Democracy Spraffa

D - 24-0183-PP - Application under section 42 to vary condition 3 of planning permission 21-1523-PP

Renfrewshire Council · 27 August 2024
Back to Planning and Climate Change Policy Board — 27 August 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Report by Chief Planning Officer
Planning and Climate Change Policy Board: 27 August 2024 
Reference No 24/0183/PP
Application Type Planning Permission
Proposal Application under section 42 to vary condition 3 (type of materials
to be processed) of planning permission 21/1523/PP for the
erection of a recycling shed and increase in throughput of
recycling material from 22,575 tonnes to a maximum of 75,000
tonnes.
Location 6 Newmains Avenue, Inchinnan, Renfrew
Ward 12 - Erskine and Inchinnan
Community
Council
Inchinnan Community Council
Applicant WRC Recycling Ltd
Recommendation Grant subject to conditions
All plans, reports, documents and representations relating to this application can be
viewed in full online at https://pl-bs.renfrewshire.gov.uk/online-
applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=S9X28YMWFY000 
The report is presented to the Planning and Climate Change Policy Board in line with the
Council's Scheme of Delegation.  While the application would normally fall within the scheme
of delegation to be determined by officers, the scheme of delegation allows for officers to
refer applications to the board, subject to agreement with the Convenor. The application has
been refered in this instance to allow the application to be fully considered given the site
history and the potential environmental matters associated with waste management facilities. 
Proposal
This application seeks permission under Section 42 of The Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended) to vary condition 3 of planning permission 21/1523/PP
which relates to waste management operations at the WRC facility on Newmains Avenue,
Inchinnan. 
Planning permission 21/1523/PP granted consent for the erection of a recycling shed and
increase in throughput of recycling material from 22,575 tonnes to a maximum of 75,000
tonnes. 
Condition 3 of this permission sets out the types of materials that can be processed at the
site, and is worded as follows. 
That the materials to be processed at the facility shall be restricted to plastics, paper, metal,
textiles and timber and that the total volume of materials handled at the facility shall not
exceed 75,000 tonnes per annum irrespective of the combination of plastics, paper, metal,
textiles and timber. For the avoidance of doubt no household or putrescible waste shall be
received, handled or processed on the site in any way.  
Reason: In the interests of amenity and traffic safety, to define the consent, and to ensure
that the operation of the facility remains consistent with the supporting information. 
The applicants have advised that they are proposing to process Waste Upholstered
Domestic Seating (WUDS) at the facility. WUDS are essentially bulky household items such
as sofas and armchairs. While the materials associated with these items e.g. textiles, timber,
metals etc are referred to in condition 3 as being permitted at the site, condition 3 specifically
precludes household waste. WUDS would be considered as a bulky household waste.

Page 2

On this basis it is proposed to vary the wording of condition 3 to introduce reference to
WUDS as per the proposed wording below. 
That the materials to be processed at the facility shall be restricted to plastics, paper, metal,
textiles and timber and that the total volume of materials handled at the facility shall not
exceed 75,000 tonnes per annum irrespective of the combination of plastics, paper, metal,
textiles and timber. For the avoidance of doubt no household (except for Waste Upholstered
Domestic Seating (WUDS)) or putrescible waste shall be received, handled, or processed on
the site in any way.  
Reason: In the interests of amenity and traffic safety, to define the consent, and to ensure
that the operation of the facility remains consistent with the supporting information. 
It is not proposed to change the maximum tonnage allowance of 75,000 tonnes (this
allowance was originally approved under application 20/0631/PP), and the applicants advise
that the handling of WUDS at the site would not breach this limitation. The applicants state
that the additional vehicle movements associated with the WUDS would be approx. one
extra roll-on roll-off vehicle per day. 
Site Description
The WRC building is located in the north west corner of the Inchinnan Business Park. It is
bound by Newmains Avenue to the south with industrial buildings beyond, Barnsford Road to
the west with agricultural land beyond, The Bible Centre and an industrial building to the
north, and an industrial building to the east with a vacant plot beyond. 
The facility comprises of a large warehouse positioned centrally within the site, with the
recycling shed granted permission under application 20/0631/PP positioned along the
northern boundary, and a two storey office block and associated parking located along the
western boundary. 
Pre-Application Consultation with Officers
The Scottish Government strongly encourages constructive pre-application discussions
between prospective applicants and the planning authority.  Pre-application discussions seek
to identify key planning considerations at an early stage and help inform what supporting
information is required to support a subsequent application.   
No pre-application discussions have taken place. 
Negotiated Improvements
Following submission, the following changes have been negotiated between officers and the
applicant: 
No changes have been negotiated. 
Site History (if applicable, site history will be listed here)   
Application No: 21/1523/PP 
Description: Section 42 application to delete Condition 12 and vary Condition 2 of
planning permission 20/0631/PP for the erection of a recycling shed and
increase in throughput of recycling material from 22,575 tonnes to a
maximum of 75,000 tonnes.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 22/0434/PP

