Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Education Resources Committee - 17/02/2026

South Lanarkshire Council · 17 February 2026
Back to Education Resources Committee — 17 February 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Council Offices, Almada Street        
Hamilton, ML3 0AA 
Monday, 09 February 2026 
Dear Member 
Education Resources Committee 
The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be
held as follows:- 
Date:  Tuesday, 17 February 2026
Time:  10:00
Venue: Hybrid - Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton,
ML3 0AA 
The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. 
Yours sincerely 
Paul Manning
Chief Executive 
Members 
Lynsey Hamilton (Chair), Gavin Keatt (Depute Chair), Joe Fagan (ex officio), Alex Allison,
John Anderson, Ross Clark, Margaret Cowie, Allan Falconer, Grant Ferguson, Elise Frame,
Alistair Fulton, Geri Gray, Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Susan Kerr, Ross Lambie, Richard
Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Katy Loudon, Julia Marrs, Ian McAllan, Mark McGeever, Mo Razzaq,
Graham Scott, Bert Thomson, Margaret B Walker, David Watson 
Substitutes
Margaret Cooper, Poppy Corbett, Maureen Devlin, Mary Donnelly, Monique Equi, Graeme
Horne, Martin Hose, Hugh Macdonald, Kenny McCreary, Lesley McDonald, Carol Nugent,
Norman Rae 
External Members 
Religious Representatives
Angela Milton, Reverend Jillian Storrie 
Teacher Representatives
Jennifer Gaffney, Joan Lennon 
Parent Council Representatives
Christine Hall, Naomi Baxter
1

Page 2

BUSINESS 
1 Declaration of Interests 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting
Minutes of the meeting of the Education Resources Committee held on 18
November 2025 submitted for approval as a correct record. (Copy
attached) 
5 - 14 
Monitoring Item(s) 
3 Education Resources - Revenue Budget Monitoring 2025/2026 and
Probable Outturn
Joint report dated 16 January 2026 by the Executive Directors (Finance
and Corporate Resources) and (Education Resources).  (Copy attached) 
15 - 20 
4 Education Resources - Capital Budget Monitoring 2025/2026
Joint report dated 21 January 2026 by the Executive Directors (Finance
and Corporate Resources) and (Education Resources).  (Copy attached) 
21 - 24 
5 Education Resources - Workforce Monitoring –  1 October to 31
December 2025
Joint report dated 15 January 2026 by the Executive Directors (Finance
and Corporate Resources) and (Education Resources).  (Copy attached) 
25 - 32 
Item(s) for Noting 
6 Support for Schools (Central Support)
Report dated 28 January 2026 by the Executive Director (Education
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
33 - 38 
7 Achievement of Literacy and Numeracy Curriculum for Excellence
Levels 2024/2025
Report dated 27 January 2026 by the Executive Director (Education
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
39 - 50 
8 Curriculum Improvement Cycle
Report dated 28 January 2026 by the Executive Director (Education
Resources).  (Copy attached) 
51 - 56 
Urgent Business 
9 Urgent Business
Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. 
2

Page 3

For further information, please contact:-
Clerk Name: Ishara Opatha
Clerk Telephone: 07385 370069
Clerk Email: Ishara.Opatha@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
3

Page 4

4

Page 5

EDUCATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE 
Minutes of meeting held via Confero and in Committee Room 1, Council Offices, Almada Street,
Hamilton on 18 November 2025 
Chair:
Councillor Gavin Keatt 
Councillors Present:
Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor John Anderson, Councillor Ross Clark, Councillor Margaret
Cowie, Councillor Maureen Devlin (substitute for Councillor Margaret B Walker), Councillor Monique
Equi, Councillor Allan Falconer, Councillor Grant Ferguson, Councillor Elise Frame, Councillor
Graeme Horne (substitute for Councillor Geri Gray), Councillor Cal Johnston-Dempsey, Councillor
Susan Kerr (Depute), Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Richard Lockhart, Councillor Eileen
Logan, Councillor Katy Loudon, Councillor Julia Marrs, Councillor Ian McAllan, Councillor Mark
McGeever, Councillor Carol Nugent (substitute for Councillor Alistair Fulton), Councillor Mo Razzaq,
Councillor Graham Scott, Councillor Bert Thomson, Councillor David Watson 
Councillors' Apologies:
Councillor Joe Fagan (ex officio), Councillor Alistair Fulton, Councillor Geri Gray, Councillor
Margaret B Walker 
External Member Present:
Jennifer Gaffney 
External Members’ Apologies:
Naomi Baxter, Christine Hall, Joan Lennon, Angela Milton, Reverend Jillian Storrie 
Attending:
Education Resources
L McRoberts, Executive Director; A Boyle, Interim Head of Education (Inclusion Services); D
Hinshelwood, Interim Head of Education (Support Services and School Estate); G Lambie,
Performance, Planning and Operations Manager; S Nicolson, Head of Education (Senior Phase); J
Wallace, Head of Education (Primary and Early Years)
Finance and Corporate Resources
G Booth, Finance Manager (Strategy); L Harvey, Finance Manager (Resources); E Maxwell, Human
Resources Business Manager; K McLeod, Administration Assistant; I Opatha, Administration
Officer; T Slater, Administration Adviser 
1 Declaration of Interests 
No interests were declared. 
2 Minutes of Previous Meeting 
The minutes of the meeting of the Education Resources Committee held on 9 September 2025
were submitted for approval as a correct record. 
The Committee decided: that the minutes be approved as a correct record.
2
5

Page 6

3 Education Resources - Revenue Budget Monitoring 2025/2026 
A joint report dated 22 October 2025 by the Executive Directors (Finance and Corporate
Resources) and (Education Resources) was submitted on the actual expenditure measured
against the revenue budget for the period 1 April to 5 September 2025, and providing a forecast
for the year to 31 March 2026 for Education Resources.   
A Service Analysis Statement, which outlined key highlights by Service for the Resource, was
provided in Appendix A to the report.  The detailed financial position, with variance explanations
by budget category, was provided in Appendix B to the report. 
As at 5 September 2025, the projected outturn position for the Resource was a breakeven
position.  The position reflected underspends in Early Years and Support Services’ staffing,
underspends in the Early Learning and Childcare (ELC) core budget, over-recovery of Early
Years’ fees and income from other local authorities, which were offset by projected overspends,
as detailed in paragraph 6.2 of the report. 
Several areas of financial risk to the Education Resources’ budget had been identified, as
detailed in section 6 of the report, and included:- 
 cost of transport
 teacher numbers
 reduced class contact time 
Officers responded to members’ questions on various aspects of the report.   
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the forecast to 31 March 2026 of a breakeven position, as detailed in Appendix A of
the report, be noted; and 
(2) that the proposed budget virements be approved. 
[Reference: Minutes of 9 September 2025 (Paragraph 4)] 
4 Education Resources – Capital Budget Monitoring 2025/2026 
A joint report dated 22 October 2025 by the Executive Directors (Finance and Corporate
Resources) and (Education Resources) was submitted providing information on the progress of
the Capital Programme for Education Resources for the period 1 April to 5 September 2025. 
The revised Capital Programme for 2025/2026 amounted to £6.070 million and reflected an
increase of £0.100 million, which had been approved by the Executive Committee on 24
September 2025.  Details of that adjustment were provided in Appendix A to the report. 
The forecast for the financial year was £6.070 million, and actual expenditure as at 5 September
2025 was £1.380 million. 
The Committee decided: that the Education Resources’ capital programme of
£6.070 million, and forecast expenditure of £6.070 million,
be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 9 September 2025 (Paragraph 6) and Minutes of the Executive
Committee of 24 September 2025 (Paragraph 4)] 
6

Page 7

5 Education Resources - Workforce Monitoring - 1 July to 30 September 2025 
A joint report dated 8 October 2025 by the Executive Directors (Finance and Corporate
Resources) and (Education Resources) was submitted on the following employee information
for Education Resources for the period 1 July to 30 September 2025:- 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health statistics
 accident/incident statistics
 disciplinary hearings, grievances and Dignity at Work cases
 analysis of leavers and exit interviews 
The Human Resources Business Manager responded to members’ questions on various
aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: that the report be noted. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 9 September 2025 (Paragraph 7)] 
Councillor Lockhart joined the meeting during consideration of the above item of business 
6 Education Resource Plan: Quarter 2 Progress Report 2025/2026 
A report dated 30 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
on the Education Resource Plan Quarter 2 Progress Report 2025/2026 for the period 1 April to
30 September 2025.   
The Education Resource Plan 2025/2026 set out the objectives and actions to be managed and
delivered by the Resource in the financial year 2025/2026.  The Resource Plan measures were
rated using a traffic light system of red, amber or green as well as blue (BRAG), which indicated
that an action had been completed. 
Details were provided on:- 
 progress against all Resource Plan measures, as detailed in the Quarter 2 Progress
Report 2025/2026, attached as Appendix 2 to the report
 key achievements made by the Resource, as detailed in paragraph 5.3. of the report. 
No measures had been classified as red, however, 14 had been categorised as “report later” or
“contextual”. 
The Executive Director (Education Resources) responded to a member’s question on an aspect
of the report. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the Education Resource Plan Quarter 2 Progress Report 2025/2026, as summarised
in paragraph 5.2. and attached at Appendix 2 of the report, be noted; 
(2) that the key achievements made by the Resource to date, as detailed in paragraph 5.3. of
the report, be noted; 
(3) that it be noted that there were no areas for improvement and associated management
actions, as detailed in paragraph 5.4. of the report; and
7

