Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - South Lanarkshire Council - 27/03/2024

South Lanarkshire Council · 27 March 2024
Back to South Lanarkshire Council — 27 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Tuesday, 19 March 2024 
Dear Councillor 
South Lanarkshire Council 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the Council to be held as
follows:- 
Date:  Wednesday, 27 March 2024
Time:  10:00 
Venue: Hybrid - Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton, ML3
0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
Members 
Margaret Cooper (Provost), Bert Thomson (Depute Provost), Alex Allison, John Anderson,
Ralph Barker, John Bradley, Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Archie Buchanan, Mathew
Buchanan, Janine Calikes, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Gerry
Convery, Poppy Corbett, Andrea Cowan, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin, Colin Dewar,
Mary Donnelly, Joe Fagan, Allan Falconer, Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Elise
Frame, Alistair Fulton, Ross Gowland, Geri Gray, Lynsey Hamilton, Celine Handibode,
Graeme Horne, Mark Horsham, Martin Hose, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Gavin Keatt, Susan
Kerr, Ross Lambie, Martin Lennon, Richard Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Katy Loudon, Hugh
Macdonald, Julia Marrs, Monique McAdams, Ian McAllan, Catherine McClymont, Kenny
McCreary, Lesley McDonald, Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever, Davie McLachlan, Richard
Nelson, Carol Nugent, Norman Rae, Mo Razzaq, Kirsten Robb, John Ross, Graham Scott,
David Shearer, Helen Toner, Margaret B Walker, David Watson, Kirsty Williams
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
Minutes of the meeting of South Lanarkshire Council held on 31 January
2024 submitted for approval as a correct record.  (Copy attached) 
5 - 14 
3 Minutes of Special Meeting
Minutes of the special meeting of South Lanarkshire Council held on 21
February 2024 submitted for approval as a correct record.  (Copy attached) 
15 - 32 
4 Minutes of Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee
Minutes of the meeting of the Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee held on
31 October 2023 submitted for noting.  (Copy attached) 
33 - 42 
Item(s) for Decision 
5 Clydeplan and Glasgow City Region Spatial Planning
Report dated 13 March 2024 by the Chief Executive.  (Copy attached) 
43 - 46 
6 Community Facilities – Temporary Delegated Authority
Report dated 13 March 2024 by the Executive Director (Housing and
Technical Resources).  (Copy attached) 
47 - 52 
7 Notice of Motion - Immediate Ceasefire and Long-Term Peace in Gaza
Motion received in terms of Standing Order No. 20 on 5 March, 2024,
proposed by Councillor  Andrea Cowan and seconded by Councillor Elaine
McDougall.  (Copy attached) 
53 - 54 
8 Notice of Motion - Right to Strike
Motion received in terms of Standing Order No. 20 on 12 March, 2024,
proposed by Councillor Elaine McDougall and seconded by Councillor Katy
Loudon.  (Copy attached) 
55 - 56 
Item(s) for Noting 
9 Mid-Term Review of the Council's Political Management
Arrangements Procedural Documentation
Report dated 8 March 2024 by the Chief Executive.  (Copy attached) 
57 - 60 
10  Revenue Budget and Level of Local Taxation 2024/2025 – Local
Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024
Report dated 4 March 2024 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
61 - 64 
Urgent Business 
11  Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Provost decides are urgent. 
2

Page 3

For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Susan Somerville
Clerk Telephone: 07557323097
Clerk Email: susan.somerville@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
3

Page 4

4

Page 5

SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL 
Minutes of the meeting held via Confero and in the Council Chamber on 31 January 2024 
Chair:
Provost Margaret Cooper 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor John Anderson, Councillor Ralph Barker, Councillor John Bradley,
Councillor Walter Brogan, Councillor Robert Brown, Councillor Archie Buchanan, Councillor Mathew
Buchanan, Councillor Janine Calikes, Councillor Andy Carmichael, Councillor Maureen Chalmers,
Councillor Ross Clark, Councillor Gerry Convery, Councillor Poppy Corbett, Councillor Andrea
Cowan, Councillor Margaret Cowie, Councillor Maureen Devlin, Councillor Colin Dewar, Councillor
Mary Donnelly, Councillor Joe Fagan, Councillor Allan Falconer, Councillor Grant Ferguson,
Councillor Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Councillor Elise Frame, Councillor Alistair Fulton, Councillor Ross
Gowland, Councillor Geri Gray, Councillor Lynsey Hamilton, Councillor Celine Handibode, Councillor
Graeme Horne, Councillor Mark Horsham, Councillor Martin Hose, Councillor Cal Johnston-
Dempsey, Councillor Gavin Keatt, Councillor Susan Kerr, Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Martin
Lennon, Councillor Richard Lockhart, Councillor Eileen Logan, Councillor Katy Loudon, Councillor
Hugh Macdonald, Councillor Julia Marrs, Councillor Ian McAllan, Councillor Catherine McClymont,
Councillor Kenny McCreary, Councillor Lesley McDonald, Councillor Elaine McDougall, Councillor
Mark McGeever, Councillor Davie McLachlan, Councillor Carol Nugent, Councillor Norman Rae,
Councillor Kirsten Robb, Councillor John Ross, Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor David Shearer,
Councillor Bert Thomson (Depute), Councillor Helen Toner, Councillor David Watson, Councillor
Kirsty Williams 
Councillors’ Apologies:
Councillor Monique McAdams, Councillor Richard Nelson, Councillor Mo Razzaq, Councillor
Margaret B Walker 
Chief Executive’s Service
P Manning, Chief Executive
Community and Enterprise Resources
D Booth, Executive Director
Education Resources
C McKenzie, Executive Director
Finance and Corporate Resources
N Docherty, Administration Assistant; G McCann, Head of Administration and Legal Services; S
Somerville, Administration Manager; J Taylor, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Housing and Technical Resources
S Gibson, Executive Director
Social Work Resources/Health and Social Care
L Purdie, Head of Children and Justice Services 
Order of Business
The Committee decided: that the items of business be dealt with in the order minuted
below.  
2
5

Page 6

1 Declaration of Interests 
The following interests were declared:- 
Councillor(s) Item(s) Nature of Interest(s) 
Cooper  Touch a Life, Make a Difference Initiative
 Recommendation Referred by Executive
Committee – Reduction in Number of
Specialist Palliative Care Beds at
Kilbryde Hospice 
Member of the Board of
Trustees of Kilbryde
Hospice Board 
Logan Recommendation Referred by Executive
Committee – Reduction in Number of
Specialist Palliative Care Beds at Kilbryde
Hospice
Member of NHS Board 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 
The minutes of the meeting of South Lanarkshire Council held on 1 November 2023 were
submitted for approval as a correct record. 
The Council decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record. 
3 Minutes of Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee 
The minutes of the meeting of the Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee held on 22 August 2023
were submitted for noting. 
The Council decided: that the minutes be noted. 
4 The Armed Forces Community Covenant Duty 
A report dated 19 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted advising of the Armed
Forces Community Covenant Duty, a legal duty introduced by the Armed Forces Act 2021, which
came into effect on 22 November 2022. 
On 5 March 2012, the Council, together with a range of other partners from NHS, the military, the
voluntary and charity sectors, signed up to the terms of an Armed Forces Community Covenant
for South Lanarkshire. 
The specific aims of the Armed Forces Community Covenant were to:- 
 encourage local communities to support the armed forces community in their areas
 nurture public understanding and awareness amongst the public of issues affecting the
armed forces community
 recognise and remember the sacrifices faced by the armed forces community
 encourage activities which helped to integrate the armed forces community into local life
 encourage the armed forces community to help and support the wider community, whether
through participation in events and joint projects, or other forms of engagement  
6

Page 7

In order to take the principles of the original Covenant forward, a local group was set up under the
co-ordination of the army, entitled Lanarkshire Firm Base, which aimed to bring a range of
organisations, including North and South Lanarkshire Councils, the NHS, the military, voluntary
sector groups, appropriate charitable organisations and other community planning partners to
work together to improve services and support to local veterans and their families by progressing
the terms of the Covenant. 
In 2018, the Armed Forces Community Covenant was updated and Lanarkshire Firm Base
relaunched.  To underline and raise awareness of the Covenant, the Council recommitted to it by
signing an updated version of the Covenant at the Council’s Armed Forces Day Flag Raising
Event on 23 June 2018. 
The Armed Forces Act 2021 further enshrined the Covenant into law and it was intended to help
prevent service personnel and veterans being disadvantaged when accessing public services.  It
meant that decisions about the development and delivery of certain services must be made with
conscious consideration of the needs of the Armed Forces community, details of which were
outlined in Section 4 of the report. 
An update on the Council’s progress in each of the Service areas outlined, as well as on
employment of veterans, was included in the annual report attached as Appendix 1 to the report. 
A role profile for Local Government Armed Forces Champions, attached as Appendix 2 to the
report, had been drafted to reflect the terms of the legislation, associated guidance and
accompanying toolkit. 
The Lanarkshire Firm Base Group had been renamed as the Lanarkshire Armed Forces
Community and Veterans Covenant Group and its Terms of Reference had been updated to
reflect the terms of the Act and associated guidance. 
Councillor Horsham, as the Council’s Armed Forces and Veterans Champion, welcomed the
report and thanked colleagues and organisations for their input in working towards the aims and
objectives of the Covenant.  He advised that the membership of the Lanarkshire Armed Forces
Community and Veterans Covenant Group was growing and the plan over the coming year was
to focus on employment and develop a website and booklet. 
Councillors Cowan, Fagan, Allison and Brown, in turn, were heard in support of the work
undertaken and, in particular, to the role played by Councillor Horsham as the Council’s Armed
Forces and Veterans Champion. 
The Provost also paid tribute to the late Councillor Jim Handibode, who was the Council’s first
Veterans Champion and well-known in the Armed Forces community.  She considered he would
have been proud of how Councillor Horsham had progressed the aims and objectives of the
Covenant. 
The Council decided: 
(1) that the Armed Forces Community Covenant Duty be noted; 
(2) that it be noted that the Lanarkshire Firm Base Group had been renamed as Lanarkshire
Armed Forces Community and Veterans Covenant Group; 
(3) that the content of the South Lanarkshire Armed Forces Community Covenant Duty
Report 2023, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, be noted; and  
7

Page 8

(4) that the updated Armed Forces and Veterans Champion role profile, attached as
Appendix 2 to the report, be approved. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 26 June 2019 (Paragraph 5)] 
Following this item, the Provost advised that she had received a request for an Item of Urgent
Business and would deal with it at this point in the meeting 
5 Request in Terms of Standing Order No 4(c) for an Item of Urgent Business 
Following Councillor Cowan’s request for an urgent motion relating to the issues in Palestine and
Israel, the Provost advised that, while it made some points that many would agree with, at the last
Council meeting, a minute’s silence had been observed to show sympathy for the suffering in that
conflict.  She further advised that the position remained the same as before when Councillor
Cowan proposed a similar emergency motion at the last Council meeting.  She considered that
the resolution of international conflict was not a matter for political debate in this chamber and
there was plenty of business to be dealt with on behalf of the constituents of South Lanarkshire. 
She considered that elected members could write to their own political party leaders to express
their own opinions in this regard.  She ruled, therefore, that she was not going to allow the
emergency motion or open up a political debate as she considered it was more appropriate for a
higher level of government. 
Councillor Cowan expressed her disappointment that the motion would not be heard following on
from the International Court of Justice’s ruling. 
The Provost advised that she did not consider there was a need for this motion to be brought
forward as urgent business as there had been ample opportunity to submit it in the normal manner
since the last Council meeting. 
The Provost responded to a point from Councillor Brown to confirm that motions in relation to
international matters could be considered and had been brought forward in the past, however, the
premise would be that the content of motions should have a direct influence on how the Council
operated in South Lanarkshire for the benefit of its people.  She considered that, prior to bringing
forward a motion, elected members might wish to consider the most appropriate tier of government
for it to be debated at a political level. 
The Head of Administration and Legal Services having clarified the terms of Standing Order Nos
4(c) and 20, the Provost ruled that any further questions on Standing Orders on Procedures could
be addressed directly to G McCann’s office after the meeting. 
The Council decided: to note the position. 
6 Composition of the Council and Membership Places 
A report dated 8 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted advising of the revised
political composition of the Council and proposed changes to memberships. 
Following the resignation of Councillor Horsham from the SNP Group, the political composition of
the Council had changed and the allocation of committee and forum places required to be
considered. 
While there was no statutory requirement, the Council endeavoured to reflect the overall political
balance in the membership of its committees, forums, Joint Boards and Outside Bodies insofar
as was reasonably practicable.  
8

