Democracy Spraffa

Minutes of meeting

Renfrewshire Council · 28 May 2024
Back to Planning and Climate Change Policy Board — 28 May 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Minute of Meeting
Planning and Climate Change Policy Board 
Date Time Venue
Tuesday, 28 May 2024 13:00 Council Chambers (Renfrewshire), Council
Headquarters, Renfrewshire House, Cotton
Street, Paisley, PA1 1AN 
Present: Councillor Jennifer Adam, Councillor Alison  Ann-Dowling, Councillor Andy Doig,
Councillor Chris Gilmour, Councillor Neill Graham, Councillor Anne Hannigan, Councillor
Bruce MacFarlane, Councillor Kenny MacLaren, Councillor Jamie McGuire, Councillor Marie
McGurk, Councillor John McNaughtan, Councillor Iain Nicolson, Councillor Jim Paterson,
Councillor John Shaw, Councillor Ben Smith 
Chair
Councillor Paterson, Convener, presided. 
In Attendance
A Morrison, Head of Economy & Development, D Love, Chief Planning Officer, K
Dalrymple, Development Plans & Housing Strategy Team Leader, G McCracken,
Development Standards Manager, J Weir and F Knighton, Senior Planning Officers, A
McKenzie and C Murray, Planners and A Williamson, Strategy & Place Manager (all Chief
Executive’s); G Hannah, Head of Climate, Public Protection & Roads (Environment,
Housing & Infrastructure); and C McCourt, Head of Finance & Procurement, N Young,
Managing Solicitor (Litigation & Advice) and R Devine and E Gray, both Senior Committee
Services Officers (all Finance & Resources). 
Webcasting of Meeting
Prior to the commencement of the meeting the Convener intimated that this meeting of the
Policy Board would be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council's internet
site.

Page 2

Transparency Statements
Councillor Nicolson indicated that he had a connection to Planning Application 6(a) by
reason of his participation in the appeal process conducted by the Directorate of
Planning and Environmental Appeals in respect of Planning Application 19/0184/PP
which had sought detailed planning permission for the erection of 246 dwellings and
flats for the same site with a layout identical to the indicative layout submitted as part
of the planning application in 6(a). However, he indicated that he had applied the
objective test and did not consider he had an interest to declare.  
Councillor N Graham indicated that he had a connection to Planning Applications 6 (c)
and 6(d) by reason of meeting with a group of local residents in 2021, who later
became the save the RAI group. However, he indicated that he had not expressed
any opinion regarding the applications at the meeting and applied the objective test
and did not consider he had an interest to declare.  
Declarations of Interest
There were no declarations of interest intimated prior to the  commencement of the
meeting. 
1 Renfrewshire Biodiversity Action Plan 2024
There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive relative to the Renfrewshire
Biodiversity Action Plan 2024. 
The report advised that a Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP) for Renfrewshire,
East Renfrewshire and Inverclyde had originally been prepared in 2004, highlighting
that the plan had been developed with representation from local authorities and a
range of organisations and stakeholders with an interest in biodiversity. During 2018 a
Biodiversity Action Plan for Renfrewshire had been developed in partnership with
biodiversity partner organisations active in the area. A copy of the Renfrewshire
Council Biodiversity Action Plan 2024 was attached as an appendix to the report. The
Renfrewshire Biodiversity Action Plan 2024 updated the 2018 Plan reflecting current
Scottish Government guidance and legislation which placed a strong emphasis on the
response to climate change and biodiversity, such as the Scottish Biodiversity
Strategy to 2045 and National Planning Framework 4. In addition, the plan continued
to set out a positive and ambitious approach, identifying a range of principles and
actions which reflected the current landscape of active biodiversity partner
organisations and their activities. In this context the plan provided a refreshed
framework for conservation, promotion and enhancement of biodiversity across
Renfrewshire. It was highlighted that progress on delivery of the Biodiversity Action
Plan would be monitored by the Council and partners through a Steering Group, with
updates reported to this Policy Board as appropriate. 
During discussion it was proposed and agreed that arrangements be made to
undertake a re-evaluation of the Council’s land portfolio in recognition of regenerated
sites within the Council’s ownership.

