Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Finance and Corporate Resources Committee - 26/03/2025

South Lanarkshire Council · 26 March 2025
Back to Finance and Corporate Resources Committee — 26 March 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Tuesday, 18 March 2025 
Dear Councillor 
Finance and Corporate Resources Committee 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Wednesday, 26 March 2025
Time:  14:00
Venue: Hybrid - Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton,
ML3 0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
Members 
Lesley McDonald (Chair), Walter Brogan (Depute Chair), Celine Handibode (Depute Chair), Joe
Fagan (ex officio), Alex Allison, Mathew Buchanan, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers, Margaret
Cooper, Andrea Cowan, Maureen Devlin, Mary Donnelly, Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller,
Graeme Horne, Martin Hose, Ross Lambie, Katy Loudon, Hugh Macdonald, Catherine McClymont,
Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever, Mo Razzaq, John Ross, Graham Scott, Kirsty Williams 
Substitutes
Archie Buchanan, Colin Dewar, Ross Gowland, Gavin Keatt, Susan Kerr, Martin Lennon, Richard
Lockhart, Richard Nelson, Richard Nelson, Carol Nugent, Norman Rae, Helen Toner, David Watson 
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
Minutes of the meeting of the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
held on 29 January 2025 submitted for approval as a correct record.  (Copy
attached) 
5 - 10 
3 Minutes of Meeting of Appeals Panel
Minutes of the meeting of the Appeals Panel held on 22 January 2025 submitted
for approval as a correct record.  (Copy attached) 
11 - 12 
Monitoring Item(s) 
4 Revenue Budget Monitoring 2024/2025 - Finance and Corporate Resources
Report dated 26 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
13 - 24 
5 Capital Budget Monitoring 2024/2025 - Finance and Corporate Resources
Report dated 24 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
25 - 28 
6 Finance and Corporate Resources – Workforce Monitoring – December
2024 and January 2025
Report dated 3 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
29 - 36 
7 Council-wide Workforce Monitoring - December 2024 to January 2025
Report dated 7 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
37 - 56 
Item(s) for Decision 
8 Revenue Collection and Approval for Write Offs
Report dated 3 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
57 - 62 
9 Consultation on Universal Credit - Mitigation of the Two-Child Limit
Report dated 4 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
63 - 68 
10  Finance and Public Administration Committee - Call for Views on the
Scottish Budget Process in Practice
Report dated 4 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
69 - 76 
Item(s) for Noting 
11  Consultation on Financial Considerations that Women Face When Leaving
an Abusive Relationship
Report dated 3 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
77 - 84
2

Page 3

12  Mental Health Moratorium Regulations - Consultation
Report dated 3 March 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
85 - 98 
13  Response to Consultation on the Public Sector Equality Duty
Report dated 20 February 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and
Corporate Resources).  (Copy attached) 
99 - 102 
Urgent Business 
14  Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 
For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Carol Lyon
Clerk Telephone: 07385370065
Clerk Email: carol.lyon@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
3

Page 4

4

Page 5

FINANCE AND CORPORATE RESOURCES COMMITTEE 
Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street,
Hamilton on 29 January 2025 
Chair:
Councillor Lesley McDonald 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor Walter Brogan (Depute), Councillor Mathew Buchanan, Councillor
Andy Carmichael, Councillor Andrea Cowan, Councillor Maureen Devlin, Councillor Colin Dewar
(substitute for Councillor Maureen Chalmers), Councillor Mary Donnelly, Councillor Grant Ferguson,
Councillor Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Councillor Celine Handibode, Councillor Graeme Horne,
Councillor Martin Hose, Councillor Katy Loudon, Councillor Hugh Macdonald, Councillor Catherine
McClymont, Councillor Mark McGeever, Councillor Mo Razzaq, Councillor John Ross, Councillor
Graham Scott, Councillor Kirsty Williams 
Councillors' Apologies:
Councillor Maureen Chalmers, Councillor Margaret Cooper, Councillor Joe Fagan (ex officio),
Councillor Elaine McDougall, Councillor Richard Nelson 
Finance and Corporate Resources
J Taylor, Executive Director; C Fergusson, Head of Finance (Transactions); M Husband, Head of IT
Services; S Jessup, Administration Assistant; T Little, Head of Communications and Strategy; C Lyon,
Administration Officer; M Milne, Head of Personnel Services; L O’Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy);
I Strachan, Head of Administration and Legal Services 
1 Declaration of Interests 
No interests were declared. 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
The minutes of the meeting of the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee held on 30
October 2024 were submitted for approval as a correct record. 
The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record. 
3 Revenue Budget Monitoring 2024/2025 - Finance and Corporate Resources 
A report dated 6 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted comparing the actual expenditure for the period 1 April to 1 November 2024 and
providing a forecast for the year to 31 March 2025 for Finance and Corporate Resources. 
A Service Analysis Statement, which outlined key highlights by Service for the Resource, was
provided at Appendix A to the report.  The detailed financial position, with variance explanations
by budget category, was provided at Appendix B to the report. 
As at 1 November 2024, the projected outturn position for the Resource was a breakeven position. 
The Resource breakeven position assumed a proposed transfer to reserves at year end in relation
to an anticipated underspend of £0.106 million on grants to voluntary organisations which was
included as part of the savings reported to the Executive Committee on 13 November 2024.  
2
5

Page 6

Virements were proposed to realign budgets, and those movements were detailed in the
appendices to the report. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the forecast to 31 March 2025 of a breakeven position, as detailed in Appendix B of the
report, be noted; and 
(2) that the proposed budget virements, as detailed in the appendices to the report, be
approved. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 30 October 2024 (Paragraph 3) and Minutes of the Executive Committee
of 13 November 2024 (Paragraph 8)] 
4 Capital Budget Monitoring 2024/2025 - Finance and Corporate Resources 
A report dated 6 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted advising of progress on Finance and Corporate Resources’ capital programme for
2024/2025 and summarising the expenditure position at 1 November 2024. 
The revised capital programme for 2024/2025 was £3.086 million, as approved by the Executive
Committee on 26 June 2024. 
The forecast for the financial year was £3.086 million and spend to date was £2.619 million. 
The Committee decided: that the Finance and Corporate Resources’ capital
programme of £3.086 million, and expenditure to date of
£2.619 million, be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 30 October 2024 (Paragraph 4)] 
5 Finance and Corporate Resources - Workforce Monitoring – October and November
2024
A report dated 8 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on the following employee information for Finance and Corporate Resources for the
period October and November 2024:- 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health statistics
 accident/incident statistics
 disciplinary hearings, grievances and Dignity at Work cases
 analysis of leavers and exit interviews
 staffing watch as at 14 September 2024 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted 
[Reference:  Minutes of 30 October 2024 (Paragraph 5)]  
6

Page 7

6 Council-wide Workforce Monitoring – October and November 2024 
A report dated 8 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on the following Council-wide employee information for the period October and
November 2024:- 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health statistics
 accident/incident statistics
 disciplinary hearings, grievances and Dignity at Work cases
 analysis of leavers and exit interviews
 recruitment monitoring
 staffing watch as at 14 September 2024 
Following a request at the previous meeting of this Committee, the Head of Personnel Services
advised that she would circulate the 5 Year trend information in relation to BAME applicants to all
members of the Committee.  She also advised that she planned to reinstate the focus groups in
this respect. 
Following a request from a member, the Head of Personnel Services undertook to provide the
same information in respect of veterans as had been provided for BAME applicants. 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 30 October 2024 (Paragraph 6)] 
7 Treasury Management Activity - 2024/2025 Third Quarter Review 
A report dated 6 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on the second quarter review of Treasury Management activity for 2024/2025. 
Details were given on:- 
 market performance  management of risk
 debt management and borrowing strategy  next quarter investment plans
 investment activity  treasury management indicators 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 30 October 2024 (Paragraph 7)] 
8 Finance and Corporate Resource Plan – Quarter 2 Progress Report 2024/2025 
A report dated 10 December 2024 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on the Finance and Corporate Resource Plan Quarter 2 Progress Report
2024/2025 for the period 1 April 2024 to 30 September 2024. 
Details were provided on:- 
 progress made against all Resource Plan measures, as detailed in Appendix 2 to the report
 key achievements made by the Resource to date, as detailed in section 5.3 of the report
 areas for improvement and associated management actions, as detailed in section 5.4 of
the report  
7

Page 8

The Committee decided: 
(1) that the Finance and Corporate Resource Plan Quarter 2 Progress report for 2024/2025, as
detailed in Appendix 2 to the report, be noted; 
(2) that the key achievements made by the Resource to date, as detailed in paragraph 5.3 of
the report, be noted; and 
(3) that the areas for improvement and associated management actions, as detailed in
paragraph 5.4. to the report, be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 22 May 2024 (Paragraph 10)] 
9 Revenue Collection and Approval for Write-Offs 
A report dated 8 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on:- 
 collection performance for the financial year 2024/2025 to 30 November 2024 on revenue
income which comprised Council Tax, non-domestic rates, sundry debts and arrears
 performance in the Non Domestic Rates Incentivisation Scheme (NDRIS)
 the write-off of irrecoverable Council Tax, non-domestic rates, Business Improvement
District (BID) levy, sundry debt and Housing Rent and associated charges 
Details were provided on current collection targets.  The Council was ahead of both target and
comparable performance from 2023/2024 in respect of Council Tax and Sundry Debt.  In respect
of non-domestic rates, the Council was equal to target and behind to comparable performance
from 2023/2024. 
In terms of arrears collection targets, the Council was ahead of both target and comparable
performance from 2023/2024 in respect of Council Tax and non-domestic rates.  In relation to
sundry debt, the Council was behind target and also comparable performance for 2023/2024. 
The Non Domestic Rates Incentivisation Scheme (NDRIS), formerly known as the Business Rates
Incentivisation Scheme (BRIS), was a Scottish Government initiative to incentivise growth of the
local business tax base, with a view to increasing NDR income yields. 
The Scottish Government set annual targets for growth (buoyancy) and councils which achieved
their target retained 50% of the additional income generated above the target.  The provisional
annual buoyancy target for South Lanarkshire Council in 2024/2025 had been set by the Scottish
Government at 0.9%. 
Performance against the NDRIS target would be reported to Committee on a quarterly basis. 
Buoyancy to the end of December 2024 was 0.76%.  The tax base required to achieve further
growth of 0.14% during the last quarter of the financial year to secure additional income under the
scheme. 
It was proposed that the following debts be written off:- 
 irrecoverable Council Tax accounts from 1993/1994 to 2024/2025 to the value of
£137,887.68 relating primarily to prescribed debt, sequestrations and estates of the
deceased
 irrecoverable non-domestic rates from 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 to the value of £362,563.33
relating primarily to debtors in liquidation, those who had ceased trading or had been
sequestrated  
8

Page 9

 BID levies totalling £1,794.44 administered by the Council on behalf of Hamilton, Carluke
and Lanark BID companies
 sundry debts to a value of £20,759.45
 former tenant rent arrears totalling £960,143.89 (including bulk write-off for 2024/2025 for
temporary accommodation), factoring arrears of £2,838.29 and housing benefit
overpayments of £12,582.11 
Officers undertook to provide Councillor Allison with the figures for outstanding debt in respect of
all write-off streams that could come forward in the future. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the Council’s performance in the collection of revenues be noted; 
(2) that the current position in respect of the Non Domestic Rates Incentivisation Scheme be
noted; and 
(3) that the write-off of the following irrecoverable debts be approved:-
 Council Tax debt from 1993/1994 to 2024/2025 to the value of £137,887.68
 Non Domestic Rates from 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 totalling £362,563.33
 BID levies totalling £1,794.44
 sundry debts to a value of £20,759.45
 house rent and associated charges totalling £975,564.29 
[Reference:  Minutes of 30 October 2024 (Paragraph 10)] 
10 Consultation on a Proposal to Increase Scottish Social Services Council
Registration Fees 
A report dated 8 January 2025 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on a consultation by the Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC) on the proposal to
increase registration fees. 
SSSC registration fees had last been reviewed and increased in 2017.  As a result of feedback
from that consultation, it had been agreed that a longer term plan for increasing fees incrementally
would be put in place.  This consultation was due to start in 2020 but had been delayed due to
the Covid-19 pandemic. 
The consultation sought views on proposals to increase SSSC registration fees and ran for a
period of 12 weeks from 30 September to 23 December 2024.  The Council’s response had been
submitted on 23 December 2024.  The SSSC would consider responses and decide on any
increase which would then go to the Minister to consider.  If an increase was approved, fees would
be likely to increase from 1 April 2025. 
Details of the proposed increase in fees was provided in paragraph 4.3 of the report. 
In preparing the response to the consultation, views had been sought from Personnel Services,
Education Resources and Social Work Resources.  The Council’s response to each aspect of the
consultation was attached at Appendix 1 to the report and included that the Council was
concerned that any fee increase could have unintended consequences across a variety of sectors,
such as recruiting and retaining entrants into social care and children’s services roles and the
potential negative impact on private organisations delivering services on behalf of the Council. 
The Committee decided: that the Council response submitted to the Scottish Social
Services Council on 23 December 2024 be noted.
9

Page 10

11 Early Retirement, Voluntary Severance and Switch 2
A report dated 25 November 2024 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on the activity related to early retirements, voluntary severances, re-employment
of early retirees and re-deployments during the period 1 April to 30 September 2024 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 22 May 2024 (Paragraph 15)] 
12 Notification of Contracts Awarded 1 April to 30 September 2024
A report dated 4 December 2024 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
was submitted on contracts awarded by Finance and Corporate Resources during the period 1
April to 30 September 2024. 
In terms of Standing Oder Nos 21.8 and 22.5 of the Standing Orders on Contracts, Resources
were required to notify the relevant Committee of contracts awarded.  Details of the contracts
awarded by Finance and Corporate Resources were provided in the appendix to the report. 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 22 May 2024 (Paragraph 16)] 
13 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
10

Page 11

APPEALS PANEL 
Minutes of meeting held in Committee Room 5, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton on 22
January 2025 
Chair:
Councillor Lesley McDonald 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Poppy Corbett, Councillor Bert Thomson 
Attending:
Finance and Corporate Resources
E McPake, HR Business Manager; L Hamilton, Administration Officer 
1 Declaration of Interests
No interests were declared. 
2 Urgent Business
There were no items of urgent business. 
3 Exclusion of Press and Public
The Panel decided: that, in terms of Section 50A(4) of the Local Government
(Scotland) Act 1973, the press and public be excluded from
the meeting for the next item of business on the grounds that
it was likely that there would be disclosure of exempt
information in terms of Paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule 7A
of the Act. 
4 Appeal Against Demotion
The Panel considered an appeal (Ref 8/24) by an employee against their demotion. 
The appellant was present and represented by a trade union representative.  The Council was
represented by a Personnel Adviser.  The Council called a witness and the appellant’s
representative called the appellant.  All parties were heard in relation to the appeal and then
withdrew from the meeting. 
The Panel decided: that the grounds of the appeal had not been substantiated
and the appeal be not upheld. 
3
11

Page 12

12

Page 13

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Revenue Budget Monitoring 2024/2025 - Finance and
Corporate Resources 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[p
 advise Committee of the forecast for the year to 31 March 2025 for Finance and
Corporate Resources, and the actual spend position for the period 1 April 2024 to
24 January 2025
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the projected breakeven position on the 2024/2025 revenue budget for
Finance and Corporate Resources’, as detailed in Appendix B of the report,
be noted; and
(2) that the proposed budget virements be approved. 
3. Background
3.1. This is the fourth revenue budget monitoring report presented to the Finance and
Corporate Resources Committee for the financial year 2024/2025. 
3.2. The report details the financial position for Finance and Corporate Resources. 
Appendix A provides the service analysis statement, outlining key highlights by
Service for the Resource and Appendix B provides the detailed financial position with
variance explanations by budget category.  Any variance explanations and proposed
budget virements are shown, where relevant, in Appendices C to I. 
3.3. This report reflects the actual spend to 24 January 2025 within the Resource budget
and the expected outturn forecast on expenditure and income at this date. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. None. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. Appendix A is the service analysis statement and will outline the key projected
outturn variances by Service for the Resource. 
5.2. Probable Outturn:  Following the Council’s formal Probable Outturn exercise, the
Resource is forecasting a breakeven position after approved transfers to reserves of
£0.856 million.  This position is outline in Appendices C-I. 
4
13

Page 14

5.3. Financial Position as at 24 January 2025:  As at 24 January 2025, the Resource’s
projected outturn position for 2024/2025 is an underspend of £0.856 million before
approved transfers to reserves (Appendix B). 
5.4. The transfers to Reserves approved at the Executive Committee (12 February 2025)
total £0.856 million and relate to £0.750 million for Scottish Welfare Funding which
will be carried forward for use in 2025/2026 and an underspend of £0.106 million in
the Grants to Voluntary Organisations budget which is being set aside to support the
use of reserves to delay the implementation of the 2024/2025 Budget Saving, as per
the recently agreed Budget Amendment (Council, 26 February 2025).  After these
transfers, the Resources outturn is breakeven. 
5.5. Virements are proposed to realign budgets across budget categories and with other
Resources.  These movements have been detailed in Appendices C-I, where
relevant. 
6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability, or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
7. Other Implications
7.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Revenue Budget is that there is an
overspend. The risk has been assessed as low given the detailed budget
management applied across the Resources. The risk is managed through four
weekly Budget Monitoring Meetings at which any variance is analysed. In addition,
the probable outturn exercise ensures early warning for corrective action to be taken
where appropriate. 
8. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
8.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function, or strategy and therefore no impact
assessment is required. 
8.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
26 February 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Finance and Corporate Resources Committee, 29 January 2025
 Executive Committee, 12 February 2025
 South Lanarkshire Council, 26 February 2025 
14

Page 15

List of Background Papers
 Financial ledger and budget monitoring results to 24 January 2025. 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Lorraine O’Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel: 01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o’hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
15

