Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Executive Committee - 24/06/2026

South Lanarkshire Council · 24 June 2026
Back to Executive Committee — 24 June 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Tuesday, 16 June 2026 
Dear Councillor 
Executive Committee 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Wednesday, 24 June 2026
Time:  10:00
Venue: Hybrid - Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton,
ML3 0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
Members
Maureen Devlin (Chair/ex officio), Gerry Convery (Depute Chair), Alex Allison, John Anderson,
Robert Brown, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Margaret Cooper, Andrea
Cowan, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Lynsey Hamilton, Gavin Keatt, Susan Kerr, Ross
Lambie, Eileen Logan, Katy Loudon, Ian McAllan, Catherine McClymont, Davie McLachlan, Richard
Nelson, Norman Rae, Mo Razzaq, Kirsten Robb, John Ross, David Shearer, Margaret B Walker 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Poppy Corbett, Margaret Cowie, Celine Handibode, Graeme Horne, Martin Hose,
Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Hugh Macdonald, Kenny McCreary, Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever,
Graham Scott, David Watson 
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
Minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on 20 May 2026
submitted for approval as a correct record.  (Copy attached) 
5 - 14 
Monitoring Item(s) 
3 Revenue Budget Year-End 2025/2026
Report dated 2 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
15 - 30 
4 Revenue Budget Monitoring for Period 2 - 1 April 2026 to 15 May 2026
Report dated 2 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
31 - 36 
5 Capital Budget Monitoring Final Outturn - 2025/2026
Report dated 2 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
37 - 44 
6 Capital Budget 2026/2027 and Monitoring for Period 2 - 1 April 2026 to 15
May 2026
Report dated 2 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
45 - 54 
7 Update to Funding
Report dated 3 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
55 - 60 
8 Employee Workforce Monitoring Information - 1 April 2025 to 31 March
2026 Summary
Report dated 19 May 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
61 - 82 
Item(s) for Decision 
9 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 Revenue Budget Strategy
Report dated 12 May 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
83 - 106 
10  Larkhall Leisure Centre Replacement – Full Business Case Glasgow City
Region City Deal - Larkhall Community Growth Area
Report dated 10 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
107 - 116 
11  Pride in Place Programme  Hamilton Town Centre
Report dated 10 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and
Enterprise Resources).  (Copy attached) 
117 - 122 
12  Local Action Fund Approach for 2026/2027
Report dated 1 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
123 - 126
2

Page 3

13  Statutory Consultation on Proposed Primary School Catchment Changes
Report dated 5 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Education Resources). 
(Copy attached) 
127 - 138 
14  Council of Sanctuary Accreditation
Report dated 19 May 2026 by the Executive Director (Housing and Technical
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
139 - 142 
15  Recommendation Referred by Licensing Committee
Report dated 1 June 2026 by the Chief Executive.  (Copy attached) 
143 - 146 
16  Appointment of Trustees to South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Board
Report dated 4 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
147 - 150 
Item(s) for Noting 
17  Investment Challenge Motion
Joint report dated 12 May 2026 by the Executive Directors (Finance and
Corporate Resources) and (Community and Enterprise Resources).  (Copy
attached) 
151 - 166 
18  Transformational Review Programme – Summary of Outcomes Report
2025/2026 and Future Pipeline
Report dated 29 May 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
167 - 184 
19  Update on Scotland’s Climate Change Plan 2026 to 2040
Report dated 1 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
185 - 194 
20  Good Food Nation Plan
Report dated 4 June 2026 by the Chief Executive.  (Copy attached) 
195 - 200 
21  Membership of Committees, Forums and Trusts - Update
Report dated 4 June 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
201 - 208 
22  Scottish Fire and Rescue Service - Service Delivery Review
Recommendations
Verbal update by the Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources). 
Urgent Business 
23  Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 
For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Tracy Slater
Clerk Telephone: 07385 370089
Clerk Email: tracy.slater@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
3

Page 4

4

Page 5

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 
Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street,
Hamilton on 20 May 2026 
Chair:
Councillor Joe Fagan (ex officio) 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor John Anderson, Councillor Robert Brown, Councillor Andy
Carmichael, Councillor Maureen Chalmers, Councillor Ross Clark, Councillor Andrea Cowan,
Councillor Margaret Cowie (substitute for Councillor Gerry Convery), Councillor Maureen Devlin,
Councillor Elise Frame, Councillor Lynsey Hamilton, Councillor Graeme Horne (substitute for
Councillor John Ross), Councillor Martin Hose (substitute for Councillor Richard Nelson), Councillor
Susan Kerr, Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Eileen Logan, Councillor Katy Loudon, Councillor Ian
McAllan, Councillor Catherine McClymont, Councillor Davie McLachlan, Councillor Norman Rae,
Councillor Mo Razzaq, Councillor Kirsten Robb, Councillor David Shearer, Councillor Margaret B
Walker 
Councillors' Apologies:
Councillor Gerry Convery (Depute), Councillor Margaret Cooper, Councillor Gladys Ferguson-Miller,
Councillor Richard Nelson, Councillor John Ross 
Attending:
Chief Executive’s Service
P Manning, Chief Executive; T Little, Head of Communications and Strategy
Community and Enterprise Resources
K Carr, Executive Director; F Carlin, Head of Planning and Regulatory Services
Education Resources
L McRoberts, Executive Director
Finance and Corporate Resources
J Taylor, Executive Director; K McLeod, Administration Assistant; M Milne, Head of Personnel
Services; T Slater, Administration Adviser; I Strachan, Head of Administration and Legal Services
Housing and Technical Resources
C Jardine, Head of Property Services
Health and Social Care/Social Work Resources
S Sengupta, Director, Health and Social Care 
Chair’s Opening Remarks
The Chair noted that this was the first meeting of the Committee since the sad death of Councillor
Lesley McDonald and the thoughts of all present were with Councillor McDonald’s family at this time. 
1 Declaration of Interests 
No interests were declared. 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 
The minutes of the meeting of the Executive Committee held on 1 April 2026 were submitted for
approval as a correct record. 
The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record. 
2
5

Page 6

3 Update to Funding 
A report dated 15 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on additional funding, totalling £2.118 million, which had been made available to the
Council by the Scottish Government and other external sources. 
The funding had been allocated as follows:- 
Revenue Funding 
Resource 2026/2027 2027/2028 
(£m) (£m) 
Community and Enterprise 0.713 
Education 0.331 0.324 
Total 1.044 0.324 
Capital Funding 
Resource 2026/2027 
(£m) 
Community and Enterprise 0.750 
Total 0.750 
Overall Total 2.118 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 1 April 2026 (Paragraph 5)] 
4 2026/2027 Investments – Updates 
A report dated 13 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted providing information on the 2026/2027 investment plans. 
Following approval by the Council, as part of the budget setting process at its meeting on 25
February 2026, information was provided on:- 
 the allocation of 2026/2027 recurring investments of £3.534 million, and one-off investments
of £33.300 million, as detailed in section 4 of the report
 the process for the allocation of the Galas and Festivals Fund, which included £0.200 million
of investment monies and in-kind support which amounted to a £0.055 million allocation, as
detailed in section 5 of the report
 the allocation of Third Sector funding of £0.300 million, as detailed in section 6 of the report
 the proposed approach for the allocation of Local Action Fund monies, as outlined in section
7 of the report 
Following a request by Councillor Chalmers and discussion on various aspects of the report, it
was agreed that the decision on the proposed approach for the Local Action Fund be deferred to
the next meeting of the Committee.  This would allow the planned Members’ Awareness Session
to take place and further discussion on the various issues raised. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the details of the 2026/2027 Investments, as detailed in section 4 of the report, be noted;  
6

Page 7

(2) that information on the Galas and Festivals Fund, and the Third Sector allocation, as detailed
in sections 5 and 6 of the report, be noted; and 
(3) that the decision on the proposed approach for the Local Action Fund be deferred to the
next meeting of the Committee. 
[Reference: Minutes of South Lanarkshire Council of 25 February 2026 (Paragraph 2)] 
5 Review of Petitions Process 
A report dated 5 May 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted advising of the outcome of a review of the petitions process. 
Following a motion to Council on 10 December 2025, it was agreed that a review be conducted
on the effectiveness of the petitions process.  A copy of the motion was attached as Appendix 2
to the report. 
Information was provided on:- 
 the current criteria/guidance for submitting a petition, as detailed in Appendix 1 to the report
 the number of petitions received to date, including a breakdown of those not taken forward
in terms of the current criteria
 how this Council’s petitions process compared with other local authorities
 proposed changes to the current criteria, as detailed in section 6 of the report
 the work that would be undertaken to raise public awareness of the petitions process 
The Head of Administration and Legal Services responded to members’ questions and, following
discussion, it was proposed that, when determining any matters of dispute in respect of the
petitions process, the Head of Administration and Legal Services would do this in consultation
with the Chair of the Petitions Committee. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that, following a review of the petitions process, the criteria for petitions be amended:- 
 to allow for the submission of petitions from businesses entered on the Valuation Roll
for the South Lanarkshire Council area
 to make it clearer that any petitions that related to a current or recent proposal that was
subject to a specific Council consultation/engagement exercise would be passed to
the relevant Resource for consideration and response
 to make it clear that the Head of Administration and Legal Services, in consultation
with the Chair of the Petitions Committee, would determine any matters of dispute in
respect of the petitions process, including as to whether a petition was valid
 to make it clear that, should a petitioner be dissatisfied with their petition being
determined as invalid, they had the option of asking that it be considered under the
Council’s formal complaints procedures 
(2) that authority be delegated to the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) to
update the current petitions procedures and associated guidance to reflect the Committee’s
decision; and 
(3) that the proposed promotion of the petitions process, as outlined at paragraph 7.1 of the
report, be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of South Lanarkshire Council of 27 June 2018 (Paragraph 5) and 10
December 2025 (Paragraph 13)] 
7

Page 8

6 Statutory Review of the Byelaws Prohibiting the Consumption of Alcohol in
Designated Public Places 
A report dated 30 March 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted:- 
 advising of the statutory requirement to review the South Lanarkshire Council byelaws which
prohibited the consumption of alcohol in designated public places, and to seek authorisation
for how the review would be undertaken
 seeking authorisation for the continuation of the existing byelaws as presently constituted
until such time as the review was complete 
The current byelaws prohibiting the consumption of alcohol in designated public places in South
Lanarkshire came into force in March 2010 and were updated in April 2014.  The areas subject to
the byelaws were listed in the appendix to the report. 
The Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 required local authorities to review byelaws within 10
years of the date they came into force.  Although the byelaws would remain in force without a
review, it was requested that Committee approve the continuation of the byelaws, as presently
constituted, until the review was complete. 
Information was provided on:- 
 the consultation process that would be undertaken as part of the review
 the steps that would require to be taken should the byelaws be amended, which would
require confirmation by the Scottish Government 
The Committee decided: 
(1) to note that a statutory review of the South Lanarkshire Council byelaws which prohibited
the consumption of alcohol in designated public places required to be undertaken; 
(2) to agree that a statutory review be undertaken, as outlined in section 4 of the report; 
(3) to note that, following the statutory review, a report would be submitted to this Committee
on 16 September 2026 to approve the results of the review and seek such further authority
as necessary; and 
(4) to agree that the present byelaws should continue in effect as presently constituted, pending
the completion of the review. 
[Reference: Minutes of 11 February 2015 (Paragraph 15)] 
7 Representation on International Children’s Games 
A report dated 22 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted seeking the Committee’s approval to make a nomination for representation on the
General Assembly and related committees of the International Children’s Games (ICG). 
The ICG was an event recognised by the International Olympic Committee for children aged 12
to 15 years.  A delegation from South Lanarkshire had previously taken part in the Games, and
South Lanarkshire was listed as a member city of the ICG.  The next Games would take place in
August 2026, in Taiwan.  
8

Page 9

As a member city, the ICG had written to the Chief Executive seeking confirmation if Lanarkshire
wished to be represented on the ICG’s General Assembly.  Lanarkshire was already represented
on the General Assembly by Mr Hugh Waters, who held the position of Secretary General of its
Executive Committee.  Given the Council’s historic support for the ICG, and Mr Waters’ knowledge
of Lanarkshire, it was proposed that he be nominated as Lanarkshire’s representative on the ICG’s
General Assembly and as Executive Committee Secretary General, but also for the Committee,
should he not be appointed to the role of Secretary General on the Executive Committee.  Mr
Waters had already secured North Lanarkshire Council’s agreement for this nomination. 
Mr Waters had confirmed that he would meet any costs associated with this, therefore, there
would be no cost to the Council. 
The Committee decided: that Mr Hugh Waters be nominated by the Council as its
representative on the International Children’s Games’
General Assembly, and as Executive Committee Secretary
General, but also for the Committee should he not be
appointed to the role of Secretary General on the Executive
Committee. 
[Reference: Minutes of 1 December 2021 (Paragraph 7)] 
8 Recommendation Referred by Finance and Corporate Resources Committee 
A report dated 6 May 2026 by the Chief Executive was submitted on a recommendation which
had been referred to this Committee by the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee of 6
May 2026. 
The recommendation of the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee was that the proposed
Disability Policy be approved, subject to the amendment to Step 9 of Sections 1 and 2 in Appendix
C of the Policy, as detailed in the report. 
The Committee decided: that the proposed Disability Policy, as amended, be
approved. 
[Reference: Minutes of the Employee, Equalities, Diversity and Inclusion Forum of 4 March 2026
(Paragraph 7) and Minutes of the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee of
6 May 2026 (Paragraph 9)] 
9 Representation on Outside Bodies – Business Loans Scotland 
A report dated 15 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted providing an update on member representation on Business Loans Scotland (formerly
the West of Scotland Loan Fund Limited). 
Following notification of the intention of Councillor Fagan to step down from this position, a request
was received that Councillor Devlin replace Councillor Fagan as the Council’s representative on
Business Loans Scotland. 
The Committee decided: that Councillor Devlin replace Councillor Fagan as the
Council’s representative on Business Loans Scotland. 
[Reference: Minutes of 29 June 2022 (Paragraph 8)] 
9

Page 10

10 South Lanarkshire’s State of the Environment Report 2025 
A report dated 28 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources)
was submitted on South Lanarkshire’s State of the Environment Report 2025. 
The report had been prepared using data from across the Council, partner agencies and
government bodies.  The findings, detailed in Appendix 1 to the report, showed that:- 
 18 indicators had a ‘Good’ rating, with 11 of those showing improvement
 22 indicators had a ‘Fair’ rating, with 7 of those showing improvement
 7 indicators had a ‘Poor’ rating, with 4 of those showing improvement 
If approved, the full State of the Environment Report would be made available on the Council’s
website. 
Officers responded to members’ questions in relation to various aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that the State of the Environment Report 2025 be approved
and disseminated across the Council and to relevant Council
partners and external agencies for use in the preparation of
plans, policies, programmes and strategies, and their
Strategic Environmental Assessments, as well as for an
information resource. 
[Reference: Minutes of 26 June 2024 (Paragraph 13)] 
11 The Housing Promise 
A joint report dated 5 May 2026 by the Director, Health and Social Care and Executive Director
(Housing and Technical Resources) was submitted on the Housing Promise for care experienced
young people, consolidating and formalising existing activity already being delivered and
progressed by the Council. 
Following the independent Care Review commissioned by the Scottish Government in 2016, the
conclusions, known as The Promise, provided a universal commitment across public bodies and
political parties to deliver meaningful change for care experienced people and their families. 
Within South Lanarkshire, The Promise was embedded as a key theme in the Children’s Services
Plan, supported by The Promise Board and the young people-led Champions Board. 
Building on the work already undertaken by the Council to implement The Promise, it was
proposed that a Housing Promise be formally approved.  This would deliver a person-centred
approach, drawing together and formalising existing work already being delivered across services,
to ensure that all care experienced young people had access to safe, suitable and sustainable
housing options. 
Information was provided on:- 
 the core commitments of the Housing Promise
 Barnardo’s South Lanarkshire Futures, which was a key development project between
Barnardo’s and the Council to provide good quality transition housing and support
 some of the experiences of the young people involved
 the Throughcare and Aftercare Protocol
 Social Work Resources’ Close to Home approach  
10

Page 11

The Committee decided: that the Housing Promise for care experienced young
people, as set out in section 4.2 of the report, which would
consolidate and formalise existing activity already being
delivered across Housing, Social Work and partner services,
and complemented the previously approved Employability
Promise, be approved. 
[Reference: Minutes of 26 June 2024 (Paragraph 13)] 
12 Land and Property Transfers and Disposals 
A report dated 27 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources) was
submitted on proposed actions in respect of land and property transactions. 
The recommendations had been made in terms of agreed procedures for dealing with surplus
land and property. 
At its meeting on 1 April 2026, the Committee agreed to continue consideration of the site at 51
Machan Road, Larkhall to a future meeting, to allow further engagement with all local members,
clarification on pedestrian and road safety implications including any mitigation measures,
consideration of the impact on remaining open greenspace and further explanation regarding
previous interest in the land. 
Further discussions had taken place with the local members, and a consensus was reached to
progress the proposed negotiated sale, subject to Committee approval to declare the land surplus. 
In response to a member’s question in relation to a recent arson attack on the property, the Head
of Property Services undertook to check with the relevant officers and provide an update on any
damage. 
The Committee decided: that the land detailed in Appendix A, which would be the
subject of a negotiated transaction, be declared surplus to
Council requirements. 
[Reference: Minutes of 1 April 2026 (Paragraph 7)] 
13 Summer of Sport 
A report dated 29 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources)
was submitted advising of a draft programme of events being proposed across South Lanarkshire
using the Summer of Sport funding from sportscotland. 
As part of the Summer of Sport funding provided by sportscotland, the Council had been allocated
£713,000 for the 2026/2027 financial year.  The aim of the initiative was to provide free or reduced
cost activity and inclusive opportunities for children and young people aged 3 to 26 years to get
active, stay active and improve their lives, particularly focusing on reducing barriers to participation
and addressing poverty-related inequality. 
Clubs affiliated with South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture’s Club SL programme would have the
opportunity to apply for grants to deliver to targeted groups, in line with the guidance supported
by sportscotland. 
The proposed programme of events was attached as Appendix 1 to the report.  
11

Page 12

The Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) responded to members’ questions
in relation to various aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that the programme of planned events, as detailed in
Appendix 1, be approved. 
14 Amendments to Memberships of Committees 
A report dated 30 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted on a proposed change to the membership of the Education Resources Committee and
Social Work Resources Committee. 
Following a request received from the Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group on 30 April 2026, it
was proposed that Councillor Brown replace Councillor McGeever on the Education Resources
Committee and that Councillor McGeever replace Councillor Brown on the Social Work Resources
Committee, with Councillor Brown becoming a substitute member. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that Councillor Brown replace Councillor McGeever on the Education Resources
Committee; and 
(2) that Councillor McGeever replace Councillor Brown on the Social Work Resources
Committee, with Councillor Brown becoming a substitute member. 
15 Update on Corporate Asset Management Plan 
A report dated 24 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources) was
submitted providing an update on the Corporate Asset Management Plan 2021 to 2026, including
the Local Government Benchmarking Framework indicator outcomes for Property Condition and
Suitability. 
The Corporate Asset Management Plan detailed the objectives which directed asset management
and the structures that supported it.  A summary of the strategies and priorities in the following
service areas included in the Corporate Asset Management Plan was provided in section 4 of the
report:- 
 Property and Housing Management
 Roads Asset Management Plan
 Fleet Asset Management Plan
 Information and Communication Technology Asset Management Plan 
The Property Asset Management Plan 2025 update was attached as Appendix 1 to the report.  It
was also highlighted that a 10-year Estate Strategy was currently being finalised which would
inform future land and property decisions on the investment, rationalisation, co-location and
disposal of assets, taking account of community, financial and service considerations. 
In response to members’ questions:- 
 the Head of Property Services undertook to provide members with a list of properties that
came under the C and D condition category
 the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) undertook to provide information
on the increase in capital receipts from 2024 to 2025  
12

Page 13

The Committee decided: 
(1) that the update on the Corporate Asset Management Plan 2021 to 2026, including the Local
Government Benchmarking Framework (LGBF) indicator outcomes for Property Condition
and Suitability, be noted; 
(2) that the proposal to bring forward a new 10-year Estate Strategy 2026 to 2036 be noted;
and 
(3) that the Property Asset Management Plan 2025 update, attached at Appendix 1, be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 7 September 2016 (Paragraph 10)] 
16 Integration Joint Boards - Extension of Voting Rights 
A report dated 29 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was
submitted providing an update on the Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Integration Joint Boards)
(Scotland) Amendment Order 2025, which had been made by the Scottish Ministers and was
scheduled to come into force on 1 September 2026. 
The purpose of the Order was to extend voting rights on Integration Joint Boards (IJBs) to include
members appointed to represent the third sector, service users and unpaid carers.  The Order
also made related amendments in relation to the resignation of members and proxy arrangements. 
Councillor Walker expressed concerns about how these significant changes in the governance of
IJBs, which risked blurring the lines of accountability, had been processed through secondary
legislation and negative instruments, therefore, avoiding full parliamentary debate.  It had also
avoided debate with elected members in the wider community. 
Councillor Loudon advised that the Policy Note: The Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Integration
Joint Boards (Scotland) Amendment Order 2025 (SSI 2025/405), listed as a background paper in
the report, provided an evidence base on why this was brought forward, ensuring that people with
lived experience had equal rights on IJBs.  It also provided a list of engagements that had taken
place. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the update provided on the Public Bodies (Joint Working) (Integration Joint Boards)
(Scotland) Amendment Order 2025 be noted; and 
(2) to note that officers would provide further engagement and reporting to the Integration Joint
Board as appropriate to support implementation. 
Councillor Frame left the meeting during this item of business 
17 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
Chair’s Closing Remarks
The Chair advised that this would be his last meeting as Chair of the Executive Committee and noted
that his time as Chair had been during a challenging time for local government.  
13

Page 14

The Council had, however, made some very forward-thinking decisions during that period which he
was proud to have been part of, noting, in particular, the Marmot Initiative, town centre masterplans,
the establishment of Family Support Hubs and the best paid Home Care workforce in Britain. 
The Chair recognised the Council workforce and partners for all they did to provide essential and
excellent public services.  He thanked the Trade Unions for their constructive partnership, the
Corporate and Senior Management teams, Administration Services and Members’ Services that had
supported him over the last 4 years. 
The Chair also thanked the councillors and political groups and, in particular, Councillors Devlin,
Convery and Brown, and the Chief Executive for his corporate leadership and dedication to South
Lanarkshire Council. 
14

Page 15

Report
Agenda Item 
To: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Prepared By: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Revenue Budget Year-End 2025/2026 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise the Committee of the overall financial position of the Council’s General
Fund Revenue Account and Housing Revenue Account for the period 1 April
2025 to 31 March 2026 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that across Resources, Corporate Items, Loan Charges and Council Tax, the
Council is showing a year-end underspend of £3.131 million after proposed
Transfers to Reserves (Section 4 and Appendix 1), be noted;
(2) that the increase in the Probable Outturn Transfers to Reserves to £60.206
million (previously £58.026 million) (Appendix 3), be approved;
(3) that the additional year-end Transfers to Reserves totalling £1.886 million
(Appendix 4), be approved; 
(4) that the additional non-recurring underspend of £1.356 million in the delegated
budget to the IJB be held in Reserves for their use in future years (sections
4.13), be approved;
(5) that the proposed use of £3.131 million underspend for 2025/2026 as set out in
section 4.22, be approved;
(6) that this results in a breakeven position for the Council for 2025/2026 (section
4.23), be noted; and
(7) that the breakeven position on the Housing Revenue Account (Section 5), be
noted. 
3. Background
3.1. This overview report will summarise the 2025/2026 year-end position for the Council’s
General Fund Revenue Account and Housing Revenue Account.   
3.2. Section 4 details the final position for the financial year, as well as the movement from
the previously reported Probable Outturn position for the Council. The Housing
Revenue position is shown in Section 5. 
3.3. Appendix 1 to the report details the overall spend position for the current year. This
position includes new proposed Transfers to Reserves since the Probable Outturn was
approved.  The Transfers to Reserves approved at Probable Outturn (Executive
Committee, 4 February 2026) are shown in Appendix 3 for reference, along with some
changes to these transfers to reflect final spend achieved during the year.   
3
15

Page 16

3.4. There are also some new Transfers to Reserves proposed at the end of the year, and
these are shown in Appendix 4.  This includes proposals for the overall underspend of
£3.131 million outlined in Appendix 1. 
4. 2025/2026 General Services Year End Position 
4.1. This report and appendices provide a detailed analysis of the Council’s financial
position.  A summary position including the key highlights is detailed in sections 4.3 –
4.21 with the full detail included in Appendix 2. 
4.2. For reference, the Council’s overall Probable Outturn after approved Transfers to
Reserves was a forecast break-even (Executive Committee, 4 February 2026).   
4.3. The year-end outturn position is showing an underspend of £3.131 million. This is after
proposed Transfers to Reserves at year-end.  Table 1 shows the movement from the
Probable Outturn break-even position to the underspend position of £3.131 million at
financial year-end which includes new proposed Transfers to Reserves at the year-
end.     
Table 1 – General Services Year-End 2025/2026 
Probable
Outturn
Including
Approved
Transfers
£m
Year-End
Before
New
Proposed
Transfers
£m
Movement
from
Probable to 
Year-End
£m
Year-End
Proposed
Transfers 
£m
Year-End
After
Transfers 
£m
Community and Enterprise Resources 
(4.6 – 4.7)
0.348 1.438 1.090 (1.091) 0.347
Education Resources (4.8 – 4.9) 0.000 1.189 1.189 (1.189) 0.000
Finance and Corporate Resources (4.10) 0.578 0.674 0.096 (0.096) 0.578
Housing and Technical Resources (4.11) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Social Work Resources (4.12 – 4.16) 0.000 1.047 1.047 (1.047) 0.000
Joint Boards (4.17) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resources Underspend 2025/2026 0.926 4.348 3.422 (3.423) 0.925      
Loan Charges (section 4.18) 2.101 4.006 1.905 0.000 4.006
Corporate Items (section 4.19 – 4.20) 0.422 2.308 1.886 (0.635) 1.673
Council Tax (section 4.21) 0.130 0.114 (0.016) (0.008) 0.106
PO Transfer to Reserves (3.579) (3.579) 0.000 0.000 (3.579)
Total Underspend 2025/2026 0.000 7.197 7.197 (4.066) 3.131 
4.4. This report and appendices provide a detailed analysis of the Council’s financial
position at the end of financial year 2025/2026.  Appendix 1 shows the position in full,
including the outturn before and after transfers to reserves.  A summary is included in
sections 4.5 to 4.21 which details the movement from the Probable Outturn, with the
detail across spend areas included in Appendix 2.   
4.5. Resources: As covered in Table 1, Resources are reporting a combined underspend
position of £0.925 million.  This position across Resources is after £3.423 million of
additional proposed Transfers to Reserves.  These are detailed in Appendices 3 and
4.  A summary of each Resource is provided below with the detail included in Appendix
2.  
16

Page 17

4.6. Community and Enterprise Resources are showing a year end underspend of
£1.438 million after their previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  The Resource
are proposing that the Transfers to Reserves approved at Probable Outturn are
increased to reflect the to the anticipated timing of spend and are shown in Appendix
3.  The underspend is made up of a number of variances including increased fee
income for Planning and Building Standards (£0.5 million) and a net reduction in costs
within Roads Construction reflecting type and volume of works (£1.2 million). 
4.7. In addition, new Transfers to Reserves are proposed for the increased lease costs for
Waste Services Vehicles moving forward (£0.605 million) and funds to support
planned IT Developments in Planning and Building Standards (£0.100m).  This would
take the Resource to an underspend of £0.347 million, which is in line with their
Probable Outturn. 
4.8. Education Resources are showing a year-end underspend position of £1.189
million after their previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  This mainly relates to
underspends on specific funding including Pupil Equity Fund, Additional Support for
Learning and schools’ Devolved Management Scheme budgets.   
4.9. The Resource are proposing new Transfers to Reserves which include an increase to
the previously approved Transfers and are shown in Appendix 3.  In addition, further
Transfers to Reserves are requested to support ASN adaptations (£0.125 million), and
which would take place next financial year, and also for funding from schools’
Devolved Management Scheme (£0.325 million) which can be carried forward in line
with the scheme.  Taking account of these year-end transfers would leave the
Resources in a break-even position, which is in line with their Probable Outturn. 
4.10. Finance and Corporate Resources are showing an underspend of £0.674 million
after previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  Additional Transfers to Reserves
are proposed at the year-end for Discretionary Housing Payment (DHP) funding that
was received later in the year, and which can be carried forward to spend next year
(£0.081 million) and for Place Based funding committed for projects in 2026/2027
(£0.015 million).  After these Transfers to Reserves, the Resource position would be
an underspend of £0.578 million.  This is in line with their Probable Outturn position. 
4.11. Housing and Technical Resources are showing a breakeven position after the
previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  The year-end position includes a £0.373
million underspend in relation to an element of the Resource budget delegated to the
Integrated Joint Board (IJB) for the Centralised Adaptations Service for aids and
adaptations, which is based on Social Work assessments. It is proposed that this
underspend of £0.373 million be retained by the IJB within their reserves earmarked
for future costs.  After this commitment, the year-end position is break-even, which is
in line with the Resource’s Probable Outturn position. 
4.12. Social Work Resources is showing a year-end underspend of £1.047 million after
previously approved Transfers to Reserves / commitments.  
17

Page 18

4.13. The Adults and Older People position at the year-end also includes a further £0.983
million commitment in relation to the element of the budget delegated to the IJB – this
is effectively a further underspend on the delegated budget, and mainly reflects the
level of service demand and the financial impact of financial assessments for new and
existing service users. It is proposed that this additional non-recurring underspend of
£0.983 million also be retained by the IJB within their reserves earmarked for future
costs.  Including the £0.373 million for aids and adaptations outlined in section 4.11,
this takes the total additional amount being proposed to be retained by the IJB to
£1.356 million. 
4.14. The Social Work Resources non-delegated Services position is showing an
underspend of £1.047 million after previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  This
is mainly due to reduced costs for anticipated residential placements, lower than
anticipated costs of respite and increased turnover in staff across the Services.  At
year-end, a Transfer to Reserves is requested for residual pressures within the
Children and Families Service which are anticipated to continue into 2026/2027 while
the budget recovery plan continues to be implemented.  The year-end Transfer to
Reserves would take the non-delegated budget to break even, in line with their
Probable Outturn. 
4.15. The Resources’ Approved Probable Outturn Transfers to Reserves are shown in
Appendix 3 with their additional Proposed Transfers at year-end shown in Appendix
4). 
4.16. Joint Boards: There is a break-even position within Joint Boards in relation to the
requisition budgets. The Probable Outturn position was break-even. 
4.17. Loan Charges: There is an underspend of £4.006 million after the Transfers to
Reserves approved at Probable Outturn (Appendix 3). The underspend is an improved
position of £1.905 million from the £2.101 million reported at Probable Outturn and
reflects the level of deposit interest received in year being greater than anticipated, as
well as the benefit of interest on Revenue Balances. 
4.18. Corporate Items: There is an underspend at year end of £2.308 million, after taking
into account approved Transfers to Reserves.  This is a movement of £1.886 million
which reflects recent confirmation of the date the new pension contributions were to
be applied (£1.200 million), and 2025/2026 investment monies to be carried forward
for commitments in 2026/2027 (£0.566 million).  These are covered further in Appendix
2. 
4.19. Two year-end Transfers to Reserves are proposed from the Corporate Items budget. 
These are for 2025/2026 investment monies noted above, to be carried forward
(£0.566 million) to complete the programmes of work, and Fairer Futures funding
received (£0.069 million) that was unable to spend before the end of the financial year
and is committed for supporting the development of the new children’s service plan
and a performance framework.  This takes the Corporate Items position to an
underspend of £1.672 million.   
4.20. Council Tax: The over recovery for the year, after the transfer to the HRA reserve in
line with the approved Council Tax Second Homes Policy (100% surcharge), is £0.106
million, representing a minor adverse movement of £0.024 million since the Probable
Outturn.  
18

Page 19

4.21. Summary and Proposals:  As noted in Table 1, within section 4.3, there is an overall
underspend of £3.131 million. This year-end underspend of £3.131 million is after
adjustments to the Transfers to Reserves approved at Probable Outturn (Appendix 3),
and the new proposals detailed in Appendix 4. 
4.22. In terms of this £3.131 million, the following is proposed: 
 that £1.000 million of the underspend be transferred to reserves to allow the
Council to provide financial support to contribute towards the response to
questions posed by the Marmot initiative.  The NHS and the IJB have already set
aside funds of £2.000 million each. This additional £1.000 million will allow the
Council to match these monies (as we have a previous amount of £1.000 million
in Reserves agreed at Probable Outturn) and contribute towards the cost of
taking forward activity to progress Marmot findings including any required staffing
and implementation costs
 that an allocation of £0.030 million be Transferred to Reserves for commitments
in Youth, Family and Community Learning Services in 2026/2027
 that an amount of £1.000 million be Transferred to Reserves and set aside to
fund the Local Government Elections into 2027/2028
 that the remaining £1.101 million underspend be Transferred to Reserves to
support future year’s budget strategies 
4.23. If this proposal is agreed, then these monies will be transferred to Reserves and will
result in the Council returning a break-even position for financial year 2025/2026. 
4.24. Year-end Accounting Adjustments:  As part of the year-end process, expenditure
is reviewed to identify whether it is Revenue or Capital spend.  Any spend that should
be classed as Capital has been removed from these monitoring figures.  This has no
impact on the bottom-line position of the Resources. 
5. Housing Revenue Account Year-End 2025/20256
5.1. As at 31 March 2026, the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) is a showing a break-even
position. 
5.2. This break-even position is after a transfer from the HRA Reserve of £3.988 million.
This Transfer from Reserves is £0.375 million less than the Probable Outturn Transfer
from Reserves of £4.363 million.  The main reasons for this reduction are increased
income from house rents, less than anticipated void rent loss and the less than
anticipated Loan Charges reflecting the level of deposit interest received in year being
greater than anticipated, as well as the benefit of interest on Revenue Balances. 
5.3. These are partially offset by the planned drawdown from reserves for the
implementation costs associated with the new Housing Management system which
went live in early 2026, One Housing.  As a result of the underspends mentioned
above, this spend can now be accommodated within the overall outturn, without
increasing the use of reserves. 
5.4. The details of the variances across the HRA are shown in Appendix 5. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. None.  
19

Page 20

7. Financial Implications
7.1. As detailed in sections 4 and 5 of the report. 
8. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
8.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms
of the information contained in this report. 
9. Risk and Other Implications
9.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Revenue Budget is that there is an
overspend.  The risk has been assessed as low given the detailed budget
management applied across the Resources.  The risk is managed through four weekly
Budget Monitoring Meetings at which any variance is analysed. In addition, the
Probable Outturn exercise ensures early warning for corrective action to be taken
where appropriate. 
9.2. There are no implications for sustainability in terms of the information contained in this
report. 
10. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
10.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required.   
10.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
2 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Executive Committee, 4 February 2026 
List of Background Papers
 Financial Ledger and budget monitoring results to 31 March 2026 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Lorraine O'Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o'hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
20

Page 21

Appendix 1 
21

Page 22

Appendix 2 
Detail of Year-End Position Across Resources and Centrally Held Budgets 
1. Community and Enterprise Resources are showing a year end underspend of £1.438
million after their previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  This reflects increased
fee income for Planning and Building Standards (£0.5 million), increased turnover of
staff within Regeneration, Support and Facility Services (£0.4 million) and reduced
materials costs within Roads Construction (£1.4 million). These are partially offset by
increased vehicle leasing (£0.4 million), and casual hire costs (£0.2 million) within Waste
and Grounds Services, increased plant and equipment costs within Grounds (£0.7
million) and reduced income for works within Roads Construction (£0.2 million). 
The Resource are proposing that the Transfers to Reserves approved at Probable
Outturn are increased to reflect the to the anticipated timing of spend: spend on Front
Line First (£0.046 million), contributions to the Strategic Waste Fund for planned works
(£0.275 million) and works to upgrade air conditioning for Refuse Collection Vehicles
(£0.065 million).  In addition, new Transfers to Reserves are proposed for the increased
lease costs for Waste Services Vehicles moving forward (£0.605 million) and funds to
support planned IT Developments in Planning and Building Standards (£0.100m).   
The Resource is showing an underspend of £0.347 million after proposed Transfers to
Reserves, in line with the Probable Outturn position. 
2. Education Resources are showing a year-end underspend position of £1.189 million
after their previously approved Transfers to Reserves. This mainly relates to
underspends on specific funding including Pupil Equity Fund, Additional Support for
Learning and schools’ Devolved Management Scheme budgets.  The Resource are
proposing an increase to the previously approved Transfers to Reserves for these areas
as spend will be incurred by the end of the school year, but which falls into financial year
2026/2027.  Also, a Transfer to Reserves is requested for funding from schools’
Devolved Management Scheme (£0.325 million) which can be carried forward in line
with the scheme.   
The overall Resource position allows a further transfer requested to support ASN
adaptations required following recent inspection outcomes, and which would take place
next financial year.  This totals £0.125 million and is included in Appendix 3. 
3. Finance and Corporate Resources are showing an underspend of £0.674 million
including previously approved Transfers to Reserves. This mainly relates to
underspends on specific funding including Discretionary Housing Payments that was
received later in the year, and which can be carried forward to spend next year (£0.081
million) and Place Based funding (£0.015 million) which is committed for expenditure in
2026/2027 and have been included as proposed transfer to reserves.  Taking these into
account leave the Resource position as an underspend of £0.578 million.  This is in line
with the Probable Outturn position.  
22

Page 23

4. Housing and Technical Resources are showing a breakeven position after the
previously approved Transfers to Reserves for the First Stop Accommodation project
within Homelessness service.  Underspends in Property Services is mainly due to
reduced grants for disabled adaptations, and which is offsetting overspends in Housing
Services mainly due to reduced rental income than forecast within Homelessness and
increased utilities costs.  As noted above, the year-end position includes a £0.373
million underspend in relation to an element of the Resource budget delegated to the
Integrated Joint Board (IJB) for the Centralised Adaptations Service for aids and
adaptations, which is based on Social Work assessments. It is proposed that this non-
recurring underspend of £0.373 million be retained by the IJB within their reserves
earmarked for future costs.  After this commitment, the year-end position is break-even,
which is in line with the Resource’s Probable Outturn position.   
5. Social Work Resources are showing a year-end underspend of £1.047 million
including the previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  This is an improvement of
£1.047 million since the Probable Outturn. 
Within this is the Adults and Older People budget which is delegated to the Integrated
Joint Board (IJB) and includes already approved Transfers to Reserves.  It also includes
a £2.745 million commitment in relation to the element of the budget delegated to the
IJB – this is effectively an underspend on the delegated budget. 
It was approved at Probable Outturn that the IJB retain £1.762 million within their
reserves for use in future years.  The commitment of £2.475 million noted above is an
increase of £0.983 million from the Probable Outturn position.  This is mainly due to
admissions to hospital and long-term care being greater than new services called on
and the financial impact of the finalisation of financial assessments for new and existing
service users. These are partially offset by employee turnover being less than assumed
and increased spend in Telecare due to demand.  It is proposed that the additional non-
recurring underspend of £0.983 million also be retained by the IJB within their reserves
earmarked for future costs. 
The Social Work Resources non-delegated Services is an underspend of £1.047 million
including approved Transfers to Reserves.  This is mainly due to reduced costs for
anticipated residential placements, lower than anticipated costs of respite and increased
turnover in staff across the Services.  It is proposed that the underspend of £1.047
million be Transferred to Reserves for residual pressures within Children and Families
Service which are anticipated to continue into 2026/2027, while the budget recovery
plan continues to be implemented.   
6. Joint Boards: There is a break-even position within Joint Boards in relation to the
requisition budgets. The Probable Outturn position was break-even. 
7. Loan Charges:  There is an underspend of £4.006 million after the Transfers to
Reserves approved at Probable Outturn (Appendix 3), an additional £1.905 million
since Probable Outturn. This reflects the level of deposit interest received in year being
greater than anticipated, as well as the benefit of interest on Revenue Balances. 
8. Corporate Items: There is a net underspend at year end of £2.308 million, after taking
into account previously approved Transfers to Reserves.  This is a movement of £1.886
million (from the underspend of £0.422 million at Probable Outturn) and mainly reflects
notable movements in relation to superannuation commitments (£1.2 million), and
2025/2026 investment monies to be carried forward (£0.566 million). Detail is shown in
Table 1.
23

Page 24

Table 1: Movements in Corporate Items Since Probable Outturn 
£m
Superannuation Accrual
Monies accrued on the balance sheet in 2024/2025 are no longer
required in 2025/2026 as the superannuation increase to 17.5% has been
implemented from the first full pay in 2026/2027. 
1.231
2025/2026 Investments
Funding allocated to 2025/2026 Investments projects will be required in
2026/2027. This relates to committed staffing costs for Fly Tipping
(£0.121m) and Local Action Fund projects (£0.445m) that will be included
in the 2026/2027 Capital Programme mainly in relation to play parks
projects. This is included as a proposed transfer to reserves. 
0.566
Bad Debt Provision
Movements in specific provisions across Resources has had a favourable
impact on the Corporate Bad Debt Provision budget in 2025/2026. 
0.129
Additional Procurement Savings
A further underspend of £0.100 million has materialised in relation to
procurement savings approved for 2026/2027 but that were achieved
earlier than planned (in 2025/2026). 
0.100
Fairer Futures Funding
Funding received that was unable to spend before the end of the financial
year and is committed for supporting the development of the new
children’s service plan and a performance framework. This is included as
a proposed transfer to reserves. 
0.069
Centre West Rates
Centre West rates bills for 2025/2026 from January to March have been
accounted for as the Council are liable for these while the Centre is back
in Council possession and being demolished. 
(0.111)
Other Minor Movements  (0.099)
Further Underspend since Probable Outturn 1.885 
Two year-end Transfers to Reserves are proposed.  These are for 2025/2026
investment monies to be carried forward (£0.566 million) to complete the programmes of
work, and Fairer Futures funding received (£0.069 million) that was unable to spend
before the end of the financial year and is committed for supporting the development of
the new children’s service plan and a performance framework.  This takes the Corporate
Items position to an underspend of £1.672 million.   
9. Council Tax including Council Tax Reduction Scheme (CTRS):  An over recovery of
£0.314 million in 2025/2026 before Transfers to Reserves is a minor adverse movement
of £0.016 million since the Probable Outturn. An increased Transfer to Reserves is
proposed from that approved at Probable Outturn in relation to income from Second
Homes which should be transferred to the HRA in line with the approved Council Tax
Second Homes Policy (100% Surcharge) (£0.008 million).   
24

Page 25

Appendix 3
Transfers to Reserves – Included in the Probable Outturn 
Purpose / Description Resource  Value
£m
Resources  
Strategic Waste Fund
Due to timing of spend on Waste projects, funding is required to be carried forward to in the Strategic Waste
Fund to support future spend on Waste. 
Community
and Enterprise
0.150
Air Condition for Refuse Collection Vehicles
Due to timing of expenditure on the retro fitting of air condition units within older refuse collection vehicles,
funding is required to be carried forward to next financial year.
Community
and Enterprise
0.080
Operational IT handheld devices
Due to the timing of procurement of handheld devices for Grounds and Streets staff in line with IT
development upgrades, funding is required to be carried forward to next financial year.
Community
and Enterprise
0.100
Front Line First
Funding received as part of 2025/2026 Investment funding is required to be carried forward to reflect the
profile of spend this year and within the overall three-year delivery programme.  
Community
and Enterprise
0.438
Local Plan
Annual contribution for future years costs associated with 2026/2027 Local Plan.
Community
and Enterprise
0.100
Local Growth Fund Transition
Through utilising external funding received in-year, an underspend in core Council funding will be carried
forward to maintain service levels into 2026/2027.
Community
and Enterprise
0.200
Fleet Sinking Fund 
Annual contribution to the Fleet sinking fund to maintain the asset replacement programme.
Community
and Enterprise
0.050
Total Community and Enterprise Resources Transfers at Probable Outturn   1.118
Adjust: Increase / (Decrease) in transfers to reflect spend during the year  0.386
Total Community and Enterprise Resources Transfers at Year End  1.504
PEF
The funding received from the Government can be used up to the end of the school term (June 2026). The
underspend reflects the element of the funding that will be utilised in April to June 2026.
Education 0.400
Additional Support for Learning
Sourcing and purchasing Additional Support for Learning equipment for schools that will be utilised in April
to June 2026.
Education 0.078
Total Education Resources Transfers at Probable Outturn   0.478
Adjust: Increase / (Decrease) in transfers to reflect spend during the year  0.739
Total Education Resources Transfers at Year End  1.217
Insurance Fund
A contribution to manage the anticipated increase in insurance premiums paid from the Fund.
Finance and
Corporate
0.300
Total Finance and Corporate Resources Transfers at Probable Outturn   0.300
First Stop Temporary Accommodation
The use of the in-year underspend to be set aside for the First Stop Accommodation project as planned
(Executive Committee, November 2025).
Housing and
Technical
0.123
Total Housing and Technical Resources Transfers at Probable Outturn  0.123
Children and Families Pressures
The transfer of one-off funding from the IJB due to reduced pension contributions has realised an
underspend which will be carried forward to support the pressures in Children and Families until the Budget
Recovery Plan is fully achieved.
Social Work 3.095
Transformational Residential Care
An in-year underspend is proposed as a contribution to transformational residential care in future years.
Social Work 0.500
The Promise
An in-year underspend in the IJB is proposed as a contribution to The Promise, to further augment the
support for young people transitioning from Children and Family Services to Adult Services over the
following two years.
Social Work 0.750
Total Social Work Resources Transfers at Probable Outturn  4.345
Adjust: Increase / (Decrease) in transfers to reflect spend during the year  1.047
Total Social Work Resources Transfers at Year End  5.392   
Total Resource Transfers to Reserves at Probable Outturn  6.364
Adjust: Increase / (Decrease) in transfers to reflect spend during the year  2.172
Total Resources Transfers at Year End  8.536   
Loans Charges  
Loans Charges
Funding to be utilised in future years in line with borrowing for service concession arrangements.  This will
be required to be drawn down from 2027/2028 (as approved at South Lanarkshire Council, January 2023).
Loans Charges 0.358
Total Loans Charges Transfer at Probable Outturn  0.358 
25