Page 9

The political composition of Resource Committees, Planning Committee, Risk and Audit Scrutiny
Committee, Recruitment Committee and Planning Local Review Body remained unchanged, as
did most of the Forum memberships.  It was, therefore, proposed that those places previously
filled by Councillor Horsham be allocated to the SNP Group. 
There was now an equality in percentage entitlement for both the Labour and SNP Groups which
did not equate to a full number and required to be rounded up or down in terms of appointments
to:- 
 Executive Committee
 Climate Change and Sustainability Committee
 Licensing Committee
 Petitions Committee
 Equal Opportunities Forum
 Standards and Procedures Advisory Forum 
In the past, it had been custom and practice to grant any unfilled spaces on committees, forums
or boards to the Ruling Group.  However, there had never been a situation where the 2 largest
Groups had an equality of numbers/percentage entitlement. 
Following discussion, Councillor Fagan, seconded by Councillor Convery, moved that the
remaining vacant places be allocated to the Labour Group which would continue to engage with
smaller groups and the independent member in terms of filling those places. 
Councillor Ross, seconded by Councillor Shearer, moved as an amendment that the item be
deferred and remitted to the Standards and Procedures Advisory Forum for clarity going forward. 
Meanwhile, the Business Managers of the Labour and SNP Groups to decide on the allocation of
vacant places without precluding those who did not have a place at the present time. 
Councillor Allison, seconded by Councillor Hose, moved as a further amendment that the Labour
Group, as part of the Ruling Administration, be given the places subject to taking into consideration
Councillor Horsham’s position.   
Having heard Councillor Fagan’s clarification that it had always been the case that there was
engagement with the smaller groups and the independent member and his assurance that this
would continue, Councillor Allison, with the agreement of Councillor Hose, withdrew his
amendment. 
The Head of Administration and Legal Services clarified that a decision could be taken today by
a simple majority.  If members wished to consider a change in Standing Orders on Procedures,
then the opportunity would be given as part of the mid-term review of procedural documentation
which was scheduled to take place in 2024/2025, during which the Standards and Procedures
Advisory Forum would meet to consider matters. 
Prior to the vote, the Provost responded to Points of Order by Councillor Clark in terms of clarifying
her powers and duties as Chair. 
On a vote being taken using the electronic voting system, 31 members voted for the motion, 26
for the amendment and 2 abstained.  The motion was declared carried. 
The Council decided: 
(1) that the current political composition of the Council, as detailed in Appendix 1, be noted; 
(2) that Councillor Marrs replace Councillor Horsham on the Education Resources Committee,
with Councillor Horne filling the resulting place as a substitute member;  
9

Page 10

(3) that Councillor Marrs replace Councillor Horsham on the Education Appeals Committee; 
(4) that Councillor Anderson replace Councillor Horsham on the Social Work Resources
Committee, with Councillor Dewar filling the resulting place as a substitute member; 
(5) that Councillor Horne replace Councillor Horsham and Councillor Donnelly replace
Councillor Ferguson-Miller on the Planning Committee, with Councillor Ferguson-Miller
becoming a substitute member; 
(6) that Councillor Shearer replace Councillor Horsham on the Planning Local Review Body; 
(7) that Councillor Ferguson-Miller replace Councillor Horsham as a substitute member on the
Licensing Committee; 
(8) that Councillor Clark replace Councillor Horsham as a substitute member on the Rural Task
Force; 
(9) that Councillor McDougall replace Councillor Horsham as a Trustee on both the South
Lanarkshire Charitable Trust and the South Lanarkshire Educational Trust; 
(10) that Councillor Marrs replace Councillor Horsham on the South Lanarkshire Cycling
Partnership; 
(11) that Councillor Shearer replace Councillor Horsham as a substitute member on the
Standards and Procedures Advisory Forum; 
(12) that Councillor Ross replace Councillor Horsham on the Strathclyde Partnership for
Transport Board; 
(13) that the remaining vacant place on the following committees and forums be allocated to the
Labour Group which would continue to engage with smaller groups and the independent
member in terms of filling those places:- 
 Executive Committee
 Climate Change and Sustainability Committee
 Licensing Committee
 Petitions Committee
 Equal Opportunities Forum
 Standards and Procedures Advisory Forum 
(14) that authority be delegated to the Chief Executive, in consultation with the Leaders of the
relevant political groups, to finalise memberships of those bodies listed in Recommendation
(13), or any other outstanding places, on the basis approved by the Council. 
In terms of Standing Order No 14, the Provost adjourned the meeting during this item of business at
11.01am.  The meeting reconvened at 11.10am 
Councillor Lennon joined the meeting during this item of business  
10

Page 11

6 Notice of Motion – South Lanarkshire’s Nature Emergency 
In terms of Standing Order No 20, a motion proposed by Councillor Robb, seconded by Councillor
Clark, was submitted as follows:- 
“Council:- 
1) Notes the body of evidence which outlines the alarming extent of the global nature
and biodiversity crisis due to species extinction, climate breakdown, habitat loss,
pesticide use, pollution, invasive species and soil degradation. 
2) Recognises the inherent value of nature as an integral part of culture and society,
as well as its crucial importance for our health, wellbeing, and economy. 
3) Acknowledges the key role nature will play in meeting climate targets, and for
climate adaptation and resilience. 
Further, Council:- 
4) Welcomes the Edinburgh Declaration, signed by South Lanarkshire Council, which
recognised local authorities’ important role in delivering biodiversity and notes
there will be forthcoming statutory targets for public bodies to halt biodiversity loss
by 2030 and restore it by 2045. 
5) Acknowledges the progress made in South Lanarkshire, with the designation and
expansion of nature reserves and award of Nature Restoration Fund of £1million
to date. 
6) Recognises the role that the public have played and must play in the future to meet
biodiversity targets and notes the important role of the council’s Countryside and
Greenspace team who between 2011 and 2022 facilitated around £2m worth of
environmental volunteering. 
7) Notes the results of the 2022 Grounds Participatory Budgeting exercise where the
majority of respondents said they would like to see more areas developed for
wildflowers and pollinators. 
8) Congratulates young people in Holy Cross and Carluke High Schools for their work
on the Scottish Curriculum and Qualification Framework accredited Forestry and
Outdoor Learning Award (FOLA), preparing them for green economy jobs and
enhancing their employability skills. 
Therefore, Council agrees:- 
9) To declare a Nature Emergency recognising the current state of nature, its value
to society and the crucial role its recovery and restoration will play in ameliorating
climate breakdown. 
Further, Council requests reports to appropriate committees to:- 
10) Ensure Council strategies, Resource plans and initiatives align with the Scottish
Biodiversity Strategy and address any changes, data and capacity required to
develop and monitor action. 
11) Adopt a partnership approach at a landscape scale, maximising opportunities for
biodiversity improvement and external funding, and propose and support the link
between the South Lanarkshire Biodiversity Partnership and the South
Lanarkshire Community Planning Partnership being reinstated.  
11

Page 12

12) Highlight council action which would improve biodiversity, such as: ceasing the use
of peat and plastic grass in landscaping, reducing glyphosate use, planting only
pollinator friendly species and incorporating nest boxes and minimising light
pollution in the Residential Design Guide. 
13) Ensure the current and future workforce understands the importance of
biodiversity, how it impacts their role and how nature-connected organisations
improve staff wellbeing. This would also determine additional skills or knowledge
needed by the workforce, offer biodiversity training to all elected members, and
promote and support FOLA in more schools.   
14) Build on existing corporate communications highlighting changes that will be put
in place to improve biodiversity, why they are happening and what benefits they
will bring.” 
In moving her motion, Councillor Robb stated that she wished to raise awareness of the nature
emergency and, more importantly, to support more local action on it at the scale and pace the
emergency demanded.  She referred to the statistics and the anxiety felt by young people, which
highlighted that nature urgently required to be protected and restored.  In seconding the motion,
Councillor Clark considered that transformative action was needed to combat biodiversity loss
and environmental degradation. 
Councillor McGeever and Councillor Allison were heard in support of the motion but highlighted
the requirement for the Council to have appropriate funding and resources to continue its good
work in this area. 
The Council decided: that the terms of the motion be agreed and the Council
declare a nature emergency, recognising the current state
of nature, its value to society and the crucial role its recovery
and restoration would play in ameliorating climate
breakdown and, through reports to appropriate committees,
would:- 
 ensure Council strategies, Resource plans and
initiatives aligned with the Scottish Biodiversity
Strategy and addressed any changes, data and
capacity required to develop and monitor action
 adopt a partnership approach at a landscape scale,
maximising opportunities for biodiversity improvement
and external funding, and proposed and supported the
link between the South Lanarkshire Biodiversity
Partnership and the South Lanarkshire Community
Planning Partnership being reinstated
 highlight Council action which would improve
biodiversity, such as ceasing the use of peat and
plastic grass in landscaping, reducing glyphosate use,
planting only pollinator friendly species and
incorporating nest boxes and minimising light pollution
in the Residential Design Guide
 ensure the current and future workforce understood
the importance of biodiversity, how it impacted their
role and how nature-connected organisations
improved staff wellbeing.  This would also determine
additional skills or knowledge needed by the
workforce, offer biodiversity training to all elected
members, and promote and support FOLA in more
schools 
12

Page 13

 build on existing corporate communication highlighting
changes that would be put in place to improve
biodiversity, why they were happening and what
benefits they would bring 
Councillor Lennon left the meeting during this item of business 
7 Touch a Life, Make a Difference Initiative 
A report dated 17 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted proposing the launch of a
“Touch a Life, Make a Difference” initiative within South Lanarkshire. 
The Provost had suggested that a new approach be taken within the Council to encourage local
businesses, groups, organisations and schoolchildren to fundraise for local good causes which
would benefit people within their communities or within the wider South Lanarkshire Council area
and the “Touch a Life, Make a Difference” initiative was developed to facilitate this.  Each year,
one beneficiary would be recommended as the recipient of fundraising activities, although
individuals, groups etc would be free to choose their own good cause.  Kilbryde Hospice had been
suggested as the beneficiary in 2024. 
It was proposed that a South Lanarkshire Council Roll of Honour for Local Fundraising and
Provost Charitable Award be established to recognise the hard work of local fundraisers.  Ward
councillors would be invited to submit names of individuals, groups etc for inclusion in the Roll of
Honour and to be recipients of the Provost Charitable Award.  To honour those included in the
Roll of Honour, it was proposed that a civic reception be held at the end of the calendar year. 
The Head of Administration and Legal Services responded to members’ questions on various
aspects of the report. 
Following discussion, Councillor Fagan, seconded by Councillor Convery, moved the
recommendations in the report.  Councillor Ross, seconded by Councillor Johnston-Dempsey,
moved as an amendment that it be deferred for further background information and remitted for
consideration at a future date. 
On a vote being taken using the electronic voting system, 32 members voted for the motion and
26 for the amendment.  The motion was declared carried.   
The Council decided: 
(1) that the launch of the “Touch a Life, Make a Difference” initiative to encourage local
organisations, community groups, local people and schoolchildren to raise money for good
causes within their own and the wider South Lanarkshire area for the benefit of people be
approved; 
(2) that it be approved that Kilbryde Hospice be promoted as the beneficiary of fundraising
initiatives in 2024; and 
(3) that a Provost Charitable Award and South Lanarkshire Council Roll of Honour for Local
Fundraising be established to honour local fundraisers. 
Councillor Keatt joined the meeting during this item of business 
The Provost, having declared an interest in the above item and following item, left the meeting during
their consideration.  The Depute Provost took the Chair for those items only  
13

Page 14

8 Recommendation Referred by Executive Committee – Reduction in Number of
Specialist Palliative Care Beds at Kilbryde Hospice 
A report dated 17 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted on the recommendation
which had been referred to the Council by the Executive Committee of 22 November 2023 in
relation to the reduction in the number of specialist palliative care beds at Kilbryde Hospice.   
Following on from the Executive Committee, a response had been received to the Chief
Executive’s letter from the Minister for Public Health and Women’s Health, as outlined in
paragraph 4.1 of the report.  A members’ briefing session, led by NHS Lanarkshire, on End of Life
Care and Support had been held on Friday 19 January 2024. 
The recommendation from the Executive Committee of 22 November 2023 was that the update
in relation to Kilbryde Hospice be noted. 
The Council decided: that the recommendation of the Executive Committee of 22
November 2023 in relation to Kilbryde Hospice be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of the Executive Committee of 22 November 2023 (Paragraph 5)] 
Councillor Logan, having declared an interest in the above item, withdrew from the meeting during its
consideration 
9 External Auditor’s Annual Report to South Lanarkshire Council 
A report dated 12 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted on the External Auditor’s,
Audit Scotland, Annual Report to the Council for 2022/2023. 
In response to Councillor Kerr’s question in terms of members’ training and development, as
outlined within the Action Plan attached to the Auditor’s report, the Chief Executive advised that it
was proposed that Personnel Services undertake a Training Needs Analysis with elected
members in February 2024 to get feedback to help inform the 2024/2025 members’ training plan. 
This would include a range of levels of training to suit members, including finance, with the
involvement of the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). 
The Council decided: that the External Auditor’s Annual Report 2022/2023 to the
Council be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of the Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee of 31 October 2023 (Paragraph
4a)] 
Provost’s Closing Remarks
The Provost advised that at future Council meetings she intended to stick rigidly to the time limits set
out in Standing Orders on Procedures in order to expedite business.  At the Provost’s invite, the Head
of Administration and Legal Services reminded members of the contents of Standing Order No 16, in
terms of the length of speeches, and Standing Order No 12 which set out the powers and duties of
the Provost. 
The Head of Administration and Legal Services responded to a member’s question to clarify the
Provost’s powers and duties. 
14