Page 16

Appendix A 
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report – Service Analysis 
Service Analysis
Revised
Annual
Budget
(£000)
Projected
Outturn
(£000)
Projected
Outturn
Variance
(£000)
% YTD Actual
(£000)
Strategy 2,014 2,027 (13) (0.65%) 2,697
Transactions 18,700 18,080 620 3.32% 14,098
Audit 338 301 37 10.95% 367
Information Technology 7,534 7,439 95 1.26% 12,694
Communications and Strategy 2,710 2,546 164 6.05% 2,341
Administration, Legal, Licensing and
Registration 4,164 4,006 158 3.79% 3,760
Personnel 6,325 6,530 (205) (3.24%) 5,712
Net Controllable Exp. 41,785 40,929 856 21.48% 41,669 
Service Heading Explanation for significant projected outturn variances
Strategy No significant projected outturn variances to report. (Appendix C). 
Transactions  Before Transfers to Reserves, there is an overall net underspend position or the Service (Appendix D). 
There are projected overspends in Supplies and Services from contract renewals for Financial Software
Packages, and in Administration Costs, due to higher than budgeted postage costs for Council Tax billing.
These are partially offset by an anticipated over recovery of income reflecting additional commission
received from Scottish Water and Non-Domestic Rates income. 
In addition, there is an anticipated underspend in Property Costs from additional funding provided for the
Scottish Welfare Fund.  Due to the timing of this funding being awarded, an element of this will be carried
forward as a Transfer to Reserves for use next financial year (section 5.4).  After the Transfer to Reserves,
the Service is showing an overspend of (£0.130) million. 
Audit  No significant projected outturn variances to report. (Appendix E). 
Information
Technology
There is an anticipated overspend in Supplies and Services due to greater than budgeted IT subscription,
licensing and contract costs which are partially offset by an over recovery of income. In addition, there is
less than budgeted telephony contract costs anticipated during the financial year. (Appendix F). 
Communications
and Strategy 
There is an anticipated underspend in Employee Costs due to the level of turnover during the financial year.
(Appendix G).
Administration,
Legal, Licensing
and Registration
The Service is showing a projected underspend before Transfers to Reserves.  There is an anticipated
underspend in Payments to Other Bodies due to less than budgeted spend on the Grants budget.  A
Transfer to Reserves has been approved (section 5.4) which results in an underspend of £0.052 million.
(Appendix H). 
Personnel There is an anticipated overspend in Employee Costs due to a lower than budgeted level of turnover during
the financial year. There is also a projected overspend in Financing Charges due to higher than budgeted
IT equipment leasing costs. In addition, there is an anticipated under recovery of income relating to lower
than budgeted income from third party settlements.  These are partially offset by an anticipated underspend
in Payments to Other Bodies relating to lower than anticipated legal costs in the financial year. (Appendix I). 
16

Page 17

Appendix B 
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Finance & Corporate Resources Summary 
Variance Explanations
Variance explanations are shown in Appendices C to I as appropriate. 
Budget Virements
Budget Virements are noted in Appendices C to I as appropriate. 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000   £000 
Employee Costs 33,649 33,567 82 under 0.24% 26,607 
Property Costs 4,959 4,243 716 under 14.44% 1,256 
Supplies & Services 7,801 8,055 (254) over (3.26%) 7,684 
Transport & Plant 37 26 11 under 29.73% 9 
Administration Costs 7,728 7,711 17 under 0.22% 6,005 
Payments to Other Bodies 4,091 3,941 150 under 3.67% 3,098 
Payments to Contractors 253 287 (34) over (13.44%) 285 
Transfer Payments 65,934 60,661 5,273 under 8.00% 47,756 
Financing Charges 1,404 1,445 (41) over (2.92%) 1,096 
Total Controllable Exp. 125,856 119,936 5,920 under 4.70% 93,796 
Total Controllable Inc. (84,071) (79,007) (5,064) under
recovered (6.02%) (52,127) 
Net Controllable Exp. 41,785 40,929 856 under 2.05% 41,669 
Transfer to Reserves 0 856 (856)            
Position after Transfer to Reserves 41,785 41,785 0 - 0.00%  
17

Page 18

Appendix C 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Finance – Strategy Services 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000  £000  £000    £000 
Employee Costs 2,855 2,866 (11) over (0.39%) 2,285 a, b, c               
Property Costs 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Supplies & Services 14 18 (4) over (28.57%) 6 
Transport & Plant 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Administration Costs 114 118 (4) over (3.51%) 100 
Payments to Other Bodies 637 640 (3) over (0.47%) 327 c               
Payments to Contractors 16 26 (10) over (62.50%) 24 
Transfer Payments 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Financing Charges 20 21 (1) over (5.00%) 3 
Total Controllable Exp. 3,656 3,689 (33) over (0.90%) 2,745 
Total Controllable Inc. (1,642) (1,662) 20 over
recovered 1.22% (48) 
Net Controllable Exp. 2,014 2,027 (13) over (0.65%) 2,697 
Transfer to Reserves 0 0 0            
Position after Transfer to
Reserves 2,014 2,027 (13) over (0.65%)   
Variance Explanations
None. 
Budget Virements
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.092m: Employee Costs £0.092m.
b. Transfer to IT Services in relation to transfer of employees.  Net Effect (£0.046m): Employee Costs (£0.046m).
c. Transfer from corporate items in relation to Audit Fee.  Net Effect £0.117m: Employee Costs £0.080m, Payments to
Other Bodies £0.037m. 
18

Page 19

Appendix D 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Finance – Transactions Services 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000   £000 
Employee Costs 12,472 12,388 84 under 0.67% 9,817 1, a, b               
Property Costs 4,953 4,228 725 under 14.64% 1,219 2, c               
Supplies & Services 778 867 (89) over (11.44%) 851 3               
Transport & Plant 4 3 1 under 25.00% 0 
Administration Costs 1,399 1,525 (126) over (9.01%) 1,193 4               
Payments to Other Bodies 1,500 1,517 (17) over (1.13%) 1,157 
Payments to Contractors 237 261 (24) over (10.13%) 261 
Transfer Payments 65,934 60,661 5,273 under 8.00% 47,756 5               
Financing Charges 105 113 (8) over (7.62%) 6 
Total Controllable Exp. 87,382 81,563 5,819 under 6.66% 62,283 
Total Controllable Inc. (68,682) (63,483) (5,199) under
recovered (7.57%) (48,185) 6               
Net Controllable Exp. 18,700 18,080 620 under 3.32% 14,098 
Transfer to Reserves 0 750 (750)    i        
Position after Transfer to Reserves 18,700 18,830 (130) over (0.69%)   
Variance Explanations
1. The underspend in Employee Costs is due to a greater than anticipated level of turnover during the financial year.
2. The projected underspend is due to additional funding provided for the Scottish Welfare Fund.  Due to the timing of
this funding being awarded, an element of this will be carried forward for use next financial year – shown as a
Transfer to Reserves (refer i below).
3. The projected overspend reflects increased costs for two contract renewals for Civica financial software packages.
4. The anticipated overspend in Administration Costs is due to higher than budgeted postage costs for Council Tax
billing.
5. The projected underspend in this line reflects the demand-led spend on Rent Allowance and Rent Rebates and is
offset by an under-recovery of Income (refer 6 below).
6. The projected under recovery is offset by the demand-led underspend in Transfer Payments (refer 5 above). 
Budget Virements
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.486m: Employee Costs £0.486m.
b. Transfer to IT Services in relation to employee moves.  Net Effect (£0.087m): Employee Costs (£0.087m).
c. Establish budget to reflect General Revenue Grant funding in relation to Scottish Welfare Fund.  Net Effect £1.243m:
Property Costs £1.243m. 
Transfer to Reserves
i. Scottish Welfare Fund - This funding forms part of the 2024/2025 revenue grant redeterminations and will be carried
forward for use in 2025/2026 (£0.750m).
19

Page 20

Appendix E 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Audit Services 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000   £000 
Employee Costs 488 455 33 under 6.76% 370 a               
Property Costs 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Supplies & Services 7 5 2 under 28.57% 1 
Transport & Plant 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Administration Costs 6 4 2 under 33.33% 3 
Payments to Other Bodies 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Payments to Contractors 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Transfer Payments 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Financing Charges 4 4 0 - 0.00% 0 
Total Controllable Exp. 505 468 37 under 7.33% 374 
Total Controllable Inc. (167) (167) 0 - 0.00% (7) 
Net Controllable Exp. 338 301 37 under 10.95% 367 
Transfer to Reserves 0 0 0            
Position after Transfer to Reserves 338 301 37 under 10.95%          
Variance Explanations  
None.      
Budget Virements  
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.020m: Employee Costs £0.020m. 
20

Page 21

Appendix F 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Information Technology Services 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000   £000 
Employee Costs 5,513 5,505 8 under 0.15% 4,363 a, b               
Property Costs 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Supplies & Services 6,052 6,205 (153) over (2.53%) 6,206 1               
Transport & Plant 4 2 2 under 50.00% 1 
Administration Costs 1,591 1,488 103 under 6.47% 1,447 2               
Payments to Other Bodies 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Payments to Contractors 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Transfer Payments 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Financing Charges 823 826 (3) over (0.36%) 826 c               
Total Controllable Exp. 13,983 14,026 (43) over (0.31%) 12,843 
Total Controllable Inc. (6,449) (6,587) 138 over
recovered 2.14% (149) 3               
Net Controllable Exp. 7,534 7,439 95 under 1.26% 12,694 
Transfer to Reserves 0 0 0            
Position after Transfer to Reserves 7,534 7,439 95 under 1.26%          
Variance Explanations  
1. The anticipated overspend in Supplies and Services is due to greater than budgeted IT subscription, licensing and contract costs which    
are partially offset by an over recovery of income (see 3 below).
2. The projected underspend reflects less than budgeted telephony contract costs during the financial year.
3. The projected over recovery of income reflects greater than budgeted level of recharges during the financial year which partially offsets 
the increased IT costs above (refer 1.). 
Budget Virements  
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.175m: Employee Costs £0.175m.
b. Transfer from other Services in relation to employee moves.  Net Effect £0.315m: Employee Costs £0.315m.
c. Transfer from reserves in relation to leasing of IT Equipment.  Net Effect £0.192m: Financing Charges £0.192m.   
21

Page 22

Appendix G 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Communications and Strategy Services 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note               
Employee Costs 2,257 2,163 94 under 4.16% 1,702 1, a               
Property Costs 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Supplies & Services 668 653 15 under 2.25% 388 
Transport & Plant 7 4 3 under 42.86% 2 
Administration Costs 1,080 1,078 2 under 0.19% 682 
Payments to Other Bodies 992 992 0 - 0.00% 971 
Payments to Contractors 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Transfer Payments 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Financing Charges 351 348 3 under 0.85% 251 
Total Controllable Exp. 5,355 5,238 117 under 2.18% 3,996 
Total Controllable Inc. (2,645) (2,692) 47 over
recovered 1.78% (1,655) 2               
Net Controllable Exp. 2,710 2,546 164 under 6.05% 2,341 
Transfer to Reserves 0 0 0            
Position after Transfer to Reserves 2,710 2,546 164 under 6.05%          
Variance Explanations  
1. The underspend in Employee Costs is due to the anticipated level of turnover during the year.
2. The projected over recovery is due to level of work anticipated within the print room during the financial year.     
Budget Virements  
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.083m: Employee Costs £0.083m. 
22

Page 23

Appendix H 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Administration, Legal, Licensing and Registration 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000    £000 
Employee Costs 3,594 3,610 (16) over (0.45%) 2,909 1, a               
Property Costs 6 5 1 under 16.67% 4 
Supplies & Services 161 147 14 under 8.70% 123 
Transport & Plant 13 15 (2) over (15.38%) 6 
Administration Costs 2,333 2,276 57 under 2.44% 1,767 
Payments to Other Bodies 678 572 106 under 15.63% 485 
Payments to Contractors 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Transfer Payments 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Financing Charges 65 66 (1) over (1.54%) 8 
Total Controllable Exp. 6,850 6,691 159 under 2.32% 5,302 
Total Controllable Inc. (2,686) (2,685) (1) under
recovered (0.04%) (1,542) 2               
Net Controllable Exp. 4,164 4,006 158 under 3.79% 3,760 
Transfer to Reserves 0 106 (106)    i        
Position after Transfer to Reserves 4,164 4,112 52 under 1.25%   
Variance Explanations  
1. The anticipated overspend in Employee Costs is due to a lower than budgeted level of turnover during the financial year.
2. The projected over recovery of income is due to higher than budgeted income relating to Landlord Registration applications.   
Budget Virements  
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.116m: Employee Costs £0.116m.  
Transfer to Reserves  
i. Grants to Voluntary Organisations - An underspend on the Grants budget has been set aside to support the delay in the 
implementation of the Grants saving as agreed at Council (26 February 2025). 
23

Page 24

Appendix I 
South Lanarkshire Council 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Finance & Corporate Resources Committee: Period Ended 24 January 2025 (No.11) 
Personnel 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000   £000      
Employee Costs 6,470 6,580 (110) over (1.70%) 5,161 1, a, b               
Property Costs 0 10 (10) over 0.00% 10 
Supplies & Services 121 160 (39) over (32.23%) 109 
Transport & Plant 9 2 7 under 77.78% 0 
Administration Costs 1,205 1,222 (17) over (1.41%) 813 
Payments to Other Bodies 284 220 64 under 22.54% 158 2               
Payments to Contractors 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Transfer Payments 0 0 0 - 0.00% 0 
Financing Charges 36 67 (31) over (86.11%) 2 
Total Controllable Exp. 8,125 8,261 (136) over (1.67%) 6,253 
Total Controllable Inc. (1,800) (1,731) (69) under
recovered (3.83%) (541) 3               
Net Controllable Exp. 6,325 6,530 (205) over (3.24%) 5,712 
Transfer to Reserves 0 0 0            
Position after Transfer to Reserves 6,325 6,530 (205) over (3.24%)          
Variance Explanations  
1. The anticipated overspend in Employee Costs is due to a lower than budgeted level of turnover during the financial year.
2. The projected underspend relates to lower than budgeted legal costs in the financial year.
3. The anticipated under recovery of income mainly relates to lower than budgeted income from third party settlements. 
Budget Virements  
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to 2024/2025 pay award.  Net Effect £0.237m: Employee Costs £0.237m.
b. Transfer to IT Services in relation to employee moves.  Net Effect (£0.182m): Employee Costs (£0.182m). 
24

Page 25

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Capital Budget Monitoring 2024/2025 - Finance and
Corporate Resources 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide information on the progress of the capital programme for Finance and
Corporate Resources for the period 1 April 2024 to 24 January 2025
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the Finance and Corporate Resources capital programme of
£3.086 million, and forecast expenditure of £2.678 million, be noted.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. This is the fourth capital monitoring report presented to the Finance and Corporate
Resources Committee for the financial year 2024/2025.  A final report will be
provided following financial year-end. 
3.2. The budget of £3.086 million for Finance and Corporate Resources is based on the
overall Capital Programme for 2024/2025, as approved by the Executive Committee
on 26 June 2024.  There has been no change to this budget since the last report to
this Committee. 
3.3. The report details the financial position for Finance and Corporate Resources in
Appendix A. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. There are no employee implications as a result of this report. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. 2024/2025 Budget 
As detailed in Section 3.2, the revised capital programme for Finance and Corporate
Resources is £3.086 million. 
5.2. 2024/2025 Forecast
Appendix A shows a forecast for the financial year of £2.678 million.  This forecast
underspend reflects the timing of spend across this year and into the new financial
year, and results in budget required in 2025/2026 rather than 2024/2025.  Funding
for projects remaining underspent at the financial year end will be carried forward to 
5
25

Page 26

allow the projects to be completed in 2025/2026.  As at 24 January 2025, work
continues to clarify the predicted spend position for the programme for the remainder
of this financial year.  Officers will continue to work to maximise spend in 2024/2025. 
5.3. For information, actual expenditure to 24 January 2025 is £2.468 million. 
6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
7. Other Implications
7.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Capital Programme is that there is an
overspend.  The risk has been assessed as low given the detailed project
management plans prepared and monitored for each project.  The risk of overspend
is managed through four weekly Investment Management Meetings. 
8. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
8.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact
assessment is required. 
8.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
24 February 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Finance and Corporate Resources Committee, 29 January 2025 
List of Background Papers
 Financial ledger to 24 January 2025 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Graham Booth, Finance Manager (Strategy) 
Ext:  2699 (Tel:  01698 452699)
E-mail: graham.booth@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
26

Page 27

Appendix A 
South Lanarkshire Council
Capital Expenditure 2024-2025
Finance and Corporate Resources Programme
For Period 1 April 2024 – 24 January 2025 
Finance and Corporate
Resources Total Original
Budget 
£000
Budget
Adjustments
£000
Slippage
£000
Total
Budget
£000 
Forecast
Spend
£000 
Forecast
Variance
£000
Actual
Expenditure
£000
Information Technology Services  3,086 - - 3,086 2,678 408 2,468
TOTAL 3,086 - - 3,086 2,678 408 2,468 
27

Page 28

28

Page 29

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Finance and Corporate Resources – Workforce
Monitoring – December 2024 and January 2025 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide employment information for December 2024 to January 2025 relating to
Finance and Corporate Resources
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the following employment information for December 2024 to January
2025 relating to Finance and Corporate Resources be noted:- 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health
 accident/incident statistics
 discipline, grievance and Dignity at Work cases
 analysis of leavers and exit interviews
 staffing watch as at 14 December 2024 
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. As part of the Council’s performance management arrangements, regular workforce
monitoring reports are submitted to Committee.  This report for Finance and
Corporate Resources provides information on the position for December 2024 to
January 2025. 
4. Monitoring Statistics
4.1. Attendance Statistics (Appendix 1) 
Information on absence statistics is analysed for the month of January 2025 for
Finance and Corporate Resources. 
The Resource absence figure for January 2025 was 3.7%, this figure has decreased
by 0.7% when compared to the previous month and is 3.0% lower than the Council-
wide figure.  Compared to January 2024, the Resource absence figure has
increased by 0.9%. 
Based on the absence figures at January 2025 and annual trends, the annual
average absence for the Resource for 2024/2025 is 3.4%, compared to a Council-
wide average figure of 5.8%.
6
29

