Agenda Document Pack - Clydesdale Area Committee - 17/08/2022
South Lanarkshire Council · 17 August 2022
Back to Clydesdale Area Committee — 17 August 2022 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Council Offices, Almada Street Hamilton, ML3 0AA Tuesday, 09 August 2022 Dear Councillor Clydesdale Area Committee The Members listed below are requested to attend a meeting of the above Committee to be held as follows:- Date: Wednesday, 17 August 2022 Time: 14:00 Venue: Hybrid - Council Chamber, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton, ML3 0AA The business to be considered at the meeting is listed overleaf. Yours sincerely Cleland Sneddon Chief Executive Members Catherine McClymont (Chair), Ross Gowland (Depute Chair), Alex Allison, Ralph Barker, Poppy Corbett, Lynsey Hamilton, Mark Horsham, Ross Lambie, Richard Lockhart, Eileen Logan, Julia Marrs, Ian McAllan, David Shearer 1
Page 2
BUSINESS 1 Declaration of Interests 2 Minutes of Previous Meeting Minutes of the meeting of the Clydesdale Area Committee held on 22 June 2022 submitted for approval as a correct record. (Copy attached) 3 - 6 Item(s) for Noting 3 Police Scotland Presentation by Chief Inspector Tony Gallagher and Inspector Paul Doyle. 4 Participatory Budgeting - Community and Enterprise Resources - Footways Report dated 21 July 2022 by the Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources). (Copy attached) 7 - 20 Item(s) for Decision 5 Community Grant Applications Report dated 25 July 2022 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources). (Copy attached) 21 - 24 Urgent Business 6 Urgent Business Any other items of business which the Chair decides are urgent. For further information, please contact:- Clerk Name: Carol Lyon Clerk Telephone: 07385 370065 Clerk Email: carol.lyon@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 2
Page 3
CLYDESDALE AREA COMMITTEE Minutes of meeting held via MS Teams and in the Banqueting Hall, Council Offices, Almada Street, Hamilton on 22 June 2022 Chair: Councillor Catherine McClymont Councillors Present: Councillor Alex Allison, Councillor Poppy Corbett, Councillor Ross Gowland (Depute), Councillor Lynsey Hamilton, Councillor Mark Horsham, Councillor Ross Lambie, Councillor Julia Marrs, Councillor Ian McAllan, Councillor David Shearer Councillors’ Apologies: Councillor Ralph Barker, Councillor Richard Lockhart, Councillor Eileen Logan Attending: Finance and Corporate Resources C Lyon, Administration Officer; L Wyllie, Administration Assistant 1 Declaration of Interests The following interests were declared:- Councillor(s) Item(s) Nature of Interest(s) Marrs Community Grant Applications:- ♦ Kirkfieldbank Homing and Sporting Club, Lanark (CL/1/22) ♦ St Nicholas Pre School Playgroup, Lanark (CL/11/22) ♦ Lanark and District Archaeological Society, Lanark (CL/13/22) Known to group Known to group Known to group McClymont ♦ Cargill House Club, Lanark (CL/8/22) Member 2 Playscheme Grant Applications A report dated 25 May 2022 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was submitted on an application received from Lanark Universal Connections (PS/CL/1/22) for a playscheme grant for 2022/2023. Playscheme funding allowed an allocation of £600 to be made to playschemes that operated over the summer, October and Easter holiday periods with £400 for the summer period only and £100 for each of the October and Easter periods. Financial provision was available for individual playschemes to receive, as appropriate, Travel and Freedom passes from Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT). The Committee decided: that a playscheme grant of £600 be awarded to Lanark Universal Connections. [Reference: Minutes of 8 June 2021 (Paragraph 4)] 2 3
Page 4
3 Community Grant Applications A report dated 6 June 2022 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) was submitted on:- applications for community grants to be met from the 2022/2023 budget 6 community grant applications which had been dealt with by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources), in consultation with the Chair, during the period from 15 February to 31 March 2022 to ensure that the 2021/2022 budget was utilised as fully as possible The Committee decided: (1) that community grants be awarded as follows:- (a) Applicant: Kirkfieldbank Homing and Sporting Club, Lanark (CL/1/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment, administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £270 Councillor Marrs, having declared an interest in the above application, withdrew from the