Democracy Spraffa

Dargavel Non Denomination PS Demand ECSPB

Renfrewshire Council · 18 January 2024
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 18 January 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Page 1 of 6 
To:  Education and Children’s Services Policy Board
On: 18 January 2024
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by:  Director of Children’s Services
___________________________________________________________________ 
Heading:  Dargavel Non Denomination Primary School Demand:
Assessment of Options for Additional Future Capacity 
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1 Given both the scale of the masterplan development at Dargavel Village,
coupled with the expectation of around a decade of development still to be
delivered, there remains ongoing risk and uncertainty in respect to the actual
level of educational demand that will arise from the development – both in
terms of the scale and timing of an anticipated peak in demand as well as the
stabilised longer-term position. The work completed to date in conjunction with
Edge Analytics has identified upper projection scenarios in addition to the core
projection estimate to inform longer term planning and management of risk.   
1.2 In this context it was agreed that work would be progressed to consider the
range of options that would be available to the Council in future years should
additional capacity be required as the development progresses towards
completion over an estimated 10+ period. This report provides an overview of
the assessment process which confirms that the Council is able to deploy a
range of options either individually or combined to respond appropriately to
any confirmed trend that would indicate a longer-term position in excess of the
currently planned primary provision capacity.
 
1.3 Officers will continue to monitor all relevant live data and updated projections
and provide appropriate updates to future boards to support timely decision
making in future years. 
___________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1 Members of the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board are asked to:  
 Note that the Edge Analytics tried and tested core model indicates a peak
of demand 1,131 for planning purposes which is within the current
planned operational primary capacity of 1,230;

Page 2

Page 2 of 6 
 Note that current projection data also presents a number of potential
upper scenarios that would require further intervention from the Council if
these materialise; 
 Note that as outlined in the paper the Council will be able to consider a
number of options which can be deployed either in isolation or combined
and has significant flexibility to respond appropriately at a future point in
time should additional demand emerge. This incudes a temporary peak in
demand and or longer term stabilised demand; 
 Note that the roll projections are being continually monitored and updated
and that regular updates will be provided to the Board to enable timeous
decisions to be made in future years as and when required. 
__________________________________________________________________ 
3.  Background 
3.1 As outlined in the report Roll Projection Update on this agenda, long term
pupil projection work (15 years), completed by officers in conjunction with
Edge Analytics for the Dargavel Village catchment, has identified that primary
school demand will reach a natural peak, estimated to occur in 2033/34, as
the development progresses towards completion. This is similar to other
comparable large scale developments across the UK. After this point the
demand levels are projected to drop year on year towards the end of the 2030
decade, transitioning to a mature stabilised level of demand.   
3.2 The decisions the Council has taken to date to expand primary school
provision within Dargavel, by planning an additional 800 capacity primary
school, has been framed based on the core model arising from Edge
Analytics. The Edge Analytics core modelling, which is based on tried and
tested formula used across the UK, indicates a projected peak roll of 1,134 by
2033/34. Additional projection models were run by Edge Analytics at the
request of the Council, to also include limited live registration data. These
additional scenarios suggested the potential for a higher peak of up to circa
1,400 - 1,500 pupils could be possible if the current registration trend
continued and was sustained over the long term. 
3.3 Given both the scale of the masterplan, coupled with there being an
expectation of around a decade of development still to be delivered, there
remains ongoing risk and uncertainty in respect to the eventual educational
demand that will arise from the development – both in terms of the scale, pace
of growth, timing of the anticipated peak as well as the stabilised longer-term
demand. In these circumstances it is prudent to consider now what options
the Council could deploy to respond to potential upper end scenarios,
recognising there are a very wide range of potential outcomes and ensuring
the Council retains flexibility to deliver a response aligned to the specific
circumstances that emerge. 
3.4 In this context it was agreed by Board that work would be progressed to
consider the range of options that would be available to the Council in future
years should additional capacity be required to address upper demand
scenarios above the core modelling position. This report provides an overview
and outcomes from that assessment process.

Page 3

Page 3 of 6 
__________________________________________________________________
 
4. Scenarios and Option Assessment
 
4.1 As live data is confirmed over the coming years, it will provide increasing
confidence and eventual certainty over the longer-term trend. In the
meantime, in considering options to manage this uncertainty and risk, there
are three broad outcome scenarios which the Council is required to consider
and plan for: - 
 Scenario 1 – the current planned provision provides sufficient capacity to
support the actual level of demand that will emerge, both in terms of the
expected peak and the mature stabilised demand. In such circumstances
no additional intervention will be required by the Council. 
 Scenario 2 – the current planned provision provides sufficient capacity to
support the actual level of mature stabilised demand – however for a
relatively short period leading up to and after the temporary peak, demand
will exceed this capacity. In such circumstances, the Council would be
required to identify additional capacity, but only for a temporary period.
This would not require investment in a permanent extension to school
capacity given the temporary nature of the demand. Permanent additional
capacity would not represent value for money and would result in surplus
capacity once the short term peak had subsided. 
 Scenario 3 – the current planned provision is insufficient to meet the
stabilised demand when the development fully reaches maturity. In such
circumstances, the Council would be required to resolve two issues.
Firstly, provide additional permanent capacity to meet the long-term
stabilised demand and identify and provide temporary capacity to manage
the period of additional demand arising from the temporary peak. 
4.2  The options available to the Council to be deployed in isolation or combination
to meet the specific needs that may be presented in the future are outlined
below: - 
 Additional Permanent Capacity 
Should additional permanent capacity be required there is significant
flexibility offered through the existing Primary School site as well as the
potential long-term use of capacity at Bishopton Primary School. 
Extension at the existing Dargavel Primary School site 
As part of the agreement with BAE Systems the Council has secured
ownership of additional land adjacent to the existing Dargavel Primary
School site. This additional land provides significant flexibility for the
Council to extend the existing school capacity through a range of potential
options. 
Utilising the now available adjacent land provides flexibility to permanently
extend the existing school if this was deemed a requirement. Any
permanent extension would require to be scaled appropriately to the
identified need, however the additional land now secured would