Page 30

Managers follow the procedures outlined in the Maximising Attendance Policy to
support employees to remain at work, or to return to work after a sickness absence. 
There are comprehensive employee supports in place and additionally, Personnel
Services work in close partnership with line managers and Resource Management
Teams on a case management basis to ensure that appropriate actions are taken. 
4.2. Occupational Health (Appendix 2) 
In terms of referrals to occupational health, which include medical examinations and
physiotherapy, overall, 35 referrals were made this period.  This represents an
increase of 5 when compared with the same period last year. 
4.3. Accident/Incident Statistics
There were 3 accidents/incidents recorded within the Resource this period. 
4.4. Discipline, Grievance and Dignity at Work (Appendix 2) 
During the period, 1 disciplinary hearing was held within the Resource.  This figure
has increased by 1 when compared to the same period last year.  No appeals were
heard by either the Resource or the Appeals Panel, this figure has also remained the
same when compared to last year and no appeals panels were pending.  No
grievance or Dignity at Work complaints were raised within the Resource, these
figures remain unchanged when compared to the same period last year. 
4.5. Analysis of Leavers (Appendix 2a) 
There were a total of 2 leavers this period eligible for an exit interview.  This figure
has decreased by 4, when compared with the same period last year.  1 exit interview
was conducted this period, this figure has reduced by 2 when compared to the same
period last year. 
5. Staffing Watch (Appendix 3)
5.1. There has been a decrease of 1 employee in post from 14 September 2024 to
14 December 2024. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. There are no implications for employees arising from the information presented in
this report. 
7. Financial Implications
7.1. All financial implications are accommodated within existing budgets. 
8. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
8.1. There are no Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications in
terms of the information contained within this report. 
9. Other Implications
9.1. There are no implications for sustainability or risk in terms of the information
contained within this report. 
10. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
10.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact
assessment is required.
30

Page 31

10.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
3 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Ambitious, self aware and improving
 Excellent employer
 Focused on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others 
Previous References
 Finance and Corporate Resources – 29 January 2025 
List of Background Papers
 Monitoring information provided by Finance and Corporate Resources 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Eileen McPake, HR Business Manager
Ext: 4647 (Tel: 01698 454647)
E-mail:  Eileen.McPake@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
31

Page 32

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 2.8 3.6 2.8 April 0.0 0.0 0.0 April 2.8 3.6 2.8 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 3.2 3.9 3.2 May 0.0 0.0 0.0 May 3.2 3.9 3.2 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 4.0 4.2 3.2 June 0.0 0.0 0.0 June 4.0 4.2 3.2 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 3.9 3.5 3.5 July 0.0 0.0 0.0 July 3.9 3.5 3.5 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 4.1 3.8 2.6 August 0.0 0.0 0.0 August 4.1 3.8 2.6 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 3.6 3.9 3.2 September 0.0 0.0 0.0 September 3.6 3.9 3.2 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 3.8 3.2 3.2 October 0.0 0.0 0.0 October 3.8 3.2 3.2 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 3.4 3.5 4.6 November 0.0 0.0 0.0 November 3.4 3.5 4.6 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 4.3 3.3 4.4 December 0.0 0.0 0.0 December 4.3 3.3 4.4 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 4.3 2.8 3.7 January 0.0 0.0 0.0 January 4.3 2.8 3.7 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 3.8 3.5 February 0.0 0.0 February 3.8 3.5 February 5.9 6.4
March 3.8 2.6 March 0.0 0.0 March 3.8 2.6 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 3.8 3.5 3.4 Annual Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 Annual Average 3.8 3.5 3.4 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 3.7 3.6 3.4 Average Apr-Jan 0.0 0.0 0.0 Average Apr-Jan 3.7 3.6 3.4 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
818 0 818 15713
Manual Workers
No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Appendix 1
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
Finance and Corporate Resources
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
APT&C Council Wide
32

Page 33

Dec - Jan Dec - Jan
2023 / 2024 2024 / 2025
MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS
Number of Employees Attending
EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING SERVICE
Total Number of Referrals
PHYSIOTHERAPY SERVICE
Total Number of Referrals
REFERRALS TO EMPLOYEE SUPPORT OFFICER 11 10
REFERRALS TO COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR
THERAPY 0 0
TOTAL 30 35
Dec - Jan Dec - Jan
2023 / 2024 2024 / 2025
Specified Injuries* 0 0
Over 7 day absences 0 0
Over 3 day absences** 0 0
Minor 10 3
Near Miss *** 0 0
Violent Incident:  Physical**** 0 0
Violent Incident:  Verbal***** 0 0
Total Accidents/Incidents 10 3
Dec - Jan Dec - Jan
2023 / 2024 2024 / 2025
Total Number of Hearings 0 1
Total Number of Appeals 0 0
Appeals Pending 0 0
Time Taken to Convene Hearing October - Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
0-3 Weeks 4-6 Weeks Over 6 Weeks
0 0 1
Dec - Jan Dec - Jan
2023 / 2024 2024 / 2025
Number of Grievances 0 0
Number Resolved at Stage 1 0 0
Number Resolved at Stage 2 0 0
Number Resolved at Stage 3 0 0
Still in Progress 0 0
Dec - Jan Dec - Jan
2023 / 2024 2024 / 2025
Number of Incidents 0 0
Number Resolved at Informal Stage 0 0
Number Resolved at Formal Stage 0 0
Number of Appeals 0 0
Appeals in Process 0 0
Still in Process 0 0
***Near Miss - Any unexpected, unplanned occurrence (except Dangerous Occurrences) that does not
lead to injury of persons, damage to property, plant or equipment but may have done so in different
Appendix 2
FINANCE AND CORPORATE  RESOURCES
9 9
0 6
10 10
CAUSE OF ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS
*A Specified Injury is any fracture (other than to the fingers, thumbs or toes), amputation, loss of sight,
serious burns, crushing injury, scalping, loss of consciousness caused by asphyxiation/ head injury, a
chemical or hot metal burn to the eye or penetrating injury as defined by the HSE.
**Over 3 day / over 7day absence is an injury sustained outwith specified injury category that results in a
period of absence of absence as defined by the HSE. 
RECORD OF DIGNITY AT WORK
****Physical violent incidents are included in the "Specified" figures, where applicable, to provide the
****Physical violent incidents and ***** Verbal Violent Incidents are included in the "Over 3-day or Over 7-
day" figures, where applicable, to provide the "Total Over 3-day or Over 7-day" figures.
****Physical Violent Incidents and ***** Verbal Violent Incidents are included in the "Minor" figures, where
applicable, to provide the "Total Minor" figures.
RECORD OF DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS
RECORD OF GRIEVANCE HEARINGS
33

Page 34

Dec - Jan Dec - Jan
2023 / 2024 2024 / 2025
Career Advancement 5 2
Personal Reasons 1
Total Number of Leavers Eligible for Exit Interview 6 2
Number of Exit Interviews conducted 3 1
Percentage of interviews conducted 50% 50%
ANALYSIS OF REASONS FOR LEAVING
Appendix 2a
FINANCE AND CORPORATE  RESOURCES
34

Page 35

As at 14 December 2024
Total Number of Employees
F/T P/T F/T P/T
183 24 365 249
Chief Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher TOTAL
8.00 92.08 340.45 210.38 55.05 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 727.96
As at 14 September 2024
Total Number of Employees
F/T P/T F/T P/T
183 24 366 249
Chief Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher TOTAL
8.00 93.90 341.81 210.36 53.96 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 730.03
*Full - Time Equivalent No of Employees
Salary Bands
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
822
Appendix 3
JOINT STAFFING WATCH RETURN
FINANCE AND CORPORATE RESOURCES
*Full - Time Equivalent No of Employees
Salary Bands
821
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
35

Page 36

36

Page 37

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Council-wide Workforce Monitoring – December 2024
to January 2025 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide employment information relating to the Council for the period December
2024 to January 2025
[1purpose] 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the following employment information for the period December 2024 to
January 2025 relating to the Council be noted: - 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health
 accident/incident statistics
 discipline, grievance and Dignity at Work cases
 analysis of leavers and exit interviews
 recruitment monitoring
 staffing watch as at 14 December 2024
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. As part of the Council’s performance management arrangements, regular workforce
monitoring reports are submitted to the Committee.  This report for the Council
provides information on the position for the period December 2024 to January 2025. 
4. Attendance Statistics
4.1. Information on absence statistics for the Council and each Resource, as analysed for
January 2025, is provided in Appendices 1 to 8.  Points to note are:- 
The Council’s absence rate for January 2025, shown in Appendix 1, is 6.7%, which
represents an decrease of 0.3% when compared with last month and the figure has
increased by 0.6% when compared to January 2024. 
When compared to January 2024, the APT&C absence rate has increased by 1.0%,
the teachers’ figure has increased by 0.1% and the manual workers’ figure has
increased by 0.5%. 
Based on annual trends and the absence rate to January 2025, the average absence
rate for the Council for the financial year 2024/2025 is 5.7%. 
7
37

Page 38

In comparison to January 2024 (Appendix 8):- 
 Psychological, musculoskeletal and respiratory conditions are the main reasons
for absence
 Total days lost due to psychological conditions have increased by 155 days
 Total days lost due to musculoskeletal conditions have decreased by 440days
 Total days lost due to respiratory conditions have increased by 351 days
 Total days lost due to stomach, bowel, blood and metabolic disorders have
increased by 358 days 
Managers follow the procedures outlined in the Maximising Attendance Policy to
support employees to remain at work, or to return to work after a sickness absence. 
There are comprehensive employee supports in place and additionally, Personnel
Services work in close partnership with line managers and Resource Management
Teams on a case management basis to ensure that appropriate actions are taken. 
5. Occupational Health
5.1. Information on Occupational Health for the period December 2024 to January 2025
is provided in Appendix 9. 
 during the period there were 304 employees referred for a medical examination,
an increase of 34 when compared to the same period last year.  Both
musculoskeletal and psychological conditions continue to be the main reason for
medical referrals
 a total of 301 employees attended physiotherapy treatment, showing a increase
of 16 when compared to the same period last year.  Of the 301 employees
referred, 66% remained at work whilst undertaking treatment
 during this period 361 employees were referred to the Employee Support Officer,
showing a increase of 36 when compared with the same period last year.  Of the
referrals made this period, 90% related to personal reasons
 62 employees were referred to the PAM Assist counselling service this period,
showing an decrease of 33 when compared with the same period last year. All
the referrals made this period were made directly by employees.  Work related
referrals accounted for 15% and 85% were for personal/other reasons
 3 employees were referred for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy this period, a
decrease of 9 when compared to the same period last year 
6. Accidents/Incidents
6.1. The accident/incident reported for December 2024 to January 2025 is contained in
Appendix 10. 
 the total number of accidents/incidents recorded was 170, 53 of these have been
investigated and categorised and 117 are still in the process of being investigated
 of those investigated, no specified injuries were recorded
 of those investigated there were 52 minor accidents/incidents
 of those investigated no accident resulted in an absence lasting over 3 days
 of those investigated, 1 accident resulted in an absence lasting over 7 days 
7. Discipline, Grievance, Dignity at Work Hearings and Mediation Referrals
7.1. Information on Disciplinary, Grievance Hearings, Dignity at Work and Mediation
Referrals for December 2024 to January 2025 is contained in Appendices 11, 12a
and 12b. 
38

Page 39

 in total, 41 disciplinary hearings were held and concluded across Resources
within the Council, this figure has increased by 27 when compared to the same
period last year
 action was taken in 39 of these cases and 3 appeals were raised against the
outcomes
 our target is to convene disciplinary hearings within 6 weeks, 68% of hearings
met this target
 during the period, 1 appeal was heard by the Appeals Panel and 1 is pending a
date being scheduled
 during the period, 1 grievance and 7 Dignity at Work complaints were raised
 during the period, 1 referral for mediation was submitted 
8. Analysis of Leavers and Exit Interviews
8.1. Information on the number of leavers and exit interviews for the period December
2024 to January 2025 is contained in Appendix 13.  Exit interviews are conducted
with employees who leave voluntarily. 
Labour Turnover 
Using information compiled from Resources and Staffing Watch information as at
14 December 2024, the Council’s turnover figure for December to January 2025 is as
follows:- 
75 leavers eligible for exit interviews/15,716 employees in post = Labour Turnover of
0.5%. 
Based on the figure at January 2024, the annual labour turnover figure for the
financial year 2024/2025 for the Council is 3,8%. 
8.2. Analysis of Leavers and Exit Interviews 
 there were a total of 75 employees leaving the Council that were eligible for an
exit interview, a decrease of 32 when compared with the same period last year
 there were a total of 8 exit interviews conducted which is a decrease of 33 when
compared with same period last year 
9. Recruitment Monitoring
9.1. Information on Recruitment Monitoring for December 2024 to January 2025 is
contained within Appendix 14. 
From an analysis of Equal Opportunities Monitoring Forms, the main points to note
are:- 
 3,784 applications and 3,317 completed Equal Opportunities Monitoring Forms
were received
 of those applicants who declared themselves as disabled (531), 197 were
shortleeted for interview and 37 were appointed
 of those applicants of a black/ethnic minority background (362), 106 were
shortleeted for interview and 9 were appointed
 Of those applicants who are veterans (37), 20 were shortleeted for interview and
5 were appointed 
Point to note:  Appendix 14.  The increase is a result of a sweep up exercise to
conclude all recruitment on the previous recruitment system which was being
decommissioned as a result of the launch of Oracle Fusion 
39

Page 40

10. Staffing Watch
10.1 There has been an decrease of 10 in the number of employees in post from
14 September 2024 to 14 December 2024.  Details of the staffing watch are
contained in Appendix 15. 
11. Employee Implications
11.1. There are no implications for employees arising from the information presented in
this report. 
12. Financial Implications
12.1. All financial implications are accommodated within existing budgets. 
13. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
13.1. There are no climate change, sustainability or environmental implications arising
from the information presented in this report. 
14. Other Implications
14.1. There are no implications for risk in terms of the information contained within this
report. 
15. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
15.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact
assessment is required. 
15.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
7 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving
 Excellent employer
 Focused on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others 
Previous References
 Finance and Corporate Resources Committee – 30 October 2024 
List of Background Papers
 Monitoring information provided by Resources 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact: -
Elaine Maxwell, HR Business Manager
Ext: 4647 (Tel: 01698 454647)
E-mail:  Elaine.Maxwell@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
40

Page 41

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.2 5.2 5.2 April 2.7 2.8 2.9 April 8.8 7.0 7.3 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 5.0 5.1 5.4 May 3.6 3.2 3.0 May 7.6 6.2 7.1 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 5.0 4.9 5.3 June 2.6 2.2 2.8 June 8.1 6.5 7.2 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 4.5 4.0 4.3 July 1.4 1.1 1.0 July 7.4 5.8 6.3 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 4.3 4.2 4.6 August 1.4 1.3 1.9 August 7.4 6.2 7.5 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 5.2 5.2 6.2 September 2.8 2.9 3.5 September 8.0 7.6 8.3 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 5.7 5.2 6.3 October 3.4 2.7 3.8 October 8.1 7.1 7.7 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 6.3 6.1 7.0 November 4.7 4.3 5.0 November 8.6 8.1 8.4 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 6.7 6.7 7.1 December 5.3 4.8 5.4 December 8.9 7.8 8.5 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 5.2 5.8 6.8 January 4.3 4.8 4.9 January 8.0 7.8 8.3 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 5.7 6.3 February 4.1 4.9 February 7.9 8.0 February 5.9 6.4
March 6.2 6.3 March 4.6 4.1 March 8.3 8.1 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 5.4 5.4 5.9 Annual Average 3.4 3.3 3.6 Annual Average 8.1 7.2 7.7 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 5.3 5.2 5.8 Average Apr-Jan 3.2 3.0 3.4 Average Apr-Jan 8.1 7.0 7.7 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
7286 4027 4400 15713
Council Wide
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Appendix 1
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
Council Wide
APT&C Teachers
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Manual Workers
41

Page 42

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 4.4 3.6 3.2 April 7.3 6.3 6.8 April 6.9 6.0 6.3 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 3.9 3.7 3.1 May 6.8 6.3 6.3 May 6.3 5.9 5.9 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 3.5 4.3 4.1 June 7.2 5.9 6.4 June 6.7 5.7 6.0 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 3.9 2.3 3.8 July 5.9 4.6 4.5 July 5.6 4.3 4.4 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 3.4 3.0 3.4 August 6.6 5.2 6.2 August 6.1 4.9 5.7 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 3.1 2.5 3.8 September 7.9 7.1 7.5 September 7.1 6.4 6.9 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 5.1 2.0 4.2 October 7.5 7.0 7.2 October 7.1 6.3 6.7 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 4.2 2.6 3.6 November 8.3 8.1 8.3 November 7.7 7.3 7.6 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 3.7 3.0 3.8 December 8.8 7.5 8.1 December 8.0 6.8 7.4 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 2.6 3.6 3.9 January 7.4 7.4 7.8 January 6.7 6.9 7.2 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 3.6 4.0 February 7.4 7.8 February 6.9 7.2 February 5.9 6.4
March 3.9 3.2 March 7.9 7.9 March 7.3 7.2 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 3.8 3.2 3.7 Annual Average 7.4 6.8 7.1 Annual Average 6.9 6.2 6.5 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 3.8 3.1 3.7 Average Apr-Jan 7.4 6.5 6.9 Average Apr-Jan 6.8 6.1 6.4 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
587 2828 3415 15713
Manual Workers Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Appendix 2
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
Community and Enterprise Resources
APT&C Council Wide
42

