Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Planning Committee - 01/04/2025

South Lanarkshire Council · 1 April 2025
Back to Planning Committee — 1 April 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Monday, 24 March 2025 
Dear Councillor 
Planning Committee 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Tuesday, 01 April 2025
Time:  10:00
Venue: Hybrid - Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton,
ML3 0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
Members 
Richard Nelson (Chair), Gerry Convery (Depute Chair), Joe Fagan (ex officio), Alex Allison, Ralph
Barker, Archie Buchanan, Ross Clark, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin, Colin Dewar, Mary
Donnelly, Alistair Fulton, Celine Handibode, Graeme Horne, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Ross Lambie,
Martin Lennon, Lesley McDonald, Davie McLachlan, Norman Rae, John Ross, Graham Scott, David
Shearer, Helen Toner, David Watson 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Mathew Buchanan, Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Allan Falconer,
Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Julia Marrs, Ian McAllan, Kenny McCreary, Bert Thomson
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
Minutes of meeting of the Planning Committee held on 4 March 2025 submitted
for approval as a correct record. (Copy attached) 
5 - 10 
Item(s) for Decision 
3 South Lanarkshire Development Plan Scheme and Participation Statement
2025/2026
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
11 - 32 
4 Application P/23/0770 for Proposed Residential Development and
Associated Infrastructure at Land 50 Metres South Southwest of 48
Toftcombs Crescent, Toftcombs Crescent, Stonehouse
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
33 - 42 
5 Application P/24/0533 for Change of Use of Open Space to Accommodate
Expansion of Petrol Filling Station Including 2 Electric Vehicle Charging
Bays, 2 Jet Wash Bays, Laundry Unit, Boundary Fencing and Extension to
Retail Unit at Earnock Service Station, 105 Wellhall Road, Hamilton
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
43 - 50 
6 Application P/24/0990 for Erection of Free-Range Poultry Unit and Feed
Silos with New Access, Parking and Associated Works at Land 360 Metres
West Southwest of Station Cottage, Darvel Road, Drumclog, Strathaven
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
51 - 60 
7 Application P/24/1069 for Formation of Fishing Ponds and Associated
Facilities (Section 42 Application to Vary the Terms of Condition 21 of
Consent P/19/1807 to Allow Continued Operations at the Site for a Further
10 year Period) at Woodend Farm, Carnwath, Lanark
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
61 - 74 
8 Application P/24/1085 for Extension to Existing Quarry to Extract Sand and
Gravel Using Existing Access, with Associated Progressive Restoration at
Ryeflatt Quarry, Carnwath, Lanark
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
75 - 88 
9 Application P/24/1360 for Erection of 1.5 Storey House with Attached
Garage at Land 20 Metres West Northwest of 51 Colinhill Road, Colinhill
Road, Strathaven
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
89 - 96
2

Page 3

10  Application P/24/1382 for Erection of 2 Houses with Associated Car
Parking and Landscaping at Flattmoss Farm, A726 From East Kilbride to
Chapelton, East Kilbride
Report dated 24 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
97 - 104 
Urgent Business 
11  Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 
For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Stuart McLeod
Clerk Telephone: 07385 370 117
Clerk Email: stuart.mcleod@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
3

Page 4

4

Page 5

PLANNING COMMITTEE 
Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street,
Hamilton on 4 March 2025 
Chair:
Councillor Richard Nelson 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor Ralph Barker, Councillor Archie Buchanan, Councillor Ross
Clark, Councillor Gerry Convery (Depute), Councillor Margaret Cowie, Councillor Maureen Devlin,
Councillor Colin Dewar, Councillor Mary Donnelly, Councillor Celine Handibode, Councillor Graeme
Horne, Councillor Lesley McDonald, Councillor Davie McLachlan, Councillor Norman Rae,
Councillor John Ross, Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor Helen Toner, Councillor David Watson 
Councillors' Apologies:
Councillor Joe Fagan (ex officio), Councillor Alistair Fulton, Councillor Cal Johnston-Dempsey,
Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Martin Lennon, Councillor David Shearer 
Attending:
Community and Enterprise Resources
F Carlin, Head of Planning and Regulatory Services; B Darroch, Planning Area Manager (East
Team); F Jack, Team Leader, Development Management Team, Roads, Transportation and Fleet
Services; D Russell, Planning Area Manager (West Team)
Finance and Corporate Resources
S Jessup, Administration Assistant; S McLeod, Administration Officer 
1 Declaration of Interests 
Councillor(s)
McLachlan and Cowie 
Item(s)
Application P/24/1421 for erection of 6 2-
storey houses (2 terraced blocks) and a
3-storey block of 18 flats with associated
parking, landscaping and associated
services at land enclosed by High
Blantyre Road, Glenlee Street and Reid
Street, Hamilton
Nature of Interest(s)
Chair and Depute Chair,
respectively, of the
Housing and Technical
Resources Committee –
proposed properties would
be purchased by South
Lanarkshire Council if
approved 
McLachlan and Cowie  Application P/24/1423 for erection of 2  
3-storey blocks of flats (24 units) with
associated parking, landscaping and
associated services at land at Backmuir
Road, Hamilton 
Chair and Depute Chair,
respectively of the Housing
and Technical Resources
Committee – proposed
properties would be
purchased by South
Lanarkshire Council if
approved 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 
The minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 4 February 2025 were submitted
for approval as a correct record. 
The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record.
2
5

Page 6

3 Application P/24/0260 for Mixed Use Development Including Residential, Hotel
and Commercial Uses, Demolition and Ancillary Works (Planning Permission in
Principle) at Shawfield Stadium, Rutherglen Road, Rutherglen 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/0260 by Shawfield Regeneration
Limited for a mixed use development including residential, hotel and commercial uses,
demolition and ancillary works (planning permission in principle) at Shawfield Stadium,
Rutherglen Road, Rutherglen. 
In accordance with regulations associated with national developments, the applicant and all
representees in respect of the application had been offered the opportunity of a pre-
determination hearing, however, none of the parties had accepted this offer and, therefore, a
pre-determination hearing had not been required. 
The application had been assessed against the relevant policies and criteria contained in the
adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2) and National Planning
Framework 4.  Details of the assessment were provided in the report.  The development
constituted Development Contrary to the Development Plan as the proposals did not fully
comply with SLLDP2, however, it was not considered that the proposal was significantly contrary
to the Development Plan. 
In the view of the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources), a departure from
the Development Plan was justified in this case for the following reasons:- 
 the proposals would allow the provision of a mixed use development, to include residential
development, on a brownfield site within the urban area
 the proposals would allow a vacant, redundant site to be redeveloped to an appropriate
use
 the proposals could be developed in a manner that would not adversely impact on the
amenity of existing or future residents of the area
 the proposals fully complied with the provisions of National Planning Framework 4 (2023),
with particular regard to sustainability and brownfield land considerations
 the proposals complied with the provisions of Policies 1, 2, 5, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16
of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (adopted 2021) 
At its meeting on 7 July 2015, the Committee had approved a procedure for processing planning
applications which required completion of a Legal Agreement.  If approved, the application
would be subject to a Legal Agreement and/or other appropriate mechanism and the approved
procedure would apply. 
There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer responded to a member’s
questions on aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/0260 by Shawfield
Regeneration Limited for a mixed use development
including residential, hotel and commercial uses,
demolition and ancillary works (planning permission in
principle) at Shawfield Stadium, Rutherglen Road,
Rutherglen be granted subject to:- 
 the conditions specified in the Executive Director’s
report
 the conclusion of a Section 75 Agreement between
the Council, site owner(s) and the applicant 
[Reference:  Minutes of 7 July 2015 (Paragraph 15)]
6

Page 7

4 Application P/24/0332 for Erection of House with Associated Landscaping and
Access Arrangements at New Steadings Farm, Green Towers Road, Lanark 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/0332 by Mr D Lowry for the erection of
a house with associated landscaping and access arrangements at New Steadings Farm, Green
Towers Road, Lanark. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/0332 by Mr D Lowry for the
erection of a house with associated landscaping and
access arrangements at New Steadings Farm, Green
Towers Road, Lanark be refused for the reasons detailed
in the Executive Director’s report. 
5 Application P/24/1069 for Formation of Fishing Ponds and Associated Facilities
(Section 42 Application to Vary the Terms of Condition 21 of Planning Consent
P/19/1807 to Allow Continued Operations at the Site for a Further 10 Year Period)
at Woodend Farm, Carnwath 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1069 by Onyx Leisure Limited for the
formation of fishing ponds and associated facilities (Section 42 application to vary the terms of
condition 21 of planning consent P/19/1807 to allow continued operations at the site for a further
10 year period) at Woodend Farm, Carnwath. 
At its meeting on 22 September 2020, the Committee approved planning application P/19/1807
to vary condition 25 of planning consent CL/12/0511 for the formation of fishing ponds and
associated facilities at Woodend Farm, B7016 from Forth, A706 to Carnwath A70, Carnwath,
Lanark. 
Condition 21 attached to planning consent P/19/1807 stated that “All extraction operations on
the site shall be discontinued not later than 01 February 2025 and, within a period of 12 months
from this discontinuance date, the entire site shall be restored in accordance with the approved
restoration plan to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.” 
The applicant had now requested that condition 21 be varied to state that “All extraction
operations on the site shall be discontinued not later than 10 years from the date of this
Planning Permission and, within a period of 12 months from this discontinuance date, the entire
site shall be restored in accordance with the approved restoration plan.” 
The varied condition, as detailed in the report, was listed as condition 09 due to re-ordering as
some of the conditions attached to planning consent P/19/1807 had been discharged. 
There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer responded to a member’s
questions on aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1069 by Onyx Leisure
Limited for the formation of fishing ponds and associated
facilities (Section 42 application to vary the terms of
condition 21 of planning consent P/19/1807 to allow
continued operations at the site for a further 10 year
period) at Woodend Farm, Carnwath be deferred to a
future meeting of the Committee to allow for further
information to be provided in relation to access to the
application site and the storage of materials to the
southeast of the existing access track.  
7

Page 8

[Reference:  Minutes of 22 September 2020 (Paragraph 7)] 
6 Application P/24/1185 for Erection of Single-Storey House and Relocation of
Existing Stables at Knowehead Farm, Blackburnmill Highway, Strathaven 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1185 by Mr Bavaird for the erection of a
single-storey house and relocation of the existing stables at Knowehead Farm, Blackburnmill
Highway, Strathaven. 
There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer responded to a member’s
question on an aspect of the report. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1185 by Mr Bavaird for the
erection of a single-storey house and relocation of the
existing stables at Knowehead Farm, Blackburnmill
Highway, Strathaven be refused for the reasons detailed in
the Executive Director’s report. 
7 Application P/24/1282 for Section 42 Application to Vary Condition 18 of Planning
Consent P/21/1100 to Amend Position of Substation Associated with Wind
Turbine at Land at West Dykes, Muirkirk Road, Strathaven 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1282 by Clean Earth Energy Limited for
a Section 42 application to vary condition 18 of planning consent P/21/1100 to amend the
position of the substation associated with the wind turbine at land at West Dykes, Muirkirk Road,
Strathaven. 
At its meeting on 25 August 2020, the Committee refused planning application P/19/1829 for the
erection of a wind turbine, up to a maximum blade tip height of 150 metres, with associated
infrastructure including crane pad, access track and electrical housing at West Dykes Farm,
C133 Waterhead Peelhill and Linbank Highway, Strathaven, however, planning permission had
subsequently been granted following an appeal to the Scottish Government.  Furthermore,
planning application P/21/1100 had been granted on 22 October 2021, in terms of the Council’s
Scheme of Delegation, to vary condition 1 of planning consent P/19/1829 to extend the time
period of the development and allow micrositing of the turbine. 
The applicant had now requested that condition 18 of planning consent P/21/1100 be varied to
change the location of the substation associated with the turbine and, consequently, to amend
the drawing referenced in condition 18 to CE5439-LP-02-1-5000. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1282 by Clean Earth Energy
Limited for a Section 42 application to vary condition 18 of
planning consent P/21/1100 to amend the position of the
substation associated with the wind turbine at land at West
Dykes, Muirkirk Road, Strathaven be granted subject to the
conditions specified in the Executive Director’s report. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 25 August 2020 (Paragraph 7)]
8

Page 9

8 Application P/24/1373 for Erection of House at Newark Farm, Land 135 Metres
Northwest of Newark Mill, Whitecraigs Highway, Glassford, Strathaven 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1373 by Mr T Miller for the erection of a
house at Newark Farm, land 135 metres northwest of Newark Mill, Whitecraigs Highway,
Glassford, Strathaven. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1373 by Mr T Miller for the
erection of a house at Newark Farm, land 135 metres
northwest of Newark Mill, Whitecraigs Highway, Glassford,
Strathaven be refused for the reasons detailed in the
Executive Director’s report. 
9 Application P/24/1421 for Erection of 6 2-Storey Houses (2 Terraced Blocks) and a
3-Storey Block of 18 Flats with Associated Parking, Landscaping and Associated
Services at Land Enclosed by High Blantyre Road, Glenlee Street and Reid Street,
Hamilton 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1421 by JR Group Limited for the
erection of 6 2-storey houses (2 terraced blocks) and a 3-storey block of 18 flats with associated
parking, landscaping and associated services at land enclosed by High Blantyre Road, Glenlee
Street and Reid Street, Hamilton. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1421 by JR Group Limited
for the erection of 6 2-storey houses (2 terraced blocks)
and a 3-storey block of 18 flats with associated parking,
landscaping and associated services at land enclosed by
High Blantyre Road, Glenlee Street and Reid Street,
Hamilton be granted subject to the conditions specified in
the Executive Director’s report. 
Councillors Cowie and McLachlan, having declared an interest in this item, withdrew from the
meeting during its consideration 
10 Application P/24/1423 for Erection of 2 3-Storey Blocks of Flats (24 Units) with
Associated Parking, Landscaping and Associated Services at Land at Backmuir
Road, Hamilton 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1423 by JR Group Limited for the
erection of 2 3-storey blocks of flats (24 units) with associated parking, landscaping and
associated services at land at Backmuir Road, Hamilton. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1423 by JR Group Limited
for the erection of 2 3-storey blocks of flats (24 units) with
associated parking, landscaping and associated services at
land at Backmuir Road, Hamilton be granted subject to the
conditions specified in the Executive Director’s report. 
Councillors Cowie and McLachlan, having declared an interest in this item, withdrew from the
meeting during its consideration
9

Page 10

11 Application P/24/1465 for Erection of Single Storey House with Attic Space,
Associated Garage/Studio Space and Formation of New Driveway at Land 82
Metres Northwest of 148 Lanark Road, Crossford, Carluke 
A report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) was submitted on planning application P/24/1465 by Mr Scott and Mrs Neal for the
erection of a single storey house with attic space, associated garage/studio space and formation
of new driveway at land 82 metres northwest of 148 Lanark Road, Crossford, Carluke. 
There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer responded to members’
questions on aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that planning application P/24/1465 by Mr Scott and Mrs
Neal for the erection of a single storey house with attic
space, associated garage/studio space and formation of
new driveway at land 82 metres northwest of 148 Lanark
Road, Crossford, Carluke be refused for the reasons
detailed in the Executive Director’s report. 
12 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
10

Page 11

Report
Agenda Item 
Checked
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject South Lanarkshire Development Plan Scheme and
Participation Statement 2025-2026 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 update Members on the progress that is being made in the preparation of South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 3
 seek approval for the South Lanarkshire Development Plan Scheme and
Participation Statement 2025-2026, attached as appendix 1 of the report 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the current position on the preparation of South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 3 be noted; and
(2) that the South Lanarkshire Development Plan Scheme and Participation
Statement 2025-2026, attached as Appendix 1 of the report, be approved. 
3. Development Plan Scheme 2025-2026
3.1. The Council has a statutory duty to prepare a Development Plan Scheme (DPS) which
sets the timetable for the preparation of the Local Development Plan. 
3.2. This document is produced annually and made available to the public.  It includes:- 
 an explanation of what the Local Development Plan is
 a timetable for the preparation of the next Local Development Plan (LDP3)
 a Participation Statement which describes how the Council will carry out
community engagement, and how and when relevant stakeholders, including
residents can get involved 
4. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 3 (LDP3)
4.1. The Council has a statutory duty to prepare a Local Development Plan for all parts of
its area.  The next local Development Plan (LDP3) will be the first to be prepared under
the new planning system.  Along with National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) it will
form the statutory development plan for South Lanarkshire.  In line with the updated
national legislation and guidance it will be place-based, people-centred and deliver-
focussed, and presented as a series of maps, site briefs and masterplans for individual
sites and localities. 
3
11

Page 12

4.2. It is expected that a collaborative approach will be used in the preparation of LDP3 so
that the delivery of the Council’s relevant strategies and plans, as well of those of its
partners and other stakeholders, are embedded in the plan.  The LDP is required to
take account of the Council’s Community Plan. 
4.3. Key agencies will be engaged in the preparation of the plan including NatureScot,
SEPA, Scottish Water, Scottish Enterprise, NHS Lanarkshire and the Regional
Transport Partnership.  There will also be engagement with a prescribed range of
groups including children and young people, disabled persons, Gypsies and Travellers
and community councils, as well as other targeted groups.  The Participation
Statement in the Development Plan Scheme (DPS) has been developed to reflect
these requirements and demonstrate the work to be undertaken in the next 12 months. 
4.4. Drafting of the Evidence Report
The first stage of the process involves the preparation of an Evidence Report which is
to be used to inform the development of the Council’s land use strategy and identify
what LDP3 should consider and address.  Work on the Evidence Report is progressing
with data and evidence being collated from a range of national, regional and local
sources to support this process including Public Health Scotland, Glasgow City Region
and the Local Government Improvement Service as well as internal Council Services. 
4.5. Engagement 
The Evidence Report is also to be informed by the views of those affected by the plan
and involved in its delivery and, therefore, extensive engagement is being carried out
with key agencies, stakeholders, interest groups and local communities to ensure
evidence gathering is collaborative and transparent. 
4.6. The first stage of engagement involved an online survey which ran from 1 May to 30
September 2024 and asked a series of questions designed to draw out people’s views
of their places and what they considered were the key issues for their area.  A link to
the survey was promoted to all community councils and groups, the Access Panel,
Citizen’s Panel, and Third Sector Organisations (TSOs).  Awareness of the survey was
raised through a variety of communication channels including social media platforms
Facebook and X/Twitter, a video hosted on YouTube, articles posted in South
Lanarkshire View, posters/leaflets on noticeboards, the Council’s LDP and VASLAN’s
mailing lists, and in-person at a range of interest group/locality events.  978 responses
were received on the survey offering a wealth of knowledge on what’s important to
people in their places. 
4.7. At the same time, direct engagement began by holding in-person Place Workshops
focussing first on a range of age groups.  This has included children and young people
and parents/carers, as well as our older citizens through Seniors Together.  Attention
then turned to specific groups including disabled/neurodiverse people,
Gypsy/Travellers, developers/landowners, Community Councils, tenants, and hard to
reach/seldom heard voices.  Currently, engagement is ongoing with community groups
focussing on key issues specific to their localities. 
4.8. Finally, topic papers are under preparation which will set out initial findings and
analysis of the evidence that has been collected.  Consultation will be carried out on
the topic papers through engagement with key agencies, national bodies, and other
relevant stakeholders.  It is intended that the engagement phase of work will conclude
at the end of March 2025 and will enable understanding of where evidence gaps exist
12