Page 3

DECIDED: 
(a) That the Renfrewshire Biodiversity Action Plan 2024, a copy of which was
appended to the report, be approved and published on the Council website; and 
(b)  That arrangements be made to undertake a re-evaluation of the Council’s land
portfolio in recognition of regenerated sites within the Council’s ownership. 
2 Discretionary Fees – Building Standards
There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive relative to the updating of
discretionary fees associated with Building Standards. 
The report advised that the Council’s Building Standards team undertook tasks which
were both statutory and non-statutory in nature. Statutory tasks were set out in
relevant legislation and charges payable applied in line with nationally set fees.  Fees
relating to non-statutory tasks were set locally and it was highlighted that the
discretionary fees associated with Building Standards had last been reviewed in
Renfrewshire during 2007.  The report recommended that the fees be increased to
take account of current costs and staff time, and Appendix 1 of the report set out
proposed discretionary fees, effective from 1 July 2024, associated with Building
Standards.  The report also indicated that to ensure fees continued to reflect the
demands placed upon the Building Standards Team, it was proposed that an annual
increase was applied to all matters listed in Appendix 1 in line with the percentage
increase applied to charges for services agreed as part of the Council’s annual budget
setting process. The new charges would be effective from 1 April annually. 
DECIDED: 
(a) That the proposed discretionary charging fees associated with Building Standards,
as detailed in Appendix 1 of the report, be approved; and 
(b) That the annual increase, to discretionary charging fees associated with Building
Standards as detailed in Appendix 1 of the report be approved. The annual increase
would be applied on 1st April each year in line with any percentage increase applied
to charges for services as agreed as part of the Council’s annual budget setting. 
3 Street naming and numbering – protocol and charging
There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive relative to a revised street
naming and numbering protocol and proposing the introduction of charges for the
street naming and numbering process. 
The report advised that the power to name and number streets was provided to the
Council by the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982. Within Renfrewshire Council,
these powers had been delegated to the Head of Economy & Development. A
synopsis of the range of tasks in relation to this delegation was provided. The report
highlighted that the current street naming and numbering protocol had been agreed in
2012 and that the Council did not currently charge for its naming and numbering
service.  A revised street naming and numbering protocol was attached as Appendix 1
of the report for approval. The document set out the protocol the Head of Economy &
Development would undertake when assigning new street names, matters that would

Page 4

be taken into account in assigning street names and numbers and some of the
conventions that would be followed in doing so. It also illustrated how properties
would be numbered in different types of developments.  With regards to the process
for assigning street names, the revised protocol also indicated that the Head of
Economy & Development would consult with local elected members, the local
community council(s), and any ‘tenants and residents’ associations operating in the
area. 
Analysis by the Council, undertaken in January 2024, had found that twenty-four
Scottish local authorities charged for street naming and numbering services. The time
involved in identifying and consulting on new street names and numbering properties
could be substantial and it was considered reasonable for Renfrewshire Council to
introduce charges for this service to assist with cost recovery. Appendix 2 of the
report set out proposed charges for the service which were comparative to those
charged by other Scottish local authorities who charged for the service. Charges
would not be applicable for social rented houses within developments by
Renfrewshire Council. The report proposed that the charges were introduced from 1
July 2024, and increased on 1 April each year in line with any percentage increase
which was applied to charges for services as agreed as part of the Council’s annual
budget setting. 
Councillor Paterson, seconded by Councillor Smith, moved that the street naming and
numbering protocol, which formed Appendix 1 of the report, be approved subject to
amendment to permit the naming of streets after living people. 
Councillor N Graham being the mover of an amendment which failed to find a
seconder asked that his dissent be recorded in terms of Standing Order 23.   
DECIDED: 
(a) That the street naming and numbering protocol set out in Appendix 1 of the report
be approved subject to amendment to permit the naming of streets after living people;
and 
(b) That the introduction of charges for street naming and numbering as set out in
Appendix 2 of the report be approved. 
4 Planning Enforcement Charter 2024
There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive relative to the Renfrewshire
Planning Enforcement Charter 2024, a copy of which was appended to the report.   
The report advised that in terms of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act
1997 (as amended) the planning enforcement charter required to be reviewed every
two years. The updated Charter outlined the role of the Council, applicable policies
and procedures and the standards of service to be expected. The Charter highlighted
that the purpose of planning enforcement was to find a solution and/or deal with the
issue rather than seek to punish, with enforcement being a discretionary power and
each case being considered in terms of the nature of the planning breach and the
wider public interest. The Planning Enforcement Charter 2024 proposed that the
following issues be prioritised: (i) Significant detrimental impact on public safety; (ii)
Irreversible damage to listed buildings; (iii) Significant detrimental impact on amenity;
(iv) Impact on trees protected by Tree Preservation Orders/in Conservation Areas;

