Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Planning Committee - 14/11/2023

South Lanarkshire Council · 14 November 2023
Back to Planning Committee — 14 November 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Monday, 06 November 2023 
Dear Councillor 
Planning Committee 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Tuesday, 14 November 2023
Time:  10:00
Venue: Hybrid - Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton,
ML3 0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Cleland Sneddon
Chief Executive 
Members 
Richard Nelson (Chair), Gerry Convery (Depute Chair), Joe Fagan (ex officio), Alex Allison, Ralph
Barker, Archie Buchanan, Ross Clark, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin, Colin Dewar, Gladys
Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Alistair Fulton, Celine Handibode, Mark Horsham, Ross Lambie,
Martin Lennon, Monique McAdams, Lesley McDonald, Davie McLachlan, Norman Rae, John Ross,
Graham Scott, David Shearer, Helen Toner, David Watson 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Mathew Buchanan, Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Allan Falconer,
Grant Ferguson, Graeme Horne, Martin Hose, Julia Marrs, Ian McAllan, Kenny McCreary, Bert
Thomson
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
Minutes of meeting of the Planning Committee held on 3 October 2023
submitted for approval as a correct record.  (Copy attached) 
5 - 6 
Item(s) for Decision 
3 Application P/20/1657 for Erection of 5 Detached  Bungalows  with 
Associated Parking and Formation of Access Road at Land at Main Street, 
Symington, Biggar
Report dated 2 November 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
7 - 22 
4 Application P/23/0179 for Erection of 3 Houses at Land 20 Metres North of
4 Church Street, Uddingston
Report dated 2 November 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
23 - 32 
5 Application P/23/0632 for Erection of Extensions to Existing Care Home to
Create Additional Floorspace with Associated External Alterations at 60
Wellhall Road, Hamilton
Report dated 2 November 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
33 - 40 
6 Application P/23/0866 for Re-engineering of Bus Station to Provide 4 Bus
Stop Locations, 2 Bus Layover Areas, 4 Bus Shelters, Bike Store, Lighting,
CCTV, a Real Time Information Board and New Paving at Lanark Bus
Station, St Vincent Place, Lanark
Report dated 2 November 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
41 - 48 
7 Application P/23/1070 for Extension of Existing Feed Bins (Retrospective)
at Roadhead Farm, Shieldhill Road, Quothquan, Biggar
Report dated 2 November 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
49 - 56 
8 Planning Appeal Decisions – April to October 2023
Report dated 2 November 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
57 - 60 
Urgent Business 
9 Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 
For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Stuart McLeod
Clerk Telephone: 07385 370 117
Clerk Email: stuart.mcleod@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
2

Page 3

3

Page 4

4

Page 5

PLANNING COMMITTEE 
Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street,
Hamilton on 3 October 2023 
Chair:
Councillor Richard Nelson 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor Ralph Barker, Councillor Archie Buchanan, Councillor Ross
Clark, Councillor Gerry Convery (Depute), Councillor Margaret Cowie, Councillor Maureen Devlin,
Councillor Colin Dewar, Councillor Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Councillor Celine Handibode, Councillor
Mark Horsham, Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Lesley McDonald, Councillor Davie McLachlan,
Councillor Julia Marrs (substitute for Councillor Elise Frame), Councillor Norman Rae, Councillor
John Ross, Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor David Shearer, Councillor Helen Toner 
Councillors' Apologies:
Councillor Joe Fagan (ex officio), Councillor Elise Frame, Councillor Alistair Fulton, Councillor
Martin Lennon, Councillor Monique McAdams, Councillor David Watson 
Attending:
Community and Enterprise Resources
F Carlin, Head of Planning and Regulatory Services; B Darroch, Planning and Building Standards
Manager (East); F Jack, Team Leader, Development Management Team, Roads and
Transportation Services
Finance and Corporate Resources
M Cannon, Legal Services Adviser; S Jessup, Administration Assistant; S McLeod, Administration
Officer 
1 Declaration of Interests 
Councillor(s) Item(s) Nature of Interest(s)
Lambie Application P/23/0858 for Installation of
16 Pedestrian Lighting Columns in
Village Green at Coalburn Village
Green, Coalburn Road, Coalburn,
Lanark
Agent 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 
The minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 5 September 2023 were
submitted for approval as a correct record. 
The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record. 
3 Application P/21/2176 for Erection of 4 Detached Houses with Associated Car
Parking and Landscaping at Land at St Isidore’s RC Church, Lindsaylands Road,
Biggar 
A report dated 22 September 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/21/2176 by the Trustees of the Diocese of
Motherwell for the erection of 4 detached houses with associated car parking and landscaping at
land at St Isidore’s RC Church, Lindsaylands Road, Biggar.
2
5

Page 6

There followed a discussion on the application during which officers responded to members’
questions on aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/21/2176 by the Trustees of the
Diocese of Motherwell for the erection of 4 detached
houses with associated car parking and landscaping at
land at St Isidore’s RC Church, Lindsaylands Road, Biggar
be granted subject to the conditions specified in the
Executive Director’s report. 
Councillor Clark left the meeting during consideration of this item of business 
4 Application P/23/0797 for Erection of Outbuilding (Retrospective) at 11 Drumgray
Drive, Cambuslang 
A report dated 22 September 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/23/0797 by W Afzal for the erection of an
outbuilding (retrospective) at 11 Drumgray Drive, Cambuslang. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/23/0797 by W Afzal for the
erection of an outbuilding (retrospective) at 11 Drumgray
Drive, Cambuslang be granted subject to the condition
specified in the Executive Director’s report. 
5 Application P/23/0858 for Installation of 16 Pedestrian Lighting Columns in Village
Green at Coalburn Village Green, Coalburn Road, Coalburn, Lanark 
A report dated 22 September 2023 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/23/0858 by Hargreaves Land for the
installation of 16 pedestrian lighting columns at Coalburn Village Green, Coalburn Road,
Coalburn, Lanark. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/23/0858 by Hargreaves Land
for the installation of 16 pedestrian lighting columns at
Coalburn Village Green, Coalburn Road, Coalburn be
granted subject to the condition specified in the Executive
Director’s report. 
Councillor Lambie, having declared an interest in this item, withdrew from the meeting during its
consideration 
6 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
6

Page 7

Report
Agenda Item 
CHECKED
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 14 November 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/20/1657
Proposal:  Erection of five detached bungalows with associated parking and
formation of access road
Site Address:  Land at Main Street
Symington
Biggar
ML12 6LJ
Applicant:  Pine Valley Homes
Agent:  DTA Chartered Architects Limited
Ward:  03 Clydesdale East
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Type:  Non-notification of neighbours and Development Contrary to the
Development Plan: Lanark Gazette 2nd December 2020
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Partly contrary to Development Plan 
Departures:  N/A
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish
Ministers: 
N/A 
3
7

Page 8

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as it
has received more than 5 objections, as detailed in paragraph 3.5 (b) of the Decision
Making Process April 2015. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The application site is located at the western edge of Symington and is currently vacant
having been most recently used as a builder’s yard.  The proposed development site
extends beyond the northern boundary of the former yard and includes a strip of
agricultural land. 
2.2. An open water course runs along the southern boundary before entering a culvert
which continues in an eastward direction below Main Street. 
2.3. Originally the site was occupied by a farmhouse and steading. However, most of these
structures were demolished in the late 1990s after the site was acquired by a
construction company. A hay/storage shed was left in place and used by the
construction business until its removal in 2015/2016. 
2.4. The site is bounded to the south by a single storey dwelling and Tinto Primary School,
to the north by a single storey dwelling and agricultural land.  Main Street is located to
the east, along with further dwellings and the access into Symington Tinto AFC football
ground.  Further agricultural land is located to the west of the site. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. Planning Permission is sought for 5 three-bedroom bungalows with associated parking
and garden space.  The proposals include traditional design features such as piend
roofs and front bay windows. Two of the bungalows (Plots 1 and 2) will face onto Main
Street, whilst a private access will serve the three remaining bungalows (Plots 3-5).
Along the northern and western boundaries of Plots 3-5 a hedgerow interspersed with
trees is proposed and individual trees will be planted to the rear of Plots 1 and 2. 
3.2. A Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) would serve the development and
include soakaways wrapped in permeable membrane to manage and treat surface
water runoff from roofs and roads. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. Planning Application P/18/0699 for 6 dwellings was withdrawn in December 2018 and
Planning Application P/19/0739 for 4 semi-detached dwellings was withdrawn in July
2019. Both these applications were withdrawn because the applicant was unable to
demonstrate that the potential flood risk associated with development of the site could
be addressed to the satisfaction of SEPA and the Council as Flooding Authority. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1.  In support of the planning application, the applicant has submitted:- 
 Flood Risk Assessment Reports
 Soakaway Calculations
 Percolation Test Results
 Drainage Details
 Culvert Site Inspection Report
 Legal Agreement – Visibility Splay 
8

Page 9

6. Consultations
6.1. Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) - Initially SEPA objected to the
proposals due to a lack of information on flood risk grounds. Following the submission
of additional information, SEPA confirmed that they had no objection to the proposals
on flood risk grounds. 
Response - Noted.
6.2. Scottish Water – No objection to the proposal although the applicant is required to
contact their Asset Impact Team prior to any works commencing on site.
Response – Noted.
6.3. Environmental Services – No objections, subject to advisory notes in respect of
construction noise, pest control, nuisance, and contamination. 
Response - Noted. Appropriate conditions would be attached to any decision issued. 
6.4. West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WOSAS) – Do not object to the proposal
subject to a condition requiring an archaeological watching brief to be undertaken. 
Response - Noted.
6.5. Symington Community Council – Do not object to the proposed development.
However, it does recognise that nearby residents have raised the following issues:- 
 Flooding 
 Road safety and pedestrian safety
 Site boundary
 Housing density
 Proximity of development to the neighbouring primary school 
Response - Noted. 
6.6. Roads Development Management – No objection subject to appropriate visibility
splays and parking being provided to serve the development.  Appropriate pedestrian
and drainage provisions would also be required along with a suitable access. 
Response - Noted. Suitable conditions would be attached to any consent issued. 
6.7. Roads Flood Risk Management – No objection subject to the inclusion of conditions
relating to flood risk and drainage.
Response - Noted. Suitable conditions would be attached to any consent issued. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement for non-
notification of neighbours and Development Contrary to the Local Plan in the local
press, a total of 43 objections and two representations have been received.  The
issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
Objections/Representations:- 
Amenity
⧫ Overdevelopment of the site as it will not fit in with the layout and existing
dwellings on Main Street.
⧫ The layout would be a departure from the established linear layout with houses
facing Main Street.
⧫ Proximity to and overlooking of nearby primary school.
⧫ Loss of privacy in the surrounding area.  
9