Page 26

Appendix 3 (cont) 
Corporate Items  
Service Concessions
Underspend arising due to a change in interest rates and indexation since the initial calculations were
undertaken, has meant that the estimated savings previously anticipated in 2028/2029 are available earlier.
Corporate
Items
4.388
Pay Award
Underspend carried forward from 2025/2026 as a result of Teachers pay award being implemented in line
with the school year.
Corporate
Items
3.987
Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility (PEPR) Staffing
Profiling of spend on waste project staffing costs in future years.
Corporate
Items
0.545
Central Energy Efficiency Fund (CEEF)
Resources are allocated funding from the CEEF Reserve to pay for spend to save projects which they repay
over future years from the revenue savings generated by the project. This transfer represents the payback
of savings from Resources and allows the Reserve to be regenerated for use on future projects.
Corporate
Items
0.297
Renewable Head Incentive (RHI) and Feed In Tariff (FIT)
Income from RHI and FIT is received in-year and will be set aside for funding future capital spend. 
0.200
Total Corporate Items Transfers at Probable Outturn  9.417
Council Tax  
Council Tax Second Homes Policy (100% Surcharge)
Income of £0.200m should be transferred to the Housing Revenue Account in line with the Council’s second
homes policy.
HRA 0.200
Total Council Tax Transfers at Probable Outturn  0.200
Adjust: Increase / (Decrease) in transfers to reflect spend during the year  0.008
Total Council Tax Transfer at Year End  0.208 
Previously Approved Transfers to Reserves  
Loans Fund Review
(An underspend of £13.349 million is anticipated in the Loans Fund Budget in 2025/2026.  This budget
underspend of £13.349 million will be set aside and used against the Budget Gap in 2027/2028 as planned
(detailed in the Executive Committee report, June 2025).
Loans Fund (T/f
to Reserves)
13.349
Investments 
The total budget line 2025/2026 Investments – Transfers to Reserves is £13.859 million (£10.263 million
one-off Revenue investments not required this year and the underspend in Loan Charges of £3.596
million).  It is proposed that these two amounts (£10.263 million and £3.596 million) be transferred to
Reserves at the end of the year (detailed in the Executive Committee report, June 2025).
Investments (T/f
to Reserves)
13.859
Teachers Numbers
As there is no longer a need to restore teacher numbers to the higher level, this budget line can be
transferred to reserves.  Given the budget pressures resulting from the higher than budgeted pay award, it is
recommended that consideration be given to using the £4.2 million to support the Budget Strategy – with a
view to setting this aside for Pay Award (detailed in the Executive Committee report, August 2025
Teachers
Numbers (T/f to
Reserves)
4.200
Waste and Recycling Services
The November Executive Committee agreed that £2.5 million of core monies released by pEPR funding will
be retained within Community and Enterprise Resources and utilised towards one-off investment in waste
and recycling services.  It is anticipated that £0.3 million will be spent by the end of 2025/2026.  As a result,
£2.2 million has been transferred to earmarked reserves for use in future years (detailed in the Executive
Committee report, December 2025).
Waste (T/f to
Reserves)
2.200
Budget Strategy
The November Executive Committee agreed that £4.5 million of core monies released by pEPR funding will
be used to support the Council’s Budget Gap.  This will be transferred to earmarked reserves for use in
future years (detailed in the Executive Committee report, December 2025).
Budget Strategy
(T/f to
Reserves)
4.500
Total Approved Transfers to Reserves  38.108 
Additional Transfers to Reserves – Use of Outturn Underspend  
Marmot Initiative 
Use of £1.000 million underspend to allow the Council to provide financial support to contribute towards the
response to questions posed by the Marmot initiative.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
1.000
Winter Wishes 
Use of £0.040 million underspend to support the continuation of the Winter Wishes programme within
Children and Families in 2026/2027.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
0.040
Commercial Feasibility 
Use of £0.100 million underspend for Commercial Feasibility costs.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
0.100
Third Sector 
Use of £0.400 million underspend to support the findings of the Third Sector to contribute to the external
medium grants allocation available for the next two years beyond 2026/2027.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
0.400
Budget Strategy
Use of £2.039 million underspend for budget considerations in future years.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
2.039
Total Additional Transfers to Reserves – Use of Outturn Underspend  3.579 
Total Transfers to Reserves at Year End: 
Total Transfers to Reserves Approved at Probable Outturn  58.026
Adjust: Increase / (Decrease) in transfers to reflect spend during the year  2.180
Total Transfers to Reserves at Year End  60.206 
26

Page 27

Appendix 3 (cont) 
The increase in transfers to reflect changes in spend since Probable Outturn is shown below: 
Purpose / Description Resource  Value
£m
Resources
Strategic Waste Fund
Due to timing of spend on Waste projects, funding is required to be carried forward to in the Strategic Waste
Fund to support future spend on Waste. 
Community
and Enterprise
0.275
Air Condition for Refuse Collection Vehicles
Due to timing of expenditure on the retro fitting of air condition units within older refuse collection vehicles,
funding is required to be carried forward to next financial year.
Community
and Enterprise
0.065
Front Line First
Funding received as part of 2025/2026 Investment funding is required to be carried forward to reflect the
profile of spend this year and within the overall three-year delivery programme.  
Community
and Enterprise
0.046
Total Community and Enterprise Resources  0.386
PEF
The funding received from the Government can be used up to the end of the school term (June 2026). The
underspend reflects the element of the funding that will be utilised in April to June 2026.
Education 0.253
Additional Support for Learning
Due to the timing of spend that was originally in the probable outturn assumptions, additional funding is
required to be carried forward for sourcing and purchasing Additional Support for Learning equipment for
schools that will be utilised in April to June 2026.
Education 0.486
Total Education Resources 0.739
Children and Families Pressures
It is proposed that the Service underspend be carried forward to support the pressures in Children and
Families until the Budget Recovery Plan is fully achieved.
Social Work 1.047
Total Social Work Resources 1.047
Total Resource Proposed Transfers to Reserves at Year-End  2.172   
Council Tax  
Council Tax Second Homes Policy (100% Surcharge)
Income of should be transferred to the Housing Revenue Account in line with the Council’s second homes
policy.
HRA 0.008
Total Council Tax Transfers at Year End  0.008
Total Increase in Already Approved Transfers to Reserves  2.180 
27

Page 28

Appendix 4
Transfers to Reserves – Additional Proposed Transfers at Year-End 
Purpose / Description Resource  Value
£m
Resources
Wast Services RCVs
Funding required to support additional leasing costs for RCVs within Waste Services into next year.
Community
and Enterprise
0.605
IT Developments
Funding for planned investment for IT development upgrades to planning and building standards
performance systems. 
Community
and Enterprise
0.100
Total Community and Enterprise Resources  0.705
ASN Adaptations
Funding required to support ASN adaptations next financial year to support service delivery demands. 
Education 0.125
Equipment Replacement Fund
Funding from schools’ Devolved Management Scheme being carried forward to allow spend across the
academic year and to allow schools to support capital equipment requirements over a number of years.
Education 0.325
Total Education Resources 0.450
DHP Funding
Transfer for DHP funding received later in the year, that was unable to spend before the end of the financial
year and will be spent in 2026/2027.
Finance and
Corporate 
0.081
Place Based Funding
Transfer for Council Place Based funding committed for projects in 2026/2027 with funding allocated to
specific areas. 
Finance and
Corporate 
0.015
Total Finance and Corporate Resources 0.096
Total Resource Proposed Transfers to Reserves at Year End  1.251   
Corporate Items  
2025/2026 Investments
Funding required to meet the obligations of the 2025/2026 investment commitments in relation to Local
Action Fund (£0.445m) and Fly Tipping (£0.121m).
Investments
(T/f to
Reserves)
0.566
Fairer Futures Funding
Transfer for additional funding received that was unable to spend before the end of the financial year and is
committed for supporting the development of the new children’s service plan and a performance framework. 
Education  0.069
Total Corporate Items Transfers to Reserves at Year End  0.635
Total Proposed Transfers to Reserves at Year End  1.886 
Final Transfers resulting in a Break Even (section 4.20)  
Marmot Initiative 
Use of £1.000 million underspend (in addition to £1.000 million approved at Probable Outturn) to allow the
Council to provide financial support to contribute towards the response to questions posed by the Marmot
initiative.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
1.000
Youth, Family and Community Learning
Allocation of £0.030 million for commitments in Youth, Family and Community Learning Services in
2026/2027.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
0.030
Local Government Elections
Amount of £1.000 million be set aside to fund the Local Government Elections into 2027/2028.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
1.000
Budget Strategy
Use of £1.101 million underspend to support future year’s budget strategies.
Use of Outturn
Underspend
1.101
Total Final Transfers to Reserves – Use of Outturn Underspend  3.131 
28

Page 29

Appendix 5 
Variance Explanations 
1. The underspend in employee costs is due to vacancies within the service that continue to be actively recruited. 
2. The underspend is due to the net effect of underspends in void rent loss, utility costs and ground maintenance charges partially offset
by greater than budgeted expenditure on fixture and fittings and contract cleaning costs. 
3. The planned overspend reflects anticipated spend on the implementation of the new One Housing system. 
4. Income is over recovered mainly due to greater than anticipated house rents as a result of the number of buy backs in year. 
5. The transfer to reserves is lower than budgeted reflecting the net effect of the variances noted. 
6. The underspend is due to the level of deposit interest received in year being greater than anticipated, as well as the benefit of interest
on Revenue Balances. 
Revised Projected Projected Actual Variance Under / % Note
Annual Outturn Outturn 31/03/26 31/03/26 (Over) Variance
Budget Variance
Budget Category £m £m £m £m £m
Employee Costs 15.360 15.295 0.065 15.267 0.093 Under 0.61% 1
Property Costs 62.592 62.420 0.172 62.115 0.477 Under 0.76% 2
Supplies and Services 0.405 0.477 (0.072) 0.427 (0.022) Over -5.43%
Transport and Plant 0.195 0.213 (0.018) 0.193 0.002 Under 1.03%
Administration 5.604 5.537 0.067 5.577 0.027 Under 0.48%
Payment to Other Bodies 12.590 12.981 (0.391) 14.098 (1.508) Over -11.98% 3
Payment to Contractors 0.422 0.422 0.000 0.484 (0.062) Over -14.69%
Transfer Payments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.00%
Financing Charges 26.133 26.164 (0.031) 25.985 0.148 Under 0.57%
Total Controllable Exp. 123.301 123.509 (0.208) 124.146 (0.845) Under -0.69%
Total Controllable Inc. (133.819) (133.740) (0.079) (134.150) 0.331
Over
Recovered 0.25% 4
Transfer to/(from) Balance Sheet (4.076) (4.363) 0.287 (3.988) (0.088)
Under
Recovered -2.16% 5
Net Controllable Exp. (14.594) (14.594) 0.000 (13.992) (0.602) Over -4.12%
Loan Charges 14.594 14.594 0.000 13.992 0.602 Under 4.12% 6
Net Controllable Exp. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 - 0.00%
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report
Period Ended 31 March 2026 (No.14)
Housing Revenue Account
29

Page 30

30

Page 31

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Revenue Budget Monitoring for Period 2 - 1 April 2026
to 15 May 2026 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise the Committee of the forecast for the year to 31 March 2026 for the
Council’s General Fund Revenue Account and Housing Revenue Account, and
the actual spend position for the period 1 April 2026 to 15 May 2026
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Executive Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the projected breakeven position on the General Fund Revenue Account
for 2026/2027 (section 4.1), and the actual spend as at 15 May 2026
(Appendix 1), be noted;
(2) that the proposed Transfers to Reserves (sections 4.3 to 4.5), be approved;
and
(3) that the projected breakeven position on the Housing Revenue Account for
2026/2027, and the actual spend as at 15 May 2026 (section 5 and Appendix
2), be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. This overview report will summarise the projected outturn for 2026/2027 for both the
Council’s General Fund (sections 4 and 5) and for the Housing Revenue Account
(section 6).  It will also provide the actual spend as at 15 May 2026. 
4. General Services 2025/2026 Projected Outturn as at 15 May 2026
4.1. As at 15 May 2026, the projected outturn position for 2026/2027 on the General
Services budget is breakeven (Appendix 1).  The actual spend to date is shown in
Appendix 1. 
4.2. Committed Funding:  Following the Budget being set on 25 February 2026, it is
appropriate to update Members on the impact on the 2026/2027 Revenue Budget.    
4.3. Of the committed investment monies (£33.300 million), officers have considered the
budget profiling, and as a result, one-off funding of £19.829 million has been moved
to the budget line 2026/2027 Investments – Transfers to Reserves to complete the
committed works into future years.    
4
31

Page 32

4.4. In addition, as part of the 2026/2027 Budget setting process, the Council agreed to a
further extension to the Loans Fund Review.  An underspend of £6.017 million was
anticipated in the Loans Fund Budget in 2026/2027.  £6.017 million has, therefore,
been moved to the budget line Loan Charges – Transfers to Reserves and will be set
aside and used to reduce the Budget Gap in 2027/2028 as planned.   
4.5. Similarly, in line with borrowing for service concession arrangements, as approved at
Council (January 2023), £0.826 million is required to be transferred to reserves to be
utilised from 2027/2028.  £0.826 million has therefore also been moved to the Loan
Charges – Transfers to Reserves budget line as planned. 
4.6. This funding of £26.672 million (sections 4.2 to 4.5) is committed for approved
investment and future costs, and has been moved to the Transfers to Reserves
budget lines in Appendix 1. 
4.7. Transfers from Capital:  The Budget in Appendix 1 includes a £5.300 million
transfer from the Capital Programme for the Private Housing Scheme of Assistance
(£1.000 million) and Planned Maintenance (£4.300 million) programmes.  Following
a review of the spend, it has been identified that it cannot be classed as Capital. 
Therefore, it is proposed that budget of £5.300 million will be transferred to Housing
and Technical Resource’s Revenue budget.  This is an accounting transaction only.
The total overall budget for the projects remains the same. 
4.8. Across the Council’s Budget, there are 3 notable areas where underspends are
anticipated this financial year.  These are taken in turn. 
4.9. Loan Charges Underspend:  An underspend is anticipated in 2026/2027 due to the
capital profile meaning a reduced requirement to borrow for investment monies this
financial year (£3.596 million), and that anticipated deposit interest and interest on
revenue balances is expected to be higher than budgeted (£2.500 million).   
4.10. Non-Domestic Rates Underspend:  Following the national Rates Revaluation
exercise and the rates poundage figure set as part of the 2026/2027 Settlement, an
underspend of £2.700 million is anticipated in 2026/2027.  This will be a one-off
benefit in 2026/2027 and a permanent benefit to the Budget Strategy from
2027/2028 (included in the Budget Strategy paper to this Committee).   
4.11. Empty Property Relief Underspend:  A recurring underspend of £1.000 million is
anticipated due to a reduction in the number of empty properties being supported
and will mean a permanent benefit to the Budget Strategy from 2027/2028 (noted in
the Budget Strategy report to this Committee).   
4.12. We are still very early in the financial year.  The budget for each of these areas has
been moved to a separate budget line in Appendix 1 and will be considered later in
the financial year as part of the Probable Outturn position. 
5. Updates on Budget Areas
5.1. Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility (pEPR) and Teacher Numbers /
Reduction in Class Contact Time (RCCT) 2026/2027:  The 2026/2027 Revenue
Budget paper to Council in February 2026 identified £7.865 million of core Council
budget released from pEPR monies and £4.200 million of core Council budget for
potential costs of RCCT in future years available as one-off benefits in 2026/2027. 
Both budgets have already been utilised within the Council’s budget for 2026/2027
and are part of the funding for the approved £33.3 million of one-off investments. 
32

Page 33

5.2. Social Work Resources – Children and Families:  The forecast for Children and
Families, Justice and Performance and Support Services show a breakeven position. 
As reported to Social Work Resources Committee, budget pressures within Children
and Families are continuing into 2026/2027 in relation to statutory duties of
continuing care and increased costs and requirements for residential placements,
fostering and kinship care.  This break-even forecast includes an allocation of £1.080
million from the Integrated Joint Board (IJB) for Pension Contributions no longer
required.  This will support the ongoing budget pressures in Children and Families,
while further options are being progressed to bring spend in line with budget,
including the use of earmarked monies held in reserves. 
5.3. Social Work Resources – Adult and Older People:  As we move through the
financial year, the forecast outturn will continue to be refined, taking into account the
ongoing recruitment across the Service and management decisions. Any transfers to
reserves will be confirmed as part of the Probable Outturn exercise. 
5.4. Inflation and Price Assumptions: The Council’s budget for 2026/2027 includes the
provision of budget for assumed inflationary increases for the Council’s main
contracts including schools’ modernisation contract (Public Private Partnership
(PPP)), school transport (Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) and Additional
Support Needs (ASN) taxis), social care for Children and Families and waste. It also
includes provision for assumed price impacts of utilities and fuel. 
5.5. Inflation reduced to below 3% in May 2026, however it is anticipated to increase
again during 2026/2027 due to increased utilities prices from June 2026 as a result
of the current conflict in Iran.  The schools’ modernisation contract increase is based
on inflation at the start of the calendar year and has been accounted for.  The costs
for the other main contracts will continue to be monitored throughout the financial
year as more information becomes available. 
5.6. In relation to utilities, the Council is a member of the buying consortium who
purchase wholesale energy in advance, on behalf of ourselves and other public
sector bodies. All of the Council’s required units are purchased for 2026/2027 at a
lower price than 2025/2026. However, this does not cover non-energy charges
including standing charges etc. with only a minor net saving assumed in 2026/2027.
This will continue to be monitored throughout the financial year as more information
becomes available. 
5.7. Fuel prices have seen an increase of approximately 30% from February to May as a
result of the current conflict in Iran. Prices and any budgetary impact will continue to
be monitored throughout the financial year. 
5.8. An increased inflationary budget requirement for these areas has been assumed in
the Council’s Budget Strategy for 2027/2028 to 2028/2029. However, for 2026/2027,
it is proposed that they continue to be monitored. 
6. Housing Revenue Account Position
6.1. As at 15 May 2026, Appendix 2 of the report shows a breakeven position on the
Housing Revenue Account. 
33

Page 34

7. Employee Implications
7.1. None. 
8. Financial Implications
8.1. As detailed in sections 4 to 5 of the report. 
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
9.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
10. Risk and Other Implications
10.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Revenue Budget is that there is an
overspend.  The risk has been assessed as low given the detailed budget
management applied across the Resources.  The risk is managed through four
weekly Budget Monitoring Meetings at which any variance is analysed. In addition,
the probable outturn exercise ensures early warning for corrective action to be taken
where appropriate. 
10.2. There are no implications for sustainability in terms of the information contained in
this report. 
11. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
11.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact
assessment is required.   
11.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
2 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council, 25 February 2026 
List of Background Papers
 Financial Ledger and budget monitoring results to 15 May 2026 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Lorraine O'Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o'hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
34

Page 35

Note:  While the Year to Date Actual at period 2 presents a net surplus position (£65.834m), this is timing only.  The forecast outturn
shows a breakeven position (section 4.1).
Appendix 1
Revised Projected Projected % Note Year to Date
Annual Outturn Outturn Actual
Budget Variance
Resources: £m £m £m £m
Community and Enterprise Resources 138.745 138.745 0.000 0.00% 4.651
Facilities Waste and Grounds 84.332 84.744 (0.412) (0.49%) 2.351
Leisure and Culture 19.658 19.658 0.000 0.00% (0.128)
Planning and Regulatory Services 5.925 5.426 0.499 8.42% 0.424
Enterprise and Sustainable Development 7.117 6.901 0.216 3.03% (1.415)
Roads, Transportation and Fleet 21.713 22.016 (0.303) (1.40%) 3.419
Education Resources 524.398 524.398 0.000 0.00% 50.702
Education 524.398 524.398 0.000 0.00% 50.702
Finance and Corporate Resources 47.674 47.674 0.000 0.00% 7.502
Finance Services - Strategy 2.684 2.736 (0.052) (1.94%) 0.278
Finance Services - Transactions 18.987 18.739 0.248 1.31% 1.873
Audit and Compliance Services 0.430 0.430 0.000 0.00% 0.051
Information Technology Services 9.193 9.117 0.076 0.83% 3.270
Communications and Strategy Services 3.175 3.137 0.038 1.20% 0.532
Administration and Licensing Services 5.549 5.692 (0.143) (2.58%) 0.572
Personnel Services 7.656 7.823 (0.167) (2.18%) 0.926
Housing & Technical Resources 18.720 18.720 0.000 0.00% 3.865
Housing Services 8.669 8.659 0.010 0.12% 0.030
Property Services 10.051 10.061 (0.010) (0.10%) 3.835
Social Work Resources 270.442 270.442 0.000 0.00% 28.341
Performance and Support Services 6.791 6.460 0.331 4.87% 0.649
Children and Families 49.375 50.018 (0.643) (1.30%) 5.469
Adults and Older People 212.765 212.765 0.000 0.00% 22.158
Justice and Substance Misuse 1.511 1.199 0.312 20.65% 0.065
Joint Boards 1.875 1.875 0.000 0.00% 0.288
1,001.854 1,001.854 0.000 0.00% 95.349
Revised Projected Projected Year to Date
Annual Outturn Outturn Actual
Budget Variance
Summary: £m £m £m £m
Resources Total 1,001.854 1,001.854 0.000 0.00% 95.349
CFCR 5.470 5.470 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Loan Charges 35.755 35.755 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Corporate Items (5.715) (5.715) 0.000 0.00% 0.000
2026/2027 Investments - T/f to Reserves 19.829 19.829 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Loan Charges - T/f to Reserves 6.843 6.843 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Loan Charges - Underspend 6.096 6.096 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Non-Domestic Rates - Underspend 2.700 2.700 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Empty Property Relief - Underspend 1.000 1.000 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Total Expenditure 1,073.832 1,073.832 0.000 0.00% 95.349
Council Tax 210.719 210.719 0.000 0.00% 32.418
Less: Council Tax Reduction Scheme (26.228) (26.228) 0.000 0.00% (4.035)
184.491 184.491 0.000 0.00% 28.383
General Revenue Grant 428.326 428.326 0.000 0.00% 65.896
Non Domestic Rates 434.876 434.876 0.000 0.00% 66.904
Transfer from Reserves 26.139 26.139 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Total Income 1,073.832 1,073.832 0.000 0.00% 161.183
Net Expenditure 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% (65.834)
Period Ended 15 May 2026 (No.2)
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL
35

Page 36

Note:  While the Year to Date Actual at period 2 presents a net surplus position (£10.389m), this is timing only.  The forecast outturn
shows a breakeven position (section 6.1). 
Appendix 2
Revised Projected Projected Year to Date
Annual Outturn Outturn % Note Actual
Budget Variance
Budget Category £m £m £m £m
Employee Costs 17.681 17.681 0.000 0.00% 1.764
Property Costs 63.036 63.036 0.000 0.00% 4.354
Supplies and Services 0.523 0.523 0.000 0.00% 0.026
Transport and Plant 0.195 0.195 0.000 0.00% 0.028
Administration 5.604 5.604 0.000 0.00% 0.049
Payment to Other Bodies 3.421 3.421 0.000 0.00% 0.012
Payment to Contractors 0.100 0.100 0.000 0.00% 0.036
Transfer Payments 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Financing Charges 33.918 33.918 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Total Controllable Exp. 124.478 124.478 0.000 0.00% 6.269
Total Controllable Inc. (142.365) (142.365) 0.000 0.00% (16.658)
Transfer to/(from) Balance Sheet (3.498) (3.498) 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Net Controllable Exp. (21.385) (21.385) 0.000 0.00% (10.389)
Loan Charges 21.385 21.385 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Net Controllable Exp. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00% (10.389)
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report
Period Ended 15 May 2026 (No.2)
Housing Revenue Account
36

Page 37

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Capital Budget Monitoring Final Outturn - 2025/2026 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise Committee of the outturn position of the General Services and Housing
Capital Programmes for the year ended 31 March 2026
 advise of the projects expressed in financial terms, which have been carried into
year 2026/2027 
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Executive Committee is asked to note the following recommendation(s):-
[r
(1) that the outturn on the 2025/2026 General Fund Capital Programme of £57.570
million (section 4.2), be noted;
(2) that the carry forward of 2025/2026 projects into the 2026/2027 General Fund
Capital Programme totalling £10.142 million (section 4.8), be approved;
(3) that the outturn on the 2025/2026 Housing Capital Programme of £85.782
million (section 5.2), be noted;
(4) that £1.958 million of Housing Capital Programme be carried forward into
2026/2027 (section 5.3), be approved; and
(5) that the level of overall spend anticipated in 2026/2027, for the General Fund
and Housing Capital Programmes, is the subject of a separate report to this
Committee (sections 4.9 and 5.3), be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. The attached statements to this report provide a final outturn position for the financial
year 2025/2026.  Spending has been split into two separate sections below:- 
 General Fund Capital Programme inc. Education, Social Work, Roads and
General Services (Section 4)
 Housing Capital Programme (Section 5) 
4. General Fund Capital Programme 
4.1. 2025/2026 Budget:  The final agreed programme for the General Fund in 2025/2026
was £67.712 million.  
5
37

Page 38

4.2. 2025/2026 Year End Position:  Appendix 1 shows the total expenditure of £57.570
million on the General Fund Capital Programme for financial year 2025/2026.  This is
compared to the budget of £67.712 million and results in an underspend of £10.142
million.  This underspend relates to projects within Community and Enterprise
Resources (£8.401m), Education Resources (£0.966m), Housing and Technical
Resources (£1.014m) and Finance and Corporate Resources (£0.048m), which are
partly offset by a funded overspend in Social Work Resources of £0.287m. 
4.3. The final spend position of £57.570 million results in approximately 96% of the original
capital budget approved at the start of this financial year being spent (£60.216m).   
4.4. This underspend reflects the profile of spend across a number of projects at the end
of the financial year.  The reasons for the revised profile of spend can be categorised
as weather related delays / programme changes, re-tendering of projects required,
and delays with external consultants and contractors progressing planned works. 
4.5. Overall, the programme net underspend results in budget required in 2026/2027 rather
than 2025/2026.  The main projects responsible for the overall programme
underspend are detailed in Appendix 2.  This appendix provides a list of the continuing
projects into 2026/2027, along with their estimated completion dates. 
4.6. Year End Accounting Adjustments:  Accounting Regulations mean that
adjustments are required to report spend correctly as either Capital or Revenue for the
purposes of publishing our Annual Accounts.  This includes where spend from the
Capital Programme is on assets that are not owned by the Council (for example
Shawfield Industrial Estate spend) or where spend must be classed as Revenue due
to the nature of the spend.  This adjustment has no physical impact on projects – it is
an accounting entry only.   
4.7. From reviewing the Council’s Revenue and Capital spend, £8.786 million of capital
spend is required to be recorded as Revenue spend.  These transfers mean that for
the purpose of publishing our Annual Accounts only, there is capital spend of £48.784
million.  The funding sources for this spend are detailed in Appendix 1 and have also
been transferred to the Revenue account for the purposes of the Accounts. 
4.8. Carry Forward to 2026/2027:  As noted in 4.2, the year-end underspend is £10.142
million.  This will carry forward into financial year 2026/2027. 
4.9. The overall base programme for 2026/2027 including this carry forward of £10.142
million is included in a separate report to this Committee.  This separate report reviews
the programme for the coming year detailing the overall level of spend achievable. 
4.10.  Funding: Funding available to support the programme in 2025/2026 is detailed in
Appendix 1. 
5. Housing Programme 
5.1. 2025/26 Budget:  Appendix 3 summarises the position on the Housing programme as
at 31 March 2026.  The revised capital programme for the year is £87.740 million, as
reported to the Executive Committee on 1 April 2026.    
38

Page 39

5.2. 2025/2026 Year End Position:  The actual expenditure on the Housing programme
was £85.782 million, an underspend of £1.958 million.  The actual spend is broadly in
line with the outturn previously reported although the actual spend on the New Build
programme was better than forecast, while the spend on Housing Investment
Programme (HIP) was slightly less than expected due to an underspend on kitchens
and heating projects partially offset by overspends in external fabrics, windows and
doors and environmental works.  The planned land settlement for the site on Almada
Street (£0.720 million) could not be concluded by 31 March and settled in early April
2026 and as a result the expenditure has slipped into 2026/2027.  Additional spend on
other sites offset this planned spend.   
5.3. Carry Forward to 2026/2027:  Taking into account the year end underspend would
mean a carry forward of £1.958 million.  A breakdown of the carry forward is £0.852
million for New Build programme and £1.106 million for Housing Investment
Programme.  This is detailed in a separate report to this meeting.  It is proposed that
the full amount be included in the 2026/2027 Capital Programme. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. None 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms
of the information contained in this report. 
8. Risk and Other Implications
8.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Capital Programme is an overspend.  The
risk has been assessed as low given the detailed project management plans prepared
and monitored for each project.  The risk of overspend is managed through four weekly
Investment management meetings. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to existing policy, function, or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
9.2. There was also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
2 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent  
39

Page 40

Previous References
 Executive Committee, 1 April 2026 
List of Background Papers
 Capital Ledger prints to 31 March 2026 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Lorraine O’Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637), E-mail:  lorraine.o’hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
40

Page 41

APPENDIX 1
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL       
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2025/2026       
GENERAL FUND PROGRAMME 
FOR PERIOD 1 APRIL 2025 TO 31 MARCH 2026 
Expenditure
2025/2026
Revised
Budget
2025/2026
Actual to
31/03/26  
£m £m   
General Fund Programme  67.712 57.570
Accounting Adjustments (Sections 4.6 and 4.7):     
Less:  Transfers to Revenue  (8.786) (8.786)   
Add:  Year End Transfers to Capital 0 0   
2025/2026 Outturn Position (Accounting Basis only) 58.926 48.784   
Income 
2025/2026
Actual to
31/03/26  
£m
Prudential Borrowing  10.288
Developer Contributions  3.534
Partners (including Levelling Up Fund, Cycling Scotland and
Transport Scotland) 
2.826
Scottish Government:   
- Capital Grant  28.115 
- Road Safety Improvement  0.698 
- Place Based Investment Programme  0.589
Capital Receipts  0.700
Specific Reserves  0.992
Revenue Contribution  1.042   
TOTAL FUNDING  48.784   
41

Page 42

APPENDIX 2
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL       
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2025/2026      
GENERAL FUND PROGRAMME 
FOR PERIOD 1 APRIL 2025 TO 31 MARCH 2026 
Projects with budget from 2025/2026 
which will carry forward into 2026/2027
Project Name Project Type Completion Date
Community and Enterprise Resources   
East Kilbride Town Centre Regeneration Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Hamilton Junctions Improvement Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Calderglen Pump Track Infrastructure July 2026
Clyde Walkway Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
SLC Industrial Infrastructure – Energy Efficiency
(Cathcart Road) 
Regeneration September 2026
Shawfield Remediation and Development  Regeneration Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Leisure and Culture Transformation Fund Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
Roads Investment Programme  Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Active Travel Infrastructure Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Safe Routes Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Larkhall Leisure Centre Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
and beyond
Play Parks Infrastructure Throughout 2026/27
and beyond   
Education Resources  
Secondary Schools Refurbishment Throughout 2026/27
and beyond   
Housing and Technical Resources   
Prioritised Urgent Investment Refurbishment Throughout 2026/27
Lifecycle Replacement Schools Refurbishment Throughout 2026/27
Fire Alarm System Upgrade Refurbishment Throughout 2026/27 
42

Page 43

APPENDIX 3
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL           
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2025/2026
HOUSING PROGRAMME 
FOR PERIOD 1 APRIL 2025 TO 31 MARCH 2026 
2025/2026
Annual
Budget  
2025/2026
Actual to
31/03/26 
£m £m
EXPENDITURE  
2025/2026 Budget 
Incl. carry forward from 2024/25
87.740 85.782 
2025/2026
Actual to
31/03/26  
£m
INCOME     
Capital Funded from Current Revenue  25.815
Prudential Borrowing  15.762
Scottish Government Specific Grant:
– Capital Grant   11.312
– New Build  24.620
– Open Market Purchase Scheme  7.700
– Mortgage to Rent  0.160
– Climate Emergency Fund  0.219
Miscellaneous Income  0.194
TOTAL FUNDING  85.782 
43

Page 44

44

Page 45

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee 
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Capital Budget 2026/2027 and Monitoring for Period 2 -
1 April 2026 to 15 May 2026 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 consolidate the capital budget monitoring to give a Council-wide summary of the
2026/2027 Capital Programme including 2025/2026 carry forward.  It includes
information on two programmes:  the General Fund Programme (being
Education, Social Work, Roads and Other General Services) and the Housing
Investment Programme, which covers all investment in relation to the Council’s
Housing stock
 update Committee of progress on the Capital Programme for the period 1 April
2026 to 15 May 2026  
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-  
(1) that the position of the General Fund Capital Programme, detailed in (section
4) and the Housing Capital Programme (section 5), be approved; 
(2) that the adjustments to the General Fund programme, listed at Appendix 1, be
approved; and
(3) that the revised programmes be monitored by the Financial Resources Scrutiny
Forum. 
3. Background
3.1. South Lanarkshire Council (25 February 2026) approved a General Fund Capital
Programme base budget of £105.247 million for financial year 2026/2027.  Since the
approval of this programme, there have been a number of events that will impact this
budget namely the approval of investments as part of the 2026/2027 revenue budget
and the finalisation of the year-end position for 2025/2026.   This will be detailed in
section 4. 
3.2. A total Housing Capital Programme budget for 2026/2027 was also approved by
Council in February 2026 of £90.934 million.  This position is detailed in section 5.   
3.3. This report provides an update on the Capital programmes as well as a summarised
monitoring position as at 15 May 2026 (Period 2).  Spending has been split into two
separate sections:  
6
45

Page 46

 General Fund Capital Programme (which includes Education, Social Work, Roads
and Other General Services) (Section 4) and
 Housing Capital Programme (Section 5) 
4. General Fund Capital Programme
4.1. 2026/2027 Budget: Section 3.1 notes that the base General Fund Capital
Programme is £105.247 million, as approved by Council in February 2026.  This
base budget is affected by the adjustments detailed in sections 4.2 to 4.13 and
summarised in Table 1. 
4.2. 2026/2027 Investments:  As part of the Revenue Budget setting process in
February 2026, an amendment was approved which allocated investment monies of
£33.300 million.  Officers from across the Council have considered the budget
allocations and £12.130 million of this is anticipated to spend in 2026/2027.  Of that
amount, it is anticipated that £10.610 million will be Capital spend and will be added
to the General Fund Programme to be funded by Revenue Budgets (CFCR). 
Increase to Budget:  £10.610 million 
4.3. 2025/2026 Carry Forward:  As reported in the Final Outturn Report for 2025/2026 (a
separate report to this meeting), a carry forward total of £10.142 million will ensure
sufficient budget is available to conclude ongoing projects within the General Fund
Capital Programme. 
Increase to Budget:  £10.142 million 
4.4. General Capital Grant: The Local Government Finance Circular received by the
Scottish Government in May revised our 2026/2027 General Capital Grant allocation
to £25.982 million.  This is an increase of £5.031 million and reflects the additional
distribution of a number of funds: 
4.5. Nature Restoration Fund: An allocation has been made for Nature Restoration
Fund £0.285 million.  This will be added to the 2026/2027 Capital Programme and
used to fund Urban Woodland Management plans, Local Nature Reserve plans and
Peatland surveys.
Increase to Budget: £0.285 million 
4.6. Active Travel Funding: An additional amount of £2.451 million for Active Travel
Infrastructure will be added to the 2026/2027 Capital Programme to fund a number
of works including Strathaven Road East Kilbride Phase 2 (inc. footway, cycle way
widening, street lighting, drainage), upgrade of East Kilbride underpasses (inc.
lighting, landscaping, drainage, artwork), National Cycle Network 75 Phase 3
(Cambuslang to Newton widening, surfacing and lighting), Cambuslang connection
to Clyde Cycle Park (inc. footway, segregated cycle route, street lighting, drainage),
and Bothwell to Uddingston (footpath widening, new surfacing, street lighting,
drainage). 
Increase to Budget: £2.451 million  
46

Page 47

4.7. Climate Emergency Funding Projects:  An allocation of £1.100 million for Climate
Emergency Funding projects will be used for a number of projects including roof
replacement & PV installation at Coulter Primary School, upgrades to Building
Energy Management Systems at various schools, energy efficiency measures at St
Andrews & St Brides and Holy Cross High Schools, installation of EV charging points
at Hawbank and Canderside Roads Depots, Sports Pitch LED Floodlighting (Fernhill,
Willie Waddell, Whitemoss and Newton Farm), extension of the Beat the Street
programme in Uddingston and Bothwell, reusable drink system to reduce single use
drinks containers in primary schools, and feasibility studies for the next phase of PV
installations and LED replacement of school staging lights. 
Increase to Budget: £1.100 million 
4.8. Flood Prevention Funding Projects:  An allocation of £1.195 million for Flood
Prevention will be added to the 2026/2027 Capital Programme with a programme of
works being collated.  This will include updating existing studies for Eastfield,
Muirbank, Halfway Stormwater Management Plans, Hamilton Surface Water
Management Plan and Rutherglen Road, Shawfield - Flood Risk Assessment. 
Increase to Budget: £1.195 million 
4.9. Profiling of Spend Exercise 2026/2027:  As per the Capital Budget and Monitoring
Process, Resources were asked to confirm their anticipated spend levels for the full
programme for the coming year to ensure that, in totality, the programme can be
delivered in 2026/2027.  This exercise has identified spend that requires to be
removed from the programme this year.  The movements are outlined below and
taken in turn.   
 City Deal Stewartfield Way / Hamilton Junctions:  £7.335 million of budget has
been reprofiled into future years to reflect expected contractor timescales for
Stewartfield Way (£5.335 million), and for Hamilton Junction Improvements (£2
million) where only 6 months of Utility contractor works can be undertaken this
year.
 Secondary Schools expansion budget:  Reflecting the programme of works,
spend of £9.000 million is now anticipated for 2026/2027 meaning that £4.743
million of budget will be required into future years. 
 Estates Strategy:  As the work on the Estate Strategy progresses, current
indications are that expenditure of £7.3 million could be achieved in 2026/2027,
meaning £4.7 million is removed for use in future years.   
4.10. The review of spend profiles has meant a reduction to the programme of £16.778
million. 
Decrease to Budget: (£16.778 million) 
4.11. Transfers to Revenue:  In addition to the adjustments noted at Section 4.9 to 4.10,
a £1.000 million transfer to the Revenue Budget for the Private Housing Scheme of
Assistance project and £4.300m for Planned Maintenance is proposed.  To reflect
Accounting Regulations, this spend cannot be classed as Capital.  Therefore, it is
proposed that budget of £5.300 million will be transferred to Housing and Technical
Resource’s Revenue budget.  
47

Page 48

4.12. Capital expenditure can be funded by Revenue monies however Revenue spend
cannot be paid for from Capital funding.  The Council’s Capital programme includes
funding that can be used for Revenue spend.  We are therefore able to move funding
between the Capital and Revenue Programmes and deliver the project as planned. 
This is an accounting transaction only.
Transfer of Budget: (£5.300 million) 
4.13. 2026/2027 General Services Base Budget Position:  Taking into account the
movements noted in sections 4.2 to 4.12, the General Services Programme for
2026/2027 is now £108.952 million.  This is the base budget for the financial year. 
This is summarised in Table 1 and is shown in detail, in Appendices 2 and 3 to this
report. 
Table 1 – 2025/2026 General Services Base Budget 
2026 / 2027
£m
Approved Programme – 26 February 2025 (Section 4.1) 105.247
2025/2026 Investments (Section 4.2) 10.610
2025/2026 Carry Forward (Section 4.3) 10.142
General Capital Grant – Nature Restoration Funding (Section 4.5) 0.285
General Capital Grant – Active Travel Funding (Section 4.6) 2.451
General Capital Grant – Climate Emergency Funding (Section 4.7) 1.100
General Capital Grant – Flood Prevention Funding (Section 4.8) 1.195
Profiling of Spend Exercise – Change in Profile of Spend (Section 4.9) (16.778)
Transfers to Revenue (Sections 4.11 and 4.12) (5.300)
2026/2027 General Services Base Budget  108.952 
4.14. Leisure and Culture Transformation Fund:  The proposed budget for 2026/2027
includes the remaining £4.226 million of the £13 million total budget. 
4.15. White Bridge, Chatelherault: Having now completed the feasibility study, it has
been determined that delivery of the project is not financially viable, with estimated
costs in the region of £8 million against an available budget of £1 million. The
estimated increase in cost is due to legislative restrictions which now apply to
building or development next to the River Avon where it is likely that fish will be
affected by the works.  It is therefore recommended that the existing £1 million
budget be reallocated to improvements to the footpath network in the vicinity of the
White Bridge, including upgrades to footpaths, steps, and signage.  Budget of £0.100
million for design and tendering has been profiled to spend in quarter four of
2026/2027. 
4.16. Place Based Investment Funding: Confirmation of the 2025/2026 Placed Based
Investment Funding allocation for Larkhall Leisure Centre has been received, and
there is a shortfall against budget of £0.263 million.  This funding shortfall is being
managed through an allocation of £0.263 million released from the Investments
funding in the wider capital programme. 
4.17. 2026/2027 Adjustments:  Since the budget was approved in February 2026,
Resources have submitted amendments to the programme totalling £0.550 million. 
A list of these adjustments is included in Appendix 1 and includes a transfer of
£0.038 million of Climate Emergency Fund projects which is being managed through
the Housing Revenue Account.      
48

Page 49

4.18. If approved, these adjustments to the 2026/2027 Capital Programme take the total
base budget for the year to £109.502 million 
4.19. 2026/2027 Forecast:  As noted in 4.16, the total capital spending programme for the
year is £109.502 million.  The detailed programme and spend for the General Fund
are shown in Appendix 3.   
4.20. Appendix 3 also shows a forecast for the financial year of £109.502 million. 
4.21. 2026/2027 Actual Position:  Actual spend incurred to the 15 May 2026 totals
£1.899 million.   
4.22. Actual funding received to 15 May 2026 is £1.767 million.  This is shown in Appendix
3.  Relevant officers will continue to closely monitor the generation of all income
including receipts. 
5. Housing Programme 
5.1. 2025/2026 Budget:  Section 3.2 notes that the total approved Housing Capital
programme for the year is £90.434 million.  The Final Outturn report for financial year
2025/2026 noted a carry forward of £1.958 million.   
5.2. As per Section 4.19, the budget is increased by a transfer of funds from the General
Fund’s Climate Emergency Fund (£0.038 million) for projects that will be managed
as part of the Housing Programme.   
5.3. The Scottish Government revised our Affordable Housing grant allocation for
2026/2027. This has been increased by £2.310 million and will increase the number
of Open Market Purchases made in 2026/2027. 
5.4. As a result of the confirmed figures noted in Sections 5.1 and 5.2, a revised
programme for 2026/2027 of £94.740 million will be presented to the Executive
Committee for approval.   
5.5. Programme funding for the year also totals £94.740 million.  Appendix 4 summarises
the position on the Housing programme as at 15 May 2026.   
5.6. 2026/2027 Forecast:  As noted in 5.4, the total capital spending programme for the
year is £94.740 million.  Current estimates from Resources have identified an outturn
of £94.740 million for the year. 
5.7. 2026/2027 Actual Position:  Spend to 15 May 2026 on the Housing Capital
Programme amounts to £3.617 million.   
5.8. As at 15 May 2026, £3.617 million of funding had been received. 
5.9. Regular monitoring of both the General Fund Programme and the Housing
Programme will be carried out in detail by the Financial Resources Scrutiny Forum
and reported on a regular basis to the Executive Committee. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. None.  
49

