Democracy Spraffa

Item 5 - Prohibition and Restriction of Waiting and Loading and Parking Places

Renfrewshire Council · 8 November 2023
Back to Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board — 8 November 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

To:  Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board 
On:  8 November 2023 
Report by: Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure 
Heading: Renfrewshire Council (Prohibition and Restriction of Waiting and
Loading and Parking Places) (Consolidation) Order 202*. (Ref TRO
1000), Sustained Objections 
1.  Summary
1.1. In terms of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and the Council’s Scheme of
Delegation, the making of a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO) is delegated to the
Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure after consultation with the
Convener of the Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board and the Elected
Members. 
1.2. This proposed TRO allows Renfrewshire Council to align all existing Traffic
Regulation Orders within Renfrewshire, containing waiting and loading restrictions
that are marked on-street, into a single digital format to modernise and increase the
efficiency of Traffic Management within the service. 
1.3. On the 06 September 2023 the above TRO was advertised for public consultation
with a closing date of 04 October 2023. No objections, four acknowledgments and
two requests for clarity on how to access the proposed order were received. The
proposed TRO records the waiting and loading restrictions which were surveyed as
being present on Renfrewshire’s roads between July and November 2019 plus
nominal additions of small traffic orders promoted between November 2019 and
September 2023. No restrictions not already marked on-street are included in the
proposed TRO. 
1.4. Normally if no objections are received the Director of Environment, Housing and
Infrastructure has delegated power to make the traffic order. In this instance given
the significance of the traffic order in providing a baseline position from which all
future amendment orders will be measured, it is considered appropriate that the
Board notes the order is being made. 
1.5. The making of the order is a major improvement to the administration and
enforcement of all Renfrewshire Council’s existing waiting and loading restrictions
and will provide the public with a much more streamlined service going forward and
reduce the length of time taken for a Traffic Regulation Order to be made.

Page 2

1.6. The digital map of the proposal and its Articles are here
https://ren.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/sidebar/index.html?appid=7c1f0325b4b342
51aefcd7527a586dfa
_________________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations 
It is recommended that the Infrastructure, Land and Environment Policy Board: 
2.1. Notes the report outlining the making of the order by the Director of Environment,
Housing and Infrastructure under delegated authority. 
3. Background 
3.1. This Order is considered necessary for Renfrewshire Council to align all existing
Traffic Regulation Orders within Renfrewshire, containing waiting and loading
restrictions that are marked on-street, into a single digital format to modernise and
increase the efficiency of Traffic Management within the service.
3.2. Up until now, Renfrewshire’s TROs have been recorded on paper documents with
written descriptive schedules explaining the type, location and extent of waiting and
loading restrictions in words. TROs have been produced one by one for individual
places when circumstances have required them. They date back to the 1930s and
have been written in different styles by different authorities. Interpretation of the
TROs is difficult and can lead to mistakes in transferring the information to the
markings and signs on the road. Filing the paper TROs takes up space, over time
some have been lost and retrieving specific items is increasingly time consuming.
This all makes the administration of Renfrewshire’s TROs inefficient and inaccurate.
3.3. In July 2019 an extensive four-year process began with a survey of all
Renfrewshire’s on-street waiting and loading restrictions and parking spaces. Over
time some errors had inevitably been made in the refurbishing of road markings and
signs, so a comprehensive query exercise followed to correct any anomalies with the
minimum of alteration. Digital maps of the survey were created to form the basis of
the consolidation order and articles (the legal description of the way in which the
restrictions are enforced and the consequence of disobeying them) created by
combining relevant sections from previous existing orders.
3.4. The TRO was duly drafted and on 06 September 2023 it was advertised for public
comment with responses by 04 October 2023. 
4. Consultation Results 
4.1. The proposal, being a consolidation order, went through a single-stage consultation
process as normal. It was issued by email on 06 September 2023 to emergency
services, public utilities, local road user groups, local community groups and local
ward Members. On the same date it was advertised in the Paisley and Renfrewshire
Gazette to the public, all for responses by 04 October 2023. All communications
included the hyperlink to the TellmeScotland website where the digital map file and
articles were made available to view.
https://www.tellmescotland.gov.uk/notices/renfrewshire/traffic/00000300798
4.2. Seven responses were received. One response expressed ‘no objections’ from
Police Scotland. Four responses acknowledged receipt of the consultation. Two
responses requested help in accessing the proposed order.

Page 3

Respondent Response
Police Scotland No objections
Councillor 1 Acknowledgment
Councillor 2 Acknowledgment
Councillor 3 Acknowledgment
Councillor 4 Acknowledgment and request for help
to access the proposed order
Renfrew Community Council Advised conclusion of their discussion
would be forwarded in August but no
further response has been received 
British Telecom
Request for help to access the
proposed order 
4.3. Officers consider the responses tabled above do not prevent the passage of the
proposed order and recommend that the Renfrewshire Council (Prohibition and
Restriction of Waiting and Loading and Parking Places) (Consolidation) Order 202*
be made as advertised. 
5. Consideration of the objections 
5.1. Normally if no objections are received The Director of Environment, Housing and
Infrastructure has delegated power to make the traffic order. In this instance given
the significance of the traffic order in providing a baseline position from which all
future amendment orders will be measured, it is considered appropriate that the
Board notes the making of the order. 
_________________________________________________________________________
Implications of the Report 
1. Financial - the capital and revenue costs of implementing and maintaining the
proposed lines and signs and the digital map is accommodated within existing
budgets. 
2. HR & Organisational Development – N/A. 
3. Community Planning 
Children and Young People – N/A 
Community Care, Health & Well-being – N/A 
Empowering our Communities – N/A 
Greener – N/A 
Jobs and the Economy – N/A 
Safer and Stronger – N/A

Page 4

4. Legal - The Local Authorities' Traffic Orders (Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations
1999. 
5. Property/Assets – N/A 
6. Information Technology – N/A 
7. Equality & Human Rights - 
(a) The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in relation to
their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts on equality groups
or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights have been identified arising
from the recommendations contained in the report.  If required following
implementation, the actual impact of the recommendations and the mitigating actions
will be reviewed and monitored, and the results of the assessment will be published
on the Council’s website.   
8. Health & Safety – The primary reason for the proposal is for avoiding danger to
persons or other traffic using the road or any other road or for preventing the
likelihood of any such danger arising
.
9. Procurement – N/A 
10. Risk - no risks have been identified in relation to the proposal. 
11. Privacy Impact – N/A 
12. CoSLA Policy Position – N/A. 
13. Climate Change – N/A 
List of Background Papers - none 
Author: Mark Higginbotham;  (email: mark.higginbotham@renfrewshire.gov.uk).    
Tel:  07974 071380