Democracy Spraffa

Minutes of meeting

Renfrewshire Council · 12 May 2023
Back to Personnel Appeals and Applied Conditions of Service Appeals Panel — 12 May 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Minute of Special Meeting
Personnel Appeals and Applied Conditions of Service
Appeals Panel. 
Date Time Venue
Friday, 12 May 2023 09:00 Corporate Meeting Room 1, Council
Headquarters, Renfrewshire House, Cotton
Street, Paisley, PA1 1AN 
Present: Councillor Fiona Airlie-Nicolson, Councillor Stephen Burns, Councillor Jacqueline
Cameron, Councillor Neill Graham, Councillor Lisa-Marie Hughes, Councillor Janis McDonald,
Councillor Cathy McEwan, Councillor Sam Mullin 
Chair
Councillor Burns, Convener, presided. 
In Attendance
L Mullin, Principal HR & OD Adviser and P Shiach, Senior Committee Services Officer (both
Finance & Resources). 
Declarations of Interest
There were no declarations of interest intimated prior to the commencement of the meeting. 
EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC
The Appeals Panel resolved that the press and public be excluded from the meeting during
consideration of the following item of business as it was likely, in view of the nature of the
business to be transacted, that if members of the press and public were present, there would
be disclosure to them of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule
7A of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973.

Page 2

1  Communities & Housing
Consideration was given to an appeal submitted by an employee of Communities &
Housing Services following dismissal from the Council’s employment. 
The appellant was present. C Dalrymple, Head of Facilities Management & Property
Services (Environment, Housing & Infrastructure) and K Clark, Principal HR & OD
Adviser (Finance and Resources) represented management. 
The Head of Head of Facilities Management & Property Services submitted a copy of
the Code of Conditions for Employees which he indicated he had not submitted with
the management submissions. 
The Panel adjourned to allow members to consider the additional submission. The
Board reconvened and the appellant requested that consideration of his appeal be
continued to allow him to be accompanied by his solicitor. This was agreed. 
DECIDED: That consideration of the appeal be continued to allow the appellant to be
accompanied by his solicitor.