Page 8

(4) that it be noted that there were no measures identified as ‘report later’ at Quarter 4
2024/2025, as detailed in paragraph 5.5. of the report. 
[Reference:  Minutes of 10 June 2025 (Paragraph 5)] 
7 Additional Support for Learning Fund 2025/2026 
A joint report dated 31 October 2025 by the Executive Directors (Education Resources) and
(Finance and Corporate Resources) was submitted:- 
 providing an update on the current Additional Support for Learning (ASL) national agenda
 setting out proposals for the allocation of the ASL Fund for 2025/2026 
Information was provided on:- 
 the Education (Additional Support for Learning) (Scotland) Act 2004 (ASL Act), which
established a progressive and inclusive framework for supporting children and young
people
 key factors that could give rise to Additional Support Needs (ASN), which had expanded
since the implementation of the ASL Act
 the outcomes of the Morgan Review, which had a particular focus on developing a
workforce that was equipped to meet the needs of learners within ASN
 additional funding from the Scottish Government to develop the ASL workforce, along with
an enhanced offer in support, spanning all stages of the curriculum 
Following a review of identified needs across the Council’s schools and establishments, it was
proposed that the following posts be added to the Education Resources’ staffing establishment:- 
 1 full-time equivalent (FTE) post of Pedagogy – Quality Improvement Officer on Grade
QIO, SCP1-3 (£73,110 to £81,579)
 10 FTE posts of Pedagogy – Class Teacher on Main Grade, SCP 1-5 (£40,305 to £50,589)
 1 FTE post of Data Officer on Grade 4, Level 2-5, SCP 82-88 (£52,922 to £57,886)
 9 FTE posts of Pathfinder Officer on Grade 3, Level 2, SCP 63-65 (£40,805 to £41,699)
 1 FTE post of Marmot Early Years Lead on Grade 4, Level 2, SCP 82-83 (£52,922 to
£53,725)
 2 FTE posts of Early Years Quality Officer on Grade 4, Level 2, SCP 82-83 (£52,922 to
£53,725) 
The Pedagogy and Marmot posts would initially be for 23 months, with the long-term plans
supporting those areas to be re-assessed at the appropriate time. 
The cost of proposals would be met from the Scottish Government ASL funding, as outlined in
the report. 
The Executive Director (Education Resources) responded to a member’s question on an aspect
of the report. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that proposals for the commitment of the ASL Fund 2025/2026 in South Lanarkshire be
approved; and 
(2) that the proposed increase to the Education Resources’ establishment, as detailed at
paragraph 6.1 of the report, be approved.
8

Page 9

8 Update on the Changes to the Qualification Criteria for Mainstream Secondary
School Transport 
A report dated 18 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
providing an update on the implementation of the revised qualification criteria for mainstream
secondary school transport in South Lanarkshire. 
The Education (Scotland) Act 1980 required councils to provide free school transport for children
under 8 years living over 2 miles from their catchment school and, for those aged 8 and over,
living over 3 miles away.  Until August 2025, the Council provided a more generous entitlement
than required by law, offering free transport to all primary pupils living more than 1 mile and all
secondary pupils living more than 2 miles from their catchment school. 
Due to significant pressures, and following consultation, the Council’s Executive Committee
agreed to change the distance that a mainstream secondary school pupil must live from their
catchment school in order to qualify for free school transport to more than 3 miles. 
Information was provided on:- 
 the communication undertaken with all affected families
 the impact on pupil numbers qualifying for school transport, with supports being provided
 work undertaken with bus contractors and commercial operators to ensure sufficient
capacity on public routes
 engagement with parents/carers who had raised concerns
 the review of attendance rates to assess any impact
 the review and update of School Travel Plans 
Officers responded to members’ questions in relation to various aspects of the report and
undertook to provide the Committee with:- 
 information on late-coming figures
 information on the 51 areas identified for remedial action in relation to concerns raised
about lighting, footpaths, vegetation and personal safety
 an update on the progress of the Council motion on reconvening the West of Scotland
Road Safety Forum   
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the progress made in implementing the revised qualification criteria for mainstream
secondary school transport be noted; 
(2) that the ongoing approach to monitoring, stakeholder engagement and risk management
be noted; and 
(3) to note that a further update would be provided to the Committee at the end of the current
academic session in June 2026. 
[Reference: Minutes of the Executive Committee of 7 August 2024 (Paragraph 8)] 
In terms of Standing Order No 14, the Chair adjourned the meeting during this item of business at
10.58am.  The meeting reconvened at 11.05am
9

Page 10

9 Relationships and Behaviour National Action Plan 2024 to 2027 – Policy Updates 
A report dated 17 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
providing an update on the Council’s Framework for Promoting Positive Relationships and
Understanding Distressed Behaviour (PPRUDB). 
The framework was a comprehensive guide for schools, underpinned by the ethos that all
behaviour was a form of communication and that a positive, inclusive school ethos, with an
emphasis on nurturing relationships and firm, consistent boundaries, was crucial to ensuring that
incidents of disruption were kept to a minimum.     
Information was provided on:- 
 the contents of the PPRUDB framework
 how the Council had further strengthened its approaches to promoting positive
relationships, including the development of an Attachment Strategy and the revised
framework for Inclusion and Equality
 the promotion of the PPRUDB framework 
 the revisions to the PPRUDB framework to ensure it was fully aligned with the Scottish
Government’s Relationships and Behaviour National Action Plan 2024 to 2027, which
included:-
 ensuring compliance with new guidelines in relation to physical intervention
 updating the Council’s ‘Treat Me Well’ anti-bullying guidance, part of which was to
tackle prejudice-based behaviour in schools.  This guidance had focused on racism
over the past 2 years and would now focus on gender-based violence
 the next steps to continue to promote the PPRUDB framework, review current risk
assessment guidance, launch the ‘Treat Me Well’ update and further embed and
strengthen school-based approaches to tackling gender-based violence 
The Interim Head of Education (Inclusion Services) responded to members’ questions and
undertook to provide a member with a copy of the ‘Treat Me Well’ guidance and summary of the
discussions and findings from the November conference being organised by the Violence
Against Women and Girls Partnership (Early Intervention Subgroup). 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the scope of the Relationships and Behaviour National Action Plan 2024 to 2027, and
the impacts on current policies, be noted; and 
(2) that ongoing work and next steps to address those impacts be noted. 
10 Update of the Education Resources' Risk Register 
A report dated 18 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
providing an update on Education Resources’ Risk Register. 
The Resource had followed Council guidance in developing, monitoring and updating its Risk
Register on an ongoing basis.  The Register had been developed to ensure that the Resource:- 
 was fully aware of its top risks
 was able to prioritise those risks
 had controls in place to eliminate or minimise the impact of the risk
10

Page 11

The risks were scored in accordance with the Council’s scoring mechanism, which scored risks
based on likelihood and impact of risk.  This resulted in risks being scored between 1 to 25 (low
to very high).  Risks were scored on their inherent risk (risk if nothing was done), and their
residual risk (risk after applying controls).  Very high and high risks were monitored closely.   
The central Risk Management team had reviewed compliance with the Risk Management
Strategy for 2024/2025 and confirmed that Education Resources had achieved 100%
compliance. 
The top risks identified for the Resource, that was those that were residually scored as being
very high and high, were attached as Appendix 1 to the report.  The main changes to the Risk
Register were summarised in paragraph 5.5. 
A comparison of the 2024 and 2025 Resource Risk Registers was detailed in Appendix 2 to the
report.  That appendix also detailed changes in risk descriptions. 
Officers responded to a member’s question on an aspect of the report.   
The Committee decided: that the content of the Education Resources’ Risk Register
be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 29 October 2024 (Paragraph 13)] 
Councillor Lockhart left the meeting during consideration of the above item of business 
11 Accessibility Strategy 2025 to 2028 
A report dated 18 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
providing an update on the development of the Education Resources’ Accessibility Strategy
2025 to 2028. 
The Education (Disability Strategies and Pupils’ Educational Records) (Scotland) Act 2002
required local authorities to prepare and implement long-term strategies to improve access to
education for pupils and prospective pupils with disabilities.  Those strategies were also required
to ensure that duties under the Equality Act 2010 were met.  The Accessibility Strategy 2025 to
2028 would provide an overall purpose and direction for the work of all establishments and
services in relation to inclusion and equality. 
A consultation process had been undertaken, inviting views and comments on various aspects
of the draft Strategy, and some minor amendments had been incorporated into the revised
Strategy. 
The finalised Strategy, attached as an appendix to the report, would be distributed to all services
and establishments.  Arrangements would also be made to publish the Strategy on the Council’s
website. 
Officers responded to members’ questions on various aspects of the report. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the updated Education Resources’ Accessibility Strategy, attached as Appendix 1 to
the report, be noted; and
11

