Democracy Spraffa

Minutes of meeting

Renfrewshire Council · 13 March 2024
Back to Regulatory Functions Board — 13 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Minute of Meeting
Regulatory Functions Board 
Date Time Venue
Wednesday, 13 March 2024 10:00 Council Chambers (Renfrewshire), Council
Headquarters, Renfrewshire House, Cotton
Street, Paisley, PA1 1AN 
Present: Councillor Audrey Doig, Councillor Neill Graham, Councillor Lisa-Marie Hughes,
Councillor Janis McDonald, Councillor Cathy McEwan, Councillor John McNaughtan,
Councillor Andy Steel 
Chair
Councillor McNaughtan, Convener, presided. 
In Attendance
C Dalrymple, Head of Facilities & Property Services and T Irvine, Homeless & Housing
Support Services Manager (both Environment, Housing & Infrastructure) (for item 1 only);
R Graham, Senior Solicitor (Litigation & Regulatory Services), C Gregory, Senior Solicitor
(Litigation & Advice), E Currie, Senior Committee Services Officer, D Cunningham and A
Easdon, both Committee Services & Licensing Officers and K Marriott and S Kerr, both
Licensing & Committee Assistants (all Finance & Resources). 
Apologies
Councillors Montgomery and Mullin. 
Declarations of Interest
Councillor McNaughtan declared an interest in items 2(c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) of the agenda
for the reason that he had prior knowledge of the applications which had been discussed at
a meeting of the Paisley East & Whitehaugh Community Council which he had attended.
Councillor McNaughtan indicated that as he had declared an interest, he would withdraw
from the meeting during any discussion and voting on the items.

Page 2

Transparency Statement
Councillor McNaughtan indicated that he had a connection to the additional item of
business he would propose be considered at this meeting by reason of the person
named in the report being a constituent in his Ward and having prior knowledge of the
background referred to within the report. However, he indicated that he had applied the
objective test and did not consider he had an interest to declare.  
Additional Item
The Convener intimated that there was an additional item of business in relation to
Renfrewshire House – Exclusion Order which had not been included in the notice
calling the meeting.  The Convener, being of the opinion that the item, which is dealt
with at item 1 below, was urgent, authorised its consideration.  
Order of Business
In terms of Standing Order 16, the Convener intimated that he proposed to alter the
order of business to facilitate the conduct of the meeting by considering items 3, 4(a)
and (b), and 5(a) and (b) of the agenda after item 2(f) of the agenda and item 2(h) of
the agenda before item 2(g) of the agenda.  
Exclusion of Press and Public
The Board resolved that the press and public be excluded from the meeting during
consideration of the following item of business as it was likely, in view of the nature of
the business to be transacted, that if members of the press and public were present
there would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in paragraphs 3
and 13(a) and (b) of part I of schedule 7A of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. 
1 Renfrewshire House - Exclusion Order
There was submitted a report by the Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure
relative to the making of an Exclusion Order in terms of section 117 of the Civic
Government (Scotland) Act 1982, 
The report intimated that Renfrewshire Council had made Management Rules in
respect of its headquarters at Renfrewshire House, Cotton Street, Paisley which set out
behaviours which were not permitted within the Council’s headquarters. Further that an
individual had persistently contravened or attempted to contravene these Management
Rules and the report sought to make the individual the subject of an Exclusion Order,
thereby excluding that person from the land and premises to which the Management
Rules applied, except for those periods where the person had, by prior arrangement,
been invited to attend for a specific reason, for a period of one year. 
The report intimated that, if approved, the Exclusion Order would take effect on 28
March 2024.

Page 3

DECIDED: 
(a) That the contents of this report detailing the efforts undertaken by officers to engage
with the person named within the report be noted; 
(b) That it be agreed that the person named within the report had persistently
contravened or attempted to contravene the Management Rules applying to the
Council’s headquarters and was likely to contravene them again; 
(c) That the person named within the report be made subject to an Exclusion Order in
terms of section 117 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 thereby excluding
that person from land and premises to which the Management Rules applied, except
for those periods where they had, by prior arrangement, been invited to attend for a
specific reason, for a period of one year; 
(d) That the Exclusion Order take effect on 28 March 2024; and 
(e) That it be noted that officers would continue to support the person named within the
report wherever required.  
Sederunt
Councillor Hughes entered the meeting prior to consideration of the following item of
business.  
Admission of the Press and Public
The press and public were invited back into the meeting prior to consideration of the
following item of business. 
2 Grant of Taxi Operator’s Licence – Personal Appearance
There was submitted the undernoted application for grant of a Taxi Operator’s Licence.
The applicant had been asked to appear personally for the first time:- 
Kamran Bashir 
Mr Bashir, the applicant, was invited into the meeting and he advised that he wished to
withdraw his application. 
DECIDED: That it be noted that the application had been withdrawn.   
3 Grant of Short-term Let Licences – Personal Appearances
There were submitted the undernoted applications for grant of Short-term Let Licences.
The applicants had been asked to appear personally for the first time together with the
objectors to the applications:-