Page 50

7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in
terms of the information contained in this report. 
8. Risk and Other Implications
8.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Capital Programme is an overspend.  The
risk has been assessed as low given the detailed project management plans prepared
and monitored for each project.  The risk of overspend is managed through four weekly
Investment management meetings. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to existing policy, function, or strategy and therefore no impact assessment is
required. 
9.2. There was also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
2 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council, 25 February 2026 
List of Background Papers
 Capital Ledger prints to 15 May 2026 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact: 
Lorraine O’Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  2601 (Tel:  01698 452601)
E-mail:  lorraine.o’hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
50

Page 51

APPENDIX 1 
Proposed Adjustments 
Community and Enterprise Resources
Tree Planting
Grant awards from Future Woodlands Scotland (£0.030 million) and Trees for
Cities (£0.001 million) have been received which will be used to expand the reach
of both the Clyde Climate Forest and Future Woodlands Scotland’s strategic
goals. 
Approval is sought to increase the 2026/2027 Capital programme by the grant
awards totalling £0.031 million. 
£0.031m
Education Resources 
St Athanasius Primary School
Upgrading and expansion of the external play and teaching area to increase pupil
capacity of PE, including upgrading of School Multi-Purpose Games Area
(MUGA).  This will be funded from Developers Contributions. 
Approval is sought to allocate £0.050 million received from Developers
Contribution. 
£0.050m
(£0.050m) 
Housing and Technical Resources
Central Energy Efficiency Fund (CEEF) 
This is the revolving fund which delivers savings through the installation of energy
efficient technologies within Council properties. 
Approval is sought to increase the Capital Programme by £0.557 million for the
2026/2027 CEEF programme of works installing PV Panels and LED lighting. 
Climate Emergency Fund
Approval is sought to transfer Climate Change Funding of £0.038 million to the
Housing Programme, to allow the project to be managed as part of the overall
programme of works. 
£0.557m 
(£0.038m)  
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS £0.550m   
51

Page 52

APPENDIX 2 
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL       
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2026/27       
GENERAL FUND PROGRAMME 
FOR PERIOD 1 APRIL 2026 TO 15 MAY 2026 
£m  
Total Base Budget (including carry forward from 2025/2026) 108.952  
Proposed Adjustments – Period 2 0.550  
Total Revised Budget 109.502   
2026/27
Budget 
Period 2
Proposed
Adjustments 
Revised
2026/27
Budget
Resource £m £m £m    
Community & Enterprise 79.571 0.031 79.602
Education 15.297 - 15.297
Finance & Corporate 0.498 - 0.498
Housing & Technical 13.086 0.519 13.605
Social Work 0.500 - 0.500    
TOTAL CAPITAL PROGRAMME 108.952 0.550 109.502      
52

Page 53

APPENDIX 3
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL       
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2026/2027      
GENERAL FUND PROGRAMME 
FOR PERIOD 1 APRIL 2026 TO 15 MAY 2026 
2026/27
Base
Budget 
2026/27
Revised
Budget 
2026/27
Forecast 
Spend 
2026/27
Forecast
Variance 
2026/27
Actual to
15/05/26      
Expenditure £m £m £m £m £m      
General Fund Programme 108.952 109.502 109.502 - 1.899 
Income
2026/27
Budget
2026/27
Revised
Budget  
2026/27
Actual
To
15/05/26         
£m         £m   £m
Prudential Borrowing 54.520 54.520   0.000
Developers Contributions 1.775 1.775   0.000
Partners 3.071 3.102   0.000
Scottish Government:     
- Capital Grant 25.982 25.982   1.746
Levelling Up Fund 4.196 4.196   0.000
Capital Receipts 4.500 4.500   0.021
Specific Reserves 9.438 9.957   0.000
Revenue Contribution 5.470 5.470   0.000      
TOTAL FUNDING 108.952 109.502   1.767 
53

Page 54

APPENDIX 4 
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL       
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 2026/27       
HOUSING PROGRAMME 
FOR PERIOD 1 APRIL 2026 TO 15 MAY 2026 
2026/27
Annual 
Budget  
2026/27
Forecast
Spend
2026/27
Forecast
Variance
2026/27 
Actual to
15/05/26 
£m £m £m £m
Expenditure 
2026/27 Budget  94.740  94.740  -  3.617     
2026/27
Annual 
Budget  
2026/27
Actual to
15/05/26 
£m   £m     
Income         
Capital Funded from Current Revenue 33.851   0.014
Capital Receipts -   0.093
Prudential Borrowing 33.385   3.408
Scottish Government Specific Grant:    
- New Build 18.474   -
- Open Market Purchase Scheme 8.910   -
- Mortgage to Rent 0.120   0.081
Other Income -   0.021 
94.740   3.617 
54

Page 55

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Update to Funding 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise Members of additional funding that has been made available to the
Council by the Scottish Government and other external sources since the last
report to this Committee (20 May 2026)
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the additional funding totalling £12.054 million, detailed in appendices 1
and 2, be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. In year funding can change, and this can be in relation to funding for specific purposes
or funding expected and already included in our budget planning. 
3.2. Additional funding may either be paid through the General Revenue/Capital Grant
mechanism or by the completion of appropriate grant claims. 
3.3. Details of the additional funding is attached in appendices 1 and 2 of the report.  The
report details additional funding that has been reported by Resources as part of the
additional resources’ notification process, as well as any additional funding that has
increased the Council’s budget by more than £0.100 million. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. None. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. Additional Revenue funding of £7.023 million has been identified across 2026/2027.
This is detailed in Appendix 1. 
5.2. Additional Capital funding of £5.031 million has been identified for 2026/2027.  This is
detailed in Appendix 2.   
5.3. Resource budgets will be updated to reflect this additional funding.  Where
appropriate, details of spending plans will be presented to Resource Committees for
approval.  
7
55

Page 56

6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms
of the information contained in this report. 
7. Risk and Other Implications
7.1. There are no other implications in terms of the information contained in this report. 
8. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
8.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
8.2. There was also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
3 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Additional Funding Grant Awards 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:
Lorraine O’Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o’hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
56

Page 57

Appendix 1 
Additional Revenue Funding 
Resource  Description  2026/2027
£m 
Total
£m 
Method
Community
and
Enterprise
No One Left Behind (NOLB) – Employability 
Funding has been provided for 2026/2027, to
support the vision for economic transformation
through tackling child poverty, tailoring support for
all ages using the following allocations: 
• All-age employability support (£2.076m)
• Tackling Child Poverty (£2.311m)
• Specialist Employability Support (£0.284m) 
4.671 4.671 Scottish
Government
Community
and
Enterprise
Free School Meals Funding Allocation –
Pensions Credit and Uplift for the
Administrative Earnings Threshold 
Funding has been provided in 2026/2027 to reflect
the financial cost of new eligibility criteria, for
families in receipt of free school meals through
targeted provision from 1 April 2026. 
Funding is for the provision of free school meals
during school term-time only.  It does not support
holiday payments for eligible children.   
0.213 0.213 Scottish
Government
Finance and
Corporate
Child Poverty Action Plan – Additional Funding
for Discretionary Housing Payments –
Mitigation of the Local Housing Allowance rate
freeze for families 
Funding of £0.945m has been provided for financial
year 2026/2027, to help mitigate the impact of the
ongoing freeze on Local Housing Allowance rates. 
0.945 0.945 Scottish
Government
Housing and
Technical
Additional Asylum Dispersal Funding 
This funding is intended to support the integration
and allow Local Authorities to facilitate and assist
with costs of supporting Asylum Seekers. The
payment is to provide a contribution to eligible
expenditure incurred during 2026/2027 in relation to
pressure on local services associated with
supporting Asylum Seekers. 
0.270 0.270 UK
Government
Social Work Scottish Recommended Allowance (SRA) for
kinship and foster carers Funding 
The funding is to support the SRA that all local
authorities must pay as a minimum. Local
authorities that already pay above these rates
should continue to do so, ensuring that no existing
kinship or foster carers will be financially
disadvantaged as a result of this change. 
0.255 0.255 Scottish
Government
Social Work Delivery of Care Leaver Payment 
Funding received to deliver the Care Leaver
Payment £2,000 per eligible young person) in
0.197 0.197 Scottish
Government
57

Page 58

Resource  Description  2026/2027
£m 
Total
£m 
Method
accordance with the Care Leaver Payment
(Scotland) Regulations 2026. 
Funding will also cover implementation and delivery
costs. 
Social Work Section 27 Grant Funding – Justice Social Work 
This funding is for the purposes of delivering and
commissioning Justice Social Work services. 
0.472 0.472 Scottish
Government 
TOTAL REVENUE FUNDING 7.023 7.023 
58

Page 59

Appendix 2 
Additional Capital Funding 
Resource  Description  2026/2027
£m 
Total
£m 
Method
Community
and
Enterprise
Climate Emergency
The purpose of this funding is to scale up existing
projects. 
This will be used to fund a number of projects
including roof replacements, PV installations and
LED replacements, upgrades to Building Energy
Management Systems and installation of EV
charging points.  
1.100 1.100 Scottish
Government
Community
and
Enterprise
Active Travel
The purpose of this funding is to scale up existing
projects on the active travel networks.   
This will be used to fund a number of projects
including Strathaven Road East Kilbride Phase 2,
upgrade of East Kilbride underpasses, National
Cycle Network 75 Phase 3, Cambuslang
connection to Clyde Cycle Park and Bothwell to
Uddingston. 
2.451 2.451 Scottish
Government
Community
and
Enterprise
Nature Restoration Fund
This funding is to support new and to enhance
existing approaches to restoring biodiversity.   
This will be used to fund Urban Woodland
Management plans, Local Nature Reserve plans
and Peatland surveys. 
0.285 0.285 Scottish
Government
Community
and
Enterprise
Flooding
This funding provides an increase in the flexible
funding available to deliver services in line with the
Local Authorities Flood Risk Management Plans
and the National Flood Resilience Strategy.   
This will be used for updating existing studies for
Eastfield, Muirbank, Halfway Stormwater
Management Plans, Hamilton Surface Water
Management Plan and Rutherglen Road, Shawfield
- Flood Risk Assessment. 
1.195 1.195 Scottish
Government 
TOTAL CAPITAL FUNDING 5.031 5.031 
59

Page 60

60

Page 61

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Employee Workforce Monitoring Information - 1 April
2025 to 31 March 2026 Summary 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide employment information relating to the Council for the period 1 April
2025 – 31 March 2026
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the following employment information for 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026
relating to the Council be noted: - 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health
 accidents/incidents
 discipline, grievance and Dignity at Work
 employee development
 labour turnover/analysis of leavers and exit interviews
 recruitment monitoring 
 Staffing Watch as of 14 March 2026
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. As part of the Council’s performance management arrangements, the following
monitoring information is submitted to the Executive Committee. This report provides
information on the position for the period 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026. 
4. Attendance Statistics
4.1. Information on absence statistics for 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026, for the Council
and each Resource is provided in Appendices 1 – 8. The main points to note are:- 
 the Council’s annual average absence rate for 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is
6.0%, which represents an increase of 0.1% when compared with the previous
year
 the APT&C annual average absence rate for 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is
6.0%, which remains unchanged when compared with the previous year
 the teaching staff average absence rate for 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is
4.0%, which represents an increase of 0.4% when compared with the previous
year
8
61

Page 62

 the manual workers’ average absence rate for 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is
8.1%, which represents an increase of 0.3% when compared to the previous
year 
When compared with 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025 (Appendix 8):- 
 psychological and musculoskeletal conditions remain the main reasons for
absence
 the total days lost due to musculoskeletal conditions increased by 937 days
 the total days lost due to psychological conditions increased by 2,511 days
 the total days lost due to stomach, bowel, blood and metabolic disorders
decreased by 1,465 days
 the total days lost due to respiratory conditions have decreased by 4,580 days 
4.2. Managers follow the procedures outlined in the Maximising Attendance Policy to
support employees to remain at work, or to return to work after a sickness absence. 
Comprehensive employee supports are in place and Personnel Services work in
close partnership with managers and Resource Management Teams on a case
management basis, to ensure that appropriate actions are being taken, at the correct
time during the course of an absence. 
5. Occupational Health
5.1. Information on occupational health for the period 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is
provided in Appendix 9. 
When compared with 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025:- 
 psychological and musculoskeletal conditions remain the main reasons for
medical referrals
 a total of 1,894 employees were referred for a medical examination which
represents an increase of 157
 a total of 1,955 employees attended physiotherapy treatment, which is a
decrease of 3. Of these referrals, 68% remained at work whilst undertaking
treatment
 a total of 2,100 employees were referred to the Employee Support Officer; this
represents an increase of 181. 79% of these referrals related to personal issues
 a total of 668 referrals were made for counselling, representing a decrease of
65
 a total of 185 employees were referred for Cognitive Behavioural Therapy,
representing an increase of 97 
6. Accidents/Incidents
6.1. The accident/incident report for the period 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is contained
in Appendix 10. 
When compared with 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025:- 
 the number of accidents/incidents recorded during the period was 2,280, which
represents an increase of 474
 the number of specified injuries/incidents decreased by 4
 the number of minor accidents/incidents increased of 542
62

Page 63

 the number of accidents resulting in an absence lasting over 3 days decreased
by 11
 the number of accidents resulting in an absence lasting over 7 days decreased
by 39 
7. Discipline, Grievance, Dignity at Work
7.1. Information on Disciplinary, Grievance Hearings and Dignity at Work for the period 1
April 2024 – 31 March 2025 is detailed in Appendices 11, 12a and 12b:- 
 a total of 225 disciplinary hearings were held across Resources, which
represents an increase of 42 when compared to the previous year. Action was
taken in 214 of these cases and 2 Resource appeals were submitted, which
were not upheld
 the target is to convene disciplinary hearings within 6 weeks. During the period
54% of hearings met this target which represents a decrease of 12% when
compared with the previous year. The main reason(s) for not meeting this target
relate to the availability of all the relevant parties including requests to
reschedule dates due to annual leave and/or absences.  Personnel Services
works with employees and the relevant trades unions, to ensure hearings are
convened as timeously as possible and there is an action plan in place to
monitor timescales and to take steps to address areas of concern
 10 appeals were submitted to the Appeals Panel, of which 4 were not upheld, 4
were withdrawn and 2 were pending as at 31 March 2026
 33 grievances were raised during the period; an increase of 17 when compared
with the previous year
 34 dignity at work complaints were raised during the period; an increase of 6
when compared with the previous year
 7 referrals for mediation were submitted; this figure remains unchanged when
compared with the previous year 
8. Employee Development
8.1. Information on Employee Development for the period April 2025 – March 2026 is
detailed in Appendix 13:- 
 the Council is committed to ensuring that every employee has the opportunity to
undertake learning and development which relates to their job
 during this period there were 8,393 attendances at classroom learning and
development events.  There were also 972 attendances at virtual classroom
learning and development events
 as our suite of eLearning courses continues to develop, employees have
successfully completed 82,242 e-learning packages covering a wide variety of
subjects 
9. Labour Turnover/Analysis of Leavers and Exit Questionnaires
9.1. Labour Turnover 
Information on the number of leavers and exit questionnaires for the period 1 April
2025 – 31 March 2026 is detailed in Appendix 14. Exit questionnaires are completed
by employees who leave voluntarily. This does not include planned retirements. 
The Council’s annual labour turnover figure is 3.3%.  This figure has decreased by
0.6% when compared to the previous year.
63

Page 64

9.2. Analysis of Leavers and Exit Questionnaires
When compared with 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025:- 
 there were 507 leavers eligible to complete an exit questionnaire, representing
a decrease of 121
 130 exit questionnaires were completed, which represents an increase of 14.
The percentage of exit questionnaires completed was 26%, this figure has
increased by 8% 
10. Recruitment Monitoring
10.1. Information on Recruitment Monitoring for the period 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026 is
detailed within Appendix 15. From an analysis of the Equal Opportunities Monitoring
Forms, the main points to note are:- 
 99% of applicants completed an Equal Opportunities Monitoring Form, which is
an increase of 3% when compared to 1 April 2024 – 31 March 2025
 of the applicants who declared themselves as disabled (1,609), 889 were
shortlisted for interview and 73 were appointed. This compares to 955
applicants last year; of which, 393 applicants were shortlisted and 61 were
appointed
 of those applicants who declared themselves as being from a black, Asian or
ethnic minority background (4,246), 1,501 were shortlisted for interview and 131
were appointed. This compares to 1,755 applicants last year; of which 410 were
shortlisted and 37 were appointed
 focus continues to be given to increasing ethnic minority representation within
the Council. This work is aligned to the Employee, Equalities, Inclusion and
Diversity (EEDI) Forum and the most recent progress update was made to the
Forum at its meeting on 17 June 2026.  Progress to date includes: 
 a recruitment improvement plan has been established to enhance the
candidate experience of the application process
 recruitment Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) have been introduced for
candidates, hiring managers and Personnel Services
 the role of Resource Diversity Liaison Officer (DLO) has been reviewed
and will be relaunched in September 2026
 as a result of the ongoing improvement work, the Council has seen an
increased % of people interviewed that declare BME from 5.9% in 24/25 to
9.1% in 25/26 with an increased % of appointments that declare BME from
2.4% in 24/25 to 4.5% in 25/26
 of those applicants who declared themselves as being from an ex-armed forces
background (247), 98 were shortlisted for interview and 18 were appointed. This
compares to 98 applicants last year; of which 43 were shortlisted and 6 were
appointed 
11. Staffing Watch
11.1. Details of the number of employees in post on 14 March 2026 are contained in
Appendix 16. There were 15,688 employees in post on 14 March 2026 compared to
15,619 on 8 March 2025, representing an increase of 69 employees.  
12. Employee Implications
12.1. There are no implications for employees arising from the information presented in
this report.
64

Page 65

13. Financial Implications
13.1. All financial implications are accommodated within existing budgets. 
14. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
14.1. There are no Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications arising
from the information presented in this report. 
15. Risk and Other Implications
15.1. There are no implications for sustainability or risk in terms of the information
contained within this report. 
16. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
16.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact
assessment is required 
16.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor 
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
19 May 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving
 Excellent employer
 Focused on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others 
Previous References
 Executive Committee of 3 December 2025 
List of Background Papers
 Monitoring information provided by Resources 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Elaine Maxwell, HR Business Manager
Ext: 4647 (Tel: 01698 454647)
E-mail:  Elaine.Maxwell@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
65

Page 66

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.2 5.2 6.0 April 2.8 2.9 3.5 April 7.0 7.3 7.3 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 5.1 5.4 5.6 May 3.2 3.0 3.8 May 6.2 7.1 7.4 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 4.9 5.3 5.6 June 2.2 2.8 2.9 June 6.5 7.2 7.5 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 4.0 4.3 4.6 July 1.1 1.0 1.4 July 5.8 6.3 6.5 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 4.2 4.6 5.0 August 1.3 1.9 1.7 August 6.2 7.5 7.0 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 5.2 6.2 5.9 September 2.9 3.5 4.1 September 7.6 8.3 8.3 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 5.2 6.3 6.0 October 2.7 3.8 4.2 October 7.1 7.7 8.4 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 6.1 7.0 6.8 November 4.3 5.0 5.3 November 8.1 8.4 8.8 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 6.7 7.1 7.3 December 4.8 5.4 5.6 December 7.8 8.5 9.5 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 5.8 6.8 6.2 January 4.8 4.9 5.0 January 7.8 8.3 8.4 January 6.1 6.7 6.5
February 6.3 7.0 6.4 February 4.9 4.9 5.1 February 8.0 9.0 9.1 February 6.4 7.0 6.8
March 6.3 7.0 6.6 March 4.1 4.5 4.8 March 8.1 8.4 8.7 March 6.3 6.8 6.7
Annual Average 5.4 6.0 6.0 Annual Average 3.3 3.6 4.0 Annual Average 7.2 7.8 8.1 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.0
7328 4003 4438 15769
Appendix 1
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
Council Wide
APT&C Teachers
No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Manual Workers Council Wide
No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
66

Page 67

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 3.6 3.2 3.5 April 6.3 6.8 7.2 April 6.0 6.3 6.6 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 3.7 3.1 2.6 May 6.3 6.3 7.4 May 5.9 5.9 6.6 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 4.3 4.1 3.6 June 5.9 6.4 7.4 June 5.7 6.0 6.8 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 2.3 3.8 3.6 July 4.6 4.5 5.9 July 4.3 4.4 5.5 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 3.0 3.4 2.5 August 5.2 6.2 6.7 August 4.9 5.7 6.1 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 2.5 3.8 3.5 September 7.1 7.5 8.2 September 6.4 6.9 7.4 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 2.0 4.2 3.3 October 7.0 7.2 8.2 October 6.3 6.7 7.4 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 2.6 3.6 3.3 November 8.1 8.3 8.6 November 7.3 7.6 7.7 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 3.0 3.8 4.6 December 7.5 8.1 9.1 December 6.8 7.4 8.4 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 3.6 3.9 4.1 January 7.4 7.8 8.0 January 6.9 7.2 7.4 January 6.1 6.7 6.5
February 4.0 4.0 3.6 February 7.8 8.7 9.0 February 7.2 7.9 8.1 February 6.4 7.0 6.8
March 3.2 3.5 4.8 March 7.9 8.2 8.6 March 7.2 7.4 8.0 March 6.3 6.8 6.7
Annual Average 3.2 3.7 3.6 Annual Average 6.8 7.2 7.9 Annual Average 6.2 6.6 7.2 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.0
590 2862 3452 15769
Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Appendix 2
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
Community and Enterprise Resources
APT&C Council WideManual Workers
67

Page 68

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.0 5.4 6.8 April 2.8 2.9 3.5 April 3.8 4.0 4.9 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 5.4 6.0 6.6 May 3.2 3.0 3.8 May 4.2 4.4 5.0 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 4.8 5.5 6.3 June 2.2 2.8 2.9 June 3.4 4.1 4.4 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 3.4 3.2 3.8 July 1.1 1.0 1.4 July 2.2 2.0 2.4 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 4.0 3.9 4.4 August 1.3 1.9 1.7 August 2.5 2.8 2.8 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 5.9 6.6 5.8 September 2.9 3.5 4.1 September 4.3 4.9 4.8 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 5.5 6.5 6.6 October 2.7 3.8 4.2 October 4.0 5.0 5.2 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 7.1 7.8 8.2 November 4.3 5.0 5.3 November 5.6 6.2 6.6 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 8.1 8.6 8.5 December 4.8 5.4 5.6 December 6.3 6.8 6.9 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 6.6 8.0 7.2 January 4.8 4.9 5.0 January 5.6 6.3 5.9 January 6.1 6.7 6.5
February 7.2 8.4 7.5 February 4.9 4.9 5.1 February 6.0 6.5 6.1 February 6.4 7.0 6.8
March 7.5 8.3 7.8 March 4.1 4.5 4.8 March 5.7 6.2 6.1 March 6.3 6.8 6.7
Annual Average 5.9 6.5 6.6 Annual Average 3.3 3.6 4.0 Annual Average 4.5 4.9 5.1 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.0
3246 4003 7249 15769
Teachers Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Appendix 3
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
Education Resources
Council WideAPT&C
68

Page 69

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 3.6 2.8 3.0 April 0.0 0.0 0.0 April 3.6 2.8 3.0 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 3.9 3.2 2.7 May 0.0 0.0 0.0 May 3.9 3.2 2.7 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 4.2 3.2 2.9 June 0.0 0.0 0.0 June 4.2 3.2 2.9 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 3.5 3.5 3.0 July 0.0 0.0 0.0 July 3.5 3.5 3.0 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 3.8 2.6 4.0 August 0.0 0.0 0.0 August 3.8 2.6 4.0 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 3.9 3.2 4.0 September 0.0 0.0 0.0 September 3.9 3.2 4.0 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 3.2 3.2 3.9 October 0.0 0.0 0.0 October 3.2 3.2 3.9 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 3.5 4.6 4.5 November 0.0 0.0 0.0 November 3.5 4.6 4.5 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 3.3 4.4 4.7 December 0.0 0.0 0.0 December 3.3 4.4 4.7 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 2.8 3.7 3.5 January 0.0 0.0 0.0 January 2.8 3.7 3.5 January 6.1 6.7 6.5
February 3.5 3.5 4.1 February 0.0 0.0 0.0 February 3.5 3.5 4.1 February 6.4 7.0 6.8
March 2.6 3.7 3.9 March 0.0 0.0 0.0 March 2.6 3.7 3.9 March 6.3 6.8 6.7
Annual Average 3.5 3.5 3.7 Annual Average 0.0 0.0 0.0 Annual Average 3.5 3.5 3.7 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.0
822 0 822 15769No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Appendix 4
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
Finance and Corporate Resources
No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
APT&C Council WideManual Workers
No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Resource Total
69

Page 70

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.7 5.3 5.6 April 6.9 7.2 4.8 April 6.2 6.1 5.3 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 4.9 5.2 4.5 May 6.1 8.1 5.7 May 5.4 6.4 5.0 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 5.4 5.7 5.1 June 6.8 8.4 6.0 June 6.0 6.8 5.5 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 5.0 5.3 5.2 July 8.1 8.6 6.4 July 6.2 6.7 5.7 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 5.1 5.5 5.4 August 8.5 8.8 6.0 August 6.4 6.9 5.7 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 4.7 7.5 5.9 September 7.8 7.4 6.7 September 6.0 7.5 6.2 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 4.9 7.3 5.7 October 5.2 6.0 7.1 October 5.0 6.8 6.3 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 4.8 6.8 6.9 November 6.7 6.2 7.8 November 5.6 6.5 7.2 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 5.1 6.4 6.6 December 7.4 5.8 8.9 December 6.0 6.2 7.5 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 4.4 7.0 5.2 January 6.0 6.2 5.9 January 5.0 6.7 5.5 January 6.1 6.7 6.5
February 5.2 7.0 6.1 February 6.3 7.1 5.8 February 5.6 7.0 6.0 February 6.4 7.0 6.8
March 5.3 6.8 5.6 March 7.2 5.9 5.5 March 6.1 6.4 5.6 March 6.3 6.8 6.7
Annual Average 5.0 6.3 5.7 Annual Average 6.9 7.1 6.4 Annual Average 5.8 6.7 6.0 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.0
881 564 1445 15769
Manual Workers Council Wide
No of Employees at 31 March 2026No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Appendix 5
Housing & Technical Resources
Resource Total
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
APT&C
70

Page 71

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 6.5 6.5 7.0 April 9.4 8.8 9.4 April 7.4 7.3 7.8 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 5.8 5.8 6.6 May 8.4 9.5 8.6 May 6.6 7.0 7.2 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 5.5 6.0 6.6 June 8.6 9.2 8.7 June 6.5 7.0 7.3 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 5.4 6.5 6.8 July 8.8 11.2 9.0 July 6.5 8.0 7.5 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 4.8 6.9 7.1 August 8.6 11.4 8.7 August 6.0 8.4 7.7 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 5.6 7.2 7.7 September 9.3 12.0 10.0 September 6.8 8.8 8.5 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 6.5 7.5 7.0 October 8.5 11.0 10.1 October 7.1 8.6 8.0 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 7.3 8.1 6.6 November 9.0 10.0 10.1 November 7.8 8.7 7.8 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 7.4 7.0 7.6 December 9.5 11.6 11.2 December 8.1 8.5 8.8 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 7.0 6.7 7.0 January 10.3 11.3 11.4 January 8.1 8.2 8.4 January 6.1 6.7 6.5
February 7.0 7.0 6.6 February 9.9 11.6 11.9 February 7.9 8.5 8.3 February 6.4 7.0 6.8
March 7.1 7.5 6.9 March 9.4 10.7 11.1 March 7.9 8.6 8.3 March 6.3 6.8 6.7
Annual Average 6.3 6.9 7.0 Annual Average 9.1 10.7 10.0 Annual Average 7.2 8.1 8.0 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.0
1789 1012 2801 15769
Resource TotalManual Workers
No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026 No of Employees at 31 March 2026
Appendix 6
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
Social Work Resources
APT&C Council Wide
71

Page 72

Appendix 7
Community and Enterprise 2.3 4.9 7.2
Education 1.7 3.4 5.1
Finance and Corporate 1.3 2.4 3.7
Housing & Technical 2.1 3.8 6.0
Social Work 2.5 5.5 8.0
Council Overall for           
April 2025 - March 2026 2.0 4.1 6.0
Absence by Long and Short Term
From: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026
Resource Total Long
Term %
April 2025 - March 2026
Total Short
Term %
Resource Total
Absence %
72

Page 73

Appendix 8
Reason Total Work Days Lost % of Work Days Lost
Psychological 76691 36
Musculoskeletal 46664 22
Respiratory 24162 11
Stomach 22559 10
Others 45293 21
Total Days Lost 215369 100
Reason Total Work Days Lost % of Work Days Lost
Psychological 74180 34
Musculoskeletal 45727 21
Respiratory 28742 13
Stomach 24024 11
Others 45707 21
Total Days Lost 218380 100
Absence Monitoring
Absence Classifications
From 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026
From 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025
73

Page 74

FROM: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 comparison with 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
Teachers Others
488 154 263 95 299 595
395 199 343 46 269 485
RESOURCE Apr-Mar
2024/25
Apr-Mar
2025/26 RESOURCE Apr-Mar
2024/25
Apr-Mar
2025/26 RESOURCE Apr-Mar
2024/25
Apr-Mar
2025/26
Community and Enterprise 471 525 Community and Enterprise 371 455 Community and Enterprise 2 7
Education (Teachers) 298 238 Education 828 855 Education 22 33
Education (Others) 403 371 Finance and Corporate 95 93 Finance and Corporate 0 1
Finance and Corporate 75 85 Housing and Technical 140 184 Housing and Technical 0 4
Housing and Technical 228 218 Social Work 485 503 Social Work 8 18
Social Work 483 518 Total 1919 2100 56 122
Total 1958 1955 Total 88 185
Reason Apr-Mar
2024/25
Apr-Mar
2025/26
Work Stress 186 107
Addicition 5 3
Personal 243 119
Anxiety/Depression 229 407
Bereavement 70 32
Total 733 668
Appendix 9
Analysis of Counselling Referrals by Cause
Total (Apr-Mar 2025/26) 1894
Total (Apr-Mar 2024/25) 1737
No of Employees Referred For Physiotherapy No of Employees Referred To Employee Support Officer No of Employees Referred For Cognitive Behavioural
Therapy
Not Disclose
Occupational Health Reports
Medical Referrals
Community
and Enterprise
Education Finance and
Corporate
Housing and
Technical Social Work Totals
74

Page 75

Apr 24 - Mar
25
Apr 25 - Mar
26
Apr 24 - Mar
25
Apr 25 - Mar
26
Apr 24 - Mar
25
Apr 25 - Mar
26
Apr 24 - Mar
25
Apr 25 - Mar
26
Apr 24 - Mar
25
Apr 25 - Mar
26
Apr 24 - Mar
25
Apr 25 - Mar
26
Specified Injury 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 2
Specified Injury (Violence) 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0
Total Specified Injury* 3 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 6 2
Over 7 Day 19 4 6 0 0 0 7 2 10 0 42 6
Over 7 Day (Violence) 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1
Total Over 7 Day** 19 4 9 1 0 0 7 2 11 0 46 7
Over 3 Day 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 0
Over 3 Day (Violence) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Over 3 Day** 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 11 0
Minor Injury 93 80 156 191 3 3 24 24 67 90 343 388
Near Miss 5 26 22 65 0 0 6 6 13 23 46 120
Violence (Physical) 28 44 1037 1437 0 0 1 1 50 53 1116 1535
Violence (Verbal) 14 11 123 140 0 1 15 15 50 39 202 206
Total Minor*** 140 161 1338 1833 3 4 46 46 180 205 1707 2249
Total Finalised 164 165 1354 1835 4 4 48 48 194 206 1770 2258
Accident 1 3 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 7
Incident 0 0 5 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 3
Violence (Physical) 0 0 12 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 9
Violence (Verbal) 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 7 3
Near Miss 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total to be investigated**** 1 3 30 16 0 0 3 3 2 0 36 22
Total Events/Month 165 168 1384 1851 4 4 51 51 196 206 1806 2280
*Specified Injury is any fracture (other than fingers/toes), amputation, loss or sight, serious burns, crushing injury, scalping, loss of consciousness caused by asphyxiation/head injury, a chemical or hot metal burn to the eye or
**Over 3 Day /Over 7 Day absence relates to events outwith the specified injury category that resulted in an absence or inability to do normal work for more than 3/7 days (not including day of injury)
Finance and Corporate Housing & Tech Social Work TOTAL
Appendix 10
Analysis of Accidents / Incidents
From 1 April 2025 - March 2026 comparison with 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
Accidents by Month of Occurrence
Community and Enterprise Education
75

Page 76

APT&C Manual / Craft Teachers Total APT&C Manual / Craft Teachers Total
Community and Enterprise 2 96 N/A 98 0 1 N/A 1 2 95 N/A 97 29 27 35 57%
Education 12 N/A 10 22 0 0 0 0 12 0 10 22 2 4 16 27%
Finance and Corporate 3 0 N/A 3 1 0 N/A 1 2 0 N/A 2 1 1 1 67%
Housing and Technical 9 17 N/A 26 0 2 N/A 2 9 15 N/A 24 10 9 7 73%
Social Work 10 66 N/A 76 3 4 N/A 7 7 62 N/A 69 19 20 35 51%
Total (Apr-Mar 2025/26) 36 179 10 225 4 7 0 11 32 172 10 214 61 61 94 54%
Total (Apr-Mar 2024/25) 50 120 13 183 7 12 1 20 44 107 12 163 48 73 62 66%
APT&C Manual/ Craft Teachers Total APT&C Manual/ Craft Teachers Total APT&C Manual/ Craft Teachers Total
Total (Apr-Mar 2025/26) 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Total (Apr-Mar 2024/25) 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0
*Resources nil responses are not included in figures
Appeal's Panel
FROM: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026
Appeal's Panel
Total
4-6
Upheld in Part Not Upheld Total
Appendix 11
Withdrawn
6+
% Held within
6 Weeks
Upheld in Part
Record of Disciplinary Hearings
No of weeks to convene Disciplinary
Hearing
Total
Manual/ Craft
Upheld
N.B.  Non-White employees refers to those employees who have indicated that they are:-  Any other mixed background, Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Chinese, Any other Asian background, Caribbean, African and any other black background.
No Action
Outcome of Disciplinary Hearings
Teachers 3
RESOURCE
APT&C
Action Taken
0 0 4 4
Upheld
Outcome of Appeals
RESOURCE
Total
No of Appeals
APT&C
Not Upheld
24
Appeals
Pending
FROM: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 comparison with 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
Appeals pending to date
No of Disciplinary Hearings
Manual/ Craft Teachers
76

Page 77

Record of Grievances
Grievances No of Grievances No Resolved at
Stage 1
No Resolved at
Stage 2
No Resolved at
Stage 3
Still in
Process
Total (Apr-Mar 2025/26) 33 0 21 2 10
Total (Apr-Mar 2024/25) 16 2 14 0 0
Dignity at Work
Dignity at Work No of Incidents No Resolved at
Informal Stage
No Resolved at
Formal Stage No of Appeals Appeals in
Process
Still in
Process
Community and Enterprise 12 5 1 1 6
Education 6 5 1
Finance and Corporate 1 1
Housing and Technical 3 3
Social Work 12 9 3
Total (Apr-Mar 2025/26) 34 19 1 1 14
Total (Apr-Mar 2024/25) 28 1 27
FROM: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 comparison with 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
FROM: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026 comparison with 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
Appendix 12a
77

Page 78

Appendix 12b
Referrals for Workplace Mediation
Workplace Mediation Apr-25 May-25 Jun-25 Jul-25 Aug-25 Sep-25 Oct-25 Nov-25 Dec-25 Jan-26 Feb-26 Mar-26
No of Referrals 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0
*No of Successful Cases 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
*No of Unsuccessful Cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No of cases unsuitable for mediation 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2
Workplace Mediation Apr-24 May-24 Jun-24 Jul-24 Aug-24 Sep-24 Oct-24 Nov-24 Dec-24 Jan-25 Feb-25 Mar-25
No of Referrals 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
*No of Successful Cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*No of Unsuccessful Cases 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No of cases unsuitable for mediation 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
As at March 2026
78

Page 79

Attended classroom based training
Community and Enterprise 1750
Education 2842
Finance and Corporate 133
Housing and Technical 981
Social Work 2687
Total 8,393
Attended training delivered virtually
Community and Enterprise 39
Education 89
Finance and Corporate 29
Housing and Technical 74
Social Work 741
Total 972
Courses Completed / Passed
Community and Enterprise 13998
Education 23016
Finance and Corporate 6182
Housing and Technical 10698
Social Work 28348
Total 82,242
Employee Development
1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026
Appendix 13
79

Page 80

Appendix 14
From: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026
Reason for leaving Community and
Enterprise Education Finance and
Corporate
Housing &
Technical Social Work Total %
Career Advancement 26 79 8 14 28 155 31%
Child Caring / Caring
Responsibilities 15 9 1 0 3 28 5%
Disatisfaction with terms and
conditions 2 4 0 4 0 10 2%
Further Education 3 7 0 3 2 15 3%
Moving outwith area 6 4 2 2 13 27 5%
Personal Reasons 34 50 5 9 25 123 24%
Poor relationship with managers /
colleagues 4 3 1 0 2 10 2%
Travelling difficulties 0 0 0 2 1 3 1%
Other 42 52 8 9 25 136 27%
Total no. of leavers per
Resource eligible for an exit
questionnaire
132 208 25 43 99 507
Number of exit questionnaires
completed 27 63 8 8 24 130
% of leavers questionnaires
completed 20% 30% 32% 19% 24% 26%
From: 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
Number of exit interviews
conducted 174 272 18 59 105 628
Total no. of leavers per
Resource eligible for an exit
interview
22 54 6 16 18 116
% of leavers interviewed 13% 20% 33% 27% 17% 18%
* Note these totals include temporary employees
Analysis of Leavers and Exit Questionnaires
80

Page 81

Appendix 15
Applied Interviewed Appointed
% breakdown of
applications
received
% breakdown of
candidates 
interviewed
% breakdown of
applicants
interviewed
(based on total
applications
received)
% breakdown of
appointments
(based on total
appointments
made)
*Working age
population in
South
Lanarkshire
%
**South
Lanarkshire
Council
workforce 
%
24099 10993 1634 Male 48.3 25.74
8020 3239 450 33% 29% 13% 28% Female 51.7 74.26
16079 7754 1184 67% 71% 32% 72% Disabled 17 1.35
1609 889 73 7% 8% 4% 4% Not disabled 83 95.63
22490 10104 1561 93% 92% 42% 96% Disability not disclosed NA 3.02
0 0 0 0% 0% 0% 0% Under 50 57.1 57.12
19657 8724 1321 82% 79% 36% 81% Over 50 42.9 42.88
3367 1923 313 14% 17% 8% 19% Minority Ethnic 4 2.48
1075 346 0 4% 3% 1% 0% BME (subset of ME) 4 1.25
4246 1501 131 18% 14% 6% 8% White Scottish and White Other British 92 67.14
3140 1002 73 13% 9% 4% 4% ***Ethnicity not disclosed/provided NA 30.38
18945 8933 1363 79% 81% 37% 83%
908 559 140 4% 5% 2% 9%
247 98 18 1% 1% 0% 1% ***30% of employees did not disclose their ethnicity
** Includes Black, Asian, and Mixed  ethnic backgrounds
Applied Interviewed Appointed
% breakdown of
applications
received
% breakdown of
candidates 
interviewed
% breakdown of
applicants
interviewed
(based on total
applications
received)
% breakdown of
appointments
(based on total
appointments
made)
*Working age
population in
South
Lanarkshire
%
**South
Lanarkshire
Council
workforce 
%
14066 6360 1447 Male 48.3 25.74
4139 1480 390 29% 23% 11% 27% Female 51.7 74.26
9804 3478 1057 70% 55% 25% 73% Disabled 17 1.35
955 393 61 7% 6% 3% 4% Not disabled 83 95.63
13111 5967 1386 93% 94% 42% 96% Disability not disclosed NA 3.02
11297 3991 987 80% 63% 28% 68% Under 50 57.1 57.12
2769 2369 460 20% 37% 17% 32% Over 50 42.9 42.88
1755 410 37 12% 6% 3% 3% Minority Ethnic 4 2.48
12089 4920 1227 86% 77% 35% 85% BME (subset of ME) 4 1.25
98 43 6 1% 1% 0.3% 0.4% White Scottish and White Other British 92 67.14
***Ethnicity not disclosed/provided NA 30.38
* Includes Black, Asian, and Mixed  ethnic backgrounds
***30% of employees did not disclose their ethnicity
* source - 2022 census
**source - Mainstreaming Equalities Report 2025
Total No of Male Applicants
Recruitment Monitoring
Analysis of Gender, Disability, Ethnicity and Age
From: 1 April 2025 - 31 March 2026
Total Number of applications received: 24118
Total Number of Equal Opportunities Monitoring forms received: 24099
Total Number of posts advertised:
Total No of applicants disability not disclosed
Total EO Forms Received
Total EO Forms Received
1017
Total Number of appointments: 1646
Total Number of posts filled: 1012
Total Number of applications received:
Total No of applicants aged over 50
14615
Total No of applicants age not disclosed
Total No of Minority Ethnic applicants*
Total No of BAME applicants**
Total No of White applicants***
*** Includes White Scottish and White Other British
Total No of applicants aged under 50
Total No of applicants aged over 50
Comparison demographic information
* source - 2022 census
**source - Mainstreaming Equalities Report 2025
Gender / Disability / Ethnicity/ Age
Total No of Male Applicants
Total No of Female Applicants
Total No of applicants aged under 50
Total No of Disabled Applicants
Total No of applicants not disabled
From: 1 April 2024 - 31 March 2025
Total Number of appointments: 1515
Gender / Disability / Ethnicity/ Age
Total no of applicants ethnicity not disclosed
Total No of Ex-armed forces applicants
*Includes, Asian, Black, Mixed and White Irish, Polish, Gypsy/Traveller, Roma, Showman/Showwoman, other white and other ethnic backgrounds.
Comparison demographic information
Total No of BAME applicants**
Total Number of Equal Opportunities Monitoring forms received: 14066
Total No of Ex-armed forces applicants
Total No of White applicants
Total No of Female Applicants
Total No of Disabled Applicants
Total No of applicants not disabled
81

Page 82

Resource Total F/T P/T F/T P/T Total Chief Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher
Community & Enterprise Resources 3376 1235 341 254 1546 2361.13 4.00 1601.75 416.42 268.73 51.63 16.60 0.00 2.00 0.00
Education - Others 3195 95 85 545 2470 2237.93 6.00 1054.83 990.77 127.95 47.80 10.00 0.00 0.58 0.00
Education - Teachers 4116 672 127 2110 1207 3519.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3519.30
Finance & Corporate Resources 815 187 19 370 239 730.93 8.00 79.92 341.57 222.38 56.06 23.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing & Technical 1414 791 111 361 151 1311.88 3.00 204.17 698.81 363.72 30.49 10.00 0.00 1.69 0.00
Social Work Resources 2772 184 235 953 1400 2373.57 3.00 316.00 1447.12 477.52 96.33 32.60 0.00 1.00 0.00
9015.44 (excluding Teachers)
Total All Staff 15688 3164 918 4593 7013 12534.74 24.00 3256.67 3894.69 1460.30 282.31 92.20 0.00 5.27 3519.30
Resource Total F/T P/T F/T P/T Total Chief
Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher
Community & Enterprise Resources 3351 1198 365 239 1549 2404.42 5.00 1650.91 410.60 269.67 47.94 18.30 0.00 2.00 0.00
Education - Others 3169 97 94 551 2427 2438.90 5.00 1172.94 1063.60 136.40 48.00 11.00 0.00 1.96 0.00
Education - Teachers 4154 705 127 2140 1182 3544.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3544.20
Finance & Corporate Resources 813 184 22 360 247 721.38 8.00 89.59 338.44 207.13 56.22 22.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Housing & Technical 1373 760 115 337 161 1266.27 3.00 188.00 676.43 354.95 32.89 9.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Social Work Resources 2759 189 232 927 1411 2364.87 3.00 320.84 1449.61 472.02 84.80 33.60 0.00 1.00 0.00
9195.84 (excluding Teachers)
Total All Staff 15619 3133 955 4554 6977 12740.04 24.00 3422.28 3938.68 1440.17 269.85 93.90 0.00 6.96 3544.20
Female Salary Band
Total Number of Employees Full-Time Equivalent
Male Female Salary Band
Quarterly Joint Staffing Watch Return : Number Employed On 8 March 2025
Male
Quarterly Joint Staffing Watch Return : Number Employed On 14 March 2026
Analysis by Resource
Appendix 16
Analysis by Resource
Total Number of Employees Full-Time Equivalent
82

