Agenda Document Pack - Planning Committee - 06/10/2026
South Lanarkshire Council · 6 October 2026
Back to Planning Committee — 6 October 2026 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Council Offices, Almada Street Hamilton, ML3 0AA Tuesday, 29 September 2026 Dear Councillor Planning Committee The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be held as follows:- Date: Tuesday, 06 October 2026 Time: 10:00 Venue: Hybrid - Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton, ML3 0AA The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. Yours sincerely Paul Manning Chief Executive Members Richard Nelson (Chair), Gerry Convery (Depute Chair), Maureen Devlin (ex officio), Alex Allison, Ralph Barker, Archie Buchanan, Ross Clark, Margaret Cowie, Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly, Alistair Fulton, Celine Handibode, Graeme Horne, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Ross Lambie, Martin Lennon, Davie McLachlan, Norman Rae, Mo Razzaq, John Ross, Graham Scott, David Shearer, Helen Toner, David Watson, Kirsty Williams Substitutes Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Mathew Buchanan, Poppy Corbett, Allan Falconer, Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Richard Lockhart, Julia Marrs, Ian McAllan, Kenny McCreary, Bert Thomson 1
Page 2
BUSINESS 1 Declaration of Interests 2 Minutes of Previous Meeting Minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 8 September 2026 submitted for approval as a correct record. (Copy attached) 5 - 8 Item(s) for Decision 3 Application P/25/1485 for Use of Stables as House (Class 9) and Associated Works at Land 190 Metres East Southeast of Huntlybank House, Huntlybank Lane, Ravenstruther, Lanark Report dated 29 September 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 9 - 16 4 Application P/26/0092 for Erection of 117 Houses, Landscaping, Access, Drainage and Associated Works at Winston Barracks, Robertson Drive, Lanark Report dated 29 September 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 17 - 32 5 Application P/26/0458 for Erection of 207 Houses, Landscaping, Open Space, Access, Drainage and Associated Works at Winston Barracks, Robertson Drive, Lanark Report dated 29 September 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 33 - 48 6 Application P/26/0470 for Erection of 4 Houses, Vehicular Access and Associated Infrastructure and Landscaping (Planning Permission in Principle) at Land Northeast of 41 Covanburn Avenue, Hamilton Report dated 29 September 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 49 - 56 7 Application P/26/0918 for Erection of 2 Houses and Associated Works at Hawks Close, Cleghorn, Lanark Report dated 29 September 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 57 - 64 8 Application P/26/0922 for Construction and Operation of Renewable Energy Development, Comprising up to 21 Wind Turbines with Maximum Blade Tip Height of 220 Metres with a Combined Generating Capacity Greater Than 50MW, a Battery Energy Storage System of Approximately 50MW and Associated Infrastructure (Section 36 Consultation) at Ravengill Energy Park, B797 from Abington A702 to Leadhills Report dated 29 September 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 65 - 74 Urgent Business 9 Urgent Business Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 2
Page 3
For further information, please contact:- Clerk Name: Stuart McLeod Clerk Telephone: 07385 370 117 Clerk Email: stuart.mcleod@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 3
Page 4
4
Page 5
PLANNING COMMITTEE Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton on 8 September 2026 Chair: Councillor Richard Nelson Councillors Present: Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor Ralph Barker, Councillor Archie Buchanan, Councillor Ross Clark, Councillor Gerry Convery (Depute), Councillor Margaret Cowie, Councillor Colin Dewar, Councillor Gladys Ferguson-Miller (substitute for Councillor Graeme Horne), Councillor Alistair Fulton, Councillor Celine Handibode, Councillor Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Councillor Davie McLachlan, Councillor Julia Marrs (substitute for Councillor Mary Donnelly), Councillor Norman Rae, Councillor Mo Razzaq, Councillor John Ross, Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor David Shearer, Councillor Helen Toner, Councillor David Watson, Councillor Kirsty Williams Councillors' Apologies: Councillor Maureen Devlin (ex officio), Councillor Mary Donnelly, Councillor Graeme Horne, Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Martin Lennon Attending: Community and Enterprise Resources F Carlin, Head of Planning and Regulatory Services; B Darroch, Planning Area Manager (East Team); S Laird, Engineering Manager (Transportation Engineering); D Russell, Planning Area Manager (West Team) Finance and Corporate Resources L Healy and K McLeod, Administration Assistants; S McLeod, Administration Officer 1 Declaration of Interests The following interest was declared:- Councillor(s) Barker Item(s) Application P/26/0396 for Erection of Single Storey Rear Extension and Associated Alterations at Carstairs Junction Hall, 20 St Charles Avenue, Carstairs Junction Nature of Interest(s) Prior involvement in application 2 Minutes of Previous Meeting The minutes of the meeting of the Planning Committee held on 11 August 2026 were submitted for approval as a correct record. The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record. 2 5
Page 6
3 Application P/26/0299 for Erection of 5 Houses, Formation of Access Road and Associated Landscaping Works and Ancillary Development at Cottage Grove, 83 Meikle Earnock Road, Hamilton A report dated 31 August 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on planning application P/26/0299 by C Revie for the erection of 5 houses, formation of access road and associated landscaping works and ancillary development at Cottage Grove, 83 Meikle Earnock Road, Hamilton. At its meeting on 7 July 2015, the Committee had approved a procedure for processing planning applications which required completion of a Legal Agreement. If approved, the application would be subject to a Legal Agreement and/or other appropriate mechanism and the approved procedure would apply. There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer responded to a member’s questions on an aspect of the report. The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0299 by C Revie for the erection of 5 houses, formation of access road and associated landscaping works and ancillary development at Cottage Grove, 83 Meikle Earnock Road, Hamilton be granted subject to:- the conditions specified in the Executive Director’s report the conclusion of a Section 75 Agreement and/or other appropriate agreement between the Council, site owner(s) and applicant [Reference: Minutes of 13 February 2024 (Paragraph 6) and 7 July 2015 (Paragraph 15)] 4 Application P/26/0396 for Erection of Single Storey Rear Extension and Associated Alterations at Carstairs Junction Hall, 20 St Charles Avenue, Carstairs Junction A report dated 31 August 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on planning application P/26/0396 by Soul of the Junction for the erection of a single storey rear extension and associated alterations at Carstairs Junction Hall, 20 St Charles Avenue, Carstairs Junction. There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer undertook to find out if the development would meet the criteria for developer funding. The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0396 by Soul of the Junction for the erection of a single storey rear extension and associated alterations at Carstairs Junction Hall, 20 St Charles Avenue, Carstairs Junction be granted subject to the conditions specified in the Executive Director’s report. [Reference: Minutes of Housing and Technical Resources Committee of 8 October 2025 (Paragraph 14)] Councillor Barker, having declared an interest in this application, withdrew from the meeting during its consideration 6
Page 7
5 Application P/26/0449 for Residential Development of 36 Flats Across 2 Number 4 Storey Blocks, Access Arrangements, Parking, Landscaping and Associated Works at South Parish Church, Baird Hill, East Kilbride A report dated 31 August 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on planning application P/26/0449 by Wilson Developments (EK) Limited and East Kilbride Housing Association for a residential development of 36 flats across 2 number 4 storey blocks, access arrangements, parking, landscaping and associated works at South Parish Church, Baird Hill, East Kilbride. The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0449 by Wilson Developments (EK) Limited and East Kilbride Housing Association for a residential development of 36 flats across 2 number 4 storey blocks, access arrangements, parking, landscaping and associated works at South Parish Church, Baird Hill, East Kilbride be refused for the reasons detailed in the Executive Director’s report. 6 Application P/26/0243 for Installation of 49.9 Megawatt (MW) Battery Storage Facility and Associated Infrastructure at Land 190 Metres Northwest of 3 Leadhills Road, Elvanfoot, Biggar A report dated 31 August 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on planning application P/26/0243 by Elvanfoot Energy Storage 2 Limited for the installation of a 49.9 MW battery storage facility and associated infrastructure at land 190 metres northwest of 3 Leadhills Road, Elvanfoot, Biggar. Following discussion, during which an officer responded to members’ questions on various aspects of the report, Councillor Nelson, seconded by Councillor Convery, moved that the application be granted, subject to the conditions specified in the Executive Director’s report. Councillor Barker, seconded by Councillor Clark, moved as an amendment that the application be deferred to allow:- the applicants to provide the Committee with an explanation as to why they had submitted 3 separate planning applications that referred to the same wider site and were under the same ownership additional opportunity for the applicants to engage with residents within the vicinity of the application sites On a vote being taken using the electronic voting system, 10 members voted for the motion and 12 members voted for the amendment which was declared carried. The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0243 by Elvanfoot Energy Storage 2 Limited for the installation of a 49.9 MW battery storage facility and associated infrastructure at land 190 metres northwest of 3 Leadhills Road, Elvanfoot, Biggar be deferred to a future meeting of the Planning Committee for the reasons detailed above. [Reference: Minutes of 4 February 2025 (Paragraph 5)] 7
Page 8
7 Application P/26/0324 for Installation of Circa 25 Megawatt (MW) Battery Storage Facility and Associated Infrastructure at Land 190 Metres Northwest of 3 Leadhills Road, Elvanfoot, Biggar A report dated 31 August 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) was submitted on planning application P/26/0324 by Elvanfoot Energy Storage 3 Limited for the installation of a circa 25 MW battery storage facility and associated infrastructure at land 190 metres northwest of 3 Leadhills Road, Elvanfoot, Biggar. The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0324 by Elvanfoot Energy Storage 3 Limited for the installation of a circa 25 MW battery storage facility and associated infrastructure at land 190 metres northwest of 3 Leadhills Road, Elvanfoot, Biggar be deferred to a future meeting of the Planning Committee to allow:- the applicants to provide the Committee with an explanation as to why they had submitted 3 separate planning applications that referred to the same wider site and were under the same ownership additional opportunity for the applicants to engage with residents within the vicinity of the application sites [Reference: Minutes of 4 February 2025 (Paragraph 5)] 8 Urgent Business There were no items of urgent business. 8
Page 9
Report Agenda Item CHECKED Report to: Planning Committee Date of Meeting: 6 October 2026 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Reference no: P/25/1485 Proposal: Use of stables as dwellinghouse (Class 9) and associated works Site Address: Land 190M ESE of Huntlybank House Huntlybank Lane Ravenstruther Lanark Applicant: Mrs L Lindsay Agent: Calum Smith Architect Ward: 03 – Clydesdale East Application Type: Full Planning Permission Advert : Carluke Gazette 21 January 2026 Development Plan Compliance: No Departures: N/A Recommendation: Refuse Legal Agreement: N/A Direction to Scottish Ministers N/A 3 9
Page 10
1. Reason for Report 1.1. The application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee under the South Lanarkshire Council Scheme of Delegation (2024) as the Head of Planning and Regulatory Services, in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Committee, has determined that it raises policy issues meriting consideration by the Planning Committee. 2. Site Description 2.1. The application relates to a stable building accessed from Huntlybank Lane, southeast of Lanark Road, Ravenstruther. The site is within the rural area. 2.2. Excluding the access, the irregularly shaped site extends to approximately 0.16 hectares. It occupies a separate position from the nearby residential properties, between agricultural fields and alongside a mature tree line. Despite some containment provided by the trees, the building is readily visible. 2.3. The building has a rectangular footprint of approximately 126m2, including a 50m2 rear lean-to extension. It comprises timber framing supported by masonry piers and a steel beam, with exposed oriented strand board wall sheathing and a profiled metal roof. Render has been applied to parts of the frontage. The three principal front openings are boarded over, with access through an opening at the side. Internally, the framing is exposed and the floor comprises compacted hardcore. Machinery, hay and other stored items were evident at the site visit. 3. Description of Proposed Development 3.1. The development comprises the conversion of the stable to a 2-bedroom dwellinghouse together with associated works. These works include the infilling and formation of openings, installation of windows and doors, wet dash render and replacement profiled metal roofing, and the erection of a 5m2 front porch extension. The structural report identifies additional framing, a new concrete floor slab, replacement wall sheathing and roof covering, and additional structural connections. 3.2. Access would be taken from the existing private access, with two parking spaces formed beside the dwelling. Private drainage infrastructure, including a septic tank and soakaway, is shown within the site. Details of the driveway surfacing, garden layout, landscaping and boundary treatments have not been provided. 4. Relevant Planning History 4.1. The stable was erected following the granting of planning consent in July 2017 (CL/17/0226). The rear lean-to extension does not have planning consent. 5. Supporting Information 5.1. A supporting statement, supplementary supporting statement, and structural report have been submitted which contend that the building could potentially be made suitable for conversion to a dwelling and meets the development plan policies on rural housing. 6. Consultations 6.1. West of Scotland Archaeology Service – requests an archaeological condition is attached to any grant of planning permission. Response: Noted. 7. Representations 7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, 4 comments in support and no objections have been received. 10
Page 11
8. Development Plan 8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The development plan comprises the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and National Planning Framework 4. 8.2. National Planning Framework 4 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and supports the planning and delivery of sustainable places, liveable places, and productive places. National Planning Framework 4 Policies Policy 1 Tackling the climate and nature crises Policy 2 Climate mitigation and adaptation Policy 3 Biodiversity Policy 9 Brownfield Policy 13 Sustainable transport Policy 14 Design, quality and place Policy 15 Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods Policy 17 Rural homes Policy 22 Flood risk and water management 8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will, therefore, also assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard, the application site and associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2. SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies Policy 2 Climate Change Policy 4 Green Belt and Rural Area Policy 5 Development Management and Placemaking SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies Policy SDCC3 Sustainable Drainage Systems Policy SDCC7 Low Carbon Emissions from New Buildings Policy GBRA1 Rural Design and Development Policy GBRA4 Conversion and Re-use of Existing Buildings Policy DM15 Water Supply Policy DM16 Foul Drainage/Sewerage Provision 9. Guidance 9.1. None applicable. 10. Assessment and Discussion 10.1. Principle of Development Policy 4 of SLLDP2 seeks to protect the amenity of the countryside while supporting appropriately located, small-scale development of high environmental quality. Policy 17(a) of NPF4 supports rural housing where it meets one of the specified circumstances and is suitably scaled, sited and designed. The proposal involves the reuse of an existing building and therefore falls principally to be assessed against Policy 17(a)(iii) of NPF4 and Policy GBRA4 of SLLDP2. 11
Page 12