Page 15

SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL 
Minutes of the special meeting held via Confero and in the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada
Street, Hamilton on 21 February 2024 
Chair:
Provost Margaret Cooper 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor John Anderson, Councillor Ralph Barker, Councillor John Bradley,
Councillor Walter Brogan, Councillor Robert Brown, Councillor Archie Buchanan, Councillor Mathew
Buchanan, Councillor Janine Calikes, Councillor Andy Carmichael, Councillor Maureen Chalmers,
Councillor Ross Clark, Councillor Gerry Convery, Councillor Poppy Corbett, Councillor Andrea
Cowan, Councillor Margaret Cowie, Councillor Maureen Devlin, Councillor Colin Dewar, Councillor
Mary Donnelly, Councillor Joe Fagan, Councillor Allan Falconer, Councillor Grant Ferguson,
Councillor Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Councillor Elise Frame, Councillor Alistair Fulton, Councillor Ross
Gowland, Councillor Geri Gray, Councillor Lynsey Hamilton, Councillor Celine Handibode, Councillor
Graeme Horne, Councillor Mark Horsham, Councillor Martin Hose, Councillor Cal Johnston-
Dempsey, Councillor Gavin Keatt, Councillor Susan Kerr, Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Martin
Lennon, Councillor Richard Lockhart, Councillor Eileen Logan, Councillor Katy Loudon, Councillor
Hugh Macdonald, Councillor Julia Marrs, Councillor Ian McAllan, Councillor Catherine McClymont,
Councillor Kenny McCreary, Councillor Lesley McDonald, Councillor Elaine McDougall, Councillor
Mark McGeever, Councillor Davie McLachlan, Councillor Richard Nelson, Councillor Carol Nugent,
Councillor Norman Rae, Councillor Mo Razzaq, Councillor Kirsten Robb, Councillor John Ross,
Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor David Shearer, Councillor Bert Thomson (Depute), Councillor
Helen Toner, Councillor Margaret B Walker Councillor David Watson, Councillor Kirsty Williams 
Councillor’s Apology:
Councillor Monique McAdams 
Chief Executive’s Service
P Manning, Chief Executive
Community and Enterprise Resources
D Booth, Executive Director
Education Resources
C McKenzie, Executive Director
Finance and Corporate Resources
N Docherty, Administration Assistant; G McCann, Head of Administration and Legal Services; T
Slater, Administration Adviser; S Somerville, Administration Manager; J Taylor, Head of Finance
(Strategy)
Housing and Technical Resources
S Gibson, Executive Director
Social Work Resources/Health and Social Care
S Sengupta, Director, Health and Social Care 
Provost’s Opening Remarks
The Provost referred to the recent Burns Supper and wished to record her personal thanks to
colleagues and officers for their support. 
Councillor Nelson gave his thanks to the Provost for organising the event and for the amount raised
for Kilbryde Hospice. 
The Provost confirmed that the amount raised for the Hospice was nearing £40,000 and fundraising
would continue throughout the year following on from the Council’s agreement to it being the selected
charity for the Touch a Life, Make a Difference Initiative. 
3
15

Page 16

1 Sederunt and Declaration of Interests 
Prior to inviting declaration of interests, the Head of Administration and Legal Services, as
Monitoring Officer, reminded elected members of restrictions on voting in setting the level of
Council Tax in the event that any member present was in arrears with payment of Council Tax
which had remained unpaid for at least 2 months or had outstanding bills for Community
Charge/Poll Tax.  Any person who failed to comply would be guilty of an offence. 
The following members made transparency statements, however, having taken account of the
recent updated guidance issued by the Standards Commission for Scotland on participating in
budget decision-making, did not consider that they met the criteria for declaring an interest :- 
 Councillor McClymont stated that she was the Council’s appointed representative to the
Clydesdale Citizens’ Advice Bureau and attended meetings of the Cargill House Club as a
local member.  Both groups were listed for potential savings at Item 2, Appendix 1 (d) of the
report
 Councillor Logan stated that, in a personal capacity, she was Secretary of Carluke Gala Day
Committee.  Savings reference CER16 at Item 2 referred to support for gala days
 Councillor Brown stated that he was a Director of Clyde Gateway, as appointed by the
Council – referenced within the savings at Item 2
 Councillor Cowie stated that she was a Director of Clyde Gateway, was Chair of Fernhill
Playscheme and Vice Chair of Rutherglen Landemer Committee – referenced within the
savings at Item 2 
The following interest was declared:- 
Councillor(s) Item(s) Nature of Interest(s) 
Robb  Overall Position of Revenue Budget and
Level of Local Taxation for 2024/2025 –
CER03 and EDR02
 Volunteer at
Calderglen Country
Park
 Friend employed as
a school technician 
At this point in the meeting, the Provost referred to the forthcoming retirement of G McCann as Head
of Administration and Legal Services.  Ms McCann had delayed her original retirement date to allow
time for her successor to be in post.  The Provost, on behalf of the Council, thanked her for all her
hard work and advice over the years and wished her a long and happy retirement.  Councillors Ross,
Fagan, Brown and Allison spoke, in turn, to thank Ms McCann for her support and counsel 
The Provost then congratulated S Sengupta in his role as Acting Depute Chief Executive 
2 Overall Position of Revenue Budget and Level of Local Taxation for 2024/2025 
A report dated 9 February 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted on:- 
 the 2024/2025 budget position, following the Local Government Settlement for 2024/2025
 updated savings proposals and the proposed Council Tax level for 2024/2025
 the proposed Revenue Budget for 2024/2025, including the base budget allocations to
Resources 
At the Executive Committee on 24 January 2024, an update to the Budget Strategy was presented
which resulted in a Budget Gap of £20.570 million.  This position assumed no increase in Council
Tax and was based on the Local Government Settlement received in December 2023.  
16

Page 17

The 2024/2025 Finance Order had not yet been approved, therefore, further changes might arise
and members would be notified of the final settlement value as appropriate.  It was also highlighted
that the UK Spring Budget was set for 6 March 2024 and there was a risk that this could affect the
Scottish Government/Scottish Public Sector Budgets should there be fundamental changes from
those agreed in the Scottish Budget. 
The Council’s proposed Revenue Budget for 2024/2025 included a budget for Social Work
Resources.  This included budget for the delegated services of the Integration Joint Board (IJB)
(Adults and Older People) as well as non-delegated services such as Children and Families. 
As previously advised, the recent actuarial valuation of Strathclyde Pension Fund had meant that
the level of Employer Pension Contributions would be reduced into 2024/2025.  This meant that
the IJB would not incur the same level of costs in 2024/2025.  The total Social Work Resources
Budget for 2024/2025 would remain the same, however, funds released as a result of the reduced
pension contributions for the IJB in 2024/2025 could be used to contribute towards continued
pressures in Children and Families. 
Options to eliminate the Budget Gap of £20.570 million were outlined in Section 5 of the report. 
An updated package of savings proposals was attached as Appendix 1 to the report.  This included
a proposed reduction of £1.000 million in the Management Fee paid by the Council in 2024/2025
to South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture (SLLC).  The package of savings also included 2
proposals that impacted on teacher numbers – EDR10 and EDR12.  The Council had received
notification that the allocation of funding for teacher numbers of £145.5 million for 2024/2025
would be distributed via Specific Resource Grants and those grants would be conditional on
councils agreeing at the outset to maintain teacher numbers. 
A national allocation of £144 million had been advised for a Council Tax Freeze, the Council’s
indicative share being £7.869 million.  This was not included in the Local Government Settlement
received in December 2023.  Any allocation of those monies to the Council would be conditional
on the Council approving a Council Tax Freeze.  In arriving at the Budget Gap, no account had
been taken of any increase in Council Tax nor of any Scottish Government Funding for a Council
Tax Freeze. 
At the Executive Committee on 24 January 2024, approval was given to transfer £6.000 million to
reserves which presented an option to assist with the Council’s Budget Strategy.  Appendix 2
illustrated the budget gap over the next 4 years.  As this funding was one-off, it could not be used
to replace the need for permanent savings, however, it might help in phasing in the delivery of
agreed savings or delay the need to make savings for a period of time.  It was considered that
those reserves be used as a contingency should cost pressures, specifically pay, be higher than
anticipated in the Budget Strategy.   
Councillor Fagan, seconded by Councillor Brown, proposed the following amendment, which had
been agreed by those political/independent groups which had participated in the cross-party
Budget Working Group:-   
“As an amendment to Item 2 ‘Overall Position of Revenue Budget and Level of Local
Taxation for 2024/2025’, the Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s): 
(1) that the Budget Gap of £20.570 million (section 4.1), be noted; 
(2) that the assumptions detailed at paragraph 7.2, used to arrive at the Budget
presented in section 7, be noted; 
(3) that the amount of savings, the level of Council Tax, investments and the
Use of Reserves to be used to balance the 2024/2025 Budget as detailed in
this amendment be agreed;
(4) that the budget figures detailed at section 7 (based on the assumptions in section
7.2 and 7.3) are to be updated following agreement of the Budget, be noted;  
17

Page 18

(5) that the potential impact of savings beyond 2024/2025 (section 9), be noted; and 
(6) that the Revenue Budget for 2024/2025, including the base budget allocations to
Resources, as shown in Appendix 3, be approved, subject to Members’ decision
on recommendation 3. 
Savings agreed: 
It is proposed that the savings outlined below totalling £13.190 million be agreed.  
Saving Ref. Description Value
£m
M&O01 Overtime 0.300
M&O02 Charging Increase at 3% - revised to
6%
0.400
M&O03 Alternative Working Patterns 0.075
M&O04 Mechanical Sweeping – Large 0.150
M&O05 Central Administration Support 0.375
M&O06 Early Administration Support 2.150
M&O07 Additional Income from Statutory
Additions
0.050
CER01 Waste 0.460
CER02 School Crossing Patrols 0.010
CER03 Countryside and Greenspace 0.120
CER04 Roads Spend –£480k reinvested in
loans fund through investments to
create £7.2 million capital investment in
roads
1.800
CER07 Food Waste Liners 0.100
CER08 Secondary Meals Price Increase 0.177
CER10 Business Support Programmes 0.070
CER11 Leisure and Culture – revised saving 0.750
CER14 Winter Shrub Beds 0.700
CER15 Bedding and Hanging Baskets – revised
saving to protect services to war
memorials
0.124
EDR01 Librarians 0.240
EDR02 Secondary School Technicians 0.590
EDR03 Period Poverty 0.080
EDR04 ELC Quality Support and Service
Delivery
0.300
EDR05 Delivery of the Curriculum, Quality and
Improvement Service (CQIS)
0.350
EDR06 Early Learning and Childcare Food
Provision
0.150
EDR07 Remove SLC Summer Programme
Provision
0.143
EDR08 Mentoring and Learner Journey 0.380
EDR09 Payments to Regen:fx 0.115
FCR01 Community Grants, Civic Events and
Gifts – revised saving to protect Civic
Hospitality and Community /
Playscheme Grants
0.270
FCR02 Council Tax and Benefits Call Centre 0.096
FCR03 Community Engagement – revised
saving
0.215
FCR04 Payment to Regen:fx 0.200
18

Page 19

Saving Ref. Description Value
£m
HTR01 Community Safety Budget 0.046
HTR02 Housing Strategy Service 0.113
HTR03 CCTV 0.039
HTR04 Scheme of Assistance (Housing) 1.052 
SWR01 Reduce the Subsidy of the In-House
Residential Care Home Service
0.790
SWR02 Increase the Taper for Non-Residential
Care Services from 60% to 70%
0.147
SWR03 Reduce the subsidy of the In-House
Day Service
0.020
SWR04 Introduce a New Charge for the
Installation of Key Safes
0.043
Total  13.190 
Council Tax Increase: - It is proposed that the Council Tax is frozen.   
Investments:  It is proposed that the following investments be agreed : 
Investment  Description  Value 
Roads Investment –
Revenue for Capital
Borrowing 
£0.480 of permanent budget will
be used to fund borrowing of £7.2
million of capital roads
investment. 
Capital investment funded
through revenue spending on a
recurring basis. 
£0.480 
Transitional Funding
for Regen:fx 
Transitional funding for Regen:fx
will be provided to maintain
current funding levels for the
coming year. A review of
Regen:fx will be conducted
during this period. 
Funded on a one-off basis
through use of reserves. 
£0.315
Community
Fightback Fund 
£800,000 will be used to enhance
existing budget of £200,000 for
transitional funding for South
Lanarkshire Council’s leisure and
culture assets. This will create a
£1 million Community
Fightback Fund. 
The Community Fightback Fund
will be a council-controlled fund
that keeps open community
facilities considered by SLLC for
rationalisation where there has
been credible interest in
Community Asset Transfer, CAT-
lite or a similar agreement. 
Funded on a one-off basis
through use of reserves.
£0.800
19

Page 20

Investment  Description  Value 
Transitional Funding
for Voluntary
Organisations
To assist community groups and
causes, £270,000 will be used for
transitional funding to delay
implementation of the revised
FCR01 saving until 2025. 
Funded on a one-off basis
through use of reserves. 
£0.270
Future Libraries
Fund
Additional revenue support of
£150,000 will be made available
over more than one financial year
to fund alternative library
provision models for those areas
affected by SLLC library
rationalisation. 
Funded on a one-off basis
through use of reserves. 
£0.150
Net Zero Innovation
Fund 
£150,000 will be used to develop
‘spend to save’ and sustainable
income generation options for
South Lanarkshire Council over
more than one financial year.
These options will reflect the
Council’s ambition to transition to
net zero. 
Funded on a one-off basis
through use of reserves.   
£0.150
Central Energy
Efficiency Fund 
£500,000 will be invested in the
form of an additional contribution
to the Central Energy Efficiency
Fund over more than one
financial year. 
Funded on a one-off basis
through use of reserves. 
£0.500
Total  £2.665 
20