Page 10

⧫ The potential for outbuildings to be constructed in rear gardens will impact on
the light entering neighbour properties. 
Land Use Concerns 
⧫ The site boundary encroaches onto agricultural land.
⧫ The proposal is contrary to both National and Local Plan policy which protects
prime agricultural land. 
Impact on Natural and Historic Environment
⧫ Natural habitats, trees and foliage were destroyed when the site was cleared,
all without permission or notifying SEPA.
⧫ An arboricultural impact assessment should be undertaken to assess the
impact on trees and what mitigation will be in place during construction.
⧫ Impact upon natural heritage conservation. 
Roads Related Matters
⧫ Poor visibility – negative impact on pedestrian safety and close to school,
nursery and park.
⧫ Street furniture should be put in place alerting public to presence of an access
to a housing development.
⧫ Increase in traffic in the vicinity of the school.
⧫ Lack of adequate pavements in the surrounding area.
⧫ In freezing conditions standing water will add to the risk of freezing overnight
and the formation of ice.
⧫ Access road is not wide enough for two cars.
⧫ The new football pitch being built nearby will generate more traffic resulting in
congestion near Tinto Primary School. 
Flood Risk and Drainage
⧫ Water culvert has not been improved, maintained and is in a poor condition.
⧫ Hard surfaces required for dwellings and parking would remove natural
drainage opportunities.  
⧫ Development will exacerbate flooding by adding more hard surfaces and
faster run off rates and add extra surface water at points where flooding
already occurs.
⧫ The conclusion of the flood risk assessment is completely at odds with an
earlier flood assessment which concluded that the proposed development is
not feasible unless the layout is substantially altered or mitigation measures
relating to the culvert are proposed.
⧫ The drain on the road opening to this site is inadequate for the level of water
it has to cope with presently, adding a new build will only increase run off rates
causing increased water on the road and pavement.
⧫ The 1 in 200 storm event has a water level of 221.283 – South Lanarkshire
Council policy is for floor levels 600mm above the 1 in 200 flood level which
should have a finished floor level of 221.883 almost 400mm higher than
currently indicated. 
Other Matters Raised
⧫ The village has various brownfield sites for development that are yet to be
utilised.
⧫ Accuracy of the plan is questioned as it is considered there is only sufficient
space for one plot. 
10

Page 11

⧫ Bin store site – where will it now be sited. It was on plans as directly next to
garden boundary causing smells and insects/wasps in summer to invade. 
7.2. The above issues are considered in the assessment below and full copies are
available to view on the planning portal.
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
National Planning Framework 4
8.2. National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for
Scotland. It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and
national planning policy. NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable
places, liveable places, and productive places. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises 
 Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation 
 Policy 4 - Natural places
 Policy 5 - Soils
 Policy 9 - Brownfield, vacant and derelict land
 Policy 14 - Design, quality and place
 Policy 15 - Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods
 Policy 16 - Quality homes
 Policy 17 - Rural homes
 Policy 22 - Flood risk and water management 
South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021)
8.3. The South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2) was formally adopted on
9 April 2021. For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will,
therefore, assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted
SLLDP2. In this regard the application site and associated proposals are affected by
the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies 
 Policy 2 - Climate Change
 Policy 3 - General Urban Areas and Settlements
 Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area 
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking
 Policy 14 - Natural and Historic Development
 Policy 16 - Water Environment and Flooding 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 Policy DM1 - New Development Design
 Policy GBRA7 - Small Scale Settlement Extensions (Rural Area only)
 Policy NHE10 - Prime Agricultural Land
 Policy NHE16 - Landscape
 Policy SDCC2 - Flood risk 
South Lanarkshire Council (SLC) Supporting Planning Guidance
 Residential Design Guide 2011 
 Electric Vehicle Charging Point Supporting Guidance 2022 
11

Page 12

9. Guidance
9.1. None 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Principle of Development
The site straddles the settlement boundary of Symington, with the footprint of the
proposed houses being within the urban area of and the rear garden areas of three of
the plots being located in the area defined as Rural Area. It is located in close proximity
to Main Street and a variety of facilities are available within 1km or less of the site and
include shopping, education facilities, open space, sports and recreation facilities. 
There is also access to bus connections and various employment opportunities. 
10.2. Policy 3 in SLLDP2 covers the land within the settlement boundary and provides a
policy position in relation to development within the urban area. It does not specifically
allocate sites for housing, however, it does state that the principle of residential
development on appropriate sites is acceptable. The area beyond the settlement
boundary is affected by Policy 4 where the Council seeks to protect the amenity of the
countryside while supporting small scale development in the right places that is
appropriate in land use terms. 
10.3. NPF4 Policy 16 seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate the delivery of more high
quality, affordable and sustainable homes, in the right locations. It details that homes
on land not allocated for housing in the LDP shall only be supported in limited
circumstances, as set out in part (f). This includes proposals involving small scale
opportunities within an existing settlement boundary. NPF4 Policy 9 Brownfield, vacant
and derelict land and empty buildings seeks to ensure that development proposals
result in the sustainable reuse of brownfield land.   
10.4. NPF4 Policy 17 is relevant in that the garden areas of three of the plots are outwith
the settlement boundary. Proposals for new homes in the Rural Area will be supported
where the development is suitably scaled, sited and designed to be in keeping with
the character of the area; the development should also accord with one of five
scenarios including the re-use of brownfield land or a redundant building or is a site
allocated in the LDP.   
10.5. The development of the land within the settlement boundary is considered to comply
with policy in both SLLDP2 and NPF4 in that it represents a small-scale opportunity
located primarily within an existing settlement boundary which satisfies part iii of the
policy and is consistent with the principles of local living and 20 minute
neighbourhoods satisfying part ii.  A condition requiring an agreed timescale for build
out will be applied to any permission granted in line with part (i). 
10.6. There will only be a small encroachment beyond the settlement boundary and there
will be no visible construction in this area which will be restricted to garden use.
Therefore, the character of the rural area will not be eroded. The development can be
integrated into the edge of Symington without adversely affecting amenity and
character. This part of the proposal complies with SLLDP2 in that it is located adjacent
to the existing settlement boundary. While technically it fails to accord with NPF4 in
considering the small scale nature of this part of the proposal in the context of the
wider area, the objectives of NPF4 Policy 17 would not be undermined. 
10.7. Overall, it is considered that the principle of development is acceptable on this site and
the proposal complies with Policy 15, 16 and 17 of NPF4 and Policy 3 and 4 of
SLLDP2. 
12

Page 13

10.8. Climate Change
NFP4 Policy 1, NPF4 Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2 aim to ensure that proposals for
new development must, where possible, seek to minimise and mitigate against the
effects of climate change. SLLDP2 Policy SDCC7 - Low and Zero Carbon Emission
from New Buildings, also requires a further 10% reduction on emissions beyond that
contained in the Building Regulations. NPF4 Policy 19 Heating and Cooling requires
that buildings occupied by people (i.e. dwellings) ensure sustainable temperature
management utilising passive methods where possible. 
10.9. The site is well located for services within the existing settlement, where the majority
of the daily needs could be achieved by walking, wheeling or cycling. The dwellings
themselves shall be required to comply with the Scottish Building Standards. However,
that aside, further conditions shall be imposed to ensure electric car charging at each
dwelling. A condition requiring further details on including low and zero carbon
technologies shall be imposed on any permission granted. The site layout has
positioned the main living area to face either south/southeast, to allow for sustainable
temperature management. In addition, the proposal will have no significant adverse
impact on the water or soil environment, flood risk, air quality, biodiversity and/or green
networks. Therefore, overall the proposal is considered, on balance, to meet the terms
of NPF4 Policy 1 and Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2 and SDCC7. 
10.10. Layout, Siting and Design
NPF4 Policy 14 Design Quality and Place and SLLDP2 Policy 5 Development
Management and Placemaking and Policy DM1 New Development Design seeks to
ensure well designed development that makes for successful places and considers
the impact on residential amenity. 
10.11. The proposal consists of five detached bungalows.  Two of which would be positioned
to the front of the site, facing onto Main Street.  Although narrower than the house
frontages in the immediate vicinity, the house design is appropriate to its surroundings
and rather than detracting from the local character, will add interest and variation whilst
meeting demand for housing. The designs include hipped roofs and bay windows,
representing a modern interpretation of traditional properties.  It is considered that the
proposals are appropriate in terms of scale, siting and design for the surrounding area. 
10.12. Although there would be other properties adjacent to the site, it is not considered that
there would be a loss of residential amenity.  Nor is the volume of traffic from five
properties considered to be a significant issue.  The proximity to bus routes to Lanark
and Biggar will ensure that an alternative form of transport is available rather than
solely relying on car journeys. In consideration the proposed development complies
with Policy 14 Design, quality and place of NPF4. 
10.13. There is suitable space at each dwelling for access, parking, bin storage and garden
ground.  Given the location of the site within Symington, there is good quality
recreation facilities in the surrounding area.  There are also opportunities for informal
play within the site. 
10.14. The proposal meets the terms of NPF4 Policy 12, 14 and 21 and SLLDP2 Policy 5 and
DM1. 
10.15. Natural and Historic Environment
NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity under part (c) details that all local developments shall
include appropriate measures to conserve, restore and enhance biodiversity.  The
Development with Nature Guidance is pertinent in this case.  The guidance
encourages a mitigation hierarchy to be applied – avoid, minimise, restore and offset
13

Page 14

to achieve a net positive biodiversity impact.  NPF4 Policy 4 Natural Places requires
that where proposals are likely to have an impact on a protected species (eg. bats),
steps must be taken to establish its presence and a level of protection then afforded. 
SLLDP2 Policy NHE9 Protected Species, carries similar aims. The proposal will not
have a significant impact upon landscape features, protected habitats, or species.
Some scrub trees to the front will be removed, however, replacement planting will be
undertaken elsewhere in the site as compensation. There are no archaeological
designations on the site and the West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WOSAS) has
not objected subject to an archaeological watching brief condition.  The proposal
meets the terms of NPF4 Policy 3 and 4 and SLLDP2 Policy NHE9 and NHE13. 
10.16. NPF4 Policy 5 Soils advises that development proposals should only be supported
where they are designed and constructed appropriately.  The proposal is considered
to comply with this policy. 
10.17. Technical Matters (Flood Risk and Drainage)
SLLDP2 Policy SDCC 3 Sustainable Urban Drainage seeks to ensure the provision
of suitable drainage arrangements within a development.  NPF4 Policy 22 Flood risk
and water management details that proposals shall not increase the risk of surface
water to others or themselves.  Additionally, all rain and surface water should be
managed through SUDS and form part of the proposed/existing, blue/green
infrastructure and areas of impermeable surfaces are to be minimised. 
10.18. SLLDP2 Policy 16 ‘Water Environment and Flooding’ states that any development
proposal which will have an unacceptable impact on the water environment will not
be permitted. SLLDP2 Policy SDCC2 ‘Flood Risk’ states that the storage and
conveyance capacity of the functional floodplain should be safeguarded.  In addition,
new development should achieve a minimum freeboard allowance of 600mm, and 1
metre (where it is adjacent to a watercourse) to take account of the uncertainties
involved in flood design and physical imponderables such as post construction
settlement or wave action. 
10.19. A comprehensive Flood Risk Assessment has been submitted as supporting
information. The site has previously been occupied by buildings. The Flood Risk
Assessment has entailed the development of a robust hydraulic model for the local
area. Acceptable pedestrian and emergency vehicle access will be provided and the
proposed development will have a neutral impact on any flooding and will not
increase flood risk to any neighbour properties or potentially increase the probability
of flooding elsewhere.  The impact of the proposed development in flood terms is
considered to be acceptable and a condition will ensure that the properties are
constructed at an appropriate level. 
10.20. A Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) will be installed to deal with surface
water run-off from the roofs and access roads and driveways. The drainage system
was designed following ground percolation tests and soakaway calculations and will
ensure existing surface water run-off does not exceed that of the post development –
the flow will be managed in a controlled manner. Run-off will be directed to
soakaways wrapped in permeable membrane to treat run-off from roofs and road. 
10.21. Conditions are proposed which will require the repair of defects around the culvert
entrance prior to the commencement of the housing development. Other conditions
proposed relate to the implementation of a culvert and burn management plan,
primarily focused on the regular clearance of debris. 
14