Page 83

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 Revenue Budget Strategy 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 advise the Committee on the Budget Strategy for 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Executive Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the Revenue Budget position for 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 (detailed in
section 4, Table 2), a Budget Gap of £26.500 million, be noted;
(2) that the Programme of Transformational Reviews, detailed in Section 5, be
noted;
(3) to note that, in arriving at the Budget Gap, no account has been taken of any
increase in Council Tax (section 6.1);
(4) that the scenarios around the level of increase in Council Tax that could
contribute to reducing the Budget Gap (section 6) be noted;
(5) that the Summary and Next Steps at section 7, including the Timeline provided
in Table 4, and the Net Zero Challenges in sections 7.8 and 7.9, be approved; 
(6) that the longer-term outlook (section 11) be noted; and
(7) that the risks detailed in the Other Implications Section (section 15.3), be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. Now that the Budget and Council Tax has been set for financial year 2026/2027,
attention turns to the next Budget setting cycle. The Council has a Medium-Term
Strategy in place covering the years 2027/2028 and 2028/2029, reported as part of
2026/2027 budget setting, and this is the subject of this report.   
3.2. Section 4 will outline the Medium-Term Strategy.  It will look at the current Budget Gap
across the coming years from 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 and will explain how this has
moved due to setting the Budget for 2026/2027, and also as a result of updating
assumptions on a number of items within the Budget Strategy. 
3.3. The paper will go on to provide an update on the ongoing Programme of
Transformational Reviews (section 5) and will provide contextual information in
relation to Council Tax levels (section 6). 
3.4. A Summary, Next Steps and a Timeline for consideration will be provided in section 7. 
Section 8 will cover Reserves whilst section 9 will provide information in relation to
Financial Resilience.    
9
83

Page 84

3.5. Section 10 will note the consultation and communication process, section 11 will make
reference to the refresh of the Council’s Long-Term Strategy and section 15 will note
the implications of the report including reference to potential areas of risk in relation to
the Budget. 
4. Revenue Budget Gap and Strategy Items
4.1. The Council has an expected Budget Gap in future years.  The Budget Gap is the
excess that the Council is predicting it will have to spend, over the funding it has
available. To balance our Budget, the Budget Gap has to be bridged through reducing
our expenditure or increasing income. 
4.2. The previously reported Budget Gap for 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 was £42.819
million (South Lanarkshire Council, February 2026).  This is summarised in Table 1. 
This table reflects the starting position in the development of the 2026/2027 Budget,
where rates of Council Tax increases were considered.  At that point in the 2026/2027
Budget process, modelling involving a 6% increase in Council Tax assumed across
the years from 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 meant that the Budget Gap would be around
£6 million over these years.   
Table 1 – Original Budget Gap 
2027/2028
£m
2028/2029
£m
Total
£m
Original Budget Gap 
(Council, 25 Feb 2026)
23.319 19.500 42.819 
4.3. This section takes the original Budget Gap in Table 1 as a starting point, and updates
it to reflect the impact of Budget Decisions taken during the 2026/2027 Budget Setting
process, as well as changes to the Budget Strategy in relation to assumptions on grant
movement, pay award and pension, contract impacts and other inflation and Council
Tax property numbers.  These are detailed in Appendix 1 and summarised in sections
4.4 to 4.17. 
4.4. 2026/2027 Budget Decisions: As part of the 2026/2027 Budget Setting process
(February 2026), the agreed savings (£4.503 million), Council Tax increase (£11.168
million) and recurring investments (£3.534 million) left a recurring budget surplus of
(£13.655 million) before one-off investments.  This recurring budget surplus of £13.655
million can be used to reduce the Budget Gap into 2027/2028. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£13.655 million) 
4.5. The report to Council in February 2026 also outlined the impact of 2026/2027
approved savings beyond that year. M&O03 Organisational and Management
Structures Review (£0.124 million) and M&O08 Customer Engagement Review
(£0.038 million) were both approved for 2026/2027 (Council, 25 February 2026) and
will realise further savings into 2027/2028.  This reduces the Budget Gap by £0.162
million into 2027/2028.
Reduction to Budget Gap (£0.162 million) 
4.6. Grant Movement (Appendix 1, Section 2): The grant assumption into 2027/2028
and 2028/2029 is Flat Cash.  This is based on the Scottish Government’s Medium-
Term Financial Strategy (MTFS) published last year which provided for no change to
the Local Government Settlement across the medium term.  At this point, there is no
information regarding any impact of the Scottish Government’s Reform Agenda on
future Local Government Settlements.   
84

Page 85

4.7. Information on the level of Government Grant for 2027/2028 is not anticipated until
later in the financial year.  Any changes in the level of grant received against the level
assumed in the Budget Strategy could significantly impact on the Budget Gap and this
is, therefore, an area of risk. 
4.8. While the general grant assumption is Flat Cash, further information has been
provided from the Scottish Government on specific elements of the grant: the
consequence of Council Tax Increases and the level of Loan Charges Support. 
4.9. Council Tax Properties: As noted in previous Budget Strategies, increases in Council
Tax due to increased property numbers, does not give a permanent benefit to the
Council as there will be a reduction in Government Grant. The impact had previously
been calculated as a reduction of £2.200 million in the Budget Gap, however, the
Scottish Government have clarified the assumed income generated for a Band D
property and how any total increase in assumed income across Scotland is then
reallocated across councils.  As a result, there is a net estimated reduction in the
Budget Gap of £0.700 million 2027/2028 and £0.500 million in 2028/2029,
reflecting the impact of assumed increases in Council Tax receivable for new
properties.  This is a benefit to the Budget Gap. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£1.200 million) 
4.10. Loan Charges Support: Councils were previously given permissions to borrow to
fund their capital expenditure, and the Scottish Government funded the resulting loan
charges. While the level of support for Loan Charges is reducing as old borrowing
ends, the Scottish Government have ringfenced the total funding for loan charges
across Scotland, and any amount not required to pay off old debt is reallocated across
councils.  It is estimated that the Council’s Government Grant will increase by £1.800
million in 2027/2028, and £1.400 million in 2028/2029 to reflect national changes in
loan charges support.  This is a benefit to the Budget Gap. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£3.200 million) 
4.11. Pay Award and Pension (Appendix 1, Section 3): Given the level of Pay Awards
experienced to date, a revised assumption has been made regarding the potential pay
award for both teaching and non-teaching staff beyond 2026/2027, as well as the full
year effect of an estimated Teachers’ Pay Award from August 2027 (into 2028/2029).
For both teaching and non-teaching staff, an increase in the estimated pay award has
been assumed in both 2027/2028 and 2028/2029. The Pay Award requirements
across the 2 years are therefore increased by £0.100 million in 2027/2028, and
£3.500 million in 2028/2029. 
Increase to Budget Gap £3.600 million 
4.12. In relation to the Local Government Pension Scheme, following an actuarial review, a
report was presented to Strathclyde Pension Fund Committee in late 2025 which
highlighted the Fund’s positive position and gave consideration to reducing Employer
Contribution Rates. While this has not been confirmed formally, we have been advised
that for budgeting purposes, we could assume a reduction of 2.5% in Employer
Contribution Rates from 2027/2028.  This would equate to £5.000 million of reduced
costs from 2027/2028 and this has now been assumed in the Budget Gap. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£5.000 million)  
85

Page 86

4.13. Contract Impacts / Other Inflation (Appendix 1, Section 5): Updated assumptions
have been made to inflationary increases for the secondary schools’ modernisation
contract (PPP), school transport (SPT and ASN taxis), social care for Children and
Families and waste. These are all based on the most recent forecast inflation rates for
the next 2 financial years.  The requirements across the 2 years are therefore
increased by £3.845 million in 2027/2028, and £1.003 million in 2028/2029. 
Increase to Budget Gap £4.848 million 
4.14. In relation to Non-Domestic Rates, the 2026/2027 Budget Strategy included an
allocation to accommodate a potential increase in rate poundage. However, as a result
of the national Revaluation exercise and the rates poundage figure set as part of the
2026/2027 Settlement, an underspend of £2.7 million is now anticipated in 2026/2027.
This will be a one-off benefit in 2026/2027 (referred to in a separate paper to a future
meeting) but will be a permanent benefit to the Budget Strategy of £2.700 million from
2027/2028. This is a benefit to the Budget Gap in 2027/2028.  It is likely that the
poundage will increase into 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 and this continues to be taken
account of in the Budget Gap previously identified. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£2.700 million) 
4.15. On Empty Property Relief, the 2025/2026 underspend within Finance and Corporate
Resources was £0.803 million due to reduced costs (a minor decrease from the £0.878
million in the Probable Outturn position reported to Executive Committee in February
2026). The recurring underspend from 2026/2027 is slightly higher at £1.000 million
due to the anticipated reduction in the number of empty properties being supported.
This will be a one-off benefit in 2026/2027 (referred to in a separate paper to a future
meeting) but will be a permanent benefit to the Budget Strategy of £1.000 million
from 2027/2028. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£1.000 million) 
4.16. For Utilities and Fuel, recent information has suggested an upward trend in prices into
2027/2028 as a result of the current conflict in Iran. Current estimates are that an
additional £3.850 million would be required in 2027/2028.  The Council currently has
£2.100 million earmarked in Reserves for utilities and this would be used in 2027/2028,
with the balance of £1.750 million being an addition to the Budget Gap for
2027/2028.  The Council is a member of the buying consortium who purchase
wholesale energy in advance, on behalf of ourselves and other public sector bodies.
As only a small proportion of the required units are purchased for the year 2027/2028
and 2028/2029, the cost of this cannot be accurately quantified. This will be noted as
a risk item (see section 15.3). More wholesale units will be purchased during the
current financial year, and further information will be provided to Members as part of
the November 2026 Budget Strategy update if available.  This will include an update
on the 2028/2029 position.
Increase to Budget Gap £1.750 million  
86

Page 87

4.17. Finally, in relation to the Insurance Fund, the Probable Outturn report to Executive
Committee in February 2026 proposed a transfer to reserves to cover the costs for
increased premiums anticipated within the Insurance Fund of £0.300 million. This is
required permanently from 2027/2028 in addition to further increased premiums
anticipated in future years given the impact of recent storm events and fires and
damage to Council property. Budget increases of £0.800 million in 2027/2028 and
£0.500 million in 2028/2029 have been added to the Budget Strategy. 
Increase to Budget Gap £1.300 million 
4.18. Council Tax Property Numbers (Appendix 1, Section 6): Updated estimates of new
build properties in 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 has allowed an increase in assumed
income levels of £0.900 million across the next 2 years. 
Reduction to Budget Gap (£0.900 million) 
4.19. Taking the above into account, leaves a revised Budget Gap of £26.500 million across
2027/2028 and 2028/2029.  This is summarised in Table 2 and is the position before
any assumption in relation to Council Tax. 
Table 2: Revised Budget Gap Across 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 
2027/2028
£m
2028/2029
£m
Total
£m
Original Budget Gap 
(Council, 25 Feb 2026)
23.319 19.500 42.819
Budget Surplus from 2026/2027
(section 4.4)
(13.655) - (13.655)
Full Year Impact of 2025/2026 
Approved Savings (section 4.5)
(0.162) - (0.162)
Grant Movement – Council Tax Properties (section 4.9) (0.700) (0.500) (1.200)
Grant Movement – Loan Charges Support (section 4.10) (1.800) (1.400) (3.200)
Pay Award (section 4.11) 0.100 3.500 3.600
Pension (section 4.12) (5.000) - (5.000)
Inflationary Increases for Contracts 
(section 4.13)
3.845 1.003 4.848
Non-Domestic Rates (section 4.14) (2.700) - (2.700)
Empty Property Relief (section 4.15) (1.000) - (1.000)
Utilities and Fuel (section 4.16) 1.750 - 1.750
Insurance Fund (section 4.17) 0.800 0.500 1.300
Council Tax Property Numbers 
(section 4.18)
(0.400) (0.500) (0.900)
Revised Budget Gap before Council Tax 4.397 22.103 26.500 
4.20. Table 2 shows the Budget Gap across the next 2 years.  The Budget Gap itself is
made up of a number of items, and it is important to note that it is impacted significantly
by the level of price inflation forecast for the coming years. This is shown reflected in
the additional budget required for contract inflation (an extra £4.848 million) which is
based on more recent inflation forecast information than had previously been
available, as well as in the requirement for additional utilities and fuel budgets (£1.750
million) which reflects upward movement in market price forecasts for fuel / energy. 
This is detailed further in section 6.18.  
87

Page 88

4.21. The 2025/2026 year-end position and 2026/2027 period 2 forecast position are
finalised and are included as separate papers to this Committee. 
4.22. Teacher Numbers / Reduced Class Contact Time (RCCT):  As previously reported
(Council, 25 February 2026), the £4.2 million of Council budget that had been
earmarked to manage the cost of reinstating teacher numbers to the 2023 level, was
no longer required.  This core funding of £4.2 million was taken as a one-off benefit in
2026/2027 only and is still available in the Council’s Budget beyond 2026/2027. 
4.23. National discussions on RCCT are ongoing and recent information suggests that the
policy will not be implemented until August 2027 for Primary Schools and August 2028
for Secondary Schools.  Reducing the amount of time that a teacher is in the classroom
would mean a requirement for additional teachers to be brought into the system. This
would have financial implications for councils including South Lanarkshire Council. 
4.24. COSLA Leaders have agreed to progress with the RCCT policy on the understanding
that full funding is provided. However, we have still to establish how that funding will
be calculated and what funding will be made available.  As noted above, timescales
and expectations for RCCT are still to be confirmed and if the Scottish Government do
not fully fund the cost of RCCT, then the Budget Gap that the Council has to manage,
and savings required would be higher that they would be if funding is provided.   
4.25. Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility (pEPR):  Similarly, the 2026/2027
Budget included an allocation of pEPR funding from the UK Government – in excess
of £7 million per annum.  This released the Council’s core budget for investment on a
one-off basis.  The release of core Council budget of £7.8 million in 2026/2027 meant
that this was available on a one-off basis and used to support one-off Investments for
that year.  No information is known beyond 2026/2027, and it is not clear if the future
Local Government Settlement will be reduced in subsequent years.  However, it is
suggested that if the core budget is again released in 2027/2028, then this be allocated
to support the Depot Rationalisation project. 
4.26. Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS):  The UK wide ETS is a cap-and-trade system
designed to cut UK greenhouse gas emissions. The UK ETS Authority has announced
its intention to expand the scope of the UK ETS to cover incineration and Energy from
Waste (EfW) from 2028. It is anticipated that a methodology for passing on ETS costs
from EfW operators to waste suppliers will be developed meaning that it is likely that
this will be a cost to Scottish councils which has been estimated at £28 million for
2028, to £40.9 million by 2032 and £150 million by 2050.  The Budget Gap in Table 2
takes no account of any costs of the ETS at this point.  COSLA Leaders recently
agreed that their Environment and Economy spokesperson engages in urgent
discussions with the Scottish Government on this matter.  Updates will be provided
when these are known. 
4.27. Local Government Election 2027:  The Local Government Elections will take place
in May of 2027, so they fall into financial year 2027/2028.  It is estimated that these
will cost £1.000 million.  Due to the favourable year end position reported in a
separate report to the June 2026 Executive Committee, it is proposed that an
amount of £1.000 million be Transferred to Reserves and set aside to fund the Local
Government Elections into 2027/2028.  Assuming this proposal is approved, there is
no impact on the 2027/2028 Budget Strategy.  
88

Page 89

5. Programme of Transformational Reviews
5.1. One way of managing the Budget Gap is through Transformational Reviews ongoing
across the Council. South Lanarkshire Council is already delivering a number of
transformation programmes that have the potential to change how services are
delivered and how the Council operates. These programmes span organisational
redesign, estates, digital development, system modernisation and partnership
working. 
5.2. Recent initiatives include participation in the Marmot programme, the Third Sector
Review, Estates Review, systems developments and a programme of service
reviews contributing towards efficiency and savings targets. Together, these
programmes demonstrate a sustained commitment to improvement and
transformation across the organisation. 
5.3. The driver for our need to change is how we need to react to a changing local
authority environment. This includes changing demand for services, as well as the
need to continue to balance our budget every year. Our programme of change is
ongoing and is detailed in a separate report to this Committee (Transformation –
Programme of Reviews and Benefit Realisation). This report consolidates ongoing
programmes with new and planned programmes of work, and provides Members
with a a summary of the outcomes from the Transformational Review Programme
achieved so far. 
5.4. As the Transformational Reviews continue to progress, proposals will be presented
to Members for approval as part of the Budget setting process for 2027/2028 and
2028/2029. 
5.5. While any savings from the majority of the Reviews have still to be confirmed, it is
unlikely that that they would cover the full extent of the Budget Gap over the next 2
years, currently estimated at over £26 million, without impacting / reducing services
provided. 
6. Council Tax
6.1. One of the levers available to councils to assist in reducing their Budget Gap is an
increase in Council Tax levels.  In arriving at the Budget Gap which is currently in
excess of £26 million (Table 2), no account has been taken of any increase in
Council Tax.   
6.2. The 2026/2027 Council Tax Budget is £184.491 million, therefore every 1% increase
in the Band D level means a £1.845 million of additional income.   
6.3. For illustration, a 6% increase in Council Tax in both 2027/2028 and 2028/2029
would reduce the Budget Gap by £22.9 million on a recurring basis. This would leave
a potential Budget Gap of £3.6 million to be met through reducing expenditure (by
making savings) across the period to 2028/2029. 
6.4. However, if Council Tax was only approved at 3% per annum, this would only reduce
the Budget Gap by £11.3 million on a recurring basis. This would leave a substantial
Budget Gap of £15.2 million to be met through reducing expenditure (by making
savings) across the period to 2028/2029. 
89

Page 90

6.5. These illustrations are shown in Table 3. The level of cuts in spending required in the
3% Council Tax scenario would be extremely challenging and have wide ranging
impacts on service delivery. 
Table 3 – Council Tax Illustration at 6% and 3% 
2027/2028
£m
2028/2029
£m
Total
£m
Current Budget Gap  4.397 22.103 26.500
Increase in Council Tax in
2027/2028 and 2028/2029 at 6%
(11.100) (11.800) (22.900)
Revised Potential Budget Gap /
(Surplus) after illustrative
Council Tax increase of 6%
(6.703) 10.303 3.600    
Current Budget Gap  4.397 22.103 26.500
Increase in Council Tax in
2027/2028 and 2028/2029 at 3%
(5.600) (5.700) (11.300)
Revised Potential Budget Gap /
(Surplus) after illustrative
Council Tax increase of 3%
(1.203) 16.403 15.200 
6.6. In South Lanarkshire, the comparatively low level of Council Tax we charge sets us
apart from other councils and provides options for consideration when addressing the
significant budget gap for future years. 
6.7. South Lanarkshire Council set its 2026/2027 Council Tax (Band D) at £1,468.48.   This
was a 6.5% increase on the previous year.  The highest increase across all councils
in Scotland in 2026/2027 was 10.0%, with the average increase being 7.68%. 
6.8. The 2026/2027 Scottish Average Council Tax at Band D is £1,661.92. South
Lanarkshire Council’s 2026/2027 Band D rate of £1,468.48 would require to be
increased by 13% to be in line with the Scottish average.  If the Council were to
increase its Council Tax Band D to the level of the Scottish average, this could
generate additional income.  By having a Council Tax Band D at the current level, the
Council is forgoing income of £24.0 million of income that would be available if we
were to take Council Tax to the Scottish average. 
6.9. Table 3 illustrates the Council’s Budget Gap over the next 2 years.  Taking into account
the illustrative increases of 6% and 3%, Members can see the impact that Council Tax
can have on reducing the 2 year cumulative Budget Gap to £3.6 million and £15.2
million respectively.   
7. Summary and Next Steps 
7.1. As detailed in Table 2, the Council’s Budget Gap over the years 2027/2028 to
2028/2029 is £26.500 million. This Budget Gap is based on the assumptions and
estimates summarised in section 4 (and detailed in Appendix 1).   
7.2. Information on the level of Government Grant for 2027/2028 is not anticipated until
later in the financial year and therefore remains an area of risk to the Budget Strategy.   
7.3. As the Transformational Reviews continue to progress, proposals will be presented to
Members for approval as part of the Budget setting process for 2027/2028 and
2028/2029. 
90

Page 91

7.4. There are options available to the Council to consider levels of Councils Tax, noting
that South Lanarkshire’s Council Tax is the lowest in Scotland and is significantly
below the Scottish Average. Options to bridge any residual Budget Gap after any
increase in Council Tax, will need to include savings proposals.   
7.5. Timeline:  A proposed timeline for the Budget process, commencing with this refresh
of the Budget Strategy, is detailed in Table 4. 
Table 4 – Proposed Timeline 
Timeline
Members Seminar Week commencing 
16 November 2026
Budget Update Paper for Committee    25 November 2026
Budget Consultation 26 November 26 –
February 27
Receive Local Government Settlement for 2027/2028  End December 2026
Update the Budget Strategy for Members (post Settlement)  January 2027
Set Council Budget for 2027/2028 and Budget Strategy for 2028/2029  February 2027 
7.6. As noted in section 6.9, Table 3 illustrates the Council’s Budget Gap over the next 2
years.  Taking into account the illustrative increases of 6% and 3%, Members can see
the impact that Council Tax can have on reducing the 2 year cumulative Budget Gap
to £3.6 million and £15.2 million respectively.   
7.7. The Financial outlook for the Council is still challenging, and as is detailed in section
8 (Long Term Financial Strategy), the increase in income generated by the Council is
not covering the increase in its costs.  This is exacerbated by the higher than
anticipated increases in inflation being forecast for the coming years.  The Council’s
longer-term outlook presents Budget Gaps of between £15 million and £24 million per
annum over the next 10 years to 2036/2037.   
7.8. In addition, this Budget takes no account of the challenges and ambitions of the
Council in relation to Net Zero or the revenue impact of wider capital investment. The
Council owns and manages a vast estate of properties.  While the Council’s Estate
Strategy is working towards the identification of the key Council properties and the
investment funding of £24 million allocated by the Council will assist in their
transformation and will also assist in moving towards Net Zero, it will not be sufficient
to meet the significant cost implications of meeting Net Zero targets.   
7.9. While the Council continues to seek external funding to assist in the journey to Net
Zero, as highlighted in a recent Audit Scotland report Transforming the approach to
climate change: Lessons from public audit, there is limited long‑term certainty over
climate funding, and climate‑related investment is often dependent on short‑term or
competitive external funding streams. Audit Scotland advise that longer term financial
planning for sustainability investment would be beneficial but if this is funded from
Revenue, then it would increase the Budget Gaps presented in this paper.  This would
need to be offset by an increased savings requirement, Transformation, Service cuts
or an increased level of Council Tax.    
91

Page 92

7.10.  Reinstatement of Temporary Funding:  The Budget Strategy across the years
2027/2028 to 2028/2029 includes a number of solutions which are temporary in nature
and will require to be re-instated in future years of the Strategy period.  Appendix 2
shows the year of reinstatement.  Importantly, as the reinstatements fall within the
years 2027/2028 and 2028/2029, then they are included in the Budget Gap of £26.500
million noted in Table 2 (section 4.17).   
8. Reserves Strategy
8.1. A Reserves Strategy was presented to the Finance and Corporate Resources
Committee on 10 September 2025.  This detailed the Council’s Reserves, their
balance at the end of 2024/2025, their purpose, and also a proposed strategy. 
8.2. The Strategy is subject to an annual review to consider the monies held in the
Earmarked/Committed General Fund Reserve, alongside the Council’s Revenue
Budget Strategy. This will be undertaken following the completion of the Annual
Accounts for 2025/2026 with an update provided to the Finance and Corporate
Resources Committee on 30 September 2026. 
9. Financial Management and Resilience 
9.1. A Financial Resilience and Sustainability report was presented to the Risk and Audit
Scrutiny Committee on 30 September 2025. This provided a summary of the
2026/2027 to 2027/2028 Budget Strategy, demonstrating the Council’s understanding
of the medium-term financial outlook and providing information on the Council’s
Financial Resilience and Sustainability. 
9.2. This paper demonstrated the Council’s financial resilience by explaining its detailed
financial planning, its level of reserves and its key financial strengths in term of its
balance sheet position. It noted that any risks identified through horizon scanning are
mitigated where appropriate through the Budget Strategy, which is a key part of the
Council’s financial resilience framework. 
9.3. An annual update on the Council’s financial sustainability will be presented to the Risk
and Audit Scrutiny Committee on 29 September 2026. 
10. Communications, Engagement with Elected Members and Public Consultation
10.1. The financial challenges being faced by the Council and the operational changes that
transformational change will bring mean that clear communication is essential. The
communication and consultation process for the 2026/2027 Budget worked well, and
we would look to build on that work to ensure the Council’s financial challenges are
understood by all stakeholders. 
11. Long Term Financial Strategy
11.1.  In addition to looking at the Budget Strategy covering 2027/2028 and 2028/2029, it is
considered best practice to consider a longer-term outlook and present a picture of the
potential Budget Gaps that the Council could be facing over the next 10 years. 
11.2. It is important to remember the difficulties in estimating the financial outlook for the
Council when we are looking out to 10 years in the future.  There is no certainty on the
level of funding that the Council will receive even for the next financial year, and the
pressures on the Council’s budget will inevitably change over such a lengthy
timeframe with overseas conflicts being one of a number of influences on our financial
outlook that we have experienced in recent years.  
92

Page 93

11.3. In order to present a longer-term Strategy, a number of high-level assumptions have
been made in relation to key budget areas.  These key budget areas are detailed in
Appendix 3 and cover estimates of Government Grant (flat cash), Inflation (based on
Treasury Financial Adviser’s projection of between 2.2% and 3% depending on the
Index), Pay Award (from 2029/20230 onward), reinstatement of prior year budget
decisions and Council Tax property numbers. 
11.4. The result of these assumptions shows a Budget Gap across the next 10 years of
£180.400 million (shown from 2029/2030 in Appendix 4).  The £180.400 million
includes the Budget Gap of £26.500 million for 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 (noted in
Table 1) and importantly, is the Budget Gap before taking any account of an increase
in Council Tax.   
11.5. The Budget Gap across years will continue to be met from efficiencies, savings from
Transformational Reviews and the consideration of levels of Council Tax. In addition,
as referred to in a previous Budget report (Executive Committee, November 2025),
the Council currently holds monies in Earmarked Reserves for use in the Long-Term
Financial Strategy. 
12. Employee Implications
12.1. There are no direct employee implications from this report. 
13. Financial Implications
13.1. The financial implications are summarised within the report. 
14. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
14.1. At this stage Members are not being asked to approve the budget.  Elements feeding
into this current Budget Strategy are anticipated to reflect increases in cost of current
activity, rather than any change to existing practices and, therefore, should have no
direct environmental impact change as a result. The Council’s Integrated Impact
Assessment process (refer section 16) includes a Sustainability Impact Assessment. 
14.2. Climate Change targets will have an impact on the Council’s future financial strategies. 
This will be included in future Budget Strategy papers as appropriate. 
15. Risk and Other Implications
15.1. The financial strategy is a way of managing a number of key risks which directly impact
on the money available to deliver Council objectives.     
15.2. The main risk areas where the Council has made assumptions in the Budget Strategy
for 2027/2028 and 2028/2029, and which have a significant impact on the budget
estimates going forwards, are on the level of grant which we will receive (refer section
4.6), and the level of pay award (refer section 4.11). In addition, the impact of general
demand or price increases / inflation can only be assumed at this stage, and these
have been estimated, as far as possible. Also, the level of new build properties and,
therefore, Council Tax Income generation is based on best information at the time of
writing. Any movement in these assumptions would be a risk to the Strategy.  
93

Page 94

15.3. Specific risks for the budget are: 
 Government Grant: As detailed in section 4.6, there is no certainty on the level
of Government Grant funding that will be received over the life of this Strategy.
This Strategy is based on economic information and advice we have to date,
however, it is accepted that these are assumptions. The Council will not know its
own grant award until later in the financial year. This is therefore an area of risk. 
 Pay Awards:  As noted in section 4.11, the Strategy includes an increased
assumption for both teaching and non-teaching staff in 2027/2028 and beyond,
as well as the full year effect of an estimated Teachers’ Pay Award from August
2027 (into 2027/2028). The pay deal for Non-Teachers is set for 2026/2027 only
and there has been no agreement of what the pay award will be beyond financial
year 2026/2027.  For teaching staff, there is no pay deal beyond August 2026.
This is therefore a risk to the financial Strategy.   
 Inflation:  Some of the Council’s key contracts are linked to inflation including
Waste and the Schools PPP.  An increased assumption has been made in
relation to forecast inflation, however given the value of these contracts, any
further fluctuation in inflation rates could have a sizeable impact. This is an area
that will continue to be monitored and will be considered as part of the Long-Term
Financial Strategy (referred to in section 11). 
 Utilities and Fuel:  As noted in Appendix 1 section 5.5, there is an upward trend
in the price for utilities and fuel as a result of the current conflict in Iran. While an
estimate has been made of the impact into 2027/2028, the buying consortium
that the Council is a member of who purchase wholesale energy in advance,
have only bought a small proportion of the required units for 2027/2028 and
2028/2029.  The cost of this cannot therefore be accurately quantified at this time.
This will continue to be monitored as further purchases are made during the year. 
Information will be provided to Members as part of the November 2026 Budget
Strategy update if available.  This will include an update on the 2028/2029
position. 
 Insurance: The Council operates an Insurance Fund to manage claims and
liabilities arising from normal business. An amount has been included in the
Budget Strategy to allow the Fund to balance on an annual basis (refer section
4.17), however, recent storm events and their frequency alongside increasing
premium costs mean that this may be insufficient if this pattern continues. This
will continue to be monitored.   
 Net Zero / Property:  The Council owns and manages a vast estate of properties
and there is a need to consider what our property estate will look like going
forward. While the investment funding of £24 million allocated by the Council will
assist in their transformation and will also assist in moving towards Net Zero, it
will not be sufficient to meet the significant cost implications of meeting Net Zero
targets.  Any additional statutory requirements imposed on the Council at short
notice, would be a financial risk to the Budget Strategy.  
94

Page 95

 Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS):  Section 4.26 details the UK wide ETS and
the potential cost to the Council.  The Budget Strategy assumes that the cost to
local Government will be funded.   While COSLA officers will continue to work
with and raise relevant concerns with Scottish and UK Governments, the outlook
regarding both cost and funding is uncertain, therefore this is a risk to the Budget
Strategy. 
15.4. Level of Support Provided to the Integration Joint Board (IJB) and South
Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture SCIO (SLLC):  The Council’s Budget Strategy for
2027/2028 to 2028/2029 at this stage assumes no additional allocation of monies from
the Council to the IJB or SLLC. It is for the IJB and SLLC to produce their own balanced
budgets. In terms of SLLC specifically, through ongoing engagement, officers will
continue to work with SLLC regarding funding and continued opportunities around the
Management Fee and budget sustainability for SLLC.   
16. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
16.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no integrated impact
assessment is required. 
16.2. There is no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. However, as the progress of Transformational Change
Programme and the identification of savings continues, proposals will be presented to
Members later in the year and stakeholder consultation and integrated impact
assessments will be carried out. The results will be provided to members to inform
their decision-making process. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
12 May 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Council, 25 February 2026 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Jackie Taylor, Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
Ext:  4622 (Tel:  01698 454622)
E-mail: jackie.taylor@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
95

Page 96

Appendix 1 
2027/2028 to 2028/2029 Budget Strategy: 
Budget Strategy Items 
This Appendix details the Budget Strategy Items included in the 2027/2028 to 2028/2029
Budget Strategy (Table 2 of main report).  Section references relate to the main report.    
1. Budget Strategy Expenditure Assumptions 
1.1. In arriving at the expenditure assumptions, a number of factors are taken into
account including the reinstatement of previous year solutions, demographics and
economic conditions.  These are summarised in Table 1, with the detail of each in
section 2 covering the 2 years from 2027/2028 to 2028/2029. 
Table 1 – Items Contributing to the Budget Gap 
2027 /
2028
£m
2028 /
2029
£m
Grant Movement 
(Section 4.6 - 4.10 and Appendix 1, para 2.1 – 2.9)
The grant assumption into 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 is Flat Cash,
however the risk to this position is noted (section 4.6). This also
includes the impact of new properties on grant received because we
are collecting Council Tax from more properties and Loan Charges
support. 
(1.300) (0.900)
Pay and Pension Items 
(Section 4.11 – 4.12 and Appendix 1, para 3.1 – 3.5)
Includes assumed pay award for teachers and non-teachers as well
as the permanent reduction in Pension Contributions in 2027/2028. 
12.800 15.600
Reinstatement / Impact of Prior Year Budget Decisions
(Appendix 1, para 4.1 – 4.13)
This includes the need to reinstate budget to cover one-off savings
from previous years and the benefit of previous year decisions.   
(10.803)  4.353 
Contract Impacts / Other Inflation 
(Section 4.13 – 4.17 and Appendix 1, para 5.1 – 5.10)
Includes typical inflationary increases on non-domestic rates, the
secondary schools’ modernisation contract (PPP), school transport,
utilities and fuel, social care for children and families and waste. 
5.100  4.550
Council Tax – Property Numbers 
(Section 4.18 and Appendix 1, para 6.1 to 6.2)
Reflects a projection of an increase in property numbers into
2026/2027 and the 2 years of the Strategy. 
(1.400) (1.500)
Total Budget Strategy Items  4.397 22.103
Total Budget Strategy Items for 2027/2028 and 2028/2029 26.500 
2. Government Grant (net benefit of £2.200 million)
2.1. Local Government budgets are affected by both changes in the UK Government
Budget and the subsequent Scottish Government Budget. 
96

Page 97

2.2. A Flat Cash Government Grant position has been assumed into 2027/2028 and
2028/2029. 
2.3. Consequence of Council Tax Increases on Grant (Properties): As noted in
previous Budget Strategies, increases in Council Tax due to increased property
numbers, does not give a permanent benefit to the Council as there will be a
reduction in Government Grant – £911 Council Tax is assumed by the Scottish
Government for a Band D property. 
2.4. In relation to 2027/2028 to 2028/2029, the net estimated reduction in Government
Grant reflecting the assumption of Council Tax receivable for new properties is
£0.500 million for 2027/2028, and £0.500 million for 2028/2029. 
2.5. Loan Charges support: Previously, rather than giving such large amounts in Capital
Grants, Councils were given permissions to borrow, and then the Scottish
Government funded the resulting loan charges. In 2008 the procedure changed, and
Scottish Government now just give capital grants. However, Councils are still
supported with their historical loan charges. 
2.6. In relation to 2027/2028 to 2028/2029, the net estimated increase in Government
Grant reflecting changes in Loan Charges support across Councils is £1.800 million
for 2027/2028, and £1.400 million for 2028/2029. 
2.7. Population: There may also be changes in how grant is distributed to councils,
based on their share of population numbers. 
2.8. In previous years, the Council has experienced both increases and decreases in
grant as a result of the funding quantum and the way in which the funding is
distributed. Movement in grant is wholly dependent on the distribution methodology
used. It is proposed that the prudent approach is to not assume any grant increase
due to population changes, and that if there is new money, it is likely this will have a
policy intent attached and therefore no impact to the Council’s Budget Gap.   
2.9. The total net benefit of Government Grant changes on the 2027/2028 and 2028/2029
Strategy is £2.200 million. 
3. Pay Items (net cost of £28.400 million)
3.1. Pay Award (inc. Apprenticeship Levy): An assumption had been made regarding
the potential increase for both teaching and non-teaching staff beyond 2026/2027, as
well as the full year effect of an estimated Teachers’ Pay Award from August 2027
(into 2028/2029). The Pay Award requirements across the 2 years are, £17.800
million into 2027/2028, and £15.600 million into 2028/2029. 
3.2. The pay deal for Non-Teachers is set for 2026/2027 only.  There has been no
agreement of what the pay award will be beyond financial year 2026/2027.  For
teaching staff, there is no pay deal beyond August 2026.   
3.3. These assumptions will be updated as more information becomes available.  This
excludes pay award for the Integrated Joint Board and the South Lanarkshire
Leisure and Culture SCIO. 
97

Page 98

3.4. Local Government Pension Scheme:  A report was presented to Strathclyde
Pension Fund Committee last year regarding the Fund’s position and the Employer
Contribution Rates. As a result of the positive position of the Fund, it is expected that
employer contribution rates will be reduced from 2027/2028. The final position will be
known when the actuarial valuation is completed this year. However, for budgeting
purposes it is anticipated that this could be a reduction of 2.5% which could equate
to £5.000 million of reduced costs. This has now been assumed in the Budget Gap
presented in Table 1. 
3.5. The total cost impact of the Pay Items on the 2027/2028 to 2028/2029 Strategy is
£28.400 million. 
4. Reinstatement / Impact of Prior Year Budget Decisions (net benefit of £6.450
million)
4.1. A number of budget strategy solutions approved for the previous year budgets were
temporary in nature. These must be re-instated into 2027/2028 and 2028/2029. 
These are taken in turn below and summarised in Table A. 
4.2. Reduction in Pension Contributions: It was agreed as part of the 2024/2025
Revenue Budget and Savings report to Council (February 2024) that the in-year
underspends totalling an estimated £45.200 million would be transferred to Reserves
and used to support the Budget Strategy in years 2024/2025 to 2026/2027.   
4.3. The use of Pension Contribution Reserves in 2026/2027 needs to be reinstated in
2027/2028. This adds £17.700 million of costs to the Budget Strategy in 2027/2028
only. 
4.4. 2023/2024 Underspend:  In the 2024/2025 Revenue Budget and Savings report to
Executive Committee (November 2023), it was agreed that an underspend of £6.000
million would be used to support the Strategy with £2.000 million in each year over
the period 2024/2025 to 2026/2027. This temporary solution needs to be reinstated
into 2027/2028 at a cost of £2.000 million. 
4.5. Lanarkshire Valuation Joint Board Requisition Payments: There is a need to
reinstate money in relation to temporary requisition payment savings in respect of
the Council’s funding of the Joint Board. £0.264 million is required in 2027/2028. 
4.6. Loans Fund Review Savings:  As reported at the 2025/2026 Council budget
meeting (February 2025), the Budget Gap included the benefits from the Loans Fund
Review proposals that were presented to Members at the November 2024 Executive
Committee. The approval of the budget removes £3.600 million in 2027/2028. 
4.7. Use of Loans Fund Review Underspends:  As noted in section 4.6, the Budget
Gap included the benefits from the Loans Fund Review proposals that were
presented to Members at the November 2024 Executive Committee. This includes
additional in-year underspends to help address the Budget Gap on a one-off basis. 
This removes £13.000 million from the Budget Gap in 2027/2028 but is required to
be re-instated in 2028/2029. 
4.8. In addition, £9.000 million is removed from the Budget Gap in 2028/2029 but is
required to be re-instated in 2029/2030.  
98

Page 99

4.9. Loan Charges: As previously reported to Executive Committee (November 2025) a
significant capital receipt is anticipated from the sale of an industrial site.  As well as
being used to fund any new capital spend, capital receipts can also be used to
reduce the level of approved borrowing. This capital receipt will be used to reduce
previously approved borrowing. This will result in a recurring revenue saving to the
Council’s Loan Charges budget of £1.500 million in 2027/2028. 
4.10. Local Growth Fund (LGF): As previously reported to Council (February 2026), from
2026/2027, the LGF Revenue allocation is lower than the previous year’s funding by
£1.150 million.  Using the LGF money as well as budget carried forward from
2025/2026, we are able to maintain the 2026/2027 programme of works, including
employability, at the same level as before.  However, in order to keep spend at the
same level into future years, an allocation of £1.150 million has been added to the
budget in 2027/2028.     
4.11. 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 Savings: The Budget report to Council in February 2025
outlined the impact of 2025/2026 savings beyond that year. CER10 Business
Support (£0.353 million) would require reinstatement in 2028/2029. This adds £0.353
million to the Budget Strategy into 2028/2029. 
4.12. The Budget report to Council in February 2026 also outlined the impact of 2026/2027
approved savings beyond that year. M&O03 Organisational and Management
Structures Review (£0.124 million) and M&O08 Customer Engagement Review
(£0.038 million) were both approved for 2026/2027 (Council, 25 February 2026) and
have an impact on the Budget Gap in 2026/2027.  This reduces the Budget Gap by
£0.162 million into 2027/2028. 
4.13. 2026/2027 Budget Surplus for One-Off Investment: As reported at the 2026/2027
Council budget meeting, as well as balancing the Budget for 2026/2027, the
approved budget amendment for 2026/2027 has a financial impact on the Budget
Gap in 2027/2028. The 2026/2027 budget surplus of £13.655 million was used for
one-off investments in that year and is available to reduce the Budget Gap
permanently in 2027/2028. 
4.14. The total impact of Reinstatements / Prior Year Budget Decisions on the 2027/2028
to 2028/2029 Strategy is a benefit of £6.450 million.  These are summarised in
Table A. 
Table A – Reinstatement / Prior Year Budget Decisions 
2027 /
2028
£m
2028 /
2029
£m
Pension Contribution Reserves – net impact of using one-off reserves
each year, reinstated the next.  Reinstatement offset by further use of
reserves until completion in 2027/2028 (2024/2025 Revenue Budget
and Savings report to Executive Committee, November 2023). 
17.700  - 
Previous use of 2023/2024 underspend used for the 3 years to
2026/2027, reinstated in 2027/2028 (2024/2025 Revenue Budget and
Savings report to Executive Committee, November 2023). 
2.000 -
Reinstate budget required following the temporary reduction in
requisition payments to the Valuation Joint Board.   
0.264  -
Loans Fund Review Savings (Overall Position of Revenue Budget
and Level of Local Taxation for 2025/2026, February 2025).
(3.600) -
99

Page 100

2027 /
2028
£m
2028 /
2029
£m
Use of Loans Fund Review Underspends (Overall Position of
Revenue Budget and Level of Local Taxation for 2025/2026,
February 2025). 
(13.000) 4.000
Loan Charges - significant capital receipt is anticipated from the sale
of an industrial site (2026/2027 to 2027/2028 Revenue Budget Gap
and Savings Proposals for 2026/2027 report to Executive Committee,
November 2025) 
(1.500) 
Local Growth Fund - to keep spend at the same level into future
years, an allocation of £1.150 million has been added to the budget in
2027/2028 (Council, February 2026)   
1.150 -
2025/2026 and 2026/2027 savings approved with a future year
impact - Business Support, Organisational and Management
Structures Review and Customer Engagement Review (Council
February 2025 and February 2026) 
(0.162) 0.353
2025/2026 Budget Surplus for One-Off Investment available to
reduce budget gap (Approved Budget Amendment, February 2025) 
(13.655) -
Total (10.803) 4.353 
5. Contract Impacts / Other Inflation (net cost of £9.800 million)
5.1. Education - Secondary Schools’ Modernisation Contract / School Transport
(SPT and ASN Taxis):  An allocation of £3.450 million has been added to the
Budget Strategy for 2027/2028 and a further £2.200 million for 2028/2029 (total
£5.650 million). This includes anticipated inflationary increases for the Schools
Modernisation Contract (£2.550 million in 2027/2028 and £1.750 million in
2028/2029) and to manage inflation on School Transport contracts for both SPT and
ASN taxis (£0.900 million in 2027/2028 including impact of 2026/2027 and £0.450
million in 2028/2029). 
5.2. Non-Domestic Rates: The 2026/2027 Budget Strategy included an allocation to
accommodate the impact of property revaluation and rate poundage increases into
2026/2027. An underspend of £2.7 million is now anticipated in 2026/2027 as a
result of the national Revaluation exercise and the rates poundage figure set as part
of the 2026/2027 Settlement. This can be utilised permanently within the Budget
Strategy and reduces the Budget Gap by £2.700 million in 2027/2028. 
5.3. It is likely that the poundage will increase into 2027/2028 and beyond, however any
impact would be the result of Scottish Government changes to bandings, and these
are not available until the Local Government Settlement is issued later in the
calendar year.  In order to prepare for the change in poundage, an inflationary
increase is included, similar to previous increases experienced.  This would add
£0.500 million for 2027/2028 and £0.500 million for 2028/2029. 
5.4. Empty Property Relief: The 2025/2026 underspend within Finance and Corporate
Resources was £0.803 million due to reduced costs associated with Empty Property
Relief (a minor decrease from the £0.878 million in the Probable Outturn position
reported to Executive Committee in February 2026).  This is anticipated to continue
into 2026/2027 and beyond. This can be utilised permanently within the Budget
Strategy and reduces the Budget Gap by £1.000 million in 2027/2028.  
100

