash requiring investment. 
6.8. The liability benchmark for the Council shows a future borrowing requirement. The
Council manages the risks inherent in this by having a view of the future course of
interest rates and a borrowing strategy that aims to minimise borrowing costs and
ensure that these are affordable. The financial impact of borrowing for capital
expenditure has been built into the long-term revenue budget strategy. 
Treasury Management Indicator 2 – Maturity Structure of Borrowing
6.9. By setting limits on the maturity structure of borrowing, the exposure to large
concentrations of debt needing to be replaced at the same time in the future at
currently unknown rates can be limited.  This effectively places a limit on exposure to
longer term interest rate movement. The upper and lower limits for the maturity
structure of borrowing is shown in the table overleaf. 
Maturity Structure of Borrowing 
Upper Limit Lower Limit
Under 12 months 30% 0%
12 months and 24 months 30% 0%
24 months and 5 years 50% 0%
5 years and 10 years 60% 0%
10 years and 20 years 60% 0%
20 years and 30 years 70% 0%
30 years and 40 years 80% 0%
40 years and 50 years 90% 0%
50 years and above 90% 0% 
Treasury Management Indicator 2 – Investments Greater Than 364 Days-
6.10. Limits on the total principal sums invested for greater than 364 days protects against
potential loss that we would suffer if we required to get our money back earlier than
the full term of the investment.  
6.11. This Council will, at any one time, have no more than £10 million invested for periods
greater than 364 days, subject to a maximum period of 5 years. 
Interest Rate Risk
6.12. As there is no longer a specific recommended indicator in respect of interest rate
exposures, councils are asked to explain their strategy for managing interest rate
risks. 
6.13. Interest rate risk is the risk that movements in interest rates create an unexpected or
unbudgeted burden on the organisation’s finances, against which the organisation has
failed to protect itself adequately. 
6.14. The Council manages this risk by having a view of the future course of interest rates
and a borrowing strategy that aims to minimise borrowing costs and ensure that
63

Page 64

these are affordable. The financial impact of borrowing for capital expenditure has
been built into the long-term revenue budget strategy. 
Credit Risk
6.15. There is no specific recommended indicator in relation to credit risk, although the
Treasury Management Code states that authorities may wish to design and set their
own indicators in relation to this. 
6.16. Details of how South Lanarkshire Council manages credit risk are included in the
Annual Investment Strategy 2022/2023 which is included in Appendix 3 of this report. 
7. Statutory Repayment of Loans Fund Advances
7.1 The Scottish Government introduced The Local Authority (Capital Financing and
Accounting) Scotland Regulations 2016 with effect from 1 April 2016. These
regulations require the statutory loans fund to be administered in accordance with
the 2016 Regulations, proper accounting practice and prudent financial
management. 
Policy for the Statutory Repayment of Loans Fund Advances
7.2. The Council is required to set out its policy for the statutory repayment of loans fund
advances prior to the start of the financial year. The repayment of loans fund
advances ensures that the Council makes a prudent provision each year to pay off
an element of the accumulated loans fund advances made in previous financial
years. 
7.3. A number of options are available to councils so long as a prudent provision is made
each year. The Council is recommended to approve the following policy on the
repayment of loans fund advances. 
The policy for the repayment of loans fund advances will be to use the most
appropriate method of repayment for individual capital schemes or projects from the
following two methods:  
1. Asset life method – loans fund advances will be repaid with reference to
the life of an asset on an annuity basis. 
2. Funding / Income profile method – loans fund advances will be repaid by
reference to an associated income stream. 
7.4. For loans fund advances repaid using the annuity basis, the annual repayment will
be calculated using an appropriate interest rate based on an average cost of funding
capital advances to services. 
7.5. The Council’s strategy for managing debt includes making additional voluntary
repayments. These repayments will be used as a tool to reduce interest costs in the
short to medium term by lowering the Council’s need to borrow. These additional
voluntary repayments will be retained and used to offset higher loans fund
repayments in the long term. All of this helps to ensure that charges to the revenue
account remain prudent and affordable in the long term.    
64

