Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Petitions Committee - 25/04/2025

South Lanarkshire Council · 25 April 2025
Back to Petitions Committee — 25 April 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Thursday, 17 April 2025 
Dear Councillor 
Petitions Committee 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Friday, 25 April 2025
Time:  10:00
Venue: Hybrid - Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton,
ML3 0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
Members
Alistair Fulton (Chair), Richard Nelson (Depute Chair), Mary Donnelly, Susan Kerr, Eileen
Logan, Norman Rae, Graham Scott, Helen Toner 
Substitutes
Alex Allison, Robert Brown, Archie Buchanan, Janine Calikes, Allan Falconer, Lesley
McDonald
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
Item(s) for Decision 
2 Petition Requesting Safety Measures at Peel Road and Railway Bridge,
Thorntonhall
Report dated 14 April 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
3 - 12 
Urgent Business 
3 Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 
For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Carol Lyon
Clerk Telephone: 07385370065
Clerk Email: carol.lyon@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
2

Page 3

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Petitions Committee
Date of Meeting: 25 April 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Petition Requesting Safety Measures at Peel Road and
Railway Bridge, Thorntonhall 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 allow the Petitions Committee to consider a petition lodged by Paul Harvey (Lead
Petitioner)
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Petitions Committee is asked to:-
[recs]
(1) give due consideration to the petition lodged requesting safety measures at
Peel Road and Railway Bridge, Thorntonhall.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. A petition has been lodged with the Council which meets the Guidelines as:- 
 the matter has been raised with the Council prior to submission and relates to
issues that affect the community
 the number of petitioners exceeds the minimum limit of 50 
3.2. A petition was previously raised in respect of similar matters in November 2021, and
reported to this Committee on 16 February 2022.  Following consideration of that
matter, this Committee agreed that the matter be referred to Police Scotland for them
to survey and monitor the issue and report back to the Council and that the Lead
Petitioner be updated once feedback had been received from Police Scotland. 
4. Petition Details
4.1. The petition requests traffic calming measures to address speeding at Peel Road
and Railway Bridge, Thorntonhall, along with road surface repairs.  The statement by
the lead petitioner states that:- 
“In November 2021 Residents of Thorntonhall raised an e-petition relating to the
risks to safety posed by traffic passing through the village on Peel Road. 
There were two main issues:- 
1. Vehicle speeds through the village regularly exceed the 30mph limit  
2
3

Page 4

2. The mini-roundabouts at the junctions with Baroness Drive and Frederick
Boulevard  where motorists either drive over them or take the wrong (anti-
clockwise) route around them.  The latter behaviour is also often associated with
speeding 
Since 2021 Peel Road has seen a further increase in the traffic volumes due to the
new developments in Jackton and it is now being used as a "Rat Run" route to
Busby, the Carmunnock bypass and the new housing estates in Jackton, which
ironically have traffic calming measures installed.  Speeding along the road has also
increased and further issues have arisen:- 
3. Speed warning signs are ignored 
4. Road traffic and wildlife accidents have occurred at the Waterfoot Road Junction
with Peel Rd 
5. RTA’s, and close misses involving Pedestrians, have occurred on the crest of the
Peel Road railway bridge, on the faster straights and on the mini roundabouts. 
6. The road surfaces have deteriorated considerably forcing road users to travel
down the centre or even closer to the sides of the carriageway. 
We are therefore petitioning South Lanarkshire Council to act upon this petition and
introduce road calming measures as well as repairing, the road surfaces before the
current road conditions result in a serious injuries or deaths.” 
5. Support for Petition
5.1. The petition contains 118 names broken down as follows:- 
 11 names from Jackton
 85 names from Thorntonhall
 19 names from East Kilbride
 3 names from other location in Scotland 
6. Comments from Roads and Transportation Services
6.1. As further background on the terms of the petition, Roads and Transportation Services
have provided the following comments:- 
 Roads and Transportation Services provided a response to the previous Petition
raised in November 2021 as detailed in the Petitions Committee Report dated 16
February 2022.  Roads and Transportation Services remain satisfied that the
response to the Petition remains valid and that there has not been any material
changes to affect this position.
 By way of background and as noted in the Petitions Committee Report dated 16
February 2022, when considering the introduction of road safety improvements,
such as junction alterations and traffic calming measures, which have been
requested by the petitioners, South Lanarkshire Council has a responsibility to
allocate available resources in a manner that contributes to a reduction in the
number of deaths and injuries resulting from road accidents across the entirety of
the Council area.  This is achieved through partnership working with other
organisations, including Police Scotland and the Scottish Government, and with
other Council services to deliver a combination of education, enforcement and
engineering measures.  
4