Page 4

(a) Applicant: Investments 38 Limited              
Premises: 65 Huntly Terrace, Paisley     
Mr Corr, on behalf of the applicant, was invited into the meeting. There was no
appearance by or on behalf of Mr Stevenson, Mr and Mrs Wilson, Ms Jones, Mr
Johnstone, Mr and Mrs Wilson, Mr Orr, Mr Cameron, Ms Stevenson, Ms McCabe, Mr
Fleming, Ms Johnstone or Mr Easton, the objectors to the application. After
consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the
application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years. 
(b) Applicant: Mez Property Limited  
Premises: 23 Baronscourt Gardens, Paisley       
Ms Merrells, on behalf of the applicant, and Ms Moore, on behalf of the applicant’s
Management Company, were invited into the meeting. There was no appearance by or
on behalf of Councillor McMillan or Ms Young, the objectors to the application. After
consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the
application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years. 
Declaration of Interest 
Councillor McNaughtan having previously declared interests in items (c), (d), (e) and (f)
left the meeting and took no part in the discussion or voting thereon. 
Adjournment 
The meeting adjourned at 11.20 am and reconvened at 11.25 am. 
Chair 
Councillor McEwan, Depute Convener, assumed the Chair. 
(c) Applicant: Brian Souter
Premises: Flat 5, 10 Kilnside Road, Paisley 
Mr Souter, the applicant, was invited into the meeting. There was no appearance by or
on behalf of Paisley East & Whitehaugh Community Council, the objector to the
application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Depute Convener
proposed that the application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years.

Page 5

(d) Applicant: Brian Souter
Premises: Flat 5, 14 Kilnside Road, Paisley 
Mr Souter, the applicant, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration
of the previous item of business. There was no appearance by or on behalf of Paisley
East & Whitehaugh Community Council, the objector to the application. After
consideration of all matters before the Board, the Depute Convener proposed that the
application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years. 
(e) Applicant: Gordon Duncan
Premises: Flat 1/2, 54 Kilnside Road, Paisley 
Mr Duncan, the applicant, and Ms Garcia, his wife, were invited into the meeting. There
was no appearance by or on behalf of Paisley East & Whitehaugh Community Council,
the objector to the application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the
Depute Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period of three years.
This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years. 
(f) Applicant: Gordon Duncan
Premises: Flat 3/1, 47 Cochran Street, Paisley 
Mr Duncan, the applicant, and Ms Garcia, his wife, remained in the meeting having not
left following consideration of the previous item of business. There was no appearance
by or on behalf of Paisley East & Whitehaugh Community Council, the objector to the
application. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Depute Convener
proposed that the application be granted for a period of three years. This was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years.  
Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 12 noon and resumed at 1.30pm.  
Chair
Councillor McNaughtan entered the meeting prior to consideration of the following item
of business and resumed the Chair.  
Exclusion of Press and Public
The Board resolved that the press and public be excluded from the meeting during
consideration of items 4, 5, 6 and 7(a) as it was likely, in view of the nature of the
business to be transacted, that if members of the press and public were present there
would be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 of part I
of schedule 7A of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973.

