Democracy Spraffa

Joint Inspections of Services for Children and Young People at Risk of Harm ECSPB

Renfrewshire Council · 30 October 2025
Back to Education and Children's Services Policy Board — 30 October 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Page 1 of 6 
To:  Education and Children’s Services Policy Board
On: 30 October 2025
___________________________________________________________________ 
Report by:  Director of Children’s Services
___________________________________________________________________ 
Heading:  Joint inspections of services for children and young people
at risk of harm - review of findings from the joint inspection
programme 2021 – 2025 
___________________________________________________________________
1. Summary
1.1. This report presents the key findings from the Care Inspectorate’s review of
joint inspections conducted between 2021 and 2025 across 15 community
planning partnerships in Scotland. The review can be accessed here. 
___________________________________________________________________
2. Recommendations
2.1. The Board is asked to note the content of the report and the findings of the
review. 
2.2. The Board is asked to note that the joint inspection of services for children at
risk of harm in Renfrewshire Community Planning Partnership found major
strengths with very few areas for improvement. Areas for improvement are
being addressed through the current Renfrewshire Child Protection
Committee (RCPC) Improvement Plan. 
___________________________________________________________________
3. Background
3.1. Between 2021 and 2025, the Care Inspectorate led joint inspections of
services for children and young people in need of care and protection across
15 local authority areas. 
3.2. The inspections assessed how well services work together to identify and
respond to risks, support wellbeing, and improve outcomes for children and
families.
3.3. In August 2025, the Care Inspectorate published a review summarising the
findings from these inspections to provide a national overview of strengths,

Page 2

Page 2 of 6 
challenges, and areas for improvement. Thirteen full inspections formed the
basis of the national review, providing a broad picture of service effectiveness
across Scotland. The findings of the joint inspection of services for children at
risk of harm in Renfrewshire Community Planning Partnership which
concluded in October 2024 are included in the overview. 
___________________________________________________________________
4.0 Previous inspection programme
4.1 The 2018–2020 joint inspection programme covered eight areas and focused
on the impact of services on children in need of protection and those with
corporate parenting responsibilities. 
4.2 In 2020, the Care Inspectorate published a report summarising joint
inspections from 2018–2020 across eight community planning partnerships.
Key findings included strong trauma-informed relationships and effective
multi-agency protection processes, but weaker responses for older children
and care leavers. 
4.3 In response to the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020, the Care Inspectorate
revised its scrutiny framework to reduce the burden on partnerships while
maintaining public assurance. Changes included a narrower inspection focus,
virtual and hybrid activities, smaller on-site teams, and streamlined
methodologies. 
4.4 From 2021 to 2025, the inspection programme was refocused on services for
children and young people at risk of harm. Fifteen joint inspections were
carried out, including in Renfrewshire. 
___________________________________________________________________ 
5.0 Previous inspection programme 
5.1 The 2018–2020 joint inspection programme covered eight areas and focused
on the impact of services on children in need of protection and those with
corporate parenting responsibilities. 
5.2 In 2020, the Care Inspectorate published a report summarising joint
inspections from 2018–2020 across eight community planning partnerships.
Key findings included strong trauma-informed relationships and effective
multi-agency protection processes, but weaker responses for older children
and care leavers. 
5.3 In response to the Covid-19 pandemic in March 2020, the Care Inspectorate
revised its scrutiny framework to reduce the burden on partnerships while
maintaining public assurance. Changes included a narrower inspection focus,
virtual and hybrid activities, smaller on-site teams, and streamlined
methodologies. 
5.4 From 2021 to 2025, the inspection programme was refocused on services for
children and young people at risk of harm. Fifteen joint inspections were
carried out, including in Renfrewshire. 
___________________________________________________________________

Page 3

Page 3 of 6 
6.0 Evidence base 
6.1 During each joint inspection, evidence was drawn from staff surveys, reviews
of records and direct engagement with children, families, and professionals.
For each of the 13 joint inspections, the Care Inspectorate evaluated one
quality indicator from their quality framework: Quality Indicator 2.1 the impact
on children and young people. 
___________________________________________________________________ 
7.0 Findings 
7.1 A summary of the review findings is provided below: 
• Quality Indicator 2.1 – Impact on Children and Young People
- 85% of partnerships were rated ‘Good’ or above (Renfrewshire was
rated as ‘Very Good’.
- Strengths included relational and rights-focused practice, service
availability, and involvement of children and young people.
- Challenges included inconsistent access to services, staff turnover,
limited advocacy support, and inadequate responses for older young
people. 
• Statement 1: Early Identification and Response to Risk
- Early help was effective and aligned with strategic priorities including
The Promise and GIRFEC.
- Staff were confident and competent, supported by training and
supervision.
- IRDs were generally effective but inconsistently applied.
- Responses to older young people and cumulative harm were identified
as areas for improvement. 
• Statement 2: High-Quality Planning and Support
- Improvements were noted in assessment, planning, and reviewing
processes.
- Relationships between staff and families were strong.
- Mental health support remains a significant challenge due to capacity
issues. 
• Statement 3: Involvement in Decision-Making
- Children’s involvement in care planning was improving.
- Strategic influence by children was limited, especially for those in
protective processes.
- Independent advocacy was inconsistently available and understood. 
• Statement 4: Collaborative Leadership and Management
- Most partnerships had clear visions and values.
- Governance and quality assurance were stronger in high-performing
areas.
- Staff valued support from first-line managers but had mixed views on
strategic leadership.
- Data use for service improvement remains an area for development. 
___________________________________________________________________