Page 13

and provide a robust baseline to demonstrate any unresolved issues prior to the
Evidence Report submission. 
4.9. A Call for Ideas will be carried out after approval of the Evidence Report when the
public, landowners, developers and others can suggest potential sites, policy content
or other issues which they feel the Proposed Plan should include or address.  In
advance of this, however, a ‘soft’ Call for Sites will be undertaken during 2025 to allow
for early engagement.  A Call for Sites proforma will also be published which will set
out the range of information that must be submitted at the formal Call for Ideas to allow
a robust site assessment to be carried out.   
4.10. Gate Check 
Once approved by the full Council, the Evidence Report will be submitted to Scottish
Ministers to carry out a Gate Check.  This involves an assessment by a Reporter
appointed by Scottish Ministers on whether sufficient information has been gathered
to prepare the LDP and appropriate engagement has been carried out.  On being
notified that there is sufficient information, the Council can move to carry out the Call
for Ideas and start to prepare the Proposed Plan.  However, the Reporter may also
recommend how to improve the Evidence Report for resubmission and further
assessment. 
5. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) Delivery Programme
5.1. The Council is required to prepare a Delivery Programme (introduced in the Planning
(Scotland) Act 2019) which is to set out the list of actions required to deliver the policies
and proposals contained in the current adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development
Plan 2.  It replaces the Action Programme required under earlier legislation. 
5.2. Delivery Programmes are intended in the longer term to accompany the new style of
LDP (ie LDP3).  However, the Scottish Government expect the style of the new
Delivery Programme to be applied to current adopted plans (LDP2 in the case of South
Lanarkshire) and for this to be completed by 31 March 2025.  LDP2 has not been
prepared in a style which lends itself to be easily reported in the Delivery Programme
format and associated work is being carried out to allow this.  As a result, completion
will not by achieved by this deadline, however, it will be reported to Members for
approval later in the year.   
6. Next Steps
6.1. The Development Plan Scheme has been updated to reflect progress being made in
the preparation of Local Development Plan 3.  Once approved it will be made available
to the public through publication on the Council website. 
6.2. Preparation of the Evidence Report is continuing and it will be presented to full Council
for approval later in 2025 following which it will be submitted to Scottish Ministers for
a Gate Check.  In the meantime, the ‘soft’ call for sites described above will be carried
out in mid 2025. 
7. Employee Implications
7.1. The preparation of the Local Development Plan is likely to be more resource intensive
than earlier versions based on the new procedures and guidance and additional topics
that are required to be covered.  
13

Page 14

8. Financial Implications
8.1. The costs of the preparation and production of the next Local Development Plan will
be expected to be met from existing budgets.  This includes the cost of the newly
introduced Gate Check of the Council’s Evidence Report as well as the Examination
of the Proposed Plan. 
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications 
9.1. The themes of tackling the climate and nature crises, climate mitigation and adaptation
and support for sustainable developments through the application of principles of local
living and 20-minute neighbourhoods will be central to the spatial strategy of LDP3. 
10. Other Implications
10.1. The preparation of the Local Development Plan is a statutory requirement for the
Council.  Failure to have up to date versions carries a reputational risk and the
possibility of not attracting investment into the Council area. 
11. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
11.1. LDP3 will be subject to the statutory Integrated Impact Assessment process as work
progresses on its preparation. 
11.2. Extensive engagement and consultation by the Council has been carried out as set
out in the Development Plan Scheme at appendix 1.  The outcome of this will be
reported in the Evidence Report which will be presented to full Council for approval in
due course. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
24 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live 
Previous References
 Report to Planning Committee - 28 May 2024 – Development Plan Scheme and Review
of Local Development Plan 
List of Background Papers
 Planning (Scotland) Act 2019
 Town and Country Planning (Development Planning) (Scotland) Regulations 2023
 Scottish Government Local Development planning guidance published May 2023 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact: 
Tony Finn, Planning and Building Standards Manager (Headquarters)
Ext:  5105  (Tel: 01698 455105)
E-mail: tony.finn@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
14

Page 15

Development Plan Scheme and Participation Statement 2025-26
(March 2025) 
If you need this information in another language or format, please contact us to discuss how we can best meet your needs. Phone 0303 123
1015 or email equalities@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
3
15

Page 16

CONTENTS 
1. What is the Development Plan Scheme?
2. The current Development Plan for SLC – National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2)
3. Local Development Plan 3 (LDP3)
4. LDP3 Timetable
5. Key Stages and Actions
6. Participation Statement
7. Mediation 
Annex 1 NPF4 and Council Plans/Strategies Links
Annex 2 Matters to be addressed in the LDP3 Evidence Report
Annex 3 Additional Assessments
Annex 4 Engagement Strategy 
16

Page 17

1. What is the Development Plan Scheme? 
A Development Plan Scheme (DPS) is prepared and updated by South Lanarkshire Council (the council) every year.  For 2025, the DPS provides
further detail on the engagement strategy and evidence gathering in preparation of the next Local Development Plan.  This work will inform how
our places look in the future, where new houses and places of work will be built, how services and facilities such as schools and travel will be
provided and identify the places and buildings to be protected. 
DPS 2025-26 includes the projected timetable for delivery of the different stages of the plan making process, as well as the Participation Statement
which explains how and when stakeholders including local communities and key agencies will be involved. 
2. The Current Development Plan for SLC – National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) And Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2) 
Development plans are important as they define how we use our land and what areas requires greater protection.  They also provide policy which
guides decisions on applications for planning permission.  The statutory Development Plan is made up of the council’s Local Development Plan
(LDP) and the National Planning Framework (NPF), which contains the Scottish Government's policies and proposals for the development and
use of land, as shown in Figure 1 below. 
The current National Planning Framework is National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4), which was published and adopted by the Scottish
Government on 13 February 2023.  It sets out 33 national planning policies which represent the Scottish Government’s long term spatial strategy
for Scotland.  These policies are used to assess planning applications and provide the direction for what the council’s Local Development Plan
should include. 
The table in Annex 1 shows how these policies link to other national and the council’s own strategies and policies. 
The current Local Development Plan is South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (LDP2), which was adopted in April 2021 and represents
the council’s spatial policy for its area.  It includes sites that are allocated for development as well as detailed policies on matters such as climate
change, the green belt and rural area, housing, town centres and transport. 
It is accompanied by other documents including Supporting Planning Guidance covering Developer Contributions, Renewable Energy, and
Development at a Dwellinghouse. 
17

Page 18

Figure 1: Development Plan and associated plans 
Statutory  Non-Statutory
National Planning Framework Regional Spatial Strategy
The Scottish Government's
policies and proposals for the
development and use of land.
A planning authority, or
authorities long-term spatial
strategy for the strategic
development of an area.  Not
part of the statutory development
plan but have an important role
informing future versions of the
NPF and LDPs.
Local Development Plan Local Place Plans
Councils must prepare one or
more LDP for their area,
showing how local places will
evolve in the future, including
where development should and
should not happen.  It must take
into account the NPF any
registered Local Place Plans
(LPPs) for the area the LDP
covers.  It should also have
regard to any RSS and the
Community Plan for the area it
covers.
Community-led plans prepared
by community bodies setting out
proposals for the development
and use of land in their local
area.  Must have regard to the
NPF, any LDP which covers the
same area, and also any
neighbourhood plan which
covers the same area.  Not part
of the statutory development
plan but have an important role
to play in informing LDPs. 
18

Page 19

3. Local Development Plan 3 (LDP3) 
The council formally agreed the preparation of the next Local Development Plan (to be known as LDP3) in summer 2023.  The preparation of an
Evidence Report is now well underway, which will include qualitative and quantitative information and data as well as the ‘lived experience’ of
those in the council area.  This will capture the aims and ambitions of the council and its partners, stakeholders and communities.  Annex 2
provides further details.  There are some other key assessments that need to be developed alongside the LDP, which help to inform decisions
and ensure that the plan meets other legislative requirements.  A list of these is provided in Annex 3. 
Once complete the Evidence Report is submitted to Scottish Ministers for a Gate Check.  This is to allow an assessment by an independent
Reporter of whether the evidence is sufficient to allow preparation of the Local Development Plan.  It will also check that that sufficient engagement
and consultation have been carried out. 
As soon as a decision is issued that the Evidence Report is sufficient, work will start on the Proposed Plan.  This will be map based with site
briefs and masterplans to detail how sites will be developed.  Sites must be deliverable and free from constraints, and information will be sought
from developers, key agencies and any other relevant parties to evidence this.  Undeveloped sites in LDP2 will be looked at again and may be
removed if they are no longer deliverable or viable or accord with the policy direction in NPF4. 
A Call for Ideas will be carried out early on in this stage of plan preparation so that proposals for any part of the plan can be submitted, including
policy or suggestions for development sites. 
Although there is currently no Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) covering South Lanarkshire, if one were in place, the LDP would be required to
have regard to it.  Regional Spatial Strategies will look at strategic development issues – in the case of South Lanarkshire across the Glasgow
City Region.  RSS are not part of the statutory development plan but have an important role informing future versions of the NPF and LDPs. 
Local Place Plans (LPP) are a new opportunity for communities to get involved in the planning system by setting out proposals for the
development and use of land in their area.  Once registered by the planning authority, they are required to be taken into account in the preparation
of the next LDP, although they do not form part of the statutory development plan.  Communities have been invited to prepare Local Place Plans
and it is expected that the first LPPs will be registered in 2025.  For further information please refer to Planning circular 1/2022: Local Place Plans. 
19

Page 20

Once the Proposed LDP has been prepared there will be a formal consultation for a minimum period of 12 weeks.  This will include neighbour
notification for anyone who owns, or leases sites or neighbouring land affected.  During this period anyone can make representations to the
council either in support of the plan or if they wish to object. 
After the consultation period the proposed plan can be modified to take account of representations made to the council or consultation responses
from key agencies. 
When modifications cannot be agreed then the representation is considered unresolved.  When this happens, the proposed plan is submitted to
Scottish Ministers for examination carried out by a reporter from the Department for Planning and Environmental Appeals.  Once the Examination
is complete the Reporter will prepare a report setting out their recommendations and any modifications they require to be made.  The report will
be submitted to the council along with anyone who has made unresolved representations.  The council are to make the modifications except in
limited circumstances.  After this process has been carried out the plan can be formally adopted. 
4. LDP3 Timetable (Development Plan Scheme updated annually) 
The time table for preparing LDP3 is set out in the diagram below.
20

Page 21

21

Page 22

5. KEY STAGES AND ACTIONS 
Key stages Actions
EVIDENCE
REPORT
Evidence gathering
Includes: Local Place Plan register, Self-build register, Urban Capacity Study, Green Belt
Review, Settlement Boundary Review, Play Sufficiency Assessment, Retail Studies, Town
Centre appraisals, Vacant and Derelict Land Survey, Housing Land Audit, Employment Land
Audit, Conservation Area Appraisals
Early engagement Engagement requires capturing hard to reach, young people, minority groups and place-
based communities to ensure we capture the lived experience.
Preparation of Evidence
Report
The evidence report will identify any gaps in the evidence required; our interpretation of the
evidence gathered and the implications for the proposed plan; and a summary of any
conflicting views on the evidence and lived experience.  Approval of Full council required
prior to submission for the Gate Check.
Publish Approved Evidence
Report and submit for Scottish
Government Gate Check
Submission of evidence report to Scottish Government who will appoint a Reporter to identify
any unresolved issues and provide evidence base for developing strategy is robust.
Gate Check approval Current average timescale to complete Gate Check is 3 months 
PROPOSED
LDP3
Strategy development for
Proposed LDP3
Development of key strategies to support development of LDP, including Open Space
Strategy, Housing Needs and Demand Assessment and Employment Land review.
Call for ideas and continuing
engagement
The call for ideas will be an invitation open to everyone to propose ideas for any aspect of the
new local development plan including local policy/guidance and land allocations.
22

Page 23

Key stages Actions 
PROPOSED
LDP3 cont.
Development of LDP3 Policy
and sites 
Development of Policies if required to supplement NPF4 policies or address new topics.
Publish Proposed Plan and
consult
Proposed Plan presented to Full council for approval.
One approved statutory consultation of minimum 12 weeks to allow any representations from
stakeholders, including the public, which seek to make changes to the plan.  This stage will
include targeted engagement with key stakeholders and communities most affected by the
proposals.
Modification of the Proposed
Local Development Plan
Modifications carried out to proposed plan.  The Regulations state that there is no
requirement to invite comment on the Modification Report.  However, this depends on
whether new information has been submitted that challenges the evidence position in terms
of strategy development.
Approval of Full council required for any modifications.
Examination
Council submits Proposed LDP to Scottish Government for examination of any unresolved
issues.  DPEA issues Examination Report providing council with recommendations on how to
resolve these issues.
ADOPTED
LDP3
Adoption and Publish LDP3 Modifications and any new material considerations incorporated into Proposed LDP and
presented to council for adoption.
Publish Delivery Programme
and Post-Adoption monitoring
Monitoring and delivery programme for LDP established and updated regularly to identify any
modifications or requirements to ensure delivery. 
6. PARTICIPATION STATEMENT 
To develop Local Development Plan (LDP3), we are asking for thoughts and ideas of how to create successful and enjoyable places within South
Lanarkshire.  The Participation Statement outlines the range of engagement which will be carried out and with whom.  The aim is to engage with
23

Page 24

as many people as possible to collect the information needed to reflect the strengths and opportunities that can be built upon.  If done well, LPD3
will embody everything learned from stakeholders and will provide local approaches to meet these identified needs. 
We would like to hear from you, and in your own words, about the things that matter to you.  As part of this, we recognise you may have many
different roles and interests.  We believe that everyone has the right and the ability to get involved, and by doing so you will be making a valuable
contribution to the improvement and wellbeing of your area.  This is everybody’s plan, and it needs to embody your views and the diverse needs
of communities within South Lanarkshire.  To reflect these diverse needs, there will be some engagement targeted to specific communities.
Initiatives to reach underrepresented groups are included in this.  A more detailed Engagement Strategy is provided in Annex 4. 
The Participation Statement is a ‘living’ document that will be regularly updated to reflect good practice and changing circumstances.  We will
listen to feedback from experiences of engagement and will take steps to make improvements going forward.  We hope the Participation
Statement helps you to feel empowered, welcomed, and that your input and lived experience of South Lanarkshire is hugely valuable to us. 
What general principles will we follow?
 The approach to engagement on LDP3 will be shaped by the principles highlighted in the National Standards for Community Engagement.
 People with protected characteristics (including race, age, gender, sex, sexual orientation and disability) will not be discriminated against,
and will be actively included in the engagement process.
 The contents of the draft Effective community engagement in local development planning guidance: consultation (May 2023) will be used
to shape engagement activities with local communities.
 We will also incorporate the Planning and Building Standards Consultation Communication and Engagement Strategy 2021 into our
engagement methods.
Our inclusive approach
 We will encourage participation from as wide a range of stakeholders as possible throughout the LDP process.  We want to make it as
easy as possible for everyone with an interest to engage in its preparation.
 Information will be provided in accessible formats to meet the needs of our varied stakeholders.  We can exchange and gather information
using graphics and audio to remove the barrier for those with vision impairment or literacy and numeracy challenges.  We understand that
using technology won’t always be the best method for everyone, and in these cases we will use alternative methods.  In addition to
English, we can provide the document in additional language formats.
 Engagement with children and young people, older people, disabled people and Gypsy/Travellers is a statutory requirement.  We will
work with the council’s Education Service as well as organisations such as the Youth Panel, Seniors Together, the Access Panel,
Lanarkshire Ethnic Minorities Action Group and Minority Ethnic Carers of People Project to develop appropriate methods to engage.
 We will develop a programme with Voluntary Action South Lanarkshire to facilitate engagement with the many local voluntary groups
across the council’s area. 
24

Page 25

How will we publicise engagement opportunities and provide feedback?
We propose to use:
 Email and letter mailings
 Adverts in local newspapers and South Lanarkshire View
 Documents held at local libraries
 South Lanarkshire council website
 Social media
 Collaboration with Community Planning colleagues
 Posters and flyers
 Use existing representative organisations to reach a wider audience 
An emphasis on good communication
 We will identify the method of engagement by asking those we want to hear from.  For large groups we may focus on the method that is
most preferred.
 We will use the relationships that already exist within communities, in particular where there has already been extensive engagement to
produce Neighbourhood Plans.
 We won’t over consult, and we may focus on topics or issues that people are most interested in.
 Where it would be advantageous to the stakeholder, we will facilitate other services to provide questionnaires and the Place Standard
Tool on our behalf.
 We will participate in other consultations being carried out by the council and its partners.
 We will attend events within communities and work closely with colleagues in Community Planning who have already established strong
links to communities.
 We will ensure that the format of communication is led by accessibility and ease of use.
 We want to involve communities who may be excluded from participating due to disadvantage relating to social or economic factors. 
Ways in which we will gather information and comments include:
 Using the Place Standard Tool, including a simplified version for children and young people.
 Holding Exhibitions and workshops.
 Online surveys.
 Work closely with our Community Planning Partnership partners to engage with people living in communities experiencing socio-economic
difficulties to gain a better understanding of their place.
 We will promote and facilitate the participation of children and young people under the age of 25 to seek views on their lived experience. 
Proposed methods of engagement will include the Place Standard Toolkits to support conversations between educators/teachers and
children, and capture views about play needs and opportunities in their area, including likes and dislikes about their places.  We will
25

Page 26

engage through South Lanarkshire Youth Council, Youth Parliament Representatives, student representatives in higher education and
the council's Education Services.
 We will seek the views of and engage with Gypsies and Travellers to help gain a perspective on their distinct planning needs.  Positive
engagement with Gypsies and Travelling People will be facilitated through dialogue with representative organisations and the council’s
Gypsy/Traveller Liaison Officer.  Attention will also be given to non-written and face-to-face on-site engagement.
 We will work with groups and organisations representing disabled people and older people to establish the most suitable methods of
engagement and multimedia formats to share and collect information. 
Who can participate?
Participation in the preparation of Local Development Plan 3 is open to everyone and inclusion will be encouraged, including (this is not an
exhaustive list):
 South Lanarkshire residents and those with an interest in the area
 Landowners, developers and housing providers
 Business, industry, and tourism groups
 Elected members
 Underrepresented and minority groups
 Religious bodies and organisations
 Voluntary organisations
 Neighbouring authorities
 Rural communities 
Other key groups:
 Children and young people
 Disabled people
 Gypsies and Travellers, and Showpeople
 Community councils
 Older people
 Communities experiencing socio-economic disadvantage
 Community bodies who have expressed an interest in, or have completed, a Local Place Plan
Key Agencies:
The key agencies are set out in the Town and Country Planning (Development Planning) (Scotland) Regulations 2023 as follows:
 NatureScot
 Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA)
26