Page 15

10.22. It is considered that the proposal complies with the objectives and purpose of NPF4
Policy 22 and SLLDP2 Policy 16 and SDCC2. 
10.23. Technical Matters 
SLLDP2 Policy DM16 Water Supply and Policy DM16 Foul Drainage, seek to ensure
appropriate water supply and foul drainage arrangements.  The application form
details connections will be made to the existing public water and sewerage system. 
Therefore, the proposal meets the terms of Policy DM15 and DM16. 
10.24. A suitable road design and layout are proposed.  Roads and Transportation Services
have not raised any traffic or public safety issues in their consultation response and
conditions are proposed which will ensure maintenance of pedestrian and vehicle
visibility at the entrance. Adequate parking and access can be provided. A six metre
wide dropped kerb crossing with edging is proposed at the entrance which will highlight
the access road to the three plots to the back. The six metre width will continue into
the site for six metres, which is sufficient to avoid conflict with vehicles entering and
leaving with adequate intervisibility further into the site. The two parking spaces
assigned to each plot accord with recommended standards for three-bedroom
dwellings. 
10.25. A condition has been attached requiring approval of measures to facilitate the
provision of full fibre broadband. 
10.26. Conclusion 
In conclusion, the proposal seeks planning permission for 5 dwellings. The site is well
located within the settlement of Symington and is a suitable location for residential
use. The proposed layout can be achieved without significant impact on surrounding
amenity and the natural environment and the design complements the surrounding
area. Overall, it is considered that the proposals comply with the provisions of the
relevant policies within National Planning Framework 4 and the South Lanarkshire
Local Development Plan 2. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1.  The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant Planning Permission Subject to the following Conditions:- 
01.   That before any development commences on site or before any materials are   
ordered or brought to the site, details or samples of all materials to be used as
external finishes on the development shall be submitted to and approved by
the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to
maintain the visual quality of the area. 
02.  That before development starts, full details of the design and location of all
fences and walls, including any retaining walls to be erected on the site shall
be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to
maintain the visual quality of the area. 
15

Page 16

03.  Prior to completion or first occupation of the dwelling houses hereby
approved, whichever is the sooner; full details of the tree and hedge planting
scheme, shown on the Site Plan as Proposed (Dr No: L(0-) 02 Rev H), shall
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority.
This will include planting and maintenance specifications, including cross-
section drawings, use of guards or other protective measures and
confirmation of location, species and sizes, nursery stock type, supplier and
defect period. All tree planting shall be carried out in accordance with those
details and at those times.   
Reason:  To enhance the natural heritage of the area. 
04.  That the approved hedgerow and tree planting shall be completed to the
satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority during the first available
planting season following occupation of the dwellings or completion of the
development hereby approved, whichever is the sooner.   
Reason: In the interests of the visual amenity of the area. 
05.  That no development shall commence until details of surface water drainage
arrangements and future maintenance of sustainable drainage apparatus
have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning
Authority; such drainage arrangements will require to comply with the
principles of sustainable urban drainage systems and with the Council's
Developer Design Guidance (May 2020) and shall include the following
signed appendices: C 'Sustainable Drainage Design Compliance certificate',
D 'Sustainable Drainage Design Independent Check Certificate' and E
'Confirmation of Future Maintenance of Sustainable Drainage Apparatus' .
The development shall not be occupied until the surface drainage works have
been completed in accordance with the details submitted to and approved in
writing by the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason: To ensure that the disposal of surface water from the site is dealt
with in a safe and sustainable manner, to return it to the natural water cycle
with minimal adverse impact on people and the environment and to alleviate
the potential for on-site and off-site flooding. 
06.  Prior to the commencement of works on site, the applicant will require to
submit a copy of the independent check certificate appendix B : Flood Risk
Assessment Independent Check Certificate (refer to the Council's developer
design guidance May 2020) duly signed by the relevant party. 
Reason: To ensure that works proposed are not at risk of flooding and will not
increase the likelihood of flooding elsewhere. 
07.  That no dwellinghouse shall be occupied until the developer provides a written
agreement from Scottish Water that the site can be served by a water and
sewerage scheme constructed to the specification and satisfaction of Scottish
Water as the Water and Sewerage Authority.     
Reason: To ensure that the development is served by an appropriate effluent
disposal system and water supply. 
16

Page 17

08.  That prior to the commencement of development, the applicant shall provide
written confirmation from Scottish Water that the development does not affect
their assets and, if it does, the applicant shall submit details for a
diversion/relocation scheme approved by Scottish Water and that
development shall not commence until the approved diversion/relocation
scheme has been satisfactorily implemented.   
Reason: To ensure that the development does not impact upon Scottish
Water assets. 
09.  That prior to the commencement of work on site defective brick/stonework
around the culvert entrance and grate shall be repaired to the satisfaction of
the Council as Planning and Flooding Authority. 
Reason: To ensure the water flow through the burn and connecting culvert is
not impeded by obstructions. 
10.  Prior to commencement of works a culvert and burn management plan shall
be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning and
Flooding Authority. The management plan should include the following
elements:- 
a) type and frequency of management operations to achieve an uninterrupted
water flow along the burn and through the culvert;   
b) frequency of inspections; 
c) removal of debris, silt and other material at the culvert entrance and grate,
in the burn and on the burn banking which could interrupt water flow and
cause the banks of the burn to overflow; 
d) confirmation of cyclical management plan assessments and revisions to
evaluate the plan's success and identification of any proposed actions.   
Reason:  To protect the site from flood risk and to ensure the water flow
through the burn and connecting culvert is not impeded by obstructions. 
11.  Prior to the commencement of development, plans shall be submitted for the
written approval of the Planning Authority which demonstrate that the finished
floor levels of the approved dwellings shall be 600mm above the existing
ground level.  The development shall thereafter be completed in accordance
with the approved level details.   
Reason: To achieve a flood risk freeboard above the peak 1:200 years plus
climate change flood event. 
12.  That before the development hereby approved is brought into use, the access
shall be formed to plots 3, 4, and 5 and shall consist of a 6m wide vehicular
dropped kerb crossing, with a heel kerb installed to the rear of the footway, to
carriageway specifications to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority.   
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety and to distinguish the
private access from the public road. 
17

Page 18

13.  That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into
use, the access to Plots 3, 4, and 5 shall be a minimum of 6m in width and the
6m width shall be continued over the first 6m and shall be hard surfaced,
sealed and trapped over this length to prevent deleterious material being
carried onto the road.   
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety and to prevent deleterious
material being carried onto the road. 
14.  That before the development hereby approved is brought into use, the
driveway accesses shall be by means of a 6m wide vehicular dropped kerb
crossing with a heel kerb installed to the rear of the footway to carriageway
specifications, to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority.   
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety and to distinguish the
private access from the public road. 
15.  That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into
use, the first 2m of the driveways, measured from the edge of the heel kerb,
shall be hard surfaced, sealed and trapped to prevent deleterious material
being carried onto the road.   
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety and to prevent deleterious
material being carried onto the road. 
16.  That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into
use, visibility splays of 2.5 metres by 43 metres measured from the road
channel shall be provided at the junction of Main Street and the access road
and everything exceeding 0.9 metres in height above the road channel level
shall be removed from the sight line areas. 
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety. 
17.  That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into
use, visibility splays of 2.4 metres by 2.4 metres measured from the heel of
the footway shall be provided on both sides of the driveways and vehicular
access and everything exceeding 0.6 metres in height above the road channel
level shall be removed from the sight line areas and thereafter nothing
exceeding 0.6 metres in height shall be planted, placed or erected within
these sight lines.     
Reason: In the interests of public safety. 
18.  That before the dwellinghouses are occupied, all of the parking spaces shown
on the approved plans shall be laid out, constructed and available for use. 
Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate parking facilities within the site. 
19.  That prior to the formation of the footway along the site frontage, the road
gully at the site entrance shall be relocated to the public road channel.     
Reason: To reduce the risk of flooding at the site entrance. 
18

Page 19

20.  The developer shall secure the implementation of an archaeological watching
brief, to be carried out by an archaeological organisation acceptable to the
Council as Planning Authority, during all ground disturbance. The retained
archaeological organisation shall be afforded access at all reasonable times
and allowed to record and recover items of interest and finds.  A method
statement for the watching brief shall be submitted by the applicant, agreed by
the West of Scotland Archaeology Service and approved by the Council as
Planning Authority prior to commencement of the watching brief.  The name of
the archaeological organisation retained by the developer shall be given to the
Council as Planning Authority and to the West of Scotland Archaeology
Service in writing not less than 14 days before development commences.     
Reason: In order to safeguard any archaeological items of interest or finds. 
21.  Prior to commencement of the development hereby approved, details of
measures to facilitate the provision of full fibre broadband to serve the
development, including details of appropriate digital infrastructure and a
timescale for implementation, shall be submitted to and approved in writing by
the Council as Planning Authority, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the
applicant. The approved measures shall thereafter be carried out in
accordance with the agreed implementation timescale.     
Reason: To ensure the provision of digital infrastructure to serve the
development. 
22.  Prior to the commencement of development on site, an energy statement
covering the new build element of the approved development which
demonstrates that on-site zero and low carbon energy technologies contribute
at least an extra 10% reduction in CO2 emissions beyond the 2007 building
regulations carbon dioxide emissions standard, shall be submitted to and
approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. The statement shall
include:-     
a) the total predicted energy requirements and CO2 emissions of the
development, clearly illustrating the additional 10% reduction beyond the 2007
building regulations CO2 standard; 
b) a schedule of proposed on-site zero and low carbon energy technologies to
be included in the development and their respective energy contributions and
carbon savings; 
c) an indication of the location and design of the on-site energy technologies;
and 
d) a maintenance programme for the on-site zero and low carbon energy
technologies to be incorporated.       
Reason: To secure a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions. 
23.  That prior to the commencement of works, details, and locations of charging
points for electrical cars, at a rate of one charging point per house plot, shall
be submitted for the written approval of the Council as Planning Authority.
Prior to the completion of the development the approved charging points shall
be installed and available for use.     
Reason: To ensure facilities for recharging electrical cars are available for the
use of the residents.  
19