Page 65

Repayment of Loans Fund Advances
7.6. Borrowing to fund the capital programmes result in new loans fund advances and
create a liability to repay those advances from future years’ budgets. The Council is
required to report on the commitment to repay loans fund advances. This is shown in
the following tables. 
General Fund
Opening
Balance
New
Advances  Repayments
Closing
Balance
2022/23 827.175 30.260 -2.821 854.614
2023/24 854.614 50.812 -3.324 902.102
2024/25 – 2027/28 902.102 67.977 -64.340 905.739
2028/29 – 2033/34 905.739 0.000 -155.766 749.973
2034/35 – 2037/38 749.973 0.000 -137.606 612.367
2038/39 – 2042/43 612.367 0.000 -128.927 483.440
2043/44 – 2047/48 483.440 0.000 -132.210 351.230
2048/49 – 2052/53 351.230 0.000 -132.800 218.430
2053/54 – 2057/58 218.430 0.000 -108.239 110.191
2058/59 – 2062/63 110.191 0.000 -38.534 71.657
2063/64 – 2067/68 71.657 0.000 -48.478 23.179
2068/69 – 2072/73 23.179 0.000 -20.068 3.111
2073/74 – 2077/78 3.111 0.000 -3.111 0.000 
Housing Revenue
Account
Opening
Balance
New
Advances  Repayments
Closing
Balance
2022/23 282.841 26.463 -4.578 304.726
2023/24 304.726 17.302 -8.491 313.537
2024/25 – 2027/28 313.537 78.222 -38.968 352.791
2028/29 – 2033/34 352.791 0.000 -55.195 297.596
2034/35 – 2037/38 297.596 0.000 -56.442 241.154
2038/39 – 2042/43 241.154 0.000 -44.683 196.471
2043/44 – 2047/48 196.471 0.000 -52.242 144.229
2048/49 – 2052/53 144.229 0.000 -54.750 89.479
2053/54 – 2057/58 89.479 0.000 -43.451 46.028
2058/59 – 2062/63 46.028 0.000 -34.853 11.175
2063/64 – 2067/68 11.175 0.000 -11.175 0.000
65

Page 66

ANNEX 1 
66

Page 67

Appendix 3
Annual Investment Strategy 2023/2024 
1. Background
1.1. Local authority investment activity is regulated by statute. In Scotland the legislation
that local authorities rely on to make investments had consisted of the Trustee
Investments Act 1961 and the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. 
1.2. In response to representation from local authorities that the existing regulation was too
prescriptive, provision was made in the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003 for
Scottish Ministers to introduce a new regulatory framework. 
1.3. Section 40 of the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003 provides local authorities
with the power to invest money. This power may be exercised in accordance with
regulations made by Scottish Ministers under this section. 
1.4. Scottish Ministers have, through Consent and Regulations, provided a formal
investment framework, namely The Local Government Investments (Scotland)
Regulations 2010 which came into force on 1 April 2010. 
1.5. The new regulatory framework introduced by regulations made by Scottish Ministers
under Section 40, provides greater autonomy for local authorities in their investment
activities. With this greater freedom comes greater responsibility and the onus is on
local authorities to act prudently regarding their investment and treasury management
activities. 
1.6. Local authorities are required to manage their investments in a way that minimises the
risk to the capital sum and optimises the return on the funds consistent with those
risks. 
1.7. Local authorities are required to prepare an Annual Investment Strategy before the
start of the financial year. 
2. Investment Policy and Strategy
2.1. Scottish Ministers have identified two CIPFA Codes of Practice which local authorities
must have regard to in managing their investments: 
• Treasury Management in the Public Services: Code of Practice and Cross-
Sectoral Guidance Notes (Fully Revised Second Edition 2009) 
• The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities (Fully Revised
Second Edition 2009) 
2.2. The first Code referenced covers the whole range of treasury management issues
including the fundamental principles for making and managing investments. The
second Code deals with capital investment but also includes guidance on Treasury
Management. 
2.3. The CIPFA Treasury Management Code and the CIPFA Prudential Code were
updated in December 2021 with a “soft launch” for 2022/2023 and full implementation
for 2023/2024. There are no significant areas of change in the revised codes that
impact on our investment strategy for 2023/2024. 
67

Page 68

2.4. This Council in its Treasury Management Policy Statement defines its Treasury
Management Activities as: 
The management of the organisation’s investments and cash flows, its banking,
money market and capital market transactions; the effective control of the risks
associated with those activities; and the pursuit of optimum performance consistent
with those risks. 
2.5. The main objective when investing surplus funds will therefore be the security of the
transaction.  The Council must also meet its liquidity requirement and only invest for
the period of time that is prudent.  Finally, and only after consideration of security and
liquidity, the yield that will be gained from the investment will be considered. 
3. Treasury Management Risks
3.1. The CIPFA Treasury Management Code of Practice adopted by the Council includes
a section on Managing Treasury Management Risks, placing Credit and
Counterparty risk at the forefront of treasury risks. 
3.2. South Lanarkshire Council recognises that any investment activity will carry an
element of risk. It is important that risk is identified and controls put in place to limit
those risks. 
3.3. Risks when carrying out investment activities can broadly be categorised as follows: 
Credit Risk: failure to receive back the principal and interest on an
investment in full and on the due date
Liquidity Risk: the maturity or terms of the investment are such that insufficient
cash is available in the short term
Market Risk: the effect of market prices on the value of the investment 
4. Permitted Investments
4.1. Local authorities are required to list and document all types of investments that they
will permit in the financial year. These will be described as the permitted investments
for that local authority. 
4.2. Local authorities are required to state the limits for the amounts which at any time
during the year may be invested in each type of permitted investments, such limit
being applied when the investment is made. 
4.3. For each type of permitted investment, the objectives of that investment are to be
identified along with the associated treasury risks and the controls that will be put in
place to limit those risks. 
4.4. The permitted investments that South Lanarkshire Council have identified for the
financial year 2023/2024 are detailed in Annex 1 to this strategy and listed below: 
• Deposits with the Debt Management Account Deposit Facility
• Deposits with UK Local Authorities
• Deposits with Banks and Building Societies
• Certificates of Deposit with Banks and Building Societies
• UK Government Gilts and Treasury Bills
• AAA Rated Bonds Issued by Multilateral Development Banks
• AAA Rated Money Market Funds
• Loans to Third Parties
68