Page 27

 Scottish Water
 Scottish Enterprise
 Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT)
 NHS Lanarkshire
 Historic Environment Scotland (HES)
National and Regional agencies:
 Transport Scotland
 Scottish Forestry
 SportScotland
 Architecture and Design Scotland
 Central Scotland Green Network Partnership
A sample of topic interest groups:
 Natural Environment and Climate
 Historic Environment
 Art, Leisure and Culture
 Active travel and transport
 Town centre and business groups
 Food growing and local living 
7. Mediation 
The use of mediation to help build bridges between stakeholders and explore, reduce or resolve issues of dispute in development planning is
highlighted in the Scottish Government - Circular 2/2021: Guidance on the promotion and use of mediation in the Scottish Planning System. 
Mediation has the potential benefits of opening up communication, improving relationships and encouraging a way to move forward from disputes,
however this does not guarantee dispute resolution or an agreement between parties. 
It is a voluntary process and be facilitated either by an impartial third party or through ‘informal mediation’ where planners and other relevant
stakeholders take a mediation-style/faciliatory approach in their work.  We will have regard to any requests for the use of mediation through the
consultation process of the Participation Statement.  Where the council has been requested to enter into mediation during the local development
plan process, each case will be considered on its individual merits.
27

Page 28

Annex 1 – NPF4 and Council Plans/Strategies Links 
Sustainable places
NPF4 Policies Key Scottish Government links Council Plans/Strategies
1. Tackling the climate and nature
crises
2. Climate mitigation and
adaptation 
3. Biodiversity
4. Natural places
5. Soils
6. Forestry, woodland and trees
7. Historic assets and places
8. Green belts
9. Brownfield land, vacant and
derelict land and empty buildings
10. Coastal development
11. Energy
12. Zero waste
13. Sustainable transport
• Land Use – getting the best from our land:
strategy 2021 – 2026
• Making things last: a circular economy
strategy for Scotland
• Scotland’s Energy Strategy
• Scotland’s Environment Strategy
• Scotland’s Forestry Strategy
• Scottish Biodiversity Strategy
• Council Plan – Connect
• Community Plan
• Various neighbourhood plans
• Sustainable Development and Climate Change
Strategy
• Carbon Management Plan
• Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy
(under preparation)
• Biodiversity Strategy
• Glasgow and Clyde Valley Forestry and
Woodland Strategy
• Local Transport Strategy (under review)
• Park and Ride Strategy
• Various active travel studies 
Liveable Places
NPF4 Policies Key Scottish Government links Council Plans/Strategies
14. Design, quality and place
15. Local living and 20-minute
neighbourhoods
16. Quality homes
17. Rural homes
18. Infrastructure first
• A Connected Scotland
• A Healthier Future: Scotland’s diet and
healthy weight delivery plan
• Cleaner Air for Scotland 2
• Creating Places
• Local Housing Strategy
• Food Strategy
• Air Quality Strategy (under preparation)
28

Page 29

NPF4 Policies Key Scottish Government links Council Plans/Strategies
19. Heat and cooling
20.Blue and green infrastructure
21.Play, recreation and sport
22.Flood risk and water
management
23.Health and Safety
24.Digital infrastructure
• Culture Strategy
• Heat in Buildings Strategy Housing to 2040
• Learning Estate Strategy/Learning Estate
Investment Programme
• Public Health Priorities for Scotland
• Remote, Rural and Islands Housing Action
• Scotland’s Population Strategy   
Productive Places
NPF4 Policies Key Scottish Government links Council Plans/Strategies
25. Community wealth building
26. Business and industry
27. City, town, local and commercial
centres
28. Retail
29. Rural development
30. Tourism
31. Culture and creativity
32. Aquaculture
33. Minerals
• National Strategy for Economic
Transformation
• Retail Strategy for Scotland
• Report of the City Centre Recovery
Taskforce
• Scottish land rights and responsibilities
statement
• Town Centre Action Plan 2
• Economic Strategy
• Community Wealth Building Strategy
• Social Enterprise Strategy
• Tourism Strategy
• Various town centre strategies 
29

Page 30

Annex 2 Matters to be addressed in the LDP3 Evidence Report 
 The principal physical, cultural, economic, social, built heritage and environmental characteristics of the district;
 The principal purposes for which the land is used;
 The size, composition, health and distribution of the population of the district;
 The housing needs of the population of the area, including the needs of persons undertaking further and higher education, older people,
disabled people;
 The availability of land in the district for housing, including for older people and disabled people;
 The desirability of allocating land for the purposes of resettlement;
 The health needs of the population of the district and the likely effects of development and use of land on those health needs;
 The education needs of the population of the district and the likely effects of development and use of land on those education needs;
 The extent to which there are rural areas within the district in relation to which there has been a substantial decline in population;
 The capacity of education services in the district;
 The desirability of maintaining an appropriate number and range of cultural venues and facilities (including in particular, but not limited to,
live music venues) in the district;
 The infrastructure of the district (including communications, transport and drainage systems, systems for the supply of water and energy,
and health care and education facilities); [the reference to energy includes land available for the development and use of facilities for
renewable sources of energy.
 How that infrastructure is used; and
 Any change which the planning authority thinks may occur in relation to any of the matters mentioned above. 
The Evidence Report must also set out the following:
 A summary of the action taken by the planning authority to support and promote the construction and adaptation of housing to meet the
housing needs of older people and disabled people in the authority's area, and analysis of the extent to which the action has helped to
meet those needs.
 A summary of the action taken by the planning authority to meet the accommodation needs of Gypsy/Travellers in the authority’s area,
and an analysis of the extent to which that action has helped to meet those needs.
 How the authority has invited local communities to prepare LPPs, and what assistance they have provided.
30

Page 31

Annex 3 Additional Assessments 
Other impact assessments are required to be carried out alongside the plan preparation process.  The assessments include: 
Strategic Environmental
Assessment 
This is a statutory requirement to ensure the environment is a primary consideration when preparing the plan
and that the environmental and sustainability implications of the emerging plan and its proposals are
assessed.  It allows a better understanding of the environmental context and sets out the steps to avoid,
mitigate or reduce significant adverse impacts, or indeed enhance any positive ones.  SEA will be based on
the council’s State of the Environment report.  A link to 2023 version is here, South Lanarkshire State of the
Environment Report 2023.  Scoping of the Evidence Report will be done in tandem with the scoping report
for the SEA.
Habitats Regulations
Assessment
This is a statutory requirement to consider the potential impacts of the proposed plan on internationally
important wildlife sites.  The HRA will be done as we consider the ideas presented to us during the
preparation of the proposed plan.  Any policy content in LDP3 will also be subject to HRA assessment.
Integrated Impact
Assessment
The IIA process brings together a number of assessments within a single document ensuring that all
relevant legal duties are addressed in terms of the impacts on different groups in the communities, at the
same time within the one consistent process. Duties within the IIA are;
 Equality Act 2010 protected characteristics 
 Socio-Economic 
 Human Rights 
 Children and Young People’s Rights
 Armed Forces Duty
 Consumer Duty
 Sustainability
Health Impact Assessment  Health impact assessment (HIA) considers the potential, and sometimes unintended, effects a policy,
strategy or service plan may have on the health of a population.  It is particularly useful for considering effects
on vulnerable or disadvantaged groups.  HIA considers the socioeconomic determinants of health and how
they influence health outcomes.  Evidence from research, data and the experience of stakeholders is used
to inform the assessment. 
31

Page 32

32

Page 33

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/23/0770
Proposal:  Proposed residential development and associated infrastructure
Site Address:  Land 50m SSW of 48 Toftcombs Crescent
Toftcombs Crescent
Stonehouse  
Applicant:  Advance Construction Scotland 
Agent:  EMA Architecture + Design Limited 
Ward:  05 Avondale and Stonehouse
Application Type:  Planning Permission in Principle 
Advert Date:  Hamilton Advertiser 13th July 2023
Development Plan
Compliance: 
No 
Departures:  N/A
Recommendation:  Refuse
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
4
33

Page 34

1.  Reason for Report
1.1. This application is presented to Committee as it constitutes a major planning
application under The Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments)
(Scotland) Regulations 2009 and the approved South Lanarkshire Scheme of
Delegation requires that all major applications are determined by the Planning
Committee. 
2.  Site Description
2.1.  The application site extends to approximately 2.73 hectares and is currently
undeveloped land.  Access to the site is from a roundabout, adjacent to Stonehouse
Hospital, which connects the A71 with Strathaven Road.  Pedestrian access is
available from a path that connects across the site from Whinriggs in the south west
of the site, to the core path along the north western boundary.  The topography of the
site reflects its former use as a railway line, with a section of steeper ground along the
former route. 
3  Description of Proposed Developments
3.1. Planning permission in principle is sought for residential development and associated
infrastructure.  An indicative drawing has been submitted indicating approximately 49
new dwellings. 
3.2. Access into the site is proposed from the existing roundabout and a vehicle and
pedestrian route through the site is indicated, terminating with a turning head in the
west of the site.  A number of shared drives are further shown along this indicative
route, alongside a number of potential future pedestrian connections points to the
existing street network.  The existing pedestrian route, between Whinriggs and the
Core Path to the north would be retained. 
4.  Relevant Planning History
4.1. P/22/0011/PAN - Residential development with associated infrastructure works
(Proposal of application notice) was undertaken in October 2022. 
4.2. Planning application HM/15/0471 for the erection of 36 dwellinghouses with
associated works and landscaping was refused because the appropriate contribution
towards affordable housing, education provision and the improvement/upgrading of
community facilities had not been agreed and formalised through the completion of a
Planning Obligation. 
4.3. Planning application HM/15/0470 for the erection of 26 dwellinghouses with
associated works and landscaping was refused because the appropriate contribution
towards affordable housing, education provision and the improvement/upgrading of
community facilities had not been agreed and formalised through the completion of a
Planning Obligation. 
4.4. A detailed application HM/10/0414 for the erection of 45 dwellinghouses and
associated roads, drainage and landscaping works on land located within the
application site was refused because the appropriate contribution for the
improvement/upgrading of community facilities and a required landscaping bond had
not been agreed and formalised through the completion of a Planning Obligation. 
5.  Supporting Information 
5.1.  Several supporting documents have been submitted in support of this application
including:-  
34

Page 35

 Design and Access Statement
 Transport Statement
 Drainage Strategy
 Topographical Survey
 Agricultural Impact Assessment
 Ground Investigation Report
 Pre-application consultation (PAC) Report
 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal 
6. Consultations
6.1.  Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services: Object to the proposal.  Additional
information has been sought on levels along the proposed means of access and a
drainage solution for surface water on the access.  Also requested that the developer
demonstrate how they would address the levels differential at the site entrance without
the need for additional retention and advised that taking the proposed access off the
A71 roundabout would result in a cost to the developer which to date has not been
resolved. 
Response: The additional information has been requested from the agent a number
of times to try and address Roads issues, however, this has not been received.  Rather
than submit the information, the applicant has instead requested that the application
be determined as it currently stands. 
6.2. Environmental Services: No objection subject to the imposition of planning
conditions relating to contamination and dust control and standard informatives
relating to noise, demolition/pest control and contamination.
Response: Noted.  These matters could be addressed through conditions and on the
decision notice if the application were to be approved. 
6.3.  Scottish Water: No objection.
Response: Noted. 
6.4. Scottish Power: No objection in principle, however, it should be noted that SP
Distribution PLC has high-voltage (HV) and low-voltage (LV) underground cable within
the vicinity of the proposals.
Response: Noted. 
6.5. SEPA: No comment provided. 
Response:  Noted. 
6.6. Stonehouse Community Council: The Community Council offered no objections to
the proposal, however, they made comments on Development Plan policy, roads and
access issues, boundary treatment, drainage, structural issues, developer obligations
and affordable housing.   
Response:  Noted.  The relevant policy considerations are all addressed in the
assessment below. 
7.  Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, 48 letters
of representation have been received (45 objections and 3 neutral comments).  The
issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
⧫ Detrimental impact on amenity to adjoining properties
⧫ Noise/air/light pollution generated by the development
⧫ Loss of privacy/sunlight/daylight
⧫ Lack of landscaping/children’s play area
35

Page 36

⧫ Biodiversity impacts
⧫ Area used as walkway to countryside by residents/walkers on a daily basis
⧫ Layout/density/housing mix
⧫ Impact upon green belt and green network
⧫ Traffic congestion and adverse impact on road safety
⧫ Safety of proposed road’s structure which is to be built
⧫ Parking provision
⧫ Drainage/flooding issues
⧫ Site levels not indicated
⧫ Lack of public consultation for PAC process, overreliance in outdated means
of communication.  Misleading to suggest community is supportive
⧫ Lack of infrastructure in Stonehouse and not enough schools, nurseries and
services
⧫ Impact on mental health of residents
⧫ Access to Scottish Water infrastructure 
7.2. The above issues are considered in the assessment below.  These letters are
available for inspection on the planning portal.  Other non-material issues were also
raised, however, these are not planning related and do not form part of the assessment
of the proposal.    
8.  Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and sets
out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and national planning
policy. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises
 Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation
 Policy 3 – Biodiversity
 Policy 13 – Sustainable transport
 Policy 14 - Design, quality, and place
 Policy 15 - Local living and 20-minute neighbourhoods
 Policy 16 - Quality homes
 Policy 22 - Flood risk and water management 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will assess
proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).  In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies
• Policy 2 – Climate Change
• Policy 3 - General Urban Areas
• Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking
• Policy 7 – Community Infrastructure Assessment
• Policy 12 - Affordable Housing
• Policy 16 – Water Environment and Flooding 
36

Page 37

SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 Policy SDCC2 – Flood Risk
 Policy SDCC3 – Sustainable Drainage Systems
 Policy SDCC4 – Sustainable Transport
 Policy DM1 – New Development Design
 Policy DM15 – Water Supply
 Policy DM16 – Foul Drainage/Sewerage Provision
 Policy DM20 – Supporting Information 
9.  Guidance
9.1. None applicable. 
10.  Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Introduction 
The applicant seeks planning permission in principle for residential development and
associated infrastructure.  An indicative drawing has been submitted indicating
approximately 49 new dwellings.  The determining issues in the consideration of this
application are its compliance with the development plan, which consists of National
Planning Framework 4 and the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan. 
10.2. Principle of Development 
The application site is located within the settlement boundary however it is not an
allocated housing site.  NPF4 Policy 16(f) confirms that development proposals for
new homes on land not allocated for housing in the local development plan (LDP) will
only be supported in limited circumstances. 
10.3. In this instance the site is not supported by an agreed timescale for build-out and does
not meet the limited circumstances identified in 16(f)(iii) which could allow the delivery
of housing on this unallocated site. 
10.4. With regards to SLLDP2, the site is not allocated, however, it is undeveloped land
within a settlement boundary and, as such, under Policy 3 – General Urban Areas
could be considered appropriate for residential development if it can be suitably
accessed and serviced. 
10.5. With regards to the means of access to the site, and as noted above in the summary
of the consultation response from Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services, the
proposed access road into the site has not been demonstrated to be appropriate or
that it could be built to an acceptable standard. 
10.6. The principle of a new residential development not being connected to the wider area
by a safe means of access for pedestrian and vehicular traffic is not acceptable in
terms of the Development Plan and efforts to secure additional information from the
applicant to demonstrate that the means of access is appropriate have not been
successful. 
10.7. Policy 7 – Community Infrastructure Assessment of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 states that, in cases where development proposals would require
capital or other works or facilities to enable the development to proceed, financial
contributions towards their implementation will be required.  A legal agreement would
be required for developer contributions applicable to this site to cover infrastructure
impacts associated with education, roads and transportation, affordable housing and
community facilities.  The applicant has in principle indicated a willingness to enter into
a Section 75 Obligation and/or other legal agreement with the Council regarding these
contributions. 
37

Page 38

10.8. Climate Change
Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of SLLDP2 seek to encourage, promote and
facilitate development that addresses the global climate emergency and nature crisis,
and which minimises emissions and adapts to the current and future impacts of
climate change.  NPF4 Policy 3 states that development proposals will contribute to
the enhancement of biodiversity, and proposals for major development will only be
supported where it can be demonstrated that the proposal will conserve, restore and
enhance biodiversity.  This position is similarly set out in Policies NHE9 – Protected
Species and NHE20 – Biodiversity, in the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan.   
10.9. In this case, the Planning Service is of the view that, subject to appropriate conditions
to preserve and enhance biodiversity that would be addressed in any application for
matters specified in conditions, the development would not adversely impact on
existing biodiversity interests and there are no specific concerns with regard to climate
change issues associated with the proposal in this instance.  As such, the proposals
are considered to comply with the relevant provisions of Policies 1, 2 and 3 of NPF4
and Policies 2, NHE9 and NHE20 of SLLDP2. 
10.10. Layout, Siting and Design 
Policy 14 – Design, quality and place of NPF4 sets out that all development should be
designed to improve the quality of an area and be consistent with the six qualities of a
successful place: healthy, pleasant, connected, distinctive, sustainable, and
adaptable.  Notwithstanding the issues of safe access to the site highlighted above,
detailed design and placemaking for the site would be assessed under a future
Approval of Matters Specified in Condition (AMSiC) application as plans provided at
this stage are indicative only.   
10.11. NPF4 Policy 15 Local Living and 20 Minute Neighbourhoods aims to encourage,
promote and facilitate the application of the Place Principle and create connected and
compact neighbourhoods where people can meet the majority of their daily needs
within a reasonable distance of their home, preferably by walking, wheeling or cycling
or using sustainable transport options.  The application site is within the existing
settlement and the location is within a reasonable distance of existing community and
retail facilities and with public transport provided via various bus services in the wider
area.  The proposal is therefore considered to generally comply with the spirit of Policy
15 of the NPF4 subject to the detail of future AMSiC proposals. 
10.12. Policy DM20 Supporting Information requires that all applications must be
accompanied by sufficient information and supporting documents to enable the
Council to fully consider the potential impact of development.  As advised above,
Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services have requested further information on roads
design and drainage and this information has not been provided to date. 
10.13. The application is unacceptable as the applicant has failed to supply sufficient
information/adequate plans in respect of access, layout, and drainage to allow proper
consideration of the proposal and demonstrate an appropriate means of access to the
site.  It is therefore considered that the proposal is not consistent with Policy 3, Policy
5, Policy DM1 and Policy DM20 of the adopted local development plan. 
10.14. Technical Matters 
NPF4 Policy 22 aims to strengthen resilience to flood risk by promoting avoidance as
a first principle and reducing the vulnerability of existing and future development to
flooding.  SLLDP2 Policies 16, DM15, DM16, SDCC2 and SDCC3 relate to any
potential flood risk and impact on the water environment from the proposed
development.  Drainage/flooding concerns have been raised with the proposal and
38

