D - 25-0510-PP - Park Mains Erksine Extension
Renfrewshire Council · 4 November 2025
Back to Planning and Climate Change Policy Board — 4 November 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
PUBLIC Planning and Climate Change Policy Board: 4 November 2025 Report by Chief Planning Officer Reference No 25/0510/PP Application Type Planning Permission (Major) Proposal Erection of new-build 3 storey Teaching Annex Building and 2 storey P.E. Annex Building, single-storey Dining Extension to existing School building courtyard. Associated landscape works including canopy over amphitheatre steps, canopy to external courtyard dining area and seating. Alteration and extension of bus parking area and car parking. New electrical substation with GRP enclosure adjacent to existing Energy Centre. Location Renfrewshire Council, Main Building, Park Mains High School Ward 12 - Erskine and Inchinnan Community Council Erskine Community Council Applicant Children's Services, Renfrewshire Council Recommendation Grant Subject to Conditions All plans, reports, documents and representations relating to this application can be viewed in full online at https://pl-bs.renfrewshire.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=SYNQ9TMWJBZ00 This report fulfils the requirements of regulation 16, Schedule 2, paragraphs 3(c) and 4 of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013. The report is presented to the Planning and Climate Change Policy Board in line with the Council's Scheme of Delegation. In this instance, the application relates to a major development as defined within the Town and Country Planning (Hierarchy of Development) (Scotland) Regulations 2009. Proposal This application seeks planning permission for the erection of a 3-storey teaching annex building, 2 storey physical education (PE) annex building and a single storey dining extension at Park Mains High School, Erskine. The proposal would also include other associated works including landscaping, a canopy over the amphitheatre steps and external courtyard dining area. The existing bus parking and car parking area would also be altered and extended and a new electrical substation with a Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP) enclosure would also be installed adjacent to an existing Energy Centre. Both annexes and the single storey extensions would be located to the rear of the school. The 3 storey annex building would have a rectangular footprint and would measure approximately 21m x 45m x 14.3m and would comprise of a flat roof enclosed by a 1.1m high parapet. The teaching annex would include flexible teaching spaces, breakout areas and circulation zones. The proposed PE annex would also have a flat roof and would measure approximately 33m x 38m x 10.5m. The PE annex would include two multi-use sports halls, changing villages with office space. The proposed dining extension would increase the school's dining capacity and would comprise of a flat roof single storey in-fill extension with a floor area of approximately 208sqm. The dining extension would be located within the existing school courtyard, adjacent to the internal 'street'. A sheltered dining space would also be located adjacent to the existing PE block.
Page 2
PUBLIC Finishing materials for the teaching and PE annexes would be a mixed palette of grey and bronze metal cladding to the upper levels with facing brick to the ground floor elevations. The dining extension would be finished with facing brick to match the existing building. Vehicular access and drop off would remain as present with direct access via Rashieholm Roundabout. Within the school grounds, the entrance road from the roundabout would be widened and a new pedestrian footway formed on the eastern side of the access road to connect the external footpath network to the school's internal path network. An additional staff carpark would be formed adjacent to the existing carpark to provide 77 parking spaces including provision of shelters for 80 cycles. Alterations to the bus-drop off area would also provide space for 16 x 12-15m buses, 1 x 12m bus and 1 space for a minibus. Other associated works include landscaping, formation of sensory garden, allotments, habitat area and formation of canopies within the grounds. Site Description The application site relates to Park Mains High School, which is located to the south-west of Rashieholm Roundabout, Erskine. The school is a flat roofed building comprising of a central atrium with three wings to the rear of the building. The current pupil capacity of Park Mains High School is currently 1,717 pupils taking account of temporary modular classrooms. The proposed extensions would result in a maximum capacity of 2,000 pupils. Pre-Application Consultation with Officers The Scottish Government strongly encourages constructive pre-application discussions between prospective applicants and the planning authority. Pre-application discussions seek to identify key planning considerations at an early stage and help inform what supporting information is required to support a subsequent application. Pre-application discussions have taken place, focusing on the following matters: Principle of development. Documents that would be necessary in the submission of the planning application. Required consultations. Negotiated Improvements No changes have been negotiated. Site History The planning history for the site is as follows; if no history is listed then planning has no record of previous applications for the site. Application No: 24/0690/PAN Description: Erection of extension to school Decision: Accepted; Application No: 05/0009/RD Description: Construction of synthetic surfaced football pitch with associated fencing and floodlighting. Decision: Deemed Consent: Consultations Dougall Baillie Associates (DBA) (Councils Independent Drainage Consultants) – Request that further information is provided with regards to attenuation. This information can be secured through the imposition of an appropriate condition.