Page 12

(2) that the arrangements to publish the Accessibility Strategy on the Council’s website be
noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 14 February 2023 (Paragraph 11)] 
12 Notification of Contracts Awarded: 1 April to 30 September 2025 
A report dated 23 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
providing an update on contracts awarded by Education Resources during the period 1 April to
30 September 2025. 
In terms of Standing Order Nos 21.8 and 22.5 of the Council’s Standing Orders on Contracts,
Resources were required to notify the relevant Committee of contracts awarded above the sum
of £50,000.  Details of the contracts awarded or extended by Education Resources were
provided in Appendix 1 to the report. 
An officer responded to a member’s question in relation to an aspect of the report and undertook
to look into the issue raised and provide feedback to the member. 
The Committee decided: that the details of the contracts awarded be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 10 June 2025 (Paragraph 14)] 
13 Celebrating Success in Education Session 2025/2026 – Quarter 2 
A report dated 18 October 2025 by the Executive Director (Education Resources) was submitted
highlighting some of the exemplary work currently taking place in South Lanarkshire educational
establishments and across services during academic session 2025/2026, recognising wider
achievements and awards received.   
Educational establishments in South Lanarkshire took immense pride in recognising the daily
achievements of children and young people through social and traditional media.  This not only
kept families informed, but also engaged the wider community in celebrating the milestones
reached in their learning journeys.  Appendix 1 to the report provided notable highlights linked to
the following key areas:- 
 health and wellbeing 
 inclusion, equity and equality
 curriculum, strategic leadership and professional practice
 safe and respectful environments (Digital Learning) 
 climate change and sustainability
 children’s rights in education 
Members congratulated the staff and pupils on the successes achieved. 
The Executive Director thanked the members for their positive comments and advised that it
was intended to bring some additional reports to the Committee in the future, celebrating
successes in school. 
The Committee decided: 
(1) that the examples of good practice highlighted across a wide range of provision be noted;
and
12

Page 13

(2) that the continuing commitment to the importance of celebrating success within education
beyond academic attainment be noted. 
[Reference: Minutes of 10 June 2025 (Paragraph 12)] 
14 Urgent Business 
There were no items of urgent business. 
Chair’s Closing Remarks
The Chair thanked officers for their work and support over the year to young people and this
Committee and wished everyone the compliments of the season. 
13

Page 14

14

Page 15

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Education Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 17 February 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Education Resources - Revenue Budget Monitoring
2025/2026 and Probable Outturn 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide information on the actual expenditure measured against the revenue
budget for the period 1 April to 29 December 2025 for Education Resources
 provide a Probable Outturn forecast for the year to 31 March 2026
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the Probable Outturn forecast to 31 March 2026 of a breakeven position
after approved transfers to reserves (detailed in Appendix A), be noted; and 
(2) that the proposed budget virements be approved.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. This is the third revenue budget monitoring report presented to the Education
Resources Committee for the financial year 2025/2026. 
3.2. The report details the financial position for Education Resources.  Appendix A outlines
the service analysis statement, providing key highlights by service for the Resource
and Appendix B provides the detailed financial position with variance explanations by
budget category.   
3.3. This report reflects the actual spend to 29 December 2025 within the Resource budget,
as well as the output from the formal Probable Outturn exercise, which provides an
expected outturn forecast on expenditure and income at this date.   
4. Scottish Attainment Challenge Funding
4.1. The 2025/2026 budget for Education contains £9.594m awarded for Pupil Equity
Funding (PEF) and £2.475m for Strategic Equity Funding (SEF).  Total budget for
2025/2026 is £12.069m and this is contained within this reported position.   
4.2. In relation to PEF funding, the £9.594m represents £0.631m 2024/2025 carry forward
and £8.963m for the 2025/2026 allocation.  Spend and commitment to date as at 29
December 2025 is £7.080m, with £2.514m still to spend.  This includes known staff
costs for the period 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026.  
3
15

Page 16

4.3. It is anticipated £0.400m will be carried forward at year-end for schools to align to
commitments for the academic year to June 2026, in line with PEF guidelines. This is
an approved Transfer to Reserves agreed at the Executive Committee on 4 February
2026. 
4.4. In relation to SEF funding, spend and commitment to date is £2.295m with £0.180m
still to spend.  Known staff costs to 31 March 2026 are reflected within this position,
and as this is a specific grant allocation, funding is received based on actual spend.  It
is anticipated full spend will be made by 31 March 2026 for this programme.   
4.5. Committee will continue to be updated with the spend position for 2025/2026
throughout the year for both of those Scottish Attainment Challenge funded areas.   
5. Employee Implications
5.1. There are no employee implications as a result of this report. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. Probable Outturn: Following the Council’s formal Probable Outturn exercise, the
forecast for the budget to 31 March 2026 is a breakeven position after approved
transfers to reserves of £0.478m.  The transfer to Reserves were approved at
Executive Committee (4 February 2026). This position is outlined in Appendix B. 
6.3. This position reflects underspends in Early Years and Support Services staffing offset
by a projected overspend in teacher costs due to cover, overspends in relation to
mainstream and ASN transport costs and school placements, which are demand led,
and additional costs of classroom supplies in schools.   
6.4 There are underspends with the Early Learning and Childcare (ELC) core budget and
a projected underspend in the cost of footwear and clothing grant provision due to
demand. There is also an over recovery of Early Years fees and income from Other
Local Authorities, which is reflected in the position. 
6.5 In relation to the Additional Support for Learning (ASL) funding, there is currently a
projected underspend of £0.078m, which will be carried forward at year-end to support
expenditure commitments to the end of the school session in June 2026. This is an
approved Transfer to Reserves agreed at Executive Committee on 4 February 2026. 
6.6. Teacher Numbers:  The Summary statistics for schools in Scotland 2025 was
published on 10 December 2025. South Lanarkshire Council met the Scottish
Government’s teacher numbers target. 
6.7. Virements are proposed to realign budgets across budget categories and with other
Resources.  These movements have been detailed in Appendix B to this report. 
7. 2025/2026 Investments
7.1 Local Action Fund
Funding has been allocated to Education Resources as part of the approved Local
Action Fund for 2025/2026.  Funding of £0.150m is included in the Education budget
presented in Appendix B. Schools and services have been allocated the new funding
this year as approved at the Executive Committee and are spending these additional
resources in line with Elected Members’ proposals.  
16

Page 17

7.2. Other Investments
Footwear and Clothing grant of £0.285m was allocated as part of the budget setting
process for 2025/2026 which enabled a top of £20 per grant award across all sectors. 
This has been distributed as part of the new allocations this year in line with demand.   
8. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications 
8.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or environment in terms of
the information contained in the report.   
9 Other Implications
9.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Revenue Budget is that there is an
overspend.  There are inflationary and budget pressures, this year, which increase the
risk of overspend however we have mitigated this going forward by providing additional
funds in the budget strategy, and in this year, through some reserve funds available. 
9.2. The risk is managed through four weekly Budget Monitoring Meetings at which any
variance is analysed.  In addition, the new forecasting within FUSION and work within
the Resource and finance teams, ensures early warning for corrective action to be
taken where appropriate. 
10. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
10.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
10.2 There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
Lyndsay McRoberts 
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
16 January 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Financial ledger and budget monitoring results to 29 December 2025 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Louise Harvey
Ext:  2658 (Tel:  01698 452658)
E-mail:  louise.harvey@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
17

Page 18

Appendix A 
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Education Committee: Period 10 Ended 29 December 2025 (No. 10) 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report – Service Analysis 
Service Analysis
Revised
Annual
Budget
(£000)
Projected
Outturn
(£000)
Projected
Outturn
Variance
(before
transfers)
(£000)
% YTD Actual
(£000)
Education     
Net Controllable Exp. 502,488 502,010 478 0.10% 373,110
Transfer to Reserves 0 478 (478) - -
Position After Transfer to Reserves 502,488 502,488 0 - - 
Service Heading Explanation for significant projected outturn variances
Education
Schools  
The cost of teachers is expected to be overspent due to the demand for cover across the year.  The
impact of classroom materials budgets as a result of pupil growth, transport costs and increased cost
continues to be a financial pressure this year but is managed within the overall Probable Outturn
position. 
Support Services
Staff turnover within Support Services this year are supporting pressures across the Resource. 
Inclusion Services 
There continues to be high demand on the Inclusion services budgets in the areas of external
placement, aids and adaptation and transport.  Overspends this year are being supported by reserve
balances as well as underspends in other areas including income from Other Local Authorities.   
Early Years
Staff turnover and vacancies continue within the Early Years service this year as well as increased
levels of fee income.  These underspends and over recovery of income are supporting pressures across
the Resource.   
Transport
The cost of both mainstream transport and ASN transport (taxis) continues to be a rising pressure this
year.  Support for these costs is being met through underspends in other budget areas. 
18