Page 39

Roads and Transportation Services have requested further information, including
drainage detail.  This information has not been provided to date and the application is
unacceptable as the applicant has failed to supply sufficient information/adequate
plans in respect of drainage to allow proper consideration of the proposal.  It is
therefore considered that the proposal is not consistent with Policy 16, Policy SDCC2
and Policy SDCC3 of the adopted local development plan. 
10.15. Concerns have been expressed regarding the proposed access location, potential
congestion from the development and the parking situation in the local area.  Policy
15 - Travel and Transport requires all new development proposals to consider the
resulting impacts of traffic growth.  The impact of the proposal on the local road
network and in terms of parking provision has been fully assessed by Roads,
Transportation and Fleet Services who have raised concerns pertaining to access,
drainage and geotechnical issues which the agent has failed to address.  The proposal
can therefore be considered to be contrary to Policy 15 of the adopted LDP. 
10.16. In relation to other concerns raised we would reiterate that this application is for
permission in principle and issues relating to the layout/density, positioning/heights of
houses, finishing materials used, garden size, parking, impact on neighbouring
properties particularly in relation to privacy and sunlight/daylight would be assessed in
any detailed planning application submitted.  In relation to potential noise, air and light
pollution it is noted that Environmental Services have no objection to the proposal. 
10.17.  Whilst planning permission in principle applications do not require detailed information
on layout, they are required to address where access to the site is to be taken from. 
No vehicle access is proposed from the Mainsacre Estate as part of this application. 
Whilst a potential emergency access may be required at the detailed layout stage, this
would be limited to pedestrians or emergency vehicles and would need the agreement
of the respective landowners.  No such arrangements form part of this current
application. 
10.18. Conclusion 
Given the above, it is considered that the applicant has failed to supply sufficient
information/adequate plans in respect of access, layout, and drainage to allow proper
consideration of the proposal.  The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the
proposal would not have road safety implications or that the principle of a major
residential development on land not allocated for residential use is appropriate in this
location.  As such, the proposal is not considered to comply with the relevant policies
of the adopted development plan (NPF4 and SLLDP2) and it is therefore
recommended that planning consent is refused. 
11. Recommendation and Reasons
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Refuse for the following reasons:- 
1 The applicant has failed to supply sufficient information/adequate plans in respect
of access, layout, parking and drainage to allow proper consideration of the
proposal.  The proposal is therefore not deemed to be in accordance with Policy
3, Policy 5, Policy 15, Policy 16, Policy DM1, Policy DM20, SDCC2 and Policy
SDCC3 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021).  
39

Page 40

2 The applicant has failed to demonstrate an appropriate means of pedestrian and
vehicle access for the site exists, in principle, for the proposed development and
the proposal is therefore contrary to Policies SDDC4 Sustainable Transport and
DM1 New Development Design of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (2021) and Policies 13 Sustainable Transport and 14
Design, Quality and Place of National Planning Framework 4 (2023). 
3 The proposed residential development has not been supported by an agreed
timescale for build-out and, as such, does not meet the limited circumstances
identified in Policy 16(f)(iii) of the National Planning Framework 4 which could
allow the delivery of housing on this unallocated site 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date:  24 March 2025 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:-
P/23/0770 | Proposed residential development and associated infrastructure (planning permission in
principle) | Land 50M SSW Of 48 Toftcombs Crescent Toftcombs Crescent Stonehouse Larkhall ML9
3RA 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
40

Page 41

41

Page 42

42

Page 43

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025  
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) 
Reference no:  P/24/0533
Proposal:  Change of use of open space to accommodate expansion of petrol
filling station including 2 electric vehicle charging bays, 2 jet wash
bays, laundry unit, boundary fencing and extension to retail unit 
Site Address:  Earnock Service Station, 105 Wellhall Road, Hamilton, ML3 9UE
Applicant:  Grove Retail Ltd
Agent:  Gray Planning and Development Ltd
Ward:  18 - Hamilton West and Earnock
Application Type:  Full planning permission
Advert Date:  Hamilton Advertiser: 16 May 2024 
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  N/A 
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  No 
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
No 
5
43

Page 44

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as
the proposal has received more than 5 objections. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The application site extends to approximately 0.16ha and is situated in an established
residential area of Hamilton.   
2.2. The site relates to an existing petrol filling station which operates 24 hours a day.  The
site is enclosed to the north by Wellhall Road, which is a key route through Hamilton
and to the east by a roundabout.  In addition, the site is bound to the south and west
by residential properties. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. The proposal relates to an expansion of the existing petrol filling station.  An existing
area of vacant ground within the application site is proposed to accommodate two
electric vehicle charging bays, two jet wash bays and an air and water bay.  In addition,
the proposal will include a 29sq metre extension to the existing retail facility, a laundry
unit, 4 metre high lighting columns and the erection of 1 metre high boundary fence. 
3.2. The vehicular and pedestrian entrance to the site is from Wellhall Road. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. The planning history for the site is as follows:- 
 P/21/1701 (withdrawn) - Installation of two self-service car wash bays with 2.7
metre high glazed screens, two parking spaces, and associated alterations
 P/23/1576 (withdrawn) - Change of use of open space to accommodate
expansion of petrol filling station including 2 electric vehicle charging bays, 2 jet
wash bays, laundry unit with boundary fencing and extension to retail unit to
accommodate a hot food take-away with associated flue 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. In support of the planning application, the following has been submitted:- 
 Planning Statement 
 Noise Impact Assessment (NIA)
 Letter (dated 31 August 2024) from New Acoustics which provides a response to
noise related objections   
6. Consultations
6.1. Environmental Services - No objection to the proposals, subject to conditions and
advisory notes relating to noise, hours of operation and nuisance.
Response: Noted. 
6.2. Roads Development Management Team – No objection. 
Response: Noted. 
6.3. Scottish Water - No objection to the proposed development. 
Response: Noted. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, 17
objections have been received.  The issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
44

Page 45

Amenity Issues
 The proposal will have a significant adverse impact on residential amenity.
 The development will result in light pollution. 
 The repositioning of the bins will result in odours. 
 There is a problem with litter at the site and the extension will make this issue
worse. 
Noise Issues 
 Significant concern regarding the noise generated from the proposal and, in
particular, from the car wash and car vac.
 Despite the findings of the NIA, the proposal is anticipated to generate noise and
disturbance. 
 The NIA is flawed and the noise readings are different from the ones which have
been taken by an objector.   
Flooding and Drainage 
 Jura Gardens currently has issues with flooding and the proposal will exacerbate
this issue.  
 A neighbouring property has previously been flooded a number of times and this
development will make matters worse.
 Other developments, in close proximity to the site, have been refused in the area
due to concerns regarding flooding.  
 There is no drainage proposed at the site and the increase in the volume of water
from the proposed jet washers will overload the strained drainage network.
 Concern that unchecked chemicals from this site will enter the drainage system. 
Roads Related Matters
 The proposal will lead to queues and traffic build up on Wellhall Road.
 The site is situated between two roundabouts.
 The congestion caused by the proposal will increase noise and air pollution. 
 The proposed car parking at the site is inadequate and this will result in users
parking in the surrounding streets.  
 This is already an area where it is hazardous for the public to walk.
 Concern about water run-off on to nearby roads. 
Other Matters Raised
 This proposal is the same as the previous application P/23/1576 which was
withdrawn.
 The contents of the planning statement are disputed.
 Confirmation is sought in relation to the position of the postal lockers on the site. 
 Clarification is sought in relation to the boundary between the petrol filling station
and Jura Gardens and the use of land which is outwith the control of the applicant.
 The development is contrary to the Development Plan. 
 Clarification is sought in relation to the existing trees.
 The proposal has a disregard for local residents and the community.
 These additional facilities are just not required. 
 Concern that the existing anti-social behaviour issues will be exacerbated. 
7.2. The above issues are considered in the assessment below.  These letters are
available for inspection on the planning portal.    
45

Page 46

8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and sets
out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments and national planning
policy.  The relevant policies are:- 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises 
 Policy 2 - Climate Mitigation and Adaptation 
 Policy 15 - Local Living and 20 Minute Neighbourhoods 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021)
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will also assess
proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).  In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Policies
 Policy 1 - Spatial Strategy
 Policy 2 - Climate Change
 Policy 3 - General Urban Areas
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking 
9.   Guidance
9.1. None. 
10.   Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Principle of Development 
Detailed planning permission is sought for the change of use of open space to
accommodate the expansion of the petrol filling station including 2 electric vehicle
charging bays, 2 jet wash bays, a laundry unit, boundary fencing and an extension to
the existing retail unit at Earnock Service Station, 105 Wellhall Road, Hamilton.  The
determining issues in the consideration of this application are its compliance with
national policy, local development plan policy and its impact on residential amenity,
environmental matters and infrastructure issues. 
10.2. The site is situated within an established residential area and relates to an existing
petrol filling station.  Policy 15 of NPF4 establishes that development proposals should
contribute to local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods.  The proposed development
site is located within the Hamilton settlement boundary and is considered to be well
connected and situated within a sustainable location which will support local compact
living and a 20 minute neighbourhood.  In addition, the site is considered to be
adaptable as the proposal seeks to expand an established use whilst utilising an area
of vacant ground.  Therefore, it is considered that the principle of the development
raises no issues within the context of Policy 15 of NPF4. 
10.3. The site is affected by Policy 3 of the adopted Local Development Plan which
establishes that residential developments, and those of an ancillary nature, may be
considered acceptable provided that they do not have a significant adverse impact on
the amenity and character of the area.  The lawful use of the site as a petrol filling
46

Page 47

station has been established and such operations are commonplace within residential
areas, especially adjacent to main road networks such as the application site. 
Therefore, it is considered that the principle of the intensification and expansion of this
existing use raises no issues within the context of Policy 3 of the adopted Local
Development Plan. 
10.4. Policies 1 and 2 of the adopted Local Development Plan and National Planning
Framework 4 encourage sustainable economic growth and regeneration, a move
towards a low carbon economy, the protection of the natural and historic environment
and mitigation against the impacts of climate change.  The proposal relates to the
expansion of an existing facility, the use of vacant ground and includes the provision
of electric vehicle charging units at the site.  Subsequently, it is not considered that the
proposal raises any adverse issues within the context of Policies 1 and 2 of the
adopted Local Development Plan or NPF4.   
10.5. Layout, Siting and Design
In terms of the detailed design of the development, Policy 5 of the adopted Local
Development Plan generally requires new development to have due regard to the
layout, form, design and local context of the area, and to promote quality and
sustainability in its design.  Following review, it is considered that the proposed scale,
design and finish of the extension to the retail unit reflect the existing building.  In
addition, the proposed layout, form and scale of the expansion of the petrol filling
station to accommodate new charging bays, jet wash bays, a laundry unit, lighting
columns and fencing are not out of keeping with the existing site. 
10.6. In relation to the impact on the amenity of nearby residential properties, it is considered
that these dwellings are situated near an existing petrol filling station which operates
24 hours a day and in close proximity to a main route through Hamilton.  Accordingly,
the current level of amenity enjoyed by these properties cannot be considered to be
the same as dwellings within an exclusive residential estate.  Indeed, it was noted
during the site visit that there is considerable road traffic noise which can be heard
from the site and in the surrounding area.  Notwithstanding the above, a Noise Impact
Assessment and an addendum to this document have been submitted and reviewed. 
Environmental Services have not raised any significant concerns regarding the
proposal in relation to noise, floodlighting or other amenity issues, subject to a
restriction on the operating hours of the use of the jet wash facility.  Subsequently,
following assessment it is considered that the design, location and scale of the
proposed development is acceptable and the proposal raises no issues within the
context of Policy 5 of the adopted Local Development Plan. 
10.7. With regards to the other matters raised in the representations, following a detailed
assessment Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services consider that the proposal is
acceptable in terms of access, parking and road safety issues.  In relation to the
potential flooding issues, details of the proposed drainage system have been
submitted in relation to the development.  The issue of land ownership and boundary
disputes are a legal matter, postal lockers are not considered to be development, the
existing trees on site are not protected and can be removed by the applicant and
matters relating to anti-social behaviour are outwith the remit of the Planning Service. 
10.8. Conclusion 
In conclusion, the proposal relates to the extension and expansion of a long
established petrol filling station.  The design, layout and general impact of the
development is considered to be acceptable and the proposal raises no significant
amenity or infrastructure issues.  Overall, it is considered that the proposal complies
with the provisions of the relevant policies within the National Planning Framework 4
47

Page 48

and the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan.  It is therefore recommended that
the application be granted subject to the conditions listed. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than
the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision
notice. 
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 
02. That between the hours of 0800 and 2000 the measured noise rating level
emitted from the premises  (LAeq (1hour)) shall not exceed the pre-existing
background noise level (LA90 (1/2hour)) by more than 4dB when measured in
accordance with British Standard BS 4142:2014 - Method for Rating and
Assessing Industrial and Commercial Sound at buildings where people are
likely to be affected.     
Reason: In the interests of amenity. 
03. The use of the jet wash (with the exception of maintenance works not audible
outside the premises) shall be restricted to the following hours of operation:- 
Between 0800 and 2000 hours.     
Reason: In the interests of amenity. 
04. That the development hereby approved shall not be operational until the
drainage system identified in drawing PL_010 has been installed to the
satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure a satisfactory drainage system is installed at the site.  
05. For the avoidance of doubt, the approved extension to the existing forecourt
retail unit shall operate within the provisions of Class 1A (Shops, Financial,
Professional and Other Services) of the Town and Country Planning (Use
Classes) (Scotland) Order 1997 as amended. 
Reason: To ensure that the unit does not operate as a hot food take-away. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposal raises no significant adverse amenity, environmental or infrastructure
issues and complies with Policies 1, 2 and 15 of the National Planning Framework 4
and raises no issues within the context of Policies 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the adopted South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2.  There are no other material considerations
which would justify the refusal of planning permission.  
48

Page 49

David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 24 March 2025 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:-
P/24/0533 | Change of use of open space to accommodate expansion of petrol filling station including
2 electric vehicle charging bays, 2 jet wash bays, laundry unit, boundary fencing and extension to
retail unit. | Earnock Service Station 105 Wellhall Road Hamilton ML3 9UE 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
49

Page 50

50

Page 51

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/24/0990
Proposal:  Erection of free-range poultry unit and feed silos with new access,
parking and associated works 
Site Address:  Land 360M WSW of Station Cottage
Darvel Road
Drumclog
Strathaven 
Applicant:  Alan Blackwood
Agent:  Grant Murray Architects Ltd
Ward:  05 – Avondale and Stonehouse
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Date:  East Kilbride News 16 October 2024
Development Plan
Compliance:
Yes 
Departures:  No
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A 
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
6
51

Page 52

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as
the proposal has received more than 5 objections. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The site, which measures approximately 1.05 hectares in area, is located
approximately 250 metres to the west of the village of Drumclog and 9km south-west
of Strathaven.  The site is bounded by agricultural land on all sides and there is no
current vehicular access to the site, though the A71 road is located approximately 180
metres to the south.  The site comprises agricultural land screened by a row of trees
to the south.  The site is located at a raised level relative to the A71 and the village of
Drumclog, however, it is predominantly flat throughout. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. Detailed planning permission is sought for the erection of a free-range poultry unit and
feed silos with new access, parking and associated works within the site.  The
proposed poultry unit would comprise a low profile, single storey building measuring
approximately 2700 square metres in size and would house up to 32,000 birds on site. 
The proposals would represent the expansion of an existing poultry business, currently
operating in Ayrshire, into a new site within South Lanarkshire.  A new access would
be formed from the A71, to include a passing place to accommodate HGVs.  Car
parking and a turning area would also be provided as part of the proposed
development. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. There is no relevant planning history for the site. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1.  The agent has submitted a Design Statement and a Business Plan in support of the
proposals.  This has been considered as part of the assessment of the application
below. 
6. Consultations
6.1. Environmental Services – Offered no objections to the proposed development
subject to conditions relating to environmental matters including odour and waste
management.
Response: Noted.  These matters could be addressed through conditions and on the
decision notice if the application were to be approved. 
6.2. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services (Development Management) – Offered
no objections subject to the inclusion of conditions relating to the provision of
appropriate access, visibility splay, parking provision and turning space within the site. 
Response: Noted.  These matters could be addressed through conditions and on the
decision notice if the application were to be approved. 
6.3. Scottish Water – Offered no objections to the proposed development.
Response: Noted. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, a total of
16 objections have been received.  The issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
 Traffic and road safety
 Proximity to residential properties 
 Impact on residential amenity
52

Page 53

 Loss of privacy 
 Visual and landscape impact 
 Impact on peatland 
 Impact on wildlife 
 Scale and nature of development 
 Noise and disturbance 
 Air pollution, dust and odours 
 Vermin and biosecurity concerns 
 Impact on human health 
 Waste management 
 Drainage 
 Impact on historical assets 
The above issues are considered in the assessment below.  These letters are
available for inspection on the planning portal.  Other non-material issues were also
raised, however, these are not planning related and do not form part of the assessment
of the proposal. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and sets
out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and national planning
policy. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises 
 Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation 
 Policy 14 - Design, quality and place 
 Policy 26 - Business and industry 
 Policy 29 – Rural development 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will assess
proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).  In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies 
 Policy 2 - Climate Change 
 Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area 
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies 
 Policy DM1 - New Development Design 
 Policy GBRA1 – Rural Design and Development 
 Policy GBRA2 – Business Proposals within Green Belt and Rural Area 
9. Guidance
9.1. None applicable. 
53

Page 54

10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Introduction
The main issues to be addressed in the determination of this application include the
acceptability in principle of the proposed development and an assessment of technical
matters.  The policies contained within National Planning Framework 4 and the South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 are the main consideration in this case,
together with an assessment of any other material planning considerations. 
10.2. Principle of Development
The site is located within the rural area as designated by Policy 4 – Green Belt and
Rural Areas of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (adopted 2021),
where the principle of appropriate business uses relating to agriculture and rural
activities is considered to be acceptable.  As such, the principle of development of the
application site to form a poultry unit is acceptable at this location in planning policy
terms, subject to an assessment of the detailed matters relating to this proposal. 
10.3. Climate Change
Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development
Plan 2 seek to encourage, promote and facilitate development that addresses the
global climate emergency and nature crisis, and which minimises emissions and
adapts to the current and future impacts of climate change.  In this case the nature of
the proposed development necessitates a rural location, removed from major
settlements.  However, the design of the development incorporates the provision of
PV panels into the roof of the proposed building, while the supporting information
provided as part of the application notes that the facility would allow the production of
local food products, reducing the reliance on imported foods and associated high
carbon footprints.  As such, this is considered to be a development that would make
a positive impact in terms of climate change and sustainability considerations and
complies with the provisions of Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of the South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. 
10.4. Rural Development
Policy 29 – Rural Development of NPF4 seeks to encourage rural economic activity,
innovation and diversification whilst ensuring that the distinctive character of the rural
area and the service function of small towns, natural assets and cultural heritage are
safeguarded and enhanced.  The policy supports the provision of appropriate rural
businesses, including food production facilities, within rural areas. 
10.5. Policy 26 – Business and Industry seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate business
and industry uses, including uses outside of designated business and industry areas
where the nature and scale of the activity will be compatible with the area in which it
is located.  Given that this proposed development relates to an agricultural food
production facility in the form of a poultry unit, it is considered to be appropriate to the
rural location in which it is proposed to be sited in terms of its scale and nature and is
therefore considered to be compliant with the provisions of Policies 26 and 29 of NPF4. 
10.6. Policy GBRA1 – Rural Design and Development of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 supports proposals within countryside areas that are
appropriately sited, designed and do not create any significant adverse amenity
impacts in terms of amenity issues, to include overlooking and overshadowing of
residential properties.  Policy GBRA2 – Business Proposals within Green Belt and
Rural Area provides more specific policy relating to rural business proposals and
states that business proposals relating to agricultural uses can be considered
acceptable in rural areas, where sufficient land is available and where an appropriate
business plan is provided in support of the proposed development.  
54