Page 6

4  Grant of Private Hire Car Driver’s Licence – Personal Appearance
There was submitted the undernoted application for grant of a Private Hire Car Driver’s
Licence. The applicant had been asked to appear personally for the first time together
with Police Scotland who had submitted a representation to the application:- 
Paul Kennedy  
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Kennedy, the applicant. Sergeant
Robertson was invited into the meeting, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had
submitted a representation to the application. The Convener proposed that the
application be considered in Mr Kennedy’s absence. This was agreed unanimously.
Sergeant Robertson requested that consideration of the application be continued to a
future meeting of the Board. After consideration of all matters before the Board, the
Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued and that the
applicant be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be
invited to a future meeting of the Board. 
5 Grant of Taxi Drivers’ Licences – Personal Appearances
Under reference to items 6(d) and 6(e), respectively, of the Minute of the meeting of
this Board held on 1 February 2024, consideration was resumed of the undernoted
applications for grant of Taxi Drivers’ Licences. The applicants had been asked to
appear personally for the second time together with Police Scotland who had submitted
representations to the applications:- 
(a) Gerald Adams 
There was no appearance by or on behalf of Mr Adams, the applicant. Sergeant
Robertson, remained in the meeting having not left following consideration of the
previous item of business, on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a
representation to the application. The Convener proposed that the application be
considered in Mr Adam’s absence. This was agreed unanimously. After consideration
of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that consideration of the
application be continued and that the applicant be invited to a future meeting of the
Board. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued and that the applicant be
invited to a future meeting of the Board. 
(b) Hasan Babelli 
Mr Babelli, the applicant, was invited into the meeting. Sergeant Robertson, remained
in the meeting having not left following consideration of the previous item of business,
on behalf of the Chief Constable who had submitted a representation to the application.
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the
application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.

Page 7

6  Grant of Taxi Drivers’ Licences
There were submitted the undernoted applications for grant of Taxi Drivers’ Licences:- 
(a) Jahanzab Tufaila 
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the
application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year. 
(b) Shakeel Ahmed Ghafar Begum 
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Convener proposed that the
application be granted for a period of one year. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of one year.   
7 Grant of Short-term Let Licences - Personal Appearances
There were submitted the undernoted applications for grant of Short-term Let Licences.
The applicants had been asked to appear personally for the first time together with the
late objector to application (a) and the objectors and late objectors to application (b):- 
(a) Applicant: William Laird          
Premises: Flat 0/1, 2 Canal Terrace, Paisley           
Mr Laird, the applicant, and Ms Perry were invited into the meeting. There was no
appearance by or on behalf of Mr Connor and Ms Halbert, who had submitted an
objection received outwith the statutory timescale to the application. The Convener
proposed that the objection from Mr Connor and Ms Halbert be not taken into account
when the application was being considered as the objector was not in attendance to
provide reasons as to why the objection was received outwith the statutory timescale
to the application. This was agreed unanimously. After consideration of all matters
before the Board, the Convener proposed that the application be granted for a period
of three years. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted for a period of three years. 
Declaration of Interest 
Councillor McNaughtan having previously declared an interest in (b) left the meeting
and took no part in the discussion or voting thereon. 
Chair   
Councillor McEwan, Depute Convener, assumed the Chair.

Page 8

Sederunt 
Councillor McDonald left the meeting prior to consideration of the following item of
business. 
Admission of the Press and Public 
The press and public were invited back into the meeting prior to consideration of the
following item of business. 
(b) Applicant: Carol-Anne Brown
Premises: Flat 5/1, 1 Abbey Place, Paisley 
Mrs Brown, the applicant, and Mr Brown, her husband, were invited into the meeting
together with Mr McCue, Mr Stewart, who also represented Ms Graham, the objectors
to the application and Ms Cunningham and her representative, Mr Watson, Ms White
and Ms McDonald, who had submitted objections received outwith the statutory
timescale to the application. There was no appearance by or on behalf of Paisley East
& Whitehaugh Community Council, an objector to the application. 
The Senior Solicitor (Litigation & Regulatory Services) advised as to the reasons for the
lateness of the objections from Ms Cunningham, Ms White and Ms McDonald. The
Depute Convener proposed that the objections from Ms Cunningham, Ms White and
Ms McDonald be taken into account when the application was being considered. This
was agreed unanimously. Ms Brown objected to Ms Cunningham’s, Ms White’s and Ms
McDonald’s objections being taken into account when the application was being
considered. 
After consideration of all matters before the Board, the Board adjourned to allow
members to consider this application. The meeting was reconvened and the Depute
Convener proposed that consideration of the application be continued to allow the
applicant to submit details of her buildings insurance policy to the licensing section and
that the applicant and objectors be invited to a future meeting of the Board. This was
agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That consideration of the application be continued to allow the applicant to
submit details of her buildings insurance policy to the licensing section and that the
applicant and objectors be invited to a future meeting of the Board.