Page 4

Page 4 of 6 
comfortably accommodate an extension that could increase operational
capacity by up to 268 pupils. This flexibility provides comfort that the
Council could secure access to more than sufficient additional permanent
capacity to address the projected upper scenario of stabilised demand
should this ever materialise. Based on the layout of the additional land
holding and design of a potential extension this could be delivered without
disrupting the existing school operations. 
It is estimated that it would take approximately three years to deliver a
permanent extension and therefore this would require to be factored into
any relevant future decision in this regard. 
Utilisation of surplus capacity at Bishopton Primary School 
Bishopton Primary has a maximum capacity of 519 pupils and is currently
operating at 70% capacity. Edge Analytics supported roll modelling
indicates that the roll at the school will gradually decrease, reducing to in
the region of 50% capacity by 2033/34. 
It would be a feasible option to utilise the spare capacity at Bishopton
Primary School on a permanent basis by matching demand to the
available capacity across the three schools in Dargavel and Bishopton.
This would require a future redrawing of catchment boundaries. This
would merit consideration given some neighbourhoods within Dargavel
Village are as close to Bishopton Primary as they are to either the existing
or proposed primary school sites.   
This option offers a practical solution that requires no physical intervention
and is cost-effective short-term, avoiding the need to invest in a
permanent extension and making maximum and efficient use of the
existing available school estate. 
However, it is acknowledged that Bishopton Primary School is
predominantly an early 1960’s construction and will inevitably have a
limited future lifespan. In addition, in considering future investment needs
linked to achieving the Council’s net zero ambitions, the age of Bishopton
Primary may, on value for money grounds, direct the Council to a future
replacement strategy rather than a net zero retrofit. In such circumstances
and based on its existing catchment area a replacement project would
deliver a much smaller school aligned to the existing and projected school
roll at that time. 
In this context therefore any cost benefit of permanently utilising capacity
at Bishopton Primary rather than investing in an extension at Dargavel
Primary School may be marginal and limited to merely achieving a
relatively short delay in timing of investment in new build capacity. Such
cost benefit perspectives would require to be considered amongst other
factors as part of the assessment carried out at the appropriate future
point in time.   
 Additional Temporary Capacity 
Should additional short-term capacity be required to manage a peak in
demand, the Council will continue to have a number of alternative options

Page 5

Page 5 of 6 
to consider and assess at a future point in time and which can be framed
to meet the specific demand in terms of scale and length of time the
additional capacity demand is expected to last. 
Modular Units at Dargavel Primary School 
The existing temporary arrangements at Dargavel Primary, which are to
date working successfully and effectively from an educational perspective
and have been well received by the school community, have clearly
demonstrated that additional modular capacity can be introduced if
required. This option would therefore be available to be reintroduced at a
future point in time if necessary. This option could also be introduced
whilst any extension was being delivered to the existing school. 
Use of surplus capacity at Bishopton Primary 
Similar to current arrangements, Bishopton Primary school could be used
to provide relief capacity for a short period if demand exceeded available
in-take capacity. 
Use of flexible capacity at existing schools 
Should relatively limited temporary additional demand emerge that is
expected to occur for only a short period of time, there would remain the
option to consider the use of flexible capacity at the existing Dargavel
Primary School and second primary school. 
The existing Dargavel Primary, has an operational design capacity of 430
pupils, with the ability to expand to 530 for shorter periods through the
flexible use of space. In addition, the planned second primary school to be
delivered is planned to have an operational capacity of 800. Equally, the
second primary school will have flexibility as a core design principle and is
expected to have a similar ability to flexibly accommodate above its
planned operational capacity to meet short term demand. 
__________________________________________________________ 
5. Next Steps 
5.1 Officers will continue to monitor all available data and report back regularly to
this board. This will provide opportunities to review the longer term projection
as live data and trends become increasingly available and support timely
decision making should any increase in provision, be that temporary or
permanent, be identified as a future requirement.  
_____________________________________________________________
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial 
None 
2. 
3. 
HR and Organisational Development 
None. 
Community/Council Planning
None.

Page 6

Page 6 of 6 
4.  Legal 
None. 
5.  Property/Assets 
None. 
6.  Information Technology 
None. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report because it is for noting only.   
8. Health and Safety
None. 
9. Procurement 
None. 
10. Risk 
None. 
11. Privacy Impact
None. 
12.  Cosla Policy Position 
None. 
13. Climate Risk 
None.   
List of Background Papers
None.
___________________________________________________________________
Children’s Services
JC 
Author:  Julie Calder, Head of Education julie.calder@renfrewshire.gov.uk, telephone 0141 487 0884