Democracy Spraffa

Ctax-NDR consultation report June 2023 bv final

Renfrewshire Council · 8 June 2023
Back to Finance, Resources and Customer Services Policy Board — 8 June 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

_________________________________________________________________ 
To: Finance, Resources and Customer Services Policy Board
On:  8 June 2023
___________________________________________________________________
Report by: Director of Finance and Resources
___________________________________________________________________
Heading: Non-domestic rates/ council tax on second and empty homes:
Consultation 
1. Summary 
1.1 The Scottish Government and COSLA (on behalf of Local Government) are
seeking responses to a consultation on council tax on second and empty
homes. It seeks to explore the role of more inclusive and fiscally sustainable
local taxation, in the form of council tax and non-domestic rates, as part of the
commitment that ‘everyone should have a safe, high-quality home that is
affordable and meets their needs in the place’ (Scottish Government's Housing
to 2040 strategy). 
1.2 The consultation document, link below, recognises that second homes and
short-term lettings bring benefits to those who own them and the tourism
businesses and local economy that they support. However also that the reasons
that homes may be left empty for long periods can be complex. 
https://www.gov.scot/publications/consultation-council-tax-second-empty-
homes-thresholds-non-domestic-rates/ 
1.3 It is also recognised that different kinds of ownership patterns impact on the
availability of homes to meet local needs and on community sustainability, and
it is stated that a fair balance should be pursued. 
1.4 The Council supports the consultation principles and plans to submit a full
response (attached as appendix 1) This response fully supports the premise of
allowing more local flexibility to Councils in the setting of council tax and non-
domestic rates for empty, second homes and holiday rental accommodation.

Page 2

___________________________________________________________________ 
2. Recommendations 
2.1 It is recommended that the Board: 
 Agree the consultation response and agree the Director of Finance &
Resources will submit the response to the Scottish Government in line with
the consultation timescales. 
___________________________________________________________________ 
3.  Consultation Aims and Objective 
3.1 Important aspects of the Scottish Government’s strategy around housing are
the focus on ensuring local areas can make the best use of their existing
housing stock, committed to providing councils with tools and powers to support
them to do so. This includes managing the number of long-term empty homes,
short-term lets and second homes. 
3.2  This consultation specifically seeks views on how local taxation can help
achieve this with additional discretionary powers. Nationally the aim is to
encourage more residential accommodation to be used as homes for living with
local areas deciding how to achieve the right balance in the use of housing to
meet local needs and to support thriving communities. 
4.  Current Position 
Second homes and empty homes (unoccupied dwellings) are currently defined
in the Council Tax (Variation for Unoccupied Dwellings) (Scotland) Regulations
2013. 
4.1 Council Tax – Empty Homes (Unoccupied dwellings) 
4.1.1 An "unoccupied dwelling" is a dwelling, which is no one's sole or main residence
but which is not used as a second home. 
4.1.2 The current 2013 Regulations allow Councils the discretionary power to remove
the empty property discount or set a council tax increase of a maximum 100%
on certain properties which have been empty for 1 year or more. 
4.1.3 On 3 March 2016 the Council approved that, the council tax discount regime   
for empty and unfurnished properties be changed under discretionary powers
providing the mandatory 100% exemption period of 6 months, a 10% discount
for the next 6 months, moving to a 100% levy applying after 1 year unless the
property is being actively marketed for sale or rent, in which circumstances the
10% discount will apply for a further period of up 12 months after which the
100% levy would apply.