Page 5

and (iv) unauthorised felling of trees and matters affecting trees. The proposed
Charter detailed the processes and procedures deployed when breaches of planning
control would be dealt with. In addition, the Charter provided information and advice
as to how suspected breaches of planning control could be brought to the attention of
the Planning Authority. 
The report highlighted that funding had been made available within the Council
budget 2024 for a Planning Enforcement Officer post for the next two years, that the
post was currently being advertised and that one of the primary responsibilities of the
new postholder would be to implement the new Enforcement Charter. 
During discussion, it was proposed and agreed that the Chief Planning Officer write to
the Scottish Government requesting that legislation be reviewed to enable local
government to intervene pro-actively and protect trees on privately-owned sites to be
developed where it was considered to be in the public interest.  Arrangements would
be made to share the response received from the Scottish Government with members
of this Policy Board. 
DECIDED:   
(a) That the Renfrewshire Planning Enforcement Charter 2024, a copy of which
formed Appendix 1 of the report, be approved; and 
(b) That the Chief Planning Officer write to the Scottish Government requesting that
legislation be reviewed to enable local government to intervene pro-actively and
protect trees on privately-owned sites to be developed where it was considered to be
in the public interest and that arrangements be made to share the response received
from the Scottish Government with members of this Policy Board. 
5 Investing in Planning: A consultation on resourcing Scotland’s
planning system
There was submitted a report by the Chief Executive relative to the consultation
document published by the Scottish Government on resourcing Scotland’s planning
system. 
The report stated that the consultation document detailed a range of options which
sought to improve the capacity of the Scottish planning system and planning
authorities and sought views on a range of issues including planning fees, increasing
discretionary charging and resourcing other elements of the planning system. A draft
response, attached as Appendix 1 of the report, had been prepared on behalf of
Renfrewshire Council and was submitted for consideration. 
DECIDED: 
(a) That it be noted that the Scottish Government had published a consultation
document on resourcing Scotland’s planning system; and 
(b) That the draft response, Appendix 1 of the report, be approved and submitted as
the Council’s response.

Page 6

6  Planning Applications
There were submitted reports by the Chief Executive relative to the following 
applications for planning permission that required to be determined by the Board. 
(a) 19/0765/PP - Erection of residential development in principle at Erskine
Bridge Hotel Erskine Harbour Erskine PA8 6AN by Cosmopolitan Hotels Limited 
C Murray, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal. 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that the application be
refused for the reasons detailed within the report. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be refused for the reasons detailed within the report. 
(b) 22/0310/AD - Display of two internally illuminated box signs (in retrospect) at
2 West Brae Paisley PA1 2EB by Mr Abubakr Malik 
J Weir, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal. 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that the application be
refused for the reasons detailed within the report. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be refused for the reasons detailed within the report. 
(c) 23/0354/PP - Redevelopment, partial demolition and conversion of former
infirmary into 45 flats and erection of two blocks of additional flats providing 36
units, with associated parking and landscaping at Alexandra Nursing Home
Calside Paisley PA2 6LX by Mr Abdullah Hamid 
A McKenzie, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal. It was highlighted
that the report of handling contained an error in that the first paragraph of page 149 of
the agenda pack relating to education provision made reference to St Fergus Primary
school in error and should be deleted.  It was indicated that no issues were raised by
the development in relation to current primary school capacities in the area. 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that the application be
granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report. This was
agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons
detailed within the report. 
(d) 23/0355/LB - Redevelopment, partial demolition and conversion of former
infirmary into 45 flats at Alexandra Nursing Home Calside Paisley PA2 6LX by
Mr Abdullah Hamid 
A McKenzie, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal . 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that the application be
granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report. This was

