Democracy Spraffa

3 - Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework Feedback 2021-22_Redacted

Renfrewshire Council · 24 January 2023
Back to Planning and Climate Change Policy Board — 24 January 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

___________________________________________________________________ 
To: Planning and Climate Change Policy Board 
On: 24 January 2023
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by: Chief Executive 
___________________________________________________________________ 
Heading: Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework Feedback 2021/22
___________________________________________________________________ 
1. Summary 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the board of the feedback report from
the Minister for Public Finance, Planning and Community Wealth in relation to
Renfrewshire’s Planning Performance Framework 2021/22 as set out in
Appendix 1.
________________________________________________________________ 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 It is recommended that the Board: 
(i) Notes the positive feedback report on Renfrewshire’s Planning
Performance Framework 2021/22.   
___________________________________________________________________ 
3. Background 
3.1 A system of performance management has been established between local
authorities and the Scottish Government, whereby every planning authority is
asked to produce an annual planning performance framework. 
3.2 The framework was developed by the Heads of Planning Scotland to capture
and highlight a balanced measurement of planning performance, showing
commitment to the following areas:
 Speed of decision making;
 Qualitative analysis, providing case studies to demonstrate the years
planning performance;
 Delivery and implementation of good quality development and design;

Page 2

 Communication, consultation and engagement with our communities and
stakeholders;
 The added value that planning makes in decision making;
 How policies and guidance have shaped developments;
 Use of project management in planning. 
4. Feedback Report for Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework
2021/22 
4.1 It was the 11th year of reporting planning performance. This year Renfrewshire
Council have received a very positive feedback report on Renfrewshire’s
Planning Performance Framework, with all areas of the assessment awarded
green for achieving the required level of performance in each area of review.   
4.2 The planning performance framework demonstrates that Renfrewshire
Council is committed to continuous improvement in the service it provides in
its role as a local planning authority. 
5. Next Steps 
5.1 Planning will work with members, other council services and stakeholders in
the preparation and shaping of the next Renfrewshire Council’s Planning
Performance Framework 2022/23 which is anticipated will be reported to the
Board in August 2023. 
5.2 During 2023, the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 will continue to be
implemented along with the wider reforms of the planning system and
significant changes to planning regulations, guidance and practice which
includes new duties on planning authorities. As part of these wider reforms
the Scottish Government will introduce mandatory training for elected
members in the planning system. Training of elected members in planning
has already commenced at Renfrewshire Council and this will continue
throughout the year with various training sessions being organised. 
5.3 Notwithstanding the positive results outlined above, it is significant to note that
recruitment of suitably qualified planning officers remains a challenge for all
authorities across Scotland.  We are currently carrying three vacancies within
a team of eight dealing with planning applications (and related matters), and
we are hopeful of successfully recruiting to fill the vacant positions in the
coming months. However, the challenges faced are likely to impact the
authority’s performance in the short term.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of the Report 
1. Financial – The extent and details of the additional duties in the newly
published National Planning Framework 4 (Jan 2023) are still to be confirmed.   
2. HR & Organisational Development – None.

Page 3

3. Community/Council Planning – None. 
4. Legal – None. 
5. Property/Assets – None. 
6. Information Technology – None. 
7. Equality & Human Rights - 
(a) The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report.  If required following implementation, the actual impact of the
recommendations and the mitigating actions will be reviewed and monitored,
and the results of the assessment will be published on the Council’s website.    
8. Health & Safety – None. 
9. Procurement – None. 
10. Risk – None. 
11. Privacy Impact – None. 
12. COSLA Policy Position - None. 
13. Climate Risk – None.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Appendix 1 - Feedback Report from the Scottish Government on Renfrewshire
Planning Performance 2021/22.
___________________________________________________________________
Author: Sharon Marklow, Place Strategy Manager 
Tel: 0141 618 7835; Email:   Sharon.marklow@renfrewshire.gov.uk

Page 4

Scottish Ministers, special advisers and the Permanent Secretary are
covered by the terms of the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016.  See
www.lobbying.scot 
St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh  EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot

 
Ministear airson Ionmhas Poblach, Dealbhachadh
agus Beartas Còimhearsnachd
Minister for Public Finance, Planning and Community
Wealth
Tom Arthur MSP 
T: 0300 244 4000
E: scottish.ministers@gov.scot 
 