meeting during its consideration (b) Applicant: Scottish Retired Teachers’ Association – Clydesdale Group, Braidwood (CL/2/22) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £250 (c) Applicant: Elsrickle Women’s Rural Institute, Biggar (CL/4/22) Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £200 (d) Applicant: Clydesdale Community Concert Band, Carluke (CL/5/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment Amount Awarded: £720 (e) Applicant: Barn Buddies Community Interest Company, Carluke (CL/6/22) Purpose of Grant: Start-up costs - Equipment Amount Awarded: £250 (f) Applicant: Wild Things Scotland Community Interest Company, Biggar (CL/7/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment and materials Amount Awarded: £600 (g) Applicant: Cargill House Club, Lanark (CL/8/22) Purpose of Grant: Outing Amount Awarded: £200 Councillor McClymont, having declared an interest in the above application, withdrew from the meeting during its consideration. Councillor Gowland took the Chair for this application only (h) Applicant: Abington Bowling Club (CL/9/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment Amount Awarded: £300 4
Page 5
(i) Applicant: Crawfordjohn Public Hall Association (CL/10/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment Amount Awarded: £500 (j) Applicant: St Nicholas Pre School Playgroup, Lanark (CL/11/22) Purpose of Grant: Materials Amount Awarded: £480 Councillor Marrs, having declared an interest in the above application, withdrew from the meeting during its consideration (k) Applicant: Leadhills Silver Band (CL/12/22) Purpose of Grant: Materials Amount Awarded: £500 (l) Applicant: Lanark and District Archaeological Society, Lanark (CL/13/22) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £250 Councillor Marrs, having declared an interest in the above application, withdrew from the meeting during its consideration (2) that the action taken during the period 15 February to 31 March 2022 by the Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources), in consultation with the Chair, to approve the award of the following community grants from the 2021/2022 budget be noted:- (a) Applicant: Biggar and District Community Heritage, Biggar (CL/16/21) Purpose of Grant: Equipment, administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £240 (b) Applicant: Equitots Lanarkshire Community Interest Company, Carluke (CL/21/21) Purpose of Grant: Equipment, administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £325 (c) Applicant: Lanark Men’s Shed (CL/22/21) Purpose of Grant: Start-up costs – Equipment and advertising costs Amount Awarded: £250 (d) Applicant: Lanark and District U3A, Lanark (CL/23/21) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £250 (e) Applicant: Hawksland Women’s Rural Institute, Lesmahagow (CL/24/21) Purpose of Grant: Outing and entrance fees Amount Awarded: £250 (f) Applicant: Lesmahagow Farmers’ Society (CL/25/21) Purpose of Grant: Administration and publicity costs Amount Awarded: £600 [Reference: Minutes of 15 February 2022 (Paragraph 6)] 4 Urgent Business There were no items of urgent business. 5
Page 6
6
Page 7
Report Agenda Item Report to: Clydesdale Area Committee Date of Meeting: 17 August 2022 Report by: Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) Subject: Participatory Budgeting: Footways 1. Purpose of this Report 1.1 The purpose of the report is to:- advise the Area Committee of the outcome and level of engagement for the Participatory Budgeting (PB) consultation exercise to identify £2.500 million of footway projects and next steps [1purpose] 2. Recommendation(s) 2.1 The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s): (1) that the outcome and level of engagement for the PB consultation exercise to identify £2.500 million of footway projects, as set out in this report, be noted. 3. Background 3.1 Following the participatory budgeting investment in carriageway and footways completed in 2021/2022, a second phase of investment has now been agreed that will focus on the improvement of footways, making our towns and villages safer for pedestrians, supporting healthy lifestyles through physical activity, and improving the look and feel of our environment. 3.2 £2.500 million ring-fenced investment in the Roads Capital Programme will support footway improvements which are part of the adopted footway network. This investment will continue the Council’s commitment to prioritise investment in roads and related infrastructure by directing additional funds to help improve the condition of our footways. 3.3 As was the case in 2021/2022 the split between geographical and operational areas is largely based on the estimated footway network length. Operational Area Footway length (Km) Footway network share (%) Allocation Clydesdale 498.70 20.5% £512,500 Hamilton 812.07 33.5% £837,500 East Kilbride 701.09 28.9% £722,500 Rutherglen & Cambuslang 413.91 17.1% £427,500 Totals 2425.77 100.00% £2,500,000 4 7