Page 69

Inclusion as a permitted investment simply allows the Council to use that investment
if considered to be appropriate. It is not necessarily the case that all permitted
investments will be used. 
5. Risk Management
5.1. The CIPFA Treasury Management Code of Practice adopted by the Council includes
a section on Managing Treasury Management Risks, placing Credit and
Counterparty risk at the forefront of treasury risks. The Code states: 
Credit ratings should only be used as a starting point when considering credit risk.
Organisations should make use of generally available market information, such as the
quality financial press, market data, and information on government support for banks
including the ability and willingness of the relevant government to provide adequate
support. 
5.2. In managing credit and counterparty risk the Council will be required to: 
• Establish a sound diversification policy with high credit quality counterparties
• Set clear minimum credit limits for counterparties.
• Have regard to the credit ratings issued by all three rating agencies and make
decisions based on the lowest rating
• Consider country, sector and group limits
• Regularly review credit ratings and other creditworthiness indicators as
outlined in 5.6 below and act upon forward looking rating warnings 
Deposits with the Debt Management Account Deposit Facility
5.3. Deposits with the Debt Management Office Account Deposit facility provided by HM
Treasury will be continued.  This facility offers the highest security for investments
and deposits will be subject to a maximum period of six months which is the
maximum time allowed by the DMO and no maximum deposit size. 
Deposits with UK Local Authorities
5.4. Deposits with UK local authorities will be permitted subject to a maximum period of
three years and a maximum deposit size of £20 million for up to 364 days and £10
million beyond this. 
5.5. Before placing a deposit with a local authority, an internet search will be carried out
to ensure that there are no financial concerns regarding the local authority that may
cause reputational damage to this Council through association. 
Deposits and Certificates of Deposit with Banks and Building Societies
5.6. The following minimum thresholds will be applied to all deposits with banks and
building societies, including Certificate of Deposits. 
Rating Agency Long Term
Rating
Maximum Deposit
Fitch A- £20 million
Moody’s A3 £20 million
Standard and Poors A- £20 million 
5.7. Prior to depositing funds with any bank or building society, checks will be made with
the Council’s treasury adviser, Link Asset Services, that the institution is considered
safe and that any deposit conforms to their recommended time duration as
69

Page 70

determined by their Rating Methodology.  This methodology uses credit ratings,
rating watches and outlooks and credit default swap (CDS) prices to establish a
suggested time duration for deposits. 
5.8. Currently all deposits are with UK institutions.  Non-UK banks would only be
considered if they meet our strict criteria and are recommended by our advisers. 
Any one foreign country would carry a limit of £20 million deposits. 
5.9. If two or more organisations in the same group meet the criteria detailed in 5.5. then
a group limit of £20 milllion will be applied. 
5.10. Deposits with banks or building societies will be restricted to 364 days. 
5.11. The existing Counterparty policy sets out a sound approach to depositing cash in
normal market circumstances.  Whilst this policy still stands, the Executive Director
of Finance and Corporate Resources may consider temporarily restricting deposits to
those counterparties considered of higher credit quality than the minimum criteria set
out in the policy. 
5.12. Examples of these restrictions would be greater use of higher rated institutions;
increased use of the DMO account and restricting the term of deposits as
appropriate. 
5.13. Operational banking will continue with our contracted provider. Any deposits with
banks or building societies will continue to meet the criteria set in 5.6. 
UK Government Gilts and Treasury Bills
5.14. UK Government Gilts and Treasury Bills are bonds issued by HM Treasury.
Purchasing these bonds is a means of investing in the UK Government. The UK
Government has never failed to make interest or principal payments on these bonds. 
5.15. Investments in UK Government Gilts and Treasury Bills carry very little credit risk as
they are investments in the UK Government.  Gilts and Treasury Bills are
marketable, and the price fluctuates from day to day. There is therefore the potential
of capital loss if sold ahead of maturity.  Gilts and Treasury Bills will be bought by the
Council with the intention of holding them to maturity thereby mitigating market risk. 
There will be no maximum limit to the amount that will be invested in UK Gilts or
Treasury Bills for maturities of less than one year. For Gilts with maturities in excess
of one year a limit of £10m will be applied and no maturity will exceed five years. 
AAA Rated Bonds Issued by Multilateral Development Banks
5.16. These are bonds issued by supranational institutions such as the World Bank or the
European Investment Bank. 
5.17. Investments in AAA rated bonds issued by Multilateral Development Banks carry
very little credit risk as they are backed by several Sovereign States. These bonds
carry market risk as their price fluctuates from day to day. There is therefore the
potential of capital loss if sold ahead of maturity.  These bonds will be bought by the
Council with the intention of holding them to maturity, thereby mitigating market risk. 
The maximum amount that will be invested in AAA rated bonds issued by Multilateral
Development Banks is £10 million with a maximum period of five years. 
5.18. Any investments in these bonds would only be undertaken after careful consideration
and with advice from our advisers to ensure security of our investments.
70