10.2. Policy 17(a)(iii) supports the reuse of a redundant or unused building. The supplementary statement advises that the stables are no longer required for their original private equestrian purpose. However, the current owner having no further requirement for the building, does not in itself, establish redundancy. The consideration is whether there remains a reasonable prospect of continued use for that purpose, rather than whether the building meets the owner’s present requirements. 10.3. No substantive evidence has been provided to demonstrate that continued equestrian use is impracticable or that there is no demand for the building. This could include evidence of unsuccessful marketing for sale or letting as stables. The Planning Authority regularly receives applications for stable buildings, indicating continuing interest in this form of development. Although this does not establish demand for this particular building, it reinforces the need for a site-specific justification. 10.4. During the site visit, machinery, hay and other items were being stored within the building. While they do not establish that horses are currently kept on the site, they demonstrate that the building is not wholly unused. The applicant’s statement, considered alongside the available evidence, does not adequately demonstrate that the building is redundant or unused for the purposes of Policy 17(a)(iii). 10.5. Suitability for Conversion Policy GBRA4 requires buildings to have local, visual or historical merit and be suitable for conversion. Their structure, form, setting and architectural integrity should be respected, with alterations and extensions sympathetic to the original proportions and character. The stables are a modern utilitarian structure, and no particular local, visual or historical merit has been demonstrated. Their rural use does not, in itself, establish the traditional or local vernacular qualities sought by the policy. 10.6. The McLeish structural report which has been submitted is based on a visual inspection without numerical assessment. It identifies that the building appears capable of supporting vertical loads but has inadequate lateral stability. Concrete strip foundations are assumed rather than verified, the timber wall panels do not appear sufficiently tied to the foundations, and there is no concrete floor slab. 10.7. Recommended works include additional steel frames, a reinforced concrete floor slab, replacement sheathing to all timber wall panels, replacement roof covering with structural sarking, and additional restraint and holding-down connections. These works remain subject to detailed structural analysis and design. The report concludes that the building has the potential to meet building standards without replacement or holistic structural changes, but the adequacy of the assumed foundations and the final extent of the necessary works remain unresolved. 10.8. It is accepted that conversion to residential use would normally require insulation, weatherproofing and other upgrading. However, the identified works extend to substantial intervention in the building’s structural stability and fabric. Whether the existing building is suitable for conversion is a planning consideration under Policy GBRA4 and cannot be deferred entirely to the building warrant process. On the evidence assessed, this has not been adequately demonstrated. 12
Page 13
10.9. Layout, Siting and Design Policy 14 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and GBRA1 of SLLDP2 require development to respond positively to its surroundings. Policy GBRA1 supports traditional or contemporary design which interprets and adapts traditional principles, while avoiding suburban-style development in the countryside. Policy 17(a) also requires rural homes to be suitably scaled, sited and designed. 10.10. The supporting statements describe the development as contained within the established Huntlybank group. However, the building occupies a separate position within an open field setting, with a stronger relationship to the surrounding countryside than to a cohesive residential group. Its visibility across surrounding land requires a design appropriate to this rural setting. Retaining an existing footprint does not, by itself, establish that a dwelling would be acceptable. 10.11. The proposed dwelling would retain the deep plan and extended roof profile created by the rear lean-to. Together with the inconsistent proportions and arrangement of domestic openings, this would produce an unbalanced composition which neither retains a traditional rural character nor provides a coherent contemporary interpretation of it. 10.12. The amended drawings introduce a gabled entrance porch. Its broad frontage and shallow projection create an awkward relationship with the main elevation, while its roof occupies a substantial part of the principal roof slope. The porch does not resolve the wider shortcomings in the building’s form and proportions. Although wet dash render and profiled metal roofing can be appropriate rural materials, their use does not overcome these concerns. The resulting dwelling would have a suburban appearance which would detract from its visually exposed rural setting. 10.13. Two parking spaces are indicated, but details of surfacing, landscaping and boundary treatments are limited. These would require further consideration if the principle and design were acceptable, although they would not resolve the fundamental concerns identified. Given the separation from neighbouring dwellings and the single-storey form, unacceptable overlooking or overshadowing is not anticipated. 10.14. Sustainability The applicant identifies benefits from reusing an existing building and reducing new construction. These are relevant to Policies 1, 2 and 9 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of SLLDP2. However, their extent depends on the fabric retained and must be considered against the substantial works identified. Policy 9 supports reuse taking account of suitability for conversion and does not remove the need to satisfy the specific rural housing and design requirements. 10.15. Policy 3 of NPF4 requires proportionate biodiversity enhancements. No clear enhancement scheme has been identified, although appropriate measures could be secured if the development were otherwise acceptable. 10.16. Policies 13 and 15 of NPF4 promote sustainable transport and local living, with Policy 17(b) requiring consideration of transport needs appropriate to the rural location. The applicant contends that residential traffic would be comparable to that associated with the authorised equestrian use. The existing access and potential equestrian traffic are relevant, but do not establish the acceptability of residential development in principle. 13
Page 14
10.17. Technical Matters Policy 22 of NPF4 and Policies DM15, DM16 and SDCC3 of SLLDP2 relate to water management and drainage. The site is not identified as being at flood risk, and private foul and surface water drainage would include a septic tank and soakaway. Full details could be secured if the development were otherwise acceptable including permeable surfacing to limit run-off. 10.18. Policy 5 of SLLDP2 requires development to provide suitable access and parking. The existing private access would be used and there is space for parking and manoeuvring. Full details could be secured if the development were otherwise acceptable. 10.19. Conclusion The proposal has not been justified as the reuse of a redundant or unused building, and its suitability for conversion has not been adequately demonstrated. The building does not possess the qualities sought by Policy GBRA4, while the proposed dwelling’s form and design would detract from the character and amenity of its rural setting. The additional supporting information and design amendments do not overcome these concerns. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies 4, GBRA 1 and GBRA4 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and Policies 14 and 17 of National Planning Framework 4. 11. Recommendation and Reasons 11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- Refuse Planning Permission for the following reasons:- 01. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 4 – Green Belts and Rural Areas of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 as it is not supported by the Development Plan in land use terms. 02. The proposal is contrary to Policy GBRA1 – Rural Design and Development of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 as it would introduce suburban-style development into the rural environment. 03. The proposal is contrary to Policy GBRA4 – Conversion and Re-use of Existing Buildings of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 as the building has not been demonstrated to be of local, visual or historical merit or suitable for conversion. 04. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 17 – Rural homes of National Planning Framework 4 as it has not been demonstrated that it would reuse a redundant or unused building or be suitably designed to be in keeping with the character of the area. Kevin Karr Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Date: 29 September 2026 Background Papers Further information relating to the application can be found online:- P/25/1485 | Use of stables as dwellinghouse (Class 9) and associated works | Land 190M ESE Of Huntlybank House Huntlybank Lane Ravenstruther Lanark 14
Page 15
Corporate Considerations The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications. Any implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- E-mail: planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 15
Page 16
16
Page 17
Report Agenda Item Report to: Planning Committee Date of Meeting: 6 October 2026 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Reference no: P/26/0092 Proposal: Erection of 117 dwellings, landscaping, access, drainage and associated works Site Address: Winston Barracks, Robertson Drive, Lanark Applicant: Abbey Developments (Lanark) Ltd Agent: Ogilvie Homes Ward: 02 Clydesdale North Application Type: Detailed Planning Permission Advert Type: Lanark Gazette 25 February 2026 Development Plan Compliance: No Departures: Yes Recommendation: Grant subject to conditions and legal agreement Legal Agreement: Yes – to secure financial contributions towards education and affordable housing provision Direction to Scottish Ministers N/A 4 17
Page 18
1. Reason for Report 1.1. This application is being presented to Committee as it constitutes a major planning application under The Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland) Regulations 2009, and the Scheme of Delegation requires that all major applications are determined by the Planning Committee. 2. Site Description 2.1. The application site (5.54 ha) lies to the east of Lanark – it is vacant land within the confines of the former Winston Barracks. Previously, it contained an assortment of buildings, associated with the military function of the Barracks, since their demolition the area has the now largely reverted to scrub. There are individual and groups of matures trees located within the site, intermittently along the eastern boundary and at the southern end. Topographically the site is relatively level other than the southern corner where it drops steeply towards the A70/A73 junction. 2.2. The site is bounded to the north by the roundabout onto the A73. To the west is the Sandhurst Building and Sergeants Mess (B-Listed Buildings), associated amenity space and vacant land subject of a separate planning application (Ref. P/26/0458) for 207 dwellings, submitted by Miller Homes. To the south is the existing entrance into Winston Bararcks, the roundabout access onto the A73 and the A73/A70 junction. 3. Description of Proposed Development 3.1. The applicant seeks planning permission for a residential development consisting of 117 dwellings. The house types are a mixture of 2 storey detached, semi-detached and terraced dwellings (5 five bedroom, 57 four bedroom, 42 three bedroom and 13 two bedroom). The house designs are contemporary and external finishes include red/charcoal facing bricks, white render and red/charcoal tiles. 3.2. Access will be taken from Robertson Drive via a roundabout access onto Hyndford Road, (A73) and a new priority access onto A70 in the northeast corner of the site. A network of interconnected, secondary roads will branch out from Robertson Drive, serving residential clusters. Surface water will be treated by soakaways in the rear gardens of each plot, and this will be supplemented by soakaway basins located in amenity open space areas. Extensive landscaping and amenity space will be laid out throughout the development. A centrally located village green will create a focal point. 3.3. As the proposal relates to a residential development which falls within the definition of ‘major’ development, as set out in the Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland) Regulations 2009, the applicants undertook a pre- application consultation prior to the submission of this planning application. 4. Relevant Planning History 4.1. The following is a list of previous Planning Decisions affecting the application site:- Listed Building Consent (Ref. P/25/0008) for the demolition of the former Officers Mess (C-Listed), granted August 2025 A Proposal of Application Notice (Ref. P/24/0019/PAN) for residential development was issued in December 2024 with further consultations required Planning Permission (Ref. CL/10/0362) for 44 dwellings, granted November 2010 Planning Permission (Ref. CL/08/0057) for alteration to site layout and substitution of house types (amendment to CL/06/0345) granted May 2008 Planning Permission (Ref. CL/06/0345) for 347 dwellings and conversion of 4 Listed Buildings to form 45 residential units, was granted September 2007 Listed Building Consent (Ref. CL/05/0486) for the conversion of 4 Listed Buildings, granted December 2006 18
Page 19
Planning Permission (Ref. CL/00/0320) for residential development (Outline) granted March 2006 5. Supporting Information 5.1. In support of the planning application, the applicant has submitted:- ⧫ Preliminary Ecological Appraisal ⧫ Report on Public Consultation ⧫ Report on Site Investigations ⧫ Design and Access Statement ⧫ Transport Assessment ⧫ Arboricultural Impact Assessment ⧫ Report on Road Traffic Sound ⧫ Drainage Assessment ⧫ Strategic Biodiversity Management Plan 6. Consultations 6.1. West of Scotland Archaeological Service – There is no known significant archaeological potential and no investigations are required. Response: Noted. 6.2. Scottish Power Energy Network (SPEN) – No objection, however, there is a substation with underground cables in the vicinity of the site and SPEN therefore reserve the right to protect and/or deviate apparatus at the applicant’s expense. Response: Noted. 6.3. Developer Obligations - Contributions are required for Education in relation to primary and nursery provision. The preference is for the affordable housing contribution to be provided in the form of a commuted sum for off-site provision. Response: If Committee is minded to grant consent, these contributions will be dealt with through a legal agreement. 6.4. Environmental Services – No objection, subject to conditions requiring a piling method statement, noise mitigation, contaminated land remediation and dust control. Response: Noted. Should planning permission be approved appropriate conditions would be attached to any decision issued. 6.5. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services – No objection subject to conditions. Response: Noted. 6.6. Roads Flood Risk Management – No response received to date. Response: The site is not identified as falling within a flood risk area. A Drainage Assessment and plans showing the proposed drainage system, including SUDS basins have been submitted. If consent is granted a condition will be attached requiring the completion of self-certification and independent check certificates appendices for drainage as listed in the Council's Developer Design Guidance (May 2020). 6.7. Scottish Gas Networks High Pressure Pipeline – Do not have any high pressure assets within the vicinity of the above consultation and, as such, would have no comment/objection. Response: Noted. 19
Page 20
6.8. Scottish Water – No objection. There is sufficient capacity in the Camps Water Treatment Works for a foul only connection to the Lanark Wastewater Treatment works. The development may impact upon infrastructure in the proximity of the development and Scottish Water should be contacted by the developer directly. Response: Noted. Surface water will be directed to soakaway basins and will not connect into the sewage network. 6.9. The Royal Burgh of Lanark Community Council – No objection subject to the development including appropriate drainage measures and not having a detrimental impact on associated services and facilities in the surrounding area. The development should also include appropriate street lighting, play areas and footpath links. Response: Noted. The development will include appropriate street lighting, play area and footpath links. In addition, affordable housing will be addressed through on-site provision and a financial contribution will be sought to address any educational impacts of the development. 7. Representations 7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement in the local press, 1 objection and 1 letter of support have been received. The issues raised are summarised as follows:- the development would be wholly inappropriate in an already built-up area in a climate emergency there is a need to protect any natural spaces in the area land is going to waste so would be good for the area a park and football pitch should be provided as there is nothing for children to do in the area unless travelling by car 7.2. The above issues are considered in the assessment below. These letters are available to view on the planning portal. 8. Development Plan 8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all applications must be determined in accordance with the Development Plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 8.2. National Planning Framework 4 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for Scotland. It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments and national planning policy. NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable places, liveable places and productive places. National Planning Framework 4 Policies Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation Policy 3 – Biodiversity Policy 7 - Historic assets and places Policy 9 - Brownfield, vacant and derelict land and empty buildings Policy 13 - Sustainable transport Policy 14 - Design, quality and place Policy 15 - Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods Policy 16 - Quality homes Policy 17 - Rural homes Policy 21 - Play, recreation and sport 20
Page 21
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard the application site and associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies Policy 2 - Climate Change Policy 3 - General Urban Areas and Settlements Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking Policy 7 - Community Infrastructure Assessment Policy 11 - Housing Policy 12 - Affordable Housing Policy 14 - Natural and Historic Environment Policy 15 - Travel and Transport SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies Policy GBRA1 - Rural Design and Development Policy GBRA5 - Redevelopment of Previously Developed Land Containing Buildings Policy NHE3 - Listed Buildings 9. Guidance 9.1. None applicable 10. Assessment and Discussion 10.1. The determining issues in the consideration of this application are its compliance with the National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). 10.2. Climate Change Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of the SLLDP2 relate to the climate crises and identify that all development should seek to minimise and mitigate the effects of climate change. 10.3. The site is not identified on SEPA flooding maps as being at risk of flooding. Proposed SUDS will effectively manage surface water runoff, benefitting neighbouring properties and the drainage network. If approved, conditions will be attached requiring the implementation of a landscaping scheme which includes tree planting and wildflower meadow creation. The proposal involves development of vacant brownfield land which is served by good public transport links. Overall, the proposal would not compromise the objectives of NPF4 Policies 1 and 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2. 10.4. Principle of Development NPF4 Policy 17 Rural homes advises that development proposals for new homes in rural areas will be supported where the development is suitably scaled, sited and designed to be in keeping with the character of the area and the development can meet one of the following criteria: the site is allocated for housing in the Local Development Plan; reuses a redundant or unused building; supports a viable rural business; is for a retired farmer; reuses brownfield land where a return to a natural state has not or will not happen without intervention; or, is for a one to one replacement of an existing house. 21