Page 8
3.4 Furthermore, to address concerns that the vote could be dominated by larger population centres or more affluent/organised communities and using learning from national and 2021/2022 PB exercise pilots, the process was again organised in ‘thematic options’ rather than specific streets/roadways. 3.5 The public were asked to vote on the following themes they wished to see delivered through this fund:- (1) minor and residential footways (2) main and distributor footways (3) footways in business areas 3.6 Last year there were both carriageway and footway themes put forward including those unrelated to the public adopted road network (e.g. cemeteries, country parks). However, this year a more focused investment on footways that are part of/adjacent to the public adopted road and footway network has been progressed. 4. Consultation Outcomes 4.1 The consultation ran between 22 April and 5 June 2022 and was promoted via the Council’s website, social media channels and third sector networks. 4.2 Separate votes were held for each of the 4 Areas and each participant was allowed multiple votes for the chosen themes. Participants were able to apportion the votes in any way they chose; for example, all 3 votes could be allocated to a single theme or, at the other extreme, a single vote could be allocated to each of 3 themes. 4.3 As was the case last financial year, rather than having only a single winning theme the available funding was allocated across all themes. 60% of funding in an area was allocated to the top scoring theme, 25 % to the second top theme and 15% to the third-place theme. 4.4 The proposed allocation of funding allows a proportion of the funding to be distributed to all themes (and in turn priorities). This provides the flexibility to continue to target key priorities within each theme based on engineering merit rather than to solely target all funds into one theme, while providing our communities with the opportunity to influence spend across specific themes. 4.5 This also represents best practice in terms of risk management as it gives the service the ability to continue to target funds to those areas in greatest need with the aim of improving those footways that are in the worst condition in the first instance. 4.6 The results of the vote, are shown in Appendix 1 with numbers of votes cast in brackets. In each of the areas the first-place theme was minor and residential footways, followed by main and distributor footways, and then footways in business areas. 4.7 The equalities information attached in Appendix 2 was collected from participants to identify how representative the process was of the area profile of South Lanarkshire. Some participants opted not to leave their information so there is a discrepancy between total participants and the information available below. 4.8 In terms of participation several areas showed significant strength that should be noted, namely:- 8
Page 9
83% of respondents fell under the category of working age (25-64). This is a harder to reach group and should be regarded as a sign of success for the project 16% of respondents classified themselves as having caring responsibilities out with parental responsibilities. This showed significant representation from this community 15% of respondents identified as having a long-term disability or illness which showed good representation from this community representation from SIMD 1 (Bottom 20%) considerably increased this year rising from only 12% representation last year to 19% this year. 4.9 In terms of participation, specific areas that stand out that require improvement in the future to try and ensure the process is representative are: Under 24’s – This could be due to the nature of the process but there was also no specific targeted work done to engage this group. Joint work to promote was undertaken with the Education department, this requires further development Ethnic Minorities – Improvement from last year was demonstrated in this area with an increase to 1.5% representation. This area still requires further development East Kilbride and Cambuslang and Rutherglen were both underrepresented in this process. More targeted work to engage residents in these areas may be required. 