Page 20

24.  That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into
use, visibility splays of 2.0 metres by 43 metres measured from the road
channel shall be provided at the junction of the public road and the driveways,
taking direct access onto Main Street (Plots 1 and 2) and everything
exceeding 0.9 metres in height above the road channel level shall be removed
from the sight line areas and thereafter nothing exceeding 0.9 metres in
height shall be planted, placed or erected within these sight lines. 
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety. 
25.  The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than
the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision
notice. 
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposal will have no adverse impact on residential amenity, the setting of
Symington, agricultural land or landscape character and raises no road safety or flood
risk concerns.  The development complies with Policies 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17
and 22 of National Planning Framework 4 and Policies 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 16, DM1, GBRA7,
NHE10, NHE16 and SDCC2 of South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date:  2 November 2023 
Background Papers
P/20/1657 | Erection of five detached bungalows with associated parking and formation of
access road. | Land At Main Street Symington Biggar ML12 6LJ 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
20

Page 21

21

Page 22

22

Page 23

Report
Agenda Item 
CHECKED
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 14 November 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/23/0179
Proposal:  Erection of 3 no. dwellinghouses
Site Address:  Land 20 Metres North of 4 Church Street
Uddingston
Applicant:  Mr Ken Fisher
Agent:  Barry McMullan
Ward:  16 – Bothwell and Uddingston
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Type:  Affecting the character of a Conservation Area:
Hamilton Advertiser 9 March 2023
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  N/A
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
4
23

Page 24

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as it
has received more than 5 objections, as detailed in paragraph 3.5 (b) of the Decision
Making Process April 2015. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The site relates to a plot of vacant land located to the rear of 4 and 6 Church Street,
Uddingston. The site is adjacent to a mix of uses including residential, office space
and a church and has a boundary with the Gardenside Avenue Conservation Area. 
2.2. Currently the site is enclosed and contains a large area of hardstanding. The site was
used as a haulage yard until approximately 2018 when the warehouse buildings were
demolished. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. The proposed development relates to the erection of three 2-storey dwellinghouses.
The proposed houses will have a 70m2 rectangular footprint; a cross gable roof
finished in slate effect rooftiles, with a ridge height of 8.4m; external walls finished in
natural stone cladding on the principal elevation and white wet dash render on the
sides and rear; and vertically emphasised fenestration with sash-and-case front
windows. 
3.2. The houses are positioned so that rear gardens have depths between 9.6m and 12.5m
and that windows are at least 18.0m from any existing facing windows. Provision is
made within the overall site for 2 off-street parking spaces per house, vehicle turning,
and bin storage. Access would be taken via the existing access onto Church Street. 
3.3. The application has been revised serval times since validation. The design has been
amended in consideration of the architectural character surrounding the site, windows
changed and removed in consideration of overlooking, and access/parking/turning
arrangements altered. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. There are 4 previous applications on the site:- 
 HM/98/0207 – Outline Planning Application – Approved
o Residential development
 HM/12/0278 – Detailed Planning Application – Withdrawn
o Demolition of 2 sheds and erection of 3 dwellinghouses
 HM/12/0364 – Detailed Planning Application – Approved
o Demolition of 2 sheds and erection of 3 dwellinghouses
 P/20/0676 – Detailed Planning Application – Withdrawn
o Erection of dwellinghouse and 4 flats 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. None. 
6. Consultations
6.1. Roads Development Management - No objections subject to conditions. 
Response: Noted. 
6.2. Scottish Water 
There is sufficient water and waste water capacity to service the development. 
Response: Noted.  
24

Page 25

7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, a total of 6
representations have been received (6 objections, 0 support). The issues raised are
summarised as follows:- 
Design
 Not in-keeping with surrounding area
 Materials proposed for the new houses
 Fenestration of the proposed buildings 
Roads
 Blocking of access
 Low visibility splays
 Congestion
 Turning
 Visitor parking provision 
Amenity Impacts
 Overshadowing
 Overlooking 
Land Ownership
 Access in shared ownership with 4 Church Street and proprietor will not consent
to the proposed use. 
7.2. The above issues are considered in the assessment below and full copies are
available to view on the planning portal.  Please note that the issue of land ownership
is a private legal matter and cannot be considered in the assessment of this planning
application. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. The development plan comprises the
South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and National Planning Framework 4. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4 
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for
Scotland. It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and
national planning policy. NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable
places, liveable places, and productive places. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies
 Policy 1 Tackling the climate and nature crisis
 Policy 2 Climate mitigation and adaptation
 Policy 3 Biodiversity
 Policy 7 Historic assets and places
 Policy 9 Brownfield, vacant and derelict land and empty buildings
 Policy 12 Zero waste
 Policy 13 Sustainable transport
 Policy 14 Design, quality and place
 Policy 15 Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods
 Policy 16 Quality homes
 Policy 19 Heating and cooling
25

Page 26

 Policy 21 Play, recreation and sport
 Policy 22 Flood risk and water management 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021)
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will, therefore, also
assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire
Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2. 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies
 Policy 2 Climate Change
 Policy 3 General Urban Areas and Settlements
 Policy 5 Development Management and Placemaking
 Policy 14 Natural and Historic Development 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 Policy SDCC3 Sustainable Drainage Systems
 Policy SDCC7 Low and Zero Carbon Emissions for New Buildings
 Policy DM1 New Development Design
 Policy DM15 Water Supply
 Policy DM16 Foul Drainage and Sewerage
 Policy NHE6 Conservation Areas 
South Lanarkshire Council (SLC) Supporting Planning Guidance
 Residential Design Guide 2011
 Electric Vehicle Charging Point Supporting Guidance 2022 
9. Guidance
9.1. NatureScot Developing with Nature Guidance is relevant to all local developments and
provides advice and guidance on how to achieve Policy 3 Biodiversity of NPF4. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Principle of Development
The site is located within the general urban area of Uddingston, as defined by Policy
3 of SLLDP2 and has a boundary with Uddingston town centre. Consequently, a wide
variety of shops, services, employment and transportation options are available within
a short distance from the site. 
10.2. Policy 9 of NPF4 supports the sustainable reuse of brownfield land, provided that
biodiversity value and contamination are considered. The site has not naturalised and
is unlikely to do so due to the hard surfacing and its location in a developed urban
area. The site is not known or suspected to be contaminated. Consequently,
redevelopment of the site can be supported by Policy 9 of NPF4. 
10.3.  Policy 3 of the SLLDP2 does not specifically allocate sites for housing, however, the
principle of residential development is acceptable in an urban location. Policy 16 of
NPF4 seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate the delivery of high quality,
affordable and sustainable homes in the right locations. This site of 3 dwellings in the
context of Uddingston is considered a small-scale opportunity within an existing
settlement boundary satisfying part (iii).  The site is consistent with local living and 20-
minute neighbourhoods (including Policy 15 of NPF4) satisfying part (ii).  A timing
condition will be applied to any permission granted in line with part (i).  
26

Page 27

10.4. Overall, the principle of development is considered acceptable on this site and the
proposal complies with Policies 15 and 16 of NPF4 and Policy 3 of the SLLDP2. 
10.5. Climate Change
Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of SLLDP2 relate to the climate crises and
identify that all development should seek to minimise and mitigate the effects of
climate change. Policy 13 of NPF4 promotes sustainable transport and aims to facilitate
developments that prioritise walking, wheeling, cycling and public transport for everyday
travel and reduce the need to travel unsustainably. Policy 19 of NPF4 states that new
buildings should be designed to promote sustainable temperature management, and
Policy SDCC7 of the SLLDP2 seeks that buildings reduce emissions beyond the
requirements of building regulations. 
10.6. The site is well located for services within the existing settlement, where the majority
of daily needs could be achieved by sustainable travel means. Conditions should be
imposed on any permission granted for the provision of electric vehicle charge points
at each dwelling and the submission of further information in regard to low and zero
carbon energy and heating technologies. Additionally, the Council has other
mechanisms to promote sustainable development such as through the Building
Standards Service. Furthermore, the proposal will redevelop a brownfield site without
any significant adverse impact on the water or soil environment, flood risk, air quality,
biodiversity and/or green networks. Therefore, on balance, the proposal is considered
to meet the terms of Policies 1, 2, 13 and 19 of NPF4 and Policies 2 and SDCC7 of
the SLLDP2. 
10.7. Biodiversity
Policy 3 of NPF4 outlines that local developments should conserve, restore and
enhance the biodiversity value of a site. As a brownfield site that is unlikely to
naturalise without intervention, the development of dwellinghouses with garden
ground is likely to improve biodiversity by increasing soil exposure which can
subsequently be planted. Measures to specifically restore and enhance biodiversity
(i.e. details of species specific planting) can be sought by condition. 
10.8. Layout, Siting and Design
Policies 14 and 21 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and DM1 of the SLLDP2 relate to liveable
places, placemaking and the quality of the design of a development. Policy 14 of NPF4
sets out that all development should be designed to improve the quality of an area and
be consistent with the six qualities of a successful place: healthy, pleasant, connected,
distinctive, sustainable, and adaptable. Policy 21 of NPF4 sets out that any dwelling
occupied by children and young people shall incorporate well designed, good quality
provision for play, recreation and relaxation which is proportionate to the development
and existing provision in the area. 
10.9. It is considered that in terms of scale, design and materiality that the proposed
dwellinghouses will be sympathetic to the character and setting of the locale. The
proposed external materials would replicate the traditional natural finishes of the
surrounding area. Therefore, the development will not result in a detrimental impact
on the character of the area, the streetscape or any adjacent properties. 
10.10. The development has been subjected to a significant redesign since validation and the
receipt of objections regarding the design. It is acknowledged that the original design
was not in-keeping with the locale in terms of form, fenestration and materiality,
however, the houses as currently proposed would sit sympathetically in their
surroundings. Furthermore, the first floor side windows which could have directly
27