Page 3
PUBLIC Glasgow Airport Safeguarding – No objections subject to conditions. Environment, Health and Infrastructure (Environmental Protection) – No objections subject to conditions. Scottish Water – No objections. Chief Executive's (Roads Development) – Advise of no objection subject to conditions with regards to further details being submitted with respect to sustainable transport modes. Sports Scotland – No objections. Bishopton Community Council – Object. The size of the extension is inadequate with regards to the potential pupil intake from Bishopton and Dargavel. The capacity of Park Mains is capped at 2,000 pupils which includes the proposed extension. This is inadequate given the potential intake from Dargavel. The financial and environmental cost is also incalculable due to busing 1,800 pupils to and from Erskine. The process is also flawed as the Council made a decision on the Park Main extensions before the latest census was released and before the latest forecast of pupil numbers. Representations The application has been publicised in line with the requirements of the relevant legislation. 228 representations have been received with 226 objections, one neutral and one in support. The following concerns have been raised through objection: Extensions not big enough to accommodate pupils in catchment area, a new school is required in Dargavel/Bishopton and development does not take account of roll projections; Impact on traffic congestion and increase in vehicular movements is not sustainable; Road safety; No direct transport links; Children lacking teaching attention in a 'super sized' school including degradation and access to extra curriculum activities; Carbon emissions from extra buses, negative impact on environment; Walking to school should be encouraged; Development doesn't meet education provision for Renfrewshire; Financial outlay for taxpayers; Undermining of Council's climate commitments; Lack of statutory consultation with the public and also teachers; Site not suitable for school expansion; Bridgewater Shopping Centre being 'swamped' at lunchtime with pupils. No comments were made in the supporting representation whilst the neutral representee only commented that a new school is required. Policy Context In making any determination under the Planning Acts, regard is to be had to the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this instance the Development Plan consists of National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the Renfrewshire Local Development Plan (2021) (LDP). The following provisions of the Development Plan are considered relevant to the determination of this application:
Page 4
PUBLIC National Planning Framework 4 Policy 3 - Biodiversity Policy 13 - Sustainable transport Policy 14 - Design, quality and place Policy 21 - Play, recreation and sport Policy 22 - Flood risk and water management Full details relating to the policies of the NPF4 can be found online. Renfrewshire Local Development Plan Policy P1 - Renfrewshire's Places Policy P6 - Open Space Policy ENV2 - Natural Heritage Policy I1 - Connecting Places Policy I3 - Flooding and Drainage Full details relating to the policies of the LDP can be found online. New Development Supplementary Guidance Delivering the Places Strategy - Creating Places - Open Space Submitted Reports and Assessments The following reports and assessments were submitted in support of the application: Design and Access Statement - Provides details of the site location, description, wider site appraisal, design approach, access and movement, landscaping. Pre-application consultation (PAC) Report - Provides details on PAC process including scope of event, publicity, attendance, feedback etc. Noise Impact Assessment and Noise Survey - Provides details on the method and results of noise surveys carried out and an assessment of noise to the neighbouring dwellings. Travel Strategy - Provides details of consideration given to travel connections that would serve the extended school. Transportation Assessment and associated Technical Addendum - Provides details on the increased traffic associated with the proposed development and active travel review. Drainage Strategy Report and Flood Risk Assessment - Provides details on existing and proposed drainage including treatment and attenuation and maintenance of the surface water drainage system. Ground Investigation Report - Provides details on the review of existing ground investigations. Civil and Structural Works Report - Provides details on ground investigations and outcomes, including drainage. Environmental Screening Checklist - A request for a screening opinion determined that though the proposal would fall within Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017, it is not likely that the proposed works would have a significant environmental impact which would require an Environmental Impact Assessment to be undertaken.