Page 3

4.1.4 The Council has applied the levy to approximately 310 unoccupied properties. 
4.1.5 The consultation seeks views on whether Councils should have the discretion
to charge more than 100% premium on council tax for second homes and long-
term empty homes. 
4.1.6 Views are also sought about the current definitions of second and empty
homes, the factors councils should consider when deciding whether to apply
council tax premiums and what types of accommodation/ circumstances
should be exempt. 
4.1.7 The Council’s responses are supportive of granting this greater flexibility which
could be used locally to support its strategic objectives. 
4.2 Council Tax – Second Homes 
4.2.1  A "second home" is a dwelling which is no one's sole or main residence but
which is furnished and lived in for at least 25 days during the chargeable 12-
month period. 
4.2.2    The regulations described in 3.1.3 above do not apply to ‘second homes’,
which are currently entitled to a discount which authorities may set between
10% and 50% or they may apply no discount. From April 2014 this was set at
10% for Renfrewshire. 
4.2.3 Renfrewshire currently has 150 properties classified as second homes 
4.2.4 The consultation seeks views on whether Councils should have the
discretionary power to charge up to 100% premium (double the full rate) on
council tax for second homes as well as the factors which should be
considered when setting such rates. 
4.2.5 The Council’s response agrees with the range of consideration factors for
councils suggested by the consultation paper. We are also supportive of
granting this greater flexibility which could be used locally to maximise local
taxation revenue as well as supporting needs, where appropriate for making
more affordable housing available. 
4.3 Non-Domestic Rates – Self- Catering accommodation 
4.3.1 Self-catering accommodation will be liable for non-domestic rates if the
premises is: 
a) not the sole or main residence of any person; and 
b)  being made available for letting on a commercial basis and with a view
to the making of profit, for 140 days or more in the financial year, and in
practice been let in the financial year for a total of 70 days.

Page 4

If the self-catering accommodation does not meet the above criteria and
thresholds, it is liable for council tax instead. 
B&Bs and guest houses may be liable for non-domestic rates if their
operation has capacity to cater for more than 6 people at any one time,
regardless of how many days the premises or rooms are available or
actually let. 
4.3.2 The consultation seeks views on whether the current non-domestic rates
thresholds for self-catering accommodation should change, and/or if councils
should have discretion to set them. 
4.3.3 The Council’s response supports the view that thresholds should change to
minimise the risk of property statuses being changed with the purpose of
avoiding council tax. It also supports local flexibility, where practical in setting
the thresholds. 
_________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of the Report 
1. Financial - None – consultation response only no policy changes.
 
2. HR & Organisational Development – None. 
 
3. Community/Council Planning – None consultation response only no policy
changes. 
4. Legal – None. 
5. Property/Assets – None. 
6. Information Technology – None. 
7. Equality & Human Rights - The recommendations contained within this report
in relation to performance updates has been considered in relation to its impact
on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts on equality groups or
potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights have been identified arising
from the recommendations contained in the report because it is for consideration
of performance only. 
 
8. Health & Safety – None. 
9. Procurement – None. 
10. Risk – None. 
11.  Privacy Impact – None.

Page 5

12.  Cosla Policy Position – None. 
13. Climate Risk – None.
_________________________________________________________
List of Background Papers 
None.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Author:           Emma Shields, Strategic Service Delivery Manager

Page 6

Non-domestic rates/ council tax on second and
empty homes: Consultation
Respondent Information Form 
Please Note this form must be completed and returned with your response.
To find out how we handle your personal data, please see our privacy policy:
https://www.gov.scot/privacy/ 
Are you responding as an individual or an organisation?   
Individual 
Organisation 
Full name or organisation’s name 
Phone number 
Address 
Postcode 
 
Email Address 
The Scottish Government would like your 
permission to publish your consultation 
response. Please indicate your publishing 
preference: 
Publish response with name 
Publish response only (without name) 
Do not publish response
We will share your response internally with other Scottish Government policy teams who
may be addressing the issues you discuss. They may wish to contact you again in the
future, but we require your permission to do so. Are you content for Scottish
Government to contact you again in relation to this consultation exercise? 
Yes 
No 
Renfrewshire Council 
Information for organisations:
The option 'Publish response only (without
name)’ is available for individual
respondents only. If this option is selected,
the organisation name will still be
published. 
If you choose the option 'Do not publish
response', your organisation name may still
be listed as having responded to the
consultation in, for example, the analysis
report.