Page 43

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.5 5.0 5.4 April 2.7 2.8 2.9 April 4.0 3.8 4.0 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 5.5 5.4 6.0 May 3.6 3.2 3.0 May 4.5 4.2 4.4 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 5.1 4.8 5.5 June 2.6 2.2 2.8 June 3.7 3.4 4.1 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 3.8 3.4 3.2 July 1.4 1.1 1.0 July 2.5 2.2 2.0 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 3.6 4.0 3.9 August 1.4 1.3 1.9 August 2.4 2.5 2.8 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 5.8 5.9 6.6 September 2.8 2.9 3.5 September 4.1 4.3 4.9 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 6.5 5.5 6.5 October 3.4 2.7 3.8 October 4.8 4.0 5.0 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 7.9 7.1 7.8 November 4.7 4.3 5.0 November 6.2 5.6 6.2 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 8.5 8.1 8.6 December 5.3 4.8 5.4 December 6.8 6.3 6.8 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 6.1 6.6 8.0 January 4.3 4.8 4.9 January 5.1 5.6 6.3 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 6.8 7.2 February 4.1 4.9 February 5.4 6.0 February 5.9 6.4
March 7.0 7.5 March 4.6 4.1 March 5.7 5.7 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 6.0 5.9 6.4 Annual Average 3.4 3.3 3.6 Annual Average 4.6 4.5 4.9 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 5.8 5.6 6.2 Average Apr-Jan 3.2 3.0 3.4 Average Apr-Jan 4.4 4.2 4.7 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
3244 4027 7271 15713
Appendix 3
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
Education Resources
Council WideAPT&C Teachers Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
43

Page 44

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 2.8 3.6 2.8 April 0.0 0.0 0.0 April 2.8 3.6 2.8 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 3.2 3.9 3.2 May 0.0 0.0 0.0 May 3.2 3.9 3.2 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 4.0 4.2 3.2 June 0.0 0.0 0.0 June 4.0 4.2 3.2 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 3.9 3.5 3.5 July 0.0 0.0 0.0 July 3.9 3.5 3.5 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 4.1 3.8 2.6 August 0.0 0.0 0.0 August 4.1 3.8 2.6 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 3.6 3.9 3.2 September 0.0 0.0 0.0 September 3.6 3.9 3.2 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 3.8 3.2 3.2 October 0.0 0.0 0.0 October 3.8 3.2 3.2 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 3.4 3.5 4.6 November 0.0 0.0 0.0 November 3.4 3.5 4.6 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 4.3 3.3 4.4 December 0.0 0.0 0.0 December 4.3 3.3 4.4 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 4.3 2.8 3.7 January 0.0 0.0 0.0 January 4.3 2.8 3.7 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 3.8 3.5 February 0.0 0.0 February 3.8 3.5 February 5.9 6.4
March 3.8 2.6 March 0.0 0.0 March 3.8 2.6 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 3.8 3.5 3.4 Annual Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 Annual Average 3.8 3.5 3.4 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 3.7 3.6 3.4 Average Apr-Jan 0.0 0.0 0.0 Average Apr-Jan 3.7 3.6 3.4 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
818 0 818 15713
Manual Workers
No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 January 2025
Appendix 4
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
Finance and Corporate Resources
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
APT&C Council Wide
44

Page 45

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.5 5.7 5.3 April 10.6 6.9 7.2 April 7.6 6.2 6.1 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 4.5 4.9 5.2 May 8.1 6.1 8.1 May 6.0 5.4 6.4 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 4.9 5.4 5.7 June 8.5 6.8 8.4 June 6.4 6.0 6.8 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 5.5 5.0 5.3 July 8.9 8.1 8.6 July 6.9 6.2 6.7 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 4.7 5.1 5.5 August 7.1 8.5 8.8 August 5.7 6.4 6.9 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 4.5 4.7 7.5 September 6.3 7.8 7.4 September 5.2 6.0 7.5 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 4.3 4.9 7.3 October 7.8 5.2 6.0 October 5.8 5.0 6.8 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 4.6 4.8 6.8 November 7.8 6.7 6.2 November 5.9 5.6 6.5 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 4.4 5.1 6.4 December 7.2 7.4 5.8 December 5.6 6.0 6.2 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 4.5 4.4 7.0 January 5.5 6.0 6.2 January 4.9 5.0 6.7 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 4.4 5.2 February 6.2 6.3 February 5.1 5.6 February 5.9 6.4
March 5.3 5.3 March 6.8 7.2 March 5.9 6.1 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 4.8 5.0 6.0 Annual Average 7.6 6.9 7.2 Annual Average 5.9 5.8 6.5 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 4.7 5.0 6.2 Average Apr-Jan 7.8 7.0 7.3 Average Apr-Jan 6.0 5.8 6.7 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
860 544 1404 15713
Appendix 5
Housing & Technical Resources
Resource Total
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
APT&C Manual Workers Council Wide
No of Employees at 31 January 2025No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
45

Page 46

2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2022 /
2023
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 6.2 6.5 6.5 April 12.6 9.4 8.8 April 8.3 7.4 7.3 April 5.6 5.1 5.2
May 5.7 5.8 5.8 May 10.1 8.4 9.5 May 7.1 6.6 7.0 May 5.4 5.1 5.3
June 5.9 5.5 6.0 June 11.3 8.6 9.2 June 7.6 6.5 7.0 June 5.3 4.7 5.2
July 6.0 5.4 6.5 July 11.8 8.8 11.2 July 7.9 6.5 8.0 July 4.6 3.8 4.1
August 6.0 4.8 6.9 August 10.8 8.6 11.4 August 7.5 6.0 8.4 August 4.4 4.1 4.7
September 5.9 5.6 7.2 September 9.6 9.3 12.0 September 7.1 6.8 8.8 September 5.4 5.3 6.1
October 5.8 6.5 7.5 October 10.4 8.5 11.0 October 7.3 7.1 8.6 October 5.8 5.1 6.0
November 6.0 7.3 8.1 November 10.4 9.0 10.0 November 7.4 7.8 8.7 November 6.5 6.2 6.9
December 6.4 7.4 7.0 December 10.6 9.5 11.6 December 7.7 8.1 8.5 December 7.0 6.6 7.0
January 5.2 7.0 6.7 January 12.0 10.3 11.3 January 7.4 8.1 8.2 January 5.8 6.1 6.7
February 5.8 7.0 February 11.0 9.9 February 7.5 7.9 February 5.9 6.4
March 7.0 7.1 March 10.9 9.4 March 8.2 7.9 March 6.4 6.3
Annual Average 6.0 6.3 6.9 Annual Average 11.0 9.1 10.4 Annual Average 7.6 7.2 8.0 Annual Average 5.7 5.4 5.8
Average Apr-Jan 5.9 6.2 6.8 Average Apr-Jan 11.0 9.0 10.6 Average Apr-Jan 7.5 7.1 8.1 Average Apr-Jan 5.6 5.2 5.7
1777 1028 2805 15713
Appendix 6
Absence Trends - 2022/2023, 2023/2024 & 2024/2025
Social Work Resources
APT&C Council WideResource TotalManual Workers
No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025 No of Employees at 31 January 2025
46

Page 47

Appendix 7
Absence by long and short term
From: 1 November 2024 to 31 January 2025
Community and Enterprise 3415 2.8 4.8 7.6 2.2 5.2 7.4 2.7 4.5 7.2
Education 7271 2.6 3.6 6.2 2.1 4.7 6.8 2.6 3.7 6.3
Finance and Corporate 818 2.3 2.3 4.6 1.8 2.6 4.4 1.5 2.2 3.7
Housing & Technical 1404 2.2 4.3 6.5 1.7 4.5 6.2 3.2 3.5 6.7
Social Work 2805 2.6 6.1 8.7 2.6 5.9 8.5 2.8 5.5 8.2
Council Overall for November
2024 to January 2025 15713 2.6 4.3 6.9 2.2 4.8 7.0 2.6 4.1 6.7
January 2025
Total Short
Term %
Total Long
Term %
Resource
Total
Absence %
Resource No of
employees
Resource
Total
Absence %
December 2024
Total Short
Term %
Total
Long
Term %
November 2024
Total Short
Term %
Total Long
Term %
Resource Total
Absence %
47

Page 48

From : 1 January 2025 - 31 January 2025
Total
WDL % Total
WDL % Total
WDL % Total
WDL % Total
WDL %
Musculoskeletal 1485 28 1197 13 58 10 485 26 805 19 4030 19
Psychological 1415 27 3596 39 215 36 486 26 1451 35 7163 34
Stomach, Bowel, Blood, Metabolic Disorders 591 11 804 9 51 9 194 10 395 10 2035 10
Respiratory 851 16 1762 19 177 30 395 21 859 21 4044 19
Other Classification 984 18 1917 21 92 16 336 18 639 15 3968 19
Total Days Lost By Resource 5326 100 9276 100 593 100 1896 100 4149 100 21240 100
Total Work Days Available
From : 1 January 2024 - 31 January 2024
Total
WDL % Total
WDL % Total
WDL % Total
WDL % Total
WDL %
Musculoskeletal 1684 32 1452 16 82 17 377 24 875 20 4470 21
Psychological 1370 26 3209 35 168 34 569 37 1692 39 7008 34
Stomach, Bowel, Blood, Metabolic Disorders 397 8 751 8 14 3 132 8 383 9 1677 8
Respiratory 756 14 1956 21 85 17 264 17 632 14 3693 18
Other Classification 1047 20 1758 19 147 30 214 14 783 18 3949 19
Total Days Lost By Resource 5254 100 9126 100 496 100 1556 100 4365 100 20797 100
Total Work Days Available
*WDL = Work Days Lost
74077 147854 16012
Social Work
Resources
53999309481793916276476391
Percentage
Housing and
Technical
Resources
Education
Resources
PercentageTotal WDL
By ReasonREASONS
Community and
Enterprise
Resources
Education
Resources
Finance and
Corporate
Housing and
Technical
Resources
Finance and
Corporate
28332 50445
Appendix 8
Attendance Monitoring
Absence Classification
Reasons
Community and
Enterprise
Resources
Social Work
Resources Total WDL
By Reason
48

Page 49

Appendix 9
Teachers Others
16 5 14 0 9 25
15 13 11 4 12 26
2 2 1 0 3 3
3 2 2 0 1 3
2 1 0 1 0 2
2 1 0 0 1 2
3 5 11 1 2 1
2 0 0 0 0 2
1 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 2 1 1 1
0 0 0 0 0 0
19 10 19 2 14 22
66 39 60 9 43 87
80 36 41 9 31 73
Dec 23 - Jan 24 Dec 24-Jan 2025 Dec 23 - Jan 24 Dec 24-Jan 2025 Dec 23 - Jan 24 Dec 24-Jan 2025
86 83 67 69 0 0
48 38 151 175 3 0
49 66 11 10 0 0
10 10 15 25 2 0
34 38 81 82 Social Work 3 1
58 66 325 361 Not Disclosed 4 2
285 301 Total 12 3
Reason Dec 23 - Jan 24 Dec 24-Jan 25
Work Stress 19 9
Addicition 0 0
Personal 54 12
Anxiety/Depression 4 33
Bereavement 18 8
Total 95 62
Finance and Corporate
Education
Community and Enterprise
Resource
Housing and Technical
Occupational Health Reports
From: 1 Dec 2024 - 31 January 2025 comparison with 1 December 2023- 31 January 2024
Medical Referrals
Community and
Enterprise
Education Finance and
Corporate
Housing &
Technical Social Work Totals
Musculoskeletal 69
Psychological 81
Cardiovascular 11
Stomach / Bowel / Blood / Metabolic 11
Respiratory 6
Cancer 6
Neurological & Endocrine 23
Gynaecological / Urological 4
Skin 1
Ear, Nose, Throat & Eye 6
Infectious Diseases 0
Non classified 86
Total (Dec 2024 -Jan 2025) 304
Total (Dec 2023 -Jan 2024) 270
No of Employees Referred For Physiotherapy No of Employees Referred To Employee Support Officer No of Employees Referred For Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Resource Resource
Community and Enterprise Community and Enterprise
Education (Teachers) Education
Education (Others) Finance and Corporate
Analysis of Counselling Referrals by Cause
Total
Finance and Corporate Housing and Technical
Housing and Technical Social Work
Social Work Total
49

Page 50

Dec 23 - Jan
24
Dec 24 - Jan-
25
Dec 23 - Jan
24
Dec 24 - Jan-
25
Dec 23 - Jan
24
Dec 24 - Jan-
25
Dec 23 - Jan
24
Dec 24 - Jan-
25
Dec 23 - Jan
24
Dec 24 - Jan-
25
Dec 23 - Jan
24
Dec 24 - Jan-
25
Specified Injury 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Specified Injury (Violence) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Specified Injury* 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Over 7 Day 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1
Over 7 Day (Violence) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Over 7 Day** 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 1
Over 3 Day 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Over 3 Day (Violence) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Over 3 Day** 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
Minor Injury 20 5 24 2 10 3 4 0 18 0 76 10
Near Miss 0 0 8 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 9 1
Violence (Physical) 2 3 248 29 0 0 0 0 4 2 254 34
Violence (Verbal) 1 1 27 2 0 0 0 1 6 3 34 7
Total Minor*** 23 9 307 33 10 3 5 2 28 5 373 52
Total Finalised 30 9 308 33 10 3 5 3 28 5 381 53
Accident 0 3 2 7 0 1 0 1 0 4 2 16
Incident 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 7
Violence (Physical) 0 0 8 83 0 0 0 0 1 1 9 84
Violence (Verbal) 0 0 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 9
Near Miss 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total to be investigated**** 0 3 12 103 0 1 0 1 1 9 13 117
Total Events/Month 30 12 320 136 10 4 5 4 29 14 394 170
****In process relates to records not yet investigated/defined by managers
*Specified Injury is any fracture (other than fingers/toes), amputation, loss or sight, serious burns, crushing injury, scalping, loss of consciousness caused by asphyxiation/head injury, a chemical or hot metal burn to the eye or
penetrating injury as defined by the HSE
Appendix 10
Analysis of Accidents / Incidents
From: 1 December 2024 - 31 January 2025 comparison with 1 December 2023 - 31 January 2024
Accidents by Month of Occurrence
Community and Enterprise Education Finance and Corporate Housing & Tech Social Work TOTAL
**Over 3 Day /Over 7 Day absence relates to events outwith the specified injury category that resulted in an absence or inability to do normal work for more than 3/7 days (not including day of injury)
***A minor injury is an injury not covered by  Over 7 day, Over 3 day or Specified
50

Page 51

APT&C Manual / Craft Teachers Total APT&C Manual / Craft Teachers Total
Community and Enterprise 1 19 N/a 20 0 0 N/a 0 1 19 N/a 20 6 8 6 70% 20.7
Education 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0% 0
Finance and Corporate 1 0 N/a 1 0 0 N/a 0 1 0 N/a 1 0 0 1 0% 1
Housing and Technical 2 0 N/a 2 0 0 N/a 0 2 0 N/a 2 0 2 0 100% 2
Social Work 5 13 N/a 18 0 2 N/a 2 5 11 N/a 16 1 11 6 67% 18
Total  (Dec 24 -Jan 25) 9 32 0 41 0 2 0 2 9 30 0 39 7 21 13 68% 41
Total  (Dec 23 -Jan 24) 1 12 1 14 0 1 0 1 1 11 1 13 8 2 4 71% 14
APT&C Manual/ Craft Teachers Total APT&C Manual/ Craft Teachers Total APT&C Manual/ Craft Teachers Total
Community and Enterprise 1 1 N/A 2 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 2
Education 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Finance and Corporate 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0
Housing and Technical 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0
Social Work 1 0 N/A 1 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 1
Total  (Dec 24-Jan 2025) 2 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Total  (Dec 23-Jan 2024) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*Resources nil responses are not included in figures
Appeal's Panel
From: 1 December 24 - 31 January 2025
Appeal's Panel
Community and Enterprise  
Education
Finance and Corporate
Housing and Technical
Social Work
Total 10
Appendix 11
Outcome of Appeals
Not Upheld
From: 1 December 2024 - 31 January 2025 comparison with 1 December 2023 - 31 January 2024
Appeals pending to date
Record of Disciplinary Hearings
No of weeks to convene Disciplinary Hearing
Total
1
1
0
0
0
0
% Held within
6 Weeks
No of Appeals
No Action
APT&C 4-6 6+3Teachers Total
No of Disciplinary Hearings
Upheld
APT&C
0
0
0
Upheld in Part
0
0
0
Teachers
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Resource
Resource
Action Taken
Upheld Upheld in Part
Manual/ Craft
Outcome of Disciplinary Hearings
Manual/ Craft
0
0
0
0
Withdrawn
0
0
0
10
Not Upheld Total
Appeals
Pending
1 1
0
0
00
51

Page 52

Appendix 12a
Record of Grievances
From: 1 December 2024 - 31 January 2025 comparison with 1 December 2023 - 31 January 2024
Grievances No of Grievances No Resolved at
Stage 1
No Resolved at
Stage 2
No Resolved at
Stage 3
Still in
Process
Community and Enterprise 0 0 0 0 0
Education 0 0 0 0 0
Finance and Corporate 0 0 0 0 0
Housing and Technical 0 0 0 0 0
Social Work 1 0 1 0 0
Total (Dec 24 -Jan 25) 1 0 1 0 0
Total (Dec 23 -Jan 24) 1 0 1 0 0
Dignity at Work
From: 1 December 2024 - 31 January 2025 comparison with 1 December 2023 - 31 January 2024
Dignity at Work No of Incidents No Resolved at
Informal Stage
No Resolved at
Formal Stage No of Appeals Appeals in
Process
Still in
Process
Community and Enterprise 2 0 0 0 0 2
Education 3 0 0 0 0 3
Finance and Corporate 0 0 0 0 0 0
Housing and Technical 1 0 0 0 0 1
Social Work 1 0 0 0 0 1
Total (Dec 24-Jan 25) 7 0 0 0 0 7
Total (Dec 23 - Jan 24) 0 0 0 0 0 0
52

Page 53

Appendix 12b
Referrals for Workplace Mediation
As at January 2025
Workplace Mediation Dec-24 Jan-25
No of Referrals 0 1
*No of Successful Cases 0 0
*No of Unsuccessful Cases 0 0
No of cases unsuitable for mediation 0 0
Workplace Mediation Dec-23 Jan-24
No of Referrals 0 1
*No of Successful Cases 0 0
*No of Unsuccessful Cases 0 0
No of cases unsuitable for mediation 0 0
*successful/unsuccessful case outcomes may be shown outwith the month they were referred.
53

