E - 25-0241-FUR - Caplethill Road
Renfrewshire Council · 26 August 2025
Back to Planning and Climate Change Policy Board — 26 August 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Planning and Climate Change Policy Board: 26 August 2025 Report by Chief Planning Officer Reference No 25/0241/FUR Application Type Further Application Proposal Section 42 application to vary planning condition 10 (offsite improvements) of planning permission 20/0510/PP in relation to an alternative footpath location. Location Former Thornly Park Campus, Caplethill Road, Paisley Ward 6 - Paisley Southeast Community Council Glenburn Community Council Applicant Miller Homes Ltd Recommendation Grant Subject to Conditions and a variation of the existing Unilateral Undertaking All plans, reports, documents and representations relating to this application can be viewed in full online at https://pl-bs.renfrewshire.gov.uk/online- applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=SU2WUOMWH6N00 This report fulfils the requirements of regulation 16, Schedule 2, paragraphs 3(c) and 4 of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013. The report is presented to the Planning and Climate Change Policy Board in line with the Council's Scheme of Delegation. In this instance, the Chief Planning Officer has declined to exercise delegated powers in light of the planning history which relates to the parent planning application 20/0510/PP. Proposal This proposal is an application under Section 42 to vary condition 10 (off-site improvements) of planning permission 20/0510/PP in relation to an alternative footpath. Planning permission 20/0510/PP was granted on appeal by the Scottish Government on 15 July 2022 for the erection of a residential development comprising of 179 units with associated access, landscaping and ancillary works. Condition 10 states the following: 10. Prior to the commencement of development hereby approved, the applicant shall submit for the written approval of the planning authority, full details of: ▪ The upgrades to the core path GB/6 that runs along the western boundary; ▪ The 3-metre footway with 0.5 metre carriageway segregation as illustrated on drawing no. 19223-SK-18; ▪ Upgrades to the footpath to the northern footway on Caplethill Road as illustrated on drawing no. 19223-SK-18; ▪ The footpath that runs from the northeast of the site to Stoney Brae; ▪ Bus stop improvements on Caplethill Road; ▪ A signalised crossing on Caplethill Road; and ▪ Traffic calming measures on Caplethill Road. Thereafter, all improvements as may be approved, shall be implemented fully in accordance with the phasing plan for which the permission of the planning authority has been obtained under the terms of condition 9 above.
Page 2
In response to condition 10, drawings were provided and reviewed by the Council's Chief Executives (Roads Development). The submitted drawings were considered to be acceptable to discharge the suspensive elements of this condition and that the works specified in the approved drawings are to be undertaken within and in accordance with the phasing plan approved under condition 9. The 3-metre footway with 0.5 metre carriageway as detailed above was illustrated on drawing no. 19223-SK-18 and relates to a proposed path on the southern edge of Caplethill Road. The formation of this footpath verge and associated embankment works would require removal of all the existing vegetation within this area with the estimated extent circa 3,800m2 which translates to close to 1 acre of removal. To minimise the impact on trees and ecology, the applicant proposes to vary condition 10 and upgrade the existing cycle route further to the south as an alternative. Upgrades include path lighting and upgrades to the existing path at Glenfield Road which also includes some widening of the path on Glenfield Road. The upgrades at Glenfield Road would require the removal of one overhanging tree at the southern end and the removal of a small cluster of 3 self-seeded sycamores at the northern end. For clarity, the applicant seeks to vary condition 10 to delete the requirement for the upgrades to the south side of Caplethill Road and to include the proposed alternative works for the upgrade of the cycle route and path at Glenfield Road. As detailed above, other pedestrian links were approved as part of this development including, improvement works on the northern side of Caplethill Road, a pedestrian link to the east of the site, works to the existing core path and a further pedestrian access point at the south-west corner of the site and links on to the north of the site. Traffic calming is also proposed on Caplethill Road and a crossing point. These remain unchanged as part of the current proposals and condition 10 is only to be partially varied in respect of the implementation of the footpath specifically. Site Description The application site relates to an existing footpath/cyclepath (core path GB/9 and core path SP/32) located to the south of the approved housing site which is currently under construction (20/0510/PP). Caplethill Road is located to the north and Thornley Dam to the south. The Glenfield Road area of path to be upgraded is also located adjacent to existing dwellinghouses which are located to the west. Pre-Application Consultation with Officers The Scottish Government strongly encourages constructive pre-application discussions between prospective applicants and the planning authority. Pre-application discussions seek to identify key planning considerations at an early stage and help inform what supporting information is required to support a subsequent application. Pre-application discussions have taken place, focusing on tree loss and potential impact on ecology. Negotiated Improvements No changes have been negotiated. Site History The planning history for the site is as follows; if no history is listed then planning has no record of previous applications for the site.