Page 19

Appendix B 
SOUTH LANARKSHIRE COUNCIL 
Revenue Budget Monitoring Report 
Education Resources Committee: Period Ended 29 December 2025 (No.10) 
Education Resources Summary 
Budget Category
Revised
Annual
Budget 
Projected
Outturn
Projected
Outturn
Variance 
Over/
Under
%
Variance
YTD
Actual  Note 
£000 £000 £000   £000 
Employee Costs 366,996 365,332 1,664  under 0.45% 262,649 1, a, d, e,
f, g
Property Costs 36,501 36,499 2  under 0.01% 29,305 a, b, c, f, g
Supplies & Services 13,658 13,740 (82)  over (0.60%) 8,219 2, a, c, e, 
f, g, h, i
Transport & Plant 17,912 21,299 (3,387)  over (18.91%) 16,391 3, f, g
Administration Costs 1,702 1,703 (1)  over (0.06%) 1,352 4, f, g
Payments to Other Bodies 31,159 32,092 (933)  over (2.99%) 23,456 5, a, f, g
Payments to Contractors 48,064 47,704 360  under 0.75% 35,004 6, g
Transfer Payments 2,888 2,774 114  under 3.95% 2,691 7, g
Financing Charges 395 396 (1)  over (0.25%) 208 g
Total Controllable Exp. 519,275 521,539 (2,264)  over (0.44%) 379,275 
Total Controllable Inc. (16,787) (19,529) 2,742  over
recovered
16.33% (6,165) 8, f, g
Net Controllable Exp. 502,488 502,010 478  under 0.10% 373,110 
Transfer to Reserves - 478 (478) 
Position after Transfer to
Reserves 502,488 502,488 0  - 0.00%   
Variance Explanations 
1. The position represents the net effect of an underspend in Early Years and Support staff costs due to vacancies and turnover of staff offset
by an overspend in Teacher costs due to cover.
2. The overspend is mainly due to increased spend on materials within schools due to pupil growth, the increased demand for equipment
required by children with complex needs and food costs for breakfast clubs being higher than budget. This is offset by an underspend on
the Pupil Equity Fund which will be carried forward at the end of the financial year for future commitments.
3. The overspend is mainly due to the cost of home to school transport for ASN children and mainstream transport.        
4. The underspend mainly relates to Early Years core conferences spend being lower than anticipated offset by telephone costs for schools
and legal costs for ASN tribunals.
5. This overspend is due to the increased cost of placements for pupils within Other Local Authorities and Independent Schools. This is
partially offset by less than anticipated core Early Years spend to date including cross boundary charges and income from placements from
other local authorities.
6. The underspend represents the timing of payments for insurance within the PPP contract. 
7. The underspend is due to spend on footwear and clothing grants reflecting current demand.
8. The over recovery of income reflects projected levels of income from Early Years fees and Other Local Authorities for placements within
South Lanarkshire Council schools. 
Budget Virements 
a. Transfer from corporate items in relation to Local Action Fund allocated to schools, 2025/2026 Teachers Pay Award and Rates large
property increase.  Net Effect £6.930m: Employee Costs £6.583m, Property Costs £0.314m, Supplies and Services £0.021m and Payments
to other Bodies £0.012m.
b. Transfer to corporate items in relation to Utilities and procurement savings.  Net Effect (£0.446m): Property Costs (£0.446m).
c. Transfer to Community and Enterprise Resources for Jackton Primary School Facility Costs.  Net Effect (£0.248m): Property Costs
(£0.161m) and Supplies and Services (£0.087m). 
d. Establish budget to reflect general revenue grant funding in relation to Teacher Induction Scheme.  Net Effect £1.169m: Employee Costs
£1.169m
19

Page 20

e. Realignment of budget to reflect Pupil Equity Fund programme delivery.  Net Effect £0.000m: Employee Costs £0.429m and Supplies and
Services (£0.429m).
f. Realignment of budget to reflect ASL spend, transport funding and current service delivery.  Net Effect £0.000m: Employee Costs
(£1.355m), Property Costs (£0.498m), Supplies and Services £1.568m, Transport Costs £0.680m, Administration Costs £0.008m,
Payments to Other Bodies (£0.370m) and Income (£0.033m).
g. Virement within school budgets as part of the Devolved Management Scheme for Schools.  Net Effect £0.000m: Employee Costs £0.075m,
Property Costs £0.233m, Supplies and Services (£0.919m), Transport Costs (£0.166m), Administration Costs £0.351m, Payments to Other
Bodies £0.434m, Payment to Contractors £0.008m, Transfer Payments £0.257m, Financing Charges (£0.011m) and Income (£0.262m). 
Transfer to Reserves (£0.478m): 
h. Pupil Equity Funding underspend (£0.400m).
i. Additional Support for Learning Funding underspend (£0.078m) 
20

Page 21

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Education Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 17 February 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Education Resources - Capital Budget Monitoring
2025/2026 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide information on the progress of the capital programme for Education
Resources for the period 1 April to 29 December 2025
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the Education Resources capital programme of £5.007 million, and forecast
expenditure of £5.007 million, be noted.
[1recs]
3. Background
3.1. This is the third capital monitoring report presented to the Education Resources
Committee for the financial year 2025/2026. Further reports will follow throughout the
year. 
3.2. The revised budget of £5.007 million for Education Resources is based on the overall
Capital Programme for 2025/2026 (Executive Committee, 25 June 2025) and includes
updates approved by the Executive Committee on 3 December 2025.   
3.3. The report details the financial position for Education Resources in Appendix A. 
4. Employee Implications
4.1. There are no employee implications as a result of this report. 
5. Financial Implications
5.1. 2025/2026 Budget   
As detailed in Section 3.2, the revised capital programme for Education Resources for
2025/2026 is £5.007 million.  This includes adjustments totalling a net decrease of
£1.063 million which were approved by the Executive Committee on 3 December
2025. The detail of these adjustments is shown in Appendix A.   
5.2. 2025/2026 Forecast   
Appendix A shows a forecast for the financial year of £5.007 million. For information,
actual expenditure to 29 December 2025 is £3.018 million.  
4
21

Page 22

6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms
of the information contained in this report. 
7. Other Implications
7.1. The main risk associated with the Council’s Capital Programme is that there is an
overspend.  The risk has been assessed as low given the detailed project
management plans prepared and monitored for each project.  The risk of overspend
is managed through four weekly Investment Management Meetings. 
8. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
8.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
8.2. There is also no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in the report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
Lindsay McRoberts
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
21 January 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, Effective, Efficient and Transparent 
Previous References
 Executive Committee – 25 June 2025
 Executive Committee – 3 December 2025 
List of Background Papers
 Financial ledger to 29 December 2025 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Graham Booth, Finance Manager (Strategy)
Ext:  2699 (Tel:  01698 452699)
E-mail: graham.booth@southlanarkshire.gov.uk
22

Page 23

Appendix A 
South Lanarkshire Council
Capital Expenditure 2025/2026
Education Resources Programme
For Period 1 April 2025 – 29 December 2025 
Education Resources Base Budget 
£000
Budget
Adjustments
£000
Slippage/
Acceleration
£000
Total
Budget
£000 
Forecast
Spend
£000 
Forecast
Variance
£000
Actual
Expenditure
£000
Growth / Accommodation
Pressures 3,682 566 (1,063) 3,185 3,185 - 1,864
ICT Developments 1,346 - - 1,346 1,346 - 769
Free School Meals 476 - - 476 476 - 385
TOTAL 5,504 566 (1,063) 5,007 5,007 - 3,018 
For Information Only  
Budget Adjustments approved by Executive Committee, 3 December 2025: 
Kirkstyles ELC Phase 2 
Carluke High School
(total project approved is £0.219m, with £0.010m profiled in 2025/2026) 
Secondary Schools 
Total Budget Adjustments            
(£0.073m) 
£0.010m 
(£1.000m) 
(£1.063m)   
23

Page 24

24

Page 25

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Education Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 17 February 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources)
and Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Education Resources - Workforce Monitoring –             
1 October to 31 December 2025 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide employment information for 1 October to 31 December 2025 relating to
Education Resources
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the following employment information for 1 October to 31 December 2025
relating to Education Resources be noted:- 
 attendance statistics
 occupational health
 accident/incident statistics
 discipline, grievance and Dignity at Work cases
 analysis of leavers and exit interviews
 Staffing Watch as at 13 September 2025 
3. Background
3.1. As part of the Council’s performance management arrangements, regular workforce
monitoring reports are submitted to Committee.  This report for Education Resources
provides information on the position for 1 October to 31 December 2025. 
4. Monitoring Statistics
4.1. Attendance Statistics (Appendix 1) 
Information on absence statistics is analysed for the month of December 2025 for
Education Resources. 
The Resource absence figure for December 2025 was 6.9%, this figure has
increased by 0.3% when compared to the previous month and is 0.6% lower than the
Council-wide figure.  Compared to December 2024, the Resource absence figure
has increased by 0.1% 
Based on the absence figures at December 2025 and annual trends, the annual
average absence for the Resource for 2025/2026 is 5.2%, compared to a Council-
wide average figure of 6.1%.
5
25

Page 26

Managers follow the procedures outlined in the Maximising Attendance Policy to
support employees to remain at work, or to return to work after a sickness absence.
There are comprehensive employee supports in place and additionally, Personnel
Services work in close partnership with line managers and Resource Management
Teams on a case management basis to ensure that appropriate actions are taken. 
4.2. Occupational Health (Appendix 2) 
In terms of referrals to occupational health, overall, 551 referrals were made this
period.  This represents a decrease of 120 when compared with the same period last
year. 
4.3. Accident/Incident Statistics
There were 531 accidents/incidents recorded and investigated within the Resource
during this period.  This represents an increase of 264 when compared with the
same period last year. 
4.4. Discipline, Grievance and Dignity at Work (Appendix 2) 
During the period, 8 disciplinary hearings were held within the Resource, this figure
has increased by 4 compared to the same period last year.  No appeals were heard
by the Resource, and no appeals were pending, these figures have remained the
same when compared to last year.  Two grievances were raised within the Resource,
this figure has remained the same when compared to the same period last year. 
Three Dignity at work complaints were raised within the Resource, this figure has
increased by 2 when compared to the same period last year. 
4.5. Analysis of Leavers (Appendix 2a) 
There was a total of 45 leavers this period eligible for an exit interview. This figure
has decreased by 9, when compared with the same period last year.  Eleven exit
interviews were conducted in this period, this figure has decreased by 3 when
compared to the same period last year.   
5. Staffing Watch (Appendix 3) 
5.1. There has been a decrease of 143 employees in post from 14 June 2025 to 13
September 2025. 
6. Employee Implications
6.1. There are no implications for employees arising from the information presented in
this report. 
7. Financial Implications
7.1. All financial implications are accommodated within existing budgets. 
8. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
8.1. There are no Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications in terms 
of the information contained within this report. 
9. Other Implications
9.1. There are no implications for sustainability or risk in terms of the information
contained within this report. 
10. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
10.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact
assessment is required.
26

