Democracy Spraffa

Inspection of Residential Children's Houses ECSP 19 01 23

Renfrewshire Council · 19 January 2023
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 19 January 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Page 1 of 6 
To:  Education and Children’s Services Policy Board
On: 19 January 2023
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by:  Director of Children’s Services
___________________________________________________________________ 
Heading:  Inspections of registered children’s residential houses by
the Care Inspectorate
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1. Residential childcare refers to the service provided within our children’s
houses and is a form of accommodation for children who require to be cared
for out with a family setting. Residential care is provided by Renfrewshire
Council when the specific needs of children and young people means that
they cannot remain living with their parents or in an alternative family setting
such as kinship or foster care.  
1.2. Social work and social care services are subject to a range of audit and
scrutiny activities to ensure that they are undertaking all statutory duties and
providing appropriate care and support to vulnerable individuals and groups. 
A number of social work and social care services including residential
children’s houses are required to register with the Care Inspectorate. 
Registered services are subject to regular inspection by the Care Inspectorate
and the outcomes of the inspections are published on the Care Inspectorate
website.   
1.3. Generally, residential children’s houses are inspected once each year by the
Care Inspectorate.  The inspections are made  on an unannounced basis. 
The frequency of inspections was reduced during the last two years as a
result of the COVID pandemic.  It is expected that the programme of annual
inspections will recommence. 
1.4. Renfrewshire has 4 residential children’s houses. At the present time there
are 22 children and young people living in our houses. This report
summarises the outcomes from the inspections of our residential Children’s
Houses during the past two years.  Two of the houses received positive
inspections, one had a grade of adequate and one graded as weak.

Page 2

Page 2 of 6 
1.5. Where a children’s house receives a grade of weak or adequate a formal
support plan is put in place to address the areas identified as requiring
improvement.  The improvement activity for the relevant children’s houses is
included in this report.
_______________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1. Elected members are asked to note:
a) the findings from the inspections of Renfrewshire’s children’s houses
undertaken in 2021 and 2022; and 
b)  areas for service development and associated improvement actions.
___________________________________________________________________
3. Background
3.1. Care services in Scotland require to register with the Care Inspectorate. Our
four children’s houses are registered with the Care Inspectorate as providers
of residential care and are consequently generally subject to at least annual
inspection by the regulator.  The annual inspection arrangements were
disrupted during the COVID pandemic but are now back in place.
3.2. The Care Inspectorate uses a proportionate risk model of inspection.  
Services graded as ‘Good’ or above in previous inspections are subject to
low-intensity inspections.  Services are assessed on up to four quality themes:
• Quality of Care and Support
• Quality of Environment
• Quality of Staffing
• Quality of Management and Leadership. 
3.3. The scrutiny process applies 5 key questions about the difference a care
service makes to people’s wellbeing, and the quality of the elements that
contribute to that. These include:
1. How well do we support people’s wellbeing?
2. How good is our leadership
3. How good is our staff team?
4. How good is our setting?
5. How well is our care and support planned?
3.4. The Care Inspectorate utilises the following gradings across each of the areas
considered during each inspection:  
1. Unsatisfactory  
2. Weak  
3. Adequate  
4. Good  
5. Very good   
6. Excellent

Page 3

Page 3 of 6 
3.5. The Care Inspectorate publishes the inspection reports on its website.  In
addition to awarding grades in each of the themes inspected, the Care
Inspectorate can make a recommendation or put in place a requirement.  A
recommendation will set out an action that would improve or develop the
quality of the service, but failure to meet a recommendation would not result in
enforcement by the Care Inspectorate.  Requirements are legally enforceable
and set out what is required by a care service to comply with the Regulation of
Care (Scotland) Act 2001 or with the conditions of registration.
3.6. The Care Inspectorate changed the way they report the outcome of
inspections in the past year.  As a result of the change two of the houses do
not have grades for each area inspected, rather an overall grading is awarded
on the following statement: “How well do we support children and young
people's rights and wellbeing?” 
Recent inspection activity in Children’s Services 
3.7. Renfrewshire children’s services provides 4 residential children’s houses. At
the present time there are 22 children and young people living in our
children’s houses.  
3.8. All Four of Renfrewshire’s residential children’s houses for children and young
people were inspected between February 2021 & October 2022.  Our
residential children’s houses are known as:
• Brediland
• Beech Avenue
• Arkleston 
• Barochan Road 
3.9. Brediland was inspected on 16th February 2021 and a subsequent report
published (appendix 1).   The inspectorate reported that they saw that children
and young people at Brediland Road benefitted from meaningful relationships
with staff who provided consistent and compassionate care.  They received
strong feedback from external professionals and made comment that they
witnessed solid evidence of one-to-one work with young people.  From the 5
key areas scrutinised, the inspectors graded 4 areas Very Good (Grade 5) &
one area Good (Grade 4). 
3.10. Beech Avenue was inspected on 14th October 2021 and a subsequent report
was published (appendix 2) detailing significant strengths in the delivery of
care alongside some recommendations for improvement.  From the 4 key
areas scrutinised the inspectors awarded 2 areas as Good and 2 areas as
adequate. This inspection highlights a strength in the relationships and
interactions with young people in response to their needs and the staff
perseverance in doing so.   
3.11. The areas of improvement focussed on the impact of staff and management
absence. Beech Avenue was inspected at the height of the pandemic when
they had experienced significant and sustained staff absence. Whilst cover
arrangements were made, the temporary nature of these did impact on the
consistency of approach in supporting the young people and the overall
evidence of leadership.  All areas of improvement identified by the Care
Inspectorate have been addressed in full.