Page 3
Application No: 22/0503/AD Description: Display of one non-illuminated V stack sign (retrospective) Decision: Grant subject to conditions Application No: 22/0644/PP Description: Erection of temporary sales cabin with associated landscaping Decision: Grant subject to conditions Application No: 23/0349/NMV Description: NMV 10 of 20/0510/PP relocation of gas governor and alterations to path behind plot 280 Decision: Grant Application No: 23/0391/NMV Description: NMV of 20/0510/PP for alterations of SuDs area. Decision: Grant Application No: 23/0478/NMV Description: Variation 13 of 20/0510/PP Proposed infill area for off site works Decision: Withdrawn Application No: 23/0479/NMV Description: Variation to Planning Application 20/0510/PP for change to housetypes Decision: Grant Application No: 23/0509/DOC Description: Discharge condition 10 of planning application 20/0510/PP Decision: Withdrawn Application No: 23/0591/NMV Description: Non material variation to application 20/0510/PP to relocate electrical sub station and change of finishing material to sub station. Decision: Grant Application No: 23/0656/NMV Description: Non material variation to planning permission 20/0510/PP to indicate plots with enhanced glazing specification and increase path to rear of plots 3-6 Decision: Grant Application No: 23/0699/NMV Description: Non material variation to planning application 20/0510/PP Plots 244 and 245 block size corrected and plot 244 handing note corrected. Indicative note removed from the gas governor position Decision: Grant Application No: 23/0732/NMV Description: Non material variation for planning application 20/0510/PP - comprising 1.Plots 16 and 17 changed. 2.Footpath arrangements changed for plots 27, 33, 42, 43, 88 and 250. 3.Plot 53 moved 200mm towards plot 54 to assist with retention.4. Path next to plot 34 moved slightly to assist with retention also.5.Layby/turning area also shown at the SUDS area Decision: Grant Application No: 24/0055/NMV
Page 4
Description: Non material variation to planning application 20/0510/PP comprising adjustment to footpath at plots 17, 19, 69, 89. 90. 93, 94, 203, 242 and 243 and plot 17 handed. Decision: Grant Application No: 25/0149/NMV Description: Non-Material Variation in relation to planning permission 20/0150/PP for garage conversion for plots 7,8 and 75 Decision: Grant Application No: 25/0343/NMV Description: Non-Material Variation (NMV) for garage conversion to plot 84 for Planning Permission 20/0510/PP Decision: Grant Application No: 25/0385/NMV Description: Non-Material Variation (NMV) for garage conversion to plot 82 for Planning Permission 20/0510/PP Decision: Grant Application No: 20/0510/PP Description: Erection of residential development comprising of 179 units with associated access, landscaping and ancillary works. Decision: Refused Application No: 19/0384/NO Description: Erection of residential development Decision: Accepted Application No: 19/0385/EO Description: Request for a screening opinion for a residential development Decision: Environmental Assessment not Required Application No: 00/0939/PP Description: Extension to existing research station. Decision: Grant subject to conditions Application No: 93/1313/PP Description: Extension to sports hall. Decision: Grant subject to conditions Consultations ▪ Environment, Housing & Infrastructure (Env. Protection) – No objections. ▪ Chief Executive's (Roads Development) - Object. To promote active travel and reduce car dependency for the housing development, upgrades on the northern footway at Caplethill Road including a new footpath to the south of Caplethill Road were considered necessary. The consented footpath on the south side of Caplethill Road would assist is removing the semi-rural character of the road. The proposed alternative is considered to be remote and will require pedestrians and cyclists to travel further. Clarification is also sought where the turning head at Glenfield Road stops in relation to the footpath and investigation and assessment is necessary to ensure that a clear forward sightline for drivers on Caplethill Road.