Page 3

Description: Installation of solar panels on roof of building
Decision: Grant 
Application No: 20/0365/NO 
Description: Erection of recycling shed, and increase in facility volume to 75,000 tonnes
per annum
Decision: Accepted; 
Application No: 20/0631/PP 
Description: Erection of recycling shed and increase in throughput of recycling material
from 22,575 tonnes to a maximum of 75,000 tonnes.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 18/0117/PP 
Description: Variation to condition 4 (enclosure and operation of storage bays) of
planning permission 16/0832/PP.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 16/0728/PP 
Description: Formation of vehicle wash area, external yard, erection of covered storage
area, storage bays, concrete walling and pump house
Decision: Withdrawn 
Application No: 16/0914/PP 
Description: Erection of water storage tank, pump house and valve housing.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 16/0832/PP 
Description: Formation of vehicle wash area, formation of yard, erection of covered
external storage areas and erection of concrete walling.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 15/0294/PP 
Description: Re-cladding of building
Decision: Grant 
Application No: 15/0339/PP 
Description: Temporary siting of weighbridge and portable office building
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 15/0703/PP 
Description: Installation of solar panels on roof of building.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Application No: 15/0534/PP 
Description: Erection of boundary wall and fencing, and formation of hardstanding
Decision: Refused 
Application No: 15/0537/PP 
Description: Engineering operations comprising the reinstatement of land to former
ground level
Decision: Grant subject to conditions

Page 4

Application No: 15/0753/PP 
Description: External alterations to front elevation and formation of ramped loading bay.
Decision: Grant 
Application No: 14/0328/PP 
Description: Use of premises as waste reprocessing and recycling facility.
Decision: Grant subject to conditions 
Consultations   
S.E.P.A - Falls below threshold for which to provide specific advice. 
Environment, Housing & Infrastructure (Env. Protection) - Confirmed that they have no
comment in relation to the proposal. 
Chief Executive's Service (Roads Development) - No detrimental impact on local road
network. Confirmation sought over active travel links and targets set out within the Travel
Plan for the facility. 
Glasgow Airport Safeguarding - No objection. 
NATS - No objection. 
Scottish Water – No objection. 
Policy Context
In making any determination under the Planning Acts, regard is to be had to the
development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this instance the
Development Plan consists of National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the Renfrewshire
Local Development Plan (2021) (LDP). 
The following provisions of the Development Plan are considered relevant to the
determination of this application: 
National Planning Framework 4
Policy 1 – Tackling the climate and nature crisis
Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation
Policy 12 - Zero waste
Policy 13 - Sustainable transport
Policy 26 - Business and industry 
Full details relating to the policies of the NPF4 can be found online. 
Renfrewshire Local Development Plan
Policy E1 - Renfrewshire's Economic Investment Locations
Policy ENV2 - Natural Heritage
Policy ENV4 - The Water Environment
Policy ENV5 - Air Quality
Policy I1 - Connecting Places
Policy I5 - Waste Management 
Full details relating to the policies of the LDP can be found online. 
Other relevant policies and guidance
Scotland's Zero Waste Plan

