Democracy Spraffa

Dargavel Stat Consultation ECSPB

Renfrewshire Council · 18 January 2024
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 18 January 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

To:  Education and Children’s Services Policy Board
On: 18 January 2024
_________________________________________________________________ 
Report by:  Director of Children’s Services
_________________________________________________________________ 
Heading:  Proposal to Consult on:
 establishment of a new primary school to be built at
Dargavel Village and
 a Catchment Review Affecting Dargavel Primary School
and a new primary school to be built at Dargavel Village 
____________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1 In accordance with the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, this report
seeks approval to consult on the establishment of a new school within
Dargavel Village.
1.2 The report seeks approval for consultation on the site of the proposed new
building to be an 8.5 acre site at the north end of Craigton Drive and approval
to consult on revised catchment areas for the existing Dargavel primary
school and the proposed new school.
1.3 Subject to approval by the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board to
proceed with this proposal and subject to the outcome of the consultation, it is
anticipated that any new school will be constructed by 2027. Revised
catchment areas would take effect on completion of construction.
_________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1 The Education and Children’s Services Policy Board is asked to:
 authorise the Director of Children’s Services to undertake a consultation,
in line with the procedure required by the Schools (Consultation)
(Scotland) Act 2010, on the basis of the proposal paper set out in
appendix 1;
 authorise the Director of Children’s Services, or another appropriate officer
nominated by her, to take such action as is required to carry that
consultation through to completion, in accordance with the legal
requirements;

Page 2

 note that provision for denominational pupils within Dargavel Village will
remain unchanged, within the St John Bosco Primary School catchment;
 note that the catchment secondary school will be Park Mains High School
 note that it is anticipated that a report on the outcome of the consultation
will be submitted to the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board on
23rd May 2024.
_________________________________________________________________
3. Background
3.1 The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 (“the 2010 Act”) makes
provision for the consultation process that is to apply regarding various
proposals made by Councils for schools. The principal purpose of the 2010
Act is to provide strong, accountable statutory consultation practices and
procedures that local authorities must apply to their handling of all proposals
for school closures and other major changes to schools. These consultation
processes are expected to be robust, open, transparent, and fair, and seen to
be so. They are also expected to be consistent across Scotland. The 2010 Act
applies to a wide range of changes to the school estate, referred to as
“relevant proposals”. 
3.2 This report seeks approval to consult on the proposal to deliver a new non-
denominational primary school within Dargavel Village and to revise
catchment arrangements between Dargavel Primary School and the new
school. The Report notes that that the catchment primary school for all
denominational pupils in Dargavel Village will remain St John Bosco Primary
School. In accordance with Section 2 and Schedule 1, Para. 2 and 4 of the
2010 Act a proposal to establish a new school and a proposal to vary any
admission arrangements for a school, including altering or establishing the
catchment area of a school, is a relevant proposal for the purposes of the
2010 Act, therefore the proposal outlined above is subject to the 2010 Act. 
3.3 The consultation will include the options officers have considered when
developing the proposal for a new primary school. This includes identifying
operational capacity and potential locations for a new school. It also includes
consideration of the impact of increasing primary school provision on the
catchment high school Park Mains High School.  
___________________________________________________________________
4. Summary
4.1 This report lays out the consultation procedures required to take forward the
proposal as outlined above in terms of the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland)
Act 2010, amended through the enactment of the Children and Young People
(Scotland) Act 2014.
___________________________________________________________________
5. Procedures
5.1 The procedures for consultation relating to this proposal are:
a proposal paper has been prepared (Appendix 1) which:

Page 3

a) sets out the details of the proposal to establish a new primary school to be
built at Dargavel Village; and to create a catchment area for that school
and revise catchment arrangements for Dargavel Primary;
b) proposes a date for implementation of the proposal;
c) contains the educational benefits statement in respect of the proposal;
d) sets out the information in support of, or relevant to, the proposal.
Copies of the document will be issued to a list of statutory consultees,
who  include:
 the parent Council of the affected schools: Dargavel Primary School;
Bishopton Primary School and St John Bosco Primary School;
 the parents of the pupils at the schools identified above;
 the parents of any children who would be likely to become pupils at the
affected schools or expected by Renfrewshire Council to attend any
affected school within 2 years of the date of publication of the proposal
paper;
 the staff (teaching and other) at any affected school;
 any trade union which appears to the education authority to be
representative of the staff (teaching and other) at any affected school;
 elected members of wards affected by the consultation proposal;
 the community Council 
 the community planning partnership for the area of the local authority in
which any affected school is situated and any other community
planning partnership that the education authority considers relevant;
 any other community groups using any of the affected schools. 
5.2 It is proposed that:
 An advertisement will be prepared notifying the public and inviting written
comment from individuals or organisations outlining the proposal and the
recommendations and stating that full details can be obtained from
establishments affected. The advert will be published in the Paisley Daily
Express and the Renfrewshire Gazette
 The report will be available for inspection at all reasonable times and
without charge at Renfrewshire House and on the Council website and at
all affected schools and all public libraries.
 The consultation should commence no later than 29th January 2024 and,
in line with statutory requirement of a period of at least 6 weeks, to include
30 days when the school is open to all pupils, will run until 26th March
2024. 
 A public meeting will be held at Dargavel Primary School at 7pm on 19th
February 2024 to allow the proposal to be discussed and oral
representations to be considered.
 Written representation should be made to Gerry Lyons, Interim Head of
Education, Renfrewshire Council, Renfrewshire House, Cotton Street,