Page 22
10.5. The application site could be defined as brownfield land because of its previous use as a barracks. It contained numerous military style buildings including housing for soldiers. Although there is evidence of hardstanding throughout the site it has largely reverted to scrub comprising young trees, wildflowers and gorse. Therefore, considering these circumstances the proposal does not meet criteria NPF4 Policy 17 a) ii where a return to a natural state would not be possible without intervention. 10.6. However, the site is subject of Planning Permission CL/06/0345 for 347 dwellings and conversion of 4 Listed Buildings. This consent was implemented with two of the Listed Buildings (Sandhurst Building and Sergeants Mess) having been converted and 32 townhouses built, thereby ensuring Planning Permission CL/06/0345 remains extant. The remaining approved dwellings, within the current application site area and the adjoining residential site, being progressed by Miller homes, could in effect still be built. The change proposed by the current application principally relates to a change in house types. It is therefore considered that this application can be supported as a departure from the development plan in recognition of the development history of the site. 10.7. Policy 4 ‘Green Belt and Rural Area’ of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 specifies that within the Rural Area the aim is to protect the amenity of the countryside while at the same time, supporting small scale development in the right places that is appropriate in land use terms and is of a high environmental quality that will support the needs of communities. Generally, it is expected that houses will be accommodated within identified settlements other than circumstances including redevelopment of previously developed land containing buildings. 10.8. SLLDP2 Policy GBRA5 ‘Redevelopment of Previously Developed Land Containing Buildings’ outlines several criteria relevant to redevelopment proposals. Although consented prior to the adoption of SLLDP2, the appropriateness of a brownfield development, (which did contain buildings, since demolished) in this rural location has been established by the previous consent CL/06/0345 which remains extant. As the proposal under consideration will not have an adverse impact on the wider area in terms of landscape character and setting, it is reasonable to conclude that it complies with SLLDP2 Policies 4 and GBRA5. 10.9. NPF4 Policy 16 – Quality homes seek to encourage, promote and facilitate the delivery of high quality homes, in the right locations. It advises that development proposals for new homes on land not allocated for housing in the local development plan will only be supported in limited circumstances, where there is an agreed timescale for build- out, where they are consistent with the spatial strategy and local living and in rural locations, must be consistent with the policy on rural homes. 10.10. In this case, the proposal contravenes policy criteria above for rural homes. However, the proposal represents a housing opportunity, served by a public bus route and within reasonable walking and cycling distance of Lanark. The layout will be enhanced by extensive amenity open space, tree planting and structured landscaping. The landscaping scheme will contribute to biodiversity. The applicant, a national house builder, has carried out extensive market research and on those findings is confident of significant demand for new housing in the locality. The site was previously identified as a housing supply site and the current proposal would include 30 affordable units. Redeveloping unattractive vacant land with a sensitively designed residential development will result in environmental and amenity improvements. The applicant has provided a Statement of Community Benefit. For these reasons and the reasons elaborated in paragraph 10.5 above, a departure from policy can be justified. 22
Page 23
10.11. In NPF4 Policy 9 Brownfield, vacant and derelict land and empty buildings the relevant sections state: ‘Development proposals that will result in the sustainable reuse of brownfield land including vacant and derelict land and buildings, whether permanent or temporary, will be supported. In determining whether the reuse is sustainable, the biodiversity value of brownfield land which has naturalised should be taken into account’ and ‘Where land is known or suspected to be unstable or contaminated, development proposals will demonstrate that the land is, or can be made, safe and suitable for the proposed new use’. 10.12. Although the site has started to regenerate, the scrub habitat is considered to have low biodiversity value. Proposed biodiversity enhancements will ensure the housing development can be integrated into its setting without detriment to overall biodiversity value. The proposed development will result in the sustainable reuse of brownfield land which formerly operated as a military barracks. A comprehensive Ground Investigation Report has been submitted containing survey results, assessments, and recommendations for remediation. As a precaution Environmental Services in their consultation response recommended conditions requiring the submission and implementation of a remediation strategy. In consideration the proposal complies with NPF4 Policy 9. 10.13. SLLDP2 Policy 11 - Housing supports development included in the housing land supply audit and identified in the Local Plan proposal map. If, during the period of the plan, a shortfall in the five year supply of effective land is identified, the Council will support development proposals which are effective and capable of meeting the identified shortfall. This includes non-effective sites that can now be demonstrated to be effective and additional brownfield sites. 10.14. Although identified as a windfall site in the recent South Lanarkshire Housing Land Audit (CL5035 Winston Barracks) the application site is not identified in the Local Plan proposal map. Under previous Local Plans it had been identified as allocated housing land. For many years only a small proportion of the approved dwellings subject of Planning Permission CL/06/0345 for 347 dwellings had been completed, leaving the impression that most of the site was non-effective. The recent submission of planning applications for the remaining site area by Miller Homes and Ogilvie now demonstrates an intention to progress a residential development. In helping to meet latent demand for housing the terms of SLLDP2 Policy 11 have not been compromised. 10.15. Layout, Siting and Design NPF4 Policy 14 Design Quality and Place, SLLDP2 Policy 5 Development Management and Placemaking, and Policy GBRA1 Rural Design and Development aim to ensure well designed development that makes for successful places and considers the impact on residential amenity and the appropriateness of the development to a rural setting. 10.16. Informal open space, a village green and plays areas, structural landscaping, links to the existing path network and safe vehicle accesses into and out of the site will create a sense of place with the benefits of a rural lifestyle. A range of housing styles and sizes will be provided, adaptable to the needs of families, couples and individuals. Landscaping and new woodland planting will contribute to visual screening whilst enhancing the overall setting of the development. The proposed layout has been designed in a manner which ensures that the amenity and privacy of existing and future residents will not be compromised. Connections and linkages through to the adjacent Miller residential development (Planning Application P/26/0458), will allow these two parcels of development to function as a single unified neighbourhood. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services in their consultation response did not raise 23
Page 24
any public or traffic safety issues. There are no infrastructure constraints. The proposal will not impact upon landscape features, protected habitats, or species. The proposal is therefore satisfactory in terms of NFP4 Policy 14 and SLLDP2 Policies 5 and GBRA1. 10.17. NPF4 Policy 15 relates to local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods. It seeks to create connected and compact neighbourhoods where people can meet most of their daily needs within a reasonable distance of their home, preferably by using sustainable transport. 10.18. Both the adjoining Ogilvie and Miller Homes developments combined will ensure footpath connections into Lanark racecourse, Lanark Moor Country Park and Springbank Cemetery. Lanark market and a veterinary clinic are only 250m to the west. The site lies close to a bus stop, where a frequent bus service to Lanark can be accessed – in Lanark there is a wide range of shops, services, business, schools, a medical centre, train station and leisure facilities. There are safe pedestrian routes into Lanark via the Racecourse. Lanark is only 2km to the west which is a reasonable walking and cycling distance. Within the development an extensive area of landscaped amenity space with play facilities will be laid out to meet the recreational needs of a range of ages. In view of the circumstances described, the proposal does on balance accord with the aims and intent of Policy 15 Local Living and 20 minute neighbourhoods of National Planning Framework 4. 10.19. Community Infrastructure Assessment SLLDP2 Policy 7 Community Infrastructure Assessment states where development proposals would require capital or other works or facilities to enable to proceed, financial contributions towards their implementation will be required. 10.20. SLLDP2 Policy 12 – Affordable housing advice for sites of 20 or more units advises 25% of capacity should be allocated on site. If on site provision is not viable, then a contribution towards affordable housing on alternative sites within the housing catchment area will be sought. 10.21. There have been no requests from Roads or Community facilities for contributions. A contribution for Education in relation to primary and nursery provision is required. Whilst a commuted sum is required to contribute to the provision of affordable housing elsewhere in the local area. The terms of SLLDP2 Policies 7 and 12 can be complied with and a decision will not be issued until the conclusion of a section 75 agreement covering the contributions and on-site provision of affordable housing. 10.22. Play, Recreation and Sport NPF4 Policy 21 – Play recreation and sport advises that residential development incorporates well designed, good quality provision for play, recreation, and relaxation that is proportionate to the scale and nature of the development. New residential areas should be inclusive and enable children and young people to play and move around safely and independently, maximising opportunities for informal and incidental play in the neighbourhood. 10.23. The proposed layout identifies a central village green with play area and an amenity space, close to the entrance. If planning permission is granted, a condition will be applied requiring approval of the details for play areas. There will be a network of paths throughout the site and connections to the footpath network proposed for the adjacent Miller Homes site. The neighbouring Lanark Racecourse and Lanark Moor Country Park have sports and all weather pitches and mountain bike routes providing 24
Page 25
recreational opportunities for residents. In consideration the terms of NPF4 Policy 21 can be met. 10.24. Travel and Transport NPF4 Policy 13 Sustainable Transport states that for significant car generating developments, a Transport Assessment and Travel Plan would be required. Over reliance on private car journeys will be discouraged. SLLDP2 Policy 15 Travel and Transport advises that active travel and the availability and/or provision of public transport facilities and access to, should be fundamental design and locational elements of new development. 10.25. A Transport Assessment has been submitted, and Roads agree with the conclusions of the report that the additional traffic generation will not adversely impact upon the road network. New priority junctions have been designed to a satisfactory standard, adequate parking can be provided, and the road system includes traffic calming measures and safe crossings. The layout will have segregated and safe links to local facilities via walking and cycling networks. The residential development is accessible by public transport. There are regular buses to Lanark where a wide range of shops, services and employment opportunities can be accessed. At Lanark Railway Station a regular train service to Hamilton, Glasgow and the wider conurbation is available. In considering these factors the proposal accords with NPF4 Policy 13 and SLLDP2 Policy 15. 10.26. Natural and Historic Environment NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity relates to biodiversity and details that all local development shall include appropriate measures to conserve, restore and enhance biodiversity. 10.27. Existing woodland in the southern edge will be retained and structured tree planting will be established along the eastern boundary thereby facilitating ecological corridors for wildlife. Wherever possible, existing trees will be retained and protected. Trees and bulbs will be planted in selected locations throughout the site. Extensive areas of flowering meadows will be created to encourage pollinators. Recommendations in the Preliminary Ecological Appraisal and the Strategic Biodiversity Management Plan will be complied with. Therefore, the proposal accords with NPF4 Policies 3 and 6. 10.28. NPF4 Policy 7 Historic assets, SLLDP2 Policies 14 and NHE3 – Listed Buildings states that the layout, design, materials, scale, siting of any development shall be sensitive to and respect the character and setting of Listed Buildings. 10.29. The layout and house designs take cognisance of the setting of two neighbouring listed buildings, the Sandhurst Building and the Sergeants Mess. Dwellings fronting Robertson Drive, towards the Sandhurst Building will reinforce the interrelationship between the new development and the heritage asset. Dwellings adjoining the Sergeants Mess will be positioned to present side elevations thereby deferring to the prominence of the Sergeants Mess. At key corner plots, close to the listed buildings, plots will accommodate larger dwellings with dual aspect frontages, designed and located to respect the setting. External finishes will feature red multi brick and red tiles to enable sensitive integration. In considering the above assessment, the setting and character of the Listed Buildings would not be adversely affected. Therefore, the proposal complies with NPF4 Policy 7 and SLLDP2 Policies 14 and NHE3. 10.30. Conclusion The proposal will result in the development of vacant land adjoining Lanark and will help meet demand for housing in the Lanark area. Whilst the proposal does not fully comply with the current land use policies contained in the development plan, the extant 25
Page 26
planning permission for a residential development on the site is a significant material consideration. The proposed layout reflects the extant permission and is considered to be acceptable. On balance, it is considered that this proposal can be supported as a departure. Overall, it is an appropriate form of development at this location. 11. Recommendation and Conditions 11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- Grant Detailed Planning Permission subject to conditions and the conclusion of a Section 75 agreement (or other appropriate legal agreement) to secure affordable housing contributions (or suitable alternative arrangement) and for financial contributions towards educational provision (nursery and primary school provision):- In accordance with agreed procedure, should there be no significant progress, on behalf of the applicant, towards the conclusion of the Planning Obligation within 6 months of the date of the Committee, the proposed development may be refused on the basis that, without the planning control/developer contribution which would be secured by the Planning Obligation, the proposed development would be unacceptable. Conditions 01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice. Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 02. That before development starts, full details of the design and location of all fences and walls, including any retaining walls to be erected on the site shall be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority. Thereafter the development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to maintain the visual quality of the area. 03. That no trees, identified on the approved Landscaping plans for retention, shall be felled, removed or otherwise affected without the prior written consent of the Council as Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of amenity and to ensure the protection and maintenance of the existing trees and other landscape features within the site. 04. The tree protection measures and arboricultural recommendations listed in the Arboricultural Impact Assessment (Envirocentre Ltd, September 2025) shall be fully complied with. Reason: To ensure that the trees to be retained will not be damaged during construction and to protect and enhance the appearance and character of the site and locality. 26
Page 27