Page 5

Submitted Reports and Assessments
No reports or assessments were submitted in support of the application. 
Scottish Ministers Direction
In determining a planning application, the Council is required to provide details of any
Direction made by Scottish Ministers under Regulation 30 (Directions requiring consultation),
Regulation 31 (Directions requiring information), Regulation 32 (Directions restricting the
grant of planning permission) and Regulation 33 (Directions requiring consideration of
condition) of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2013, or under Regulation 50 (that development is EIA development)
of The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland)
Regulations 2017. 
None. 
Planning Assessment
This application has been submitted under Section 42 of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997. In this respect, the Council may only take into consideration the
acceptability of any existing and proposed conditions. However, in some cases this does not
preclude the consideration of the overall effect of granting a new planning permission
primarily where the previous permission has lapsed or is incapable of being implemented. 
In this instance it should also be noted that the proposal must also be assessed against
National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) which is now adopted but did not form part of the
development plan at the time the previous application 21/1523/PP was assessed. 
WRC is an established recycling facility that processes a range of materials in accordance
with the relevant planning conditions. In land use terms its location is consistent in principle
with policies 26 of NPF4 and E1 of the LDP which provide support for a wide range of
employment generating uses. 
Policy I5 of the LDP and 12 of NPF4 seek to promote and facilitate development that is
consistent with the waste hierarchy and would support delivery of the zero waste plan. 
WRC is licensed for waste management processes by SEPA. The proposal to process
WUDS would further diversify the waste streams that are recycled at the facility in
accordance with the waste hierarchy and the zero waste plan. 
WUDS are classed as absolute non-hazardous bulky waste (EWC Code: 20 03 07). It is
noted that some of the materials associated with WUDS such as timber, textiles and metals
are already permitted to be processed at the facility. WUDS that arrive at the site would be
dismantled and separated into these individual components for further processing either at
WRC or an alternative location. Previous conditions which require all sorting and processing
of materials to be undertaken within a building envelope shall be retained. 
The Environmental Protection Team have confirmed that they have no comment in relation
to the proposal. SEPA have advised that the application falls below their threshold for
providing specific advice. It is noted that environmental matters at the site are regulated by
SEPA via the waste management licence. 
On the basis that the WUDS waste stream is non hazardous, most of the component items
are already permitted to be recycled at the premises within a building envelope, handling
and processing of the waste will be undertaken within a building, and there have been no
objections from the Environmental Protection Team or SEPA, it is considered that the

Page 6

processing of WUDS at the site will not have a detrimental impact on the amenity of
surrounding land uses or the environment. 
There are no significant built heritage or natural environment impacts associated with the
development, and there will be no adverse effect on the integrity of any European sites. 
In view of the above, it is considered that the development complies with Policies ENV2,
ENV4 and ENV5 of the LDP as there are no significant impacts anticipated with regard to the
natural environment, water environment, and air quality. 
It is also considered that the facility will be able to co-exist with existing neighbouring uses
and is compatible with the core role and function of Inchinnan Business Park. The
development is therefore also compliant with policies 26 of NPF4 and E1 of the LDP.     
The Roads Development Officer has advised that the additional trips associated with
processing the WUDS will not have a significant detrimental impact on the local road
network. 
The applicant advises that the processing of the WUDS will also fall within the 75,000
tonnage allowance for the site as specified in the relevant planning condition. 
Accessibility to the site would be enhanced through two conditions attached to the previous
planning permission, namely through provision of an additional active travel link and
production of a Travel Plan. These conditions will be retained. 
In view of the above, it is considered that the development complies with policies 13 of NPF4
and I1 of the LDP. 
NPF4 requires emissions associated with transportation and processing to be minimised. It
is noted that WRC have installed solar panels on the roof of the building in accordance with
planning permissions 15/0703/PP and 22/0434/PP. These will contribute to reducing
emissions associated with the processing of waste through the generation of electricity at the
site through solar power. 
Adequate buffer zones between the site and neighbouring premises are provided. A previous
condition requiring the installation and maintenance of an acoustic barrier will be retained
with a timescale for its delivery. 
Additional landscaping along the frontage of the site was sought through a condition
attached to the previous planning permission. This comprised of hedge, tree, and shrub
planting. It is noted that hedge planting has been undertaken along the front boundary fence,
and that Glasgow Airport Safeguarding have not raised any concern with the hedge. It is
considered that the landscape scheme comprising of the hedge, tree and shrub planting
should be completed in full and an appropriate condition is attached to control this matter. 
There is a requirement within Policy 12 of NPF4 to provide a restoration and aftercare
scheme (including appropriate financial mechanisms) to ensure the site is restored to a
standard that is acceptable to the Council. This could include removal of all waste materials,
plant, machinery, and vehicles from the site for example. Conditions can be applied which
require such a scheme to be agreed with the Council. 
It is noted that waste operators have similar restoration and aftercare agreements in place
with SEPA as part of the waste management licence. However, SEPA’s remit in respect of
restoration and aftercare would be to remedy any damage to the environment and to ensure
sites are not actively polluting the environment. While this remit is acknowledged, it does not