Page 21

Appendix – Balanced Budget Reconciliation 
Budget Gap from 
Officers’ Report 
(Section 5.1) 
£20.570m
Agreed Savings:  
M&O01 0.300 
M&O02 0.400 
M&O03 0.075 
M&O04 0.150 
M&O05 0.375 
M&O06 2.150 
M&O07 0.050 
CER01 0.460 
CER02 0.010 
CER03 0.120 
CER04 1.800 
CER07 0.100 
CER08 0.177 
CER10 0.070 
CER11 0.750 
CER14 0.700 
CER15 0.124 
EDR01 0.240 
EDR02 0.590 
EDR03 0.080 
EDR04 0.300 
EDR05 0.350 
EDR06 0.150 
EDR07 0.143 
EDR08 0.380 
EDR09 0.115 
FCR01 0.270 
FCR02 0.096 
FCR03 0.215 
FCR04 0.200 
HTR01 0.046 
HTR02 0.113 
HTR03 0.039 
HTR04 1.052 
SWR01 0.790 
SWR02 0.147 
SWR03 0.020 
SWR04 0.043 
Total Savings (A) £13.190m 
Proposed Council Tax Increase  -
Freeze  - if council tax freeze then
£7.869m will be received in grant 
£7.869m 
= Total Savings and Increase
from Council Tax  £21.059m 
Balance After Savings and
Council Tax
(Budget Gap) / Investment
Opportunity 
£0.489m
Further Investment Proposed:  
Permanent Budget required for
Loans fund for Roads investment 
£0.480 
21

Page 22

Transitional Funding for Regen:fx   £0.315
Community Fightback Fund   £0.800
Transitional Funding for Voluntary
Organisations 
£0.270
Future Libraries Project  £0.150
Net Zero Innovation Fund   £0.150
Central Energy Efficiency Fund  £0.500   
Total Further Investment
Proposed (B) 
(£2.665m)   
Add:  Use of Reserves Proposed
(C)
Using some of the £6 million set
aside at Probable Outturn.  The
balance of reserves will be used
as a contingency in the event of
more funds being required for
pay award. 
Use  £500k EY clothing grants
reserves money not needed 
£1.676m 
£0.500m   
Budget Gap – should be zero  £0 
Restatement of Net Expenditure Figure (report section 7.4)
Net Expenditure Figure within Revenue Budget Paper 
(sections 7.4 and associated appendices)
£956.076m
Add Back Assumed Level of Savings in Budget Paper
(section 7.2)
£12.701m
Adjusted Net Expenditure Figure (before savings) £968.777m
Deduct: Actual Savings Taken from Table above (A)  £13.190m
Add: Any Further Investment Proposed (from Table
above (B)) 
£2.665m 
Revised Net Expenditure figure for Revenue Budget (D) £958.252m 
Restatement of Net Sum Funded by Council Tax (Table 2, report section 7.5)
Revised Net Expenditure Figure for Revenue Budget for
2024/2025 
(from Table above (D))
£958.252m
Deduct: Government Grant  £750.533m
Deduct: Use of Reserves / Underspends in the Budget
Strategy
(£47.500m plus C from Table above)
£49.676m
= Resultant Net Sum to be Funded Locally from Council
Tax 
£158.043m 
At the invite of the Provost, the Leader of the Council spoke on his proposals.  He wished to thank
the Budget Working Group and officials who had supported the budget process.  He referred to
COSLA’s counter proposal to the Scottish Government which he considered would have led to
the Council not having to face the significant Budget Gap of £20.7 million, meaning no cuts to jobs
or services.  He advised that the Working Group had chosen to freeze Council Tax, not because
it was the best outcome but the best in terms of options available.  He confirmed that there was
still a requirement to make approximately £13 million in savings and, for the most part, that would
mean cuts to balance the budget.  He said a number of the options that were being accepted
could be mitigated or would have a limited impact, while some would have consequences, but he
considered the Council did not have the resources to avoid those consequences.  He advised that
some options were only accepted partially or the introduction of savings had been deferred, while
some had been rejected entirely. 
22

Page 23

He advised that £0.480 million had been identified to fund £7.2 million of capital investment in
roads to offset the impact of revenue budget cuts through borrowing.  He referred to the challenges
in balancing the budget and the difficulties still faced, such as meeting low carbon ambitions, and
wished to recognise the work of the Climate Change and Sustainability Committee.  He advised
that it was proposed that a £0.150 million Net Zero Innovation Fund be established and a cash
injection to the Central Energy Efficiency Fund of £0.5 million.  He stated SLLC could not be
protected from the challenges facing the Council but the Council would intervene where it could,
therefore, the original savings required from SLLC had been halved to £0.750 million.  He advised
of 2 new funds that would help transition to a new operating model and mitigate the impact on the
community.  Those were a Future Libraries Fund, totalling £0.150 million, and a Community
Fightback Fund, totalling £1 million, which would act as a transition fund to help sustain assets
under new community operators.   
In seconding the proposals, Councillor Brown considered the motion was set against the worse
financial economic background he could recall.  Therefore, the core principles in approach were:- 
 to get as much as possible from efficiencies and charging policies to reduce the pressure on
services
 to fund spend to save projects which would reduce core revenue bills and contribute to
tackling climate change
 to sustain education and community care services as well as increase the voluntary capacity
of organisations   
The Provost advised that she was going to make a statement, not in her role as Provost, but as
Leader of the Independent Group.  As Chair of the Budget Working Group, she highlighted its aim
had always been to find consensus and put party politics aside to identify the best solutions for
the residents of South Lanarkshire and expressed her regret that not all political groups had
participated.  She advised that this was the most difficult budget period to date after years of
under-funding.  She wanted to thank officers across the Council for bringing forward options,
however, emphasised it was for members to decide on how to balance the Council’s budget.  She
considered that the amendment presented by the Leader would protect frontline services across
the Council and would:- 
 avoid cuts in schools that would impact on teacher numbers
 maintain the number of cuts and weedkiller applications that were needed to keep
communities tidy
 avoid introducing parking charges at Chatelherault, the James Hamilton Heritage Park,
Calderglen and Tinto
 maintain and improve roads for future years
 enable work with communities to find new futures for buildings such as halls and libraries
 enable continued support to voluntary groups while assisting them to find long-term funding
solutions 
Councillor Allison concurred that this was the most difficult budget process and, while not part of
the Administration, he advised that his Group had always worked with the Administration to try to
get the best deal for constituents.  He referred to the requirement to save in excess of £90 million
over the next 4 years.  He considered that while reserves could be used, this would make the
situation worse in the future.  He advised that his Group’s priorities were Education, the roads
budget and the Leisure Trust.  He said he fully agreed with 92% of those who had responded to
the consultation that the roads budget should not be cut, although how that could be funded had
presented challenges and his Group had reluctantly accepted that the Council had no alternative
but to borrow £7.2 million which would be paid back over a 40 year period at a total cost of £19.2
million. 
23

Page 24

Councillor Nelson was then heard and wished to thank members of the Budget Working Group
and officers, in particular the Chief Executive and the Head of Finance (Strategy), for their
assistance to the Working Group.  He referred to the difficult financial challenges and recognised
the complexities of achieving a balanced budget.   
The Provost clarified that Councillor Fagan’s amendment would be considered as the motion as
no-one had moved the officer’s recommendations.  She then invited Councillor Ross to speak to
his amendment. 
Councillor Ross, seconded by Councillor Chalmers, moved the following:- 
“As an amendment to Item 2 ‘Overall Position of Revenue Budget and Level of Local
Taxation for 2024/2025’, the Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s): 
(1) that the Budget Gap of £20.570 million (section 4.1), be noted; 
(2) that the assumptions detailed at paragraph 7.2, used to arrive at the Budget
presented in section 7, be noted; 
(3) that the amount of savings, the level of Council Tax and the Use of Reserves to
be used to balance the 2024/2025 Budget (detailed in section 6), are agreed as
follows;
(4) that the budget figures detailed at section 7 (based on the assumptions in section
7.2 and 7.3) are to be updated following agreement of the Budget, be noted; 
(5) that the potential impact of savings beyond 2024/2025 (section 9), be noted; and 
(6) that the Revenue Budget for 2024/2025, including the base budget allocations to
Resources, as shown in Appendix 3, be approved, subject to Members’ decision
on recommendation 3. 
Savings agreed: £7.306m 
It is proposed that the savings outlined below totalling £7.306m million be agreed. 
In accepting the following savings, the SNP Group has sought to minimise the harmful
effects of service reduction, protect communities where possible from the Cost-of-Living
Crisis and reflect the views of as many of our residents as possible. 
Saving Ref.  Description  Value 
£m 
CER01  Bulky Waste – Remove Free
Bulk Uplift 
£0.460m 
CER05  Christmas Events  £0.045m 
CER07  Food Waste Liners  £0.100m 
CER12  Grass Cutting  £0.900m 
CER13  Weedkilling  £0.550m 
CER14  Winter Shrub Cover  £0.700m 
CER15  Hanging Baskets  £0.144m 
CER16  Gala Day Support  £0.055m 
HTR04  Scheme Assisted Housing  £1.052m 
M&O 01  Overtime  £0.300m 
M&O 02  Charging  £0.200m 
M&O 03  Alternative Work Patterns  £0.075m 
M&O 04  Mechanical Sweeping  £0.150m 
M&O 05  Central Admin Support  £0.375m 
M&O 06  Early Learning  £2.150m 
M&O 07  Additional Income  £0.050m 
TOTAL  £7.306m 
24

Page 25

Council Tax Increase: CT Freeze - £7.869m 
We welcome the Scottish Governments Council Tax Freeze and note that South
Lanarkshire’s funding allocation exceeds the amount which would have raised if the
council had increased Council Tax by 5%. This freeze will be welcomed by many
households who feared an even higher increase than the 5.5% imposed by this council
last year, adding additional pressures during a cost-of-living crisis. 
The Scottish Government has baselined the council tax freeze funding so the Council
can include in the budget strategy for 2025/2026 and beyond. 
Investments: £605k 
Leisure and Culture provides so many benefits to our communities promoting individual
and community wellbeing, tackling inequalities, and providing safe inclusive spaces for
community led activities, informal learning, community development, sport and cultural
activities. The work they do is central to delivery of the Community Plan and the Child
Poverty Action Plan. 
Residents’ responses to surveys provide a clear steer to elected members. SLLC services
such as libraries, sports centres, swimming pools and community halls are highly valued.
So, instead of reducing our funding to SLLC we propose to protect services with an
increase of £0.605m in 2024-25. 
Use of £6.000m uncommitted Funds 
In order to protect front line jobs and services, we propose using all the funding available
to us in setting out our budget. This includes using the £6m probable outturn underspend
as set out in the Executive Committee Report on 24th January 2024, [Agenda Item 3
Recommendations 5] in 2024-25 rather than keeping in reserve for future years’ budget
strategies. 
In doing so we note the SG decision to baseline the council tax funding of £7.869m and
also the potential Barnett Consequential from additional UKG funding dependent on the
outcome of the Spring Statement. 
Appendix – Balanced Budget Reconciliation 
Budget Gap from 
Officers’ Report 
(Section 5.1) 
£20.570m
Agreed Savings:     
Total Savings (A) £7.306m £7.306m 
Proposed Council Tax Increase 0%  £7.869m  £7.869m 
= Total Savings and Increase from Council Tax   £15.175m
Balance After Savings and Council Tax
(Budget Gap) / Investment Opportunity   £5.395m   
Further Investment Proposed:  
SLLC £0.605m £0.605m   
Total Further Investment Proposed (B)  (£0.605m)   
25

Page 26

Add: Use of Reserves Proposed (C)
£6m Probable Outturn Underspend 
£ 6.000m   
Budget Gap – should be zero  £0.000m 
Restatement of Net Expenditure Figure (report section 7.4) 
Net Expenditure Figure within Revenue Budget Paper (sections 7.4
and associated appendices)
£956.076m
Add Back Assumed Level of Savings in Budget Paper (section 7.2) £12.701m
Adjusted Net Expenditure Figure (before savings) £968.777m
Deduct: Actual Savings Taken from Table above (A) (£7.306m)
Add: Any Further Investment Proposed (from Table above (B)) £0.605m
Revised Net Expenditure figure for Revenue Budget (D) £962.076m 
Restatement of Net Sum Funded by Council Tax (Table 2, report section 7.5) 
Revised Net Expenditure Figure for Revenue Budget for 2024/2025
(from Table above (D))
£962.076m
Deduct: Government Grant £750.533m
Deduct: Use of Reserves / Underspends in the Budget Strategy
(£47.500m plus C from Table above)
£53.500m
= Resultant Net Sum to be Funded Locally from Council Tax £158.043m 
In moving his amendment, Councillor Ross advised that, to protect frontline jobs and services, his
Group had used all money available in setting the budget and this included the £6 million probable
outturn underspend, as set out in the Executive Committee report of 24 January 2024, rather than
keeping it in reserves.  He wished to thank the Corporate Management Team in bringing forward
saving proposals and to the Finance team for ensuring the proposals were competent.  From
savings proposals of £18 million, only £7 million had been taken.  Those included management
efficiencies and the least harmful Resource saving proposals, while protecting all of the areas that
raised concerns in the budget survey.  He considered his budget amendment was balanced,
measured, took cognisance of the views expressed by South Lanarkshire residents and was
targeted at those families and communities in most need of the Council’s help. 
Councillor Chalmers, in seconding the amendment, said her Group had attended many
community meetings and had based their amendment on what was heard.  She considered that
community empowerment needed relationship based engagement, trust and a partnership built
on mutual respect between elected members and the communities they represented.   
In response to Councillor Loudon’s Point of Order, the Provost advised that she was trying to be
equitable across the Chamber in allowing political debate.  In relation to a further Point of Order
by Councillor Clark in terms of people online not being able to raise their hands, the Provost
confirmed that those who wished to speak should press their ‘request to speak’ buttons. 
The Chief Executive, in response to a question from Councillor Watson, confirmed that both
amendments had been checked by the Head of Finance (Strategy) and were deemed competent. 
In response to a Point of Order from Councillor Ross following comments made by Councillor
Convery, the Provost ruled that Councillor Convery should go no further in reading from the
document.   
Following a further Point of Order raised by Councillor Chalmers regarding behaviour and
language, the Provost expressed her disappointment in the behaviour of some in the chamber in
terms of consistent, sometimes irrelevant, Points of Order being disruptive to the meeting so asked
that when making a Point of Order it be about a matter specific to the discussion at that particular
time.  
26