Page 54

Appendix 13
From 1 December 2024 - 31 January 2025
Reason for leaving Community and
Enterprise Education Finance and
Corporate
Housing &
Technical Social Work Total %
Career Advancement 4 7 2 2 7 22 29%
Child Caring / Caring
Responsibilities 1 1 0 0 2 4 5%
Disatisfaction with terms and
conditions 1 0 0 0 0 1 1%
Further Education 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Moving outwith area 1 3 0 2 1 7 9%
Other 6 15 0 0 4 25 33%
Personal Reasons 7 5 0 2 1 15 20%
Poor relationship with managers /
colleagues 1 0 0 0 0 1 1%
Travelling difficulties 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Number of exit interviews
conducted 2 4 1 1 0 8
Total no. of leavers per Resource
eligible for an exit interview 21 31 2 6 15 75
% of leavers interviewed 10% 13% 50% 17% 0% 11%
From 1 December 2023 - 31 January 2024
Number of exit interviews
conducted 9 19 3 4 6 41
Total no. of leavers per Resource
eligible for an exit interview 31 43 6 9 18 107
% of leavers interviewed 29% 44% 50% 44% 33% 38%
* Note these totals include temporary employees
Analysis of leavers and exit interviews
54

Page 55

Appendix 14
Applied Interviewed Appointed % of Applicants
interviewed
% of Applicants
appointed
% of
Interviewees
appointed
3317 1764 469 53% 14% 27%
813 384 100 47% 12% 26%
2421 958 216 40% 9% 23%
531 197 37 37% 7% 19%
2679 1139 251 43% 9% 22%
549 266 62 48% 11% 23%
2907 1651 608 57% 21% 37%
362 106 9 29% 2% 8%
37 20 5 54% 14% 25%
Applied Interviewed Appointed % of Applicants
interviewed
% of Applicants
appointed
% of
Interviewees
appointed
1947 607 145 31% 7% 24%
714 234 50 33% 7% 21%
1230 351 82 29% 7% 23%
61 33 6 54% 10% 18%
1541 436 107 28% 7% 25%
399 144 24 36% 6% 17%
1719 543 130 32% 8% 24%
212 38 2 18% 1% 5%
24 9 0 38% 0% 0%
Recruitment Monitoring
Analysis of Gender, Disability, Ethnicity and Age
From : 1 December 2024 - 31 January 2025
Total Number of applications received: 3784
Total Number of Equal Opportunities Monitoring forms received: 3317
Total Number of posts advertised: 122
Total Number of appointments: 493
Gender / Disability / Age
Total EO Forms Received
Total No of Male Applicants
Total No of Female Applicants
Total No of Disabled Applicants
Total No of applicants aged under 50
Total No of applicants aged over 50
Total No of White applicants
Total No of Black/Ethnic minority applicants*
Total No of Veteran applicants
*Black/Ethnic Minority applicants includes Mixed, Asian, Black and other backgrounds.
From : 1 December 2023 - 31 January 2024
Total Number of applications received: 1973
Total No of applicants aged under 50
Total Number of Equal Opportunities Monitoring forms received: 1947
Total Number of posts advertised: 133
Total Number of appointments: 152
Total No of applicants aged over 50
Total No of White applicants
Total No of Black/Ethnic minority applicants*
Total No of Veteran applicants
*Black/Ethnic Minority applicants includes Mixed, Asian, Black and other backgrounds.
Gender / Disability / Age
Total EO Forms Received
Total No of Male Applicants
Total No of Female Applicants
Total No of Disabled Applicants
55

Page 56

Appendix 15
Resource Total F/T P/T F/T P/T Total Chief
Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher
Community & Enterprise Resources 3387 1206 378 240 1563 2428.85 5.00 1669.72 416.48 269.41 47.94 18.30 0.00 2.00 0.00
Education - Others 3208 99 94 574 2441 2484.97 5.00 1207.06 1072.71 138.64 48.60 11.00 0.00 1.96 0.00
Education - Teachers 4127 708 121 2174 1124 3641.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3641.95
Finance & Corporate Resources 821 183 24 365 249 727.96 8.00 92.08 340.45 210.38 55.05 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing & Technical 1392 770 116 341 165 1282.49 3.00 195.37 680.22 359.41 33.49 9.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Social Work Resources 2781 194 230 949 1408 2386.60 3.00 332.43 1453.91 474.98 85.77 35.51 0.00 1.00 0.00
9310.87 (excluding Teachers)
Total All Staff 15716 3160 963 4643 6950 12952.82 24.00 3496.66 3963.77 1452.82 270.85 95.81 0.00 6.96 3641.95
Resource Total F/T P/T F/T P/T Total Chief
Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher
Community & Enterprise Resources 3439 1244 384 235 1576 2471.12 5.00 1711.95 415.46 269.47 48.94 18.30 0.00 2.00 0.00
Education - Others 3255 104 95 587 2469 2530.85 5.00 1240.13 1087.44 137.72 48.60 11.00 0.00 0.96 0.00
Education - Teachers 4034 711 114 2177 1032 3600.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3600.11
Finance & Corporate Resources 822 183 24 366 249 730.03 8.00 93.90 341.81 210.36 53.96 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing & Technical 1396 774 120 334 168 1284.40 3.00 196.94 674.12 365.25 33.09 10.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Social Work Resources 2780 194 225 964 1397 2398.98 3.00 332.61 1455.57 508.52 64.77 33.51 0.00 1.00 0.00
9415.38 (excluding Teachers)
Total All Staff 15726 3210 962 4663 6891 13015.49 24.00 3575.53 3974.40 1491.32 249.36 94.81 0.00 5.96 3600.11
Quarterly Joint Staffing Watch Return : Number Employed On 14 September 2024
Analysis by Resource
Total Number of Employees Full-Time Equivalent
Male Female Salary Band
Quarterly Joint Staffing Watch Return : Number Employed On 14 December 2024
Analysis by Resource
Total Number of Employees Full-Time Equivalent
Male Female Salary Band
56

Page 57

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Revenue Collection and Approval for Write Offs 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 advise Committee of Revenue Collection performance for financial year
2024/2025 to 31 January 2025
 advise Committee of the position regarding the Non Domestic Rates
Incentivisation Scheme (NDRIS) for financial year 2024/2025
 seek approval for write offs 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that performance in the collection of revenue be noted;
(2) that the current position in respect of NDRIS be noted; and
(3) that write offs for the following be approved:-
 Council Tax  £230,831.40
 Non-Domestic Rates £386,014.73
 BID Levy £6,000.00
 Sundry Debt  £410,430.23
 Housing Rent and associated charges £61,720.86  
3. Background
3.1. Responsibility for the collection of Council Tax, Non-Domestic Rates (NDR) and
Sundry Debt is the responsibility of Finance and Corporate Resources.  This report
and the attached appendix provide information on collection performance and
proposals for write off. 
4. Current Collection Performance
4.1. The first table in Appendix 1 presents the collection performance for Council Tax,
NDR and Sundry Debts for financial year 2024/2025. 
4.2. The annual Council Tax collection target for 2024/2025 has been set at 95.5%. 
Council Tax collection is currently 94.51%, ahead of target by 0.12% and behind
comparable performance in 2023/2024 by 0.05%. 
4.3. Council Tax performance is reported nationally on a line by line basis, which adjusts
for the impact of Scottish Water billing and collection.  For information, the equivalent
level of Council Tax collection at 31 January 2025 when Scottish Water debts are
removed is 95.17%. 
8
57

Page 58

4.4. A Non-Domestic Rates (NDR) collection target of 97.5% has been set for 2024/2025. 
NDR collection is currently 92.9%, ahead of target by 0.1% and ahead of
comparable performance in 2023/2024 by 0.7% due to the profile of payments
received in comparison with the same period last year. 
4.5. The 2024/2025 annual target for Sundry Debt collection has been set at 97.5%. 
Sundry Debt collection to 31 January 2025 was 97.8%, ahead of target by 0.3%.and
ahead of comparable performance in 2023/2024 by 0.5%. 
5. Arrears Collection Performance
5.1. Arrears collection performance for Council Tax, NDR and Sundry Debt is presented
in the second table of Appendix 1. 
5.2. The 2024/2025 arrears annual target for Council Tax has been set at £3.000 million,
with collection to 31 January 2025 of £3.337 million, ahead of target by
£0.890 million (29.7%) and ahead of comparable performance in 2023/2024 by
£0.509 million. 
5.3. The 2024/2025 arrears target for NDR has been set at £2.000 million, with collection
to 31 January 2025 of £3.225 million, ahead of target by £1.298 million (64.9%) and
ahead of comparable performance in 2023/2024 by £0.992 million. 
5.4. The 2024/2025 arrears target for Sundry Debt has been set at £10.153 million, with
collection to 31 January 2025 of £7.966 million, behind target by £1.446 million and
behind comparable performance in 2023/2024 by £0.897 million. 
6. Non Domestic Rates Incentivisation Scheme
6.1. The Non Domestic Rates Incentivisation Scheme (NDRIS), formally known as the
Business Rates Incentivisation Scheme is a Scottish Government initiative to
incentivise growth of the local business tax base, with a view to increasing NDR
income yields. 
6.2. The Scottish Government sets annual targets for growth (buoyancy) and Councils
who achieve their target retain 50% of the additional income generated above the
target.  The buoyancy target is a measure of the increase in the total rateable value
of the non-domestic properties on the Valuation Roll (including certain categories of
public undertakings). 
6.3. The provisional annual buoyancy target for South Lanarkshire Council in 2024/2025
has been set by the Scottish Government at 0.9%.  This is a measure of the increase
in the total rateable value of the non-domestic properties on the Valuation Roll
(including certain categories of public undertakings). 
6.4. Performance against the NDRIS target will be reported to Committee on a quarterly
basis.  Buoyancy to the end of December 2024, was 0.76%. 
6.5. The tax base must achieve growth of more than 0.14% during the last quarter of the
financial year to secure additional income under the scheme. 
7. Proposals for Write Off
7.1. Approval for write off of the following irrecoverable debts is requested from
Committee.  The Council has the power to write off accounts where the debtor is
deceased, sequestrated, in liquidation or the debt is prescribed or where the debt is
deemed uneconomical to pursue. 
58

Page 59

7.2. The proposed write off of Council Tax accounts dating from 1993/1994 to 2024/2025
totals £230,831.40 relating mainly to prescribed debt, sequestrations and estates of
the deceased. 
7.3. The value of accounts currently marked for write off in the Non-Domestic Rates
system from rating years 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 totals £386,014.73.  These debts
are deemed to be irrecoverable because the debtor is in liquidation, has ceased
trading or has been sequestrated. 
7.4. Approval is sought for the write off of Business Improvement District (BID) Levies
totalling £6,000.00, administered by the Council on behalf of the Hamilton, Carluke
and Lanark BID companies.  There is no financial impact on the Council for these
write offs. 
7.5. Following consultation and agreement with Resources, the proposed write off of
Sundry Debt totals £410,430.23.  Appendix 2 provides a breakdown of the proposed
write-off over categories. 
7.6. Approval is sought for the write off of former tenant rent arrears of £61,720.86. 
7.7. A full list of all debts proposed for write off is held by the Executive Director (Finance
and Corporate Resources). 
8. Employee Implications
8.1. None. 
9. Financial Implications
9.1. Provision has been made for the financial impact of all write offs. 
10. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
10.1. There are no direct climate change, sustainability and natural environment
implications arising from this report. 
11. Other Implications
11.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s revenue collection is a failure to monitor
collection rates and take effective corrective action where required, resulting in a
significant reduction in collection performance and Council funding.  The risk is
managed through monthly performance reporting and review of performance at
monthly Senior Management Meetings. 
11.2. There are no implications for sustainability in terms of the information contained in
this report. 
12. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
12.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact
assessment is required. 
59

Page 60

12.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
3 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving 
Previous References
 Finance and Corporate Resources Committee - 29 January 2025 
List of Background Papers
 System Reports from Council Tax, Non-Domestic Rates, Sundry Debt and Academy
Housing 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Craig Fergusson, Head of Finance (Transactions) 
Ext:  4951  (Tel:  01698 454951)
E-mail:  craig.fergusson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
60

Page 61

Appendix 1        
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL        
REVENUES COLLECTION        
FOR PERIOD ENDING 31 JANUARY 2025         
Annual Budget           
Cash Target  Actual Variance   % Variance   
Budget to 31/01/25 to 31/01/25 to 31/01/25   to  Notes 
£000's £000's £000's £000's    annual budget          
FINANCIAL YEAR 2024/2025       
Council Tax 156,673  154,852  155,047  195 over 0.12% 
Non-Domestic Rates 385,983     367,376      367,860         484 over 0.1% 
Sundry Debt 109,118  109,118  109,480  362 over 0.3% 
ARREARS        
Council Tax 3,000  2,447 3,337 890 over  29.7% 
Non-Domestic Rates 2,000    1,957  3,255      1,298 over 64.9% 
Sundry Debt       10,153       9,412       7,966      (1,446)       under         -14.2% 
61

Page 62

Appendix 2 
BREAKDOWN OF PROPOSED
SUNDRY DEBT WRITE-OFF 
Resource Service No. of Accounts Value (£)
Housing & Technical Factoring / H&T General 71                 38,212.47 
Rechargeable Repairs / Capital
Repairs
796               286,020.08
Social Work Residential / Non-Residential / Social
Work General                     
63                 74,518.25
Community and Enterprise Roads / Bereavement 11                   2,697.38
Finance & Corporate Housing Benefit Overpayments  13    8,982.05 
Total 954 410,430.23 
62

Page 63

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Consultation on Universal Credit - Mitigation of the
Two-Child Limit 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1.  The purpose of the report is to:- 
 provide the Committee with the proposed response in relation to the Scottish
Government’s consultation on Universal Credit – Mitigation of the Two-Child Limit 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the consultation response provided at Appendix 1 be approved for
submission to the Scottish Government. 
3. Background
3.1. The consultation is by the Scottish Government Social Security Directorate and looks
at how the Scottish Government can mitigate the effects of the Universal Credit Two-
Child Cap in Scotland.  The deadline for submitted responses is 18 April 2025. 
3.2. Universal Credit is a UK benefit administered by the Department of Works and
Pension and is available for people to apply for across the UK.  It is a means tested
benefit and is the only means tested benefit available that an individual or family can
apply for when they are of working-age.  Where an individual or family are
responsible for a child, a Child Element is paid as part of their entitlement to
Universal Credit. 
3.3. However, the UK Government will only pay a Child Element for the first two children
in a household where any subsequent children are born after the 6 April 2017,
except in limited circumstances. 
3.4. The exceptions are where the third or other subsequent child was part of a multiple
birth (twins etc), the child is part of a non-parental caring agreement or born because
of non-consensual conception. 
3.5. It is known that in April 2024, 42,000 Scottish households with three or more children
were receiving Universal Credit, and of these, 27,000 were in the scope of the Two-
Child Cap due to having children born after the 6 April 2017.  Allowing for
exceptions, it understood 26,000 households in receipt of Universal Credit have had
the Two-Child Cap applied. 
9
63

Page 64

3.6. The Scottish Fiscal Commission (SFC) estimates in April 2024 there were 32,000
children in Scotland where there was no Universal Credit Child Element paid for
them because of the Two-Child Cap.  It is expected this number will increase as
more children are born. 
3.7. On 4 December 2024 the Scottish Government set out plans to mitigate the two-child
cap in Scotland as part of the annual budget statement to the Scottish Parliament. 
The proposal is for a payment equal to the Universal Credit Child Element for each
third and subsequent child impacted by the two-child cap – currently £287.92 each
month, rising to £292.81 in April per child. 
3.8. The SFC estimates that the mitigation will be paid to 42,000 children at a cost of
£3,609 per child per year in 2026/2027 (equivalent to the UC child element payments
for a year), rising to 49,000 children and £3,845 in 2029/2030.  The forecast includes
£3 million in 2026/2027, rising to £9 million in 2029/2030, for behavioural change: for
example, families choosing to work fewer hours to remain eligible for UC, or parents
choosing to receive a mitigation payment from the Scottish Government instead of
applying to DWP for an exception.  On this basis the SFC estimates the total cost of
the policy for 2026/2027 at £155 million, increasing to £198 million in 2029/2030. 
4. Response
4.1. In its response South Lanarkshire Council has noted:- 
 that it supports the Scottish Government taking steps to mitigate the Two-Child
Cap in Universal Credit, using section 79 of the Social Security Scotland Act
2016 through the creation of a stand-alone top-up benefit, administered and paid
by Social Security Scotland
 data sharing between the Scottish and UK Government will be vital to ensure
maximum uptake by identifying those who are in receipt of Universal Credit and
affected by the Two-Child Cap
 any data sharing should be real time data to ensure benefits are paid timeously
and where an underlying qualifying criterion is no longer met, any entitlement to
the top-up benefit ceases.  This will reduce the likelihood of unnecessary
overpayments of the top-up benefit
 it is recognised, however, that there will be households who could be entitled to
the top-up benefit who would not be in receipt of Universal Credit because of the
current operation of the Two Child Cap rules.  It will be vital these households are
also identified so they also can benefit from any mitigation
 there should be a take-up campaign to ensure all those who should benefit, do so
 any take-up campaign should be a national campaign, but should also focus on
local delivery, including promotion in nurseries, schools, jobcentres and other
community venues
 where the top-up benefit is paid, but Universal Credit is not received, the top-up
benefit should be treated as the equivalent of Universal Credit for the purposes of
other Scottish Benefits where receipt of that benefit is a qualifying criterion
 the UK and Scottish Government should disregard any payment of the top-up
benefit for the purposes of calculating any other entitlement to other means
tested benefits
 it is also suggested it should be considered whether the top-up payment should
be made available to the guardians of kinship children, who under current
Universal Credit rules do not qualify for any Child Element in Universal Credit and
where currently the responsibility for making any mitigating payment is the
responsibility of local authorities  
64