Page 5
PUBLIC Scottish Ministers Direction In determining a planning application, the Council is required to provide details of any Direction made by Scottish Ministers under Regulation 30 (Directions requiring consultation), Regulation 31 (Directions requiring information), Regulation 32 (Directions restricting the grant of planning permission) and Regulation 33 (Directions requiring consideration of condition) of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013, or under Regulation 50 (that development is EIA development) of The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017. None. Planning Assessment National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) provides the long-term national spatial strategy for planning in Scotland. It sets out the Scottish Government's current view on delivering sustainable, liveable, and productive places through the application of spatial principles. The application relates to the extension of an existing school within school grounds and the development does not introduce a new land use. As such, the principle of the school in this location has already been established and it is not under assessment within this application and consideration concerns only the acceptability of the proposed extension and other associated works within the school grounds. The application site is covered by policy P1 (Renfrewshire's Places) of the LDP which states that within these areas, there will be a general presumption in favour of a continuance of the built form. New development proposals within these areas should make a positive contribution to the place and be compatible and complimentary to existing uses and character. Similarly, policy 14 (Design, Quality and Place) also seeks to ensure that proposals will be designed to improve the quality of an area whether in urban or rural locations and requires development proposals to be designed to improve the quality of an area and be consistent with the six qualities and placemaking policy framework set out in the New Development Supplementary Guidance which set out a range of considerations that form the basis of good places design. Each consideration will be assessed in turn. Context and Character As detailed above, the application site relates to an existing school with extensive grounds. The proposed extensions would be located to the rear of the existing school, and it is considered that the development could easily be accommodated within the school grounds whilst maintaining open space and recreational areas within the site. It is also considered that formation of the canopy area and sensory garden would also enhance the outdoor space associated with the school. As such, it is considered that the proposed development would be compatible to the context and character of the site. Adequate services are also in place to serve the proposals. Access and Connectivity Policy 15 (Local Living and 20 minute Neighbourhoods) advocates local living to encourage connected and compact neighbourhoods where people can meet most daily needs within a reasonable distance of their home. Policies 13 (Sustainable Transport) and I1 (Connecting Places) advocate good accessibility and connectivity to walking, cycling and public transport. As discussed above, the principle of the school in this location or the pupil catchment area is not under assessment within this application and consideration concerns only the acceptability of the proposed extension. Due to residential development within Bishopton and Erskine, the
Page 6
PUBLIC pupil capacity requirement for the catchment has increased at the High School and as such, the extension is required to facilitate this. The Transport Assessment submitted with the application states that travel by school bus is the highest mode of transport with walking, the second most popular. Given the distance to the existing school from Dargavel and the provision of the school bus, it is considered that walking is unlikely from this area. However, the catchment area for the school is not a planning matter and is not something that can be taken into consideration in the assessment of this application. Alterations to the bus-drop off area are proposed to facilitate the increase in school bus transport. The Travel Strategy submitted with the application also gives consideration to various interlinking travel connections that will serve the extended school including aspirational shared use footway links. Details are also provided of public transport services in the area and the school transport provision. Cycle shelters would also be provided on-site with provision for 80 spaces. The Council's Chief Executive's (Roads Development) also advise of no objection subject to conditions with regards to further details being submitted with respect to sustainable transport modes. Children’s Services also advise that Transport has been a key consideration as part of the development and the Council will continue to investigate all avenues to ensure that transport is as sustainable as possible. Transport requirements are expected to gradually increase over the 5 plus years and an appraisal will be undertaken to determine which avenue offers the Council best financial and sustainable value. In view of the above, it is considered that the proposal has given due consideration to access and connectivity in line with policies 13, 15 and I1. Layout and Built Form It is considered that the design of the proposed extensions would be complimentary to the vernacular of the existing school and the new annexes would have a palette of external finishes to give them their own identity from the existing school whilst the extended dining area would be finished in materials to match the existing building. It is considered that the proposal would also improve the appearance and use of the external courtyards with the canopy over the amphitheatre steps, sensory garden etc. As such, it is considered that the proposal would comply with Policy 14. Environment and Community In response to Policies 22 (Flood Risk and Water Management) and 13 (Flooding and Drainage), a Drainage Strategy and Flood Risk Assessment were reviewed by the Council's Drainage Consultant who advise that further information is provided with regards to attenuation. These details could be secured through the imposition of an appropriate condition. With regards to the Noise Impact Assessment (NIA), mitigation is recommended. The Council's Environment, Housing and Infrastructure (Environmental Protection) were consulted and advised of no objections subject to conditions. However, it is considered appropriate to attach an informative for the applicant to seek advice from Environment, Housing & Infrastructure in this regard. Policies P6 (Open Space) and 21 (Play Recreation and Sport) are similar in that they seek to protect areas of recreational and functional open space and development proposals which result in the loss of outdoor sports facilities will only be supported where it can be
Page 7