Page 7

Questionnaire 
Question 1
Do you think the current definition of a second home should continue to apply?:
More information:
For council tax purposes, the current definition of a second home is, ‘a dwelling which is
no one’s sole or main residence and that is lived in for at least 25 days during the 12
month period of the council tax charge'. 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 2
Do you think the discount eligibility for job related dwellings and purpose built holiday
accommodation is appropriate?:
More information:
Eligible job related dwellings and purpose built holiday accommodation are entitled to a
council tax discount of 50%.
Purpose built holiday accommodation is defined as a dwelling that is used for holiday
purposes and has a licence or planning permission limiting its use for human habitation
throughout the whole year. An example might be chalets or other types of holiday
accommodation that are either unsuitable to be occupied all year round (their
construction may mean they are only suitable to be lived in during the warmer months)
or are not allowed to be lived in all year due to planning, licensing or other restrictions.
Job-related dwellings are defined as homes owned by someone who has to live
elsewhere for most or all of the time as part of their job, or the home the person
occupies to undertake their job if the person has another home that is their main
residence.   
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Yes, it is still appropriate to have the category of a second home and the occupancy
duration seems reasonable.

Page 8

Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 3
Do you think councils should be able to charge a council tax premium on top of regular
council tax rates for second homes?
More information:
A premium is charging more than the full rate of council tax. 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 4
If you have answered yes to question 3, what do you think the maximum premium
councils could charge should be?
More information:
50% premium is the same as one and a half times the normal rate of council tax.
100% premium is double the normal rate of council tax
150% premium is two and a half times the normal rate of council tax
200% premium is three times the normal rate of council tax
250% premium is three and a half times the normal rate of council tax
300% premium is four times the normal rate of council tax 
Answer: 
50% 
100%
Yes, reasonable to have both categories with a discount, due to the limitation of use
in the case of purpose-built accommodation and the essential nature of requiring to
live at a specific location for job purposes.
Yes, this would be income generating, a higher level of permanent residents will
bring a wide range of benefits to the local community. Locally set policies could
encourage owners, where it is possible,  to bring homes predominantly empty into
use as potentially affordable homes.

Page 9

150% 
200% 
250% 
300%      
Other (specify) 
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 5
What factors should be taken into account by councils when deciding whether to
introduce a premium on council tax for second homes?
More information:
A non-exhaustive list of potential factors is set out below:
 numbers and percentages of second homes in the local area
 distribution of second homes and other housing throughout the council area and
an assessment of their impact on residential accommodation values in particular
areas
 potential impact on local economies and the tourism industry
 patterns of demand for, and availability of, affordable homes
 potential impact on local public services and the local community
 other existing measures or policies that are aimed at increasing housing supply
and the availability of affordable housing
Councils may also decide not to use the powers or to disapply a premium for a specific
period of time.
A non-exhaustive list of examples of where a council might consider doing this include:
 where there are reasons why the home could not be lived in as a permanent
residence
 where there are reasons why a home could not be sold or let
 where the owner’s use of their accommodation is restricted by circumstances not
covered by an exception from the premium
Premium rate should be determined by individual local authorities based on market
conditions and economic tolerance.
See above

Page 10

 where charging a premium might cause hardship 
Answer:
Please list the factors and provide reasons for your answer: 
Question 6
If you do, or were to, own a second home please tell us what you would do if the
applicable rate of council tax were to increase, and the ‘thresholds’ to be classed as self-
catering holiday accommodation for non-domestic rates purposes stayed the same?
More information:
The current threshold for defining premises as self-catering holiday accommodation
liable for non-domestic rates is it must be available to let for 140 days or more and
actually let for 70 days or more in the same financial year. 
A private residential tenancy is when a registered landlord lets accommodation to an
individual/s and it will be their sole or main residence. All tenancies created on or after 1
December 2017 are open-ended, which means a landlord will no longer be able to ask a
tenant to leave simply because the fixed term has ended. 
Answer: 
The home is (or would be) already used as self-catering accommodation and
liable for non-domestic rates 
The home is (or would be) already used as a private residential tenancy and the
tenant is liable for council tax 
I would continue to use it purely for personal use and pay the higher rate of
council tax 
I would continue with split use between self-catering accommodation (below the
non-domestic rates threshold) and personal use, and pay council tax 
My second home already has/would have split use between self-catering
accommodation (below the non-domestic rates threshold) and personal use. Rather than
pay the higher rate of council tax, I would increase the number of days the
accommodation is available to let and actually let in order to meet the non-domestic
rates thresholds 
My second home is purely for personal use. However, in order to stop paying
council tax, I would make it available as self-catering accommodation for 140 days or
more and actually let it for 70 days or more in order to be liable for non-domestic rates 
I use my second home purely for personal use but I would change its use to a
private residential tenancy
All of the above would apply, one potential further reason could be wider economic
conditions.