Page 4

Paisley, PA1 1LE or to Dargavelreview@renfrewshire.gov.uk, no later than
noon on 26th March 2024
5.3 Copies of the proposal report and all written representations and comments
received will be forwarded to Education Scotland who will consider the papers
and prepare a report which will be sent to the education authority.
5.4 A consultation response report including a summary of all written submissions
from all bodies and the report from Education Scotland will then be published
by children’s services in advance of any Council decision. The report will
include a statement of the authority’s responses to any issues raised by
representations received or by the report from Education Scotland. The
consultation response report will be available for inspection at all reasonable
times and without charge at Renfrewshire House and on the Council website
and at all affected schools and all public libraries.
5.5 The Council may not decide to implement, or implement, the proposal until
three weeks after the date of publication of the consultation report.
5.6 The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, amended through the
enactment of the Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 does not
require referral to Scottish ministers in cases other than closure of schools.
5.7 The final recommendation considering the results of the consultative process
will be presented to a meeting of the Education and Children’s Services policy
board on 23rd May 2024.
5.8 Appendix 1 is the proposal paper produced by the Council in accordance with
the terms of Sections 1 and 4 of the 2010 Act. 
________________________________________________________________
6 Correction of the proposal paper
6.1 Where, during the consultation period, the Council has been notified of an
alleged omission of relevant information from a proposal paper or an alleged
inaccuracy in a proposal paper the Council must proceed as follows:
a) determine if relevant information has (in its opinion) been omitted and
whether there is (in fact) an inaccuracy;
b) inform the notifier of its determination under paragraph (a), and the
reasons for that determination;
c) inform the notifier as to the action (if any) it is taking and of the reasons
why it is, or is not, taking such action; and 
d) invite the notifier to make representations to the Council if the notifier
disagrees with the Council's determination under paragraph (a) or its
decision as to whether to take action. 
6.2 Where the notifier disagrees with the Council's determination under paragraph
(a) or its decision as to whether to take action and makes representations
about that, the Council may make a fresh determination or make a fresh
decision as to whether to take action. The Council must inform the notifier if it
does so.

Page 5

6.3 If the Council determines that relevant information has been omitted from, or
there is an inaccuracy in, the proposal paper, related to a material
consideration relevant to the Council's decision as to implementation of the
proposal, it must:
(i) publish a corrected proposal paper,
(ii) give revised notice to the statutory consultees and
(iii) send a copy of the corrected paper to Education Scotland, or
(iv) issue a notice to the relevant consultees and Education Scotland
providing the omitted information or correcting the inaccuracy, and, if the
Council considers it appropriate, extending the consultation period by
such period as is reasonable by reference to the significance of the
information provided or the nature of the correction. 
6.4 Where the information that has been omitted or the inaccuracy does not relate
to a material consideration, the Council may, but is not obliged to, take steps
(i)-(iii) or (iv) described above, and may also take no further action, except to
report the inaccuracy/omission as required by the 2010 Act in the consultation
report, which is referred to in more detail below.
6.5 If the Council issues the notices providing the omitted information or
correcting the inaccuracy after the end of the consultation period, the notice
may specify a further period during which representations may be made on
the proposal. 
___________________________________________________________________
7 Consultation arrangements
7.1 As confirmed above, the present proposal is a relevant proposal for the
purposes of the 2010 Act, and therefore the Council will adhere to the
consultation process in the 2010 Act. 
7.2 The proposal paper attached to this report as Appendix 1, provides
background information to the catchment review. It details the proposal and
indicates a timeframe for implementation should the proposal be approved.
7.3 The proposal paper also includes the Council’s Educational Benefits
Statement.
___________________________________________________________________
8 Involvement of Education Scotland
8.1 A copy of this proposal has been sent to Education Scotland.
8.2 At the end of the formal consultation period Children’s Services will send
Education Scotland the following:
a) a copy of all relevant written representations that are received from any
person during the consultation period; 
b) a summary of any oral representations made by any person during the
public meeting;

Page 6

c) a copy of any other relevant documentation, as available and so far, as
practicable. 
8.3 Education Scotland will provide the Council with a report on the educational
aspects of this proposal. This report will be submitted to the Council no later
than 3 weeks after Children’s Services have sent them all of the
representations and documents noted above, or such longer period as the
Council may agree with Education Scotland.
8.4 In preparing their report, Education Scotland may visit establishments affected
by the proposal and may make reasonable enquiries of such persons (both in
the establishments and outwith) as they consider appropriate.
___________________________________________________________________
9 Consultation Report
9.1 After receiving the report from Education Scotland, Children’s Services will
review the proposal having regard (in particular) to the following:
a) written representations received by the Council from any person during the
consultation period; 
b) oral representations received by the Council from any person at the public
meeting; and 
c) the report provided by Education Scotland. 
9.2 Thereafter the service will prepare a consultation report for consideration by
the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board.
9.3 The consultation report will contain the following:
a) a record of the total number of any written representations made to the
Council (by any person) on the proposal during the consultation period; 
b) a summary of those written representations and any oral representations
made to it (by any person) at the public meeting. 
c) a statement of the Council’s response to those representations and
Education Scotland's report. 
d) a copy of that report 
e) a statement explaining how the Council complied with its obligation to
review the relevant proposal. 
9.4 The consultation report will also include the following:
a) details of any (alleged) omission/ inaccuracy in the proposal paper with a
statement of the Council's opinion on it; 
b) a statement of the action taken in respect of the (alleged) omission or
inaccuracy, and why; and

Page 7

c) any representations made to the Council where the person who made the
notification re: omission/inaccuracy disagreed with the Council's
determination as to whether there had been an omission/inaccuracy, or its
decision as to whether to take action. 
9.5 The Council will:
a) publish the consultation report in both electronic and printed form; 
b) make the report available for inspection at all reasonable times and without
charge at Renfrewshire House and on its website; and at the affected
schools and all public libraries. 
c) provide the information contained in the consultation report to such persons
as may reasonably require it in another form in that form, if requested,
without charge. 
d) inform any person who during the consultation period made written
representations on the relevant proposal of the publication of the
consultation report; and 
e) advertise the publication of the consultation report in the Paisley Daily
Express and the Renfrewshire Gazette. 
9.6 The timeline and summary of the consultation process in respect of this
proposal is set out below:
Activity  Date
Approval for consultation sought from Education and
Children’s Services policy board 18th January 2024
Proposal document to be issued outlining the proposal to:
 the parent Council or combined parent Council of any
affected schools;
 the parents of the pupils at any affected school;
 the parents of any children who would be likely to become
pupils at the affected schools expected by the education
authority to attend any affected school within 2 years of the
date of publication of the proposal paper;
 the pupils at any affected school (in so far as the education
authority considers them to be of a suitable age and
maturity);
 the staff (teaching and other) at any affected school;
 any trade union which appears to the education authority
to be representative of the staff (teaching and other) at any
affected school;
 the community Council
 the community planning partnership for the area of the
local authority in which any affected school is situated and
any other community planning partnership that the
education authority considers relevant;
 any other education authority that the education authority
considers relevant; and 
By 29th January
2024