Page 101

5.5. Utilities and Fuel: Recent information has suggested an upward trend in prices into
2027/2028 as a result of the current conflict in Iran. Current estimates are that an
additional £1.750 million will be required in 2027/2028. The Council is a member of
the buying consortium who purchase wholesale energy in advance, on behalf of
ourselves and other public sector bodies. As only a small proportion of the required
units are purchased for the year 2027/2028 and 2028/2029, the cost of this cannot
be accurately quantified. This will be noted as a risk item (see section 15.3) and as
more wholesale units are purchased during the year, further information will be
provided to Members as part of the November 2026 Budget Strategy update. 
5.6. Waste: The Council has a number of significant contracts for waste collection and
disposal. Taking account of estimated inflationary increases each year, as well as
£0.250 million per annum to allow the service to manage the increasing number of
properties, the following is included in the Budget Strategy for the next 2 years: 
£1.200 million and £0.850 million respectively.   
5.7. Social Care: In previous years, the Strategy assumed increases in prices reflecting
the ongoing commitments for Children and Families Social Care contracts held by
the Council (excluding Adults and Older People contracts). Given the work being
carried out to review the overall costs included in Children and Families, it is
assumed that this Service will be back on budget, and an inflationary increase only is
required. In addition, the Education Resources impact of these contracts has also
been accounted for. This equates to £1.100 million in 2027/2028 (including impact
of 2026/2027) and £0.500 million in 2028/2029 (total £1.600 million).   
5.8. Insurance Fund: The Revenue Budget Monitoring for Period 1 April 2025 to 
29 December 2025 and Probable Outturn report to Executive Committee in February
2026 proposed a transfer to reserves to cover the costs for increased premiums
anticipated within the Insurance Fund of £0.300 million. This is required permanently
from 2027/2028 in addition to further increased premiums anticipated in future years
given the impact of recent storm events and fires and damage to Council property.
Budget increases of £0.800 million in 2027/2028 and £0.500 million in 2028/2029
have been added to the Budget Strategy. 
5.9. Strathclyde Passenger Transport:  In previous years, SPT had adjusted their
requisitions to reflect the movement in the local government grant to councils. The
Strategy for 2027/2028 assumes no change in the requisition payment, reflecting the
assumption that there will be no change in grant levels. This will be updated as more
information becomes available. 
5.10. The total impact of Contract / Other Inflation on the 2027/2028 and 2028/2029
Strategy is £9.650 million. 
6. Council Tax Properties (£2.900 million)
6.1. Estimates of new build properties in 2027/2028 and 2028/2029. Assuming Council
Tax Band D, this is estimated to generate net income of £1.400 million for
2027/2028 and £1.500 million for 2028/2029. 
6.2. While there remains a risk that development will not progress as originally
anticipated, housebuilding continues to progress in sites across the Council area. 
The position will continue to be monitored during 2026/2027.  The impact of new
houses on the Government Grant is detailed in Appendix 1, section 2.3. 
7. Total Budget Strategy Items (2027/2028 to 2028/2029):  The total of these items is
£26.500 million. 
101

Page 102

Appendix 2 
Temporary Solutions 
Year of Adjustment 
2027 /
2028
£m
2028 /
2029
£m
2029 / 
2030
£m
2025/2026 Corporate Solutions
Reduction in Employers’ Pension
Contribution (1)
Reinstated into 2027/2028
(Executive Committee, November 2023) 
17.700  -  - 
2024/2025 to 2026/2027 Solutions (2)
Use of 2023/2024 Probable Outturn Monies
£6.000 million used across 2024/2025 to
2026/2027 at £2.000 million per annum
(Executive Committee, November 2023) 
2.000  -  -
Reduction in LVJB Requisition
Reinstatement of temporary reduction. 
0.264 - -
2027/2028 to 2029/2030 Solutions
Use of Loans Fund Review Underspends (3)
£26.495 million used across 2027/2028 to
2029/2030 (Executive Committee, November
2024) 
(13.000)  (9.000)  (4.495)
Re-instatement of Loans Fund Review
underspends 
13.000 9.000
Total Temporary Solutions 6.964 4.000 4.505 
(1) Requirement to reinstate budget of £17.700 million in 2027/2028 following the use of
Reserves resulting from the reduction in Employers Pension Contributions in 2025/2026. 
(2) Requirement to reinstate £2.000 million in 2027/2028 to reflect the use of £2.000 million
each year from 2024/2025 to 2026/2027, and £0.264 million in 2027/2028 for the temporary
reduction in LVJB Requisition payments. 
(3) Use of Loans Fund Review underspends of £13.000 million in 2027/2028, £9.000 million
in 2028/2029 and £4.495 million in 2029/2030. £13.000 million is then reinstated into
2028/2029 and £9.000 million into 2029/2030.  
102

Page 103

Appendix 3 
Long Term Budget Strategy – 2027/2028 to 2036/2037 
Budget Assumptions 
The Longer-Term Budget Strategy includes assumptions in key budget lines. Each is taken
in turn.   
1. Government Grant   
General Government Grant:  The grant assumption beyond 2028/2029 continues to
assume Flat Cash based on the Scottish Government’s Medium-Term Financial Strategy
(MTFS) published last year.  While the general grant assumption is Flat Cash, further specific
elements of the grant have been considered: Redress Scheme, Council Tax Increases and
the level of Loan Charges Support. 
Redress Scheme: The Redress for Survivors (Historical Child Abuse in Care) (Scotland) Act
2021 introduced a scheme to provide financial redress payments to survivors of historical
child abuse in care in Scotland. Local Government is contributing £100m to the Redress
Scheme, top-sliced from the Local Government Settlement over 10 years from 2022/2023.
Based on agreement at COSLA Leaders in October 2025, a £50m uplift has been assumed
equating to an estimated £3 million reduction in grant for the Council across the period
2032/3033 to 2035/2036 (£0.750 million per annum). 
Council Tax increases: The impact on grant as a consequence of assumed increases in
Council Tax receivable for new properties is £0.500m per annum across the longer-term
Budget Strategy. 
Loan Charges Support: It is estimated that the Council’s Government Grant will increase
by £5.500 over the longer-term Budget Strategy with the assumed increases in 2027/2028
(£1.8 million) and 2028/2029 (£1.4 million) reducing to between £0.100 million and £0.7
million increases per annum. 
2. Inflation 
Pay Award: For non-teaching staff, a pay award of 3% has been assumed in 2027/2028,
2.5% for 2028/2029 and 2029/2030, and 2% per annum beyond this.  For teaching staff, a
pay award of 3% from August 2027, 2.5% from August 2028 and August 2029 and 2% per
annum beyond this has been assumed. 
Contracts: Inflationary increases for contracts are based on current inflation projections for
2027/2028 and 2029/2030 as at April 2026. Beyond this period, an assumption has been
made that the level of inflation reduces to 2% in line with the Bank of England inflation target
by 2030/2031 and that it remains at that level beyond this. 
3. Reinstatement of Prior Budget Decisions 
All reinstatements of prior budget decisions have been accounted for including the temporary
use of underspends. The increase in 2035/2036 relates to Loan Charges budget that requires
to be re-instated linked to the approval of savings that were taken across 2025/2026 to
2027/2028 from the Loans Fund review.  
103

Page 104

4. Council Tax 
Property Numbers: Estimates of income from new build properties have been assumed in
2027/2028 and 2028/2029 and beyond. While there remains a risk that development will not
progress as originally anticipated, housebuilding continues to progress in sites across the
Council area.  The position will continue to be monitored during 2026/2027. 
Increase: No account has been taken of any increase in Council Tax over the period of the
long-term strategy. 
104

Page 105

Appendix 4 
Long Term Financial Strategy 
2029/2030 2030/2031 2031/2032 2032/2033 2033/2034 2034/2035 2035/2036 2036/2037 
Grant Movement  0.100 (0.200) (0.200) 1.250 1.050 1.050 1.150 0.500 
Pay and Pension Items  15.500 13.200 13.000 13.300 13.600 13.900 14.200 14.500 
Contract Impacts / Other Inflation  4.550 3.750 3.750 3.750 3.750 3.750 3.750 3.750 
Reinstatement / Impact of Prior
Year Budget Decisions  4.505 5.995 - - - - 4.800 - 
Council Tax – Property Numbers  (1.100) (1.000) (1.000) (1.000) (1.000) (1.000) (1.000) (1.000) 
Budget Gap before Council Tax   23.555 21.745 15.550 17.300 17.400 17.700 22.900 17.750 
105

Page 106

106

Page 107

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject:   Larkhall Leisure Centre Replacement – Full Business
Case Glasgow City Region City Deal - Larkhall
Community Growth Area 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 set out the Full Business Case (FBC) for the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement
element of the Larkhall Community Growth Area City Deal project
 advise Committee on the next steps in progressing the project 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement Full Business Case be approved;
and
(2) that grant funding of £3.0 million be sought in accordance with the City Deal
grant distribution process outlined in the Assurance Framework in relation to
the delivery of the project.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. The Council is one of eight local authorities who, with the UK and Scottish
Governments, are signatories to the £1.13 billion Glasgow City Region City Deal. 
3.2. The City Deal is made up of a list of 20 key infrastructure projects that are intended to
collectively drive economic growth across the Glasgow City Region area. 
3.3.  The Community Growth Areas (CGAs) is one of four South Lanarkshire projects
among the list of twenty. Larkhall Community Growth Area is one of the four CGAs
that have been combined to form the CGA project – the other CGAs being located in
Newton, Hamilton and East Kilbride. 
3.4. The CGAs comprise a number of individual education, transport and community
infrastructure projects which will be delivered over a timeframe of up to 12 years which
will in turn ‘create’ capacity to accommodate the increase in population from
housebuilding of initially up to 2,600 new homes in East Kilbride and 1,700 new homes
in Larkhall. The proposed replacement of the Larkhall Leisure Centre is one of the
projects to be brought forward to FBC stage at Larkhall CGA. 
10
107

Page 108

3.5.  Governance arrangements for the City Deal initiative are defined within the associated
City Deal Assurance Framework. This sets out requirements for the development of
Business Cases for individual projects. The first level business case was the
Community Growth Areas Strategic Business Case, and this was approved by the
Executive Committee on 26 August 2015 and the second level business case, the
Larkhall CGA Outline Business Case, was approved by the Executive Committee on
8 February 2017.   
3.6.  On 18 August 2015 the City Deal Cabinet approved Strategic Business Cases for all
the Council’s City Deal Projects.  The Outline Business Case for Larkhall CGA was
approved on 13 August 2019, augmented to reflect required guidance from the
Programme Management Office (PMO). 
3.7. Full Business Cases for the project requires to be formally approved via:- 
 the Member Authority committee process 
 the City Deal approved procedures   
4. Current Proposal
4.1. A FBC has now been produced for the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement element
of the Larkhall CGA project. 
4.2. The Leisure Centre will be a new-build facility that will replace the existing ageing
sports centre which no longer meets the needs of the community. The replacement
Leisure Centre will provide a gross internal floor area of 2,864m² and will comprise:- 
 a 25-metre 6 lane swimming pool featuring an adjustable-depth moving floor to
accommodate users of all ages and abilities and complemented by tiered
spectator seating for local aquatic events
 a wellness suite with sauna and steam rooms
 a state-of-the art gym equipped with cardiovascular and resistance training
technology
 a multi-functional fitness and dance studio adaptable for yoga, Pilates and
community events with a dedicated tea prep facility
 a 3 court games hall which will support a range of facilities including badminton,
pickleball and 5-a-side football
 associated accessible changing, showering and toilet facilities that are fully
compliant with current guidelines 
4.3. The new Leisure Centre will be constructed in accordance with contemporary
environmental goals and sustainability practices with approaches focussed on
maximising energy efficiency whilst minimising environmental impact.  Key elements
of this include optimising the orientation of the building to maximise natural light and
solar heat gain, internal thermal segregation and strategic zoning to minimise heat
loss, and incorporating sustainable materials with high thermal performance and
airtight properties.  These measures are designed to create an environmentally
responsible facility that not only meets the present need of the community but is also
future-proofed against the demands of a changing climate. 
4.4. The CGA is focused on development of family-style houses, and the provision of an
accessible and modern Leisure Centre is an essential element of the community
infrastructure.  The delivery of this key project is a necessary pre-requisite for delivery
of the full CGA developments.  
108

Page 109

4.5. This FBC continues to make the case for Larkhall CGA project in terms of:- 
 Strategic Fit 
 Commercial Case 
 Economic Case 
 Financial Case 
 Management Case 
4.6. The Executive Summary of the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement FBC is contained
in Appendix 1. 
4.7. The critical success factors against which the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement
project will be judged are:- 
 being an integral element of the CGA infrastructure alongside transport,
education and other community facilities that will unlock housing growth in the
CGA
 the construction of the new facility will be undertaken in tandem with the
operation of the existing leisure centre which needs to provide continuity for
users and the wider community until the new facility is completed
 the delivery of the construction contract on time and within budget 
This project will deliver on these requirements. 
4.8. The production of the FBC is the final City Deal approval milestone for this project
element of the CGA projects and provides the basis for full delivery and construction
of replacement Leisure Centre. The value of the City Region contribution to the project
allows a streamlined delegated approval process to be adopted, with a sign-off by the
programme GCR Chief Executive, without the need to revert to the GCR Cabinet. 
4.9. This project is being delivered via Hub South West Scotland, with Hub South West
acting as the Council’s pre-procured development partner under the Scottish Futures
Trust (SFT) Hub programme. Hub South West has run a competitive tender process
within its supply chain to appoint a Tier 1 construction contractor, with Council involved
in governance and approvals.  BAM Construction has then been appointed for the
enabling works and subject to this approval will be appointed for the full works contract.   
4.10. The approval of this FBC is expected to release funding to allow construction work to
be completed in Spring/Summer 2028.  A programme of enabling works commenced
on site in May 2026 (erection of site hoardings, drainage works, construction of a haul
road, installation of an electricity sub-station, and part demolition works of the existing
centre) using Council funding which has prepared the site for the main construction
contract which will commence, subject to approval, in August 2026.   
5. Employee Implications
5.1. There are no direct employee implications from this project for the Council as existing
resources within Enterprise and Sustainable Development Services are currently
tasked with the management and delivery of this City Deal project.  On completion of
the works, the facility will be operated by South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture under
existing terms and conditions.  
109

Page 110

6. Financial Implications
6.1. The project budget for the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement is £27.827 million. 
Project costs include professional fees, construction works, contingency, community
benefit monitoring and evaluation.  The costs also include early works to the Larkhall
Academy sports campus to enable it to support leisure activities during the project
demolition and construction periods.  These works were completed in December 2025. 
6.2. The funding package to support the Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement is shown in
table 1 below and comprises the following contributions: 
 South Lanarkshire Council (£22.500 million)
 City Deal grant (£3.000 million) as part of the overall City Deal Programme
 Shared Prosperity Fund (£1.150 million)
 Place Based Investment Fund (£0.677 million)
 Regeneration Capital Grant Fund (£0.300 million)
 sportscotland (£0.200 million) 
6.3 As outlined in the Capital Budget 2026-2027 paper (Agenda Item 6), Place Based
Investment Funding has been confirmed for 2025/2026 for allocation to Larkhall
Leisure Centre.  There is however a shortfall against budget of £0.263 million and this
funding shortfall is being managed through an allocation of £0.263 million released
from the Investments funding in the wider capital programme.. 
6.4 The funding will be incorporated into the Council’s future year capital programmes for
monitoring purposes.    
Total  
£m
Budget 27.827   
Funding Contributions:   £m
South Lanarkshire Council 22.500
City Deal 3.000
Shared Prosperity Fund 1.150
Place Based Investment Fund 0.677
Regeneration Capital Grant Fund 0.300
SportScotland 0.200  
TOTAL 27.827
Table 1 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1.  The statutory processes associated with the approval of the CGAs have considered
the following climate change, sustainability and environmental implications and are
subject to monitoring and review as detailed proposals for each phase of the
development progress: 
 encourage energy efficiency through the orientation and design of buildings
 choice of materials and the use of low and zero carbon generating technologies
 support sustainable water resource management
 support sustainable waste management  
110

Page 111

 consider the lifecycle of the development
 encourage the use of sustainable and recycled materials in construction
 support habitat connectivity and consider active travel and sustainable transport
links 
8. Risk and Other Implications
8.1. Risk - The City Deal Cabinet has a Risk Management Strategy applied across all City
Deal projects. The purpose of this Risk Management Strategy is to provide a
systematic and effective method by which risks can be consistently managed. It adopts
a best practice approach, describes the specific risk management techniques and
standards to be applied and the responsibilities for achieving effective risk
management. 
8.2. The Council is required to apply this City Deal Risk Management Strategy  across
each of its City Deal projects to ensure consistency across all City Deal projects. This
will be a key tool in mitigating project risks and thereby limiting our financial risk
associated with the Council’s 14% share of City Deal project costs. A robust monitoring
system has also been put in place to ensure that ‘early warnings’ are provided, and
appropriate action taken. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
significant change to an existing policy, function or strategy; however, it does involve
the construction of a new facility in Larkhall.  An Integrated Impact Assessment has,
therefore, been completed. Larkhall Leisure Centre – Integrated Impact Assessment - 
https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/download/1200/integrated_impact_assessm
ents_-_2026-27_non-budget_proposals 
9.2. Consultation has taken place with relevant Resources within the Council and with the
wider Larkhall community through the planning process and through several well
publicised and well attended public consultation and stakeholder events. 
Kevin Carr
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
10 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Our children and young people thrive
 Thriving businesses, fair jobs and vibrant town centres
 Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live
 People live the heathiest lives possible
 We will work to progress and improve
 We will work towards a sustainable future in sustainable places  
111

Page 112

Previous References
 Executive Committee, 26 August 2015 - Glasgow and Clyde Valley City Deal –
Strategic Business Cases
 Executive Committee, 8 February 2017 - Glasgow City Region City Deal – Larkhall
Community Growth Area, Outline Business Case
 Executive Committee, 21 February 2024 – 2024/2025 Capital Programme Update
 Executive Committee, 26 February 2025 – 2025/26 Capital Programme Update
 Community and Enterprise Resources Committee, 13 May 2025 – Larkhall Leisure
Centre Progress Update 
List of Background Papers
 City Deal, Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement Full Business Case 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact: 
Graeme Inglis, Project Manager
E-mail:  graeme.inglis@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
112

Page 113

Appendix 1 – Larkhall Leisure Centre replacement
– Full Business Case Executive Summary 
Executive Summary
This Full Business Case (FBC) is for £3.0 million - £2.58m City Deal (86%) and £0.420m SLC
(14%), of City Deal funding to be matched by a further £24.8m from a cocktail of sources,
including SLC, Place Based Investment Fund, Shared Prosperity Fund, RCGF and
SportScotland - providing a total funding package of £27.8m to develop a new leisure centre
in Larkhall to replace the existing ageing facility. 
This FBC continues to build the case from the Strategic Business Case (SBC) which secured
approval for £60.3m (reduced from £62.3m due to requirement to vire funds to Greenhills
Road City Deal project) across South Lanarkshire’s four CGAs and from the Outline Business
Case (OBC) which secured approval for £20.15m City Deal funding to develop the Larkhall
CGA project, comprising off-site education, community and transport infrastructure. 
The design process has been informed by extensive stakeholder engagement. Workshops
and consultations with South Lanarkshire Council, SportScotland, and local residents
provided valuable insights that shaped the proposal. Public engagement events attracted
over 700 responses, reflecting strong community interest and support. Feedback from these
consultations has been incorporated into the design, ensuring the facility meets the needs of
its users. 
Overview of Works
In summary, the new leisure centre will be situated at a site adjacent to Larkhall Academy (in
close proximity to the existing leisure centre) and provide 2,383 sqm (GIA) of class 10 leisure
floorspace, comprising:
• 25m, 6 lane swimming pool with moveable floor and c.144 capacity spectators’
area;
• Gym (c.244m²) - to accommodate high spec cardiovascular and resistance
equipment, free weight training areas;
• Fitness and dance studio (c.165m²) - a large-scale multipurpose space to cater for
the latest trends in fitness; 
• Games Hall (513m²) that provides courts for badminton, pickleball and 5-a-side
football; and
• Flexible space which will be used to support learning and training opportunities for
local people as well as business support activities for entrepreneurs,
microbusinesses, SME’s etc. 
The Larkhall Community Growth Area (CGA) is a strategic City Deal investment programme
designed to unlock housing growth and supporting infrastructure across Larkhall, delivering
up to 1,750 new homes alongside transport, education and community facilities. Larkhall
Leisure Centre forms a core component of the CGA infrastructure package, providing
essential additional denominational secondary capacity to enable planned housing delivery
to proceed at pace and in a sustainable manner.  
113

Page 114

The Larkhall Community Growth Area (CGA) is a strategic City Deal investment programme
designed to unlock housing growth and supporting infrastructure across Larkhall, delivering
up to 1,750 new homes alongside transport, education and community facilities. Larkhall
leisure centre forms a core component of the CGA infrastructure package, providing essential
additional denominational secondary capacity to enable planned housing delivery to proceed
at pace and in a sustainable manner. 
The CGA project scope is set out in Table 1 below. 
Table 1: CGA Project Scope
CGA Larkhall
Developer Persimmon Homes plus other developer partners to be finalised
City Deal
(CD/SLC),
Additional
SLC, S75
Holy Cross High School Extension 
Larkhall Academy Improvements 
Glengowan Primary School Extension 
Larkhall Leisure Improvements 
Road Network Upgrade
Follow-On 1,750 new houses over 15 years (preferred option) On-site roads/ utilities
infrastructure, greenspaces and local facilities 
Strategic Case
The OBC demonstrates a clear strategic need for additional community infrastructure
(replacement of an ageing leisure centre) to support the planned 1,750 new homes, ensuring
local infrastructure keeps pace with growth and allowing the wider development to progress. 
The rationale for public sector investment is based on the positive externalities and an equity
market failure rationale. In scoping out the options at OBC stage, alternative sources of public
sector funding were considered but, in the economic climate, none were identified. 
The project contributes to several cross-cutting policy objectives and would note the following
new policy documents since approval of the OBC where the project demonstrates a strong
fit: 
• National Strategy for Economic Transformation (NSET);
• National Performance Framework (NPF);
• Glasgow City Region Economic Strategy;
• South Lanarkshire Economic Strategy; and
• South Lanarkshire Local Development Plan. 
Economic Case
The physical benefits of this specific project are projected on a proportional basis of the total
benefits, as presented in the Larkhall CGA OBC.  The benefits will be driven from the
combination of City Deal funding and the further money leveraged through developer
contributions.  The OBC secured £20.15m of City Deal (CD) Funding at CGA level (split 86%
City Deal and 14% SLC), with a further £6.65m in developer contributions earmarked under
the proposed Option 3 (preferred option – roads and education infrastructure) – totaling
£26.8m. 
114

Page 115

Of the CD funding, £3.0m is to be allocated to the new health and leisure centre, which will
leverage a further £23.8m from a range of sources – total project cost of £27.8m. On this
basis, the Larkhall leisure centre represents 15% of the CD total, and as such can be
attributed this proportion of the economic impacts.  
Based on a proportional split (15%), the project would generate the following economic
impacts – Table 3 and Table 4. 
Table 3: Project Benefits
Benefit Option 3 – Full CGA H+L facility 
(@15%)
GCR Net Additional GVA by 2035 £111m £16.7m
GCR Net Additional GVA over 25 years £107m £16.1m
Scotland Net Additional GVA by 2035 £176m £26.4m
Scotland Net Additional GVA over 25 years £169m £25.4m
NPV Total costs over 25 years (£m) £59m £8.9m
GCR Benefit-Cost Ratio over 25 years 1.8 1.8
GCR Net Additional Construction Jobs PYE by 2035 1,180 177.0
GCR Net Additional Operational Jobs FTE over 25 yrs 110 16.5
Net Additional Private Sector Investment by 2035 (£m) £118m £17.7m
Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest £0.1m. 
Table 4: Impacts – On basis of Option 3
Project Performance Option 3 – Full
CGA
H+L facility 
(@15%)
Total units delivered 1,750 263
Net Direct Construction PYEs (Scotland) 4,000 600
Net Direct Operational FTEs (Scotland) 240 36
Total Net Direct Benefits – GVA Discounted @ 3.5% £297m £44.6m
Total Public Cost-Direct Benefit NPV Discounted @ 3.5% £239m £35.9m
The detailed Economic Case in the OBC presents an analysis of the alternative options and identifies Option
3 as the preferred intervention for City Deal. 
Commercial Case
SLC explored alternative funding options for the Larkhall CGA infrastructure but found no
viable sources due to economic conditions and limited funding programmes. Developer
contributions secured through the S75 agreement have reached their maximum, and neither
the Scottish Government can fund the required works. City Deal funding, alongside a range
of other sources therefore remains essential. 
The requirements for follow-up on private/public sector funding as stated in the OBC remain
unchanged. 
The Council have used an established national framework through Hub South West and look
to appoint the main contractor, BAM Construction based on a competitive bid process. Hub
South West provides a compliant procurement framework and development partner model,
enabling South Lanarkshire Council to access established supply chains and current market
pricing without the need for direct market engagement. Its approach supports value for money
115

Page 116

through competitive benchmarking, programme certainty, and risk management, while
embedding community benefits and sustainable delivery aligned with net zero objectives. As
part of the Scottish Futures Trust hub programme, it offers a proven route for the delivery of
education infrastructure projects in line with City Deal procurement principles. 
The type of contract agreed with BAM construction is a DBDA agreement through HubSW.
A DBDA Agreement, or Design Build Direct Agreement, is a construction contract commonly
used in public sector projects to directly engage a contractor for both design and construction
services. It differs from traditional methods by consolidating project phases into a single,
capital funded contract, often used for new builds or refurbishments like schools. 
The construction programme is estimated to take 103 weeks to deliver, beginning in June
2026 and completing in June 2028. 
Financial Case
Following on from a competitively tendered procurement exercise, the cost of delivering the
new health and leisure centre is estimated at £27,827,459, of which £3.0m - £2.58m City
Deal (86%) and £0.420m SLC (14%), has been requested from the City Deal in grant support.
To date, c. £2.45m has been spent on land assembly, site enabling and professional/design
fees. 
It should be noted that costs have increase c.£4.0m since the OBC which reflects capital
inflations and additional of the multi-sport games hall / courts. 
Phasing of project expenditure and by source is provided below. 
Table 5: Project Funding and Sources 
Funding
Sources
Original Revised Formally
Confirmed
2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 TOTALS
SLC funds -  £18.0 £18.0 £18.0 £0.0 £0.0 £5.8 £12.2 £18.0
SLC
additional (1)
£0.0 £3.9 £3.9 £0.0 £0.1 £3.8 £0.0 £3.9
SLC
additional (2)
£0.0 £0.4 £0.4 £0.0 £0.0 £0.4 £0.0 £0.4
SLC
additional (3)
£0.0 £0.2 £0.2 £0.0 £0.2 £0.0 £0.0 £0.2
City Deal £3.0 £3.0 £0.0 £0.0 £0.0 £3.0 £0.0 £3.0
Place Based
Investment
Fund
£1.6 £0.6 £0.6 £0.0 £0.6 £0.0 £0.0 £0.6
Shared
Prosperity
Fund 2024/25
£1.0 £1.0 £1.0 £1.0 £0.0 £0.0 £0.0 £1.0
SG RCGF £0.3 £0.3 £0.3 £0.3 £0.0 £0.0 £0.0 £0.3
SportScotland £0.0 £0.2 £0.2 £0.0 £0.0 £0.2 £0.0 £0.2
Shared
Prosperity
Fund 2025/26
£0.0 £0.2 £0.2 £0.0 £0.2 £0.0 £0.0 £0.2
SUB TOTALS £23.9 £27.8 £24.8 £1.3 £1.2 £13.2 £12.2 £27.8 
116

Page 117

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject: Pride in Place Programme – Hamilton Town Centre 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 provide an update on the Pride in Place Programme in respect of the appointment
of the Hamilton Town Centre Neighbourhood Board and seek approval for the
appointment of the Neighbourhood Board and governance arrangements 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the appointment of representatives to the Hamilton Town Centre
Neighbourhood Board (the Neighbourhood Board), as set out in paragraphs 4.4.
and 4.5, be approved; 
(2) that it be approved that decisions on the replacement of any Neighbourhood
Board members, or the appointment of additional Neighbourhood Board
members, be delegated to the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) in consultation with the Chair of the Neighbourhood Board, the MP
for Hamilton and the Chair of this Committee, provided that should any elected
representatives on the Neighbourhood Board no longer hold those positions,
they will be automatically replaced by those elected to their positions as MP,
MSP and Ward 17 Councillors, as the case may be, with any such changes
being reported to Committee for noting;
(3) that the progression of the Hamilton Town Centre Pride in Place project being
directed by the Neighbourhood Board, and all decisions in respect of the use of
Pride in Place funding being taken by the Neighbourhood Board, be approved
with such decisions then being delivered operationally by the Council as the
accountable body, as set out in paragraph 5.1;
(4) that authority is delegated to the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources) in consultation with the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources) to implement decisions of the Neighbourhood Board as set out in
paragraph 5.1, save to the extent such authority has already been delegated in
terms of the Scheme of Delegation; and
(5) that it be noted that update reports on the Pride in Place Programme, including
decisions on expenditure by the Neighbourhood Board and the proposed Pride
in Place Plan, will be reported to Committee for noting.  
11
117

Page 118

3.  Background
3.1. In September 2025, the UK Government confirmed that 12 local authorities would
benefit from Phase 2 of the Pride in Place Programme, including South Lanarkshire
Council. The programme aims to support the most in-need neighbourhoods across the
UK by awarding up to £20m over 10 years for each neighbourhood.  The Programme
relies on local people and partnerships, bringing together residents the local MP, the
Council, businesses and community organisations to produce a clear vision for their
area.   
3.2. Selected neighbourhoods will decide how to prioritise funding, based on extensive
community engagement, across three core objectives:- 
 to build stronger communities
 to create thriving places
 to empower people to take back control 
3.3. In October 2025, the Council received a letter from the Secretary of State for Scotland
inviting applications to the Programme from the four eligible UK Parliamentary
constituencies within South Lanarkshire, based on the highest deprivation levels and
the weakest social infrastructure (using the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation and
the Community Needs Index).  Constituencies identified by the UK Government as
being ‘in scope’ contained one or more ‘high-need Intermediate Zones’.   
3.4. In consultation with Group Leaders, six applications were submitted to the UK
Government in November 2025 and on 12 December 2025, the Council was notified
that the Hamilton Town Centre – An Anchor for Hamilton Area was identified as the
neighbourhood within the South Lanarkshire Council area to receive funding from the
Pride in Place Programme. 
3.5. Executive Committee on 4 February 2026 approved the recruitment of an Independent
Chair of the Hamilton Town Centre Neighbourhood Board and, following an agreed
recruitment and selection process, Executive Committee on 1 April 2026 approved the
appointed of Ronnie Smith as Chair of the Neighbourhood Board.   
3.6. In accordance with UK Government Guidance on the Pride in Place Programme, the
Chair is required to lead on the recruitment of the Neighbourhood Board.   
4. Appointment of the Neighbourhood Board 
4.1. As previously outlined to Committee, the Chair has led the recruitment for members
of the Neighbourhood Board, with the aim of ensuring an inclusive and representative
selection of people from across the community. The Chair has been supported by the
Council and Imogen Walker MP.
4.2. The Chair has been guided by the following criteria in convening and agreeing the
Board, working with their MP and the Council:- 
 Boards must have at least eight members, to ensure a broad range of voices and
perspectives
 the majority (at least 51%) of members should live or work within the boundaries
of the neighbourhood, ensuring that the Board is resident-led
 members should broadly reflect the range and diversity of people who live in the
area – for example, in relation to age, ethnicity, gender, faith, disability or income
levels  
118

Page 119

4.3. As per the UK Government guidance referenced in paragraph 3.6, the Neighbourhood
Board should include the following members: 
 the local MP
 MSP
 at least one ward Councillor 
 Other representatives such as:-
 community leaders such as community groups, faith groups and youth
groups
 local businesses and social enterprises such as Business Improvement
District representatives, Chamber of Commerce, and key
employers/investors
 cultural, arts, heritage and sporting organisations such as local sports clubs
and heritage groups.
 public agencies and anchor institutions such as local schools, higher and
further education establishment, community planning partnerships, GPs. A
senior local authority officers such as Director of Economic Development is
also eligible to sit on the Board to ensure co-ordination with wider plans 
4.4. At the request of the Chair, adverts and public notices were published seeking
expressions of interest for membership of the Neighbourhood Board.  At the closing
date of 17 April 2026, 30 expressions of interest were received from a range of
interested parties   Thereafter, a short-leeting process was undertaken and 13
candidates were invited to interview with the Chair and the Council’s Chief Executive
on 28 May 2026.  Following that interview, the following candidates are recommended
for appointment to the Board:
Name Representation 
Councillor Davie McLachlan Ward 17 Local Councillor
Councillor Colin Dewar Ward 17 Local Councillor
Chioma Gregory Local Resident
Catriona Mason Seniors Together
Gillian McCahon Hamilton Information Project for Youth (HIPY)
Ian Robertson  Local Resident and former Director at Glasgow
City Council – City Development 
Alasdair Irvine Local Resident and Chartered Surveyor
Tracey Campbell-Hynd Local Business Owner and Chair of Lanarkshire
Chamber of Commerce
Malcolm Thomas-Harley Hamilton Business Improvement District 
Martin Cryans South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture
TBC Education Rep
Alison Brown  Head of Enterprise and Sustainable Development,
South Lanarkshire Council 
4.5. In addition to the above members, the Board will also comprise the Chair, Ronnie
Smith, Imogen Walker MP and Alex Kerr MSP, giving a total Board composition of 15
members.  Subject to approval by Committee, there is a requirement to notify the UK
Government by 17 July 2026.    
119

Page 120

4.6. As regards future changes in the membership of the Neighbourhood Board, it is
proposed that should any members leave the Board then a decision on their
replacement, or the appointment of additional Board members, be delegated to the
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) in consultation with the
Chair of the Board, the MP for Hamilton and the Chair of the Committee. However, it
is also proposed that should any elected representatives on the Board no longer hold
those positions, they will be automatically replaced by those elected to their positions
as MP, MSP and Ward 17 Councillors, as the case may be. Any such changes will be
reported to Committee for noting.   
4.7. The Neighbourhood Board is required to develop a Pride in Place Plan outlining their
vision for change over the next decade and how they will use their funding to achieve
their goals.  The Board is required to detail how funding will be spent in the first 4-year
investment cycle.  This Plan is required to be formally submitted to the UK Government
for approval by 28 November 2026 with approval anticipated in spring 2027.   
4.8. It is anticipated that the Board will hold its initial meeting mid-July in order that it can
agree a consultation strategy and arrange to hold various consultation events over the
summer/early autumn to inform the Pride in Place Plan.  To support this activity the
Council, has appointed two project officers for an initial period of one year to lead on
this activity which is fully funded by UK Government.   
5. Governance Arrangements
5.1. The Pride in Place Programme seeks to ‘empower local communities to shape and
improve their neighbourhoods’.  As set out in paragraph 4.5, a Pride in Place Plan has
yet to be developed and suitable projects/programmes identified.  Nonetheless, in line
with the UK Government Guidance, the progression of the Hamilton Town Centre
Pride in Place project will be directed by the Neighbourhood Board, and all decisions
in respect of the use of Pride in Place funding will be taken by the Neighbourhood
Board and not the Council.  Thereafter the Council, as the accountable body, will
deliver and/or oversee those projects/programmes.  As such, delegated authority is
sought for the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) in
consultation with the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) to
implement such decisions save to the extent such authority has already been
delegated in terms of the Scheme of Delegation. 
5.2. Update reports including decisions on expenditure by the Neighbourhood Board will
be reported to Committee for noting including the proposed Pride in Place Plan.   
5.3. The Neighbourhood Board will establish its own meeting arrangements, including its
own terms of reference. Information on the work of the Neighbourhood Board will be
available on its website including minutes of meetings, consultation events and the
emerging Pride in Place Plan.   
6. Next Steps and Timescales
6.1. The following activity and timeline are proposed:- 
Appointment of Independent Chair – Complete 
Appointment of Neighbourhood Board – for approval prior to submission to UK
Government by 17 July 2026 
Community engagement – Summer/Autumn 2026 
Submission of Pride in Place Plan for Hamilton Town Centre – by 28 November 2026 
Approval of Pride in Place Plan for Hamilton Town Centre – spring 2027  
120

Page 121

7. Employee Implications
7.1. The meetings of the Board will be administered by Administration and Legal Services
within Finance and Corporate Resources.   
7.2. As outlined in paragraph 4.6, the Council has appointed two project officers for an
initial period of one year to lead on Pride in Place activity which is fully funded by UK
Government.   
8. Financial Implications
8.1. Hamilton Town Centre will receive up to £20m over a 10-year period commencing in
2026/2027 until 2035/2036.  The funding will be split 63% towards capital works and
37% revenue funding.  The UK Government however advises that funding post
financial year 2028/29 will be reviewed at the next Spending Review. 
8.2. Revenue funding will be paid out across two tranches in Year 1 (2026/2027) of the
programme – 50% will be made at the start of the financial year, which has been
received and the remaining 50% on approval of the Pride in Place Plan. 
8.3. The Pride in Place funding is in addition to the £8m approved for Hamilton Town
Centre as part of the 2025/2026 Budget.   
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
9.1. The Neighbourhood Board will be encouraged to have due consideration to climate
change, sustainability and environmental considerations.   
10. Risk and Other Implications
10.1. The success of the Neighbourhood Board will be reliant on the community coming
together and having the drive and commitment to realise their vision over a 10-year
period.   
11. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
11.1. The Neighbourhood Board will be encouraged to undertake Integrated Impact
Assessments where required as projects are developed.   
11.2. There is an obligation on the Neighbourhood Board to undertake community
consultation to establish the priority projects for Hamilton Town Centre.  This will take
place during summer/autumn 2026.   
Kevin Carr
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
10 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Working towards a sustainable future in a sustainable environment
 Thriving business, fair jobs and vibrant town centres 
121

Page 122

Previous References
 Executive Committee of 4 February 2026 – Pride in Place – Hamilton Town Centre 
 Executive Committee of 1 April 2026 – Pride in Place – Hamilton Town Centre 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Alison Brown, Head of Enterprise and Sustainable Development  
alison.brown@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
122

Page 123

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Local Action Fund Approach for 2026/2027 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 seek the approval of the Committee in respect of the proposed approach the
Council is to take for the Local Action Fund in the 2026/2027 financial year and
proposed spend for Ward 18 (Hamilton West and Earnock)
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Executive Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the proposed approach the Council is to take for the Local Action Fund in
the 2026/2027 financial year be approved, as set out in Section 4; 
(2) that the proposal from Ward 18 (Hamilton West and Earnock) members to issue
a Local Action Fund grant of £1,100 to Hillhouse Tenants and Residents
Association is approved, as set out in Section 4.10; and
(3) that it be noted that future reports will be submitted to the Committee to seek
approval for further spend from the Local Action Fund. 
3. Background
3.1.  As part of the Budget Amendment approved by Council on 25 February 2026, it was
agreed that the Local Action Fund would be available again for the 2026/2027 financial
year, the Local Action Fund providing £50,000 for each of South Lanarkshire’s 20
Wards, the spend to be approved by the Executive Committee, following input from
local councillors. Specifically, the Budget Amendment stated as follows:- 
“Building on last year’s investment in all wards, we will provide for £50k per ward. A paper will
be brought to a future Committee to agree the parameters of the fund and how it will operate,
focussing on community plans and priorities and working with communities and local members
to identify projects to be approved by the Executive Committee” 
3.2. The Committee received a report at its meeting on 20 May, which included a
proposal for how the Local Action Fund would operate in 2026/2027. The Committee
agreed that a decision on this would be deferred pending two member briefings on
the Local Action Fund proposals, which had been arranged to take place following
the Committee meeting. 
12
123

Page 124

3.3. The two briefings took place on 27 May and 1 June and were attended by 41
members, with discussion on a number of points, including:-
 how members could be supported in assessing the priorities in their wards that
the Local Action Fund might be used to support
 whether decisions could be taken in time to award grants from the Local Action
Fund to support group activities over the summer period
 the application and decision process, and associated timescales
 the due diligence that would be undertaken on proposed grantees 
3.4. As was requested at the May meeting of the Committee, a note has been provided to
elected members with details of how the Local Action Fund monies were spent in
2025/2026. 
4. Proposed Approach
4.1. As previously reported to the Committee in May, the proposed approach for 2026/2027
builds on that adopted in the previous financial year, with members seeking to use
their knowledge of local priorities to inform decisions.   
4.2. This knowledge includes the 10 Neighbourhood Plans which, following consultation,
list the priorities for Blantyre, Burnhill, Cambuslang East, East Kilbride South, Fernhill,
Hamilton South, Hillhouse, Udston and Burnbank, Springhall and Whitlawburn,
Strutherhill and Birkenshaw, and Whitehill. These priorities have been engaged on
annually with a wide range of stakeholders through Participatory Budgeting. 
4.3. Elected members have been provided with links to the various community plans the
Council has developed or has access to, including other local community plans that
the Council is aware of: Community Planning. 
4.4. As the Committee will be aware, not all areas have Neighbourhood Plans, and those
plans that do exist are generally not established on a single or whole ward basis.
However, additional knowledge of local priorities can be gathered from the discussions
of Community Planning Partnerships. There are four locality partnerships, for
Cambuslang/Rutherglen, Clydesdale, East Kilbride and Hamilton, where community
representatives, Neighbourhood Planning areas, community councils and other
community bodies come together to discuss common issues and report to the
Community Planning Partnership on the discussions and look at improvement
actions/options. 
4.5. As was discussed at the member briefings, the Community Engagement Team can
provide elected members with an analysis of the local views, together with other
community feedback received through stakeholder groups. Officers would be available
to support elected members in each ward on how they use this information. Members
may agree their own proposals but if not, then further engagement with stakeholder
groups could be carried out to provide a list of potential Local Action Fund projects.
Appropriate communication with the wider public on the funding and process will be
made available. It would also be possible for some form of simple Participatory
Budgeting process to be run for a small number of wards, if members wish that, albeit
this could not be resourced on a wholesale basis. 
4.6. Ward members would then finalise and submit their proposals for review by officers,
to ensure deliverability within the agreed budget, and for compliance with Council
policy and procedure. Ward members would also be free to engage in their own
community engagement to inform their Local Action Fund proposals, alone or with
other ward members. Subject to those checks, suggestions will be reported to the
Executive Committee for consideration and approval.  
124

Page 125

4.7. The following additional guidance will be provided to members:- 
 as with last year, in line with the Council’s multi-member ward guidance, ward
members will be encouraged to discuss possible suggestions with their fellow
ward members and, if able, to agree a single proposal for their ward
 in the usual way, Council procedures/policies need to be followed for use of the
Local Action Fund funding, including the Standing Orders on Contracts, the
Financial Regulations and the Scheme of Delegation
 the proposals could be for capital or revenue spend. Given the funds are one off,
members should look to spend on areas where recurring spend is not required
 suggestions should ideally be capable of commencing delivery in 2026/2027
 if a member was considering suggesting that the Local Action Fund be used for
the issuing of a grant, then officers can assist in ensuring that the issuing of the
grant complies with the Code of Guidance on Funding External Bodies and
Following the Public Pound, as well as the Council’s Grants Policy
 members are encouraged to contact relevant senior officers in advance of the
closing date should they have any questions on possible suggestions, estimated
costings and whether they would be appropriate for the Local Action Fund 
4.8. Joint working between ward members is recommended to arrive at consensus on
proposed projects.  If there is more than one submission per ward (if consensus cannot
be reached) then all forms submitted for a ward will be shared with all ward members
following the closing date for suggestions. As noted above, suggestions will be
reported to the Executive Committee for consideration and approval.  In this way, the
Council’s investment will be shown to be focused on community plans and priorities,
informed by communities and local members. 
4.9. It is proposed that the Local Action Fund would be taken forward as outlined in the
timetable below, this being slightly updated form that reported to the Committee in
May:- 
Members briefing session on process and existing Community
Priorities shared with Ward Members
25 May and 1 June
2026
Executive Committee 24 June 2026
Guidance issued to members on Local Action Fund for 2026/27 25 June 2026
Engagement with Community Partnerships if necessary  Through June and
July 2026  
Members’ proposals to be submitted to officers 14 August 2026
Report to Executive Committee with spend proposals  16 September 2026
Future reporting as required to Executive Committee for any
remaining spend proposals
As required 
4.10. Subsequent to the two member briefings a proposal has been submitted on behalf of
all the Ward 18 (Hamilton West and Earnock) members to issue a grant of £1,100
from the Ward’s Local Action Fund, to Hillhouse Tenants and Residents Association,
with the funding being used as a contribution of the cost of two buses to take local
families on an annual outing to Burntisland. 
4.11. Once proposals have been agreed by Committee, they will be added to the
programme of spend for the current year, to be taken forward for implementation by
officers in the normal way, where they are service area delivery, such as on local
infrastructure. Where grants to third party organisations have been agreed they will
likewise be taken forward by officers, in line with existing procedures for the issuing
of grants. 
125