PUBLIC demonstrated that there is clear excess of provision to meet current and anticipated demand in the area, and that the site would be developed without detriment to the overall quality of provision. The school grounds includes 2 full size synthetic grass pitches, an athletics oval and a full size grass pitch. The proposed works would result in the loss of the grass pitch. Sport Scotland were consulted and advise of no objections. The applicant advises that consultation has been undertaken with the school, local community and sports groups who use the 3G pitches and no concerns have been raised about the loss of the grass pitch. On this basis, Sport Scotland consider that the proposal would accord with criterion iv) of policy 21 and the site can be developed without detriment to the overall capacity of provision in the area. It is therefore considered that the proposal would accord with Policies P6 and 21. Policy ENV 2 (Natural Heritage) states that development proposals should consider the potential impact on natural heritage. A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal was submitted with the application where habitats within the site were considered to be of relatively low ecological importance and no specific constraints in this regard were identified in terms of the habitats likely to fall within the footprint of the development. Bat roost emergence surveys were recommended for the main school building that will be affected by the development. This could addressed by the imposition of an appropriate condition in this regard. Policy 3 (Biodiversity) also seeks to enhance biodiversity. Proposed landscaping areas including a sensory garden, allotments, wildflower meadow and tree planting would take place within the site to enhance the external amenity space around the school. Buildings and Design As discussed above, it is considered that the design, scale and finish of the buildings are sympathetic to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and in an appropriate location in accordance with Policy 14 (Design, Quality and Place). The design and materials of the building also been chosen to deliver thermal comfort and overall energy performance in line with Policies 1 (Tackling the Climate and Nature Crisis) and I7 (Zero and Low Carbon Buildings). Representations The majority of the matters raised in the letters of representation have been addressed in the foregoing assessment however a summary of the points raised is also set out below with a response below each highlighted in bold: Extensions not big enough to accommodate pupils in catchment area, a new school is required in Dargavel/Bishopton; and development does not take account of roll projections; The issue of roll projections is fundamentally for Children's Services to consider and is not a planning matter. Notwithstanding this, Children's Services advise that projections are based on specialist modelling used across the UK. The methodology factors in a wide range of data, including population data, school census information and known future house-building, as well as school intake and transition rates. It is also advised that the latest detailed long-term projections, produced in partnership with industry experts show the extended Park Mains High School will have enough capacity for pupils expected from within the catchment over the years ahead. In 2023, the Council agreed to extend Park Mains to 2,000 by considering the pupil projection forecasts as well as undertaking an assessment on the viability of both extending Park Mains, or constructing a new secondary school. This assessment found that the option of constructing a new school could not be justified due to the significant
Page 8
PUBLIC additional yearly cost to the Council, when comparing both options. Park Mains is the Council’s newest secondary school, and a decision to build an additional secondary school for Dargavel/Bishopton would have resulted in Park Mains being significantly under capacity. The Council’s latest pupil projection forecast, published in late October 2025 continues to show that an extended Park Mains can accommodate all catchment demand for the years ahead. Impact on traffic congestion and increase in vehicular movements is not sustainable; Road safety; The Council’s Chief Executive’s (Roads Development) have no objections to the proposal. This issue has also been addressed above. No direct transport links; The development relates to the extension of an existing school and as such the principle of pupils accessing the school through various transport modes has already been accepted. As discussed above, the Transport Assessment submitted with the application states that travel by school bus is the highest mode of transport with walking, the second most popular. Given the distance to the existing school from Dargavel and the provision of the school bus, it is considered that walking is unlikely from this area. However, the catchment area for the school is not a planning matter and is not something that can be taken into consideration in the assessment of this application. Alterations to the bus-drop off area are proposed to facilitate the increase in school bus transport. The Travel Strategy submitted with the application also gives consideration to various interlinking travel connections that will serve the extended school including aspirational shared use footway links. Details are also provided of public transport services in the area and the school transport provision. Cycle shelters would also be provided on-site with provision for 80 spaces. Children lacking teaching attention in a 'super sized' school including degradation and access to extra curriculum activities; This is a matter for Children's Services and is not a planning consideration. Notwithstanding this, Children's Services advise that the proposed development which includes new PE and teaching facilities would increase subject choice, and a greater range of ways to support pupils with attainment and wellbeing. Children’s Services also advise that there will be no change to current class sizes and Park Mains will remain within the agreed national policy of class size maximums. As a result of increased pupil numbers, the extension will provide additional teaching spaces and the recruitment of additional staff. Pupils will not be taught in classes of larger numbers, therefore retaining current pupil to teacher ratios in line with all secondary schools in the authority. An increase in capacity through an extended Park Mains High School will also come with increased pastoral and management staff across the school, ensuring that young people and families are fully supported in their education journey. Carbon emissions from extra buses, negative impact on environment; Walking to school should be encouraged; As discussed above, the principle of pupils accessing the school through various transport modes including school buses has already been accepted through the development of the existing school and the proposed extensions are required to facilitate the pupil capacity within the catchment area.
