Democracy Spraffa

4. Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework Feedback 2021-22 - Report

Renfrewshire Council · 7 November 2023
Back to Planning and Climate Change Policy Board — 7 November 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

___________________________________________________________________ 
To: Planning and Climate Change Policy Board 
On: 7 November 2023
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by: Chief Executive 
___________________________________________________________________ 
Heading: Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework Feedback 2022/23
___________________________________________________________________ 
1. Summary 
1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the board of the feedback report from
the Minister for Local Government Empowerment and Planning in relation to
Renfrewshire’s Planning Performance Framework 2022/23 as set out in
Appendix 1.
________________________________________________________________ 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 It is recommended that the Board: 
(i) Notes the feedback report on Renfrewshire’s Planning Performance
Framework 2022/23.   
___________________________________________________________________ 
3. Background 
3.1 A system of performance management has been established between local
authorities and the Scottish Government, whereby every planning authority is
asked to produce an annual planning performance framework. 
3.2 The framework was developed by Heads of Planning Scotland to capture and
highlight a balanced measurement of planning performance, showing
commitment to the following areas:
 Speed of decision making;
 Qualitative analysis, providing case studies to demonstrate the years
planning performance;
 Delivery and implementation of good quality development and design;

Page 2

 Communication, consultation and engagement with our communities and
stakeholders;
 The added value that planning makes in decision making;
 How policies and guidance have shaped developments;
 Use of project management in planning.  
4. Feedback Report for Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework
2022/23 
4.1 This year Renfrewshire Council have received a positive feedback report on
Renfrewshire’s Planning Performance Framework, with all areas of the
assessment, with the exception of one area, achieving the required level of
performance.   
4.2 The planning performance framework demonstrates that Renfrewshire
Council is committed to continuous improvement in the service it provides in
its role as a local planning authority. 
4.3 The one area which did not meet the required level of performance relates to
the decision making timescales with respect to major, local and householder
applications.  In this regard the feedback noted the following:
 Timescales for major applications were slower than the statutory target
but faster than the Scottish average;
 Timescales for local (non householder) applications were slower than the
statutory target and also the Scottish average; and
 Timescales for householder applications were slower than the statutory
target and also the Scottish average. 
4.4 As previously advised to Board in January 2023, the service was carrying 
three  vacancies for a significant period of time during the reporting period in 
question.  The vacancies in question contributed significantly to the 
processing times relating to the application types noted above. 
5. Next Steps 
5.1 Planning will work with members, other council services and stakeholders in
the preparation and shaping of the next Renfrewshire Council’s Planning
Performance Framework 2023/24 which is anticipated will be reported to the
Board in August 2024. 
5.2 During 2023, the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 continues to be implemented
along with the wider reforms of the planning system and significant changes
to planning regulations, guidance and practice which includes new duties on
planning authorities. As part of these wider reforms the Scottish Government
will introduce mandatory training for elected members in the planning system.
Training of elected members in planning has already commenced at
Renfrewshire Council and this will continue throughout the year with various
training sessions being organised.

Page 3

5.3 Notwithstanding the positive results outlined above, it is significant to note that
recruitment of suitably qualified planning officers remains a challenge for all
authorities across Scotland.  We are currently carrying one vacancy within a
team of eight dealing with planning applications (and related matters), and we
are hopeful of successfully recruiting to fill the vacant position in the coming
weeks. 
5.4 In addition, it is also significant to note that delays experienced in relation to
receiving comments from some consultees will also have an impact on the
performance of the service in respect of decision making timescales. 
5.5 The challenges noted above are likely to impact the authority’s performance in
the current reporting period.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of the Report 
1. Financial – The extent and details of the additional duties in the newly
published National Planning Framework 4 (Jan 2023) are still to be confirmed.   
2. HR & Organisational Development – None. 
3. Community/Council Planning – None. 
4. Legal – None. 
5. Property/Assets – None. 
6. Information Technology – None. 
7. Equality & Human Rights - 
(a) The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report.  If required following implementation, the actual impact of the
recommendations and the mitigating actions will be reviewed and monitored,
and the results of the assessment will be published on the Council’s website.    
8. Health & Safety – None. 
9. Procurement – None. 
10. Risk – None. 
11. Privacy Impact – None. 
12. COSLA Policy Position - None.