Page 65

4.2. The proposed response is attached to the report as appendix 1. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. There are no financial implications arising from the consultation response. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. There are no employee implications arising from the consultation response. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental implications arising
from the consultation response. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. There are no other implications arising from this report. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not include any recommendations in respect of Council policy, so
no consultation or equality impact assessment is required. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
4 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focussed on people and their needs 
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Consultation from the Scottish Government Social Security Directorate 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Craig Fergusson, Head of Finance (Transactions) 
Ext:  4951  (Tel:  01698 454951)
E-mail:  craig.fergusson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
65

Page 66

Appendix 1
South Lanarkshire Council
Consultation on Universal Credit - Mitigation of the Two-Child Limit
Consulting Body: Social Security Directorate, Scottish Government
Response Date: 18 April 2025 
1.Do you agree or disagree with the Scottish Government's assessment that Social
Security Scotland should deliver payments to mitigate the two-child cap in
Scotland? 
We agree with this proposal as it would be a positive step by the Scottish Government to
support the estimated 26,000 families that are affected by the Two-Child Cap in Scotland. 
Our primary concern, however, would be that mitigated payments paid by the Scottish
Government may interfere with other payments paid by the DWP.   
We also believe delivery of this payment should be simple and straight forward for families,
and automatic if they are entitled to it and that is possible.  Any steps to mitigate its effect
on households with children would be welcomed.   
2. Do you agree or disagree that to mitigate the Two-Child Benefit Cap the Scottish
Government should use the powers at s79 to top-up Universal Credit? 
We would support section 79 (Power to Provide Top Up) of the Social Security (Scotland)
Act 2016 being used to create a new top up benefit that could be used to mitigate the
effects of the Two-Child Cap. 
The goal should be to maximise family income and avoid any disruption to their existing
benefits. 
We believe, however, for this to be successful, the UK and Scottish Government must have
effective data sharing agreements in place to ensure all those who are entitled to the top up
benefit are receiving it and to ensure if the qualifying criteria for the top up benefit ceases to
be met, this is communicated timeously to Social Security Scotland (SSS) to avoid any
overpayments. 
We also believe there will be a problem in that there will be households who are not eligible
to receive Universal Credit because of the current operation of the Two Child Cap rules.  A
non-qualifier due to these circumstances is not uncommon and we are not clear how they
will be identified or notified if/that they are entitled to the top-up benefit.  Where the top-up
benefit is paid, but Universal Credit is not received, the top-up benefit should be treated as
the equivalent of Universal Credit for the purposes of other Scottish Benefits where receipt
of that benefit is a qualifying criterion. 
3. Do you agree or disagree that payments to mitigate the Two-Child Cap should be
disregarded as income by the UK Government? 
We fully support that UK and Scottish Governments should disregard payment of the top-up
benefit for the purposes of calculating entitlement to other UK and Scottish benefits.  Failure
to do so will cause further financial hardship to families and be counterproductive in terms
of the policy aims of the top-up benefit.    
66

Page 67

4. Do you have any information you wish to share about any additional potential
impacts of the proposed approach outlined in this consultation? 
Social Security Scotland (SSS) can only gain access to information of those affected by the
cap from the Department of Works and Pensions (DWP).  This involves data sharing.  Data
sharing between large organisations can be complex and challenging.  The information the
SSS receives from the DWP must be real-time information, to avoid potential wrongful
payments. 
SSS should also ensure that effective take-up campaigns are run to ensure information on
the top-up payment is made widely available.  Such take-up campaigns should be operated
nationally and at a local level, and include promotion in nurseries, schools, jobcentres and
other community venues. 
As important as the data sharing is with the DWP, there will also be a risk, that over-
reliance on this information will lead to people being missed, where they have no current
entitlement to Universal Credit because of operation of the Two-Child Cap rules.   
We would also suggest it should be considered whether the top-up payment should be
made available to the guardians of Kinship Children, who under current Universal Credit
rules do not qualify for any Child Element and where the responsibility for making any
mitigating payment is currently the responsibility of local authorities.   
67

Page 68

68

Page 69

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Finance and Public Administration Committee - Call for
Views on the Scottish Budget Process in Practice 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[p
 advise of the Scottish Parliament Finance and Public Administration Committee’s
call for views on the Scottish Budget Process in practice and the Council’s
submitted response
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the content of the report and the Council’s response to the call for views
on the Scottish Budget process in practice be noted; and 
(2) that the consultation response detailed in Appendix 1 be approved and
submitted to the Scottish Government. 
3. Background
3.1. The Finance and Public Administration Committee is carrying out a short, focussed
inquiry on how the Scottish budget process has worked in practice, during the
current parliamentary session (2021 to 2026).  It aims to identify any improvements
that can be made to the budget process, ahead of the next five-year session of
Parliament. 
3.2. The focus of the inquiry will be on the four core objectives that underpin the Scottish
budget process:- 
 to have greater influence on the formulation of the Scottish Government’s budget
proposals;
 to improve transparency and raise public understanding and awareness of the
budget;
 to respond effectively to new fiscal and wider policy challenges;
 to lead to better outputs and outcomes as measured against benchmarks and
stated objectives. 
3.3. A call for views was issued on 12 February 2025, asking for particular feedback on a
number of areas by 26 March 2025.  The specific questions and the Council’s
response is summarised in section 4 of the report and the full response, which will be
submitted prior to the deadline, is attached at Appendix 1. 
10
69

Page 70

4. Call for Views
4.1. The call for views asked for comments in five parts as follows:- 
1  Four Objectives to the Budget Process
2  Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS)
3  Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan
4  Approach to Spending Reviews
5. Effectiveness 
4.2. Officers from Finance and Corporate Resources have prepared a response to the
call for views.  The main points raised in the consultation response are as follows:- 
Part 1: Four Objectives to the Budget Process
 The Council welcomes the Scottish Government’s engagement with COSLA on
this year’s budget and the commitment to continue to progress the positive work
achieved to date. 
 Improved transparency and engagement in the budget process are welcomed
with acknowledgment from the Scottish Government of the continued financial
challenges facing the Council.
 The Budget contained funding to manage some, but not all, policy challenges. 
One particular area of difficulty was Teacher Numbers where there was limited
information being made available to councils in relation to the policy and what the
expectation was around maintaining teacher numbers.  There was (and remains)
a distinct lack of clarity around mitigations to maintaining teacher numbers and
this has a real impact on the Council both financially and operationally. One of the
main issues here is around the lack of communication to councils around this,
and a lack of understanding from the Scottish Government around how this
impacts on councils. 
 In addition, councils were not fully funded for the implications of the increase in
National Insurance Contributions to be made by employers.  
 It would be helpful if the Council were provided with a multi-year financial
settlement.  This would allow the Council to plan and budget more effectively for
the medium and longer term and allow better collaboration with partners to
develop long term plans to deliver better outcomes and address inequalities. 
Part 2: Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS)
 Scotland’s public finances and services have come under significant pressure
since the last Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) was published. The
absence of up-to-date information on the fiscal position makes scrutiny more
challenging and prolongs key decision-making processes.  Consequently, this
increases uncertainty for the Council in terms of its financial planning.
 A multi-year approach to financial planning will help the parliamentary committees
as well as local government, by giving them a degree of certainty in relation to
their funding, and the ability to plan strategically in relation to their policy intent. 
Part 3: Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan
 The Delivery Plan should ensure detailed involvement with stakeholders,
including COSLA and local government, to ensure their plans and policy intent
are deliverable and that any additional funding required to pursue those plans is
added to the local government financial envelope.
70

Page 71

Part 4: Approach to Spending Reviews
 The Resource Spending review in 2022 included multi-year portfolio spending
plans. However, inflationary pressures over the course of 2022/2023 changed
expectations of spending and funding significantly.  Scenario planning for a range
of outcomes should be included in future spending reviews and would enhance
the value of the exercise. 
Part 5: Effectiveness
 The full year budget process allows greater cognisance of the UK Government
Budget timetable, within the plans for the Scottish Budget.  The UK Government
has stated plans to publish its next spending review in spring 2025 and that
spending reviews will be conducted at least every two years in future.  This
should allow a more regular cycle for Scottish Government spending reviews and
allow multi-year budget settlements to be set with greater confidence.
 The effectiveness of the Budget process could be enhanced by including multi-
year financial settlements.  This would allow the Council to better plan and budget
effectively for the medium and longer term and allow more informed decision
making due to having certainty regarding its main funding stream (Government
Grant).
 The Council has an important role in delivering Scottish Government policy and
contributing towards improved outcomes and decisions regarding our overall
funding are a key part of the budget process.  Annual performance and audit
reports and financial returns will continue to support outcomes-based scrutiny to
ensure value for money and to evidence that funding is being used to best effect
to support the delivery of the desired outcomes.
 The process would also benefit from agreement on the message around funding
provided to the Council, with fair and consistent reporting of the financial position
– a realistic statement on what the Local Government Settlement actually means
for councils. 
5. Employee Implications
5.1. There are no employee implications in terms of the information contained in this
report. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. There are no financial implications in terms of the information contained in this
report. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability, or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. There are no implications for sustainability in terms of the information contained in
this report. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function, or strategy and therefore no impact
assessment is required. 
71

Page 72

9.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
4 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Scottish Parliament Finance and Public Administration Committee Inquiry into the
Scottish Budget Process in practice – Call for Views 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Lorraine O’Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel: 01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o’hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
72

Page 73

Appendix 1 
Finance and Public Administration Committee Inquiry into the Scottish Budget
Process in Practice 
Part 1: Four objectives to the budget process  
1. To what extent have the following four objectives for the Scottish budget process been
met this parliamentary session – please address each in turn:
• greater influence on formulation of the Scottish Government’s budget proposals.
• improved transparency and increased public understanding and awareness of the
budget.
• effective responses to new fiscal and wider policy challenges.
• better outputs and outcomes as measured against benchmarks and stated
objectives. 
The Council welcomes the Scottish Government’s engagement with COSLA on this
year’s budget and the commitment to continue to progress the positive work
achieved to date. 
Improved transparency and engagement on the budget process are welcomed with
acknowledgment from the Scottish Government of the continued financial
challenges facing the Council. 
Information flow during the process was appreciated, although full confirmation was
not available until the Order was laid before Parliament in late February.   
The Budget contained funding to manage some, but not all, policy challenges.  One
particular area of difficulty was Teacher Numbers where there was limited
information being made available to councils in relation to the policy and what the
expectation was around maintaining teacher numbers.  There was (and remains) a
distinct lack of clarity around mitigations to maintaining teacher numbers and this
has a real impact on the Council both financially and operationally. One of the main
issues here is around the lack of communication to councils around this, and a lack
of understanding from the Scottish Government around how this impacts on
councils.   
In addition, councils were not fully funded for the implications of the increase in
National Insurance Contributions to be made by employers.   
2. Please set out any barriers to meeting the four core objectives of the budget process and
suggestions as to how these might be overcome. 
It would be helpful if the Council were provided with a multi-year financial settlement. 
This would allow the Council to plan and budget more effectively for the medium and
longer term and allow better collaboration with partners to develop long term plans
to deliver better outcomes and address inequalities. 
Part 2: Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS)  
The MTFS aims to focus on the longer-term sustainability of Scotland’s public finances and
support a strategic approach to financial planning. 
The MTFS is expected to be published annually after the UK Spring Statement and at least
four weeks before summer recess. 
73

Page 74

3. To what extent does the MTFS support a more strategic approach to the Scottish
Government’s financial planning? 
Scotland’s public finances and services have come under significant pressure since
the last Medium-Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) was published. The absence of up-
to-date information on the fiscal position makes scrutiny more challenging and
prolongs key decision-making processes.  Consequently, this increases uncertainty
for the Council in terms of its financial planning. 
4. How is the MTFS currently used by parliamentary committees and how might it be further
developed to support effective scrutiny and a strategic approach to financial planning? 
The MTFS will set out the financial context after the UK Spring Statement each year
and allow parliamentary committees to plan their pre-budget scrutiny in the Autumn,
feeding into the Budget which comes towards the end of the year. 
As noted above, a multi-year approach to financial planning will help the
parliamentary committees as well as local government, by giving them a degree of
certainty in relation to their funding, and the ability to plan strategically in relation to
their policy intent.    
Part 3: Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan  
The Scottish Government said it will publish a Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan alongside
the MTFS 2025 for the first time. 
The government say this will support fiscal transparency and “stable ground” for longer-
term financial planning.    
5. What key areas should the Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan include to ensure it
supports fiscal transparency and “stable ground” for longer-term financial planning? 
The Fiscal Sustainability Delivery Plan should be fully transparent about the scale of
the risks to the affordability of public services and options for how the Scottish
Government can manage them. 
The Delivery Plan should ensure detailed involvement with stakeholders, including
Cosla and local government, to ensure their plans and policy intent are deliverable
and that any additional funding required to pursue those plans is added to the local
government financial envelope.    
6. How should parliamentary scrutiny of this Plan, a new aspect of the budget process,
operate? 
Parliamentary scrutiny of the plan should follow similar lines as the scrutiny of the
MTFS.  The Plan should contain key actions with delivery timescales, so that
progress can be readily monitored. 
Part 4: Approach to spending reviews  
The Scottish Government is expected to carry out a spending review linked to the
equivalent UK spending review.  
74

Page 75

In advance, it is required to publish a framework document setting out the economic and
political context, the criteria which will govern the assessment of budgets and the process
and timetable for the spending review. 
7. Learning from the practice of this parliamentary session, how should the Scottish
Government approach future spending reviews?  
The Resource Spending review in 2022 included multi-year portfolio spending plans.
However, inflationary pressures over the course of 2022/2023 changed expectations
of spending and funding significantly.  Scenario planning for a range of outcomes
should be included in future spending reviews and would enhance the value of the
exercise. 
Part 5: Effectiveness  
Weaknesses previously identified in the budget process include that it did “not take
sufficient account of the interaction of the UK budget timetable with the Scottish budget
timetable, and that parliamentary influence on the formulation of the budget has been
limited”. 
8. To what extent has the full year budget process addressed this weakness? Please set
out the reasons for your response and any suggestions on how any remaining weaknesses
could be better addressed.  
The full year budget process allows greater cognisance of the UK Government
Budget timetable, within the plans for the Scottish Budget.   
The UK Government has stated plans to publish its next spending review in spring
2025 and that spending reviews will be conducted at least every two years in future. 
This should allow a more regular cycle for Scottish Government spending reviews
and allow multi-year budget settlements to be set with greater confidence. 
9. How effective is current public engagement in the budget process and are there any
ways in which this can be improved?  
Budget documents are freely available and published on the Scottish Government
website and the budget process is designed to encourage participation by the public
about how the budget is spent. 
The Draft Budget Scrutiny Phase is a consultation, and interested parties have an
opportunity to make their views known, either in writing or at consultation sessions. 
The Council has its own Budget Consultation process where response rates are
increasing each year as the Council strives to make the consultation more
accessible through a variety of media routes.   
10. What adjustments do you consider are required to enhance the overall effectiveness of
the budget process? 
The effectiveness of the Budget process could be enhanced by including multi-year
financial settlements.  This would allow the Council to better plan and budget
effectively for the medium and longer term and allow more informed decision making
due to having certainty regarding its main funding stream (Government Grant). 
75

Page 76

The process would also benefit from agreement on the message around funding
provided to the Council, with fair and consistent reporting of the financial position –
a realistic statement on what the Local Government Settlement actually means for
councils. 
11. Are any changes needed to the information, guidance and support provided to
parliamentary committees to better support effective budget scrutiny? 
The Council has an important role in delivering Scottish Government policy and
contributing towards improved outcomes and decisions regarding our overall
funding are a key part of the budget process. 
Annual performance and audit reports and financial returns will continue to support
outcomes-based scrutiny to ensure value for money and to evidence that funding is
being used to best effect to support the delivery of the desired outcomes. 
76

Page 77

Report
Agenda Item 
To: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date: 26 March 2025
Prepared by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Consultation on Financial Considerations that Women
Face When Leaving an Abusive Relationship 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of this report is to:- 
 provide committee with the response provided to the consultation from the Social
Justice and Social Security Committee of the Scottish Parliament on financial
considerations that women face when leaving an abusive relationship 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the consultation response provided to the Social Justice and Social
Security Committee detailed in Appendix 1 be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. The consultation by the Social Justice and Social Security Committee of the Scottish
Parliament considering the financial implications that women face when leaving an
abusive relationship, was launched on the 13 December 2024 and closed on the 20
February 2025. 
3.2. Police Scotland recorded 61,934 incidents of domestic abuse in 2022/2023; their
figures also recorded that more than 80% survivors of this abuse were female. 
Abuse can take different forms.  Sometimes, women are hurt by economic abuse. 
This means an abuser restricts a person from getting, using, or keeping money. 
3.3. In 2020, a domestic abuse organisation for women called Refuge found that more
than 8 million adults in the UK have faced economic abuse.  On average, survivors
of economic abuse who find themselves in debt owing £3,272. 
3.4. Women in abusive relationships may also struggle with the cost of living, which may
prevent them leaving the relationship.  In 2022, Women’s Aid reported that almost
three-quarters of women living, and having financial links, with an abuser said the
cost-of-living crisis made it hard for them to leave. 
3.5. The Social Justice and Social Security Committee wants to learn more about:- 
 the support local authorities give to women leaving abusive relationships
 how rules and practices related to the public sector and social security take
account of the financial issues women can face when leaving abusive
relationships 
11
77