Page 27

10.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Jackie Taylor
Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 
Lyndsay McRoberts
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
15 January 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent
 Fair, open and sustainable
 Ambitious, self aware and improving
 Excellent employer
 Focused on people and their needs
 Working with and respecting others 
Previous References
 Education Resources – 18 November 2025 
List of Background Papers
 Monitoring information provided by Finance and Corporate Resources 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Elaine Maxwell, HR Business Manager
Ext: (Tel: 01698 454647)
E-mail:elaine.maxwell@southlanarkshire.gov.uk  
27

Page 28

2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
2023 /
2024
2024 /
2025
2025 /
2026
% % % % % % % % % % % %
April 5.0 5.4 6.8 April 2.8 2.9 3.5 April 3.8 4.0 4.9 April 5.1 5.2 5.7
May 5.4 6.0 6.6 May 3.2 3.0 3.8 May 4.2 4.4 5.0 May 5.1 5.3 5.6
June 4.8 5.5 6.3 June 2.2 2.8 2.9 June 3.4 4.1 4.4 June 4.7 5.2 5.4
July 3.4 3.2 3.8 July 1.1 1.0 1.4 July 2.2 2.0 2.4 July 3.8 4.1 4.3
August 4.0 3.9 4.4 August 1.3 1.9 1.7 August 2.5 2.8 2.8 August 4.1 4.7 4.7
September 5.9 6.6 5.8 September 2.9 3.5 4.1 September 4.3 4.9 4.8 September 5.3 6.1 6.1
October 5.5 6.5 6.6 October 2.7 3.8 4.2 October 4.0 5.0 5.2 October 5.1 6.0 6.2
November 7.1 7.8 8.2 November 4.3 5.0 5.3 November 5.6 6.2 6.6 November 6.2 6.9 7.0
December 8.1 8.6 8.5 December 4.8 5.4 5.6 December 6.3 6.8 6.9 December 6.6 7.0 7.5
January 6.6 8.0 January 4.8 4.9 January 5.6 6.3 January 6.1 6.7
February 7.2 8.4 February 4.9 4.9 February 6.0 6.5 February 6.4 7.0
March 7.5 8.3 March 4.1 4.5 March 5.7 6.2 March 6.3 6.8
Annual Average 5.9 6.5 6.8 Annual Average 3.3 3.6 3.9 Annual Average 4.5 4.9 5.2 Annual Average 5.4 5.9 6.1
Average Apr-Dec 5.5 5.9 6.3 Average Apr-Dec 2.8 3.3 3.6 Average Apr-Dec 4.0 4.5 4.8 Average Apr-Dec 5.1 5.6 5.8
3200 4022 7222 15695
Appendix 1
Absence Trends - 2023/2024, 2024/2025 & 2025/2026
Education Resources
Council WideAPT&C Teachers Resource Total
No of Employees at 31 December 2025 No of Employees at 31 December 2025 No of Employees at 31 December 2025 No of Employees at 31 December 2025
28

Page 29

Oct - Dec Oct - Dec
2024 2025
MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS
Number of Employees Attending
EMPLOYEE COUNSELLING SERVICE
Total Number of Referrals
PHYSIOTHERAPY SERVICE
Total Number of Referrals
REFERRALS TO EMPLOYEE SUPPORT OFFICER 264 242
REFERRALS TO COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR
THERAPY 0 2
TOTAL 671 551
Oct - Dec Oct - Dec
2024 2025
Over 7 day absences 3 0
Minor 31 68
Near Miss *** 6 23
Violent Incident:  Physical**** 201 403
Violent Incident:  Verbal***** 26 37
Total Accidents/Incidents 267 531
Oct - Dec Oct - Dec
2024 2025
Total Number of Hearings 4 8
Time Taken to Convene Hearing October - Oct to Dec 2025
0-3 Weeks 4-6 Weeks Over 6 Weeks
1 1 6
Oct - Dec Oct - Dec
2024 2025
Number of Grievances 2 2
Still in Progress 2 2
Oct - Dec Oct - Dec
2024 2025
Number of Incidents 1 3
Still in Process 1 3
RECORD OF DIGNITY AT WORK
189 162
CAUSE OF ACCIDENTS/INCIDENTS
*A Specified Injury is any fracture (other than to the fingers, thumbs or toes), amputation, loss of sight,
serious burns, crushing injury, scalping, loss of consciousness caused by asphyxiation/ head injury, a
chemical or hot metal burn to the eye or penetrating injury as defined by the HSE.
**Over 3 day / over 7day absence is an injury sustained outwith specified injury category that results in a
period of absence of absence as defined by the HSE. 
***Near Miss - Any unexpected, unplanned occurrence (except Dangerous Occurrences) that does not
lead to injury of persons, damage to property, plant or equipment but may have done so in different
****Physical violent incidents are included in the "Specified" figures, where applicable, to provide the
****Physical violent incidents and ***** Verbal Violent Incidents are included in the "Over 3-day or Over 7-
day" figures, where applicable, to provide the "Total Over 3-day or Over 7-day" figures.
****Physical Violent Incidents and ***** Verbal Violent Incidents are included in the "Minor" figures, where
applicable, to provide the "Total Minor" figures.
RECORD OF DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS
RECORD OF GRIEVANCE HEARINGS
70 44
Appendix 2
EDUCATION  RESOURCES
148 101
29

Page 30

Oct - Dec Oct - Dec
2024 2025
Career Advancement 11 18
Child Caring / Caring Responsibilities 0 1
Disatisfaction with terms and conditions 0 1
Personal Reasons 1 12
Other 42 13
Total Number of Leavers Eligible for Exit Interview 54 45
Number of Exit Interviews conducted 14 11
Percentage of interviews conducted 26% 24%
ANALYSIS OF REASONS FOR LEAVING
Appendix 2a
EDUCATION RESOURCES
30

Page 31

As at 13 September 2025
F/T P/T F/T P/T
Teachers 673 111 2143 1116 4043
Other 97 81 561 2361 3100
Total Employees 770 192 2704 3477 7143
Chief Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher TOTAL
Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3542.61 3542.61
Other 6.00 1155.43 1038.62 129.78 49.40 11.00 0.00 1.58 0.00 2391.81
As at 14 June 2025
F/T P/T F/T P/T
Teachers 700 117 2127 1178 4122
Other 95 88 554 2427 3164
Total Employees 795 205 2681 3605 7286
Chief Officer Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Fixed SCP Teacher TOTAL
Teachers 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3527.90 3527.90
Other 6.00 1181.26 1054.95 130.70 49.00 11.00 0.00 0.96 0.00 2433.87
JOINT STAFFING WATCH RETURN
EDUCATION RESOURCES
*Full - Time Equivalent No of Employees
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
Appendix 3
Salary Bands
*Full - Time Equivalent No of Employees
Salary Bands
MALE FEMALE TOTAL
31

Page 32

32

Page 33

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Education Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 17 February 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Support for Schools (Central Support) 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to update the Committee on progress within Education
Resources in relation to:- 
[purpose]
 a review of service leadership and management structures 
 options for improvement via central support reconfiguration 
 the management of risks associated with new operating models
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the restructure of the Education Resources Central Support Team from a
service-based structure to a 3-18 years structure be noted;
(2) to note that Early Years Quality Officer posts would be reconfigured within the
new structure; and
(3) that the increase in the number of Senior Manager Pupil Support posts from
four to five be noted. 
3. Background 
3.1 This review was started in 2023 and, at that time, considered the wider central team
resource including all administration staff, Educational Psychologists and central
school support staff. A change in approach as a result of leadership changes within
the Resource has resulted in these areas being removed. They will be considered
separately in future reviews and for the purpose of this review only the central team
leadership support has been considered. 
3.2 It is important to recognise that the successful delivery of these options and any others
subsequently identified is contingent upon the capacity and capability of central
support teams. Implementing complex change, managing risk and sustaining service
quality during a period of transformation requires a core management team with the
necessary expertise, resilience and strategic oversight. 
3.3 Any proposals to reduce this functionality must, therefore, be carefully balanced
against the need to retain sufficient leadership, operational knowledge and technical
skill to drive forward efficiencies, support schools, and ensure that any planned
reconfiguration is realised without compromising statutory responsibilities or approved
long-term strategic improvement outcomes.  
6
33