Page 126

5. Employee Implications
5.1. None. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. As detailed in section 4 of the report, each Ward has been allocated £50,000, a total
of £1.0 million for all 20 Wards. 
6.2. As part of this paper, a small grant of £1,100 has been proposed for Ward 18. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. Any implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment from the
proposals included in Appendix 1 are anticipated to be minimal. 
8. Risk and Other Implications
8.1. A risk associated with spend on the Ward proposals is that there is an overspend. The
risk has been assessed as low given the detailed budget management applied across
the Resources and projects.  The risk is managed through financial monitoring
arrangements at which any variance is analysed. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
9.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. As noted above, the proposed approach highlights the use of
existing analysis of local views and other community feedback received through
stakeholder groups. Members may agree their own proposals based on this
information, but, if not, then further engagement with stakeholder groups could be
carried out to provide a list of potential Local Action Fund projects 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
1 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council – 26 February 2025
 Executive Committee - 25 June 2025
 Executive Committee - 27 August 2025
 Executive Committtee – 20 May 2026 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Iain Strachan, Head of Administration and Legal Services
Ext:  4658 (Tel:  01698 454658) E-mail: iain.strachan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
126

Page 127

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Statutory Consultation on Proposed Primary School
Catchment Changes 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide information on proposed changes to denominational primary school
catchment arrangements in Hamilton, including alterations to the catchment
areas of St Mary’s Primary School and St Paul’s Primary School to better
balance pupil numbers, the removal of the optional catchment arrangement
between St Mary’s Primary School and St Peter’s Primary School, and the
removal of the optional catchment arrangement between St Peter’s Primary
School and Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary School
 seek approval from Executive Committee to undertake a statutory consultation
on the proposed changes, in accordance with the Schools (Consultation)
(Scotland) Act 2010
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that a statutory consultation under the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act
2010 is undertaken on proposed changes to the catchment areas of St Mary’s
Primary School, Hamilton and St Paul’s Primary School to balance pupil
numbers more effectively, the removal of the optional catchment area
between St Mary’s Primary School and St Peter’s Primary School and the
alignment of this area to St Peter’s Primary School, and the removal of the
optional catchment area between St Peter’s Primary School and Our Lady
and St Anne’s Primary School and the alignment of this area to Our Lady and
St Anne’s Primary School.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. The current catchment areas for St Mary’s Primary School, Hamilton, and St Paul’s
Primary School are shown in Appendix 1. These reflect a historic boundary
arrangement which, in light of changes in housing patterns, population distribution,
and planned developments, now requires review. Redrawing the boundary would
support more effective management of school capacities and a more balanced
distribution of pupils across the two schools. 
3.2. The current optional catchment area where families may choose either St Peter’s
Primary School or St Mary’s Primary School, Hamilton, as their denominational
catchment school is shown in Appendix 3. 
13
127

Page 128

3.3. The current optional catchment area where families may choose either St Peter’s
Primary School or Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary School as their denominational
catchment school is shown in Appendix 5. 
3.4. Sections 4 to 7 set out current pupil rolls, projected school populations, and the
estimated number of pupils expected to arise from known housing developments
within the catchment areas of the affected schools. 
4. St Mary’s Primary School
4.1. St Mary’s Primary School has 15 Classrooms.  With this accommodation (assuming
an average of 30 pupils per class), the school could accommodate 450 pupils. 
4.2. The current pupil roll (September 2025 census) is 451.  Trends based on the
average of the last three years’ P1 intake figures suggest the mainstream roll will
reach 469 in August 2028. 
4.3. In addition, after August 2028, there are a further 23 pupils projected to be generated
from future housing developments within the St Mary’s catchment area. 
4.4. This means that the projected roll is expected to be 481 by August 2030 and post
2030 to rise to 527 if all known housing developments are completed. 
5. St Paul’s Primary School
5.1. St Paul’s Primary School currently has 6 Classrooms, and assuming an average of
30 pupils per class, the school could accommodate 180 pupils. 
5.2. The current pupil roll (September 2025 census) is 145. Trends based on the average
of the last three years’ P1 intake figures suggest the roll will be 140 in August 2028. 
5.3. Known housing developments within the St Paul’s catchment area are projected to
generate 3 additional pupils. 
6. St Peter’s Primary School
6.1. St Peter’s Primary school currently has 6 classrooms, and, assuming an average of
30 pupils per class, the school could accommodate 180 pupils. 
6.2. The current pupil roll (September 2025 census) is 102. Trends based on the average
of the last three years’ P1 intake figures suggest the roll will be 90 in August 2028. 
6.3. Currently, there are no known housing developments within St Peter’s Primary
school catchment area. 
7. Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary School
7.1. Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary school currently has 8 classrooms, and assuming
an average of 30 pupils per class, the school could accommodate 240 pupils. 
7.2. The current pupil roll (September 2025 census) is 161. Trends based on the average
of the last three years’ P1 intake figures suggest the roll will be 131 in August 2028. 
7.3. Currently, there are no significant housing developments within Our Lady and St
Anne’s Primary school catchment area.  
128

Page 129

8. Proposals
8.1. Catchment realignment of St Mary’s and St Paul’s Primary School
Appendix 1 outlines the existing catchment areas of St Paul’s and St Mary’s Primary
Schools. 
8.2. The proposal is to realign an area currently zoned to St Mary’s Primary to St Paul’s
Primary school.  This will allow for a better distribution of housing in the area and a
more balanced pupil population across both schools. 
8.3. Within the area proposed to be re-zoned to St Paul’s Primary School there are
proposals for a large development on the site of the former University of West of
Scotland (UWS).  Initial proposals indicate that there will be between 345 and 365
residential units on the site. 
8.4. If 350 units are built, there would be 34 denominational pupils expected to be
generated from the UWS site development.   
8.5. The pupil projection figures for St Mary’s Primary indicate that the school will further
exceed the planning capacity should all pupils predicted to be generated from known
developments within the catchment area materialise. 
8.6. In addition to the proposal to re-zone the development site at the former UWS, there
are also existing housing areas proposed to be re-zoned to help manage the school
rolls effectively and also to ensure that the catchment boundary changes proposed
are sensible and clearly defined. 
8.7. The addresses proposed to be rezoned are:
Arthur Street, Barrack Street, Beckford Street, Bothwell Road, Bothwell Street, Caird
Gardens, Caird Park, Caird Street, Clydesdale Street, Douglas Street, Hamilton Park
North, Hamilton Park South, Mausoleum Drive, May Gardens, May Street, May
Wynd, New Park Street, Park Holme Court, Racecourse View, The Furlongs (Avon
House, Bothwell House, Brandan House, Cadzow House, Clyde House, Kinneil
House, Mausoleum House, Park House) and The Paddock. 
8.8. The number of pupils from existing housing within the area proposed to be rezoned
that currently attend St Mary’s Primary school is 26. (session 2022/2023).  In session
2024/2025, this number was 27. In session 2025/2026 this number was 22.  There
are no pupils within this area currently enrolled at St Mary’s Primary Hamilton for
primary 1 in August 2026. 
8.9. St Paul’s has the capacity to accommodate both the pupils from the existing housing
within the proposed area to be re-zoned, and also from the housing development on
the former UWS site.   
8.10. Appendix 2 shows the proposed catchment areas of St Mary’s Primary School and
St Paul’s Primary School.   
9. Optional Area 1 – St Peter’s Primary and St Mary’s Primary
9.1. Appendix 3 outlines the area that currently offers an option to parents to either attend
St Mary’s Hamilton or St Peter’s as their denominational catchment school. 
129

Page 130

9.2. The proposal is to zone this area to St Peter’s Primary schools, thereby removing the
option to attend St Mary’s Primary as the denominational catchment primary school. 
9.3. In session 2024/2025, there were 8 pupils from this area enrolled at St Mary’s
Hamilton and 14 enrolled at St Peter’s.  In session 2025/2026, there were 15 pupils
from this area enrolled at St Mary’s Primary School and 16 enrolled at St Peter’s.   
9.4. Therefore, over the previous 2 sessions, 66% of families in this area have chosen to
attend St Peter’s Primary as their denominational catchment primary school. 
9.5. The addresses proposed to be zoned to St Peter’s Primary School are:
Nos 6b-55 Allanshaw Gardens, Allanshaw Grove, Arbroath Grove, Buchanan
Crescent, Chantinghall Gardens, Fraser Crescent, Hardie Street, Laighstonehall
Road, Rosevale Crescent, St Giles Park, St Giles Way, Stonehall Avenue,
Westwood Crescent (nos 40-81 already in St Peter’s catchment), Nos 2-40 and 50-
52 Woodfoot Road. 
9.6. Appendix 4 outlines the proposed new catchment area for St Peter’s Primary School. 
9.7. St Peter’s Primary school has sufficient capacity to accommodate all pupils within
this area. 
9.8. In addition, by removing St Mary’s Primary school, Hamilton as a choice from this
area it further helps to ease the capacity pressures experienced at St Mary’s Primary
and manage the rolls of the denominational primary schools in the area more
effectively. 
10. Optional Area 2 – St Peter’s Primary and Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary
10.1. Appendix 5 outlines the area that currently offers an option to parents to either attend
Our Lady and St Anne’s or St Peter’s as their denominational catchment school. 
10.2. The proposal is to zone this area to Our Lady and St Anne’s thereby removing the
option to attend St Peter’s as the denominational catchment primary school. 
10.3. In session 2024/2025, there were 22 pupils from this area enrolled at Our Lady and
St Anne’s Primary and 7 enrolled at St Peter’s Primary school.  In session 2025/2026
this was reduced to 12 pupils enrolled at Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary and 7 at St
Peter’s Primary. 
10.4. Therefore, over the previous 2 sessions, 70% of families have chosen to attend Our
Lady at St Anne’s Primary as their denominational catchment primary school. 
10.5. The addresses proposed to be zoned to Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary school are:
Nos 50, 63-69 Buchan Street, Fairhill Avenue, Falconer Terrace, Kerr Crescent, Nos
49-75 and 96-116 Millgate Road, Neilsland Square. 
10.6. Appendix 6 outlines the proposed new catchment area for Our Lady and St Anne’s
Primary school. 
10.7. Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary school has sufficient capacity to accommodate the
pupils within this area.  
130

Page 131

10.8. In addition, by removing the choice within this area, it further helps to manage the
rolls of the denominational primary schools in the area more effectively. 
11. Risk and Other Implications
11.1. Secondary School implications: 
Both St Mary’s Primary and St Paul’s Primary Schools are zoned to Holy Cross High
School, therefore there would be no effect on secondary pupil numbers as a result of
this proposal being implemented. 
By aligning optional area 1 to St Peter’s, the associated secondary school would be
St John Ogilvie High School. 
By aligning optional area 2 to Our Lady and St Anne’s, the associated secondary
school would be Holy Cross High. 
12. Implementation Date
12.1. If, following a period of statutory consultation, the proposals were approved, the
implementation date of any catchment realignment would be for P1 enrolment in
January 2027 for session 2027/2028. 
12.2. Families with children already attending any of the affected schools and with a
further sibling enrolling in P1 in respect of school sessions August 2027 through to
August 2032 will have the choice for their P1 child to be granted placement in that
school regardless of any catchment change. 
12.3. As part of the statutory consultation process, Public Meetings will be held to fully
engage with the local communities affected by this proposal. 
13. Employee Implications
13.1. Employee resources would continue to be provided by means of existing staffing
protocols when calculating class teacher requirements and agreed management
structures. 
14. Financial Implications
14.1. The proposal demonstrates a Best Value approach to effectively managing the
primary school estate and the Council’s property portfolio. 
15. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
15.1 There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment
associated with this report. 
16. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
16.1. This report does not present a new strategy, policy or plan and is, therefore, not
subject to equality impact assessment.  The report seeks approval for formal
consultation. 
Lyndsay McRoberts
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
5 June 2026  
131

Page 132

Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Education and learning: inspiring learners, transforming learning, strengthening
partnerships
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
David Hinshelwood, Interim Head of Education (Support Services and School Estate)
Ext: 4468   (Tel: 01698 454468 )
E-mail:  david.hinshelwood@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
132

Page 133

Appendix 1 – Existing catchment areas for St Mary’s Primary School and St Paul’s Primary School 
St Paul’s PS
catchment
area 
St Mary’s PS
catchment
area
13
133

Page 134

Appendix 2 – Proposed catchment areas for St Mary’s and St Paul’s 
134

Page 135

Appendix 3 – St Peter’s PS catchment and area where either St Peter’s or St Mary’s can be opted for 
Optional
area – St
Peter’s or St
Mary’s 
St Peter’s PS
catchment
area 
St Mary’s PS
catchment
area
135

Page 136

Appendix 4 – Proposed St Peter’s PS catchment   
Proposed St
Peter’s PS
catchment
area 
St Mary’s PS
catchment
area
136

Page 137

Appendix 5 – Our Lady and St Anne’s PS catchment and area where either St Peter’s or Our Lady and St Anne’s can be opted for 
Optional
area
between St
Peter’s and
Our Lady and
St Anne’s 
Our Lady and
St Anne’s
catchment
area 
St Peter’s
catchment
area
137

Page 138

Appendix 6 – Proposed Our Lady and St Anne’s Primary School catchment area 
Proposed
Our Lady and
St Anne’s
catchment
area 
St Peter’s
catchment
area
138

Page 139

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources)  
Subject: Council of Sanctuary Accreditation 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of this report is to:-
[purpose]
⧫ provide an update to Executive Committee on the Council of Sanctuary
programme and what is required to achieve accreditation, following the motion
raised at full Council by an elected member in December 2025
⧫ seek approval to progress the work to pursue Council of Sanctuary accreditation,
including governance arrangements and next steps 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. Executive Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the Council join the City of Sanctuary UK Local Authority Network;
(2) that the establishment of a senior officer-led cross-Council Working Group, to
lead and coordinate this work, be noted;
(3) that the proposed governance and delivery approach, including the
development of a Council of Sanctuary Action Plan and Evidence Portfolio, be
noted; and
(4) that a further report is presented to Executive Committee seeking approval to
apply for Council of Sanctuary accreditation, once the Action Plan and Evidence
Portfolio are developed. 
3. Background
3.1. In December 2025, full Council agreed a motion raised by an elected member to adopt
Council of Sanctuary principles and requested officers work towards achieving
accreditation. 
3.2. Officers have since completed initial scoping and, as requested, this report sets out
what is required to obtain Council of Sanctuary accreditation and seeks approval to
progress this work towards accreditation. 
3.3. City of Sanctuary UK is a recognised charity and national umbrella organisation
promoting welcome, safety and inclusion for people seeking refuge from conflict,
persecution, or risk. The organisation supports councils, schools, universities, health
bodies and communities to:- 
 Learn about the experiences of asylum seekers and refugees
 Embed inclusive and anti-racist practices
 Share good practice across services and local partnerships  
14
139

Page 140

3.4. City of Sanctuary coordinates the Local Authority Network and accreditation process
and provides training and guidance to support organisations to meet the “Learn –
Embed – Share” criteria. 
3.5. National guidance (UK Government, Scottish Government and COSLA) increasingly
emphasises the need for proactive leadership around cohesion, anti-racism and
misinformation. Accreditation would align South Lanarkshire with other local
authorities and organisations adopting structured approaches to community
integration (recognised groups include Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen Cities of
Sanctuary and Perth and Kinross Council of Sanctuary). 
3.6. If approved by Executive Committee, South Lanarkshire Council will join the City of
Sanctuary UK Local Authority Network to support the initial scoping work. Membership
of the network is a prerequisite for Council of Sanctuary accreditation; however,
councils can be members without committing to pursue accreditation. Approval at this
stage would enable the Council to join the network and undertake the structured
development work required to assess readiness for accreditation; it would not
constitute approval to submit an accreditation application. 
3.7. The following potential positive benefits can be identified for councils who engage with
City of Sanctuary:- 
 positive recognition as a welcoming local authority
 strengthened community cohesion with the benefit of network learning and
support
 improved relationships with national partners and readiness for future changes
to asylum systems 
4. Current Position in South Lanarkshire
4.1. South Lanarkshire Council has a well-established, nationally recognised track record
in refugee resettlement, including:- 
 over 10 years of delivering structured and compassionate resettlement
programmes
 committee-approved commitments supporting up to 30 refugee households per
year (approx. 130 individuals annually)
 strong performance across Syrian, Afghan and Ukrainian schemes
 a skilled, experienced and permanent resettlement workforce
 strong cross-service collaboration
 highly positive engagement feedback from families and partners
 a mature network of community-based integration activities 
4.2. Comparable strengths can be seen in other accredited local authorities such as Perth
and Kinross Council (recognised in 2024), acknowledged for high-quality operational
support, compassionate practice, sustainability, community integration, and a strong
multi-agency partnership culture. 
4.3. While foundations are strong, unprecedented demand on the homelessness service
and increased numbers of asylum and refugees dispersed within South Lanarkshire
have reduced capacity for coordinated community engagement and corporate-level
cohesion activity.  Accreditation will require:-  
140

Page 141

 a more formal, whole-Council approach
 clear evidence of staff training, policy alignment and inclusive practice
 renewed investment in community engagement, communication, and anti-racism
initiatives 
4.4.  Progressing this work at this stage is timely and it supports strengthened local
responses, enhances corporate cohesion, and reinforces positive public messaging.
It also aligns with wider work underway across homelessness, housing, education,
community safety, and equalities. 
4.5. Moving forward, it is recognised that addressing the three requirements noted at
paragraph 4.3 above would be a specific focus for the proposed working group. 
5. Requirements for Accreditation
5.1. To achieve Council of Sanctuary status, South Lanarkshire Council must:- 
1. Maintain membership of the Local Authority Network (a prerequisite for
accreditation);
2. Submit an application demonstrating corporate commitment to learning,
embedding and sharing sanctuary principles;
3. Demonstrate strong partnership engagement, including people with lived
experience; and
4. Develop and publish a Council of Sanctuary Action Plan and supporting Evidence
Portfolio. 
6. Next Steps
6.1. If approved, the following steps are proposed:- 
1. Executive Directors nominate service leads to the Cross-Council Working Group
(proposed lead: Housing Services).
2. Establish the Cross-Council Working Group (agree terms of reference, chair,
membership, meeting schedule and reporting route).
3. Develop a full proposal and Council of Sanctuary Action Plan (including
deliverables, owners, milestones, resourcing, risks and monitoring
arrangements) for consideration by Executive Committee.
4. Submit a further report to Executive Committee seeking approval to apply for
Council of Sanctuary accreditation, once the Action Plan and Evidence Portfolio
are developed. 
6.2. The working group will be cross-Council and partnership-based, with third-sector
involvement and input from people with lived experience. Progress will be overseen
through appropriate senior officer governance arrangements, with any significant
resource implications or proposed accreditation application brought back to Executive
Committee for approval. 
6.3. EKIN, a third-sector partner, has already expressed interest in working with the
Council with a view to enhancing support to refugee resettlement programmes and
potentially supporting work towards Council of Sanctuary accreditation. 
7. Employee Implications
7.1. There are no direct employee implications arising from the recommendations in this
report at this stage. Any workforce implications identified through development of the
Action Plan would be considered and reported as required. 
141

Page 142

8. Financial Implications
8.1. There are no additional financial implications at this stage. Delivering community
engagement and evidence-gathering will require some resource, and funding
opportunities through existing partnership structures, national cohesion support or
grant-funding will be explored. A detailed assessment will be undertaken as part of the
Action Plan development. 
8.2. The Council holds ring-fenced refugee resettlement reserves funded through UK and
Scottish Government programmes, with eligibility restrictions.  As the Action Plan is
developed, officers will confirm whether any existing funding can be used to support
relevant activity and will ensure compliance with grant conditions. 
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
9.1. There are no climate or environmental implications arising from this report. 
10. Risk and Other Implications
10.1. Progressing this work would support the Council’s equalities, inclusion and community
cohesion objectives through strengthened training, monitoring, communications and
participation arrangements. 
11. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
11.1. There are no immediate Integrated Impact Assessment requirements. Any future
action plan or policy changes will be assessed accordingly. 
11.2. At this stage, there was no requirement for consultation in terms of the content of this
report. 
Stephen Gibson
Executive Director (Housing and Technical Resources) 
19 May 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focused on people and their needs
 We will work to put people first and reduce inequality
 Working with and respecting others
 Caring, connected, sustainable communities
 Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council – 10 December 2025 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Jackie Fernie, Homelessness and Housing Support Manager
Ext: (Tel: 01698 455139)
E-mail: Jacqueline.fernie@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
142

Page 143

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Chief Executive  
Subject: Recommendation Referred by Licensing Committee 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- 
 request approval of the undernoted recommendation referred to this Committee
by the Licensing Committee at its meeting on 19 May 2026 in relation to the
revised Statement of Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets
1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the updated Statement of Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets be
approved. 
3. Background
3.1. Recommendations Referred by Licensing Committee of 19 May 2026 – Short
Term Lets Licensing Policy Review – Extract of Minute
A report dated 24 April 2026 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate
Resources) was submitted on the revised Statement of Licensing Policy for Short
Term Lets. 
On 2 November 2022, the Executive Committee had approved the Council’s Short
Term Lets Policy, in implementation of the 2022 Order, which introduced the Short
Term Lets licensing regime.  There were approximately 195 licensed short term lets
within the South Lanarkshire area. 
On 29 August 2024, the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 (Licensing of Short
Term Lets) Order 2024 (‘the 2024 Order’) had been enacted to include the following
licence application types in the short term letting regime, along with minor technical
changes:- 
♦ Provisional Short Term Let Licence
♦ Confirmation of Provisional Short Term Let Licence
♦ Transfer of Short Term Let Licence 
The Licensing Committee approved minor changes to the Council’s Statement of
Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets to include the new application types listed
above on 24 June 2025.  It also approved in principle to the new fees for those
application types.  The fees were approved by the Finance and Corporate
Resources Committee on 10 September 2025.
15
143

Page 144

A public consultation had been launched on 29 December 2025, as part of the 3
yearly review of the Policy.  This was undertaken by way of an online survey on the
Council’s website.  The consultation closed on 24 January 2026. 
The consultees detailed in paragraph 3.6. of the report had been consulted directly. 
A summary of the consultation questions and the responses received were attached
as Appendix 2 of the report. 
As required by the 2022 Order, mandatory conditions of licence applied to all Short
Term Let licences issued across Scotland.  In addition to the mandatory conditions,
the Council could set additional conditions using discretionary powers within the
2022 Order which could respond to local challenges and concerns.  Additional
conditions aimed to ensure that best practice was applied by licence holders to
secure public safety and minimise the risk to public nuisance, as well as anti-social
behaviour resulting from the operation of a short term let. 
Following consideration of the consultation responses and a separate review by
officers, it was recommended that:- 
♦ the Council should impose additional conditions for Short Term Lets, as detailed
in Appendix 3 to the report, which would be incorporated into the Statement of
Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets
♦ no changes should be made to the current Policy in terms of temporary
exemptions, and that there be no temporary exemptions 
In addition, there were some other minor changes proposed to the existing Policy,
which included a statement that the fees would be reviewed annually as part of the
Council’s annual review of fees and charges and inclusion of provision for a 3-yearly
review of the Policy.  The updated Statement of Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets
was attached as Appendix 1 to the report. 
The updated Statement of Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets would be submitted
to the Executive Committee on 24 June 2026 for approval. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) the content of the report be noted; 
(2) that the updated Statement of Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets be
endorsed:- 
♦ to include additional licence conditions, as detailed in Appendix 3 to the
report
♦ to reflect that there would be no temporary exemptions 
(3) that the updated Statement of Licensing Policy for Short Term Lets be referred
to the Executive Committee on 24 June 2026 for formal approval. 
[Reference: Minutes of the Executive Committee of 2 November 2022 (Paragraph
7), Minutes of 24 June 2025 (Paragraph 3) and Minutes of the Finance
and Corporate Resources Committee of 10 September 2025
(Paragraph 14)]
144

Page 145

3.2. A link to the report submitted to the Licensing Committee of 19 May 2026 is provided
for information: Agenda Document Pack - Licensing Committee - 19_05_2026. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. There are no employee implications arising from this report. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. There are no financial implications arising directly from this report. 
6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no climate change, sustainability and environmental implications arising
directly from this report. 
7. Risk and Other Implications
7.1. There are no risk or other implications arising directly from the content of this report. 
8. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
8.1. The Council consulted with organisations listed within this report. There were 19
responses received from the consultees or members of the public during the 4 week
consultation period, which had been summarised in Appendix 2 to the report to the
Licensing Committee. Council officers have also caried out an Integrated Impact
Assessment which did not highlight any negative impacts from the proposed
changes to the Policy. The Integrated Impact Assessment is available on the
Council’s website and can be accessed here
https://www.southlanarkshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/18479/short_term_lets_policy_re
view . 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
1 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focussed on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Excellent employer
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving
 We will work with people first and reduce inequality
 People live the healthiest lives possible 
Previous References
 Executive Committee, 2 November 2022
 Licensing Committee, 24 June 2025
 Finance and Corporate Committee, 10 September 2025
 Licensing Committee, 19 May 2026
145

Page 146

List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Tracy Slater, Administration Adviser
Tel:  07385 370089
E-mail:  tracy.slater@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
146

Page 147

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Appointment of Trustees to South Lanarkshire Leisure
and Culture Board 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 advise of a change to the trustees to the South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture
(SLLC) Board
 seek nominations to fill the vacant trustee positions
 note the requirement for a further report to be brought back to Committee in
September on Board appointments
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that Councillor Cowie replace Councillor Devlin as a trustee of the South
Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Board; 
(2) that the Council confirm to South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture that it
recommends that Councillor Razzaq be the new Vice-Chair of the South
Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture Board;
(3) that nominations are sought to fill the remaining vacant trustee positions for
elected members or officers of the Council; and
(4) note that a further report on appointments to the South Lanarkshire Leisure and
Culture Board will be brought to the 16 September meeting of the Committee. 
3. Background
3.1. The revised governance arrangements and constitution for SLLC were approved by
the Council at its meetings on 23 June 2021 and 15 June 2022 respectively.  The
constitution set out the membership of the SLLC Board which included 14 charity
trustees made up of 5 elected members or officers of the Council, 1 representative of
the trade unions and 8 who were neither an elected member nor an officer of the
Council. 
3.2. The constitution also set out eligibility criteria and the appointment process for
trustees. This process requires the Council to give written notice to SLLC for the
appointment of a trustee, and to be guided by SLLC’s Nominations Committee in
relation to the selection of appropriate trustees. 
3.3. Following her appointment as Leader of the Council, Councillor Devlin has resigned
from the SLLC Board. Currently, the Council has only two appointed trustees on the
Board, being Councillor Razzaq and Councillor Nelson. The Council is entitled to
appoint up to five trustees.
16
147

Page 148

4. Appointment of Trustees
4.1. Following notification from the Chair of the SLLC Board that Councillor Devlin has
resigned, and as noted above, currently there are three elected member trustee
vacancies.  It is proposed that Councillor Cowie replace Councillor Devlin as a
trustee on the Board, and nominations are sought to fill the remaining two vacant
positions from elected members of the Council. 
4.2. In the first instance, and in line with existing practice, it would be for the Council’s
SNP Group to decide whether it wished to take up the remaining two vacancies. 
Thereafter, other nominees could be sought. 
4.3. Councillor Devlin also held the position of Vice-Chair of the SLLC Board, this being a
position for a Council trustee to hold. The election of the Vice-Chair is a matter for
the SLLC Board, but it is proposed that the Committee confirm to SLLC its wish that
Councillor Razzaq be appointed to that position. 
4.4. As the Committee will be aware, SLLC is currently going through a process to
appoint a new independent Chair and an additional independent trustee. It is
anticipated that the SLLC Nominations Committee will be in a position to make
recommendations on this to the Council in early September, after which the Council
would need to confirm its agreement with this, in terms of SLLC’s constitution. As
such, it is anticipated that a report will be brought to the Committee on 16 September
seeking agreement as to these proposed appointments. Subject to that reporting, the
appointment of the new Chair and independent trustee would then be confirmed at
the SLLC AGM in November. 
4.5.  In addition, as trustee appointments are for as period of 3 years, the Council will also
require to confirm its trustee appointments for the next three years, in advance of the
AGM. The September report to Committee will also cover this, which will naturally be
subject to the outcome of the May 2027 local government elections, and subsequent
external appointments of councillors. 
5. Employee Implications
5.1. None. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. None. 
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no climate change, sustainability or environmental implications associated
with this report. 
8. Risk and Other Implications
8.1. An elected member is not obliged to accept an appointment to an external
organisation. However, if they do then they may find themselves taking on additional
legal duties, e.g. as a trustee of a charity or a director of a company, where they will,
in essence be obliged to act in the best interests of that organisation. The exact
nature of these legal duties will depend upon the nature of the organisation in
question and the role they are appointed to. There is also potential for future conflicts
of interests between such a role and their role as an Elected Member. The
Standards Commission has issued an Advice Note on such matters. There are no
other implications arising from this report. 
148

Page 149

9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy therefore, no impact assessment is
required. 
9.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. SLLC have, however, been consulted on the contents of this
report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
4 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council 15 June 2022 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Iain Strachan, Head of Administration and Legal Services
Ext: 4658 (Tel:  01698 454658)
E-mail: iain.strachan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
149

Page 150

150

Page 151

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject: Investment Challenge Motion 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide a paper on Investment Challenge, as requested in the Motion to Council
on 10 December 2025
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Executive Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the investment principles listed in section 4, be noted;
(2)  that the opportunities detailed in Appendix 2 (summarised in section 6), and
the potential partners/funding sources in section 6, be noted; and
(3) that the next steps detailed in section 7, be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. On 10 December 2025, the Council approved a Motion entitled Investment
Challenge Paper. 
3.2. The Motion is included in full in Appendix 1 and notes that, “despite a strong capital
programme, the investment ambitions of the Council and our communities have
exceeded the level of funding available over a number of years. The Council
considers that the time has come for a Challenge Paper on infrastructure and
investment to drive constructive challenge across local and central government and
to help create a pipeline of credible options for investment for South Lanarkshire
Council and our partners”. 
3.3. This paper has been prepared by officers to address the Motion and to bring an
investment Challenge Paper to the Executive Committee.  The aim of the paper is to
affirm the investment principles and ambitions for South Lanarkshire.  This is
detailed in Section 4.   
3.4. Section 5 of the paper sets the scene for the future of the Glasgow City Region
(GCR), of which the Council is part.  Section 6 then summarises a series of
investment opportunities which would enhance South Lanarkshire and contribute to
the success of our key strategic plans including Council Plan, Community Plan,
Local Transport Strategy, Economic Strategy and other key strategies and
objectives.  The status of these opportunities is also noted.  Detail on these is
included in Appendix 2.  
17
151

Page 152

3.5. Through Appendix 2, any potential partners and funders are noted where relevant to
the investment opportunity.  Where appropriate, the appendix also notes what would
be required in order to realise these opportunities.   
3.6. Finally, the Motion noted that it was agreed that any pipeline of options and
proposals arising from an Investment Challenge Paper be subject to review and
scrutiny by the Executive Committee and /or an appropriate Resource Committee
before final decisions are made.  The planned approach to this is noted in the
Summary and Next Steps (section 7). 
4. Investment Principles and Ambitions
4.1. The Council has experience in developing masterplans for town centres (Hamilton
Town Centre Masterplan and East Kilbride Town Centre Masterplan) and country
parks (Calderglen and Chatelherault).  These masterplans set out a vision and
framework on where investment will have the greatest benefit and demonstrate the
ambition of the Council to benefit the communities and where relevant, investors. 
The intention of the masterplans (for the Town Centres specifically) is to set out the
context for public and private sector investment over the next 15+ years. 
4.2. The masterplans provide the strategic context to support a delivery structure and
programme of activity.  They also provide the strategic framework to support external
funding applications as well as the development of business models.  All
Masterplans were subject to a public consultation to garner the views of the
communities on the proposals being put forward. 
4.3. Having these Masterplans in place and supported by the views of the community,
means that any funding identified, either internally or from an external funder
(commercial or otherwise) can be readily directed to support the aims of the
Masterplan.  This has been the case for the 2026/2027 Investment monies where
funding earmarked for spend on the Country Parks has been allocated to masterplan
projects such as the new play park at Chatelherault and car parking and active travel
proposals in Calderglen. 
4.4. The Motion proposed that we draw inspiration from the approach used in these
robust pieces of work, with a view to establishing a framework within which future
investment plans could be developed.  It also noted the principles on which the
Council’s investment proposals should be founded: 
 Infrastructure first 
 Right First-Time decision making based on robust business cases 
 Timely, quality public consultation 
 The needs and aspirations of our communities 
4.5. The approach used in developing the Masterplans supports these principles as the
focus is on developing infrastructure, proposing detailed business cases as and
when appropriate, and sourcing the views of the communities through timely
consultation.  This best practice approach will be embraced in developing investment
opportunities moving forward.  By identifying these opportunities, the Council will be
ready to react when funding becomes available.  
152

Page 153

5. The Future Role of Glasgow City Region
5.1. In November 2025, the First Minister announced plans for new enabling legislation in
the next Parliament to give Regional Partnerships legal status, new devolved powers
and flexibility to design regional delivery models.  This reflects the shift in Scottish
and UK policy toward stronger regional governance.   
5.2. GCR delivers major programmes including City Deal, Investment Zone, Shared
Prosperity Fund, New Local Growth Fund, Clyde Mission, etc.  The proposed
devolved powers to Regional Partnership will see greater powers for GCR with
activity underway to design the future regional model for innovation, investment,
infrastructure, housing, planning, transport skills and economic development.   
5.3. It is evident that GCR will have a greater role in decision-making and investment
which is already being witnessed with the UK Government’s New Local Growth Fund
(see para 1.3 in Appendix 1) which is required to be administered by GCR for
regional projects of scale.  The Council must ensure therefore that it has a pipeline of
activity that aligns with regional strategies in order to position itself to be best placed
to secure investment.   
6. Investment Options and Opportunities
6.1. The Council approved a report entitled 2026/2027 Capital Programme Update and
Future Capital Investment Strategy on 25 February 2026.  As well as approving a
£105 million Capital Programme for 2026/2027, the report also detailed the Council’s
Priority Projects – Growing South Lanarkshire 2022 to 2030.  This demonstrated that
in addition to core projects, the Council also has some significant capital investment
plans for the years to 2030 including a new Leisure centre in Larkhall costing £27
million, Secondary Schools Refurbishment totalling £18 million and improvements to
Stewartfield Way (£30 million).  This reflects the Council’s ambitious Capital
Investment plans for the coming years.   
6.2. As detailed in section 3.4, the Motion noted that this Investment Challenge Paper
should set out a series of investment ambitions for the Council, our funders and
partners, that would enhance South Lanarkshire and contribute to the success of our
main strategic plans including the Council Plan and the Community Plan.  It also
encouraged the extension of the Council’s current ambitions to include partnership
and collaboration.   
6.3. Table 1 lists a number of investment ambitions and opportunities which will advance
the Council’s key strategic plans, and which are over and above the strategic capital
plans that are already in place.  The detail of these is noted in Appendix 2 which
takes each investment opportunity in turn and aligns them with the relevant Council
Strategy where appropriate.     
Table 1 – List of Investment Ambitions and Opportunities 
Commercial Opportunities Business Space Transportation Infrastructure and Services
Town Centres Transition to Net Zero
Country Parks Long Term Estates Strategy 
Housing Emergency and Homelessness Regeneration Capital Grant / Vacant and
Derelict Land Projects
An Bothan Project  Renewable Energy Fund 
153

Page 154

6.4. Partner Activity:  Whilst Table 1 (and Appendix 2) identifies opportunities for the
Council, it is important for us to understand the ambitions of our partners, to identify
potential collaborative working opportunities and to ensure South Lanarkshire as
location is as ambitious as possible.  Through our existing communication channels
in Regeneration and Employability, officers continue to engage with a range of
partners including NHS, Police, West of Scotland University, South Lanarkshire
Council, New College Lanarkshire etc.   
6.5. External Funding Opportunities:  Officers are continually horizon scanning for
external funding opportunities and are reaching out to a number of organisations to
better understand their funding priorities including Sportscotland, Scottish Football
Association, National Lottery, Creative Scotland, Historic Environment Scotland etc.   
6.6. As requested in the Motion, consideration has been given to other funding options. 
One of these is the Scottish National Investment Bank however as they cannot
invest directly with local authorities, and any investment they do is at commercial
rates, any collaboration is likely to be more expensive than borrowing from the Public
Works Loan Board (PWLB).   
6.7. In relation to Strathclyde Pension Fund, as an investment body, they are interested
in projects of scale, and making a return on their investment.  Glasgow City Council
has commissioned consultancy support to “identify and attract new sources of capital
into Glasgow and the wider city region, with a particular focus on considering
whether an Impact Fund, similar to those in place in Greater Manchester and
London, to accelerate housing development, should be created here.  This will be a
larger investment proposal with a focus on the City Region Investment Workstream,
and could be something that Strathclyde Pension Fund may be interested in
investing in.  As a member authority of the GCR, Council Members will continue to
be updated as the programme of works progresses.   
7. Summary and Next Steps
7.1. Section 4 of this report provides a summary of the position in relation to the GCR,
while section 5 of this report provides Members with a list of investment opportunities
which are over and above our already ambitious capital plans stretching to 2029 and
beyond.  Details of these are provided in Appendix 2. 
7.2. Where possible, funding opportunities are referenced, some of which are already
being actively pursued, and others where further work would be required to develop
business cases before they can be confirmed as proposed projects.  This approach
is in line with the principles detailed in section 4 (and reiterated below) which should
be followed for any project under consideration: 
 Infrastructure first 
 Right First-Time decision making based on robust business cases 
 Timely, quality public consultation 
 The needs and aspirations of our communities 
7.3. Members are asked to note the pipeline of opportunities detailed in section 6
(Appendix 2).  As funding opportunities are realised, projects will be developed in
line with the principles in section 7.2.  External funding opportunities will be pursued
as appropriate and will form part of the business cases for projects, along with the
opportunity to pursue collaborative working with partner organisations.  
154

Page 155

8. Employee Implications
8.1. None. 
9. Financial Implications
9.1. As detailed in sections 4 to 7 of the report. 
10. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
10.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in
terms of the recommendations of this report. 
11. Risk and Other Implications
11.1. The main risk associated with any of the project opportunities identified is that there
is an overspend.  Given the robust business cases required if we are to progress any
project moving forward, then the risk has been assessed as low. 
12. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
12.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact
assessment is required.   
12.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the
information contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
Kevin Carr
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
12 May 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:
Lorraine O'Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o'hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
155

Page 156

Appendix 1 
Council Motion – Investment Challenge Paper (10 December 2025)
(incorporating the amendment agreed by Council) 
The Council notes that future Capital Investment Strategy is anticipated alongside capital
budget proposals for the new financial year. The Council further notes that, despite a strong
capital programme, the investment ambitions of the Council and our communities have
exceeded the level of funding available over a number of years. 
The Council considers that the time has come for a Challenge Paper on infrastructure and
investment to drive constructive challenge across local and central government and to help
create a pipeline of credible options for investment for South Lanarkshire Council and our
partners. 
The Council therefore agrees to the following recommendations: 
1. That an Investment Challenge Paper be brought forward for consideration at a future
meeting of the Executive Committee. 
2. That this Investment Challenge Paper sets out investment principles and ambitions for
South Lanarkshire, drawing inspiration from the approaches previously adopted by the
Scottish Government in developing an Infrastructure Investment Plan and by the Council
in developing master plans for town centres and country parks. 
The principles of these Investment proposals should be founded on: 
 Infrastructure first 
 Right First-Time decision making based on robust business cases 
 Timely, quality public consultation 
 The needs and aspirations of our communities 
3. That the Investment Challenge Paper sets out a series of investment options for the
Council, our funders and partners that would enhance South Lanarkshire and contribute
to the success of our Council Plan, Community Plan, Local Transport Strategy,
Economic Strategy and other key strategies and objectives, such as developing Long
Term Estate Strategy, action on the housing emergency, the transition to net zero and
exploring commercial opportunities for the Council. 
4. That the Investment Challenge Paper should not be limited to our Council’s ambitions to
enhance our Capital Strategy, such as through the delivery of a replacement Blantyre
Leisure Centre, but should extend to our ambitions for partnership and collaboration,
such as the extension of the Larkhall rail line. 
5. That in the development of the Investment Challenge Paper, council officials engage
with potential partners and funders, such as the Scottish National Investment Bank,
Glasgow City-Region, the Scottish Government, the Scotland Office and Strathclyde
Pension Fund. 
That any pipeline of options and proposals arising from an Investment Challenge Paper be
subject to review and scrutiny by the Executive Committee and /or an appropriate Resource
Committee before final decisions are made. 
156

Page 157

Appendix 2
Investment Challenge Opportunities 
This appendix details a number of investment ambitions and opportunities which will
advance the Council’s key strategic plans, and which are over and above the
strategic capital plans that are already in place.  Each opportunity is taken in turn
and is aligned with the relevant Council Strategy where appropriate.  Also
highlighted is the current status and any current and potential funding and
partnership involvement and collaboration with external partners and funders.   
1. Commercial Opportunities
1.1. A recent report titled Response to Industrial Market Challenges was approved by the
Executive Committee in February 2026. This identified a Summary of Interventions
which included the following aspirational areas: 
• Grants programme for existing industrial stock. 
• Dispose of the Council’s obsolete industrial property.
• Creation of Serviced Plots or Units including through Partnership Working.
• Enhance Operational Business Centres.
• Laboratory Space / R&D Space. 
1.2. The Budget set for 2026/2027 invested monies in all of these areas with the focus on
delivering good quality, fit for purpose business space across South Lanarkshire:
Expansion of Business Grants (£0.4m) and Supporting and Developing Local
Business (£1m to offer higher value grants, £0.5m to develop our own business
centres, and £2m to pay for the costs to fund the development of these spaces which
will become self-financing when operational and generating income, enabling in
excess of £11m in commercial properties).  However, more funding would allow us to
do more.  There are a number of funding opportunities that are available and being
pursued to augment the Council’s current programme of works.  This includes a
number of funding streams that are directed through the City Region, and the
Council is working with its partners to maximise its allocation of monies, and the
impact that these funds can make on the Council area. 
1.3. UK Government New Local Growth Fund (NLGF):  The introduction of the NLGF
has meant a change in emphasis of funding from Revenue to Capital compared to
the previous Shared Prosperity Fund.  As outlined in paragraph 5.3, these monies
will be allocated to the Glasgow City Region and the eight Member Authorities
including South Lanarkshire Council are collaborating to develop Regional Projects
of Scale.  This is in line with the Council’s ambitions. 
1.4. The Council was required to submit expressions of interests in April 2026 for projects
to Glasgow City Region PMO for consideration as Regional projects.  These
included commercial projects, creation of serviced industrial site, business grants
and a housing viability project.  35 expressions of interest were received from across
the City Region with £20m now ringfenced for an ‘Enabling Commercial Space’
project of which £3.4m is allocated for a Council project.  In addition, a further £20m
is to be allocated to a further strategic project yet to be identified.  This collaboration
with the City Region will give us the opportunity to develop the Council’s commercial
capacity further and could generate income to support the Revenue Budget in the
longer term.    
157