Page 78

 how much information and advice is available from public bodies and charities 
4. Response
4.1. In its response South Lanarkshire Council has noted:- 
 the Scottish Government Equal Safe Strategy currently does not contain a
section in it which focuses on economic and financial abuse against women, and
this should be considered
 the current social security system does try to secure women who are in
relationships an independent income, but this is not without challenges,
particularly in relation to Alternative Payment Arrangements for Universal Credit
and Child Benefit.  There may be situations where women do not feel safe
applying for Alternative Payment Arrangements if they are still living with the
abusive partner, as this may worsen their situation.   In relation to Child Benefit,
where the abusive partner is contesting who has main responsibility for the child,
to receive the payment, this may require HMRC Officers to investigate, which can
take time
 local authorities currently do what they can to assist women who are in abusive
relationships when it comes to public sector debt, but this can be dependent on
them being aware of the woman’s situation
 access to justice can be a problem for women fleeing abuse and if they are not
able to access Legal Aid solicitors, this can leave women powerless and allow
the other party to use the law to continue to frustrate their ability to take control of
their lives and move on
 local Authorities are limited as to what assistance they can provide people with
no access to public funds, but do have some powers, under s12 of the Social
Work (Scotland) Act 1968 an s22 of the Child (Scotland) Act 1995.  They also
can, through services like Money Matters Advice Service, provide other forms of
support through charitable bodies, where that support does not constitute
accessing public funds
 services like Money Matters Advice Service can provide advice and information
to women whilst they are in abusive relationships as to what financial support,
they will be able to access after leaving an abusive relationship and can assist
them once they do to claim benefits and obtain control of benefits like Child
Benefit
 Local Government have a statutory duty to provide advice and assistance to
women in relation to their welfare as contained in s12 of the Social Work
(Scotland) Act 1968 and s22 of the Child (Scotland) Act 1995.  They also have a
duty to house people who are homeless under s33 of the Housing (Scotland) Act
1987 and to treat them as homeless where they have accommodation but are at
risk of abuse under s24 of the Act.  They also are the primary funders of advice in
relation to Welfare Benefits and Money Advice in Scotland.  Councils therefore
have a significant role in ensuring an individual’s economic circumstances do not
prevent them from leaving an abusive relationship 
4.2. The Council’s response submitted on 20 February 2025 is attached as Appendix 1 to
the report. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. There are no financial implications arising from the consultation response. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. There are no employee implications arising from the consultation response.  
78

Page 79

7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental implications arising
from the consultation response. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. There are no other implications arising from this report. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not include any recommendations in respect of Council policy, so
no consultation or equality impact assessment is required. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
3 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focussed on people and their needs 
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Consultation by the Social Justice and Social Security Committee 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Craig Fergusson, Head of Finance (Transactions)
Ext:  4951  (Tel:  01698 454951)
E-mail:  Craig.Fergusson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
79

Page 80

Appendix 1 
South Lanarkshire Council
Consultation on financial considerations when leaving an abusive relationship
Consulting Body: Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Response Date: 20 February 2025 
1. To what extent do Scottish Government strategies such as Equally Safe give
proper recognition to financial considerations when leaving an abusive
relationship? 
The Scottish Government’s Equal Safe strategy recognises Violence Against
Women and Girls (VAWG) to include coercive controlling behaviours and
commercial sexual exploitation; however, it doesn’t directly recognise financial
considerations. 
There is recognition that more women are likely to live in poverty than men and that
VAWG sustains this.  Poverty can be a factor in preventing women from accessing
support for safety and wellbeing needs.  Financial abuse can be used to control
women which in turn puts them at further risk. 
Further consideration around this would be welcomed, this includes considering how
women can overcome the challenges of joint Universal Credit claims, where only one
partner is receiving all the funds.  Women need to be more informed in relation to
their right to apply for Alternative Payment Arrangements and have access to clear
information on their rights in relation to benefits and housing. 
2. How well do social security systems take account of domestic abuse?  Do you
have specific examples of social security rules and practices that need to
change?
The current social security system does partly recognise the need for women to have
their own independent source of income in that it allows joint Universal Credit claims
to be applied for an Alternative Payment Arrangement, where the payment is split.  It
also recognises that Child Benefit and Scottish Child Payment should be paid to the
person who is normally responsible for the child most of the time.  However, there
can still be challenges with these arrangements. 
In the case of Alternative Payment Arrangements, many abused partners may be
unwilling to apply for this when they are still in the arrangement, as they may believe
to do so would be unsafe.  Equally, in relation to Child Benefit and Scottish Child
Benefit, disputes can arise as to who has the main responsibility for looking after the
child.  Although there are procedures in place for investigating and resolving these
disputes, they can take time to resolve and in the meantime the parent with the child
can be left without that source of funding. 
There also is no bespoke benefit available to someone who is fleeing an abusive
relationship, and this can create financial obstacles for those that may wish to. 
80

Page 81

3. When public bodies, for example local authorities and housing associations,
are pursuing debt owed to them, to what extent do they take into account the
way debt can arise as a result of being in or leaving an abusive relationship?
Do you have specific examples of rules and practices that need to change?
In relation to people in abusive relationships and where people no longer have
control over their finances, it is not uncommon for the abusive partner to run up debt
in their name.  This can also be done to control someone and remove their ability to
leave the relationship.  This can be consumer debt, but also debt owed to local
authorities, where they are both joint and several liable, such as in the case of
council tax and rent arrears. 
Money Advice Services can support those trying to flee abusive relationships, by
contacting their creditors and requesting debt write offs.  They can also look at
formal debt solutions that may allow people to repay their debts, such as the Debt
Arrangement Scheme. 
Where repaying a debt would take an unreasonable amount of time or is unrealistic,
they can also look at options like sequestration, but this can have a negative impact
on an individuals’ credit rating and ability to obtain credit again in the future and can
leave them financially excluded.   
Where appropriate and evidence can be provided of debt that has arisen as a result
of being in or leaving an abusive relationship, it would be helpful if more creditors
would consider debt write offs. 
Rent Arrears
In relation to rent arrears, resorting to eviction is a last resort for local authorities.  
When a tenant falls into arrears local authorities make contact usually within the first
four weeks. 
The process of contact and engagement continues to try and support tenants,
provide advice and information and ensure income is maximised through referrals to
services like South Lanarkshire Council’s Money Matters Advice Service, which can
help avoid future debts from accruing. 
Domestic abuse victims, however, do not always let their Housing Officers know that
they are suffering domestic abuse. 
Where a victim of domestic abuse indicates that their situation is contributing to their
arrears, advice, support and income maximisation can be put in place.  They can
also be provided with advice in relation to housing options if this is something of
interest to them. 
Council Tax
The situation in relation to council tax is like that for rent arrears with a wide range of
support in place to support individuals.  Liable persons can be offered extended
periods to repay and support from Scottish Welfare Fund and the Money Matters
Advice Service.  As couples are jointly and severally liable for council tax, there is
also the ability to put the debt on hold for one party while recovery action takes place
against the other.  The use of diligence is a last resort. 
81

Page 82

4. Do legal aid rules take sufficient account of the financial circumstances of
women who have experienced domestic abuse?  Do you have any specific
examples of rules or practices which need to change?
Legal Aid is a means tested benefit, which means it is not uncommon for one partner
in a relationship to be able to access it, whilst the other cannot.  It can also be
difficult to find solicitors who are willing to take on Legal Aid work.  This can make
accessing justice difficult for those fleeing abusive relationships and can create
financial and legal obstacles that prevent them from doing so. 
This can be a problem when one partner uses the law vexatiously and to continue
the abuse, as the abused partner may struggle to challenge the conduct.  This can
be an issue in relation to the division and sale of homes, claims that someone has
suffered a financial disadvantage because of a relationship; or, other examples we
are aware of, in relation to enforcing pre-nuptial agreements and resolving disputes
in relation to preventing access to children. 
5. What are the particular barriers faced by those with No Recourse to Public
Funds?  And what can be done at a Scottish and local level to address these? 
Households with No Recourse to Public Funds are unable to access temporary
accommodation or homelessness services.   
The Council’s Money Matters Advice Service can support households with No
Recourse to Public Funds by providing information in relation to debt and can also
provide access to other forms of support that do not constitute public funds, such as
energy top up vouchers, grants and food bank referrals from charitable
organisations. 
Local Authorities can also, in some circumstances, also support families with
accommodation, advice and assistance through provisions contained in S12 of the
Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968 and S22 payments of the Child (Scotland) Act
1995. 
6. Does the advice and information available to women experiencing domestic
abuse adequately deal with financial barriers?
Advice Services such as those provided by the Council’s Money Matters Advice
Service can help women experiencing domestic abuse by providing “What If?”
Benefit checks that can give them the information they require on what benefits they
would be entitled to once they leave the relationship.  They can also give them
assistance to apply for benefits once they have and support them to get control of
benefits such as Child Benefit. 
They can also deal with any creditors they have and negotiate on their behalf and
can apply for a Moratorium to give them “breathing space” from their creditors, whilst
they receive advice on solutions.  This could include seeking debt write offs and
advising and assisting on other options such as the Debt Arrangement Scheme and
Sequestration in relation to dealing with any historical debts from the relationship. 
They can also dispute liability for a debt where it has fraudulently been taken out by
another party where there has been financial abuse, although this can be difficult as
creditors may want evidence the abuse has occurred. 
82

Page 83

7. To what extent is it the role of government to ensure that someone’s economic
circumstances do not prevent them from leaving an abusive relationship?
Local Government have a statutory duty to provide advice and assistance to women
in relation to their welfare as contained in s12 of the Social Work (Scotland) Act 1968
and s22 of the Child (Scotland) Act 1995.  They also have a duty to house people
who are homeless under s33 of the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 and to treat them
as homeless where they have accommodation but are at risk of abuse under s24 of
the Act.  They also are the primary funders of advice in relation to Welfare Benefits
and Money Advice in Scotland.  They, therefore, have a significant role in ensuring
someone’s economic circumstances do not prevent them from leaving an abusive
relationship. 
8. Please share any other comments that you have with us.
None.
83

Page 84

84

Page 85

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Mental Health Moratorium Regulations - Consultation 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 provide Committee with the response provided to Scottish Government on the
consultation on the Mental Health Moratorium Regulations 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the consultation response provided to Scottish Government detailed in
Appendix 1 be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. The Bankruptcy and Diligence (Scotland) Act 2024 was passed by the Scottish
Parliament on the 6 June 2024 and received Royal Assent on the 15 July 2024. 
3.2. It introduced a framework that allows Scottish Ministers to make regulations that
create a Mental Health Moratorium.  This will allow those who are receiving
compulsory mental health treatment, or the equivalent, to apply for a Moratorium that
will provide them with protection from their creditors whilst their treatment continues. 
3.3. Section 2 of the 2024 Act requires Scottish Ministers, prior to laying Regulations
before the Scottish Parliament, to lay a proposed draft copy of the Regulations
before the Parliament for 60 days.  The Scottish Government also committed, during
the passing of the Bill, to consult with stakeholders on any draft Regulations. 
3.4. The consultation was launched on 9 of December 2024 with a closing date of
17 March 2025. 
4. Mental Health Moratorium 
4.1. The proposed Mental Health Moratorium is intended to provide protections for those
who are receiving compulsory mental health treatment in an institution or the
community (or receiving the equivalent treatment on a voluntary basis) from those
they owe debt to.  It is proposed the Moratorium will be administered by the Scottish
Government agency the Accountant in Bankruptcy. 
4.2. The proposed application process will involve the applicant being certified as
meeting the mental health criteria and the debt criteria by a mental health
professional.  The mental health criteria requires that the person is receiving
compulsory mental health treatment in an institution or in the community or the 
12
85

Page 86

equivalent.  The debt criteria require a person to have problem debts that are
contributing to their mental health problem, are likely to result in it deteriorating and
that the person’s recovery is being hindered by it, and they are not able to address
their problem debts due to their mental health problems. 
4.3. Applications for Mental Health Moratoriums will have to be made by Money Advisers. 
It is expected that this will be approved by Money Advisers for the purposes of the
Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016, which means Money Advisers employed by Citizen
Advice Bureaux and Local Authorities (Money Matters Advice Service).  The AIB
receive the application and award the Moratorium and notify the Creditors.  They will
also monitor it and review it every six months to ensure the criteria is still met by
contacting the Mental Health Professional. 
4.4. Once a Mental Health Moratorium is approved, the effect of it will be to protect the
applicant from any diligence, such as bank account and wage arrestments or being
sequestrated for debts that they owed at the date they applied for the Moratorium.  It
is also proposed that it will stop creditors from applying interest, fees, penalties and
charges to debts. 
4.5. During the operation of the Mental Health Moratorium, the debtor will have to
continue to pay their ongoing liabilities, such as utility bills, rent and council tax.  The
Mental Health Moratorium will continue in place for as long as the Mental Health
Professional confirms that the debtor meets the Mental Health criteria. 
4.6. Once the mental health criteria is no longer met, the Mental Health Moratorium will
stop, but there will be a six-month recovery period for the applicant, where the
protection will continue to allow the debtor to work with their Money Adviser to find a
long-term solution to their problem debts. 
5. Consultation Response
5.1. In preparing the response to the consultation, input was provided by Social Work,
Housing Services, Benefits and Revenues Service and Money Matters Advice
Service.  The response provided is attached to the report as Appendix 1. 
5.2. In the response, South Lanarkshire Council support in principle the idea of a Mental
Health Moratorium that was introduced by the Bankruptcy and Diligence (Scotland)
Act 2024. 
5.3. However, it has expressed its concerns that the current level of protection that a
Mental Health Moratorium will provide people will be less than a current
Statutory/Standard Moratorium in relation to debts accrued after one is applied for. 
This is because, a current Statutory/Standard Moratorium provides blanket
protection against all diligence for all debts for six months, regardless of when the
debt was accrued, whereas the proposed Mental Health Moratorium will only provide
protections against diligence executed for debts owed at the date the Moratorium is
applied for.  A Statutory/Standard Moratorium does not however, freeze interest and
charges. 
5.4. This may mean Money Advisers, from a best practice perspective, may take the view
it would be more prudent to apply for a Statutory/Standard Moratorium until they can
maximise an individual’s income and ensure that once they enter a Mental Health
Moratorium, the person will not accrue further debts.  
86

Page 87

5.5. This may delay the applicant benefiting from the freezing of interest, penalties, fees
and charges that a Mental Health Moratorium offers and which a Statutory/Standard
Moratorium does not.  However, as a Mental Health Moratorium can be revoked if
someone does not pay their ongoing liabilities, Money Advisers may be reluctant to
use this solution until they can be sure that they can pay their ongoing liabilities and
prefer instead to rely on the blanket protection provided by a Statutory/Standard
Moratorium. 
5.6. In its response, South Lanarkshire Council has suggested that it should be
considered whether both Moratoriums could run in tandem for a six-month period to
allow maximum protection and time for the Money Adviser to maximise the income of
the debtor so they can pay their ongoing liabilities. 
5.7. The response also advises that as the details of someone who has a Mental Health
Moratorium will be published on a Register, this should not be publicly available due
to the sensitive personal data it will hold (that they are receiving mental health
treatment) and that those who wish to access the Register should have to satisfy the
Accountant in Bankruptcy they have a legitimate interest in doing so. 
5.8. Currently, the Scottish Government has stated it has no policy intention to extend the
effects of a Moratorium will have so that it prevents evictions and home
repossessions.  Their reason for this position, is that current legislation requires a
judge to only grant an eviction or repossession order if they believe it is reasonable
to do so, which the Scottish Government believe is sufficient protection. 
5.9. However, in the proposed response it is suggested that a Mental Health Moratorium
should prevent evictions or repossessions for rent and mortgage arrears.  Housing
Services would not seek to evict a tenant for rent arrears should there be a Mental
Health Moratorium in place, they would instead aim to work with the tenant and their
money adviser to find an alternative solution.  However, the concern is not all
landlords and mortgage lenders may follow such good practice. 
5.10. Often it is the threat of eviction or repossession, that leads to people abandoning
their homes.  This is then likely to lay the responsibility for housing these households
with South Lanarkshire Council under the requirements of current homelessness
legislation. 
5.11. South Lanarkshire Council has also indicated its view that the protections should
also extend to preventing disconnection of domestic gas and electricity supplies and
the forced installation of prepayment meters for gas and electricity arrears. 
5.12. South Lanarkshire Council has also indicated that while Housing Officers should not
contact tenants in relation to rent arrears whilst a Mental Health Moratorium is in
place, they should not be prevented from fulfilling other statutory duties under
homeless, housing and anti-social behaviour legislation. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. There are no financial implications from the consultation response. 
7. Employee Implications
7.1. There are no employee implications from the consultation response.  
87

Page 88

8. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
8.1. There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental implications arising
from the consultation response. 
9. Other Implications
9.1. There are no other implications arising from this report. 
10. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
10.1. This report does not include any recommendations in respect of Council policy, so
no consultation or equality impact assessment is required. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
3 March 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focussed on people and their needs 
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Draft Mental Health Moratorium Regulations Consultation – Respondent Information
Form 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Craig Fergusson, Head of Finance (Transactions)
Ext:  4951  (Tel:  01698 454951)
E-mail:  Craig.Fergusson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
88

Page 89

Appendix 1 
Mental Health Moratorium Consultation
Respondent Information Form
Please note this form must be completed and returned with your response. To find out
how we handle your personal data, please see our privacy policy.
Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?
☐   Individual
☒   Organisation
Full name or organisation’s name
South Lanarkshire Council 
Phone number
01698 454951
Address
Finance and Corporate Resources
South Lanarkshire Council
Floor 12, Almada Street
Hamilton 
Postcode
ML3 0AA 
Email address
craig.fergusson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
The Scottish Government would like your permission to publish your consultation response.
Please indicate your publishing preference:
Information for organisation:
The option 'Publish response only (without name)’ is available for individual
respondents only. If this option is selected, the organisation name will still be
published. If you choose the option 'Do not publish response', your organisation
name may still be listed as having responded to the consultation in, for example, the
analysis report.
☐   Publish response with name
☒   Publish response only (without name)
☐   Do not publish response
We will share your response internally with other Scottish Government policy teams who
may be addressing the issues you discuss. They may wish to contact you again in the
future, but we require your permission to do so. Are you content for Scottish Government to
contact you again in relation to this consultation exercise?
☒   Yes
☐   No
89

