Democracy Spraffa

National Qualifications Report ECSPB 02 11 2023

Renfrewshire Council · 2 November 2023
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 2 November 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

___________________________________________________________________
To:  Education and Children’s Services Policy Board 
On:  2 November 2023
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by: Interim Chief Education Officer 
Heading:  National Qualifications Results 2023
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1 This report summarises attainment in the Scottish Qualifications Authority
(SQA) National Qualifications in 2023, based on the key measures contained
within the Insight benchmarking tool.
1.2 The 2023 exam diet saw a return to the traditional model of assessment. Due
to the Covid-19 pandemic, alternative methods of assessment were put in
place for the 2020 and 2021 exam diet. The 2022 diet was also seen as a
transitional point back to a traditional model of assessment. As such, we
should be cautious in making direct comparisons between years that had
different assessment approaches.
1.3 Skills Development Scotland are currently tracking school leavers’
destinations. Insight is normally updated in spring and a further report
providing data on our school leavers’ attainment will be submitted to the
Education and Children Service’s Policy Board when this data becomes
available. This report will provide data on the attainment of all pupils in the
senior phase by stage (S4, S5 and S6).
__________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1 Members of the Education and Children’s Services Policy Board are asked to:
• note the content of this report;

Page 2

• note the efforts of pupils and the school communities in achieving these
results; and
• agree that a further report will be brought to the Education and Children’s
Services Policy Board when leavers data becomes available.
__________________________________________________________________
3. Background
3.1 Insight is a performance evaluation tool provided by the Scottish Government
to schools and education authorities as a way of benchmarking performance
in four key measures:
• Attainment in literacy and numeracy;
• Improving attainment for all;
• Attainment versus deprivation; and
• Leavers’ destinations.
3.2 This report provides data and commentary on the performance of each of our
senior phase cohorts (S4, S5 and S6) over the last three years and against
our virtual comparator for three of the measures detailed above. Leavers’
destinations will become available in February/March 2024 and will form part
of the report to this board in spring 2024 or as soon thereafter if the data
release is delayed. 
3.3 In addition to these local benchmarking measures, this report will provide data
in relation to the number and quality of passes at each qualifications level.
3.4 The methodology for the Insight ‘virtual comparator’ (VC) is unchanged in
2023. The virtual comparator allows authorities and schools to make
statistically valid comparisons between how young people have performed
against young people nationally, who share four similar characteristics. These
characteristics are gender, year group, percentage of time spent in
mainstream classes (ASN), and the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
(SIMD) decile which measures the level of deprivation experienced in the area
that a pupil resides. 
__________________________________________________________________
4. Attainment in literacy and numeracy (S4, S5 and S6)
4.1 Raising attainment in literacy and numeracy remains a key priority of
Renfrewshire Council children’s services and this is reflected in one of the key
priorities of the National Improvement Framework. 
4.2 Attainment in literacy and numeracy includes passes at National 4 and 5 in
English and Maths and passes in some other awards at Scottish Certificate
and Qualification Framework (SCQF) levels 4 and 5 which contain certain
core elements of literacy and numeracy. The tables which follow, provide data
on our performance in literacy and numeracy, alongside our virtual
comparator and national figures, for each of our senior phase cohorts.