Page 27

Having heard the views of a number of councillors, on a vote being taken by roll call, members
voted as follows:-   
Motion 
Alex Allison, Ralph Barker, Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Mathew Buchanan, Andy Carmichael,
Gerry Convery, Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin, Joe Fagan,
Allan Falconer, Ross Gowland, Lynsey Hamilton, Celine Handibode, Mark Horsham, Martin Hose,
Gavin Keatt, Susan Kerr, Ross Lambie, Martin Lennon, Richard Lockhart, Eileen Logan,
Catherine McClymont, Kenny McCreary, Lesley McDonald, Mark McGeever, Davie McLachlan,
Richard Nelson, Norman Rae, Mo Razzaq, Graham Scott, Bert Thomson, Margaret B Walker,
David Watson, Kirsty Williams 
Amendment 
John Anderson, John Bradley, Janine Calikes, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Andrea Cowan,
Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly, Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Alistair
Fulton, Geri Gray, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Katy Loudon, Hugh Macdonald, Julia Marrs, Ian
McAllan, Elaine McDougall, Carol Nugent, John Ross, David Shearer, Helen Toner 
37 members voted for the motion and 23 for the amendment.  The motion was declared carried. 
The Council decided: 
(1) that the Budget Gap of £20.570 million be noted; 
(2) that the assumptions detailed at paragraph 7.2, used to arrive at the Budget presented in
section 7, be noted; 
(3) that the amount of savings, the level of Council Tax, investments and the Use of Reserves
to be used to balance the 2024/2025 Budget, as detailed in Councillor Fagan’s motion, be
agreed; 
(4) that it be noted that the budget figures detailed at section 7, based on the assumptions in
sections 7.2 and 7.3, would be updated to reflect the agreed Budget; 
(5) that the potential impact of savings beyond 2024/2025 be noted; and 
(6) that the Revenue Budget for 2024/2025, including the base budget allocations to Resources,
as shown in Appendix 3, be approved. 
[Reference:  Minutes of the Executive Committee of 24 January 2024 (Paragraph 8)] 
In terms of Standing Order No 14, the Provost adjourned the meeting during this item of business at
12.10pm to allow members time to read both amendments.  The meeting reconvened at 12.20pm.  A
second adjournment, for an eye break, commenced at 12.40pm and the meeting resumed at
12.50pm.  Following this item of business, a further adjournment commenced at 2.11pm and the
meeting reconvened at 2.52pm 
Councillors A Buchanan and Horne left the meeting during this item of business and prior to the vote 
Councillor Robb, having declared an interest in the above item, left the meeting during its
consideration  
27

Page 28

3 Recommendation Referred by Executive Committee – Housing Revenue and
Capital Account Budget for 2024/2025 
A report dated 21 February 2024 by the Chief Executive was tabled on recommendations referred
to the Council by the Executive Committee of 21 February 2024.  The recommendations were as
follows:- 
 Housing Revenue and Capital Account Budget 2024/2025
 that the rent increase of 6.50% to be applied in 2024/2025 with a further 6.50%
increase in 2025/2026 and again in 2026/2027 subject to annual review and customer
engagement for all Council houses, Gypsy/Traveller sites, lockups and garage sites
and the revenue estimate proposals for the Housing Revenue Account (HRA), as
detailed in Appendix 1 to the report to the Housing and Technical Resources
Committee, be approved
 that the findings of the HRA Loans Fund Review, as detailed in Section 4 of the report
to the Housing and Technical Resources Committee, be approved for implementation
 that based on the rent increase of 6.50%, the 2024/2025 Housing Capital Programme
of £77.303 million, as detailed in Appendix 2 to the report to the Housing and Technical
Resources Committee, be approved 
The Council decided: that the recommendations of the Executive Committee of 21
February 2024 in relation to the Housing Revenue and
Capital Account Budget 2024/2025 be approved. 
[Reference:  Minutes of the Executive Committee of 21 February 2024 (Paragraph 6) and Minutes
of the Housing and Technical Resources Committee of 7 February 2024 (Paragraph
8)] 
Councillor McGeever left the meeting during this item of business 
4 2024/2025 Capital Programme Update 
A report dated 30 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted on the proposed General
Services Capital Programme for 2024/2025, reflecting the spend requirements identified by
Resources and the availability of funding. 
The proposed Capital Programme for 2024/2025 had taken account of ongoing programmes of
work and priorities, commitments from the approved Glasgow City Region City Deal Programme,
as well as incorporating the programme moves and additions from financial year 2023/2024. 
Capital grant for 2024/2025 had seen a significant reduction of £1.9 million on the funding
available in financial year 2023/2024.  There had also been reductions in funding allocated to
partner organisations which impacted on Council projects. 
The level of funding available to support the programme was provided at Section 5 of the report,
with a detailed breakdown of funding sources included as Appendix 4 to the report. 
As part of the 2023/2024 Revenue Budget, an allocation of £1.182 million had been approved to
pay for the cost of borrowing £13 million of capital investment for a Leisure and Culture
Transformation Fund.  A process for identifying projects was being progressed and initial
proposals would be brought to the Executive Committee in May 2024 for approval. 
Funding of £11.900 million had previously been approved for the replacement of Larkhall Leisure
Centre.  As this funding would be insufficient to cover the anticipated cost of the project, it was
proposed that an additional £12 million be earmarked in future capital programmes to address the
estimated budget gap and allow the project to progress.  
28

Page 29

Details of the proposed 2024/2025 capital programme, totalling £49.512 million, were as follows:- 
£million
Ongoing programmes of work (paragraph 4.2 and Appendix 1) 18.200
New priority projects (paragraph 4.3) 1.500
Specific capital projects (paragraphs 4.4 and 4.5) 1.865
Glasgow City Region City Deal (paragraph 4.6) 4.747
Clyde Gateway (paragraph 4.7) 0.800
Leisure and Culture Transformation Fund (paragraphs 4.8 and 4.9) -
Larkhall Leisure Centre – additional (paragraphs 4.10 to 4.14) -
Projects approved in previous financial years (paragraphs 4.15 and 4.16) 6.827
Secondary school estate – capacity issues (paragraphs 4.17 and 4.18) -
2023/2024 movements (paragraph 4.19) 40.008
2024/2025 movements (paragraph 4.20) (23.390)
Reduction in match funding requirements (paragraphs 4.21 and 4.22) (1.045) 
The Chief Executive highlighted that Table 1, showing the compilation of the capital programme,
did not take account of:- 
 the £13 million for the Leisure and Culture Transformation Fund
 any additional money for Larkhall Leisure Centre
 any additional money in respect of secondary estate capacity issue
 the consequences in the capital programme of decisions that were taken earlier in the
meeting when setting the Council’s Revenue Budget which would direct more spend through
the capital programme.  Those would be added in and reported to committee in the new
financial year   
Bids for additional funding in 2024/2025 had been submitted to Strathclyde Partnership for
Transport (SPT) to progress the existing projects at Hairmyres Park and Ride and Lanark
Interchange.  SPT had advised that funding reductions to their 2024/2025 budget would have an
impact on the level of grant funding they could provide to local authorities.  As a result, this
expenditure had not been included in the 2024/2025 Capital Programme at this time.  An update
would be provided to members when the outcome of discussions with the Scottish Government
were known, however, it was noted that there was a risk to the projects if this funding was not
received.   
Local members were heard in support of the replacement of Larkhall Leisure Centre.   
The Chief Executive and Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) responded
to members’ comments and questions in respect of Larkhall Leisure Centre, Hairmyres Park and
Ride, Lanark Interchange and the bid to the Scottish Government’s Learning Estate Improvement
Programme (LEIP). 
The Council decided: 
(1) that the 2024/2025 Capital Programme totalling £49.512 million, as detailed in paragraph
4.23 and Appendix 3 of the report, be approved and augmented taking account of decisions
taken earlier as part of agreement of the Revenue Budget 2024/2025; and 
(2) that the funding for Larkhall Leisure Centre for the period to 2027/2028, as detailed in
paragraphs 4.10 to 4.14, be approved. 
Councillor Nelson left the meeting following this item of business  
29

Page 30

5 Prudential Indicators, Treasury Management Strategy and Annual Investment
Strategy 2024/2025 
A report dated 30 January 2024 by the Chief Executive was submitted on the:- 
 Prudential Code indicators for 2024/2025 to 2026/2027
 Council’s Treasury Management Strategy for 2024/2025
 Council’s Annual Investment Strategy for 2024/2025 
The Prudential Code for Capital Finance in Local Authorities was introduced through the Local
Government (Scotland) Act 2003 with the aim of supporting strategic planning for capital
investment at a local level. 
The key objectives of the Prudential Code were to ensure, within a clear framework, that:- 
 local authorities’ capital expenditure plans were affordable, prudent and sustainable 
 treasury management decisions were taken in accordance with good professional practice
and in full understanding of the risks involved and how those risks would be managed to
levels that were acceptable to the organisation 
The Prudential Indicators for 2024/2025 to 2026/2027 were shown in Appendix 2, together with
explanations for each indicator.  An updated position for 2023/2024 was also included. 
The Prudential Indicators included estimates of capital expenditure.  When considering potential
capital investment, the Council ensured that the objectives of capital investment were in line with
its strategic plans and informed through the asset management planning process. 
The Council’s treasury activities were regulated by statute and a professional code of practice. 
The Treasury Management Strategy for 2024/2025 was detailed at Appendix 3 to the report.  The
main areas covered by the Strategy were:- 
 debt and investment projections
 expected movement in interest rates
 borrowing strategies
 statutory repayment of loans fund advances 
The level of borrowing required to fund the Council’s Capital Programme, together with the
variable nature of interest rates, increased the risks associated with the treasury management
function.  The Council would, therefore, take a cautious approach to its Treasury Strategy by
setting treasury management indicators to contain the activity of the treasury function within
certain limits, thereby managing risk and reducing the impact of adverse movements in interest
rates. 
The Local Government Investments (Scotland) Regulations 2010 provided a formal investment
framework for councils.  The Regulations required an Annual Investment Strategy, detailing the
permitted investments to be approved by the Council. 
The Annual Investment Strategy for 2024/2025 was attached as Appendix 4 to the report. 
The Head of Finance (Strategy) highlighted the steps the Council had taken in terms of ensuring
its money was invested for positive change and did not fuel the climate and ecological crises, as
well as ways in which it could incorporate additional factors covering climate change and
sustainability into the creditworthiness assessment service. 
The Council decided: 
(1) that the Prudential Code indicators for 2024/2025 to 2026/2027 be approved;  
30

Page 31

(2) that the 2024/2025 Treasury Management Strategy be approved; and 
(3) that the Annual Investment Strategy be approved. 
Councillor Cowan left the meeting during this item of business 
6 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
31

Page 32

32

Page 33

RISK AND AUDIT SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 
Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street,
Hamilton on 31 October 2023 
Chair:
Councillor Elaine McDougall 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Colin Dewar (substitute for Councillor Mary Donnelly), Councillor Alistair Fulton,
Councillor Ross Gowland, Councillor Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Councillor Gavin Keatt (substitute for
Councillor Mathew Buchanan), Councillor Susan Kerr, Councillor Richard Lockhart 
Councillors' Apologies:
Councillor Mathew Buchanan, Councillor Mary Donnelly, Councillor Celine Handibode 
Councillor Also Present:
Councillor Joe Fagan (for items 4 and 5) 
Attending:
Chief Executive’s Service
C Sneddon, Chief Executive (for items 4 and 5)
Finance and Corporate Resources
P Manning, Executive Director; Y Douglas, Audit and Compliance Manager; S Dunsmore, Insurance
and Risk Adviser; E-A McGonigle, Administration Officer; A Norris, Administration Assistant; N Reid,
Research and Improvement Manager; J Taylor, Head of Finance (Strategy) 
Also Attending:
Audit Scotland
J Boyd and M Ferris, External Auditors
East Lothian Council
D Stainbank, Service Manager – Internal Audit 
1 Declaration of Interests 
No interests were declared. 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 
The minutes of the meeting of the Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee held on 22 August 2023
were submitted for approval as a correct record. 
The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record. 
3 Leadership of the Development of New Local Strategic Priorities: Best Value
Thematic Work in South Lanarkshire Council 2022/2023 
A report dated October 2023 by Audit Scotland, the Council’s external auditors was submitted
entitled South Lanarkshire Council Leadership of the Development of New Local Strategic
Priorities: Best Value Thematic Work in South Lanarkshire Council 2022/2023.
4
33