Page 8

10 Delegation of Power to Manage the Consultation Process to the Director
of Children’s Services
10.1 The process as set out above requires various actions to be taken by the
Council in order for the consultation to proceed (for example, dealing with any
notification of an omission or inaccuracy). It Is not practicable for these steps
to be referred back to this Board for approval in the timescales set out. For
that reason, the Board is asked to delegate authority to the Director of
Children’s Services, or another appropriate officer nominated by her, to take
such action as is required to carry the consultation through to completion, in
accordance with the legal requirements.
___________________________________________________________________
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial 
None. 
2.  HR and Organisational Development 
None. 
3. Community/Council Planning 
Our Renfrewshire is thriving -  The revised catchment areas and
approval of site will give clarity to
the community and enable the new
building to have a positive start 
Our Renfrewshire is fair -  The process is designed to ensure
everyone can give their views and
have them heard
Activity  Date
 any other community groups using any of the affected
schools. 
Advert to advise of public consultation meeting and the
commencement of the formal consultation period issued via
local press.
By 29th January
2024
 Public consultation meeting held to consult with affected
community; and
 Proposal Questionnaire to go live on the Council website.
19th February 2024
29th January 2024
Public consultation period ends. 26th March 2024
Report to Education Scotland on outcome of consultation.  12th April 2024
Response from Education Scotland on outcome of
consultation.
By 3rd May 2024
Consultation response report (including Education Scotland
response) presented to Education and Children’s Services
policy board meeting stating consultation outcomes and
making final recommendation. 
23rd May 2024
Implementation of any proposal approved. No earlier than 14th
June 2024

Page 9

Reshaping our place, our
economy, and our future 
-  The catchment review informs the
development of the new building
Building strong, safe, and
resilient communities 
-  There is a clear consideration given
to safe travel
Creating a sustainable
Renfrewshire for all to enjoy 
-  The site evaluations had
sustainability and green space as a
clear focus 
Working together to improve
outcomes 
-  Ensuring children have a high
quality and sustained primary
education is at the core of the
process. 
4.  Legal 
The requirement for consultation and the process to be followed is set out
in law. The recommendations made in this report will ensure that the
Council meets its legal obligations in that regard. 
5.  Property/Assets 
None. 
6.  Information Technology 
None. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report because the consultation recommended will be open to all interested
persons, as set out by the legislation governing the matter. 
8. Health and Safety
None. 
9. Procurement 
None. 
10. Risk 
None. 
11. Privacy Impact
None. 
12.  Cosla Policy Position 
None. 
13. Climate Risk 
None.
___________________________________________________________________

Page 10

List of Background Papers 
(a) Background Paper 1 
The foregoing background papers will be retained within children’s services for
inspection by the public for the prescribed period of four years from the date of the
meeting. The contact officer within the service is Gerry Lyons, Interim Head of
Education Renfrewshire House 0141 487 0084 Email:
Gerry.Lyons@Renfrewshire.gov.uk
_________________________________________________________________
Children’s Services
GL/JC
10 January 2024
Author:  Gerry Lyons, Interim Head of Education, 0141 487 0084, 
email: gerry.lyons@Renfrewshire.gov.uk

Page 11

Appendix 1
THIS IS A PROPOSAL PAPER
This is a consultation on 2 proposals:
1 A proposal to establish a new primary school in Dargavel Village on an 8.5-
acre site at the north end of Craigton Drive.
2. A catchment review affecting Dargavel Primary School and the proposed new
primary school to be built at Dargavel Village. 
Table of Contents
1. Summary
2. Procedure for Statutory Public Consultation 
3. Rationale for Proposal
4. School Configuration Options
5. Site Option Appraisal
6. Catchment Proposals
7. Educational Benefits Statement
8. Wider Site Considerations
9. Catchment Considerations
10. Statutory Consultation Process
Proposal Appendices
1. Edge Analytics Housing and Roll Projections
2. Map of proposed Catchment Area for 2 Dargavel Primary Schools
3. List of streets included in the new catchment areas
4. Dargavel Education Provision – New Build – Site Options Matrix 
5. Dargavel Education Provision – New Build – Site E1 location map
1. Summary
1.1 This paper asks for your views on the proposals set out above, in accordance
with requirements of the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010.
2 Procedure for Statutory Public Consultation
2.1 The procedures for the statutory public consultation relating to this proposal
are:
This paper will be issued simultaneously to:

Page 12

 the Parent Council or combined Parent Council of Dargavel Primary
School; Bishopton Primary School and St. John Bosco Primary School;
 the parents of the pupils at the schools identified above;
 the parents of any children who would be likely to become pupils at the
affected schools or expected by Renfrewshire Council to attend any
affected school within 2 years of the date of publication of this proposal
paper;
 the pupils at any affected school – for the purposes of this consultation,
Dargavel Primary School, Bishopton Primary School (in so far as 
Renfrewshire Council considers them to be of a suitable age and
maturity);
 the staff (teaching and other) at these schools;
 any trade union which appears to Renfrewshire Council to be
representative of the staff (teaching and other) at any affected school;
 elected members of wards affected by the consultation proposal;
 the community Council (if any);
 the community planning partnership for the area of the local authority in
which any affected school is situated and any other community
planning partnership that the education authority considers relevant;
and
 any other community groups using any of the affected schools. 
2.2 Also:
 An advertisement will be prepared notifying the public and inviting written
comment from individuals or organisations outlining the proposal and the
recommendations and stating that full details can be obtained from
establishments affected. This will be published in The Paisley Daily
Express and the Renfrewshire Gazette.  
 The paper will be available for inspection at all reasonable times and
without charge at Renfrewshire House and on the Council website at
https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/dargavel-school-consultation and at all
affected schools and all public libraries.
 The consultation is now underway and will run until 26th March 2024. 
 A public meeting will be held at Dargavel Primary School at 7pm on 19th
February 2024 to allow the proposal to be discussed and oral
representations to be considered.
 Written representation should be made to The Director of Children’s
Services, Renfrewshire Council, Renfrewshire House, Cotton Street,
Paisley, PA1 1LE or to Dargavelreview@renfrewshire.gov.uk, no later than
noon on 26th March 2024
2.3 Copies of the proposal paper and all written representations and comments
received will be forwarded to Education Scotland who will consider the papers
and prepare a report which will be sent to the education authority.