Page 55

10.7. In this case the proposals are considered to be sited a sufficient distance from
residential properties to ensure that there would be no significant amenity impact. 
Furthermore, a business plan has been provided demonstrating that the proposals
represent an appropriate expansion of an existing production business in Ayrshire into
a new site in South Lanarkshire and would be sustainable at the new location.  It also
notes that two full time and two part time posts would be generated by the
development.  As such, the proposals are considered to comply with the relevant
provisions of Policies GBRA1 and GBRA2 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2. 
10.8. Layout, Siting and Design
Policy 14 of NPF4 relates to liveable places.  The policy sets out that all development
should be designed to improve the quality of an area and be consistent with the six
qualities of a successful place: healthy, pleasant, connected, distinctive, sustainable,
and adaptable.  Policies 5 – Development Management and Placemaking and DM1
– New Development Design seek the provision of high quality proposals that do not
significantly adversely impact on surrounding amenity. 
10.9. In this case the proposals relate to the erection of a single storey building on a
greenfield site to the west of the settlement of Drumclog.  The proposed building would
not appear prominent in the landscape, particularly as it would be screened from the
most prominent viewpoints to the south and east by a row of mature trees located
adjacent to the proposed development site.  Additionally, the development would be
sited a sufficient distance from the nearest residential properties to ensure that there
would be no significant adverse impact in terms of privacy issues in this case.  As
such, the proposed development is considered to be satisfactory in terms of its siting
and design with regard to landscape and visual amenity considerations.  It is also
noted that the building would be sited outwith an identified peatland area located to
the west of Drumclog and, as a result of the greenfield nature of the site, it is unlikely
there would be any significant impact on protected species or wildlife in this case, or
on any sites of historical interest. 
10.10. Technical Matters 
With regard to technical considerations, it is noted that the Council’s Roads
Transportation and Fleet Services have confirmed their satisfaction with access,
parking, road safety and other relevant aspects of the proposals subject to conditions
that would be attached to any consent issued.  It is noted that sufficient visibility splays
can be provided in both directions at the junction of the proposed access road with the
A71 and passing space for HGVs would also be provided along the access road.  As
such, there are no concerns held with regard to traffic or other road safety
considerations in this case. 
10.11. Similarly, the Council’s Environmental Services have confirmed that they have no
significant concerns with regard to noise, pollution, smell, waste or other
environmental considerations in this case.  Conditions requested by the Service
relating to environmental matters would be attached to the consent issued to ensure
that environmental matters of relevance to the planning process would be controlled
as appropriate.  Further enforcement action could also be taken directly by
Environmental Services under relevant environmental legislation should any specific
matters arise resulting from the development.  There are also no specific concerns
held relating to drainage issues in this case.  
55

Page 56

10.12. Conclusion
In summary, following a detailed assessment of the proposed development, it is
considered that the poultry unit would be appropriately sited in the rural area and would
be developed in a manner that would have no significant adverse impact on residential
amenity, road safety, the character of the surrounding rural area or in terms of relevant
environmental considerations. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the
expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice.  
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Act 1997 (as amended). 
02. That, prior to the commencement of any works on site, full details of the design and
location of all fences and walls, including any retaining walls, to be erected on the site
shall be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority.  The
approved details shall thereafter be implemented on site to the satisfaction of the
Council as Planning Authority before the development hereby approved is completed
or brought into use.   
Reason: These details have not been submitted or approved. 
03. Prior to the commencement of the development on site an Odour Management Plan
detailing measures proposed to control odour, (including bioaerosols) shall be
submitted to, and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority.  The
measures as approved shall thereafter be implemented, along with any subsequent
remedial measures as required, to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning
Authority.   
Reason: To safeguard the environmental amenity of the area. 
04. Prior to the commencement of the development a waste management plan shall be
submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority.  This should include
the disposal of poultry manure, or if considered a product its intended use including
storage or stock piling of the product.  The development shall thereafter be undertaken
in accordance with the approved details to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning
Authority.   
Reason: To safeguard the environmental amenity of the area. 
05. That no gates or other obstructions shall be erected within the first 30 metres of the
access as measured from the edge of the carriageway.   
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety. 
06. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use, a
visibility splay of 9metres by 215metres shall be provided and everything exceeding
1.05metres in height above the road channel level shall be removed from the sight line
areas. 
56

Page 57

Reason: In the interests of public safety. 
07. That before the access is completed or brought into use, the surface of the first 30m
of the access (measured from the edge of the carriageway) shall be surfaced, sealed
and trapped to mitigate the potential for any detritus material or water to leave the
access / driveway and enter the public road.  This section of the access road shall be
constructed as an industrial road.  Within this 30m, a delineation flush kerb shall be
installed and located 2m from the edge of the carriageway to delineate the public road
/ service strip from the private access.  
Reason: In the interests of traffic safety and to prevent deleterious material entering
the road. 
08. The access shall not have a gradient in excess of 1:10.   
Reason: In the interests of traffic and public safety. 
09. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use, the
passing place on the access road shall be formed to a length that is sufficient to
accommodate an HGV, to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason: In the interests of public safety. 
10. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use, all of
the parking spaces shown on the approved plans shall be provided at a size of 2.9m
x 5.5m each with an aisle width of 6m, to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning
Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate parking facilities within the site. 
11. That, prior to commencement of works on site, a tracking drawing detailing the
provision of a turning area and demonstrating that HGV's can access/exit the site in
forward gears shall be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning
Authority.  The development shall thereafter be undertaken in accordance with the
approved details, with the turning area being provided on site before the development
hereby approved is completed or brought into use.   
Reason: In the interests of public safety. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposal would have no significant adverse impact upon amenity and complies
with Policies 1, 2, 14, 16 and 29 of the National Planning Framework 4 and with
Policies 2, 4, 5, DM1, GBRA1 and GBRA2 of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (adopted 2021). 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 24 March 2025 
57

Page 58

Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:- 
P/24/0990 | Erection of free-range poultry unit and feed silos with new access, parking
and associated works | Land 360M WSW Of Station Cottage Darvel Road Drumclog
Strathaven South Lanarkshire 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
58

Page 59

59

Page 60

60

Page 61

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/24/1069
Proposal:  Formation of fishing ponds and associated facilities (Section 42
application to vary the terms of condition No. 21 of consent P/19/1807
to allow continued operations at the site for a further 10 year period) 
Site Address:  Woodend Farm
Carnwath
Lanark
ML11 8LR 
Applicant:  Onyx Leisure Ltd 
Agent:  ICDP Architects
Ward:  03 Clydesdale East
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Type:  Non-notification of neighbours 
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  N/A
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
7
61

Page 62

1. Reason for Report
1.1. The application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee within the
context of the approved South Lanarkshire Scheme of Delegation (2024) as it relates
to a major development. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The application site lies to the east of the B7016, approximately 2km to the north of
Carnwath, between a conifer plantation and the Dippool Water.  The site occupies a
total area of 17.3 hectares.  Access is via an existing track (approximately 1km in
length) taken directly off the B7016.  The existing access currently also serves
Woodend Farm (which sits immediately adjacent to the B7016). 
2.2. Work has started on site with a pond partly formed.  An access, hard standing,
compound with car park, site office and weigh bridge has been established on site. 
Throughout the site there are mounds of excavated sand and gravel.  The entrance
has been widened and surfaced with concrete for the first 33m, from the edge of the
public road. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. The application is made under Section 42 of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended) and is an application for planning permission for
the development of land but without compliance with a condition or conditions attached
to a previous planning permission. 
3.2. In this instance, the application seeks to vary the terms of condition 21 attached to
Planning Permission P/19/1807 which was granted in September 2020 for the creation
of 3 fishing ponds through the extraction of sand and gravel from the raised mounds
at the forestry edge.  The amendment of the condition is to enable a further 10 years
of operations at the site including excavations, land engineering, landscaping and
pond creation. 
3.3. Condition 21 of application P/19/1807 states:- All extraction operations on the site shall
be discontinued not later than 01 February 2025 and, within a period of 12 months
from this discontinuance date, the entire site shall be restored in accordance with the
approved restoration plan to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority. 
3.4. The applicant has requested that the condition be varied to read:- All extraction
operations on the site shall be discontinued not later than 10 years from the date of
this Planning Permission and, within a period of 12 months from this discontinuance
date, the entire site shall be restored in accordance with the approved restoration plan. 
3.5. In this report the condition is listed as No. 09 due to re-ordering as some conditions
attached to the previous consent P/19/1807 have now been discharged. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. The original Planning Permission CL/12/0511 for the formation of fishing ponds and
associated facilities was granted in April 2013.  A Section 42 application to vary
condition 25 attached to Planning Permission CL/12/0511, to enable an extension of
the extraction period by a further 6 years was granted in September 2020. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. In support of the planning application, the applicant has submitted:-  
62

Page 63

 Dust Management Report
 Maintenance Plan
 Traffic Management Plan
 Flood Risk Assessment Report
 Hydrogeological Assessment
 Surface Water Features Survey Report 
6. Consultations
6.1. Roads Development Management Team - No objection subject to appropriate roads
related conditions. 
Response:  Noted. 
6.2. NatureScot – Requested a condition preventing road widening onto or material storage
within the confines of the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). 
Response:  An appropriate condition is proposed to address this matter. 
6.3. Scottish Environmental Protection Agency (SEPA) – No objection. 
Response:  Noted. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement for non-
notification of neighbours, one objection and one representation have been received. 
The issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
Roads Related Matters
⧫ Land ownership at the site entrance is under dispute and it is not possible to
install a wheel wash where first planned.
⧫ The top access is unsuitable for large vehicles. 
Other Matters Raised
⧫ There is no operational weighbridge therefore no paperwork for transactions.
⧫ Boulders were placed in front of the access at a neighbouring property.
⧫ A neighbouring resident was advised that their septic tank would be removed. 
7.2. Other non-material planning comments were included in representations:- 
⧫ The holder of the servitude cannot extend the right to third parties unless
expressly permitted.
⧫ Servitudes cannot be materially changed in a way that increases the burden on
burdened land.
⧫ The applicant should negotiate with the burdened landowner to extend the
servitude or create a new one for third party use. 
7.3. The above issues are considered in the assessment below.  These letters are
available for inspection on the planning portal. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
63

Page 64

8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and sets
out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and national planning
policy.  The relevant policies are:- 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises
 Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation
 Policy 3 - Biodiversity
 Policy 14 - Design, quality and place
 Policy 29 - Rural development
 Policy 30 - Tourism
 Policy 33 - Minerals 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will, therefore,
assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire
Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).  In this regard the application site and
associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies
 Policy 2 - Climate Change
 Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking
 Policy 6 - Visitor Economy and Tourism
 Policy 19 - Minerals Development 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies
 GBRA1 - Rural Design and Development
 Policy GBRA2 - Business Proposals within Green Belt and Rural Area
 Policy VET1 - Visitor Attractions 
9. Guidance
9.1. NatureScot Developing with Nature Guidance is relevant to all local developments and
provides advice and guidance on how to achieve Policy 3 Biodiversity of NPF4. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Introduction
This application has been submitted under Section 42 of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended) and seeks to extend the time period for
excavation of sand and gravel to be carried out to form fishing ponds on land at
Woodend Farm near Carnwath.  Section 42 of the Act states that:-  
'On such an application, the Planning Authority shall consider only the question of the
conditions subject to which planning permission should be granted.’ 
10.2. This type of application, therefore, does not revisit the principle of development on the
site but only considers the appropriateness of the conditions attached to the previous
consent and whether it is acceptable to amend or delete as requested.  Whilst, in
essence, a Section 42 is an application to vary condition(s) on an existing permission,
the process requires a new, stand-alone planning permission to be issued for the
original development but with a new suite of conditions, including all those still thought
to be relevant as well as the varied condition(s).  Should the proposed amendment to
64

Page 65

the condition(s) not be acceptable, a Section 42 application is to be refused but without
affecting the status of the original permission. 
10.3. In assessing whether any condition is still relevant there is a requirement to consider
certain aspects of the development.  In this instance, the applicant has requested that
condition 21 is amended.  However, it is noted that the nature of the legislation requires
all conditions to be revisited as they may be linked or connected to these specific
conditions.  The main matters for consideration are, therefore, whether the proposed
amendment to the condition proposed would undermine the reasons for the original
conditions or the Development Plan position; and if it is considered this Section 42
application does undermine either of these, whether there are material considerations
which would outweigh this to allow permission to be granted. 
10.4. The determining issues in the consideration of this application are its compliance with
the National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). 
10.5. Climate Change
NFP4 Policy 1, NPF4 Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2 aim to ensure that proposals for
new development must, where possible, seek to minimise and mitigate against the
effects of climate change. 
10.6. The application seeks a time extension of 10 years to allow the formation of fishing
ponds.  The method of mineral extraction and restoration of the site has previously
been approved by condition discharge and does not involve any additional
infrastructure being created.  Most of the site will comprise landscaped greenfield with
water bodies which is a sustainable land use for the countryside.  The development
will utilise an existing access road.  A substantial area of native tree planting will be
established around the pond margins.  It is therefore considered that the proposals
comply with the relevant criteria of these policies. 
10.7. Principle of Development 
SLLDP2 Policy 4 ‘Green Belt and Rural Area’ of the SLLDP2 specifies that within the
Rural Area, the aim is to protect the amenity of the countryside while at the same time,
supporting small scale development in the right place that is appropriate in land use
terms and is of a high environmental quality that will support the needs of communities. 
It functions primarily for agriculture, forestry, recreation, and other uses appropriate to
the countryside. 
10.8. SLLDP2 Policy GBRA2 ‘Business Proposals within the Greenbelt and Rural Area’
reiterates that proposals should be an appropriate use in the rural area.  The policy
lists types of development considered appropriate in the rural area including:
recreation, tourism, holiday accommodation, leisure and sporting developments. 
10.9. It is considered that the principle of the development has already been deemed
acceptable within the Rural Area through the granting of the previous planning
permission P/19/1807 and the proposed amendment to condition 21 of said
permission has no further implications on the countryside strategy set out within the
Development Plan.  It is therefore considered that the proposals comply with SLLDP2
Policies 4 and GBRA2. 
10.10. It has been noted that a fence has been erected on land associated with the
development, at the access onto the public road.  Access to the site is still available. 
However, the applicant advises that the fence that has been erected has been done
so without the relevant landowner’s permission and legal action will be pursued to
65

Page 66

resolve this matter.  The process to remove the fence is a legal matter separate to the
consideration of the planning application. 
10.11. Layout, Siting and Design
NPF4 Policy 14 Design Quality and Place and SLLDP2 Policy 5 Development
Management and Placemaking and GBRA1 - Rural Design and Development aim to
ensure well designed development that makes for successful places and considers
the impact on residential amenity and the appropriateness of the development to a
rural setting. 
10.12. The proposals are to extend the lifetime of the extraction period by a further 10 years. 
It is considered that, in terms of both landscape and visual impact, the extended time
period would not have a long-term adverse impact upon the landscape.  The site is
currently well screened in the context of the wider area by woodland and topography. 
The distance from the nearest public road further reduces the visual impact.  Once
complete, the fishing ponds and associated landscaping will be a feature which
integrates with and enhances the landscape quality of the area.  In addition, the
residential amenity of the area would not be adversely affected subject to the
implementation of conditions. 
10.13. The access route will use the improved track which served the nearby peat extraction
works.  The route would be a reasonable distance from the nearby residential
properties. 
10.14. It is therefore considered that the amendment to condition 21 would be in accordance
with NPF4 Policy 14 and SLLDP2 Policy 5. 
10.15. Rural Development and Tourism 
NPF4 Policy 29 Rural Development states that development proposals which
contribute to the viability, sustainability and diversity of rural communities and local
rural economy will be supported. 
10.16. NPF4 Policy 30 Tourism states: Proposals for tourism related development will take
into account: (i). The contribution made to the local economy; (ii). Compatibility with
the surrounding area in terms of the nature and scale of the activity and impacts of
increased visitors; (iii). Opportunities for sustainable travel and appropriate
management of parking and traffic generation and scope for sustaining public
transport services, particularly in rural areas. 
10.17. SLLDP2 Policy 6 ‘Visitor Economy and Tourism’ states ‘The provision of new, high
quality visitor attractions, activities, facilities, infrastructure and accommodation, and
the safeguarding and maintenance of existing features will be supported where they
are shown to positively contribute towards the visitor economy.  Policy VET1 ‘Visitor
Attractions’ will support the creation of new visitor attractions or the expansion of
existing facilities in appropriate locations where the financial viability and contribution
of the proposal towards the visitor economy and attracting visitor footfall can be
demonstrated. 
10.18. In the recent past, progress in forming the ponds has been impeded by legal disputes
and the Covid 19 pandemic.  With the resolution of these constraints, meaningful
progress can now be made.  Ten years in 3 phased stages is considered both a
realistic and cautious timescale.  Extending the operational period by a further 10
years would not deviate from or change the intention to create fishing ponds.  The
proposal will provide an attractive environment for fishing and will be an additional
recreational asset in South Lanarkshire.  The leisure business will create employment
66

Page 67

opportunities and contribute to the local economy.  It is therefore considered that the
amendment to condition 21 would be in accordance with NPF4 Policies 29 and 30 and
SLLDP2 Policies 6 and VET1. 
10.19. Natural and Historic Environment
NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity under part (c) details that all local developments shall
include appropriate measures to conserve, restore and enhance biodiversity.  The
Development with Nature Guidance is pertinent in this case.  The guidance
encourages a mitigation hierarchy to be applied – avoid, minimise, restore, and offset
to achieve a net positive biodiversity impact. 
10.20. Extensive areas of landscaping around the ponds includes native trees, hedgerows,
marginal and aquatic plants.  The proposed landscaping and pond creation will
enhance biodiversity.  To avoid adverse impacts upon protected species, regular
monitoring and mitigation measures, as recommended by appointed ecological
consultants, will be undertaken during the construction phases.  Therefore, the
proposal accords with NPF4 Policy 3. 
10.21. Mineral Development 
NPF4 Policy 33 advises sustainable extraction of minerals will only be supported
where adverse impacts upon biodiversity, geodiversity and the natural environment
can be avoided.  The proposal needs to demonstrate there are no significant adverse
impacts on any homes.  Any noise, dust, vibration and potential for pollution needs to
be at an acceptable level.  Transport impacts need to be minimised.  A high standard
of restoration and after care is required.  Safeguards should include a restoration bond. 
10.22. SLLDP2 Policy 19 – Minerals states any development proposals for mineral extraction
must be carried out with impacts reduced to acceptable levels and with appropriate
mitigation. 
10.23. There are material differences in the pond depths and extraction quantities compared
to what was approved by the original Planning Permission (Ref. CL/12/0511).  A
section 42 application does not require a complete reconsideration of the Planning
merits.  Works to implement the proposal have already started.  Extraction,
Restoration and Aftercare/Maintenance plans, detailing the referred updated pond
depths and extraction quantities, were submitted to support the discharge of conditions
09 ‘Landscaping’ and 22 ‘Restoration scheme’ attached to Planning Permission
P/19/1807.  These conditions have since been discharged.  The said plans have been
marked in the file for P/19/1807 as having been approved.  If planning permission is
granted a revised restoration bond, taking account of increased pond depth and
excavated material, to be concluded with the Council, will be required by condition. 
10.24. The creation of ponds along with additional tree planting will enhance the environment
and create an asset in an area of limited landscape appeal.  The proposal will not have
an adverse impact upon the nearby Kames SSSI (a geological feature) or any historic
designations.  The amount of mineral extraction and importation over the extended 10
year period is considered relatively small scale in comparison to larger operations
elsewhere in South Lanarkshire and over the construction period, the number of
vehicle trips generated is unlikely to be significant.  The adjacent peat extraction site
has now ceased operations thereby reducing cumulative impacts which were
prevalent at the time the previous planning permission was determined.  Roads,
Transportation and Fleet Services have not objected to this application.  The entrance
has already been widened and improved with concrete surfacing.  Speed restriction
signage has been installed along the access route.  The extraction area itself is remote
from housing.  As a result, there would not be an adverse effect on residential amenity. 
67