Page 3

S4
4.3 Table 1 below provides data on attainment in literacy and numeracy in S4 at
SCQF Level 4 and SCQF Level 5. 
Table 1 - % S4 Pupils Achieving Literacy & Numeracy  
Year
%
Achieved
Level 4
Literacy
% Achieved
Level 4
Numeracy
%
Achieved
Level 5
Literacy
% Achieved
Level 5
Numeracy
Renfrewshire 2021 96% 83% 82% 55%
Virtual Comparator 2021 93% 88% 76% 59%
National 2021 92% 87% 73% 56%
Renfrewshire 2022 94% 91% 77% 67%
Virtual Comparator 2022 93% 88% 76% 62%
National 2022 92% 87% 74% 61%
Renfrewshire 2023 94% 90% 77% 68%
Virtual Comparator 2023 93% 89% 77% 65%
National 2023 92% 88% 76% 64% 
4.4 The percentage of pupils achieving SCQF Level 4 and SCQF Level 5 in
literacy and numeracy was above all national figures in 2023. Renfrewshire’s
figures were also above those of our virtual comparator for both numeracy
measures and for Level 4 literacy. Renfrewshire was aligned to its virtual
comparator at Level 5 literacy.
S5 (based on S4 roll)
4.5 Table 2 below provides data on attainment in literacy and numeracy in S5 at
SCQF Level 4 and Level 5. 
Table 2 - % S5 Pupils Achieving Literacy and Numeracy  
Year
%
Achieved
Level 4
Literacy
% Achieved
Level 4
Numeracy
%
Achieved
Level 5
Literacy
% Achieved
Level 5
Numeracy
Renfrewshire 2021 96% 94% 88% 76%
Virtual Comparator 2021 95% 93% 84% 72%
National 2021 94% 91% 82% 70%
Renfrewshire 2022 96% 92% 87% 74%
Virtual Comparator 2022 95% 92% 83% 70%
National 2022 93% 90% 81% 68%
Renfrewshire 2023 94% 93% 84% 76%
Virtual Comparator 2023 94% 91% 82% 71%
National 2023 93% 90% 81% 70%

Page 4

4.6 Renfrewshire remains aligned to or ahead of the virtual comparator and
national figures across most measures at SCQF Level 4 and SCQF Level 5 in
S5. Attainment remains higher in literacy than in numeracy across both levels.
This mirrors the trend within the virtual comparator and nationally.
S6 (based on the S4 roll)
4.7 Table 3 below provides data on attainment in literacy and numeracy in S6 at
SCQF Level 4 and Level 5. 
Table 3 -% S6 Pupils Achieving Literacy & Numeracy 
Year
%
Achieved
Level 4
Literacy
%
Achieved
Level 4
Numeracy
%
Achieved
Level 5
Literacy
% Achieved
Level 5
Numeracy
Renfrewshire 2021 96% 94% 87% 78%
Virtual Comparator 2021 94% 92% 83% 72%
National 2021 93% 91% 81% 71%
Renfrewshire 2022 96% 94% 89% 78%
Virtual Comparator 2022 95% 93% 84% 74%
National 2022 94% 91% 82% 72%
Renfrewshire 2023 96% 93% 88% 75%
Virtual Comparator 2023 95% 92% 84% 72%
National 2023 93% 90% 81% 70% 
4.8 In S6, Renfrewshire remains above its virtual comparator and the national
level across all measures. This is consistent with previous years. Attainment
in both literacy measures and Level 4 numeracy remains broadly in line with
the previous year. 
__________________________________________________________________
5. Improving attainment for all
5.1 Each qualification on the Scottish Certificate and Qualifications Framework
(SCQF) is attributed a number of tariff points. The higher level of qualification,
the more tariff points are attributed. Each pupil gains a number of points that
represents the number and level of qualifications they have gained. This
report uses complementary tariff points, which measures a fixed volume of
learning. Complementary tariff points allow for fair comparison across
Scotland, regardless of differences in curricular models. 
5.2 Within this measure, Insight breaks the data down into three groups: the
average complementary tariff points for the lowest attaining 20%, the middle
attaining 60% and the highest attaining 20% and compares these with the
virtual comparator and the national figure. 
S4
5.3  Graph 1 below shows the average complementary tariff points of S4 pupils by
attainment cohort in the 2023 exam diet.

