Democracy Spraffa

Lighting and CCTV in Parks

Renfrewshire Council · 16 June 2026
Back to Cross Party Sounding Board — 16 June 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

OFFICIAL 
To:  Cross Party Sounding Board 
On:  16 June 2026 
Report by: Director of Environment, Housing and Infrastructure 
Heading: Lighting and CCTV in Council Parks 
1. Summary 
1.1 At the Council meeting of 11 December 2025, the following motion was agreed
“Renfrewshire Council notes with deep concern the recent high-profile incident
in Brodie Park, and child safeguarding concerns elsewhere, and therefore
proposes that the Council reviews its CCTV policy with the aim of placing CCTV
in all of Renfrewshire’s main parks to assist with the safety and wellbeing of all
users." 
1.2 Officers have since commenced a process of assessing what the arrangements
for CCTV provision across Renfrewshire’s parks and open spaces, however
CCTV cannot be looked at in isolation as it would be ineffective without
appropriate lighting arrangements. 
1.3 This key requirement is one of the main considerations included as part of the
Council’s public space CCTV policy that was approved by the Communities and
Housing Policy Board in January 2025. The principles of the CCTV Policy are
outlined at section 4.4 of this report. 
2. Recommendations 
It is recommended that the Cross Party Sounding Board;
2.1. Notes the report and that discussion at Cross Party Sounding Board is required
to progress this issue to a future meeting of the Cross Party Sounding Board.

Page 2

OFFICIAL
3. Background 
3.1. Renfrewshire’s parks, greenspaces and open spaces are the green hearts of
our communities, functioning as important spaces to benefit health and
wellbeing, help tackle climate change, and support and enhance nature. These
are essential breathing spaces for residents and visitors to Renfrewshire alike. 
3.2. They form the character and setting of our towns and villages, provide places
for outdoor play, sports and physical activity, social gathering, and civic events
in the heart of our communities, and bring economic benefits to the area
through tourism. 
3.3. The Council has prioritised investment in these open spaces over the last
number of years and continues to make a commitment to ensuring access to
our parks is maintained for all users of these vital community spaces. 
3.4. Public parks are used beyond daylight hours for recreation, commuting, and
community events and concerns have been raised regarding safety,
accessibility, and antisocial behaviour in unlit /unmonitored areas 
3.5 The figures in the table below cover the last 5 years of data from Police and
identifies where incidents have been reported in our public park locations. 
*The figure of 19 relates to manual entry of incidents where a GPS location couldn’t be exactly identified.

Page 3

OFFICIAL
3.6  It is worth noting that the park with the most significant number of incidents is
Robertson Park, which already benefits from extensive CCTV coverage. It is
also worth noting that there has been a positive downward trend in the number
of incidents recorded within our public parks 
3.7 In terms of other trends, the figure below shows the number of incidents per
month, showing a peak in lighter evenings with a significant drop off in the
winter months. 
3.8 In line with expected usage levels and seasonal patterns, incident peaks were
noted as weekends and the lighter summer months. Saturdays are the highest
individual day for reported incidents with 117 incidents noted over this 5-year
period, which equates to 22% of the overall total. Peak times were noted
between 1800hrs and 2100hrs, with the highest individual time noted between
2000hrs and 2100hrs. 
3.9 Removing the incidents at Robertson Park, which is already covered by CCTV
reduces the number of incidents to 530. Public Nuisance was identified as the
most common incident type reported, and along with Disturbance, Noise and
Drinking in Public would constitute the most common or frequent low-level youth
disorder/ or ASB-related complaint. These incident types combined accounted
for a total of 387 out of the overall total of 530 incidents – this equates to around
three-quarters (73%) of all incidents being attributable to low-level youth
disorder and ASB. 
3.10 Furthermore, 387 incidents across 36 parks averages out at nearly 11 incidents
per park. Given that the duration of analysis for this report covers a period of 56
months, the overall average for reported incidents of low-level ASB is roughly
one incident per park every five months. Clearly there are exceptions and some
of the larger and more popular parks would have higher individual monthly
averages, however this statistic provides an overall context to the scale of
reported incidents which must be regarded as extremely low. 
4.    Public Space CCTV
4.1. Building public trust and confidence is essential to ensuring that the benefits of
any public space CCTV. The use of surveillance systems must be lawful, fair,
transparent and meets the other standards set in data protection law. The rights