05. That the landscaping scheme relating to the development hereby approved shall be carried out and completed simultaneously with the development. Reason: In the interests of the visual amenity of the area. 06. The recommendations and mitigation measures as listed in the Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (Acorna Ecology Associates Ltd, May 2025) and the Strategic Biodiversity Management Plan (Acorna Ecology Associates, July 2025) shall be fully complied with. Reason: In the interests of biodiversity and wildlife 07. Prior to work commencing on the site, a scheme for the provision of play area(s) within the site shall be submitted to the Council as Planning Authority for written approval and shall include:- (a) details of the type and location of play equipment, seating and litter bins to be situated within the play area(s); (b) details of the surface treatment of the play area, including the location and type of safety surface to be installed; (c) details of the fences to be erected around the play area(s); and (d) details of the phasing for the completion of these works unless agreed in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate play facilities within the site and in order to retain effective planning control. 08. No development shall commence unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority until drainage details have been provided and approved which demonstrate compliance with the principles of sustainable urban drainage systems and with the Council's Developer Design Guidance (May 2020). These details shall include the submission of the following signed appendices:- C 'Sustainable Drainage Design Compliance certificate', D 'Sustainable Drainage Design Independent Check Certificate' and E 'Confirmation of Future Maintenance of Sustainable Drainage Apparatus’. Thereafter development shall not be occupied until the surface drainage works have been completed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the disposal of surface water from the site is dealt with in a safe and sustainable manner, to return it to the natural water cycle with minimal adverse impact on people and the environment and to alleviate the potential for on-site and off-site flooding. 09. Prior to development commencing on site, a scheme for the control and mitigation of dust shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. No changes to the approved scheme shall take place unless agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. The scheme shall thereafter be implemented during construction on site. Reason: To minimise the risk of nuisance from dust to nearby occupants. 27
Page 28
10. No piling works shall be carried out until a method statement has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. This statement shall include an assessment of the impact of the piling on surrounding properties, taking into account the guidance contained in BS 6472: 1992 'Evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings'. It shall detail any procedures which are proposed to minimise the impact of noise and vibration on the occupants of surrounding properties. This statement shall be prepared by a suitably qualified person, and the piling works shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved method statement. Reason: To minimise noise, vibration and disturbance to neighbouring residents/occupants during blasting. 11. That prior to the commencement of development details of the construction, surface density of materials, final position and maintenance scheme of the acoustic barriers, as recommended by the Report on Road Traffic Sound (Charlie Fleming, August 2026) shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Authority. The approved acoustic barrier shall be installed prior to the occupation of the dwellings, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority and thereafter maintained to the satisfaction of the Council. Reason: To protect residents from unreasonable levels of road traffic noise. 12. Prior to the commencement of development full details of the glazing components and trickle vents proposed to be used at the properties most exposed to road traffic noise shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Thereafter the development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the internal noise levels shall complies with BS 8233:2014 Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings. 13. A detailed remediation strategy, which takes cognisance of the conclusions and recommendations of the Site Investigation Report (Mason Evans, January 2025) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. No works other than investigative works shall be carried out on site prior to receipt of the Council's written approval of the remediation plan. Reason: To avoid unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, to ensure that the land is remediated and made suitable for its proposed use. 14. (a) Remediation of the site shall be carried out in accordance with the approved remediation plan prior to the occupation of dwellings. Any amendments to the approved remediation plan shall not be implemented unless approved in writing by the Planning Authority. (b) On completion of the remediation works, the developer shall submit a completion report to the Planning Authority, confirming that the works have been carried out in accordance with the approved remediation plan and that the works have successfully reduced these risks to acceptable levels. (c) Any previously unsuspected contamination which becomes evident during the development of the site shall be brought to the attention of the Planning Authority within one week or earlier of it being identified. A more detailed site investigation to determine the extent and nature of the 28
Page 29
contaminant(s) and a site-specific risk assessment of any associated pollutant linkages, shall then require to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To avoid unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, to ensure that the land is remediated and made suitable for its proposed use. 12. Reason for Decision 12.1. The principle of a residential development on the site is contrary to Policies 17 and 16 of National Planning Framework 4. However, planning permission was previously granted for 347 dwellings on the site and that permission remains extant. The remaining approved dwellinghouses can therefore still be constructed and the site is identified in the South Lanarkshire Housing Land Audit as a windfall development site. These factors are a significant material consideration. The proposal will not adversely impact on residential amenity, biodiversity and road safety, and makes optimum use of vacant land, helping to meet demand for housing. The proposal accords with Policies 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 21 of National Planning Framework 4 and policies 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 12, 15, GBRA1 and GBRA5 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. On balance, it is considered that this proposal can be supported as a departure since it is an appropriate form of development at this location. Kevin Carr Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Date: 29 September 2026 Background Papers P/26/0092 Erection of 117 dwellings, landscaping, access, drainage and associated works Corporate Considerations The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications. Any implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- E-mail: planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 29
Page 30
30
Page 31
Addendum Specifying Heads of Terms in relation to any relevant legal agreement Planning Application No. P/26/0092 Development Description Erection of 117 dwellings, landscaping, access, drainage and associated works Site Address Winston Barracks, Robertson Drive, Lanark Applicant Abbey Developments (Lanark) Ltd Date of Committee 6 October 2026 Type of obligation Section 75 or an appropriate alternative legal agreement such as a Section 69 agreement Obligations Resource Summary of Required Contributions Community N/A Education Contributions are required for primary and nursery provision within the surrounding area Housing On site provision of affordable housing or an appropriate contribution Roads N/A 31
Page 32
32
Page 33
Report Agenda Item Report to: Planning Committee Date of Meeting: 6 October 2026 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Reference no: P/26/0458 Proposal: Erection of 207 dwellings, landscaping, open space, access, drainage and associated works Site Address: Winston Barracks, Robertson Drive, Lanark Applicant: Miller Homes Scotland West / Abbey Developments (Lanark) Ltd Agent: Stantec Ward: 02 Clydesdale North Application Type: Detailed Planning Permission Advert Type: Lanark Gazette 13 May 2026 Development Plan Compliance: No Departures: Yes Recommendation: Grant subject to conditions and legal agreement Legal Agreement: Yes – to secure financial contributions towards education and onsite provision of affordable housing. Direction to Scottish Ministers N/A 5 33
Page 34
1. Reason for Report 1.1. This application is being presented to Committee as it constitutes a major planning application under The Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland) Regulations 2009 and the Scheme of Delegation requires that all major applications are determined by the Planning Committee. 2. Site Description 2.1. The application site (8.7 ha) lies to the east of Lanark – it is vacant land within the confines of the former Winston Barracks. Previously it contained an assortment of buildings associated with the military function of the Barracks. Since their demolition, the area has largely reverted to scrub. Topographically the site is relatively level. 2.2. The site is bounded to the north and west by existing woodland belts and beyond by Lanark Racecourse, Lanark Moor Country Park and agricultural land. To the east is vacant land subject of a separate Planning Application P/26/0092 for 118 dwellings, submitted by Ogilvie Homes. To the south are existing dwellings including the converted B-Listed Sandhurst Building and associated amenity and parking areas. 3. Description of Proposed Development 3.1. The applicant seeks planning permission for a residential development consisting of 207 dwellings, including 30 affordable units. Other than 12 single storey semi- detached dwellings, the house types are a mixture of 2 storey detached, semi- detached and terraced dwellings (44 five bedroom, 71 four bedroom, 77 three bedroom and 15 two bedroom). The house designs are contemporary and external finishes include red facing brick, render and grey and red tiles. 3.2. Access will be taken from an extension of Robertson Drive via a roundabout access onto Hyndford Road, (A73) and a new priority access onto A70 in the northeast corner of the site. From Robertson Drive, a primary loop road will extend around the site. A network of interconnected, secondary roads will branch out from the primary loop. The footpath network will provide links to the existing core paths. Surface water will be treated by an extensive soakaway system connected to several soakaway basins located in designated green space. Landscaping and amenity space will be laid out throughout the development, with a centrally located village green containing a toddler play area to create a focal point. 3.3. As the proposal relates to a residential development which falls within the definition of ‘major’ development, as set out in the Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Developments) (Scotland) Regulations 2009 the applicants undertook a pre- application consultation prior to the submission of this planning application. 4. Relevant Planning History 4.1. The following is a list of previous applications relating to the application site:- Listed Building Consent (Ref. P/25/0008) for the demolition of the former Officers Mess (C-Listed), granted August 2025 A Proposal of Application Notice (Ref. P/24/0019/PAN) for residential development was issued in December 2024 with further consultations required Planning Permission (Ref. CL/08/0057) for alteration to site layout and substitution of house types (amendment to CL/06/0345) granted May 2008 Planning Permission (Ref. CL/06/0345) for 347 dwellings and conversion of 4 Listed Buildings to form 45 residential units, was granted September 2007 Listed Building Consent (Ref. CL/05/0486) for the conversion of 4 Listed Buildings, granted December 2006 34
Page 35
Planning Permission (Ref. CL/00/0320) for residential development (Outline) granted March 2006 5. Supporting Information 5.1. In support of the planning application, the applicant has submitted:- ⧫ Preliminary Ecological Appraisal ⧫ Proposal of Application Consultation (PAC) Report ⧫ Site Investigation ⧫ Planning Statement ⧫ Transport Assessment ⧫ Air Quality Impact Assessment ⧫ Arboriculture Impact Assessment ⧫ Noise Impact Assessment ⧫ Drainage Statement ⧫ Energy Statement ⧫ Protected Species Survey ⧫ Badger Monitoring ⧫ Bat Emergence Survey 6. Consultations 6.1. West of Scotland Archaeological Service – There is no known significant archaeological potential and no investigations are required. Response: Noted. 6.2. Scottish Power Energy Network (SPEN) – No objection, however, there is a substation with underground cables in the vicinity of the site and SPEN therefore reserve the right to protect and/or deviate apparatus at the applicant’s expense. Response: Noted. 6.3. Developer Obligations - Contributions are required for Education in relation to primary and nursery provision. On site provision of 30 affordable housing units is also required. Response: If Committee is minded to grant consent, this contribution and on-site affordable housing provision will be dealt with through a legal agreement. 6.4. Environmental Services – No objection, subject to conditions requiring a piling method statement, noise mitigation, contaminated land remediation and dust control. Response: Noted. Should planning permission be approved appropriate conditions would be attached to any decision issued. 6.5. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services – No objection subject to conditions. Response: Noted. 6.6. Countryside and Greenspace – No objection and they welcome the recommendations in the Ecological appraisal to enhance biodiversity. Response: Noted. The retained woodland belts within the application site will be reinforced with additional planting and habitat creation. 6.7. Roads Flood Risk Management – No response received to date. Response: The site is not identified as falling within a flood risk area. A Drainage Assessment and plans showing the proposed drainage system, including SUDS basins have been submitted. If consent is granted a condition will be attached requiring the completion of self-certification and independent check certificates appendices for drainage as listed in the Council's Developer Design Guidance (May 2020). 35
Page 36
6.8. Scottish Water – No objection. There is sufficient capacity in the Camps Water Treatment Works for a foul only connection to the Lanark Wastewater Treatment works. The development may impact upon infrastructure in the proximity of the development and Scottish Water should be contacted by the developer directly. Response: Noted. Surface water will be directed to soakaway basins and will not connect into the sewage network. 6.9. The Royal Burgh of Lanark Community Council – No objection subject to the development including appropriate drainage measures and not having a detrimental impact on associated services and facilities in the surrounding area. The development should also include appropriate street lighting, play areas and footpath links. Response: Noted. The development will include appropriate street lighting, play area and footpath links. In addition, affordable housing will be addressed through on-site provision and a financial contribution will be sought to address any educational impacts of the development. 7. Representations 7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement in the local press, no valid representations have been received. 8. Development Plan 8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all applications must be determined in accordance with the Development Plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 8.2. National Planning Framework 4 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy for Scotland. It sets out spatial principles, regional priorities, national developments and national planning policy. NPF4 supports the planning and delivery of sustainable places, liveable places and productive places. National Planning Framework 4 Policies Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation Policy 3 – Biodiversity Policy 6 - Forestry, woodland and trees Policy 9 - Brownfield, vacant and derelict land and empty buildings Policy 13 Sustainable transport Policy 14 - Design, quality and place Policy 15 - Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods Policy 16 - Quality homes Policy 17 - Rural homes Policy 21 - Play, recreation and sport 8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard the application site and associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies Policy 2 - Climate Change Policy 3 - General Urban Areas and Settlements Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking 36
Page 37
Policy 7 - Community Infrastructure Assessment Policy 11 - Housing Policy 12 - Affordable Housing Policy 15 - Travel and Transport SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies Policy GBRA1 - Rural Design and Development Policy GBRA5 - Redevelopment of Previously Developed Land Containing Buildings 9. Guidance 9.1. None applicable 10. Assessment and Discussion 10.1. The determining issues in the consideration of this application are its compliance with National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). 10.2. Climate Change Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of the SLLDP2 relate to the climate crises and identify that all development should seek to minimise and mitigate the effects of climate change. 10.3. The site is not identified on SEPA flooding maps as being at risk of flooding. Proposed sustainable urban drainage systems (SUDS) will effectively manage surface water runoff, benefitting neighbouring properties and the drainage network. If approved, conditions will be attached requiring the implementation of a landscaping scheme which includes native tree and hedgerow planting. The proposal involves development of vacant brownfield land served by good public transport links. Overall, the proposal would not compromise the objectives of NPF4 Policies 1 and Policy 2 and SLLDP2 Policy 2. 10.4. Principle of Development NPF4 Policy 17 Rural homes advises that development proposals for new homes in rural areas will be supported where the development is suitably scaled, sited and designed to be in keeping with the character of the area and the development can meet one of the following criteria: the site is allocated for housing in the Local Development Plan; reuses a redundant or unused building; supports a viable rural business; is for a retired farmer; reuses brownfield land where a return to a natural state has not or will not happen without intervention; or, is for a one to one replacement of an existing house. 10.5. The application site could be defined as brownfield land because of its previous use as a barracks. It contained numerous military style buildings including an indoor shooting range, Officers Mess, administrative blocks and Naffi. Although there is evidence of hardstanding throughout the site it has largely reverted to scrub, comprising young trees, wildflowers and gorse. Therefore, considering these circumstances the proposal does not meet criteria NPF4 Policy 17 a) ii where a return to a natural state would not be possible without intervention. 10.6. However, the site is subject of Planning Permission CL/06/0345 for 347 dwellings and conversion of 4 Listed Buildings. This consent was implemented with two of the Listed Buildings (Sandhurst Building and Sergeants Mess) having been converted and 32 townhouses built, thereby ensuring Planning Permission CL/06/0345 remains extant. The remaining approved dwellings, within the current application site area and the 37