Page 71

AAA Rated Money Market Funds
5.19. Investments in Money Market Funds will be limited to those funds rated as AAAmmf
by Fitch, Aaa by Moody’s or AAAm by Standard and Poor’s. In the event that the
Money Market Fund is rated by more than one credit rating agency, each rating must
meet the set criteria. 
5.20. In addition to the credit rating, Money Market Funds will also be assessed for
suitability on fund size, the strength of the custodian and the stability of invested
capital. 
5.21. Selection of suitable Money Market Funds will be undertaken in consultation with our
advisers. 
5.22. Investments in Money Market Funds will be restricted to 0.5% of the Money Market
Fund size and to no more than £10 million in any individual Money Market Fund. 
5.23. Investments in Sterling Government Money Market Funds which only invest in
Sterling denominated debt securities issued by the UK Government will be restricted
to 2% of the Money Market Fund size and to no more than £10 million in any
individual Money Market Fund. 
Loans to Third Parties
5.24. Any new types of loans to third parties should be approved by The Finance and
Corporate Resources Committee with full consideration of the service rationale
behind the loan and the likelihood of partial or full default and the impact that this will
have on service budgets. 
Liquidity Risk
5.25. In order to manage liquidity risk, the Council will endeavour to maintain a minimum
balance of £5 million in bank accounts and money market funds with instant access
(same day notice account). This is dependent on these facilities continuing to be
provided by the banks and subject to our minimum lending criteria. 
5.26. In addition to retaining a balance of deposits on instant access, South Lanarkshire
Council will maintain an appropriate overdraft facility. 
5.27. Longer term investments will only be considered where the Council’s liquidity
requirements are ensured and an assessment of liquidity risk has been carried out.
No more than £10 million of investments at any one time will be for a period in
excess of 364 days. 
6. Borrowing In Advance
6.1. Borrowing in advance may be taken if it is considered appropriate, for example if
interest rates were expected to increase significantly. 
6.2. The Council will not borrow more than or in advance of its needs purely in order to
profit from the investment of the extra sums borrowed. Any decision to borrow in
advance will be within forward approved Capital Financing Requirement estimates
and will be considered carefully to ensure that value for money can be demonstrated
and that the Council can ensure the security of such funds.  
71

Page 72

6.3. The risks of holding increased levels of deposits and investments would be managed
in accordance with section 5 above. The Council has unlimited access to using the
DMO Deposit Facility where necessary. This facility offers the highest security for
investments. 
7. Investment Projection 2022/2023 – 2024/2025
7.1. Over the period 2022/2023 – 2024/2025, it is estimated that the level of investments
will be minimal as reserves and working capital are used to reduce the Council’s
borrowing requirement. 
7.2. Regardless of the level of deposits, the main consideration when investing surplus
funds will be the security of the transaction.  The Council must also meet its liquidity
requirement and only invest for the period of time that is prudent.  Finally, and only
after consideration of security and liquidity, the yield that will be gained from the
investment will be considered. 
8. Prudential Indicators
8.1. The regulations require that the Annual Investment Strategy contains details of the
relevant prudential indicators for investments. 
8.2. The Treasury Management Code requires local authorities to set an upper limit for
each forward financial year period for investments longer than 364 days. The
purpose is to contain the exposure to the possibility of loss that might arise as a
result of having to seek early repayment of principal sums invested.   
8.3. No more than £10 million may be invested for periods in excess of 364 days and that
the maximum period for any investment is 5 years. 
9. Common Good Investments
9.1. The regulations require local authorities to identify separately the permitted
investments relating to the Common Good. 
9.2. All investments relating to the Common Good funds administered by South
Lanarkshire Council are cash investments in South Lanarkshire Council. These
investments are not considered to have any significant risk attached. 
10. Responsible Investing
10.1. At a meeting of the Council on 28 September 2022 a motion was passed for South
Lanarkshire Council to further demonstrate its own climate leadership by: 
• Reviewing its Investment Strategy and developing and implementing a
Responsible Investment Policy to ensure that South Lanarkshire money is
invested for positive change and does not fuel the climate and ecological crises;
and 
• Reporting back on work to incorporate sustainability into Treasury Management
decisions to the Climate Change and Sustainability Committee. 
10.2. While the prime considerations when investing surplus funds are security liquidity
and yield, it is recognised that consideration must be given to other factors such as
climate change, sustainability and the environment, and we have looked to develop
an approach where we can consider all factors.  
72