Page 90

Consultation Questions 
Question 1. Do you agree with the proposed mental health eligibility criteria as listed
above?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We believe that it sufficient to cover over those who are subject to compulsory mental
health treatment or the voluntary equivalent. 
Question 2. Do you agree with the proposed debt eligibility criteria as listed above?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We agree that it is sufficient and broad enough to cover those who are not only struggling
with problem debts, but those whose mental health recovery may be affected by their debts
and accepts that they should also receive protection, whilst they seek further assistance. 
Question 3. Do you agree that an individual subject to a statutory debt solution should not
be eligible for a Mental Health Moratorium?
☐  Agree
☒  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below:  
90

Page 91

Our concern is that as most statutory debt solutions only cover debts owed up to the point
when they enter the statutory debt solution, there may be debts that people accrue after
they enter the solution, and this may be because the deterioration of their mental health has
impacted on their ability to maintain their ongoing financial obligations. 
Where this is the case, we believe consideration must be given to whether these people
would also benefit from a Mental Health Moratorium for new debt incurred after the formal
debt solution has been entered into, to assist with their mental health recovery and also to
possibly seek advice on whether it would be in their best interest to continue with their
current Statutory Debt Solutions or transfer to another, where that is allowed, such as from
the a Debt Payment Programme under the Debt Arrangement Scheme to a Sequestration;
or a Trust Deed to Sequestration, where the agreement of the Trustee is required.
Also, it may be that where the person is in a Protected Trust Deed, the correct solution may
be for the Trustee to seek an early discharge for the debtor in the Trust Deed. 
Whilst these options are being considered we believe that the protection from a Mental
Health Moratorium for new debts accrued after they entered their formal debt solution could
be extremely beneficial for the person in debt. 
Question 4. Do you agree with the proposed definition of moratorium debt which would
qualify to be protected in a Mental Health Moratorium (see regulation 3 in particular)?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We agree in principle with the definition of debt for a Mental Health Moratorium, but believe
it is not without problems, as it will only include debts owed up to the point the Mental
Health Moratorium is applied for and, therefore, any debts incurred after that date will not
be covered. 
This is different from a Statutory/Standard moratorium as this prevents diligence being
executed for all debts throughout the moratorium period (6 months), whether they were
owed prior to or after the moratorium is applied for. 
This is likely to mean that advisers may feel it is the best interests of the client to apply for a
statutory moratorium first, to ensure that the client will not incur further liabilities, before
applying for a Mental Health Moratorium. 
This may be to allow income maximisation to take place first, to ensure for example no
further ongoing council tax or rent arrears are accrued. One solution may be to allow
someone to apply for a Statutory and a Mental Health moratorium at the same time and to
allow these to run in tandem. This would allow the person in debt the benefit of both
solutions for the first six months, whilst they seek assistance.
The issue is both types of Moratoriums do different things and work differently and both
have advantages and disadvantages, so if one (the Mental Health Moratorium) has the
effect of not providing the same protection as the other (Standard Moratorium) and revokes
the other when applied for, this may delay an application for a Mental Health Moratorium,
meaning the client doesn’t receive all the protections that are available. We believe
solutions should be explored, as to how these two solutions interact with each 
91

Page 92

Question 5. Do you agree with the proposed requirement for AiB to confirm the mental
health eligibility criteria is continuing to be met?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
Yes. Due to the fact a Mental Health Moratorium will potentially last longer than a statutory
moratorium, we feel there must be a requirement for the AIB to continue to monitor that the
criteria for it is continuing to be met. 
Question 6. Do you agree with the proposed application process?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We agree with the two-stage process: that a Mental Health Officer should certify that the
mental health and Debt criteria have been met, as Money Advisers are not qualified to do
this. We also believe that a Money Adviser is an essential part of the application process,
as it clear that the client may still require advice after the application is made to maximise
income and deal with rent and mortgage arrears, if evictions and repossessions will still be
possible after a Moratorium is applied for. 
Question 7. Do you agree with the proposed process for the notification of the Mental
Health Moratorium?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
92

Page 93

We believe that the AIB should be responsible for this, as it may not be possible to gather
all information on an applicant’s debts, especially if an applicant is being detained in an
institution. 
The AIB, therefore, should be required to carry out a credit check and notify creditors and
as a matter of practice notify the applicants local authority as there may be debts owed that
are not reported on credit reports. 
Question 8. Do you agree with the proposed process for the registration of the Mental
Health Moratorium?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We do believe, however, the fact that someone is receiving compulsory mental health
treatment or the equivalent, is sensitive personal information and, therefore, access to that
information should not be made publicly available, but should only be made available to
those that can show a legitimate interest for accessing it, such as creditors, Money
Advisers, local authorities etc. 
Authorisation to access the register should be controlled by the Accountant in Bankruptcy 
Question 9. Do you agree with the proposed Mental Health Moratorium protections
included in the current draft regulations?
☐  Agree
☒  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below 
The proposed protections are the equivalent those already provided for by Statutory
Moratoriums and include the freezing of interest, fees, penalties and charges, which is the
same as those provided by the Debt Arrangement Scheme. We are concerned it will,
however, only cover debts owed up to the point that MH Moratorium is applied for and
believe this would be inferior to the protections available to debtors that apply for a
Statutory Moratorium, as this acts as a diligence stopper for all debts accrued before, but
also during the Statutory Moratorium.
We have suggested that it may be better that a Statutory Moratorium and a MH Moratorium
could operate in tandem for the first six months, to allow money advisers to assist clients in
preventing them from accruing further debts through income maximisation. Otherwise, we
93

Page 94

believe good practice may be that Money Advisers may delay applying for a Mental Health
Moratorium until they are confident the client will not accrue further debts and instead rely
on the protections provided by a Statutory Moratorium. 
Question 10. What are your views on how best to link the Mental Health Moratorium
administrative processes and evictions procedures to ensure these work effectively
together in practice? 
Please provide your views in the box below: 
We would not apply for an eviction for rent arrears during a Mental Health Moratorium
(although they may do so for other reasons such as abandonment of the property or anti-
social behaviour). They take the view to do so would possibly be viewed as unreasonable
and would prefer the person receives advice and assistance to reduce the risk of
homelessness. 
However, our concern is not all landlords and mortgage providers may take the same
approach, and this may result in people losing their home, which would put a pressure on
the local authority to re-house households under homelessness legislation.
We are also concerned, that the threat of eviction through the serving of notices to quit and
leave and the serving of calling up notices in the case of mortgages, often results in people
abandoning their property and making themselves homeless, even if current protections in
housing legislation means a Sheriff would not grant an eviction or repossession. 
We think it, therefore, is reasonable that a Mental Health Moratorium should stop evictions
or repossessions for rent and mortgage arrears, but possibly still allow on other grounds
(abandonment and anti-social behaviour). 
Question 11. Do you agree that protection against the installation of pre-payment meters
and disconnection of gas or electricity supply should be one of the protections available
under the Mental Health Moratorium?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
Yes, we do. This is particularly the case where someone has been detained in an
institution, as during that time, even if they are not using gas or electricity at their home,
they will still be accruing debt in the form of standard charges. This may mean that
someone’s recovery may be threatened if they return home to a property where the gas and
electricity has been disconnected. Ultimately, disconnection may also threaten the
sustainability of someone’s tenancy and therefore their recovery and mental and physical
well-being. 
94

Page 95

Question 12. Do you agree with the proposed framework for the Mental Health Moratorium
period?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We acknowledge that there will be a six-month recovery period after the mental health
criteria ends where people will continue to benefit from the MH Moratorium protections. We
believe this is important as it will allow the person to seek advice and possibly a long-term
debt solution once they are able to. We also feel it is appropriate that after the expiry of that
recovery period, someone will not be able to use the Standard Statutory Moratorium
procedure for 6 months. This is important as the Mental Health Moratorium will allow a 6-
month recovery period for people to deal with their debts and if another Standard
Moratorium can be applied for at the end of that period, this may delay people engaging
with their Money Adviser and finding a solution. 
Question 13. Should an individual in a Mental Health Moratorium be subject to the
following proposed obligations? (Please tick all applicable options) 
☒  An obligation to pay a continuing liability
☐  An obligation to not obtain additional credit
☐  Some other obligation (please specify in the comment box below)
☐  No obligation at all 
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We believe that people should have to pay their continuing liabilities and that is why we
believe that it is vital that people are not given the impression once they have entered a
Mental Health Moratorium, they do not need to seek advice. People will still have to obtain
income maximisation advice to avoid further debts accruing, particularly in relation to
council tax, rent, mortgage and utility debts.
In relation to whether someone should be able to obtain additional credit, this may be
unavoidable and undesirable to prevent, as people may have to take out new phone
contracts or also car or home insurance, most of which are funded  by consumer credit
agreements when the person chooses to pay by instalments, which is often the only way
people can afford such products.
Also, people may have to accrue debts to pay for essential home and car repairs and to pay
other essentials such a funeral costs for family members. 
Possibly essential debt should be allowed but applicants should have to notify the money
adviser who should report to the Accountant in Bankruptcy and a reason for it should be
provided. 
95

Page 96

Question 14. Do you agree with the proposed process for a creditor’s search?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response(s) in the box below: 
Client consent will have to be obtained. We note, however, not all debts are reported to
credit reference agencies, particularly those owed by local authorities. It will, therefore, be
necessary to notify local authorities as a matter of course to allow them to identify debts
and to allow them to know when to place recovery action on hold for someone who has
entered a MH Moratorium. 
Question 15. Do you agree with the proposed consequences for creditors? 
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
Yes. If a moratorium doesn’t provide creditors with such restrictions on their ability to
recover a debt, it will have no benefit for the applicant. As currently proposed it will prevent
them from executing diligence to recover a debt or apply interest, fees, penalties and
charges. We believe this is fair. We also believe it should stop evictions and repossession
for rent and mortgage arrears. 
It is recognised that the council is also a creditor and there is the potential for recovery
action around council tax and rents to be impacted. However, based on the information
available on the low number of individuals who benefit from similar protections in England
and Wales, it is not thought that the impact would be significant. This will have to be kept
under review. 
Question 16. Do you agree with the proposed process for an individual to request a review
of AiB’s decision to either not grant or to cancel a Mental Health Moratorium?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree 
96

Page 97

☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We believe this is fair to avoid abuse of the process. 
Question 17. Do you agree with the proposed process for a creditor to request a review of
AiB’s decision to grant, or not cancel a Mental Health Moratorium?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response(s) in the box below: 
As above, we agree that where a decision is made, a quick and inexpensive administrative
process should be available to request that decision is reviewed by more senior
management in the Accountant in Bankruptcy. 
Question 18. Do you agree with the proposed cancellation process?
☒  Agree
☐  Disagree
☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We agree where it is proposed a Moratorium should be cancelled, all interested parties
should be notified and allowed to make representations before a final decision is made. 
Question 19. Do you agree with the proposed interaction between the Mental Health
Moratorium and the standard moratorium?
☐  Agree
☒  Disagree 
97

Page 98

☐  Neither agree nor disagree
Please provide the reason for your response in the box below: 
We are concerned that the granting of a MH Moratorium would revoke a Statutory/Standard
Moratorium. 
For the reasons above we think both could run in tandem and this would maximise the
protection people would have.
This is important as often it takes time to maximise income to prevent the person in debt
accruing further debts, but whilst this is ongoing, they require the protection of the Statutory
Moratorium for debts that they may still accrue after applying for a MH Moratorium.
We think it should be considered that both should be allowed to run in tandem up to a
maximum six-month period. 
Question 20. We would be grateful for any further comments you have about the Mental
Health Moratorium which has not been raised in this consultation.
Please provide comments in the box below: 
We agree with the principle of a MH Moratorium but believe the issue as to what it does has
to be considered further. 
For the reasons above, we are concerned in relation to what debts Statutory/Standard
Moratoriums provide protection from and those a MH Moratorium provide protection from.
There are clearly circumstances where the benefits of a Statutory Moratorium may be better
than those provided by a MH Moratorium, for a period at least.
Also, in relation to evictions and repossessions, we have provided our reasons for why we
believe a MH Moratorium should prevent evictions and repossession. It should be noted
that many local authorities in Scotland are experiencing a homelessness crisis an if
landlords and mortgage providers can threaten or make homeless vulnerable households
where a MH Moratorium has been granted, this could add pressure to local authorities and
other social landlords.
It is our view including this protection would have a negligible effect on social landlords, as
most would be keen to support and work with tenants in this situation and would not deem it
reasonable to proceed with or continue with eviction action. 
We also believe it is important that a MH Moratorium does not prevent creditors from
fulfilling any other statutory obligations they have, particularly in the case of landlords in
terms of anti-social behaviour, complaints, repairs and under prevention of anti-
homelessness legislation. This may mean they still have to contact the tenant. 
98

Page 99

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Finance and Corporate Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 26 March 2025
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Response to Consultation on the Public Sector
Equality Duty 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise of a consultation by the Scottish Parliament Equalities, Human Rights and
Civil Justice Committee on the Public Sector Equality Duty
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the contents of the report be noted; and
(2) that the requirements on the Council should this duty be implemented, as
detailed in section 4.3 of the report be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. On 7 February 2025, the Scottish Parliament Equalities, Human Rights and Civil
Justice Committee opened a consultation on the operation of the Public Sector
Equality Duty in Scotland. 
3.2. The consultation closed on 28 February 2025. 
3.3. The Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED) is a legal requirement for public authorities
in Scotland. Under the duty, public authorities must consider equality when carrying
out their functions.  The aims of the duty are to:- 
 eliminate unlawful behaviour by ending discrimination, harassment, and
victimisation
 advance equality of opportunity between people who have a protected
characteristic and those who do not
 foster good relations between people who have a protected characteristic and
those who do not 
3.4. In addition to the general duty, the PSED regulations set out additional specific
duties in Scotland, which have been in force since 2012.  They were introduced in
the Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) (Scotland) Regulations 2012 (as amended). 
3.5. The consultation notes that in 2018 the Scottish Government started to review the
effectiveness of the Scottish-specific duties with the intention of revised regulations
to come in to force by the end of April 2025.  
13
99

Page 100

3.6. The consultation goes on to explain that a proposal for an inclusive communication
regulation has been revised to ensure legislative competence and a new approach
agreed.  Scottish Government officials will be trained in better inclusive
communication practices.  Officials will also assess existing guidance and materials
on inclusive communication.  Ministers will be able to use their powers to draw listed
public authorities' attention to these materials. 
4. Proposal
4.1. The consultation advises that The Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice
Committee is expected to work on this inquiry for three weeks from 4 March 2025,
and will use the responses from the five questions in the consultation to form the
basis of questions at the evidence sessions.  The response from the Council to each
question were as follows:- 
Question 1: To what extent do you think that listed public authorities
understand the terms and the aims of the PSED in Scotland? 
The extent to which listed public authorities understand the terms and aims of the
PSED may well be mixed.  Public authorities have made positive progress in
integrating the principles of the PSED into their operations, however there is likely to
be elements of the PSED where understanding and implementation could be
improved, therefore ongoing training and support is crucial to ensure that all local
authorities fully grasp and achieve the aims of the PSED. 
Question 2: Is the PSED in Scotland delivering on its aims to improve
outcomes for people with protected characteristics? 
We believe the PSED in Scotland is delivering on its aims to improve outcomes for
people with protected characterises. This is evidenced through the mainstreaming
report process. While notable progress in some areas has been made, for example,
reducing gender pay gaps and enhancing accessibility, challenges remain in
achieving consistent and widespread improvements across all protected
characteristics. 
Question 3: Do you think the Scottish Government’s proposed reforms will
assist listed authorities in embedding an equalities focus and in turn improve
outcomes for people with protected characteristics? 
The Scottish Government's proposed reforms aim to strengthen the PSED
framework and support listed authorities in embedding an equalities focus. By
revising pay gap reporting to include ethnicity and disability and introducing new
duties related to inclusive communication, these and other reforms, if effectively
implemented, could significantly enhance public authorities' ability to address
inequalities and improve outcomes for people with protected characteristics. 
Question 4: What are your views on the Scottish Government’s revised
approach to assisting listed public authorities to embed inclusive
communication? 
We welcome the Scottish Government’s revised approach to assisting listed public
authorities to embed inclusive communication. We believe this approach is
pragmatic and cognisant of the work already being done by public authorities to
ensure that as many people as possible understand and are able to easily interact
with public information. Accessibility is a core principle in all the council’s
communications, whether direct or via the website or other channels, and we use a
number of software tools as well as guidance to prepare and monitor this. The
revised Scottish Government approach, to provide more information, guidance, tools 
100

Page 101

and materials for use by public authorities would be a welcome addition to this.
Where gaps are identified, any collective approach which might provide economies
of scale would also be welcome. 
Question 5: How effective do you think the Equality and Human Rights
Commission is at regulating public authorities’ performance against the
PSED? 
The Equality and Human Rights Commission has been effective in promoting
awareness and ensuring compliance with the PSED. The increased transparency
benefits those impacted by the PSED, although there is always room for further
improvement in regulatory practices. 
4.2. Further to CMT approval on 20 February 2025 officers finalised and submitted the
response prior to the consultation closing on 28 February 2025. 
4.3 After consultation, should the Scottish Government proceed and implement these
proposals, the Council would be required to:- 
 review and update or introduce guidance/training for employees and managers
on inclusive communications.  A joint working approach with the Personnel, Legal
and Communications team will be required as well as Resource Management
Teams involvement to ensure the full Council needs are met
 the Duty would also need to be incorporated into the integrated impact
assessment process 
5. Employee Implications
5.1. There are no employee implications arising directly from this report. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. There are no financial implications arising directly from this report. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental implications arising
directly from this report. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. There are no other implications arising directly from this report. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. There is no requirement for an integrated impact assessment in respect of this
report.  There is neither a requirement for the Council to undertake a consultation in
respect of this proposal from the Scottish Government. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
20 February 2025 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focused on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others
 Accountable, effective, efficient, and transparent
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Excellent Employer 
101

Page 102

Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you wish to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:-
Tracy Ferguson (Learning, Organisational Development & Diversity Manager)
Ext:  4715 (Tel:  01698 454715)
Email: tracy.ferguson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
102