Page 7

extend as far as the Council’s remit which would also include site restoration to safeguard
visual amenity. It is therefore considered that an appropriate condition should be imposed to
control this matter. 
The proposed variation to condition 3 will bring environmental benefits by allowing an
established recycling facility to process additional waste in a manner that does not have a
detrimental impact on the environment or amenity of neighbouring properties subject to the
imposition of conditions on the operation of the facility. It is considered that the variation
complies with policies I5 of the LDP and 12 of NPF4. 
Finally, the development is consistent with policies 1 and 2 of NPF4 as it contributes to
provision of a circular economy whereby WUDS are recycled as opposed to being disposed
of. 
The conditions attached to the previous planning permission 21/1523/PP should also be
reviewed and reapplied to the grant of any new planning permission where required.  
Condition 1 will be retained. 
Condition 2 requires the applicant to submit a monitoring statement, that measures are put in
place to ensure that waste is stored safely and that if complaints are received in relation to
non-compliance that these are dealt with appropriately. The applicant is required to submit
quarterly returns on the waste processed at the site to SEPA and these are publicly available
for the Council to inspect. Furthermore, it is recognised that arrangements can be made for
the Council to undertake a site inspection should it be required. 
On balance it is therefore considered that the condition should be updated as some of the
requirements previously stipulated can be removed given that they are already regulated by
SEPA. However, it is considered that a monitoring regime will still be required to be
maintained by the applicant to ensure that waste storage is effectively managed and that a
procedure is in place in the event of a complaint.  This should continue to be controlled. 
Condition 3 will be varied as per the above assessment. 
Condition 4 will be retained. 
The applicant has advised that the acoustic barrier required under condition 5 has not been
installed as the noise associated with the facility does not exceed the limitations set out in
condition 4. The Environmental Protection Team have advised that condition 4 specifically
relates to steady state noise from fixed plant and machinery. The acoustic barrier required
under condition 5 however would relate to all sources of noise including variable sources
such as vehicle manoeuvring, loading, and unloading etc. 
The applicant submitted a noise report which sought to demonstrate that noise from the
facility was at an acceptable level. However, the Environmental Protection Team have
advised that the report relates to exposure to noise for the workforce at the facility and not
sensitive receptors outwith the facility. The requirement for the acoustic barrier under
condition 5 is therefore retained with a defined time period for its delivery.   
Condition 6 will be updated to reflect the Bird Hazard Management Plan (BHMP) which has
been approved by Glasgow Airport Safeguarding. The BHMP shall remain in force for the life
of the development and shall not be altered without the prior written consent of the Planning
Authority in consultation with Glasgow Airport Safeguarding.