Page 73

Operational Banking
10.3. During 2021, an open tender process was carried out for banking services. Only one
response was received, and Royal Bank of Scotland plc was awarded the contract
for banking services for the period 1 April 2022 to 31 March 2029. 
10.4. While we are contracted for another 6 years, we can use our voice as a client of
Royal Bank of Scotland to influence their actions. We will write to the bank to set out
the Council’s position regarding climate change and sustainability, explain that we
expect the bank to take positive action in these areas and ask them what they are
doing to address these issues. 
Deposits with Banks & Building Societies
10.5. The Council currently only places short term deposits with three banks, Bank of
Scotland, The Royal Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank. Any deposits with Bank
of Scotland or The Royal Bank of Scotland are in instant access call accounts to
mitigate against liquidity risk (Section 5.25). Short term deposits with Clydesdale
Bank are restricted to 100 days. 
10.6. There are other banks that would accept short term deposits from the Council,
however security is the main objective when investing surplus funds and if banks
don’t meet our criteria as set out in section 5.6 we cannot use them. 
10.7. All these banks are part of groups which have their own policies on climate change,
sustainability and environmental issues. Further details can be found at the following
links. 
Lloyds Banking Group - Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Information 
Sustainability | NatWest Group 
ESG Hub | Virgin Money PLC (virginmoneyukplc.com) 
10.8. While there is an established basis for the selection of counterparties with which
short term deposits can be placed, based on their financial standing (Section 5.6.)
there is no generally accepted method used to assess an organisations approach to
climate change, sustainability and the environment. 
10.9. We are looking at emerging assessments of ethical banking along with our Treasury
Management Advisers, and have asked them specifically what have they done to
date on this, what do they plan to do and when do they plan to provide information or
ratings that would allow the Council to ensure that our investments do not fuel the
climate and ecological crises? 
10.10. In the meantime, we are sighted on the work of Bank.Green and research carried out
in 2020 by The Ethical Consumer Research Association Ltd and have used that
when considering this investment policy. 
10.11. This research asked how banks were measuring the climate impacts of projects they
were lending to and what their plans were to change practices to meet globally
agreed targets. Of 36 banks rated, only two were rated “best” and five rated “middle”.  
73

Page 74

10.12. The method from that research for rating the banks and building societies is attached
at Annex 2 to the Annual Investment Strategy along with a list of the banks rated as
“best” or “middle”. 
10.13. Of the seven rated as “best” or “middle”, only two (Leeds Building Society and
Yorkshire Building Society) meet the minimum credit ratings as specified at Section
5.6. 
10.14. Of the remaining five, two are not active in the market for short term deposits. The
Council’s Treasury Adviser, Link Asset Services has strongly advised that the
minimum ratings are not lowered solely to enable deposits to be placed with the
remaining three organisations as this increases risks surrounding the security of the
investment. 
10.15. As the Leeds Building Society and Yorkshire Building Society meet our minimum
credit ratings, we will open facilities with these two building societies to allow the
Council to place short term deposits with them, subject to the yield that they pay in
comparison to other counterparties. 
10.16. For the three banks that the Council has placed short term deposits with (Bank of
Scotland, Royal Bank of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank), there has been some
positive action taken regarding climate change. However, at this time as assessment
of ethical banking matures, until there is a generally accepted standard to assess
banks’ approach to climate change and sustainability, deposits with banks and
building societies outwith the “best” and “middle” categories will be limited to instant
access. As the banks are required to hold capital in reserves to cover these deposits
they cannot use them to invest in any projects. 
10.17. We can use our voice as a customer of these three banks to influence their actions
and to encourage them to make further progress regarding climate change and
sustainability. We will write to the banks to set out the Council’s position, explain that
we expect the bank to take positive action in these areas and ask them what they
are doing to address these issues. 
10.18. Specific questions that we will put to these banks are listed below: 
• How much of your total investments are in projects which increase carbon
emissions (i.e. fossil fuel extraction / burning and environmental degradation e.g.
deforestation) – expressed as a total financial figure and as a percentage of total
investments? 
• How much of your total investments are in projects which reduce carbon
emissions (i.e. renewables, reforestation) – expressed as a total financial figure
and as a percentage of total investments? 
• Do you have a deposit account that South Lanarkshire Council can use that can
guarantee our deposits will not be used to fund climate change and projects
which fuel the ecological crises? 
• What sources of investments are available from the bank to invest in low carbon
projects / projects to address the ecological crises in South Lanarkshire?    
74

Page 75

Conclusion
10.19. We have attempted to identify counterparties that have a better record around the
issues of climate change, sustainability, and the environment using research carried
out in 2020 by The Ethical Consumer Research Association Ltd, however due to a
combination of credit ratings and lack of market activity, the Council cannot place
short term deposits with most of the banks rated “middle” or “best”. 
10.20. Two building societies rated as “middle” and that meet our credit rating criteria have
been identified and facilities to place short term deposits with them will be opened. 
10.21. The Council has a very restricted actual range of counterparties and has recently
placed short term deposits with only three banks, Bank of Scotland, The Royal Bank
of Scotland and Clydesdale Bank. There has been some positive action taken by
these banks regarding climate change. 
10.22. Short term deposits will continue to be placed with these banks only for the purpose
of immediate liquidity subject to them continuing to meet the minimum criteria set out
in Section 5.6. 
10.23. We will use our voice as a customer or client of these banks to influence their actions
by writing to them to set out the Council’s position regarding climate change and
sustainability, explain that we expect the banks to take positive action in these areas
and to ask them what they are doing to address these issues. 
10.24. The Council will continue to work with their Treasury Management Advisors who are
looking at ways to incorporate additional factors covering these areas into their
creditworthiness assessment service.
75