Page 68

If planning permission is granted, conditions will be applied requiring confirmation on
daily traffic generation, a wheel wash facility, restricted hours of operation, compliance
with approved dust mitigation plans and the approval of pollution control measures. 
10.25. In view of this assessment. it is considered that the section 42 application does not
compromise NPF4 Policy 33 and SLLDP2 Policy 19. 
10.26. Conclusion
It is considered that the extension of the lifetime of the extraction period to form the
fishing ponds for a further 10 years is acceptable as it will not prejudice the
development plan nor have an adverse impact on landscape character, residential and
visual amenity and road safety.  The variation to the condition will not affect the
outcome or intent of the original approval. 
10.27. It is therefore recommended that permission be granted.  Under the terms of Section
42 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 if a Planning Authority is
content that the proposed changes to conditions are acceptable, as in this instance, a
new planning permission with amended conditions could be issued.  It is considered
that whilst it is acceptable to amend condition 21 as requested, other conditions should
be updated and/or removed as necessary to any new permission issued.  This ensures
that the new permission is consistent with the Development Plan and previous
assessment.  It should be noted that some conditions have already been fully or
partially discharged.  In addition, several additional conditions are proposed which
reflects the effects of the development to date. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
01. The operator shall abide by the approved dust monitoring and management plan,
unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason: To minimise any nuisance; to protect the amenity of nearby properties;
and to minimise the chance of dust being transmitted onto the public highway. 
02. That within 4 months from the date of this permission (and each year thereafter)
the operator shall submit to the Planning Authority an annual progress plan
detailing:- 
 The extent of ongoing extraction operations;
 Areas prepared for extraction;
 Water quality;
 The extent of backfilling or restoration operations carried out;
 The extent of landscaping, nature conservation and agricultural works that have
been implemented;
 Current and anticipated production figures;
 Remaining reserves;
 Compliance with statutory permissions;
 Site complaint logs and actions taken.  
Reason: To ensure that the Planning Authority is informed at regular intervals of
the progress of the site. 
68

Page 69

03. That within two months of the date of this Planning Permission, a scheme showing
the details of peat/soil stripping at the site and the storage and proposed use and
replacement of peat/soil and subsoil shall be submitted to the planning authority. 
The scheme shall have regard to the drainage implications of soil movement and
storage.  All soil stored on site shall be stored in accordance with BS 3882. 
Thereafter, all soil stripping, storage and replacement operations shall accord with
the approved details as approved by the planning authority.  In particular, the
scheme shall incorporate a method statement setting out the measures to protect,
store and replace peat/soil and any necessary mitigation measures.  
Reason: In the interests of amenity and in order to retain effective planning control. 
04. That within one month of the date of this Planning Permission a Pollution
Prevention and Incident and Waste Management Plan which includes mitigation
measures against environmental pollution during the life of the site shall be
submitted to the Planning Authority.  
Reason: In the interests of pollution and waste control. 
05. That the approved landscaping scheme shall be completed during the first
available planting season following completion of each phase of the development. 
Reason: In the interests of amenity. 
06. That within one month of the date of this permission the developer shall ensure a
programme of archaeological works, in accordance with the approved written
scheme of investigation, is fully implemented and that all recording and recovery
of archaeological resources within the development site is undertaken to the
satisfaction of the Planning Authority in agreement with the West of Scotland
Archaeology Service. 
Reason: In order to safeguard any archaeological items of interest or finds. 
07. The mitigation measures for birds, otters and badgers as outlined in the Badger
and Otter Survey (Wild Surveys Ltd, October 2023) shall be fully implemented
during all phases of construction. 
Reason: In the interests of wildlife. 
08. The silt and freshwater lagoons shall be properly lined and located at least 5 metres
away from the Dippool Water in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Authority.  
Reason: To limit pollution and to prevent erosion of the river bank. 
09. All extraction operations on the site shall be discontinued not later than ten years
from the date of this Planning Permission and, within a period of 12 months from
this discontinuance date, the entire site shall be restored in accordance with the
approved restoration plan to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.  
Reason: To ensure that the Planning Authority retains effective control of the
development and to ensure that the site is satisfactorily restored.  
69

Page 70

10. Upon the termination of extraction operations, all plant, machinery, buildings and
the foundations thereof shall be removed from the site, and the areas so occupied
restored in accordance with the approved restoration and 5 year aftercare scheme
shall be carried out to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority in accordance with
the approved details and within the agreed timescale. 
Reason: To ensure that the Planning Authority retains effective control of the
development and to ensure that the site is satisfactorily restored. 
11. That the mitigation measures contained in section 4.8 'Flood Management
Measures' of the Flood Risk Assessment Report (Gondolin, Land and Water,
December 2023)' shall be adhered to during the construction/excavation and
operational phases. 
Reason: To ensure appropriate flood risk mitigation measures are in place. 
12. The developer shall ensure that any vehicle transporting excavated material on or
off the site must be treated by means of adequate wheel washing facilities.  The
facility will require to be in operation at all times during earth moving operations. 
The wheel washing facility shall be fully operational prior to works commencing on
site.  A ''clean zone'' shall be maintained between the end of the wheel wash facility
and the public road.  Furthermore, the developer shall ensure a road brush motor
is made available throughout the construction period to ensure adjacent roads are
kept clear of mud and debris.  
Reason: In the interests of road safety. 
13. That prior to any further work starting on site, a programme indicating the phasing
of construction of development and number and rate of heavy goods vehicles
entering the site on a daily basis, shall be submitted for the written approval of the
Planning Authority.  The approved details shall be implemented throughout the
period of the development of the site.  
Reason: In the interests of road safety. 
14. Within three months of the date of this Planning Permission a revised restoration
bond taking account of increased pond depth and excavated material shall be
concluded with the Council.  This will include a guarantee to cover all site
restoration for each phase of the construction in the event that the development is
not satisfactorily completed.  Such guarantee must, unless otherwise agreed in
writing:- 
i) be granted in favour of the Council as Planning Authority 
ii) be granted by a bank or other institution which is of sound financial 
standing and capable of fulfilling the obligations under the guarantee;
iii) be for a specified amount which covers the value of all site restoration 
and aftercare liabilities as agreed between the developer and the 
planning authority at the commencement of development
iv) either contain indexation provisions so that the specified amount of the 
guarantee shall be increased on each anniversary of the date of this
consent by the same percentage increase in the General Index of Retail
Prices (All Items) exclusive of mortgage interest published by or on
behalf of HM Government between the date hereof and such relevant
anniversary or be reviewable to ensure that the specified amount of the
70

Page 71

guarantee always covers the value of the site restoration and aftercare
liabilities 
v) come into effect on or before the date of commencement of development 
and expire no earlier than 12 months after the end of the construction 
period.  
No further work shall be undertaken at the site until (1) written approval of the
Council as Planning Authority has been given to the terms of such guarantee
and (2) thereafter the validly executed guarantee has been delivered to the
Council as Planning Authority.  
In the event that the guarantee becomes invalid for any reason, no further
operations will be carried out on site until a replacement guarantee completed
in accordance with the terms of this condition is lodged with the Council as
Planning Authority. 
Reason: To ensure that provision is made for the restoration and aftercare of
the site. 
15. That the hours of operation during the creation of the fishing ponds through the 
excavation of sand and gravel and lorry movements associated with the 
export/import of material from the site shall be limited to between 8am and 7pm
Monday to Friday; 8am and 1pm on Saturday and at no time at all on Sunday or
public holidays. 
Reason: In the interests of residential amenity. 
16. That within one month of the date of this permission written details of a
maintenance scheme for the access road shall be submitted for the written
approval of the Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure that the developer contributes to the maintenance of the access
road. 
17. The existing access track shall not be widened or expanded in any way and no
materials, associated with the formation, maintenance and management of the
approved fishing ponds and ancillary operations, shall be dumped or stored outwith
the track’s current line. 
Reason: This is to protect the integrity of the Carstairs Kames SSSI. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The amendment to condition 21 is considered acceptable.  Extending the extraction
period by a further 10 years, does not contravene the relevant provisions of the
Development Plan subject to the imposition of the attached environmental conditions
as allowed under Section 42 of the Town and Country Planning Act (Scotland) 1997
as amended.  The development also complies with the relevant policies contained in
the development plan. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 24 March 2025  
71

Page 72

Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:- 
P/24/1069 | Section 42 application to vary the terms of condition No. 21 of consent P/19/1807
to allow continued operations at the site for a further 10 year period | Woodend Farm
Carnwath Lanark ML11 8LR 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
72

Page 73

73

Page 74

74

Page 75

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/24/1085
Proposal:  Extension to existing quarry to extract sand and gravel using existing
access, with associated progressive restoration 
Site Address:  Ryeflatt Quarry, Carnwath, Lanark, ML11 8SA
Applicant:  Tillicoultry Quarries Ltd
Agent:  Wardell Armstrong LLP – Abigail Brown 
Ward:  03 – Clydesdale East
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Date:  Lanark Gazette 25th September 2024 
Development Plan
Compliance: 
Yes 
Departures:  None
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions, Section 75 Agreement and Section 96
Agreement 
Legal Agreement:  The Committee should note that the planning permission, if granted,
should not be issued until such times as the following matters have
been concluded:- 
1: A Section 75 Agreement to secure financial contributions towards
the South Lanarkshire Rural Communities Trust Fund; and 
2: A Section 96 Agreement to ensure the suitable upkeep and repair
of roads within the vicinity of the site. 
The applicant will be responsible for meeting the Council’s reasonably
incurred legal expenses in respect of the legal agreement. 
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
Not Required  
8
75

Page 76

1. Reason for Report
1.1. The application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee under Clause
5.1 of the Decision-Making Process 2015 as the proposed development constitutes a
Major Planning Application. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The application site, which extends to some 19.6ha, lies to the north side of the A70
Carstairs to Carnwath Road and to the northwest of the village of West End. 
2.2. The site is located to the immediate southwest of the operational Ryeflatt sand and
gravel quarry.  The existing quarry is served by a vehicular access which is taken
directly off the A70, which runs parallel to the southern boundary of the site. 
2.3. The Carstairs and Kames Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) (which is
designated for geological reasons) is located to the north of the proposed extension
area and to the existing quarry area.  The Cranley Moss Special Area of Conservation
(SAC) is located to the west of the site. 
2.4. The site is currently used for livestock grazing purposes, with parts of the site having
been historically subject to mineral extraction works. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. Under this application, full planning permission is sought for an extension to the
existing operational sand and gravel quarry at Ryeflatt.  The proposed extension area
would not be worked until the extraction of the sand and gravel within the existing
quarry has been completed.  The extension area would be accessed via the existing
quarry access off the A70. 
3.2. It is anticipated that approximately 130,000 tonnes of sand and gravel would be
extracted per annum, over a proposed operational period of circa 9.2 years and would
take place in four phases, as detailed below. 
 Phase 1 – 419,338t (3.2 years)
 Phase 2 – 342,993t (2.6 years)
 Phase 3 – 359,112t (2.8 years)
 Phase 4 – 75,753t (0.6 years)
 Total – 1,197,196t (9.2 years) 
3.3. During the proposed extraction works, water, traffic, dust and noise would be managed
via the same management controls which apply to the existing quarrying operations. 
A new earth bund would be created long the southern boundary of the site to screen
the proposed extraction area from views from the A70.  All minerals would be
processed within the existing processing area, which would be retained during the
operational life of the extension area as would the existing site offices and welfare
facilities.  The existing mineral conveyor belt which serves the existing quarry would
also be retained and extended into the proposed extension area. 
3.4. The proposed extraction operations would be subject to progressive respiration works
which, on completion, would provide opportunities for local ecological and biodiversity
enhancements via the creation of new on-site habitats.  In this respect this application
seeks a further period of one year post completion of the extraction works to ensure
the compete restoration of the site. 
76

Page 77

3.5. Assuming extraction begins in July 2025, the end of the extraction phase would be
2035, with the restoration works being completed by 2036.  It is proposed that the site
be restored back to agricultural grazing land, along with a new water body.  Around
the margins of the water body, marginal wetland habitat would be created to enhance
the overall biodiversity value of the site.  The bunds created to screen the development
would be removed to create a more natural landform, allowing views across the
restored land to the kame to the north. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. Whilst the application site itself has not been subject to any previous planning
permissions, the existing extraction operations at Ryeflatt have been ongoing for over
70 years and have been subject to several different planning permissions since works
first commenced. 
4.2. Planning applications PM/52/388, P/LK/76/23 and P/LK/84/515 all allowed for the
extraction of sand and gravel from the main quarry site. 
4.3. Planning application CL/05/0806 granted planning permission for the further extraction
of sand and gravel from the site and for the restoration of the site following completion
of the extraction operations.  This planning permission was granted subject to a
Section 75 Agreement to secure a restoration guarantee bond to cover the restoration
of the site if the applicant was unable, for whatever reason, to complete this task;
financial contributions to the South Lanarkshire Rural Communities Trust Fund; and,
for hydrological monitoring and water flow equipment maintenance. 
4.4. The site has also been the subject of two Section 42 applications. 
4.5. Application CL/17/0092 sought to amend condition 2 of planning permission
CL/05/0806 to permit an additional period of 5 years to the permitted extraction period
prior to the restoration of the site.  This permission was granted subject to a Section
75 Agreement to cover the same matters within the original. 
4.6. Application P/23/0485 sought to amend conditions 22 and 23 of planning permission
to allow for quarrying operation to start at 07.00 hours Monday to Saturday.  This
application was approved by Committee subject to a Minute of Variation being
concluded in respect of the Section 75 Agreement relating to planning permission
CL/17/0092.  This has still to be concluded. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. The planning application submission is supported by the following reports/documents:- 
 Water Appraisal Report
 Transport Statement
 Planning Statement
 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal
 Noise Assessment Report
 Land Capability for Agriculture Report
 Landscape and Visual Appraisal
 Stage 1 Habitats Regulation Appraisal
 Great Crested Newt Habitat Suitability Index Report
 Protected Species Survey, Badger
 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment 
 Air Quality Assessment
 Pre-Application Consultation report 
77

Page 78

6. Consultations
6.1. Roads Development Management Team 
No objection and request that the roads/drainage conditions attached to planning
permission CL/05/0806 be applied to any permission granted.  Also request that the
applicant enter into a Section 96 Agreement to ensure the suitable upkeep and repair
of roads within the vicinity of the site.
Response: The earlier conditions will be applied, where this is still appropriate. 
6.2. Environmental Services 
No objection to the proposed development subject to the imposition of appropriate
conditions relating to noise emissions, dust management and hours of operation. 
Response: Appropriate conditions will be applied, to any consent that is granted to
address these issues. 
6.3. NatureScot 
Following the submission of additional information, NatureScot have advised that
subject to the imposition of a number of suggested conditions, they have no objection
to the proposed development.
Response: Appropriate conditions will be applied, to any consent that is granted to
address these issues. 
6.4. SEPA 
Following the submission of additional details of the perimeter bunding, SEPA have
advised that they have no objection to the proposed development, subject to the
imposition of a condition dealing with the redesign of the perimeter bund.
Response: An appropriate condition will be applied, to any consent that is granted to
address this issue. 
6.5. West of Scotland Archaeological Service 
No objection subject to the imposition of a condition requiring the implementation of
mitigation measures which have been put forward by the applicant.
Response: An appropriate condition will be applied, to any consent that is granted to
address this issue. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, no valid
representations have been received. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and sets
out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and national planning
policy. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 – Tackling the climate and nature crisis
 Policy 2 – Climate mitigation and adaptation
 Policy 3 – Biodiversity
 Policy 4 – Natural places
 Policy 5 – Soils
78

Page 79

 Policy 29 – Rural development
 Policy 33 – Minerals 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will assess
proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).  In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies:- 
SLLDP2 Policies 
 Policy 1 – Spatial Strategy
 Policy 2 – Climate Change
 Policy 4 – Green Belt and Rural Area
 Policy 5 – Development Management and Placemaking
 Policy 13 – Green Network and Greenspace
 Policy 14 – Natural and Historic Environment
 Policy 15 – Travel and Transport
 Policy 16 – Water Environment and Flooding
 Policy 19 – Minerals Development
 Policy GBRA2 – Business Proposals within Green Belt and Rural Area
 MIN1 – Settlements
 MIN2 – Cumulative Impact
 MIN3 – Restoration
 MIN5 – Controlling Impacts from Extraction Sites
 MIN6 – Community Benefit 
9. Guidance
9.1. Planning Advice Note 50 – Controlling the environmental effects of surface mineral
workings and its associated Annex A are of relevance to the assessment of this
application. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Principle of Development 
Under the terms of this application, full planning permission is sought for an extension
to the existing operational sand and gravel quarry at Ryeflatt near Carstairs village. 
The determining issues in the consideration of this application are its compliance with
national policy, local development plan policy and its impact on traffic safety,
environmental matters and infrastructure issues. 
10.2. The application site is identified as being within the designated Rural Area in the
adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2.  Policy 4 Green Belt and Rural
Areas states that, amongst other things, both the green belt and rural areas function
primarily for “other uses appropriate to the countryside”.  Policy GBRA2 Business
Proposals within Green Belt and Rural Area sets out a range of types of development
that are considered appropriate and they include mineral extraction proposals which
accord with Policy 19 Minerals of the Plan. 
10.3. Policy 19 provides specific policy guidance relative to minerals developments and
advises, amongst other things, that in assessing applications for mineral extraction,
the Council will balance the economic and other benefits form the development against
any potential impacts on the environment and local communities.  To this end, it is
notable that the existing operations at Ryeflatt have not given rise to any issues of
concern in relation to impacts upon any existing sensitive receptors, with the planning
79

Page 80

conditions which control and regulate the development providing the means to ensure
that the operations do not have any adverse environmental impacts. 
10.4. Since adoption of SLLDP2, National Planning Framework has become part of the
Development Plan for South Lanarkshire.  Policy 33 of NPF4 deals specifically with
minerals development.  It contains a range of criteria that must be met in order for
proposals to be supported, including ensuring that there are no adverse impacts on
the natural and historic environment, the landscape and visual impacts, nearby
settlements and homes; show acceptable levels of noise, dust and vibration; minimise
transport impacts; and include schemes for a high standard of restoration and
aftercare.  A detailed assessment in respect of these matters is set out below and it is
concluded there would be no adverse impacts in relation to these issues. 
10.5. The proposed development would allow for the continued extraction of mineral
resources from the extended site for a further period of 9.2 years and, as such, does
not introduce a new use into this area.  The extraction of minerals from the extension
area would commence upon completion of the works within the currently consented
extraction area and, as such, would not result in an increase in the established level
of activity within the site itself or result in an increase in vehicular movements
associated with the operation of the site. 
10.6. On this basis it is considered that the proposed extension to the quarry complies with
Policy 19 and, as a result, the principle of the development is acceptable. 
10.7. Climate Change 
NPF4 Policy 1 Tackling the climate and nature crisis requires that when considering
all development proposals, significant weight should be given to the global climate and
nature crisis.  The requirement to address the climate crisis is expanded upon within
Policy 2 Climate mitigation and adaptation which requires, amongst other things, that
development proposals should be sited and designed to minimise, as far as possible,
lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions. 
10.8. In assessing each of these policy matters it is considered that as the proposed
development represents an extension of an existing operational quarry (with the
extraction works only commencing following completion of works within the existing
consented quarry area) the proposals themselves will not result in a net increase in
impacts associated with the site as it stands at present and will not result in an increase
in any greenhouse gas emissions associated with the operation of the site (which are
restricted to emissions associated with the operation of plant and machinery on the
site). 
10.9. With regards to the nature crisis, it is noted that the supporting evidence lodged as
part of the overall application submission shows clearly that the site is of low ecological
and biodiversity value.  As an integral part of the proposed restoration works, new
habitats will be created within the site which will result in an over increase in the
biodiversity value of the site and on this basis, in the longer term, the proposals will
further the aims of addressing the nature crisis. 
10.10. Accordingly, it is considered that the proposed development accords with the
requirements of policies 1 and 2 of NPF4.  Following the same assessment process,
it is also considered that the proposed development accords with the requirements of
policy 2 Climate Change of SLLDP2.  
80