Page 34

The Accounts Commission had noted that councils were operating in a complex and
increasingly volatile, unprecedented and unpredictable environment.  Strong leadership from
councils was needed now more than ever, with new and returning councillors able and willing to
make difficult decisions about where and how to spend highly pressurised resources.   
This report concluded on the effectiveness of the Council’s leadership of the development of the
Council’s strategic priorities, following the local government elections in May 2022.  The
coverage of the work was in line with the expectations for the Council’s arrangements for the 7
Best Value themes in the Local Government in Scotland Act 2003: Best Value Statutory
Guidance. 
The Audit Director, Audit Scotland, highlighted the following sections of the report:- 
 key messages
 scope of the audit
 Council visions and priorities
 citizen and community engagement
 reducing inequalities and tackling climate change
 alignment of delivery plans
 leadership 
The report detailed the following audit recommendations:- 
 the Council should continue its work to embed its Fairer Scotland duties by completing and
referencing Fairer Scotland assessments in council papers, strategies and plans.  It should
also check that all assessments were listed online
 officers should continue to engage with elected members to support their training and
development requirements, including specific training to build confidence and allow
scrutiny 
An improvement action plan, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, set out those audit
recommendations, and the Council’s planned response which included responsible officers and
dates for implementation. 
Progress against Best Value improvement recommendations from the 2019 Best Value
Assurance Report (BVAR) was detailed at Appendix 2 to the report and those had now been
addressed. 
The Chair, on behalf of the Committee, thanked the Audit Scotland team for the comprehensive
work that had been undertaken to prepare the report. 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
4a External Auditors’ Annual Report to South Lanarkshire Council 2022/2023 
The following documents were submitted by Audit Scotland, the Council’s external auditors:- 
 letter and appendices relating to the 2022/2023 Annual Audit report on South Lanarkshire
Council 
 2022/2023 South Lanarkshire Council proposed Annual Audit report to members of the
Council and the Controller of Audit 
34

Page 35

The Audit Director, Audit Scotland, spoke on the Annual Audit report and highlighted the
following:- 
 the audit of the 2022/2023 Annual Accounts
 financial management
 financial sustainability
 best value
 vision, leadership and governance
 use of resources to improve outcomes
 key messages
 significant findings and key audit matters:-
 job evaluation: back pay for home carers
 pension ceiling asset 
 significant risks of material misstatement in the annual accounts identified during planning
of the audit:-
 risk of material misstatement due to fraud caused by management override of
controls
 estimation in the valuation of land and buildings
 2022/2023 action plan on recommendations for improvement
 summary of corrected misstatements 
One adjusted difference had not been included at the time of writing the proposed 2022/2023
Annual Audit report.  This was in relation to unfunded pension benefits, which were historic
pension obligations that were not offset through pension scheme assets.  This was included in
the Audited Annual Accounts 2022/2023 which had been presented to members and would be
reflected in the final version of the 2022/2023 Annual Audit report.  A verbal update was
provided on some further minor changes that would be included in the final version of the
Annual Audit report. 
The external auditors’ opinion on the Council’s Annual Accounts 2022/2023 and those of the 3
charities administered by the Council was unmodified, that is, the financial statements and
related reports were free from material misstatement.   
Due to the interaction of section 106 of the Local Government in Scotland Act 1973 with the
charities legislation, a separate independent auditor’s report was required for the statement of
accounts of each registered charity where members of the Council were sole trustees and this
was irrespective of the size of the charity.  The Council had made good progress in reducing or
removing the number of charitable trusts where it was the sole trustee. 
The Audit Director, Audit Scotland extended thanks to the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources), the Head of Finance (Strategy) and the wider team for their help and
support during the course of the audit. 
Officers responded to a member’s questions on various aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted.
35

Page 36

4b External Auditors’ Annual Report to South Lanarkshire Council 2022/2023:  South
Lanarkshire Council Charitable Trusts 
Summary letters, proposed independent auditor’s reports and letters of representation (ISA 580)
were submitted by Audit Scotland, the Council’s external auditors for:- 
 South Lanarkshire Council Educational Trust
 South Lanarkshire Council Charitable Trust
 East Kilbride Information Technology Centre Trust 
The Senior Auditor, Audit Scotland advised that there were no unadjusted misstatements to be
corrected for the 3 charities administered by the Council and an unqualified audit opinion was
expressed for all. 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
5 Audited Annual Accounts 2022/2023 
A report dated 12 October 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on the:- 
 Council’s Certified Annual Accounts and Charitable Trusts’ Accounts for 2022/2023, which
had received a clean audit certificate from the Council’s external auditors, Audit Scotland
 requirement to approve the Annual Accounts 2023/2023 for signature in terms of both the
Council’s accounts and related charitable trusts 
The accounts covered the Council as well as 3 Charitable Trusts managed by the Council,
namely South Lanarkshire Council Educational Trust, South Lanarkshire Council Charitable
Trust and the East Kilbride Information Technology Trust.  A clean audit certificate had been
received for each with no qualifications on the Council’s accounts.  An agreed action plan had
been included in the external auditor’s report and officers would work to ensure those were
implemented in 2022/2023. 
The Annual Accounts would be advertised as being available for public inspection on the
Council’s website and on request from Finance Services. 
The Chief Executive commended the professional approach and collaborative working from the
Audit Scotland team. There was cognisance of the current challenges of audit work around the
UK, particularly around timescales.  Appreciation was extended to the Internal Audit team and to
colleagues in Finance and Corporate Resources for the exemplary financial stewardship.  The
Chair, on behalf of the Committee, echoed those remarks. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that it be noted that the South Lanarkshire Council Annual Accounts 2022/2023 and the
Charitable Trusts’ Accounts had each received a clean audit certificate from the Council’s
external auditors, Audit Scotland; 
(2) that the audited South Lanarkshire Council Accounts 2022/2023 and the Charitable Trusts’
Accounts be approved for signature; 
(3) that it be noted that the external auditor’s report would be referred to a future meeting of
South Lanarkshire Council for information; and
36

Page 37

(4) that it be noted that the Audited Accounts 2022/2023 would be available on the Council’s
website, as detailed at section 3.7 of the report. 
6 2022/2023 External Quality Assessment of Internal Audit Service 
A report dated 13 October 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on the 2022/2023 External Quality Assessment of South Lanarkshire Council’s
Internal Audit Service. 
The Internal Audit Service was delivered within the context of the Public Sector Internal Audit
Standards (PSIAS).  Those standards required that a Quality Assurance and Improvement
Programme (QAIP) was developed to provide assurance that Internal Audit activity:- 
 operated in an efficient and effective manner
 was perceived to be adding value and improving operations
 was conducted in accordance with an Internal Audit Charter 
The Programme included periodic and ongoing internal assessments as well as an external
review once in every 5 year period.  The Council’s external review had been undertaken by East
Lothian Council’s Internal Audit Service Manager. The findings from the external review, which
had been issued in October 2023, were detailed in the appendix to the report.   
The overall assessment was that South Lanarkshire Council’s Internal Audit function “fully
conformed” with 7 standards and “generally conformed” with the remaining 7 areas. This was
considered to be a positive outcome, with no significant areas of improvement identified. 
The main areas for improvement were detailed in the Action Plan included in the appendix to the
report and were summarised as follows:- 
 the Chief Audit Executive (Audit and Compliance Manager) should report in their own
name to the Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee, enhancing the clarity of independence
 job profiles/descriptions should be refreshed for all Internal Audit staff to provide a clear
expectation of the requirements of each role
 consideration should be given to developing a formal questionnaire or feedback
mechanism from clients to obtain quantifiable client feedback
 the Audit and Compliance Manager should complete the assurance mapping exercise that
was currently underway and report the findings to the Committee 
Further updates would be provided to the Committee to confirm that the actions had been
implemented and the recommendations were anticipated to be delivered by March 2024. 
The Committee decided: that the contents of the report be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of Risk and Audit Scrutiny Forum of 21 March 2018 (Paragraph 6) and
Minutes of 9 September 2022 (Paragraph 4)] 
7 Internal Audit Activity as at 13 October 2023 
A report dated 13 October 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on work completed by Internal Audit during the period 5 August to 13 October
2023.
37

Page 38

Findings from internal audit assignments were reported to this Committee throughout the year
and the last progress report was considered by this Committee on 22 August 2023.  Key
performance indicators, which reflected quality, on time and within budget as at 30 September
2023, were summarised in Appendix 1 to the report.   
A list of all assignments completed in the period 5 August to 13 October 2023, together with a
summary of overall assurances for each area of work, was provided in Appendix 2 to the report. 
All of those assignments related to South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture (SLLC) and were
reported to its Audit Committee. 
As at 30 September 2023, 9% of the 2023/2024 Audit Plan was completed to draft report stage
and a further 26 assignments were in progress at that date.  In the reporting period, all elements
of the Audit Plan had been progressed with a specific focus on the National Fraud Initiative
(NFI), investigative activities and external client audit plans.   
Updates were also provided on:- 
 the contributions Internal Audit had made to:-
 the implementation of Oracle Fusion - the cloud based human resources and
financial management system in the Council
 a review of controls around unmasking of bank account details
 the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS) external review which had been
concluded
 progress against the Audit Strategy which was a requirement of the PSIAS.  Delivery of
the 2023/2024 Strategy had been evidenced by the completion of the Internal Audit Plan in
year, and monitored during the year by performance indicators which were regularly
reported to the Committee   
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 22 August 2023 (Paragraph 3)] 
8 Year End Risk Management Report (2022/2023) and Review of Council’s Top
Risks (2023/2024) 
A report dated 3 October 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted providing an update on:- 
 progress with risk management activity undertaken during 2022/2023
 the Council’s top risk register following the review and consultation process   
Annual reviews of the Council’s top risks were undertaken, with the findings of the last review
reported to the Committee on 25 October 2022.  This year’s full review commenced in April
2023 and the consultation had sought views from Heads of Service, elected members and
trades unions on new areas of risk.   
Risk Sponsors were required on an annual basis to assess their Resource’s compliance with the
Risk Management Strategy and provide supporting evidence.  The information for 2022/2023
was summarised in the end of year compliance statement, which was detailed in Appendix 1 to
the report.  Resources continued to demonstrate full compliance with the Strategy, having
scored 45 out of 45.   
The annual review, in line with previous years, did not result in wholesale changes to the top risk
register.  The risks from the previous year’s review, as detailed in the report to this Committee
on 25 October 2022, were still deemed to be valid. 
38

Page 39

Details were given on the main changes to the Council’s top risk register in section 6.2 of the
report and, taking account of the revision of risk scores, the top risk register for 2023/2024 was
provided in Appendix 2 to the report.  The main changes to the risk profile from the previous
year were:- 
 2 new very high risks had been added to the top risk register:-
 failure to comply with or meet the expected standards, scrutiny levels or improvement
as identified by regulatory bodies
 changes in response to automatic fire alarms by the Scottish Fire and Rescue
Service (SFRS) within the Council’s non-domestic estate
 3 new high risks had been added to the top risk register:-
 failure to deliver the outcomes of the Economic Strategy
 third and private sector market capacity
 inability to maintain infrastructure, assets and properties in a safe and well-
maintained condition due to budget constraints and failure to achieve objectives of
asset and property reviews
 3 risks had moved from being high to very high:-
 the Council fails to meet statutory and legislative duties in respect of public protection
 the Council does not fully deliver the strategic outcomes required of the Integration
Joint Board (IJB) as outlined in its Strategic Commissioning Plan
 inability of the Council to effectively balance the provision of accommodation and
support to households who arrived in South Lanarkshire as part of refugee
resettlement and the asylum seeker dispersal programmes, including those for
unaccompanied children, whilst also meeting demands from other high need groups
including homeless household
 one risk had moved from being very high to high:-
 the Council is materially affected by the implications arising from the National Care
Service Bill 
The Council’s top risk register was monitored on an ongoing basis and updates were reported
annually to this Committee.  Risk scores and rankings would be amended if new information
came to light that allowed the position to be reassessed.   
Horizon scanning was used to identify several areas that could pose potential threats and risks
or emerging issues and opportunities that could affect the Council.  Areas identified had
included the COVID-19 National Inquiry, Martyn’s Law and Health and Care (Staffing) Act 2019
(effective from 1 April 2024) and those would continue to be monitored. 
A model had been developed by the Institute of Internal Auditors which aimed to provide
assurance of the adequacy of control measures that were in place for strategic risks. The model
aimed to ensure that top risks were mitigated through ‘three lines of defence’ which were:- 
 Line 1 – control by operational management
 Line 2 – control and compliance by functions that had an oversight role (for example Risk
Management)
 Line 3 – independent assurance 
A process to categorise controls that mitigated top risks using the Three Lines model had taken
place throughout 2022/2023 and would be concluded in 2023/2024. 
The Insurance and Risk Adviser responded to members’ questions on various aspects of the
report.
39

Page 40

The Committee decided: 
(1) that Resource compliance with the requirements of the Risk Management Strategy be
noted; 
(2) that the progress being made in delivering actions to mitigate top Council risks be noted;
and 
(3) that the updated Council’s top risks be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 25 October 2022 (Paragraph 4)] 
9 Audit Scotland: Local Government in Scotland Overview 2023 
A report dated 15 September 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources) was submitted providing a summary of the information contained within the Audit
Scotland Report entitled ‘Local Government in Scotland: Overview 2023’ which had been
published in May 2023. 
Audit Scotland published an annual overview report on behalf of the Accounts Commission,
covering key areas of current and future activity relative to local government and providing an
opinion on how those were, or should be, managed. 
The Overview 2023 report was the third and final in a series of reports which reflected on the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.  The 2021 and 2022 reports considered the initial response
phase of the pandemic and the second year of the pandemic respectively.  The 2023 report built
on the previous reports and examined the following:- 
 how had the pandemic affected councils and their performance
 what were the current and future challenges facing local government
 how well placed were councils to deal with the current and future challenges 
The Overview 2023 report, which could be accessed on the Audit Scotland website, had been
structured around the following 3 main topics:- 
 the impact of the pandemic on councils’ performance
 what were the current challenges facing local government
 how were councils responding 
A number of key messages were detailed in the Overview 2023 report and summarised in the
report to the Committee.  Audit Scotland’s recommendations were detailed in the report, along
with an assessment of the Council’s position and any action considered necessary. 
The Accounts Commission had prepared a checklist of questions for elected members’
consideration to accompany the Overview 2023 report and the checklist, including narrative
responses from a South Lanarkshire Council perspective, was attached as Appendix 1 to the
report. 
The Research and Improvement Manager responded to a member’s question in relation to
workforce challenges.   
The Committee decided: that the key messages and recommendations contained
within the report be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 6 December 2022 (Paragraph 6)]
40