Page 8

Condition 7 shall be amended to provide a timescale for the delivery of the footpath link and
crossing point to ensure the site’s connectivity is improved and its delivery can be controlled. 
Condition 8 relates to the requirement for a landscape scheme to be implemented along the
front boundary of the site. It is noted that the landscape scheme outlined in drawing 1849-
PL-02 f titled 'Proposed Block Plan / Future Works' has been partially completed. While this
drawing specified tree, hedge and shrub planting, only hedge planting has been completed
to date. Condition 8 shall be amended to seek a timetable for the completion of the
landscaping scheme in full. 
The applicant has advised that the Travel Plan has been implemented and that more
employees are travelling to work by cycling or car sharing. Condition 9 will be retained. 
Condition 10 will be retained. 
The applicant has advised that no additional lighting has been installed as part of the project.
However, it is considered that condition 11 should be retained to ensure that if any
floodlighting were to be installed there would be a requirement to agree the specification with
the Council. 
NPF4 policy 12 requires a restoration and aftercare scheme (including appropriate financial
mechanisms) to be provided and agreed to ensure the site is restored. Conditions 12, 13
and 14 have been attached to ensure this requirement is met.  
Section 75 Obligations
The Council is required to provide a summary of the terms of any planning obligation which
is required to be entered into under Section 75 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland)
Act in relation to the grant of permission for the proposed development: 
None. 
Conclusion
In view of the above, it is considered that the proposal would accord with the relevant
provisions of the Development Plan. There are no other material considerations. Planning
permission should therefore be granted subject to conditions. 
Recommendation
Grant subject to conditions 
Reason(s) for Recommendation 
1. The proposal accords with the provisions of the Development Plan and there were no
material considerations which outweighed the presumption in favour of development
according with the Development Plan. 
Condition(s)   
1. That all activities associated with the sorting and processing of waste materials shall be
undertaken entirely within a building envelope. Processed materials awaiting uplift shall
also be stored within a building envelope. Waste materials awaiting processing shall be
stored entirely within a building envelope or in areas of the external yard that are behind
the rear elevation of the main building fronting Newmains Avenue. 
Reason: To ensure that materials are stored appropriately in the interests of visual
amenity.

Page 9

2. That within 3 months of the date of this consent, the developer shall submit a monitoring
statement for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The monitoring statement
shall set out the measures to be undertaken on site in the interests of safeguarding the
visual amenity of the area, and shall include details of the following elements:   
▪ Daily inspection regime of the site to ensure waste materials are being stored in an
appropriate manner. Monitoring should be logged and exceptions and solutions
detailed. 
▪ Protocol for addressing individual complaints regarding storage of waste materials
not in compliance with the approved monitoring statement, and to take all necessary
steps to remedy any noncompliance. 
The measures specified within the approved monitoring statement shall thereafter be
implemented on site for a period of five years at which point the monitoring statement
will be reviewed. 
Reason: To ensure waste materials are stored in an appropriate manner and that
monitoring of the site is undertaken in the interests of visual amenity. 
3. That the materials to be processed at the facility shall be restricted to plastics, paper,
metal, textiles, and timber and that the total volume of materials handled at the facility
shall not exceed 75,000 tonnes per annum irrespective of the combination of plastics,
paper, metal, textiles and timber. For the avoidance of doubt no household (except for
Waste Upholstered Domestic Seating (WUDS)) or putrescible waste shall be received,
handled or processed on the site in any way. 
Reason: In the interests of amenity and traffic safety, to define the consent, and to
ensure that the operation of the facility remains consistent with the supporting
information. 
4. The design, installation and operation of any plant, machinery or equipment at the site
shall be such that noise associated with the recycling facility shall not exceed Noise
Rating Curve NR25 between the hours of 2300 and 0700 and NR35 at all other times
when measured within any dwelling in the vicinity of the development. 
Reason: To ensure noise from the site is restricted in the interests of residential amenity
and to protect sensitive receptors. 
5. That within 3 months of the date of this consent, a specification detailing the location,
design and finish of the acoustic barrier as generally illustrated in approved drawing
1849-PL-02 f titled 'Proposed Block Plan / Future Works' shall be submitted for the
written approval of the Planning Authority. The specification shall also include measures
to protect the existing hedgerow and trees within the vicinity of the acoustic barrier, and
shall detail compensatory re-planting should any hedgerow or trees be removed to
accommodate the acoustic barrier, a timetable for the installation of the acoustic barrier
and a maintenance schedule for the acoustic barrier. 
The acoustic barrier thereafter approved shall be implemented in accordance with the
approved timetable, and shall be maintained thereafter in accordance with the
maintenance schedule for the duration that the recycling shed is in use. 
Reason: To ensure that noise impact from the recycling shed is mitigated in the interests
of residential amenity and to protect sensitive receptors.

