Democracy Spraffa

Inspection of Residential Childrens Houses by the Care Inspectorate ECSPB

Renfrewshire Council · 21 May 2026
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 21 May 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

PUBLIC
Page 1 of 6 
To:  Education and Children’s Services Policy Board
On: 21 May 2026
__________________________________________________________________ 
Report by:  Director of Children’s Services
__________________________________________________________________ 
Heading:  Inspection of Residential Children’s Houses by the Care
Inspectorate
__________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1. Renfrewshire Children’s Services operate 4 residential children’s houses
across Renfrewshire subject to inspection by the Care Inspectorate on a
regular basis.   
1.2. The Care Inspectorate utilise a quality frameworks approach to evaluate the
quality of care during inspections of registered care services.  After an
inspection the Care Inspectorate grades the service and promotes an
improvement agenda. 
1.3. This report details the findings of the most recent inspection of Barochan and
Brediland Residential Children’s Houses.  The Care Inspectorate graded
Barochan as very good and Brediland as excellent.  A copy of the inspection
report for Barochan is attached at appendix 1 and for Brediland at appendix 2.
__________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1. The Education and Children’s Services Policy Board is asked to note:
[a] the grading of Barochan residential children’s house as very good by the
Care Inspectorate; and 
[b] the grading of Brediland residential children’s house as excellent by the
Care Inspectorate.
______________________________________________________________
3. Background 
3.1 Social work and social care services operate within a robust framework of
audit and scrutiny to ensure they meet statutory responsibilities and deliver

Page 2

PUBLIC
Page 2 of 6 
high-quality care and support to vulnerable children, young people, and
families. Many of these services are required to register with the Care
Inspectorate and are therefore subject to regular, independent evaluation.
Registered support services typically receive at least one unannounced
inspection each year, providing assurance that practice standards are
maintained consistently and that services continue to improve outcomes for
those in need.   
3.2 Inspectors use quality frameworks to evaluate the quality of care during
inspections and improvement planning. The frameworks reflect the Health and
Social Care Standards and provides transparency about what is expected.   
3.3 The Care Inspectorate utilises the following gradings across each of the areas
considered during each inspection: 
• Unsatisfactory – major weaknesses, urgent remedial action is required.
• Weak – important weaknesses, priority action required.
• Adequate – strengths just outweigh weaknesses.
• Good – important strengths, with some areas for improvement. 
• Very good – major strengths.
• Excellent – outstanding or sector leading. 
3.4  The Care Inspectorate publishes all inspection reports on its public website.
Alongside the evaluation grades awarded for each inspected theme, the Care
Inspectorate may issue recommendations or requirements.
Recommendations highlight areas where practice could be improved or
developed to enhance the quality of the service; however, non-compliance
with a recommendation does not lead to formal enforcement action.
Requirements, by contrast, are legally enforceable and set out the actions a
service must take to meet its obligations under the Regulation of Care
(Scotland) Act 2001 or the specific conditions of its registration.
3.5  Two unannounced inspections were undertaken by the Care Inspectorate of
two of our four residential children’s houses and reports have been published. 
Barochan and Brediland children’s houses are operated by Renfrewshire
Council and are registered care services each supported by an allocated link
inspector from the Care Inspectorate, who provides ongoing oversight of the
service’s improvement agenda. This relationship ensures that quality, practice
development, and compliance are explored not only during formal inspections
but continuously throughout the year.
3.6  Renfrewshire Children’s Services operate four residential children’s houses
across Renfrewshire, all of which are subject to regular inspection by the Care
Inspectorate. The Care Inspectorate utilises a quality frameworks approach to
evaluate the quality of care during inspections of registered services.
Following inspection, the Care Inspectorate applies evaluative gradings and
promotes an improvement agenda where appropriate.
3.7 Inspectors use national quality frameworks informed by the Health and Social
Care Standards. These frameworks provide transparency regarding
expectations and support continuous improvement planning.

Page 3

PUBLIC
Page 3 of 6 
Barochan Residential Children’s House
3.10 The Care Inspectorate inspection undertook an unannounced inspection of
Barochan residential children’s house over two days on 25 and 26 November
2025.  The inspection was carried out by two inspectors from the Care
Inspectorate who found evidence of significant and sustained improvement
since the previous inspection in October 2024.  The inspectors confirmed that
previous areas of concern had been effectively addressed by the house
manager and external managers within Children’s Services.
3.11 At the most recent inspection the inspectors found children and young people
experienced their care at Barochan Road as nurturing, consistent and
emotionally supportive. Relationships between staff and young people were
described as warm, respectful and trusting, with young people feeling listened
to and confident in approaching staff for support. 
3.12 Inspectors noted that staff demonstrated a strong understanding of the
individual life experiences and emotional needs of each young person,
enabling them to respond sensitively and appropriately to distress, anxiety
and changes in presentation.
3.13 Practice across the house was clearly underpinned by a trauma-informed and
child-centred ethos. Young people were supported to express their views,
participate meaningfully in daily routines and decisions, and understand how
and why decisions were made about their care. 
3.14 Inspectors highlighted that:
• participation was not tokenistic but embedded within everyday
practice and relationships.
• Safeguarding and risk management arrangements were found to be
significantly strengthened. Inspectors observed improved
consistency and clarity in personal plans and risk assessments,
with staff demonstrating confidence in recognising and responding
to potential risks. 
• Protocols relating to incidents and missing episodes were
implemented effectively, and learning from incidents was used
constructively to inform practice and improve outcomes for young
people.
• Leadership and governance were highlighted as clear strengths.
The manager was described as visible, approachable and
proactive, providing strong direction and oversight while maintaining
a supportive presence within the house. 
• Staff reported feeling well supported through regular supervision,
reflective practice and clear expectations. 
• That quality assurance systems were embedded and being used
effectively to monitor standards, identify learning and drive
continuous improvement.
3.15 The inspection also identified positive outcomes in relation to education,
wellbeing and wider life skills. Young people were supported to attend and