Page 38
adjoining residential site, being progressed by Ogilvie Homes, could in effect still be built. The change proposed by the current application principally relates to a change in house types. It is therefore considered that this application can be supported as a departure from the development plan in recognition of the development history of the site. 10.7. Policy 4 ‘Green Belt and Rural Area’ of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 specifies that within the Rural Area the aim is to protect the amenity of the countryside while at the same time, supporting small scale development in the right places that is appropriate in land use terms and is of a high environmental quality that will support the needs of communities. Generally, it is expected that houses will be accommodated within identified settlements other than circumstances including redevelopment of previously developed land containing buildings. 10.8. SLLDP2 Policy GBRA5 ‘Redevelopment of Previously Developed Land Containing Buildings’ outlines a number of criteria relevant to redevelopment proposals. Although consented prior to the adoption of SLLDP2, the appropriateness of a brownfield development, (which did contain buildings, since demolished) in this rural location has been established by the previous consent CL/06/0345 which remains extant. As the proposal under consideration will not have an adverse impact on the wider area in terms of landscape character and setting it is reasonable to conclude that it complies with SLLDP2 Policies 4 and GBRA5. 10.9. NPF4 Policy 16 – Quality homes seek to encourage, promote and facilitate the delivery of high quality homes, in the right locations. It advises that development proposals for new homes on land not allocated for housing in the local development plan will only be supported in limited circumstances, where there is an agreed timescale for build- out, where they are consistent with the spatial strategy and local living and in rural locations, must be consistent with the policy on rural homes. 10.10. In this case, the proposal contravenes policy criteria above for rural homes. However, the proposal represents a housing opportunity, served by a public bus route and within reasonable walking and cycling distance of Lanark. The layout will be enhanced by extensive amenity open space, tree planting and structured landscaping. The landscaping scheme will contribute to biodiversity. The applicant, a national house builder, has carried out extensive market research and on those findings is confident of significant demand for new housing in the locality. The site was previously identified as a housing supply site and the current proposal would include 30 affordable units. Redeveloping unattractive vacant land with a sensitively designed residential development will result in environmental and amenity improvements. The applicant has provided a Statement of Community Benefit. For these reasons and the reasons elaborated in paragraph 10.5 above, a departure from policy can be justified. 10.11. NPF4 Policy 9 Brownfield, vacant, derelict land and empty buildings - the relevant sections states: ‘Development proposals that will result in the sustainable reuse of brownfield land including vacant and derelict land and buildings, whether permanent or temporary, will be supported. In determining whether the reuse is sustainable, the biodiversity value of brownfield land which has naturalised should be taken into account’ and ‘Where land is known or suspected to be unstable or contaminated, development proposals will demonstrate that the land is, or can be made, safe and suitable for the proposed new use’. 10.12. Although the site has started to regenerate, the scrub habitat is not considered to have significant biodiversity value. Proposed biodiversity enhancement will ensure the housing development can be integrated into its setting without detriment to overall 38
Page 39
biodiversity value. The proposed development will result in the sustainable reuse of brownfield land which formerly operated as a military barracks. A comprehensive Ground Investigation Report has been submitted containing survey results, assessments, and recommendations for remediation. As a precaution, Environmental Services in their consultation response recommended conditions requiring the submission and implementation of a remediation strategy. In consideration the proposal complies with NPF4 Policy 9. 10.13. SLLDP2 Policy 11 - Housing supports development included in the housing land supply audit and identified in the Local Plan proposals map. If, during the period of the plan, a shortfall in the five year supply of effective land is identified, the Council will support development proposals which are effective and capable of meeting the identified shortfall. This includes non-effective sites that can now be demonstrated to be effective and additional brownfield sites. 10.14. Although identified as a windfall site in the recent South Lanarkshire Housing Land Audit (CL5035 Winston Barracks) the application site is not identified in the Local Plan proposal map. Under previous Local Plans it had been identified as allocated housing land. For many years only a small proportion of the approved dwellings subject of Planning Permission CL/06/0345 for 347 dwellings had been completed leaving the impression that most of the site was non-effective. The recent submission of Planning Applications for the remaining site area by Miller Homes and Ogilvie now demonstrates an intention to progress a residential development. In helping to meet latent demand for housing, the terms of SLLDP2 Policy 11 have not been compromised. 10.13. Layout, Siting and Design NPF4 Policy 14 Design Quality and Place and SLLDP2 Policy 5 Development Management and Placemaking and Policy GBRA1 Rural Design and Development, aim to ensure well designed development that makes for successful places and considers the impact on residential amenity and the appropriateness of the development to a rural setting. 10.14. Informal open space, a village green and plays areas, structural landscaping, links to the existing path network and safe vehicle access to and from the site will create a sense of place with the benefits of a rural lifestyle. A range of housing styles and sizes will be provided, adaptable to the needs of families, couples and individuals. Landscaping and new woodland planting will contribute to visual screening whilst enhancing the overall setting of the development. The proposed layout has been designed in a manner which ensures that the amenity and privacy of existing and future residents will not be compromised. Connections and linkages through to the adjacent Ogilvie residential development (Planning Application P/26/0092), will allow these two parcels of development to function as a single unified neighbourhood. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services in their consultation response did not raise any public or traffic safety issues. There are no infrastructure constraints. The proposal will not impact upon landscape features, protected habitats, or species. The proposal is therefore satisfactory in terms of NFP4 Policy 14 and SLLDP2 Policies 5 and GBRA1. 10.15. NPF4 Policy 15 relates to local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods. It seeks to create connected and compact neighbourhoods where people can meet the majority of their daily needs within a reasonable distance of their home, preferably by using sustainable transport. 39
Page 40
10.16. There are footpath connections into Lanark racecourse, Lanark Moor Country Park and Springbank cemetery. Lanark market and a veterinary clinic are only 250m to the west. The site lies close to a bus stop, where a frequent bus service to Lanark can be accessed – in Lanark there is a wide range of shops, services, business, schools, a medical centre, train station and leisure facilities. There are safe pedestrian routes into Lanark via the Racecourse. Lanark is only 2km to the west which is a reasonable walking and cycling distance. Within the development an extensive area of landscaped amenity space with play facilities will be laid out to meet the recreational needs of a range of ages. In view of the circumstances described, the proposal does on balance accord with the aims and intent of Policy 15 Local Living and 20 minute neighbourhoods of National Planning Framework 4. 10.17. Community Infrastructure Assessment SLLDP2 Policy 7 Community Infrastructure Assessment states where development proposals would require capital or other works or facilities to enable to proceed, financial contributions towards their implementation will be required. 10.18. SLLDP2 Policy 12 – Affordable housing advice for sites of 20 or more units advises 25% of capacity should be allocated on site. If on site provision is not viable, then a contribution towards affordable housing on alternative sites within the housing catchment area will be sought. 10.19. There have been no requests from Roads or Community facilities for contributions. A contribution for Education in relation to primary and nursery provision is required. Housing advise that there should be onsite provision of 30 affordable units which is deemed sufficient to accommodate local housing need. The applicant has agreed to building these units. Revisions to layout and house types show affordable housing in accordance with the appropriate specification. The terms of SLLDP2 Policies 7 and 12 can be complied with and the decision will not be issued until the conclusion of a Section 75 agreement covering the contributions and onsite provision of affordable housing. 10.20. Play, Recreation and Sport NPF4 Policy 21 – Play recreation and sport advises that residential development incorporates well designed, good quality provision for play, recreation, and relaxation that is proportionate to the scale and nature of the development. New residential areas should be inclusive and enable children and young people to play and move around safely and independently, maximising opportunities for informal and incidental play in the neighbourhood. 10.21. The proposed layout identifies a toddler play area in the central village green and another play area has been proposed for the public amenity space, close to the entrance. If Planning Permission is granted a condition will be applied requiring approval of the details for the proposed play areas. There will be a network of paths, formal and informal, throughout the site and along the woodland perimeter. The neighbouring Lanark Racecourse and Lanark Moor Country Park have facilities including all weather pitches and mountain bike routes providing recreational opportunities for local residents. In consideration the terms of NPF4 Policy 21 can be met. 40
Page 41
10.22. Travel and Transport NPF4 Policy 13 Sustainable Transport states that for significant car generating developments, a Transport Assessment and Travel Plan would be required. Over reliance on private car journeys will be discouraged. SLLDP2 Policy 15 Travel and Transport advises that active travel and the availability and/or provision of public transport facilities and access to, should be fundamental design and locational elements of new development. 10.23. A Transport Assessment has been submitted, and Roads agree with the conclusions of the report that the additional traffic generation will not adversely impact upon the road network. New priority junctions have been designed to a satisfactory standard, adequate parking can be provided, and the road system includes traffic calming measures and safe crossings. The layout will have segregated and safe links to local facilities via walking and cycling networks. The residential development is accessible by public transport. There are regular buses to Lanark where a wide range of shops, services and employment opportunities can be accessed. At Lanark Railway Station a regular train service to Hamilton, Glasgow and the wider conurbation is available. In considering these factors the proposal accords with NPF4 Policy 13 and SLLDP2 Policy 15. 10.24. Natural and Historic Environment NPF4 Policy 3 Biodiversity relates to biodiversity and details that all local development shall include appropriate measures to conserve, restore and enhance biodiversity. 10.25. NPF4 Policy 6 Forestry, woodland and trees seeks to ensure development proposals enhance, expand and improve woodland and tree cover. 10.26. Existing woodland belts will be retained and enhanced with additional tree planting along the edges thereby facilitating ecological corridors for wildlife. Wherever possible existing trees will be retained and protected. Trees and hedgerow will be planted throughout the site. Flowering meadows will be established to encourage pollinators. No buildings with potential for bat roosts will be removed or altered unless Licence authorisation from NatureScot has been obtained. Recommendations in the Badger Monitoring Report will be complied with. The Landscaping Strategy includes a Biodiversity Enhancement Plan. Therefore, the proposal accords with NPF4 Policies 3 and 6. 10.27. Conclusion The proposal will result in the development of vacant land adjoining Lanark and will help meet demand for housing in the Lanark area. Whilst the proposal does not fully comply with the current land use policies contained in the development plan, the extant planning permission for a residential development on the site is a significant material consideration. The proposed layout reflects the extant permission and is considered to be acceptable. On balance, it is considered that this proposal can be supported as a departure. Overall, it is an appropriate form of development at this location. 11. Recommendation and Conditions 11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- Grant Detailed Planning Permission subject to conditions and the conclusion of a Section 75 agreement (or other appropriate legal agreement) to secure 30 affordable housing units within the site (or suitable alternative arrangement) and for financial contributions towards educational provision (nursery and primary school provision):- 41
Page 42
In accordance with agreed procedure, should there be no significant progress, on behalf of the applicant, towards the conclusion of the Planning Obligation within 6 months of the date of the Committee, the proposed development may be refused on the basis that, without the planning control/developer contribution which would be secured by the Planning Obligation, the proposed development would be unacceptable. Conditions 01. The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice. Reason: To comply with Section 58(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 02. That before development starts, full details of the design and location of all fences and walls, including any retaining walls to be erected on the site shall be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority. Thereafter the development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure the development is satisfactory in appearance and to maintain the visual quality of the area. 03. That no trees, identified on the approved Landscaping plans for retention, shall be felled, removed or otherwise affected without the prior written consent of the Council as Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of amenity and to ensure the protection and maintenance of the existing trees and other landscape features within the site. 04. The tree protection measures and arboricultural recommendations listed in the Arboricultural Impact Assessment (Envirocentre Ltd, September 2025) shall be fully complied with. Reason: To ensure that the trees to be retained will not be damaged during construction and to protect and enhance the appearance and character of the site and locality. 05. That the landscaping scheme relating to the development hereby approved shall be carried out and completed simultaneously with the development. Reason: In the interests of the visual amenity of the area. 06. The recommendations and mitigation measures as listed in the Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (Wild Surveys Ltd, August 2025), Badger Monitoring (Wild Surveys, May 2026) and Dusk Emergence Surveys (Wild Surveys Ltd, August 2026) shall be fully complied with. Reason: In the interests of biodiversity and wildlife 07. Prior to work commencing on the site, a scheme for the provision of play area(s) within the site shall be submitted to the Council as Planning Authority for written approval and shall include:- 42
Page 43
(a) details of the type and location of play equipment, seating and litter bins to be situated within the play area(s); (b) details of the surface treatment of the play area, including the location and type of safety surface to be installed; (c) details of the fences to be erected around the play area(s); and (d) details of the phasing for the completion of these works unless agreed in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate play facilities within the site and in order to retain effective planning control. 08. No development shall commence unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority until drainage details have been provided and approved which demonstrate compliance with the principles of sustainable urban drainage systems and with the Council's Developer Design Guidance (May 2020). These details shall include the submission of the following signed appendices:- C 'Sustainable Drainage Design Compliance certificate', D 'Sustainable Drainage Design Independent Check Certificate' and E 'Confirmation of Future Maintenance of Sustainable Drainage Apparatus’. Thereafter development shall not be occupied until the surface drainage works have been completed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the disposal of surface water from the site is dealt with in a safe and sustainable manner, to return it to the natural water cycle with minimal adverse impact on people and the environment and to alleviate the potential for on-site and off-site flooding. 09. Prior to development commencing on site, a scheme for the control and mitigation of dust shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. No changes to the approved scheme shall take place unless agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. The scheme shall thereafter be implemented during construction on site. Reason: To minimise the risk of nuisance from dust to nearby occupants. 10. No piling works shall be carried out until a method statement has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. This statement shall include an assessment of the impact of the piling on surrounding properties, taking into account the guidance contained in BS 6472: 1992 'Evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings'. It shall detail any procedures which are proposed to minimise the impact of noise and vibration on the occupants of surrounding properties. This statement shall be prepared by a suitably qualified person, and the piling works shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved method statement. Reason: To minimise noise, vibration and disturbance to neighbouring residents/occupants during blasting. 43