Page 76

ANNEX 1 
Permitted
Investment
Treasury Risks Mitigating Controls Limits
Deposits with the
Debt Management
Account Deposit
Facility
This is a deposit with
the UK Government
and so credit risk is very
low. 
Liquidity risk has to be
considered as deposits
can only be broken with
the agreement of the
counterparty and
penalties may apply. 
There is no market risk
as the principal sum
invested is not affected
by market prices.
There are no
mitigating controls
required. 
There is no maximum
monetary limit. 
A maximum term of
deposit of six months
as set by the Debt
Management Office.
Deposits with UK
Local Authorities and
other bodies defined
as local authorities in
the Local
Government Scotland
Act 2003
(And Equivalent
English Act)
These are considered
to be quasi UK
Government investment
and as such credit risk
is very low. 
Liquidity risk has to be
considered as deposits
can only be broken with
the agreement of the
counterparty and
penalties may apply. 
There is no market risk
as the principal sum
invested is not affected
by market prices.
There are no
mitigating controls
required. 
The maximum
deposit with any local
authority will be £20
million for deposits
less than one year. 
Deposits in excess of
one year will be
subject to a maximum
term of deposit of
three years and be
limited to £10 million.
Deposits with Banks
and Building
Societies
These tend to be low
risk but credit risk will
be higher than deposits
placed with the DMO or
UK local authorities. 
Liquidity risk has to be
considered as deposits
can only be broken with
the agreement of the
counterparty and
penalties may apply. 
There is no market risk
as the principal sum
invested is not affected
by market prices. 
The counterparty
selection criteria
restricts lending only
to high quality
counterparties,
measured initially by
credit ratings from
Fitch, Moody’s and
Standard and Poors. 
Additional indicators
of creditworthiness
will also be
considered prior to
placing any deposits. 
Liquidity risk can be
controlled by the use
of instant access call
accounts. 
The maximum
deposit with any bank
or building society will
be £20 million. 
A maximum term of
deposit of 364 days.
76

Page 77

Certificates of Deposit
with Banks and
Building Societies
These are short to
medium term dated
marketable securities
issued by financial
institutions. 
These tend to be low
risk investments but
credit risk will be higher
than deposits placed
with the DMO or UK
local authorities. 
Liquidity risk is lower
than placing a deposit
with a Bank or Building
Society as these can be
sold on the market. 
There is a risk of capital
loss arising from selling
ahead of maturity.
The counterparty
selection criteria
restricts lending only
to high quality
counterparties,
measured initially by
credit ratings from
Fitch, Moody’s and
Standard and Poor’s. 
Additional indicators
of creditworthiness
will also be
considered prior to
using this type of
instrument. 
Market risk would be
mitigated by holding
the instrument to
maturity.
The maximum
investment with any
bank or building
society will be £20
million. 
A maximum period of
investment of 364
days.
UK Government Gilts
and Treasury Bills
These are marketable
securities issued by the
UK Government and as
such credit risk is very
low. 
Liquidity risk is very low
as there is a huge
market for Gilts and
Treasury Bills 
There is a risk of capital
loss arising from selling
ahead of maturity.
There are no
mitigating controls
required for credit risk
as the investment is
with the UK
Government. 
Market risk would be
mitigated by holding
the instrument to
maturity.
There is no maximum
limit to investments in
UK Gilts or Treasury
Bills for maturities
less than one year
and a limit of £10
million for maturities
greater than one
year. 
The maximum period
of investment will be
five years.
AAA Rated Bonds
Issued by Multilateral
Development Banks
These are bonds issued
by supranational bodies
such as the European
Investment Bank or
World Bank and as a
result are backed by
several sovereign
states and as such
credit risk is very low. 
Liquidity risk is very low
as there is a large
market for
Supranational Bonds. 
There is a risk of capital
loss arising from selling
ahead of maturity.
As the investment is
effectively spread
across a number of
sovereign states, the
Council will mitigate
the credit risk of
holding such bonds
by considering the
sovereign rating of the
underlying sovereign
states and only
holding bonds that
have a AAA rating. 
Market risk would be
mitigated by holding
the instrument to
maturity.
The maximum
amount that will be
invested in AAA
Rated Bonds issued
by Multilateral
Development Banks
is £10 million. 
The maximum period
of investment will be
five years. 
77

Page 78

AAA Rated Money
Market Funds
Money market funds
are pooled funds that
invest in short-term
money market
instruments and other
debt instruments. 
The underlying
investments are
diversified and Credit
risk, liquidity risk and
market risk are all
very low. 
Investments in these
MMFs are highly liquid
(same day liquidity).
Money Market Funds
will only be used where
they have obtained a
AAA rating from the
credit rating agencies. 
In addition to the credit
rating, Money Market
Funds will also be
assessed for suitability
on fund size, the
strength of the
custodian and the
stability of invested
capital.
Investments in Money
Market Funds will be
limited to 0.5% of the
Money Market Fund
Balance and to no
more than £10 million
in any one Fund. 
Investments in
Sterling Government
Money Market Funds
which only invest in
Sterling denominated
debt securities issued
by the UK
Government will be
restricted to 2% of the
Money Market Fund
size and to no more
than £10 million in
any individual Money
Market Fund. 
Loans to Third
Parties
These are service
investments which
may exhibit credit risk
and are likely to be
highly illiquid.
Any new types of loans
to third parties should
be approved by
Members through the
appropriate Committee
with full consideration
of the service rationale
behind the loan and the
likelihood of partial or
full default and the
impact that this will
have on service
budgets. 
78