Page 4

PUBLIC
Page 4 of 6 
engage in education, training and leisure activities, with staff actively
promoting aspiration and resilience. Links with families, schools and partner
agencies were appropriately maintained and, where possible, strengthened to
provide continuity and stability for young people.
3.16 The physical environment was described as welcoming, comfortable and
well-maintained. Inspectors noted that young people were supported to
personalise their spaces, contributing to a sense of belonging and ownership
within the home.
3.17 Overall, the inspection concluded that Barochan Residential Children’s House
now demonstrates major strengths in supporting children’s rights and
wellbeing and awarded a grade of very good. The 2025 evaluation confirms
that improvements have been sustained, that previous requirements have
been met in full, and that the service is operating within a stable, accountable
and child-focused framework.
Brediland Residential Children’s House
3.18 Brediland is a Renfrewshire Council-owned residential children’s house
located in Linwood. The service is registered to provide care for up to four
children and young people aged 8–20, with approval to support one additional
named young person until September 2026.
3.19 The service operates within a trauma-informed, relationship-based model of
care and is subject to regular unannounced inspection by the Care
Inspectorate.
3.20 An unannounced inspection was undertaken by the Care Inspectorate on 23
and 24 February 2026, with the report published in April 2026. The inspection
included engagement with young people, discussions with families and visiting
professionals, interviews with staff and managers, observation of daily
practice and review of care documentation.
3.21 The inspection focused on the key question: How well do we support children
and young people’s rights and wellbeing?
3.22 Inspectors identified that relationships between young people and staff were a
defining strength of the service. Young people experienced staff as
emotionally available, dependable and attuned to their individual needs.
3.23 Practice was found to be firmly grounded in an understanding of trauma, with
staff confidently supporting young people to feel safe, respected and valued
within the home.
3.24 Young people’s views were consistently central to decision-making, care
planning and everyday life. Inspectors noted that staff actively supported
young people to express their wishes, influence routines and contribute to
decisions about their care in ways that were meaningful and age-appropriate.
3.25 The inspection highlighted the staff team’s proactive response to indicators of
concern, including effective safeguarding practice, thoughtful risk
management and strong multi-agency communication. Teamworking was
described as highly effective, with staff sharing responsibility and supporting
each other to sustain high-quality relational practice.

Page 5

PUBLIC
Page 5 of 6 
3.26 Inspectors noted a strong focus on family life and enduring relationships.
Where appropriate, staff worked creatively and sensitively to support young
people to maintain relationships that were important to them, contributing to
stability and positive identity development.
3.27 Education, learning and personal development were identified as areas of
strength. Young people were encouraged and supported to engage positively
in education, hobbies and wider community activities, with staff demonstrating
high expectations and ambition for young people’s futures.
3.28 The physical environment was also highlighted positively. The house was
experienced by young people as welcoming, comfortable and homely, with
well-maintained internal spaces and ongoing development of outdoor areas
contributing to quality of life and emotional wellbeing.
3.29 The Care Inspectorate did not identify any requirements or
recommendations for improvement. The service was graded Excellent, the
highest evaluation available, reflecting sector-leading practice and
outstanding outcomes for children and young people. No requirements or
recommendations were made.
3.30 The inspection outcomes for both Barochan and Brediland Residential
Children’s Houses demonstrate sustained improvement and strong assurance
regarding the quality of residential childcare provision in Renfrewshire.
__________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial 
None. 
2.  HR and Organisational Development 
None. 
3. Community/Council Planning
None. 
4.  Legal 
None. 
5.  Property/Assets 
None. 
6.  Information Technology 
None. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report.

Page 6

PUBLIC
Page 6 of 6 
8. Health and Safety
None. 
9. Procurement 
None. 
10. Risk 
None. 
11. Privacy Impact
None. 
12.  Cosla Policy Position 
None. 
13. Climate Risk 
None. 
14.  Children’s Rights 
This report demonstrates compliance with Article 3 (best interest of child),
Article 9 (keeping families together), Article 12 (respect for children’s
views), Article 19 (protection from violence), Article 22 (refugee children)
and 25 (review of a child’s placement) of the United Nations Convention on
the Rights of the Child 
List of Background Papers
(a) None
__________________________________________________________________
Children’s Services
KS 20.4.26
Author:  Kevin Smith, Children’s Services Manager, Tel 0141 487 4280