Page 13

2.4 A consultation response report including a summary of all written submissions
from all bodies and the report from Education Scotland will then be published
by Children’s Services in advance of any Council decision. The report will
include a statement of the authority’s responses to any issues raised by
representations received or by the report from Education Scotland. 
2.5 The consultation response report will be available for inspection at all
reasonable times and without charge at Renfrewshire House and on the
Council website and at all affected schools and all public libraries. 
2.6 The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 does not require referral to
Scottish Ministers in cases other than closure of schools.
2.7 The final recommendation considering the results of the consultative process
will be presented to a meeting of the Education and Children’s Services policy
board on 23rd May 2024. Implementation of any decision may not be carried
out until at least three weeks have passed.
3 Rationale for Proposal to establish a new primary school and catchment
review 
3.1 In August 2019, following a consultation process in the first half of 2019, the
Education and Children’s Service Policy Board agreed the defined catchment
for a new non-denominational primary school within Dargavel Village. In
January 2022, the newly constructed Dargavel Primary School in Arrochar
Drive, within the village development, opened.
3.2 In November 2022, a report was presented to a Special Education and
Children’s Services Board setting out that the Council had identified that the
primary school capacity provided at Dargavel Primary School would be
insufficient to meet the revised projected demand expected to emerge from
the catchment area, as the Dargavel Village development progresses to
completion.
3.3 Following detailed and updated projection modelling undertaken by the
Council and specialist consultancy Edge Analytics in the first half of 2023, the
Education and Children’s Services Policy Board agreed the need to plan to
deliver a second primary school to meet the revised projected demand.
3.4 Although underpinned by the best available data and a tried and tested model
that has been used extensively across the UK by Edge Analytics, it is
recognised that pupil projection modelling in relation to major sites retain
unavoidable risk and uncertainty. This is particularly the case when projecting
over a significant timeframe. Given almost a decade of development is yet to
be delivered in Dargavel Village, the future demand projections produced from
the modelling carry an inevitable degree of uncertainty.
3.5 The Edge Analytics model – which projects over a 15-year period and has
assumed a completion of the Dargavel Village development in 2033, has
indicated a peak in non-denominational demand of 1,131 in 2033/34. This is
expected to reduce over the second half of the 2030’s to a slightly lower
stabilised level of demand. This pattern of a peak demand followed by a lower
stabilised level of demand is evidenced in other large-scale developments
across the UK.

Page 14

3.6 In addition, further scenario modelling, informed by one year of live data for
the forthcoming 2024/25 year suggests that if P1 admissions continued long-
term at this rate - higher than the Edge Analytics modelling, a peak demand of
around 1,500 could emerge in 2033/34. Discussions with Edge Analytics
indicate this scenario is not consistent with the experience of large community
growth areas elsewhere in the UK and would place Dargavel Village in the
very upper tier of education demand profile. 
3.7 In this context and based on the core Edge Analytics modelling (peak demand
of 1,131), the Education and Children’s Services Policy board agreed that a
second school should be planned for to expand non-denominational
education provision and deliver 800 pupil places in addition to the existing
capacity of Dargavel Primary School (434). 
3.8 This followed engagement with Dargavel Parent Council and their strong
advocacy for a second primary school to be delivered. It was also agreed that
options would be identified for managing potential upper end projection
scenarios, should this be required in the long-term.
3.9 Therefore, the proposal for consultation is to deliver a new non-
denominational primary school within Dargavel Village for 800 pupils, and to
revise catchment arrangements between Dargavel Primary School and the
new school. The proposal notes that that the catchment primary school for all
denominational pupils in Dargavel Village will remain St John Bosco Primary
School. 
3.10 In accordance with Section 2 and Schedule 1, Para. 2 and 4 of the 2010 Act,
a proposal to establish a new school and a proposal to vary any admission
arrangements for a school, including altering or establishing the catchment
area of a school, is a relevant proposal for the purposes of, and subject to, the
2010 Act. 
4 School Configuration Options
4.1 Although the Council identified an unavoidable requirement to deliver a new school
and additional permanent non-denominational primary school capacity of 800, it is
recognised that there are options that can be considered to achieve an expansion in
capacity at this scale.
Option 1 - fulfil the need through delivery of a new 800 capacity primary
school. 
Option 2 - fulfil the need through delivery of a new smaller capacity school of
circa 600 and extend capacity at the existing Dargavel Primary School which
is now possible following an additional land parcel adjacent to the existing
school being secured from BAE systems.  
Option 3 - fulfil the need through delivery of a new smaller school of circa 600
capacity and extend the catchment of Bishopton Primary School to
encapsulate an element of Dargavel Village. This option recognises that a
degree of surplus capacity exists at Bishopton Primary School that could
support demand from an expanded catchment area encompassing an
appropriately sized element of Dargavel Village that is within closest proximity
to the school and benefits from a safe walking route.

Page 15

Option 4 – fulfil the need through a combination of both 2 and 3, where a
much smaller new school is delivered of a similar scale to the existing
Dargavel Primary, with the existing Dargavel Primary extended and Bishopton
Primary catchment extended to take in an element of Dargavel Village. 
4.2 In assessing the options, the key consideration focused on the following
assessment criteria:
 To what extent the option delivers a learning environment which best
supports the delivery of the curriculum and the best educational
experience for all learners.
 To what extent the option supports environmentally sustainable facilities
with lower carbon footprints, satisfactory building conditions, sufficiency
levels and education facilities. 
In addition to these core educational assessment criteria, additional wider
factors were considered as part of the assessment process.
 To what extent the option would assist in preserving the broad conclusion
of the 2019 consultation exercise to maintain a clearly identifiable primary
school provision and catchment serving Dargavel Village, whilst retaining
a separately identifiable catchment for Bishopton Primary School which
should remain focused on the needs of the historic village.
 Given the uncertainty and risk in relation to the potential for further
additional capacity demand to emerge, to what extent the option supports
the Council to maintain flexibility to respond to potential upper demand
scenarios emerging in the future.
 The extent to which the proposal can deliver facilities that would, outside
of school operating times, provide flexible space to support a wide range
of community activities and uses within Dargavel Village. This
acknowledges community feedback during the pre-consultation
engagement that accessible and flexible community facilities is a key
requirement the community would like to see fulfilled. This also
recognises the existing Dargavel Primary School design failed to
adequately meet this expectation.
 The financial cost and value for money of the proposed solution.  
4.3 Based on the above criteria, the option appraisal assessment has identified
that option 1, delivery of a new 800 school provides the best overall school
configuration outcome.
4.4 A 3 to 18 campus for Dargavel and Bishopton has previously been suggested 
by some members of the community. This consultation does not propose to 
alter the catchment area for Park Mains High School. A detailed analysis of 
high school demand and provision for the Park Mains catchment, and the 
Council’s decision to extend Park Mains High School was subject to a Report 
to Board on 24th August 2023 which can be accessed here  Microsoft Word - 
Education Provision Dargavel ECSPB (cmis.uk.com)