5. Next Steps 5.1 In line with the results of the vote, the funding has been allocated as set out below to each of the areas and prioritised themes and specific named schemes have subsequently been identified. Area 1st (60%) 2nd (25%) 3rd (15%) Totals Clydesdale £307,500 £128,125 £76,875 £512,500 Hamilton £502,500 £209,375 £125,625 £837,500 East Kilbride £433,500 £180,625 £108,375 £722,500 Rutherglen & Cambuslang £256,500 £106,875 £64,125 £427,500 Totals £1,500,000 £625,000 £375,000 £2,500,000 5.2 Appendices 3 to 6 sets out the specific schemes and indicative sums allocated to each scheme. These schemes have been identified using our scheme assessment criteria which allows us to score potential footway schemes based on several factors, which collectively contribute towards an overall score enabling us to prioritise our resources. This ensures that funds are targeted at those footways that are in greatest need of repair based on engineering judgement. 5.3 Schemes in Clydesdale are indicated at Appendix 6. 5.4 It should be noted that these are provisional project estimates and there may be some variance in terms of final outturn once more detailed design is undertaken and works are completed. 9
Page 10
5.5 As a result other projects may come forward should projects outturn under budget. Conversely, some projects may require to be deferred or supplemented from other budgets if costs increase from the provisional estimates. 5.6 Given an already full and challenging workload, and as already intimated to Elected Members, to ensure delivery of both our core capital investment programme and the participatory budget priority projects, it has been necessary to commence the schemes prior to the August Area Committee cycle. 5.7 An essential element of any participatory budgeting process is advising participants of the outcome of the vote. The Community Engagement Team will contact those respondents who provided their email address to advise them of the successful themes in each area with a link to a tracking area for PB on South Lanarkshire’s website. 5.8 The Community Engagement Team, with support from the Service, will also work alongside the Corporate Communications/Digital Team to publicise the results through the SL View and social media posts to raise awareness of both the process and the results. 5.9 Reports have been prepared for the four Area Committees to update Elected Members on the voting process and the outcomes from it. These reports are for noting only given the budget allocation has been agreed as part of budget setting process. 6 Employee Implications 6.1 There are no employee implications at this time. 7. Financial Implications 7.1 The intention is to spend the full £2.500 million during 2022/2023, however, market conditions (e.g. contractor/material availability) are likely to result in some spend moving into 2023/2024. 7.2 Specific issues have emerged and are ongoing in relation to bituminous materials due to the Ukraine/Russia conflict and a saturated market is also impacting on contractor availability. However, every effort will be made to deliver the projects identified in appendices 3 through 6 during 2022/2023. 7.3 In terms of an update on the 2021/2022 participatory budgeting programme for footways, 29 projects within residential areas, town centres, country parks and parks were identified and 26 were completed. 7.4 The footway project in Chatelherault Country Park is expected to be undertaken during 2022/2023 and is linked to the replacement of White Bridge and a feasibility study is underway. Work was also not fully completed and is continuing at Calderglen Country Park. These works are being progressed by colleagues in Facilities, Grounds and Waste. 7.5 An adopted footway project in Clydesdale was only partially completed due to weather related issues and works are now programmed for 2022/2023. Funding of circa £0.120 million from 2021/2022 has, in addition to the share identified for 2022/2023, been made available to the Clydesdale Area. A further £0.040 million is also available from 2021/2022 for Hamilton schemes and this will be used to manage inevitable cost variances. 10
Page 11