Page 4

OFFICIAL
and freedoms of individuals can be greatly affected where decisions are made
about them based on particularly intrusive means of processing personal data. 
4.2. It is therefore important that the use of surveillance is not seen as the cure to
the problems that organisations may face. But instead, a helpful supporting tool
where lawful, necessary and proportionate in the circumstances. 
4.3. Whilst having public space CCTV in our parks could be a tool to be used for
deterring criminal and antisocial behaviour it should not be considered as the
immediate solution for solving problems like this and should only be part of a
wider community safety approach. 
4.4. In January 2025 the Communities and Housing Policy Board approved a public
space CCTV installation policy providing clear guidance on the factors
considered in assessing any request for public space CCTV. The factors are
summarised below;
 Purpose – Initial evaluation of the request for CCTV to establish
what the installation is looking to achieve and if this is realistic /
feasible. 
 Data Analysis – Collect and analyse relevant data to understand
the area's safety and surveillance needs. This will include Crime
Statistics, Hotspots and emerging ASB trends. 
 Current Infrastructure – Identify any existing CCTV resources in
the area for example Community Centres, Schools and public
buildings. Where there is existing CCTV infrastructure this will result
in a low scoring. 
 Site Evaluation – Assess the physical attributes of the site
requested and feasibility for CCTV. Is there suitable fibre
connectivity, power and lighting in the area. Would the area be
obstructed by trees / landscape. Is the location a listed building. 
 Cost Benefit – Analysis Based on the site evaluation identify
financial implications of implementing CCTV against expected
benefits and any other preventative measures which could be
equally effective. 
 Funding Availability – Available Funding Resources or longer-term
potential for funding re assessment. 
 Legal & Ethical Considerations – Establish whether the proposed
location complies with respect for privacy and ethical standards. 
4.5. In Renfrewshire we currently have 66 public space CCTV cameras which are
actively monitored by the CCTV control room in the Community Safety Hub. The

Page 5

OFFICIAL
current operation is close to its limit in terms of active monitoring of cameras,
extending usable hours of parks, supporting evening exercise and community
activities, improving inclusivity for residents who work late or commute through
parks. 
4.6. The use of public space CCTV in unlit areas is ineffective in terms of the quality
of imagery that is obtained. Should any installation of public space CCTV be
carried out, this would require to be done in conjunction with efficient lighting to
ensure footage recorded is usable. 
5.    Lighting in Parks 
5.1. Installing streetlighting in conjunction in our public parks could introduce
tangible benefits, including;
 deterring criminal and antisocial behaviour, 
 extending usable hours of parks, supporting community activities, 
 encouraging healthier lifestyles by promoting walking, cycling, and
outdoor recreation, and 
 enhancing perception of public spaces as safe and welcoming 
5.2 Any deployment of lighting and CCTV within public parks must be done on an
evidence-led basis with clear assessment criteria by which to determine
whether introduction of public space CCTV would be an effective community
safety tool. 
5.3 It is likely that the introduction of lighting into these spaces could also bring
unintended negative impacts such as;
 Potential disruption to wildlife and the environment (e.g. bats, nocturnal
species) and 
 Increased energy consumption and carbon footprint. 
5.4 There are also feasibility considerations as to whether there is a viable power
supply, what are the ground conditions like and how accessible lights are for
maintenance purposes. 
5.5 Any new streetlighting installations would require to be LED in order to
maximise energy efficiency and increase colour and facial recognition with
consideration given to smart lighting systems which would use motion sensors,
with the placement of lighting restricted to key pathways, entrances and activity
zones. 
6. Financial Implications and Next Steps 
6.1. From a revenue and capital perspective the annual streetlighting budgets are
already at capacity in terms of what can be delivered both from new installations
and ongoing maintenance perspectives.

Page 6

OFFICIAL
6.2. For any new lighting installations an alternative funding source would have to be
provided in order to deliver any new lighting installations associated with public
parks or open spaces. 
6.3. In order to support this process a transparent assessment framework would
need to be developed along the same principles as the current CCTV policy in
order to provide assessment criteria that officers can assess any new requests
against. 
6.4. Officers will benchmark against other local authority areas in order to develop
proposals that could be discussed at a future meeting of the cross party
sounding board.

Page 7

OFFICIAL 
Implications of this Report 
1. Financial – the proposals within the paper do not contain any financial
implications at the current time although this will be determined in future
iterations of the report. 
2. HR and Organisational Development – none 
3. Community Planning – The proposals within the paper do not contain any
community planning implications at the current time although this will be
determined in future iterations of the report. 
4. Legal – none 
5. Property/Assets – none 
6. Information Technology – none 
7. Equality & Human Rights - The recommendations contained within this
report have been assessed in relation to their impact on equalities and human
rights. No negative impacts on equality groups or potential for infringement of
individuals’ human rights have been identified arising from the
recommendations contained in the report. 
8. Health and Safety – none. 
9. Procurement – none. 
10.  Risk – none.   
11. Privacy Impact – none. 
12. Climate Risk – none at the current time although any increase in the lighting
estate will increase carbon emissions.. 
13 Children’s Rights - This report demonstrates compliance with Article 6 (life,
survival and development) and Article 24 (health, water, food, environment) of
the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. 
List of Background Papers 
- none 
Author Gordon McNeil, Director of Environment, Housing & Infrastructure
e-mail: gordon.mcneil@renfrewshire.gov.uk