Page 79

ANNEX 2
How we rated the banks on climate change 
Part 1: Company shows that it has a reasonable understanding of its areas of climate
impact and how to ameliorate it, and is taking steps to do so. 
a) A company must discuss its areas of climate impact and discuss plausible ways it
has cut it in the past, and ways that it will continue to cut it in the future.
b) A company must have relevant sector-specific policies in place. In the banking sector
this must include a promise to divest from all fossil fuel extraction.
c) A company must not be involved in any particularly damaging projects like tar sands,
oil or aviation, be subject to damning secondary criticism regarding it’s climate
actions, or involved in funding climate denial think tanks. 
Part 2: Company reports its scope 1&2 emissions annually (Scope 1 is direct
emissions by the company. Scope 2 is emissions in purchased electricity and heat). 
Part 3: Company reports scope 3 emissions, covering at least tier one suppliers. 
Part 4: Company has a future target in line with international agreements. 
The company has a target to cut 2.5% per year or more of its absolute scope 1&2
greenhouse gas emissions, without offsetting.
OR
The company has a scope 3 target and a scope 1&2 target that adds up to the equivalent of
2.5% or more a year.
OR
The company has a target to reduce scope 1&2 emissions per pound value added by 7% or
more a year.
OR
The company has targets in place agreed by the SBTI. 
Scoring:
BEST = Company gets Parts 1-4
MIDDLE = Company gets Parts 1&2 
How the banks rated 
Best rating for carbon management and reporting 
Ecology Building Society
Triodos 
Middle rating for carbon management and reporting
Co-operative Bank
Cumberland Building Society
Leeds Building Society
Sainsbury's
Yorkshire Building Society 
Source:  https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/climate-change-impact-ratings-
bank 
79

Page 80

80

Page 81

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to:  South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting:  22 February 2023
Report by:  Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject: South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture – Concession
Recommendations for 2023/2024 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to: - 
 Present recommendations for amending the concession rates for South
Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture (SLLC) services. 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendations: - 
(1) To approve the following recommendations made by the Board of SLLC:
a. That the individual general concession for SLLC services be amended
from 50% to 25% of the adult rate. 
b. That the additional U16s Club discount (75% of the adult rate) reverts to
50%. 
c. That the Halls under 5’s and over 60’s group discount (75% of the full rate)
reverts to 50%. 
3. Background
3.1. Like all local authorities, Leisure and Cultural Trusts across Scotland are facing
significant increased pressure on their budgets. The majority are considering, or have
implemented, price increases and many have also had to reduce the scope of their
services. Trusts have also been significantly affected since the arrival of the Covid19
pandemic that has impacted on levels of customer use and generated income.
Recovery from the pandemic continues to be further impacted by the current cost of
living crisis and consequent pressures on household income. 
3.2. As with South Lanarkshire Council, SLLC is also experiencing extraordinary financial
pressures due to inflation levels on areas including pay, utilities and contracts. The
2022-23 Pay Award averaged around 7% for staff and contracts linked to RPI could
see increases of between 12% and 15%. In addition, utility price increases across
financial years 2022-23 and 2023-24 are expected to be in excess of 200% for gas
and 88% for electricity. 
3.3. As part of the review process conducted by the SLC Cross Party Working Group
(CPWG), approval was given at a full Council meeting in June 2021, and further
agreed at the SLLC Board meeting in August 2021, that the Board of SLLC have full
autonomy to review and set the pricing for all SLLC commercial activities in line with
6
81