Page 4

Page 4 of 6 
8.0 Reflections, conclusion and next steps 
8.1 The final section of the review encourages partnerships to reflect on the
following:
• Understanding local needs and risks.
• Addressing poverty and deprivation.
• Using data effectively.
• Capturing and acting on children’s views.
• Supporting staff and ensuring equitable participation.
• Evidencing capacity for improvement. 
8.2 The report highlights improvements in relation to the impact of services on
many children and young people. It also praised relationship based and
trauma informed practice across services and noted staff in a wide range of
universal services working well together to support families. There were
strengths in multi-agency responses to early indications of concern and the
ways in which children and young people were involved in decision making in
relation to their own planning and support. Improvements were noted across
key processes of assessment, planning and reviewing. 
8.3 It also highlights variability across partnerships in relation to some areas of
practice. These included: multi-agency responses to risk in relation to
cumulative harm, poverty, deprivation, domestic abuse and mental health;
responses to risks for older young people; the wider collation of children’s and
young people’s views to help shape the development of services was not
taking place systematically in every partnership area; and the extent to which
partnerships could measure and demonstrate the difference they were making
to children’s lives varied. 
8.4 Future inspections will focus on children subject to compulsory supervision
orders living at home, where outcomes remain poorer. The Care Inspectorate
started the new programme of scrutiny in summer 2025 and aim to complete
up to four inspections with this focus by April 2026. 
___________________________________________________________________
9.0 Renfrewshire position 
9.1 Renfrewshire Community Planning Partnership was subject to a joint
inspection of services for children at risk of harm in 2024. The inspection
report was published on 22 October 2024. It was extremely positive and the
grade of Very Good was awarded for Quality Indicator 2.1 – this means there
were major strengths with very few areas for improvement. 
9.2 The two areas for improvement are being addressed through the RCPC
Improvement Plan. These are: 
• the availability of resources for children experiencing mental health
problems.  While they saw examples of good practice and children being
helped to improve their wellbeing, they observed that such resources
were not always readily accessible.  However, the inspectors highlighted
recent service developments which were showing potential for improving
this, namely the new CAMHS/Education liaison officer and the resources
available via the REN10 website.

Page 5

Page 5 of 6 
• The use of data collated by the partnership. While inspectors noted the
plethora of data we gather about our service priorities, they suggested the
need to strengthen how this data is used to identify impact for children at
risk of harm. 
9.3 It is not anticipated that Renfrewshire will be inspected during the first round of
the new inspection programme, however, work is ongoing to gather information
about the new inspection methodology to inform the partnership’s preparation
for a future inspection and RCPC’s approach to self-evaluation. 
9.4 In October and November 2025, the Depute Chief Social Work Officer will
undertake the role of Associate Inspector during one of the first inspections
using the new methodology.
___________________________________________________________________ 
Implications of this report 
1.  Financial 
None. 
2.  HR and Organisational Development 
None. 
3. Community/Council Planning
Our Renfrewshire is safe  -  The review provides learning for
continuous improvement and helps
to protect vulnerable local children. 
4.  Legal 
None. 
5.  Property/Assets 
None. 
6.  Information Technology 
None. 
7.  Equality and Human Rights 
The Recommendations contained within this report have been assessed in
relation to their impact on equalities and human rights. No negative impacts
on equality groups or potential for infringement of individuals’ human rights
have been identified arising from the recommendations contained in the
report because it is for noting only.   If required following implementation, the
actual impact of the recommendations and the mitigating actions will be
reviewed and monitored, and the results of the assessment will be published
on the Council’s website. 
8. Health and Safety
None. 
9. Procurement 
None.

Page 6

Page 6 of 6 
10. Risk 
None. 
11. Privacy Impact
None. 
12.  Climate Risk
None. 
13. Children’s Rights
This report demonstrates compliance and promotion of Article 3 (best interest
of child), Article 9 (keeping families together), Article 12 (respect for children’s
views), Article 20 (children without families), Article 22 (refugee children) and
25 (review of a child’s placement) of the United Nations Convention on the
Rights of the Child. 
14. Cosla Policy Position 
None.     
List of Background Papers 
(a) Background Paper 1: 
Joint inspections of services for children and young people at risk of harm
Review of findings from the joint inspection programme 2021 – 2025 
The foregoing background papers will be retained within children’s services for
inspection by the public for the prescribed period of four years from the date of the
meeting.  The contact officer within the service is Michelle McCargo, Strategic
Manager Children and Justice & Depute Chief Social Work Officer
(michelle.mccargo@renfrewshire.gov.uk) 
___________________________________________________________________
Children’s Services
7 October 2025 
Author: Michelle McCargo, Strategic Manager Children and Justice & Depute Chief Social
Work Officer (michelle.mccargo@renfrewshire.gov.uk) 
___________________________________________________________________