Page 9
PUBLIC Development does not meet education provision for Renfrewshire; This is a matter for Children's Services and is not a material planning consideration. Financial outlay for taxpayers; This is not a material planning consideration. Notwithstanding this Children's Services advise that the financial case for extending Park Mains High School was publicly set out in 2023. That analysis showed a new secondary school in Bishopton could cost £90m to build, meaning net additional annual costs of £5.5m every year. This would not have been best value for public funds. Undermining of Council's climate commitments; As detailed above, the principle of pupils accessing the school through various transport modes including school buses has already been accepted through the development of the existing school. Lack of statutory consultation with the public and also teachers; The application has been publicised in line with the statutory requirements of the relevant planning legislation. Other consultation beyond that required as part of this planning application process is a matter for Children Services. Notwithstanding this, Children's Services advise that, for the past two years the proposal has been moving forward, with the support of parent groups from throughout the catchment, who, along with staff and pupils, have been fully engaged in the redesign. Site not suitable for school expansion; For the reasons set out in this report, it is considered that the proposed development would be of an appropriate scale and could easily be accommodated within the curtilage of the site without detriment to amenity. Bridgewater Shopping Centre being 'swamped' at lunchtime with pupils. This issue of pupils use and activity of and in surrounding facilities is not a planning matter. With regards to the specific concerns raised by Bishopton Community Council with regards to roll projections and financial outlay, these issues have been addressed above. Planning Obligations The Council is required to provide a summary of the terms of any planning obligation and any associated legal agreement and/or mechanism required to secure it including those provisions under The Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act in relation to the grant of permission for the proposed development: None required. Conclusion In view of the above, it is considered that the proposal would accord with the relevant provisions of the Development Plan. There are no other material considerations. Planning permission should therefore be granted subject to conditions.
Page 10
PUBLIC Recommendation Grant Subject to Conditions Reason(s) for Recommendation 1. The proposal accords with the provisions of the Development Plan and there were no material considerations which outweighed the presumption in favour of development according with the Development Plan. Condition(s) 1. That the development hereby permitted must be begun within three years of the date of this permission. Reason: To be in compliance with Section 58 of The Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 as amended by Section 32 of The Planning (Scotland) Act 2019. 2. Prior to the commencement of any construction works on site the developer shall provide for the written approval of the Planning Authority: a) a Site Investigation Report (characterising the nature and extent of any soil, water and gas contamination within the site); and, if remedial works are recommended therein. b) a Remediation Strategy and implementation Plan identifying the proposed methods for implementing all remedial recommendations contained within the Site Investigation report and including (where relevant) a materials management plan, a monitoring and maintenance plan and a phasing plan showing how the site is to be subdivided for the purposes of remedial implementation and/or verification reporting, prepared with current authoritative guidance has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that the site will be made suitable for its proposed use. 3. Prior to the occupation of the annexes and extension: a) a Verification Report confirming completion of the works specified within the approved Remediation Strategy and Implementation Plan; and/or b) where remediation works are not required but soils are to be imported to site, a Verification Report confirming imported materials are suitable for use shall be submitted to and approved in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To demonstrate that the works necessary to make the site suitable for use have been completed. 4. That the approved Bird Hazard Management Plan, Park Mains High School, Erskine, 29 August 2025, shall be implemented and adhered to at construction and operational phase and there shall be no changes to the approved plan unless otherwise agreed in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority in consultation with Glasgow Airport. Reason: In the interests of Aerodrome Safeguarding.