Page 5
Representations The application has been publicised in line with the requirements of the relevant legislation. The following representations were received: ▪ Object - 22 (including 1 from an elected member) ▪ Support - 0 ▪ Neutral - 0 The issues raised can be summarised as follows with responses to these detailed further in this report in the assessment section below: 1. Impact on habitat, biodiversity and habitat. 2. Deviation from what has already been consented. 3. Not a safe route for pedestrian and not a direct route to school. 4. Loss of trees including those already lost as a result of the housing development. 5. Path to the north of the site not DDA compliant. 6. Housing development should not have been approved. 7. Concerns developer will not adhere to conditions. 8. Concerns that widening of path will impact on wildlife. 9. Concerns over crossing point on Caplethill Road. 10. North side of Caplethill Road improvements not safe, safety barriers should be included. 11. Upgrades to Caplethill Road beyond Glenfield Road should be considered. 12. Concerns that the path to Stoney Brae will not be delivered, potential planning breach. 13. No specification on lighting. 14. Council should maintain the footpath once clearance works have been done. Policy Context In making any determination under the Planning Acts, regard is to be had to the development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise. In this instance the Development Plan consists of National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the Renfrewshire Local Development Plan (2021) (LDP). The following provisions of the Development Plan are considered relevant to the determination of this application: National Planning Framework 4 ▪ Policy 1 - Tackling the climate and nature crises ▪ Policy 2 - Climate mitigation and adaptation ▪ Policy 3 - Biodiversity ▪ Policy 6 - Forestry, woodland and trees ▪ Policy 12 - Zero waste ▪ Policy 14 - Design, quality and place ▪ Policy 15 - Local Living and 20-minute neighbourhoods ▪ Policy 16 - Quality homes ▪ Policy 18 - Infrastructure first ▪ Policy 21 - Play, recreation and sport ▪ Policy 22 - Flood risk and water management Full details relating to the policies of the NPF4 can be found online. Renfrewshire Local Development Plan ▪ Policy P1 - Renfrewshire's Places ▪ Policy P3 - Housing Mix and Affordable Housing
Page 6
▪ Policy ENV2 - Natural Heritage ▪ Policy I1 - Connecting Places ▪ Policy I3 - Flooding and Drainage ▪ Policy I4 - Renewable and Low Carbon Energy Developments ▪ Policy I6 - Communications and Digital Infrastructure ▪ Policy I7 - Zero and Low Carbon Buildings ▪ Policy I8 - Developer Contributions Full details relating to the policies of the LDP can be found online. New Development Supplementary Guidance ▪ Delivering the Places Strategy: Affordable Housing and Open Space Provision in New Developments ▪ Delivering the Infrastructure Strategy: Connecting Places; Provision for Waste Recycling in New Developments; and Flooding and Drainage ▪ Delivering the Environment Strategy: Noise and Contaminated Land. Submitted Reports and Assessments The following reports and assessments were submitted in support of the application: Drawings have been submitted to show the extent of an approximate measure of tree removal should the consented footpath on the south side of Caplethill Road be implemented. Scottish Ministers Direction In determining a planning application, the Council is required to provide details of any Direction made by Scottish Ministers under Regulation 30 (Directions requiring consultation), Regulation 31 (Directions requiring information), Regulation 32 (Directions restricting the grant of planning permission) and Regulation 33 (Directions requiring consideration of condition) of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013, or under Regulation 50 (that development is EIA development) of The Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017. None. Planning Assessment In terms of the Development Plan, the principle of the residential development (which is partially implemented/under construction) has already been established and approved under planning permission 20/0510/PP and this Section 42 planning application as submitted requires to be assessed on its individual merits. The current application seeks only to vary condition 10 (off-site improvements) to provide an alternative footpath to the consented path on the south side of Caplethill Road and this forms the focus of this assessment. As discussed above, the previously consented and approved 3 metre footway with 0.5 metre carriageway relates to a proposed path on the southern edge of Caplethill Road. The formation of this consented footpath verge and associated embankment works would require removal of all the existing vegetation/trees within this area with the estimated extent circa 3,800m2 which translates to close to 1 acre of complete tree and vegetation removal. The applicant has submitted a specific overlay drawing which shows the impact of providing the approved verge/footpath to the south side of Caplethill Road, as per the current proposals. To minimise the impact on trees and ecology, the applicant now proposes to upgrade the existing cycle route further to the south as an alternative and seeks to vary an aspect of condition 10 to cover this. Upgrades include path lighting and upgrades to the existing path at Glenfield Road which also includes some widening of the path on Glenfield Road. The
Page 7
