Democracy Spraffa

ILE Renfrewshire Council Strategic Property Review

Renfrewshire Council · 22 January 2025
Back to Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board — 22 January 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

To:  Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board 
On:  22 January 2025 
Report by: Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure 
Heading: Renfrewshire Council – On-going Strategic Property Review 
1. Summary 
1.1 In 2022, Renfrewshire Council commenced a Strategic Property Review (SPR). The
objectives of the review are to assess the size of and shape of the property estate and
to produce a modern portfolio that will: 
• Support learning
• Support service delivery outcomes
• Support community needs
• Reduce its carbon footprint (including energy consumption)
• Have a financially sustainable property portfolio to invest in and maintain. 
1.2 A paper to the Infrastructure Land and Environment (ILE) Board in May 2023 set out
the key principles which underpin the review and the approach that would be taken.
The principles and approach, outlined below, were agreed by the Board and the paper
supported. 
Principles
• Council has a modern, good quality operational and community property portfolio
that meets the needs of services and communities that we can sustainably
maintain and invest in. 
• Support reducing the carbon footprint across our sustainable property portfolio. 
• Ensure there is access to good quality community facilities in all communities.
• For property and land assets declared surplus, consider potential regeneration
plans to support the closure and development of the property asset and associated
land.
• Develop a new Learning Estate Strategy that looks at the replacement /
refurbishment needs of schools for the next 25 years.

Page 2

• Exit where possible from external leases.
• Council partners pay their fair share of property costs. 
1.3 This paper notes the progress of the review to date, describing the processes
employed to assess and consider our properties and the services provided from them.
For example, the paper highlights progress on exiting from external leases and the
disposal of surplus properties through sale or Community Asset Transfer (CAT). 
1.4 As part of the next steps, consideration and discussion will be required to understand
which buildings remain core to Renfrewshire Council (and must be retained) and which
buildings may require further discussion around consolidation, CAT etc. These
discussions will take place with relevant stakeholders over the next six months.   
1.5 To ensure a coordinated approach, an Asset Management Oversight Group has been
established to strategically oversee the whole portfolio across all current reviews
detailed in this paper, and to ensure alignment for proposed changes/investment etc
in the portfolio.
___________________________________________________________________ 
2. Recommendations  
It is recommended that the Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board: 
2.1 Note the updates detailed within this report.
___________________________________________________________________ 
3. Background 
3.1 The SPR began with an exercise to assess the existing portfolio of buildings owned
or leased by Council. The portfolio includes properties currently in use, other
properties that may be unused and surplus properties. This consists of two strands: 
• Community and Operational assets
• Commercial assets 
3.2 The Commercial portfolio of assets consists of around 60 Industrial Units and 175
Retail Units.  Commercial buildings are being reviewed separately and an update to
this board will be undertaken in due course.   
3.3 The scope of the SPR reviewed Community and Operational assets, which currently
consists of 232 buildings, including schools, civic buildings such as Town Halls,
operational buildings used to support services (including Housing, OneRen & HSCP),
staff facilities, Waste, Leisure, Cultural and Community Facilities. 
3.4 The review initially analysed the relevance and purpose of properties based on
current corporate and operational knowledge including service and community use of
the properties.

Page 3

3.5 The portfolio was further examined to assess how each building is used to deliver
services in the broadest sense and subsequently, in terms of a more focused
property type and reflecting the division of administrative responsibilities between
OneRen and Renfrewshire Council.
Grouping Number Percentage
OneRen Cultural & Leisure 73 31.5%
Operational 40 17.2%
Residential 20 8.6%
Surplus 20 8.6%
Learning Estate 79 34.1%   
Property Type Number Percentage
Community Facilities 15 6.5%
Household Waste Recycling Centre 5 2.1%
Learning Estate 79 34.1%
Offices – in use 7 3.0%
Offices – not in use 2 0.9%
Residential 20 8.6%
Self-managed Community Facilities 10 4.3%
Specialist Facilities 22 9.5%
Sports Pitches Changing 16 6.9%
Staff Welfare Facilities 4 1.7%
Surplus 20 8.6%
Swimming and Sports 13 5.6%
Town Hall, Museums & Libraries 19 8.2%
_________________________________________________________________________ 
4. Approach 
4.1 The SPR has made good progress since the previous update to board.  A locality-
based review of buildings and service provision across the towns and villages of
Renfrewshire was undertaken, with multi-service workshops assessing the capacity
and demand in our buildings and the extent to which they complement other local
facilities and services. 
4.2 Discussion focused on how to ensure maximum use is made of Council buildings to
deliver services and offer the facilities communities need, for example, through future
co-location of services. Each theme has an associated strategy which sets out
potential options. 
4.3 We will now be required to understand which buildings remain core to Renfrewshire
Council (and must be retained) and which buildings may require further discussion
around consolidation, CAT etc.