Page 34

4. Proposals
4.1. Options to revise central management posts have been carefully assessed against the
improvement priorities within the Education Resource Plan for 2026 and beyond. Any
structural changes must continue to uphold equitable access to education, promote
inclusion and support the wellbeing of all learners. This includes maintaining a robust
curriculum, ensuring safe and respectful learning environments and embedding
sustainability across our educational practices. 
4.2. The central focus of this planned restructure is to move from the current service-based
structure to a more integrated 3-18 structure. A 3-18 service structure will ensure a
more coherent level of support provided to schools and ensure that the current
inclusion and early years teams are fully integrated into the quality improvement
aspects of the service.   
4.3. Currently, the central leadership support team operates as four separate Services.
The Curriculum Quality Improvement Service (CQIS) Team oversee school
improvement, the Inclusion Service who oversee matters related to additional support
needs, the Early Years Team and Support Services.  Each of the four Heads of Service
oversee a geographical area and are supported by officers from the CQIS who function
as link officers to schools. 
4.4. The proposal to move to a 3-18 service would involve the following changes (see
Appendix 1):- 
 two new area teams would be created, each led by a Head of Service
 the CQIS team would be restructured into one quality improvement team and
officers deployed across the two area teams
 the current Early Years central team will be reduced, and the quality improvement
remit for Early Years will transfer to the new quality improvement team
 the Inclusion Service will be re-designed to include quality improvement officers,
a virtual head teacher and five senior managers of pupil support. A Head of
Service will lead this team
 all support for school resources will be led by the Head of Service (School
Resources) including a new staffing team and data team
 this structure will provide stable leadership and a basis for further consideration
of a reduction in locality mangers and Head of Service posts within the next three
years 
4.5. The Education Resources central team is built on a foundation of significant strengths,
including a highly skilled workforce, strong performance in quality improvement and a
deeply embedded culture of collegiality and positive relationships. These are
supported by sound governance, effective models of engagement and co-production,
and a shared commitment to aligned improvement objectives. These strengths provide
a stable platform from which to manage change and mitigate risk. 
4.6. However, we recognise areas of vulnerability that must be addressed to ensure
sustainable service delivery. These include variability in outcomes across sectors, a
reducing capacity to meet legislative requirements and perceptions of inequality in
service provision. A move to a more coherent 3-18 service structure will ensure we
build capacity across the system to support schools in a more equitable way that
address the challenges of education reform. 
34

Page 35

4.7. Our next steps in taking these proposals forward will be to:- 
 further engage with Personnel and Finance teams to confirm accurate
cost/benefit analysis and workforce planning requirements
 complete wider stakeholder engagement including Trade Union discussions
 complete an integrated risk assessment and analysis 
5. Employee Implications
5.1. The current position of Early Years Quality Officer (x4) will be deleted from the new
structure. It is expected that this can be managed through natural turnover and a
realignment to roles and remits with Inclusion Services funded through identified
Additional Support for Learning (ASL) monies. 
5.2. There may be a requirement for additional training for some staff as they move from
the Inclusion Team to the new improvement team. This will be managed through
current professional learning processes. 
6. Financial Implications
6.1. There are no costs associated with these proposals. Any anticipated permanent
savings as a result of these proposals will be identified by ongoing risk analysis and
financial modelling.  These would be reported via the usual reporting processes. The
new structure is expected to start in August 2026 and will enable the Resource to grow
from a more stable leadership position as well as allowing further consideration of
savings over the next three years.  
7. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications
7.1. There are no climate change or environmental implications as a result of this report. 
8. Other Implications
8.1. No other implications attached to this report. 
9. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
9.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
9.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Lyndsay McRoberts
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
28 January 2026 
35

Page 36

Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Education and learning: inspiring learners, transforming learning, strengthening
partnerships. 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact: - 
Lyndsay McRoberts, Executive Director (Education Resources)
Ext: 4468 (Tel:  01698 454379)
E-mail :  Lyndsay.McRoberts@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
36

Page 37

Appendix 1
Education Area 1 
Education Area 2 
Head of
Education
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Early Years           
Locality
Manager
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Early Years           
Locality
Manager
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Quality
Improvement
Manager
Early Years
Locality
Manager
Head of
Education
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Development
Officer Digital
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Education Support
Officer STEM (Science,
Technical, Engineering and Maths)
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Quality
Improvemen
t Officer
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Quality
Improvement
Manager
37

Page 38

Education Inclusion 
Education Resources   
Head of
Education    
Inclusion
Senior
Manager Pupil
Support
Senior
Manager Pupil
Support
Senior
Manager Pupil
Support
Senior
Manager   
Pupil support
Senior
Manager Pupil
support
Quality
Improvement
Manager
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Virtual
Headteacher
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Child
Protection
Officer
Head of 
Education
Resources
Service Manager
Planning,
Perfomance &
Operations
Service Manager
Support services
Coordinator
Children's
Services
Planning
38

Page 39

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Education Resources Committee
Date of report: 17 February 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Achievement of Literacy and Numeracy Curriculum for
Excellence Levels 2024/2025 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide an update on the recently published Literacy and Numeracy Curriculum
for Excellence levels for session 2024/2025
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the Curriculum for Excellence levels in Literacy and Numeracy for
2024/2025 be noted. 
3. Background
3.1. The Scottish Government published the Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence
(CfE) Levels for 2024/2025 on 9 December 2025. 
3.2. The published information is based on the professional judgement of teachers and is
collated annually based on data submitted by all schools in Scotland in June each
year. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, there was no data collected in 2019/2020 and
there was no S3 data collected in 2020/2021. 
3.3. Data is submitted on Curriculum for Excellence levels in literacy and numeracy at the
stages of P1, P4, P7 and S3 across all South Lanarkshire Council schools. The
Scottish Government aggregates the school level data to produce the local authority
dataset which forms the basis for their report. 
3.4. Further information on CfE levels and the expected levels by stage is shown in
Appendix 1. 
3.5. A very small number of pupils have long-term significant and complex additional
support needs that mean it is unlikely that they will progress through CfE levels during
their time in education.  These pupils are recorded as ‘child following individual
milestones’ and are included in the data. 
3.6. Individual pupils who have recently joined schools with no prior assessment history
are recorded as ‘not assessed’ and these figures are not included in the data set.  
7
39

Page 40

4. Assessment and Moderation  
4.1. Achievement of a CfE level is based on the holistic view of a child’s achievements
across a range of evidence over a period.  Some schools use standardised
assessments, including National Standardised Assessments, to contribute to this
process.   
4.2. Teacher professional judgement of achievement of a level is subject to quality
assurance to ensure a consistent understanding of standards and consistent
assessment decisions. Moderation can take place internally within a school or across
a group of schools and/or Learning Communities.  All schools have access to external
materials to support this process, including resources published by Education
Scotland and The West Partnership.   
4.3. Schools use their pupil level CfE data internally to inform next steps in progress for
individual children and young people.  Aggregated whole school data is included in
each school’s annual Standards and Quality report which is published and shared with
parents each session.   
5.  Summary of Results: National 
5.1.  National attainment in the primary stages for 2024/2025 demonstrates minor year-on-
year variation across all organisers and stages. In Numeracy, there was a decrease
at P1 and P4, and a modest increase at P7. Attainment across P1/4/7 combined in
Numeracy remains stable.  Literacy levels declined slightly at P1, but improved at P4
and P7, as well as P1/4/7 combined. 
5.2.  At S3, the proportion of pupils achieving Third Level in Numeracy increased, with a
notable increase at S3 Fourth Level, indicating enhanced performance at this stage.
Literacy overall increased at both levels with the individual organisers of Reading,
Writing, and Listening and Talking all recording gains. 
5.3. The poverty related attainment gap between the most and least deprived areas in
primary stages remained stable or narrowed across most organisers and stages. In
Numeracy, the most significant gains were made at P7 with moderate gains at P1 and
P1/4/7 combined.  Literacy combined, Reading, and Listening and Talking improved
across all stages.  Writing improved at P1, P7 and P1/4/7 combined. 
5.4. For S3, the poverty-related attainment gap narrowed at Fourth Level in both Numeracy
and Literacy. The Numeracy gaps reduced at both levels, particularly at S3 Fourth
Level.  The Literacy gap decreased at S3 Third Level and S3 Fourth Level. Reading,
Writing, and Listening and Talking all showed reductions in the attainment gap. 
6.  Summary of Results: South Lanarkshire Council (SLC) 
6.1. In 2024/2025, SLC reported Curriculum for Excellence data for 14,403 young people
across 142 schools, contributing to the national sample of approximately 219,500.   
N.B. 2021/2022 was the first year in which a full data set was collected for the 4 stages
(P1, P4, P7 and S3) since the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic began. 
The information can be accessed on the Scottish Government’s website at:-
Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) Levels 2024-2025 - gov.scot 
40

Page 41

6.2.  Primary Literacy 
P1/4/7 Literacy in SLC has shown steady recovery since the Covid-19 pandemic,
although in 2024/2025, SLC’s attainment dipped while the national average increased. 
Scotland improved slightly and narrowed the equity gap, whereas SLC experienced a
decrease in headline attainment and a marginal widening of the gap.  
71.41
72.30
66.88
70.54
72.74
73.99
74.53
72.00
71.69
70.23
71.26
73.45
74.60
73.16
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy
P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
ACEL | P147 | Literacy
Scotland South Lanarkshire
-16.80
-16.81
-21.42 -17.76
-16.96
-17.41
-16.61
-15.12
-15.37
-19.18
-18.56
-17.69
-17.38
-17.71
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
Scotland South Lanarkshire
41