Page 11

I use my second home as self-catering accommodation (below the non-domestic
rates threshold) but I would change its use to a private residential tenancy 
I will seek reclassification as an empty home and pay council tax 
I will sell the second home 
Question 7
Do you think councils should be able to charge a higher premium than the current 100%
(double the full rate) of council tax on homes empty for longer than 12 months?
More information:
Councils currently have the discretion to charge up to 100% premium on council tax on
homes empty for longer than 12 months. 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 8
If you have answered yes to question 7, what do you think the maximum premium
councils could charge should be?
More information:
This question is asking what the maximum premium should be for homes that have been
empty for longer than 12 months.
The current maximum is 100% premium, which is double the normal rate of council tax. 
Answer: 
150% 
200% 
250% 
300%
Yes the premium should be determined locally by individual local authorities based
on market conditions and economic tolerance.
No limit

Page 12

Other (specify) 
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 9
Do you think there should be a stepped approach to charging higher rates of council tax
on long-term empty homes?
More information:
By 'stepped approach' we mean only giving councils powers to charge higher rates of
council tax the longer the home is empty. For example, 100% premium at 12 months,
200% premium at 2 years, 300% premium at 5 years.
100% premium is the same as double the normal amount of council tax.
200% premium is the same as three times the normal amount of council tax
300% premium is the same as four times the normal amount of council tax. 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 10
Are there any exceptions that are not already taken into account, that should be, when
charging a premium of council tax on homes empty for longer than 12 months? 
See reasons above
Yes this a flexibility available to individual local authorities to avoid a cliff edge effect
impact on individuals.

Page 13

More information:
Current discretionary powers for councils to change council tax liability for empty
homes 
Status of
empty home
Up to 6
months
6-12 months 12 months + 2 years +
No work
underway and
not for sale or
let
Owner may
apply for an
unoccupied
and
unfurnished
exemption
Discount can
be varied
between 50
and 10%
Discount can be
varied between
50 and 10% or
discount can be
removed
or  premium of
up to 100% can
be applied
Discount can be
varied between
50 and 10% or
discount can be
removed
or  premium of
up to 100% can
be applied
If undergoing
repair work to
make them
habitable
50% discount
cannot be
changed
Owner may
apply for a
major repairs
or structural
alterations
exemption. 
Discount can
be varied
between 50
and 10%.
Discount can be
varied between
50 and 10% or
discount can be
removed
or  premium of
up to 100% can
be applied.
Discount can be
varied between
50 and 10% or
discount can be
removed
or  premium of
up to 100% can
be applied.
If
being actively
marketed for
sale or let
50% discount
cannot be
changed
50% discount
cannot be
changed
50% discount
cannot be
changed
a premium of up
to 100% can be
charged 
The current list of exemptions to council tax are:
Exemption Period of Exemption
Dwellings last occupied by charitable bodies Up to 6 months
Dwellings last occupied by persons living or detained
elsewhere Unlimited
Deceased owners
Unlimited up to grant of
confirmation  
6 months after grant of
confirmation