Page 4

13. Climate Risk – None.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Appendix 1 - Feedback Report from the Scottish Government on Renfrewshire
Planning Performance 2022/23 
Background Paper – Renfrewshire Planning Performance Framework Feedback
2021/22, Board Report (Planning and Climate Change Policy Board), 23rd January
2023
___________________________________________________________________ 
Author: David Love, Chief Planning Officer
Tel: 07483410182; Email: david.love@renfrewshire.gov.uk

Page 5

Scottish Ministers, special advisers and the Permanent Secretary are covered by
the terms of the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016.  See www.lobbying.scot
St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh  EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot

 
T: 0300 244 4000
E: scottish.ministers@gov.scot

Minister for Local Government Empowerment and
Planning  
Ministear airson Cumhachdachadh is Dealbhachadh
Riaghaltas Ionadail
Joe FitzPatrick MSP 
Joe Mac Giolla Phádraig BPA
Alan Russell
Chief Executive
Renfrewshire Council
___
20 October 2023
Dear Alan Russell,
I am pleased to enclose feedback on your authority’s twelfth Planning Performance Framework
(PPF) Report, for the period April 2022 to March 2023.
Across the country, performance against the key markers continues to be stable and there has
been little variation in the overall total of green, amber and red markings awarded this reporting
period compared with previous periods. It is clear that each of you continue to put in considerable
effort to ensuring our planning system continues to run efficiently. I have been particularly pleased
to see there has been a marked improvement on speed of determination for major applications
across some authorities.
Resourcing remains a key priority which I will continue to discuss with the High Level Group on
Planning Performance, which I jointly chair with COSLA. I also have asked officials to bring
different parties together to talk about resourcing in the autumn, to identify practical solutions. We
need options that work for all sectors, and I think it would be really beneficial to discuss a variety of
issues including full cost recovery, the local setting of fees, charges for additional services and
approaches which could enable authorities to access the skills and expertise at the time they
require.
Finally, I am delighted that we have recently announced the appointment of the National Planning
Improvement Champion (NPIC), Craig McLaren, who took up this new post in early September.
Craig will play a pivotal role in supporting improvement and will also be looking at how we can
improve the way we measure and assess the performance of the planning system in the future.  
If you would like to discuss any of the markings awarded below, please contact us at 
chief.planner@gov.scot and a member of the team will be happy to discuss them with you.

Page 6

Scottish Ministers, special advisers and the Permanent Secretary are covered by
the terms of the Lobbying (Scotland) Act 2016.  See www.lobbying.scot 
St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh  EH1 3DG
www.gov.scot

   
JOE FITZPATRICK 
CC: David Love, Chief Planning Officer

Page 7

PERFORMANCE MARKERS REPORT 2022-23 
Name of planning authority: Renfrewshire Council 
The High Level Group on Performance agreed a set of performance markers. We have assessed your report against
those markers to give an indication of priority areas for improvement action. The high level group will monitor and
evaluate how the key markers have been reported and the value which they have added. 
The Red, Amber, Green ratings are based on the evidence provided within the PPF reports. Where no information or
insufficient evidence has been provided, a ‘red’ marking has been allocated. 
No. Performance Marker RAG
rating
Comments
1 Decision-making: continuous
reduction of average timescales for
all development categories [Q1 -
Q4] 
Red Major Applications
Your average timescale is 22.5 weeks which is slower than
the previous year but faster than the Scottish average of 39.5
weeks.
RAG = Amber 
Local (Non-Householder) Applications
Your average timescale is 15.2 weeks which is slower than
the previous year and slower than the Scottish average of
14.4 weeks.
RAG = Red 
Householder Applications
Your average timescale is 12.3 weeks which is slower than
the previous year and slower than the Scottish average of 8.9
weeks.
RAG = Red 
Overall RAG = Red
2 Processing agreements:
• offer to all prospective
applicants for major
development planning
applications; and
• availability publicised on
website 
Green You continue to offer processing agreements as part of the
planning application process.
RAG = Green 
You advertise processing agreements on your website which
is accompanied by advice to help applicants.
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green
3 Early collaboration with applicants
and consultees
• availability and promotion
of pre-application
discussions for all
prospective applications;
and
• clear and proportionate
requests for supporting
information 
Green You continue to offer and encourage pre-application
discussions on all major and complex applications. 
RAG = Green 
You have highlighted how your pre-application discussions
help assist with relationship management with developers
and provide confidence to applicants by providing them with
clear advice on next steps including the types of supporting
information required.
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green
4 Legal agreements: conclude (or
reconsider) applications after
resolving to grant permission
reducing number of live
applications more than 6 months
after resolution to grant (from last
reporting period)
Green Your average timescale for applications with legal agreement
is 40.1 which is faster than the Scottish average of 41.1
weeks. You did not determine any legal agreement
applications in the previous reporting period.
5 Enforcement charter updated / re-
published within last 2 years
Green You updated your enforcement charter in 2022 which is
within the last 2 years.