Page 4

Asset Management Oversight Group 
4.4 In June 2024, the Corporate Management Team (CMT) discussed and approved the
establishment of an officer Asset Management Oversight Group to ensure that
activity related to the Council’s property estate is strategically coordinated and that
there is oversight of key decisions and activities. In turn, this should help to avoid
duplication of effort and silo working. 
4.5 The Oversight Groups scope will include the following interconnected and related
programmes of work: 
• Strategic Property Review 
• Learning Estate Strategy 
• Commercial Property Review 
• OneRen Review 
• Any other related asset management activity (e.g. lifecycle maintenance / capital
work)
• Community Asset Transfers
• Ways of Working 
4.6 It is recognised that each of the above programmes of work will have their own
governance in place and this will continue with regards to decision making and
reporting.  However, the senior level will be established to provide strategic oversight
and coordination of all programmes.   
4.7 The membership of the Oversight Group includes: 
Director of Environment, Housing and Infrastructure – Chair 
Director of Children’s Services 
Director of Finance and Resources
Chief Executive of One Ren  
Chief Officer Health and Social Care Partnership 
Head of Economy and Development 
Lead service representatives will be identified by each service. 
4.8 With regards to reporting, the board will provide a strategic report and update the 
Corporate Management Team (CMT) on a quarterly basis, unless there are any 
exceptions.  The board will report regularly to relevant policy boards.
___________________________________________________________________ 
5. External leases 
5.1 External leases made up of a variety of properties which are leased on behalf of
different services. Currently, Renfrewshire Council leases-in 19 buildings (or spaces
within buildings), for a variety of purposes, including sub-letting to other
organisations.

Page 5

5.2 The strategy for external leases is to identify those from which Council can exit with a
presumption in favour of relocating services to Council-owned properties where
appropriate, either singly or co-located with other services. 
5.3 Over the last 2 years, Council has exited 4 external leases, generating savings on
lease, utilities and facilities management costs of £518k: 
• Office, 5 High Street, Paisley
• 9B Gilmour Street, Paisley
• Abbey House, Paisley
• Shop, 7A Moss Street, Paisley 
5.4 Work will continue to exit from external lease arrangements where opportunities
arise, wherever possible consolidating services and operational functions in existing
Council-owned buildings. 
5.5 This approach acknowledges the likelihood that requirements for some external lease
arrangements will remain, such as at Glasgow Airport Public Health Team office.  
_________________________________________________________________________ 
6.  Themes 
6.1 This section examines the key property themes identified through the SPR,
highlighting some of the findings that will help inform ideas and proposals on the
future shape and makeup of the property portfolio. 
Community Facilities 
6.2 The review examined demand and capacity, building condition and future investment
requirements for 15 community facilities. 
6.3 As well as Community Halls, schools and Town Halls are bookable as community
facilities and since 2019, 77% of community lets take place within schools. Analysis
of booking data indicates that demand has fallen significantly in recent years in
Community Halls with some facilities used infrequently by the community and lets
down 40% since 2019 whilst other community facilities has increased. Lets in
Community Halls, have an average of 380 weekly booking hours, compared to 1,267
weekly booking hours in other community facilities. 
6.4 One third of bookings (107 hours) at community facilities occur during the day pre-
3pm (when schools become available for lets), an average of 10 hours per week for
each facility, however, many are less than this average. 
6.5 Post 3pm and evening bookings account for 273 hours per week, an average of 24
hours per week for each facility.

Page 6

6.6 The proximity of most community halls to local schools suggests a degree of
duplication of the facilities on offer for community lets. In some localities, local
schools offer more up-to-date facilities in a modern environment compared to the
local community hall. 
6.7 Some community facilities mainly provide a large hall space, which may no longer
meet the needs of users. 
6.8 Condition surveys have been undertaken for some of the community halls, indicating
the level of investment required to bring the buildings up to standard. For halls
currently surveyed, the work required for lifecycle investment is over £3m over the
next 5 years. An on-going commission of condition surveys will continue over 2025 to
understand the condition of community buildings in the portfolio. 
Self-Managed Community Facilities 
6.9 The review examined the demand, condition and future investment requirements of
the 10 self-managed community facilities leased to community groups by Council and
administered by OneRen since 2015. 
6.10 Typically, self-managed community facilities were leased in the late 1990s and early
2000s, on the basis of Community Contracts between Renfrewshire Council and
named community groups. The agreements pre-dated the CAT process and set out
responsibilities for both Council and the Committee respectively. 
6.11 In 2015, general responsibility for the administration of community facilities
transferred to OneRen, however costs were shared between both bodies. 
6.12 Under the terms of the community contracts, Renfrewshire Council pays for
caretaking at most facilities as well as compliance, repairs and maintenance to the
fabric of the buildings (generally on a ‘wind and watertight’ basis). OneRen meets
utility costs for the building, gas, electricity and water. The management committee is
responsible for insurance and internal fixtures and fittings. 
6.13 Any income generated from community lets remains with the community group. 
6.14 Liaison between community groups and the Council has reduced since the transfer
for administrative responsibility to OneRen in 2015. 
6.15 Similarly, adherence to the terms of the contracts has lessened, with Council often
carrying out building works and maintenance that falls outside the original scope, in
response to requests from community groups and Elected Members which puts a
further strain on constricted budgets. 
6.16 As part of the SPR, officers engaged with the management committees responsible
for the running of the self-managed facilities, to explore demand, the amenities on
offer and how services are delivered. Building condition and future investment
requirements were also considered.