Page 42

6.3. Secondary Literacy - Third Level 
SLC continues to outperform the national average in S3 (Third Level) Literacy,
maintaining a higher attainment rate. Both Scotland and SLC have demonstrated
substantial recovery from the 2020/21 Covid-related decline, with Scotland achieving
a new high in 2024/2025. However, due to SLC’s slight attainment decrease the equity
gap has widened slightly. 
6.4. Secondary Literacy - Fourth Level 
87.33
87.94
85.54
87.76
88.31
89.83
93.17
93.15
90.48
91.01
92.42
91.98
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy
S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
ACEL | S3 (3rd) | Literacy
Scotland South Lanarkshire
-13.30
-13.76
-16.34
-13.69
-12.71
-10.80
-9.19
-7.99
-8.96
-10.20
-10.06
-11.93
-18.00
-16.00
-14.00
-12.00
-10.00
-8.00
-6.00
-4.00
-2.00
0.00
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy
S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
Scotland South Lanarkshire
46.37
48.23
47.71
56.07
58.17
63.14
57.50
60.40
59.19 69.52
73.80
75.93
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy
S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
ACEL | S3 (4th) | Literacy
Scotland South Lanarkshire
42

Page 43

SLC has sustained improvement in S3 (Fourth Level) Literacy for the fourth
consecutive year. In 2024/2025, SLC’s attainment increased by approximately 2.1
percentage points, remaining above the national average, which also improved. The
equity gap narrowed nationally but widened locally, however, SLC’s gap remains more
favourable than the national figure. 
6.5. Primary Numeracy 
-34.08
-33.57
-31.31
-30.66
-30.90
-29.15
-32.23
-29.33
-23.53
-28.08
-21.67
-24.90
-40.00
-35.00
-30.00
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy Literacy
S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
Scotland South Lanarkshire
78.42
79.07
74.69
77.95
79.60
80.29
80.30
78.87
79.23
77.89
79.11
81.64
81.47
80.24
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
ACEL | P147 | Numeracy
Scotland South Lanarkshire
-16.80
-16.81
-21.42
-17.76
-16.96
-17.41
-16.61
-15.12
-15.37
-19.18
-18.56
-17.69
-17.38
-17.71
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147 P147
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
Scotland South Lanarkshire
43

Page 44

P1/4/7 Numeracy attainment declined slightly in 2024/2025, resulting in a close
alignment with the national average (Scotland: 80.30%, SLC: 80.24%). The national
equity gap narrowed to –16.61 percentage points, while SLC’s gap widened to –17.71
percentage points. 
6.6. Secondary Numeracy - Third Level 
SLC continues to exceed the national average in S3 (Third Level) Numeracy.
Scotland achieved a new high in 2024/2025, with the national equity gap narrowing.
SLC’s attainment dipped slightly, but the local equity gap also narrowed,
strengthening SLC’s comparative position.  
89.04
90.17
89.07
89.55
90.32
90.86
91.17
93.04
92.00
93.49
92.96
92.48
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
ACEL | S3 (3rd) | Numeracy
Scotland South Lanarkshire
-14.01
-13.48
-14.98
-13.65
-12.01
-11.58
-14.17 -10.12
-12.49 -9.26
-9.05
-8.96
-16.00
-14.00
-12.00
-10.00
-8.00
-6.00
-4.00
-2.00
0.00
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd) S3 (3rd)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
Scotland South Lanarkshire
44

Page 45

6.7. Secondary Numeracy - Fourth Level 
At S3 (Fourth Level) Numeracy, SLC’s attainment reached 74.9% in 2024/2025,
surpassing the national average of 68%. This represents the highest level in the past
six years. The local equity gap was 27.7 percentage points, better than the national
figure of 30.1 percentage points. 
7.  Analysis of results-Excellence and Equity, ‘The Gap’
7.1. Across Broad General Education (BGE), SLC’s progress in reducing the poverty-
related attainment gap demonstrates a varied picture. S3 Third Level Literacy
organisers are all below the national average, indicating a smaller gap. All S3 Fourth
Level organisers are above the national average. However, most P1/4/7 Literacy
organisers have declined and now fall below the national average. 
7.2. In 2024/2025, SLC ranked 16th out of 32 local authorities for P1/4/7 Numeracy and
19th for P1/4/7 Literacy. For S3 Third Level, SLC placed 8th in Literacy and 11th in
Numeracy. At S3 Fourth Level, SLC ranked 5th in Literacy and 6th in Numeracy. 
7.3. For S3 third-level literacy and numeracy, SLC is placed 8th in literacy and 11th in
numeracy out of 32 Local Authorities. For S3 fourth-level literacy and numeracy, SLC
ranks 5th in literacy and 6th in numeracy out of 32 Local Authorities. 
56.14
58.86
59.30
62.98
65.14
67.99
60.89
62.56
65.13
72.58
74.28
74.86
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
ACEL | S3 (4th) | Numeracy
Scotland South Lanarkshire
-36.51
-37.67
-34.92
-34.55
-33.31
-30.07
-25.58
-28.34
-32.25
-31.40 -24.05
-27.66
-40.00
-35.00
-30.00
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Equity (Nat)
Gap
Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy Numeracy
S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th) S3 (4th)
2017/18 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25
Achieved Expected Level (%)
Scotland South Lanarkshire
45

Page 46

7.4. The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) is a statistical tool that is used by
the Scottish Government to identify and measure areas of relative deprivation in
Scotland.  Further information on the SIMD and ‘The Gap’ is shown in Appendix 2. 
7.5. In primary, the numeracy attainment gap widened and is now 1.4 percentage points
greater than the national average for P1/4/7. The literacy gap has reduced since
2023/2024, bringing SLC closer to the national figure. 
7.6. In secondary, attainment for S3 Quintile 1 learners increased in both Literacy and
Numeracy at both levels, with the numeracy gap narrowing at Third Level. 
8. Next Steps
8.1.  Immediate steps have already been taken to address the current attainment levels
across P1/4/7 within our primary schools. Building on existing good practice and data
analysis, all schools will be supported to critically evaluate current attainment levels
and ensure appropriate target setting is in place for the remainder of session
2025/2026. A similar exercise is also taking place across Early Years to support
transition data.   
8.2. Further work is in place across Early Years to ensure practitioners are confident in
their evaluation of children’s progress through Early Level. Although in its infancy, this
targeted work will be a key focus for the remainder of this session to ensure the highest
quality of Early Level learning is delivered across all our establishments and will
support practitioner moderation and achievement at Early Level. 
8.3. A comprehensive three-year plan is currently being implemented to enhance progress
at Early Level. The plan will have a clear focus on developing our approaches to
improving language development post Covid.  It will also outline our strategy to
strengthen pedagogical approaches in light on the new curriculum improvement
agenda, whilst also maintaining a strong commitment to inclusive practice and
leadership development. 
8.4.  Through the secondary Statistical Summary Report (SSR) programme, Head
Teachers and senior leadership teams will continue to engage in high-quality support
and challenge discussions around their attainment and school improvement priorities. 
The SSR Live BGE session continues to support improvements in S3 Achievement of
Curriculum for Excellence data through professional learning and robust professional
dialogue. 
8.5. Education Resources will continue to provide support and challenge for schools and
Early Years establishments through a consistent 3-18 approach with an increased
focus on self-evaluation to support improvement. 
8.6. This data will continue to be reported on through Education Resources’ planning and
reporting mechanisms linked to both the Council Plan and Resource Plan at quarters
2 and 4.   
9. Employee Implications
9.1. None 
10. Financial Implications
10.1. None 
46

Page 47

11. Other Implications
11.1. There are no implications for sustainability or risk in terms of the information contained
within this report. 
12. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
12.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to an existing policy, function or strategy and, therefore, no impact assessment
is required. 
12.2. There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Lyndsay McRoberts
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
27 January 2026 
Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Education and learning: inspiring learners, transforming learning, strengthening
partnerships 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 Achievement of Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) Levels 20242025 - gov.scot 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Jacqueline Wallace, Head of Education (Primary and Early Years)
Ext: 4468 (Tel:  01698 454468)
E-mail:  Jacqueline.Wallace@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
47

Page 48

Appendix 1: Curriculum for Excellence levels 
Expected CfE levels by stage. 
CfE Level Stage Description
Early P1 The final two years of early learning and childcare before a
child goes to school and P1, or later for some.
First P4 To the end of P4, but earlier or later for some.
Second P7 To the end of P7, but earlier or later for some.
Third and
Fourth S3
S1 to S3, but earlier or later for some.  The Fourth Level
broadly equates to Scottish Credit and Qualifications
Framework Level 4.  The Fourth Level experiences and
outcomes are intended to provide possibilities for choice and
young people’s programmes will not include all the Fourth
Level outcomes. 
‘Literacy’ and ‘Numeracy’ and reports the percentage of children and young
people who have achieved expected CfE levels, as shown in the table, in these
areas. 
Pupils are deemed to have achieved a level in Literacy when they achieve the
expected level for the three Literacy organisers: Reading; Writing; Listening and
Talking), 
48