7.6 For completeness, in addition to the PB funding discussed in this report, circa £1.000 million funding, has been allocated from the Roads Investment Programme for prioritised footway improvements. Specific schemes are shown at the bottom of Appendices 3 through to 6 and it should be noted that the projects are similar in terms of their alignment to the top two PB themes emerging from the PB exercises. 8 Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications 8.1. There are no significant implications in terms of climate change, sustainability and environmental implications associated with this report. 9 Other Implications 9.1. There are no other significant implications as result of the contents of this report. 10. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements 10.1. There is no need to conduct an EIA and the consultation arrangements and results are as set out in section 4. David Booth Executive Director (Community and Enterprise Resources) 21 July 2022 Link(s) to Council Values/Priorities/Outcomes Values Focused on people and their needs Working with and respecting others Accountable, effective, efficient, and transparent Ambitious, self-aware, and improving Fair, open and sustainable Priorities We will work to put people first and reduce inequality We will work towards a sustainable future in sustainable places We will work to recover, progress, and improve Outcomes Good quality, suitable and sustainable places to live Thriving business, fair jobs and vibrant town centres Caring, connected, sustainable communities People live the healthiest lives possible Previous References 7 September 2021 Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact: - Colin Park, Head of Roads, Transportation and Fleet Services Ext: 3653 (Tel: 01698 453653) E-mail: colin.park@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 11
Page 12
Appendix 1 Clydesdale (Overall 807 votes) 1st Place: Minor / Residential – 475 (59%) 2nd Place: Main and distributor – 229 (28%) 3rd Place: Business areas – 103 (13%) Hamilton (Overall 1,023 votes) 1st Place: Minor / Residential – 555 (54%) 2nd Place: Main and distributor – 289 (28%) 3rd Place: Business areas – 179 (18%) Rutherglen and Cambuslang (Overall 456 votes) 1st Place: Minor / Residential – 294 (65%) 2nd Place: Main and distributor – 105 (23%) 3rd Place: Business areas – 57 (12%) East Kilbride (Overall 705 votes) 1st Place: Minor / Residential – 433 (61%) 2nd Place: Main and distributor – 175 (25%) 3rd Place: Business areas – 97 (14%) 12
Page 13
Appendix 2 Locality - 997 Locality No of Participants Percentage of Participants South Lanarkshire Area Profile East Kilbride 235 24% 30.00% Hamilton 341 34% 32.00% Clydesdale 269 27% 19% Rutherglen and Cambuslang 152 15% 19% SIMD 2020 – 951 Postcodes provided Decile Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants SL Area Profile 1-20% 180 19% 20% 21-40% 214 22.5% 23% 41-60% 224 23.5% 20% 61-80% 173 18% 20% 81-100% 158 17% 17% Age Age Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants SL Area Profile Under 16 3 0% 18% 16-24 23 2% 10% 25-64 815 83% 82% Over 65 136 14% 21% Prefer not to answer 20 2% N/A Gender Gender Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants SL Area Profile Female 686 69% 52% Male 266 27% 48% Prefer not to Answer 4 0% N/A Other 41 4% N/A 13
Page 14
Ethnic Background Ethnic Background Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants South Lanarkshire Area Profile White 932 94% 97.30% Prefer not to answer 51 5% N/A Asian, Asian Scottish, or Asian British 3 0% 2.10% Mixed/multiple ethnic groups 7 1% 0% Arab 0 0% 0% African, Carribean or black 1 0% 0.60% Other ethnic group 3 0% 0% Sexual Orientation Sexual Orientation Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants South Lanarkshire Area Profile Heterosexual/Straight 795 80% 97% Prefer not to answer 138 14% N/A Gay/Lesbian 30 3% 2.20% Bisexual 16 2% 0.80% Caring Responsibilities Caring Responsibility Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants South Lanarkshire Area Profile Children Under 18 435 44% 97% Yes, other 158 16% N/A No caring responsibilities 336 34% 2.20% Prefer not to answer 100 10% 0.80% Disabilities Disability Survey Engagement Percentage of Participants South Lanarkshire Area Profile Yes 152 15% 11% No 755 76% 89% Prefer not to answer 90 9% N/A 14
Page 15
