Democracy Spraffa

Minutes of meeting

Renfrewshire Council · 15 November 2022
Back to Local Review Body. — 15 November 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Minute of Meeting
Local Review Body. 
Date Time Venue
Tuesday, 15 November
2022
14:00 Microsoft TEAMS platform, 
Present: Councillor Neill Graham, Councillor Anne Hannigan, Councillor John McNaughtan,
Councillor Iain Nicolson, Councillor Jim Paterson 
Chair
Councillor Paterson, Convener, presided. 
In Attendance
K Dalrymple, Development Plans & Housing Strategy Team Leader (Independent Planning
Adviser to the Local Review Body); R Graham, Senior Solicitor (Litigation & Regulatory
Services) (Independent Legal Adviser to the Local Review Body); R Devine, Senior
Committee Services Officer (Clerk to the Local Review Body); D Cunningham, Assistant
Committee Services Officers and D Pole, End User Technician (all Finance & Resources). 
Webcasting of Meeting
Prior to the commencement of the meeting the Convener intimated that this meeting of the
Local Review Body would be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast on the Council's
internet site. 
Declarations of Interest
There were no declarations of interest intimated prior to the commencement of the
meeting. 
Procedure Note
The Convener summarised the procedure to be followed at the meeting of the Local
Review Body (LRB), a copy of which had been circulated to members prior to the meeting.

Page 2

1  LRB04.22
Consideration was given to a Notice of Review in respect of the Planning Authority’s
decision to refuse planning permission for the erection of a dwellinghouse (in
principle) at Barochan West Lodge, Chapel Road, Houston, Johnstone, PA6 7AX.
(21/1625/PP) 
The following materials were before members in relation to the Notice of Review: 
(i) the Planning Authority’s submissions which included the report of handling,
accompanying documents and decision notice; and    
(ii) the Notice of Review, together with supporting statement and productions
submitted by the applicant.    
The Convener confirmed that the LRB required to decide whether it had sufficient
information before it to make a decision on this matter or whether further procedure
was required to allow the LRB to determine Planning Application 21/1625/PP. It was
agreed that the LRB had sufficient information before it to reach a decision. 
The Convener then advised that the LRB required to determine the application in
accordance with the provisions of the local development plan, including any
supplementary guidance, unless material considerations indicated otherwise. 
Following discussion, Councillor McNaughtan proposed that the application be
refused for the reasons detailed in the report of handling. This was agreed
unanimously. 
DECIDED: That Planning Application 21/1625/PP be refused as (a) the proposals
were contrary to Policy ENV 1 of the Adopted Renfrewshire Local Development Plan
2021 as the proposal has not demonstrated a need for new housing that is necessary
to support an established greenbelt activity and the details provided were such that it
may have an adverse impact on the character of the green belt; (b) The proposal was
contrary to Policy E4 of the Adopted Renfrewshire Local Development Plan and the
New Development Supplementary Guidance,Tourism as it has not been
demonstrated that there was a specific location need for the dwellinghouse or that the
development would strengthen the appeal and attraction of Renfrewshire to a range of
visitors. The details provided are such that the scale of the proposal may also not be
proportionate or fit in well with the location; and (c ) the proposal was contrary to the
New Development Supplementary Guidance,Green Belt Development Criteria and
Housing in the Green Belt as the proposal did not require a specific green belt
location or justify the requirement for a residential use outwith the settlement and from
the details provided did not demonstrate outstanding quality of design of an
appropriate scale for its setting such that it would integrate and enhance the
established character of the area.

Page 3

2  LRB05.22
Consideration was given to a Notice of Review in respect of the Planning Authority’s
decision to refuse planning permission for the erection of a dwellinghouse with
associated access (in principle) at Site on Western Boundary of Marypark, Marypark
Road, Langbank.(22/0125/PP) 
The following materials were before members in relation to the Notice of Review: 
(i) the Planning Authority’s submissions which included the report of handling,
accompanying documents, including flood risk assessment, ecological constraints
survey and aerial tree survey reports and decision notice; and    
(ii) the Notice of Review, together with supporting statement and productions
submitted by the applicant.    
The Convener confirmed that the LRB required to decide whether it had sufficient
information before it to make a decision on this matter or whether further procedure
was required to allow the LRB to determine Planning Application 22/0125/PP. It was
agreed that the LRB had sufficient information before it to reach a decision. 
The Convener then advised that the LRB required to determine the application in
accordance with the provisions of the local development plan, including any
supplementary guidance, unless material considerations indicated otherwise. 
Following discussion, the Convener proposed that the application be refused for the
reasons detailed in the report of handling. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That Planning Application 22/0125/PP be refused as (a) the proposed
development did not comply with Policy ENV1 of the Adopted Renfrewshire Local
Development Plan 2021 and the New Development Supplementary Guidance, Green
Belt Development Criteria and Housing in the Green Belt as it has not been
demonstrated that there was a specific locational need for a dwellinghouse and the
development had the potential to have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Site of
Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) and the ancient woodland; and (b) the
proposed development did not comply with Policy ENV2 of the Adopted Renfrewshire
Local Development Plan 2021 and the New Development Supplementary Guidance,
Trees, Woodland and Forestry and Local Designations as the development had the
potential to have an adverse effect on the integrity of the Site of Importance for Nature
Conservation (SINC) and the ancient woodland.