Page 16

5 Site Option Appraisal 
5.1 Renfrewshire Council began identifying and assessing potential sites within
the Dargavel area to locate a second primary school in December 2022. Since
then, there have been additional sites suggested by both BAE Systems as
part of discussions in relation to the Dargavel Village development as well as
suggestions that have been promoted directly by members of the community.
5.2 The key factors which have been used to guide the site search by Council
officers, guide discussions with BAE Systems and the assessment of all
options identified throughout the process have focused on a series of key
criteria outlined and explained in the site evaluation matrix (Appendix 4)
5.3 This matrix has been used in an appraisal assessment where all the identified
sites were evaluated against these criteria and the associated site evaluation
matrix is outlined in Appendix 4. Sites which did not meet the required site
size were automatically discounted. 
5.4 As detailed in Appendix 4, the site referred to as E1 to the north end of
Craigton Drive within the Dargavel Village masterplan, has been identified as
the preferred location and is identified on the map provided at Appendix 5. 
6. Catchment Proposals
6.1 The impact of this proposal is illustrated through existing and proposed
catchment maps for Dargavel Primary School and the proposed new primary
school within Dargavel Village and is attached as Appendix 2 to this report.
6.2 It is proposed that, if approved, the catchment changes would be implemented
to take effect following construction of the new school which it is anticipated
will be in 2027.
6.3 If the proposals are approved, all pupils living in affected addresses currently
attending Dargavel Primary School would be entitled to continue attending to
the end of primary 7. If they are entitled to free school transport, in line with
the Council’s transport policy, then this entitlement would also continue.
6.4 Siblings of pupils currently attending Dargavel Primary School would also be
entitled to attend the school with their sibling if their older sibling is registered
in the school when they enrol. 
6.5 Free school transport for new primary 1 pupils would only be provided in
instances where the pupil enrols in the school at a time when their sibling still
attends the school and where that sibling is entitled to free school transport.
7 Educational Benefits Statement
7.1 Under the 2010 Act where the Council has formulated a relevant proposal, the
Council must prepare an educational benefits statement (“an EBS”) in
accordance with Sections 1 and 3 of the 2010 Act.
7.2 The Educational Benefits Statement must include the following:
a) the Council’s assessment of the likely educational effects of a relevant
proposal (if implemented) on:

Page 17

(i) the pupils of any affected school;
(ii) any other users of the school's facilities;
(iii) any children who would (in the future but for implementation) be likely
to become pupils of the school; or
(iv) the pupils of any other schools in the Council's area, 
b) the Council's assessment of any other likely effects of the proposal (if
implemented), 
c) an explanation of how the Council intends to minimise or avoid any
adverse educational effects that may arise from the proposal (if
implemented), 
d) a description of the educational benefits which the Council believes will
result from implementation of the proposal (with reference to the persons
whom it believes will derive them), as well as the Council’s reasons for
coming to those beliefs. 
7.3 Educational Benefits 
7.3.1 Section 3 of this document sets out the strategic context and rationale for the
identified need to deliver a second primary school as part of increasing by 800
the non-denominational primary school capacity serving Dargavel. 
7.3.2 The educational benefits of the proposed building and the proposed location
as outlined in the proposal:
 will ensure sufficient primary school capacity to meet projected demand,
providing catchment school places for catchment children. This will be
monitored on an ongoing basis.
 ensures all schools serving Dargavel Village and Bishopton have a viable
and sustainable school roll, located within the local area and can serve
children, families, and the community of Dargavel.
 ensures continuity of learning as children will go through all stages of their
primary education in a 21st century learning environment which will
accommodate future demand – future-proofed for peak projections and is
sector-leading in its design.
 will provide the school with a learning environment where it can build a
culture of the highest expectations; placed at the heart of the community
this will contribute to the creation a community identity for Dargavel
Village which can be grown through community engagement and
learning, and which sends the most positive messages about the children
and their potential.
 dining areas will be welcoming, naturally ventilated areas with immediate
access to outdoor dining and the IT infrastructure allows for cashless
catering arrangements which will enhance the inclusive ethos of the
school while supporting the efficient management of dining sittings.  
7.4 Learning, Teaching and Assessment
7.4.1 The Council has been working with a Space Planning Consultant who has
worked with key stakeholders to develop a strategic brief on what a 21st
Century learning environment should look like as part of the proposed new

Page 18

school. This includes classroom spaces which will enable children to
experience the full range of learning and teaching approaches with the facility
for whole class learning; for children to work and learn together in groups of
different sizes and to learn independently based on planned learning. This
will provide an environment where teachers will be able to give children a
voice in their own learning and the opportunity to lead their learning.
7.4.2 The digital connectivity within the proposed new school will provide the
opportunity for children to develop digital learning skills and learn through
digital learning methodologies.
7.4.3 Proposals include plans for learning plazas to support project-based learning;
multi-purpose spaces which will allow children to learn in different contexts in
all curricular areas; and break out spaces where teachers will be able to
develop play pedagogy developing skills for learning life and work in all
children.
7.4.4 This wide range of learning spaces will improve the quality of assessment and
professional judgement as teachers will be able to plan learning on a stage
and level basis which can be delivered and assess across more than one
class, allowing teachers to develop shared understanding of  assessment
standards. 
7.5 Curriculum – Developing the 4 capacities in all 4 contexts of learning
7.5.1 Over and above classroom spaces, the proposed school environment will
provide opportunities to experience the ethos and life of the school. The
children will develop as confident individuals through whole school activities
including school shows; choirs and instrumental bands; school clubs and
opportunities to work with community partners in a range of different activities.
7.5.2 The planned environment and assembly spaces will provide opportunities to
build positive relationships across the school; opportunities for inputs from
partners on key aspects of personal and social education including keeping
safe and healthy; building positive self-esteem and self-efficacy.
7.5.3 Outdoor spaces will be designed to encourage and enhance pupil
participation in outdoor learning and deliver positive experiences of outdoor
play, supporting children to become responsible citizens and effective
contributors. 
7.5.4 High quality sport and P.E. facilities will provide space for children to
participate in a wide range of sport and exercise supporting the delivery of the
Health and Wellbeing curriculum.
7.5.5 The proposed location of a new school, in the heart of the community and
sufficiently close to Dargavel Primary School and Bishopton Primary School,
will allow children to participate in activities where they can work together to
improve their community; to help vulnerable people in their community and so
grow their understanding about what it means to be responsible citizens.
7.5.6 The school’s proposed location within the catchment of Park Mains High
School will allow pupils to benefit from well-established cluster planning
activities as well as highly effective support for primary/secondary transition.