Page 81

10.11. Layout, Siting and Design 
As is noted within section 5 above, the application is supported by several technical
reports/studies which address in full these various considerations and which
demonstrate that, subject to the implementation of the various mitigation measures
presented therein, the proposed development will give rise to no significant adverse
environmental impacts. 
10.12. The proposed development represents a logical western extension of the current
quarry operations, with the proposed extension working from west to east across the
site.  Bunding will be formed around the southern and western boundaries of the site
to ensure that the visual impact of the works when viewed from the adjacent public
roads is kept to a minimum.  In addition, there would be no adverse impact on nearby
communities and issues relating to noise and dust are addressed in the proposed
conditions. 
10.13. The proposed progressive restoration of the site will also ensure that the site is fully
restored at the earliest possible opportunity, thus allowing the proposed biodiversity
enhancements to be secured shortly after the completion of the extraction works. 
10.14. Technical Matters
Within their initial responses on the application, both NatureScot and SEPA highlighted
some concerns in relation to certain aspects of the proposed development.  These
concerns were raised directly with the applicants agent and following a period of
iterative discussions, amendments have been made to the proposed development, in
particular the alignment of the peripheral bunding within the vicinity of the Flushing
Burn, which address the issues raised by both of these parties who have now
confirmed that, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions, they have no
objection to the proposed development. 
10.15. Conclusions 
In conclusion, it is considered that the proposed development, which comprises an
extension to and progressive restoration of an existing long standing active quarry, will
not give rise to significant adverse impacts and that through the terms of the proposed
restoration scheme, the opportunity exists to significantly enhance the overall
biodiversity value of the site by way of the creation of a number of new habitat types. 
10.16. Having regard to the provisions of Sections 25 and 37(2) of the Town and Country
Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, it is considered that the proposed development can be
justified against the relevant provisions of the development plan and no relevant
material considerations have been identified which would outweigh the acceptability
of the proposals in terms of the development plan. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions and a
Section 75 Legal Agreement and a Section 96 Agreement:- 
01. That all extraction operations on the site shall be discontinued, and the entire site shall
be restored in accordance with the restoration plan approved by the Council, as
Planning Authority (as required by condition 2) not later than 10 years from the date of
the planning permission hereby granted.  
81

Page 82

Reason: To ensure that the Planning Authority retains effective control of the
development. 
02. That indicative details only for the final restoration scheme are hereby approved, and
that, within 12 months of the date of this permission, a detailed restoration,
habitat/wetland management and aftercare scheme for the entire site shall be
submitted for the written approval of the Council as Planning Authority and the
restoration, habitat/wetland management and aftercare of the site shall thereafter be
carried out in accordance with the approved scheme including timescales.   
Reason: To ensure the satisfactory reinstatement of the site. 
03. That upon the termination of extraction operations, all plant, machinery, buildings and
the foundations thereof, shall be removed from the site, and the areas so occupied
restored in accordance with the approved restoration plan to the satisfaction of the
Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure that the site is satisfactorily restored. 
04. That the applicant shall at all times deal with the areas forming the subject of this
consent in accordance with the provisions of this application, statement of intentions
and plans submitted except as otherwise provided for by this consent and shall omit
no part of the operations provided for therein except with the prior written consent of
the Planning Authority.  
Reason: To ensure that the Planning Authority retains effective control of the
development. 
05. That reversing alarms used on plant and vehicles shall be either non-audible, ambient
related, or low tone devices.  Efficient silencers shall be fitted to and used and
maintained in accordance with manufacturer's instructions on all vehicles, plant and
machinery used on the site.  Save for the purposes of maintenance, no machinery
shall be operated with the covers open or removed. 
Reason: To minimise any nuisance and to protect the amenity of neighbouring
properties. 
06. That the movement of plant, vehicles and machinery on the site shall be carried out in
such a manner as to avoid, as far as possible, the crossing of undisturbed, reclaimed
or restored land. 
Reason: To avoid any unnecessary incursion onto parts of the site which are
undisturbed or have been restored; in the interests of the general amenity of the site. 
07. That all hardcore material used to form hardstandings shall be removed prior to subsoil
replacement, and all roadways, storage sites and other areas of compaction shall be
sub-soiled prior to restoration, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning
Authority.   
Reason: To ensure satisfactory reinstatement of the site. 
08. That, in the event of extraction operations on the site ceasing for a period of 12 months
or more, the Planning Authority shall deem operations to have ceased permanently
and shall require immediate implementation of the approved restoration scheme,
unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority. 
82

Page 83

Reason: To ensure the Planning Authority retains effective control of the development. 
09. That the developer shall ensure that sufficient water is maintained on site, at all times,
to address the requirements for dust suppression.   
Reason: To minimise any nuisance and to protect the amenity of neighbouring
properties. 
10. At the reasonable request of the Planning Authority and following a complaint to it
relating to noise or dust emissions arising from the operation of the Quarry, the
operator shall investigate the complaint using suitably competent persons as
appropriate.  Where an assessment of any noise impact or dust
emissions/accumulations are, in the opinion of the Planning Authority acting
reasonably, found to be in breach of the noise limits or to cause nuisance, the Quarry
operator shall carry out mitigation measures to remediate the breach so caused. 
Details of any such mitigation measures required shall be, on request, submitted to
the Planning Authority for prior approval. 
Reason: To minimise any nuisance and to protect the amenity of neighbouring
properties. 
11. That before development starts on site details of a groundwater monitoring plan during
the carrying out of the works hereby approved shall be submitted for the approval of
the Council as Planning Authority.  Once approved the plan shall be implemented to
the satisfaction of the Council.  The groundwater level results shall be used to inform
the site working practices and restoration.  In particular, the plan shall include details
of the locations of groundwater monitoring boreholes that may need to be replaced as
the excavations progress the site. 
Reason: To ensure there is no adverse impact on groundwater. 
12. That all laden lorries leaving the site shall be sheeted before entering the public
highway. 
Reason: In the interests of road safety. 
13. That visibility splays of 2.5m by 215m shall be maintained on both sides of the existing
access point onto the A70, and shall be retained for the duration of works on the site. 
For the avoidance of doubt, this shall be the only vehicular access for the entering and
egress of the site. 
Reason: In the interests of road safety. 
14. Except where otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority, the applicants
shall make stockproof and maintain until restoration of the site is complete all the
existing perimeter hedges and fences, and shall protect the same from damage. 
Reason: To ensure site safety and maintenance of boundary security. 
15. The hard surfaced access road entering the site from the A70, extending 100 metres
into the site, shall be maintained as such for the lifetime of the development, hereby
approved.   
Reason: To minimise the chance of any debris from the site being trailed onto the
public highway; in the interests of road safety. 
83

Page 84

16. The section of the access road between the wheel washing equipment and the A70
shall be maintained in such a condition as to prevent ruts, potholes and ponding of
water and kept clear of mud and dirt at all times, for the lifetime of the development,
hereby approved. 
Reason: To minimise the chance of any debris from the site being carried onto the
public highway; in the interests of road safety. 
17. Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted
Development) (Scotland) Order 1992 (or of any order revoking, amending or re-
enacting that Order), no buildings, structures or fixed plant, including that required for
lighting the site, shall be erected or installed within the site, unless details of their
location and appearance have received the prior written approval of the Planning
Authority. 
Reason: To ensure control over such development on the site so as to minimise the
potential visual and landscape intrusion.
18. That from the date of this permission, until completion of the final restoration, a copy
of this permission, and all approved documents and subsequently approved
documents, shall be kept available for inspection in the site offices during the approved
working hours. 
Reason: To ensure the site operator and visiting officials are aware of the approved
details. 
19. That all containers being used to store liquids within the application site shall be
labelled clearly to show their contents, and located in a bund which shall be at least
110% of the capacity of the largest container stored within it.  Bunds shall conform to
the following standards:- 
 The walls and base of the bund shall be impermeable
 The base shall drain to a sump
 All valves, taps, pipes and every part of each container shall be located within
the area served by the bund when not in use
 Vent pipes shall be directed down into the bund
 No part of the bund shall be within 10 metres of a watercourse
 Any accumulation of any matter within the bund shall be removed as necessary
to maintain its effectiveness 
Reason: To ensure the safekeeping of such liquids. 
20. That, without the prior written approval of the Planning Authority, the site shall not
operate outwith the hours stated below, and during these hours the site shall be
adequately manned and supervised.       
Weekdays Saturdays 
Time of Opening 7.00am 7.00am 
Time of Closing 7.00pm 1.00pm 
There shall be no working on Sundays or local bank holidays (with the exception of
essential maintenance work), unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning
Authority. 
Reason: To safeguard the residential amenity of the area.  
84

Page 85

21. That with respect to the control of noise resulting from the operations at this site the
developer shall comply with the following:-   
- that during the working week (07.00 to 19.00 hours Monday to Friday inclusive and
07.00 to 13.00 hours on Saturday) the nominal noise limit from site operations at all
noise sensitive properties, in the vicinity of the site, shall not exceed 55 dB(A) LAeq,
over any one hour period 
- as the site is only to be operational during day time there shall be no audible noise,
from the site at noise sensitive properties, between the hours of 19.00 hours and 07.00
hours 
- between Saturdays (from 13.00 hours) and Mondays (to 07.00 hours), there shall be
no audible noise from the site at noise sensitive properties in the vicinity of the site. 
Reason: To minimise any nuisance and to protect the amenity of neighbouring
properties. 
22. That all topsoil and subsoil shall be retained on site and shall be used for the
restoration scheme as required by condition 2.  All soil storage bunds shall be kept
free of weeds and the sward shall be managed in accordance with agricultural
management techniques throughout the period of storage; all to the satisfaction of the
Planning Authority   
Reason: To ensure the satisfactory reinstatement of the site. 
23. A 20m buffer zone shall be provided at all times for those sections of the proposed
quarry which lie adjacent to Carstairs Kames SSSI.  This buffer shall be demarcated
on the ground by suitable fencing (full details of which should be submitted to the
Planning Authority for their written approval) and no works of any kind shall be
permitted within this buffer zone. 
Reason: To safeguard the integrity of the SSSI. 
24. That no other material shall be imported to the site without the prior written permission
of the Planning Authority. 
Reason: To ensure the Planning Authority retains effective control over the importation
of materials to the site. 
25. No operations involving soil lifting/replacement shall take place between the months
of October to March inclusive except with the prior written approval of the Planning
Authority. 
Reason: To preserve the quality of the soils and to secure the eventual restoration of
the site. 
26. That within one year from the date of this permission (and each year thereafter) the
operator shall submit to the Planning Authority an annual progress plan detailing:-  
85

Page 86

 the extent of ongoing extraction operations;
 areas prepared for extraction;
 the extent of backfilling or restoration operations carried out;
 the extent of landscaping, nature conservation and agricultural works that have
been implemented;
 current and anticipated production figures;
 remaining reserves;
 compliance with statutory permissions; and
 site complaint logs and actions taken. 
Reason: To ensure that the Planning Authority is informed at regular intervals of the
progress of the site; to assist with site monitoring; and to help inform development plan
production. 
27. Prior to any works commencing on site, an updated Badger Survey shall be submitted
to the Planning Authority for their written approval.   
Reason: To safeguard ecological resources within the site. 
28. The proposed screening bund within the vicinity of the Flush Burn shall be positioned
at an elevation of at least 207mAOD, as confirmed within the drawing attached to the
e-mail from Wardell-Armstrong dated 9 October 2024. 
Reason: To ensure that the bunding is positioned out with the potential flood extents
of the Flush Burn. 
29. That no later than 3 months from the date of decision, a guarantee to cover all site
restoration and aftercare liabilities imposed on the expiry of this consent will be
submitted for the written approval of the Council as Planning Authority.  Such
guarantee must, unless otherwise approved in writing by the Council as Planning
Authority:- 
i) be granted in favour of the Council as Planning Authority 
ii) be granted by a bank or other institution which is of sound financial standing and
capable of fulfilling the obligations under the guarantee 
iii) be for a specified amount which covers the value of all site restoration and aftercare
liabilities as agreed between the developer and the Planning Authority at the
commencement of development 
iv) either contain indexation provisions so that the specified amount of the guarantee
shall be increased on each anniversary of the date of this consent by the same
percentage increase in the General Index of Retail Prices (All Items) exclusive of
mortgage interest published by on or behalf of HM Government between the date
hereof and such relevant anniversary or be reviewable to ensure that the specified
amount of the guarantee always covers the value of the site restoration and aftercare
liabilities 
v) come into effect on or before the date of commencement of development, and
expire no earlier than 12 months after the end of the aftercare period unless other
suitable multiple guarantee arrangements are agreed in writing by the Council as
Planning Authority.  For the avoidance of doubt, more than one guarantee may be
agreed but any multiple guarantees shall cover the period from on or before
commencement and to 12 months after the end of the aftercare period without any
break in cover.  
86

Page 87

No works shall begin at the site until (1) written approval of the Council as Planning
Authority has been given to the terms of such guarantee and (2) thereafter the validly
executed guarantee has been delivered to the Council as Planning Authority. 
Reason: To ensure that provision is made for the restoration and aftercare of the site. 
30. During all soil stripping operations, a watching archaeological brief shall be maintained
at all times.  Details of the extent of this watching brief, and details of actions to be
taken in the event of unrecorded findings being uncovered on the site, shall be
submitted to the Planning Authority for their written approval. 
Reason: In order to ensure that any unrecorded archaeological assets within the
boundary of the site can be properly assessed and recorded. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposed development, which proposes an extension to Ryeflatt Quarry and the
progressive restoration thereof, is considered to be acceptable subject to the
imposition of the suite of conditions, as detailed in Section 11 above.  The proposals
are therefore considered to accord with the terms of policies 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 29 and 33 of
NPF4 and also with policies 1, 2, 4, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19, MIN1, MIN2, MIN3, MIN5
and MIN6 of the adopted SLLDP2. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 24 March 2025 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:- 
P/24/1085 | Extension to existing quarry to extract sand and gravel using existing access with
associated progressive restoration | Land 215M Northwest Of Woodside Cottage A70 From
Carstairs To Carnwath Carstairs Junction Lanark South Lanarkshire 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
87

Page 88

88

Page 89

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/24/1360
Proposal:  Erection of 1.5 storey dwellinghouse with attached garage
Site Address:  Land 20M WNW of 51 Colinhill Road
Colinhill Road
Strathaven 
Applicant:  Mr Ross Brown 
Agent:  Andrew Rae
Ward:  05 – Avondale and Stonehouse
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Date:  East Kilbride News 4 December 2024
Development Plan
Compliance:
Yes 
Departures:  No
Recommendation:  Grant subject to conditions
Legal Agreement:  N/A 
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
9
89

Page 90

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is being presented to the Planning Committee for determination as
the proposal has received more than 5 objections. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The site, which measures approximately 0.05 hectares in area, is located to the south
of Colinhill Road, Strathaven.  The site is bounded by residential properties on all sides
with the Category B listed Lauder Ha’ located directly to the west of the site.  The site
comprises a grassed area and is predominantly flat throughout.  Access to the site is
taken directly from Colinhill Road. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. Detailed planning permission is sought for the erection of a 1 and a half storey four-
bedroom dwellinghouse with an attached garage within the site.  Vehicular and
pedestrian access would be taken via a new access from Colinhill Road with off-street
car parking for three cars to be provided.  Front and rear garden areas would also be
provided within the site. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. Detailed planning permission was granted in October 2010 for the demolition of the
adjacent dwellinghouse at 51 Colinhill Road, Strathaven and the erection of four flats
across the current application site and the site of the adjacent dwellinghouse (Planning
Ref: EK/10/0151).  The consented development did not proceed and the consent has
since expired. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1.  None. 
6. Consultations
6.1. Environmental Services – Offered no objections to the proposed development.
Response: Noted. 
6.2. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services (Development Management) – No
objections subject to the inclusion of conditions relating to car parking and access
matters associated with the proposals.  The Service further confirmed that required
visibility splays at the site access could be achieved without impacting on the wall
forming part of the adjacent Listed Building at Lauder Ha’.
Response: Noted.  These matters could be addressed through conditions and on the
decision notice if the application were to be approved. 
6.3. Scottish Water – Offered no objections to the proposed development.
Response: Noted. 
7. Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, a total of
seven objections have been received.  The issues raised are summarised as follows:- 
 Traffic, access and road safety 
 Parking 
 Loss of privacy
 Impact on adjacent listed building and adjoining wall
 Impact on trees
 Layout and density
 Noise and disturbance  
90

Page 91

The above issues are considered in the assessment below.  These letters are
available for inspection on the planning portal.  Other non-material issues were also
raised, however, these are not planning related and do not form part of the assessment
of the proposal. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and sets
out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and national planning
policy. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises 
 Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation 
 Policy 7 - Historic assets and places 
 Policy 14 - Design, quality and place 
 Policy 15 - Local Living and 20 minute neighbourhoods 
 Policy 16 - Quality homes 
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will assess
proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2).  In this regard the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies 
 Policy 2 - Climate Change 
 Policy 3 - General Urban Areas and Settlements 
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking 
 Policy 14 - Natural and Historic Environment 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies 
 Policy DM1 - New Development Design 
 Policy NHE3 – Listed Buildings 
9. Guidance
9.1. None applicable. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Introduction
The main issues to be addressed in the determination of this application include the
acceptability in principle of the proposed development and an assessment of technical
matters.  The policies contained within National Planning Framework 4 and the South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 are the main consideration in this case,
together with an assessment of any other material planning considerations. 
10.2. Principle of Development
The site is located within the general urban area of Strathaven as designated by Policy
3 – General Urban Areas and Settlements of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (adopted 2021), where the principle of residential use is
acceptable.  As such, the principle of development of the application site to form a 91