Page 5

 To ensure the highest rate of return on any engineering measures, the Council
produces a list of priority sites or routes for potential treatment on an annual basis. 
These are the locations where the introduction of engineering measures is
anticipated to have the greatest impact on casualty reduction. 
 The primary criterion by which a site or route is included in this list is its recent
accident history.  Locations where 3 or more injury accidents have occurred in the
previous 3 years or routes that have an injury accident rate greater than the
national average for the type of route are prioritised.  Experience has shown that
the most likely locations for an accident to occur are those in which a number of
accidents with similar contributory factors have occurred in the recent past. 
 We can advise that Peel Road has not been included in this year’s list of sites for
potential treatment. 
 While we note concerns regarding this particular location, we trust the petitioners
will understand the Council’s approach is based on our responsibility to maximise
a reduction in casualty figures across the whole of South Lanarkshire.  We would
further advise that this approach has succeeded in significantly reducing road
casualties across the Council area, in line with exacting targets set by the Scottish
Government. 
1) Vehicle speeds through the village regularly exceed the 30 mph limit 
 The detection and prosecution of speeding drivers is the responsibility of the
Police.  Should inappropriate driving practices continue at this location, then
Police Scotland can be contacted by telephoning their 101-helpline number for
non-emergency enquiries.  Alternatively, concerns to the police can be
submitted in writing by using the web link:- 
https://www.scotland.police.uk/secureforms/contact/
 We have liaised further with Police Scotland and they have advised that since
2022 only 1 Traffic Fixed Penalty Notice has been issued on Peel Road and
this was not for speeding. 
2) The mini-roundabouts at the junctions with Baroness Drive and Frederick
Boulevard where motorists either drive over them or take the wrong (anti-
clockwise) route around them.  The latter behaviour is also often associated
with speeding. 
 The mini roundabout junctions of Peel Road/Baroness Drive and Frederick
Boulevard have been assessed in terms of their geometry and layout signing
and lighting.  This concludes that they comply with the Design Manual for Roads
and Bridges (DMRB) in terms of geometry and layout.  In the case of signing
and road markings they also comply with Traffic Signs, Regulations and
General Directions 2016 (TSRGD) and Traffic Signs Manual (TSM).  We are
satisfied that the current level of features are adequate to convey to drivers
what the speed limit is and to adjust their speed accordingly and forewarning
drivers of the presence of the mini roundabout.
 In terms of driver behaviour, it has been noted that some drivers choose to
negotiate the Peel Road/Baroness Drive and Frederick Boulevard junctions in
an irresponsible manner by either driving on the opposing side or over the
domed central island.  As this behaviour is a moving traffic offence, the
responsibility for this matter lies with Police Scotland to enforce.  Similarly,
drivers who exceed the speed limit are also committing an offence, enforceable
by the Police.  
5

