Democracy Spraffa

Appendix 2 - Beech

Renfrewshire Council · 19 January 2023
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 19 January 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

BeecBeech Ah Avvenue Childrenue Childrens Hens Homeome
Care Home Service
1-3 Beech Avenue
Hunterhill
Paisley
PA2 6XN
Telephone: 01418 897 375
Type of inspection:
Unannounced
Completed on:
14 October 2021
Service provided by: Service provider number:
Renfrewshire Council SP2003003388
Service no:
CS2003001245

Page 2

About the service
Beech Avenue children's care home is registered to care for a maximum of six young people, up to and
including age 20 years. The service is managed by Renfrewshire Council and provides care and
accommodation on a short or long term basis for young people from the Renfrewshire area.
The house is within a residential area, close to local amenities and has a full time manager, two senior
practitioners and a team of residential childcare workers.
The aims and objectives of the service include:
- Promoting an environment where young people feel safe and cared for
- To support children and young people to maintain contact with family
- To encourage young people to achieve educational potential through working in partnership with other
agencies
- To support young people for independent living
It should be noted that this inspection took place during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and therefore
followed a revised procedure for conducting inspections in these circumstances.
What people told us
At the time of our inspection, there were three young people residing at Beech Avenue. We spoke to one
young person, and another on an informal basis. We also had contact with one parent and a variety of
external professionals who regularly worked alongside the service.
These are some of the comments regarding the service:
Staff genuinely care for the young people and their priority is always the safety and wellbeing of the young
people
You get a real sense that this is a home and not just a placement
The support and help staff give is superb, couldn't fault it, absolutely fantastic.
Staff provide a high level of emotional and practical support. Good awareness of trauma, mental health and
child development.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 2 of 12

Page 3

From this inspection we evaluated this service as:
In evaluating quality, we use a six point scale where 1 is unsatisfactory and 6 is excellent
How well do we support children and young people's wellbeing? 4 - Good
How good is our leadership? 3 - Adequate
How good is our staff team? 4 - Good
How well is our care planned? 3 - Adequate
Further details on the particular areas inspected are provided at the end of this report.
How well do we support
children and young people's wellbeing? 4 - Good
Young people were engaging with Beech Avenue to varying degrees, so not all had developed meaningful
relationships with staff, but staff and managers persevered in their commitment to build strong connections
with young people. We witnessed staff having a compassionate approach to care when one young person
became upset and at other times, we heard young people seeking staff members for support and assistance.
The service tried to ensure continuity of staffing, but at times this had been extremely difficult due to
absences, affecting the consistency of approach towards young people.
The young people received respect from the staff and manager, and staff also discussed the young people in
their care in a respectful manner. Each young person had their own private bedroom which they had been
given the opportunity to individualise. Young people also had the chance to mix with others in the house or
use the spacious communal areas to relax. Beech Avenue was undergoing home improvements which will
further enhance the quality of the environment for the young people.
Although external advocacy was available to the young people, in the main, they had chosen not to take up
this service on a regular basis. We spoke to Who Cares? Scotland who noted that staff regularly refer to
advocacy and strongly encourage involvement. External professionals spoke of being impressed by the
willingness of the staff to advocate on behalf of the young people.
Staff provided young people with continuing care placements and had put supports in place to ensure
outcomes were met and that appropriate transitions were considered.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 3 of 12