Page 14

Dwellings empty under statute Unlimited
Dwellings awaiting demolition Unlimited
Dwellings for occupation by ministers Unlimited
Dwellings occupied by students, etc. Unlimited
Repossessed dwellings Unlimited
Agricultural dwellings Unlimited
Dwellings for old or disabled persons Unlimited
Halls of residence Unlimited
Barracks, etc. Unlimited
Dwellings occupied by young people Unlimited
Difficult to let dwellings Unlimited
Garages and storage premises Unlimited
Dwellings of persons made bankrupt Unlimited
Visiting forces Unlimited
Dwellings occupied by severely mentally impaired
persons Unlimited
Prisons Unlimited
Prescribed housing support services accommodation Unlimited 
Answer:
Please tell us about exemptions that you feel should apply and give reasons for your
answer. Do not include exemptions that are already provided for. 
Question 11
What factors should be taken into account by councils when deciding whether to
introduce a premium on council tax for homes empty for longer than 12 months?
More information:
A non-exhaustive list of potential factors might be:
 numbers, percentages and distribution of long-term empty homes throughout a
local area
No additional suggestions.

Page 15

 potential impact on local economies and the community
 patterns of demand for, and availability of, affordable homes
 potential impact on local public services
 impact on neighbours and local residents 
Councils may also decide not to use the powers or to disapply a premium for a specific
period of time.  A non-exhaustive list of examples of where a council might do this
include:
 where there are reasons why a home could not be sold or let
 where an offer has been accepted on a home but the sale has not yet been
completed and the exception period has run out
 if the home has been empty for longer than 12 months but has been recently
purchased by a new owner that is actively taking steps to bring the home back
into use
 if an owner has submitted a timely planning application or is undergoing a
planning appeal that is under consideration by the council or Scottish
Government. This means they cannot undertake work to bring the home back into
use until that process is concluded
 where charging a premium might cause hardship or act as a disincentive to
bringing the home back into use e.g. where extensive repairs are actively being
carried out 
Answer:
Please list factors and give reasons for your answer. 
Question 12
If you do, or were to, own a home that has been empty for longer than 12 months,
please tell us what you would do if your council decided to increase the maximum
council tax charge above 100% premium?
More information:
Council tax premium:
 100% premium is the same as double the normal rate of council tax. This is the
current maximum councils can decide to charge. This question asks what you would
do if councils are given powers to charge more than this e.g. up to 300% premium/
four times the normal rate and the council where your empty home is located decided
to apply an increase.
 You may find it helpful to view what we mean by some of the options given e.g.
short-term lets and private residential tenancies.
Short-term lets:
 In this consultation, short-term lets is a term used to refer to the whole or part of
accommodation provided to one or more guests on a commercial basis that does not
become the main residence of the guest/s. Self-catering accommodation is a type of
No additional suggestions

Page 16

short-term let and may be liable for council tax or non-domestic rates depending on
the number of days they are available to let and actually let in the financial year.
 Self-catering accommodation must be available for let for 140 days or more and
actually let for 70 days or more in the financial year, to be exempt from council tax
and liable for non-domestic rates
Private residential tenancies:
 A private residential tenancy is when a registered landlord lets accommodation to an
individual/s and it will be their sole or main residence. All tenancies created on or
after 1 December 2017 are open-ended, which means a landlord will no longer be
able to ask a tenant to leave simply because the fixed term has ended. 
Answer: 
Leave the home empty and pay the higher council tax 
Sell the empty home 
Use the home as a private residential tenancy 
Use the home as a short-Term Let  
Other (specify) 
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 13
Do you think that the letting thresholds for self-catering accommodation for non-
domestic rates should be changed?
More information:
The owners, tenants or occupiers of self-catering accommodation (who may be
businesses, the public or the third sectors) may be liable for either council tax or non-
domestic rates. This includes owners of second homes who use them for self-catering
accommodation. 
The current threshold for defining premises as self-catering holiday accommodation
liable for non-domestic rates is it must be available to let for 140 days or more and
actually let for 70 days or more in the same financial year. 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
N/A
N/A