Page 28

overlooked existing neighbours have been removed and the overall level of glazing
has been reduced so that fenestration is in-keeping with the local style. 
10.11. The proposed dwellings will introduce new structures to the rear of existing residential
properties and will understandably impact those neighbours to a degree. However,
minimum garden depths (10m) and distances between facing windows (18m) as set
out in the Council’s Residential Design Guide will be maintained. Some proposed
windows fall short of 18m of separation from existing windows, however, the angle
between them is such that the possibility of overlooking is negligible. The same is true
for existing gardens to the sides of each plot, due to the staggering of buildings, the
angle between first floor windows and gardens is such that it does not raise significant
concern for overlooking. One representee expressed concern that Plot 3 would
overshadow and enclose their rear garden, however, Plot 3 is located due north and
will cast no shadow to this garden. The rear view of 4 Church Street will be impacted
upon, however, a view is not a material planning consideration. A degree of
overlooking and overshadowing is to be expected in dense residential areas, but it is
not considered to be of a significantly detrimental degree in this instance. 
10.12. Overall, it is considered that the proposed dwellinghouses would not have a significant
detrimental impact on the amenity and character of the area, the streetscape, or any
adjacent properties and will contribute to improving the quality of the site as a liveable
and successful place. The proposed houses will also have good sized garden grounds
which will be appropriate for children’s play. Consequently, the proposal accords with
the considerations of Policy 14 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and DM1 of the SLLDP2. 
10.13. Conservation Area
Policy 7 of NPF4 and Policies 14 and NHE6 the SLLDP2 identify that the Council will
seek to protect and enhance historic environment assets and places and that
development proposals in or affecting a Conservation Area should only be supported
where the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and its setting are
preserved or enhanced. The site borders the Gardenside Avenue Conservation Area,
however, after a significant redesign, it is considered that the design and materiality of
the houses would not have a significantly detrimental affect on the character and
appearance of the Conservation Area and its setting will be preserved. Consequently,
the proposal accords with the provisions of Policy 7 of NPF4 and Policies 14 and NHE6
of the SLLDP2. 
10.14. Technical Matters
Policy 12 of NPF4 identifies that proposals which generate waste including residential
should make provision to maximise the reduction and separation of waste at source
and for the storage and convenient access for the collection of waste. Provision has been
made within the site for the storage of waste bins including recycling bins. 
10.15. Policy 22 of NPF4 and Policy SDCC3 of the SLLDP2 relate to the water environment
and sustainable urban drainage systems. These require that development proposals
will not increase the risk of surface water flooding to others, or themselves be at risk,
that they manage all rain and surface water through sustainable urban drainage
systems (SUDS) and seek to minimise the area of impermeable surface. The site is
not at risk of flooding and the site is proposed to be permeable except for the dwellings
and the access. No details of a SUDS system have been provided, however,
considering the site area and scale of development, it is considered that the site can
accommodate a suitable SUDS system; details of which should be secured by
condition. 
28

Page 29

10.16. Policies DM15 and DM16 of the SLLDP2 seek to ensure appropriate supply of waste
water services. The application form details connections will be made to the existing
public water and sewerage system. Therefore, the proposal meets the terms of Policy
DM15 and DM16. 
10.17. The parking standard for a 3-bedroom house is 2 off-street parking spaces. The site
plan shows 2 spaces per house plus turning space. The Council’s Roads Authority
has responded that the parking arrangement is acceptable. The visibility splays fall
short of the standard for a restricted urban road, however, the Roads Authority has
investigated the issue and determined that a reduced splay is acceptable in this
instance considering that the access is existing, will provide access to only 4 dwellings
(3 proposed and no.4 Church Street), that traffic volumes on Church Street are low,
and that there are no records of accidents on the street. The Roads Authority has
recommended conditions to ensure the formation of the access and parking and that
a traffic management plan be submitted prior to commencement of development.
Furthermore, it is noted that an objection was raised stating that access to 4 Church
Street would be blocked.  Whilst there would be a degree of disruption during
construction, the completed proposal would not cause any obstructions. 
10.18. Conclusion 
In conclusion, the proposal seeks planning permission for 3 dwellinghouses on a
brownfield site off Church Street on the edge of Uddingston town centre. The site is
well located and is a suitable location for residential use. The proposed houses can
be accommodated on the site without significant adverse impact on surrounding
amenity and the design complements the traditional architecture of the surrounding
properties. Overall, it is considered that the proposals comply with the provisions of
the relevant policies within National Planning Framework 4 and the South Lanarkshire
Local Development Plan 2. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant Planning Permission Subject to the following Conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the
expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice.   
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Act 1997 (as amended). 
02. That before any development commences on site or before any materials are ordered
or brought to the site, details or samples of all materials to be used as external finishes
on the development shall be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning
Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to maintain the
visual quality of the area. 
03. That no development shall commence until details of surface water drainage
arrangements have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as
Planning Authority; such drainage arrangements will require to comply with the
principles of sustainable urban drainage systems and with the Council's Sustainable
Drainage Design Criteria and shall include signed appendices as required. The
development shall not be occupied until the surface drainage works have been
29

Page 30

completed in accordance with the details submitted to and approved by the Council as
Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure that the disposal of surface water from the site is dealt with in a
safe and sustainable manner, to return it to the natural water cycle with minimal
adverse impact on people and the environment and to alleviate the potential for on-
site and off-site flooding. 
04. That before any development commences on site details and locations of electric
vehicle charging points, at a rate of one 7kW charging point per house plot, shall be
submitted for the written approval of the Council as Planning Authority. Prior to the
completion of the development the approved charging points shall be installed, and
available for use. 
Reason: To ensure facilities for recharging electric vehicles are available for the use
of the residents. 
05. That before any development commences on site details of biodiversity measure(s)
shall be submitted for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The biodiversity
measure(s) shall thereafter be implemented prior to occupation or completion of the
approved dwellings, whichever occurs first.   
Reason: In order to ensure the provision of biodiversity measures which restore and
enhance the site and surrounding area. 
06. That notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development)(Scotland) Order 1992, (or any such order revoking or re-
enacting that order), no window openings shall be inserted above ground floor level
on the side elevation(s) of the dwellinghouses hereby approved.   
Reason: To safeguard the amenity and privacy of nearby occupants. 
07. That notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development)(Scotland) Amendment Order 2011 (or any such order
revoking or re-enacting that order), no alterations shall be made to the external
appearance of the dwellinghouses herby approved without the prior written consent of
the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To safeguard the visual amenity of the area. 
08. That notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development)(Scotland) Amendment Order 2011 (or any such order
revoking or re-enacting that order), no gates, fences, walls or other means of enclosure
or any hard surfaces shall be erected or installed between the front of the
dwellinghouse in Plot 1 of the approved plan ref. "AR23006 (PP) 001 G" and Church
Street.   
Reason: To ensure that no additional driveway is formed from Church Street and that
the future development potential of 6 Church Street is not prejudiced. 
09. That before the development is completed or brought into use, all of the parking
spaces shown on Drawing AR23006 (PP) 001 Rev G of the approved plans shall be
laid out and constructed to the specification of the Council as Roads and Planning
Authority.  
30

Page 31

Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate parking facilities within the site. 
10. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use, the
entire access road network serving the development shall be laid out and constructed
in accordance with the specification of the Council as Roads and Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the provision of satisfactory access to the dwellings. 
11. That prior to any works associated with the construction of the development
commence, a Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to the Council
as Roads and Planning Authority for approval. This should provide details of access
and parking provision for staff and visitors, intended working hours, how deliveries of
materials will be managed and stored and what wheel washing facilities will be
provided to prevent mud being carried on to the adopted road.   
Reason: in the interests of traffic and public safety as well as to preserve the amenity
of the surrounding area. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposed dwellinghouses would redevelop a brownfield site which represent a
small-scale opportunity within a settlement and is a sustainable location due to the
availability of services and infrastructure. The design of the houses respects the local
character and the site layout ensures that neighbouring amenity would not be
significantly impacted. Technical matters have also been met or could be met through
condition. Consequently, the proposal is considered to comply with Policies 1, 2, 3, 7,
9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, 21, 22 of National Planning Framework 4 and Policies 2, 3,
5, 14, SDCC3, SDCC7, DM1, DM15, DM16, and NHE6 of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 2 November 2023 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online: 
P/23/0179 | Erection of 3no. dwellinghouses | Land 20M North Of 4 Church Street Church
Street Uddingston 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
31

Page 32

32

Page 33

Report
Agenda Item 
CHECKED
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 14 November 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/23/0632
Proposal:  Erection of extensions to existing care home to create additional
floorspace with associated external alterations
Site Address:  60 Wellhall Road
Hamilton
ML3 9DL
Applicant:  Balmer Care Homes 
Agent:  UNUM Partnership
Ward:  17 Hamilton North and East
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission 
Advert Type:  Not applicable
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  Not applicable
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  Not applicable
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
Not applicable 
5
33

Page 34

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as it
has received more than 5 objections, as detailed in paragraph 3.5 (b) of the Decision
Making Process April 2015. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The site is located within Hamilton and access to the site is taken from Wellhall Road
via Millar Grove.  The site sits within an urban area and is enclosed by housing on all
sides.  The existing care home has a dedicated access, drop-off and parking area,
and a small amount of outdoor space. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. Planning permission is sought for the erection of a variety of two storey extensions to
the existing care home building.  The extensions would be located on all elevations of
the existing building in order to permit internal alterations which would allow the facility
to be upgraded to the required standards.  These improvements include the provision
of larger bedrooms and associated facilities.  An additional terrace would also be
formed at ground level whilst the extended bedrooms would have patio doors,
providing access to private external terraces. 
3.2. The overall ground floor footprint of the extensions would be approximately 240sq.m. 
Externally, the extensions have been designed to reflect the appearance of the existing
building through using a similar palette of materials including anthracite roof tiles,
render, fibre cement panels and cast stone features.  The existing residents garden,
parking and drop-off area would be retained, with an additional 12 parking spaces
being formed. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. Planning permission (Ref HM/09/0418) was granted for a 34 bed care home at this
location in 2009, with the care home opening in 2011. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. The applicant has submitted the following information to support the application:- 
 Design and Access Statement
 Transportation Statement
 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
 Planning Statement 
6. Consultations
6.1. Roads and Development (Transportation) – No objection as they are satisfied that the
parking provision on site will be increased to provide 24 spaces. 
Response – Noted, this can be achieved through the imposition of conditions. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, a total of
10 representations have been received which object to the proposal.  The issues
raised are summarised as follows:- 
Impact of Development
 Lack of adequate parking and that additional traffic will be generated.
 Overlooking/loss of privacy at nearby residential properties.
 Overshadowing of neighbouring residential properties.
 Water run-off may impact on neighbouring properties.
34

Page 35

 Residents using the outdoor garden area will create noise disturbance at
neighbouring properties.
 There is no need to install a pedestrian access gate on Hunston Avenue.
 There will be noise and disruption during the construction phase of the
development. 
7.2. The above issues will be considered in the assessment below and full copies are
available to view on the planning portal. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4 
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for
Scotland.  It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and
national planning policy.  NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable
places, liveable places, and productive places. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 – Tackling the climate and nature crises
 Policy 2 – Climate mitigation and adaptation
 Policy 3 – Biodiversity 
 Policy 4 – Natural places
 Policy 12 – Zero waste
 Policy 13 – Sustainable transport
 Policy 14 – Design, quality and place
 Policy 15 – Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods
 Policy 19 – Heating and cooling
 Policy 22 – Flood risk and water management 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021)
The South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2) was formally adopted on
9 April 2021.  For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will,
therefore, assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted
SLLDP2.  In this regard the application site and associated proposals are affected by
the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies
 Policy 1 – Spatial Strategy
 Policy 2 – Climate Change
 Policy 3 – General Urban Areas and Settlements
 Policy 5 – Development Management
 Policy 14 – Natural and Historic Environment 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 Policy SDCC3 – Sustainable Drainage Systems
 Policy DM1 – Design
 Policy NHE13 – Trees and Woodland
 Policy NHE9 – Protected Species
 Policy DM15 – Water Supply
 Policy DM16 – Foul Drainage/Sewerage Provision
 Policy SDCC7 – Low and Zero Carbon Emission from New Buildings
35