Page 4

Page 4 of 6 
3.12. Arkleston was inspected on 3rd August 2022 and the report published shortly
thereafter (appendix 3).  The inspectors recorded an overall grade of 5 (Very
Good) in respect of Arkleston.  The new grading and reporting process by the
Care inspectorate means that the individual grades on the areas identified in
paragraph 3.2 were not provided. The inspectors made comment on the staff
team having excellent understanding of trauma informed practice.  They
highlighted that young people were supported & included in their plans to
achieve their goals & that good relationships were evidenced, and support
was given where required.  The inspectors further reported evidence of young
people being supported to access mental health services appropriately & a
good understanding of how best to support the young people to keep safe.
They noted that good relationships with young people who had moved on
from the house were evident.  There were no recommendations for
improvement in relation to Arkleston.   
3.13. Barochan was inspected in September 2022 with the inspectors providing a
grade of 2 (Weak) (appendix 4) . During the inspection a letter of serious
concern was issued by the Care Inspectorate which the service responded to
immediately.  The inspection reported areas of good practice but also
highlighted areas of concern and made several requirements.   At the time of
inspection there was no dedicated manager to Barochan although interim
arrangements were in place during the recruitment process. The inspectors
concluded that leadership within the house had been a concern for some time
and the temporary arrangement made during the recruitment process had
exacerbated the issue instead of resolving it. The absence of effective
leadership had led to inconsistencies in practice.  
3.14. The recruitment process was unsuccessful and as such the service has
identified a permanent replacement manager by moving an existing manager. 
The service is confident that the new manager has the appropriate skills and
experience to address the concerns noted and work in partnership with the
care inspectorate on a journey of improvement.    
3.15. The inspection focussed on the young people’s safety. They highlighted that
staff responding to the challenges of one young person meant that the needs
of others were not always met satisfactorily. Risk assessments and child plans
have been reviewed in response to the concerns highlighted and additional
strategies put in place to manage these issues.
3.16. Bullying was highlighted as an area in this inspection and the previous
inspection.  Although it was recognised that measures had been put in place
to try to address this, the inspectors did not believe these measures were
effective. The complexity of the group mean that this issue requires constant
monitoring and intervention which is already being led by the new manager. 
This will be evidenced in ongoing partnership work with our link inspector.
3.17. The use of “safe holds” was highlighted as an area of concern and the need
for refresher training. The delivery of this refresher training had been impacted
upon by the Covid 19 pandemic and a plan was already in place for staff to
receive this, but the inspectors believed this should have taken place sooner. 
3.18. The inspectors also highlighted the need for sufficient staffing levels to be in
place. Resourcing our children’s houses has been extremely challenging due
to the Covid 19 pandemic and the service experiencing significant recruitment
and retention challenges. The challenges we face in Renfrewshire regarding

Page 5

Page 5 of 6 
the retention and recruitment of social care staff are unfortunately in keeping
with challenges across the whole social care sector in Scotland.  Staffing
levels are being monitored monthly with reports provided to the Children’s
Manger and the Head of Service.
3.19. A robust action plan has been developed to address the finding of the
inspection at Barochan and to meet the requirements imposed. The Care
Inspectorate have agreed to re-inspect within the next 6 months rather than
waiting the full year so that we can evidence the improvements we are
confident will be made quickly.  
___________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial 
None. 
2.  HR and Organisational Development 
The service faces challenges in recruiting staff to the residential sector. 
There is a national challenge at this time across social work and social care
in terms of recruitment. 
3. Community/Council Planning
None 
4.  Legal 
None. 
5.  Property/Assets 
None. 
6.  Information Technology 
None. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report. 
8. Health and Safety
None. 
9. Procurement 
None. 
10. Risk 
None. 
11. Privacy Impact
None.

Page 6

Page 6 of 6 
12.  Cosla Policy Position 
None. 
13. Climate Risk 
None.   
List of Background Papers 
(a) None 
___________________________________________________________________
Children’s Services
KS 30/11/22 
Author:  Kevin Smith, Acting Children’s Services Manager, tel 0141 618 4575