Allan Russell
Chief Executive
Renfrewshire Council 
22 December 2022 
Dear Allan Russell 
I am pleased to enclose feedback on your authority’s eleventh Planning Performance
Framework (PPF) Report, for the period April 2021 to March 2022. 
The reporting period which these reports cover has continued to present challenges for
people working within planning, in the development sector and across Scotland’s
communities. 
Ensuring the system is appropriately resourced is key to improving the performance of
planning,  which is why in April I implemented the biggest change to planning fees in 8 years,
with fees for most types of development increasing by between 25% and 50%. At the time I
said I would expect to see this additional  money invested in delivering improvements in
Planning Services. It is too early to know whether that has occurred, however, I have heard
positive feedback from some authorities who have managed to recruit or retain staff as a
result of the additional income. I also committed to working with Heads of Planning and
COSLA to identify how we could move planning fees closer to covering the full cost of their
determination. That work is ongoing and I expect to receive some
conclusions/recommendations early in the new year. 
I am also encouraged to see the fees for applications made under the Electricity Act also
increasing on 13th December and the voluntary contribution of 50% of the fee, for certain
types of application, being passed to planning authorities being maintained. 
However, I recognise that resourcing is about more than just money and having a pipeline of
knowledgeable and skilled planners is essential to delivering on our ambitions set out in
NPF4. This is why I supported the RTPI and Heads of Planning Scotland’s Future Planners
Project which looked at proposals to help increase the numbers of people entering the
planning profession. We recognise the importance of delivering on this vision and the
resourcing and skills challenges for planning authorities, which we are taking steps to
address.

Page 5

Scottish Ministers, special advisers and the Permanent Secretary are
covered by the terms of the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016.  See
www.lobbying.scot 
St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh  EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot

 
Work is also progressing on 
• the introduction of mandatory training for elected members in the planning system; 
• the implementation of statutory annual reports by planning authorities; and 
• the appointment of a Planning Improvement Coordinator for Scotland. 
Turning to the 2021-22 PPF reporting year, although, as expected, there have been some
minor changes overall in the markings awarded, the figures indicate that performance has
remained relatively stable. This is a testament to the hard work and flexibility of authorities
during challenging times and I believe that overall, good progress continues to be made by
Scotland’s planning authorities. 
If you would like to discuss any of the markings awarded below, please email
chief.planner@gov.scot and a member of the team will be happy to discuss these with you. 
TOM ARTHUR 
CC: David Love, Chief Planning Officer

Page 6

St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot  
PERFORMANCE MARKERS REPORT 2021-22 
Name of planning authority: Renfrewshire Council 
The High Level Group on Performance agreed a set of performance markers. We have assessed your report against
those markers to give an indication of priority areas for improvement action. The high level group will monitor and
evaluate how the key markers have been reported and the value which they have added. 
The Red, Amber, Green ratings are based on the evidence provided within the PPF reports. Where no information or
insufficient evidence has been provided, a ‘red’ marking has been allocated. 
No. Performance Marker RAG
rating
Comments
1 Decision-making: continuous
reduction of average timescales for
all development categories [Q1 -
Q4] 
Green Major Applications
Your average timescale of 17.7 weeks is faster than the
previous year and faster than the Scottish average of 44.6
weeks. 
RAG = Green 
Local (Non-Householder) Applications
Your average timescale of 10.5 weeks is slower than the
previous year but faster than the Scottish average of 13.5
weeks. 
RAG = Amber 
Householder Applications
Your average timescale of 7 weeks is marginally slower than
last year but is faster than the Scottish average of 8.7 weeks
and the statutory timescale.
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green
2 Processing agreements:
• offer to all prospective
applicants for major
development planning
applications; and
• availability publicised on
website 
Green You encourage processing agreements for major or complex
applications although take up is low.
RAG = Green 
Processing agreements are advertised on your website. 
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green
3 Early collaboration with applicants
and consultees
• availability and promotion
of pre-application
discussions for all
prospective applications;
and
• clear and proportionate
requests for supporting
information 
Green You continue to provide a free pre-application advice service
for prospective applicants, and uptake has remained
relatively stable at 48%. You note that a majority of your
applications are householder which do not require pre-
application advice.
RAG = Green 
You ensure that all relevant parties are involved so that when
applications are submitted all the relevant information is there
to enable neighbours to understand the proposals. 
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green