Page 11
PUBLIC 5. That the landscaping as detailed in 'Planting Strategy - 23020-OOB-ZZ-00-DR-L- 000040 Rev 03' shall be implemented and maintained in accordance with the 'Landscape Management Plan - 23030-OOB-XX-XX-RP-L006100 P02' to the satisfaction or Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure a suitable landscape strategy is developed for the site in the interests of visual amenity and biodiversity. 6. That the recommendations detailed in 'Preliminary Ecological Appraisal and Preliminary Roost Assessment dated March 2024' shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the Council as Planning Authority. For the avoidance of doubt, this shall include details and findings of any Bat Roost Surveys including any necessary mitigation undertaken and during the course of the development, details demonstrating the implementation of the recommendations and mitigation measures carried out shall be submitted for the written approval of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To protect the natural environment. 8. That, prior to the commencement of development, a detailed schedule of the proposed external finishes for the annexes and extension, together with a plan and schedule of the surface treatments to be used on the roads and footpaths within the site shall be submitted for the written approval of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Thereafter, the annexes, extension, roads and footpaths shall be constructed only in accordance with such details as may be approved to the satisfaction of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of the amenity of the area. 9. That prior to the commencement of the development hereby approved, a Drainage Impact Assessment shall be submitted and approved by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. The Drainage Impact Assessment shall accord with the 'Council's Drainage Assessment - Notes for Guidance'. Thereafter, the Assessment as approved shall be implemented prior to the completion of the development and maintained thereafter to the satisfaction of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure adequate provision for drainage associated with the development. 10. That prior to the commencement of development and the approved Transport Assessment, a Supplementary Report, detailing the Dargavel construction timetable, shall be submitted and approved in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Any approved mitigation measures identified in the Supplementary Report shall be submitted for the consideration of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Thereafter, any identified mitigation measures shall be implemented unless otherwise agreed in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that the Transport Assessment reflects the revised Dargavel construction timetable. 11. That prior to the occupation of the annexes and extension hereby approved, a Travel Plan to encourage sustainable modes of transport to the school shall be submitted to and approved in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning
Page 12
PUBLIC Authority. The Travel Plan shall include a system of management, monitoring, review and reporting, in respect of the sustainable modes of transport identified. The measures identified in the plan together with any measures identified for implementation shall thereafter be submitted for the consideration of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Thereafter, any agreed measures shall be implemented unless otherwise agreed in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that a cohesive approach is taken to sustainable travel. Advisory Note(s) 1. The applicant is advised to seek advice from the Council's Environment, Housing & Infrastructure with regards to noise mitigation for operational plant (Air Source Heat Pumps, Kitchen Extract and Air Handling Plant. 2. The applicant is advised that Bird Hazard records should be made available to Glasgow Airport on request. There is also no need to inform, Glasgow Airport prior to the dispersal of birds. Schedule of Plans Drawing Number Revision Drawing/Document Title Stamped Drawing Location Plan 23020- OOB- ZZ- 00- DR- L- 000001 OVERALL SITE PLAN 23020- OOB- ZZ- 00- DR- L- 000091 PHASE 1- ADVANCE WORKS 23020- OOB- ZZ- 00- DR- L- 000092 PHASE 2 - BUS LOOP 23020- OOB- ZZ- 00- DR- L- 000093 PHASE 3 - MAIN WORKS 23020-DSSR-ET-XX-DR- M-90001 PROPOSED SITE PLAN - PROPOSED SITE WIDE EXTERNAL SERVICES PLAN 23020-DSSR-ET-XX-DR- M-90002 PROPOSED SITE WIDE EXTERNAL LIGHTING AND SECURITY LAYOUT 23020-HML-00-00-DR-A- 10100 GA FLOORPLAN - LEVEL 00 23020-HML-00-01-DR-A- 10101 GA FLOORPLAN - LEVEL 01 23020-HML-00-02-DR-A- 10102 GA FLOORPLAN - LEVEL 02 23020-HML-00-ZZ-DR-A- 10321 ELEVATIONS - DINING EXTENSION 23020-HML-01-00-DR-A- 10100 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 00