Page 41

10 Forward Programme for Future Meetings 
A report dated 6 October 2023 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on the outline forward programme for the meetings of the Risk and Audit Scrutiny
Committee to 19 November 2024. 
As part of future arrangements, members were invited to suggest topics for inclusion in the
Committee’s forward programme. 
The Committee decided: that the outline forward programme for the meetings of the
Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee to 19 November 2024
be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 22 August 2023 (Paragraph 6)] 
11 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
41

Page 42

42

Page 43

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 27 March 2024
Report by: Chief Executive  
Subject:  Clydeplan and Glasgow City Region Spatial Planning 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 seeks the Approval of Council to formally withdraw from the Clydeplan Joint
Committee and agree to transfer the responsibility for the development of a
Regional Spatial Strategy to the Glasgow City Region (GCR) Cabinet. 
 this is within the context of proposed new governance structures to continue the
collaborative approach to Regional Planning that has existed in the Glasgow
and Clyde Valley/Glasgow City Region Area since the creation of Unitary
Authorities in 1996 and within the context of the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019
and the Scottish Government’s National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) 2023. 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the recommendation of the Clydeplan Joint Committee to transfer
responsibility for the development of a Regional Spatial Strategy to the
Glasgow City Region Cabinet be noted;
(2) that the GCR Cabinet’s approval of the establishment of a new Regional
Spatial Planning Sub Committee to oversee the development of a Regional
Spatial Strategy be noted;
(3) that the approval of participation in any future Regional Spatial Strategy will
remain a decision for South Lanarkshire Council be noted;
(4) Agree to formally withdraw from the Clydeplan Joint Committee and transfer
existing funding to Glasgow City Council as lead authority for the Glasgow
City Region; and
(5) Agree that Councillor Robert Brown and Councillor Richard Nelson continue
their existing role on the Clydeplan Joint Committee and act as the South
Lanarkshire Council representatives on the new Regional Spatial Planning
Sub-Committee. 
3. Background
3.1. The National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) approved by the Scottish Parliament in
2023 removed the statutory requirement to produce a Strategic Development Plan
and replaced it with a duty to prepare a non-statutory Regional Spatial Strategy
(RSS).
5
43

Page 44

3.2. Since 1996 the eight Glasgow City Region local authorities have worked together to
develop a series of regional spatial plans, the most recent being the Clydeplan
Strategic Development Plan (“SDP”), which was approved by Scottish Ministers in
July 2017. 
3.3. The previous SDP set out a Vision and Spatial Development Strategy from now until
2036, suggesting where new development should be located and a policy framework
that helps deliver sustainable economic growth through the creation of high quality
development which seeks to reduce inequalities and enhances the quality of life in
Glasgow City Region. The SDP also set the strategy and policy context for the
individual local authority Local Development Plans. 
3.4. This requirement is no longer in place since the introduction of NPF4, and has been
replaced by the requirement to prepare a Regional Spatial Strategy. 
4. Governance
4.1. Clydeplan has been governed by a Joint Committee for the purpose of representing
the eight local authorities in the Glasgow and Clyde Valley area in carrying out the
functions conferred upon them under Sections 4 to 14 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 as amended by the Planning etc (Scotland) Act and
have each passed the necessary resolution for giving effect to this Agreement.
Renfrewshire Council provides support functions for the Joint Committee on behalf of
the Member Authorities. 
4.2. The Clydeplan Joint Committee has previously agreed that work should be
undertaken to explore the future governance arrangements for the delivery of the
functions undertaken by the Joint Committee particularly in relation to the new duty
on local authorities for strategic planning as part of the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019,
namely to prepare a Regional Spatial Strategy. 
4.3. Unlike the current Strategic Development Plan the Regional Spatial Strategy will not
form part of the statutory Development Plan which will now comprise the National
Planning Framework and the Local Development Plan. 
4.4. Given these changes it was acknowledged that the role and remit for which the
Glasgow and Clyde Valley Strategic Development Planning Authority Joint
Committee as originally established will significantly change and therefore the future
role of the Committee required to be reviewed. 
4.5 The Joint Committee itself has recommended to its members that the functions
transfer to the Glasgow City Region, with GCR Cabinet overseeing the development
of the RSS. At its meeting on 12th February 2024, the Cabinet agreed to establish a
Regional Planning Sub Committee to discharge this function, subject to approval by
the 8 Local Authorities through their own local democratic structures. 
4.6. This approval by GCR Cabinet set out the proposed approach to future collaboration,
based on three fundamental principles, namely: 
(i) A collaborative approach to Regional Spatial Planning;
(ii) Integration with wider regional activity to maximise impact; and,
(iii) The need for local democratic accountability with no local authority being
bound by any decision they cannot support
44

Page 45

4.7. To achieve this, the new Sub-Committee will not have decision making powers and
will oversee the development of an RSS for the region. This will then be presented to
the 8 Local Authorities for consideration, with Cabinet simply noting the approved
document. This ensures that approval sits with local democratic structures whilst
collaboration is facilitated through regional ones and in this respect in order to
provide continuity from the existing process into the new arrangement it is
recommended that Cllr Robert Brown will represent South Lanarkshire Council on
this Sub-Committee with Cllr Richard Nelson providing a role as substitute if
required. 
4.8. Under the new arrangements, South Lanarkshire Council will remain accountable
and responsible for all planning decisions within the area.  
5. Employee Implications
5.1 The proposed arrangements will have no impact on South Lanarkshire Council
employees. Clydeplan currently has a Core Team of Officers who are employed by
Renfrewshire Council as Administering Authority and it is proposed that the staff will
transfer to Glasgow City Council who administer the City Region functions. This
process will be carried out under Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of
Employment) (TUPE) regulations. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1 It had been anticipated that South Lanarkshire Council would have received a
requisition of £60,439 from Renfrewshire Council for 2024/25 to support staff and
associated costs with the operation of Clydeplan.  It is proposed that this funding will
now be paid to Glasgow City Council as lead authority for the Glasgow City Region
to support ongoing resource, operational and associated costs. 
6.2 While it is anticipated that there should be efficiencies in the budgets to deliver the
Regional Spatial Strategies as a result of a review of its management, structure and
operational costs, this will be managed through regional structures with the Finance
Strategy Group consisting of the 8 Finance Directors overseeing the budget and
reporting to the 8 Chief Executives. The final budget for the new Regional Planning
Sub Group will be approved by Cabinet on an annual basis.               
6.3 Appropriate due diligence will be carried out by Glasgow City Council and
Renfrewshire Council to ensure the transfer of assets. Any reserves will be returned
to the 8 constituent authorities following conclusion of the process. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. Having appropriate Regional Spatial Planning arrangements in place will help in
providing a policy context for development priorities across the Glasgow City Region. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. None 
9. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
9.1. This report does not introduce any new activities that would have an impact on the
Council’s Equality Objectives and consultation has taken place across the eight
Local Authorities in the Glasgow City Region. 
45

Page 46

Paul Manning
Chief Executive   
13 March 2024 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Achieve results through leadership, good governance and organisational effectiveness
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Agenda - Glasgow City Region Cabinet 17th February 2024 - Committee Information -
Meetings (glasgow.gov.uk) 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- Paul Manning, Chief Executive
Ext: 4208   (Tel:01698 454208)
E-mail:  paul.manning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
46

Page 47

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council 
Date of Meeting: 27 March 2024
Report by: Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources) 
Subject: Community Facilities – Temporary Delegated Authority 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 request authority is temporarily delegated to officers to enter into short term
arrangements with community organisations wishing to take on the
management of community facilities affected by the impact of recent budget
decisions. 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources), in conjunction
with the Head of Administration and Legal Services, be authorised to enter
into short term lease arrangements for the properties listed in appendix 1 and
2 of this report, subject to the criteria set out in sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this
report;
(2) that this period of delegated authority will cover the period from 19 June to 18
September 2024; and
(3) that a report will be presented to the Housing and Technical Resources
Committee on 18 September 2024 to confirm progress made during this
period. 
3. Background
3.1. The facilities set out in Appendix 1 and 2 of this report are affected by the budget
setting decisions made by the Council and South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture on
21 February and 28 February 2024 respectively. 
3.2. At Full Council and Executive Committee on 21 February 2024, the proposals for
managing the Community Fightback Fund and changes to the criteria in relation to
Renewable Energy Funding (REF) were agreed to assist community organisations
develop alternative operating models and community capacity. 
3.3. Whilst this is a dynamic situation and the arrangements will be different in each
circumstance, it is envisioned that a number of requests for leases under CAT lite
will be received in the next few months. 
3.4. A CAT lite lease is a lease for a period of up to 1 year at a rental if £1 p.a. if asked,
with the tenant being responsible for the revenue costs associated with the property
including regular health and safety checks. It is “CAT lite” because it is not
progressed as a formal Community Asset Transfer in terms of the relevant
legislation. The Council may retain some responsibilities in respect of the property.
6
47

Page 48

3.5. In terms of the Council’s Terms of Reference, and to demonstrate transparency, any
leases or sales on concessionary terms are reported to Housing and Technical
Resources Committee for approval. The next scheduled meetings of this Committee
will be held on 19 June 2024 and 18 September 2024. Due to this timetable and the
desire to avoid a situation where the schedule of meetings could result in a break in
the continuity of services, this report seeks approval for the Executive Director
(Housing and Technical Resources), in consultation with the Head of Administration
and Legal Services, to have temporary delegated authority to approve CAT lite
applications. If approved, the applications would be required to meet agreed criteria,
as set out in section 4 below. This report is being submitted to this meeting of South
Lanarkshire Council to provide clarity to interested parties as to the process the
Council will follow in respect of these applications. 
4. Proposal
4.1. It is proposed that the Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources), in
conjunction with the Head of Administration and Legal Services, be authorised to
enter into short term lease arrangements for the properties listed in appendices 1
and 2 of this report, subject to the following criteria: - 
(1) The organisation applying for the tenancy is:- 
a) Appropriately constituted. 
b) Has a bank account and is able to provide suitable evidence that it has
access to funding to cover the initial costs of operation. 
(2) There is suitable evidence of community support for the proposal and no
competing community interests, including there being no formal Community
Asset Transfer applications in respect of the property in question. 
(3) There are no legislative, health and safety or repair issues affecting the property
which would prevent occupation and use of the property by the organisation. 
4.2. The lease agreements will be on such terms and conditions as the Executive
Director (Housing and Technical Resources) considers appropriate, but provided that
they will include the following:- 
a) The duration of a lease will be for a period of up to 1 year
b) The rent will be £1 p.a. if asked
c) They will require the tenant to have appropriate public liability insurance;
d) They will require the tenant to meet all ongoing revenue costs associated with
the property, including utilities, non-domestic rates and internal
repair/maintenance costs;
e) They will require that the tenant cannot sub-let/transfer the lease; and
f) They will require each party to bear their own legal fees and expenses in
connection with the grant of the lease 
4.3. This delegated authority is a temporary arrangement from 19 June to 18 September
2024 to address requests for short term occupation of specific properties. It is not
intended to replace the process for approval of formal Community Asset Transfer
requests or the grant of other concessionary leases. 
48

Page 49

4.4. The grant of the 1-year lease arrangements will provide community organisations
with the opportunity to develop their capacity and longer term proposals in respect of
specific properties, with a view to applying formally for Community Asset Transfer at
a future date. 
4.5. A report will be presented to the Housing and Technical Resource Committee on 18
September 2024 to confirm the outcome of applications made during this period of
delegated authority. 
5. Employee Implications
5.1. There are no employee implications arising specifically from this report. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. The short-term lease agreements will remove the revenue liabilities associated with
managing their facilities, in line with the 2024/2025 budgetary decisions of the
Council and SLLC. 
6.2. Although the leases would be granted at less than market value, there is potential for
community benefits and other social value to be generated. As the leases are for 1
year there is minimum risk and an evaluation of the benefits will be undertaken
before arrangements are extended. This approach is consistent with the Council’s
duties to secure Best Value, and under the Disposal of Land by Local Authorities
(Scotland) Regulations 2010. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no implications for sustainability in terms of the information contained
within the report. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. Officers in Property Services will work closely with the Community Engagement
Team and External Funding Team to streamline the overall process. 
9. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
9.1 Consultation will take place with SLLC, Planning, Community Engagement Team,
Community and Enterprise and Legal in respect of each request. 
9.2. Organisations applying for lease will be encouraged to engage with their local
communities. 
9.3. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
permanent change to existing policy, function or strategy therefore no impact
assessment is required.   
Stephen Gibson
Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources) 
13 March 2024 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes 
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Work with communities and partners to promote high quality, thriving and sustainable
communities.
49

Page 50

Previous References 
List of Background Papers 
Contact for further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact: 
Joanne Forbes, Head of Property Services
Tel:  01698 454073
E-mail: joanne.forbes@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
50

Page 51

Appendix 1 
Relevant facilities which fall within REF catchment areas 
Clydesdale
Braehead Village Hall
Carmichael Village Hall*
Carstairs Junction Hall
Coulter Village Hall*
Crawford Village Hall
Crossford Village Hall
Tom Craig Hall
Carstairs Village Hall
Douglas St Brides Hall
Pettinain Village Hall
Thankerton Village Hall*
Hollandbush Golf Course 
East Kilbride
Calderwood Hall
Greenhills Hall
Kirktonholme Hall
Strathaven Park
Westwood Community Hall 
Hamilton
Netherburn Community Hall 
*These facilities are within SSE catchment areas. Officers are currently engaging with SSE with
the aim of introducing arrangements similar to the REF revenue proposals. 
51