Page 7

agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons
detailed within the report. 
(e) 23/0738/PP - Construction of vehicular access and associated works at
Torrance House Erskine Harbour Erskine PA8 6PA by CWP Erskine Ltd 
C Murray, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that the application be
granted subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report. This was
agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to the conditions and reasons
detailed within the report. 
(f) 24/0052/EB - Section 36 application to construct and operate a 150MW
battery energy storage facility together with associated infrastructure,
substation, security fencing, cctv, security lighting and landscaping (Energy
Consents Unit consultation request) to view plans go to
https://www.energyconsents.scot/  at Neilston Battery Storage System Site,
Gleniffer Road Paisley by Carolanne Brown Energy Consents Unit Scottish
Government 
J Weir, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that no objection be
submitted in respect of the Section 36 application subject to the conditions and
reasons detailed within the report. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That no objection be submitted in respect of the Section 36 application
subject to the conditions and reasons detailed within the report. 
(g) 24/0118/PP - Section 42 application to vary conditions 4 and 5 of planning
permission 99/02668/DC, to allow for increased gross retail floorspace and to
widen the range of goods sold from Unit I and to consolidate previously granted
consents to allow a wider range of goods to be sold from Units D2, E and J at
Braehead Retail Park 136 King's Inch Drive Renfrew Glasgow G51 4BT by
Braehead (Glasgow) Ltd 
F Knighton, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal. 
It was highlighted that condition 2 as detailed on page 209 of the agenda pack
required to be amended to read:- 
The retail warehouses shall be used for the sale of Do-It-Yourself, furniture, carpets,
electrical, gardening goods and automotive goods and accessories to the satisfaction
of the Planning Authority, with the exception that: 
Unit I and its associated external display area comprising 3,439 square metres gross
will comprise of Class 1A retail floorspace under the Town and Country Planning (Use
Classes) (Scotland) Order 1997 (as amended), with no more than 825 square metres
used for the sale of convenience goods.

Page 8

Unit D2 shall be used for the sale of Class 1A unrestricted comparison (non-food)
goods only in accordance with planning permission reference 13/0502/PP. 
Unit E shall be used for the sale of Class 1A unrestricted comparison (non-food)
goods only in accordance with planning permission reference 21/0027/PP. 
Unit J, which measures 10,558 square metres gross, shall be used for the sale of
Class 1A goods, of which no more than 6,332 square metres shall be used for the
sale of convenience goods and no more than 4,226 square metres shall be used for
the sale of comparison goods. This is in accordance with planning permission
08/0698/PP.       
Reason: To define the consent to ensure the use of the retail units reflects the role
and function of the commercial centre, and to ensure that the use does not have an
adverse impact upon the role and function of any other network centre. 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that no objection be
submitted in respect of the Section 42 application subject to the conditions and
reasons, as amended and detailed within the report. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be granted subject to the conditions, including the
amendment noted above and reasons as detailed within the report. 
(h) 24/0153/PP - Erection of up to a 49.9MW Battery Energy Storage System
Ward 2 (BESS) at Land Off Barnwell/Wright Street Renfrew PA4 8AN by P3P
Partners LLP 
J Weir, Planner, made a presentation relative to the proposal. 
In terms of Standing Order 59 Councillor Paterson, moved that the application be
refused for the reasons detailed within the report. This was agreed unanimously. 
DECIDED: That the application be refused for the reasons detailed within the report.