Page 5

5.4 In S4, the average complementary tariff is below the virtual comparator and
aligned to the national figure for the lowest 20%. Renfrewshire is slightly
ahead of the virtual comparator and the national figure for the middle 60%
attainment cohort. Renfrewshire is slightly behind both the virtual comparator
and national figure for the highest 20% attainment cohort.
5.5 Table 4 shows the average complementary tariff of Renfrewshire S4 pupils
over time.
Table 4- Renfrewshire S4 Complementary Tariff by Attainment Cohort 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Highest 20% Attainment Cohort 419 424 422 420 422
Middle 60% Attainment Cohort 331 341 343 332 325
Lowest 20% Attainment Cohort 145 139 146 134 103 
5.6  The 2023 average complementary tariff is slightly higher than 2022 in the
highest 20% cohort but lower in the middle 60% and lowest 20% attainment
cohorts. Comparison to the last pre-pandemic exam diet year (2019) shows
that the highest 20% attainment cohorts have improved slightly whilst the
middle 60% and lowest 20% cohort has decreased. 
S5
5.7  The graph below shows the average complementary tariff points of S5 pupils
by attainment cohort in the 2023 exam diet. 
103
325
422
111
323
425
103
321
426
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
Lowest 20%
Attainment Cohort
Middle 60%
Attainment Cohort
Highest 20%
Attainment Cohort
Average Complementary Tariff Points
Attainment Cohorts
Improving Attainment for All
Average Complementary Tariff Points
Renfrewshire
Virtual Comparator
National
Graph 1- Renfrewshire S4 Complementary Tariff by Attainment Cohort 2023

Page 6

5.8  Graph 2 demonstrates that Renfrewshire is above the virtual comparator and
national figures in the lowest 20% and the middle 60%. Renfrewshire is
slightly behind the virtual comparator and national figure for the highest 20%
attainment cohort. 
5.9 Table 5 shows the average complementary tariff of Renfrewshire S5 pupils
since 2019.  
Table 5- Renfrewshire S5 Complementary Tariff by Attainment Cohort 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Highest 20% Attainment Cohort 954 981 991 975 962
Middle 60% Attainment Cohort 546 597 606 580 547
Lowest 20% Attainment Cohort 146 167 164 171 145 
5.10 Attainment is lower than in 2022 for all cohorts. Attainment in 2023 is similar
to the last pre-pandemic year of 2019, with the lowest 20% and middle 60%
cohorts aligned to 2019 figures. 
S6
5.11 Graph 3 shows the average complementary tariff points of S6 pupils by
attainment cohort in the 2023 exam diet. 
145
547
962
130
538
967
119
530
966
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Lowest 20%
Attainment Cohort
Middle 60%
Attainment Cohort
Highest 20%
Attainment CohortAverage Complementary Tariff Points
Attainment Cohorts
Improving Attainment for All
Average Complementary Tariff Points
Renfrewshire
Virtual Comparator
National
Graph 2- Renfrewshire S5 Complementary Tariff by Attainment Cohort 2023

Page 7

5.12 In graph 3, we can see that the average complementary tariff for the lowest
20% attainment cohort is above both the virtual comparator and national
figures. Pupils in the middle 60% attainment cohort are also ahead of both
comparators. The highest 20% attainment cohort is below both the virtual
comparator and national figures.
5.13 Table 6 shows the average complementary tariff of Renfrewshire S6 pupils
over 5 years.   
Table 6 - Renfrewshire S6 Complementary Tariff by Attainment Cohort 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Highest 20% Attainment Cohort 1258 1261 1321 1275 1269
Middle 60% Attainment Cohort 653 660 718 700 662
Lowest 20% Attainment Cohort 175 152 173 167 173 
5.14 The average complementary tariff is lower than in 2022 across the highest
20% and middle 60% attainment cohorts. However, the lowest 20% cohort
has improved on the 2022 figure. The 2023 figures are in line with or above 
the last pre-pandemic diet in 2019.
__________________________________________________________________
6. Attainment versus deprivation
6.1 The attainment versus deprivation measure provides the average
complementary tariff of pupils by SIMD decile. This allows us to identify the
attainment gap in Renfrewshire and compare it to both our virtual comparator
and national data. 
6.2 The following charts show SIMD deciles 1 -10 (most deprived to least
deprived) plotted along the horizontal axis with the average complementary
tariff points plotted on the vertical axis. The size of the circles represents the
Graph 3- Renfrewshire S6 Complementary Tariff by Attainment Cohort 2023 
173
662
1269
148
658
1294
127
629
1290
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
Lowest 20% Attainment
Cohort
Middle 60% Attainment
Cohort
Highest 20% Attainment
CohortAverage Complementary Tariff Points
Attainment Cohorts
Improving Attainment for All
Average Complementary Tariff Points
Renfrewshire
Virtual Comparator
National