Page 158

1.5. National Wealth Fund (NWF):  The NWF is a private limited company and is wholly
owned by HM Treasury.  Over the past three years, it has partnered with local
authorities across the UK, deploying over £1 bn in lending and building expertise in
sectors such as heat networks, transport, and retrofit. Building on this foundation,
they recently launched a new phase of support, shaped by feedback from our
partners and aligned with the UK Government's Industrial and Infrastructure
Strategies and Clean Power Action Plan 2030.   
1.6. The focus is to establish strategic partnerships with City Regions to form long-term
collaborations and support the development of investment-ready projects and Local
Growth Plan priorities. This has been launched in 4 regions including Glasgow City
Region, and their offer has 3 strands which councils and City Regions can access: a
Knowledge Service, Local Authority Lending and Flagship Project Advisory. 
1.7. Glasgow City Region (GCR) is partnering with the National Wealth Fund (NWF) to
look at options for financing major infrastructure projects with GCR keen to ensure
that NWF have visibility of a range of projects across the region to allow them to
identify where they could best offer support.  All 8 councils of the GCR have entered
into a Strategic Partnership Agreement with the NWF which formalises an
agreement to carry on working together as has been the case to date, however as a
Council, we are still free to work with the NWF on our own.     
1.8. The Council has prepared a submission to the GCR to seek consideration of advice
from the National Wealth Fund for a number of projects which are all aimed at
furthering the ambitions of the Council and are aligned to a number of key strategic
proprieties.  This includes Enhancing Commercial Industrial Space.  GCR are initially
taking forward a commercial industrial project of regional scale along with the NWF. 
The Council will be part of this programme of works, but progress is dependent on
the GCR.     
1.9. The Local Innovation Partnership Fund:  Is a UK wide £500m research and
innovation programme led by UK Research and Innovation and backed by the UK
Government.  It is designed to drive economic growth by investing in placed-based
innovation.  Glasgow City Region has received an allocation of £50m allocated as
follows: 
• £25m for commercialisation of Research & Development activities
• £20m for lab space to support cluster growth
• £5m for complementary skills programme 
1.10. The Urban Regeneration Company, Clyde Gateway, of which the Council is a
partner along with Glasgow City Council and Scottish Enterprise, has submitted a
proposal for Red Tree Labs at Shawfield for a £3m gap in their funding of their £22m
project.   
1.11. Strategic Sites Accelerator Programme:  The UK Government Department of
Business and Trade has invited parties to submit a comprehensive pro-forma
containing information on sites to be considered for participation in a Strategic Sites
Accelerator programme.  The UK wide £600 million programme aims to unlock sites
for investment from the growth-driving sectors of the Industrial Strategy by the end of
the year, with the aim of scaling up the programme over time.  Sites must be within
Industrial Strategy Zones to be eligible to be selected in the first wave of sites. The
Region-wide GCR Investment Zone is an industrial Strategy Zone.  
158

Page 159

1.12. The deadline for submissions was 27 February 2026, and the Council submitted a
joint proposal for the Shawfield Area in conjunction with Clyde Gateway. 
1.13. Any progress on any of these funding opportunities to allow the Council to respond
to industrial market challenges, will be brought to Members as appropriate. 
2. Town Centres
2.1. Significant work is underway in East Kilbride and Hamilton Town Centres including
the Price in Place Programme, which will take a number of years to come to fruition. 
However, there are 8 other towns identified in the South Lanarkshire Local Plan.  As
well as the approved masterplans for Hamilton and East Kilbride Town Centres,
Town Centre Strategies and Action plans were previously approved by Committee
for Rutherglen, Cambuslang, Larkhall, and Blantyre.  For each of these, the action
plans were progressed and completed in partnership with the communities with a
number of key projects delivered.  There remain aspirations across these
communities to continue to develop and grow the town centres as the heart of their
community. 
2.2. The remaining towns of Lanark, Carluke, Biggar and Strathaven had developed a
range of strategies and locally led approaches.  Lanark worked on the Vision through
the community council, Carluke the Conversation and Place Plan through the
development trust, Strathaven were delivering the CARS project and Biggar
accessed funds such as the Renewable Energy Fund to deliver local priorities. 
Again, a number of aspirations and opportunities remain across these towns.   
2.3. Subject to identifying suitable resources and funding, by developing these in
conjunction with local communities, we could look to continue to improve town
centres increasing local spend and creating a greater sense of community and
wellbeing. It also relies on significant community engagement and buy-in. 
3. Country Parks
3.1. Masterplans are in place for both of the Council’s Country Parks (Chatelherault and
Calderglen).  While funding has been approved for some projects from the
Transformation Fund and 2026/27 Budget Investments, further funding is required
for some of the more ambitious plans including a potential new events/wedding
venue at Chatelherault and a new visitor experience at Calderglen.   
3.2. Both of these projects are of scale and require resources to develop the projects and
associated business cases and develop external funding applications to the likes of
Historic Environment Scotland and Heritage Lottery.   
4. Long Term Estate Strategy
4.1. The work on this Strategy is ongoing with a report to be presented to a future meeting
of this Committee.   
4.2. This Estates Review considers the future of all the Council’s assets and whether these
can be rationalised, and that the future estate is smaller, high quality and contributes
to the Council’s future Net Zero ambitions.  This ongoing piece of work will continue to
consider emerging policy.  Due regard will continue to be given to the operational
requirements of South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture, particularly in relation to wet
leisure provision which will include Blantyre Leisure Centre.    
159

Page 160

4.3. The future report to this Committee, referenced in section 4.1, will detail the Estate
Strategy, including the expenditure proposals for the £24 million of previously
allocated investment monies. 
5. Transition To Net Zero
5.1. The Sustainable Development and Climate Change Strategy (SDCCS) 2022-27 was
approved by South Lanarkshire Council on 15 June 2022. This Strategy sets out the
policy context for the Council’s approach to developing sustainably and tackling the
climate emergency over a five-year period, while also providing a broad strategic
direction for longer-term planning. The aim is to deliver on agreed outcomes and
contribute to a long-term vision for a more sustainable, resilient, and equitable South
Lanarkshire.   
5.2. To support delivery of the SDCCS, an associated overarching 5-year action plan was
developed, alongside more detailed annual action plans which are approved by, and
reported biannually to, the Climate Change and Sustainability Committee. A copy of
the original 5-year action plan can be found here with a list of the refreshed actions
as at the mid-point (2025) included in Appendix 3.   
5.3. These action plans show the direction of travel in relation to the Transition to Net
Zero.  They set out clear priorities and actions to improve health and wellbeing,
promote climate justice, empower communities, protect and restore the natural
environment, and drive economic transformation, highlighting achievements,
challenges, and next steps across the Council’s 13 strategic priorities. 
5.4. Actions within the plan are being delivered within existing resources, supplemented
by external funding where possible (e.g. Climate Emergency Fund, Scottish
Government grants).  Additional funding opportunities and projects continue to be
explored and include the potential for an Almada Street Heat Network where the
Council, in conjunction with Scottish Water Horizons and the Scottish Government is
currently exploring a heat network for the Bothwell Road / Almada Street area.  This
network would utilise the surplus heat from the Bothwell Road Waste Water
Treatment plant. As part of the Council’s Probable Outturn exercise for 2025/2026,
the Executive Committee approved funding of £0.300m to match fund three heat
networks to outline business case (Carluke, East Kilbride and this one in Hamilton),
and to conduct a feasibility study for one heat network in Cambuslang. Match
funding will be sought from the Scottish Government in the first instance. 
5.5. Windfarm / Solar Farm like North Ayrshire’s Council owned solar farm in conjunction
with the private sector, is being considered by Housing and Technical Resources. 
Similarly, Solar Panels on Council Buildings including car parks, could be progressed
in partnership with the private sector.  These rely on a business case being developed
and on overcoming previous issues experienced re guaranteeing energy supply, and
procurement channels. 
5.6. Funding opportunities for the Transition to Net Zero include The Clyde Mission Heat
Decarbonisation Fund (CM-HDF) established by Glasgow City Region but funded by
the Scottish Government under the Clyde Mission programme. Its purpose is to
accelerate the replacement of fossil fuel heating systems with low and zero carbon
alternatives across the Clyde Mission corridor, in line with local, regional and national
policy objectives. CM-HDF complements national initiatives like the Heat in Buildings
Strategy but is distinct in its place-based focus and could support some of these
areas of activity to reduce emissions, lower energy bills, address fuel poverty and
stimulate local economic activity through green jobs and supply chain opportunities. 
160

Page 161

5.7. The next application deadline is 31 July 2026.  Officers from Housing and Technical
Resources are currently carrying out the preparatory work to write a bid and submit
this by the deadline set. 
6. Transportation Infrastructure and Services
6.1. Across South Lanarkshire, transport investment is fundamental to economic
performance and community wellbeing with businesses relying on efficient networks
to attract staff, move goods and access markets, while residents depend on
transport to reach employment, colleges, universities, apprenticeships and essential
services. In areas such as Clydesdale, where choices are more limited,
improvements to road safety, bus and rail services, demand-responsive transport
and interchange facilities can make the difference between opportunity and
exclusion. Transport investment is central to sustaining communities, supporting
businesses and enabling inclusive growth. 
6.2. The Local Transport Strategy (LTS) 2026–2036, seeks to deliver a safe, resilient and
sustainable transport network that supports net-zero emissions, inclusive economic
growth and improved health and wellbeing. The investment challenge is therefore
about aligning local and national ambition, as well as the funding, to deliver transport
infrastructure and services that are reliable, affordable and accessible across all
modes. 
6.3. Safety: A safe transport network underpins all other investment ambitions. The
Council’s responsibility for over 2,200 kilometres of local roads, hundreds of bridges
and structures, extensive footway and cycleway networks, and traffic management
systems means that continued and sustained investment in roads maintenance,
bridge strengthening, winter service, flood risk management and road safety
schemes is essential.  Initiatives such as the ongoing Accident Investigation and
Prevention (AIP) Programme, Roads Investment Programme and measures to
address climate impacts ensure that communities and businesses can rely on the
network day in, day out. Without this baseline of maintenance, safety and resilience,
wider ambitions for public transport and modal shift cannot be realised. 
6.4. Road Infrastructure Investment: While the LTS prioritises sustainable transport, it
also recognises the essential role of the road network in supporting buses, freight,
servicing trips and rural accessibility.  Strategic schemes such as Cathkin Relief
Road and Greenhills dualling project as well as the to be completed Stewartfield
Way Enhancement in East Kilbride and the Lanark Town Centre Circulatory System
demonstrate how targeted road investment can unlock development land, reduce
congestion, improve air quality and create safer environments for pedestrians,
cyclists and bus users. These multi-million pound projects illustrate the importance of
maintaining a pipeline of well-developed road schemes that deliver wider social,
environmental and economic benefits rather than simply additional traffic capacity. 
Alongside these large-scale projects, the Council continues to invest annually in the
general road network, with an approved Roads Investment Programme of £15.3
million for 2026/2027.  
161

Page 162

6.5. Rural Connectivity: The investment challenge is most acute in Clydesdale, where
dispersed settlements, longer travel distances and limited service frequencies place
additional pressure on residents, businesses and public services.  The LTS
highlights that access to employment, further and higher education, healthcare and
training in Clydesdale often depends on the availability of reliable bus and rail
services, supported by safe local road connections.  Core corridors linking
communities such as Lanark, Carluke, Biggar, Douglas and surrounding villages
require sustained investment to maintain safety and reliability, while complementary
solutions such as Demand Responsive Transport, community transport and
improved interchange with rail are essential to address gaps in provision. 
6.6. Strengthening Bus Infrastructure and Services: Buses are a critical mode of
transport across South Lanarkshire and a lifeline for many communities, particularly
in rural areas and for those without access to a car. The Council has continued to
invest in bus priority at signalised junctions, high-quality shelters, real-time
passenger information, and interchange improvements such as those at Hamilton
Interchange and the ongoing proposals for Lanark Interchange. 
6.7. However, infrastructure investment must be matched by high-quality services.
Continued collaboration with SPT, Transport Scotland and operators to improve
service frequency, reliability and coverage, and to continue to explore changes to
how the bus network is planned and operated across the west of Scotland, including
franchising or enhanced partnership models where appropriate. 
6.8. Rail Investment and Regional Connectivity: Rail connectivity is a critical
component of South Lanarkshire’s transport network, supporting access to
employment, education, healthcare and national markets, and aligning directly with
the Local Transport Strategy’s ambition for a safe, integrated and sustainable
system. Existing rail corridors provide essential links to Glasgow and beyond but
also play a vital local role in connecting towns and communities across South
Lanarkshire. Continued partnership working with Transport Scotland, Network Rail,
ScotRail and SPT is therefore essential to maintain asset condition, improve service
reliability and deliver targeted enhancements. 
6.9. The East Kilbride Rail Enhancement Project, including electrification and the new
Hairmyres Station interchange, demonstrates the benefits of coordinated national
and local action, improving accessibility, capacity and integration with active travel
and park-and-ride. Similarly, ongoing improvements to Lanark Station and
Interchange will strengthen connections between rail, bus and active travel,
supporting access to services, employment and learning for communities across
Clydesdale.  Looking further ahead, the Local Transport Strategy identifies a clear
ambition to develop and appraise additional rail enhancements that respond to
geographic need and economic opportunity. This includes the potential extension of
the Larkhall railway to Stonehouse and potentially onward to the Avon Valley,
reopening rail access to communities that currently rely heavily on road travel. Such
an extension has the potential to support regeneration, housing growth, access to
jobs and education, and reduced car dependency in semi-rural and rural areas, while
strengthening east–west connectivity within South Lanarkshire. 
6.10. Clyde Metro:  South Lanarkshire Council supports the ambition behind Clyde Metro
as a transformational, multi-modal mass transit programme for the Glasgow City
Region. The potential benefits including improved access to employment, education
and healthcare, reduced carbon emissions and stronger regional competitiveness
are well recognised.  
162

Page 163

6.11. However, the development of Clyde Metro must be underpinned by a balanced,
place-based approach that accurately reflects the geographic diversity of the region,
including urban, semi-rural and rural communities, and the differing transport needs,
travel patterns and economic roles that exist across it.  In South Lanarkshire, this
means ensuring that Clyde Metro options and phasing do not focus solely on core
urban corridors or radial routes leading into and through Glasgow but also support
local priorities and outcomes in centres such as Hamilton, East Kilbride,
Cambuslang, Rutherglen and Clydesdale towns, as well as the wider network of
town centres, business locations and settlements that underpin the regional
economy. 
6.12. It is essential that Clyde Metro is developed as a genuinely multi-modal and
integrated programme, complementing existing and planned investment in local rail
enhancements, bus service improvements, interchanges and active travel networks.
Careful consideration must be given to how proposals interact with the existing road
network, particularly where road space reallocation is proposed. Buses, servicing,
freight, rural movements and local journeys are fundamental to business operations
and everyday life and balancing of available road space is essential. 
6.13. The Council therefore advocates an approach to Clyde Metro that maintains network
balance, protects safety and reliability across all modes, and supports economic and
social inclusion across the whole city region. Early option development, appraisal
and phasing should explicitly assess impacts and benefits for urban, semi-rural and
rural communities alike, ensuring that investment decisions deliver locally relevant
outcomes, strengthen resilience, and support businesses and communities wherever
they are located, not solely those on the most heavily trafficked central corridors. 
6.14. Active Travel:  Investment in walking, wheeling and cycling is integral to delivering
the LTS vision of a safe and sustainable network. Schemes such as the expansion of
the National Cycle Network (including NCN 74 and NCN 75), town-based active
travel networks in Lanark, Carluke, Hamilton and East Kilbride, and safer routes to
schools all support everyday access to services and learning. In rural areas, active
travel improvements linked to park-and-ride, rail stations and bus stops help to
extend the reach of public transport and reduce dependency on private car use. 
6.15. Collaboration and Sustained Funding: Delivering the schemes and initiatives
highlighted above will require significant funding and long-term collaboration
between local, regional and central government and a move towards sustained,
outcome-focused funding models. Short-term and competitive funding cycles make it
difficult to plan strategically, particularly for rural areas and public transport services.
Funding permitting, the Council could work with partners to develop a shared,
credible pipeline of road, bus, rail, active travel and mass transit investments that
deliver a safe network and tangible benefits for communities and businesses across
the entire Council area. 
7. Housing Emergency and Homelessness
7.1. Housing New Build Programme: In funding the Housing New Build Programme
through borrowing, the Council has been able to lever in external support from the
Scottish Government.  The Council’s allocation of Scottish Government Grant for
planning purposes (the Resource Planning Assumption) for the Affordable Housing
Supply Programme has been confirmed for next few years, although this will need to
be confirmed by the new Parliament.  This joint working will continue to deliver on
the aspirations of the Council.  
163

Page 164

7.2. Homelessness:  In order to address pressures in the homeless sector, the Council
has identified 3 projects:  the partnership with Social Bite to deliver 15 new homeless
units in Harriet Gardens, Rutherglen which opened in early April 2026, the purchase
and conversion of a former hotel in Hamilton, and the development of a former care
home in Cambuslang. 
7.3. In terms of identification of further opportunities, consideration could be given to a
further Social Bite venture in another area of South Lanarkshire, however, it is
proposed that this is only considered once the original venture in Rutherglen has
proven successful.   
8. Regeneration Capital Grant / Vacant and Derelict Land Projects
8.1. The Scottish Government is a key funding partner of the Council and has provided
financial support to facilitate the delivery of a number of projects over recent years. 
These include Regeneration Capital Grant Fund (RCGF) and Vacant and Derelict
Land Fund (VDLF).  The VDLF has supported the Council and Clyde Gateway in the
regeneration of the chromium sites in the Clyde Gateway area and recently the
RGCF has supported a community owned facility in Glassford for the development of
their local hall / community hub. 
8.2. In recent years the RCGF has been under pressure from Scottish Government with a
reduced allocation.  Successful awards tend to be smaller community led initiatives.   
9. An Bothan Project
9.1. The Scottish Government’s Gaelic Language Plan emphasises its commitment to
supporting the Gaelic Language and recognises that Gaelic is an integral part of
Scotland’s heritage, national identity and current cultural, economic and social life.
The Government encourages initiatives to ensure Gaelic has a sustainable future in
a modern, growing and progressive Scotland. 
9.2. The Council has received funding for feasibility plans for the An Bothan project.  If
further funding were to be made available, then this would provide South Lanarkshire
with a ‘state of the art’ modern building for the development of Gaelic language and
culture and establish the Council as a leading exponent of Gaelic Language among
Scottish Local Authorities and the wider community.  There is the potential to bid for
the cost of the build, on the basis that 100% of the funding is sourced from the
Scottish Government. 
10. Renewable Energy Fund 
10.1. The Council administers the community benefit element of the Renewable Energy
Fund (REF) for 42 wind farms within South Lanarkshire and the community benefit for
Clyde Wind Farm Fund (CWFF) and 5 operational quarries. Operators of larger
windfarm developments provide recurring annual fund contributions, formalised
through legal agreements, whilst smaller developments such as single wind turbines
sites, may consider providing a ‘capitalised’ one off community benefit payment.
Community groups, social enterprises, trusts, public organisations and not for profit
organisations within 10km of contributing wind farm provider are eligible to apply. Over
the ten-year period, 2015/2016 to 2024/2025, the Council has made awards including
of £15.6m from the Community Benefit Funds.    
10.2. A review of the guidance and priorities for the REF was undertaken and amendments
were approved at the Community and Enterprise Resources Committee in February
2024 which supports capital and revenue projects within the localised areas. 
Consideration could be given to a more strategic approach to REF to delivery projects
across South Lanarkshire.   
164

Page 165

Appendix 3 
Sustainable Development and Climate Change Strategy 2022-27 – Action Plan 
The key work areas which have been identified for inclusion in future annual plans are as
follows: 
• Continue to develop action to reduce the Council’s carbon emissions, including
development of a route map for net zero Scope 1 emissions.
• Continued implementation of the Council’s LHEES and associated Delivery Plan,
including efforts to address fuel poverty.
• Progress implementation of Sustainability Impact Assessment and Sustainable
Procurement Process, including roll out of relevant training.
• Develop the Council’s approach to local implementation of the Good Food Nation Plan.
• Contribute to the redesign of the Council’s website to support sustainability objectives.
• Preparation for the forthcoming energy efficiency standards for housing and the
anticipated Heat in Buildings Bill.
• Development of the Open Space Strategy and Local Development Plan 3 (LDP3).
• Continue the Council’s efforts to adapt to the impacts of climate change, including
completion of the strategic climate change risk and opportunity assessment and
development of an adaptation plan.
• Strengthening collaboration with the Lanarkshire Climate Action Hub to enhance local
climate action initiatives and community engagement.
• Continuing waste reduction efforts including further exploration of food waste reduction
pilots, promotion of reuse activity and the circular economy, preparation of the
anticipated Deposit Return Scheme, and continued implementation of the Litter
Strategy.
• Assessing and developing understanding of the Council’s built and natural historic
assets for informed decision making.
• Progressing projects for tree planting on Council-owned land to support climate targets.
• Further work to increase biodiversity and peatlands restoration to improve carbon
sequestration and ecosystem health.
• Expanding workforce upskilling opportunities in the green and circular economy.
• Evaluating the local food and drink sector’s capacity to supply the Council, supporting
local economic resilience.
165

Page 166

166

Page 167

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Transformational Review Programme – Summary of
Outcomes Report 2025/2026 and Future Pipeline 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide a summary of the outcomes from the Council’s Transformational Review
Programme for the year 2025/2026, and the Future Pipeline of Transformation 
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Executive Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the summary of outcomes from the Council’s Transformational Review
Programme (section 4 / Appendix 1), be noted;
(2) that the transformation themes and pipeline of activity moving forward (section
5 / Appendix 2), be noted;
(3) to note that the transformation programme will continue to be developed and
refined in line with changes in legislation, demand, financial assumptions and
operational challenges (section 5.3); and
(4) that the approach to benefits realisation (section 6), the planned template for
monitoring and reporting outcomes (Appendix 3) and the governance
arrangements in place, be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. South Lanarkshire Council continues to operate in a period of sustained change and
increasing financial pressure, as demonstrated in a separate report to this Committee,
Revenue Budget Strategy 2027/2028.  To continue delivering effective, high‑quality
services for our residents, we must plan proactively for the future and adapt how we
operate. 
3.2. The Council faces a range of challenges, including economic pressures, demographic
change, increasing demand for services, legislative requirements and rapid
technological development. Collectively, these factors require a continual focus on
transformation and improvement.  In order to care for and educate our residents, and
to provide safe, healthy environments for people to live and work in, the Council must
continue to evolve its services, workforce, estate and ways of working.  
18
167

Page 168

3.3. Transformation is not new to the Council, as demonstrated in the Audit Scotland report
published in October 2025: South Lanarkshire Council: Best Value Thematic
Management Report.  This report noted that the Council has a Transformational
Change Programme in place that is clearly linked to its updated Council Plan, financial
plans and Digital Strategy, but that it needs to explore further transformation
opportunities alongside other measures to help bridge its Budget Gap and improve
outcomes for the people of South Lanarkshire.  It also noted that, while we report on
the financial aspects of transformation, we could also report on the impact on service
quality and outcomes for service users. 
3.4. The programme of change continues, and the need for transformation is continual.
This report covers what we are currently doing, our continued plan for change, and
how we will monitor and report this moving forward. 
3.5. This report brings together information on previous/current transformation activity
(section 4) alongside a forward‑looking programme of work (section 5). It sets out how
the Council intends to respond to these challenges, balance future budgets and
improve services over the coming years. 
3.6. A key part of transforming (and any change) is to monitor the outcomes realised as
part of the transformation.  Section 6 proposes a benefits realisation approach, while
section 7 looks at the governance process in place to support this.
4. How South Lanarkshire is Transforming
4.1. One of the key drivers for transformation is the need to balance the Council’s budget.
As reported in a separate report to this Committee (2027/2028 and 2028/2029
Revenue Budget Strategy), the expected Budget Gap over the next two years is
£26.500 million, before taking account of any increase in Council Tax.  The
transformation programme is expected to contribute towards closing the Budget Gap,
and the programme identifies where savings may be achieved. 
4.2. However, finance is not the only reason to transform.  South Lanarkshire Council is
already delivering a number of transformation programmes that have the potential to
significantly change how services are delivered and how the Council operates.  These
programmes span organisational redesign, the Council’s property estate, digital
development, system modernisation and partnership working. 
4.3. More recent initiatives include participation in the Marmot programme, the Third Sector
Review, significant systems developments as well as the programme of service
reviews contributing towards efficiency and savings targets. Together, these
programmes demonstrate a sustained commitment to improvement and
transformation across the organisation. 
4.4. Appendix 1 shows the many areas of Transformation that have already taken place in
recent years, and includes detail of the impact, both financial where relevant, and also
the impact in terms of service outcomes.  It shows the wide-ranging work carried out
across the Council to meet the financial challenges we face, but also to change
services for the better, to improve the customer experience, and importantly, to
improve people’s lives across South Lanarkshire. 
4.5. The programme of service reviews in Appendix 1 has delivered nearly £6 million in
savings towards the 2025/2026 and 2026/2027 budget, with more anticipated in future
years. These savings are being delivered through Council-wide and Resource-specific
activities focused on ongoing efficiencies, maximising the use of resources, improving
and adapting services and spend to save initiatives.   
168

Page 169

4.6. As well as these efficiency reviews, Transformation activity has taken place through
reviews across Resources, through the implementation of Large-Scale Systems
Implementation, and through investment monies including the Transformation Fund
for South Lanarkshire Leisure and Culture.  These are detailed in Appendix 1. 
5. Pipeline of Activity
5.1. As described above, the driver for our need to change is how we need to react to a
changing local authority environment. This includes changing demand for services, as
well as the need to continue to balance our budgets every year. 
5.2. The planned programme of change is detailed in Appendix 2.  This consolidates
ongoing programmes with new and planned programmes of work. All of these have
been combined into their relevant themes as detailed by 5.4. 
5.3. The programme outlined represents a position at a point in time and looks ahead over
the next 3 years. Given the changing environment, it is essential that this programme
remains flexible and is subject to regular review.  This programme is designed to be
fluid and to be added to. Changes to the programme will reflect changes to legislation,
demand or operational challenges, or may need to change to reflect changes in our
financial strategy. 
5.4. In doing this, the transformation programme looks to align with the ambition set out in
the Council Plan and is structured around key themes which reflect the Council’s
priorities and the scale of change required. These are:- 
Ongoing efficiencies and spend‑to‑save. 
Aligns with Council Plan Priority “We will work to recover, progress and improve” and
Council Plan Value “Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent”. 
Recognising the benefits of prevention. 
Aligns with Council Plan Priority “We will work to put people first and reduce inequality”
and Council Plan Outcome “People live the healthiest lives possible”. 
Maximising the use of our resources, including buildings, workforce and
technology. 
Aligns with Council Plan Priority “We will work to recover, progress and improve” 
Being an enterprising Council, including opportunities for income generation. 
Aligns with Council Plan Priority “We will work towards a sustainable future in
sustainable places” and Council Plan Outcome “Thriving business, fair jobs and
vibrant town centres”. 
Improving and adapting services to better meet the needs of people and
communities in South Lanarkshire. 
Aligns with the Council Plan Vision “Improve the lives and prospects of everyone in
South Lanarkshire”.  
169

Page 170

6. Benefits Realisation
6.1. It is important to understand what we expect to achieve through the programme of
transformation. To support this, a benefits realisation approach has been developed
which can set out at the outset what we expect to achieve from the programme of
work. 
6.2. Benefits may include cashable savings, productivity improvements and qualitative
service improvements for customers and service users. The approach will also define
how success is measured and reported, providing transparency and accountability for
delivery. 
6.3. Appendix 3 provides the planned template for monitoring outcomes from programmes.
As they commence, we should record what we expect in the way of benefits (both
quantitative and qualitative). We can then use that assessment to monitor progress as
programme progress. 
7. Governance
7.1. It is proposed that the Performance and Review Scrutiny Forum continue to receive
updates on the overall programme of transformation, recognising that Executive
Committee and Individual Resource Committees will have a role to play in decision
making where necessary. 
7.2. Papers to the Performance and Review Scrutiny Forum will provide updates on a
quarterly basis for the whole programme, including benefits realisation. 
7.3. At an officer level, programmes will continue to be monitored by a programme of senior
officer meetings, with Lead Officers at Head of Service Level, sponsored by Executive
Director.  The programme would be monitored through the provision of information on
the benefits realisation template (Appendix 3).   
8. Financial Implications
8.1. Section 4 of this report provides a reminder of the key financial challenges that the
Council faces. The transformation programme is expected to contribute towards
closing the Budget Gap.  Section 4 / Appendix 1 of this report provides a summary of
outcomes from the Council’s Transformational Review Programme to date, including
savings achieved over the past 2 financial years. 
9. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
9.1. There are no implications at this stage of the process. 
10. Risk and Other Implications
10.1. There are no other implications at this stage of the process. 
11. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
11.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required at this point. 
11.2. The was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
170

Page 171

Jackie Taylor 
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
29 May 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focused on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Ambitious, self-aware and improving
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Excellent employer
 We will work to put people first and reduce inequality
 We will work towards a sustainable future in sustainable places
 We will work to recover, progress and improve
 Our children and young people thrive
 Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live
 Thriving business, fair jobs and vibrant town centres
 Caring, connected, sustainable communities
 People live the healthiest lives possible
 Inspiring learners, transforming learning, strengthening partnerships 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Lorraine O'Hagan, Head of Finance (Strategy)
Ext:  5637 (Tel:  01698 455637)
E-mail: lorraine.o'hagan@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
171

Page 172

Appendix 1
Transformation Programme – Benefits Realisation 
Achievements to date from current and ongoing reviews, including cashable and non-cash implications
Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
2025/2026 and 2026/2027 Approved Savings from Programme of Reviews
Procurement Finance &
Corporate
Resources
(FCR)
Review and strengthening of corporate
procurement arrangements to maximise
compliance, improve value for money and
identify savings opportunities, including
collaborative procurement. 
Ongoing
efficiencies and
spend‑to‑save
Cashable Savings 
£1.043 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy, with a total
of £1.984 million delivered since
2025/2026. Further savings are targeted
for future years. 
Overtime FCR / All
Resources
Review of overtime usage, controls and
workforce planning arrangements across
services to better manage demand, reduce
reliance on premium costs and to support the
health and wellbeing of employees. 
Ongoing
efficiencies and
spend‑to‑save
Cost avoidance / Cashable Savings 
£0.991 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy, with a total
of £1.355 million delivered since
2025/2026. 
Charging FCR / All
Resources
Review of fees and charges to ensure alignment
with policy, affordability and cost recovery
principles where appropriate. 
Enterprising
Council
Income generation 
£0.200 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy, with a total
of £0.575 million delivered since
2025/2026. 
Organisational
and
FCR / All
Resources
A review of management and supervisory
structures in order to align to the current
Preferred Operating Model and generate
Ongoing
efficiencies
Cashable Savings 
172

Page 173

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
Management
Structures
organisational benefits of enhancing efficiency,
consistency, and capacity across Council
services, as well as identifying savings for
2026/2027 and 2027/2028. 
£0.900 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy, with a total
of £1.900 million delivered since
2025/2026.
Digital
Transformation
FCR Maximising digital, and investment in digital
systems and process automation to streamline
activity and ensure resources are suitably
deployed to priority projects across three key
areas of focus: Business Systems and
Processes, Workforce Productivity and
Customer Engagement. 
Maximising use
of resources
Productivity savings 
£0.030m saving secured for 2026/2027
through a website contract refresh
making the website more user friendly
and accessible.  Further developments
as well as financial savings are expected
in future years. 
Customer
Engagement
FCR Improving how residents engage with Council
services, including channel shift, improved
access and customer experience. 
Improving and
adapting
services
Qualitative benefits / Likely cashable
savings 
£0.048 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy 
The programme is defined by two
workstreams covering: Continuous
Improvement (new solutions to automate
processes with improved workflow and
getting it right first time for the customer)
and Transformational Change (new
technologies such as investment in a
new Customer Experience Platform). 
173

Page 174

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
Planning and
Regulatory
Community
and
Enterprise
Resources
(CER)
The introduction of charges for a range of new 
discretionary advice and support services for
Planning and Building Standards. 
Enterprising
Council
Cashable Savings 
£0.272 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy. 
Pre-application advice services are
tailored to reduce workload and make
the formal planning process more
timeous. 
South
Lanarkshire
Leisure and
Culture (SLLC)
CER /
SLLC
Aligning governance and ensuring ongoing
discussions around financial sustainability to
build a sustainable approach to how the Council
and SLLC work together. 
Maximising use
of resources
Sustainability for SLLC / Savings for SLC 
Youth. Family
and
Community
Learning
(YFCL) 
Education
Resources
(EDR)
The identification of service improvements and
efficiencies while maintaining high standards of
delivery and ensuring equitable access and
outcomes for young people, adults, and families. 
Improving and
adapting
services
£0.465 million of savings included in the
2026/2027 Budget Strategy.  
Consideration was given to the entire
remit of services across South
Lanarkshire. It highlighted areas of the
service that could be better aligned to
locality-based models and areas of the
service that were operating with
particular success. The review also
identified a need to enhance the current
locality-based models across all YFCL
services, strengthening community-
based provision. 
174

Page 175

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
Other Resource Reviews
In-House and
Procured
Services
FCR / All
Resources
A robust examination of existing contracts and
areas of high spend in order to ensure that Best
Value is being delivered.  This review assessed
the Council’s statutory powers, current contract
terms, considerations of cost, and factors within
the Resource / Service itself such as capacity
and capability, to ensure that the Council
maximises its ability to deliver services in-house
where appropriate. 
Maximising use
of resources /
Spend to save
Cost avoidance 
A greater proportion of works being
brough in-house, facilitated by staff
recruitment. This has reduced the
reliance on external delivery and allows
greater control over programming, 
performance and workforce.   
The review also noted many areas of
good practice where in-house provision
is actively considered, as well as areas
of collaborative working with external
parties to deliver best value and mitigate
areas of high risk. 
Shared
Services
FCR The Council engages with SOLACE and the
Improvement Service across a number of
workstreams as part of the national
SOLACE/Improvement Service Transformation
Programme. Workstreams cover public sector
reform, opportunities for collective
transformation, and building the capacity to lead
and deliver the work. 
Improving and
adapting
services
Cost avoidance / Cashable Savings /
Income Generation as a result of shared
(national) procurement practices,
reduced duplication aided by the Duties
and Powers Portal and the development
of a sector-wide digital assets register. 
This work is ongoing. 
Third Sector
Partnership
FCR The development of The South Lanarkshire
Third Sector Partnership Agreement, which set
out better ways of working together, including a
commitment by the Council to include the local
third sector in strategic and service delivery
discussions.  This was co-produced with the
Enterprising
Council
Enhanced partnership working between
the Council and Third Sector and the
creation of fair, open and transparent
processes for accessing Council funding
and increased stability within existing
resources with £0.300 million permanent
175

Page 176

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
local third sector, alongside a Third Sector
Grants Policy that establishes clear and
transparent processes for payments from the
Council to the sector. 
funding included in the 2026/2027
Budget.
Fleet CER Progress has been made in returning the
Council fleet to pre-COVID levels. Collaboration
with the wider transformational review
programme is ongoing to identify any fleet
implications and savings as reviews are
progressed.  Work continues on a review of the
Fleet Strategy, which will include a review of key
strategic outcomes. 
Maximising use
of resources /
Spend to save
Collaboration with Resources continues
across the programme of reviews, with
the potential to internalise areas of
expenditure and increase alignment with
Council priorities.
Routes to
Work South
(RTWS)
CER RTWS operates as an Arms-Length External
Organisation, and, given the changes in
employability policy and in the funding
landscape over recent years, a review of the
current delivery mechanism was undertaken. 
Maximising Use
of Resources
Cost avoidance / Sustainability for RTWS 
This review resulted in a reduction in
duplication and costs, ensuring
appropriate financial control by the
Council while increasing the reach of
parental employability support to
communities across South Lanarkshire. 
Estate
Strategy
Housing
and
Technical
Resources
(HTR)
Review and rationalisation of the Council estate
to reduce / avoid cost, considering net zero
challenges, improve utilisation and support new
ways of working. 
The Council’s Estate Strategy supports future
public service delivery, encourage collaboration
with other public sector bodies, and guides
Maximising use
of resources
Cashable savings in future years/Cost
Avoidance 
The objective of the Strategy is to
prioritise a high-quality, energy-efficient
estate, focussing on maintaining the
buildings we retain and making them fit
for purpose.
176

Page 177

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
decisions about investment, rationalisation, co-
location, and asset disposal. 
Factoring HTR A full review of the Council’s Factoring Service
is ongoing.  This service provides a repairs and
maintenance service to owners of former
Council Houses, with a view to delivering a high-
quality effective service. 
Improving and
adapting
services
The Review will inform the future
direction of the Factoring Services, its
function and service delivery model.  The
outcome will be reported to Committee in
September.
Property
Services
HTR The review considered the organisational
structure and the span-of-control. 
Maximising use
of resources /
spend to save
Reduced reliance on subcontractors
through the expansion of in-house teams
for electrical testing, kitchen upgrades
and fencing works. Void performance
has also improved, reducing rent free
periods. 
Large-Scale Systems Developments
Housing,
Social Care
and Oracle
Fusion
FCR / HTR
/ Social
Work
Resources
(SWR)
Modernisation of core systems to improve
service delivery, data quality, integration and
staff productivity.
Maximising use
of resources
Productivity and service delivery benefits
are anticipated from all new systems, as
well as cashable savings from the
implementation of Oracle Fusion.   
Liquidlogic and One Housing are newly
implemented and any financial benefits
are not yet realised. 
South
Lanarkshire
Futures
SWR / HTR Led by South Lanarkshire Council, in
partnership with Barnardo’s and local services,
the project supports young people transitioning
from care to independent living. 
Improving and
adapting
services /
Recognising the
benefits of
prevention
By January 2025, five young people had
been supported into independent living,
reducing out-of-area placements and
homelessness presentations. The project
generated £0.230 million in savings for
2024/2025.  Further placements will
177

Page 178

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
allow the Council to achieve the full year
impact of £1.6 million in 2026/2027. 
The Project has been shortlisted for the
Chartered Institute of Housing Awards
2025 as a finalist for the Marion Gibb
Award for Equality in Housing. 
Analogue to
Digital
FCR / SWR Shared Cloud-Based Alarm Receiving Centre
(ARC) Solution this project ensured the
continued delivery of community alarms services
ahead of the UK-wide analogue switch off in
October 2025. 
Improving and
adapting
services
The project focuses on service
improvement with the cloud-based
system offering efficiencies through
flexible working and better data access.
A key outcome for the project is for the
use of digital solutions to assist in
preventing hospital admissions or the
need for long-term care for sheltered
housing tenants. 
Marmot – Pilot EDR / All
Resources
Pilot activity focused on prevention and reducing
inequality through embedding proportionate
universalism within service delivery. 
Recognising the
benefits of
prevention
Long‑term demand reduction
2026/2027 Investments
Children’s
Services –
Pods 
Social Work
Resources
(SWR)
The 2026/2027 budget includes a £0.500 million
investment in accommodation units which will
further support delivery of The Promise by
enabling young people to gain experience of
living independently prior to moving to their own
home. 
Improving and
adapting
services
Cashable savings to assist in the Budget
Recovery Plan for Children and Family
Services, as well providing transition
housing for young people and improving
their outcomes. 
178

Page 179

Programme Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Benefits Realisation (including
financial implications)
Culture
Strategy
CER Facilitation of a place based, culture strategy by
through funding to provide for local community
led activities and events sharing and celebrating 
heritage, local history, arts and culture. 
Improving and
adapting
services
Investment in communities and their
culture, recognising that each town and
village in South Lanarkshire has its own
identity.
Supporting
and
Developing
Local
Business
CER An allocation of £3.500 million for Supporting
and Developing Local Business. 
Improving and
adapting
services
An offering of higher value grants for
businesses to upgrade commercial
stock, invest to meet the demand for
commercial space and for the Council to
improve its own business centres, to
support the business community in South
Lanarkshire. 
Energy
Efficiency 
Investment of £1.000 million to expand the
Energy Efficiency Programme. 
Spend to Save Investment will improve energy efficiency
in Council facilities and allow a recurring
investment fund to deliver future projects
supporting the transition to Net Zero. 
Leisure and Culture Transformation Programme
Capital
Investment in
Buildings
South
Lanarkshire
Leisure and
Culture
(SLLC)
£13 million investment across the SLLC Estate
to improve the user experience and rejuvenate
the offer for customers.  
Improving and
adapting
services /
Maximising the
use of
resources
As well as a better user experience, the
improvements will assist SLLC in
developing a sustainable business
model. 
179

Page 180

Appendix 2
Transformation Programme Pipeline
Note: Programme summaries below are drafted for reporting purposes and can be refined as project scope and timelines are confirmed.
Programme Ongoing 
/ new
Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Indicative
Timeline
Financial
Implications
Procurement Ongoing  Finance &
Corporate
Resources
(FCR)
Review and strengthening of corporate
procurement arrangements to maximise
compliance, improve value for money and
identify savings opportunities, including
collaborative procurement. 
Ongoing
efficiencies and
spend‑to‑save
Ongoing Cashable
savings
Overtime Ongoing FCR / All
Resources
Review of overtime usage, controls and
workforce planning arrangements across
services to better manage demand and reduce
reliance on premium costs. 
Ongoing
efficiencies and
spend‑to‑save
Short to
medium
term
Cost
avoidance /
Cashable
Savings 
Charging Ongoing FCR / All
Resources
Review of fees and charges to ensure alignment
with policy, affordability and cost recovery
principles where appropriate. 
Enterprising
Council
Ongoing Income
generation
South
Lanarkshire
Leisure and
Culture (SLLC)
Ongoing Community
and
Enterprise
Resources
(CER) /
SLLC
Aligning governance, and ensuring ongoing
discussions around financial sustainability 
Maximising use
of resources
Medium
term
Sustainability
for SLLC  /
Savings for
SLC 
Digital
Transformation
Ongoing FCR Maximising digital , and investment in digital
systems and process automation to streamline
activity
Maximising use
of resources
Medium
to long
term
Productivity
savings
180

Page 181

Programme Ongoing 
/ new
Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Indicative
Timeline
Financial
Implications
Customer
Engagement
Ongoing FCR Improving how residents engage with Council
services, including channel shift, improved
access and customer experience.
Improving and
adapting
services
Short to
medium
term
Qualitative
benefits /
Likely
cashable
savings 
Estates
Strategy
Ongoing Housing
and
Technical
Resources
(HTR)
Review and rationalisation of the Council estate
to reduce  / avoid cost, considering net zero
challenges,  improve utilisation and support new
ways of working.
Maximising use
of resources
Medium
to long
term
Cashable
savings /
Cost
Avoidance 
Assets –
Commercial
Opportunities
New All
Resources
Identification of opportunities to generate
income or realise value from Council land
particularly around commercial  / industrial
space 
Enterprising
Council
Medium
term
Income
generation
ASN Transport
/ Fleet
New Education
Resources
(EDR) /
CER
Review of ASN transport and wider fleet
arrangements to improve efficiency,
sustainability and value for money.
Ongoing
efficiencies and
spend‑to‑save
Medium
term
Cost
Avoidance /
Cashable
savings 
Systems
Developments
– Housing and
Social Care
Ongoing HTR /
Social Work
Resources
(SWR)
Modernisation of core systems to improve
service delivery, data quality, integration and
staff productivity.
Maximising use
of resources
Short
Term 
Productivity
benefits
Marmot – Pilot New  Education
Resources
(EDR) / All
Resources
Pilot activity focused on prevention and reducing
inequality through embedding proportionate
universalism within service delivery.
Recognising the
benefits of
prevention
Medium  
to Long
term
Long‑term
demand
reduction
Children’s
Services –
Pods / Gap
Homes
New Social Work
Resources
(SWR)
Development of internal provision to reduce
reliance on external placements and improve
outcomes for children and young people.
Improving and
adapting
services
Medium
term
Cashable
savings
181

Page 182

Programme Ongoing 
/ new
Lead
Resource
Programme Summary Transformation
Theme
Indicative
Timeline
Financial
Implications
Children’s
Services – Day
Placements
(Outwith
Placements)
New SWR / EDR Reduction in the use of outwith placements
through service redesign and increased
in‑house capacity.
Improving and
adapting
services
Medium
term
Cost
avoidance /
Cashable
savings 
School Estate
/ Early Years
New Education
Resources
(EDR)
Review of school estate utilisation and early
years provision to ensure long‑term
sustainability and alignment with demand. 
Maximising use
of resources
Medium 
to Long
term
Efficiency
Joint
Collaboration /
Improvement
Service
Programme
Ongoing FCR / All
Resources
Participation in national and regional
collaboration and improvement activity to
support best practice and efficiency.
Ongoing
efficiencies and
spend‑to‑save
Ongoing Efficiency /
possible
cashable
savings  
Waste New Community
and
Enterprise
Resources
(CER)
Improvements to recycling performance,
preparation for future regulatory change and
exploration of income‑generation opportunities.
Enterprising
Council
Medium
to Long
term
Cashable
savings 
182