Page 52

Appendix 2 
Relevant facilities which fall outwith REF catchment areas 
Hamilton
Ferniegair Hall
High Blantyre Community Hall
Tileworks Park (Pitches)
Uddingston Community Centre
June Stewart Centre (Hall)
TACT Hall 
Cambuslang
Eastfield Community Centre
North Halfway Hall
Peter Brownlie Pavilion 
52

Page 53

Agenda Item 
Immediate Ceasefire and Long-term Peace in Gaza 
Notice of Motion 
Motion received in terms of Standing Order No 20 on 5 March, 2024, proposed by
Councillor Andrea Cowan, seconded by Councillor Elaine McDougall, as follows:- 
“Council unequivocally condemns the terrorist attacks by Hamas on 7 October 2023 and
calls for the immediate unconditional release of all hostages. Council recognises the rights
of Israel, in common with all nations, to protect itself from terror. However, Council asserts
that Hamas’ actions are not a justification for genocide – there are no justifications for
genocide. Council shares the sorrow and outrage of South Lanarkshire’s Jewish and
Muslim Communities and all other like-minded people. 
Council recognises that many families and communities in South Lanarkshire are affected
by violence in the region, offers condolences to all those who have suffered as a result of
this horrific conflict; and resolves to be alert to, and to stand up against, discrimination and
hate crime, and resolves that there is no place for antisemitism, Islamophobia or hatred of
any kind in our communities. 
Council recognises that a humanitarian catastrophe is being inflicted on the civilian
population of Gaza by the far-right, Likud-led government of Israel and that this collective
punishment has to date resulted in the killing of almost 40,000 civilians including 21,000
women and children. In addition, at least 70,450 people have been wounded and 7000 are
missing in the rubble that is Gaza.   
Council condemns any military assault on the 1.5 million refugees sheltering in Rafah and
demands that the UK Government immediately halts the transfer of all military equipment
and technology, including components, to Israel and suspends the issuing of new licences.   
Council repeats calls from the Scottish Government asking the UK Government to use the
already established UK Resettlement Scheme, which works with the UN High Commission
for Refugees, to allow a route to safety for the most vulnerable such as children and
families, those with severe health needs, and those with links to residents in Scotland. 
Council also calls on the UK Government to support an immediate permanent ceasefire and
humanitarian corridor, to commit supplies and aid to mitigate the human tragedy unfolding
in Gaza and to be prepared to offer sanctuary and support to Palestinian refugees. 
Council further supports moves towards a long-term peace for all communities in Israel-
Palestine and urges all international partners to work together to establish a diplomatic
process to deliver the peace of a two-state nation. 
Council instructs the Chief Executive to write to both the Scottish First Minister and the UK
Prime Minister outlining the details of this motion, as agreed.” 
7
53

Page 54

54

Page 55

Agenda Item 
Right to Strike 
Notice of Motion 
Motion received in terms of Standing Order No 20 on 12 March, 2024, proposed by
Councillor Elaine McDougall, seconded by Councillor Katy Loudon, as follows:- 
“That this Council:- 
(a) notes:- 
(i) the right to strike is a fundamental freedom which is protected by international
law; this can be seen in the Human Rights Act, Article 11 of the European
Convention on Human Rights, the International Labour Organisation’s
Convention 87 and Article 6(4) of the European Social Charter; 
(ii) the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 sets out that when employees in
relevant sectors democratically vote to strike they can be required to work, lose
their right to automatic protection from unfair dismissal, and potentially be sacked
if they don’t comply; 
(iii) the Joint Committee on Human Rights has expressed concern that this legislation
is not compatible with the UK’s commitments to human rights for workers and
trade union members; and 
(iv) the Regulatory Policy Committee has determined that the impact assessment for
this Bill was ‘not fit for purpose’; 
(v) that the Scottish Government has committed not to use the powers to compel
workers not to strike 
(b) believes:- 
(i) the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 is a direct attack on the right to
strike fundamental freedom; 
(ii) that consecutive Conservative Governments have been carrying out brutal
attacks on trade unions for decades, culminating with this most recent attack on
the right to strike; 
(iii) that this Westminster Government, instead of tackling the causes of the cost-of-
living crisis, are attempting to shift the blame from profiteering bosses who have
manufactured unsustainable levels of inflation, on to ordinary workers who are
exercising their right to fight for dignity and fair pay at work and in their lives; 
(iv) the regime initiated by the Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Act 2023 is
draconian, unnecessary and unworkable; 
8
55

Page 56

(v) the Act undermines constructive industrial relations and is likely to inflame and
prolong disputes; and 
(vi) the issuing of a “work notice” by an employer compelling named workers to
attend work under threat of dismissal with no recourse to the courts is a denial
of justice; 
(vii) that this Act is a direct attack on the freedoms of the ordinary, hardworking
residents of South Lanarkshire; and 
(c) resolves:- 
(i) to direct Council officers not to use powers in this Act to compel workers, who
would otherwise be on strike, to work, subject to the Council’s overarching legal
duties; 
(ii) to work with local unions to oppose this legislation together as effectively as
possible. 
56

Page 57

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 27 March 2024
Report by: Chief Executive  
Subject: Mid-term Review of the Council’s Political Management
Arrangements Procedural Documentation 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise members of arrangements to take forward the mid-term review of the
Council’s political management arrangements procedural documentation 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the commencement of the mid-term review of the Council’s political
management arrangements procedural documentation be noted. 
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. The current political management arrangements procedural documentation,
including the Terms of Reference, Standing Orders on Procedures, Standing Orders
on Contracts, Financial Regulations and Scheme of Delegation, was formally
approved by the Council at its statutory meeting in May 2022 following the Local
Government Elections. 
3.2. In the period since that time, amendments have been made to the Scheme of
Delegation as a result of decisions taken by committee or Council.   
3.3. In line with good governance requirements, it is considered good practice, at the
mid-term point of the Council term, to formally review the documentation to take
account of legislative amendments, external guidance requirements, structural
changes and to reflect and/or streamline working practices. 
4. Process for Review
4.1. Initial consultation on the current documents has commenced with officers and it is
now proposed that each Group, as well as the independent member, submit
comments to the Chief Executive on the areas they would like addressed/considered
by the end of April 2024.   
4.2. At its meeting on 23 August 2023, the Council agreed that the matter of sustainability
assessments be referred to the Standards and Procedures Advisory Forum (SPAF)
for consideration as part of the mid-term review.
9
57

Page 58

4.3. The documents can be accessed via the following links:- 
Financial Regulations 
Scheme of Delegation 
Standing Orders on Contracts 
Standing Orders on Procedures 
Terms of Reference 
4.4. Arrangements will be made for a meeting of the SPAF to be held in June 2024 to
consider feedback received.  Further meetings of the SPAF will be scheduled, as
necessary, to consider proposals and agree recommendations to submit to the full
Council for formal approval later in the year. 
5 Employee Implications
5.1 At this stage, there are no employee implications in terms of the content of this
report. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1 None at this stage. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the
environment. 
8. Other Implications
8.1 To ensure that there is no risk of being in breach of legislative requirements and to
ensure compliance with good governance principles, the political management
arrangements supporting documentation requires to be kept under review. 
8.2. There was no requirement for a Fairer Scotland Duty Assessment in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
9. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
9.1 This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy, or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact
assessment is required. 
9.2. Consultation has commenced with all Resources as part of the mid-term review of
the procedural documentation. 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
8 March 2024 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
58

Page 59

Previous References
South Lanarkshire Council of 23 August 2023 and 18 May 2022 
List of Background Papers
None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Susan Somerville, Administration Manager
Ext:  4197  (Tel:  01698 454197)
E-mail:  susan.somerville@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
59

Page 60

60

Page 61

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: South Lanarkshire Council
Date of Meeting: 27 March 2024
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Revenue Budget and Level of Local Taxation 2024/2025
– Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:
[purpose]
 confirm receipt of the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Council is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):
[recs]
(1) that the update to the Council’s Budget as a result of the Local Government
(Finance) Order 2024, detailed in sections 4.1 to 4.7, be noted;  
(2) that the information contained in the Local Government Finance (Scotland)
Order 2024 has no impact on the Budget decisions taken by Council on 21
February 2024, be noted; and
(3) that Scottish Government’s commitment to £62.7 million of funding, following
the UK Spring Budget (section 4.10), be noted; and
(4) that the position on the funding for the increased Teachers’ Pension
contributions (section 4.12), be noted.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. At its meeting on 21 February 2024, the Council approved the Revenue Budget and
Level of Local Taxation for 2024/2025. 
3.2. The Budget paper noted that the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024
had not been received and that members would be notified of the final settlement
value as appropriate.  This report to Council confirms receipt of the Order and
section 4 updates the Budget for 2024/2025. 
4. Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024
4.1. The Council’s Budget was set on 21 February 2024 and was based on the Draft
Local Government Settlement issued to councils on 20 December 2023.  The
December Settlement allocation (£742.664 million) was augmented by the Council’s
allocation of the national Council Tax Freeze monies (£7.869 million) meaning the
overall assumption of Scottish Government Grant was £750.533 million. 
4.2. Subsequently, the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024 (the Order)
was laid in Parliament on 27 February 2024, and was issued to councils on 29
February 2024.  The Order showed a Government Grant allocation for the Council of
£752.291 million.  This did not include an allocation for the Council Tax Freeze.  By
adding the assumed Council Tax Freeze monies to this (£7.869 million), the
10
61

Page 62

Council’s new Settlement totals £760.160 million.  This is an increase of £9.6 million
compared to the Council’s Settlement which had been used to form the budget
approved by the Council at its meeting on 21 February 2024. 
4.3. The £9.6 million is predominantly due to annual allocations which are now being
distributed but which were not in the December Settlement namely Discretionary
Housing Payments (£4.1 million) and Scottish Disability Assistance (£0.2 million).  In
addition, new money has been allocated to take the hourly pay rate for external
providers of Health & Social Care and Early Learning & Child Care to £12 per hour
(being £13.737 million and £0.990 million respectively). 
4.4. It is noted that Order does not change the Council’s bottom line budget gap as the
monies now allocated are fully committed.  The Base Budget allocations across
Resources will be updated as part of the first Revenue monitoring cycle reported to
Committee (June 2024). 
4.5. The additional monies allocated since the Draft December Settlement are offset by a
reduction of £9.4 million due to the Government holding back funds in relation to
Teacher Numbers.  
4.6. Members are advised that the treatment of Teacher Numbers hold back is a change
to the original Settlement approach where the funds were allocated to councils in the
Draft Local Government Settlement in December 2023.  There is no reference in the
Order letter on how or when councils will be advised of the conditions around funding
for Teacher Numbers.  
4.7. For clarity, in relation to the council tax freeze monies (£7.869 million), which are not
yet allocated, and the teachers holdback funding (£9.4 million) which has now been
removed from the Order, these are both still assumed as funding in the Council’s
approved budget.  
4.8. Taking into account the information contained in sections 4.1 to 4.7, it is confirmed
that the Order does not require any change to the Budget decisions taken by Council
on 21 February 2024.   
4.9. The Scottish Government had previously written to councils to state that any further
funding coming to Local Government are subject to the outcome of the UK
Government Spring Budget delivering net additional funding. This relates to earlier
correspondence where Councils had been advised of additional funding for Local
Government totalling £63 million nationally.  The Order does not include any
allocation of these monies and states that any additional funding will be discussed
and agreed through the formal financial governance process and will be included for
approval in the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2025.  
4.10. Further correspondence from the Scottish Government, following the UK Spring
Budget in early March, advised that the UK Government have identified £48 million
of funding for Scottish Local Government and that they will pass that funding through
to councils.  It also states that the Scottish Government will make the decisions in
year which are necessary to top that up to the £62.7 million, for those who have
agreed to freeze their Council Tax. 
4.11. The Council has yet to be formally advised of its share of these monies.  As advised
through previous Budget reports to Council (21 February 2024), recent pay claims
presented have identified a risk that any pay deal for 2024/2025 will exceed the pay
funding that has been included in the Council’s Budget Strategy.  It is suggested that
62

Page 63

it would be prudent, when an allocation is made, that members consider holding this
as a contingency against higher than budgeted costs of pay.   
4.12. In addition, the letter also advised that the Scottish Government has had no
confirmation yet of any funding in relation to increased Teacher Employer Pension
Contributions, however, officials at the Scottish Government understand that this will
be confirmed later in the year by the UK Government.  The letter states that the
Minister is committed to passing these through once confirmation is received.  The
Council’s budget has been set on the basis that this will be forthcoming as the
increased contributions will commence on 1 April 2024. 
5. Employee Implications
5.1. There are no employee implications. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. The placing of the Local Government Finance Order provides an update to the
2024/2025 Local Government Settlement, included in the Budget presented to
Council on 21 February 2024. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no implications in terms of sustainability arising from the recommendations
in this report. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. There are no other implications arising from the recommendations in this report. 
9. Equality Impact and Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
9.1. There is no requirement to carry out an impact assessment in terms of the proposals
contained within this report.   
9.2. No consultation was required in terms of the recommendations in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
4 March 2024 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council, 21 February 2024 
List of Background Papers
 Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Jackie Taylor, Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637)
E-mail: jackie.taylor@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
63

Page 64

64