Page 7

6.17 Engagement indicated that demand is low at the majority of self-managed facilities,
whilst some are well-used and consequently, well-funded through community lets. 
6.18 Building condition surveys undertaken at 5 of the facilities, ranked 4 as ‘poor’ and
requiring considerable investment in the next 1-5 years to bring them to an
acceptable condition. 
6.19 Engagement with the committee at Old Farmhouse community centre identified that
the facility was primarily used to support a local nursery, with minimal other
community lets. ILE Board has since approved the sale of the building to the owners
of the nursery who will continue community use of the building. 
6.20 Engagement at Beechwood Community Centre has seen Officers work with the
committee to discuss the challenges they face and to assess how Officers and the
Strategic Property Review process can assist them moving forward. 
6.21 The community contracts require review and update to ensure clarity around
responsibilities and expectation of what the organising committees must fund in
future leases. This acknowledges the current legislative approach for such facilities
would sit as a community asset transfer for self-managed community facilities. 
OneRen Cultural and Leisure 
6.22 A joint review of OneRen services and operations is being undertaken by OneRen
and Renfrewshire Council. This will examine service provision and consider if there
are opportunities to consolidate operational spaces through co-location of services in
existing locations, building upon an initial assessment carried out through the SPR.
There will be a focus on the following workstreams: Culture; Community and
Learning; Corporate Assets and Governance. 
6.23 Analysis of leisure and cultural properties identified 48 buildings offering a range of
services and activities. The properties are sub-divided according to function as
follows: 
Type Number
Sports Pitches Changing facilities 16
Swimming and Sports 13
Museums and Libraries 15
Town Halls 4 
Operational 
6.24 Reviewing operational properties has involved consideration of how services are best
delivered in communities and which locations are central to that provision. Strategies
have been developed for different types of operational building, including used and
unused offices, staff welfare facilities, specialist services, and household waste
recycling centres.

Page 8

6.25 Work continues to review all operational facilities across the portfolio to assess where
services can exit and share other properties. Meetings have been undertaken with
colleagues in Environment, Housing and Infrastructure to assess any opportunities
around Operational workplaces and staff facilities e.g. Parks/Cemeteries.   
Residential 
6.26 The review of residential properties in the portfolio acknowledges that many are used
to address homelessness or are dedicated homes for children and adults.  These
properties will no longer be categorised as commercial and operational portfolio and
managed as homes, as we do for the Council’s housing stock. 
Surplus 
6.27 The strategy for surplus properties considers the need for plans to support the
closure and/or redevelopment of buildings and associated land. 
6.28 The review considered those properties already declared surplus by Council, some of
which are still in use whilst leased out, or used for a new or temporary purpose, with
a view to proposing or supporting a means of disposal. 
6.29 Examples of this process are seen in former and current surplus properties which
have been, or will soon be, removed from the Council’s property portfolio through
sale or CAT. Since September 2022, Renfrewshire Council has brought in £826,786
of capital receipts from buildings detailed in the table below: 
Former Property Disposal
Roneil House Sale
Whitehaugh Barracks CAT Sale
India Tyres Playing Fields CAT Lease
Carsewood House site Sale
Cartha Crescent  Sale
Kilpatrick Drive, Erskine - plot of
land
Sale