Page 82

market tolerances and trends. It was agreed that the Council would retain the authority
to decide concession pricing. 
3.4. At the SLLC Board meeting on 1 February 2023, the Board approved the retention of
the fitness membership at £25 per month and a commercial price rise of 7% across all
other services. This is part of a package of measures that will also include
consideration of service efficiencies and rationalisation required to address an
estimated budget gap of £4m. 
3.5. If agreed, the recommendations in this report would enable SLLC to realise £616k of
additional income, reducing the funding gap further by that amount. Should the
concession proposals not be agreed, there would be a requirement for the SLLC Board
to approve service reductions, commensurate with the amount of income associated
with the concession proposals. 
3.6 The SLLC Board has a legal duty to set a balanced budget similar to that held by
elected members in relation to setting a balanced budget for the council. The scale of
the financial pressures faced by the Trust inevitably means that service levels cannot
be maintained and difficult decisions will need to be faced. The challenge requires
consideration of a range of measures to mitigate those decisions and the concession
scheme changes below have been recommended by the Trust Board to assist with
this mitigation.  
4. Concession Recommendations 
U16s Club Discount 
4.1. The Council are asked to consider a recommendation from the Board of SLLC
regarding changes to the level of concession awarded under this category, generating
up to £0.476m of additional income. 
4.2. In addition to standard concession discounts for Juniors which is 50% of the adult rate,
many Clubs receive an additional discount equating to a 75% discount of the adult
rate. This benefits clubs with predominantly South Lanarkshire Under 16’s residents
as members and applies to football pitch hire, swimming and dry-side club activities. 
4.3. In the majority of instances, particularly in relation to pitch hire, this additional discount
for clubs is not passed on to the U16s participating, who are charged the same rates
to attend the club as in other local authority areas where the clubs do not receive a
75% discount. In this respect, SLLC is effectively not subsidising participation but
rather is making a contribution to club funds. 
General Concessions 
Leisure
4.4. Individual concession subsidies are currently significantly higher in South Lanarkshire
than in other authority areas benchmarked using the Local Government Benchmarking
family group as a comparison. 
4.5. South Lanarkshire currently has the highest concession rate within the group at 50%,
with other authorities offering a discount of between 15% and 40% with an average
discount of 24%. It is therefore proposed that the concession rate be amended to a
discount of 25% of the adult rate, bringing it in line with the average. Amending the
concession rate would generate circa £90k of additional income. 
82

Page 83

Table 1: Recommended changes to leisure concessions
Concession
Membership Category
Concession
Charge – existing 
Concession
Charge – revised
Full price
Health & Fitness Adult  £12.50 £18.75 £25.00
Health & Fitness Junior  £6.25 £9.40 £12.50
A.C.E Monthly £13.40 £20.10 £26.80
Swim Lesson Monthly £13.85 £20.80 £27.70 
Hall Lets
4.6. SLLC currently offer a 75% discount of the community/junior rate to various Pre-5’s
and Over 60’s groups. It is recommended that this discount is also amended to 50%
in line with the proposed change to the leisure discount for clubs, generating an
additional £50k of income. 
4.7. It should be noted that even with this new charging rate, the services would be
operated at a net subsidy as staffing costs would exceed the income received. 
Table 2: Recommended changes to hall lets based on typical customer rate per
hour
Pre-5's, Over 60's -
existing charge
Under 16's/Pre-
5’s/Over 60’s groups
proposed charge
Full community rate
£3.15 £6.30 £12.60 
5. Next Steps
5.1. Following Council approval implementation of new concession rates would commence
on 1 April 2023. 
5.2. A meeting of the Board of SLLC is due to take place on 22 February 2023 following
the full Council meeting. This meeting will consider further measures required to
achieve a balance budget for 2023/24. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. There are no employee implications as a result of this report. 
7. Financial Implications
7.1. The SLLC Board has estimated a budget gap of £4m for 2023/24 arising from
exceptional inflationary rises in costs, related pay increases, the impact of the
COVID19 pandemic and the subsequent cost of living crisis/ economic situation on
their income. The Board has a legal duty to set a balanced budget and has agreed a
number of commercial price increases to reduce the gap by £0.819m. The Board has
agreed to recommend a number of changes to the concessionary scheme for Council
agreement that will reduce the budget gap by a further £0.616m. This set of measures
will assist in mitigating the impact on service levels across the entire SLLC operation. 
7.2. The SLLC Board will consider the decision of Council at its subsequent meeting
following the Council budget meeting in relation to the additional measures it will
require to take to ensure it sets a balanced budget. 
8. Climate change, sustainability and Environmental Implications
8.1. There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental implications as a result
of this report.
83

Page 84

9. Other Implications
9.1. There are no other implications in terms of risk and sustainability as a result of this
report. 
10. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
10.1. An Equalities Impact Assessment has been conducted in relation to the proposals by
SLLC. 
David Booth
Executive Director 
9 February 2023 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 Executive Committee – 23 June 2021 – Cross Party Working Group Review of South
Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture (SLLC) - Outcomes 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
David Booth, Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources)
E-mail: David.booth@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
84

Page 85

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 22 February 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Family Leave for Elected Members - Councillor Hose 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 Advise of arrangements in terms of family leave for Councillor Hose.
[purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that it be noted that Councillor Hose will take two weeks paternity leave after
the birth of his baby. 
.[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. The Council, at its meeting on 26 February 2020, approved, for implementation, the
new Elected Members’ Family Leave Guidance produced by COSLA. 
3.2. Councillor Hose notified the Council that he intends to take two weeks paternity
leave, as permitted by the Guidance, commencing on 13 February 2023 following
the birth of his baby daughter on 12 February 2023. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. There are no employee implications arising from this report. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. There are no financial implications associated with the proposals contained in this
report. 
6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
7. Other Implications
7.1. There are no other implications in terms of the information contained in this report. 
8. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
8.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact assessment is
required. 
8.2. There was also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report.
7
85

Page 86

Paul Manning
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
3 February 2023 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Fair, Open and Sustainable
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
South Lanarkshire Council of 26 February 2020
South Lanarkshire Council of   7 December 2022 
List of Background Papers
None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Susan Somerville, Administration Manager
Ext:  4197  (Tel:  01698 45454197)
E-mail:  susan.somerville@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
86