Page 17

Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer.
Question 14
If you have answered yes to question 13, what do you think the threshold for the number
of days self-catering accommodation must actually be let for should be?
More information:
The current threshold is self-catering accommodation must actually be let for 70 days in
the financial year. 
Answer: 
50 days 
100 days 
140 days 
180 days  
Other (specify) 
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 15
If you have answered yes to question 13, what do you think the threshold for the number
of days self-catering accommodation must be available to let should be?
More information:
The current threshold is self-catering accommodation must available to let for 140 days
in the financial year.
Yes this should be increased to actually let for at least 120 days, which would equate
to 1/3 of the year, case can then be made that the property is contributing to the local
economy. It would lessen the risk of owners reclassifying property to avoid Council
Tax.
120
See above

Page 18

Answer: 
120 days 
160 days 
200 days 
250 days  
Other (specify) 
Please give reasons for your answer.
Question 16
Do you think councils should have discretion to change the self-catering accommodation
‘days actually let’ threshold, for their local area? 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 17
If you answered yes to question 16 do you think that councils should have discretion to: 
Answer: 
Increase the number of days actually let only 
Decrease the number of days actually let only
250 days
Potentially yes due to the wide-ranging holiday seasons across the country, where
rural areas occupancy would be heavily weighted to summer months. However this
would have implications for the role the assessor and this would need to be fully
considered in terms of practicality
This would equate for the period March to October, which seems reasonable if an
owner is designating a property as a holiday let it should be available as such for
most of the year.

Page 19

Increase or decrease the number of days actually let
Please specify if you think councils should have discretion to do something else 
Please give reasons for your answer 
Question 18
Do you have any other comments on the non-domestic rates system in respect of self-
catering accommodation? 
Answer: 
Please provide your views 
Question 19
If you do, or were to, own a second home please tell us what you would do in the event
that the applicable rate of council tax and non-domestic rate thresholds both increased? 
More information:
The current threshold for defining premises as self-catering holiday accommodation
liable for non-domestic rates is it must be available to let for 140 days or more and
actually let for 70 days or more in the same financial year. 
A private residential tenancy is when a registered landlord lets accommodation to an
individual/s and it will be their sole or main residence. All tenancies created on or after 1
December 2017 are open-ended, which means a landlord will no longer be able to ask a
tenant to leave simply because the fixed term has ended. 
Varying needs/scenarios of different Local Authority areas.
N/A

Page 20

Answer: 
The home is already used as a private residential tenancy 
I would continue to use it purely for personal use and pay the higher rate of council
tax 
I would continue with split use between self-catering accommodation (below the
thresholds to be liable for non-domestic rates) and personal use, and pay council
tax 
My second home already has/would have split use between self-catering
accommodation (below the non-domestic rates threshold) and personal use.
Rather than pay the higher rate of council tax, I would increase the number of days
the accommodation is available to let and actually let in order to meet the non-
domestic rates thresholds 
My second home already has/would have split use between self-catering
accommodation (above the non-domestic rates threshold) and personal use.
Rather than revert to paying council tax, I would increase the number of days the
accommodation is available to let and actually let in order to meet the higher non-
domestic rates thresholds 
My second home is purely for personal use. However, in order to stop paying
council tax, I would make it available as self-catering accommodation and let it for
the number of days I needed to in order to be liable for non-domestic rates 
I use my second home purely for personal use but I would change its use to a
private residential tenancy 
I use my second home as self-catering accommodation (below the non-domestic
rates threshold) but I would change its use to a private residential tenancy 
I would seek reclassification as an empty home and pay council tax 
I would sell the second home 
Other (specify)
Please give reasons for your answer.