Page 183

Appendix 3
Benefits Tracker Template
A benefits tracker template will be used to record expected benefits (cashable,
productivity and qualitative) at the outset of each programme and to monitor progress and
realisation over time.
Summary Benefits Tracker 
Programme Benefits Cashable /
Qualitative
Status (RAG) 
Detailed Benefits Tracker 
Programme Name  
Programme Owner  
Expected Benefits  
Description of benefit 
Measure (original) This could be a KPI, or other
qualitative measure (from before the transformation) 
Measure (expected) Ambition / target.  
Expected Timeframe for Benefit  
How will progress be reported? 
Progress Check  
Date of assessment  
On Track (RAG)  
If not on track – what action are we
taking? 
183

Page 184

184

Page 185

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise
Resources)  
Subject: Update on Scotland’s Climate Change Plan 2026 to
2040 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide the Committee with an overview of the recently published Scottish
Government’s Climate Change Plan 2026 to 2040
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendations:-
[recs]
(1) that the overview of the contents of the Climate Change Plan be noted; and
(2) that the role and responsibilities for local authorities, as set out in the Climate
Change Plan, be noted (see Appendix 1).
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. In November 2024, the Scottish Parliament passed the Climate Change (Emissions
Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2024. The new legislation replaced Scotland's
previous system of annual and interim greenhouse gas emissions targets with a
framework of five-year carbon budgets which set limits on emissions over these
periods. 
3.2. The proposed Carbon Budgets for Scotland (as recommended by the Climate Change
Committee) are:- 
 57% lower than 1990 levels for the First Carbon Budget (2026 to 2030)
 69% lower than 1990 levels for the Second Carbon Budget (2031 to 2035)
 80% lower than 1990 levels for the Third Carbon Budget (2036 to 2040)
 94% lower than 1990 levels for the Fourth Carbon Budget (2041 to 2045) 
3.3. The Scottish Government published a draft  Climate Change Plan – 2026-2040 (CCP)
for consultation on 6 November 2025. South Lanarkshire Council submitted a
response to this consultation with contributions from elected members and key
services across the Council. The full response was reported to the Climate Change
and Sustainability Committee on 11 February 2026. 
19
185

Page 186

3.4. The above draft plan has now been superseded by the finalised Climate Change Plan:
2026–2040 (CCP) which was published on 24 March 2026. The CCP sets out the
policies and proposals the Scottish Government will take forward in order to meet its
emissions reduction targets (as set out in 3.2). It is a statutory plan required under the
Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 and covers a 15-year period aligned with the new
five-year carbon budgets. The plan aims to keep Scotland on a credible pathway to
net zero by 2045, while delivering wider economic, health and social benefits. 
4. Scotland’s Climate Change Plan 
4.1. Scotland’s Climate Change Plan 2026 to 2040, published by the Scottish Government
on 24 March 2026, contains over 150 policies and proposals to decarbonise Scotland’s
economy to align with net zero by 2045. The Plan outlines the emissions pathway for
seven key sectors, the key actions required and the economic opportunities and
benefits these actions will support. 
4.2. A summary of the key policy driver for each of the seven key sectors is provided
below:- 
4.2.1. Buildings (residential and public)
 a target for decarbonising heating systems by 2045
 heat in Buildings Programme
 financial support for energy efficiency
 heat Networks Development 
4.2.2. Transport: 
 Vehicle Emissions Trading Scheme and Zero Emissions Vehicle (ZEV) Mandate 
 policies to reduce car use, such as free bus travel, investment in public and active
transport, and local schemes
 consumer incentives to encourage electric vehicle (EV) uptake by households,
sole traders and micro businesses
 early investment in HGV infrastructure and vehicle replacement, to support the
private sector to transition to zero-emission HGVs 
4.2.3. Waste
 measures to reduce landfill emissions further
 ban on biodegradable municipal waste going to landfill
 Deposit Return Scheme for single-use drinks containers and reforms to extended
producer responsibility schemes (e.g. packaging and batteries)
 actions to modernise recycling, including a new co-designed statutory Code of
Practice for household waste and recycling services, and statutory local recycling
and reuse performance targets 
4.2.4. Energy Supply
 support the inclusion of energy from waste in the UK Emissions Trading Scheme
(ETS) 
4.2.5. Business and Industrial Process and Negative Emissions Technologies
 electrification of industrial processes
 Carbon Capture, Utilisation and Storage (CCUS) Deployment
 Hydrogen Action Plan and Sector Development
 Scottish Industrial Energy Transformation Fund (SIETF)  
186

Page 187

4.2.6. Agriculture
 delivery of the Agricultural Reform Route Map
 reduce emissions from agriculture non-road mobile machinery
 investigate technologies for alternative, improved or more efficient fertilisers 
4.2.7. Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF)
 increase in the annual woodland creation target every year until the end of the
decade, hitting 18,000 hectares per year in 2029/2030, and with an aim of
achieving 21% woodland cover in Scotland by 2032.
 targeted forestry grants to support landowners and by additional private finance
through the Woodland Carbon Code.
 increase peatland restoration by 10% each year to 2030 and maintain levels after
that, leading to the restoration of more than 400,000 hectares by 2040. 
4.3. The implementation of the CCP will be coordinated by the Scottish Government and
delivered through a collaborative approach.  Local authorities are highlighted as
primary delivery partners alongside businesses, communities and third sector
organisations. 
5. Local Authorities Role and Responsibilities 
5.1. The Climate Change Plan, Annex 2 (Sectoral Annexes)1 sets out clear delivery
expectations for local authorities. They are expected to play a key role in the planning,
coordination and direct delivery of the CCP across all sectors. A sector-by-sector
summary of responsibilities is provided in Appendix 1. 
5.2. Across all seven sectors, local authorities have responsibilities for implementation.
This includes developing programmes and investable projects, strengthening
partnerships and securing external funding and private investment. Delivery must also
incorporate effective community engagement and embed just transition principles,
such as tackling fuel poverty and supporting local employment (See Section 7). South
Lanarkshire Council is required to play a leading delivery role in the buildings, waste,
and land use sectors, while also contributing significantly to the transport and energy
sectors and supporting delivery across business, industry, and agriculture. Effective
implementation will depend on strong cross-service coordination, sustained
investment and partnership working. 
5.3. In practice, the Council is already contributing to the delivery of the CCP through a
wide range of actions aligned to national priorities. These include decarbonising
buildings through energy efficiency and low-carbon heating upgrades, expanding
active travel and electric vehicle infrastructure, improving recycling rates and reducing
waste, enhancing biodiversity and green spaces, supporting renewable energy and
engaging communities in climate action. 
5.4. The Sustainable Development and Climate Change Strategy 2022 to 2027 (SDCCS)
is the Council’s main strategic document for addressing climate change at a local level.
Although the strategy predates the CCP, it broadly aligns with the national policy
priorities of climate mitigation, climate adaptation and just transition structured around
the interlinking themes of People, Place and Planet. The forthcoming development of
a new SDCCS provides a key opportunity to build on these themes. 
1 Scotland's Climate Change Plan: Annex 2 - Sectoral Annexes
187

Page 188

6. The Benefits of Climate Action
6.1. The CCP highlights the benefits of climate action and notes that a failure to take the
action now would mean Scotland missing out on the enormous opportunities that net
zero offers. Action to reduce emissions offers many different types of benefits under
four broad categories:- 
 Financial benefits:  Direct financial benefits and cost savings as a result of the
policies in the plan being implemented. Delivery of the policies in the Plan is
estimated to generate £42.3 billion2 in direct cost savings and financial benefits
for Scotland between 2026 and 2040 (in 2025 prices)
 Economic opportunities:  Economic benefits as a result of the transition to net
zero, such as the growth in green jobs or opportunities for businesses
 Health impacts:  Improved health outcomes such as warmer, more energy
efficient homes leading to reduced cold-related illnesses and hospital admissions
 Co-benefits:  Wider benefits to Scottish society as a result of decarbonisation 
6.2. Information on the benefits of decarbonising has also been strengthened through the
Edinburgh Climate Change Institute UK Co-Benefits model to quantify the wider
benefits associated with delivery of the plan. Beyond direct savings and health
impacts, climate action is estimated to deliver an additional £8.0 billion in wider socio-
economic benefits between 2026 and 2040. These co-benefits include: 
 improved quality of life
 reduced noise pollution
 safer, more liveable communities
 lower public service costs 
7. Just Transition Principles 
7.1. The Climate Change Plan 2026 to 2040 is the first plan underpinned by Just Transition
principles.  It sets out the wider impacts of policies across different sectors and actions
to ensure a just transition for people and communities, workers and employers. The
Plan commits to:- 
 protecting workers and communities affected by climate change
 avoiding deindustrialisation
 supporting regions facing concentrated impacts
 addressing rural and island impacts 
7.2. The CCP will also include just transition indicators as part of its monitoring and
evaluation framework using social, environment and economic indicators to track
progress. The Council will work to align future work with Just Transition principles,
including within the development of the next Sustainable Development and Climate
Change Strategy. The Council has been working with a PhD student researching Just
Transition within South Lanarkshire and the outputs from this work will be critical in
shaping the Council’s approach going forward. The research specifically looks at
transport and housing, two key themes within the CCP.   
2 Scotland's Climate Change Plan: 2026-2040, page 12
188

Page 189

8. Adaptation: Delivering a Climate Resilient Future
8.1. The CCP sets out Scotland’s overall framework for meeting statutory carbon budgets
and responding to climate change. Within this framework the Scottish National
Adaptation Plan (2024-2029) (SNAP3) is the primary delivery mechanism for climate
adaptation to ensure that communities, services, infrastructure and the natural
environment become more climate resilient. 
8.2. SNAP3 is structured around five long-term outcomes:-
 connecting our natural environment to increase resilience
 preparing our communities to be more resilient to climate impacts
 supporting our economy, businesses and industry to be responsive to both the
risks and opportunities of a changing climate
 delivering climate resilient public services and infrastructure
 ensuring Scotland is taking action at the international level on climate adaptation 
8.3. Both the CCP and SNAP3 emphasise Just Transition principles, social justice and
inclusion and protecting vulnerable communities from disproportionate climate
impacts. The Scottish Government recognises these dual benefits across climate
mitigation and adaptation, and this is reflected in the design and monitoring of the
SNAP3 and the CCP.  Local Authorities are expected to align local plans, infrastructure
investment and service delivery with both adaptation and emissions reduction
objectives under the CCP/SNAP3 framework. 
8.4. As a Council, we are aligning work with SNAP3 expectations through practical, locally
focused adaptation action embedded across our services. A strategic climate change
risk and opportunities assessment is being undertaken to help understand
organisational impacts of climate change now and in the future. In doing so, the
Council will be able to fulfil statutory duties and support evidence-based decision
making. Through our biodiversity and green space work, we are expanding and
enhancing green and blue infrastructure such as sustainable drainage, woodland
creation and habitat restoration to manage surface water, offer natural cooling and
strengthen biodiversity while delivering carbon and health co-benefits. Building retrofit
actions embedded in the Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategy are helping us
work towards a more resilient Council estate while making properties more
comfortable to reside in and cheaper to run. Meanwhile, emergency and resilience
planning is helping to improve our preparedness for storms and floods. We are also
working with regional partners and neighbouring councils on cross-boundary
resilience priorities, aligning investment and delivery with national objectives.
Together, these actions help the Council contribute to SNAP3’s long-term outcomes
for a climate-resilient Scotland. 
9. Support for Public Bodies
9.1. As noted throughout the CCP and in Section 5, public sector action will be vital in
allowing Scotland to meet the aims of the plan and to achieve net zero. The plan also
recognises the significant challenges to delivery and notes the following support
networks available to support public bodies: 
 the Climate Delivery Framework a group co-chaired by the Scottish Government
and COSLA, which supports the joint shaping of key climate change polices and
implementation at the national, regional and local level  
189

Page 190

 the Sustainable Scotland Network which supports the public sector to drive action
on climate change, through building and showcasing leadership on climate
change; peer-to-peer knowledge exchange and support; capacity building; and
development of case studies, tools and resources
 Statutory guidance for public bodies to support them in putting the climate change
duties into practice, including a climate change plan template for local authorities.
 Sustainable Procurement which provide detailed guidance to public bodies on
including social and environmental requirements in contracts
 The Scottish Climate Intelligence Service funded jointly by the Scottish
Government and all 32 local authorities, which helps local authorities use data to
plan, monitor and deliver climate action
 Adaptation Scotland which is funded by the Scottish Government to provide
capacity-building support for local authorities and the public, private and third
sectors to be more resilient to the impacts of our changing climate 
10. Next Steps for South Lanarkshire Council
10.1. The CCP emphasises that the scale of delivery must accelerate in the coming years
for Scotland to achieve its carbon budgets and ultimately meet net zero in a fair and
equitable way. 
10.2. Delivery of these commitments will require coordinated action across all Council
Resources, with a requirement for climate consideration to be embedded in capital
investment decisions and all Resource and Service planning. 
10.3. A new Sustainable Development and Climate Change Strategy covering the period
2028 to 2035 is under development. This strategy will align with the priorities and
requirements of the CCP. 
11. Employee Implications
11.1. All Resources will be required to contribute to the implementation of Scotland’s
Climate Change Plan to ensure that actions and targets are met. The Council’s Policy
and Performance Team will monitor and report on the Council’s progress through
Public Sector Climate Change Duties Reporting. 
12. Financial Implications
12.1. Scotland’s Climate Change Plan is the first to set out the costs of the policies within it.
The assessment shows that the net cost arising from delivering the policies in the plan
is estimated at £2.1 billion. These figures have been produced by deducting the
estimated cost savings and financial benefits from the estimated costs.3 
12.2. The level of investment needed to implement the policies within the CCP is
significantly beyond the Council’s budget and will require additional external
investment and grant funding. The CCP highlights the need for significant upfront
investment with the longer-term savings and wider economic and health benefits. 
13. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
13.1. The climate change, sustainability and environmental implications of the Climate
Change Plan will be significant. The policies outlined in the plan provide a framework
for Scotland and South Lanarkshire Council to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and
adapt to climate change.   
3 Scotland's Climate Change Plan: 2026-2040, page 19
190

Page 191

14. Risk and Other Implications
14.1. One of the top risks for the Council is: ‘Inability to take the necessary action due to
funding constraints, to combat climate change, and work toward achieving net zero
carbon emissions by 2045, thereby contributing to negative and irreversible
environmental, social and economic impacts on the council and its residents’. Without
a fully funded plan in place to support the required action within the Climate Change
Plan, this will continue to be one of the Council's top risks. 
15. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
15.1. At this stage, this report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or
recommend a change to an existing policy; therefore, no impact assessment is
required. 
15.2. No consultation was required in terms of the contents of this report. 
Kevin Carr
Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 
1 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Focused on people and their needs
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Fair, open and sustainable
 We will work to put people first and reduce inequality
 We will work towards a sustainable future in sustainable places
 We will work to recover, progress and improve
 Our children and young people thrive
 Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live
 Thriving business, fair jobs and vibrant town centres
 Caring, connected, sustainable communities
 People live the healthiest lives possible
 Inspiring learners, transforming learning, strengthening partnerships 
Previous References
 Climate Change and Sustainability Committee report, 11 February 2026, Scottish
Government Consultation on the Climate Change Plan 2026 - 2040 
List of Background Papers
 Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009
 Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2024
 Climate change duties: statutory guidance for public bodies 
 Scotland's Climate Change Plan: 2026–2040
 Sustainable Development and Climate Change Strategy 2022 -2027 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Kathryn McCafferty, Carbon Management Officer
E-mail: kathryn.mccafferty@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
191

Page 192

Appendix 1: 
Local Authority Role and Responsibilities 
Buildings (residential and public):
 Implement and monitor the Local Heat and Energy Efficiency Strategies (LHEES)
delivery plans and zones
 Improve energy efficiency of homes and buildings, including insulation and fabric
upgrades 
 Upgrade council housing stock to meet net zero and fuel poverty commitments 
 Identify, develop and support heat network opportunities, 
 Use schemes like Area Based Schemes to deliver place-based retrofit
 Support large-scale deployment of clean heat technologies, including heat pumps
and heat networks 
 Work with communities and advice services to drive uptake 
Transport: 
 Expand active travel infrastructure, including walking, wheeling, and cycling
networks 
 Deliver bus priority measures to improve public transport reliability 
 Support the rollout of electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure 
 Lead programmes to support behaviour change and modal shift 
 Align transport interventions with spatial planning and town centre regeneration 
Waste
 Improve recycling performance and reduce contamination
 Deliver local circular economy initiatives, including reuse and repair schemes
 Maintain and upgrade waste collection and treatment services
 Support delivery of waste infrastructure aligned with national policy
 Lead public engagement campaigns to promote waste reduction and recycling 
Energy Supply
 Enable renewable energy development through planning and land use decisions
 Support community and locally owned energy projects
 Facilitate development of local energy systems, including heat and electricity
networks
 Support delivery of energy infrastructure, including grid and storage capacity
 Work with partners to attract investment in local energy projects
 Ensure alignment of energy initiatives with place-based strategies such as LHEES 
Business and Industrial 
 Engage with local businesses to support energy efficiency improvements and
decarbonisation
 Promote access to advice and funding support programmes
 Support the development of low-carbon supply chains and green jobs
 Provide planning support for low-carbon commercial and industrial development
 Facilitate shared infrastructure solutions, including low-carbon heat networks
192

Page 193

 Align economic development, employability, and skills programmes with net zero
priorities 
Agriculture
 Work with farmers and land managers to promote low-carbon and sustainable
farming practices
 Support awareness and uptake of national agricultural support schemes
 Facilitate land-based emissions reduction and resilience projects
 Integrate agricultural considerations into regional land-use planning
 Support partnerships delivering nature-based solutions involving the agricultural
sector 
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF)
 Deliver tree planting and woodland creation projects
 Support and implement peatland restoration activities where appropriate
 Manage council land to increase carbon sequestration and biodiversity outcomes
 Deliver green and blue infrastructure, particularly within towns and communities
 Integrate nature-based solutions within planning and development frameworks
 Coordinate landscape-scale environmental projects with key partners 
193

Page 194

194

Page 195

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026 
Report by: Chief Executive  
Subject: Good Food Nation Plan 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1.  The purpose of the report is to:- 
 update Committee on the upcoming duties for all local authorities on the
development of Good Food Nation (GFN) plans and South Lanarkshire
Council’s current progress on our local plan 
2. Recommendations
2.1.  The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- 
(1) that the plans to meet the requirements for the Council to prepare South
Lanarkshire’s Good Food Nation Plan be noted.
3. Background
3.1. The Good Food Nation (Scotland) Act 2022 was passed in June 2022. It imposes a
legislative duty on Scottish Ministers, local authorities and territorial health boards to
prepare and publish GFN plans. 
3.2. The legislation asks Ministers and public bodies to “have regard” in their plans to
how food-related issues affect outcomes across a wide range of sectors and areas,
including: 
 Health and physical & mental wellbeing 
 Social and economic wellbeing
 Environmental sustainability, climate change, and biodiversity
 Economic development
 Animal welfare
 Education
 Child poverty
3.3. The Act explicitly requires decision makers to have regard to the principle that
adequate food is a human right, referencing Article 11 of the International Covenant
on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 
3.4. In preparing plans, authorities must consider the role of all parts of the food system
and supply chain, the importance of a sustainable food system in tackling climate
change and biodiversity loss, and the role of high-quality, nutritious, culturally
appropriate food in improving wellbeing. 
20
195

Page 196

3.5. The Act does not just create a set of food strategies for Scotland; it puts food into
policy and law on an equal footing to other Scottish Government policy priorities and
asks that we consider the interrelationships and dependencies across policy. It also
provides for clear accountability, monitoring, and reporting on plans for food.
3.6. The Act establishes a statutory Scottish Food Commission which became
operational in January 2026.  The Commission’s role includes: 
 Scrutinising Good Food Nation Plans
 Providing advice and recommendations
 Supporting transparency and evidence-based policymaking 
4  The National Good Food Nation Plan 
4.1. The national Good Food Nation Plan was put before Scottish Parliament and
approved in December 2025. 
4.2. The national Good Food Nation Plan sets out six over-arching Outcomes for a Good
Food Nation; the range of targets and indicators that will be used to gauge progress
towards achieving them; and details of a wide range of food-related policies and
initiatives from across the Scottish Government: 
1. A Better Food Environment
2. A More Sustainable Food System
3. Thriving Local and Regional Food Economies
4. High-Quality Scottish Food Production
5. A Food System That Promotes Health and Wellbeing
6. Connection, Participation and Food Culture
4.3. The Good Food Nation Plan exists to provide an overarching framework for a clear,
consistent, and coherent future Scottish food policy that will be taken forward at both
the national and local levels. Relevant authorities do not need to mirror the national
plans outcomes but must “have regard” for them. 
5  Relevant Authority Plans
5.1. Section 10 of the Act, which is not yet in force, requires each “relevant authority” to
publish a Good Food Nation plan. Local authorities and health boards are included in
the definition of “relevant authority”. 
5.2. Local Authorities were provided with 12 months written notice in March 2026 that it is
intended that Section 10 of the Act will come into force in April 2027. However, this
notice highlighted that this may take place later than this date. 
5.3. Once Section 10 is in force, relevant authorities will be legally required to publish a
Good Food Nation plan within a period of 12 months. 
5.4. Local Good Food Nation plans are intended to bring together, in a comprehensive
fashion, the actions that local organisations are taking or will take to address a wide
range of food-related issues. 
5.5. The Act requires these plans to “have regard” to the scope for food-related issues to
affect outcomes or the national plan and the legislation, but relevant authorities are
free to set their own local outcomes reflecting the needs of the local food system. 
196

Page 197

5.6. The production of a local authority’s Good Food Nation plan will require input and
activity from different council services, including procurement, education, social care,
economic development, environmental protection, cultural and leisure services and
waste management. There will also be ongoing outputs from the plan for all of its
contributors. 
5.7. While the statutory duties rests with the Council, the local plan will be co-developed
across our local food system and with Community Planning partners and residents. 
5.8. NHS Lanarkshire is also a “relevant authority” and will be required to produce its own
plan. Council officers have been meeting with both NHS Lanarkshire and North
Lanarkshire Council to ensure some regional consistency and support across our
plans. 
5.9.  The Living Lab is a commissioned resource for relevant authorities which is providing
resources and policy support across Scotland, including useful monthly, topical
online drop-in sessions with all relevant authorities across Scotland. 
6. Key Requirements in the Development of a Local Plan
6.1. Written records and statements are required to demonstrate how we have met our
duties under the legislation in the development of our plan.  It is recommended that
we document this evidence from the beginning to support our statement.  This
evidence will be subject to scrutiny by the Food Commission. 
6.2. When preparing a GFN plan, the relevant authority must publish and consult on a
draft of the plan and have regard to any responses received. When consulting, the
relevant authority must have regard to: 
 the importance of communicating in an inclusive way
 the importance of communicating in a way that is effective in engaging children
and young people 
6.3. There are concerns about consultation fatigue with both the Council and NHS
Lanarkshire having the same duties to undertake consultation on similar plans, in the
same timescales. We will work together to mitigate this. 
6.4. Joint and regional plans are possible but each relevant authority participating in them
must be able to demonstrate how they individually meet their duties in the production
and reporting of the plan. Legal advice is recommended for all partners considering a
joint plan as duties apply individually to each relevant authority that participates in a
joint plan. 
6.5. We must document how we have had ‘due regard’ to the national plan and produce a
statement to this effect. 
6.6. Authorities are required to report progress against their plans’ outcomes every two
years and undertake a full review of the plan every five years. All plans are required
to have outcomes, indicators, measures and list related policies as part of the duties. 
6.7. Funding to support the development of plans is being discussed between COSLA
and the Scottish Government and is expected to commence once Section 10
legislation comes into force. NHS Boards have been advised they will not receive
any additional funding to develop their plans. 
197

Page 198

6.8.  A new statutory instrument is also be introduced under the legislation requiring all
relevant public bodies to “have regard” to our own local GFN plan when carrying out
“specific functions” in either policy or actions across other policy areas.  Further
information and a list of the specified functions are not yet published as there was
still significant debate around them at the time of publishing the national plan. 
6.9. When the list of specified functions is published, it may require us to review the
functions specified on the list as part of our plan development and on an ongoing
basis thereafter. This would include mapping other related policies and considering
and noting any interdependencies with our Good Food Nation plan at review points.   
7. Current and Next Steps
7.1.  The Community Engagement Team Manager and Tackling Poverty and Inequalities
Officer are the Good Food Nation Lead Officers for South Lanarkshire Council. They
will work with colleagues internally and externally through the Community Planning
Partnership to develop and draft our local plan. 
7.2. In 2025/2026, a grant was offered to fund the establishment and start-up costs of an
organised community food network for South Lanarkshire. The Community Food
Network South Lanarkshire is coordinated by a partnership of five local third sector
organisations: Grow73, Clydesdale Community Initiatives, Healthy and Active East
Kilbride, Larkhall Community Growers and VASLan. The network will be self-
sustaining through the third sector locality networks coordinated by VASLan.   
7.3. The Community Food Network undertook engagement on local food systems across
third sector food related organisations as an output of the funding and a report is
forthcoming to inform the development of the Plan. 
7.4. The Council’s lead officers will work across South Lanarkshire Council to form an
internal working group of officers to begin to discuss the duties and requirements of
the Council in relation to the plan and the various departments that will need to take
actions in their respective areas to develop it. This group will have an initial meeting
in June 2026. 
7.5. Relevant officers in the working group will identify and drive forward their theme for
the development of the plan with the Community Engagement Team acting as an
overall facilitator to produce the plan and conduct the public consultation
requirements with stakeholders and partners. 
7.6 Updates will be provided to elected members as appropriate, with the proposed local
Good Food plan presented to the relevant committee in line with the timescales of
the legislation. 
8.  Employee Implications
8.1.  Scottish Government funding levels remain unknown at this stage. Currently, existing
Council officers will carry out initial development and scoping of approaches to
develop the plan and identify expected resourcing needs to undertake the work,
including any requirement for a temporary officer role to support the work. 
9.  Financial Implications
9.1.  Further to the enactment of Section 10, it is anticipated that funding will be made
available to relevant authorities to develop the plan. 
198

Page 199

9.2. The Community Food Network is likely to require support towards ongoing costs and
further engagement during the development of the local plan, given that the previous
Shared Prosperity Funding has come to an end. 
10. Risk and Other Implications
10.1. There is a risk that elements of the South Lanarkshire Food system are not within
the scope of influence of Local Government, which could impact on achieving the
outcomes set out in the local Good Food Plan for South Lanarkshire. This risk would
be minimised by ensuing cross sector partnership involvement in the development of
South Lanarkshire’s Good Food Plan. 
10.2. There are possible future implications in terms of ‘due regard’ to ‘specified duties’
which have still to be legislated or described. 
11. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
11.1. A strategic environmental assessment will need to be carried out by the working
group prior to public consultation and presentation of a draft plan. 
11.2.  Sustainability and climate change should be a key element of a Good Food Nation
plan. 
12.  Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
12.1.  The Good Food Nation plan will require an Integrated Impact Assessment which will
be completed prior to public consultation and updated thereafter. 
12.2.  All necessary and appropriate consultations will be undertaken within the council,
with partner organisations and community groups. 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
4 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 We will work to put people first and reduce inequality
 We will work to progress and improve
 We will work towards a sustainable future in sustainable places
 Caring, connected, sustainable communities
 Focused on people and their needs 
Previous References
None 
List of Background Papers
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2022/5/contents 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact 
Jennifer Kerr, Community Engagement Manager, Community Engagement Team
Email: Jennifer.Kerr1@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
Mobile: 07880 174955 
199

Page 200

200

Page 201

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Executive Committee
Date of Meeting: 24 June 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)  
Subject: Membership of Committees, Forums and Trusts -
Update 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide an update on the membership of committees, forums and trusts following
on from the decisions taken at the previous Council meeting
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the updated committee and forum memberships, as detailed in the
appendix to the report, be noted; and
(2) that it be noted that Councillor Razzaq, as Chair of Finance and Corporate
Resources Committee, will be appointed as Trustee to both The South
Lanarkshire Educational Trust and The South Lanarkshire Charitable Trust. 
3. Background
3.1. At the Council meeting held on 27 May 2026, authority was delegated to the Chief
Executive to update memberships as a consequence of Councillor Devlin being
appointed as Leader of the Council and Councillor Razzaq being appointed as Chair
of Finance and Corporate Resources Committee. 
3.2. A copy of the updated membership of committees and forums is attached as an
appendix to the report. 
3.3. As agreed at the Executive Committee on 15 August 2018, the Chair of the Finance
and Corporate Resources Committee is a member of both The South Lanarkshire
Educational Trust and The South Lanarkshire Charitable Trust.  As the newly
appointed Chair, Councillor Razzaq will become a member of both Trusts. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. There are no employee implications in terms of this report. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. There are no financial implications in terms of this report. 
21
201

Page 202

6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no climate change, sustainability or environmental implications in terms of
this report. 
7. Risk and Other Implications
7.1. There are no implications in terms of risk. 
8. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
8.1. There was no requirement to carry out an integrated impact assessment or formal
consultation process. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
4 June 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 South Lanarkshire Council of 27 May 2026
 Executive Committee of 15 August 2018 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:-
Susan Somerville, Administration Manager
Tel:  07557 323097
E-mail: susan.somerville@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
202

Page 203

South Lanarkshire Council 2022 to 2027     Appendix 1
Membership of Resource Committees and Forums 
Resource Committees and associated Forums 
Community and Enterprise Resources Committee (26)
John Anderson, Ralph Barker, Walter Brogan, Robert Brown (Chair), Andy Carmichael, Gerry
Convery, Andrea Cowan, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin (Depute) (ex officio), Colin Dewar, Gladys
Ferguson-Miller, Ross Gowland, Lynsey Hamilton, Graeme Horne, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Susan
Kerr, Martin Lennon, Richard Lockhart, Hugh MacDonald, Ian McAllan, Kenny McCreary, Davie
McLachlan, Carol Nugent, Kirsten Robb, Helen Toner, David Watson 
Substitutes
Alex Allison, Ross Clark, Margaret Cooper, Allan Falconer, Alistair Fulton, Gavin Keatt, Catherine
McClymont, Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever, Richard Nelson, Graham Scott, David Shearer 
Roads Safety Forum (10)
John Anderson, Ralph Barker, Margaret Cowie (Depute), Colin Dewar, Cal Johnston-Dempsey,
Susan Kerr, Kenny McCreary, Davie McLachlan (Chair), Julia Marrs, Norman Rae 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Janine Calikes, Richard Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Helen Toner 
Education Resources Committee (26 + External representatives) 
Alex Allison, John Anderson, Robert Brown, Ross Clark, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin (ex-officio),
Allan Falconer, Grant Ferguson, Elise Frame, Alistair Fulton, Geri Gray, Lynsey Hamilton (Chair), Cal
Johnston-Dempsey, Gavin Keatt (Depute), Susan Kerr, Ross Lambie, Richard Lockhart, Eileen
Logan, Katy Loudon, Ian McAllan, Julia Marrs, Mo Razzaq, Graham Scott, Bert Thomson, Margaret
B Walker, David Watson 
Substitutes
Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Mary Donnelly, Monique Equi, Graeme Horne, Martin Hose, Hugh
Macdonald, Kenny McCreary, Carol Nugent, Norman Rae, Kirsty Williams, Vacancy (Labour Group x
2) 
External Members
Religious:   Angela Milton, Reverend Jillian Storrie
Teacher:   Jennifer Gaffney, Joan Lennon
Parent Council/Carer: Naomi Baxter, Christine Hall 
Education Appeals Committee 
15 members serving or acting as a substitute on Education Resources Committee (excluding
Chair and Depute Chair)
Margaret Cowie, Mary Donnelly, Grant Ferguson, Elise Frame, Alistair Fulton, Susan Kerr, Ross
Lambie, Richard Lockhart, Ian McAllan, Julia Marrs, Mo Razzaq, Graham Scott, Bert Thomson,
Margaret B Walker, Kirsty Williams 
15 members not serving on Education Resources Committee
Ralph Barker, Mathew Buchanan, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers, Andrea Cowan, Ross
Gowland, Mark Horsham, Catherine McClymont, Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever, Richard Nelson,
John Ross, David Shearer, Helen Toner, Vacancy (Conservative Group)  
21
203

Page 204

Finance and Corporate Resources Committee (26)
Alex Allison, Walter Brogan (Depute), Mathew Buchanan, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers,
Margaret Cooper, Andrea Cowan, Maureen Devlin (ex officio), Mary Donnelly, Grant Ferguson,
Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Celine Handibode (Depute), Graeme Horne, Martin Hose, Gavin Keatt, Ross
Lambie, Katy Loudon, Hugh Macdonald, Catherine McClymont, Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever,
Mo Razzaq (Chair), John Ross, Graham Scott, Kirsty Williams, (Vacancy – to be filled after the by-
election) 
Substitutes
Archie Buchanan, Poppy Corbett, Colin Dewar, Ross Gowland, Susan Kerr, Martin Lennon, Richard
Lockhart, Richard Nelson, Carol Nugent, Norman Rae, Helen Toner, David Watson, Vacancy (Labour
Group) 
Employee, Equalities, Diversity and Inclusion Forum (11)
Walter Brogan, Janine Calikes, Ross Clark, Margaret Cowie (Depute), Grant Ferguson, Ross Lambie,
Catherine McClymont, Mark McGeever, Mo Razzaq (Chair), Kirsten Robb, Vacancy (Conservative
Group) 
Substitutes
Mathew Buchanan, Poppy Corbett, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Gavin Keatt, Katy Loudon, Norman Rae 
Joint Consultative Forum (10)
Robert Brown, Mathew Buchanan, Gerry Convery, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Geri Gray, Graeme
Horne, Richard Lockhart, Hugh Macdonald, Catherine McClymont, Mo Razzaq (Chair) 
Substitutes
Andrea Cowan, Maureen Devlin, Martin Lennon, Ian McAllan, Mark McGeever 
Appeals Panel and Grievance and Disputes Panel
3 members in total to serve on the Panel, comprising the Chair or one of the Depute Chairs of the
Finance and Corporate Resources Committee, a member of the Administration, who is not the Chair
or Depute Chair(s) of the relevant Resource/Service Committee, and a member of the Opposition
Groups to be drawn from the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee and the following 15
members not serving on the Finance and Corporate Resources Committee 
John Anderson, Ralph Barker, Robert Brown, Ross Clark, Gerry Convery, Margaret Cowie, Monique
Equi, Elise Frame, Geri Gray, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Kenny McCreary, David Shearer, Bert
Thomson, Margaret B Walker, Vacancy (Conservative Group) 
Housing and Technical Resources Committee (26)
Walter Brogan, Archie Buchanan, Mathew Buchanan, Janine Calikes, Gerry Convery, Margaret
Cooper, Andrea Cowan, Margaret Cowie (Depute), Maureen Devlin (ex officio), Colin Dewar, Allan
Falconer, Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Alistair Fulton, Ross Gowland, Geri Gray, Susan
Kerr, Richard Lockhart, Martin Lennon, Julia Marrs, Kenny McCreary, Davie McLachlan (Chair),
Norman Rae, Kirsten Robb, David Shearer, Kirsty Williams 
Substitutes
Robert Brown, Mary Donnelly, Monique Equi, Elise Frame, Martin Hose, Cal Johnston-Dempsey,
Gavin Keatt, Eileen Logan, Richard Nelson, Helen Toner, Margaret B Walker, David Watson 
204

Page 205

Social Work Resources Committee (26)
Alex Allison, John Anderson, Walter Brogan, Archie Buchanan, Mathew Buchanan, Janine Calikes,
Maureen Devlin (ex officio), Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly, Allan Falconer, Elise Frame, Celine
Handibode, Graeme Horne, Mark Horsham, Martin Hose, Gavin Keatt, Eileen Logan, Hugh
Macdonald, Catherine McClymont, Mark McGeever, Carol Nugent, John Ross, Graham Scott,
Margaret B Walker (Chair), David Watson, Kirsty Williams (Depute) 
Substitutes
John Bradley, Robert Brown, Maureen Chalmers, Margaret Cooper, Margaret Cowie, Geri Gray,
Susan Kerr, Richard Lockhart, Elaine McDougall, Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson, Bert Thomson 
Area Committees 
Cambuslang and Rutherglen Area Committee (12) 
John Bradley (Depute), Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Janine Calikes, Andrea Cowan, Margaret
Cowie, Alistair Fulton, Martin Lennon, Katy Loudon, Carol Nugent (Chair), Norman Rae, Margaret B
Walker 
Clydesdale Area Committee (13)
Alex Allison, Ralph Barker, Poppy Corbett, Ross Gowland (Depute), Lynsey Hamilton, Mark Horsham,
Ross Lambie, Richard Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Ian McAllan, Catherine McClymont (Chair), Julia
Marrs, David Shearer 
East Kilbride Area Committee (18)
John Anderson, Archie Buchanan (Chair), Mathew Buchanan, Gerry Convery, Margaret Cooper,
Monique Equi, Joe Fagan, Grant Ferguson, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Geri Gray (Depute),
Susan Kerr, Hugh Macdonald, Elaine McDougall, Kirsten Robb, Graham Scott, David Watson, Kirsty
Williams 
Hamilton Area Committee (21)
Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Maureen Devlin, Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly,
Allan Falconer (Chair), Celine Handibode, Graeme Horne, Martin Hose, Cal Johnston-Dempsey,
Gavin Keatt, Kenny McCreary, , Mark McGeever, Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson, Mo Razzaq
(Depute), John Ross, Bert Thomson, Helen Toner, Vacancy 
205

Page 206

Other Committees and associated Forums 
Climate Change and Sustainability Committee (28)
Alex Allison, John Anderson, Ralph Barker, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Margaret Cooper,
Maureen Devlin (ex-officio), Colin Dewar, Monique Equi, Ross Gowland, Lynsey Hamilton, Gavin
Keatt, Ross Lambie, Richard Lockhart, Katy Loudon, Julia Marrs, Elaine McDougall, Carol Nugent,
Norman Rae (Chair), Mo Razzaq, Kirsten Robb (Depute), John Ross, Graham Scott, Bert Thomson,
Helen Toner, Margaret B Walker, Kirsty Williams, (Vacancy - to be filled following by-election) 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Andy Carmichael, Gerry Convery, Poppy Corbett, Andrea Cowan,
Allan Falconer, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Geri Gray, Martin Hose, Richard Nelson, David
Watson 
Conference Allocation Committee (6)
Ross Clark, Gerry Convery (Chair), Gavin Keatt (Depute), Richard Nelson, Kirsten Robb, David
Shearer 
Executive Committee (29)
Alex Allison, John Anderson, Robert Brown, Andy Carmichael, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Gerry
Convery (Depute), Margaret Cooper, Andrea Cowan, Maureen Devlin (Chair) (ex officio), Gladys
Ferguson-Miller, Elise Frame, Lynsey Hamilton, Gavin Keatt, Susan Kerr, Ross Lambie, Eileen
Logan, Katy Loudon, Ian McAllan, Catherine McClymont, Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson, Norman
Rae, Mo Razzaq, Kirsten Robb, John Ross, David Shearer, Margaret B Walker, (Vacancy – to be
filled following by-election) 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Poppy Corbett, Margaret Cowie, Celine Handibode, Graeme Horne, Martin Hose, Cal
Johnston-Dempsey, Hugh Macdonald, Kenny McCreary, Elaine McDougall, Mark McGeever, Graham
Scott, David Watson 
Financial Resources Scrutiny Forum (10)
Mathew Buchanan, Colin Dewar, Monique Equi, Allan Falconer, Ross Gowland, Grant Ferguson
(Chair), Richard Lockhart, Julia Marrs (Depute), Carol Nugent, Vacancy (Lib Dem/Green/Ind Group) 
Substitutes
Archie Buchanan, Elise Frame, Vacancy (Labour Group x 2) 
Performance and Review Scrutiny Forum (10)
John Anderson, Maureen Chalmers, Gerry Convery (Depute), Maureen Devlin (Chair), Richard
Lockhart, Katy Loudon, Davie McLachlan, Kirsten Robb, John Ross, Margaret B Walker 
Substitutes
Andrea Cowan, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Martin Hose, Gavin Keatt, Eileen Logan 
Standards and Procedures Advisory Forum (11)
Alex Allison, Maureen Chalmers, Gerry Convery, Margaret Cooper, Maureen Devlin (Chair), Ross
Lambie, Eileen Logan, Ian McAllan, Mark McGeever, Kirsten Robb, John Ross 
Substitutes
Robert Brown, Poppy Corbett, Andrea Cowan, Lynsey Hamilton, Gavin Keatt, Richard Nelson, David
Shearer, David Watson  
206

Page 207

Rural Task Force (10)
Alex Allison (Chair), Andy Carmichael (Depute), Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Elise Frame, Ross
Gowland, Eileen Logan, Catherine McClymont, Julia Marrs, David Shearer 
Substitutes
Ross Clark, Lynsey Hamilon, Susan Kerr, Ross Lambie, Ian McAllan, Richard Nelson 
Licensing Committee (10) 
Andy Carmichael (Chair), Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin (ex-offico), Catherine McClymont, Kenny
McCreary, Mark McGeever, Julia Marrs, David Shearer, Bert Thomson (Depute), Helen Toner 
Substitutes
Robert Brown, Mary Donnelly, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson, Graham
Scott 
Public Processions Panel (3)
3 members of Licensing Committee with Chair and Depute Chair being given first option of
participating 
Petitions Committee (9)
Mary Donnelly, Allan Falconer, Alistair Fulton (Chair), Susan Kerr, Eileen Logan, Richard Nelson
(Depute), Norman Rae, Graham Scott, Helen Toner 
Substitutes
Alex Allison, Robert Brown, Archie Buchanan, Janine Calikes, Margaret Cowie, Mo Razzaq 
Planning Committee (26)
Alex Allison, Ralph Barker, Archie Buchanan, Ross Clark, Gerry Convery (Depute), Margaret Cowie,
Maureen Devlin (ex officio), Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly, Alistair Fulton, Celine Handibode, Graeme
Horne, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Ross Lambie, Martin Lennon, Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson
(Chair), Norman Rae, Mo Razzaq, John Ross, Graham Scott, David Shearer, Helen Toner, David
Watson, Kirsty Williams, (Vacancy – to be filled following by-election) 
Substitutes
Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Mathew Buchanan, Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Allan Falconer,
Grant Ferguson, Richard Lockhart, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Ian McAllan, Kenny McCreary, Julia
Marrs, Bert Thomson 
Planning Local Review Body (Panel of 10 members with named substitutes)
Alex Allison, Gerry Convery (Depute), Colin Dewar, Gladys Ferguson-Miller, Cal Johnston-Dempsey,
Davie McLachlan, Richard Nelson (Chair), Norman Rae, Graham Scott, David Shearer 
Substitutes
Robert Brown, Margaret Cowie, Maureen Devlin, Grant Ferguson, Alistair Fulton, Graeme Horne,
Gavin Keatt, Richard Lockhart, Ian McAllan, Kenny McCreary  
207

Page 208

Recruitment Committee (Panel of 6 members with named substitutes)
Alex Allison, Robert Brown, Maureen Chalmers, Ross Clark, Gerry Convery (Depute), Maureen Devlin
(Chair) 
Substitutes
John Anderson, Margaret Cooper, Gavin Keatt, Eileen Logan, Katy Loudon, Richard Nelson 
Risk and Audit Scrutiny Committee (10)
Ralph Barker, Mathew Buchanan, Colin Dewar, Mary Donnelly (Depute), Monique Equi, Alistair
Fulton, Ross Gowland, Richard Lockhart, Elaine McDougall (Chair), Vacancy (Lib Dems/Green/Ind
Group) 
Substitutes
Julia Marrs, Bert Thomson, Helen Toner, Vacancy (Labour Group) 
Licensing Divisions 
Licensing Division 1 (Clydesdale) (10)
Alex Allison, Ralph Barker, Poppy Corbett, Ross Gowland, Richard Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Ian
McAllan, Catherine McClymont, Julia Marrs, David Shearer 
Licensing Division 2 (East Kilbride) (10)
John Anderson, Archie Buchanan, Mathew Buchanan, Maureen Devlin, Grant Ferguson, Gladys
Ferguson-Miller, Geri Gray, Elaine McDougall, Graham Scott, Kirsty Williams 
Licensing Division 3 (Hamilton) (10)
Andy Carmichael, Ross Clark, Maureen Devlin, Colin Dewar, Celine Handibode, Martin Hose, Cal
Johnston-Dempsey, Mark McGeever, Davie McLachlan, Helen Toner 
Licensing Division 4 (Rutherglen and Cambuslang) (10)
John Bradley, Walter Brogan, Robert Brown, Janine Calikes, Andrea Cowan, Margaret Cowie, Martin
Lennon, Katy Loudon, Carol Nugent, Norman Rae 
27 May 2026
208