Page 36

9. Guidance
9.1. NatureScot Developing with Nature Guidance is relevant to all local developments and
provides advice and guidance on how to achieve Policy 3 Biodiversity of NPF4. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Principal of Development
Planning permission is sought for the extension and associated alterations of an
existing care home.  The policies contained within National Planning Framework 4
(NPF4) and the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2) are the main
considerations in this case, listed above, together with an assessment of any other
material planning considerations. 
10.2. The site is located within the general urban area of Hamilton, as defined by Policy 3
of SLLDP2.  A variety of facilities are available within 1km or less of the site and there
is also access nearby to public transport connections. 
10.3. A care home is an appropriate type of use within an urban area and the proposals to
extend the facility do not raise any land use issues.  The site is consistent with local
living and 20 minute neighbourhoods (NPF4 Policy 15). 
10.4. Overall, it is considered that the principle of altering and extending an existing care
home is acceptable on this site and the proposal complies with Policy 15 of NPF4 and
Policy 3 of SLLDP2. 
10.5. Climate Change
NFP4 Policy 1, NPF4 Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2 aim to ensure that proposals for
new development must, where possible, seek to minimise and mitigate against the
effects of climate change.  SLLDP2 Policy SDCC 7 - Low and Zero Carbon Emission
from New Buildings, also requires a further 10% reduction on emissions beyond that
contained in the Building Regulations.  NPF4 Policy 19 Heating and Cooling requires
that buildings occupied by people ensure sustainable temperature management
utilising passive methods where possible. 
10.6. The site is well located for services within the existing settlement.  The proposed
extensions would be required to go through the Scottish Building Standards.  A
condition requiring further details relating to low and zero carbon technologies shall be
imposed on any permission granted.  It is not considered that the proposal would have
a significant adverse impact on the water or soil environment, flood risk, air quality,
biodiversity and/or green networks.  Therefore, overall, the proposal is considered, on
balance, to meet the terms of NPF4 Policy 1 and Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2 and
SDCC7. 
10.7. Layout, Siting and Design
NPF4 Policy 14 Design Quality and Place and SLLDP2 Policy 5 Development
Management and Placemaking and Policy DM1 New Development Design seeks to
ensure well designed development that makes for successful places and considers
the impact on residential amenity. 
10.8. The proposal consists of a variety of small extensions to an existing care home in order
that it can meet current care inspectorate guidelines.  The proposed extensions would
utilise appropriate finishing materials to match the existing building and are of an
appropriate scale and design to ensure that they would not detract from the overall
appearance of the building.    
36

Page 37

10.9. Whilst the care home is located within a residential area, it is not considered that the
extensions would result in a significant increase in use of the premises as they would
only permit a maximum increase of 4 beds within the facility.  The impact on the
surrounding area, as a result of this increase, is likely to be minimal.  Due to the
relationship of the existing building and the surrounding residential properties, it is not
considered that any unacceptable overshadowing or overlooking would occur.   
10.10. NPF4 Zero Waste Policy 12 details that suitable bin storage inclusive of recycling bins
shall be shown on site. There is suitable space within the development site to
accommodate the extensions and also ensure that additional parking is provided,
along with suitable bin storage.  The proposal meets the terms of NPF4 Policies 12,
and 14 and SLLDP2 Policies 5 and DM1. 
10.11. Biodiversity, Trees and Protected Species
The application relates to an existing care home within an urban area and there are
no protected species on site and the development would not impact on any trees. 
Therefore, the proposals raise no issues in terms of biodiversity, trees or protected
species and the proposal meets the terms of NPF4 Policies 3 and 4 and SLLDP2
Policies 14, NHE9 and NHE13. 
10.12. Technical Matters
SLLDP2 Policy SDCC 3 Sustainable Urban Drainage seeks to ensure suitable
sustainable urban drainage.  NPF4 Policy 22 Flood risk and water management details
that proposals shall not increase the risk of surface water to others or themselves. 
Additionally, all rain and surface water should be managed through SUDS and form
part of the proposed/existing, blue/green infrastructure and areas of impermeable
surfaces are to be minimised.  The site is not at risk from river or surface water
flooding.  Appropriate drainage can be provided and a suitable condition would ensure
that a SUDs scheme is implemented.  The proposal meets the terms of SLLDP2 Policy
SDCC3 and NPF4 Policy 22. 
10.13. SLLDP2 Policy DM16 Water Supply and Policy DM16 Foul Drainage seeks to ensure
appropriate water supply and foul drainage arrangements.  The application form
details that no new connections would be required to be made to the existing public
water and sewerage system. Therefore, the proposal meets the terms of Policy DM15
and DM16. 
10.14. A suitable parking layout is proposed which includes the creation of an additional 12
spaces. Roads and Transportation Services have been consulted and have not raised
any safety concerns. 
10.15. Other matters raised by representations include the installation of a pedestrian access
gate, noise from the garden area and disruption during construction.  The site is
located within an urban area and it is not anticipated that any unacceptable issues will
arise due to noise from residents in the garden area or from the creation of a
pedestrian access, which is to be kept locked unless required in an emergency. 
Appropriate conditions and advisory notes will be used to minimise any disruption from
the development during the construction phase. 
10.16. Conclusion 
The proposal seeks planning permission to extend and alter an existing care home. 
The site is well located within Hamilton and is a suitable location for a care home.  The
design and layout of the proposal would be acceptable and it is not considered that it
would have an unacceptable impact on the amenity of the surrounding area. Overall,
37

Page 38

it is considered that the proposals comply with the provisions of the relevant policies
within National Planning Framework 4 and the South Lanarkshire Local Development
Plan 2. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant Planning Permission Subject to the following Conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than
the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision
notice. 
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 
02. That prior to any works starting on site an energy statement shall be submitted
for the written approval of the Planning Authority.  The development shall then
be completed in accordance with the approved details. 
Reason: To secure the timeous implementation of renewable and/or low carbon
energy technologies. 
03. That prior to any works starting on site, details of biodiversity measure(s) shall
be submitted for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The biodiversity
measure(s) shall thereafter be implemented prior to occupation or completion
of the approved development, whichever occurs first. 
Reason: In order to ensure the provision of biodiversity measures which restore
and enhance the site and surrounding area. 
04. Prior to the commencement of development, details and samples of all
materials to be used as external finishes on the development shall be submitted
to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to
maintain the visual quality of the area. 
05. That no development shall commence until details of surface water drainage
arrangements have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Council
as Planning Authority; such drainage arrangements will require to comply with
the principles of sustainable urban drainage systems and with the Council's
Sustainable Drainage Design Criteria and Soakaway Design Guidance -
Technical Appendix May 2023 - and shall include signed appendices as
required. 
Reason: To ensure that the disposal of surface water from the site is dealt with
in a safe and sustainable manner, to return it to the natural water cycle with
minimal adverse impact on people and the environment and to alleviate the
potential for on-site and off-site flooding. 
06. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use,
24 no. parking spaces shall be formed on site. 
Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate parking facilities within the site.
38

Page 39

07. That prior to the commencement of any works associated with the
development, a Construction Traffic Management Plan shall be submitted to
and approved in writing by the Council as Roads and Planning Authority and
implemented thereafter. This document shall include details of access and a
parking provision (including a parking plan) for staff and operatives, intended
working hours, the management and storage of deliveries and the wheel
washing facilities. 
Reason: In order to retain effective planning control. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The application seeks detailed planning permission to extend and alter a care home. 
The proposal consists of a small-scale development well located within a settlement
boundary. There is no significant adverse impact on amenity, public safety or the local
environment. The proposal complies with Policies 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 14, 15, 19 and 22 of
National Planning Framework 4 (adopted 2023) and Policies 2, 3, 5, 14, SDCC3, DM1,
NHE13, NHE9, DM15, DM16 and SDCC7 of South Lanarkshire Local Development
Plan 2 (adopted 2021). 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 2 November 2023 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:- 
P/23/0632 | Erection of extensions to existing care home to create additional floorspace with
associated external alterations. | Well Hall 60 Wellhall Road Hamilton ML3 9DL
(southlanarkshire.gov.uk) 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
39

Page 40

40

Page 41

Report
Agenda Item 
CHECKED
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 14 November 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/23/0866
Proposal:  Re-engineering of bus station to provide 4 bus stop locations, 2 bus
layover areas, 4 bus shelters, bike store, lighting, CCTV, a real time
information board and new paving
Site Address:  Lanark Bus Station
St Vincent Place
Lanark
ML11 7JS
Applicant:  South Lanarkshire Council
Agent:  N/A
Ward:  2 - Clydesdale North
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Type:  Non notification of neighbours
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  N/A
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
6
41

Page 42

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as it
has received more than 5 objections, as detailed in paragraph 3.5 (b) of the Decision
Making Process April 2015. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The application site is located within the town centre of Lanark and relates to the
existing bus station and parking areas associated with the adjacent rail station. To the
east of the application site lies Morrisons supermarket, to the west lies a vacant
building (formerly occupied by the DWP) and disabled parking. To the south is a fish
and chip shop and St Vincent Place, one of the main routes through Lanark.  Within
the wider area there is a mix of residential, retail and community uses. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. The proposal involves incorporating and altering existing rows of parking for the rail
station to form 4 bus stances.  The alterations would provide parallel parking for 2
standard bus stops and 2 coach stops, with associated shelters. The entrance would
be re-designed to include a pedestrian island. There would also be a layover area for
2 buses, with potential electric vehicle charging. Other associated works include
provision of a bike store, lighting, CCTV, real time information boards and new paving.   
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. None relevant. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. The applicant has submitted the following information to support the application:- 
 Design Statement
 Equality Impact Statement
 Scheme Feasibility Study 
6. Consultations
6.1. Environmental Services – No objections, standard informatives requested.
Response – Noted. 
6.2. Roads and Development (Transportation) – No objection to the proposal.
Response – Noted 
6.3. Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) – No objections.
Response – Noted. 
6.4. Network Rail - No objection to the proposal.
Response – Noted. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, a total of
14 representations have been received (10 objections, 2 comments and 2 support).
The issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
Interchange
 Lack of toilets to serve interchange
 Lack of covered/safe waiting area
 Request real time tracking for buses at the interchange
 Knock down adjacent vacant building and form an internal wating area
 Lack of pick-up and drop-off
42

Page 43

 Lack of demand for additional bus stop and plenty within town closer to
homes/workplaces
 Car parking is required for disabled access
 Loss of parking adjacent to the rail station 
 Distance from new park and ride to rail is unsuitable for those with mobility issues,
who cannot access a blue badge. 
7.2. The above issues will be considered in the assessment below and full copies are
available to view on the planning portal. 
7.3. Various comments have been raised which are not relevant material planning
considerations to this application. This includes impact on the adjacent Morrisons car
park which is a matter for the relevant private parties to resolve. Furthermore,
comments on the operations of the bus services and park and ride are not material to
the consideration of this planning application 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for
Scotland. It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and
national planning policy. NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable
places, liveable places, and productive places. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies
 Policy 1 Tackling the climate and nature crises
 Policy 2 Climate mitigation and adaptation
 Policy 3 Biodiversity 
 Policy 7 Historic assets and places
 Policy 12 Zero waste
 Policy 13 Sustainable transport
 Policy 14- Design quality and place
 Policy 27 City, town, local and commercial centres
 Policy 31 Culture and creativity 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2(2021) 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will, therefore, also
assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire
Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies
 Policy 2 Climate Change
 Policy 5 Development Management
 Policy 9 Strategic Town Centre
 Policy 14 Natural and Historic Environment 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 Policy SDCC3 Sustainable Drainage Systems
 Policy DM1 Design
 Policy NHE1 New Lanark World Heritage Site
 Policy NHE6 Conservation Areas 
43