upgrades at Glenfield Road would require the removal of 1 overhanging tree at the southern end and the removal of a small cluster of 3 self-seeded sycamores at the northern end. Regardless of the submission of this current application, it is materially relevant to note that the consented footpath on the south side of Caplethill Road has been approved through condition 10 and can be implemented in the event of the current Section 42 application being refused. As discussed above, the consented footpath would require the removal of an area of existing vegetation/trees which would be significantly greater than the proposed tree loss for the alternative path upgrade. Conversely, the tree loss from the alternative path option subject to this Section 42 application would comprise of 1 overhanging tree and 3 self-seeded sycamores which would be significantly less than the ecological impact as a result of the loss of an area of approximately 3,800m2 vegetation/trees necessary for the consented path to be formed. As such, it is considered that the current alternative path proposal proposed through Section 42 more appropriately balances the need for connectivity whilst taking into account natural heritage and ecological impacts in-line with policies 3 (Biodiversity) of NPF4 and ENV3 (Natural Heritage) of the Councils LDP than the consented path. To capture the previously approved off-site infrastructure works including the proposed alternative Glenfield Road and Cycle Path upgrades, the revised condition would read as follows: - That infrastructure improvements as detailed on the following drawings, as approved on 3/06/2022 including the Glenfield Road Footway and Cycle Path Upgrade, shall be implemented only in accordance with the phasing plan as may be approved under the terms of condition 7 above:- 19219-100-207 A Horizontal Geometry (Northern Footpaths) 19219-100-208 A Vertical Geometry (Northern Footpaths) 19219-500-101 J Drainage Layout (Sheet 2 of 2) 19219-500-201 A Drainage Layout (Northern Footpaths) 19219-600-200 E Site Clearance 19219-700-200 G Pavements 19219-700-201 A Pavements & Kerbing (Northern Footpaths) 19219-1200-200 D Road Markings 19219-1200-201 A Signage 19219-1400-200 C Traffic Signals 19219-SK-36 Remote Footpath Details 19219-SK-47 Glenfield Road Footway Upgrade 19219-SK-43 Existing Cycle Path Upgrade For the avoidance of doubt this should not include clearance of the road verge or the formation of the footpath on the south side of Caplethill Road. Reason: in the interests of pedestrian and traffic safety. Policies 13 (Sustainable Transport) and I1 (Connecting Places) seek to support development which would improve or enhance active travel. On balance and regardless of the objection from the Council's Chief Executive's (Roads Development) in this regard, the issues raised can, to an extent be overcome by existing proposals and infrastructure, and on balance it is considered that the positive outcome of the alternative proposal in lessening the impact on biodiversity, ecology and natural heritage, significantly outweighs these concerns. As detailed above, other pedestrian links were approved as part of this development and this alternative should not be considered in isolation. It is also considered that the proposal together with these other consented improvements, pedestrian links and the connectivity to the existing road
Page 8
and footpath network would provide an acceptable alternative as part of the overall residential development and would comply with polies 13 and I1. The issue of the hammerhead and sight lines at Caplethill Road can be considered through the separate Road Construction Consent process. As the effect of granting a Section 42 application is such that a new and separate standalone planning permission exists, all other conditions associated with planning application 25/0510/PP which would be relevant to this new permission require to be re-imposed to this new permission. Given that the development has been implemented, and the suspensive conditions have been previously discharged, it is also considered necessary to attach the fulfilment and/or compliance element of these conditions and these conditions have been reworded on this basis. It is also considered necessary to re-attach a phasing plan with regards to off-site works with a defined timescale as a means to ensure control and fulfilment of the path through the Section 42 application. A unilateral undertaking was also completed by the applicant as part of the original planning application in respect of securing financial contributions towards replacement of playing pitches and education provision, and the provision, on site, of affordable homes. As stated earlier in the report, the principle of the development, including the unilateral undertaking, was established and approved under planning permission 20/0510/PP and this Section 42 planning application as submitted requires to be assessed on its individual merits. It is considered necessary that a form of Legal Agreement or other mechanism is submitted to reflect the Section 42 application should it be granted consent. Representations The majority of the matters raised in the letters of representation have been addressed in the foregoing assessment however a summary of the points raised is also set out below with a response below each highlighted in bold. 1. Impact on habitat, biodiversity and ecology. This has been addressed as detailed above and it is considered that the impact on habitat, biodiversity and ecology would be significantly less than the impact of the consented path. 2. Deviation from what has already been consented. As detailed above, the alternative proposal has been sought to minimise ecological impacts whilst still providing an alternative connectivity option. 3. Not a safe route for pedestrian. As detailed above, other pedestrian links were approved as part of this development and this alternative should not be considered in isolation. It is also considered that the proposal together with these other consented improvements, pedestrian links and the connectivity to the existing road and footpath network would provide an acceptable alternative as part of the overall residential development. 4. Loss of trees including those already lost as a result of the housing development. The proposed alternative path would have a significantly less impact on trees and vegetation the consented path as illustrated above. 5. Path to the north of the site not DDA compliant.