Page 8

percentage of pupils who live in each decile. The trend line which runs
through the circles represents the difference in attainment between pupils
living in the most deprived and the least deprived areas. The steeper the
angle, the more pronounced the disparity between the most and least
deprived deciles.
S4   
6.3 Renfrewshire’s S4 average complementary tariff is above or in line with
national figures in most deciles. The trendlines indicate that the size of the
gap between most and least deprived pupils is very slightly larger in
Renfrewshire than nationally due to lower attainment of Renfrewshire pupils
living in decile 1. 
Graph 4- S4 Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile (Ren vs National) 2023 
230
261
279 267
314 320
359 348 344 363
241 253 266 282 294 304 317 333 344
364
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SIMD Decile
Attainment vs Deprivation
S4 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile
Renfrewshire National Linear (Renfrewshire) Linear (National)

Page 9

6.4 Renfrewshire’s S4 average complementary tariff is behind the virtual
comparator figure for SIMD deciles 1,2,4,9 and 10. Renfrewshire is ahead of
the virtual comparator in SIMD deciles 3,5,6,7, and 8. The trendlines in graph
5 indicate that Renfrewshire has a slightly higher attainment gap due to lower
performance in decile 1.
6.5 Table 7 shows the S4 average complementary tariff of pupils living in SIMD 1-
3 (30% most deprived areas) and of pupils living in SIMD 4-10 (70% least
deprived areas) over 5 years. It also shows the Tariff Point gap between these
two figures. 
Table 7- Renfrewshire S4 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Groupings 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Pupils Living in 30% Most Deprived Areas 266 280 277 269 254
Pupils Living in 70% Least Deprived Areas 338 339 341 332 327
Tariff Point Gap 72 59 64 73 73 
6.6  The average complementary tariff of pupils living in 30% most and 70% least
deprived areas has fallen against 2022 figures. Despite a decrease for both
cohorts of pupils, the size of the gap remains unchanged and is in line with
levels experienced in 2019. 
Graph 5- S4 Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile (Ren vs Virtual Comparator) 2023 
230 261 279 267
314 320
359 348 344 363
249
265 274 291 299 311
330 335 348
365
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SIMD Decile
Attainment vs Deprivation
S4 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile
Renfrewshire Virtual Comparator Linear (Renfrewshire) Linear (Virtual Comparator)

Page 10

S5 
6.7 The S5 average complementary tariff for Renfrewshire is above national in all
but two SIMD deciles (3 and 10). As Renfrewshire has higher performance at
deciles 1 and 2, compared to the national picture, its attainment gap is smaller
than the national gap. 
411
475
424
492 532
575 586
659
699 738
388 413 443 474
512 540
585 618
670
741
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SIMD Decile
Attainment vs Deprivation
S5 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile
Renfrewshire National Linear (Renfrewshire) Linear (National)
Graph 6- S5 Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile (Ren vs National) 2023 
Graph 7- S5 Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile (Ren vs Virtual Comparator) 2023 
411 475 424
492 532 575 586
659
699 738
411 421 464 489 518 557
602 630 672
757
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SIMD Decile
Attainment vs Deprivation
S5 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile
Renfrewshire Virtual Comparator
Linear (Renfrewshire) Linear (Virtual Comparator)