Page 19

7.6 Supporting Children with additional support needs
7.6.1 The range of spaces that can be delivered within the proposed new school will
enable the school leadership team to design facilities which support children
who require targeted support – assessed through Renfrewshire Council’s
staged intervention policy. This may include break out spaces which allow for
targeted intervention for groups of children who require support in specific
areas to achieve expected levels of achievement, and flexible space which
could be used for sensory rooms for neurodivergent children and space for
nurture bases and safe spaces. Additionally, spaces can be created for
visiting partners to support children through counselling or group work where
there is identified need.
7.6.2 The creation of this high-quality learning environment will send positive
messages about all children supporting an ethos of inclusion and equality
where all children feel valued. This is supported by the range of spaces
available for whole school development on issues of equality. The proposed
building will be compliant with the provisions of the Equality Act (2010). 
7.7 Staff Development and Leadership Development
7.7.1 The proposed building is a 21st century work environment where teachers will
have enhanced facility to work together on planning learning and school
improvement activity. The digital capability and high quality work spaces will
enhance this further providing potential for improvements for digital learning
and to maximise the possibilities presented by Artificial Intelligence.
7.7.2 The quality of assessment and moderation will also be improved as there is
high quality space for teachers to work together, share practice and learn from
each other. The proposed site also presents opportunity for the 2 primary
schools and Dargavel primary school to improve through looking outward. 
8 Wider Site Considerations
8.1 The preferred site has been assessed as fully meeting all the criteria for the 
new building. The Council owns the land; it provides the necessary space for 
the new school building and is sufficiently distanced from the existing primary 
school, whilst maximising opportunity for active travel and supporting 
environmental considerations. In addition, the site presents the most 
deliverable proposal in terms of timeframe and costs for completion. This 
positions this site as the optimum location for ensuring continuity and 
sustainability in children’s learning and delivering the planned provision within 
Dargavel village.
8.2 The site will allow the school design to plan for delivering high quality space
for community use outwith school hours as well as additional outdoor sport
pitch provision in this new and growing area, enabling social capital and
community involvement in developing the use of the space. This will
strengthen community and school capacity to promote health, wellbeing and
resilience. Attention will be given on creating new opportunities for the local
community. As a result, the proposal will provide not only a high-quality
educational environment for children but will also realise significant outcomes
for the entire community.

Page 20

8.3 The site position within the heart of the Dargavel Village and the central
amenity parkland area, coupled with the proposed catchments, maximises the
opportunity for safe active travel to school, for both the new school and
existing Dargavel primary and maximises convenience for community use
outwith school hours. 
8.4 Consideration of the integration of the proposed school site with Dargavel
Village road and pathway infrastructure will be part of the formal planning
application process and will ensure safe traffic flows and optimum road safety
for pedestrians and all road users. The infrastructure considerations will
include measures such as active travel infrastructure to primarily support
children walking, wheeling, or cycling to the central location of both schools,
as well as providing effective drop off/pick up arrangements for private cars
and school bus services. Council Officers will work collaboratively on issues
related to managing traffic and road safety in and around the existing school
site and proposed school site. Previous learning and community feedback will
inform the future design process. 
8.5 Delivering effective road restrictions around the proposed new school and
Dargavel Primary School will be considered holistically to promote the best
environment possible for travel to and from the school grounds. Traffic
management schemes will be designed to promote positive and considerate
pedestrian and road user behaviour in the proximity of the school. 
8.6 Officers from Environment, Housing and Infrastructure will lead the
development and assessment of safe walking routes and a school travel plan
to ensure the network around the proposed new school is safe. 
8.7  Initial engagement has commenced with a transport consultant to identify
early opportunities to pro-actively incorporate such infrastructure and wider
design considerations early into the school design process and to support the
more substantial work associated with the transport assessment which will be
subsequently carried out as part of the future planning application process. 
9 Revised Catchment Considerations
9.1 The revised catchment areas have been identified from the number of houses
planned in the Dargavel Village and the projected pupil yield from those
planned houses. This has been supplemented by data gathered about the roll
of the current primary school and indications from the actual number of
children in the school, which will be closely monitored on an ongoing basis.
9.2 Despite the inherent uncertainty as projections stretch over a longer period,
the proposal is designed to provide a viable and sustainable pupil roll in both
primary schools both in the short and long term. The proposed catchments
will allow teacher staffing levels and stage classification arrangements to be
effective, and children will be able to learn in a sustainable way in their local
area.
9.3     The revised catchment areas improve the options for safe and sustainable
travel as they reduce travel distances, making walking to school highly viable
for almost all children attending the school. This has benefits for the children’s
health and well-being as well as having a positive environmental impact with
the potential for a significant and sustained reduction in children being brought
to school by car.

Page 21

9.4 The proposed new primary school will be part of the Park Mains High School
cluster comprising Bargarran, Barsail, Bishopton, Dargavel and Inchinnan
primary schools. As such it will benefit from existing strong relationships with
the associated secondary school. There will be an increased roll for the
secondary school, but all projection work undertaken by the Council and
consideration of viable options indicate this increase can be accommodated
with a planned extension to the existing school, the design of which is part of
ongoing engagement. 
10 Statutory Public Consultation Process
10.1 This document has been issued by Renfrewshire Council for consultation in
accordance with the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010
10.2 What is a statutory consultation?
In Scotland, local authorities have a statutory duty to ensure the adequate and
efficient provision of education in their areas. If a local authority proposes to
change any part of the existing education provision in its area, then it must
engage in a formal consultation process in the Schools (Consultation)
(Scotland) Act 2021. This act aims to ensure that all major changes which
affect schools are subject to clear consultation with parents, children, young
people and communities.
10.3 When does the Statutory Public Consultation start?
The consultation will start on Monday 29th January 2024 and close on 26th
March 2024, which includes a period of 30 school days.
10.4 Who will have access to this proposal document?
The proposal document has been made available to all interested parties,
including parent Councils, Education Scotland, parents and carers of children
attending the establishments affected, Staff Trade Unions and any other users
of the establishments as detailed in the distribution list.
The proposal document is published on the Council website at:
https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/dargavel-school-consultation
Copies are also available at Renfrewshire House, Dargavel Primary School
and local libraries
Copies can also be made available in alternative formats or translated for
readers whose first language is not English.
10.5 What if I notice an error in the document?
If any inaccuracies or omissions are discovered in this proposal document,
either by the Council or any person, the Council will determine if relevant
information has been omitted or if there has been any inaccuracy.
The Council may then take appropriate action, which may include the issue of
a correction notice, the reissuing of the proposal document or the revision of 
the timescale for the consultation period, if appropriate. In that event, relevant
consultees and Education Scotland will be advised.