Page 9
The routes to the north fields are not being considered as part of this application and have already been consented through consultation with the Council's Chief Executive's (Roads Development). 6. Housing development should not have been approved. The residential development was approved by the Scottish Government on appeal and the principle of this development cannot be considered in the assessment of this proposal. 7. Concerns developer will not adhere to conditions. This would be a separate matter for the Council to consider and manage as part of the implementation of the consent and would not be a material consideration in the assessment of this proposal. 8. Concerns that widening of path will impact on wildlife. As discussed above, the impact on habitat, biodiversity and ecology would be significantly less than the impact of the consented path. 9. Concerns over crossing point on Caplethill Road. This is not being considered as part of this proposal. Notwithstanding this, this was considered to be acceptable by the Council's Chief Executive's (Roads Development). 10. North side of Caplethill Road improvements not safe, safety barriers should be included. This is not being considered as part of this proposal. Notwithstanding this, this was not considered to be necessary by the Council's Chief Executive's (Roads Development). 11. Upgrades to Caplethill Road beyond Glenfield Road should be considered. The application for the residential development was approved by the Scottish Government and upgrades beyond those that were presented in the application were not considered to be necessary. 12. Concerns that the path to Stoney Brae will not be delivered, potential planning breach. This would be a separate matter for the Council to consider and would not be a material consideration in the assessment of this proposal. 13. No specification on lighting. This can be addressed through the imposition of an appropriately worded planning condition with a condition recommended below. 14. Council should maintain the footpath once clearance works have been done. The path is within the ownership of the Council and as such would also be maintained by the Council.
Page 10
Planning Obligations The Council is required to provide a summary of the terms of any planning obligation which is required to be entered into under Section 75 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act in relation to the grant of permission for the proposed development: As detailed above, a unilateral undertaking was also completed by the applicant as part of the original planning application in respect of securing financial contributions towards replacement playing pitched and education provision and the provision, on site, of affordable homes. A form of Legal Agreement or other appropriate mechanism is also required to reflect this Section 42 application if approved. Conclusion In view of the above, it is considered that the proposal subject to this Section 42 application would accord with the relevant provisions of the Development Plan. There are no other material considerations. Planning permission should therefore be granted subject to conditions and the submission of a Legal Agreement to reflect this Section 42 application. Recommendation Grant subject to conditions and a Legal Agreement to reflect this Section 42 application if approved. Reason(s) for Recommendation 1. The proposal accords with the provisions of the Development Plan and there were no material considerations which outweighed the presumption in favour of development according with the Development Plan. Condition(s) 1. Prior to the occupation of any residential unit on the site, the following shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the planning authority: (a) a Verification Report confirming completion of the works specified within the approved Remediation Strategy and Implementation Plan; or (b) where remediation works are not required but soils are to be imported to site, a Verification Report confirming imported materials are suitable for use. Verification Reports shall not be submitted on a phased basis unless first agreed in writing with the planning authority. Reason: To demonstrate that works require to make the site suitable for use have been completed. 2. That the dwellinghouses, road and footpath surface treatments within the site shall be constructed only in accordance with drawing no. TPP/PL-001 REV as approved on 25/08/2023, unless otherwise agreed in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of amenity. 3. That the boundary treatments to be formed shall be erected in accordance with drawing no. FEN-001A as approved on 5/10/2022. For the avoidance of doubt, all boundary fences and walls as approved, relating to or adjacent to each plot shall be erected prior to the occupation of the dwelling within that plot in accordance with the approved details.
