Democracy Spraffa

Installation of a Path at Drumcross Road

Renfrewshire Council · 27 January 2025
Back to Petitions Board — 27 January 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

To: Petitions Board 
On: 27 January 2025
Report by: Director of Finance and Resources 
Heading: Installation of a Path at Drumcross Road 
1. Summary 
1.1 The Council has agreed procedures in relation to the submission of petitions
including parameters for determining valid petitions and those areas where
petitions would not be valid. 
1.2 All petitions are to be submitted to the Board for consideration. Where the
Head of Corporate Governance does not consider a petition to be valid in
terms of the Council’s Petitions Procedure a summary will be provided to
the Board outlined the reasons why. However, it is for the Board to
determine the validity of such petitions. 
1.3 A petition containing one signature has been received from Mrs S Arrol
in the following terms: -  
“I am petitioning for a walking path at Drumcross Road, Bishopton. I would
like the Council to action this. 
Some years ago the farmer at Drumcross Farm was willing to give up land
to facilitate this. 
The road is now very dangerous due to the speeding of vehicles/increased
volume of traffic/many delivery vans + larger + wider cars now. 
I walk this route every week (others walk too) to Bishopton Parish Church
and am increasingly feeling unsafe in doing so. 
Ferry Road pavement is not a good alternative again due to the speed of
very busy traffic on this road.” 
1.4 The Head of Corporate Governance has reviewed this petition and has
considers it valid in terms of the procedures.

Page 2

1.5 The Council’s Infrastructure and Transportation Manager has provided a
response to the concerns raised in the petition and where appropriate
suggested actions to resolve them as outlined below: - 
“As a result of the concerns raised by a resident on 13 May 2024 to our
Transportation and Active Travel Manager, the Service undertook surveys of
the traffic speeds on Drumcross Road as well as monitoring pedestrian
usage over a 7-day period.  The vehicle speeds recorded, averaged out at
35mph in both directions with the greater majority of drivers not exceeding
41mph.   
The speed limit on the B815 Ferry Road to the north is 40mph and we are
proposing to reduce the speed limit on Drumcross Road to the same in a
forthcoming Traffic Regulation Order. It is beneficial that the speed limit on
Drumcross Road is consistent with the surrounding area and matches the
surveyed behaviour of drivers, an important consideration in ensuring that
the speed limit is accepted and adhered to. 
In general, fewer than 15 pedestrians (in each direction) used the road in any
24-hour period. There have been no recorded pedestrian or cyclist injury
accidents in the 24 years for which we hold records. In addition, the location
had been assessed against our Road Safety Policy for traffic interventions
and found not to hit any of the triggers which justify intervention. 
The process by which we consider the need for road safety interventions is
based on an objective assessment of observed data. This evidence-based
approach, as defined by our Road Safety Policy, enables us to direct our
finite resources to where the need is greatest. This ensures that as officers,
we are using public resources as efficiently and effectively as possible. 
The cost for constructing a footway at this location based on market prices
would be £100 per square metre.  Providing a new footway for the
approximately 1 kilometre of this road would cost in the region of £200k.  That
is assuming the adjacent land is flat in nature, however, the land slopes down
at sections along the road, therefore, a partial retaining structure would be
required.  This will significantly increase the cost of construction. 
Furthermore, this cost could increase if we need to provide drainage and,
potentially, streetlighting.  Added to this would be the cost and legal
implications of acquiring the significant strip of land required to construct the
path, as this lies in private ownership. 
The Service considers that the surveyed usage and lack of accidents at this
location are too small to justify the progression of the proposed footway
construction. Furthermore, there is an alternative pedestrian route along
Ferry Road on a made footway.  We have also previously erected
‘pedestrians in road’ warning signs at both ends of the road.” 
1.6 The role of the Board is to consider the petition and take the appropriate
action in respect of the petition which will be one of the following: 
(a) that no action is taken, in which case the reasons will be specified
and intimated to the petitioner;

Page 3

(b) that the petition be referred to the relevant director/and or policy board
for further investigation, with or without any specific recommendation; or 
(c) refer the petition to another organisation if the petition relates to that
organisation. 
1.7 The principal petitioner, together with one supporter has been invited to
attend the meeting. 
2 Recommendation 
2.1 That the Board considers the petition. 
3. Implications of the Report 
1. Financial – none 
2. HR & Organisational Development – none 
3. Community/Council Planning - none 
4. Legal – none 
5. Property/Assets – none 
6. Information Technology - none. 
7. Equality & Human Rights - none 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been
assessed in relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No
negative impacts on equality groups or potential for infringement of
individuals’ human rights have been identified arising from the
recommendations contained in the report. If required following
implementation, the actual impact of the recommendations and the
mitigating actions will be reviewed and monitored, and the results of
the assessment will be published on the Council’s website. 
8. Health & Safety - none 
9. Procurement - none 
10. Risk - none. 
11. Privacy Impact - none 
12. Cosla Policy Position – not applicable. 
13. Climate Risk – not applicable

Page 4

List of Background Papers 
(a) Background Paper -  Petition 
Author: Euan Gray, Senior Committee Services Officer
Tel: 0141 487 1099 Email: euan.gray@renfrewshire.gov.uk