Page 22

10.6 How will I get a chance to give my opinion? 
You will be able to give your opinion on the proposal:
 Online at - https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/dargavel-school-consultation 
 By completing an online response form at
https://www.renfrewshire.gov.uk/dargavel-school-consultation
 By submitting a paper copy of the response form, attached at Appendix 7
 By emailing - Dargavelreview@renfrewshire.gov.uk 
 In writing to Gerry Lyons, Interim Head of Education, Renfrewshire House
Cotton Street Paisley PA1 
All responses must be submitted by no later than close of business Tuesday
26th March 2024
10.7 Will there be any meetings for the public?
There will be a public meeting on  Monday 19th February at 7pm in Dargavel
Primary School. This meeting will provide an opportunity for interested parties
to hear about the proposal from Council officers, ask questions and have their
views recorded so that these can be considered as part of the consultation
process.
Advance notice of specific questions or issues to be raised at the public
meeting will be accepted up to Friday 16th February 2024. This will allow all
issues to be covered and give those who may not be comfortable speaking
publicly their opportunity to be heard.
A note will be taken of comments, questions, and officer responses at the
public session. The notes will be published on the Council website and a copy
will be made available on request. The notes will be forwarded to Education
Scotland along with all other submissions and comments that are received by
the Council during the consultation process.
10.8 Will any other agencies be involved in the process?
The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 requires that a report on the
proposal on the proposal is prepared by Education Scotland. Education
Scotland may attend the public meetings. 
Once the statutory public consultation period comes to an end, Education
Scotland have three weeks to consider the educational aspects of the
proposal and submit a report to the Council.
Education Scotland receives a copy of relevant papers from the Council,
including:
 A copy of the proposal, paper copies of the written representations or a
summary of them (if Education Scotland agree)
 A note of the oral representations made at the public meeting sessions;
and

Page 23

 Any other related documents
Education Scotland may visit schools as part of their consideration of the
proposal and meet with children, staff and parents who may be affected by
the proposal.
Upon receipt of the proposal document and other relevant documentation,
Education Scotland will consider the educational aspects of the proposal.
They will ensure that their report takes account of:
 The educational benefits statement
 The representations received by the Council; and
 Any further representations made directly to Education Scotland on
educational aspect of the proposal which is considered relevant.
The consultation report that the Council publishes following the statutory
public consultation must include the report from Education Scotland in full.
10.9 Will the outcome of the consultation be made public?
The Head of Service (Education) will prepare a report on the results of the
consultation process. The report will take account of all Education Scotland
recommendations. This report will be published in electronic and printed
formats and will be advertised in the Paisley Daily Express and the
Renfrewshire Gazette. It will be available on the Council website and from
Council Headquarters. 
The report will include a record of the total number of written representations
made during the consultation period, a summary of written and oral
representations and the Council’s response to recommendations made by
Education Scotland. A copy of the Education Scotland report will be an
appendix to the consultation report which will be published and available for
further consideration for a period of more than 3 weeks ahead of presentation
to Elected members in May 2024.
10.10 When will the Council make a decision on the outcomes of the consultation? 
The consultation report, together with any other relevant documentation, will
be considered by the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board, who
will make a decision in May 2024.

Page 24

Proposal Appendix 1

Page 25

Proposal Appendix 2 
CURRENT DARGAVEL CATCHMENT MAP 
PROPOSED DARGAVEL CATCHMENT MAP

Page 26

Proposal Appendix 3 
Streets Affected BY PROPOSAL – Dargavel Primary School and a New Primary
School to be built at Dargavel Village 
As at 28th November 2023 
Aberlady Way
Abington Circle
Acer Drive
Alness Way
Applecross Drive
Arrochar Drive
Ballantrae Crescent
Balnagown Drive
Barbeg Crescent
Barmore Crescent
Barmore Drive
Barmore Wynd
Barrangary Road
Birch Road
Birchtree Road
Boghall Drive
Boghall Place
Bolerno Avenue
Bolerno Circle
Bolerno Crescent
Bolerno Gardens
Bolerno Place
Bolerno Wynd
Broadford Place
Catterline Way
Cedarwood Gardens
Central Park View
Cherrytree Gardens
Colintraive Crescent
Craigmuir Drive
Craigmuir Road
Craigmuir Way
Craigton Drive
Crail Crescent
Crosshill Avenue
Crosshill Mews
Crosshill Road
Crosshill Wynd
Culrain Drive
Dalbeattie Way

Page 27

Dalgety Drive
Dornie Way
Drumbeg Road
Dunbeath Circle
Dundonnell Road
Durness Avenue
Elder Crescent
Elie Drive
Fern Way
Forge Crescent
Forge Way
Gatehead Avenue
Gatehead Crescent
Gatehead Drive
Gatehead Grove
Gatehead Wynd
Girvan Terrace
Glenluce Drive
Greenock Road
Inveraray Road
Kilmartin Gardens
Kilmelford Drive
Kirkconnel Road
Kirriemuir Circle
Lairg View
Limetree Lane
Lochside Avenue
Lochview Wynd
Luss Grove
Melness Grove
Melvich Way
Millbank Avenue
Millbank Circle
Millbank Crescent
Millbank Drive
Moffat Gardens
Mosshall Drive
Nairn Drive
Northbrae Drive
Northbrae View
Ormsary View
Plockton Way
Portpatrick Avenue
Portree Crescent
Rossland Crescent

Page 28

Sanquhar Way
Skelmorlie Avenue
Slateford Road
Station Lane
Station Road
Tain Avenue
Tayinloan Way
Thurso Crescent
Torrisdale Crescent
Ullapool Grove
Whitemoss Way
Whitemoss Wynd
Whithorn Crescent 
The development is still under construction and more addresses may be added to
this list, which fall within the boundary of the development site.