Page 21

Question 20
If you do, or were to, own a second home please tell us what you would do in the event
that:
a) council tax powers remained as they are for second homes (i.e. no provision for
councils to charge a premium), but
b) the ‘thresholds’ to be classed as self-catering holiday accommodation for Non-
domestic rates purposes increased?
More information:
The current threshold for defining premises as self-catering holiday accommodation
liable for non-domestic rates is it must be available to let for 140 days or more and
actually let for 70 days or more in the same financial year. 
A private residential tenancy is when a registered landlord lets accommodation to an
individual/s and it will be their sole or main residence. All tenancies created on or after 1
December 2017 are open-ended, which means a landlord will no longer be able to ask a
tenant to leave simply because the fixed term has ended. 
Answer: 
The home is already used as a private residential tenancy 
I would continue to use it purely for personal use and pay council tax 
I would continue with split use between self-catering accommodation (below the
thresholds to be liable for non-domestic rates) and personal use, and pay council
tax 
My second home already has/would have split use between self-catering
accommodation (above the non-domestic rates threshold) and personal use. I
would increase the number of days the accommodation is available to let and
actually let in order to meet the higher non-domestic rates thresholds 
I use my second home as self-catering accommodation (above the current non-
domestic rates threshold). If I was not able to meet the new thresholds, I would
change its use to a private residential tenancy 
I would seek reclassification as an empty home and pay council tax 
I would sell the second home 
Other (specify)

Page 22

Please give reasons for your answer: 
Question 21
Please tell us how you think changes to council tax and/or non-domestic rates
thresholds for self-catering accommodation might affect businesses in your area. 
Answer:
Please provide your views 
Question 22
Please tell us how you think changes to the maximum council tax rate for second and/or
empty homes and non-domestic rates thresholds might affect your local area or
Scotland as a whole (social, economic, environment, community, cultural, enterprise).
More information:
We have prepared a partial Business Regulatory Impact Assessment and undertaken
screenings to initially consider other impacts. We would welcome your views and
comments to help us expand on these assessments. 
Answer:
Please provide your views
Due the volume of these type of properties this is likely to have a negligible impact
overall.
Potential changes locally will be negligible, Scotland wide impacts from a social point
of view could be very positive if the intention to bring affordable homes into use and
eliminate empty properties is achieved. Local authorities would need to consider all
impacts including unintentional consequences before setting higher rates.

Page 23

Question 23
Please tell us how you think the changes identified might affect island communities.
More information:
We have prepared a partial Island Communities Impact Assessment and undertaken
screenings to initially consider other impacts. We would welcome your views and
comments to help us expand on these assessments.
Answer:
Please provide your views 
Question 24
Do you think there are any equality, human rights, or wellbeing impacts in relation to the
changes set out in the consultation? 
Answer: 
Yes 
No 
Don’t know
Please give reasons for your answer. 
Question 25
Is there anything else you would like to tell us in relation to this consultation? 
Answer:
Please provide any further comments on the proposals set out in this consultation
N/A
These would be more obviously identifiable at a local level and would need to form
part of any local authority’s considerations when decided to change rates.

Page 24

in the box below. 
About you 
Please tell us which of the following categories best describe you (select all that apply):
 Owner of a Second Home
 Owner of a Long-term Empty Home
 Short-Term Let/Self-Catering accommodation operator
 Council or Assessor
 Organisation e.g. third sector or industry body
 Member of the Public
 Other, please specify 
Please tick whichever council areas apply to you (or select all of Scotland)?:
 Aberdeen City
 Aberdeenshire Council
 All of Scotland
 Angus Council
 Argyll and Bute Council
 City of Edinburgh Council
 Clackmannanshire Council
 Dumfries and Galloway
 Dundee City Council
 East Ayrshire Council
 East Dunbartonshire Council
 East Lothian Council
 East Renfrewshire Council
N/A
Council

Page 25

 Falkirk Council
 Fife Council
 Glasgow City Council
 Highland Council
 Inverclyde Council
 Midlothian Council
 Moray Council
 Na h-Eileanan Siar Council
 North Ayrshire Council
 North Lanarkshire Council
 Orkney Council
 Perth and Kinross Council
 Renfrewshire Council
 Scottish Borders Council
 Shetland Council
 South Ayrshire Council
 South Lanarkshire Council
 Stirling Council
 West Dunbartonshire Council
 West Lothian Council 
Renfrewshire Council.