Page 6

Since 2021 Peel Road has seen a further increase in the traffic volumes due to
the new developments in Jackton and it is now being used as a "Rat Run" route
to Busby, the Carmunnock bypass and the new housing estates in Jackton,
which ironically have traffic calming measures installed. Speeding along the
road has also increased and further issues have arisen: 
 In the case of increased traffic volume on Peel Road as a consequence of the East
Kilbride Community Growth Area (EKCGA).  By way of background as part of the
development management process, any developer with a development proposal
of generally 100 units or more is required to prepare and submit a Transport
Assessment (TA) to the Council for approval as part of their planning application. 
The TA is prepared in accordance with Transport Assessment Guidance published
by Transport Scotland and considers a number of aspects including traffic impact
and mitigation, trip generation and modal split travel plans and sustainability.
 The approved Transport Assessment for the East Kilbride Community Growth Area
predicted traffic increases on Eaglesham Road and Redwood Drive as a result of
this development.  To account for an anticipated increase in traffic on these routes,
several junction improvements are planned for the local area, including the
junctions of A726 (GSO)/Redwood Drive, Eaglesham Road/ Greenhills Road and
A726 (Queensway)/Eaglesham Road.  Peel Road was not identified in this TA as
a route likely to be subject to a significant increase in traffic.
 Notwithstanding the above, please be advised that a traffic survey was undertaken
in June 2022.  Data extracted from the survey undertaken reveals that there is an
average weekday total of 120 vehicles travelling northbound and 170 vehicles
travelling southbound during the morning peak and an average of 267 vehicles
travelling northbound and 153 vehicles travelling southbound during the evening
peak.
 For a standard single carriageway road with frontage access and side road, with a
width similar to that of Peel Road, we would estimate an operational capacity of
750 vehicles per hour in each direction.
 Taking all the above into consideration we are satisfied that Peel Road is not
experiencing a inappropriate increase in usage associated with EKCGA and is
operating with sufficient capacity and will continue to operate within its operational
capacity for some time to come.  We will continue to monitor this. 
 Notwithstanding the above, there will always be a small proportion of drivers who
will continue to use alternative routes where they consider it to be quicker.  We are
satisfied, however, that the extent of 30mph restrictions within Jackton and
Thorntonhall, traffic calming, flashing vehicle activated signs, presence of on street
parking, 30mph roundels and mini roundabouts dissuade the majority of motorists
who may consider Peel Road as an alternative.
 In terms of traffic calming which forms part of new housing estates in Jackton. By
way of background all new residential developments and their associated roads
require planning consent, and this process includes a review of the road layout.
Roads and Transportation, who are a consultee in the planning process undertake
this review.  Any new road also requires a Roads Construction Consent (RCC)
from the Council as the Roads Authority which ensures the road is designed and
constructed to the correct specification.  During both of these processes all aspects
of the road are examined including the road geometry. Various guidance
documents are referred to during this process, including the National Roads
Development Guide and Designing Streets.  
6

Page 7

 In the case of Peel Road, as mentioned above, the Transport Assessment Scoping
Study did not identify Peel Road as a route likely to be subject to a significant
increase in traffic as a detrimental impact of EKCGA.  By virtue of this, Peel Road
never necessitated the need for the introduction of traffic calming measures to
mitigate any increase in traffic volume which is corroborated by data extracted from
the traffic volume survey undertaken in June 2022. 
3) Speed warning signs are ignored 
 In terms of existing features on Peel Road, Traffic entering Thorntonhall from
the north encounter 30mph gateway entrance features in the form of two 30mph
speed limit signs, a 30mph roundel and dragon’s teeth road markings.  This is
followed by a flashing vehicle activated ‘Your Speed Is’ sign which is then
followed by a flashing vehicle activated 30mph sign with supplementary ‘SLOW
DOWN’ text.  Traffic entering Thorntonhall from the south encounter gateway
entrance features in the form of two 30mph signs, a 30mph roundel and
dragon’s teeth which is then followed by a flashing vehicle activated ‘Your
Speed Is’ sign.
 Taking the above into consideration we are satisfied that the current level of
features is adequate to convey to drivers what the speed limit is and to adjust
their speed accordingly.
 As noted above, we have liaised further with Police Scotland and they have
advised that since 2022 only 1 Traffic Fixed Penalty Notice has been issued on
Peel Road and this was not for speeding. 
4) Road traffic and wildlife accidents have occurred at the Waterfoot Road
Junction with Peel Rd 
 A review of the Police accident database reveals that there have been no
reported injury related accidents within the most recent 3-year assessment
period up to the end of January 2025 for the priority junction of Waterfoot
Road/Peel Road.  Moreover, further interrogation of the police accident
database reveals that there have been no reported injury related accidents at
this junction for which data is available since January 2006.
 In terms of wildlife accidents, please be advised that the Police accident
database does not record wildlife accidents unless they have been a
contributory factor associated with a recorded injury related accident.
 Taking all of the above into consideration we are not minded to provide any
road safety measures such as wild animals warning signage. 
5) RTAs, and close misses involving pedestrians, have occurred on the crest
of the Peel Road railway bridge, on the faster straights and on the mini
roundabouts. 
 A review of the Police accident database reveals that there have been no
reported injury related accidents within the most recent 3-year assessment
period up to the end of January 2025 within vicinity of Peel Road railway bridge. 
Moreover, further interrogation of the Police accident database reveals that
there have been no reported injury related accidents at this bridge for which
data is available since January 2006.  
7