Page 11

6.8 Graph 7 shows that Renfrewshire outperforms its Virtual Comparator at most
deciles. The Virtual Comparator figure outperforms Renfrewshire figures at
SIMD deciles 3,7, and 10. The trendlines suggest that attainment gaps are
very similar between Renfrewshire and its Virtual Comparator.
6.9 Table 8 shows the S5 average complementary tariff of pupils living in SIMD 1-
3 (30% most deprived areas) and of pupils living in SIMD 4-10 (70% least
deprived areas) over 5 years. It also shows the Tariff Point gap between these
two figures. 
Table 8- Renfrewshire S5 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Groupings 
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Pupils Living in 30% Most Deprived Areas 417 445 467 457 433
Pupils Living in 70% Least Deprived Areas 626 668 665 642 613
Tariff Point Gap 209 223 198 185 180 
6.10 The average complementary tariff has decreased for both the 30% most
deprived and the 70% least deprived groups in 2023. This has occurred within
the National and Virtual Comparator figures also. The decrease of the 30%
most deprived group is less than that of the 70% least deprived. As a result,
the size of the attainment gap has decreased.
S6 
Graph 8- S6 Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile (Ren vs National) 2023 
483 551 570
637 681 746
683
888 838 880
467 497
544 583 627 673 721 773
831
949
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SIMD Decile
Attainment vs Deprivation
S6 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile
Renfrewshire National Linear (Renfrewshire) Linear (National)

Page 12

6.11 The S6 average complementary tariff is higher than national in all but two
SIMD deciles (7 and 10). As Renfrewshire has a higher relative performance
at decile 1 and a lower relative performance at decile 10, its trendline
suggests a smaller attainment gap relative to the National picture. 
6.12 Renfrewshire is above the virtual comparator in deciles 3,4,5,6 and 8. The
Virtual Comparator is ahead in deciles 1,7,9 and 10. Renfrewshire has a lower
attainment gap compared to its Virtual Comparator at S6.
Table 9 – Renfrewshire S6 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Groupings  
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Pupils Living in 30% Most Deprived Areas 512 507 537 548 526
Pupils Living in 70% Least Deprived Areas 774 780 830 798 769
Tariff Point Gap 262 273 293 247 243 
6.13 The average complementary tariff for pupils living in the 30% most deprived
and 70% least deprived group has decreased against 2022. Pupils from the
30% most deprived areas remain above the pre-pandemic figure of 2019. The
tariff point gap has reduced because the 70% least deprived group decreased
by a bigger amount than the 30% most deprived group. This is a pattern
repeated with the national and virtual comparator figures.
__________________________________________________________________
7. Breadth and depth
7.1 In addition to the key measures available in Insight, the service also looks at
the percentage of the cohort who achieved any number of awards at various
SCQF levels. These are known as ‘breadth and depth’ measures. We look at
Graph 9- S6 Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile (Ren vs Virtual Comparator) 2023 
483 551 570
637 681 746
683
888 838 880
501
551 565 612 645
707 733 798 851
958
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SIMD Decile
Attainment vs Deprivation
S6 Average Complementary Tariff by SIMD Decile
Renfrewshire Virtual Comparator Linear (Renfrewshire) Linear (Virtual Comparator)

Page 13

this data in conjunction with the Insight measures to allow us to gain a
broader understanding of attainment across Renfrewshire and between
schools. 
7.2 The tables on the following pages show performance over time of some of the
key breadth and depth measures and how we compare to the virtual
comparator. SCQF 4 is National 4 or its equivalent, SCQF Level 5 is National
5 or its equivalent, SCQF Level 6 is Higher or its equivalent; and SCQF Level
7 is Advanced Higher or its equivalent.
S4
7.3 Table 10 includes data on the number of awards achieved for S4 pupils at
SCQF Level 4 and Level 5 for Renfrewshire and the virtual comparator. 
Table 10- S4 Breadth & Depth 
S4 
A-C
3 or more
awards at
SCQF level
4 or better
5 or more
awards at
SCQF level
4 or better
3 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better
5 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better  
Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC
2021 93% 92% 86% 83% 76% 73% 60% 56%
2022 93% 91% 86% 83% 74% 70% 59% 55%
2023 89% 91% 81% 82% 71% 70% 58% 55% 
7.4  In S4, Renfrewshire is now behind the virtual comparator at SCQF Level 4.
The proportion of pupils achieving 3 or more and 5 or more at Level 4 has
fallen on previous years. At SCQF Level 5, Renfrewshire is ahead of the
virtual comparator at 3 or more and 5 or more awards, but has also fallen
against 2022 figures. 
S5
7.5  Table 11 includes data on the number of awards achieved for S5 pupils at
SCQF levels 5 and 6 for Renfrewshire and the virtual comparator.
Table 11- S5 Breadth & Depth (% of S4 Roll)
S5 
A-C
1 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better
3 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better
5 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better
1 or more
awards at
SCQF level
6 or better
3 or more
awards at
SCQF level
6 or better
5 or more
awards at
SCQF level
6 or better  
Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC
2021 91% 90% 82% 80% 71% 68% 71% 68% 51% 49% 28% 25%
2022 92% 90% 82% 80% 69% 68% 70% 66% 49% 48% 27% 25%
2023 90% 88% 80% 77% 68% 65% 68% 65% 47% 46% 28% 25% 
7.6 At both SCQF Level 5 and Level 6, Renfrewshire is above the virtual
comparator across all measures. Aside from 5+ awards at Level 6, all other
measures decreased from 2022. This also occurred with the virtual
comparator.