Page 10

6. The approved Bird Hazard Management Plan for the Covered Storage Area and other
Site Buildings at WRC Recycling version 3 dated October 2023 shall be implemented as
approved on completion of the recycling shed and shall remain in force for the life of the
development. No subsequent alterations to the plan are to take place unless first
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with
Glasgow Airport. 
Reason: It is necessary to manage the development in order to minimise its
attractiveness to birds which coulee endanger the safe movement of aircraft and the
operation of Glasgow Airport. 
7. That within 3 months of the date of this consent, the developer shall submit a
specification detailing the design, location, materials, and surface finish of the footpath
link and crossing point as generally illustrated in approved drawing 1849-PL-02 f titled
'Proposed Block Plan / Future Works'. The specification shall also include a timetable for
the installation of the footpath link and crossing point. The footpath link and crossing
point shall thereafter be implemented in accordance with the approved timetable to the
satisfaction of the Planning Authority. 
Reason: To ensure the site is connected to the pedestrian, cycle and public transport
network in the interests of accessibility and promoting journeys by sustainable means. 
8. That within 3 months of the date of this consent, the developer shall submit for the
written approval of the Planning Authority a timetable for the completion of the
landscaping scheme as outlined in approved drawing 1849-PL-02 f titled 'Proposed
Block Plan / Future Works', and a maintenance plan for the landscaping scheme. The
landscaping scheme shall thereafter be completed in accordance with the approved
timetable and maintained thereafter for the life of the development in accordance with
the maintenance plan. For the avoidance of doubt this shall include provision for the
replacement of any tree, hedge or shrub plants that die, become diseased, damaged or
uprooted within a period of five years following completion of the landscape scheme with
tree, hedge or shrub plants of a similar species and of a height that is commensurate
with the overall height of the landscape scheme at the time when the plant is replaced. 
Reason: To ensure the landscape scheme is implemented in full in the interests of visual
amenity.     
9. That the approved Travel Plan by Systra (ref: GB01T17F74.SCTLSD56) shall be
adhered to at the facility in accordance with the active travel plan actions detailed in
section 6 of the plan. This includes annual monitoring and reporting as specified in the
plan. Provision shall also be made for the delineation of the additional parking spaces as
generally illustrated in approved drawing 1849-PL-02 f titled 'Proposed Block Plan /
Future Works' should the Travel Plan indicate that additional parking spaces at the site
are required. 
Reason: To ensure the actions within the Travel Plan are implemented in the interests of
promoting journeys by sustainable means. 
10. That all dust control measures identified within the Dust Management Plan ref:
R20.10871/1/AF shall be adhered to. All measures shall thereafter remain in place for
the duration that the recycling facility is operational to the satisfaction of the Planning
Authority. 
Reason: To ensure dust control measures are implemented in the interests of air quality.