Page 4

There were examples of staff having 1:1 time with young people to discuss matters important to them, with
young people's views being sought prior to multiagency meetings and the opportunity for them to be
present at most meetings. The service had engaged young people in improving the house and responding to
their request for a 'chill' room and additions to the garden. The service could benefit from establishing more
varied methods to ensure that young people are given opportunities to voice opinions.
The young people at Beech Avenue could advise how they wished to spend their time, however again this
was mixed, with some young people making decisions independently of staff and spending significant
periods of time outwith the house. This impacted on their routine, sense of belonging to the service and
engagement in their care and support was not consistently being achieved. In contrast, staff had a strong
understanding of other young people in terms of their strengths and preferences and had a significant
awareness of how outcomes could be improved through access to specialist services and support.
Young people were not actively involved in activities within the local community, however this related to
their own wishes rather than staff not being encouraging. They did have access to the local authority leisure
centre and had recently had the opportunity to plan and go on holiday with staff.
Attempts were made by staff to encourage independence and life skills. Some young people were doing
their own laundry, maintaining their rooms and could prepare food for themselves. As part of continuing
care, this was promoted, however greater emphasis could be given to enhancing and encouraging these
skills.
The young people took significant risks at times and were at risk of harm. We found the service was working
with the young people and other agencies to promote safety and positive decision making. Staff had good
awareness of the risks for each young person, and were committed to protecting them emotionally and
physically, and responded appropriately to indicators of concern. This was also highlighted by external
professionals who stressed the commitment and determination of staff.
We found the manager and staff had a good understanding of trauma, and this was emphasised by the
external professionals we spoke to. Although not all young people were actively engaging with the service,
they were provided with nurturing and therapeutic care and support as required.
Staff had successfully managed to deescalate distressed behaviour, and physical intervention by staff was
not commonplace. There were risk management strategies in place for the young people, identifying triggers
and early warning signals.
The young people were registered with local health services and there were referrals and involvement from
substance misuse services as required. Other specialist services included mental health agencies, with
Beech Avenue staff demonstrating that they were proactive in identifying unmet health needs and
advocating on behalf of young people for appropriate and timely assessment and care. The staff team
demonstrated their ability to support young people with significant mental health difficulties and have
confidently and appropriately taken advice from specialist services.
The inspection considered the medication policy and process. For one of the young people, it was unclear
how much medication should be given and daily recordings needed to be more explicit (see Area for
Improvement 1).
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 4 of 12

Page 5

A previous inspection suggested that the service should develop a policy in relation to the management of
young people under the influence of substances whilst at Beech Avenue. There was a clear need for this to
be established, which would incorporate room and bag searches, along with appropriate disposal of any
drugs found on the premises. (see Area for Improvement 2)
Beech Avenue benefitted from a housekeeper and there was a variety of healthy food options available with
the opportunity to socialise with staff and other young people at meal times. At the time of inspection, we
heard that young people were not involved in menu planning, although staff were aware of the likes and
dislikes of the young people and menu planned accordingly. Young people were encouraged to assist with
the food shopping and cooking.
In conclusion, we considered that the service demonstrated a number of important strengths in supporting
young people's wellbeing. This has informed the grading of this key question as good.
Areas for improvement
1. The service is to review the approach to the recording of medication to ensure daily clarity, and ensure it
is clear to all staff how much medication should be issued.
This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
I use a service and organisation that are well led and managed (HSCS 4.23)
2. Develop a policy and procedure for staff relating to the management of young people under the influence
of substances whilst at Beech Avenue, incorporating procedures for searches and disposal of drugs on the
premises.
This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
I use a service and organisation that are well led and managed (HSCS 4.23)
I am protected from harm, neglect, abuse, bullying and exploitation by people who have a clear
understanding of their responsibilities (HSCS 3.20)
How good is our leadership? 3 - Adequate
There was a complaints procedure in place at Beech Avenue and this has been embedded in the admission
process. We found that the service had responded positively to young people's requests regarding the
improvement of the service and for additional resources.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 5 of 12