Page 44
11. That prior to the commencement of development, details of the construction, surface density of materials, final position and maintenance scheme of the acoustic barriers, as recommended by the Noise Impact Assessment (Envirocentre, April 2026) shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Authority. The approved acoustic barrier shall be installed prior to the occupation of the dwellings, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To protect residents from unreasonable levels of road traffic noise. 12. Prior to the commencement of development full details of the glazing components and trickle vents proposed to be used at the properties most exposed to road traffic noise shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Thereafter the development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details. Reason: To ensure that the internal noise levels shall complies with BS 8233:2014 Guidance on sound insulation and noise reduction for buildings. 13. A detailed remediation strategy, which takes cognisance of the conclusions and recommendations of the Site Investigation Report (Mason Evans, January 2025) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Council as Planning Authority. No works other than investigative works shall be carried out on site prior to receipt of the Council's written approval of the remediation plan. Reason: To avoid unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, to ensure that the land is remediated and made suitable for its proposed use. 14. (a) Remediation of the site shall be carried out in accordance with the approved remediation plan prior to the occupation of dwellings. Any amendments to the approved remediation plan shall not be implemented unless approved in writing by the Planning Authority. (b) On completion of the remediation works, the developer shall submit a completion report to the Planning Authority, confirming that the works have been carried out in accordance with the approved remediation plan and that the works have successfully reduced these risks to acceptable levels. (c) Any previously unsuspected contamination which becomes evident during the development of the site shall be brought to the attention of the Planning Authority within one week or earlier of it being identified. A more detailed site investigation to determine the extent and nature of the contaminant(s) and a site-specific risk assessment of any associated pollutant linkages, shall then require to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To avoid unacceptable risks to human health and the environment, to ensure that the land is remediated and made suitable for its proposed use. 12. Reason for Decision 12.1. The principle of a residential development on the site is contrary to Policies 17 and 16 of National Planning Framework 4. However, planning permission was previously granted for 347 dwellings on the site and that permission remains extant. The remaining approved dwellinghouses can therefore still be constructed and the site is 44
Page 45
identified in the South Lanarkshire Housing Land Audit as a windfall development site. These factors are a significant material consideration. The proposal will not adversely impact on residential amenity, biodiversity and road safety, and makes optimum use of vacant land, helping to meet demand for housing. The proposal accords with Policies 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 21 of National Planning Framework 4 and policies 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 12, 15, GBRA1 and GBRA5 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. On balance, it is considered that this proposal can be supported as a departure since it is an appropriate form of development at this location. Kevin Carr Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Date: 29 September 2026 Background Papers P/26/0458 Erection of 207 dwellings, landscaping, open space, access, drainage and associated works Corporate Considerations The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications. Any implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- E-mail: planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 45
Page 46
46
Page 47
Addendum Specifying Heads of Terms in relation to any relevant legal agreement Planning Application No. P/26/0458 Development Description Erection of 207 dwellings, landscaping, open space, access, drainage and associated works Site Address Winston Barracks, Robertson Drive, Lanark Applicant Miller Homes Scotland West / Abbey Developments (Lanark) Ltd Date of Committee 6 October 2026 Type of obligation Section 75 or an appropriate alternative legal agreement such as a Section 69 agreement. Obligations Resource Summary of Required Contributions Community N/A Education Contributions are required for primary and nursery provision within the surrounding area. Housing On site provision of affordable housing. Roads N/A 47
Page 48
48
Page 49
Report Agenda Item Report to: Planning Committee Date of Meeting: 6 October 2026 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Reference no: P/26/0470 Proposal: Erection of four dwellinghouses, vehicular access and associated infrastructure and landscaping (Planning Permission in Principle) Site Address: Land Northeast of 41 Covanburn Avenue, Hamilton, ML3 7PX Applicant: Hamilton and Kinneil Estates Ltd Agent: Interurban Developments Ltd Ward: 19 Hamilton South Application Type: Planning Permission in Principle Advert Type: Hamilton Advertiser – 9 July 2026 Development Plan Compliance: Yes Departures: N/A Recommendation: Grant subject to conditions Legal Agreement: N/A Direction to Scottish Ministers N/A 6 49
Page 50
1. Reason for Report 1.1. The application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee under the South Lanarkshire Council Scheme of Delegation as it has received more than 5 objections. 2. Site Description 2.1. The site is within Silvertonhill, which is an established residential area in Hamilton. Covanburn Avenue is a no through road which is characterised by detached houses finished in a mix of red brick and dry dash render that sit within relatively large plots. 2.2. The proposed site is an area of grassed open space located off the hammer head at the end of the street. The site extends to 3,369 square metres and is essentially rectangular in shape. To the southeast the site is bounded by Covanburn Woods, on all other sides the site is bounded by residential properties. The site slopes northwest to southeast from the rear gardens of the houses in Lilac Hill and Oak Lea down to Covanburn Woods. Along the boundary at the top of the slope there are 4 large, mature sycamore trees. 3. Description of Proposed Development 3.1. Planning permission in principle is sought for the erection of four dwellinghouses, creation of an access with associated infrastructure and landscaping. 3.2. The proposed access would extend from the end of Covanburn Avenue and the first three houses would sit to the northwest of the access. The first house would keep to the same front building line as 41 Covanburn Avenue and the remainder would be set back in line with the shape of the site so that the fourth house would sit at the end of the access. The plots and houses would be similar in scale to those in the surrounding area. 4. Relevant Planning History 4.1. The are no previous planning applications relative to this site. 5. Supporting Information 5.1. In support of the application, the following documents were submitted:- Supporting Statement Tree Survey 6. Consultations 6.1. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services – no objections subject to conditions covering a dropped kerb access, a pedestrian footway, a drainage system and suitable parking per unit. Response: Noted. 6.2. Environmental Services – no objections. Response: Noted. 6.3. Scottish Water – no objections. Response: Noted. 50
Page 51
7. Representations 7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, 21 letters of representation were received objecting to the application. The issues raised are summarised as follows:- Loss of an area of well used amenity space. The land is managed and maintained by the Low Waters Feuars Association which residents have financed. Loss of a nature corridor and disruption to biodiversity of the area, particularly nesting birds, owls and animals including bats, badgers, foxes and deer, some of which are protected. Increase in traffic as the existing routes in and out of Silvertonhill are already very busy. There are no details about the topography of the land, design of each plot or impact on trees. Road safety issues from loss of the turning head and additional traffic at the end of the road. The proposal risks creating an incongruous and more intrusive form of development that is inconsistent with the established character of the area and would be overdevelopment. Negative impact on health and wellbeing from the loss of greenspace. Loss of access to Covanburn Woods. There is no public benefit and the harm caused would be disproportionate to the limited housing gain. There is no Environmental Impact Assessment. Hamilton and Kinneil Estates have only taken over management of the land in recent years and gave a guarantee it would not be built on. There are no elevations so it is impossible to determine if there will be overlooking or overshadowing issues. 7.2. The above issues are considered in the assessment below and full copies are available to view on the planning portal. 8. Development Plan 8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. 8.2. National Planning Framework 4 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and supports the planning and delivery of sustainable, liveable and productive places. National Planning Framework 4 Policies Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation Policy 13 - Sustainable transport Policy 14 - Design, quality and place Policy 15 - Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods Policy 16 - Quality homes 51
Page 52
8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will, therefore, assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard, the application site and associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2:- SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies Policy 2 - Climate Change Policy 3 – General Urban Areas and Settlements Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies Policy DM1 - New Development Design Policy NHE4 - Gardens and Designed Landscape 9. Guidance 9.1. None applicable. 10. Assessment and Discussion 10.1. Principle of Development The site is located within the general urban area where SLLDP2 Policy 3 applies. This policy seeks to ensure that development proposals make a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the environment in which they are located, taking account of, and being integrated with, the local context and built form. The site is identified as grassed open space within the urban area in the local plan. Residential development is therefore generally acceptable providing it does not have a detrimental impact on neighbours or the surrounding area. 10.2. Climate Change Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of SLLDP2 seek to promote developments that address the global climate emergency and nature crisis. All development should aim to minimise and mitigate the effects of climate change. Given the scale and nature of the proposed development, it is not considered that any action is required within the context of this application. Further details of sustainable technologies such as solar panels could be provided in a future detailed planning application. 10.3. Layout, Siting and Design The site is located in an established residential area of Hamilton where SLLDP2 Policy 3 - General Urban Areas and Settlements applies. Also applicable are, NPF4 Policy 13 – Sustainable transport which aims to encourage, promote, and facilitate developments that prioritise active travel and public transport and reduce the need to travel unsustainably. NPF4 Policy 15 – Local living and 20-minute neighbourhoods aims to create neighbourhoods which provide for the daily needs of residents without a need to make long journeys and NPF4 Policy 16 – Quality Homes, seeks to encourage, promote, and facilitate the delivery of high-quality homes, in the right locations. Given that the site would be in an existing residential area where daily needs could be reached within a reasonable distance of their home, and potentially using sustainable transport options, it is considered that the proposal for four dwellinghouses is acceptable at this location and would comply with SLLDP2 Policy 3 and NPF4 Policies 13, 15 and 16. 52
Page 53
10.4. Policy 14 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and DM1 of the SLLDP2 relate to the quality and design of a development. Policy 14 – Design, quality and place seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate well designed development that makes successful places. Proposals will be supported where they are consistent with the 6 qualities of successful places. It confirms that proposals which are poorly designed, detrimental to the amenity of the surrounding area or inconsistent with the 6 qualities of place will not be supported. SLLDP2 Policy DM1 aims to promote quality and sustainability in the design of new houses and states that their design and layout should enhance or make a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the environment in which they are located. 10.5. In this instance, the application is for planning permission in principle and, as such, there are no details of the proposed houses as part of this application. It shall therefore be up to the applicant to ensure that they take these policies into account when they submit their further application. However, in general terms it is considered that the site has sufficient space to accommodate four dwellinghouses with appropriate access, car parking and amenity space. In light of this, it is considered that the proposal is acceptable in terms of Policy 14 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and DM1 of the SLLDP2. 10.6. The most southern portion of the site falls within the Chatelherault Garden and Designed Landscape covered by Policy NHE4 of the SLLDP. Development affecting sites listed in the Inventory of Gardens and Designed Landscapes shall protect, preserve and, where appropriate, enhance such places and shall not significantly impact adversely upon their character, important views to, from and within them, or upon the site or setting of component features which contribute to their value. It is not considered that a significant portion of the site falls within this designation. However, it does cover Covanburn Woods which runs along the southeastern boundary and, as such, the development will have to consider the siting and design of the houses carefully in any future application to ensure that they do not detract from the designated landscape. 10.7. Conclusion The principle of a small scale development of 4 dwellings within the urban area is considered to be acceptable. The proposed dwellinghouses and associated works will not result in an adverse impact on residential or visual amenity and comply with Policies 1, 2, 14, 15, 16 of National Planning Framework 4 and Policies 2, 3, 5, DM1 and NHE4 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. Overall, the proposal is considered to be an acceptable form of development at this location. 11. Recommendation and Conditions 11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- Grant planning permission in principle subject to the following conditions:- 01. The development to which this permission in principle relates shall be begun no later than the expiration of five years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice. Reason: To comply with Section 59 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). 53
Page 54
02. Prior to the commencement of development on site, a further application(s) for the approval of any of the matters specified in this condition must be submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority, in accordance with the timescales and other limitations in section 59 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended). These matters are as follows:- (a) the layout of the site, including all roads, footways, parking areas and open spaces; (b) the siting, design and external appearance of all building(s) and any other structures, including plans and elevations showing their dimensions and type and colour of external materials; (c) detailed cross-sections of existing and proposed ground levels, details of underbuilding and finished floor levels in relation to a fixed datum, preferably ordnance datum; (d) the design and location of all boundary treatments including walls and fences; (e) the landscaping proposals for the site, including details of existing trees and other planting to be retained together with proposals for new planting specifying number, size and species of all trees and shrubs, including, where appropriate, the planting of fruit/apple trees; (f) the means of drainage and sewage disposal; (g) electric vehicle charging; (h) surface water drainage; and (i) details of the phasing of development. Reason: To comply with section 59 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 as amended. 03. The surface water drainage arrangements to be submitted in relation to Condition no. 2 will require to comply with the principles of sustainable urban drainage systems and with the Council's Sustainable Drainage Design Criteria and shall include signed appendices as required. The development shall not be occupied until the surface drainage works have been completed in accordance with the details submitted to and approved by the Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that the disposal of surface water from the site is dealt with in a safe and sustainable manner, to return it to the natural water cycle with minimal adverse impact on people and the environment and to alleviate the potential for on-site and off-site flooding. 04. Notwithstanding Condition 2, the detailed design for the site should ensure that:- 1) A 2m wide footway would be required to be provided along the frontage of the site where it meets the adopted road. 2) Where the new footway is being provided, the existing lighting column would have to be relocated. 3) The entrance to the proposed properties would require a dropped kerb access. 4) A drainage system is required to prevent water flowing onto the proposed adopted footway. 54