Page 7

St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot  
4 Legal agreements: conclude (or
reconsider) applications after
resolving to grant permission
reducing number of live
applications more than 6 months
after resolution to grant (from last
reporting period)
Green You did not determine any applications subject to legal
agreements without processing agreements during the
reporting period.  It is noted that you are considering
developing a template for legal agreements in particular for
housing developments.
5 Enforcement charter updated / re-
published within last 2 years
Green Your enforcement charter was 3 months old at the end of the
reporting year.
6 Continuous improvement:
• progress ambitious and
relevant service
improvement commitments
identified through PPF
report 
Green 
You have completed 3 out of 5 of your improvement
commitments with 2 remaining commitments to be continued
over the next reporting year. You have identified a range of
tangible improvement commitments for the coming year. 
7 Local development plan less than
5 years since adoption
Green Your LDP was 4 months old at the end of the reporting
period.
8 Development plan scheme – next
LDP:
• project planned and
expected to be delivered to
planned timescale 
Green 
Your LDP was recently adopted and therefore there is
currently no new LDS prepared yet for the next LDP. 
9 &
10
LDP Engagement 
• stakeholders including
Elected Members, industry,
agencies, the public and
Scottish Government are
engaged appropriately
through all key stages of
development plan
preparation. 
N/A 
11 Policy Advice
• Production of relevant and
up to date policy advice
Green You have produced the Draft New Development
Supplementary Guidance which was adopted alongside the
new LDP. 
12 Corporate working across
services to improve outputs and
services for customer benefit (for
example: protocols; joined-up
services; single contact
arrangements; joint pre-application
advice)
Green You have provided evidence of a joined-up approach being
taken across the authority in the preparation of your LDP,
guidance and through Land Supply studies. You also
participate in a number of corporate working groups including
‘Placeshaping at Renfrewshire’ which involves various
housing and health service steering groups. 
13 Sharing good practice, skills and
knowledge between authorities 
Green You have provided a number of examples which demonstrate
how you are sharing good practice including being part of the
West of Scotland Benchmarking Group and Clydeplan
Steering group.
14 Stalled sites / legacy cases:
conclusion or withdrawal of old
planning applications and reducing
number of live applications more
than one year old
Green You stated that you cleared no cases during 2021/22 and
had no legacy cases remaining. We however note that you
had 1 legacy case remaining from the previous year.

Page 8

St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot  
15 Developer contributions: clear
and proportionate expectations
• set out in development plan
(and/or emerging plan);
and
• in pre-application
discussions 
Green Your proposed plan and associated guidance sets out where
developer contributions may be appropriate.
RAG = Green 
You seek to discuss and investigate any potential measures
to facilitate development early in the process with applicants
and other stakeholders.  
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green

Page 9

St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot  
RENFREWSHIRE COUNCIL
Performance against Key Markers 
Marker 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22
1 Decision making
timescales         
2 Processing agreements         
3 Early collaboration          
4 Legal agreements         
5 Enforcement charter         
6 Continuous improvement          
7 Local development plan         
8 Development plan scheme         
9
&
10
LDP Engagement
N/A    N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
11 Regular and proportionate
advice to support
applications 
12 Corporate working across
services         
13 Sharing good practice,
skills and knowledge         
14 Stalled sites/legacy cases         
15 Developer contributions           
Overall Markings (total numbers for red, amber and green) 
2012-13 6 5 2
2013-14  1 9 3
2014-15 0 2 13
2015-16 0 3 12
2016-17 0 6 9
2017-18 0 3 10
2018-19 1 4 8
2019-20 1 2 10
2020-21 1 2 10
2021-22 0 0 13 
Decision Making Timescales (weeks) 
13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22
2021-22
Scottish
Average
Major
Development 12.0 10.1 13.1 20.0 18.6 35.4 13.3 32.2 17.7 44.6
Local 
(Non-
Householder)
Development
8.7 8.3 9.4 9.8 10 8.9 7.4
8.0
10.5 13.5
Householder
Development 6.9 7.2 7.9 7.6 7.6 6.9 6.1 6.9 7 8.7