Page 92

single dwellinghouse within the settlement is acceptable at this location in planning
policy terms. 
10.3. Climate Change
Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development
Plan 2 seek to encourage, promote and facilitate development that addresses the
global climate emergency and nature crisis, and which minimises emissions and
adapts to the current and future impacts of climate change.  In this case the proposed
development site is well located, being within walking distance of Strathaven town
centre in addition to local schools and community facilities.  As such, this is considered
to be a well located site that can be developed in a manner that makes a positive
impact in terms of climate change and sustainability considerations and complies with
the provisions of Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2. 
10.4. Layout, Siting and Design
Policies 14 and 15 of NPF4 relate to liveable places.  Policy 14 sets out that all
development should be designed to improve the quality of an area and be consistent
with the six qualities of a successful place: healthy, pleasant, connected, distinctive,
sustainable, and adaptable.  Policy 15 seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate the
application of the Place Principle.  Policy 16 of NPF4 relates to Quality Homes.  The
policy supports small scale proposals for new homes within identified settlement
boundaries.  Similarly, Policies 5 – Development Management and Placemaking,
DM1 – New Development Design and the Council’s Residential Design Guide (2011)
seek the provision of high quality proposals that do not significantly adversely impact
on surrounding amenity. 
10.5. In this case the proposals relate to a relatively modest 1.5 storey dwellinghouse that
would appropriately integrate with existing surrounding built development.  The
proposed dwelling would be of an appropriate scale relative to the application site and
would not have any significant adverse impact on existing adjacent residential
properties in terms of overlooking or other privacy related issues.  It is noted that the
site is bounded on two sides by large, mature trees, however, the proposed
dwellinghouse would be located a sufficient distance away to ensure that these trees
should not be adversely impacted by the proposed development. 
10.6. Historic Environment
Policy 7 – Historic assets and places of NPF4 seeks to protect and enhance historic
environment assets and places, and to enable positive change as a catalyst for the
regeneration of places.  Similar policy is provided in Policy 14 – Natural and Historic
Environment and Policy NHE3 – Listed Buildings of the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (adopted 2021). 
10.7. In this instance it is noted that the proposed development site is located adjacent to
the Category B listed Lauder Ha’ and that a small section of the front wall of the listed
building lies within the application site boundary.  However, it has been determined
that the proposed development of a relatively modest 1.5 storey dwellinghouse at this
location would not have any significant adverse impact on the setting of the listed
building, and it is noted that a number of existing residential properties are situated in
similarly close proximity to the listed property.  Furthermore, it has been determined
that the development as proposed can be undertaken without there being any impact
on the small section of boundary wall, which originally formed part of the site of Lauder
Ha’, which sits within the application site boundary.  As such, the proposals are
considered to fully comply with the provisions of Policy 7 of NPF4 and Policies 14 and
NHE3 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. 
92

Page 93

10.8. Technical Matters
With regard to technical considerations it is noted that the Council’s Roads
Transportation and Fleet Services have confirmed their satisfaction with access,
parking and other relevant aspects of the proposals subject to conditions that would
be attached to any consent issued.  It is noted that off-street car parking provision and
an appropriate vehicular access on to Colinhill Road has been included as part of the
proposals.  As such, there are no concerns with regard to traffic or road safety issues
in this case.  Similarly, the Council’s Environmental Services have confirmed that they
have no concerns with regard to noise, disturbance or other environmental matters in
this case.  In light of all of the above, the view is taken that the proposals are fully
compliant with the relevant provisions of Policies 14, 15 and 16 of National Planning
Framework 4, Policies 3, 5 and DM1 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 and the South Lanarkshire Council Residential Design Guide in
this instance. 
10.9. Conclusion
In summary, following a detailed assessment of the proposed development, it is
considered that the proposed dwellinghouse would be appropriately sited in a
sustainable location within Strathaven and would be developed in a manner that would
have no significant impact on amenity, road safety or historic environment assets.  The
proposals are considered to be fully compliant with the relevant provisions of both
National Planning Framework 4 (adopted 2023) and the South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan 2 (adopted 2021).  It is therefore recommended that planning
permission is granted for the proposed development, subject to the attached
conditions. 
11. Recommendation and Conditions
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Grant full planning permission subject to the following conditions:- 
01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the
expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice. 
Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Act 1997 (as amended). 
02. That before any development commences on site or before any materials are ordered
or brought to the site, details and samples of all materials to be used as external
finishes on the development shall be submitted to and approved by the Council as
Planning Authority.  The development shall thereafter be carried out in accordance
with the approved details to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to maintain the
visual quality of the area. 
03. That before development starts, full details of the design and location of all fences and
walls, including any retaining walls to be erected on the site shall be submitted to and
approved by the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to maintain
the visual quality of the area.  
93

Page 94

04. That before the development hereby permitted is occupied or brought into use, all the
fences or walls for which the permission of the Council as Planning Authority has been
obtained under the terms of Condition 3, shall be erected to the satisfaction of the
Council.   
Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to maintain the
visual quality of the area. 
05. That no alterations to the existing wall located at the north-west corner of the site,
which originally formed part of Lauder Ha’, shall be undertaken as part of the
development hereby approved.   
Reason: To ensure there is no adverse impact on the historic asset. 
06. That, unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Council as Planning Authority,
provision shall be made for electrical charging points within the development for motor
vehicles and mobility scooters.  Prior to any works commencing on site details of the
proposed arrangements shall be submitted and agreed in writing with the Council as
Planning Authority.  Thereafter the scheme shall be implemented to the satisfaction of
the Council as Planning Authority.   
Reason: To ensure the provision of appropriate facilities on site. 
07. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use, a
vehicular visibility splay of 2 metres by 20 metres measured from the edge of the
carriageway shall be provided on both sides of the vehicular access and everything
exceeding 1.05 metres in height above the road channel level shall be removed from
the sight line areas.   
Reason: In the interests of public safety. 
08. That before the development hereby approved is completed or brought into use, a
pedestrian visibility splay of 2.4 metres by 2.4 metres measured from the heel of the
footway shall be provided on both sides of the vehicular access and everything
exceeding 1.05 metres in height above this height shall be removed from the sight line
areas.   
Reason: In the interests of public safety. 
09. That before the driveway is completed or brought into use, the surface of the first 2
metres of driveway shall be so trapped to mitigate the potential for any detritus material
or water to leave the access / driveway and enter the public road.  
Reason: In the interests of traffic safety and to prevent deleterious material entering
the road. 
12. Reason for Decision
12.1. The proposal would have no significant adverse impact upon amenity and complies
with Policies 1, 2, 7, 14, 15 and 16 of the National Planning Framework 4 and with
Policies 2, 3, 5, 14, DM1 and NHE3 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan
2 (adopted 2021).  
94

Page 95

David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 24 March 2025 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:- 
P/24/1360 | Erecti on of 1.5 storey dwellinghouse with attached garage | Land 20M WNW
Of 51 Colinhill Road Colinhill Road Strathaven ML10 6HF (southlanarkshire.gov.uk) 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
95

Page 96

96

Page 97

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Planning Committee
Date of Meeting: 1 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Reference no:  P/24/1382 
Proposal:  Erection of two dwellinghouses with associated car parking and
landscaping 
Site Address:  Flattmoss Farm
A726 From East Kilbride to Chapelton
East Kilbride
South Lanarkshire 
Applicant:  Ms Susan Gray 
Agent:  DTA
Ward:  05 – Avondale and Stonehouse
Application Type:  Full Planning Permission
Advert Date:  East Kilbride News 18th December 2024
Development Plan
Compliance: 
No 
Departures:  Yes
Recommendation:  Refuse
Legal Agreement:  N/A
Direction to
Scottish Ministers 
N/A 
10
97

Page 98

1. Reason for Report
1.1. This application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee as the Head
of Planning and Regulatory Services in consultation with the Chair of the Planning
Committee has determined it raises policy issues meriting consideration by the
Planning Committee. 
2. Site Description
2.1. The application site is located within the designated Green Belt, to the southwest of
the existing Flattmoss House which is located off the A726, approximately 1.3 km
southeast of East Kilbride.  The site is located on agricultural land which was
previously used for caravan and vehicle storage.  A small storage shed remains in situ
in the north-west corner of the site.  The use of the land for caravan and vehicle storage
did not have planning consent.   
2.2. The site is level and roughly triangular in nature, measuring 1.4 Ha.  The site is bound
to the north by a line of mature conifer trees, to the west by Flattmoss House, stables
and outbuildings, and to the south and east by agricultural land.  The proposed
properties would be accessed along a private driveway measuring approximately 220
metres off the A726 which forms the existing access to Flattmoss House. 
3. Description of Proposed Development
3.1. The proposal seeks the erection of two, one and a half storey dwellings in a linked
courtyard layout.  The properties would be set within substantial grounds with three
car parking spaces identified in the plans for each property.  The site would be bound
by a proposed hedge mix of Holly, Juniper and Rowan and 8 Silver Birch trees. 
3.2. The proposed dwellings would contain a lounge, kitchen, utility, WC, dining and family
rooms on the ground floor with 4 bedrooms and bathroom on the upper floor.  The
design and layout of the properties would be of a traditional courtyard arrangement
with dormer windows within the roof space.  No details of the proposed external
finishing materials are included in the application plans. 
4. Relevant Planning History
4.1. Planning applications P/22/1677 and P/22/1678 for the erection of a detached dwelling
and garage were refused under delegated powers on 27 July 2023.  The refusal of
these applications was the subject of a request for review before the Planning Local
Review Body (PLRB) on 12 February 2024.  The PLRB decided to uphold the
decisions taken by officers to refuse the applications.  The current application relates
to the same site as the previous applications which were separated into two plots.  The
current application has been amended to include two dwellings with a different layout
and design. 
5. Supporting Information 
5.1. No supporting information or justification for locational need within the Green Belt was
submitted with the application. 
6 Consultations
6.1.  Roads Development Management – No objection subject to conditions relating to
visibility splays, EV charging, surfacing, the provision of passing places and parking. 
Response:  Noted.  These matters could be addressed through conditions and
advisory notes if the application was to be approved. 
98

Page 99

6.2.  Environmental Services – No objection to the proposal.  Requested advisory notes
relating to construction noise, contamination caution and septic tank. 
Response:  Noted. These matters could be addressed through the inclusion of
advisory notes on the decision notice if the application was to be approved. 
7  Representations
7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, no valid
representations have been received. 
8. Development Plan
8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all
applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless
material considerations indicate otherwise. 
8.2. National Planning Framework 4 (2023) 
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for
Scotland.  It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments, and
national planning policy.  NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable
places, liveable places, and productive places. 
National Planning Framework 4 Policies 
 Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises 
 Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation 
 Policy 8 - Green belts
 Policy 14 - Design, quality and place 
 Policy 15 - Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods 
 Policy 16 - Quality homes 
8.3.  South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) 
For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will also assess
proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local
Development Plan (SLLDP2).  In this regard, the application site and associated
proposals are affected by the following policies:- 
SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies 
 Policy 2 - Climate Change
 Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area
 Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking 
SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies 
 Policy GBRA1 - Rural Design and Development
 Policy DM15 - Water Supply
 Policy DM16 - Foul Drainage and Sewerage  
9. Guidance
9.1. None applicable. 
10. Assessment and Discussion
10.1. Introduction
Full planning permission is sought for the erection of two dwellings with the associated
car parking and landscaping.  The main issues to be addressed in the determination
of this application include the acceptability in principle of the proposed development,
its layout, siting and design, and an assessment of technical matters.  The relevant
policies set out above will be assessed in turn alongside any relevant material
considerations. 
99

Page 100

10.2. Principle of Development
In terms of the principle of the development, as the site is located within the designated
Green Belt, NPF4 Policy 8 - Green Belts applies.  This policy sets out the types of
development that would be supported in the Green Belt which includes:- 
 development associated with agriculture, woodlands, and forestry
 accommodation for an essential worker
 horticulture
 outdoor recreation, play and sport, leisure and tourism uses
 flood risk management proposals
 essential infrastructure or new cemetery provision
 mineral operations and renewable energy
 intensification of established uses, including extensions to an existing building
where that is ancillary to the main use
 the reuse, rehabilitation and conversion of historic environment assets
 one-for-one replacements of existing permanent homes 
Developments in these categories are also required to demonstrate a specific
locational need, that would not undermine the purpose of the Green Belt and would
require to be compatible with the surrounding established countryside and landscape
character. 
10.3. SLLDP2 Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area would also be relevant to this proposal. 
This states that the purpose of the Green Belt is to; direct development to the most
appropriate locations and support regeneration, protect and enhance the character,
landscape setting and identity of the settlement, and protect and provide access to
open space.  Development which does not require to locate in the countryside will be
expected to be accommodated within the settlements identified on the proposals map. 
10.4. Policy GBRA5 Redevelopment of Previously Developed Land Containing Buildings
advises that within the Green Belt and Rural Area proposals shall comply with the
following criteria:- 
 New buildings shall generally occupy the same position on the site as those that
are to be replaced. 
 The physical footprint of the new buildings shall not normally exceed that of the
existing buildings in terms of floor area, unless it can be shown that there will not
be a detrimental landscape impact or that the cost of rehabilitating the site requires
the provision of additional units. 
 In exceptional circumstances and within the Rural Area only, new development
may extend to the existing physical limit of built development within the site,
including any hardstanding areas.  However, justification through the submission
of a design statement will be required to show why this is necessary. 
 The proposed houses shall be of a number, scale and design appropriate to the
landscape setting, and to the services and infrastructure available at the location. 
The new development shall be in keeping with the main features of the landscape
and integrate positively with its surroundings.
 The location, siting and design of the new house(s) shall meet existing rural design
policy and guidance as set out in Policy GBRA1 and in supporting planning
guidance.  Generally, the design, appearance and materials of the proposed
house(s) shall be complementary to the rural setting of the site and shall respect
the character and amenity of the local area.  
100

Page 101

10.5. No specific locational justification has been provided for the erection of two dwellings
at this location within the Green Belt.  In policy terms, it is considered that there is no
justification for the erection of the new dwellings within the Green Belt at this location. 
NPF4 Policy 8 provides a list of appropriate Green Belt uses, as outlined above, with
limited new-build residential development linked to essential farm workers/key
workers, retired farm workers or the one-for-one replacement of existing residential
dwellings only. 
10.6. With regards to GBRA5, Redevelopment of Previously Developed Land Containing
Buildings, although there were a range of dilapidated vehicles at the site, the only
structure is a small metal and timber shed in the north-east corner and there are no
defined physical footprints or hardstanding for any previous buildings on the remainder
of the site as it has not previously been developed with buildings.  In terms of the
additional Green Belt and Rural Area policies, the site is not a business proposal, is
not a conversion or reuse of existing buildings, is not a replacement house, small scale
settlement extension, gap site or a consolidation of an existing building group.   
10.7. The erection of two dwellings at this location would not contribute to local living and,
in summary, it is considered that there is no justification in policy terms for two new
four bedroom dwellings at this location within the Green Belt.  There are no material
considerations which would justify a departure from the development plan at this site
to permit the erection of two new dwellings contrary to policy and to do so would risk
undermining the purpose of the Green Belt.  As such, the proposal is considered to be
contrary to NPF4 Policies 8 and 15 and with SLLDP2 Policies 4, GBRA5 and related
GBRA policies. 
10.8. Climate Change
Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4, and Policy 2 of SLLDP2 seek to encourage, promote and
facilitate development that addresses the global climate emergency and nature crisis,
and which minimises emissions and adapts to the current and future impacts of climate
change.  There is no justification for two new dwellings in the Green Belt and it is
considered that two four bedroom dwellings would lead to additional private car trips
with their associated greenhouse gas emissions.  This would adversely impact upon
the wider climate and the proposal would therefore fail to comply with Policies 1 and
2 of NPF4 or with Policy 2 of SLLDP2. 
10.9. Layout, Siting and Design
In terms of the design of the proposal, the relevant policies of NPF4 to be considered
are Policies 14 – Design, quality and place and 16 – Quality homes.  These policies
require development proposals to be designed to improve the quality of an area and
supports proposals where they are consistent with the six qualities of successful
places; healthy, pleasant, connected, distinctive, sustainable, and adaptable.  In terms
of their location, new homes will be supported on land allocated for housing in LDPs
and in other specified circumstances, including where new homes improve affordability
and choice or in limited circumstances where the proposal is otherwise consistent with
the spatial strategy and other relevant policies.  SLLDP2 Policies 5 - Development
Management and Placemaking and GBRA1 – Rural Design and Development state
that development proposals should take account of and be integrated within the local
context and built form, address the six qualities of placemaking and not be isolated or
sporadic.  New development should also have no significant adverse impacts on the
local community. 
10.10. The physical characteristics of the proposed dwellings are not a material consideration
in this instance as the principle is unsupportable.  However, the design of the proposal
is considered to be rural in character.  As the proposed dwelling is within the Green
101

Page 102

Belt without a locational need, it cannot be considered as a sustainable location.  The
proposed dwelling is not connected to the local buildings and, as such, is considered
sporadic development.  It is therefore considered that the proposal is contrary to Policy
14 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and GBRA1 of the SLLDP2. 
10.11. Technical Matters
DM15 and DM16 of the SLLDP2 seek to ensure appropriate supply of water and
wastewater services.  The application form states that the proposal will connect to the
existing public water supply network.  Private treatment is proposed for wastewater
with a septic tank sewage treatment system with outflow to soakaway. 
10.12. As detailed above, the required justification for new dwellings in the Green Belt, set
out in the NPF4 and the SLLDP2 has not been provided.  The proposal is not
development associated with agriculture, woodlands, or forestry, is not redevelopment
of previously developed land and does not provide accommodation for an essential
agricultural worker. 
10.13. Conclusion 
Given the above, it is considered that the proposed development has not been
appropriately justified in policy terms with regards to its Green Belt location and that
there is therefore no justification for two new dwellings at this site.  The proposal would
also have an adverse impact upon the wider amenity of the area, being an unjustified
Green Belt development and sited in a manner which does not reflect the rural
character.  The proposal would also be unsustainable in the Green Belt, failing to
address climate concerns and generating increased private car trips and their
associated greenhouse gasses and emissions.  As such, the proposal would not
comply with the relevant policies of the adopted development plan (NPF4 and
SLLDP2) and it is therefore recommended that planning consent is refused. 
11.   Recommendation and Reasons
11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 
Refuse for the following reasons:- 
01. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 8 - Green Belts of the National
Planning Framework 4 (2023) as it does not meet the criteria set out in the policy
for Green Belt development and, as such, fails to encourage, promote and
facilitate compact urban growth and use the land around our towns and cities
sustainably. 
02. The proposal is contrary to Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area of the South
Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) as it is not for agricultural,
forestry, recreation or other uses generally appropriate to the countryside and
it has not been appropriately justified in terms of being development which
would require to be located within the Green Belt. 
03. The proposal would be contrary to Policy GBRA5 - Redevelopment of
Previously Developed Land Containing Buildings of the South Lanarkshire
Local Development Plan 2 (2021) as the land proposed for development has
not previously contained buildings.  
102

Page 103

04. The proposal is contrary to Policy 5 - Development Management and
Placemaking of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) as it
does not take account of the principles of sustainable development and does
not include measures which enhance the environment or address the six
qualities of placemaking. 
05. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 16 - Quality Homes of the National
Planning Framework 4 (2023) as it does not constitute the delivery of high
quality homes in the right locations as set out in the policy criteria. 
David Booth
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
Date: 24 March 2025 
Background Papers
Further information relating to the application can be found online:- 
P/24/1382 | Erection of two dwellinghouse's with associated car parking and landscaping | Flattmoss
Caravan Site Flattmoss Farm A726 From East Kilbride To Chapelton East Kilbride Glasgow South
Lanarkshire 
Corporate Considerations
The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications.  Any
implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been
considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Tel:  01698 454867
E-mail:  planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
103

Page 104

104