Page 29

Proposal Appendix 4 
DARGAVEL – NEW PRIMARY SCHOOL – SITE OPTION MATRIX         
Size
 
The site is large 
enough to 
accommodate 
proposed scale of 
school capacity
Active Travel ‐ 
site is less than 
1km walking 
distance from 
majority of 
school 
catchment 
residents 
Ownership of 
land
 
Site is owned 
by RC, BAE or 
other 
Land Use 
Designation
 
 
The site is 
identified for future 
development in 
adopted Local 
Development Plan
Anticipated 
additional cost 
of developing 
(see definition)
Total score Council officer comments 
Scoring
PASS = Site is > 8acres 
in size
3 = majority of 
catchment <1km 
walking distance
3 = site is 
owned by RC
3 = land designated 
for development
3 = no 
anticipated 
additional costs     
 
FAIL = Site is < 8acres 
in size
2 = less than 
50% of 
catchment <1km 
walking distance
2 = site is 
owned by BAE
2 = land has no 
definite status (eg. 
Unallocated land)
2 = either 
significant 
earthworks, 
new road, 
additional 
utility 
connections 
required for 
development 
site

Page 30

1 = majority of 
catchment >1km 
walking distance
1 = site is 
owned by other 
than RC or BAE
1 = site is allocated 
for open space or 
green belt
1 = more than 
one significant 
additional cost 
required    
Option 
Appraisal 
Ref Sites              
1
Site W7 
(Dargavel 
Masterplan)
10.9 acres = PASS 3 2 3 3 11
Not considered an optimum 
location due to close 
proximity (diagonally across 
road) from existing Dargavel 
Primary School
2
Site C1 
(Dargavel 
Masterplan – 
adj existing 
DPS) 2.5 acres = FAIL            
3
Site A 
(periphery of 
Masterplan ‐ 
west of 
Whithorn 
Crescent) 5.93 acres = FAIL

Page 31

4
Site B 
(periphery of 
Masterplan 
west of plot 
W11)
8.08 acres = PASS 3 2 3 2 10
This site has the disadvantage 
of being accessed primarily 
via residential streets 
through masterplan plots 
W9, W10 and W11. This is 
very likely to result in adverse 
impacts for residents in these 
streets. Although a distinct 
new road access could be 
provided to Site B this would 
significantly add to the 
construction costs.  
5
Site C 
(periphery of 
Masterplan ‐ 
west of plot 
W8) 6.28 acres = FAIL            
6
Site D 
(periphery of 
Masterplan ‐ 
west of plot 
W5) 6.00 acres = FAIL            
7
Site E 
(periphery of 
Masterplan ‐ 
East of 
Slateford Road) 4.50 acres = FAIL            
8
Site F 
(periphery of 
Masterplan ‐ 
between Birch  4.99 acres = FAIL

Page 32

Road and 
railway line)
9
Site E1 
(Dargavel 
Masterplan) 8.5 acres = PASS 3 3 3 3 12  
10
Site E2  
(Dargavel 
Masterplan) 8.5 acres = PASS 3 2 3 3 11
Not considered as optimum a 
site as E1 due to closer 
proximity to existing Dargavel 
Primary School
11
Site W2  
(Dargavel 
Masterplan)
9.1 acres = PASS 3 2 3 3 11
Site W2 is closer to planned 
housing development in 
Dargavel Masterplan than 
site E1. This could lead to 
impacts on residential 
amenity through the planned 
introduction of floodlighting 
for the community sports 
provision at the new school
12
Newton Road 
Playing Fields, 
Bishopton 7.5 acres = FAIL            
13 Holm Park, 
Bishopton
9.5 acres = PASS 1 1 1 2 5
Owned by Community 
Development Trust and very 
unlikely to be available for 
new school development

Page 33

14 North of 
Ingliston Drive
9.0 acres = PASS 1 1 1 1 4
Site is designated as Green 
Belt in LDP with a 
presumption against its loss 
to development. Planning 
status could elongate 
planning consenting process 
by up to 2 years.  Site is 
relatively remote from 
proposed catchment.
15
East of 
Slateford Road, 
Bishopton
8.2 acres = PASS 3 1 1 1 5
Site is designated as Green 
Belt in LDP with a 
presumption against its loss 
to development. Planning 
status could elongate 
planning consenting process 
by up to 2 years.  Site is 
relatively remote from 
proposed catchment.
16
West of 
Greenock Road, 
Bishopton
61.7 acres = PASS 2 1 1 1 5
Site is designated as Green 
Belt in LDP with a 
presumption against its loss 
to development. Planning 
status could elongate 
planning consenting process 
by up to 2 years.  Site is 
relatively remote from 
proposed catchment.

Page 34

17
East of 
Greenock Road, 
Bishopton
70.4 acres = PASS 1 1 1 1 4
Site is designated as Green 
Belt in LDP with a 
presumption against its loss 
to development. Planning 
status could elongate 
planning consenting process 
by up to 2 years.  Site is 
relatively remote from 
proposed catchment.
18 Ingliston Drive, 
Bishopton 2.3 acres = FAIL            
 
Matey’s Field, 
Bishopton 
(Camphill 
Gardens) 1.5 acres = FAIL            
20
Site W (Parent 
Council) – 
Station Road, 
Bishopton 6.4 acres (tbc) = FAIL            
21
Site X (Parent 
Council) – 
Gladstone Hill, 
Dargavel
27.5 acres = PASS 3 2 1 1 7
Site is designated as open 
space in Dargavel Masterplan 
with a presumption against 
development.  Current 
landform (steeply sloping 
site) would result in 
significantly increased costs 
of construction compared to 
Site E1.
22
Site Y (Parent 
Council) – West 
of Slateford 
duplicates with West 
of Greenock Road 
(site 16 above)

Page 35

Road, 
Bishopton
23
Site Z (Parent 
Council) – Ferry 
Road / 
Greenock Road, 
Bishopton
duplicates with East 
of Greenock Road 
(site 17 above)                     
Notes       
Size 8 acres considered the minimum size required for an 800 capacity primary school and necessary community facilities. 
Sites smaller than this threshold not considered further 
Ownership criterion is scored based on the speed and ease of delivery of the school. A third party owner will inevitably involve 
negotiations and costs to purchase (not otherwise accounted for elsewhere) and lead to a longer timescale for delivery. A BAE 
owned site is considered to be quicker due to their imperative to find a solution to assist future housebuilding but not as quick 
as a Council owned site. 
Anticipated additional costs of developing this criterion is based on a relatively flat, unencumbered site with good existing or 
committed road access would represent the lowest cost solution for site development. Sites with no existing or committed 
road access of a suitable nature or with significant earthwork requirements will add significantly to the cost of the 
development

Page 36

Proposal Appendix 5 
Map of proposed Site for Proposed new Primary school