Page 55
5) Parking for each property shall be as per the National Roads Development Guide (NRDG) (i.e. 2/3-bedroom house requires 2 spaces, 4 or more-bedroom house requires 3 spaces). A parking bay shall be 6m x 3m in size. 6) The proposed access would be private and not adopted by the Council. 7) The access onto Covanburn Avenue should be 5.0m wide and the first 6m behind the new footway should be of a bound material to prevent deleterious material spilling onto the public road. 8) The width of the shared joint access should be 3.7m wide. Reason: To ensure the provision of adequate parking, access arrangements for both pedestrians and vehicles and drainage for the development is provided. Kevin Carr Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Date: 29 September 2026 Background Papers Further information relating to the application can be found online:- P/26/0470 | Erection of four dwellinghouses, vehicular access and associated infrastructure and landscaping | Land 55M Northeast Of 41 Covanburn Avenue Covanburn Avenue Hamilton South Lanarkshire Corporate Considerations The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications. Any implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- E-mail: planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 55
Page 56
56
Page 57
Report Agenda Item CHECKED Report to: Planning Committee Date of Meeting: 6 October 2026 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Reference no: P/26/0918 Proposal: Erection of two dwellings and associated works Site Address: Hawks Close Cleghorn Lanark ML11 8NX Applicant: Mr W Cruickshank Jnr Agent: Neville Design Ltd Ward: 02 – Clydesdale North Application Type: Full Planning Permission Advert : Carluke Gazette - 12 August 2026 Development Plan Compliance: No Departures: N/A Recommendation: Refuse Legal Agreement: N/A Direction to Scottish Ministers N/A 7 57
Page 58
1. Reason for Report 1.1. The application is required to be determined by the Planning Committee under the South Lanarkshire Council Scheme of Delegation (2024) as the Head of Planning and Regulatory Services, in consultation with the Chair of the Planning Committee, has determined that it raises policy issues meriting consideration by the Planning Committee. 2. Site Description 2.1. The site relates to land at Hawks Close, Upper Muirhouse Farm, which is located between the Harelaw Roundabout and Braehead. The site is within the rural area. 2.2. Excluding the access, the rectangular site for the house plots extends to approximately 0.13 hectares and lies between the recently constructed dwellings at Falconers Lane and Hawks Close, and the existing property at Mid Muirhouse Farm. 2.3. It is set back from the public road and, aside from the immediate cluster of new houses, the wider surroundings consist of woodland and agricultural fields. Although adjacent land has been subject to development in recent years, the application site itself has not previously been developed and remains an undeveloped area. 3. Description of Proposed Development 3.1. The development comprises the erection of two single storey dwellinghouses together with associated works. These works include the formation of a private access taken from Hawks Close, boundary enclosures, and connection to the existing private surface water and foul drainage system which serves the neighbouring dwellings. 3.2. The proposed houses would be identical but handed and have a 160m2 rectangular footprint, including integral garage, a gable roof finished in concrete tile with a ridge height of 7.7m; external walls finished in white wet dash render and reconstituted stone, with a height to the eaves of 2.6m; and modern fenestration including front and rear French doors. 4. Relevant Planning History 4.1. Seven houses were built at Upper Muirhouse Farm over the footprint of three agricultural sheds. Five have been given the address Falconers Lane (P/20/1666) and two as Hawks Close (P/24/1079). The site of this application lies between these houses and Mid Muirhouse Farm, a recent dwelling (CL/07/0730) which was developed by the applicant to support a deer enterprise. 4.2. The planning obligation was subsequently removed (CL/12/0036 and CL/12/0226) and the dwelling now exists independently. 4.3. This is the second application for the proposed dwellings. The first (P/25/1095) was withdrawn on 26 January 2026 prior to its scheduled presentation to the Planning Committee on 27 January 2026. 5. Supporting Information 5.1. A supporting statement has been submitted which contends that the site should be regarded as previously developed land and therefore suitable for residential development. It also asserts that the proposal would complete a gap between existing dwellings. 58
Page 59
6. Consultations 6.1. Roads Development Management – no objection to the proposed development. Response: Noted. 6.2. Environmental Services – no objections to the proposed development. Response: Noted. 6.3. Scottish Water – The site is within the catchment of the Coulter Water Treatment Works but there is no public wastewater infrastructure within the vicinity. Response: Noted. 7. Representations 7.1. Following the statutory period of neighbour notification and advertisement, no valid third-party representations have been received. 8. Development Plan 8.1. Under Section 25 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, all applications must be determined in accordance with the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. The development plan comprises the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and National Planning Framework 4. 8.2. National Planning Framework 4 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and supports the planning and delivery of sustainable places, liveable places, and productive places. National Planning Framework 4 Policies Policy 1 Tackling the climate and nature crises Policy 2 Climate mitigation and adaptation Policy 3 Biodiversity Policy 13 Sustainable transport Policy 14 Design, quality and place Policy 15 Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods Policy 17 Rural homes Policy 22 Flood risk and water management 8.3. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) For the purposes of determining planning applications the Council will, therefore, also assess proposals against the policies contained within the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2). In this regard, the application site and associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the SLLDP2. SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies Policy 2 Climate Change Policy 4 Green Belt and Rural Area Policy 5 Development Management and Placemaking SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policies Policy SDCC3 Sustainable Drainage Systems Policy SDCC7 Low Carbon Emissions from New Buildings Policy GBRA1 Rural Design and Development Policy GBRA8 Development of Gap Sites Policy DM15 Water Supply Policy DM16 Foul Drainage/Sewerage Provision 59
Page 60
9. Guidance 9.1. None applicable. Assessment and Discussion 10.1. Principle of Development Policy 17 of NPF4 and Policy 4 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 direct new housing to settlements unless specific rural exceptions apply. For new homes in the rural area without a demonstrated locational need, it must be shown that the proposal involves the reuse of brownfield land where a return to a natural state has not occurred and would not occur without intervention. 10.2. The supporting information identifies the application site as brownfield land associated with the former deer farming operation. However, that association does not, in itself, establish its status as brownfield land. The structures associated with the former operation have all been cleared, and their footprints have already been redeveloped to accommodate seven dwellings. The application site lies outwith those footprints, and no evidence has been provided to demonstrate that it was previously occupied by buildings or other structures. Its former inclusion within the curtilage or yard of the demolished buildings does not, in itself, justify further residential development. 10.3. A septic tank associated with the demolished agricultural buildings is reported to remain beneath the site. Its retention following demolition does not provide sufficient justification for two additional dwellings, particularly when the former building footprints have already been redeveloped for housing. The residential character of the group is now established, with no remaining incompatible structures or land uses that would justify a departure from the development plan. Allowing the site to return to a natural state would not significantly harm the amenity or character of the surrounding dwelling. 10.4. The applicant has also referred to the site as a gap site; however, Policy GBRA8 of SLLDP2 can only be applied once the principle of residential development in the rural area is established. 10.5. The proposal fails to meet the requirements for rural housing and is contrary to Policy 4 of SLLDP2 and Policy 17 of NPF4. 10.6. Sustainability Policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 and Policy 2 of SLLDP2 require development to minimise climate impacts. The proposed dwellings include solar panels and air source heat pumps. 10.7. Policy 3 of NPF4 requires development proposals to enhance the biodiversity value of the site and proposals have been made in this regard. 10.8. Policies 13 and 15 of NPF4 promote sustainable travel and access to daily services through active travel networks and public transport. The supporting statement argues that these policies should be applied proportionately and that two dwellings would generate only a marginal increase in travel demand. 10.9. However, the limited scale of the proposal does not overcome the site’s poor accessibility. The site is remote from services and lacks safe, direct active travel routes, making walking and cycling unrealistic options for everyday journeys. The development would therefore be heavily dependent on private cars. While such dependency may be accepted where there is a locational justification for the development, no such justification has been demonstrated in this case. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies 13 and 15 of National Planning Framework 4. 60
Page 61
10.10. Layout, Siting and Design Policy 14 of NPF4 and Policies 5 and GBRA1 of SLLDP2 seek high-quality design that responds to local character and avoids suburban forms of development in the rural area. The proposed dwellings replicate the house type, form, and materials used in the seven recently constructed properties at Falconers Lane and Hawks Close. Within this specific cluster, that approach results in a consistent appearance and an acceptable relationship with the existing built context. However, the design is not characteristic of the wider rural area and would not necessarily be appropriate on a standalone site. Its acceptability in this instance arises only from the presence of the established group. 10.11. The proposed layout and siting would not result in unacceptable levels of overshadowing or overlooking. The rear elevations are at least 7.2 metres from the front garden of 2 Hawks Close and, given the single-storey design and proposed boundary fencing, intervisibility would be limited. The proposed use is compatible with surrounding residential properties and noise is not expected to be significant. Construction impacts would be temporary and are not grounds for refusal. 10.12. Technical Matters Policy 22 of NPF4 and Policies DM15, DM16 and SDCC3 of SLLDP2 relate to water management and drainage. The site is not identified as being at flood risk, and private foul and surface water drainage would be via the existing system serving Falconers Lane and Hawks Close. Permeable surfacing could be secured to limit run-off. 10.13. Policy 5 of SLLDP2 requires development to provide suitable access and parking. The existing private access could serve five dwellings, which is below the requirement for adoption. Each plot proposes adequate parking and turning space. 10.14. Conclusion In summary, the site does not constitute previously developed land and no locational need for new housing in the rural area has been demonstrated as required by Policy 17 of NPF4. The site also lacks sustainable access to services and facilities, resulting in reliance on private vehicles. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policy 4 of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and Policies 13, 15 and 17 of National Planning Framework 4. 11. Recommendation and Reasons 11.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- Refuse Planning Permission for the following reasons:- 01. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 4 – Green Belts and Rural Areas of the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 as it is not supported by the Development Plan in land use terms. 02. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 17 – Rural homes of National Planning Framework 4 as it does not meet any of the criteria allowing for housing in the rural area. 61
Page 62
03. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 13 – Sustainable transport of National Planning Framework 4 as it would be dependent on unsustainable means of transport. 04. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 15 – Local living and 20 minute neighbourhoods as there is poor connectivity to daily needs by sustainable means. Kevin Carr Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Date: 29 September 2026 Background Papers Further information relating to the application can be found online:- P/26/0918 | Erection of two dwellinghouses and associated works | Hawks Close Cleghorn Lanark ML11 8NX Corporate Considerations The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications. Any implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- E-mail: planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 62
Page 63
63
Page 64
64
Page 65
Report Agenda Item Report to: Planning Committee Date of Meeting: 6 October 2026 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Reference no: P/26/0922 Proposal: Construction and Operation of Renewable Energy Development, comprising up to 21 Wind Turbines with maximum blade tip height of 220m with a combined generating capacity greater than 50MW, a Battery Energy Storage System of approximately 50MW and associated infrastructure (Section 36 Consultation). Site Address: Ravengill Energy Park B797 from Abington A702 to Leadhills South Lanarkshire Applicant: Ravengill Energy Park Limited Agent: Rambol UK Ltd Ward: 03 Clydesdale East Application Type: Electricity notification Section 36 application Advert Type: None Required Development Plan Compliance: No Departures: N/A Recommendation: That the Scottish Government Energy Consents Unit is informed that, for the reasons stated, South Lanarkshire Council object to the granting of consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 Legal Agreement: In the event that the application is granted the Scottish Government is also advised that any approval issued in respect of this application should be subject to the conclusion of a legal agreement(s) covering:- 1. Community Contribution Payments Direction to Scottish Ministers N/A 8 65
Page 66
1. Reason for Report 1.1. This matter is being presented to the Committee as the Chief Planning Officer, in consultation with the Committee Chair, considered that it raises significant levels of concern or policy issues. 2. Site Description 2.1. The site covers an area of approximately 2,555 ha and is located approximately 1 km north of Leadhills and 1.5 km south of Abington. 2.2. The site is located within the wider Southern Uplands area and consists of open upland moorland (much of which is managed for grouse and sheep grazing), improved grassland and semi-improved grassland, with areas of forestry located within the lower lying valleys located predominantly to the east of the B797. 2.3. The topography within the site is undulating with multiple named hills lying within the boundary of the site, this general landform being typical of the wider Southern Uplands. 2.4. There are multiple watercourses and water bodies within the boundary of the site, tributaries of the River Clyde, including Glengonnar Water in the north, Snar Water in the west and Elvan Water in the south, with the River Clyde itself lying approximately 1 km to the east of the site at its closest point. 2.5. The land within the immediate vicinity of the site is sparsely populated, with settlements confined largely to the valleys. The main settlements within the vicinity of the site are the villages of Leadhills, Abington, Elvanfoot, Wanlockhead and Crawfordjohn. There are three individual properties within the site boundary. 3. Description of Proposed Development 3.1. An application is made to the Scottish Government under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 for the construction and operation of a renewable energy development. 3.2. The proposed development would comprise of the following:- Up to 21 turbines with a maximum blade tip height of 220m Permanent foundations supporting each turbine and associated crane hardstanding pads A temporary construction site access from the A74(M) to allow for the delivery of abnormal indivisible loads required for turbine component delivery Two new junctions onto the B797 and two new junctions onto the C class road between the B797 and Crawfordjohn New on-site access tracks with associated watercourse crossings Underground power cables On-site substation and control building Temporary construction compounds and laydown areas A BESS with appropriately 50 MW capacity, co-located with the on-site sub- station Borrow pits Temporary on-site concrete batching plant 3.3. The scale of the proposed development, in terms of its generating capacity, is such that it needs to be consented through the Electricity Act, with the Scottish Government acting as the Consenting Authority. 3.4. The Council acts as a consultee and is not the Consenting Authority. 66
Page 67