Page 6

We did not identify a clear effective system of evaluation and quality assurance. Seniors have responsibility
for oversight of care plans which are reviewed as part of the staff supervision process, however the service
did acknowledge that the quality assurance process and external scrutiny required attention. There were
plans for this process to be standardised across the local authority to ensure young people can receive the
best possible care and support. (see Area for Improvement 1)
There was a development plan in place, which could be strengthened by being more specific, with greater
detail in terms of identifying desired outcomes, how these will be achieved, by when and how the service
will measure progress and achievement. This should also ensure the views of young people, families and
stakeholders are considered to further develop Beech Avenue. (see Area for Improvement 2)
In terms of management, the absence of the service manager for periods of time has undoubtedly affected
the service, however staff stressed that other managers were always accessible, and the external manager
was hands on, approachable and advocating for the young people. Professionals commented on the strong
leadership and guidance provided by the service manager.
The service had recently changed to a new rota and planned to have a new peripatetic team in place. This
was to provide standardisation across the local authority houses and ensure that there was increased
staffing capacity to provide continuity of care. This followed recognition by management that staffing levels
was an area for improvement. Some staff were understandably apprehensive regarding this change and
considered that the communication regarding the new rota and the peripatetic team had not been
sufficient.
Beech Avenue's statement of purpose stated that careful matching will be prioritised, with the preferred
option being to facilitate a planned admission, and during the last inspection, it was identified that the
service was reviewing the assessment and matching of admissions. We found that since the last inspection
there had been several new admissions, generally at short notice, with the service itself having minimal
input into this process. This contributed to, at times, negative experiences and outcomes for some young
people. It was positive to hear during inspection that there were no plans to introduce other young people
to Beech Avenue to help promote stability after a period of change. However, we are aware that this has not
happened and there was a new admission despite concerns about the impact on the young people.
Subsequent discussions with the service provided information which highlighted that staff within Beech
Avenue had become involved in the recent admission process, and the service has also expressed their
commitment to ensuring that all options are explored for young people, including placements not provided
by the local authority when this would be beneficial. This is welcomed and should continue moving forward.
(see Area for Improvement 3).
We were able to identify some strengths for this quality indicator but these just outweigh weaknesses. The
absence of quality assurance, and the concerns about the admissions process has implications for the
service in terms of sustainable quality care to young people. These factors place good outcomes at risk,
with the potential for young people's experiences to be negatively affected. The service has expressed their
commitment to develop these areas and this key question has been graded as adequate with three areas for
improvement.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 6 of 12

Page 7

Areas for improvement
1. Quality assurance and monitoring systems are to be developed to evaluate children and young people’s
outcomes and experiences to ensure they receive the best possible care and support.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 7 of 12

Page 8

This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
I benefit from a culture of continuous improvement, with the organisation having robust and transparent
quality assurance processes (HSCS 4.19)
2. Review the service development plan to ensure this has specific outcomes, how these will be achieved
and how progress will be measured. This should take into account the views of young people, families and
stakeholders.
This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
I use a service and organisation that are well led and managed (HSCS 4.23)
I am actively encouraged to be involved in improving the service I use, in the spirit of genuine partnership
(HSCS 4.7)
3. It is essential that the service has a robust and rigorous assessment and matching process for admissions
to ensure the best interests of all children and young people, taking into account the CI guidance - Matching
Looked After Children and Young People: Admissions Guidance for Residential Services. This should include
staff from the service taking an active role in this process.
This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
I use a service and organisation that are well led and managed (HSCS 4.23)
I am in the right place to experience the care and support I need and want (HSCS 1.19)
How good is our staff team? 4 - Good
The staff team had formed a strong bond, they were flexible and communicated well to get the best
outcomes for the young people. This had taken time given changes to the team and staff absence issues.
The service acknowledged this was work in progress and will evolve as the new peripatetic team comes on
board.
Feedback from other professionals noted that staff were genuinely committed to the young people and
positive relationships were formed and sustained. Staff showed skill in resolving conflict situations and had
good awareness of policies and procedures. To meet learning needs and to provide quality care and support
to young people, we saw an emphasis on training and staff development.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 8 of 12

Page 9

Staff spoke of regular formal supervision taking place which included discussions regarding the young
people and personal development. They also noted the opportunity to have informal discussions with
managers and colleagues as a way of improving practice and reflecting. The service had recognised the
demanding nature of the work recently and provided staff with a relevant external support.
The service did not have a robust assessment of staffing needs to determine the experience, qualifications
and skill mix of staff for the young people in the service. This would consider the complexity of individual
needs and risks of the young people. (Area for Improvement 1)
The service demonstrated a number of important strengths regarding staff competence, with a focus on
learning and development to support young people's wellbeing. This has informed the grading of this key
question as good, with one area for improvement.
Areas for improvement
1. The service should ensure that there is a process to determine the number, experience, qualifications and
skill mix of staff for each shift. This will take into account the specific needs of individual young people. This
process will also benefit from the manager having a system in place that identifies individual training needs
and achievements. Consideration should be given to the document: Guidance for providers on the
assessment of staffing levels.
This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
My care and support meets my needs and is right for me (HSCS 1.19)
My care and support is provided in a planned way, including if there is an emergency or unexpected event
(HSCS 4.14)
How well is our care and support planned? 3 - Adequate
The service had varying success in terms of trying to encourage young people to take an active part in their
care plans. The care plans were reviewed by the key team but attempts to motivate the young people in
participating in their plan was not always effective and young people lacked structure to their day at times.
The service had started a process of reviewing the care plans and associated paperwork to make this
consistent across the local authority. New risk assessments and behaviour management plans had been
developed which were clear, reflected the complexities of the young people and included strategies to
support the young people across a variety of scenarios.
The service had good evidence of multi agency working and social workers and other professionals spoke of
the strong working relationship and high level of communication with staff from Beech Avenue. We saw
clear examples of the service taking the lead on planning, arranging meetings, reviews and seeking
specialist support.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 9 of 12