Page 9

6.30 The table below outlines properties across the portfolio that have either been brought
forward to this board for sale/Community Asset Transfer or will be marketed in 2025.
Due to on-going legal agreement and commercial sensitivities, capital receipts cannot
be disclosed at this time unlike for the above properties. 
Current Property Proposed Disposal
Kersland School  Sale Agreed – Leased before
final payment for sale in
coming year.
Old Farmhouse Community Centre Sale agreed – Legal agreement
being taken forward
Houston Village Hall Sale Agreed – Legals
agreement being taken forward
Montrose Care Home Advertised for Sale
Falcon Day Centre CAT/Sale in process
Robertson Centre Sale agreed – Legal agreement
being undertaken
Former Community Centre
(Faither’s Club), Blackstoun Road
CAT/Sale in process
Old Paisley Grammar Sale 
Community Asset Transfers (CAT) 
6.31 Officers working across both the Strategic Property Review and Community Asset
Transfer are in close contact to maximise benefits and minimise potential duplication.
Whilst both workstreams have their own Governance, Officers work across both.
Should a property move forward to a Community Asset Transfer, a report would be
taken to this Board for approval. 
6.32 Since 2019, there has been 17 CATs that have been approved/concluded and there
are currently 23 applications/expressions of interest in Renfrewshire Council’s
building portfolio. 
6.33 The CAT process can take time, however, this is an important avenue for
Renfrewshire Council to explore as part of the Strategic Property Review. 
Partnership Working 
6.34 As the Strategic Property Review covers many different Services and areas, work
has been undertaken to engage and discuss with all services. This will continue in
2025. 
6.35 However, one of the key discussions is with colleagues in Planning and the new
Local Development Plan (LDP3) currently being considered with an evidence report
being prepared. Discussions have been undertaken, and will continue to ensure that
decisions and impacts are known and considered strategically to prevent unintended
issues e.g. from consolidating properties.
___________________________________________________________________

Page 10

7. Next Steps 
7.1 Following this initial assessment, the review to date has shown that there are a
significant number of Council properties that are under-utilised. There are a large
number of community facilities, including schools and in particular ‘large hall’
facilities, which appear to have a ‘single-use’ function. 
7.2 The SPR will begin to examine future options and opportunities to take forward the
principles of the strategic property review, reducing the Council’s portfolio whilst
providing facilities that support service and community needs. 
7.3 Work will be required on community engagement with regards to the requirements
and the need for services and the role buildings will play within the communities. This
is a key strand for the Strategic Property Review that will be developed and taken
forward. 
7.4 Updates will continue to be provided to the Infrastructure, Land and Environment
Policy Board in due course. These updates will be cognisant and align with other
Reviews/Strategies that are currently on-going e.g. Learning Estate Strategy being
reported to the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board.
__________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of the Report 
1.  Financial – As part of financial sustainability, Renfrewshire Council requires to
review the property portfolio to maximise efficiencies and reduce costs. There may
be some land or properties sold which may raise a capital receipt that will come into
the Renfrewshire Council General Fund.  
2.  HR & Organisational Development – Any staffing changes referenced in this report
will be progressed through the Council’s HR policies and will include discussion with
Managers, staff and Trade Unions as appropriate. 
3. Community/Council Planning – the report details a range of activities which reflect
local community and council planning themes. 
4.  Legal – Where required, discussion will be taken with Legal Services in regards to
land and property. 
5.  Property/Assets – Everything detailed within this paper relates to Renfrewshire
Council property and assets, including the future requirements for the Council
portfolio. 
6.  Information Technology – Colleagues from ICT will be kept abreast of any changes
to property to allow changes and feed into wider strategies e.g. Wi-Fi.

Page 11

7.  Equality & Human Rights – The recommendations contained within this report have
been assessed in relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No
negative impacts on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’
human rights have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in
the report. However, as decisions are made throughout the Strategic Property
review, an EqIA will be done throughout to have due regard to the protected
characteristics. 
It should be noted that any rationalisation of a property will have an EqHRIA
undertaken as part of the process. 
8.  Health & Safety – Colleagues from Health and Safety are part of groups to ensure
all legislation and guidance is being followed. 
9.  Procurement – Work is currently on-going to undertake condition surveys for
Community Buildings. Colleagues in Procurement are assisting with appropriate
tender specifications/Scotland Excel Frameworks. 
10.  Risk – There is a risk to Renfrewshire Council that work cannot be undertaken in
buildings and they fall into a state of disrepair. By rationalising the property portfolio,
Renfrewshire Council can re-focus their lifecycle fund and Public Building repairs and
maintenance funds to ensure other buildings are maintained to an appropriate
standard. 
11.  Privacy Impact – None 
12. Climate Change – By reducing the Council’s building portfolio, it will lead to a
reduction in usage and in turn carbon emissions to assist Renfrewshire in striving to
meet the Net Zero Targets. 
13.  Children’s Rights – Whilst this paper doesn’t directly impact on Children’s Rights, it
will ensure, through appropriate buildings, that the Council’s property portfolio
complies with Article 28 (Access to Education). 
14.  COSLA Policy Position – None 
List of Background Papers - None 
Author:  Gordon McNeil, Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure
Email: gordon.mcneil@renfrewshire.gov.uk