4. Relevant Planning History 4.1. P/25/0683 – There was a Section 36 Scoping Request (Ref. P/25/0683) submitted and responded to relative to the Ravensgill Energy Park. 5. Supporting Information 5.1. The applicants have submitted supporting documents with the application as set out below:- Environmental Impact Assessment Report Community Benefits Statement 6. Consultations 6.1. The Council is a consultee in the Section 36 application process and therefore consultation by the Council is limited to Council services. A summary of the wider consultation responses received by the Scottish Government is also included below, as these may be relevant to the view of the Council. 6.2. Environmental Services (ES) – at the time of writing a response from ES has not been received. However, if the Council were minded to offer no objection to the proposed development, the standard conditions used by ES would be applicable. Response: Not applicable. 6.3. Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services (Development Management) – at the time of writing a response from Roads has not been received. However, if the Council were minded to offer no objection to the proposed development, the standard conditions used by Roads would be applicable. Response: Noted. 6.4. West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WoSAS) – at the time of writing a response from WoSAS has not been received. However, if the Council were minded to offer no objection to the proposed development, the standard conditions used by WoSAS would be applicable. Response: Noted. 6.5. The consultations undertaken by the Energy Consents Unit (ECU) are listed and summarised below:- Scottish Water - no objection to the proposed development. Edinburgh Airport - no objection to the proposed development. Health and Safety Executive (HSE) - no objection to the proposed development. Ministry of Defence (MoD) – they object to the proposal based upon impact on the Eskdalemuir facility and in terms of the impact on low flying routes in the area. National Air Traffic Services (NATS) – they have submitted a holding objection based upon potential impact on radar facilities. Glasgow Prestwick Airport - no objection to the proposed development. British Telecom - no objection to the proposed development. 67
Page 68
7. Representations 7.1. The Energy Consents Unit are responsible for carrying out statutory neighbour notification and publicity on the application. Any representations are sent directly to the ECU for consideration in their assessment of the Section 36 application. 8. Development Plan 8.1. The application has been submitted to the Scottish Government under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989. A planning application is required to be determined in accordance with the Development Plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise. However, for Section 36 applications, the Development Plan has the status of a material consideration which is required to be considered by the Scottish Ministers in the determination of the application. 8.2. The Council has been consulted in its role as the Planning Authority for the area in which the application site is located and therefore the Council’s response to the consultation request is required to be informed by an assessment against the provisions of the Development Plan. 8.3. Other material considerations pertinent to the application may also be considered. The Development Plan comprises the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 adopted in April 2021 and National Planning Framework 4 adopted by the Scottish Government in February 2023. 8.4. National Planning Framework 4 National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) is Scotland’s national spatial strategy and supports the planning and delivery of sustainable places, liveable places and productive places. National Planning Framework 4 Policies Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation Policy 3 - Biodiversity Policy 4 - Natural places Policy 5 - Soils Policy 6 - Forestry, woodland and trees Policy 7 - Historic assets and places Policy 11 - Energy Policy 29 - Rural development 8.5. South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (2021) The application site and associated proposals are affected by the following policies contained in the South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 (SLLDP2):- SLLDP2 Volume 1 Policies Policy 1 - Spatial Strategy Policy 2 - Climate Change Policy 4 - Green Belt and Rural Area Policy 5 - Development Management and Placemaking Policy 14 - Natural and Historic Environment Policy 15 - Travel and Transport Policy 16 - Water Environment and Flooding Policy 18 - Renewable Energy 68
Page 69
9. Guidance 9.1. The relevant guidance documents are:- South Lanarkshire Council (SLC) Supporting Planning Guidance Renewable Energy (January 2021) Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy (2019 as amended) 10. Assessment and Discussion 10.1. Principle of Development National Planning Policy Framework 4 (NPF4) sets out the long-term vision for the development of Scotland through the National Spatial Strategy. Amongst other things, NPF4 aims to meet Scotland’s climate ambition which will require a rapid transformation across all sectors of the economy and society. The Scottish Government’s Onshore Wind Policy Statement sets a target for installed onshore wind generation of 20GW by 2030. 10.2. NPF4 Policy 1 – Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises states that there is a need to encourage, promote and facilitate development that addresses the global climate emergency and nature crisis, whilst Policy 2 – Climate Change and Adaptation seeks to encourage, promote and facilitate development that minimises emissions and adapts to the current and future impacts of climate change. 10.3. In this case, the proposed development comprises the construction and operation of a wind farm, along with an associated battery energy storage system (BESS). It would assist in terms of the generation of renewable energy to enable the decarbonisation of Scotland’s energy supply and meet Net Zero targets. 10.4. It is considered that the proposed development is directly linked to renewable energy generation and supports the general principles which are set out in NPF4 Policies 1 and 2, in addition to Policy 1 – Spatial Strategy and Policy 2 – Climate Change of the SLLDP2. 10.5. Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 as a general principle encourages and promotes all forms of renewable energy development. This includes energy generation through wind farm development, solar arrays and energy storage (such as battery storage). The policy makes clear that development proposals for all forms of renewable, low carbon and zero emissions will be supported. 10.6. The policy also sets out a range of criteria that proposals should be assessed against to ensure the impact of the proposed development and any required mitigation is properly addressed. In terms of the matters that are within the remit of the Council as a consultee on the application, these include:- impacts on communities and individual dwellings, including, residential amenity, visual impact, noise and shadow flicker; significant landscape and visual impacts; public access, including impact on long distance walking and cycling routes and scenic routes; impacts on road traffic and on adjacent trunk roads, including during construction; and cumulative impacts. 69
Page 70
10.7. In terms of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2, Policy 18: Renewable Energy states that applications for renewable energy infrastructure developments will be supported subject to an assessment against the relevant criteria and requirements set out in the Assessment Checklist for Renewable Energy Proposals contained within SLLDP2 Volume 2. SLLDP2 Volume 2 Policy RE1 Renewable Energy supports Policy 18 and states that as well as the Checklist, renewable energy proposals should also take into account the considerations, criteria and guidance contained within the Supporting Planning Guidance (SPG) on Renewable Energy, Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy (2019 as amended) and other relevant policies in SLLDP2. 10.8. Together, NPF4 Policy 11, SLLDP2 Policy 18 and the associated SPG set out the criteria that are required to be addressed when determining applications of this scale and nature. The Landscape and Visual Assessment (LVIA) which forms part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is a key document in assessing the proposals, with it being considered that the landscape impact of the proposed development is the principle determining issue from the Council’s perspective. 10.9. Site History and Material Considerations In considering the landscape impact of the proposed development, cognisance must be had to the decision which was taken in respect of the proposed development of the Harryburn Wind Farm. 10.10. The proposed Harryburn Wind Farm was a Section 36 development which was determined (in the first instance) by the Electricity Consents Unit (ECU reference ECU00005277). The decision taken by the ECU was to refuse the application. This decision was subsequently appealed by the applicant (appeal reference WIN-380-1) and was the subject of a formal Inquiry. 10.11. Having considered all the evidence presented to them, it was the recommendation of the Reporter that the proposed application be refused, citing amongst other things, adverse landscape impacts. 10.12. This recommendation was accepted by the Scottish Ministers and by letter dated 27 September 2019. 10.13. The proposed Harryburn Wind Farm comprised a total of 16 wind turbines to a maximum height of 149.9m with associated supporting infrastructure. The relevance of the Harryburn proposals to the current application is that 13 of the 21 turbines (turbine numbers 9 – 21) are located on the same area of land covered by the proposed Harryburn development. 10.14. Whilst the terms of the development plan have changed since the decision was taken on the Harryburn application, SSP3 having been replaced by NPF4 and the SLLDP2 having replaced the former local plan, the nature of the relevant policy considerations, as outlined above, has not changed. 10.15. Landscape and Visual Impact The changes to the details of the development plan have not changed the approach which requires to be followed in terms of assessing the potential landscape impact of the proposed development. 70
Page 71
10.16. Those considerations concluded that the Harryburn development would give rise to adverse landscape impacts and are equally relevant to the Ravengill development, with it being of importance to note that it is considered that these adverse landscape impacts will be exacerbated by two factors. 10.17. Firstly, the turbines proposed as part of the Ravengill proposal would stand some 70m taller in height to blade tip than those proposed as part of the Harryburn development and secondly, turbine numbers 1 – 8 of the proposed development would extend the development footprint significantly further to the west (to the west of the B797). 10.18. These two factors are considered likely to increase the extent of the visibility and overall impact of the Ravengill proposals, when compared to those associated with the Harryburn development. 10.19. Given that the Harryburn development was found to give rise to, amongst other things, adverse landscape impacts, the only reasonable conclusion that can be drawn is that the Ravengill development would give rise to adverse landscape impacts which would be of greater significance than those associated with the Harryburn scheme 10.20. Natural Environment NPF4 Policy 3 – Biodiversity, seeks to protect biodiversity, reverse any biodiversity loss, deliver positive effects for development and strengthen nature networks. NPF4 Policy 4 – Natural Places seeks to protect, restore and enhance natural assets, making best use of nature-based solutions. NPF4 Policy 5 – Soils seeks to protect carbon- rich soils, restore degraded peatlands and minimise disturbance to soils because of development. These various policy considerations are echoed within Policy 14 – Natural and Historic Environment of the SLLDP2. 10.21. The application is supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), which includes detailed survey work in relation to landscape, ecology, ornithology, hydrology, geology and other relevant environmental considerations. This information has not been the subject of any objection by those parties consulted by the ECU. 10.22. Consequently, it is considered that the proposals comply with the relevant criteria of the above noted policies, subject to the identified mitigation measures being fully implemented on site as part of the proposed development. On this basis, the application is considered to comply with the relevant provisions of Policies 3, 4 and 5 of NPF4 and Policy 14 of the SLLDP2. 10.23. Policy 6 – Forestry, woodland and trees of NPF4 seeks to identify and protect existing woodland and the potential for its enhancement or expansion to avoid habitat fragmentation and improve ecological connectivity, helping to support and expand nature networks. Full details of the implementation of the proposals would require to be agreed between the applicants and the Scottish Government. 10.24. Subject to these details being agreed it is considered that the proposals do not raise any significant concerns in respect of the provisions of Policy 6. 10.25. Historic Environment Policy 7 – Historic assets and places of NPF4 seeks to protect and enhance historic environment assets and places and to enable positive change as a catalyst for regeneration. Similar policy regarding the protection of the historic environment is contained within Policy 14 of SLLDP2. 71
Page 72
10.26. Flood Risk NPF4 Policy 22 – Flood Risk Assessment seeks to strengthen resilience to flood risk by promoting avoidance as a first principle and reducing the vulnerability of existing and future development to flooding. Similar policy is provided in SLLDP2 Policy 16 - Water Environment and Flooding. It is considered that these matters could be covered by suitable planning conditions in the event of the application being approved and on balance, the proposals are considered to be compliant with the provisions of Policy 22 of NPF4 and Policy 16 of SLLDP2. 10.27. Rural Environment NPF4 Policy 29 – Rural development seeks to encourage rural economic activity, innovation and diversification whilst ensuring that the distinctive character of the rural area and the service function of small towns, natural assets and cultural heritage are safeguarded and enhanced. Similar policy is provided in SLLDP2 Policy 4 – Green Belt and Rural Area. Given the concerns which have been highlighted above in relation to the landscape and visual impact of the proposed development, it is considered that the proposed development does not represent an acceptable form of development at this locale. The proposals are therefore considered to be in conflict with the provisions of Policy 29 of NPF4 and Policy 4 of SLLDP2. 10.28. Aviation In terms of aviation and defence interests, the MoD has objected to the application on the grounds of the impact on air traffic safety, low flying by MoD aircraft and the effect on the Eskdalemuir seismology recording facility. There is currently no seismic noise capacity available which would have an unacceptable impact on the operation and capability of the facility. Based on the information available at present, there appears to be no immediate prospect of the concerns which have been raised by the MoD being overcome. As a result, the proposal is contrary to NPF4 Policy 11 and Policy 18 in SLLDP2. 11. Conclusion 11.1. The proposals have demonstrated that they address most of the impacts listed in NPF4 and the assessment criteria in SLLDP2. However, objections have been received from several statutory consultees. The applicant has been working to progress these matters although at present they remain unresolved. 11.2. In conclusion, it is considered that the proposed development does not fully comply with the relevant policies of both the adopted National Planning Framework 4 and the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 in terms of policy relating to landscape and visual impact, air traffic safety and the impact on Eskdalemuir. It is therefore recommended that the Scottish Government be notified that the Council objects to the application for the reasons stated below. 12. Recommendation and Reasons 12.1. The Committee is asked to agree the following recommendation:- 01. That the Scottish Government Energy Consents Unit is informed that South Lanarkshire Council objects to the granting of consent under Section 36 of the Electricity Act 1989 The Scottish Government is also advised that any approval should be subject to the conclusion of a legal agreement(s) covering:- 1. Community Contribution Payments 72
Page 73
Reasons for objection 1. The proposals are considered to have an adverse impact in both landscape and visual terms and, as such, are considered to be contrary to Policy 18 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2. 2. The proposals are contrary to Policies 3 and 11 of National Planning Framework 4 in that the applicant has failed to demonstrate that the impacts on aviation and defence interests have not been addressed. 3. The proposals are contrary to Policy 18 of the adopted South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan 2 and the South Lanarkshire Council Supporting Planning Guidance on Renewable Energy due to the adverse impact on the aviation and defence interests. 4. The proposals are contrary to Policy 29 of National Planning Framework 4 as the proposals represent an unacceptable form of development which would give rise to adverse impacts on the surrounding rural area. 13. Next Steps 13.1. If members agree with this recommendation, Scottish Ministers (via the Energy Consents Unit) will be advised of the Council’s objection to the proposed development. 13.2. Where a planning authority objects to an application, a reporter will be appointed to carry out an examination unless that objection is withdrawn or cannot be resolved by conditions or modifications. In any case where no objection is made by a planning authority which may require an inquiry to be held, the Scottish Ministers will give consideration as to whether it would be appropriate to cause a public inquiry to be held. Kevin Carr Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Date: 29 September 2026 Background Papers Further information relating to the application can be found online: P/26/0922 | Section 36 Consultation relating to the erection of up to 21 turbines with a height up to 220m and construction of BESS facility with capacity of approximatelely 50MW. | Ravengill Energy Park B797 From Abington A702 To Leadhills Leadhills Biggar Corporate Considerations The report raises no impacts or risks in terms of equalities or financial implications. Any implications in terms of climate change, sustainability or the environment will have been considered above in terms of the relevant national and local policies. Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- E-mail: planning@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 73
Page 74
74