Page 10

The young people had care plans which were consistent with the SHANARRI principles, however these were
not Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Realistic and Time Based (SMART) or outcome focussed. This made it
difficult to identify specific goals, how these would be achieved or measured or how progress was being
recorded. Additionally, there was no clear way of gathering the young people's views, so their voices were
not represented in the care plans and risk assessments. (see Area for Improvement 1)
We looked at the incident report forms as part of the inspection. These forms were lengthy and not
specifically designed for a residential care home. The service should consider streamlining this process as
part of the current paperwork review so that managerial comments are routinely shared with staff and to
ensure that formal debriefing is consistently undertaken with staff and young people.
We look forward to seeing the progress regarding the standardisation of paperwork in all areas as this is an
area the service had identified as requiring improvement.
Assessment and planning by the service demonstrated some strengths, but key areas of care planning and
gathering young people's views require further development to promote positive experiences and outcomes
for young people. As a result, we have graded this key question as adequate with one area for improvement.
Areas for improvement
1. Care plans to be reviewed to ensure they comply with SMART principles. The service should take effective
steps to engage young people in their care plan, and record actions to be taken to achieve positive
outcomes, how they will be measured, how achievable they are and within what timeframe.
This is to ensure that care and support is consistent with the Health and Social Care Standards (HSCS) which
state that:
I am fully involved in assessing my emotional, psychological, social and physical needs at an early stage,
regularly and when my needs change (HSCS 1.12)
My personal plan (sometimes referred to as a care plan) is right for me because it sets out how my needs
will be met, as well as my wishes and choices (HSCS 1.15)
I am fully involved in developing and reviewing my personal plan, which is always available to me (HSCS 2.17)
Complaints
There have been no complaints upheld since the last inspection. Details of any older upheld complaints are
published at www.careinspectorate.com.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 10 of 12

Page 11

Detailed evaluations
How well do we support children and young people's wellbeing? 4 - Good
1.1 Children and young people experience compassion, dignity and respect 4 - Good
1.2 Children and young people get the most out of life 4 - Good
1.3 Children and young people's health benefits from their care and
support they experience 4 - Good
How good is our leadership? 3 - Adequate
2.2 Quality assurance and improvement are led well 3 - Adequate
How good is our staff team? 4 - Good
3.2 Staff have the right values, skills and knowledge to care for children
and young people 4 - Good
How well is our care planned? 3 - Adequate
5.1 Assessment and care planning reflects children and young people's
needs and wishes 3 - Adequate
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 11 of 12

Page 12

To find out more
This inspection report is published by the Care Inspectorate. You can download this report and others from
our website.
Care services in Scotland cannot operate unless they are registered with the Care Inspectorate. We inspect,
award grades and help services to improve. We also investigate complaints about care services and can take
action when things aren't good enough.
Please get in touch with us if you would like more information or have any concerns about a care service.
You can also read more about our work online at www.careinspectorate.com
Contact us
Care Inspectorate
Compass House
11 Riverside Drive
Dundee
DD1 4NY
enquiries@careinspectorate.com
0345 600 9527
Find us on Facebook
Twitter: @careinspect
Other languages and formats
This report is available in other languages and formats on request.
Tha am foillseachadh seo ri fhaighinn ann an cruthannan is cànain eile ma nithear iarrtas.
Inspection rInspection reporteport
Inspection report for Beech Avenue Childrens Home
page 12 of 12