Page 14

S6
7.7 Table 12 includes data on the number of awards achieved for S6 pupils at
SCQF levels 5, 6 and 7 for Renfrewshire and the virtual comparator.
Table 12- S6 Breadth & Depth (% of S4 Roll)
S6 
A-C
3 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better
5 or more
awards at
SCQF level
5 or better
1 or more
awards at
SCQF level
6 or better
3 or more
awards at
SCQF level
6 or better
5 or more
awards at
SCQF level
6 or better
1 or more
awards at
SCQF level
7 or better  
Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC Ren VC
2021 82% 79% 72% 69% 73% 69% 59% 56% 45% 42% 27% 28%
2022 82% 81% 74% 71% 75% 70% 60% 56% 45% 41% 27% 28%
2023 83% 81% 73% 70% 72% 69% 56% 54% 41% 40% 26% 27% 
7.8 In S6, Renfrewshire has performed above the virtual comparator in all
measures at SCQF Level 5 and Level 6. This is consistent with previous
year’s trends. Attainment at SCQF Level 7 is slightly behind the virtual
comparator, which mimics previous years at this level. Most measures saw a
decrease in comparison to the 2022 figures.
__________________________________________________________________
8.  Conclusion and next steps
8.1 The 2023 results need to be considered in the context of returning to a
traditional exam diet after challenging circumstances and the never-before-
used alternative certification model. Considered in this context, it would not be
helpful to directly compare attainment to 2020-2022. Better comparisons are
to be made with 2019 performance which used an assessment programme
that more closely resembles what was implemented in the 22/23 session.
What is clear is that young people across Renfrewshire have performed
exceptionally well, and they should be congratulated for all that they have
achieved. 
8.2 A further report on finalised leavers’ data and the attainment of our looked
after children will be presented to this board in spring 2024 or as soon
thereafter as the data becomes available.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial Implications 
None. 
2.  HR and Organisational Development Implications 
None. 
3. Community Plan/Council Plan Implications 
Children and Young
People
-  High levels of attainment and
achievement provide our children and
young people with the best start in life

Page 15

4.  Legal Implications 
None. 
5.  Property/Assets Implications 
None. 
6.  Information Technology Implications 
None. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights Implications 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been
assessed in relation to their impact on equalities and human rights.
No negative impacts on equality groups or potential for
infringement of individuals’ human rights have been identified
arising from the recommendations contained in the report because
for example it is for noting only.   If required following
implementation, the actual impact of the recommendations and the
mitigating actions will be reviewed and monitored, and the results
of the assessment will be published on the Council’s website.   
8. Health and Safety Implications
None. 
9. Procurement Implications
None. 
10. Risk Implications
None. 
11. 
12. 
13.
Privacy Impact
None. 
COSLA Policy Position
None. 
Climate Risk
None. 
List of Background Papers 
(a) none
______________________________________________________________ 
Children’s Services
October 2023
Author: James Bowness, Data and Evaluation Officer