Page 11

11. That no floodlighting shall be installed on the recycling shed until the developer has
undertaken a survey to determine the impact of floodlighting from the proposed
development. The survey shall be based on the principles set out in British Standard BS
EN 12193:2018 (incorporating corrigendum February 2019) Light and Lighting - Sports
Lighting, or a method agreed by the Planning Authority. The survey shall be submitted
for the written approval of the Planning Authority and shall include details of:
▪ A description of the proposed lighting units including height, type, shape and
luminous flux of the floodlights.
▪ The luminance levels, both horizontal and vertical, on the illuminated part of the site
to demonstrate that obtrusive light and glare does not adversely affect neighbouring
properties.
▪ The direction and aiming angle of each floodlight and the upward waste light ratio for
each light.
▪ The Environmental Zone, as defined in the Institution of Lighting Engineers
Publication - Guidance Notes for the Reduction of Obtrusive Light, within which the
site falls. 
Only the approved floodlighting scheme shall thereafter be implemented on site, and no
changes to the scheme shall take place without the written agreement of the Planning
Authority. 
Reason: To ensure any floodlighting scheme installed at the site is appropriate in the
interests of amenity. 
12. That within 3 months of the date of this planning permission, the operator shall submit a
Restoration and Aftercare Management Plan for the written approval of the Planning
Authority. The plan shall detail all measures associated with the decommissioning,
cleaning, and rendering safe the facility following cessation of the waste management
operations at the site and shall provide a timetable within which these measures will be
undertaken and an aftercare plan to monitor success of restoration measures with
scope for interventions if required. The restoration measures shall include (but not be
limited to) the removal of all raw materials, wastes and other potentially contaminating
substances present on the site to ensure the site does not pose a risk to public health,
safety, the environment, and amenity. 
Reason: To ensure the decommissioning and removal of the waste materials is
undertaken in an appropriate and environmentally acceptable manner and the
restoration and aftercare of the site, in the interests of safety, amenity and environmental
protection. 
13. That within 6 months of the date of this planning permission, a financial guarantee to
cover the costs of, site restoration and aftercare, as required by condition 12 of this
consent, shall be submitted for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The
acceptability of such financial guarantee shall be at the sole discretion of the Planning
Authority. The financial guarantee must: 
A) be granted in favour of the Planning Authority and shall be maintained in favour of the
Planning Authority throughout the duration of this consent and until the completion of all
decommissioning, site restoration and aftercare obligations as required by condition 12
of this consent. 
B) must be provided by an independent financial body with at least an A - rating who will
be capable of fulfilling the obligations set out within the financial guarantee.

Page 12

C) be for an amount which covers the value of all closure, site restoration and aftercare
liabilities, such amount to be determined by the Planning Authority. 
D) be subject to a review every five years from the date of this consent, or other such
intervals as agreed by the Planning Authority.  Each review shall be undertaken by a
suitably qualified independent professional who has relevant experience in such
matters, the identity of whom has been agreed in writing by the Planning Authority
prior to the review of the financial guarantee commencing.  The review of the
financial guarantee shall be submitted no later than three months prior to the expiry
of the existing financial guarantee, for the written approval of the Planning Authority.
Thereafter and at least 28 days prior to the expiry of the existing financial guarantee,
the replacement financial guarantee in favour of and in terms acceptable to the
Planning Authority and for the value advised by the review noted above, shall be
submitted for the written approval of the Planning Authority. 
E) come into effect within 8 months of the date of this planning permission, and expire
no earlier than 24 months after the end of the aftercare period. 
Reason: In the interests of amenity and in order to retain effective planning control
should the operator stop operating. 
14. In the event that the financial guarantee, approved under the terms of condition 13
above becomes invalid, has expired, or is terminated for any reason, all operations at
the site shall cease no later than three months from the date the financial guarantee
became invalid, expired or terminated. If a replacement financial guarantee, which
meets the requirements of condition 13, is approved by the Planning Authority and duly
executed before the end of the three-month period, the operations may continue. If the
operations have ceased due to this clause, they may recommence only upon the
approval and execution of a replacement financial guarantee. 
Reason: In the interests of amenity and in order to retain effective planning control. 
Schedule of Plans Determined 
Drawing Number Revision Drawing/Document Title
1849 EX 02  Existing Block Plan
October 2023 3 Bird Hazard Management Plan
R20.10871/1/AF  Dust Management Plan
GB01T17F74.SCTLSD56  Travel Plan 
a Gantry Details  
Elevations and Details
1849 EX 01  Location Map
1849-PL-02 f Proposed Block Plan / Future Works
1849-PL-03 b Proposed Storage Shed 
For further information please contact James Weir, Development Standards Team, Email:
james.weir@renfrewshire.gov.uk