Page 8

6 Continuous improvement:
• progress ambitious and
relevant service
improvement commitments
identified through PPF
report 
Green You set out 3 improvement commitments in the previous year
and have made substantial progress in all 3 commitments.
You have identified that each commitment is still on-going
and will be completed in the next reporting period. 
You have set out a further 4 commitments for the coming
period.
7 Local development plan less than
5 years since adoption
Green The LDP is 1 year and 3 months old which is within 5 years
since adoption.
8 Development plan scheme – next
LDP:
• project planned and
expected to be delivered to
planned timescale 
Green As your LDP has recently been adopted, no indicative
timescales have been set out for the next LDP. You have
however set out an Action Programme relating to the delivery
of the most recent LDP.
9 &
10
LDP Engagement 
• stakeholders including
Elected Members, industry,
agencies, the public and
Scottish Government are
engaged appropriately
through all key stages of
development plan
preparation. 
N/A Although no early engagement has commenced on the next
LDP, you have asked various stakeholders to note their
interest in helping to prepare and shape the next LDP and
this will be captured in future Development Plan Schemes.
11 Policy Advice
• Production of relevant and
up to date policy advice
Green You have updated a variety of policy advice documents
during the reporting period which includes refreshing the
Vacant and Derelict Land Strategy and Development in the
Countryside as well as Development Briefs and planning
guidance for various sites identified in the LDP.
12 Corporate working across
services to improve outputs and
services for customer benefit (for
example: protocols; joined-up
services; single contact
arrangements; joint pre-application
advice)
Green You have been working with different services throughout the
council to help shape GIS mapping software and have
recently been involved in the setting up of the corporate GIS
working group. The group is seen as a strong collaborative
approach between services such as Environment, Housing
and Infrastructure to help shape the spatial mapping of data
across the council. 
Other examples of corporate working where planning have
been involved  include Local Heat and Energy Efficiency
Strategy and Schools Estate Management Plan.
13 Sharing good practice, skills and
knowledge between authorities 
Green You continue to participate in HOPS forum which encourages
sharing good practice along with identifying lessons learnt on
specific planning issues. You are also actively engaging in
the Clydeplan steering group and Glasgow City Region
meetings. 
14 Stalled sites / legacy cases:
conclusion or withdrawal of old
planning applications and reducing
number of live applications more
than one year old
Green You do not have any outstanding legacy cases.
15 Developer contributions: clear
and proportionate expectations
• set out in development plan
(and/or emerging plan);
and
• in pre-application
discussions 
Green Your expectations for developer contributions are covered
within your recently adopted LDP and also within
Renfrewshire New Development Supplementary Guidance.
RAG = Green 
You aim to seek early discussions and partnership working
with developers and landowners to help provide certainty
over contribution requirements.
RAG = Green 
Overall RAG = Green

Page 9

RENFREWSHIRE COUNCIL
Performance against Key Markers 
Marker 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23
1 Decision making
timescales          
2 Processing
agreements          
3 Early collaboration           
4 Legal agreements          
5 Enforcement charter          
6 Continuous
improvement           
7 Local development
plan          
8 Development plan
scheme          
9 &
10
LDP Engagement N/A    N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
11 Regular and
proportionate advice to
support applications 
12 Corporate working
across services          
13 Sharing good practice,
skills and knowledge          
14 Stalled sites/legacy
cases          
15 Developer
contributions           
Overall Markings (total numbers for red, amber and green) 
2012-13 6 5 2
2013-14  1 9 3
2014-15 0 2 13
2015-16 0 3 12
2016-17 0 6 9
2017-18 0 3 10
2018-19 1 4 8
2019-20 1 2 10
2020-21 1 2 10
2021-22 0 0 13
2022-23 1 0 12 
Decision Making Timescales (weeks) 
13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23
2022-23
Scottish
Average
Major
Development 12.0 10.1 13.1 20.0 18.6 35.4 13.3 32.2 17.7 22.5 39.5
Local 
(Non-
Householder)
Development
8.7 8.3 9.4 9.8 10 8.9 7.4
8.0
10.5 15.2 14.4
Householder
Development 6.9 7.2 7.9 7.6 7.6 6.9 6.1 6.9 7 12.3 8.9