Page 11
Reason: to ensure proper control over this feature of the development. 4. All planting, seeding or turfing contained in landscape drawing no.'s 01F, 02F, 03F, 04F, 05F, 06F approved on 2/11/2023, shall be carried out in the first planting season and seeding seasons following the occupation of the 150th dwelling or the completion of the development, whichever is the sooner; and any trees or plants which, within a period of five years from the completion of the development die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the next planting season with others of a similar size and species, unless Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority gives written consent to any variation. Reason: in the interest of the amenity of the area. 5. That the scheme of archaeological works detailed in Archaeological Evaluation March 2021, approved 5/10/2022, shall be fully implemented and that all recording and recovery of archaeological resources within the development site is undertaken to the written satisfaction of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Response: To ensure that any archaeological remains which may be disturbed can be identified, excavated and recorded. 6. That during the construction phase of the development, a yearly update containing details of the implementation of meeting measures contained within the Ecological Appraisal (August 2020), Thornly Park, Paisley, Biodiversity Management Plan (April 2023) Species Protection Plan - Bats (August 2022), Breeding Birds Walkover Survey (March 2023), Bat Roost Closure Technical Note (August 2022), shall be submitted to and approved in writing by Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Reason: to ensure flora, fauna and biodiversity is protected and enhanced. 7. That within 4 weeks of the date of this consent, details of phasing for off-site infrastructure works/footways/crossings (as specified in condition 10) shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Thereafter, the development shall be implemented only in accordance with such phasing as may be agreed with Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Reason: in the interest of the amenity and road safety of the area. 8. That infrastructure improvements as detailed on the following drawings, as approved on 3/06/202 including the Glenfield Road Footway and Cycle Path Upgrade, shall be implemented only in accordance with the phasing plan as may be approved under the terms of condition 7 above:- 19219-100-207 A Horizontal Geometry (Northern Footpaths) 19219-100-208 A Vertical Geometry (Northern Footpaths) 19219-500-101 J Drainage Layout (Sheet 2 of 2) 19219-500-201 A Drainage Layout (Northern Footpaths) 19219-600-200 E Site Clearance 19219-700-200 G Pavements 19219-700-201 A Pavements & Kerbing (Northern Footpaths) 19219-1200-200 D Road Markings 19219-1200-201 A Signage
Page 12
19219-1400-200 C Traffic Signals 19219-SK-36 Remote Footpath Details 19219-SK-47 Glenfield Road Footway Upgrade 19219-SK-43 Existing Cycle Path Upgrade For the avoidance of doubt this should not include clearance of the road verge or the formation of the footpath on the south side of Caplethill Road. Reason: in the interests of pedestrian and traffic safety. 9. That the Low Carbon Energy Statement as detailed in the Low Carbon Implementation Plan (Rev A) approved on 5/10/2025, shall be fully implemented to the satisfaction of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Response: To promote and implement low carbon measures at the site. 10. That the compensatory planting plan as detailed in drawing 51-115 Revision D and 51.115 08 Revision G (Tree Compensation Plan Sheet 1 of 1) approved on 6/06/20245, shall be fully implemented to the satisfaction of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority. Response: To ensure that works are undertaken to a satisfactory standard in the interests of natural heritage. 11. That prior to the commencement of the improvement/upgrade works to footway/cycleway as detailed in drawings 19219-SK-47 (Glenfield Road Footway Upgrade) and 19219-SK-43 (Existing Cycle Path Upgrade). the applicant shall submit for the written approval of Renfrewshire Council as Planning Authority, full details/specification of lighting. For the avoidance of doubt, this should also include a timetable for the installation of the lighting and thereafter implemented in line with the approved details. Reason: These details have not been considered. Advisory Note(s) 1. None required. Schedule of Plans Drawing Number Revision Drawing/Document Title Stamped Drawing Location Plan 19223-SK-18 Indicative Pedestrian Improvement Works on Caplethill Road 19219-SK-45 Existing and Alternative Footpath Upgrade Proposals 19219-SK-47 Glenfield Road Footway Upgrade 19219-SK-43 Existing Cycle Path Upgrade
Page 13
Supporting Document 19219-SK-48 Caplethill Road Southern Footway Extent of Tree Removal (Consented) For further information please contact Fiona Knighton, Development Standards Team, Email: fiona.knighton@renfrewshire.gov.uk