Page 13
PUBLIC 23020-HML-01-01-DR-A- 10110 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 01 23020-HML-01-02-DR-A- 10120 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 02 23020-HML-01-R1-DR-A- 10190 ROOF PLAN 23020-HML-01-ZZ-DR-A- 10200 SECTIONS 23020-HML-01-ZZ-DR-A- 10300 ELEVATIONS 23020-HML-02-00-DR-A- 10100 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 00 23020-HML-02-01-DR-A- 10110 FLOOR PLAN - LEVEL 01 23020-HML-02-R1-DR-A- 10190 ROOF PLAN 23020-HML-02-ZZ-DR-A- 10200 SECTIONS 23020-HML-02-ZZ-DR-A- 10300 ELEVATIONS 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-VS-A- 10701 VISUALISATION - DINING EXTENSION VIEW FROM PLAYGROUND 23020-OOB-ZZ-00-DR-L- 000010 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONTOURS WITH EXISTING TREES PLANTING STRATEGY SITE SECTIONS TYPICAL DETAILS CANOPY DETAILS SITE LOCATION PLAN SITE TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY WITH SEWER ANNEX FOOTPRINTS 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 52001 PROPOSED BUS STANCE EXTENSION - PROPOSED DRAINAGE ALTERATIONS 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 52011 PROPOSED CAR PARK EXTENSION - PROPOSED DRAINAGE ALTERATIONS 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 52021 PROPOSED BUILDING EXTENSION - PROPOSED DRAINAGE ALTERATIONS
Page 14
PUBLIC 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90001 PROPOSED BUS STANCE EXTENSION TOPO OVERLAY 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90002 PROPOSED CAR PARK EXTENSION TOPO OVERLAY 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90003 PROPOSED BUILDING EXTENSION TOPO OVERLAY 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90010 PROPOSED ALTERATIONS TO MAIN VEHICLE ENTRANCE AND PEDESTRIAN GATE 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90011 PROPOSED BUS STANCE EXTENSION - PROPOSED LEVELS LAYOUT 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90012 PROPOSED CAR PARK EXTENSION - PROPOSED LEVELS LAYOUT 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90013 PROPOSED BUILDING EXTENSION - PROPOSED LEVELS LAYOUT 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90051 PROPOSED BUS STANCE EXTENSION AND PROPOSED BUS TRACKING 23020-SCE-XX-XX-DR-S- 90052 PROPOSED BUILDING EXTENSION - PROPOSED FIRE TENDER TRACKING 5270-HML-00-ZZ-DR-A- 10321 ELEVATIONS - DINING EXTENSION CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL DESIGN NARRATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT - SCREENING CHECKLIST IFA - GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT - DECEMBER 2009 IFA - GROUND INVESTIGATION REPORT – OCTOBER 2023 IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT - PART 1 IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT – PART 2 IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT – PART 3 IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT – PART 4 IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT – PART 5
Page 15
PUBLIC IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT – PART 6 IFA - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION REPORT – PART 7 SCHOOL TRAVEL STRATEGY 025440-R01 NOISE SURVEY REPORT 025440-R03-A NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT 23020 PMHS EXTENSION PAC REPORT 23020- OOB- ZZ- 00- DR- L- 000030 ACCESS AND SECURITY STRATEGY 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_01 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_02 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_03 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_04 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_05 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_06 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-RP-A- 61110_07 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 23020-HML-ZZ-ZZ-VS-A- 10700 VISUALISATION - TEACHING ANNEX VIEW FROM PLAYGROUND 23020-OOB-XX-XX-RP-L- 006100 LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT PLAN 23020-OOB-ZZ-00-DR-L- 000015 DEMOLITION PLAN 25115 TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT SCOPING REPORT 3279GEG-MCS-L01 GI COVERING STATEMENT AELSC0721 PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL AND PRELIMINARY ROOST ASSESSMENT D 501_C8 PROPOSED SURFACE WATER AND FOULD WATER DRAINAGE LAYOUT
Page 16
PUBLIC WS5345 25 BIRD HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN 1045-244 PARK MAINS HIGH SCHOOL LEVEL 3 FRA 3279 - 140825 DRAINAGE DESIGN STATEMENT 3279 DRAINAGE_STRATEGY_REPO RT DUSK EMERGENCE SURVEY AND INNS WALKOVER TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT JULY 2025 TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL ADDENDUM For further information please contact Fiona Knighton, Development Standards Team, Email: fiona.knighton@renfrewshire.gov.uk