Page 8

 For clarity, the Police accident database records only injury related accidents. 
Near misses are inherently subjective, as individuals’ perceptions of what
constitutes a near miss can vary significantly.  By virtue, without objective
evidence or consistent reporting, it is challenging to substantiate or quantify
these incidents. 
6) The road surfaces have deteriorated considerably forcing road users to
travel down the centre or even closer to the sides of the carriageway. 
 With regards Peel Road, we are aware of its condition.  Peel Road from Hayhill
Road to the railway bridge will be included in the 2025/2026 carriageway
resurfacing programme.  In the meantime, we monitor the road condition during
routine and ad hoc inspections and repairs are instructed when required. 
7. Options open to the Committee
7.1. In terms of the approved guidance, the Petitions Committee can:- 
 agree that the issues raised deserve further action and agree to refer the petition
to another Council Committee, officer or other organisation with recommendations
 agree that the issue raised does not merit further action
 refer back to the Resource with recommendations for further action 
8. Employee Implications
8.1 There are no employee implications as a result of this report. 
9. Financial Implications
9.1. There are no financial implications at this time. 
10. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
10.1 There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms
of the information contained in this report. 
11. Other Implications
11.1 There are no implications for risk in terms of the information contained in this report. 
12. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
12.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
12.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
14 April 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent  
8

Page 9

Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
Petition Requesting Safety Measures at Peel Road, Thorntonhall - Report to Petitions
Committee - 16 February 2022 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Carol Lyon, Administration Officer
Ext: 5652 (Tel: 01698 455652)
E-mail: carol.lyon@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
9

Page 10

10

Page 11

24 to 31
1 to 6 RAVENSCOURT
GATE
BISHOPS
32 to 39
5
1
AVENUE
GILMOUR
75
77 3
73
FB
7a
East Birkwood
17
15
W
ELLKNOW
E
AVENUE
11
89
Birkwood
Ballinluig
93
Tank
18
Gables
Beechwood
Silverwood
ESS
El Sub Sta
Balancing
BEECHWOOD
LEA
Club
Pond
16 to 29
Sta
47
ESS
Ard
Ceann Brae
Ppg Sta
10
Lawn Tennis
Tennis Courts
ThorntonhallEsk House
3
Woodmont
Braehead Farmhouse
The Sheddons
2
WILLIAM
GRANGE
7
2b
16
38
Ppg
1 to 15
3
4
Track
45
2
1
5
6
4
42
2
13
50
BARON COURT
4
7
4
2
White Gables
Bealach Mor
Balnakiel
49
5
15
ARDBEG LANE
12
13
20
11
2
24
28
25
33
2
6
BOW
MORE
CRESCENT
5
1
48 Leafield
2A
Beechwood Grange
5
Taits Thornton
19
15
11
2
House
Ceard
The Rannoch
The Neuk
BRAEHEAD RD
51
Beechwood
LB 63
BISHOPS PARK
Cottage
Bishops
Tulachard
West Deyne
Barn
High
Tredayne
The Lea
GP
PEEL ROAD
Thornton Park
Homelands
Burncroft
CRESCENT
OSBORNE
MP 0.5
Thorntonhall
(Station)
8
Track
W
ELLKNOW
E
ROAD
WELLKNOWE PLACE
Cottage
Fieldway
BISHOPS GATE
7
5
11
1
Rosemere Cottage
9
1
Track
PARK
1565
Cottage
1
16
2
7 to 19
1
6
BRAEHEAD ROAD
46
7
7
5
Gleniffer
Thorntonhall
PARK DRIVE
11
PLACE
CAOL COURT
1
17
Path
1
36
2
2
1
8 34
Laigh Braehead
Durrour
59
Bowfell
El Sub Sta
Track
Ppg Sta
47
Tank
CS
Track
MP 4.25
SP
WATERFOOT ROAD
PEEL ROAD
PEEL ROAD
BARONESS DRIVE
BARONESS DRIVE
FREDERICK BOULEVARD
PEEL ROAD
PEEL ROAD
PEEL ROAD
ORIGINAL DRAWING SIZE A4
DATESUFFIX
Title
B
A
TENDER
PRELIM
REVISION
RECORD
CONT
Colin Park M.Sc., C.Eng., MCIHT FICE
Head of Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services
COMMUNITY AND ENTERPRISE RESOURCES
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL
Drawing No.
Appvd By:
Chk'd By:
Drawn By:
Scale:
SUFFIXINIT
D
C
DATE REVISION
Date: 
INIT
© Crown copyright and database right 2025. OS AC0000815808
Thorntonhall area plan
NTS
JT
JP
April 2025
2
11

Page 12

12