Page 49

Appendix 2: SIMD and ‘The Gap’ 
The Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) is a statistical tool that is used by
the Scottish Government to identify and measure areas of relative deprivation in
Scotland. It provides a composite measure of deprivation by combining information
from six different indicators: income, employment, health, education, geographic
access to services and crime. 
A score is produced based on these 6 indicators and this score is used to rank each
small geographical area (data zone) from the most deprived (rank 1) to the least
deprived (rank 6,505). 
Deciles split the data zones into 10 groups, each containing 10% of Scotland’s data
zones. Quintiles split the data zones into 5 groups, each containing 20% of Scotland’s
data zones. The graphic below shows the relationship between Deciles and Quintiles. 
Decile
1
Decile
2
Decile
3
Decile
4
Decile
5
Decile
6
Decile
7
Decile
8
Decile
9
Decile
10          
Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 
All ‘gap’ analysis within this paper compares attainment of learners who reside in
Quintile 1 data zones with all learners who reside in Quintile 5 data zones.  (Q1 v Q5). 
This is the commonly accepted methodology to measure the ‘gap’ in Scottish
Education. 
49

Page 50

50

Page 51

Report
Agenda Item 
Report to: Education Resources Committee
Date of Meeting: 17 February 2026
Report by: Executive Director (Education Resources)  
Subject: Curriculum Improvement Cycle 
1. Purpose of Report
1.1. The purpose of the report is to:-
[purpose]
 provide an update on the national programme for the review of the curriculum in
Scotland, known as the Curriculum Improvement Cycle
[1purpose]
2. Recommendation(s)
2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):-
[recs]
(1) that the content of the report be noted.
cs]
3. Background
3.1. An Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) report in 2021
made several recommendations for how Scotland’s Curriculum should evolve. These
included introducing a systematic review cycle and updating the curriculum to make
more explicit the knowledge and skills children and young people should acquire to
build and deepen understanding as they progress through learning. 
3.2. Two years after the publication of the OECD Report, in May 2023, the National
Discussion on Scottish Education also made recommendations regarding curriculum
review. In its call to action in the section focused on curriculum the conveners of the
discussion (Professor Carol Campbell and Professor Alma Harris) concluded:   
“A regular curriculum review process should be established to ensure that the
curriculum remains fit for purpose, reflects contemporary learner needs, and can be
effectively delivered in ways to ensure that all learners in Scotland have high quality
curricular-linked learning experiences. 
“As part of the review of the curriculum the technical framework of the BGE (including
the Experiences and Outcomes) needs to be re-visited to ensure it is still fit for purpose
and aligns with emerging recommendations about the Senior Phase from the
Independent Review of Assessment and Qualifications.” 
3.3. This call to action again recognised the need and importance to establish a systematic
review cycle for Scottish Education. The Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills
announced the establishment of the Curriculum Improvement Cycle (CIC) for Scotland
in December 2023. Education Scotland was commissioned by the Scottish
Government to lead the work in April 2024. 
8
51

Page 52

4. Model for Review
4.1. The Scottish Model for Curriculum Review (The Curriculum Improvement Cycle) takes
around ten years to be completed. It is anticipated that each review cycle starts and
ends with an exercise similar to the National Discussion on Scottish Education. This
means that the first year of the cycle was 2023/2024 and we should expect another
National Discussion in 2032/2033. 
4.2. The model consists of four distinct but interlinked stages:- 
1. Analysis 
Ongoing reviewing of feedback from practice on how the curriculum is working at
all levels, studies on future trends including international evidence and research
on specific issues. This will help identify areas for closer focus.   
2. Engagement and Co-creation 
Planning, engagement, collaboration and processing of feedback to test draft
workstreams. 
3. Share, Learn and Adopt 
Local capacity building and professional development; development of support
material; monitoring of experiences of teachers and students.   
4. Mobilise, Monitor and Evaluate. 
Mobilise the system around the approach and its implementation. 
Once the new approach is mainstream, the cycle begins again in terms of monitoring
and evaluation through inspectorate. 
4.3. It is noted that the review of the curriculum is being implemented as part of the wider
reform of education in Scotland.  As such, whilst the ongoing review of qualifications
and assessment is a separate activity, it is noted that there is significant
interdependency between the curriculum and how it is taught, and how pupils are
assessed to award qualifications. 
4.4. The Scottish Government has established a Curriculum and Qualifications Assurance
Board charged with ensuring that these workstreams are coordinated and
complimentary.  Appendix 1 sets out the published timelines of activity. 
5. Evolving the Technical Framework
5.1. The main focus of the current phase of the 10-year cycle is evolving the technical
framework, that supports the ‘curriculum: i.e. the documents and guidance that
teachers and practitioners use to plan learning for and with children and young people
and alongside communities and partners. 
5.2. The Analysis and the Engagement and Co-creation stages resulted in the publication
of a series of three Curriculum Improvement Cycle discussion papers. 
 Paper one is called Background and A Case For Change : Findings from the
Pilot Curriculum Reviews 2023/24. This was published in November 2024. This
paper explains why we are doing this work and talks about the pilot curriculum
reviews. It also talks about evolving the technical framework and aims to inspire
thinking  
52

Page 53

 Paper two was published in December 2024 is called ‘Towards an Evolved
Technical Framework.’  This paper draws on the finding from the pilot curriculum
reviews and other evidence to explain what the options might be to evolve the
Technical Framework of Scotland’s Curriculum
 Paper three published in April 2025 is called ‘Working Together to Make Change
Happen’.  This paper provides an overview of the development of the Curriculum
Improvement Cycle to date and shares what is currently in scope. It also outlines
the practices, processes and approaches that are being used, considers what is
needed to build capacity to support any emerging changes, and identifies the
interdependencies. 
5.3. A Know–Do–Understand approach will underpin the structure of the new technical
framework, bringing greater clarity and coherence to the curriculum. Over 1,500
teachers and practitioners are contributing to its development, exploring what children
and young people should understand, what they should know, and what they should
be able to do at developmentally appropriate stages in their learning. This change will
strengthen how we teach for deep conceptual understanding and should make
progression clearer. 
5.4. National Curriculum Steering Groups have been established to progress the
development of the new technical framework across curriculum areas.  Each steering
group is supported by further core and collaboration groups consisting of practitioners
from Early Years, Primary, Secondary and Additional Support Needs (ASN) settings
to ensure that practitioner voices are included from the outset. 
6. Next Steps
6.1. Three of the current five strategic priorities for Education Resources are linked to
curriculum:-
 provide a rich and stimulating curriculum that helps raise standards in literacy
and numeracy
 support children and young people to develop their skills for learning, life, and
work
 empower learners to shape and influence actions on climate change and
sustainability 
6.2. An internal plan has been prepared to operate in tandem with the national timeline,
and which will respond to any developments or changes which may arise.  This
includes professional development for headteachers and heads of establishment, a
communication strategy, information and support for practitioners and the provision of
opportunities for further involvement at a national level. 
6.3. Central team officers are involved in the national groups and have participated in
engagement sessions with Education Scotland and through appropriate Association
of Directors of Education in Scotland (ADES) networks.  They will continue to
participate in any national events or opportunities arising through professional
networks such as ADES and will receive ongoing training to ensure that we are
equipped to deliver the plan and support our establishments throughout the process. 
6.4. By mid-February, Primary, Secondary and ASN Headteachers will have had direct
engagement with the Director of Curriculum Innovation at Education Scotland and his
team and will have had the opportunity to discuss the plans and proposals at recent
Headteacher meetings.  
53

Page 54

6.5. In secondary schools, steps have been taken to build capacity at subject level across
South Lanarkshire by re-establishing subject specialist networks with a specific focus
on the curriculum improvement cycle and, in time, the review of qualifications and
assessment. 
6.6. Further engagement is planned in future Headteacher Business meetings and
Learning Community meetings and in our own curriculum conferences.  This will
include updates, guidance and advice; opportunities for discussion and feedback;
provision of supporting resources; and examples of best practice as they emerge. It is
also anticipated that additional In-Service time may be allocated to this programme,
but that is as yet unconfirmed. 
6.7. Whilst we are at an early stage in this programme of review, it is recognised that the
outcome and its implementation have the potential to transform learning and
qualifications for all children.  Further updates will be provided as the programme
continues. 
6.8. Further information is also available on the Education Scotland website:- 
education.gov.scot/curriculum-for-excellence/about-curriculum-for-excellence/the-
curriculum-improvement-cycle-cic/ 
7. Employee Implications
7.1. There are no employee implications associated with this report. 
8. Financial Implications
8.1. There are no financial implications associated with this report. 
9. Other Implications
9.1. There are no implications for sustainability or risk in terms of the information contained
within this report. 
10. Integrated Impact Assessment and Consultation Requirements
10.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a
change to existing policy, function or strategy and therefore, no impact assessment is
required. 
10.2  There was no requirement to undertake any consultation in terms of the information
contained in this report. 
Lyndsay McRoberts
Executive Director (Education Resources) 
28 January 2026 
54

Page 55

Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes
 Improve achievement, raise educational attainment and support lifelong learning
 Ensure schools and other places of learning are inspirational 
Previous References
 None 
List of Background Papers
 None 
Contact for Further Information
If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please
contact:- 
Stewart Nicolson, Head of Education (Secondary)
Ext: 4468   (Tel: 01698 454468)
E-mail:  stewart.nicolson@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 
55

Page 56

Appendix 1   
56