Page 44

South Lanarkshire Council (SLC) Supporting Planning Guidance
 None relevant 
9. Guidance
9.1. Nature Scot Developing with Nature Guidance is relevant to all local developments
and provides advice and guidance on how to achieve Policy 3 Biodiversity of NPF4. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Principle of Development 
The site is located in the Strategic Town Centre of Lanark.  NPF4 Policy 27 City, town,
local and commercial centres seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate development
in city and town centres, to adapt to long-term economic, environmental and societal
changes and encourage town centre living. The aim is to ensure that town centres are
accessible locations. SLLDP2 Policy 9 Network of Centres seeks to ensure strategic
town centres, such as Lanark, have a mix of commercial and community focal points.
NPF4 Policy 13 Sustainable transport seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate
developments that prioritise walking, cycling and public transport for everyday travel.
The policy details that proposals to improve or enhance public transport infrastructure
shall be supported. 
10.2. Overall, it is considered that the principle of development is acceptable on this site and
the proposal complies with NPF4 Policy 27, NPF4 Policy 13 and SLLDP2 Policy 9. 
10.3. Climate Change
NPF4 Policy 1, NPF4 Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2 aim to ensure that proposals for
new development must, where possible, seek to minimise and mitigate against the
effects of climate change. The proposal shall improve and enhance an existing public
transport interchange and is sustainably located. The proposal will have no significant
adverse impact on the water or soil environment, flood risk, air quality, biodiversity
and/or green networks. Therefore, the proposal is considered, on balance, to meet the
terms of NPF4 Policy 1 and NPF4 Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2. 
10.4. Layout, Siting and Design
NPF4 Policy 14 Design Quality and Place and SLLDP2 Policy 5 Development
Management and Placemaking and Policy DM1 New Development Design seeks to
ensure well designed development that makes for successful places. The proposal is
sited within the Conservation Area where NPF4 Policy 7 Historic places and assets
and SLLDP2 Policy 14 and Policy NHE3 Conservation Area are applicable. 
10.5. The submitted feasibility scheme demonstrates an assessment and consideration of
issues across the provision of public transport in Lanark town centre, namely at the
interchange. The document details various iterations of proposals to resolve identified
issues. The feasibility scheme sought to make improvements through the re-
engineering of the bus station, including use of additional land used for parking, to
ensure 4 stances were retained (there are 5 stances currently). This is coupled with
other projects: a park and ride (completed on Ladyacre Road around 200m from the
site) and provision of disabled parking (completed around 60m west of the site). 
10.6. It is considered that the proposals as a whole suggest a suitable layout and design for
its location and the surrounding area. The level access and natural stone flag will
improve the visual amenity of the bus interchange. The loss of car parking has been
alleviated by the formation of the nearby park and ride facility, with an overall increase
in parking provision. It is noted that concerns have been raised for those with mobility
concerns that do not qualify for blue badge parking provisions. However, the re-
44

Page 45

engineering works seek to improve the access and egress for the bus itself, provide
safe crossing and pedestrian access around the interchange, more suitable for those
with mobility issues. The proposals shall result in an accessible, pleasant, connected,
distinctive, sustainable development that meets the changing needs of the community.
The proposal meets the terms of NPF4 Policy 14 and SLLDP2 Policy 5 and Policy
DM1. 
10.7. NPF4 Zero Waste Policy 12 details that suitable bin storage, inclusive of recycling bins
should be provided. Bins have not been detailed on the plans, however, this matter
can be addressed through an appropriate planning condition. The proposal meets the
terms of Policy 12. 
10.8. Other matters
NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity under part (c) details that all local developments shall
include appropriate measures to conserve, restore and enhance biodiversity. The
Developing with Nature Guidance is pertinent in this case. The guidance encourages
a mitigation hierarchy to be applied - avoid, minimise, restore and offset to achieve a
net positive biodiversity impact. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant Planning Permission Subject to the following Conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than
the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision
notice.   
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 
02. That before any development commences on site or before any materials are
ordered or brought to the site, details and samples of all materials to be used
as external finishes on the development shall be submitted to and approved by
the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to
maintain the visual quality of the area. 
03. That prior to any work starting on site, details of a programme indicating the
phasing of the construction works and provision of alterative arrangements for
the operation of the bus interchange shall be submitted to the Council for
approval, and no work shall begin until the phasing scheme and alternative
arrangements has been approved in writing. Following approval, the
development shall be implemented in accordance with the approved scheme. 
This programme shall include details of:- 
 phasing of constructions works
 traffic management 
 the circulation of vehicles and pedestrians in and around the site
 temporary bus stops inclusive of turning arrangements
 full accessibility audit of temporary bus stops 
Reason: In order to ensure suitable interim arrangements. 
45

Page 46

04. That prior to the commencement of any works starting on site, a Road Safety
Audit shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Roads
and Planning Authority and implemented thereafter. 
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety. 
05. Prior to the commencement of development, the following details shall be
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority:- 
i. Sectional drawings detailing the proposed ground levels and any ramps,
kerbs or steps proposed at the interface between the bus station and the
railway station at the northwest corner of the site.  
ii. A site plan showing the location of the provided sections and the precise
location of the cycle storage.
iii. Design details for the proposed cycle storage. 
For the avoidance of doubt, the submitted details shall ensure that a clear and
level access is maintained between the bus station and the railway station. 
Thereafter, the development shall be undertaken in accordance with the
approved details. 
Reasons: In order to ensure that a clear and level access is maintained
between the bus station and the railway station in the interests of public safety
and in providing access for all to public transport infrastructure.   
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposal relates to the re-engineering of a bus station to improve the customer
experience for all, inclusive of those with mobility issues, and pedestrian movement
within the site. The proposal will provide a modern high-quality transport interchange
and encourage public transport as a sustainable transport alternative to the private
car. The proposal complies with the relevant Policies of National Planning Framework
4 and SLLDP2. It is recommended that planning permission is granted. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 2 November 2023 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online: 
P/23/0866 | Re-engineering of bus station to provide 4 bus stop locations,2 bus layover
areas,4 bus shelters, bike store, lighting, CCTV, a real time information board and new paving
| Lanark Bus Station St Vincent Place Lanark ML11 7JS 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies.  
46

Page 47

Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
47

Page 48

48

Page 49

Report
Agenda Item 
CHECKED
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 14 November 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/23/1070
Proposal:  Extension of existing feed bins (retrospective)
Site Address:  Roadhead Farm
Shieldhill Road
Quothquan
Biggar
ML12 6ND 
Applicant:  Mr Geoff Hewitt 
Agent:  BHC Ltd
Ward:  03 Clydesdale East
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Type:  Advertised under Schedule 2 of The Town and Country Planning
(General Permitted Development) (Scotland) Order 1992 (As
Amended)
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  N/A
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
7
49

Page 50

1. Reason for Report
1.1. The application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee under Clause
4.1 of the Decision-Making Process 2015: any application which has attracted more
than five objections. 
2. Site Description
2.1. Situated approximately 225 metres west of the settlement boundary of Quothquan, the
site is an existing farm and feed operation accessed via Shieldhill Road directly to the
north of Quothquan Village Hall and the ruins of the former Quothquan church and
graveyard. Roadhead Farm is a large farm and feeds facility and the application site
comprises the area of the feed bins and the access route out to Shieldhill Road. 
2.2. The farm is generally surrounded by agricultural land to the west, south and east with
Quothquan to the west. The closest building after the village hall is the residential
property at Gatefoot, on the same side of Shieldhill Road as the farm and around 170m
from the feed bins which are the subject of this application. The farm lies within the
Upper Clyde Valley and Tinto Special Landscape Area as set out in the adopted South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. The proposal is seeking consent in retrospect for the erection of additional feed bins
adjacent to existing bins and silos at Roadhead Farm. The new feed bins are enclosed
in a steel framed structure clad in single skin corrugated steel cladding panels. The
structure is an increase on the building approved under permission P/20/1246 and
increases the floor area by 249m², with a ridge height of approximately 20.3 metres. 
3.2. The submitted drawings also show the formation of a hardstanding in the farm yard
outside the new building, which measures 160m² (8m x 20m). No other changes are
proposed to the existing site. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. Roadhead Farm has a long history of planning applications related to its long-term use
as a cattle farm. In 2005, the partial use of the existing farm as a feed business was
consented (CL/05/0360). Since that time there have been subsequent applications for
additional agricultural buildings which increased the farm’s operational capacity
(CL/11/0437, CL/16/0248, CL/17/0174, P/18/0633, P/18/0801, P/19/0675) both in
terms of cattle and feed production. In 2020, an application was submitted for the
erection of an agricultural shed to house feed bins (P/20/1246) and this was approved
in November 2020.  The current application is for additional feed bin capacity next to
those previously approved in 2020. It was submitted following investigations by
Council Officers following complaints from nearby residents that the construction
ongoing on site exceeding the scope of what was permitted under application
P/20/1246. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. The application was submitted with location and plans and elevational drawings of the
feed bin buildings including CGIs showing the appearance of the structure in 3D. 
6. Consultations
6.1. West of Scotland Archaeological Service - Highlighted the proximity to the ruins of
Quothquan church and graveyard, however, have advised that the long-established
farm and previous disturbance which has taken place in the relatively small site area
mean that archaeological work is not required for this application. 
Response - Noted. 
50

Page 51

7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, 6 letters of
representation objecting to the application have been received from separate third
parties with a neutral comment being submitted by Quothquan and Thankerton
Community Council. The issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
 Increase in traffic
 Road Safety – traffic speeds
 Road Safety – inadequate access
 Late night / early morning activity
 Noise disturbance
 Light pollution
 Impact on visual amenity
 Intensification of the use to an industrial scale 
The above issues will be considered in the assessment below and full copies are
available to view on the planning portal. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. The development plan comprises the
South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (adopted 29 March 2021) and National
Planning Framework 4 (which was laid before the Scottish Parliament on 8 November
2022 and adopted by Scottish Ministers on 13 February 2023). 
Section 24(3) of the 1997 Act confirms that if there is an inconsistency between NPF4
policies and a Local Development Plan which was adopted before 13 February 2023,
then the policies in NPF4 prevail. 
National Planning Framework 4
8.2. National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for
Scotland. It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and
national planning policy. NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable
places, liveable places, and productive places. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies (2023) 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises 
 Policy 2 - Climate Mitigation and Adaptation 
 Policy 29 - Rural Development 
South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021)
8.3. The South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2) was formally adopted on
9 April 2021.  For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will,
therefore, assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted
SLLDP2.   
8.4. SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies
 Policy 2 - Climate Change 
 Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area 
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking 
51