Appendix 3: Clydesdale Footways Participatory Budgeting Allocation (£) Theme Theme 1, Minor / Residential (PB Budget £307,500) PB Underspend 21/22 £120,738 Station Road, Law (funded from 2021-22 PB) 52,000 Minor / Residential Wilton Road, Carluke Ph1 (part funded from 2021-22 PB) 184,211 Minor / Residential Silverdale Crescent, Lanark 79516 Minor / Residential Dale Street, Douglas 58000 Minor / Residential Brownhill Avenue, Douglas 54511 Minor / Residential Total 428,238 Theme 2, Main / Distributor (PB Budget £128,125) Main Street, Forth (Kirk Green – Hawkwood) 72,195 Main and Distributor Heathfield Drive, Blackwood 55,930 Main and Distributor Total 128,125 Theme 3, Business Areas (PB Budget £76,875) Bloomgate, Lanark 29,000 Business Areas A721 Chapel Street, Carluke 30,000 Business Areas St Leonard Street, Lanark 17,875 Business Areas Total 76,875 Other Footway, Service Capital (PB Budget £205,600) Allocation (£) Theme A70 Mainshill 100,987 Main and Distributor Low Village Rd, Lamington 20,000 Minor / Residential A706 Main Street, Forth 25,000 Main and Distributor Whitehill Crescent, Lanark 59,613 Minor / Residential Total 205,600 15
Page 16
Appendix 4: Hamilton Footways Participatory Budgeting Allocation (£) Theme Theme 1, Minor / Residential (Budget £502,500) Willow Drive, Blantyre 104,500 Minor / Residential Highfield Road, Larkhall 90,000 Minor / Residential Sycamore Grove, Blantyre 30,000 Minor / Residential Avonbrae Crescent, Hamilton (North Side) 100,000 Minor / Residential St Ninians Place, Hamilton 48,000 Minor / Residential Selkirk Street, Blantyre 50,000 Minor / Residential Wilson Place, Stonehouse 20,000 Minor / Residential St Laurence Avenue, Stonehouse 30,000 Minor / Residential Sherry Drive, Hamilton 30,000 Minor / Residential Total 502,500 Theme 2, Main / Distributor (Budget £209,375) Bellshill Road - Service Road 50,000 Main and Distributor Carlisle Road, Ferniegair 50,000 Main and Distributor Main Street, Blantyre 109,375 Main and Distributor Total 209,375 Theme 3, Business Areas (Budget £125,625) Central Avenue, Blantyre 125,625 Business Areas Total 125,625 Other Footway, Service Capital (Budget £334,800) Allocation (£) Theme Lime Grove, Blantyre 10,000 Minor / Residential Larch Court, Blantyre 45,000 Minor / Residential A723, Strathaven Road, Hamilton 99,400 Main and Distributor 16
Page 17
Bardykes Road, Blantyre 40,000 Main and Distributor Darngaber Gardens, Quarter 40,000 Minor / Residential Glenburn Avenue, Stonehouse 100,000 Minor / Residential Total 334,400 17
Page 18
Appendix 5: East Kilbride Footways Participatory Budgeting Allocation (£) Theme Theme 1, Minor / Residential (Budget £433,500) Gilderdale, East Kilbride 26000 Minor / Residential Threshold, East Kilbride 71280 Minor / Residential Glen Cannich, East Kilbride 32500 Minor / Residential Newlands Rd, East Kilbride 60000 Minor / Residential Wellesley Dr, East Kilbride 71000 Minor / Residential Kype View, Strathaven 91000 Minor / Residential Douglas St, Strathaven 30870 Minor / Residential Applegarth Rd, Strathaven 50850 Minor / Residential Total 433,500 Theme 2, Main / Distributor (Budget £180,625) High Common Rd, East Kilbride 59000 Main and Distributor Kirktonholme Rd, East Kilbride 30000 Main and Distributor St Leonards Rd, East Kilbride 51625 Main and Distributor Newton Rd, Strathaven 40000 Main and Distributor Total 180,625 Theme 3, Business Areas (Budget £108,375) Colvilles Place, East Kilbride 83200 Business Areas Thomson St, Strathaven 25175 Business Areas Total 108,375 Other Footway, Service Capital Allocation (£) Theme A71 Darvel Road, Strathaven 74000 Main and Distributor Carnegie Hill, East Kilbride 121,000 Minor / Residential 18
Page 19
Mungo Park, East Kilbride 65000 Minor / Residential Glen Morriston, East Kilbride 33000 Minor / Residential Bank Park, East Kilbride 32000 Minor / Residential 325,000 19
Page 20
Appendix 6: Cambuslang and Rutherglen Footways Participatory Budgeting Allocation (£) Theme Theme 1, Minor / Residential (Budget £256,500) Lettrickhills Crescent, Cambuslang 25470 Minor / Residential Cairns Road, Cambuslang 55,000 Minor / Residential Rosslyn Ave, Rutherglen 56,550 Minor / Residential Ryan Way, Rutherglen 33150 Minor / Residential Calderwood Rd, Rutherglen 60,080 Minor / Residential Woodlands Crescent, Cambuslang 26,250 Minor / Residential Total 256,500 Theme 2, Main / Distributor (Budget £106,875) Dukes Road (from A724 uphill), Cambuslang 86,875 Main and Distributor Hamilton Road, Cambuslang 20,000 Main and Distributor Total 106,875 Theme 3, Business Areas (Budget £64,125) Main Street, Rutherglen (streetscape repairs) 64,125 Business Areas Total 64,125 Other Footway, Service Capital Allocation (£) Theme A749 East Kilbride Road, Cambuslang 69,000 Main and Distributor Castlefern Road, Rutherglen 66,000 Minor / Residential Total 135,000 20
Page 21
Report Agenda Item Report to: Clydesdale Area Committee Date of Meeting: 17 August 2022 Report by: Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) Subject: Community Grant Applications 1. Purpose of Report 1.1. The purpose of the report is to:- [purpose] request approval for the allocation of community grants to 5 community groups in the Clydesdale Area Committee area from the 2022/2023 community grant budget 2. Recommendation(s) 2.1. The Committee is asked to approve the following recommendation(s):- [recs] (1) that community grants be awarded as follows:- (a) Applicant: Carluke Men’s Shed, Carluke (CL/14/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment Identified Community Benefits: Caring, connected, sustainable communitites Estimated Cost: £450 Total Eligible Grant Applied for: £450 Recommendation: £270 Amount Awarded: To be determined by the Committee (b) Applicant: Lanarkshire Federation Scottish WI, Carnwath (CL/15/22) Purpose of Grant: Outing Identified Community Benefits: Caring, connected, sustainable communities Estimated Cost: £350 Total Eligible Grant Applied for: £300 Recommendation: £300 Amount Awarded: To be determined by the Committee (c) Applicant: Biggar Kirk – Gillespie Centre, Biggar (CL/16/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment Identified Community Benefits: Caring, connected, sustainable communities Estimated Cost: £925 Total Eligible Grant Applied for: £925 Recommendation: £555 Amount Awarded: To be determined by the Committee 5 21
Page 22
(d) Applicant: ISKCON (Scotland) Limited, Lesmahagow (CL/17/22) Purpose of Grant: Eqiupment, materials, administration and publicity costs Identified Community Benefits: Caring, connected, sustainable communities Estimated Cost: £1,000 Total Eligible Grant Applied for: £1,000 Recommendation: £600 Amount Awarded: To be determined by the Committee (e) Applicant: Carnwath Agricultural Society, Carnwath (CL/18/22) Purpose of Grant: Equipment, administration and publicity costs Identified Community Benefits: Caring, connected, sustainable communities Estimated Cost: £945 Total Eligible Grant Applied for: £945 Recommendation: £567 Amount Awarded: To be determined by the Committee cs] 3. Background 3.1. The Council operates a community grants scheme to support local constituted community groups and voluntary organisations. All applications require to be supported by a constitution, audited accounts or annual income and expenditure accounts, a bank statement, and confirmation that the group/organisation will adhere to the conditions of the grant award. Applications are invited continually throughout the year. 3.2. The main aims of the community grants scheme are to:- fund activities and projects which bring community benefit involve people in the community by bringing them together to enjoy educational, recreational, leisure and other community activities or to improve the local environment 3.3. Support can be provided for a range of activities including administration and publicity costs, purchase of equipment and materials, annual outings and entrance fees, start-up costs and special events. 4. Employee Implications 4.1. None. 5. Financial Implications 5.1. The current position of the community for the Clydesdale Area Committtee area in 2022/2023 is as follows:- Total allocation for Community Grants £25,750 Grants previously allocated £5,120 Community grants allocated in this report £2,292 Remaining balance £18,338 22
Page 23
6. Climate Change, Sustainability and Environmental Implications 6.1. There are no implications for climate change, sustainability or the environment in terms of the information contained in this report. 7. Other Implications 7.1. The risk to the Council is that grant funding is not utilised for the purpose of which it was intended. This risk is mitigated by internal controls including audit procedures and conditions of grant agreement. 8. Equality Impact Assessment and Consultation Arrangements 8.1. This report does not introduce a new policy, function or strategy or recommend a change to an existing policy, function or strategy and therefore no impact assessment is required. 8.2. All the necessary consultation with the community groups has taken place. Paul Manning Executive Director (Finance and Corporate Resources) 25 July 2022 Link(s) to Council Vision/Priorities/Values ♦ Accountable, effective, efficient and transparent. Work with communities and partners to promote high quality, thriving and sustainable communities Previous References ♦ Clydesdale Area Committee - 22 June 2022 List of Background Papers Individual application forms Contact for Further Information If you would like to inspect the background papers or want further information, please contact:- Jennifer Hilston, Clerical Assistant Ext: 4822 (Tel: 01698 454822) E-mail: jennifer.hilston@southlanarkshire.gov.uk 23
Page 24
24