Page 52

SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 Policy DM1 - New Development Design 
 Policy GBRA1 - Rural Design and Development 
 Policy GBRA2 – Business proposals in the Green Belt and Rural Area 
9. Guidance
9.1. None. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Introduction
The main issues to be addressed in the determination of this application are the
acceptability in principle of the proposed development, the impact upon amenity and
an assessment of technical matters. The policies contained within National Planning
Framework 4 and the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 are the main
consideration in this case, together with an assessment of any other material planning
considerations raised during the application process. 
10.2. Principle of Development
Full planning permission is sought retrospectively for the erection of an extension to
existing feed bins at Roadhead Farm, which is located west of the settlement of
Quothquan. The farm partially diversified into a feed production, storage and
distribution business in 2005 and has expanded incrementally since that point. In
2020, an application for a clad feed bins structure was approved. 
10.3. During the implementation of that permission residents raised concerns about the
scale and the planning enforcement team subsequently established that the works
taking place went beyond the scale of what had previously been approved. This
application is to regularise the discrepancy and, therefore, the principle of
development hinges on the acceptability of the additional feed bins and structure in
the wider context of the site. 
10.4. Policy 29 Rural Development of NPF4 advises that development proposals which
contribute to the viability, sustainability and diversity of the local rural economy will
be supported including the diversification of existing businesses and the creation of
production and processing facilities for local produce and materials. In that regard,
the proposed feed bins to supplement the existing feed mill part of Roadhead Farm
would directly accord with Policy 29 of NPF4. 
10.5. Policy GBRA2 of SLLDP2 advises that extensions to existing rural businesses are
considered appropriate within the Rural Area. In this instance, the provision of feed
bins within the site was considered acceptable in the assessment of application
P/20/1246 and the additional 249m2 of additional feed bin floorspace in this
application is also considered appropriate given the scale of the site. 
10.6. Climate Change
Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 identify that: development shall take account of the global
climate and nature crises; and that development should minimise emissions and be
adapted to take account of current and future climate risks.  In addition, Policy 2 –
Climate Change in SLLDP2 states that all new development proposals should seek to
minimise and mitigate against the effects of climate change.  In this instance, the
proposal is only for additional feed bin capacity at an existing rural farm and feed
business.  The site is not at risk of flooding and there would be no adverse impacts on
biodiversity, soils or air quality of the blue/green network as a result of the proposal.    
52

Page 53

Design
10.7 Policy DM1 of SLLDP2 requires new development to respect the local context and be
appropriate to the character and topography of the site in terms of layout, scale,
proportion, massing and appearance of buildings, structures and landscaped and hard
surfaced areas. 
10.8 The proposed feed bins and steel-clad structure are considered appropriate in scale
and appearance for the large-scale farming and feed enterprise that takes place on
site. The materials are appropriate for a rural setting and accord with the other
agricultural buildings which have been constructed on site in the last decade or so.   
10.9 Impact Upon Amenity
The proposed feed bins will increase the capacity of the animal feed operation,
however, the noise associated with this process, outwith the period of construction, is
not anticipated to differ significantly from that generated by the existing operations on
site. Conditions regarding noise levels and mitigating light pollution are already in
place on the feed mill use as part of planning permission CL/05/0360 and, as such, it
is not considered necessary or appropriate to duplicate those conditions on this
application.  The traffic generated by the existing use and the expansion of the
business over the last decade is outwith the scope of this application and likewise
issues of traffic safety and road users on Shieldhill Road failing to respect statutory
speed limits are outwith the scope of this application for feed bin storage. 
Other Concerns Raised
10.10 Consultees raise no objections to the proposal. With regards to issues raised by
objectors that have not been referenced above, the creation of a new vehicle access
through an adjacent field, referenced by the Community Council as already under
construction, is not part of this development proposal and is outwith the scope of this
application. Should this access be outwith permitted development rights and require
permission, its merits, and any consequential impacts upon traffic movements or
adjacent archaeological heritage assets would be considered in any associated
application. 
Conclusion  
10.11. The proposal, subject to appropriate conditions, accords with national and local
policies regarding the expansion of a rural business. The scale and nature of the
proposals, when compared to the scale of the wider farm and feed operation, naturally
limit the impact they can have on the amenity of the surrounding area. Issues of noise
and light pollution have been addressed via continuing conditions on previous
consents. It is therefore recommended that approval is granted subject to conditions.   
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant Planning Permission Subject to the following Conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the
expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice. 
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Act 1997 (as amended).  
53

Page 54

02. That before any cladding materials are brought to the site, details and samples of all
materials to be used as external finishes on the development shall be submitted to and
approved by the Council as Planning Authority. The external cladding shall thereafter
be installed as approved. 
Reason: To ensure that the accommodation does not become occupied by long-term
or permanent residents without the express grant of planning permission and to ensure
compliance with local plan policy. 
03. Any lighting installed upon the new structure or within the yard to illuminate the new
hardstanding shall accord with the measures to prevent light spillage already imposed
by condition 13 of planning permission CL/05/0360. 
Reason: Reason: In the interests of traffic safety and visual amenity. 
12. Reasons for Decision
12.1 The proposal complies with Policies 1, 2 and 29 of National Planning Framework 4
(adopted 2023) and Policies 2, 4 and 5 of the South Lanarkshire local Development
Plan and is appropriate at this existing rural business. There are no material
considerations which would justify the refusal of planning permission. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 2 November 2023 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online: 
P/23/1070 | Extension of existing feed bins (retrospective). | Roadhead Farm Shieldhill Road
Quothquan Biggar ML12 6ND (southlanarkshire.gov.uk) 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
54

Page 55

55

Page 56

56

Page 57

Report
Agenda Item 
CHECKED
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 14 November 2023
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject Planning Appeal Decisions – April to October 2023 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1 The purpose of the report is to:-
Amended
 advise Committee of decisions that have been made by the Scottish
Government’s Department of Planning and Environmental Appeals Division
during the period 1 April to 31 October 2023 in relation to South Lanarkshire
Council 
[
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1 The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that Committee note the decisions that have been issued by the Scottish
Government’s Department of Planning and Environmental Appeals; and
(2) that Committee note that twice yearly updates on ongoing decisions will be
presented to future meetings of the Planning Committee.
[1re
3. Background 
3.1 Members will be aware that applicants whose planning applications are refused by the
Planning Committee have a right to appeal that decision to the Scottish Ministers within
three months of the date of the decision. The Appeals are processed by the
Department of Planning and Environmental Appeals and, in most cases, a Reporter is
appointed by the Scottish Ministers to undertake the Appeal. 
3.2 Applicants are also able to ask the Council for a Screening Opinion to determine
whether an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is required in connection with a
development proposal. Where the Council decides an EIA is required the applicant
has the right to request a Screening Direction from Scottish Ministers. 
3.3 It is considered appropriate to bring this report to Committee to update members on
the outcome of these decisions and a link to each of the Cases on the Scottish
Government DPEA website can be found in the report. 
4 Planning Appeals 
4.1 Since April 2023, three applications refused by South Lanarkshire Council have been
the subject of an appeal to Scottish Ministers and a decision has been issued. The
following sets out each of the proposals.  
8
57

Page 58

4.2 Change of use of after school care facility to class 1 retail use and associated external
alterations at 20 Argyle Drive, Hamilton (application reference P/21/2167) - Scottish
Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk) 
This application was refused by the Planning Committee on 22 November 2022
against officer recommendation on the grounds of public safety, due to insufficient
parking provision, including for the receipt of deliveries to the unit. 
The Reporter found that the amenity of local residents would be adversely affected by
the proposed parking and servicing arrangements and dismissed the appeal. 
4.3 Formation of two house plots at Lockhart Mill Farm near Lanark (application reference
P/22/1789) - Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk) 
The application was refused by Planning Committee on 9 May 2023 on the grounds
that the proposal was contrary to a number of local and national policy considerations. 
The Appointed Reporter dismissed the appeal agreeing that the proposal failed to
accord with polices in the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2
(SLLDP2) and National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4). 
4.4 Erection of dwellinghouse at Peel Road, Thorntonhall (application reference
P/22/1122) - Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk) 
The application was refused by Planning Committee on 9 May 2023 on the grounds
the proposal was contrary to national and local development planning policy. 
The Reporter found the proposal did not satisfy the requirements of NPF4 or the
SLLDP2 and dismissed the appeal. 
4.5 Erection of five dwellinghouses with associated works at Fence Terrace, Tillietudlem
(application reference P/22/1507) - Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details
(scotland.gov.uk) 
This application was refused by Planning Committee on 6 June 2023 as being contrary
to a number of local and national policy considerations. 
The Reporter dismissed the appeal stating that the proposals did not accord with the
provisions of the development plan and that there were no material considerations that
would justify granting planning permission. 
5. Screening Direction
5.1 Leisure Development at Kersewell Mains Farm, Carnwath - Scottish Government -
DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk)  
The Council issued a Screening Opinion on 9 May 2023 that an Environmental Impact
Assessment was required in relation to the variation of a condition associated with a
proposed development at Kersewell Mains Farm which included a 200 bed hotel, log
cabins, golf course and equestrian activities. 
The applicant subsequently requested a ‘Screening Direction’ from Scottish Ministers.
A decision letter was issued on 11 August 2023 which stated that the development
would have a significant effect on the environment and an EIA was required.  In
addition, it was considered that the baseline environmental conditions that existed
when the development was first approved in 2005 would have significantly changed.
58

Page 59

6. Next Steps
6.1 At the time of the preparation of this report a further 6 planning appeals have been
made against decisions made by the Council and a further report will be presented to
the Planning Committee to provide an update on appeal decisions made up to 31
March 2024. 
7. Employee Implications
7.1 There are no employee implications. 
8 Financial Implications
8.1 The resource commitment and financial costs for the Planning Authority in relation to
the Planning Appeals process must be borne from existing budgets and resources and
no external funding is provided for this activity. 
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications 
9.1 The planning system will have an increasingly key role in addressing the climate
change agenda.  Investing additional income in resources within the planning service
will contribute to meeting these aims. 
10. Other Implications
10.1 There would be a reputational risk if this was not undertaken as this action has
previously been specified in the Council’s Planning Performance Framework. 
11. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
11.1 The content of this report is not relevant to the Council’s equalities duties and,
therefore, no impact assessment is required. 
11.2 There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in the report. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
2 November 2023 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving 
Previous References
 Planning Committee report on application P/21/2167 – 22 November 2022 - associated
planning appeal decision Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk)
 Planning Committee report on application P/22/1789 – 9 May 2023 - associated
planning appeal decision Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk)
 Planning Committee report on application P/22/1122 – 9 May 2023 - associated
planning appeal decision Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk)
 Planning Committee report on application P/22/1507 – 6 June 2023 – associated
planning appeal decision Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details (scotland.gov.uk) 
List of Background Papers
 Screening Direction issued by Scottish Ministers – Leisure development at Kersewell
Mains Farm near Carnwath Scottish Government - DPEA - Case Details
(scotland.gov.uk) 
59

Page 60

Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Tony Finn, Planning and Building Standards Manager, Floor 6, Council Offices, Almada
Street, Hamilton, ML3 0AA
Email: tony.finn@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
60